WEBVTT - CLASSIC: Whatever happened to Julian Assange?

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the show, fellow conspiracy realist. This is

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a classic episode while we were on the high seas.

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot of folks that we call returning

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>guests on Stuff they Don't Want You to Know, because

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>they come in and out of all kinds of stories,

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and for several years over the course of this show,

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>one guy who absolutely captivated our attention was the creator

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange.

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 2>He was amongst one of the first dozen episodes that

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 2>we ever made of this iteration of stuff they Don't

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 2>want you to Know, and he made several appearances on

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 2>our video series on YouTube. So do check out YouTube

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 2>dot com, slash Conspiracy Stuff or at Conspiracy Stuff if

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 2>you will.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's so funny that this just came up because

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 3>I just got served a recommendation on one streaming app

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 3>or another for the Alex Gibney documentary We Steal Secrets,

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the Story of WikiLeaks, which I had never got around

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 3>to watching, and it's on my list, and it reminded

0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 3>me of this. And now, isn't there some kind of

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 3>like he's in the wind a little bit right now?

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 3>What's going on with old boy?

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, we know that he made it back to Australia

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>after we did this episode in twenty twenty, and from

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>statements by his brother Gabriel Shipton at the time, the

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>word on the street was he was still adjusting spending

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>time with his family because he went through some horrific

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff right when it was locked up in the embassy.

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>We know that he attended some pro Palestinian protest in

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the past year. He also went to some other notable events,

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but he's been kind of keeping his head down. Yeah, Hey, do.

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 2>You think Julian Massage would ever talk to us? Would

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 2>we want to talk to him?

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 4>I think I would want to talk to him, absolutely.

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I get text him. Okay, Ben, Well, well it's

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>someone who says they're Julian Massage. I think I just

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>put up like that my phone. But well, yeah, let's

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>reach out because I think it would be a fascinating

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>perspective and it's worth exploring, especially because we know the

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>reporting about this guy was so heavily tilted and influenced

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 1>by powerful forces when WikiLeaks was having its heyday in

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the news.

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 3>It's practically referred to as like a terrorist, like a

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 3>cyber terrorist.

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, and for some he is a soldier in the

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>war for transparency. To others, he is portrayed as a

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>super villain. In this episode from twenty twenty, we ask

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.119
<v Speaker 1>whatever happened to Julian Massage.

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 4>But first let's hear a quick word from our sponsor.

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 5>From UFOs to psychic powers and government conspiracies, history is

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 5>riddled with unexplained events. You can turn back now or

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 5>learn the stuff they don't want you to know. A

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 5>production of Iheartrading.

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Hello, welcome back to the show. My name is Matt,

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 2>my name is Noah.

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>They call me Ben. We are joined as always with

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>our super producer, Paul Mission Controlled Decant. Most importantly, you

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>are you. You are here, and that makes this stuff

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't want you to know. Today, we're focusing on

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the story of one man, a single individual, a larger

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>than life figure who once upon a time dominated global news.

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>To some, he is an inspiring icon of free speech

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and transparency, the kind of figure you'd build a statue for.

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>To others, he's a power mad super villain, an agent

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of chaos, and to still others many people, he's just dangerous.

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>His name is Julian Assange.

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Our last update that we did on this show on

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Julian Assange was almost exactly a year ago today. It

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 2>was May tenth, twenty nineteen, and today's May sixth, twenty twenty.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 2>As we're recording this, so you know, we're not gonna

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 2>spend too much time in the background because previously we

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 2>have covered basically Julian Assauge's earlier situations. If you really

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 2>want to learn that stuff, you can go back to

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 2>those episodes. But for for today, we're gonna look at

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 2>where he is now, briefly, how he got there, and

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the very very real, big picture issues that his current

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 2>situation is revealing.

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Do you guys think what makes people think super villain

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 3>is his like stark white hair. You know, it seems

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 3>like a really good feature for a for a like

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 3>a Superman villain of some kind.

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, Ben Ben has his background right now in the

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 2>video chat we're doing. He's got a picture of Julian

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 2>back there, and to me, it doesn't feel very super villainous.

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the that's the issue. You know, we're

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>recording shows while we're several weeks into quarantine. But this guy,

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>this picture that I have in the background, he's he's

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a quarantine master, you know, he's been on lockdown for

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>nearly seven year, so when they're pulling him out, he's

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>got the he's grown a beard that is as white

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>as his naturally white hair. And I think I could

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>agree with you, Noel, for especially for people who aren't

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>reading the specifics of what he does. If you just

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>see a headline in the picture of the guy and

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you like Bond films, you might be tempted to say, yeah,

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that guy looks like a super villain. A lot of

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>it will go into dress too, Like if he wore

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>a turtleneck more often, I think that would up the

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Bond quotient. But maybe I'm thinking of the earlier Bond movies.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he had like a bionic hand or something, and

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 3>like a cat that he would stroke with that bionic hand.

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>Or a weird gun.

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that is that, Inspector Gadget, No, what is that from?

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, doctor Claw, he stroked the weird cat with the

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 4>bionic arm. Yeah, okay, okay.

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Then there's also Blowfeld in the James Bond movies, who

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 3>also had a cat.

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Or at least at the at the very least Doctor

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Claw had a metal gauntlet, but since they called it

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a claw, like to think it was like a bionic

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>hand situation. So those are those are some speculations, right,

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>but let's get to the facts. So here are the facts.

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>The gist of Julian Nossange. You know, Julian Nossange was

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>born in Australia in nineteen seventy one July third. Specifically,

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>for a full look at his biography and his early

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>years his ascendants, if you will please check out our

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>previous episodes. What we'd like to give you by way

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of background now is just a very high level look

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>at what you could call his career and the consequences

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of his career path.

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 3>So today, Asan is probably best known for his activism,

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 3>which inspired him to create the website Wiki Leagues in

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and six. I think we're all pretty familiar

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 3>with wiki leaks, but let's think of it as kind

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 3>of a one stop shop for would.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 4>Be whistleblowers and leakers.

