WEBVTT - How Stuttering Works

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from how Stuff Works

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark.

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles w Chuck Bryan. There's no our guest producer today,

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>which means it's still Stuff you should Know. That's right,

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the Jerry Free edition. Yeah it feels weird. Yeah, She's like,

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't do this today. I'm going to the mall.

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>She's always leaving us for them all. I know. That's weird.

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Ever since we did that mall episode and she learned

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it was a thing, right, you know, She's like, this

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds like my kind of place. How you doing, I'm

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>doing pretty good. I'm been wanting to do this one

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and I think I started to

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>research it and I was like, oh man, I saw

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe we went on tour or something like that. I

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>got pulled away from it and never went back to it.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm glad we're doing it finally. So stuttering if

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>or in the in North America or Australia and stammering

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're in the UK. Perhaps is that how it works?

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I know that stammering is what they

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>call it in the UK. Do they call it stuttering

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in Australia as well. Yeah, this thing I pulled up

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>just said in general it's North American Australia say stutter,

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>UK they say stammer. But it's the same thing, right,

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it's basically Uh. I think the way that they get

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>around that is calling it disfluency. No one calls it that,

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the scientists do. I never heard that word, sure, disfluency.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's actually the clinical name for what

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>we call stuttering or stammering, depending on where you are. Yeah.

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And wasn't that Colin Firth movie called The Disfluent Prince

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Who would Be King? Yep? I think that was the

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>working title what they call it, The King's Speech? Yeah,

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty good movie. That was cute. Cute it was. Any

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>time you get Jeffrey Right in there in an inspirational role,

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a cute movie. No, not Jeffrey Right,

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Rush, I don't Jeffrey Wright always plays like the

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>super smart, like kind of um, like a deep state guy.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Right. He was bask yot right, I'm not thinking

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the right guy. Did he play Baskiyat? I think so?

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so in the movie Basku Yot, Yeah,

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>is that Jeffrey right? I don't think so. It is

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey right. Jeffrey Wright has been in tons of stuff.

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Just look them up. You'll be like, Oh, that's Jeffrey right.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>This is going terribly already. This is basically like the

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>podcast equivalent of stuttering, because chuck stuttering, also known as stammering,

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>better known as disfluency, is an interrupted flow of speech. Okay,

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>but what when it starts to qualify for what we

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>would call like stuttering or stammering, it is. It's really noticeable.

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>It's um. It has a an interrupting effect typically on

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the conversation or the communication that's meant to be going on,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the speaking that's going on. UM, that's on the far

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>end of the spectrum, on the on the other end

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of the spectrum. Apparently just about everybody engages in disfluent speech.

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm particularly guilty because I say um a lot, and

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a form of disfluency. And disfluency chuck comes from

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea that um that when you speak fluently, you're

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>speaking in a flowing manner that that is easy to

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.839
<v Speaker 1>follow typically and is owner interrupted. But when you start

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>adding things like um or pauses or uh that kind

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of thing like that, Uh, that's that's disfluency. And again,

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>disfluency is a normal part of communication if it occurs

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>about less than ten percent of the time. After that

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you start to get into the stuttering slash stammering spectrum

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>or side of the disfluent spectrum. Yeah, and one thing

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I learned, you know, you and I uh both Q

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a quality assure each episode, which means, um, it's a

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>little behind the curtain peak. But Jerry will send them

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>back to us and you listen to it once and

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>then give her any like edit notes or whatever, um

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and thoughts, and then I will listen to it and um,

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>generally I have no edit notes, um um um. And

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I found that I know we're both gonna be so

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>self conscious about that. Well that's where I was getting too. Though.

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I found early on when listening to these episodes of

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>ourselves that it's it doesn't pay to focus on disfluency

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in our own language because it can drive you nuts,

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it really can. And so we have a conversational podcast,

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>so we're not trying to you know, we're not Churchill

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>or Henry or was it Henry the six No, yeah

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>it was, Um, I don't remember. Just call him Firth,

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>how about that? Yeah, we're not calling Firth addressing the

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>country on the airwaves where it was very important that

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>he come across, as you know, a certain had a

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>certain fluency. But um, when it comes to stuff like this,

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I think people are used to the fact, like occasionally

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll get emails that go you go true do you say,

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>like and I'm a lot and we're just like, our

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>response is better luck finding a different podcast. This is

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>not for you. So anyway, I learned to not drive

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>myself crazy with that stuff. No, but it's funny you

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>bring that up because I was just yesterday listening to

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>um the Stockholm Syndrome episode for Stuff you Should Know Selects,

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 1>and I must have said, like a five time is

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>over the span of ten words even to that. But

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>even I noticed it. I normally have I'm pretty good

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.679
<v Speaker 1>about tuning it out, but even I noticed at that time.

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And it really kind of raises this issue that that

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing about starting or stammering is not that

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a disorder or disease or a the

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>sign of an unintelligent person, or that the person can't

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>think of what they mean to say. It's absolutely none

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of those things. It is strictly an interruption in what

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we would consider normal communication, and so attention is drawn

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to it, and it turns out that that just makes

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the problem worse and worse, so it it turns into

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this vicious cycle um to where But that's all that.

