WEBVTT - AFC Over/Under Wins: Best Bets (Ep. 49)

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, everybody. Welcome back to the Betting Pros NFL podcast.

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Dan Harris. You can find me on

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Dan Harris Ady. Lots happened since our last

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 1>episode where we broke down some NFL futures and the

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Oscar odds, and the NFL offseason just keeps rolling right along.

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So today we're going to break down some win totals

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>for the AFC. With me to do that is Adam Burke,

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a sports betting writer over at bangbook dot com host

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of Bang the Book Radio. You can follow him on

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Skating Tripods. Adam, thanks so much for joining

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>me today.

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>How you doing, I'm good man, How you doing? Not bad?

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a little weird right now, obviously for

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>many reasons, and there are a lot of more serious

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>things going on in the country than just sports, but

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>the complete lack of sports. I mean, I watched with

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>my kid game seven of the twenty sixteen NBA Finals,

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:53.319
<v Speaker 1>where you know, Lebron and the Cavs won, and it

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>was it just like, it reminded me of how bizarre

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.279
<v Speaker 1>it is right now to not have anything at all

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>just to turn on and watch, you know what, I mean.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah, absolutely. I mean it's you know, that's a

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 2>pretty big day for us around here. That's something you'd

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 2>almost remember quite well. I mean those are those are

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the good times, the simpler days, I guess. But the

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 2>one nice thing I guess about, you know, talking NFL,

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 2>is that this is kind of the point that the

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 2>offseason would be in any way. You know, we had

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 2>a draft coming up in ten days or so, and

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, we were just looking at win totals and

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 2>futures and all that. It's it's not like we're sitting

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 2>here talking about how we don't have baseball, which I

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>know is very hard for both of us.

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it is. And by the way, Adam is

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>from Cleveland, in case you didn't know that, or at

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>least he is a Cleveland fan. Are you born and

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>raised in Cleveland or what?

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Born and raised? I actually grew up about ten minutes

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 2>southwest of downtown.

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, I remember you had last year when we talked

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in an early episode. You had a correct take about

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the Browns, you know, in their their future to win

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the division, and you were not quite as bullish as

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the general consensus. So you had that one peg. So

0:01:58.400 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll be interested to hear what you think about their

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>own under today. So for today, as we said, we're

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna go division by division. In the AFC, we're going

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the over unders for every team in

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the division. Now, for the odds, we're going to be

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>using the consensus over unders from bettingpros dot com. That's

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the aggregate of the odds that are available in the market,

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and you can find those over at bettingpros dot com

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>slash NFL hyphen wins. And you can find more than

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>just the win totals or team futures. If you're interested

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in the draft, go to bettingpros dot com slash draft

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>hyphen props. Those are consensus lines on things like how

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>many of any position are going to be drafted, or

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the first pick by team and things like that. You

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>can find lines on pretty much every potential thing to

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>bet in the NFL, So go check it out, all right, Adam,

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the AFC East here, a division which

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>should be a little more interesting than in past years.

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the consensus lines are the Bills are over

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>under of nine, the Patriots also over under of nine,

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Jets are an over under of six and a half,

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Dolphins are an over under of six. So

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>any of these over under, any of these bets, do

0:02:58.080 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you find enticing.

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's you know, really tough to kind of

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 2>figure out right now because we're still sort of in

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 2>a holding pattern with New England. I think that New

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>England it's very hard to see them going into the

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 2>season with you know, Jared Stidham and Brian Hoyer at quarterback,

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, maybe they take one in the first round,

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 2>but I can't imagine that Bill Belichick's gonna run a

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 2>rookie quarterback out there right away, So maybe Hoyer is

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 2>kind of a placeholder something like that. But I mean,

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 2>this defense is still exceptional, you know, it's still one

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.679
<v Speaker 2>of the best defenses in the AFC, if not the

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 2>best defense in the AFC. So it's tough to kind

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 2>of ascertain what to do with the win totals here

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 2>in the AFC East until we get more clarity on

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>New England's quarterback situation, because if they upgrade at quarterback,

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 2>this could very well be a team that goes eleven

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 2>and five, you know, or has a very very strong

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 2>ten and six record, which at that point in time,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 2>would you know, positive or would potentially, I should say

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 2>impact the Bills impact those two head to head meetings

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 2>with the Jets. Same thing about their games with the Dolphins.

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 2>So I couldn't really do too much with the AFC

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>East right now until I figure out where New England's

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of going to fall, because you know, those head

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 2>to head games with two per team are very important.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask you something, what does upgrade the

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position mean to you? Does that mean literally sign

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>anybody else or trade for anybody else or anything like

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that that's going on. I mean, you we obviously have

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've got Jameis Winston and Cam Newton out there.

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals are of course looking to deal Andy Dalton

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>if they get one of those guys, is that completely

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>change your outlook on this division? I mean, how would

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you feel about an over under of nine if they

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>made one of those moves?

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I would have to go over at

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 2>that point. And you know, I've even kind of seen

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 2>some of the places out there in the offshore market

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of have a head to head matchup between New

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 2>England and Buffalo, and you know who would have more

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 2>wins in a battle between those two teams and I mean, look,

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 2>if New England makes an upgrade at quarterback, I think

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>their win total nine and a half looks good. You know,

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that they would go all the way

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 2>up to ten necessarily. And as I look at the

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 2>betting pros consensus ods, you know, some individual books out

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 2>there do have nine and a half. I mean, is

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Dalton a half win upgrade over you know, Hoyer or

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Stidham or let's say they take you know, Jordan Love

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:13.559
<v Speaker 2>or something like that. I think, so is Winston and upgrade. Yeah,

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't have the same skill position talent that he

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 2>had in Tampa Bay, but I mean he's still a

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 2>better option, I would say, than Hoyer and Stidham. And

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, Cam Newton could be an option here too.

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 2>I think New England, if I had to bet it

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 2>right now, I'm still taking New England to win this division.

