WEBVTT - Canada's Cannabis Market So Far

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisanthal, and unfortunately my colleague and co host

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Ellaway is out this week, so you'll have to

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>just listen to me solo. But I'm excited about today's

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>conversation because it's a follow up to one of our

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>episodes that we did a few months ago. So if

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you recall, in mid October, Canada legalized recreational cannabis that

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>coincided with a boom and stocks relating to cannabis, lots

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of interest in this, but still so much uncertainty about

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>how the market would actually play out and who would

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>really make money, and what kind of margins there would be,

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and just what kind of roll out there would be

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in general of the operations of legalized recreational marijuana in Canada.

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And so a few months ago we talked to Craig Wiggins.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>He is a part of a trio of analysts known

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>as the Canalysts. They have a popular Reddit page called

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the Canalysts where they do pretty serious, deep dive financial

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>analysis of the publicly traded cannabis companies. They have a

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>very big following that's grown over time and they do

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>events and podcasts and other stuff really become They've become

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the sort of go to destination for serious analysis of

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>these companies. And so we talked to Craig right before

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the legalization, right before recreational is about to come out,

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and so he wanted to go back and talk to

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Craig again about what he's learned and what he's seen

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in the first few months of the recreational market in Canada.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>And so we have him back now. Craig Wiggins, thank

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you very much for joining us. Thank you very much

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>for having me. I. Oh, I hope I'm not the

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>reason Tracey didn't show you are I said Tracy, we're

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna have Craig back. And she's like, oh, I got

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>food poisoning last night. Suddenly I can't do it. No,

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>she wishes she could do it, but due to the

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>time zone she's in Hong Kong, she couldn't make it

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>this time. UM, so what's your overall You know, you

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>warned a lot about a lot of different things when

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the market and the impending legalization of

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>recreational and the fact that, um, you know, there's just

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of issues with the supply chain, the sort

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of the separation between the distributors and the retailers and

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the provinces putting themselves in the middle. What have you

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>seen so far? How smooth has the rollout been? Well,

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure the age of your listeners, but the

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>term gung show would probably be apropos for how adult

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>wreck has been rolled out throughout Canada. Okay, so I

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>take that as a negative. What has been the biggest

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>problems of them? I think there's a multitude of problems

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh, we have no shortage of people pointing fingers

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>at each other. In Canada, we have two distinct streams

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>with respect to cannabis. We have the medical cannabis and

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>we have the adult rack. The medical cannabis is all

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>done online and ship directly from an LP, a licensed

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>producer who is licensed by Health Canada, direct to patient

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>or Shoppers Drug Market, Canada's largest drug store chain, has

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>gotten involved in distribution of cannabis, but not from the

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>retail stores. Again, all online the wreck side. Each province

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in Canada is responsible for distribution, most of them. I

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>think nine out of the ten major provinces all elected

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to be the wholesale er of cannabis, and some of

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>them elected to also be the retailer of cannabis, and

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>each events is different, so we really have a patchwork

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of different models throughout Canada. And what we've really seen

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is the theme that we've heard from the provinces who

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>are strapped for inventory, so much so that the Quebec

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>government who's actually running their own retail stores, have closed

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>their retail stores Monday through Wednesday because there's not enough

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>product New bruns a similar situation. Alberta stopped issuing new

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>retail licenses. In Alberta, it is private distribution, even though

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the government sees the need that they have to receive

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the product before distributing it to the retail. So it's

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>really been a patchwork and most of those provinces have

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>not done a very good job of their retail rollout,

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it's private or or government run. That's just what

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>I was about to ask. Of the two main models,

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>neither one is looking particularly good right now. Yeah, and

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where some of the fingerpoint it comes in. A

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of the provinces said the LPs, the license producers

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>over promised and under delivered, and there's a lot over

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>promising going on the term funded capacity was bandied about

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>greatly in the industry because it's clear before when you

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>say the LPs, these are the producers, the license producers

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>whose names investors have come to know, like a canopy

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>growth or in Afria. Yeah, they're cultivators, primarily cultivators. The

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>canopy has gone into the retail side. Aurora has purchased

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>an interest in the retail operation. But yes, the LPs

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>are are the ones that are producing, cultivating and then

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>shipping the product, whether it is medical or whether it

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>is adut rack, same distributor, the same growers feeding two

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>different screens. So if there's a shortage of supply and