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>That's all it is. That's it. That's really it. And

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like there's there's different theories about what's behind

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it or what could make it worse, what could possibly

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>make it better, But really all it is is just

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>interrupted communication between two people. Because it's not like the

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>person who's who's stuttering uh stutters in their head, Like

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it's strictly when they're speaking and communicating with other people.

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's pretty it's a unique it's a unique condition, yeah,

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're generally three ways in which that flow

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>can be interrupted. UM. One is is repetition UM. So

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>if you say the first few um, like the beginning

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of a word, if you repeat it a few times

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in a row and then say the word um. Another

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>would be prolongation. So if the word is like you would,

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you would roll that l out by itself for a

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>long time, and then the last would be an abnormal stoppage,

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>which is just no sound at all coming out. Yeah block, Yeah,

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a complete block. Have you you known anyone with a

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>severe stutter? Sure, yeah, I've I've I've known people with

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>stutters before. Yeah, I know somebody with a very severe stutter.

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's always interesting because I think, and we'll get

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to like what you should and shouldn't do as a

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>participant in a conversation with someone who stutters. But before

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I read this, I knew that just as a courtesy,

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>what you probably shouldn't do, which is correct, is try

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and complete someone sentence for them, even though that urges there.

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's just a natural instinct because people do that,

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, when speaking all the time, if someone can't

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>think of a word or something. But like you said,

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that's not what's going on. No, no, And I mean that,

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>And I think that urge also comes from a good place. Typically,

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>like you're not you're not saying like, uh, pitch is

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the word stupid. That's not what you're saying when you

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 1>when you when you finish their sentence, you're helping them

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>along to to keep the conversation on track, right, But

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>what you're also doing is saying you're not communicating effectively.

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm jumping in and taking over. Were on your behalf.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Just sit there and be quiet. So um, yeah, we'll

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>talk more about what to do or what to what

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>not to do. When you're in a conversation with somebody

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>with a stutter, I don't know what you mean. You're trying,

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to help, You're not trying to like be

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a jerk. Yeah, but it's it's not a help. No,

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not. But I imagine they also understand to a

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>certain degree to well, it's probably just from being exposed

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to it so much for so long, and some people feel,

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, like with anything like this, some people might

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>be used to it and have been like, well, you

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>know this how I talk. I've tried to correct it

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and I've kind of learned to live with it, and

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>other people might still feel really bad about it. Yeah.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I I read a um, I guess an essay, a

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>blog post basically by a guy named man I can't

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>find it anywhere, great great blog post, um where he said,

0:09:55.400 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I I recognize and accept my stutter, and it was

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>on say dot org. His name is Danny lit wak

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>l I t w A c K lit whack. Maybe

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I embrace and accept my stutter. It's great. He talks

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>about his UM, his experience with growing up with a

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>stutter his whole life, and just what a negative impact

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it had on him for a very long time. And

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw this elsewhere. But the first step toward UM,

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>either either getting past your stutter or just getting over

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you have a stutter, is accepting that

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you have a stutter. And that's a That's why from

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>what I can gather a really big first step, because

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I think people recognize that they have a stutter to themselves,

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>but there's also a m there's they take measures to

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>protect against sharing that with other people. So I read

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>another UM a story about another person who grew up

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>with a stutter and when they got to I think

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>college or something. On the first day of this one class,

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody went around and said where they were from, and

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this person said that they forgot where they are from

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>rather than having to say Wilmington's Delaware because of the

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>W and the D. So instead they told the class

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they forgot where where they where they were born and

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>grew up, because in that case there were certain triggers. Yeah,

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the W and the D, the W and Wilmington's and

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the D and Delaware. So there's like a lot of

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>obfuscation that people with with stutters engaging people with stutters

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 1>are not to be trusted in other words, but they

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>they have to they have to basically just take steps

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to make it seem like they don't have a stutter.

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think what this guy, Danny lit Wack was saying.

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And then, like I said, I saw elsewhere people saying,

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>like I have a stutter, like this is how I talk.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have to like either just walk away during

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the conversation or just let me finish my own time.

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is me, and this is how I talk,

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm accepting it or learning to and you're gonna

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>have to as well. And that's the the first step,

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>as I understand it. Once you're an adult, I should say,

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there's so many things in life where that's

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the case. Oh yeah, instead of like at a certain point,

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 1>at a certain age, you I think at least I

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>got to a point where like, well I can really

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>continue to work to try and change this thing, or

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I can just accept that this is kind of who

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>I am and be happy. Yeah, don't worry, be happy now.

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>So don't ever strive to be better people. Just accept

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>how messed up you are, enforce everyone else around you

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to accept it. Should we take a little break here,

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, we'll take a break and we'll come back

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and get into some of the stats and um, how

0:12:40.000 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>stutters can develop right after this? All right, so we're

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>back promised stats. The stats you shall receive, um, one

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>percent roughly of adults in the world stutter. Yeah, but um,

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that is not one percent of children because many times

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>have in fact about seventy at a time, um, well

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>five percent of children stuttering, about seventy five percent a time.

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>They will lose that disfluence as they grow older, leaving

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that at a one percent number as adults. Yeah, and

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>so in the U s there's that means there's about

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>three million or so, maybe three and a half million

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>people adults that stutter. Right, Um, more women, yeah? Uh?