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't be in love with it. But given the

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.239
<v Speaker 2>fact that both the Patriots and the Bills are sitting

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 2>there at nine, I mean I would have to look

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 2>probably more over nine with New England than I would

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 2>with Buffalo.

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair. I think that I think let's

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>start with your first point, which is It is nearly

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>impossible to accurately kind of assess this division without knowing

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>what the Patriots are going to be doing. Right now,

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>let me start with this. I guess if they don't

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 1>make an upgrade on quarterback, let's say they go with Stidham. Okay,

0:05:57.560 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>let's say they say, this is what we're doing, this

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>is our future. We like what we've seen, despite the

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's thrown what four passes in the NFL.

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>They go, it's Stidham. What do you think about the

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>over under nine? And you pointed it out, by the way,

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the consensus odds, it's nine nine

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half, nine nine and a half, nine nine

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half, So it's one of two ways at

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half. Personally, if they don't make an upgrade,

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm easy on the under here. I get that the

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Patriots are incredible. They haven't won fewer than ten games

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and two. The defense is good, they're

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>very good. But they have lost a boatload so far

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in free agency. Right they lost Kyle Van Nooy, they

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>lost Jamie Collins, they lost Shelton, they lost Harmon, they

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>lost a Landon Roberts. You know, I get that they

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>still have you know, Stefan Gilmore, and they still have

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>mccordy and everything like that. But you know, the thing is, defensively,

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>they're very good, but they're not this elite unit that

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody kind of thought that they were because they were

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>beaten the heck out of that horrible offensive competition that

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>they faced earlier in the year. They're a very solid

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>defensive unit, but I don't think they're good enough for

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the offense to carry them. And they just have done

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>nothing right now. On offense. I mean they tagged you know,

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Joe Toney, they still have Mohammed Sanu, they still have

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Kennon, but they really I mean, unless you're saying

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Nikhil Harry or Jacoby Myers are gonna take a huge

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>leap or they're gonna do something with you know, their

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve picks to really make a move or a trade

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, this team is not very good.

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, their defense is is decent, but their offense

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, all I hear about all the time.

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And again I live in New England, so this is

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly what I get from my in laws and everything

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>like that, and just from the crowd around here in

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the sports talk radio is you know, you think back

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to the Matt Castle gear, but you know, this is

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>not Randy Moss and Wes Welker sitting there on offense.

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not as if he can just Belichick

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and just do this without Brady. This is not a

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>very good offensive team. So for me, absent a major

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, absent upgraded quarterback for sure, but maybe even

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>more than that. If it's nine and a half, I'm

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>still going under. I'd probably stay away at nine, I guess,

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>But for the nine and a half, I really think

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I lean under.

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean those are all fair points. And you know, again,

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean there are a lot of moving parts with

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>this team, and we know that, you know, they're very,

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>very sharp and very smart organizationally, and there also has

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 2>been a brain drain in terms of the coaching staff too.

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, you lose a guy like a Jerry Schaplinsky,

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, somebody like that, a guy that, yeah he's

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>not an offensive coordinator, Yeah he's not going to get

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the same headlines, but a guy that's you know, been

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 2>in that quarterback room, been in that offensive room, obviously

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 2>a very smart guy. Three Super Bowl rings. Now I

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 2>don't even think he's forty yet, or he's pretty close

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 2>to it. That's another byproduct of being really good is

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 2>that you start losing some very smart people within the

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.719
<v Speaker 2>organization as well. Now that being said, you'll get their

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 2>eight home games here, they get San Francisco and they

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 2>get Baltimore at home, two very very difficult games. Otherwise,

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>you've got the three Division teams Denver, Las Vegas, and

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Arizona all six of those very very winnable games. And

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 2>on the road. I'm low on the Rams for this season,

0:08:57.880 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 2>which I'm sure we'll talk about in a little bit.

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm very on Seattle for this season. Those are two

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 2>road games that there'll be an underdog in in all likelihood,

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 2>but I think they're kind of there for the taking.

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 2>The three Division games. Houston, I mean, who knows if

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 2>Deshaun Watson doesn't just walk out on that team at

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 2>some point here with everything that's going on with them,

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City and the Chargers a couple of tough road

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 2>games against the AFC West. I don't think their schedule

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 2>is that bad, and I think if they've got a

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 2>quarterback that doesn't actively hurt them the schedule sets up

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 2>relatively well for them to be, you know, a ten

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 2>and six type team if everything falls into place. But again,

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about a much thinner margin for error than

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>we've seen in the past. I think it's more of

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 2>a commentary to me on I don't think Buffalo is

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 2>as good as people think they are, and I think

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins will be better. I don't think the Jets

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 2>necessarily will be. It doesn't shock me.

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, sorry, as a Jets fan, I have to

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>do that every time somebody says that the Jets are

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to be very good, which, to be fair,

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it's accurate and happens on every single podcast, So I'm sorry,

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>go ahead.

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 2>No, that's all good. But I just I mean, I

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 2>could see five and one in the division. Again, I

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 2>could see them splitting with Buffalo and you know, winning

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the other four games. And I mean, maybe your view

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>is different from mine and the Dolphins and the Jets,

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 2>and maybe that's kind of how we differ a little

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 2>bit here. But again I think that the Patriots until

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm proven otherwise that you know, maybe it was all Brady,

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 2>or maybe it was all you know, some of these

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 2>quality control guys and all that. I just feel like

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Belichick finds away.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I look, I certainly cannot dispute the Belichick finds away,

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>because Belichick finds away. It is worth noting you're talking

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>about the schedule, and again this is not the best

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>way to necessarily analyze the schedule. They actually have the

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>toughest schedule in the league in terms of opponents win percentage.

