Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. Bernie Sanders revolution will
Speaker 1: not be televised. Big win for Joe Biden in Michigan
Speaker 1: as well as a handful of other states. In mini
Speaker 1: Super Tuesday yesterday, we'll give you all the latest on that,
Speaker 1: plus Corona virus bailouts are coming or are they? And
Speaker 1: Harvey Weinstein gets twenty three years in the Slammer. That
Speaker 1: and more coming up. This is the buck Sexton Show
Speaker 1: or the mission or mission is to decode what really
Speaker 1: matters with actionable intelligence. Mag No mistake America. Bring here
Speaker 1: a great American again the Buck Sexton Show begins. He's
Speaker 1: a great guy. No, Welcome to the buck Sexton Show. Everybody.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for being here. Your team appreciate
Speaker 1: it very much. We have a lot to discuss, including
Speaker 1: some big changes in the political scene, or perhaps the
Speaker 1: impending change, the imminent change of a Bernie Sanders candidacy
Speaker 1: that if it doesn't drop out, it might as well.
Speaker 1: We're certainly close to that point. Big win last night
Speaker 1: for Joe Biden, no two ways about it. He won
Speaker 1: Michigan where Bernie actually squeaked out of victory against Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton in twenty sixteen. So Michigan was supposed to be
Speaker 1: Bernie town Man. He was supposed to do great there.
Speaker 1: But nope. And sure enough, some of the early polls
Speaker 1: that we had seen in the Democrat primary that showed
Speaker 1: African American primary voters overwhelmingly supporting Joe Biden turned out
Speaker 1: that that is the case. There wasn't just in the polls.
Speaker 1: That is the reality. Bernie Sanders does not do well
Speaker 1: with minority voters, and he did horribly in Mississippi, got
Speaker 1: absolutely crushed in Mississippi, lost substantially in Michigan. It was
Speaker 1: just not a good night for Bernie Sanders. That much
Speaker 1: is for sure. And now now we'll go into what's happening.
Speaker 1: Right now. You're seeing this transition because the Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: Revolution will not be televised. It's not going to happen.
Speaker 1: It's a fun song about if yeah. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: a good saga. I should say. If you haven't heard
Speaker 1: that one, you can go check that one out. The
Speaker 1: revolution will not be televised. The left, the progressive wing
Speaker 1: of the Democrat Party, which looked like it was in
Speaker 1: the driver's seat for the first time perhaps since FDR's era. Right,
Speaker 1: the progressive wing of the Democrat Party thought that this
Speaker 1: was their election to lose, and now it looks like
Speaker 1: they've already lost it. So they're having a bit of
Speaker 1: a pity party right now. They're a little bit upset.
Speaker 1: And so, in this spirit of bathing in the tears
Speaker 1: of the leftist opponent in our politics, I wanted to
Speaker 1: work through or talk through some of the most most
Speaker 1: delicious moments of outrage and oh no, what happens. And
Speaker 1: we're talking about Michigan, we're talking about progressives. Who comes
Speaker 1: to mind more for the insane left than a documentary filmmaker,
Speaker 1: a propagandist actually by the name of Michael Moore, who
Speaker 1: I think said it quite well last night, producer Mark
Speaker 1: playclip nineteen. Please, what is Bernie Sanders looking at? So far?
Speaker 1: We haven't seem turn out among young people like he
Speaker 1: has had expected. Who are his people in Michigan. Bernie's
Speaker 1: people are the people who are filled with an incredible,
Speaker 1: profound sense of despair. Yeah, yeah, they are a profound
Speaker 1: sense of despair. And I laugh at it because what
Speaker 1: they despair over is nonsensical. There are real things to
Speaker 1: be concerned about, you know, as Bernie supporters don't spare
Speaker 1: over communities that have suffered horrific loss. I've been hollowed
Speaker 1: out by the opioid epidemic. That's not I'm sure that
Speaker 1: they opposed that, but that's not something that gets a
Speaker 1: lot of attention from them. What do they despair over? Corporations? Man?
Speaker 1: And like public like just getting bought by the billionaires man,
Speaker 1: and like you know, like the college should be free,
Speaker 1: and like my healthcare should be free, and you know,
Speaker 1: power to the people. Feel the burn, man, That's what
Speaker 1: they despair over. Nonsense. They're trying to elevate a guy
Speaker 1: who's been saying the same thing for fifty years in
Speaker 1: American politics and who's been wrong for all fifty of them.
Speaker 1: And this raises then the question. And I have to
Speaker 1: give credit to the what only Tucker Carlson last night,
Speaker 1: who talked about this on his show is Bernie? Is
Speaker 1: Bernie really supposed to lose? And I don't just mean
Speaker 1: it has the DNC establishment made sure that it was
Speaker 1: harder for Bernie to win than it should have been,
Speaker 1: which is definitely what's gone on here. This is like
Speaker 1: in the movie Gladiator, where you know, when Maximus is
Speaker 1: fighting against that guy, they bring out of retirement. Not
Speaker 1: the Emperor commed at the very end, though it's kind
Speaker 1: of a similar situation. But you know, they put him
Speaker 1: in the arena, but all of a sudden, the tigers
Speaker 1: that are around them get get closer and closer. They
Speaker 1: loosen the slack on the chains and the tigers and
Speaker 1: the coliseum so they can get after Maximus. But then
Speaker 1: when the guy he's fighting, I think it's tightest of
Speaker 1: gaul was the guy's name. That's how many times I've
Speaker 1: seen the movie. I even remember that character's name. When
Speaker 1: the tigers get close to him, you know, they pull
Speaker 1: back on it. That's kind of what the DNC has done.
Speaker 1: They had to make it look legit, but at key
Speaker 1: points they made sure that one side was getting a
Speaker 1: little bit of extra help and the other side was
Speaker 1: getting the opposite of help. Bernie Sanders was getting the
Speaker 1: opposite of help. But was this the way it was
Speaker 1: always supposed to be? Even for Sanders, you would have
Speaker 1: to wonder, given how much he has been let's just
Speaker 1: say it's screwed over by the estabishman, you'd have to wonder,
Speaker 1: at what point does Sanders decide that he's going to
Speaker 1: go hard in the paint, as the kids say. I
Speaker 1: think the kids say that basketball reference. At what point
Speaker 1: do they does he decide to his supporters, see somebody
Speaker 1: who is engaged in the fight against his own party.
Speaker 1: He doesn't have another election. I mean, I think even
Speaker 1: the left recognizes Bernie at age eighty two eighty three
Speaker 1: too old to run for the presidency again. I think,
Speaker 1: although I can't guarantee, I think they would understand that.
Speaker 1: So it was now or never, And you have to
Speaker 1: ask the question. This is what I think Tucker got
Speaker 1: to you last night. Wasn't always supposed to be never?
Speaker 1: Is Bernie Sanders whole stick? That he gives voice to
Speaker 1: this progressive impulse in the Democratic Party and that he's
Speaker 1: able to move policy. See I still think the Democrats
Speaker 1: are more far left, they've ever been, more socialist than
Speaker 1: they've ever been. But is Bernie just playing along? Was
Speaker 1: he never really supposed to win? Even in his own mind?
Speaker 1: This was all about making the case because it creates
Speaker 1: this perception that the Democratic Party is somehow not that
Speaker 1: far left. Oh, look, they chose Joe Biden, not Bernie.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is compared to the Democratic Party of Ted
Speaker 1: or twenty years ago, very far left, because he goes
Speaker 1: wherever the party goes. So he's just a vessel, and
Speaker 1: we'll talk more about that. He's a vessel for the
Speaker 1: modern Democratic, the contemporary Democratic Party's goals. Bernie Sanders gives
Speaker 1: voice to what the party wants, but he's never actually
Speaker 1: gonna be allowed to win because he's not connected enough
Speaker 1: in the power circles. You see, Biden appeals to the
Speaker 1: Silicon Valley billionaire who writes checks to all these far
Speaker 1: left radical websites, you know, supports them, make sure that
Speaker 1: there's plenty of money going to these radical candidates, but
Speaker 1: also is going to insist at the end of the
Speaker 1: day that like the Democrats don't touch stuff that matters
Speaker 1: to him, right, that they'll be able to know they'll
Speaker 1: keep the billionaire, there won't be a wealth tax, you know,
Speaker 1: they'll they'll keep in place these advantages for the ultra wealthy.
Speaker 1: Biden understands that that's the deal. The Democrats pretend to
Speaker 1: care about the poor, they really just want to take
Speaker 1: more money from the working people, from the middle class.
Speaker 1: They want to pull the ladder up after they've risen.
Speaker 1: That's that's a classic elite Democrat mindset. You know, I'm
Speaker 1: rich now, so I'm gonna stop other people from getting
Speaker 1: rich because I want them to be the ones that
Speaker 1: have to carry the poor, the indigen the needy, the despondent,
Speaker 1: that depressed, the whatever on their backs. That's the democrat mentality, right.
Speaker 1: People that aren't people that have already been able to
Speaker 1: have the right to rise for themselves, seek to prevent
Speaker 1: that from happening for others and feel good about themselves
Speaker 1: in that process by pretending that they are the ones
Speaker 1: that are waging class warfare on behalf of the poor. Oh,
Speaker 1: they care so much about the poor. These people don't
Speaker 1: live in poor neighborhoods, Their kids don't go to school
Speaker 1: with poor kids, they don't spend any time around poor people.
Speaker 1: All they do is virtue signal, and it's crep. But
Speaker 1: Biden understands that that's the game. Biden the lackey of
Speaker 1: the credit card companies for how many decades, and as
Speaker 1: I've explained to you, credit card companies have engaged in
Speaker 1: practices that if you did it as a private citizen
Speaker 1: in a business transaction, you might go to prison. But
Speaker 1: they got very powerful lobbyists, very powerful friends in DC
Speaker 1: It's just a giant money making machine. They're best clients
Speaker 1: of the clients who end up paying interest to them,
Speaker 1: who are the people that are often in the most
Speaker 1: difficult financial situations. Just keep them, keep them on that treadmill,
Speaker 1: just paying down those I'm not even paying down, Just
Speaker 1: staying with those high interest payments a year after year,
Speaker 1: year after year. That's what the credit card companies want.
Speaker 1: Practically common place, not to have a thirty percent twenty
Speaker 1: nine percent APR absurd. Joe Joe Biden is no friend
Speaker 1: of the poor. We all know this. But he'll pretend
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders was there to act like there's some voice
Speaker 1: calling out the truth of the Democratic Party. But doesn't
Speaker 1: it all feel like kabuki theater? Now? Doesn't it all
Speaker 1: just feel like a sham. It's not serious. They were
Speaker 1: never gonna let Bernie really win. And here's here's what
Speaker 1: I would have to say, where's the real anger at
Speaker 1: the Democratic establishment from Bernie? Why doesn't he go after
Speaker 1: Hillary for being deeply corrupt? He wouldn't do it, then,
Speaker 1: why doesn't he go after Biden for being clearly on
Speaker 1: the precipice of limited mental faculties? Why doesn't he bring
Speaker 1: this up now, maybe could you say, because Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: is really old duo, Hey, Bernie Sanders sounds a lot.
Speaker 1: Do you hear me making the case day after day
Speaker 1: that Bernie Sanders sounds like he doesn't know what's going on.
Speaker 1: That would be unfair. He does sound like he knows
Speaker 1: what's going on his physical health, given he had a
Speaker 1: heart attack six months ago, and he won't release his
Speaker 1: medical records. Okay, that's that's our grounds for concern. But
Speaker 1: I don't come here saying, oh, Bernie Sanders, you know,
Speaker 1: he's clearly on the borderline of borderline for dementia. And
Speaker 1: any journalists, by the way, that's now saying, oh, it's
Speaker 1: so mean to say this about Biden. Look back at
Speaker 1: what the big journals at the Washington Post, in New
Speaker 1: York Times, CNN, and elsewhere. Look back at how they
Speaker 1: talk about Ronald Reagan. Dull I say that Ronald Reagan
Speaker 1: was suffering from Alzheimer's, you know, for all eight years,
Speaker 1: and that he was completely demented, and as no suffering
Speaker 1: from dementia has no idea what's going on. That's what
Speaker 1: they'll say. They're they're, they're, they're horrific. About Ronald Reagan,
Speaker 1: and they'll go specifically after his mental health, his mental faculties.
Speaker 1: But now they're gonna the rules always change depending on
Speaker 1: whatever they need. But where was the fight, Where was
Speaker 1: the fire in the belly from Bernie Sanders? Oh? Sure,
Speaker 1: a load of millionaires and billionaires, and we're gonna have
Speaker 1: a revolution in this country and we're going to take
Speaker 1: it to a place where a democracy is not for sale.
Speaker 1: And then they all turn on him, the Democrat apparatus,
Speaker 1: the media, they all decide that, you know, this is
Speaker 1: not going to happen because it's not good for the
Speaker 1: interests of the powerful within the Democratic Party. And does
Speaker 1: he have any harsh words for them? I mean, here's
Speaker 1: here's a Bernie. Here's about as tough as Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: gets in this play eleven. You're gonna need the primaries
Speaker 1: on one thing, primaries on one thing, And you're right, obviously,
Speaker 1: but we need them to show up in the general election.
Speaker 1: Does anyone really believe I want you to hold me
Speaker 1: throw it out to you. You know the stuff that
Speaker 1: a campaign like Joe's, which is frankly the same old,
Speaker 1: same old establishment politics supported by the wealthy, and I
Speaker 1: know they got all the governors and the senator supporting them.
Speaker 1: Does anybody really think that that is going to be
Speaker 1: the campaign of excitement and energy that's going to grow
Speaker 1: the base that we need to the v Trump. I
Speaker 1: don't think so. I say that honestly as a friend
Speaker 1: of Joe's. That's as tough as he gets. I'm I'm
Speaker 1: a friend of Joe's, so I don't want to be mean,
Speaker 1: but clearly he's a corporate hacking Yeah, I mean, how
Speaker 1: about say it. Your supporters. They they've been backing you
Speaker 1: and looking like a bunch of lunatics now for years,
Speaker 1: really decades, but years Bernie's been in the national spotlight.
Speaker 1: Don't you owe it to them, Bernie to speak the
Speaker 1: truth about what's happened here. This was a DNC coup
Speaker 1: against you. You got nothing, nothing you want to say
Speaker 1: about this? Oh no, he's he's really super dupe or
Speaker 1: fired play clip ten. The reason, you know, I'm very
Speaker 1: proud of a campaign that we are running. I'm proud
Speaker 1: of the fact that we are bringing people together. I'm
Speaker 1: proud of the fact that we have come this fall,
Speaker 1: taking on Wolf Street, who was now emptying the check
Speaker 1: check books to Joe Biden on the healthcare industry who
Speaker 1: are putting a lot of money into negative TV ans.
Speaker 1: We're taking them a one. But at the end of
Speaker 1: the day, I think the American people understand, not only
Speaker 1: do we have to be Donald Trump, who's most dangerous
Speaker 1: president in modern American school, We've got to do more
Speaker 1: than that. We really do so many people in Michigan
Speaker 1: and Vermont all over this country of working for starvation wages.