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it more women, more men, more men? One it's

0:13:56.040 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>like four to five in childhood and then it was

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>too like three or four in adulthood. So by far

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>men stutter more than women and um, although in strangely

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>boys tend to naturally lose their stutter if they're going

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>to lose their stutter in childhood, more than girls. And

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they found any rhyme or reason to

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that at all. Right, No, man, there's there's like a

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of lack of understanding as far as stuttering goes

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>scientifically socially, there's just that we just don't know that

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>much about it, which is surprising because apparently as far

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>back as Moses, people have been stuttering on record, and

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll tell that story later, Okay, about sixty There could

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>be a genetic basis because about the people who stutter

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>have a family member who stutters. Yeah, and I also

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>saw that among monos i gotic, also known as identical twins,

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>if one twin stutters, there's a nine chance that the

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>other one does as well. Interesting, but for diyes eye gotic,

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>like fraternal twins, there's only a twenty percent chance. So

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>there's clearly a genetic basis to stuttering somehow, right, But

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's also one of those things where it can be genetic,

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be. Um. Sometimes if you like suffer

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.479
<v Speaker 1>a head trauma, you might develop a stutter, right, Um,

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's developmental. Sometimes there it could be obviously with

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>something like Parkinson's disease, that could be a symptom. But

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>those are to me, I think, probably different kinds of stuttering.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>But right, so, there's basically two main categories. Developmental, which

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is by far the more the one that it counts

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>for the most cases of stuttering, and then the others acquired,

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>like you said, say from like Parkinson's or they put

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you on a prescription that like suddenly is making you stutter.

0:15:56.160 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>There's also psychogenic, which is supposedly an emotional ama can

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>give you a stutter. I don't know if that's just

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>left over lore, because apparently they used to think all

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>stutters were the result of some psychology and they they

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>just say, well, no, it's possible, or some people have

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it and just haven't figured out that it's not the

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>case at all, or if there really is a small

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>section of people who do have psychogenic stutters. But but

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>all of those would fall under acquired, And then the

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>other one is developmental. Boy, how about that guy that

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>took mushrooms and quit stuttering? Yeah, so interesting. I saw

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Ted talk at his once really yeah. He um. He's like,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>all about mushrooms saving the world. Paul's damn its yeah

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>yeah he um. He leads off our article on how

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff works and he um, that's of your stutter. H

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was very affected by it, kind of withdrew socially. Went

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>camping one time, took a bunch of psychedelic mushrooms and

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>climbed a tree, got up there, Uh, decided he could

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>not climb down. Um, and then the storm came in

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and got really intense, and he he said he sort

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of felt one with the world, um, which sounds about right.

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And Uh, eventually the storm passed. He came down and

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>while he was up there during this intense experience, he

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>was like, I will not stutter anymore, and he just

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>kept saying that. Came down and he had lost his stutter. Yeah,

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and apparently he didn't relapse, which is pretty unusual, I think.

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>So he started studying mushrooms for a living. He became

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a mycologist. Man, I gotta I've said this before, I'll

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>say it again. One of the best articles I've ever

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>read my life was called blood Spore, and I think

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it was in Harper's and it was um, it was

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>about a murder in the world of mycologists. It was

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>just so interesting blood spot coming soon to a theater

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>naming I hope, so you should write the script. So

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Stammit's was remarkably lucky, and that he just basically decided

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>stutter anymore and stop stuttering. Um. Apparently, the fact that

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>he didn't relapse is probably what's most remarkable, because I

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>think relapsing among stuttering treatments is actually pretty common. Yeah,

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>but again, this is once you get out of childhood.

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>It's fairly common to have to develop a stutter as

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you're a child, as you're learning to talk, and then

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's equally common to lose that that stutter as you

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>age um usually within eighteen months of developing the onset

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>of the stutter. Um. But then as you as you

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>acquire this or develop this stutter as you get older,

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.479
<v Speaker 1>apparently becomes more and more set in. And that seems

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to be because of the plasticity of your brain when

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>you're a kid start. It's almost like, from what I

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>can gather, it's like, if you have a stutter past

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a certain point, it almost gets locked into your brain

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>as your neural pathways solidify and cement like you learned

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to have a stutter after a while, and I think

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 1>they say to wait. I think they wait like three

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 1>months before they even start looking into it, because that's

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>how fleeting a stutter can be when you're a little kid.

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>After three months, they'll say, all right, maybe we should

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>start looking into this. Right, you would want to go

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to a speech pathologist who will be able to diagnose it.

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And usually what they're looking for when um, you take

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>your child who's developed a stutter to a speech pathologist,

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is um how pronounced it is. There's a guy, um

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and I think the late nineties named Barry Guitar. He

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds like he played, you know, guitar for the band Boston.

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>He knows all the chords. No way, that's guitar George. Right,

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>what's that from? Oh? Come on, guitar George. Is that

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a Ray Stevens song? No, it's from Dark Straits sing

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh gotcha? That's a good song. It is a good song.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Uh So Barry Guitar came with five levels of stuttering development.