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Last year it's five thirty seven. That's the toughest in

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 1>the league. The whole AFC East has a very difficult

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>schedule because again they play the NFC West, which is

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a very solid division where you know, you've got the

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks and you've got the forty nine Ers. The Cardinals

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to be improved. The Rams are still putting

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>up a fight, and then they've got the West, which

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>again you talked about it not that great from top

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to bottom. The Chiefs are, of course fantastic. The Broncos

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to be improved. The Chargers are a better

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>team than they showed last year, even losing Rivers and

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>going to Tyro. Taylor are not really sure that it's

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a downgrade at this point in their careers, but they

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>lost all those one score games so they could be better,

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you know they were the best team in

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the division. They're going to get the Ravens and then

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the Texans, which again, you're right if there's not a

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>mutiny over there or Bill O'Brien doesn't trade the entire

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>team for you know, four tires or something for his

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>new truck. But yeah, it's an interesting thing, and I

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>agree the division itself. I like Buffalo. I don't necessarily

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>expect you know, they've lost a lot of pieces, but

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they've had a lot of pieces on defense. The big

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>thing is digs. But again, you've got basically the least

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>accurate deep ball quarterback in the game with Josh Allen,

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 1>So it's really tough to know what you're gonna see

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>from then. With the Jets, yeah, I think they're gonna

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>be okay like they were last year. They've built up

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>their offensive line right now. It's gonna have to see

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>what they do in the draft, if they had a receiver,

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>or whether or not they had an edge rusher, but

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>they obviously need help. The Dolphins, actually you mentioned them.

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the one that I do like. Here is the

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>over under of six and again it does depend a

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit on the Patriots, but you know, look they

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 1>finished five and four down the stretch. They've had a

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>monstrous offseason with Byron Jones, who's you know, between him

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and Saving Howard, they're looking really good. They added Shaq

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Lawson and Kyle van Noy and the Landon Roberts and

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Agba. The defense is going to be a lot better.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And on offense they've added a little bit. Jordan Howard

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is better than you know, whoever they were throwing out

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>there last year, especially Klin Bilage, Ted Carris, Eric Flowers,

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Devonte Parker, still developing, Preston Williams if he's healthy,

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Micah Sicki. They've got fourteen picks, three in the first round.

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I get that Fits is not the future,

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>but he's capable of winning games. Again, tough schedule here,

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>but they don't go to Arrowhead, they don't go to Seattle,

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>so at least when they get those they'll have a

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote fighting chance and the fact that they'll be home.

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>They get the Jags, they're home against the Bengals. They've

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of games that they can win, especially

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the Jets. Depend on what happens with the

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>pat So for me right now, if there's one pick

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in this division that I like, and I don't love

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>any of them, but if I had to go with

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>one for me, it would be taking the Dolphins over

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>six wins.

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I agree with that. And you know too, I mean,

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 2>you look at the moves that they've made in free

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.199
<v Speaker 2>agency here and kind of the the expectations for them

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 2>in the draft where they are going to address the

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 2>offensive side and you know, quite possibly address the quarterback

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 2>position as well. But Flores is a defensive guy by note,

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 2>by trade, So you get a Byron Jones, you get

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 2>some pass rushers. I think Emmanuel Lagba is a very

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>very good player, just wound up getting overshadowed in Cleveland

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 2>because you know, Miles Garrett's here, and then you get

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, Kyle like Kyle van Noy, who Flores obviously knows, well,

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 2>they've got a lot of pieces to build around here

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 2>and something else you really like about Miami and obviously

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 2>they got off to the atrocious start last year, but

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 2>he improved the culture of that team. Flores made it

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 2>a point to do that very early in the process,

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 2>to get rid of guys that weren't buying in get

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 2>rid of guys that were kind of dragging everybody else down.

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 2>And we saw what happened at the tail end of

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 2>the year when they kind of changed that culture. They

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 2>got guys that wanted to be there, guys that wanted

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 2>to play. They were a much more cohesive unit. So

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 2>I think you're definitely onto something there. It's obviously scary

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 2>thinging about this team. You'll potentially having to improve to

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 2>seven wins to go over a win total, right, but

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 2>you've got to like everything that they've been doing here

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 2>over the last eighteen months.

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>No, absolutely, And again, remember they had five wins, but

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that was all in their last nine games, right, I

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>mean they were basically tanking, so they finished strong. So yeah,

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they could get there. It's a two win

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>improvement is something that kind of shocks you a little bit,

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But with all they've done and how well they played

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>down the stretch, I'm willing to buy it. So if

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we did go with one in that division, that would

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>be my pick. Let's move on here to the AFC North.

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>You've got the Ravens at over under of eleven, which

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is a big number, of course, but they earned it

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>by going fourteen to two. Steelers are over under nine,

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the Browns over under eight and a half, and the

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Bengals amasely over under of five. So which of any

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of these do you like?

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 2>All right? Well, be a homer here, right, because the

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland Browns are going to be better than they were

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 2>last year, and I like this team to go over

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 2>eight and a half here. I see there's a couple

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 2>of rogue eights out there as well on the betting board.

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 2>I like this team a lot. I mean they're loaded

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 2>with skill position talent on offense. Now they pick up

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 2>a guy like Austin Hooper, and most importantly, Kevin Stefanski

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 2>seems to know what he's doing. Now, obviously we'll see

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 2>if that translates into being a head coach, but as

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 2>an offensive coordinator, as a play caller, as a guy

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 2>that knows how to get all of his guys involved,

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 2>much like he did there in Minnesota. I mean, they've

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 2>got so many weapons, and defensively they're very, very good.

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 2>They'll improve the offensive line here in the draft. And

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned it in the top of today's show that

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 2>last year I talked down about them because they had

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 2>such a challenging schedule, in particular early on in the

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>season when they were trying to get everybody acclimated to

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 2>what Kitchens wanted to do and all that. Their schedule

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 2>is much much softer this year. I think I saw

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 2>they go from like thirtieth and strength to schedule to

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, ninth, something like that.

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Now they have the fourth in terms of opponents winning percentage,

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>at least their fourth easiest schedule in the NFL.

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 2>And they don't really have to travel much either. Their

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 2>schedule is very very close to home. I mean, this

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 2>is a team and this happens a lot of times too.