Speaker 1: People can't afford healthcare, that can't afford to send their
Speaker 1: kids to college. This country is giving tax breaks to billionaires,
Speaker 1: and you've got a half a million people sleeping out
Speaker 1: on the streets, half of people who live in paycheck
Speaker 1: to paycheck. That's not like. That is not right. We
Speaker 1: can do a lot better, and if we stand together,
Speaker 1: we will do a lot. It just sounds like he's
Speaker 1: happy to pack it up and say you're going to
Speaker 1: see you later. Sure, he'll still campaign and he's raised
Speaker 1: all this money. They'll go through all the motions. But revolutionary, Please,
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders didn't really want to be president. That's that's
Speaker 1: really what we figured. The samy that Elizabeth Warren is
Speaker 1: a huge fraud, and at the key moment, the critical
Speaker 1: juncture when when miss fake Pocahontas herself, Elizabeth Warren could
Speaker 1: have come forward, could have come forward, and how Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders she refused to do it, refused to do it.
Speaker 1: I thought she cared so much about progressive values. I
Speaker 1: thought it really mattered to her. Oh you mean she
Speaker 1: won't step forward and help Bernie Sanders the way that
Speaker 1: all the other candidates phone line behind Biden because she's
Speaker 1: a fraud. Now, Bernie Sanders, we see has had the
Speaker 1: DNC coup happen effectively. Right. They they let let the
Speaker 1: chains on the tigers loose, and they took him down
Speaker 1: in the arena. And instead of turning around and saying,
Speaker 1: I want to you know this is on. This is
Speaker 1: not right. I want another fight, I want another match.
Speaker 1: We gotta do it, you know, it's just yeah, we
Speaker 1: all know this is the way it was supposed to happen. Right.
Speaker 1: Part of me is happy because socialism has lost. But
Speaker 1: part of me is upset too because I wanted to
Speaker 1: see if they were real, if they were full real
Speaker 1: about this, and after this, you'd have to think it
Speaker 1: was really just all a big con run by Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders wasn't it. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast. One thing that I
Speaker 1: do that I am concerned about overall, one hundred percent
Speaker 1: legitimately is in our climate. And I'm legitimately concerned about
Speaker 1: fossil fuels. I'm legitimately concerned about what this means for
Speaker 1: a just transition. I'm legitimately concerned about what this means
Speaker 1: for carbon emissions. And we're going to have to organize
Speaker 1: a lot. There are many, many issues where people's lives
Speaker 1: are on the line, whether it's pursuing decarceal policy, whether
Speaker 1: it's making sure that we have human at our border,
Speaker 1: whether it's you know, making sure that women have access
Speaker 1: to reproduct not just women, all people have access to
Speaker 1: reproductive healthcare. All of these things are life and death issues.
Speaker 1: But the scale and the feedback and the irreversible nature
Speaker 1: of climate change is something that I think we all
Speaker 1: need to really pay a lot of close attention to. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know that's a bunch of blather. You're probably saying, Buck,
Speaker 1: why do you make me sit through that? Because this
Speaker 1: is the moment when the progressive left knows they're going
Speaker 1: to have to eat their peas eat that, you know,
Speaker 1: steamed cauliflour with nothing else. Eat this stuff you don't
Speaker 1: want to eat, whatever it may be. For a producer Mark,
Speaker 1: apparently it's oatmeal raisin cookies. The progressives are going to
Speaker 1: have to just suck it up and deal with it.
Speaker 1: All this stuff about how the world's gonna end. By
Speaker 1: the way, Joe Biden's not going to do anything on
Speaker 1: climate It's never gonna happen. They all know it. He
Speaker 1: talks a bit gay, He's not gonna do it. He
Speaker 1: likes corporations too much, he likes big fat cats with
Speaker 1: fancy golf courses. He's not gonna do anything about it.
Speaker 1: So guess what now, they're all going to forget that
Speaker 1: the world was going to end if Trump became president
Speaker 1: because of climate change. Thanks for listening to The Bus
Speaker 1: Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Because one
Speaker 1: of the weaknesses of saying hey, a return to Obama
Speaker 1: years is that there are many Americans that we're getting
Speaker 1: left behind in those years too, and they're pissed off.
Speaker 1: And so if you just say hey, I'm gonna revert
Speaker 1: that loses to at least among that group of people.
Speaker 1: There are so many Americans who just don't think that
Speaker 1: our institutions are working for them at all. And Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's big weaknesses that he represents those institutions. Wow, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden represents the institutions that aren't helping people out. That's
Speaker 1: and yet Andrew Yang on CNA also endorsed Joe Biden. Oh,
Speaker 1: that's now we see it. Everybody. Everybody's got to get
Speaker 1: on board. They know they've got no choice and we're
Speaker 1: going to be subjected to another round. They have fundamentally,
Speaker 1: the media, the Democrats, they have learned nothing. They have
Speaker 1: changed nothing from twenty sixteen. Let's just do a quick
Speaker 1: recap here for a second. In twenty sixteen, it was
Speaker 1: the Democrat Media Alliance that presented Hillary Clinton as somebody
Speaker 1: who hadn't done anything wrong. There was nothing wrong with
Speaker 1: her use of the email server. She wasn't lying about
Speaker 1: it in the early days when she still thought she
Speaker 1: could get away with it. She wasn't destroying evidence that
Speaker 1: was under subpoena in the early days when she thought
Speaker 1: she could get away with it. They just acted like
Speaker 1: there was nothing to see there nothing to see, even
Speaker 1: though she had violated the Espionage Act over a hundred
Speaker 1: times when all was said and done, although they didn't
Speaker 1: charge her, even though in the statute it says recklessness
Speaker 1: and over a hundred instances of violation like this for
Speaker 1: the Secretary of State. If that's not recklessness, there's no
Speaker 1: such thing as recklessness. But James doing his duty for
Speaker 1: the country. I'm sure he would tell you now that
Speaker 1: sanctimonious blankety blanking blank told us that, oh no, it
Speaker 1: was very careless or whatever he said, extremely careless, but
Speaker 1: not reckless. And everything was supposed to be fine. And
Speaker 1: as I said to you along on, I was frustrated
Speaker 1: with this. Then the truth of the email server was
Speaker 1: not hammered home enough, which was that Hilary needed control
Speaker 1: over her unclassified email entirely because all it would take
Speaker 1: would be one person to send her a hey, you know,
Speaker 1: the shank gave the Clinton Foundation a check for like
Speaker 1: five million, and he expects a meeting with you, miss
Speaker 1: Secretary of State. All it takes is one email like that,
Speaker 1: and she's got a big problem. And that's what she
Speaker 1: was doing all the time. We know the Clinton Foundation
Speaker 1: was a slush fund. So it actually makes sense from
Speaker 1: her perspective. I gotta keep on my unclassified emails in
Speaker 1: a place where I get to control what's scene ant scene.
Speaker 1: That's why she did it. It wasn't just a convenience thing.
Speaker 1: We're not all morons. Hello, that was bring and bring
Speaker 1: it back to what we were being told. Nope, no problem.
Speaker 1: And now people say it wasn't for Hilary's emails, she
Speaker 1: would have won. If it wasn't for Hilary's emails, she
Speaker 1: should have been criminally prosecuted. She was running at somebody
Speaker 1: who had committed a crime against the under the Espionage Act,
Speaker 1: under federal statute. That was the Democrat candidate the last
Speaker 1: time around, and they normalize the whole thing. Right, I
Speaker 1: have nothing to see. You know, James Comy decided that
Speaker 1: he apparently runs a Department of Justice because he gave
Speaker 1: the speech about non prosecution. FBI director doesn't make doesn't
Speaker 1: make prosecutorial decisions like that. It's up to it's up
Speaker 1: to prosecutors. That's why the names in the word. So
Speaker 1: that's go back and look at this. This is this
Speaker 1: is absurd, right, this is completely insane. And people say, oh,
Speaker 1: she's the most qualified. Average's work around hollow. I like people,
Speaker 1: I'm Hilary and everyone's like, oh, you're horrible, but yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: she's great. Vote for for president. Sure, that's what they
Speaker 1: were told to do. They had their marching orders. You
Speaker 1: were seeing a similar thing now happen with with Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: It's just going to be the anti Trump campaign and
Speaker 1: they're going I mean, it's it's true right now that
Speaker 1: the government is that the campaign is trying to cut
Speaker 1: him off from the public, and the media will be
Speaker 1: sort of his queen regent, you know, you know, when
Speaker 1: like the ruler is too young to actually rule and
Speaker 1: there's somebody who's older who's in charge until that person
Speaker 1: ascends to the throne. The media is going to be
Speaker 1: walking around as Biden's you know, as Biden's protector, as
Speaker 1: doing everything that can. You're going to see a total
Speaker 1: shift in tone. No more investigative pieces on on Biden
Speaker 1: or Borisma or anything. Not that there were any relay
Speaker 1: to begin with, but from the Democrat media, it's going
Speaker 1: to be all hands on deck. Think about what they've
Speaker 1: already been willing to do to try to take Trump down.
Speaker 1: It's going to be all hands on deck to then
Speaker 1: Biden and trash Trump, and they realize that they're already
Speaker 1: out of max. I mean, they can't really hit the
Speaker 1: accelerator anymore on the trash Trump truck. It's quite an alliteration,
Speaker 1: but they really won't be able to go any further
Speaker 1: than they're doing everything they can. Right, they just went
Speaker 1: through a ridiculous, a joke of an impeachment that nobody
Speaker 1: even remembers, that's how dumb it was. Oh, and they
Speaker 1: did that while we are finding out about coronavirus, and
Speaker 1: the executive branch was trying to take steps, but Congress
Speaker 1: was in the midst of an impeachment, a stupid, reckless, childish,
Speaker 1: dishonest impeachment. Thank you, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer. So
Speaker 1: there's plenty that we've already seen from the Democrats when
Speaker 1: it comes to their willingness to do anything to trash Trump,
Speaker 1: to take Trump down, and to back Joe Biden. But
Speaker 1: you are going to see stuff that will be absolutely
Speaker 1: mind boggling, and you will see people that know better,
Speaker 1: but they want to be part. They want to be
Speaker 1: part of the winning team. And they know that even
Speaker 1: at this point, if Trump were to win. If you
Speaker 1: don't support Biden, you're not going to be in favor
Speaker 1: for the Democratic Party going forward because the progressive wing.
Speaker 1: The progressive wing looks like a joke right now, it's not.
Speaker 1: There's been. The movement of Bernie Sanders has infected much
Speaker 1: of the rest of the Democratic Party. He's just not
Speaker 1: allowed to be in charge. They're going to bring up
Speaker 1: a new generation. They're going to bring up AOC and
Speaker 1: Buddha Judge and others. Better O'Rourke, you're still going to
Speaker 1: be hearing about that guy. The Progressives are ascended, but
Speaker 1: they're not allowed to be in charge yet. This is
Speaker 1: the same intergenerational battle for control you see playing out
Speaker 1: in a lot of industries in a lot of places
Speaker 1: right People who are in their late sixties or early
Speaker 1: to mid to late seventies don't want to hand over
Speaker 1: the reins of power for major institutions in government and
Speaker 1: the private sector to people who are in their forties
Speaker 1: and fifties. They don't want to do it, but it's
Speaker 1: going to happen. Bernie Sanders doesn't have the time to
Speaker 1: continue to be the leader of his party. This issue
Speaker 1: is not over. But for the next election, come on
Speaker 1: who's it really going to be, Who's going to be
Speaker 1: the progressive standard. They're gonna try Lizbeth Warren. Again, I
Speaker 1: don't think anybody who has been paying attention to thinks
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren is truly a committed progressive. She's just a fraud.
Speaker 1: Like she's always been a fraud. Even Andrew Yang, though,
Speaker 1: who comes across, as I've always said, and of people
Speaker 1: booming whenever it says something nice, but a Democrat. But
Speaker 1: there are nice things about Democrats. I have friends or Democrats,
Speaker 1: you know. I don't know what to say. I've dated Democrats.
Speaker 1: Not recommended, but I've done it. Here's what Andrew Yang
Speaker 1: says about Joe Biden at this point. Play clip one.
Speaker 1: Pruce Mark. I believe that Joe Biden will be the
Speaker 1: Democratic nominee, and I've always said I'm going to support
Speaker 1: whoever the nominee is, so I hereby am endorsing Joe
Speaker 1: Biden to be not just the nominee for the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: but the next president of the United States. And I
Speaker 1: say this having supported Bernie Sanders in twenty sixteen. Bernie
Speaker 1: is an inspiration for me, inspired my run. But the
Speaker 1: Matt says Joe is our prohibitive nominee. We need to
Speaker 1: bring the party together. We need to start working on
Speaker 1: defeating Donald Trump in the fall. I've had many personal
Speaker 1: conversations with Joe about the impact of the Fourth Industrial
Speaker 1: Revolution on the middle class. I believe that he's the
Speaker 1: right man for the job to help us not just
Speaker 1: to feed Donald Trump, but govern the country in the
Speaker 1: years ahead, doing a lot of work there without analysis.
Speaker 1: I mean, the Matt says we gotta support him, but
Speaker 1: I mean I also think he's great, but let's be honest.
Speaker 1: The Matt says, I gotta support him. So here we
Speaker 1: are Andrew Yang, a guy who's I'm a man of
Speaker 1: the left, another progressive fall on a line behind Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: They're all gonna everyone's gonna fall in line behind Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: All this stuff about the Sander Nis does not going
Speaker 1: to vote for the Democrat, gonna stay home and our please,
Speaker 1: And there are they all, Well, they hate Trump so much,
Speaker 1: they're gonna show up and vote for anybody they're gonna
Speaker 1: And Joe Biden is anybody. Joe Biden is a default Kennedy.
Speaker 1: He has been along. It's why I thought Democrats they
Speaker 1: gotta have some better than this. I overestimated the Democrats' abilities.
Speaker 1: I overestimated their nomination process and their ability to learn
Speaker 1: lessons of the past. In what world? I mean, the
Speaker 1: only let's let's be real about this, let's be honest
Speaker 1: about this. The only way that you had that you
Speaker 1: should expect a different result in the upcoming twenty twenty election.
Speaker 1: Then what happened in the twenty sixteen election where we
Speaker 1: have Biden swapped in for Hillary Clinton. Is if this
Speaker 1: coronavirus does spread out of control and cause huge economic dislocations,
Speaker 1: cause a recession, and all of a sudden, Trump's record
Speaker 1: can be attacked. It's unfair. I know Trump, It's not
Speaker 1: Trump's fault that the Wuhan virus is going to decimate
Speaker 1: our economy. But if that happens, then we're we're going
Speaker 1: to be in for quite a fight, or we should
Speaker 1: we should have differently. Look, no one knows what's going
Speaker 1: to happen, you know, I always say that, and I
Speaker 1: admit that. But we're going to be in for a
Speaker 1: real fight, and we should expect one. It's gonna be
Speaker 1: razor thin if that happens for Trump to get reelected
Speaker 1: because a lot of people are gonna say, hold on
Speaker 1: a second, I signed on. You know, people that are
Speaker 1: ideologically conservative can point to the judges, can point to
Speaker 1: the secure borders, can point and say, hey, hold on,
Speaker 1: we're getting a lot here from Trump. He's done a
Speaker 1: lot of really good things. But people that just want
Speaker 1: to know about the here and now, what have you
Speaker 1: done for me lately? Attitude that becomes the dominant theme
Speaker 1: of so much of the Biden campaigns anti Trump efforts.