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>And I already referenced the first. I know his name

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is all just. I already referenced the first level, which

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is you, um, you have blessed than ten percent of

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>your speech is disfluent. That's that's anybody walking around like that, right,

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>unless you're like the King of England or something. And

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>then ironically unless you're that one king who had a stutter.

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Um and then it goes on the from there and

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>just gets worse and worse. But one of the things

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>that's attendant with these um these different stages of development

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of a stutter are like emotional problems or symptoms like

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>co morbid symptoms along with the stutter. So there can

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>be things like blinking like um, like like pursing your lips,

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>where you're frustrated, where you're angry, where you're fearful, where

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you're anxious, in conjunction with stuttering. And so this is

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing that the speech pathologists will be

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>looking for to kind of diagnose your kid like now,

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this is just normal kids stuff. For actually this the

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>stutters developing faster than we'd like it too, so we

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>need to start treating it now. Well, that makes sense

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>because dopamine. We've talked a lot about dopamine on the

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>show The NEU transmitter. UM. If you have an overabundance

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of dopamine. Um, we talked about in the Tourette's episode,

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is that one of the things that can be co

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 1>morbid with stuttering, because I know too much dopamine can

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>lead to a stutter as well. Yeah, supposedly, Um. So

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>dopamine controls movement, right, and if you have too much,

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it makes you have ticks. Like Tourette you're saying, well,

0:21:56.040 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it can. So I noticed this. Um, Parkinson's and dopamine

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>are um, I think they're they're like Parkinson's has to

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>do with too much dopamine, and Parkinson's is one of

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the ways that you could acquire neurogenically a stutter. So

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>that makes total sense that there's something in your brain

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>with dopamine transmission to where you have maybe too much

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of it. And so you're you're trying to um, you're

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>having trouble but get getting the thoughts in your head

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>into the movements that it takes to create a speech. Yeah,

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a little clumsy the way the brain

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>does this. Um, it would be a lot easier if

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it was streamlined and one part of the brain, but

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>there are two distinct parts of the brain that deal

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>with language processing, and one is the one that processes

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it and one articulates it with UH in a motor

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>skill way. And when those two things have done brain

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>imaging mapping and they found that there's some sort of

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>discontinuity between those two processes going on. There's that's stuttering, right,

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>So it could be too much dopamine. That's one thing. Um. Again,

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the research into stuttering is so basic at the moment,

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really surprising. Um. What they're trying to figure

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>out though, is are you born with the stutter like

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you when you're born, You're you're gonna have this problem

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>because you're your brain isn't um using dopamine properly, or

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is overproducing dopamine or are you as your brain is developing,

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>something goes a little off to the side, to the

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 1>left and your brain has trouble with dopamine from that

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>point on. So they're trying to figure out the etiology

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. In other words, did you look into this

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>uh the genes the four genes, Yeah, a little bit.

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Did you find names for those? I did not? That

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>is how basic the research is right now. They're not

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>even saying what genes they're finding. Yeah, apparently they did

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>discover four different genes that are linked to these proteins,

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and these proteins are sort of like, um, they're responsible

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>for what's called cellular trafficking, so they kind of make

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>sure that the elements of the cell end up where

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>they need to be within that cell um. And they

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>said that more than one neurological disorder can be linked

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to this trafficking process. So I guess it's related to

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>those proteins in those genes. Yeah, but they're like, who knows,

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just like they've gotten to the point where they

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>have identified there's something up with these proteins in in

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>the cells and it's linked to stuttering somehow. Now just

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>give us like ten years to go figure out how right,

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, they're they're starting to realize now there's some

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of genetic basis to this two stuttering. Well, I mean,

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the twin study that says a lot right

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 1>there for sure. You know, um, should we can we

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about Moses? I think it's high time we talked

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>about Moses. We've been dancing around the burning bush for

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a while now. I can't believe that guy to laugh. Well,

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I was laughing because every time I think of burning bush,

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I think of three Amigos and how funny that singing

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>bush was. I never saw that one. Three Amigos. Yeah,

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I could do the three amigo salute, but I never

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>saw it. Oh man, that's a classic. Really yeah really? Oh? Sure?

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Why is that surprising? I don't know. I feel like

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I would have seen it if three comedic? You right? Oh,

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I know why I never saw because chevy Chase is

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in it. I'm sure, I'm sure. No. I remember my

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 1>dad raised me to really dislike so I probably wasn't

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed to see it. That's because you can see Fletch, right.

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I stopped watching Fletch like part way through.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>My dad had a real influence on me. And why

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>didn't he like chevy Chase? So I don't. I have

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>no idea he had a bone to pick. I I

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>guess I think he thought he was a jerk or something.

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Well he was, all right, it turns out right, all right.

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>So Moses, um, I know a lot about the Bible, because,

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>as listeners know, I was raised in the church, but

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know this. I don't remember this story at all. Yeah.

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't heard it either. So apparently Moses uh was

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>a little baby at one point, and the Pharaoh said,

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>was warned, you know that Moses was was gonna uh

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>not be his friend when he grew up. So he said,

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, let me try something out. I'm gonna give

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>this little baby Moses a choice between a bowl full

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of gold and a bowl full of hot coals. This

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is what you do with babies. Jesus the gold, then

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna kill him. Yeah, typical typical Egyptian stuff. Yeah. Um.