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the LPs haven't been able to deliver on what they promised,

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>does that, in your view speak to some fundamental problem

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>or is this just like, look that maybe there's still

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 1>growing pains. They didn't really appreciate the scope of the

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>demand for it. But you know, in a few quarters,

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in a few years, as they continue to build out

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>their growth facilities, that should stabilize. Yes, and no, the

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>quality that's coming out. There's only two form factors that

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>are presently allowed in Canada. One is flour but and

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the other is oil. And it's oil that has has

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>been provided in a diluted carrier oil like mct or

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>or olive oil or something like that. So there's only

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>presently two legal form factors in Canada, the edibles right

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.799
<v Speaker 1>that edibles and formed factor two point oh if you would.

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>The discussion period just ended last week if I remember correctly,

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>and those new formats will be out by October of

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this year. But the the bud side of the equation,

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>there's some pretty scraggly looking flower that's that's getting delivered

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to customers that are used to if they're they're from

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the black market or what we've been calling lately. The

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>legacy market is not nearly as good. So there are

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>some premium flower out there, no question about it. There's

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>some gorgeous flower out there, but there's a lot of

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>flower that's coming through that. Uh. We see pictures posted

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter that just do not look appeal. So one

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of the questions that I had, and that I've been

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>really curious about prior to the introduction of recreational is

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the degree to which consumers or new consumers of cannabis

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>would gravitate towards specific brands. Because we know that in

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>other sort of vice industries. People of their favorite beers

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and they can you know, maybe they dabble with some others,

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>but there's ones that they really like. Obviously, people have

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>loyalty to certain cigarettes that they like. Are we seeing

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>any trends play out where there are certain strains or

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>certain brands that people have shown a consistent affinity towards

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>or is it too early to know. There's a lot

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of brand hopping in the mid mid range and the

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>lower priced product as people try to figure out what

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they like from each of the producers. The premium brand names,

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the Broken Coasts, the Cantalus Labs, the Supreme Pharmaceuticals or

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Fire is what the what their tickers and what people

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>call them. Those Premium and Flower are doing very well.

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>They're they're selling very well, a lot of social media

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>on the product. So something like a Broken Coast, are

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we is this like this the cannabis equivalent of some

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I p a microbrew. Yes, they don't put

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>out a lot of product, but the product they put

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>out is gorgeous. It's Broken Coast is my favorite. I've

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>tried Cantaalists, I haven't tried to Fire yet, but those

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>those those higher end quality ones, and they're a little

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>bit more pricier. They're they're plus ten dollars Graham through

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the retail outlets, so they are more pricey than legacy

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>market or black market. But at the same time, they're

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>head and shoulders about what we're seeing from some of

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the mass brands that are out there. Do the mass

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>brands also have their sort of premium lines? Are they trying?

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're sort of the faux indie lines that

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you see in beer. They have them. But there's, as

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I said, there's a lot of brand hopping right now

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>as people try to figure out what's good and what's

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>not good and uh, in this day of social media,

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>if you ship a container of stems and seeds, it

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>ends up on the Internet and people know pretty quickly.

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you're if you're trying to build a brand,

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not a good idea to build the brand

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>without the quality there first. So let's talk about this

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>side of it, because obviously, as you say, ay, there's

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>not enough supply, and be when there is supply, a

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of times the flower is mediocre and it looks

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>really terrible on social media. Is this is that again?

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm still trying to wrap my head around this question

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of how much is just growing pains demands strain on

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 1>the system versus maybe they're not that good at growing

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>at scale, or maybe there's going to be some issue

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 1>that's going to permanently be an issue with growing at scale,

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Like how much of this is do you expect to

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>be solved over the coming years. Well, I think a

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of it gets solved through genetics. Yet you have

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to remember cannabis has been grown in small scale in

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Canada indoor simply because you have to hide it. So

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>going to these mass greenhouses, the genetics are going to

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>take a while to dial in. The genetics have to

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>come along to be able to grow in a different,

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>less controlled environment than an indoor shop, the indoors. And

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because the three premium brands I mentioned to

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you are the ones that I see premium. Broken Coast

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is indoor grown, U Tantalus is a craft greenhouse that's

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>only an acre in size, and fire Is is also

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a hybrid greenhouse. So growing in greenhouse, which a lot

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>of people thought, you know what, it's not gonna work

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:41.319
<v Speaker 1>because the genetics weren't there. We're seeing it so it's