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Of classified documents and footage from around the world. In theory,

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.559
<v Speaker 3>sort of a repository for all the stuff they don't

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 3>want you to know, regardless of who they might specifically be.

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 3>And Wiki Leak's gained international attention in April of twenty

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 3>ten when the organization released footage showing members of the

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 3>US military fatally shooting eighteen civilians, including journalists, from a

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 3>helicopter in Iraq.

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was sort of the leak heard around the world,

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, I've.

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Been I still remember being in the fish Bowl office

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 2>at our previous office when that footage was released, and

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 2>you and I discussing it almost immediately after it came out.

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 2>It was a very intense thing to witness, especially being

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>that it was not something that was ever meant to

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 2>get to us as you know, the American public or

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the world public.

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Right. Yeah, And on a personal note, I missed the

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>fish Bowl. Everyone listening if you checked out our YouTube

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>videos and maybe we talked about it occasionally, but that

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>was just so cool. Other than being nearly impossible to

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>film in, it was pretty cool. Long story short on

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that one. It used to be a single person's office

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and then we moved in and there were like seven

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of us at one point six, six or seven anyway.

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 2>At least six. Paul would know best.

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Paul would know best. Oh yeah, that's right. Paul was

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a fishbowler as well, and this footage rocked, not just

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the fish Bowl, but the world, and at this point

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>won a pause and give you a heads up that

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we are going to be talking about some things of

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a sexual nature, so this may not be suitable for

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>all listeners. Later that same year, twenty ten, when he

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>released the footage, Assange was detained in the United Kingdom

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>because Sweden had issued an international arrest warrant over allegations

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that he had sexually assaulted two women during his time

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>in the Scandinavian country.

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah Specifically, the allegations concerned the idea that he had

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 3>raped one woman and then molested and coerced another, all

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 3>during August tenth when he was in Stockholm to give

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 3>a lecture, and authorities were very motivated to question him

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 3>about these allegations. Assans maintained and continues to maintain to

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 3>this day, that both encounters were consensual, and this triggered

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 3>an extensive court battle. Eventually, he ended up seeking asylum

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 3>in the Ecuadorian embassy in London in order to avoid

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 3>possible extradition to either Sweden or ultimately the US, where

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 3>his actions with Wiki Leaks led him to believe he

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 3>would not receive a fair shake. Much like Chelsea Manning,

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 3>who partnered with Wiki leaks to leak that earlier footage

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 3>that we spoke about, and as we know, Chelsea Manning

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 3>was significantly demonized and the brunt of some very very

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 3>serious consequences.

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah. Part of Chelsea Manning's case, though, goes into

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Chelsea was a member of the US Army,

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>so there's some heavier consequences. But still you're right the

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>writings on the wall. Julian Essange very rightly thought that

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>he would not get a fair trial, and so it

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>was that he spent He tried to get to Ecuador proper,

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>but he ended up spending seven years almost hold up

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in the embassy. And there were a lot of media

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>reports about him. You can see some interviews. They depicted

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>him in ways that sometimes sounded like propaganda or character

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>witness stuff. Now, now, to be fair, we have not

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ourselves spoken with mister Assange, but he does have a

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>reputation of being a bit shall we say, contankerous, like

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>he'll walk out of an interview if he feels it's unfair.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 1>His bedside manner, some journalists find it lacking, but you'll

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>see reports of him like being a bad HouseGuest, basically

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>like he wasn't cleaning up after his cat, and that

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>became How surreal is that that became an issue in

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 1>the embassy. He also had two children during this time.

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>He was finally arrested by British police on April eleventh,

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, right after the Ecuadorian President, Lennon Moreno announced

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:39.479
<v Speaker 1>via Twitter again that the country had withdrawn his asylum

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>status along the way Sweden withdrew their earlier allegations. But

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>after he was dragged out of the embassy in that

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>picture that you guys can see behind me, which is

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>contrasted with what I think that's Game of Thrones? Which

0:11:56.480 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>character is that from Game of Thrones? I y lewin. Yeah,

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a good call, I think so, Yeah, I think

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you're right. So ultimately, the UK court sentenced him to

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty weeks in jail on May first, twenty nineteen, not

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>for leaking documents, just for jumping bail, for breaching bail agreements.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>And then that's when Swedish prosecutors reopened their investigation into

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the allegations of sexual misconduct and assault.

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know Wiki leagues over the years that

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 2>it has been operating, both while Julian Assange was really

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 2>at the Helm and you know, doing day to day

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 2>operations as well as when he was in the embassy,

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 2>and there were others running wiki leaks, which it did

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 2>continue actively publishing releases for a while. There were a

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>ton of controversies that arose, you know, obviously from the

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 2>ones we've already outlined there, but countless others. And one

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>of the main ones that we talked about that you know,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>the Iraq War tape, that specific video that was released.

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 2>It was a part of a larger Iraq war release

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 2>that was called the Iraq War Logs. It was also

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 2>called i think the Baghdad War Diaries, something to that effect.

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>So that tape was released in April of twenty ten.

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Then the full Iraq War Logs were released in October

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 2>of twenty ten, and this was a trove of almost

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 2>four hundred thousand classified reports that, according to WikiLeaks and

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 2>other people who have gone through these documents, quote, document

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 2>the war and occupation in Iraq from the first of

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>January two thousand and four to the thirty first of

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 2>December two thousand and nine. And this is the thing

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 2>we were talking about, that the massive event. It was

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:56.719
<v Speaker 2>everyone talking about this multiple countries and institutions weighed in

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 2>about what needed to happen because of this release, and

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 2>really everyone, especially the United States, went into damage control

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 2>because not only did this affect how the US government

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and militaries were going to be looked at, it also

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 2>was going to affect how the allies of the United

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 2>States government were going to be scrutinized in the future.

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 2>It really was a big deal.