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So of course with a baby, Moses is going to

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>reach for the gold. Um. And then apparently an angel

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>intervened Todd, Todd the angel and directed, uh, little Moses

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>hand to the hot coals instead. A little gruffly if

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you ask Moses. Moses grabbed a hot coal put it

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>in his mouth, and that's how he got to the stutter.

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And he's blamed Todd ever since. And here's what I

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>don't get is that Moses went to God and was like, hey, man,

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm supposed to lead the people out of Egypt. I

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>have a bad stutter. Can you you know, can you

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>do something for me? God? And God said no, sweat, Yeah,

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>he said God, Mr ed, you didn't know that, uh

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>he was God? So God said, um, yeah, sure I

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>can help you out. Just have your brother Aaron take

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the mic. And Moses is like, I was more thinking

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.679
<v Speaker 1>like you'd perform a miracle on me. But yeah, I

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>probably could have thought of having Aaron speak for me

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. God, thanks for that, though. I don't know

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.719
<v Speaker 1>how I missed that story. He apparently there's a quote

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I am heavy of mouth and heavy of tongue, and

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw some um Bible site where they were debating

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>whether or not what they were talking about was a stutter. Apparently,

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>some later Hebraic text said that Moses had trouble pronouncing

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>th h s thorn sounds um, it sounds more like

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>he had a lisp than a stutter. Who knows. Let's

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>go with stuttering though, because a lot of people do

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>say that Moses had a stutter. But yeah, it's it's

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty thick. It's I've gotten used to it. But I

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>remember at first when we first started doing this, like, man,

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I should not be speaking for a living like this

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is I have a speech impediment, pure and simple. No,

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just everyone now just thinks, Hey, that's Josh's voice. Yes,

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it's so grating, smooth and silky Elton history. Uh, let's

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>see the emperor Justinian apparently U or no, I'm sorry

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong. It was um Demosthenes. He was a

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Greek statesman. He apparently was smart enough to say, who

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>could help me with a stutter? How about an actor?

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Somebody who speaks broadcast their voice for a living. So

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he hired an actor to help him, and the actor

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>had him do things like chew on pebbles and try

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk smart. Um, he he's he did his speeches

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>while he's walking uphill. I guess to control his breathing.

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>This is actually pretty sharp stuff. I think out of

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>out of all the historical treatments that we're going to cover,

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this one might most closely resemble, aside from the mouthful

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of pebbles, um, modern treatment for stuttering. Yeah, which is

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, uh, speaking exercises. Uh, well, you did say Justinian.

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Justinian had the stutter, but his

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>at the very least his position. Uh. A. T. S.

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Of Amida was one of the first people to say, hey,

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe that the frenulum, you know, that little flap of

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>skin under your tongue, the connector to the bottom of

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>your mouth. He was the first one that said, why

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>don't we start slicing that thing up? Uh, and just

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the tongue in general. Over the years there have been

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of surgeon that tried variations of slicing the

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>frenulum or cutting down of the tongue itself. Now, I

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>could probably use that one by H. D. Sgoen. I'm

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>sure that's how you say it. The second way, he

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>basically said, stuttering as a result of an oversized tongue,

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>which I have. Let's just slice and dice a little

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>off the sides. But none of this I know, of course,

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it didn't work. It's just horror of thick apparently. Though

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>at the same time there were these surgeons who get

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>all the press because their stuff is so horrific. But

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>there are also other people who were kind of on

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the right track a little more like Moses Mendelssohn in

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the eighteenth century. He thought that there were too many

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>ideas or thoughts that were flowing at once, and that um,

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it was basically it was blocking speech. There's too much

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to get out, basically like the three Stooges model

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of stuttering. Remember they're all trying to go through the door. Yeah, Yeah, yeah,

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>so you've got too much to say and you want

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to just get it all out. Interesting, that makes a

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>little sense. Um Erasmus Darwin. Uh. He said that it

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>was bashfulness, emotions like bashfulness that messed up the process

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of speaking right, definitely onto something there as well. And

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>then a psychologist named sand Ow said that it was

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>brought on by either a dread of speaking or an

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>over eagerness to speak, kind of like what Moses Mendelson

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>was saying in the latter example. They brought out by

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>two completely opposite things. Yeah, so a lot of this

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>actually is kind of in step with our current thought

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>about stuttering. And so either that means that these guys

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteenth century were prescient, or our understanding of

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>stuttering is stuck in the eighteenth century. I'm very curious

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to know which one it is. Shall we take a break? Yeah,

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>it's all right. We're gonna come back after this final

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>break and talk about therapies that don't involve cutting your

0:32:40.520 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>tongue apart. Yea, all right, So now we're in the

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>modern days and we're not taking scalpels to the frenulum

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>any longer. Because they realized that it's not a physical

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>affliction of the tongue. It's it's somewhere inside the brain

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>most likely. And uh, they have a lot of recommendations

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>for when a child um starts to stutter in it

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and it sticks. Um. And you found some other tips

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to which are great for parents, and kind of one

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of the main ones is is give your kid plenty

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of room to talk, plenty of time to talk, make

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>sure they express themselves fully, because one of the side