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 2>When you've got a team that's expected to do big

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 2>things and they fall flat on their faces, that following

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 2>year is when they kind of tend to come through

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. I think the Browns are in that

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 2>exact situation right now. And I get it, I'm from Cleveland.

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like a Homer pick, but you know, hey,

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>I was honest about them last year, and I think

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 2>this is a pretty honest assessment this year.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, the bottom line is from last year, you've

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>earned a ton of credibility, at least for me and

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>hopefully with our listeners, because yeah, you per word, cold

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>water in them. I was more bullish on them. I

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>had a tough time justifying the under or not picking

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>them to win the division last year because I really

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>thought that they were going to come out gangbusters and

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it basically unfolded on almost exactly like you said. So

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly I'm not taking the home review and I'm not

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>going to disagree with really anything that you're saying. I

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of what they've done here in the

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>off season. I mean, Hooper was a little strange to me,

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, because you know, I know in Joko hasn't

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>been great, but you know, Stefanski runs a lot of

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>two tight ends sense to the to the extent that

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>they keep in Joko. But I like adding you know,

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Jack Conklin and getting a solid backup like case Keenum,

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna go. You saw that they're their offense

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>last year, and again it's gonna be a different system. So

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna look exactly like that, but you know,

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>they're they're keeping Kareem Hunt. I assume they've got a

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>second round ten around them. I don't think anybody's gonna

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>want to pay that. And you know they've got Andy Jenovitch,

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>So they want to run the ball, right that that's

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of part of what they're going to be doing.

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield's gonna work a lot better on play action passing.

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>So I find it hard and it's probably the optics,

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>even though it shouldn't because it's an entirely new coaching

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>staff and they still have talent to do the I'm

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna go they're going to improve three wins, right, that's well,

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that's just a lot in the NFL.

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>They were six and ten last year, so it's hard

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>for me to go out there. But I really I

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>can't really disagree with anything that you're saying in this one,

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>especially again they've got a really really easy schedule and

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the travel. You're right, So for me, yeah, I'm not

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>going to really argue with it. It's not bad the

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>one that I like a little better in this one. Again,

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe I just like the worst team in the division

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and the lowest over under, but I kind of like

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals over and again this is one where you'd

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>have to go way over because it's they were two

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen last year and the over unders five, so

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you're expecting them to improve six wins. But this kind

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of offseason has been different than the usual Bengals offseason, right.

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they've spent money, They've gone out there and

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 1>they've they've really helped their defense with DJ Reader, Trey Wayns, McKenzie,

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Alexander and Von Bell. So they're going to be better

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 1>against the run. And you know, Wayns and Alexander they

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>weren't that great in twenty nineteen and they've lost you know,

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Darkez Dennard and Drake Kirkpatrick. But you know, I do

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>think defensively they're going to be better and on offense, Look,

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get aj Greenback and you have to assume

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna get Joe Burrow. It's possible they trade

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that pick, but everything I've seen sounds like they're gonna

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>go for it. They sell a Dalton on the roster

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>if not, but they're gonna get with Joe Burrow. And look,

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>can you find six wins? You look at their schedule.

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>They've got the Redskins, they've got the Jaguars, They've got

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins, who are gonna be improved. But you know

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 1>that that's certainly a potential. They've got the Giants, you know,

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>those are those are some games that they could easily win.

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Divisional games are always up in the air. Five wins

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty low total. I don't love it, and

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>this division is my least favorite division in terms of

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>finding a pick that I really like. But I kind

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 1>of can see and again this is me probably assuming

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that they go with Joe Burrow, but I could kind

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of see, you know, in in their second year under Taylor,

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals taking a leap and getting to more than

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>five wins.

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that one, that one's tough for me to get

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 2>to simply because I want to see what the defense

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 2>looks like. You know, we know the offense should be better.

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Burrow's gonna have Green, he's gonna have mix,

0:19:57.640 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 2>and he's gonna have some guys that he can kind

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 2>of work with a little. But what happens with this defense?

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, can this defense get stops? And again, I

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 2>always like to look I base a lot of this

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 2>on the six games within the division. The Browns obviously

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 2>look very good and look capable of scoring a lot

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 2>of points. Pittsburgh will get Ben Roethlisberger back whatever state

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 2>he's in at this point in his career, and then

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 2>there's Baltimore, who is probably just the best team in

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 2>the AFC. And you know, unless you consider the Chiefs

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 2>to be the best team in the AFC, they're kind

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 2>of one A and one B right there. Can the

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Bengals find wins outside of the division, because if they

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 2>go zero to six in the division, which is very possible,

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 2>then you're asking him to kind of get six wins

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 2>out of their other ten games. That's a little bit

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 2>difficult for me to kind of wrap my head around.

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 2>But I will say this, I do think that you

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 2>start building the foundation because Taylor, again by trade a

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks kind of guy. You get him Burrow, you see

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 2>him provement in the second half of the season. Maybe

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 2>next year is the bye year for a team like that.

0:20:58.119 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I will say, though, maybe this kind of works in

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 2>with your thoughts on the Bengals. I'm not real high

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 2>on Pittsburgh this season, you know. I mean, I think

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 2>that Pittsburgh is a team that is obviously still a

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 2>very very well run organization, but there were questions all

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 2>year long last year about Mike Tomlin and his job

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 2>security and all that Ben Roethlisberger goes down gives them

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 2>an easy excuse to, you know, just sort of keep

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 2>things status quo and you know, wait and see what

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 2>happens next year. But I'm not a real big fan

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 2>of this Pittsburgh team. I don't know what we're going

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 2>to get from Ben. Obviously, it was going to be

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 2>more difficult having Antonio Brown alongside Juju Smith Schuster, and

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 2>we saw that with Smith Schuster, I mean it was

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 2>it was tough for him to get open. It was

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 2>tough for him to find a lot of room to work.

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Is Ben gonna be able to throw it in those windows?