Speaker 1: I'll say, hey, yeah, you had a good stock market
Speaker 1: for a few years there, you had really low unemployment,
Speaker 1: but look how things are going now. Be scared, be scared,
Speaker 1: to be scared. Vote Biden. That's what they're gonna do.
Speaker 1: But short of that, and by the way, I don't
Speaker 1: think that that's where we're heading. I'm and I put
Speaker 1: my money more my mouth is I'm betting on America
Speaker 1: every time I see an opportunity. Now. Now, granted, I'm
Speaker 1: a long term guy, but I'm I'm betting on America
Speaker 1: every day. I'm like, h, this is a great American
Speaker 1: company with fantastic long term prospects. You know, buying stock
Speaker 1: is a way of supporting the same thing. I always
Speaker 1: tell you about this show. Whenever you go to one
Speaker 1: of our advertisers, you're supporting this show, is that is
Speaker 1: a vote for support of this show. When you type
Speaker 1: in the little Buck promo code or whatever it is,
Speaker 1: you're saying, I want the Buck Saxon Show to stay
Speaker 1: on air, and I want that show to grow and
Speaker 1: more people to hear it. Stock markets kind of like that.
Speaker 1: Sometimes when you're buying American companies, you're saying, yeah, I
Speaker 1: believe in this place. I believe in this. You can
Speaker 1: just buy Indexes, right, you can buy the SNP, you
Speaker 1: can buy the overall, the overall market or sectors of
Speaker 1: markets and say I think this. I think America is
Speaker 1: going to pull through. We're gonna be stronger on the
Speaker 1: other side of this. And I'm not telling you to
Speaker 1: do that, but that's where I am. That's what I think.
Speaker 1: And I never give financial advice on this show. There
Speaker 1: are other shows that do that, from what I understand,
Speaker 1: give the same financial advice every night. But anyway, this
Speaker 1: is where this is where I just think that it's
Speaker 1: so important we all live in reality and understand that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden has never been and never been a top
Speaker 1: political contender in the past. He's never been somebody who's impressive.
Speaker 1: And this guy's whole life has just been about doing
Speaker 1: whatever he has to do to continue to build the
Speaker 1: Biden political brand. He doesn't really stand for anything, he
Speaker 1: doesn't really care. It's not about public service. It's just
Speaker 1: about how does Joe Biden you get to the next
Speaker 1: level in politics or stay, in the case of the Senate,
Speaker 1: exactly where he is. That's what it's always been about,
Speaker 1: you know, It's it's about him. So you're gonna hear
Speaker 1: all this happy talk about how Joe Biden's this great
Speaker 1: guy and he's fantastic and all this other stuff from
Speaker 1: people who quite honestly know better. They know better, but
Speaker 1: they're they're going to pretend anything to take down Trump.
Speaker 1: Before I've got some more of the Biden fallout from
Speaker 1: yesterday when he had that disastrous exchange with the union
Speaker 1: auto worker But before we get to that, I told Gabbard,
Speaker 1: I know, I know, Tulsie should we should even have
Speaker 1: probably not easier to get her on the show. She's
Speaker 1: about to be ousted from the campaign. We should probably
Speaker 1: get her on. I'd I'd be interested to talk to her.
Speaker 1: Um Tulsie Gabbard has also been very poorly treated trail.
Speaker 1: That's the Trump tweets on this stuff on Bernie and
Speaker 1: the DNC are correct, and everything that we see with
Speaker 1: Tulsie Gabbert, it's also true. They're just they change the rules.
Speaker 1: And now you could say they're allowed to change the rules,
Speaker 1: they make up the rules, Okay, But when you're changing
Speaker 1: rules in a game as you go along to benefit
Speaker 1: one person and hurt another person, that is rigging the game.
Speaker 1: That's what it is. So they've rigged this against Tulsie
Speaker 1: Gabbard and she's been talking about this. I've got to say,
Speaker 1: I think it's pretty funny that no one in the
Speaker 1: in the so called journalistic establishment is willing to speak
Speaker 1: the truth about this, which is that CNN, the DNS
Speaker 1: as CNN, the New York Times, Washington Post are affect
Speaker 1: actively appendages of the DNC. They do the Democrats work
Speaker 1: for them all the time. They are allied, ideologically allied
Speaker 1: push activism in favor of the Democrat political Party, and
Speaker 1: the Democrat Natural Committee is apparatus. That is the truth.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hud. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Well, but when it comes to actually making
Speaker 1: sure that in this presidential primary that the only woman
Speaker 1: candidate left in the race, the only woman of color,
Speaker 1: and the first female combat veteran ever to run for
Speaker 1: the presidency, has a voice. The DNC and their corporate
Speaker 1: media partners say, no, thanks, That is what they say.
Speaker 1: Is there anybody who wants to argue with that? Do
Speaker 1: you even hear about them about the Democrats describing how
Speaker 1: they have the last a female in the race. She
Speaker 1: is a woman of color, she is a combat veteran.
Speaker 1: No enthusiasm from the establishment Democrats about her candidacy whatsoever.
Speaker 1: And she's liberal, she's pretty far left. No enthusiasm about
Speaker 1: her whatsoever. I think it's remarkable. I have some ideas
Speaker 1: as to why this is, but I really haven't heard
Speaker 1: the most compelling Are they talking about the meeting with Assad?
Speaker 1: Democrats don't Democrats don't get First of all, Democrats don't
Speaker 1: care about Syrians. They don't care about the carnage in
Speaker 1: Syria in any meaningful way. It was only useful to
Speaker 1: them when they thought that they could say, oh, my gosh,
Speaker 1: the Kurds, the genocide of the Kurds. There have been
Speaker 1: genocides going on in Syria for years now, including many
Speaker 1: years under Obama's watch. You don't hear a lot of
Speaker 1: crying from Libs about that, did you. Because these people
Speaker 1: are shameless. Doesn't matter what the body count is, doesn't
Speaker 1: matter what's happening. Is this useful for our pursuit as Libs,
Speaker 1: as democrats of power? Is it useful to the answers? No,
Speaker 1: they don't care. They just don't care. If the answers yes, well,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, this is the most important thing ever.
Speaker 1: Do you realize that there was a tiny village outside
Speaker 1: of a slightly larger village in a corner of northeastern
Speaker 1: Syria where there were three brave Kurdish fighters killed by
Speaker 1: you know, Turkish military last week and everyone at all
Speaker 1: you know MSNBC in a morning show, Good heavens, this
Speaker 1: is the end of all American dignity and pride on
Speaker 1: the global stage. It's people are idiots. They're idiots. They
Speaker 1: don't know anything except they know that they're supposed to
Speaker 1: do with their paymasters and the people that are the gatekeepers,
Speaker 1: to put them in positions that are elevated that they
Speaker 1: should never have been in the first place. This is
Speaker 1: what they want them to say, so they say it.
Speaker 1: Dulcie Gabbert doesn't play that game well enough. They don't
Speaker 1: like her. Tulsei Gabbert doesn't hate conservatives enough. They don't
Speaker 1: like her. She's a woman of color, but not in
Speaker 1: a way that is useful to the Democratic Party right
Speaker 1: because she is not Latino, she is not African American.
Speaker 1: So they approach this as well. You know, there are
Speaker 1: some backgrounds that are more exciting to the Democratic establishment
Speaker 1: to support and politics than others, And so somehow she
Speaker 1: doesn't get counted as a person of color even though
Speaker 1: she is. What are the rules, Democrats? I just want
Speaker 1: to know, Please try to explain them to me. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: and while you're doing that, democrats do define what a
Speaker 1: woman is for me. Thanks for listening to The bus
Speaker 1: Essence Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. It was
Speaker 1: Biden's throwdown with an auto union worker that got a
Speaker 1: majority of the big headlines yesterday other than coronavirus related stuff,
Speaker 1: and we played right Mark. We played yesterday a version
Speaker 1: of it was really hard to hear. Better audio of
Speaker 1: this exchange emerged and so I wanted to play for
Speaker 1: you and then also just do the aftermath analysis of this,
Speaker 1: because this turns into a perfect example of so many
Speaker 1: things that Joe Biden isn't very bright, That Joe Biden
Speaker 1: doesn't know very much, that he's kind of nasty and
Speaker 1: aggressive with people for no apparent reason, even when he
Speaker 1: knows there's cameras everywhere and he's supposed to be winning votes.
Speaker 1: And then that Joe Biden, uh, you know, industrial media
Speaker 1: complex goes to work. Oh yeah, that was greg what
Speaker 1: he did. I was super smart. Joe Biden's real smart.
Speaker 1: It's great. Here is the better version. We'll play the
Speaker 1: whole thing for the better version of the audio exchange.
Speaker 1: Play a mark, and you are actually trying to diminish
Speaker 1: your second amount of right antick wearing gun. You're force
Speaker 1: a right to shush shush. I support the second. Remember
Speaker 1: the second, amenber Just like right now, if here go fire,
Speaker 1: that's not free speech. From the very beginning, I have
Speaker 1: a shotgun language twenty games to twelve gays my son's time.
Speaker 1: Guess what, I'm not allowed to old anywhere. I'm not
Speaker 1: taking your gun away at all. You need one hundred rounds,
Speaker 1: so when you want to. When you said you've got
Speaker 1: to take our guns, I did not say that. That's
Speaker 1: not I did not general video with a viral video
Speaker 1: like the other ones are putting out to this same
Speaker 1: line your voice. You said that you're taking the gun.
Speaker 1: He did, clarifying it right, right, wait, wait, wait, wait,
Speaker 1: take a r you're aar fourteen and what good? This is? Now? Okay?
Speaker 1: All right? And the guys, you're a lot of guys
Speaker 1: wanting I'm not yourself. There's a lot of going there.
Speaker 1: You are you a machine gun? Why machine? Are you
Speaker 1: able hold one? Same? Guns are camp? That's right, you're
Speaker 1: so rare, fifteen league hold machine guns? And now to
Speaker 1: night Jude, you need to rout around in a miracle camp?
Speaker 1: Guns are what you? Why are you? So you could
Speaker 1: really hear it better that time? That's why I want
Speaker 1: to because everyone's now focused on on this, because this
Speaker 1: shows you this is who the Democrats are holding up
Speaker 1: as a return to normal. We'll see adult governance, a
Speaker 1: steady hand on the wheel of America's destiny. Blah blah blah,
Speaker 1: all this crap. Right, this is the guy they're offering
Speaker 1: up for all of that. All right, Well, let's just
Speaker 1: work through the show. He starts off. He's asked a
Speaker 1: question about but very very good question about why union
Speaker 1: workers who believe in Second Amendment rights should support Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: and he within moments of the question, I mean within
Speaker 1: like the first couple of sentences, starts hunting. I've been
Speaker 1: hunting before, and my sons have guns. And you know
Speaker 1: the second any anybody who, when the Second Amendment comes
Speaker 1: up starts talking about hunting shotguns does not know what
Speaker 1: the heck they're talking about. That's it's a rule. It's
Speaker 1: just a rule. You just know this right away. The
Speaker 1: second someone starts saying, oh, I believe that hunters and sportsmen,
Speaker 1: the Second Amendment has nothing to do with shooting clay
Speaker 1: pigeons or real pigeons, or nothing to do with it, all, right.
Speaker 1: The Second Amendment is about a defense against government tyranny
Speaker 1: by an armed citizenry, which also is the same right
Speaker 1: that you have to defend yourself, your home, and your family,
Speaker 1: the basic human right of self defense. Right. So that's
Speaker 1: what the Second Amendments about. That is why it exists.
Speaker 1: It does not exist so that people can go grouse
Speaker 1: shooting on the weekend. Although some of you may really
Speaker 1: enjoy that, and that's fine, all right. That's one big
Speaker 1: problem with Biden's response here too, is when he says
Speaker 1: that he did not say that, Yes, he did. Yes.
Speaker 1: In fact, Joe Biden very much did say that he
Speaker 1: was going to He said he was going to have Beto,
Speaker 1: who said he wants to take away R fifteens in charge. Ever,
Speaker 1: this is the last few weeks. And when Anderson Cooper
Speaker 1: asked him if people should be concerned when he said
Speaker 1: he's coming for their guns, he said, you know, heck, yeah,
Speaker 1: they should be on CNN. I've seen the clips. They exist,
Speaker 1: they are real. He has said that. So he's wrong
Speaker 1: on that. He's obviously wrong about a R fourteens. Yet again,
Speaker 1: you don't have to know anything. If you're a lib
Speaker 1: and you want to ban guns, you're just allowed to
Speaker 1: just allowed to say stupid stuff. But guns bad. It's
Speaker 1: all you have to know. Guns bad. So he doesn't
Speaker 1: even know what he's talking about. Then he asked the
Speaker 1: guy if he wants to go outside. This is the
Speaker 1: this is the steady hand, folks. Remember Trump is so mean,
Speaker 1: and Trump says mean things at rallies, and Trump says
Speaker 1: the press, of the enemy, the people, and where all
Speaker 1: that stuff? And yet Joe Biden when he's asked a
Speaker 1: normal question by a possible voter who is not a
Speaker 1: Trump supporter. For what I understanding, he was on Fox
Speaker 1: and Friends this morning. I saw an interview with him,
Speaker 1: and he's like, I'm not telling you who I've I
Speaker 1: think he said he didn't vote for Trump the last time,
Speaker 1: and he wasn't gonna say who's going to vote for
Speaker 1: this time. So this is Joe Biden's opportunity to show
Speaker 1: that he's the cool, calm, collected, cerebral, thoughtful statement that
Speaker 1: the Libs are all gonna pretend he is. They're just
Speaker 1: gonna say, you know who do you believe me? Or
Speaker 1: your lying eyes. This is one of the one of
Speaker 1: the key elements I mentioned Orwell's nineteen eighty forty yesterday,
Speaker 1: which is, you know, I'm like, I'm like a nineteen
Speaker 1: eighty four book salesman here. I'm always trying to tell
Speaker 1: people you have to read it. You have to read
Speaker 1: and you read it more than once. You have to
Speaker 1: read this book. You have to understand why it had
Speaker 1: so much impact. But one of the most important tenets
Speaker 1: of Big Brother is to get you to not and
Speaker 1: there's even a quote I'll find it later, but to
Speaker 1: get you to forget what's your ears here, forget what
Speaker 1: your I see. You must believe what we tell you.