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>effects of having a stutter is your child may just

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>end up retreating and being super quiet. Yeah. I got

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>from this these hips for parents that there's kind of

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this maybe not fully spoken idea that you can actually

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>cement your child stutter if you handle it poorly when

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>they start to develop it like like which knowing that

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it just makes you even more tense about dealing with

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it correctly, I would guess, which could make the whole

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>process even even harder. But there are some pretty brainless

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>things to do. This one almost killed me when I

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:36.919
<v Speaker 1>saw it. Chuck the the site I think Kids Health

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is where I got this one, but it said maintain

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>natural eye contact with your child. Try not to look

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>away or show signs of being upset. Get like just

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>break the arrow off in my heart. That's pretty sad. Like,

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>don't look away in disgust when your child is stuttering,

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you monster, Go look in the mirror and take a

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>bamboo shoot and put it underneath your fingernail and think

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:07.359
<v Speaker 1>about what you've done. Another good one is um And

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>this feels like something that would be easy to do

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>because it seems well intentioned to say, like, you know,

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:16.359
<v Speaker 1>slow down, son, take your time, take your breath. They

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>say to not do that because you know, might make

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>things worse. Yeah, because what you're doing then is you're

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>drawing attention to the idea that your child is not

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 1>speaking correctly and uh, rather than just apparently letting them

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>communicate at their own pace. Right, There's also seems to

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>be a suggestion that the child has learned the child,

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 1>your kid has learned to speak to stutter because they're

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>trying to get too much out at once, and they

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>may have picked that up from you. If you have

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>like a rush rush, rush pace in your household. One

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of the things that that they suggest is it just

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of slow things down at home. And in addition

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to like like schedule wise and like just taking time

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>and just like letting everybody breathe, maybe a little more

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>than you guys are um also speaking more slowly, not

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.919
<v Speaker 1>just to your kid, but also to other people. When

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 1>your kids around speaking slowly, you're letting the setting an example,

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it's called modeling your own speech so that your kid

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>feels like they don't have to blurt everything out at

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>once to get their point across. They they're going to

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>be heard no matter how long it takes. You're going

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.879
<v Speaker 1>to sit there and just listen to them speak, yeah,

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and not and like really listen. Another thing that seems

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 1>like a no brainer, but really just try and focus

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 1>on on what they're saying and not the fact that

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>they're stuttering those words out. But you know, when your

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>kid tells you a story about something that happened at school,

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>don't concentrate or even bring attention to the fact that

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 1>it's being said with the stutter, but just take taking

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>their story and if it takes a little while longer

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>than just respond accordingly. And and in that same vein,

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:03.879
<v Speaker 1>like don't tell your kid to stop and start over

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>when they start stuttering, like like they're they have to

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>get the sentence just perfect or else you're not going

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 1>to hear him out and don't tell them to think

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>before speaking. That's not helping anything at all. Um, be honest, like,

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>don't try and uh mask it and say that, well,

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a stutter, like this is just you know,

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you're just in a hurry or something like they just

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 1>say to be really honest and say, you know what,

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you you have a stutter and it's a disfluence. It's

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing to worry about. And uh, if you'd like, maybe

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>we can uh talk to someone that can uh do

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>some exercises with you. And you know, just like all

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this sounds like no brainer, not being a monster parent. Yeah,

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:52.359
<v Speaker 1>but again some of it does. It's like telling your

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>kids like, okay, slow down, take a breath. Now, what

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>are you saying? Like you think you're helping your kid,

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you're not so so not all some of it is

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is monstrosity. Others is just like this is this is

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 1>what people would naturally do, but it's and it seems intuitive,

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>but you're wrong. Your intuition is dead wrong. Just let

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>your kids talk and listen to what they're saying, not

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 1>how they're saying it. And apparently this is this is

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.399
<v Speaker 1>a good These are good. This is good advice. Wow,

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it took me a second to get out. Thank you though,

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Chuck for patiently hearing it. Then, um, this is good

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>advice to helping your kid just naturally, um shed the stutter,

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the developmental stutter. We should say, all of this we've

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:39.760
<v Speaker 1>been talking about is is dealing with the developmental stutter,

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 1>although a lot of it just applies to people with

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.320
<v Speaker 1>with adults stutters out in the real world as well.

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Like you can you can take just about all of

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this and apply it to a business conversation if you

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 1>have a coworker who has a stutter, like don't look

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>away and discussed. There's there's good advice right there all too.

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Throughout your life when you're when you're watching or listening

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to somebody with the stutter. Yeah, I mean, maybe don't

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>do that at all, and you know the life advice,

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's a good point is if you're sitting

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>there and you're and you don't look like you're hurrying

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody with the stutter along, You're just engage. You're you're

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 1>into the conversation no matter how long it takes. I

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine how much that must help. And one thing

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't really. I think point out that that

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:34.879
<v Speaker 1>bears pointing out is that people who stutter do not

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily stutter and in the same frequency throughout like their day.