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't think so. Pittsburgh is a

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 2>team that I'm just pretty sour on overall for this

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 2>upcoming season. I was sour on them a little bit

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 2>to a degree last year, and I did I don't

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 2>see them getting to nine and seven. I mean, obviously

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 2>they went eight and eight and you would think, oh,

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 2>upgrade Ben's back and this and that. I just think

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 2>that the Browns passed them by, and maybe within a

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 2>couple of years the Bengals do too.

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I don't love the Steelers over nine at all.

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know what to make of them because

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they are basically the same team right, They've got a

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>great offensive line, they've got a great defense. They once

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.479
<v Speaker 1>they brought in Minko Fitzpatrick, it was, you know, the

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>defense really turned and they basically got to eight and

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>eight with nothing at quarterback last year. So if Ben

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>can do anything, you do kind of feel like they'll

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>be better. But I think the fact that they did

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>get to eight and eight last year makes me just say,

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, no matter what, they're going to be a

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>tough opponent, you know. So you can't look at even

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>if Ben is terrible, you can't look at at that

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>as a game that the Bengals can be like, oh great, well,

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>when I agree, you look at their schedule, it's not

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that forgiving. I mean, they do have an easy schedule,

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole NFC AFC North does, but there aren't that

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>many games that you look at and can say, oh, wow,

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>this is game the Bengals are definitely gonna win. But

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I do just feel like this

0:22:58.520 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a team. I think their cultures

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>and be better. I think if they get Burrow, I

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be which I'm kind of banking

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>on at this point that they're going to be well

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>improved offensively. So this is a team that I kind

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of like, I'm not overly bullish on, but I think

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I can see them getting a six months. Let's move

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 1>on here.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you real quickly. Go ahead, because by

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and large, and I talked about this a lot when

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 2>I wrote the MLB Betting Guide, which is now and

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 2>large juiceless with the season, you know, being so shortened

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 2>if it gets played at all. But one of the

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 2>things I always talk about in that betting guide is that,

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 2>as a general rule, I don't like to play really

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 2>high or really low win totals because there's just not

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of margin for error. It's very hard to

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 2>bet on the degree to which a team will be

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 2>really good or the degree to which a team will

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 2>be really bad. Is there any way you can take

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Baltimore under eleven or under eleven and a half, because

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I could. It would have to be

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 2>over or nothing. Right.

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and again they you want to talk about they

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>have the easiest schedule in opponents winning percentage of four

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight, so it's really really difficult. I remember one

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of their quote unquote harder matchups is the Patriots, which

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.199
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be nearly as hard a matchup

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>as it was last year for the reasons that we discussed.

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But in the end, yeah, no, I agree with you.

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly not going under. I just I couldn't you

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>look at what they've done this offseason. They're probably only

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>better right now on paper. Right they traded for Kalais

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Campbell and adding Derek Wolf and everything like that. It's

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>really going to be tough. They've got to add an

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>inside linebacker, they've got to bulk up the interior of

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>their offensive line. But really they're basically just as good

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>as last year. Is there a chance that the league

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>can adjust to Lamar Jackson? I mean, is there a

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>chance that was there a quote unquote blueprint that the

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Titans were able to put out there in the playoffs.

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think so. But you know, it's hard

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>with this type of offense that they run that you

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>just feel like eventually a team's going to kind of

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to play them. But for me, no,

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I don't like it because eleven's

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>way too big a number for me to really sit there,

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and there is a high or over under that I

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>like the under which we'll talk about in a few minutes.

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>But for me, yeah, I agree. If I worried about

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>on the Ravens right now, I would go over the

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 1>eleven because it's just really difficult, especially with they've had

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a very good offseason, to see them really falling off

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.719
<v Speaker 1>too much. Let's go to the AFC South here, and

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>this one's kind of all bunched up together. You've got

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the Titans at eight and a half, the Colts at

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half, the Texans at eight, and the

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars at five. So what do you think here?

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 2>This one's tough. I mean, this one is really really tough, especially.

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>One there's one I like only other than that, I

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>really don't want any part of this.

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Division, especially because you know we've seen the adjustment to

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 2>Houston and deservedly so. I mean, this is a team

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 2>that you know want its division last year at ten

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 2>and six with a negative point differential, and they trade it.

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 2>As much as I love Deshaun Watson, they trade away

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 2>their best offensive player in DeAndre Hopkins, and Will Fuller

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 2>is never healthy. Brandon Cooks has always got the concussion

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 2>background that you know you need to worry about. Maybe

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 2>David Johnson sort of has a career resurgence. I don't know,

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 2>but it's unfortunate that Houston has already been adjusted down

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 2>enough some places, even showing seven and a half out

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 2>there now that you can't really take that one. I mean,

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 2>were the Titans. Are the Titans going to be as

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 2>good as they were in the second half of last year?

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Probably not. Do I still think that they're the team

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 2>most likely to win this division? Yeah, I think so,

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 2>so over eight and a half with Tennessee probably my

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 2>favorite play. But it also doesn't shock me if any

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 2>of these three teams, you know, whatever order they finish one, two, three,

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 2>not gonna surprise me at all. The only thing I

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 2>think is for certain is that Jacksonville probably does finish

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 2>in the basement here once again.

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, Jacksonville is coming as close to outright

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.880
<v Speaker 1>tanking as you possibly can be without seriously just saying, yes,

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:47.959
<v Speaker 1>we are trying to lose. But for me, the one

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I like actually is and there's no way I'm going

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near the Texans because I don't know what the

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>psyche of that team has to be. Right now, where

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you have trades that you know, everybody who looks at

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>is like, what is happening right now? How could you

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.880
<v Speaker 1>possibly do that? And Bill O'Brien just like, yeah, this

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>works for me, and I have total control, so I'm

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna do what I want for me. I kind of

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>like the Colts at over eight and a half. So

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>here's why I personally probably a little more I don't

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>want to even use the word bullish, but a little

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>more positive on Rivers and what he has left in

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the tank. I honestly think that last year was much

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>more about him just getting the crap kicked out of

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>him all the time. He was sacked thirty four times.