Speaker 1: That's what the media is gonna do with Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be big brother for Biden. How dare you
Speaker 1: think that Joe Biden looked like a moron? He did.
Speaker 1: He looked like a total moron in this exchange, a
Speaker 1: reckless idiot. And he's moving. This isn't like it was
Speaker 1: an offhand moment. He's having a beer with the guys
Speaker 1: after work or something. By the way, some people got
Speaker 1: all mad at me because I said I didn't. I
Speaker 1: don't always like that tactic that James O'Keefe uses. Okay,
Speaker 1: so let's just remember this. When one of my friends
Speaker 1: is a conservative, when one of the lib journals out
Speaker 1: there start trying to get because you know, they want
Speaker 1: to get us all fired, they start sending people to
Speaker 1: have off the record, you know, social conversations with people
Speaker 1: who work in media, and they start taping them. In
Speaker 1: the moment they say something embarrassing or they complain about
Speaker 1: their employer, they put it out on the new I'm
Speaker 1: going to be consistent on these other investigative journalism. It's
Speaker 1: not investigative journalism to get somebody to say that their
Speaker 1: boss is doing a crappy job, and you know they
Speaker 1: loosen up their tie and say, yeah, journals are a
Speaker 1: bunch of jerks and clowns. We all know that. So sorry.
Speaker 1: I know people sometimes well you want to believe certain things,
Speaker 1: you know, And I'm all about owning the libs, but
Speaker 1: doing so in an honorable way. And I'm saying some
Speaker 1: of what James does is very good. Some of it
Speaker 1: I don't really like, and I'm honest about that. And
Speaker 1: if we get James on the show, GiB, I'll say
Speaker 1: that to him and he can explain to me how
Speaker 1: it's useful to get people on tape complaining about their
Speaker 1: bosses and then getting them suspended or fired. That that
Speaker 1: ty by pretending to be somebody that just wants to
Speaker 1: have like a friendly conversation, you know. Investigative journalism where
Speaker 1: you're like talking about the sale of human body parts. Yes,
Speaker 1: absolutely necessary. Good investigative journalism where we're just getting lib
Speaker 1: journals to say stupid things and then put it on TV. Anyway,
Speaker 1: But Biden wasn't off the clock. Biden wasn't somebody who
Speaker 1: you would think would speak in a way that could
Speaker 1: hurt him under these circumstances because everyone's holding you know,
Speaker 1: cameras out and iPhones and all this stuff. It's it's
Speaker 1: it's crazy. Then he says, you're able to own a
Speaker 1: machine gun. You're able to own a machine gun. The
Speaker 1: answer is yes, you're dope. You are able to own
Speaker 1: a machine gun under the circumstances of getting an FFL license.
Speaker 1: It's to pay. I think it's I see what I
Speaker 1: hate saying that because whenever I say with it, it's
Speaker 1: you know, like fifty year gonna write me like, excuse me, book,
Speaker 1: It's not five hundred dollars, it's three hundred dollars. The
Speaker 1: flu I've had one for thirty years, all right, I'm
Speaker 1: not sure how I don't have one. It's New York,
Speaker 1: so I'm not gonna get one. But you know, you
Speaker 1: can get an FFL license with the federal government, but
Speaker 1: then you'd have to be in compliance also with state
Speaker 1: and local laws about firearms. Nonetheless, you can own a
Speaker 1: machine gun. It's just you need a special permission to
Speaker 1: do it. But the more important point is that there
Speaker 1: is a difference in firing mechanism between a machine gun
Speaker 1: and an AAR fifteen. There is no difference in fire
Speaker 1: mechanism between a common semi I'm at a hunting rifle
Speaker 1: and an air fifteen, So how are you making that distinction?
Speaker 1: And that's when he also then brings up handguns versus
Speaker 1: assault rifles. As you know, handguns are far more ninety
Speaker 1: percent plus of homicides with firearms involved handguns, not rifles
Speaker 1: or shotguns. And then he brings up one hundred rounds,
Speaker 1: which is just they're not trying to say you can't
Speaker 1: have a hundred rounds, are trying to say you can
Speaker 1: have fifteen, you can't have ten. All right, So let's
Speaker 1: at least have the conversation where it's happening. They're not
Speaker 1: banning one hundred round drums. That's not what libs are
Speaker 1: really trying to do. Libs are trying to ban fifteen
Speaker 1: round magazine standard for like a glock nineteen. Then I'll
Speaker 1: want you to have that. No, that's so bad. I
Speaker 1: don't want to send you in prison too if they
Speaker 1: have to in order to make the case so Biden
Speaker 1: look like a look a total moron and all of this.
Speaker 1: What do you think the response was. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: really hard. I just walk you through. He was wrong, wrong, wrong,
Speaker 1: acting like a jerk. What do you think the response is? Well,
Speaker 1: we could first have Joe Biden's response when he's asked
Speaker 1: about this, and this is the most telling of all
Speaker 1: in some ways. Play clip six conus targeting over this
Speaker 1: exchange guns. Then he repress about how you handled it. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm surprised that Sanders is joining Trump. You know, I
Speaker 1: guess it's surprising at an American, though a Union voter.
Speaker 1: I'm surprisure burying Trump. I'm I'm being honest. That was
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. The press ask him a question. He answered
Speaker 1: it like somebody who really needed a blanket and his
Speaker 1: sippy cup and a long nap. Let's let's let's keep
Speaker 1: it real. That is what that sounded like. That is
Speaker 1: what it looked like in the video too. I'm surprised Bernie.
Speaker 1: Remember Bernie's older than Biden. Bernie looks like he's got
Speaker 1: a lot more energy, a lot more pep in the
Speaker 1: step he does, and Trumps not even close. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think I think Trump could sit down here and
Speaker 1: do a six hour radio show with his eyes closed.
Speaker 1: We all know he could, right. It sound like he's
Speaker 1: got a ton of energy the whole time. It's just different,
Speaker 1: you know, Biden, Biden's He's not there. He hasn't got it.
Speaker 1: They want to pretend like it's something other than what
Speaker 1: it is. We all see it. But if you were
Speaker 1: talking about pretending like it's something else, you can't do
Speaker 1: any better than looking at what The media response to
Speaker 1: this has been, Oh, conservatives, pounce, but Joe Biden did
Speaker 1: a great job. We need more of this from Joe Biden. Wow. Wow, Well, well,
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer, for example, he waited in on this and
Speaker 1: didn't hear Am I crazy? Well? I thought I thought
Speaker 1: it was Chuck Schumer that waited on this. No, he
Speaker 1: waited on the coronavirus. I'm sorry Joe, Joe Scarborough waiting
Speaker 1: on this one. Here's an example of what I was
Speaker 1: talking about, And here's here's what he says. Play clip twenty.
Speaker 1: When you listen to Joe, when you see Joe now
Speaker 1: in the past ten days, two weeks out in the
Speaker 1: campaign trail, you see something that resonates with voters, and
Speaker 1: it's pretty simple. It's humanity, it's empathy, it's stability and experience.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about humanity, Mike, and talk about that moment
Speaker 1: where somebody made the mistake of saying he was going
Speaker 1: to take other guns away. And I know Republicans has
Speaker 1: jumped on it. Oh my god. Can you believe a
Speaker 1: political figure using crass language. I mean, come on, seriously,
Speaker 1: look in the mirror, folks. But Biden yesterday, she showed
Speaker 1: the other side of his humanity, and that is he's
Speaker 1: a fighter. He's a fighter, he has the experience. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm I'll about to throw up on my shoes in here,
Speaker 1: you guys. That was Mike Barnacle by the talking to
Speaker 1: Joe Scarborough. Joe Scarborough Show is an unwatchable piece of
Speaker 1: trash for which NBC pays in millions of dollars, because
Speaker 1: there's nothing that that elite lives like more than somebody
Speaker 1: says they're a conservative, and all all they do is
Speaker 1: trash conservatives all day long. There's nothing that they enjoy
Speaker 1: more than that. It's this this disgusting, disgusting performance theater
Speaker 1: that you see with all these never trumpers and everything.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just it's just gross. But but notice
Speaker 1: how there. This is the kind of misdirection that you're
Speaker 1: going to have to expect from so many people that
Speaker 1: are paid to bring you the truth and to bring
Speaker 1: you fact. Scarborough here it's like, yo, they're using the bed.
Speaker 1: You know, I can always picture Scarborough now, and I'm
Speaker 1: a guy who you know, I know something about hair.
Speaker 1: But Scarborough has got that like he's got the swoop
Speaker 1: that's clearly been blow dried to make it the biggest
Speaker 1: swoopiest swoop possible. It's like, settled down, buddy, settled down,
Speaker 1: go write another really bad rock song. So he immediately
Speaker 1: misdirects from the real objection to this exchange that Biden
Speaker 1: has coming from people like me who are saying Biden
Speaker 1: is wrong and all the facts everything he said there
Speaker 1: was wrong. Everything Biden said was wrong and dumb. He's
Speaker 1: wrong in all the facts. He's irascible, he's rude. He
Speaker 1: offers to go fight by the way that union worker
Speaker 1: would kick his ass. We all know, so what is
Speaker 1: that supposed to be? We want to step outside, buddy, No,
Speaker 1: Biden really doesn't want to step outside with that guy. Okay,
Speaker 1: really stupid thing to say. Of course, he's got a
Speaker 1: secret Service detail there with them and the whole thing,
Speaker 1: or he's got whatever the campaign staff or woe whoever's
Speaker 1: with him. Now, No, he's an x VP. I think
Speaker 1: he's got Secret Service protection for life, so I'm sure
Speaker 1: he's Secret Service there. He is a real tough guy.
Speaker 1: At Joe Biden. It's garbage, but they make it sound
Speaker 1: like the thing that we're Oh, they're pro clutching over him,
Speaker 1: saying a naughty word. No we're not. We're not pro clutching.
Speaker 1: We're laughing, we're giggling, and also a little bit concerned
Speaker 1: for the future of the country if the wrong decision
Speaker 1: has made this fall, that this this complete and utter imbecile,
Speaker 1: this used sham wow salesman of fifty years named Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: who just gives you whatever he has to give you
Speaker 1: to get whatever he needs to get at any point
Speaker 1: in time, somebody who has had to drop out of
Speaker 1: running for the presidency before because of dishonesty and because
Speaker 1: of plagiarism, somebody who has brought us into the hyper
Speaker 1: partisan and weaponized Supreme Court battles of today, where now
Speaker 1: it's just you know, you know that that the Democrats
Speaker 1: are gonna Kavanaugh people that used to be called borking
Speaker 1: now should be called kavanaughing. He was the first one
Speaker 1: to start that with Justice Thomas Right and oversaw it
Speaker 1: with with with Robert Bork. I mean, he's not a
Speaker 1: good guy, folks, not good but man, they're gonna they're
Speaker 1: gonna do everything they can to make it sound like
Speaker 1: he's just fine. Your love freedom, hud. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. He got into a verbal altercation
Speaker 1: with that factory worker. He used some profane language. One
Speaker 1: side of the desk said, hey, was it was good
Speaker 1: for him, he showed strength. The other side of maybe
Speaker 1: he went too far. What's your take on that moment today?
Speaker 1: When I saw that moment, When I saw that moment,
Speaker 1: I thought, this is going to be a net plus
Speaker 1: for Joe Biden. I've been through so many campaigns with
Speaker 1: so many candidates that have had moments like that, and
Speaker 1: everybody thinks, oh my gosh, what just happened in this
Speaker 1: environment at this time For Joe Biden. That's going to
Speaker 1: be a net plus in this One of the things
Speaker 1: that we learned through the Donald Trump election is voters
Speaker 1: are sick of the typical political speak, the typical way
Speaker 1: where you phrase everything perfectly and say it just right,
Speaker 1: and speak in paragraphs and do all of that the
Speaker 1: way that we've gotten used to these sort of manufactured
Speaker 1: candidates that have everything put down perfectly well. Voters want
Speaker 1: somebody that they can trust and as genuine and has
Speaker 1: a believability. And that moment to me, taking on this
Speaker 1: on an issue that's important to most Americans, which is
Speaker 1: guns or a majority of the country supports where Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is on this issue, was a moment that I
Speaker 1: thought will be captured. The Democratic Party will love it,
Speaker 1: and independent voters who question whether Joe Biden has the
Speaker 1: strength to take on Donald Trump are going to see
Speaker 1: that in him. So I think, Okay, you stop this clip.
Speaker 1: I can't. I just can't. Okay, I can't handle it anymore.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. I thought that clip was half the le
Speaker 1: that it was. That's Matthew Dowd at ABC, the dumbest
Speaker 1: political analyst on TV. Everything he says is wrong, Everything
Speaker 1: he tells you is going to happen doesn't happen. He
Speaker 1: is the worst. He's now a registered independent because that's
Speaker 1: how he has to play the game, so it can
Speaker 1: be a never Trumper who used to he worked on
Speaker 1: the Bush campaign. I think he's Bush campaign director in
Speaker 1: two thousand and four or something like that. Now he's
Speaker 1: an independent, though, I think he's just an establishment hack.
Speaker 1: You know, whoever writes the biggest check that's that's whose
Speaker 1: politics he shares. And he's a jerk and he's an imbecile.
Speaker 1: So I'm sorry that that clip wins. Let's my fault.
Speaker 1: I gave producer Mark a longer version. I just wanted
Speaker 1: to get to the point where he's going, you know,
Speaker 1: a net plus for Joe. It's a net plas fair
Speaker 1: Joe Biden net plus. It's not a net plus Joe
Speaker 1: Biden look like him moron. And then afterwards he sounded
Speaker 1: like somebody who you know, had had the blueplate special
Speaker 1: taken away from him too quickly at five pm down
Speaker 1: in Florida. I mean, give me a break, it's a
Speaker 1: net plots for Joe Biden. These are the people who
Speaker 1: are telling us that Trump's gruff way of talking and
Speaker 1: the fact that Trump speaks off the conference terrible. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's so unpresidential now because Joe Biden stumbles over his
Speaker 1: words and sounds like he's having some kind of an attack.
Speaker 1: Sometimes they're gonna have to come up with something. So
Speaker 1: it's yeah, he's just he's just raw and authentic. Man.
Speaker 1: That's yeah, it's a net plats forbid it. Oh god,
Speaker 1: that was the worst, the worst. Forget Anna Navarro, Matthew
Speaker 1: dub dumbest political analysts on TV. He has the crown.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Well, this was unexpected. This was
Speaker 1: something that came out of China and it hit us
Speaker 1: in many other countries. You look at the numbers. I
Speaker 1: see the numbers just by watching you, folks. I see it.