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's set massive precedent, you know, and there were

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>so many contradicting narratives when it plays so much attempt

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to spin. It was very it's very difficult to watch

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>history being made because history books make it seem so clean,

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>so point A to point B, but there's so many

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>things that get lost in the shuffle. And that's just

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the controversies. Right. We also know that later

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>wiki leaks in twenty ten leaked more than two hundred

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and fifty thousand classified diplomatic cables. A cable here in

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>this sense is not like an HDMI cable or something.

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>It's and it's not like comcasts. It's a message, right,

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a secret message that different embassies send to one another.

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>And these these privileged communications might be intelligence on the

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>ground from an intelligence agency. They might be something as

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>small as like the ambassador to Syria said that he

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>was willing to work with us on this, but I

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>just think I just think he was trying to get

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>me out of the room, because the man has notorious ibs.

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Like it's very frank, behind the scenes kind of looks

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>at stuff. There are things the governments of the world

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>do not want the international public, other countries, or their

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>domestic constituents to know. So it is not, by any

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>means hyperbole to say that this fundamental rocked the world

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of diplomacy, and the repercussions are still reverberating today. This

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>did some irreparable damage to international relations.

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean think about like if you were on

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 3>an email thread with like somebody, and then you thought

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 3>you had deleted that person temporarily from the thread and

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 3>sort of talking a bunch of trash about them with

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 3>your you know, cohorts, and then you realize that that

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 3>person actually was on the whole time. Not a good look.

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 3>This is sort of like a much larger scale version

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 3>of that, because as you said, Ben, I mean, these

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 3>could just be very candid, little snippy comments, you know,

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 3>and it's not like it would necessarily be stuff that

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 3>would blow open the doors of like, you know, any

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of conflict necessarily directly or any kind of intelligence

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 3>that would you know, be just earth shattering.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 4>It's just a bad look.

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, diplomacy in and of itself is about good

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 3>bedside manner and keeping those relationships healthy and stroking egos.

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 3>And this would do a whole lot of damage to

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 3>break down some of those relationships that a lot of

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 3>these diplomats had worked very hard to nurse and maintain.

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, if you want to see either

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 2>of these two subjects that we just talked about, the

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Iraq warlogs or the diplomatic cables, you can find all

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 2>of that. It's all searchable on the WikiLeaks dot org website.

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 2>Just if you're curious or you know, you're feeling a

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 2>little dangerous, you can go check those out.

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, we should say one benefit of talking about

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>these past weeks is that they are all available, you

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. It reminds me of the streisand effect.

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>You guys know what that is, right, No, So the

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>streisand effect is essentially saying that once something is out there,

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>once something is published online, especially it cannot be removed

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>no matter how much someone wants it to be removed.

0:17:56.560 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It's named after a picture of Barber streisand I believe

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that she asked to be removed from the internet. And

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, we all are familiar with the denizens of

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the internet. That is the same thing as telling them

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>please pretty please spread this everywhere.

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was her Malibu home as of two thousand

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 2>and three. I believe that she was attempting to remove.

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right, And you could see the argument there because

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 1>it's like, hey, this is, you know, my personal dwelling place.

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>But this situation reminds me of something very funny. I

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I mentioned it to you guys when

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>the wikileak stuff really started hitting, but there were internal

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>emails throughout the intelligence industry, which is the right word,

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and throughout the defense industry where people were literally telling

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>government employees, hey, we know this is out there, it's

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>on the news, it's online, just so you know, you

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>will get in trouble if you read it unless you

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>have the correct classification. And that was such an attempt

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to like close the barn door after the horses have

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:05.439
<v Speaker 1>stampeded away. We just didn't have the legislation for this,

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's part of why it rocked the world so fundamentally.

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's not even we're not even talking about twenty sixteen, right,

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>but the emails, because later WikiLeaks released some twenty thousand

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>pages of emails from the Hillary Clinton campaign, as we'll

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>call former Secretary of State Clinton was running for US

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>president in twenty sixteen, and also emails from the Democratic

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>National Committee. It is again not hyperbole to say that

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>these altered the course of US politics in a big,

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>big way.

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's true.

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean the emails which later became part of the

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 3>internet catchphrase.

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 3>But her emails explored and expanded on multiple Clinton controversies

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 3>that had already been out there in the public imagination,

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 3>and we discussed some of those early on in the

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:59.479
<v Speaker 3>campaign between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, where we did Trump,

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, the most popular Trump and Clinton conspiracy theories,

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 3>and the Clinton conspiracy theories are massive because they involve

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 3>both her and her husband, and the questionable relationship between

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 3>the Clinton Foundation and its donors.

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 4>Clinton's kind of you know.

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Close knit relationships, shall we say, with some very powerful

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street interests that became problematic especially considering that she

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of, you know, was trying to cast herself as

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.719
<v Speaker 3>sort of the people's candidate and her incredibly close ties

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:37.239
<v Speaker 3>with very wealthy and powerful campaign contributors. This is just

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, beginning to scratch the service. But it's fair

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 3>to say that the League's played a huge role in

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 3>the outcome of that year's presidential election. And it also,

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, I mean, I think a lot of people

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 3>looked at as Songs early on as sort of this

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 3>great equalizer, you know, and trying to take powerful people

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 3>to task. And that's all well and good if the

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 3>outcome is on your side, right, And so I think

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 3>he really became a hugely divisive figure on the left

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 3>when this happened, and it started to feel like he

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 3>was perhaps more interested in getting the other side elected,

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 3>and that became very confusing. Part of his character really

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of complicated the relationship with the public and Julian Assange.