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>a matter of the genetics and really dialing in these

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>large facilities. It just hasn't been done before, especially in

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>greenhouses on this level. So the genetics will take a

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>while to dial in. Is there growing paints. There's always

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be growing paints. We even hear from the

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>indoor guys that it's a two year dial in to

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>get get what they're growing perfectly right. So you can

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>only be as good as the plant you're growing. So

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the genetics are really important, but also the genetics need

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>certain things to thrive to be their best. And if

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you've taken indoor genetics and you're trying to transform into

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>a greenhouse environment, it's going to take you a while

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to dial that in. We know the big some of

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the big names, your Canopies, Auroras and so on. What's

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the actual number for how many publicly traded cannabis companies

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that are in Canada? Wow, publicly traded. I've got to

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's north of fifty right now. I think there's

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred licenses. One company can hold multiple licenses like

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Canopy and and Afrian and the like. But there is

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a there's a lot of companies out there, and we

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>are seeing some of them do well in the first

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>quarter because the wholesale markets still surprisingly strong. So we

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>have some of these big companies, despite their growing capacity,

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>are still buying wholesale to leave it to sell out

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to retail, which is quite shocking given some of the

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>the amounts of inventory we see on their books and

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>what they should be growing versus their square footage. So

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about metrics, because, as I mentioned in the introduction,

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>your crew, the Canalysts are known for really top shelf,

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>deep dive analysis into these companies and you really sort

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of pick apart the financials and as you just mentioned,

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you also tour the facilities. You really sort of get

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to know them on an operational scale for an investor

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>who's looking in this space. And it's worth noting that

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>many of these cannabis companies have had a phenomenal start

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to the year in the stock market. After slumping after

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the bubble or the boom last year, they slumped, now

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>they're really back on fire. What should people look at

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>now to see who's getting traction in the recreational space

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and who's growing in some manner that you know, looks

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>like they're growing efficiently and uh, scaling nicely. What should

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>people look for in their earnings filings and so forth. Well,

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>what I look at and we run not only peer groups,

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>but we run trends on individual companies. The sales growth

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is important. The gross margin they are all over the

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>map these days. The gross margin. I'd like to see

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>gross margin in the companies that I invest in start

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>creeping into the seventy percent range. Canopy, just to give

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you an idea. Their last quarter they were at they

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>dropped from two and I even think are the folks

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>over at Aurora dropped a little bit down to fifty?

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to get good returns on the amount

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that they're spending below the line without a strong gross margin.

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Explain that. So what is going on in the business

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that is causing gross margins to deteriorate. Well, there's a

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of launching of new facilities. So as those new

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>facilities come on, you might not be matched against your

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>revenue in that quarter, so there might be a lag.

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Like for instance, Aurora Sky finally got all their licenses

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and we're actually touring a Roora Sky today with video cameras.

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'm actually looking forward to seeing what my colleagues

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>bring back on that. But Aurora Sky just got all

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>their licenses. They've actually planted the flag. They said in

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>UH for their fourth quarter of this year, which is

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>actually second calendar quarter there, they planted the ebitda flag

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and said they're gonna be ebit de positive. They've got

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a hill to client. They're they're running at a bout

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>minus thirty three million and adjusted. But it does as

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I calculated, and it's interesting to see will they be

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>able to bridge that gap in order to adjusted. But that,

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>just for your audience, is one of my favorite metrics.

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm an old school commercial lender, so that's how you

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>get paid back. Looking at that line. So what you

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>need to drive that is you need your sales growth

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to drive uh the top line. Then you need your

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>gross margin to convert it into how much money after

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>my production cost do I have to pay my s

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>g n A and my operating expenses? Just just to

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>give you an idea, last quarter, Canopy did eighty three

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>million in net revenue net of excise tax, and they

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>had a hundred and seventy million in our backs. And

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the folks over at Aurora also had over two of

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>their sale was at x so it's tough to make

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>money when when when you're ax is outpacing your sales

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>at the two to one level. So do these companies

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm thinking of like and it's kind of

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>unrelated from a business model standpoint, but the question, the

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>fundamental issue, man is like thinking about some of the

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>fast growing startups in the US, say like an Uber

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>or a Lift, and they obviously have spending growth that's

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>much fast, that's incredibly fast, and they're losing money, but

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they say, well, this is all worth it. But then

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the question that investors faces like, okay, but when is

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>the spending going to slow down? Like, what is the

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>timetable for when you're gonna be able to stop investing

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:47.959
<v Speaker 1>and actually produce growing cash flow and growing margins and stuff.