Speaker 1: It's over a hundred different countries and it hit the
Speaker 1: world and we're prepared and we're doing a great job
Speaker 1: with it, and it will go away. To stay calm,
Speaker 1: it will go away. We want to protect our shipping industry,
Speaker 1: our cruise industry, cruise ships, we want to protect our
Speaker 1: airline industry. Very important. But everybody has to be vigilant
Speaker 1: and has to be careful. But be calm. It's really
Speaker 1: working out and a lot of good things are going
Speaker 1: to happen. The consumer is ready, the consumer is so
Speaker 1: powerful in our country with what we've done with tax
Speaker 1: cuts and regulation cuts and all of those things. The
Speaker 1: consumer has never been in a better position than they
Speaker 1: are right now. So a lot of good things are
Speaker 1: going to happen. Coronavirus continues to keep everybody on edge
Speaker 1: to varying degrees. The President they're giving one of his
Speaker 1: now feels like routine every day reassurances to the country
Speaker 1: that things are going to be Okay, we're on it.
Speaker 1: Be vigilant, this is serious, but we're working on this.
Speaker 1: We're gonna do And all I hear from lives about
Speaker 1: this is just constant, constant carping, whining, just all kinds
Speaker 1: of bad faith criticism of what the administration is doing
Speaker 1: and what Trump is specifically what Trump is saying all
Speaker 1: the time. Oh he doesn't take it seriously. Oh he
Speaker 1: says it's a hoax. We could sit here all day.
Speaker 1: I just played clip after clip after clip of the
Speaker 1: President saying, look, it's serious, we're on it, We're doing
Speaker 1: what we can. Here's what we're doing. This is unsettling
Speaker 1: because it's a reminder that there are some things now,
Speaker 1: or rather that there are no things left in this country.
Speaker 1: About which we can count on, especially the left of
Speaker 1: American politics, to see their americanness as the more important
Speaker 1: thing than their partisanship. If it's not this, I don't
Speaker 1: know what it could be. There's plenty of time, you know,
Speaker 1: it's not like the election is next week. It's not
Speaker 1: like the elections next month. They have plenty of time
Speaker 1: to make their case about how Trump handled this. Once
Speaker 1: we see how it has been handled. That's not what
Speaker 1: they're doing. They're starting before and saying he lies, he lies,
Speaker 1: and all this stuff. You know, he's not doing this,
Speaker 1: he's not doing that, And the rest of us are
Speaker 1: looking around saying, Okay, I mean, so far, so far
Speaker 1: coronavirus has been in terms of the health of this nation,
Speaker 1: a minimal disruption. That could change, could change next week,
Speaker 1: could change next month. But so far it has been minimal.
Speaker 1: And if you say that, you have all the people
Speaker 1: jump down your throat. Oh, but Trump doesn't know it. Oh,
Speaker 1: here's a briect example. Play clip fourteen. Now I'm going
Speaker 1: to be blunt. We are very worried about the president's
Speaker 1: incompetence and lack of focus on fighting the spread of coronavirus.
Speaker 1: We believe that his lack of focus, his hamstringing efforts
Speaker 1: to address this public crisis, and inflicting pain on the
Speaker 1: stock market. One word could describe thus far the administration's
Speaker 1: response incompetence. The best way we would tell the president,
Speaker 1: the best way to ensure economic security right now for
Speaker 1: the American people is to focus on fighting the illness
Speaker 1: and the spread of the illness. Ask any CEO today
Speaker 1: what they want most. I'll bet they tell you they
Speaker 1: want the coronavirus to be contained. So much slimy dishonesty
Speaker 1: from Schumer, but that's his brand. I mean, that is
Speaker 1: what Schumer is. A dishonest, grotesque, shameless politician. That's all
Speaker 1: he is. Notice how he says the administrator. He keeps
Speaker 1: talking about the administration's incompetence. How are they incompetent? What
Speaker 1: has been incompetent about this administration? Now there is some
Speaker 1: journalists that has been going on about the initial this
Speaker 1: is one of the initial areas where there was all
Speaker 1: this complaint about the administration about testing, but all the
Speaker 1: testing and now there's a story about a group tied
Speaker 1: to the Bill Gates Foundation up in Washington. Obviously, Washington
Speaker 1: has had a whole lot of cases and the most
Speaker 1: fatalities in the country. They had an outbreak there. There
Speaker 1: was a group that was doing research into influenza tied
Speaker 1: to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and they went
Speaker 1: through the bureaucracy. They went through the FDA and the
Speaker 1: CDC trying to say, hey, can we switch and start
Speaker 1: testing for coronavirus wuhan virus much more specific way of
Speaker 1: talking about this virus. Can we switch to wuhan virus testing?
Speaker 1: Because right now we have the ability, but we have
Speaker 1: private their concerns about patient privacy. They haven't given us
Speaker 1: the right to do this. And also we don't know
Speaker 1: if our facilities are are certified for that. And guess
Speaker 1: what CDC and FDA, because there are government bureaucracies, we're like, nope, sorry,
Speaker 1: I can't do it. Nope, sorry, it's gonna take a week. No, nope, sorry.
Speaker 1: And this is actually evidence of how the government one
Speaker 1: can't really protect you for most of the things you
Speaker 1: need protection from too is slow, lethargic, dumb, and unaccountable.
Speaker 1: And three Trumps stepping in to try and force things
Speaker 1: along faster has actually been helpful in a variety of context,
Speaker 1: especially with the travel. See, when I'm talking about what
Speaker 1: Trump has done, I speak of things that he has done,
Speaker 1: banning flights from China into the US. And oh, of
Speaker 1: course the outbreak in Washington that has now killed a
Speaker 1: few dozen people. Somebody who visited Wuhan Province, That's where
Speaker 1: it came from. So do we want more people to
Speaker 1: come before we knew what we're dealing with from Wuhan Province,
Speaker 1: more people to come from China and affect more people
Speaker 1: in Washington and other states across the country because Trump
Speaker 1: said no, no flights, shut it down, and there were people, Oh,
Speaker 1: experts in the quotes, experts say that this doesn't really
Speaker 1: do anything. Yeah, you want one hundred flights a day
Speaker 1: coming in with people from China. You want zero if
Speaker 1: you live in Washington right now, you want one hundred
Speaker 1: flights coming in every day from China. If you live
Speaker 1: in New Rochelle right here, you know, outside of New
Speaker 1: York City in a suburb, or you want zero. I
Speaker 1: think we all know the answer to that. So I
Speaker 1: can speak of concrete steps the president took. They just
Speaker 1: speak in these vague O's terrible, He's incompetent, that's all
Speaker 1: they say. It's all they offer. Pelosi even thinks this
Speaker 1: is he typrid coronavirus jokes. She's I don't know who's worse,
Speaker 1: Pelosi or Pelosi or Schumer. They're both terrible. Play eighteen
Speaker 1: comes from Collins and comes from Gates. And the president
Speaker 1: should be tested. I think I thought he should be tested. Yeah,
Speaker 1: she's making it funny. Ha ha ha ha. Do you
Speaker 1: think that if someone asked about a Democrat president getting
Speaker 1: tested for it could be a fatal disease, especially for
Speaker 1: somebody who's over the age of seventy as Trump is.
Speaker 1: Do you think if if the Speaker of the House
Speaker 1: who was a Republican made some joke about, you know,
Speaker 1: if a president Joe biden't face a similar thing, you
Speaker 1: think that that would just be I don't think so.
Speaker 1: These people no no honor, no decency, no fair play.
Speaker 1: So then that's really that, that's the brand that the
Speaker 1: Left has built for themselves. That's who they are. So
Speaker 1: I'm never surprised by it anymore, but it's still bothers
Speaker 1: me greatly every time we have to deal with this.
Speaker 1: So it's being of deal with it. The administration is
Speaker 1: trying to deal with this, and so they're now talking
Speaker 1: about measures. I mentioned some of this Yester the show,
Speaker 1: measures to address this. And we are in a situation
Speaker 1: where it's not going to be free market. It's not
Speaker 1: going to be you know, this is not where capitalism
Speaker 1: is the only thing that comes into play. Government bailouts
Speaker 1: are kind of a political decision, let's be honest about it.
Speaker 1: And they're talking about bailing out some industries and doing
Speaker 1: some other things. Here here is Vice President Pence clearly
Speaker 1: doesn't think this is a hoax because he's the guy
Speaker 1: who's coordinating the response. Here's what he says about what
Speaker 1: we're going to try to do to play three. We
Speaker 1: want to make sure that hourly workers, hard working blue
Speaker 1: collar Americans that may not have paid family leave today,
Speaker 1: that small and medium sized businesses in America would be
Speaker 1: afforded the resources to provide paid leave so that no
Speaker 1: one would feel that they have to go to work
Speaker 1: if they might be infected or if they might have
Speaker 1: been exposed to the coronavirus. We also talked about what
Speaker 1: are known as N ninety five masks, and we're working.
Speaker 1: Senator Deb Fisher and others have important legislation that would
Speaker 1: extend temporary liability protections so that masks that are made
Speaker 1: for industrial use could be sold to hospitals to ensure
Speaker 1: that our healthcare workers are properly protected and outfitted. And
Speaker 1: we're grateful for growing bipartisan support for that measure, and
Speaker 1: we're going to be working earnestly with Republicans and Democrats
Speaker 1: to move a reform that would make more in ninety
Speaker 1: five masks available. I'm also pleased to report that we
Speaker 1: did receive this afternoon a comprehensive proposal from the cruise
Speaker 1: line industry. Proposal that includes advanced screening, improving medical services
Speaker 1: on ships, providing for airlift, evacuation, and land based care
Speaker 1: at the expense of the cruise lines for anyone that
Speaker 1: might be not only infected with the coronavirus, but with
Speaker 1: any serious illness. Is any of that unsious? Does that
Speaker 1: sound like an administration that's not taking action here? I
Speaker 1: mean he's getting into the specifics, talking about upgraded masks
Speaker 1: for medical facilities, working with specific industries, talking about paid
Speaker 1: leave for small and medium sized employers to assist with
Speaker 1: government government funds for that. I've even seen reporting they
Speaker 1: may and they absolutely should move back the tax filing
Speaker 1: deadline because right now everybody's got stuff going on, they're
Speaker 1: in a panic, they're trying to keep their business afloat.
Speaker 1: You're gonna put us through the insane the tax code.
Speaker 1: I mean, I wish I could just like the whole
Speaker 1: thing on fire and start fresh. It's it's ridiculous, But
Speaker 1: you're gonna put us through that mess right now. Really?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, that's the most important thing to think about,
Speaker 1: you know, making sure you've pulled all your receipts together.
Speaker 1: You see how much the government's allowed to rob you
Speaker 1: this year. So yeah, they're they're taking action. How does
Speaker 1: how does Chuck Schumer? Remember I played it freeze. You
Speaker 1: can hear it very specific things, paid sick leave, working
Speaker 1: with industries, improved screening procedures, masks for hospitals, all things
Speaker 1: that are being done that they're working toward. Now. They've
Speaker 1: already talked a lot about the testing kits and how
Speaker 1: they're going to make sure that people can get tested
Speaker 1: who need to get tested. This is that Chuck Schumer.
Speaker 1: You know, this is that Chuck Schumer talks about the
Speaker 1: admini iustrations response play two. You know what doesn't help
Speaker 1: stop the spread of the coronavirus, more corporate tax cuts.
Speaker 1: Here's what we're worried about, that the president will pay
Speaker 1: attention to the special interests instead of the people. Here's
Speaker 1: a headline from the Washington Post just came out. One eight.
Speaker 1: White House likely to pursue federal aid for shale companies
Speaker 1: hit by oil shocks, coronavirus downturn. We don't have enough tests.
Speaker 1: People can't determine if they're ill or not. They have
Speaker 1: to wait days. And they're concerned with the oil companies
Speaker 1: that pierce the shale and get oil. Is that incredible?
Speaker 1: Maybe they're concerned with all of the above. Schumer, You
Speaker 1: disgusting liar. And that's a perfect example what I'm talking
Speaker 1: about here. Yeah, they don't want you know, we're concerned
Speaker 1: about the cruise industry, which I gotta be honest with you,
Speaker 1: it's not like a strategic US national security interest. But
Speaker 1: everyone's like, yeah, i'd feel bad a lot of the
Speaker 1: thousands and thousands and thousands of people lose their jobs
Speaker 1: at the cruise industry. We're to just go under. They
Speaker 1: have very high overhead, very high expenses, and no one
Speaker 1: riding those ships. They got problems. But you want to
Speaker 1: talk about important US national US industries. We're already looking
Speaker 1: at how China has to provide so much of our medicine,
Speaker 1: of our antibiotics, of our medical tools and devices. And
Speaker 1: if we lose access to that for you know, nefarious
Speaker 1: or just supply chain reasons, we got big problems. You
Speaker 1: want to watch as Saudi Arabia and Russia win a
Speaker 1: price war against US shale oil producers, so all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, we're gonna be dependent on those dirt bags again.
Speaker 1: You know that's the move, Uh, you know Schoomer, But
Speaker 1: it's just the classic schoming of people. Don't people don't
Speaker 1: have enough tests, and they're worried about oil. They're we're
Speaker 1: about everything they we're about the US economy. These are
Speaker 1: unserious people, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi. Their arguments are stupid,
Speaker 1: they're dishonest, and they're trying to hurt this country at
Speaker 1: a time when the rest of us are focused on
Speaker 1: keeping our fellow Americans alive and keeping our economy going.
Speaker 1: You want to know what else is something we should
Speaker 1: think about? Suicides, depression, substance abuse, all of those things
Speaker 1: spike during an economic recession. People do die when things
Speaker 1: get really bad when they lose their job, when they
Speaker 1: lose their house, when they think they have no future.
Speaker 1: So yeah, there are more important things than putting borderline
Speaker 1: senile Joe Biden on the throne of power. Libs Chuck
Speaker 1: Schumer doesn't seem to think so even can't even put
Speaker 1: put it aside the partisan acrimony for a second to
Speaker 1: just try to be helpful. You heard what Gavin Newsom said.
Speaker 1: He's like the President said everything He's done, everything he
Speaker 1: said he would do, helping out the state of California
Speaker 1: every way we want the federal government too. Honestly, I'll
Speaker 1: never think of Gavin Knewsom quite the same way. I mean,
Speaker 1: I used to think he was one hundred percent, you know, psycholib.
Speaker 1: Now now it's more like ninety percent. Because this is
Speaker 1: this is a moment where we see who people really are,
Speaker 1: what are they really made of? You know, I'm telling
Speaker 1: everybody that did be quite I'm reading everything I can't
Speaker 1: I'm reading all day. All I do is just radio
Speaker 1: and read and research, and I try to eat some food,
Speaker 1: sometimes get some sleep, and I still produce a market
Speaker 1: hockey game. We'll get there one day when I'm not
Speaker 1: doing four hours radio a day. But all that's all
Speaker 1: I'm doing is trying to gather as much informationalist as
Speaker 1: I can all the time. And I'm still here telling you, yeah,
Speaker 1: I think I agree with the President. I think we're
Speaker 1: gonna push through. We're gonna be okay. There is this
Speaker 1: an area where we do have millions and millions infected
Speaker 1: with this before we really have a treatment, a vaccine,
Speaker 1: a cure, or the medical infrastructure to handle that kind
Speaker 1: of influx, and we could lose a lot of people.