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I would say two things here. I recently listened to

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Glenn Greenwald, now of the Intercept, that's how he's best

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 2>known currently, but a journalist who is discussing how Julian

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Assange really does represent a largely hated figure on both

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the political left and right within the United States because

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 2>of you know, the people who would consider him anti

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 2>war or anti you know, military, because of the Iraq

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 2>war logs and other things and the diplomatic cables. They

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 2>they very much dislike him from that angle. And then

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 2>from this, like you said, and the people on political

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 2>left very much dislike him because they essentially blame him

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 2>for Hillary Clinton losing the election. One commonality that we've

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 2>seen through these leaks is that it is attempting, at

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 2>least it feels that it's an attempt to show that

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 2>behind the curtain scene of the powerful people in every

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 2>single one of these that we just that we've already

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of mentioned here. And I guess when you are

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 2>doing that and showing a peek behind the curtain of

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 2>all powerful people, you're gonna kind of piss everybody off.

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, agreed, very much so. And you know, I

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you guys here just an opinion. You know,

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>do are you all of the opinion that this that

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this did significantly atpack the election or was it? I mean,

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>how much do you think it swung the needle?

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 2>I would say it swung the needle. I mean, my

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>opinion is that. Yes, for sure, it did because it

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 2>changed the conversation that was happening on the news cycle

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 2>almost like right up into the election, right up into

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the day of the election. It really did change what

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 2>people were talking about.

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 4>Oh no, I mean, I think that's there's no question

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 4>about it.

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:27.360
<v Speaker 3>It absolutely hijacked the conversation in a way that Clinton

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 3>was just not able to put back in that Pandora's box,

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, And it really completely took away her power

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 3>to kind of steer the narrative, which, you know, say

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 3>what you will about whichever side of politics that you

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 3>fall on. She definitely was trying very hard to cast

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 3>herself in this light of being kind of the people's candidate,

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 3>of being this sort of you know, even handed person

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 3>that wasn't connected to any kind of wrongdoing and that

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 3>she really cared about the everyman for lack of a

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 3>better term, and this really kind of shattered a lot

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 3>of that, and it made it at least whether it

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 3>was true or not, at least the contents of the

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 3>emails and the nature of the whole private server situation,

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 3>and whether or not she completely flaunt flouted the rules

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 3>and just went her own way. It really robbed her

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 3>of the ability and her campaign of the ability to

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 3>steer that narrative, and it was just impossible to spin

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 3>it at that point.

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's the old saying holds true. If you are

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>defending yourself in any kind of political sphere, then you

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>are automatically losing. The fascists were right about it. The

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and the Democrats were right about it. It's just

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of the part of the part of the house

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>rules of these terrible, terrible games. But there you have it.

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Here's the takeaway. A single man, flesh and blood, just

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>as many of the people listening to the show today

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>are unelected, himself, was able to shake the world. You

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>can understand why so many powerful people consider him dangerous.

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>When we last left Julian Assange, he had been removed

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Ecuadorian embassy. All indications appeared that he would

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>continue on a legal battle at a glacial pace, likely

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>from prison as he sought to avoid extradition and probably

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:37.679
<v Speaker 1>in his impossible death in the United States. So where

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>are we at now? We'll answer the question after a

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>word from our sponsors. Here's where it gets crazy. What's

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>happening now? Well, it turns out the conspiracy to expose

0:25:56.160 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 1>conspiracies has not worked out especially well for Julian as Songe.

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you'll recall how he said. As Songe was sent

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 3>us to fifty weeks in jail. Well, he was due

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 3>to be released in September of twenty nineteen, the twenty

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 3>second specifically, when is jail term for breaching that bail

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 3>ended and they just didn't let him out. The Westminster

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Magistrates Court noted that there were substantial grounds for believing

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 3>if free as Songe would make another run attempting to

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 3>gain safe status, or like Edward Snowden, make it to

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 3>a country that would not extradite him to the United States.

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's sort of you know, it's just the

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 3>same way a court assesses anyone's risk of flight. You know,

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 3>they won't grant you bail, or they'll make your bail

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 3>excessively high if they think or if they even think

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 3>that you're going to flee, let alone, if you've got

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 3>an established pattern of doing that, which as Songe absolutely

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 3>had so. Julian Assange remains in the Belmarsh Prison in

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 3>the United Kingdom. His partner, lawyer Stella Morris, who he

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 3>has two children with, recently said quote, the life of

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 3>my partner Julian Assan is severely at risk. He is

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 3>on remand at HMP Belmarsh, and COVID nineteen is spreading

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 3>within its walls. So this is absolutely a topical update.

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Morris sees more than just a song's personal health in

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 3>jeopardy here saying that quote, Julian needs to be released now,

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 3>for him, for our family, and for the society we

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 3>all want our children to grow up in. Yeah, Okay, yeah,

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, it depends on what your take

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 3>is on that particular vision of society that a songe espouses,

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 3>you know. And again, I mean a big part of

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 3>his character is the idea of like free speech and

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 3>about you know, taking powerful people to task. But he

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 3>is absolutely, has been and remains a super divisive figure.

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk about a bigger picture issue here that

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 3>we've a little bit in some of our COVID nineteen updates,

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 3>the risk of coronavirus and prisons.

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, it's certainly a hairy situation for anyone who

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 2>is being kept anywhere within fairly close quarters to other

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.679
<v Speaker 2>human beings, especially if there are any kind of sanitary

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 2>issues within let's say a prison like that, And in

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 2>prisons across the world, people are being infected with coronavirus

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 2>because it only takes one person to enter that closed

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 2>system at some point to then infect one other and

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 2>then exponentially grow that outbreak. But in this particular prison

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 2>HMP Belmarsh where Julian Assange is at least two people

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 2>within the prison have contracted COVID nineteen or have they've

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 2>contracted the coronavirus and are dealing with symptoms of COVID nineteen.

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 2>And prisons just in general are pretty rough places to

0:28:55.680 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 2>be with individuals who have attributes and possibly charges pending

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 2>against them for varying things of varying severities, and in

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:09.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, these uncertain times, there are higher than average

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 2>odds of things like violence occurring within prisons where there's

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 2>that kind of fear of something like coronavirus or uprisings

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 2>or you know, maybe even riots, very violent riots occurring

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 2>within these prisons.