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>He was pressured thirty six percent of the time. Nobody

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>likes pressure, no quarterback, especially someone who is basically a

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>mobile like Rivers. He had a terrible offensive line. Now

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>he's with the Colts, which is kind of the perfect

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.719
<v Speaker 1>spot because I have a great offensive line and they

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>kept you know, Anthony Castanzo. That was a huge move.

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>He's familiar with the sick with the system because of

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Nick Soriani, and he's got enough pieces on offense. As

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>long as Paris Campbell can stay healthy, Marlon Mack is

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>still a quality back. I don't I don't love Marlon Mack,

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>but he's a quote unquote quality back. He's good enough.

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>They've got Nahima Hines for all the dump offs that

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Rivers likes to do. They are solid defensively. They let

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 1>pier de siergo, but they added to Forrest Buckner. Not

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>sure that he was worth a thirteenth pick, but certainly

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that's an addition for them. So, look, they can go

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>four and two in the division. I assume, you know,

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 1>they can be Jacksonville twice. They'll probably split, let's say,

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>with Tennessee and Houston. They get the Jets, the Raiders,

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, the Lions, the Bears. It's not the easiest

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>schedule overall, but they have a ton of winnable games.

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I just I really like that team. I think the

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.719
<v Speaker 1>fact that they they you know, they wound up finishing

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:34.479
<v Speaker 1>seven to nine last year, but for a while they

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 1>look like they were gonna possibly win that division with

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Brissett, who is just not equality NFL quarterback in

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>my personal opinion, And the fact that they had to

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>do that while losing luck in the preseason. You know,

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I know they were kind of preparing for it, but

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they weren't exactly saying yes, we're gonna go in here

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>with Brissett. That was still kind of a big blow.

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And they're just so well coached, they've been put together.

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.040
<v Speaker 1>The bones of the team are really strong. So I

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>think if Rivers has anything left, and personally I do.

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I know how bad he looked, but again he was

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>just he was just getting blown up every single play there.

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers offensive line was terrible last year, so I

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's got a little more in the tank. You

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>give him an offensive line, you give him a decent

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>team around him, and him a well coached team. I

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's a team that can get to nine wins.

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's fair. And again we see that

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 2>with the Jews that's out there in the market ranging

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 2>anywhere from you know, minus one twenty five on up

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 2>and look Rivers to me again, feels like one of

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 2>those guys that and he's probably earned this right being

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 2>you know what is the almost forty now or over forty.

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 2>He's earned this right of being comfortable, and like you said,

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 2>last year, he was uncomfortable. He had the offensive line issues.

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, he was very good for Ken wizen Hunt

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 2>too for a while, and then wizen Hunt I don't

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 2>know if the shine came off of him or if

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 2>they just wanted to make a change or what. That's

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 2>something that probably did impact Rivers negatively as well. You

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 2>mentioned Sirianni and kind of the rapport that he has

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 2>with him. Sirianni was the quarterbacks coach for the then

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 2>San Diego Chargers, also a wide receivers coach. Rivers is

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 2>comfortable with Syrian. He would have to be, otherwise he

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have, you know, said okay, I'll go to the Colts.

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 2>So that helps. I think Frank Reich is an awesome

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 2>head coach. I think that he's had a lot of

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 2>hardship to deal with, in particular on the injury side

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 2>as it pertains to the Colts, you know, with the

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 2>couple years that he's been there. So I think he's

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 2>a very very good fit. You know, to have a

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 2>guy like Philip Rivers. They get a lot of third

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and short situations. That's somewhere where Rivers can excel. If

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 2>it's third and three, third and four, Rivers is fine.

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 2>If it's third and eight, third and nine and the

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 2>pass rushers are coming, it's a lot tougher for Philip Rivers.

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 2>So I think schematically it fits. Personnel wise it fits.

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I completely agree with you on both of those counts.

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I need to see the defense. I don't even want

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 2>to say improve, but just stay healthy, man. I mean,

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's one of the things I failed to

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 2>mention about the Browns is that they had three or

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 2>four weeks in a row last year where there are

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 2>four starters in the secondary were all out. And when

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Indianapolis is healthy and at something resembling full strength, they

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 2>are a very, very good football team. It's a two

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 2>horse race between the Colts and the Titans for this

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 2>division crown as far as I'm concerned, and I think

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 2>you could make very strong, very compelling arguments for the

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 2>over with both of them. And I think that we've

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of done that.

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think that when we say it's two

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>horse race, which I agree with, then you and I

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>can have another podcast at the end of the season

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>after the Texans miraculously go twelve and four, just bye

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a negative point differential, which they seem to be able

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to do. The one thing you pointed out, by the way,

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>which is true. I should have pointed that out. I mean,

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, it's pretty juice, right, I mean

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to take the over, it's minus one twenty five and

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:39.719
<v Speaker 1>it's plus one oh three to take the under, So

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that the over is the right

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>side at this point. I think that you know, it

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like that. Frankly a week ago it was much closer.

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:50.239
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's moving that way, and I think

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that there's a reason.

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Well that's an important distinction for listeners too, is that

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, as a general rule, you know it's about

0:31:57.760 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I want to say it's about forty to fifty cents,

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 2>was about a half win in the NFL marketplace. I

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 2>apologize if I'm off by that, but I feel like

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 2>I remember hearing that. So this is almost essentially like

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 2>what over nine at. You know, maybe a little bit

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 2>of a plus money price something like that. Would you

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 2>be willing to take that. If the answer is yes,

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 2>then don't necessarily be afraid of that little bit of

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 2>extra juice on the over eight and a half because

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of getting like a really cheap nine price.

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 2>And if you're comfortable with doing that, you know, obviously

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 2>it takes away the push on nine, then you know,

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 2>by all means, go ahead and do it. If you

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 2>feel strongly enough about it.

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a great point. And again, you know, for

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the most part, with all of these, they're they're almost

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>not all, but the vast majority of them are. The

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>juice is minus one ten on the over or the under.