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 1>There's definitely situations that are um that we are going

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.439
<v Speaker 1>to make the stutter way more pronounced. They're almost exclusively

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>associated with higher anxiety situations. I think the nationals Stuttering

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Association says that the number one situation where a stutter

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:02.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to be about as bad as it gets

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>is during a job interview. And so employers, please don't

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>think that this is how this person talks. This is

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 1>probably as bad as their stutter gets. However, they're stuttering

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 1>in the in the job interview, UM. So if they're

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>today at home, UM, and they're just talking to their

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>wife or their kid or something, the stutter is probably

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna be far less pronounced than it would be if

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.359
<v Speaker 1>they were having to give a speech UM at their

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>friend's wedding. You know. Yeah, And I found that UM

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 1>with this person, Emily, and I know that it's UM.

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 1>It can vary a lot within a conversation. UM, it's

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>a very severe stutter. And then they will say like

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of sentences straight through with nothing, and then

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, oh, man, like it catches me off guard

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>because I'm so used to the stutter, and I think, well,

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's super interesting to me. You just like

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>blurted out a couple of two or three long sentences

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>with zero stutter or stammer on the same thing. Um,

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I know, but they're fun to say together, aren't they

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>They are. I don't know, I just find it really fascinating. Um.

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, speech pathology can come a long way. I

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:21.720
<v Speaker 1>know that there are Well, it's funny. I looked online

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>about curing stuttering, and of course there was no like

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 1>patented cure. But Tony Propins after listening to our recording

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>our motivational Speaker thing, I saw a video. I didn't

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 1>even watch it. I just saw the title. It said

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Tony Robbins cures a man of a stutter in seven minutes, right,

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 1>So I was like, oh, come on, yeah, yeah, I

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't see anything that said stutter stuttering cures. There's basically

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 1>nine Yeah. I did not look into I didn't have

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>time to look into this new device though, did you. Uh, yeah,

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. It seems pretty untested as far as

0:41:56.040 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>real world application goes, but it makes sense into watively

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:04.399
<v Speaker 1>and apparently it does help in a clinical setting. So

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>basically it's like an like a hearing aid, but it

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 1>changes the person who's speaking's voice a little bit. Does

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it replay it for everybody? Know, just for the person

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in their ear right, Because one of the one of

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:22.319
<v Speaker 1>the ways that somebody who stutters will be able to

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>talk perfectly well is speaking in unison or singing. So

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>like you, you can be sitting there talking to somebody

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:33.320
<v Speaker 1>just one on one, and your stutter could be quite severe.

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 1>But then if you and the person agree to sing together,

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you may not stutter at all the whole time you're singing.

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:43.720
<v Speaker 1>And I have no no one has any idea why

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>that's the case. They just know And this device is

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>based on that that when we're talking in unison, or

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:52.879
<v Speaker 1>someone who has the stutters talking in unison with somebody else,

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:55.839
<v Speaker 1>their stutter tends to go away. So what this does

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is it creates an echo. There's a bit of a

0:42:57.680 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 1>lag with their own voice, so they feel like they're

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>talking themselves, and so it helps the stutter again, at

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 1>least in a clinical setting. UM, I don't know if

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it would just be too distracting in a conversation or what.

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But I got the impression that they haven't tested it

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>fully or proven it fully outside of the lamb. Well,

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the singing makes sense because remember mel Tillis, The name

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>sounds familiar. He was a country singer who had a

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:29.360
<v Speaker 1>really pronounced stutter, kind of around like fifties, sixties and

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 1>seventies seventies is when he was biggest. But yeah, but

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you know he was on like he haw and stuff,

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:39.359
<v Speaker 1>grand ol opry like a bird and then has has

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>had a tough stutter when he was talking to the

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 1>audience and that's what he was known for. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 1>it was like you know, obviously wouldn't act, but it

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>was a sticky speaking of so um another famous stutter chuck,

0:43:55.640 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>are we there? Uh, Porky Pig. Yeah, so I was.

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I was looking up Porky Pig, right, because you know,

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that's an unusual choice to have a cartoon character whose stutters.

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out that Porky Pig has a stutter

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>because the guy who originally did Porky Pig, Joe Doherty,

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 1>had a stutter in real life. Oh really yeah, pretty sweet? Huh,

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty heartwarming? Well wait, there's more. He did Porky Pig

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>for the first two years, and then they fired him

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>because he kept missing the cues because of his stutter,

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:33.319
<v Speaker 1>and they brought in a guy who didn't have a

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 1>stutter to do Porky Pig from that point on. But

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 1>he did it with a stutter. Yeah, because it was established.

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Well that's crutty and that's sad. That's sad. Yeah, except

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Porky Pigs trick was to go to a different word, yeah,

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 1>which is a fairly common technique though. Yeah, I imagine. So, yeah,

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>if you get hung up on something, just say something else.

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Uh that means the same thing. Yeah, that's a good one.

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Or I think, um people will say, oh, I can't

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>remember and just act like they can't remember the word

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>when they know full well what we're they're going for.

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 1>They just can't they can't say it, so they just

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>pretend like they couldn't or they forgot what they were

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.319
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Should we name all some of these other

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 1>famous stutters, because uh, I think if you're an adult stutter,

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you probably know these people. You may have looked it

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>up to feel a kinship, but maybe if you're a

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 1>little kid out there, it might make you feel better.