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's absolutely correct. In fact, there are numerous

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>reports already of riots about prison conditions in the US

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and abroad, and in some countries prisoners have even successfully

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>taken guards hostage, not even necessarily to say, hey, we're

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>throwing down the prison walls, let my people go. But

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>more to say, we need to bring attention to the

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>pandemic bloodbath that may occur when we are locked in

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>here like animals for whatever reason. So this, this prison

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>angle has a lot of fairly plausible conspiratorial aspects to it,

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we've seen the kind of manufactured concerns

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that pop up in other celebrity prison stories. Someone has

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a high paid lawyer, like someone working for Weinstein or something,

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>who says, you know, he's very fragile. Therefore, even though

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.719
<v Speaker 1>he's been convicted of these crimes, he should get some

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of special treatment because it's the human thing to do.

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way, for R and B fans, R Kelly

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is looking for the same thing, the argument being that

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>he has diabetes and COVID is going to blow through

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>prison systems. But in Assanja's case, there's solid evidence that

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>his life may be at risk more so than a Weinstein,

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>more so than an R.

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Kelly, because not as much as a an ep free Epstein,

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 2>not as much as an Epstein.

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.959
<v Speaker 1>Right, we should call that we should make the Epstein scale.

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>If the you know, fellow conspiracy realist. If you have

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the time and the inclination, please feel free to make

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>an infographic of the Epstein scale the likelihood have died

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in prison.

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, I would I just really quickly bet. This

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 2>is a very interesting thing to think about, because the

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 2>reason Julian Assange is in jail, you know, is officially

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 2>because of jumping bail, but really, when you put all

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 2>of the math together, it's because he had damning evidence

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 2>against very powerful people, right or he was able to

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 2>release information about powerful people in the actions they take.

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 4>That.

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Then you think about somebody like Jeffrey Epstein that very

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 2>likely at least allegedly had the worst kind of evidence

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 2>against extremely powerful people, and we saw what happened to him.

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, who knows if it was. Look, we can't

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 2>prove to you if it was self inflicted or not

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 2>self inflicted in his case, but he was only in

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 2>prison for a short time, That's all I would.

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Say, Right, Yeah, it's very much worth pointing out that

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>plenty of powerful people wants this guy dead, even if

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>they can't kill WikiLeaks, which is also on the wish list.

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>We should note that, you know, the Trump administration is

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>currently attempting to extradite assage to the US. However, remember

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we're very quickly going into the no real good guy's

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>morally gray territory because the desire to gain possession of

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>assage transcends the growing stark ideological divide in domestic US politics.

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Establishment Democrats want the guy under the jail or under

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the daisies as much as establishment Republicans. He has very

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>few friends in Congress, you know what I mean, And

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of misleading. That's why I appreciate the point

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you made knowl earlier about people liking a hero or

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>calling someone a hero until their principles, whatever they may be,

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>run counter to our own principles.

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 3>It's just the idea of like one person's freedom fighter

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 3>is another person's terrorist. It all depends on what side

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 3>of the issue you fall A lot of the times,

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, I mean, certainly both sides can be guilty

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 3>of what would be considered negative acts or even atrocities.

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 3>But still, in terms of the way you view the

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 3>means justifying the ends, you could probably say, well, they

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 3>might have done some bad things, but they were ultimately

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 3>supporting what I think is a just cause.

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And oh and we should point out a in a

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.239
<v Speaker 1>no way, baby, but kind of moment. Let me tell

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you what really happened. The US is still kind of

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in damage control over this, and has been since two

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand and six, so for more than a decade they've

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>been in damage control here in the States. Uncle Sam

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>says Assange is not wanted because he caught the US

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 1>doing some bad things red handed, or because he damaged

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the soft power of the reputation abroad, or because he

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>embarrassed the US. They say he's wanted because he illegally

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>endangered the lives of informants aka spies or assets, dissidents

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>aka also possibly spies or assets, but maybe you know,

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe sincere dissidents as well as activist aka spies or assets.

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>But hey, maybe maybe activists in multiple countries including of

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>course rock Iran and Afghanistan. So what what? What gives?

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 4>What?

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>What is he actually going to be charged with or

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 1>indicted for?

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Do we know? Yeah, there is an indictment impending charges

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 2>standing against Julian Assange from the United States, And I'm

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna boil it down to you in the way that

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer Robinson explained it in a recent conversation with Glenn Greenwald.

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 2>She's a human rights attorney and she's representing Assannge, and

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 2>she explains it that the charges essentially state that Assonge

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 2>was communicating had communications of some sort with Chelsea Manning

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 2>at the time known as Bradley Manning, and that Assannge

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 2>discussed with Chelsea ways in which she could access highly

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:37.800
<v Speaker 2>classified materials in a way that would protect her identity.

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 2>That's really what it's saying. That's the whole thing. Assannge

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 2>was in connection with Chelsea Manning, and Chelsea Manning got

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the materials to him and then he released them. And also,

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 2>according to Jennifer, there's a widely held misconception that's just

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of been floating around and it started from this

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 2>Department of Justice press release that came out out not

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 2>that long ago, and within this release it falsely stated,

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 2>at least according to Robinson, that as Soonge was being

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 2>charged with quote hacking, so in some way using you know,

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 2>a computer or a system to access classified government materials

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 2>and then get those for Chelsea or with Chelsea Manning,

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 2>because you know, we discussed Chelsea Manning is the person

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 2>who ended up getting a lot of that documentation that

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 2>became the IRAQ warlogs and the tapes. So just the

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 2>last thing here is that, according to Jennifer Robinson, within

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 2>that indictment, there is no allegation that Assonge attempted to

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 2>hack the US government in any way to get to

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 2>gain material. There's also no allegation within that indictment that

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:56.399
<v Speaker 2>he unlawfully accessed any government computers or systems whatsoever. That's

0:36:56.520 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 2>just just to put it out there. In conclusion, the

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 2>charges are that he had a discussion with Chelsea Manning

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 2>about how to hide her identity while accessing secret documents.