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Like the entire AFC West, which we're about to talk about,

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>over and under is all one ten minus one ten

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>all around. So this is one, you know where it's

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a little and some books. Look, I'm looking at one.

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be it's a FanDuel. So on

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel you look at it. Over eight and a half

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is minus one, say, and under is plus one thirty five.

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>So again that's another reason to shop around. But yeah,

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>for this one in particular, there's really a big disparity

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>between the over and the underwitch there aren't usually, and

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>there aren't necessarily with the West, where everyone is at

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>either over or under at minus one ten, and that's

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the chiefs at over under an eleven and a half.

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Everyone else in the division seven and a half, Broncos

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Chargers Raiders all over under seven and a half. Everybody

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the juices minus one ten on either side. So how

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>do you feel, do you like any of these.

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know again, I mean, we're talking about teams that,

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 2>at least according to the win total odds are kind

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 2>of interchangeable there with Denver, the Chargers, and the Raiders.

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 2>And there's one that I disagree with, and that's the Chargers.

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think that this is a team that

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, we just talked about it with Philip Rivers

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 2>and how he has the mobility of an Easter Island statue.

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Tyrod Taylor does not. Tyrod Taylor can move around a

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 2>little bit. And while I really wanted Jameis Winston to

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 2>land in LA with the Chargers, and who knows, maybe

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 2>he's still could, Taylor's probably an upgrade just from the

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 2>simple fact that he can move around the fact that

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 2>they can. Now I don't know if they're going to

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 2>try to adopt something of a Lamar Jackson style offense

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 2>with you know, the backs that they have in a

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 2>mobile quarterback like Taylor, but they're not handicapped by the

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 2>fact that Philip Rivers can't move They're not handicap by

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 2>the fact that Philip Rivers won't QB sneak on third

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 2>and one or fourth and one anymore. They've got a

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 2>guy in Tyrod Taylor, who's going to be willing to

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 2>move around, and I think that's going to help everything

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 2>about this offense. And look, this defense can be downright

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 2>nasty as long as everybody's healthy. They obviously have the

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 2>pass rush. You know, you got Linval Joseph in the

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 2>middle defensively to kind of help them out with the

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 2>run a little bit. Again, another team that needs to

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 2>stay healthy in the back seven. But if we're talking

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 2>about ceiling, which by and large is what I try

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 2>to look at with any win total market in any sport,

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I want to look at ceiling and I want to

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 2>look at floor, and I think the floor for the

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Chargers probably is that six and ten, seven and nine range.

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 2>I think their ceiling could be as high as ten

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 2>and six if everything falls into place for them. So

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 2>because they've got a bigger gap between floor and ceiling

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 2>than say the Broncos or the Raiders, the Chargers would

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 2>have to be the one. I'd look at it over

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 2>seven and a half.

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Yep, that is the one that I like here as well.

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know you brought up the good point first

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of all out of curiosity. Do you think they're going

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>in with Tyrod Taylor or do you think they're going

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to be doing something else?

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Man, I mean, if if they were going to

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 2>do Tyrod Taylor, wouldn't they have already gotten somebody else?

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you assume?

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, or do they do they draft someone?

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think they probably do draft someone, but

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's much more of a long term pick.

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>What are they six? I think they're the six pick

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:37.919
<v Speaker 1>in the draft. I think it's more of a long

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>term option. So if they're if they take.

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.959
<v Speaker 2>Justin Herbert, does he start you know, like maybe week three,

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 2>week four, something like that, or do they give Taylor

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 2>all year?

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it could be sort of like they did

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>with Taylor with the Browns right where he started out

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the season then they turned it over to Mayfield. So

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they certainly could do something like that. But I agree

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 1>with you. By the way, this is the one pick

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that I like. And you know, remember we talked about

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line, and it's great to have Taylor who's

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:03.720
<v Speaker 1>able to get away from pressure. But they also upgraded

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line right with Turner and Brian Blaga. So

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I agree with you basically all the points

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that you made, and you know, you look at their schedule,

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>They've got a ton of winnable games obviously, you know,

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders and the Broncos. I think you're looking like

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:17.879
<v Speaker 1>I do, is that you know, you can easily see them,

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, being the better team of all the seven

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half win teams.

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 2>You've got the.

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins, the Jaguars, the Panthers, the Jets, depending on what

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots do, the Falcons, the Bengals. There are a

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of really winnable games that you look at on

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 1>their schedule coming in. So that is a team that

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I'm looking at an over under

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of one of them. That's really the one that I

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>like the most. Again, you mentioned their defense, so it

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 1>really is the key. There's one other that I like,

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder what you think about this. How do

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 1>you feel about the Chiefs over under of eleven and

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a half.

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a big number. You know, you got over

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 2>the hump last year you won the Super Bowl, so

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, obviously there's there's kind of some difficulty with

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:02.280
<v Speaker 2>that twelve and four last year with the Mahomes injury.

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 2>You give them a lot of credit, you give them

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 2>full marks for that. I just the relative strength of

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 2>the division. I think everybody around them is a little

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 2>bit better this year. You've kind of got that sign

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:14.799
<v Speaker 2>on your back. Now we know what Mahomes just did

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 2>last year, and I have a really hard time just

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 2>looking at that team and going, yeah, they're gonna go

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 2>twelve and four or better. Again, It's it's a big ask. Yeah.

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if I were to pick another bet in

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this division, it would be the under on the Chiefs

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>over under eleven and a half. And it's hard to

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>do that, and I don't know whether or not I

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>would really have the inteslino fortitude to make that pick,

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:40.720
<v Speaker 1>just because betting against Patrick Mahomes even in a single

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 1>game is just devastating, and I'd hate to do it

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>over a full season. But look, I mean they've got

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to go You mentioned it, right. Their division is tougher.

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't love the Broncos, I don't love the Raiders.

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't even love the Chargers, but you can easily

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:57.240
<v Speaker 1>see them going four and two. Let's say the Chiefs

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>against the division, and then they've got to go two balls.