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 1>To know that. Uh, Darth Vader himself, James Earl Jones

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>was the stutter Yeah, big time. Emily Blunt, Yep, she's terrific.

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Samuel Jackson surprising right there. Yeah, because the F bombs

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 1>flow from his mouth. He was born with that talent.

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Who else from pulp fiction? Harvey kit Tell. Yeah, I

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:56.919
<v Speaker 1>can't see Harvey kite Tell stuttering now. And I guess

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 1>all of these people just went through speech therapy. Huh.

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 1>I would guess so, or else they all took mushrooms

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't say whether or not they like stuttered

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>as a child or when they overcame it. But Nicole Kidman,

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Albert Einstein, Oh really, um, Carly Simon, and you said

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Winston Churchill earlier too, he had a stutter as well. Yeah,

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Willis, Yeah, that's using too. Huh. Check I could see.

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I've actually seen Shack stutter before on TV. Really,

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>m uh see Bill Walton, Tiger Woods, Charles Darwin, Jane Seymour,

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Dr Quinn herself, Joe Biden, who will hopefully run for president,

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>right he overcame his stutter. Yeah, well all of them did,

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:51.319
<v Speaker 1>which is great. But at the same time, there are

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:53.800
<v Speaker 1>people out there who have accepted that they have a stutter.

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:56.759
<v Speaker 1>They've probably spent a lot of time and money trying

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of it and it hasn't gone anywhere,

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>so they've kind have embraced it. So I mean, if

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you've gotten rid of your stutter and you've overcome it,

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 1>that's great. But if you've also embraced it, good for

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you as well. Oh boy, how about this one? You

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about overcoming a stutter Kendrick Lamar? Oh yeah, wow.

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>If you can overcome a stutter and then become Kendrick Lamar,

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>then that that should be a shiny example people that

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you can do anything. Yeah, or if you embrace your stutter,

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>good for you as well. Agreed, because you could be

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 1>mal tell Us who was the Kendrick Lamar of country music,

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 1>or Porky Pig, the Kendrick Lamar of cartoon. That's right,

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got anything else about stuttering? I got nothing else.

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from people, though, huh, yeah, for sure.

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 1>UM get in touch with us, and then in the

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 1>meantime you can find more stuff about stuttering, including a

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of support and resources for parents, um all over

0:47:51.640 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the web and there's things like say dot org and

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the National Stuttering Association and all sorts of great resources

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>if you are looking for some information. And since I said, uh,

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 1>it's time for a listener mail, all right, I'll call

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this um coming to see you in Chicago, but by

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 1>this point will be I went to see you in

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Chicago and was disappointed. Hey, guys, want to write in

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and say what a great show I just saw? No,

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to write and say thank you for putting

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 1>together a really great podcast, long time listener and fan,

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and I even mentioned you in my work bio and

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I checked it out and did I really appreciate that

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff you sh know is informative, funny, and family friendly

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 1>all at the same time. This was especially valuable when

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:42.879
<v Speaker 1>my fiance and I took his ten year old brother

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 1>on a road trip from Chicago to Wisconsin Dells. In

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the car, we listened to a playlist of s Y

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:52.319
<v Speaker 1>s K episodes that I put together to suit his

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 1>ten year old tastes, How Spider's Work, how ice cream works, and,

0:48:56.160 --> 0:48:59.120
<v Speaker 1>most importantly, because we were going to Wisconsin Dells, self

0:48:59.120 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>proclaimed water park apple of the World, how water Slides Work,

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 1>which oddly is one of our highest performing shows ever.

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:09.319
<v Speaker 1>People love Water Slides, man, they love hearing about them,

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>they love looking at pictures of them. It got shared

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:14.319
<v Speaker 1>or something. It was so weird. I can't remember, but

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I went to look at our download numbers one time

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, Water Slides is to the top.

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So higher than marijuana, well higher than marijuana. Hilarious. Uh.

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Those episodes really entertained them and introduced them to the

0:49:29.280 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>concept of podcasts for the very first time. Thanks for

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:35.040
<v Speaker 1>everything you do, and she said, they're going to see

0:49:35.680 --> 0:49:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the Fiancee and Mara or Mara are going to see

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago show. So I hope you have a good time. Yeah,

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:45.399
<v Speaker 1>and thank you very much for supporting us in our

0:49:45.440 --> 0:49:49.759
<v Speaker 1>lives shows. We appreciate that treamendously. H If you want

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch with us like Mara did, or

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Mara We're gonna go with Mara. Um. You can tweet

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:58.799
<v Speaker 1>to us I'm for Real at josh um Clark and

0:49:58.960 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 1>at s Y s K podcast. You can hang out

0:50:01.600 --> 0:50:04.560
<v Speaker 1>with Chuck on Facebook dot com slash stuff you Should

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Know or slash Charles W. Chuck Bryant appropriately enough. You

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:11.440
<v Speaker 1>can send us all an email, including Noel and including

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Jerry and Frank Pitcher to stuff podcasts at how stuff

0:50:14.320 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 1>works dot Com has always joined us our at home

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:22.960
<v Speaker 1>on the Web Stuff you Should Know dot com. For

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:25.400
<v Speaker 1>more on this and thousands of other topics. Is it

0:50:25.480 --> 0:50:37.080
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com