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and then once that kind of stuff proceeds, if

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it does indeed proceed, then we'll see those kind of

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>charges become increasingly specific as prosecutors explore their options. So

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this naturally leads us to the next part of the update,

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 1>which is this what's on the horizon. We'll explore that

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 1>after a word from our sponsors. We've returned. So just

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a few days ago, as we record this peak behind

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the curtain interest of transparency. It is May sixth, Wednesday,

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 1>A lovely day outside in Atlanta. As far as I can.

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 4>Tell, Blustery, I would say, yes, I love it.

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:07.919
<v Speaker 1>I was writing on the porch. I wish I could

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>record out there. Just a few days ago, Juliannassange received

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>word that he will have to wait until at least

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>September of twenty twenty before a British judge will hear

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the US request for his extradition. This comes to us

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>from a possibly biased source. To be fair, Kristen Fraftsman,

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the editor in chief of WikiLeaks. Earlier they said a

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 1>video posted on social media that it's unacceptable and confirmed

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 1>that ASSANGEO likely has to spend another four months at

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 1>least in prison, and if a hearing does come to

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>pass in September, that means that he will have spent

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>one year in prison after being dragged out of that

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 1>embassy on his what was that on his charge of

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty weeks for jumping and bail.

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that he was supposed to be let out. What'd

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 2>you say last year?

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, that's correct. And additionally, the editor there at

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>WikiLeaks said he was not able to set a sounge,

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>that was not able to attend some earlier hearings via

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 1>video link because he was unwell. So that gives us,

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:24.720
<v Speaker 1>unless that spin, that gives us a pretty solid argument

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that at least in his case, the health concerns are real.

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Reporters said he was deteriorating mentally already when he was

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Ecuadorian embassy.

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 3>So the fate of a Songe may actually set a

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 3>legal precedent in the United States. Regardless of where you

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 3>stand with these leaks. In particular, it can't really be

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 3>denied that they pushed the public in multiple countries to

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 3>hold politicians accountable and well attempt to do so.

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 4>Anyway.

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 3>Imagine a world where any disclosure, even if it's incredibly

0:39:56.960 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 3>vital to the public interest, becomes a crime.

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 4>And that's like dystopian kind of stuff right there.

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Whistleblower protections, which have historically been better on paper than

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 3>in actual practice, have truly eroded in the time since

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 3>a Soinge was kind of at his peak. Consider that

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 3>other countries like China and Russia have already started intimidating

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 3>civilians for quote rumor mongering end quote. As we've discussed

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 3>in the COVID nineteen episodes, the scientists that reported the

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 3>early signs of that virus was accused of that very

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 3>thing and essentially blackballed and treated like a criminal. And

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 3>that was a big part of what we can now

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 3>call some form of cover up.

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, And Russian doctors keep falling out of windows.

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>One fell out of a window after he made a

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>video update where he's protesting being forced to work despite

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>not having ppe personal protective equipment and despite having tested

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>positive for COVID, they still wanted him to work. And

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.959
<v Speaker 1>then just a few days later he released a video

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 1>where he said that was all crazy. He denied any

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 1>of those claims, everything was fine, and then he fell

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>out of a window. I don't know if you guys

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 1>would keep a track of that, but yeah, make no mistake,

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>there is a war for information. That war is very old,

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>but now there is a war on information.

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Hmm.

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 2>This is very true and you can see that depending

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 2>on the outcome of Julian Osandra's situation, this could have

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 2>a supreme impact on the future of potential whistleblowers like

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 2>you were saying, Noel, And it has a lot to

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:45.439
<v Speaker 2>do with the fact that if you decide to leak

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 2>information somewhere and you could be hunted down essentially by

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 2>the government that you were blowing the whistle on. I mean,

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.320
<v Speaker 2>it would really set a precedent for that. And the

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:02.320
<v Speaker 2>big problem here it bans from the individual whistleblower to

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the outlets, the major news outlets that cover stories about

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 2>leaked information. If if you're recalled, during the Iraq warlogs

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Saga of twenty ten, as well as the diplomatic cables,

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 2>the DNC emails, these were major releases done in conjunction

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:26.840
<v Speaker 2>with newspapers. It wasn't just WikiLeaks putting out information in

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:29.880
<v Speaker 2>with the Iraq warlogs. That was the Guardian, that was

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 2>the New York Times. I think Despiegel released part of

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 2>that information. They all kind of segmented it out. It

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:42.840
<v Speaker 2>was all, you know, major news outlets releasing leaked material

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 2>via WikiLeaks. And this is something we have to remember.

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Major news outlets, let's say, like the Guardian or the

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 2>New York Times, these news outlets have on their sites

0:42:56.560 --> 0:43:01.720
<v Speaker 2>easily accessible methods for anyone to anonymously provide newsworthy information

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 2>to those outlets. Essentially, if we're thinking about it in

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 2>this framework, aiding and abetting potential whistleblowers. And we have

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 2>two examples of this. You can go to the Guardian

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash secure drop right now to check out

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:21.280
<v Speaker 2>the way that they want you to give them leaked

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 2>information or to leak them information securely and anonymously. You

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 2>can also go to ny times dot com slash tips

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 2>to see how The New York Times wants you to

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 2>do it. They're suggesting that you use WhatsApp and signal

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 2>and secure drop to make contact with them and then

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:43.399
<v Speaker 2>to send them materials. And you know, if the whistleblower

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 2>individual falls because of Julian Osandra's situation, it would also

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 2>make sense that perhaps the you know, journalism is the

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 2>way we understand it, leaked important information would become in

0:43:57.640 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 2>some ways illegal.

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then maybe your past actions could become prosecutable offenses.

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 1>There's one thing. I did this on a different show.

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention this to you guys because I

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 1>thought you would find it interesting, and hopefully you will too,

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 1>fellow listeners, speaking of censorship, a completely different person who

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 1>perhaps sees themselves as a whistleblower has run into what

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they say as a conspiracy of censorship. David Ike just

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:33.400
<v Speaker 1>had his YouTube channel deleted. Will not be going back up.