Speaker 1: That's real. That's real. And you know Chuck Schumer wants
Speaker 1: to complain about how you know, the oil industry. You
Speaker 1: know he's not doing enough. You know Pelosi's making jokes
Speaker 1: about Trump should be tested for coronavirus. That's not funny.
Speaker 1: These are the people that remember, these are the people
Speaker 1: that want to me back in charge because they think
Speaker 1: they know more than you, they're smarter than you. And
Speaker 1: if you support it Trump, you're a bad person. You're
Speaker 1: seeing who they are right now, You're seeing what their
Speaker 1: character is right now. Don't forget it. You're in the
Speaker 1: freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Well, look,
Speaker 1: as the President has said in our line of work.
Speaker 1: You shake hands when someone wants to shake your hand,
Speaker 1: and I expect the President will continue to do that.
Speaker 1: I'll continue to do it. What this is is a
Speaker 1: broad recommendation for Americans, but a really good recommendation is
Speaker 1: to wash your hands. Often. These are important things to do,
Speaker 1: they are not sufficient things to do. And I am
Speaker 1: just reminded of this. You know, we often say things
Speaker 1: like I pray for this country, and I pray for
Speaker 1: the president and that he will be a better leader.
Speaker 1: And I was in church last weekend thinking about this,
Speaker 1: because church right now, it feels like a place that's Look,
Speaker 1: let's be honest, it doesn't it's it's not safe in
Speaker 1: terms of virus, does not discriminate, it doesn't care. If
Speaker 1: you're in there speaking to God, you can still get coronavirus.
Speaker 1: And I am I am worried about our president, our
Speaker 1: vice president. And yes I am. And I don't say
Speaker 1: this with any any sarcasm or I mean I am
Speaker 1: worried about Pelosi and Schumer. And I mean, you look
Speaker 1: at the political leadership of this country, and we have
Speaker 1: reached we have reached this point in time where we
Speaker 1: really seem to think that the only people who can
Speaker 1: make important decisions about America's future are in their you know,
Speaker 1: early seventies up to late seventies. That when you have
Speaker 1: the possibility of this pandemic coming, this worries me. This
Speaker 1: worries me because no matter what you know, measures are
Speaker 1: taken and we are our ability to fight against this virus.
Speaker 1: The tools we have to fight this war are not
Speaker 1: that good right now. And we have a lot of
Speaker 1: very important to the function of this country older people
Speaker 1: who will be at risk, including our top leadership. So
Speaker 1: say a prayer for all of them. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The bus Essence Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: All right, I got a public service announcement for everybody. Seriously,
Speaker 1: people please stop panic buying toilet paper. Some of us
Speaker 1: just want to normal buy it, and the shelves are empty.
Speaker 1: I last night, I have a grocery delivery service that
Speaker 1: I use. I'm a single guy in New York, so
Speaker 1: you know, yes, yes there's a girlfriend, but I mean
Speaker 1: I'm not married. I don't have kids, so I get
Speaker 1: you know, I get my groceries delivered to me. It's
Speaker 1: normal in New York. I don't know how many of
Speaker 1: you do this elsewhere in the country. You have cars,
Speaker 1: you probably drive the grocery strivee. No toilet paper. I
Speaker 1: kept clicking on different you know, I even started going
Speaker 1: for like that that's sort of like third tier toilet paper,
Speaker 1: that's from reusable something or other. You're like, ooh, on my,
Speaker 1: that's that's going to that's going to chafe. That's not
Speaker 1: gonna be very nice. None that either. Can't get toilet
Speaker 1: paper delivered first time I loved. And then I go
Speaker 1: to the drug store on my corner, which is like,
Speaker 1: you know, it's a Dwayne Read. It's one of those
Speaker 1: big drug stores where you basically could do all your
Speaker 1: grocery shopping now too, and uh, no toilet paper. And
Speaker 1: I'm looking around. I'm like, I'm going on Amazon. Couldn't
Speaker 1: get any toilet paper delivered by Amazon. As I'm going
Speaker 1: to my neighborhood stores, I'm going online, can't get toilet paper. Folks, Well,
Speaker 1: what is going on here? What are we trying to
Speaker 1: do to the buckster? This is nuts? Bruce your mark,
Speaker 1: do you have a strategic TP supply? If so, you
Speaker 1: may need to help out your favorite radio host here
Speaker 1: at some point. Yeah, I have an entire box of
Speaker 1: it because I go to BJ's So I went months ago,
Speaker 1: and I've got like, I think two or three you
Speaker 1: know things left host things are going to be worth
Speaker 1: more than six garrets in prison. It's crazy. I'm getting
Speaker 1: hand sanitizer. Well, that's very you know, hand sanitizer. I'm
Speaker 1: not I'm not a believer in that stuff. Anyway. That's
Speaker 1: great because you sanitize your hands while you're breathing in
Speaker 1: the viral particles in the air, you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: It lessens your risk a little bit, but you know,
Speaker 1: not sanitizer way before the coronavirus. Yeah, I mean so
Speaker 1: for some people, I think they're just in the habit
Speaker 1: of using this thing. I hate the smell of it too.
Speaker 1: And I'm on the subway and someone starts using him.
Speaker 1: By the way, I sneeze on the subway this morning. Oh,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't write into the elbow, right in the elbow.
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, a dude look to me like I
Speaker 1: will kill you. It's like, dude, I'm not sick. I
Speaker 1: just you know, I had a little you know, and
Speaker 1: my beard like it's my nose for a second. You know,
Speaker 1: it's nothing. You can still sneeze without being sick, like
Speaker 1: it's possible, of course, But you sneeze on the New
Speaker 1: York City subway these days, everybody everyone just tenses up.
Speaker 1: And you know, I'm telling you you can walk on
Speaker 1: the subway and say anything you want. I mean, you
Speaker 1: can walk on the subway and you could walk on
Speaker 1: the subway naked and nobody would care. Oh yeah, no, naked. No.
Speaker 1: I don't know if that's it. I don't even know
Speaker 1: if that's illegal. And blasios New York. I think you can.
Speaker 1: I think as long as you say, you know, having
Speaker 1: is that website. Weird laws that are on the books
Speaker 1: but not in the force. I think you can. Technical
Speaker 1: A woman can walk around topless one percent. I've seen it,
Speaker 1: but that was like I don't just mean, I don't
Speaker 1: just mean on dates like I've seen it, like on
Speaker 1: the street there have been ladies and it's leaked out. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and they'll walk or they'll walk around as like and
Speaker 1: they'll do it. I don't know as like a freedom
Speaker 1: thing or as a form of protest. But yeah, but
Speaker 1: it is illegal to put your thumb to your nose
Speaker 1: and winkle wiggle your fingers around to a police officer.
Speaker 1: Are you serious? Yeah, that is a law that's on
Speaker 1: the books in New York. Really yep, really yeah, come on, yeah,
Speaker 1: that is I swear to you, that is a law
Speaker 1: that the boks. I'm always kind of amazed that that
Speaker 1: people who seem to think that that the person who's
Speaker 1: empowered by the state to arrest you and to use
Speaker 1: force against you is a good and who is carrying
Speaker 1: a usually now they're carrying a taser as well as
Speaker 1: a lot of times I'll have a collapsible baton as well.
Speaker 1: I think they call them like cobra or an uh
Speaker 1: you know whatever, you know what I mean those class
Speaker 1: they'll have a class one baton, they'll have a taser,
Speaker 1: and they have a loaded floated side arm obviously, and
Speaker 1: people just love to antagonize them. Antagon that now, usually
Speaker 1: an antagonization you're wheeling your fingers at them with your
Speaker 1: thumb on your nose. Well, I mean like that's I
Speaker 1: think some officers should probably think that was kind of
Speaker 1: funny and stupid, but I mean, like really get up
Speaker 1: in their faces, be like, you know, what are you
Speaker 1: going to do about it. I'm like, you wouldn't do
Speaker 1: this to a person who's just a person walk around
Speaker 1: with a gun and a and a and a collass
Speaker 1: little baton. I don't. I'm always amazing that people think
Speaker 1: to like, yeah, I'm really gonna get into it with
Speaker 1: a law enforcement officer for no reason, just because I
Speaker 1: want to show show everybody how tough I am or something.
Speaker 1: It's not that seems like a little farther than the
Speaker 1: thumb on the nose. I've got a lot for them.
Speaker 1: I'm just surprised that that's a lot. I would do
Speaker 1: the film on the nose just for fun. Since we
Speaker 1: got you here, and since now we've established that producer
Speaker 1: Mark is the strategic TPE Reserve, the penalty box has
Speaker 1: got the toilet paper if needed. Thank you for that. Um,
Speaker 1: I feel a little bit better, Nux. I'm starting I'm
Speaker 1: starting to get a little bit like, what am I
Speaker 1: gonna do? Use paper towel with like some beer or something.
Speaker 1: Tissues would work. But can you put tissues in the toilet?
Speaker 1: It depends on how Because you're plumbing is yeah, I'm
Speaker 1: in one of these new buildings where it's like, you know,
Speaker 1: it feels like I'm in you know, Tokyo. Everything that
Speaker 1: this stuff is all very modern, but it's not. It's
Speaker 1: not like those old pipes where you could, you know,
Speaker 1: fit an alligator in there back in the day. So
Speaker 1: I gotta ask you, there's forty five hundred dollars that
Speaker 1: is being offered right now too for the purposes of
Speaker 1: science with no inject yourself with coronavirusould be a lot
Speaker 1: more money than forty though I would get some time
Speaker 1: off of work. Well, it's one of these things where
Speaker 1: you know, when you get sick, there's there's there's the feeling.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you I don't know if you
Speaker 1: share this one. There's the feeling you have when you
Speaker 1: get sick and you did something like I've gotten sick
Speaker 1: before where you know, I was out all weekend partying.
Speaker 1: I stayed out super late, I was hitting on foreign chicks,
Speaker 1: I had too many shots, I didn't get enough sleep.
Speaker 1: I rallied it and then like Monday, I've got a
Speaker 1: sore throat, and it's like, yeah, of course you eighty
Speaker 1: it right. And then there are times you're just like
Speaker 1: being a good d You're like, I'm working hard these days.
Speaker 1: You wake up in the morning, you're like, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: I've got you know, the flu or something right think
Speaker 1: about and I always feel worse when it's the first one.
Speaker 1: The second one. I'm like, hey, sometimes it's your day.
Speaker 1: If you took the forty five hundred dollars and then
Speaker 1: you found yourself really sick, how do you justify that
Speaker 1: to yourself? You don't you know, you're really pay for
Speaker 1: your medical bills too, I would assume, but I'm assuming
Speaker 1: if you end up like intubated in the ICU. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't think it's worth the two weeks off of
Speaker 1: work to get injected. Probably did you upload the I
Speaker 1: don't think we did this. Did we get the Italian
Speaker 1: guy who's complaining about that it was an Italian? Yeah?
Speaker 1: I know. I wanted it. Oh, I thought you just
Speaker 1: didn't realize that it was an Italian. No, of course
Speaker 1: I realized everything, well not everything I realized most of
Speaker 1: the time because it was English subtitled, so well, no,
Speaker 1: I know, but I like it because he's like, hey,
Speaker 1: anyone understand there's already I know, but I was going
Speaker 1: to explain it's very quick. There's a guy in Italy
Speaker 1: who's just like can everyone stop buying all the pasta?
Speaker 1: This is worse, he says. He looks like he might
Speaker 1: have lived through it. He says, this is that it
Speaker 1: was during World War Two. Like you're going into stores,
Speaker 1: there's nothing there. So he's like, I want him a basta,
Speaker 1: you know, except he says in an Italian and and
Speaker 1: he's you know, it's quite quite a scene. Just now.
Speaker 1: I feel I'm walking around New York City. I'm trying
Speaker 1: to find strategic toilet paper supply. It's crazy, man. How's
Speaker 1: the food looking on the shelves in New York Foods?
Speaker 1: I mean, I haven't seen any change on that at all.
Speaker 1: I do think the subway is a little more sparse
Speaker 1: than it has been. I agree with you. The trains
Speaker 1: are trains are a little bit less um. You know.
Speaker 1: I took that train out to on Long Island Railroad
Speaker 1: to get the JFK a couple of weeks ago, and
Speaker 1: that train was was absolutely pa you know, they couldn't
Speaker 1: even take our tickets because it was so packed in
Speaker 1: the Aisland. That's crazy. Every single day, Buck, I felt
Speaker 1: like I was in the Soviet Union. I'm like, why
Speaker 1: not even I spent ten or twelve bucks on a ticket.
Speaker 1: I was like, I shouldn't have even done that. There's
Speaker 1: no for using Oh yeah, that's true, So okay, you
Speaker 1: wouldn't take the forty five hundred dollars. But which of
Speaker 1: the have you seen them bad coronavirus curious things that
Speaker 1: people are putting out there yet? I have? Which is
Speaker 1: the dumbest to you? I think masturbation was on there? Wow? Wow,
Speaker 1: I mean, come on, that is the dumbest. I didn't
Speaker 1: know it was on there. Circle gets the square. That's
Speaker 1: a yeah, I didn't know that was one of them. Man,
Speaker 1: people really do need too. Caine was on there. They
Speaker 1: need to get a grip about this stuff. I mean
Speaker 1: in yeah, cocaine is on there. That's one that I saw. Wait, Harry,
Speaker 1: that the bad coronavirus cures snorting cocaine and drinking bleach.
Speaker 1: Here's a public service announcement. If you had if you,
Speaker 1: if you had a bowl of virus, I would tell
Speaker 1: you that drinking a large quantity of bleach was in
Speaker 1: fact even more dangerous than having a bowl of virus,
Speaker 1: because you'll probably die in a matter of a like
Speaker 1: a couple of hours. What is wrong with people? How
Speaker 1: does this stuff get circle. I really want to know
Speaker 1: if somebody drank bleach. I'm sure people do. People are
Speaker 1: eating the tide pods for a while. People do this stuff.
Speaker 1: Why because if it's on the internet, it must be true. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Snorting cocaine, drinking bleach apparently auto erotica, which I think
Speaker 1: is how the scientists describe it. These are all fake
Speaker 1: things that are also some kind of like a colloidal
Speaker 1: silver or something I've seen which I don't even really
Speaker 1: know what. I think that's like liquid silver. I think
Speaker 1: people are just so stupid they see a meme, yeah,
Speaker 1: and they don't realize that it's not true. People have
Speaker 1: called in, you know, huge doses of different vitamins, all
Speaker 1: this stuff dangerous, bad, doesn't work. Trust me on this one.
Speaker 1: If if there was some cool immunity, keeping your immunity high,
Speaker 1: getting enough sleep, getting enough for us, that's very important.
Speaker 1: That's good. You got to do those things. You want
Speaker 1: to keep your immune system as strong as you can.
Speaker 1: But that's a very holistic approach that takes a lot
Speaker 1: of things. This other stuff they're talking about like a
Speaker 1: miracle cure for this No, wow, drinking drinking is this
Speaker 1: is nuts. There's a lot of Look, there's as you know,
Speaker 1: a ton of irresponsible stuff on the internet and just
Speaker 1: some other things that are going on right now about coronavirus. Uh.