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Do these companies and obviously because of the demand and

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the growing pains, obviously they have rapidly expanding costs and

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>new facilities. Do they have a timetable for when this ends?

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Or is their view that look, there's a lot of

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>growth ahead, We're just going to keep investing in the future.

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And at this point it's premature to talk about slowing

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>down the expense side. I think there's some In each

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>each of those camps, we hunt inflection points. We are

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>looking for when will the break even and sales and

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the break even for a positive net operating profit on

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a break even for adjusted EPA. We're hunting those inflection points.

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what we do with with our charting and our graphic.

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to see when that happens. And we're we've

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>seen some inflection points last quarter. Do those inflection points

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>become trends and at the end of the day, like

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>I think Canopy went from last quarter uh SE, s

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>g n A or APEX to sales, so that that's

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a big improvement, all driven by the sales line. So

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>what we're hunting is to see are the gen A

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>is going to plateau? Are the selling expenses going to

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>start trending down as a percentage of sales And we're

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 1>starting to see that in some companies. So those are

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the things we're hunting, and we believe the investors should

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>be paying attention to those things because depending on where

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.239
<v Speaker 1>you are on your your investment horizon. I'm fifty two

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>years old, I don't want to take as much risk

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>as say someone in their early twenties. I don't have

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the runway to recover versus versus some if I make

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a mistake at my age versus someone who's much younger.

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you believe in the story that cannabis is

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be everywhere and global and the light, maybe

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're more bullish on that story. But for me,

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm still concerned about can you produce a product at

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a decent gross margin to cover those those expenses. That

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what I look at. I want something that that

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I can believe in with respect to their fundamentals. Fundamentals

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't always the answer, but for where I am in

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:07.479
<v Speaker 1>my investment horizon, I am looking more for fundamentals than um.

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I care about the stake, not the sizzle so much,

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of people are throwing a lot

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of sizzle out there for sure. You know, Craig, I've

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>been meaning to ask um, what's happened to the medical

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 1>side of the market, because everybody knows a lot of

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the medical marijuana consumption, probably in the US and Canada

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>was just recreational consumption in disguise. What is the future

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of the medical side now that someone can just go

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>onto a dispensary without a prescription or anything like that. Well, actually,

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>for for a lot of the bigger companies so far,

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>their medical actually either stayed relatively stable, a little optick

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>or a little downtick. So we did. We're through our

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>first reporting quarter of full rack, which was October November seven,

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>so companies like Canopy and or are reporting full quarters

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of that. So I think Canopy went down a little

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>bit and Aurora went down. But also the other thing,

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and here's the crazy thing in Canada on the medical side,

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>our government is charging an excise tax on medical cannabis

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>because and I think this is a very lazy way

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of approaching it. They're they're seeing it, well, if you

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>want to game the system and you want to pay less,

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>well you'll go into medical. Uh. But what they've tried

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to do is even the playing field and thrown excise

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.959
<v Speaker 1>tax on it. And there is a lot of medical

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>benefit with respect to cannabis. I use it from my arthritis,

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I use it for for sleep as well. And I

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be that dismissive of medical consumption and just saying

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it's recreational and disguise, you'll really get get the folks

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that that use it riled up quite frankly, but the yeah,

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the excise tax that are that our government as has

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>put on it is crazy. And you asked, like, what's

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>part of the problem, and I said, there's a lot

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of finger pointing. These excise stamps, which are about half

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>an inch wide by by an inch long, are by

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>province and every producer, every license producer who ships it

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>out has to put one on all these disparate packages

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>from pouches, tubes, bottles, boxes, and they didn't get the

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 1>XI stamps still about two weeks before RED kicked off,

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and there was no glue on them. So they all

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 1>these companies designed all their packaging and then we're given

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>these excise stamps that that have to go on the

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>opening and when the products opened, it still has to stay.

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>It'll tear, but it has to stay affixed. So that

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>that's our government helping out. I was touring Afrey yesterday

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and they are hand sticking excise stamp stickers on the pouches,

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>on the bottles and that that is just not efficient.

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>But because all the packaging is different and these stamps

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>have to be affixed and they have to stay affixed

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>after opening. Mond, you torn, it's a silly silly person

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in this day and age in my mind. But the

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>government once they're they're sharing the excise stamps, go on it.