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I think around nine hundred thousand subscribers. His Facebook page

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 1>was also deleted because the tech companies are instituting a

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 1>ban against anybody spreading misinformation about the coronavirus. So, as

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine, there are a lot of people who

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>are saying, yes, you have to do this because he's

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>endangering lives, which is similar to the argument made by

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the US government about assage. And then you have people

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>who are saying, you know, I might not agree with

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 1>this guy at all, but he is he is exercising

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>free speech. It's a little sticky there, you know, when

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:17.879
<v Speaker 1>we start to navigate the idea of public safety, censorship,

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:23.359
<v Speaker 1>free speech, because with great speech comes great responsibility, does

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it not, And you know, you have to ask yourself

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 1>about the platform there. But but tech companies are a

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:32.920
<v Speaker 1>little different, of course, because it's their sandbox. They make

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the rules, they can do whatever they want. I just

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's interesting that we're seeing more and more of

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>these these information conflicts rising to the foe. And this

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is in no way an endorsement of David Ike.

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, assuredly.

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted to bring this up where we're talking

0:45:54.520 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 2>about kind of the control of speech on outlets like that,

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 2>on platforms such as YouTube. I just wanted to mention

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 2>to you guys. I don't know if you saw the

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:10.840
<v Speaker 2>email come through. We got contacted by our old pals

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 2>at All Time Conspiracies. Some of you older conspiracy realists

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 2>may remember a time on YouTube when we made some

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 2>videos with the guys on this channel called All Time Conspiracies,

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 2>and I did a little catching up with them, and

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 2>they've written back to us. They went through the exact

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 2>same issues we did with the YouTube algorithm and their

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 2>content being suppressed essentially because they were talking about political issues,

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 2>conspiratorial issues, and they ended up having to shutter their

0:46:45.320 --> 0:46:48.840
<v Speaker 2>channel and they've moved on. So if anyone is interested

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 2>they want to do an episode with us, They've got

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:55.320
<v Speaker 2>a podcast now similarly to ours. So I thought that

0:46:55.440 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 2>might be a fun matchup mash up in the podcast

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 2>world now instead of on video, just to talk about

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 2>what happened to our YouTube channels.

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I would be interested in that for sure. What do

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:07.239
<v Speaker 1>you think, Nol?

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? Yeah, no, I mean always down for a good

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 3>collab with like minded folks.

0:47:13.640 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And this leads us to one more potential development. So

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:21.239
<v Speaker 1>we are at a we are at a branch. We

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>are possible forks in the road, and as Yogi Bearrap

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>You'll announcer famously said, when you come to a fork

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in the road take it. Sorry that jokes for you, Dad,

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But this we do see some very important, mutually exclusive

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:43.919
<v Speaker 1>things on the horizon. One of these things is going

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to happen to Julian Assange. One He may die in

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>prison before that extradition hearing occurs or before it is

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 1>carried through, and then for some very powerful people, a

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:02.320
<v Speaker 1>big part of the problem would have solved itself. However,

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 1>we have to remember, you know, like Jay Gavera famously

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:11.320
<v Speaker 1>said in his last words, shoot fool, you're only killing

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a man. WikiLeaks wouldn't die if asanj did, it would continue.

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not a perfect system, and there are allegations, as

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe one of us mentioned earlier, that it has

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a shifting agenda of its own, you know, including pretty

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>serious allegations that have partnered with Russia to wage some

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of asymmetrical information warfare against the US. So one

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>possible occurrence is that he dies in prison. End of story.

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 2>And we're talking there, you know, about one person dying

0:48:40.200 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 2>in the movement continuing. We're also talking earlier about maybe

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 2>it would prevent other whistleblowers from coming forward. But if

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:49.759
<v Speaker 2>he did die in prison, the other scenario is that

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe more whistleblowers come forward because they see it almost

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:59.240
<v Speaker 2>as a martyrdom situation, where the way he was treated

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 2>and how it all went down, they want to stick

0:49:03.280 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 2>it to the man essentially and continue in that legacy

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 2>outside of what he leaks.

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm. And now we have to ask ourselves, what

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:18.080
<v Speaker 1>about the precedents If he goes to trial, it's going

0:49:18.160 --> 0:49:20.239
<v Speaker 1>to be even more crucial, you know what I mean?

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Then, I mean here, let's be a little bit idyllic,

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>at least from his perspective. What if a songe is

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.239
<v Speaker 1>able to stay in the United Kingdom the same way,

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 1>for instance, that Edward Snowden is currently staying in Russia. Uh,

0:49:34.760 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it probably won't happen. What if he's able to escape

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and live on the run, you know, like that Beatles

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Is it Beatles? Or is just Paul McCartney band on

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the run? That's it? Thank you? Yeah? So what if

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:53.839
<v Speaker 1>he pulls that just for the rest of his life?

0:49:54.320 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Uh song on the run?

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>There we go. Yeah, we'll figure out who Sailor's saying?

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Is that in that regard? I guess it's Uncle Sam.

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 1>But here's the question, what if what if Assane goes

0:50:07.640 --> 0:50:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to a US court, gets extra died, it goes to

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:13.160
<v Speaker 1>trial and gets found somehow not guilty, it gets off

0:50:13.200 --> 0:50:15.840
<v Speaker 1>scott free. Don't worry about that too much, because that

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is almost definitely not going to happen.

0:50:19.640 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he would end up going to jail again, right,

0:50:23.160 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 2>And I could I could see a scenario like that, Ben,

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:30.360
<v Speaker 2>where he does end up going to jail in the

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 2>United States and then just goes away and then every

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 2>once in a while, one journalist from one outlet will

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:38.440
<v Speaker 2>write a piece on it once a year.