Speaker 1: The markets are really waiting on the bailouts or the
Speaker 1: bailouts actually going to happen or not. We have to see.
Speaker 1: I think that there will be major government action. The
Speaker 1: government's going to take out the checkbook and start, you know,
Speaker 1: really propping up industries, and that'll be that'll be interesting.
Speaker 1: I've already talked about the toilet paper thing. It's in Australia.
Speaker 1: To other countries, people are panicing. So the problem with
Speaker 1: panic buying is it begets more panic buying, you know. Now,
Speaker 1: I'm somebody who's like, if I see a lot of nice, nice,
Speaker 1: high quality, like the toilet paper with a little bear
Speaker 1: that's rubbing its face with it or whatever, Right, isn't
Speaker 1: that or is that is that the Dony fabrics offen
Speaker 1: or I'm confused. I believe that's Charman Charman, Yeah, No,
Speaker 1: that is toilet paper, right, Yeah, I want the little
Speaker 1: bear with the with the thing that's rubbing on the face.
Speaker 1: You want to use a bear's toilet paper? No, but
Speaker 1: I'm saying that's this, that's the signal of the nice
Speaker 1: toilet paper, you know, the the other's. I'm not going
Speaker 1: to start calling out brands that are bad, but there
Speaker 1: are some toilet paper brands where oh yeah, and you know,
Speaker 1: it's like what they have at institutions, like what they'd
Speaker 1: have in a university library. You never liked that toilet paper.
Speaker 1: My in laws have really bad plumbing, so they have
Speaker 1: like the one ply bad toilet and I can't do that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you end up, you end up, you know, wrapping that
Speaker 1: stuff around your hand like you're a mummy. You know,
Speaker 1: you end up really you're basically wiping your hand. Whoa, hey, hey, hey, no,
Speaker 1: I I just go through a whole roll of toilet
Speaker 1: paper if I have to. We gotta, we gotta keep
Speaker 1: it clean. So there's there's a toilet paper issue. Um.
Speaker 1: This had nothing to do with with coronavirus. But as
Speaker 1: I was looking for updates health updates, they've also, thank
Speaker 1: you science, they've also discovered a completely new strain of
Speaker 1: chlamydia under the ice in the Arctic. I want to
Speaker 1: be like guys, one thing at a time. All Right,
Speaker 1: we're already dealing with coronavirus. We don't need some new
Speaker 1: super strain of chlamydia that you found drilling in the Arctic.
Speaker 1: This is a real thing. It's like, can we keep
Speaker 1: Let's keep the chlamydia in the Arctic under the ice
Speaker 1: where it belongs. Let's not disturb it, let's start spreading around.
Speaker 1: So I just look, I want the public health to
Speaker 1: be good. I think it's important. And there's also now
Speaker 1: an effort underway in the city of Newark is saying,
Speaker 1: we were talking about disinformation around this. A city of
Speaker 1: Newark is saying that if if they find people spreading
Speaker 1: disinformation at coronavirus, they're going to arrest them. I'm like, well,
Speaker 1: under what authority do they have to do that? That's
Speaker 1: that's that was very big brother. That was a little
Speaker 1: bit of a surprise. So look, we're following this, We're
Speaker 1: on it. I will say this, and maybe we should
Speaker 1: mark this down as a prediction. I think we're gonna
Speaker 1: be okay. I don't think this is going to be
Speaker 1: as bad as a lot of people are suggesting it
Speaker 1: will be. Overall, we're gonna have a day, I'd say
Speaker 1: in the next two to three weeks, we're gonna have
Speaker 1: a day where this is really scary, and I'm gonna
Speaker 1: have to come in here and say, all right, everybody,
Speaker 1: deep breath. I know you know, we got a lot
Speaker 1: of infections. It's going to happen. Be prepared for that. Now,
Speaker 1: that doesn't mean that it's going to be as out
Speaker 1: of control and as bad as other people have been saying.
Speaker 1: But we are not out of the woods. It's we're
Speaker 1: gonna be sometime. I'd say the first week of April.
Speaker 1: It's gonna get it's gonna get ugly out there. It's
Speaker 1: gonna get ugly, and then it's gonna recede and we'll
Speaker 1: be okay. But get ready for it. But don't don't panic.
Speaker 1: Buy toilet paper. You don't need anough toilet paper for
Speaker 1: six months you're in the freedom hunt. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Honestly, it sounds almost so silly
Speaker 1: to say, but there's a lot of restaurants that are
Speaker 1: feeling the pain of racism where people are literally not
Speaker 1: patroning Chinese restaurants, they're not patroning Asian restaurants because of
Speaker 1: just straight up racism around the coronavirus. I love that
Speaker 1: I can count on AOC to teach me new words
Speaker 1: that don't exist patroning the restaurant. Now, maybe this is
Speaker 1: a slang that I have not yet ever been introduced to,
Speaker 1: but I think she means patronizing. And I think that
Speaker 1: AOC also didn't learn that much in English class, because
Speaker 1: maybe she was so focused on getting that high school
Speaker 1: science prize that she was bragging about on Twitter to
Speaker 1: millions of people a few weeks ago. Okay, but also
Speaker 1: her overall contention here that people aren't going into Asian restaurants,
Speaker 1: mostly Chinese, assuming some Japanese restaurants to Korean restaurants, out
Speaker 1: of racism just goes to show you that the Left
Speaker 1: really doesn't even understand what racism means anymore. This has
Speaker 1: been the case for a long time. They've expanded racism
Speaker 1: beyond what a normal definition of it, what our understood
Speaker 1: definition of it had been for a long time. Ye,
Speaker 1: people aren't going to a Chinese restaurant because they're concerned
Speaker 1: that there have been the highest number of cases in China,
Speaker 1: and that there could be contacts because people could be
Speaker 1: visiting family, because there could be people traveling back and forth.
Speaker 1: Now I know a lot of people would say a
Speaker 1: lot of Chinese restaurants are run by people born in
Speaker 1: America and never step out. True. But it's not that
Speaker 1: the people that are worried and they're they're scared, they're
Speaker 1: they're not worried, or rather, they're not making that decision
Speaker 1: because they have anything against Chinese people. They don't like Chinese,
Speaker 1: but that would be racism. They're just scared and they're
Speaker 1: making a decision based on fear. But it's fear of
Speaker 1: getting exposure to a virus that we're all being told
Speaker 1: by the Lim media right now is going to come
Speaker 1: for all of us any day now. And it's not
Speaker 1: in any way rooted in disdain or distaste or dislike
Speaker 1: of another race. That's racism. The same problem we've seen
Speaker 1: now when they discuss how we shouldn't call it Wuhan virus. No,
Speaker 1: we should call it Wuhan virus, because that's what we do.
Speaker 1: We tend to call outbreaks of different viruses by names
Speaker 1: that are based in their point of origination, or at
Speaker 1: least where they're first discovered Zeka lime, ebola, West Nile influenza.
Speaker 1: Who even knows where influenza comes from as a term, Well,
Speaker 1: as we know, the flu has probably been around the
Speaker 1: first description but I think was It is believed to
Speaker 1: have been written about by Hippocrates, the father of the
Speaker 1: Hippocratic oath, and it was the cough of I think
Speaker 1: it was Parenthes in the fifth century BC. If I
Speaker 1: get this right, I'm pretty awesome, by the way, because
Speaker 1: this is we're going deep in the memory banks here.
Speaker 1: That was the first time that Hippocrates wrote about what
Speaker 1: was believed to be a flu. The term influenza, which
Speaker 1: is where we get flu from, which is how we
Speaker 1: generally refer to all these different viruses, comes from fourteenth
Speaker 1: century Italians who thought that it was the influence that's influenza,
Speaker 1: the influence of the stars and and sort of the
Speaker 1: celestial on people, that that's where this sickness was coming from,
Speaker 1: I believe it or not. That was the fourteenth century
Speaker 1: what they were thinking, that there was some cosmic connection
Speaker 1: to this, and it was the influence of the of
Speaker 1: the stars. So that's where we get the term. I've
Speaker 1: also talked to you about epidemic and pandemic right, epidemic
Speaker 1: on the people, pandemic all the people, descriptions for severity
Speaker 1: of outbreaks of these diseases on the people. The demos
Speaker 1: also where we get the word democracy, So AOC saying
Speaker 1: it's racist is just yet again another time when when
Speaker 1: wokeness interferes with normal brain function, it's obviously not racist.
Speaker 1: People are not Now could be wrong, they could be overreacting,
Speaker 1: but it's not because all of a sudden they they've
Speaker 1: discovered that they don't like people from China. It's because
Speaker 1: they associate people from China with a higher incidence of
Speaker 1: this disease, because it is the it is the epicenter
Speaker 1: of this, and they just want to limit their exposure
Speaker 1: as much as possible. You know, we're being told to
Speaker 1: avoid all people, We're being told to avoid all human content, acting,
Speaker 1: you know, with this social distancing policy as much as
Speaker 1: we can, although how much can we really even do that?
Speaker 1: When you have people that scared, they're going to make
Speaker 1: decisions that go above and beyond. I mean, look, I
Speaker 1: mean I ordered Chinese food last week. I'll go to
Speaker 1: Chinese restaurants all over the place. I think that that's silly,
Speaker 1: But I'm just saying it's not rooted in racism. It's
Speaker 1: just rooted in fear of exposure. People would be afraid.
Speaker 1: Would I go to Italy right now? No? Am I
Speaker 1: anti Italian. No, am I racist against it? By the way,
Speaker 1: China is really a nationality, not a race. But nonetheless
Speaker 1: am I racist against Italian people? Absolutely not. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to the bus Esson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. That sentence that was just handed down
Speaker 1: by this court was obscene. That number was obnoxious. There
Speaker 1: are murderers who will get out of court faster than
Speaker 1: Harvey Weinstein will. That number spoke to the pressure of
Speaker 1: the movements and the public. That number did not speak
Speaker 1: to the evidence that came out a trial. That number
Speaker 1: did not speak to the testimony that we heard. That
Speaker 1: number did not speak to evidence, nor did it speak
Speaker 1: to justice. I am overcome with anger at that number.
Speaker 1: I think that number is a cowardly number to give.
Speaker 1: I think the judge caved, just as I believe the
Speaker 1: jury caved, and I am not happy. So that was
Speaker 1: the defend. Now, I understand there's always a little bit
Speaker 1: of a balancing act you have to do here when
Speaker 1: you're playing sound bites. That was clearly the lawyer for Weinstein,
Speaker 1: and I know there's a whole other side to this.
Speaker 1: The side that one the prosecution. But that's just the
Speaker 1: sound that we had in reference to Weinstein getting twenty
Speaker 1: three years in prison for the sexual assault of two women,
Speaker 1: you know, years ago. And look, Weinstein's Weinstein, who is
Speaker 1: a super powerful Democrat bundler for Hillary, friend of the
Speaker 1: Obama's friend of Hillary and Bill Clinton, raised millions of
Speaker 1: dollars for Democrat causes. This guy was the elite lib
Speaker 1: establishment to a tea. Don't forget that. But you know,
Speaker 1: he's a bad guy, all right. I don't think I
Speaker 1: don't like his policy. He's clearly a bad human being,
Speaker 1: and I do think he's getting what he deserves in
Speaker 1: so far as he should be punished for, you know,
Speaker 1: sexual assault on women. I mean the things that he did.
Speaker 1: If somebody who wasn't Harvey Weinstein did, would people be saying, Yeah,
Speaker 1: you can't like throw a woman down. And when she's saying,
Speaker 1: you know, no against her world, keep doing things and
Speaker 1: keep so. I know, I think Harvey Weinstein is going away,
Speaker 1: and that's a good thing. Twenty three years. If we're
Speaker 1: talking about sexual assault sentences and the severe of this,
Speaker 1: twenty three years seems like it is longer than most
Speaker 1: people will get for killing somebody. That's true. It's a
Speaker 1: lot longer than a lot of people get from manslaughter.
Speaker 1: It's longer than people will often serve for murder two
Speaker 1: So you know that usually that's twenty five to life.
Speaker 1: But people will get parole. Now, maybe Harvey Weinstein will
Speaker 1: get parole too, but he's in the sixties. He if
Speaker 1: this is his sentence, he's gonna he's appealing it, but
Speaker 1: he's gonna die in prison. Now. I don't like Harvey Weinstein.
Speaker 1: I got nothing. I have nothing favorable to say about
Speaker 1: this guy. I think he's an extreme dirt bag, and
Speaker 1: I think he did assault women. I don't think it
Speaker 1: was just that he was using, dangling in front of
Speaker 1: them the prospect of a better career or whatever, and
Speaker 1: that they just consented. I think that he, you know,
Speaker 1: physically transgressed and then would try to cover it up
Speaker 1: with oh no, I just thought that was okay. And
Speaker 1: you know, essentially the you know, he was a like
Speaker 1: an habituated date rapist in a sense, right, he was
Speaker 1: habitually doing this, which is why they try to charge
Speaker 1: him with being a sexual predator, which could which would
Speaker 1: have sent him to prison for life. But I can't
Speaker 1: help but notice that this reminds me. You know, in
Speaker 1: the early Harvey Weinstein was one of the first big
Speaker 1: meat too, one of the first big meat too cases
Speaker 1: that came for that that came up, and there are
Speaker 1: a lot of very powerful people that protected this guy,
Speaker 1: that covered up for him, and they will never be
Speaker 1: held to account for it. Remember that NBC News will
Speaker 1: never be held to account for killing this story. They
Speaker 1: didn't want to mess with Harvey Weinstein. You know, Weinstein
Speaker 1: was hiring all these private eyes and detectives and stuff
Speaker 1: too to go after him. It's a really scared, really
Speaker 1: bad guy. So you know, okay, fine, Roden hell Harvey Weinstein,
Speaker 1: no problem with that. The sentence does feel like it's
Speaker 1: a little bit of a politic there's a little bit
Speaker 1: of a political message being sent as well, for the
Speaker 1: you know, for the meat you era and on all that.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, if he got ten years, I'd say, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's what I would have guess. Ten at fifteen, how
Speaker 1: much do we really care about the guy's in his
Speaker 1: late sixties. I mean, if he serves fifteen years, he's
Speaker 1: really not gonna spend much time on the outside anyway.