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>It's very very colonial, colonial British, I think, Craig, I

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>remember the last time we chatted, you used the phrase

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to describe the government's role in this. You said, you

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>have to put yourself in the position of a greedy

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>provincial finance minister to understand both their role as a

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>middleman but also their desire to maximize taxation revenue. What

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of taxation revenue are they seeing, are they happy

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 1>with it? And how is it impacting expected profits within

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the industry. Well, you know what, I'm glad that resonated

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>with you, because it certainly is the case between the

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>federal and the provincial taxes. I think they're taking forty

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of the net purchase price into taxes in one form

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>or another, whether it's sales tax, excise tax, or what

0:23:54.640 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 1>have you. The the government's role as a middle in

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the provincial government, it is slapstick comedy. If you look

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>at Ontario. We had a liberal government when C. Forty five,

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>which was the legislation was coming out uh provincially in Ontario,

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and they said we're gonna open forty stores, will run

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>them ourselves. They probably got three on the drawing board

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>before they lost power income the Conservatives. The Conservatives take

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a look and say, you know what, We're gonna open

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>this up to retail, private retail. We're not going to

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>own the stores. Everyone was very, very happy about that.

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Then the Conservative government looked around and looked at Quebec

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>with their operating hours or their operating days being cut

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to Thursday through Sunday, and uh and Alberta stopping giving

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>new retail licenses because the short store shelves were empty.

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>So the government had the idea that they were going

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>to do a lottery system for twenty five retail licenses.

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And this wasn't a vetted licensing system for the lottery.

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>They a actually took anybody's seventy five dollars who wanted

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to put in an application, and there were twenty five

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>winners drawn. More than half of them are sole proprietors

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 1>and they cannot, under the rules of the lottery change

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>their ownership for over a year. So we have twenty

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>five retail stories coming to Ontario supposedly by April one,

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>but the government has botched it. So much bad that

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>there these aren't season retailers coming into the market, and

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:34.479
<v Speaker 1>the big LPs are trying to figure out their way

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>around the red so they can partner with these. But

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>this is the type of rollout that that we've gotten

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in Ontario, which is the biggest province, and actually November

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to December the purchases purchases of cannabis went down in

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Ontario despite despite the rollout, and Alberta is doing better

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>because they have more retail establishments, because the new buyer

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>wants to go in, they want to take a look

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 1>at things, they want to talk to people going on

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the internet, right, something that you've never bought before. Um,

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a different, different end of the stick, quite for ittly.

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 1>So so when you talk about greedy provincial provincial finance ministers,

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.479
<v Speaker 1>it is very very true that not only are they

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>taking taxes, but they're really not adding a lot of

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>value into the equation. Craig, I feel like we should

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>just schedule you on the podcast like every six months

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>or so, because obviously a big change between now and

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the pre reck era. But it just feels like because

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>there's still so much in flux in terms of business

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>models and distribution models and scaling up that we should

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>just regularly check in with you. Really appreciate you coming on.

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Got to have you back again. Hopefully Tracey will be

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>here uh this time, and thank you very much for joining.

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 1>If you don't mind, I'd love to plug our YouTube

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>channel if you don't mind. As as far I have,

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we've gone to a paywalled subscription service for some of

0:26:57.840 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>our work, but we have a lot of our work

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>is still open source and our YouTube channel has so

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>much investor information in there if you're interested to see

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>what a indoor grow up is. From soup to nuts.

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>We have a documentary on Broken Coast and Uh, We're

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 1>hoping to do some new new work and maybe we

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>can invite Joe to come and play his guitar and

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>uh sit down on one of our podcasts one of

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 1>these days. I'd love I'd love to do that sometimes.

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, and I will as soon as

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm out of the studio. I'm gonna go check out

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>your YouTube. But I appreciate it. Craig Wiggins, he's one

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>of the cannabists. Definitely check out their stuff. And that

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 1>does it for this episode of The Odd Loans Podcast.

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe wisn'hal. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>The Stalwart. You can follow my co host on Twitter,

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway. She's at Tracy Alloway. Definitely follow Craig on Twitter.

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>He's at Go Blue cd N, and be sure to

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>follow our producer to for Foreheads. He's at Foreheads T,

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>as well as the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca Levie

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>at Francesca Today. Thanks for listening.