0:50:39.600 --> 0:50:39.799
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, I think one thing we can all

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:52.240
<v Speaker 1>agree on, Fellas, is that Wings has an enormous fan base,

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, an army across the world, and they probably

0:50:55.640 --> 0:50:58.880
<v Speaker 1>won't let this story die because, you know, now that

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking back on it, I'm pretty sure that the

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:05.960
<v Speaker 1>entire catalog of Wings is terribly prescient to the career

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:09.239
<v Speaker 1>and the controversy that is Julian A. Sounge. I've got

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I've got to look out the lyrics. This goes deep.

0:51:11.800 --> 0:51:14.839
<v Speaker 1>We need to get Paul McCartney on the phone. Who

0:51:14.880 --> 0:51:17.160
<v Speaker 1>can call Paul McCartney, Matt Noel, can you do it?

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's funny you should say that I'm actually

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 3>working on a podcast with Paul McCartney's guitarist, So may

0:51:23.160 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 3>well have an end to Macca. Nice perfect, They call

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:30.839
<v Speaker 3>him Macca. They call him Macca like the guitarist calls

0:51:30.920 --> 0:51:33.520
<v Speaker 3>him Mecca. That's a that's a big big Paul fans

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:38.359
<v Speaker 3>call him like McCartney Macca. Oh okay, wow wow, it's

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:39.280
<v Speaker 3>like a pet name.

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Or like McDonald's slaying for in Australia like McCaw.

0:51:45.320 --> 0:51:46.320
<v Speaker 4>I just called him poll.

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So so that's where we are now, and to you

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:54.120
<v Speaker 1>from failing hands, we throw the torch, be yours to

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 1>hold it high. If you break faith with us who die,

0:51:57.640 --> 0:52:00.319
<v Speaker 1>we shall not sleep. Though poppies grow and flanders Field

0:52:00.400 --> 0:52:03.360
<v Speaker 1>went on a little longer than it needed to, but

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you get the picture. We want to know two things

0:52:06.960 --> 0:52:10.239
<v Speaker 1>from you. First, what do you think should happen to

0:52:10.400 --> 0:52:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Julian Aesonge and others like him or those who come

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>after him? Secondly, what do you think will happen to

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 1>this notorious whistleblowing mastermind? Let us know. You can find

0:52:22.680 --> 0:52:24.480
<v Speaker 1>us on Facebook, you can find us on Instagram, you

0:52:24.520 --> 0:52:29.560
<v Speaker 1>can find us on Twitter as a show and as individuals.

0:52:29.719 --> 0:52:32.319
<v Speaker 2>Yes you can, and just one last question I want

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:34.760
<v Speaker 2>to pose to you, what do you think the next

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 2>big leak will be about? Because there will be another

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:38.719
<v Speaker 2>big leak.

0:52:38.800 --> 0:52:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna blow this wings thing wide open.

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you, all right, Well, we've got a nomination

0:52:44.360 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 2>from this side. Let us know what you think. Like

0:52:47.600 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Ben said, you could find us usually at Conspiracy Stuff,

0:52:51.239 --> 0:52:55.960
<v Speaker 2>sometimes at Conspiracy Stuff show. Check out our Facebook group.

0:52:56.280 --> 0:53:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Here's where it gets crazy. It's fantastic stuff written by

0:53:00.200 --> 0:53:03.279
<v Speaker 2>fantastic people like you. So go check it out. Talk

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:06.680
<v Speaker 2>about the shows, Let's discuss, you know, some of the minutia.

0:53:07.120 --> 0:53:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about future episodes. Let's hang out there together

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:14.040
<v Speaker 2>on Facebook. If you're into that kind of thing. If

0:53:14.040 --> 0:53:15.759
<v Speaker 2>you're not, you can always give us a call.

0:53:16.200 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Our number is one eight three three st d w

0:53:19.080 --> 0:53:22.840
<v Speaker 3>y t K. Leave a message at the sound of

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Ben's tone, his sultry tones, and it'll go to us.

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:30.359
<v Speaker 3>All three of us have access to it. Though Matt

0:53:30.440 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 3>is still kind of the gatekeeper. I think Ben is

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 3>more the key master. But but Matt is Matt is

0:53:37.239 --> 0:53:37.840
<v Speaker 3>the gatekeeper.

0:53:37.960 --> 0:53:40.959
<v Speaker 2>Wait, does that mean we have to copulated? I forget

0:53:41.000 --> 0:53:44.239
<v Speaker 2>how Win and Ghostbusters man, whatever, whatever, whatever you need, dude,

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:47.520
<v Speaker 2>you need, so.

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:52.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I do wonder which Ghostbusters we would be.

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:56.839
<v Speaker 1>That's funny. I was. I got some spoilers about dan

0:53:56.920 --> 0:53:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Ackroyd possibly in the future, but we'll we'll catch up

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:03.239
<v Speaker 1>on that down the road. Yes, as as Noel said,

0:54:04.200 --> 0:54:07.359
<v Speaker 1>give us a call. Matt is our Matt is our

0:54:07.480 --> 0:54:10.400
<v Speaker 1>phone guru. But we do all have access and we

0:54:10.480 --> 0:54:13.480
<v Speaker 1>are all listening in. It makes our day to hear

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:16.440
<v Speaker 1>from you. Just let us know if you're comfortable with

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:20.880
<v Speaker 1>your story, your name, or your specifics of your account

0:54:20.920 --> 0:54:23.480
<v Speaker 1>being shared on air, because we don't want to compromise you.

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Or if you're cool with us, you know, intentionally or

0:54:27.440 --> 0:54:28.879
<v Speaker 2>unintentionally calling you back.

0:54:29.160 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, if you're cool with us accidentally, but DIALI

0:54:31.640 --> 0:54:35.879
<v Speaker 1>and you full steam ahead. And if you hate all

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff for one reason or another, we totally

0:54:39.320 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 1>get it and we as always have a backup plan.

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:45.320
<v Speaker 1>You can email us directly.

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:48.200
<v Speaker 4>We are conspiracy at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:55:06.920 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Stuff they don't want you to know is a production

0:55:09.120 --> 0:55:13.600
<v Speaker 2>of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.