Speaker 1: All that to me. All that said, though there I've
Speaker 1: said this before, and this is separate from the specifics
Speaker 1: of or rather I'm separating myself from the specifics of
Speaker 1: the Weinstein case. Here to this one factoid, which is
Speaker 1: that now Weinstein's case has established that a woman can
Speaker 1: claim years after the fact that she had a consensual
Speaker 1: sexual relationship with somebody, and at some point or any
Speaker 1: point before or during that admittedly consensual sexual relationship, that
Speaker 1: person that man committed a felony rape assault for which
Speaker 1: his life should be ruined and he should go to
Speaker 1: prison for decades. In Harvey Weinstein's case, that seems like
Speaker 1: it's probably true and appropriate, right like that, That's okay,
Speaker 1: He's a bad guy. Do any of you doubt given
Speaker 1: what we saw with Kavanaugh, which was when all you know,
Speaker 1: ronan Pharaoh was called into service on that one, You know,
Speaker 1: a lot of the meat too, machinery they try to
Speaker 1: use to throw at Kavanaugh to destroy him at some point,
Speaker 1: and I can't tell you when, And you know, people
Speaker 1: might forget that I'm making this prediction, but just give
Speaker 1: it some time. You will have a very powerful UH movement,
Speaker 1: a person who is important for the left to destroy
Speaker 1: We'll have a woman come forward who has had a consent,
Speaker 1: who had an admittedly consensual sexual relationship with that person,
Speaker 1: and she will claim that, you know, one night when
Speaker 1: when they were uh, you know, maybe a little drunk,
Speaker 1: or they'd had a fight, and you know, he thought
Speaker 1: it was okay, and she said, you know, you'll get it.
Speaker 1: They'll be the sort of gray area thing and they'll
Speaker 1: say you know which, which usually would be adjudicated in
Speaker 1: a way where you'd say, okay, Well, I mean if
Speaker 1: you if you think that somebody did this and the
Speaker 1: next day you tell them you love them and you
Speaker 1: continue to have sex with them for the next five years,
Speaker 1: how did they really commit a felony, a felony rape
Speaker 1: against that person? You know, that would have been the
Speaker 1: thinking before. The thinking now will be different. You're gonna
Speaker 1: have someone, You're gonna have some guy. I'm guaranteeing you
Speaker 1: if this happens, it will be somebody that left wants
Speaker 1: to destroy. And you'll have a woman come forward and
Speaker 1: say that there was a that I had a long
Speaker 1: term sexual relationship with this person, but one time he
Speaker 1: raped me, and the entire apparatus will come forward and say,
Speaker 1: rapist must be destroyed. And now is it possible to
Speaker 1: rape somebody in the confines of a of a marriage.
Speaker 1: For of course it is right. You know, I'm not
Speaker 1: saying this isn't possible. I'm just saying that it will
Speaker 1: no longer be considered really a defense. If the person
Speaker 1: the next day was saying, literally, I love you, you're
Speaker 1: my son, my moon and my stars, and we need
Speaker 1: to continue to have sex together and everything is fine,
Speaker 1: that that was not a that did not sway the
Speaker 1: jury in the Yoscene case. That seems to me to
Speaker 1: be a change in the way that we will be
Speaker 1: thinking about these kinds of trials going forward. But it's
Speaker 1: only going to be a change that is unjust when
Speaker 1: it is applied for reasons of essentially, you know, assassinating
Speaker 1: someone's character for political reasons. It's going to happen. This
Speaker 1: is going to be the new you know, the next time,
Speaker 1: it won't you because and really, in a sense, they
Speaker 1: tried something, you know, they tried this having women come
Speaker 1: forward to lie about Kavanaugh. That was a political hit.
Speaker 1: They were liars, they were they were completely There were
Speaker 1: women who were delusional, but they were weaponized by the
Speaker 1: left to take down a very important target. What you're
Speaker 1: going to have will be somebody who you know. People
Speaker 1: get very angry when relationships end. People get very angry
Speaker 1: after a divorce, you know, messy divorce. And if you
Speaker 1: know a target of the left, you know, if they
Speaker 1: can find some someone who you know, really hates I mean,
Speaker 1: I know people who have called who have tried to
Speaker 1: get their exes thrown into prison. I know people who
Speaker 1: have you know, lied to the police about I mean,
Speaker 1: people do really bad stuff here. Now you can say, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: well he this one time. You know, I said no
Speaker 1: and he didn't listen, and he raped me. And even
Speaker 1: though we lived a happy life for five years after
Speaker 1: the fact and we were you know, married, even or whatever,
Speaker 1: note that one time. I want to I want that
Speaker 1: a jude. Now that we're divorced and I hate him,
Speaker 1: and you know he's a high profile target for whatever reason,
Speaker 1: I want that adjudicated as a as a rape claim.
Speaker 1: I Look, we had we had Christine blasi Ford come forward.
Speaker 1: Could not even prove that she had ever met Kavanaugh,
Speaker 1: never mind that he'd assaulted her. Couldn't No, nobody could
Speaker 1: even prove of that even ever happened, that they were
Speaker 1: in the same place. This, didn't know where it was,
Speaker 1: didn't know when it was, didn't how she got home,
Speaker 1: but the narrative was up. No, he assaulted me, and
Speaker 1: everyone said, oh, we have we She must be believed,
Speaker 1: even though the facts were all that she shouldn't be believed. Now,
Speaker 1: think about how easy it will be if someone chooses
Speaker 1: to to say, well, if they if they are scorned,
Speaker 1: or if they hate somebody they used to have a
Speaker 1: relationship with, and they really want to get even, and
Speaker 1: this does happen in life. This does happen. There was
Speaker 1: one time when, and even though the relationship continued, I
Speaker 1: was very happy and said I was very happy, and
Speaker 1: we continue to have a sexual relationship, there was this
Speaker 1: one time. That's a legacy of this case that I
Speaker 1: don't think a lot of people see. But maybe I'm
Speaker 1: I could be wrong. Maybe this is just a one
Speaker 1: off and the dirt bag Harvey Winstin goes away forever
Speaker 1: and you know, everything is fine. This never happens. But
Speaker 1: I used to go on radio saying they were going
Speaker 1: to weaponize me too, and they did against Kavanaugh. I
Speaker 1: could see this getting added into that. That's all I'm
Speaker 1: trying to I'm making a prediction about the future, not
Speaker 1: a commentary on specifically whether Wine seems guilty. I think
Speaker 1: Winstine is guilty, But in terms of what's going to
Speaker 1: happen going forward, this case has real ramifications. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom hunt. This is The Buck Sexton Show Podcast,
Speaker 1: Team Bugging. It's time for roll call. Hey, team, I
Speaker 1: have a request. Um so I'm doing the show on
Speaker 1: war those of you who are listening on podcast. It's
Speaker 1: a New York specific show, but downloaded, will you check
Speaker 1: it out? Seven tenwr dot com slash Buck It's not
Speaker 1: it's not the same as this show. It's a different hour.
Speaker 1: It focuses more on New York related stuff. But especially
Speaker 1: if you're in the New York area, it would be
Speaker 1: really helpful. We'd love to see those numbers go up
Speaker 1: a little bit because that's uh. We got a lot
Speaker 1: of people, a lot of eyes on that show as
Speaker 1: well as this. This show grows all the time. Thank
Speaker 1: you very much team for passing the buck. We want
Speaker 1: that show to grow too, because that will be helpful
Speaker 1: for all Facebook dot com. Slash Buck Sexton Crystal first
Speaker 1: up here, Hey Buck, who names the podcast? They're witty
Speaker 1: and I enjoy them. Shield's high. Well, Crystal. We have
Speaker 1: a very unique and intricate naming system for the podcast.
Speaker 1: I sit here right after the show and I just
Speaker 1: throw some things out there to producer Mark, and if
Speaker 1: I get one chuckle from him, we're probably gonna do it.
Speaker 1: If I get two chuckles from producer Mark, and then
Speaker 1: I know we're golden. Right. I think that's how we
Speaker 1: do it. Yeah, I'm in a great mood today, so
Speaker 1: you might get a lot of chuckle. Yeah, exactly, you are.
Speaker 1: You were in kind of a good mood. Yeah. Do
Speaker 1: you didn't ask why? Yeah, I'm not asking. Now. My
Speaker 1: basketball team, the Hofstra Pride, they won their conference tournament
Speaker 1: last night. Well, congratulation going to the NCAA tournament, going
Speaker 1: to the dance, So Hofstra. Okay, how's Rutgers doing. Rutgers
Speaker 1: has the Big Ten tournament this week Oh, so they
Speaker 1: are on this weekend. They're on a different level. They're
Speaker 1: a high major. Hafs just some mid major, so you
Speaker 1: have to win the conference tournaments. Was a good game
Speaker 1: for Hostra What do you like? What do you mean
Speaker 1: a good close game? Like? Yeah, it was a fairly
Speaker 1: close game till the end. They won three games in
Speaker 1: three days. They won the tournament. Very nice. There we go.
Speaker 1: I'm excited. But yeah, that's how If if producer Mark goes,
Speaker 1: then I'm like, it's pretty good. If you laugh twice
Speaker 1: a little bit, then I know it's awesome. And if
Speaker 1: he doesn't laugh at all, I'm like, we'll try another one.
Speaker 1: I'll try another one. That's our system, Stephen, hey Buck,
Speaker 1: there actually is a Grand Theft Auto movie. Ryan Reynolds
Speaker 1: is one of the canned characters who turns into a
Speaker 1: player in the movie. Is that true? Is there a
Speaker 1: Grand Theft Auto movie? Or is he thinking gone in
Speaker 1: sixty seconds? Is the Grand Theft AutoMovie? Because that's not
Speaker 1: the same thing. I didn't know about this. I'm I'll
Speaker 1: google it and see if it's okay. Yeah, let me know.
Speaker 1: I didn't know about that. I'm thinking these days, especially
Speaker 1: if I have to go like hunker down other than
Speaker 1: doing radio and not socialize with people, which doesn't actually
Speaker 1: sound all that bad, maybe I would get up. Maybe
Speaker 1: I get a PS four and start playing video games again.
Speaker 1: I've given up video games for for a long time.
Speaker 1: I'll occasional, once in a rare while, if I'm with
Speaker 1: my two brothers because we grew up all playing video
Speaker 1: games together. We'll play some kind of a sports game.
Speaker 1: But I don't know. I feel like, if I get
Speaker 1: a PlayStation, I'm just gonna stop doing all the books
Speaker 1: and reading and research and just start getting really good
Speaker 1: at Call of duty. Oh yeah, there's times where I
Speaker 1: just don't want to do anything. It's like, I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna play video games for five hours. Yeah, that sounds nice.
Speaker 1: I gotta say, it sounds like a nice vacation for
Speaker 1: the brain. Doug Bucks, It's resorting to personal abuse in
Speaker 1: an argument is a sure sign you've lost the argument.
Speaker 1: Can we presume every dembcile has lost every argument from
Speaker 1: the start, since they're always resorting to that kind of
Speaker 1: abuse personal insults, epithets, and character assassination. Doug sure, I
Speaker 1: give you that. I give you my blessing of that one.
Speaker 1: Go for it, Taylor. With such high praise from Gavin
Speaker 1: Newsom toward Trump and Pence, this would be the best
Speaker 1: time for Trump to fly to California and do a
Speaker 1: joint press conference with him. Trump will lead the conversation
Speaker 1: and lead Newsom into praising him not just for this,
Speaker 1: but for all the good things the media never reports
Speaker 1: on in California. Trump is not afraid to carry his
Speaker 1: shield into California. Taylor, that's interesting. I don't think Newsom
Speaker 1: would do that. It would be considered brand damaging for
Speaker 1: him if he did, I'm sure, but it'd be interesting. Look,
Speaker 1: I thought what Newsom had to say about the President
Speaker 1: was very responsible and even borderline gracious or maybe just gracious.
Speaker 1: So it is possible even even psycholibs sometimes can put
Speaker 1: on their reasonable hat and be honest brokers about what
Speaker 1: the President's doing and what's going on. I said to
Speaker 1: you before. I'm still surprised at how dishonest and how
Speaker 1: unhinged the conversation was when I was on Bill Mahr
Speaker 1: the last time, because the first time we were actually
Speaker 1: able to have a real exchange. A second time, I
Speaker 1: just it's just like libs shouting at me and shouting nonsense,
Speaker 1: and they're wrong about every They're just wrong about everything.
Speaker 1: What are you gonna do when people are just wrong
Speaker 1: about everything? I mean, you can try to debate them,
Speaker 1: but how is that going to work? You know, if
Speaker 1: we can't, if we can't agree, there's a man in
Speaker 1: the window or not. How what do we do, Jill,
Speaker 1: I'm so convinced that the big push for Biden endorsements
Speaker 1: will lead to a Hillary Rodham Clinton presidency. Right could
Speaker 1: he choose her as his running mate and reap the
Speaker 1: votes of the sad losers that got outed in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: then Biden will become potus, then declared unfit to be potus,
Speaker 1: which he already is in my opinion, and bid A
Speaker 1: being Hillary Rodham Clinton will be the first woman president.
Speaker 1: I feel the wheels turning in that direction. Am I off, Jill,
Speaker 1: You're not alone. The great political mind and pugilist James
Speaker 1: Woods has been saying this on Twitter quite frequently, So yeah,
Speaker 1: I think you could be right. I can't say you're wrong.
Speaker 1: It makes sense to me. Rick Buck, thanks for doing
Speaker 1: your homework. It's refreshing to listen to you dive into
Speaker 1: the topics of the day. Mantra Free. I'm originally from Oregon,
Speaker 1: and I was able to pass the buck behind enemy
Speaker 1: lines from my buddy Jeff, who has to put up
Speaker 1: with Governor Brown's socialist experiments. Several Oregon country accounties are
Speaker 1: trying to secede to Idaho. Libs in Portland will never
Speaker 1: allow it. But if you believe in miracles, you and
Speaker 1: producer Mark and hit the Idaho host in twenty twenty one,
Speaker 1: can't wait for Producer Mark segment shields high. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: producer the problem we wanted to a producer Mark segment.
Speaker 1: The only issue we've had is that he's busy producing
Speaker 1: the show and he's also got a new wife who
Speaker 1: expects him to like do husband and wife things sometimes
Speaker 1: like be home and be present for meals. Right. That
Speaker 1: sometimes can be a bit of a drain on you
Speaker 1: doing additional things as much as now that people have
Speaker 1: spoken and they want more, they want more Producer Mark.
Speaker 1: I mean, listen, if the people want a producer Mark
Speaker 1: segment with the producer Mark will do a segment. It's
Speaker 1: I don't want to steal bucks Xton's time. No, Manny Kiddy,
Speaker 1: it would be great. Well, we'd call it the Penalty Box.
Speaker 1: I think it would be a lot of I think
Speaker 1: it'd be a lot of fun, actually, I really do.
Speaker 1: I also want to thank all the folks who listen
Speaker 1: out in Portland, Oregon on k EX. You guys are
Speaker 1: a fantastic audience for us, because you know we're mentioning
Speaker 1: Oregon before. And I know Portland is crazy left wing
Speaker 1: territory these days, but k e x out out in Portland.
Speaker 1: We really really appreciate you all listening, and please tell
Speaker 1: other folks to tune in get some more shout outs
Speaker 1: to some other some other peeps this week, who other
Speaker 1: other stations, other of our affiliates that are really having
Speaker 1: strong showings. Team Buck is growing and growing in these areas.
Speaker 1: That's gonna be the show for today. Team Talk to
Speaker 1: you tomorrow, Shields Hi