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 1>They've got to go to Buffalo, and regardless of what

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you think of Buffalo, that is a very, very difficult

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>place to play. They've got to go to New Orleans,

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they've got to go to Tampa Bay with Brady and

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 1>that team. They have a lot of difficult games on

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>their schedule, and I know that Patrick Mahomes is capable

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:17.879
<v Speaker 1>of overcoming a lot of things that The defense played

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot better down the stretch, and they're pretty much

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>intact offensively, you know, they've still got you know, they're

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>going to go with Damian Williams again, they added DeAndre Washington. Offensively,

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty much intact. But you know, give it. That

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is a huge number going on right now. The other

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 1>thing that we didn't talk about necessarily is, you know,

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 1>if the Ravens are as good as as sort of

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we expect this, There's only going to be one by

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>this year, right So if the Ravens are, you know,

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>going ahead and easily going to have that buy, the

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs may not have any need to push it down

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:50.919
<v Speaker 1>the stretch, you know what I mean. Like it could

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 1>be something where you could see them saying if they

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 1>don't have that buy necessarily, they could take their foot

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 1>off the gas. That could work the other way too.

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>They could be going for the bye and trying to

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 1>get there and so going full team all the way.

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>But it is some situation where if the Ravens are

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:04.919
<v Speaker 1>ahead of them, the Ravens beat them head to head,

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Ravens have the tiebreaker and they're getting there.

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs could you could see at the end of

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:09.879
<v Speaker 1>the season sort of take their foot off the gas

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and just rest a little bit to try to get

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:13.280
<v Speaker 1>healthy as they go into the postseason.

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, yeah, oh no, I absolutely agree. That's definitely

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 2>a consideration you always want to think about, you know,

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:20.719
<v Speaker 2>the situations for teams. And obviously it's easier in a

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 2>sport like baseball where you got the trade deadline and

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 2>you know you kind of have an idea of where

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 2>they may be. But you're right, Kansas City may not

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 2>be pushing it as much late in the year because again,

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they played three extra games last year, so

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 2>less turnaround time, less recovery time is assuming the season

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 2>starts on time of course, right. You know, so this

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 2>is also a defense that bent a ton early on

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 2>in the year. As you mentioned, they got a lot

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 2>better down the stretch, but they also got to pad

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 2>some numbers against an Oakland offense that wasn't great. They

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 2>were okay. They weren't great. They weren't prolific by any means.

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 2>The Patriots were way down Denver and the Bears. You know,

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers moved it on them. The Texans moved it

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 2>on them in the play because they were kind of

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 2>playing that pre event defense type of thing. But I mean, again,

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:06.839
<v Speaker 2>this is a team that, you know, when they had

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 2>to step up in class and face decent offensive offenses

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 2>last year, the defense did struggle. They were a true

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 2>case of being very very good at playing the bully,

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think they have as many bully opportunities

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 2>this year.

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I'm inclined to agree. Again, it's not something

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that I'm loving. There is one pick that I like

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 1>in this division, and that is the Chargers. As we

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 1>discuss remember by the way, I realized, I forgot to

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>mention it. I forgot exactly what it came out to.

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>But at some point somebody tweeted out what the Chargers

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>record would have been if you just reversed every single

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>score game. I don't know remember exactly what was. It

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>was probably eleven and five or something like that of

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>something ridiculous. And again, that's just something that speaks to

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the strength of the team. The team, it's a very

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 1>good team. Rivers played terribly and they had a terrible

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. Taylor's probably gonna make them better, and the

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 1>better offensive line is really gonna move into that. So

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I think to improve three wins is not something that's

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:58.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be crazy for them to do.

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 2>And real quickly. That's a really good point for all

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 2>the listeners out there. Look for record in close games,

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 2>because if you've got some outliers in that department, that's

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 2>generally something that year over year kind of regresses to

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 2>the mean a little bit. A good way to start

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of narrowing your focus for some of these teams,

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 2>the ones that were say four and one or five

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 2>and zero or something like that in close games, like

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 2>a Seattle Seahawks type team for example, maybe that's something

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 2>that you know, you want to scale back a little bit,

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 2>kind of gravitate towards the under or the over, as

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 2>the case may be.

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in terms of the Chiefs, yeah, I just it

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is something where I certainly wouldn't go with the over.

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not going them to get twelve wins.

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And we talked about the extremes. But for me if

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I had to go anywhere, it would be something with

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the end. All right, that's gonna do it for today's show, Adam.

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>It was really really great to be able to catch

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:46.400
<v Speaker 1>up and having you on again. Remind everybody where they

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>can find more of you and your work.

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Please.

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, great to chat with you as well, but yeah,

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 2>you can find me over at bangbook dot com, at

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 2>Skating Tripods on Twitter. Still doing the Better's Box, my

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:59.280
<v Speaker 2>MLB betting podcast twice a week, ramping up our draft

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 2>stuff over there with I mean, my god, the prop

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 2>catalog for the draft this year is just insane. There's

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:07.359
<v Speaker 2>so much going on, as I know you guys are

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:09.479
<v Speaker 2>doing a lot over at Betting Pros for that as well.

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 2>But just trying to stay busy, man, trying not to

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, fall too far down the hole here with

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:17.959
<v Speaker 2>everything that's going on. But I really appreciate you having

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:19.839
<v Speaker 2>me on again, Dan, And you know, it's always great

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 2>to chat no matter what sport it is with you.

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>No, absolutely, And it's a shame we couldn't be talking

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>about baseball at this time and leading into it, but

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least we do have the NFL and

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the Draft coming up. So thanks again for coming on.

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:33.799
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely man, thanks for having me all right.

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget to add over to bettingpros dot com to

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>check out all the consensus lines, including our Draft day

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:41.320
<v Speaker 1>props and NFL futures. Thanks for listening, everybody. We'll be

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>back later this week to discuss the over unders for

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the NFC win totals. I'll talk to you.

0:42:45.160 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Then, money the mo I thin that the fact that

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:15.560
<v Speaker 3>have not been as com