WEBVTT - Geetha Ranganathan on Netflix Earnings (Radio)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, thanks very much. AD. Ten minutes here before

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the top of the hour, it's time for the daybreak

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Asian media and Tea Leaves review from the Wall Street Journal,

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and this is a story we've talked a lot about

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>this morning. China is preparing to impose a fine of

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>about a billion dollars on d D Global. This would

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>bring to an end a year long investigation. The inquiry

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>has been into the company cyber security practices and protection

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of data. Once this penalty is unveiled, the story says,

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the government plans to ease an earlier restriction that bans

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>d D from adding new users to its platform. It

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>has tens of millions of users but wasn't able to

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>add so this wrapping up of the investigation would pave

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the way for d D to kick start a new

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 1>share listing in Hong Kong from a p and this

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is also from the Financial Times earlier. China will take

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>resolute and strong measures should the Speaker of the U

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>S House of Representative, Nancy Pelosi, proceed with a reported

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to visit Taiwan. Now this was originally reported by the

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Financial Times. She's originally scheduled, or was originally scheduled to

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>visit in April, but had a postpone after she tested

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>positive for COVID nineteen and from the Nick, Japan Airlines

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is planning to transfer about three thousand workers from its

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 1>core business to its budget carriers and to non aviation units.

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 1>And that's due to forecast of business travel not returning

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to pre pandemic levels for a prolonged period of time.

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>That's from the Nick. And back to that Wall Street

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Journal story we mentioned d d U the A d

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>r S did advance in the U S session. That

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is a rap on the media. Nine minutes eight minutes

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>now before the top of the hour, Yvon, all right,

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>let's get more on those Netflix earnings. Now. Things could

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>be turning around for the streaming company, losing fewer subscribers

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>expected in the second quarter, but the company isn't projecting

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a return to rapid growth anytime soon. Joining us now

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>discuss all this is geta rocket, nothing, Bloomberg Intelligence, tech

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and media analysts and geta It's interesting because even read

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>hastings at himself, losing close to a million subscribers can't

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>be really seen as a success, but investors centainly are

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>cheering the news what's your take overall, Yes, so Yvonne,

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely a mixed bag, you know, and I think right

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>now we're we're you know, just with the stock having

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>taken such a beating, I think the general sentiment is

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>just less bad is good, which is why we're kind

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of seeing this uh short term relief rally. But if

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you kind of just dig through the numbers a little

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>bit and look under the hood. As far as the

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>three Q guidance sys concerned, there's really not a whole

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>lot to cheer about. Um. So they are guiding to growth, yes,

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>so you know they're guiding to about a million subscriber ads.

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>But then you look at the number of subscribers that

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you've lost so far in the first half of the year,

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that's just over a million. So it's about one point

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>two million or so. So this is really going to

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 1>be a wash at the end of three Q. Uh.

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>And there's really no clarity in terms of what the

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>long term subscriber trajectory is going to be, uh, you know,

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 1>especially with all these macro headmands kind of building. Um.

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But there are some positives, there are some positives to

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>think about. I mean, one thing was the valuation of

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the stock had dropped so far that you know there

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>was some room there. Uh. The the the advertising option, which

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is which is coming. I guess they're testing in Latin America.

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you specifically about that. Uh, that

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>would seem to suggest that there could be some positives

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>from that, but that it might be really slow in coming.

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right, brand, So this is all going to

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>take a while. Yes, there are positives, Uh, definitely, as

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you pointed out, that they are trying to do their

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>best in terms of monetizing all of these incremental revenue opportunities,

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it is cracking down or password sharing as as

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>they are doing as they're testing out right now in

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Latin America, whether it's introducing that new ad vertizing tier.

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>But again, remember none of these are inherently in their DNA.

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>They have to build this from scratch, and so it

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is definitely going to take time. Uh, you know, and

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and before like it kind of uh has a material

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>impact on financials, it's going to be We're we're looking

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>at at least another twelve to eighteen months before this

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>really kind of boost the top line and the bottom line.

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And what really drove these results was you know, as

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 1>they said one single thing, which was stranger things. I

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder in terms of how much they're saying that they're

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>going to put into putting generally new content, what's in

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the pipeline. Is there anything there to kind of sort

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of reverse this tide and actually beat the competition spending less? Yes,

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>they are. They're actually holding spending flat at about seventeen

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in cash content spend. Um. Is that a

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>good thing? Well, yes, it does help them from you know,

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>an overall financial perspective that is going to partly contribute

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to their free cash flow, their positive free cash flow

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>guidance for about a billion dollars this year and substantial

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>growth into three. But then, um, you know, you do

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have their competitors kind of really really ramping up, um,

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, when it comes to content, whether it's a Disney,

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>whether it's an Amazon Prime that's going after football, that's

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>going after all of these expensive new drama series. You

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>have Apple foraying into sports. So you have all of

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>their competitors kind of really going after a huge, big,

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>massive pieces of content, taking big swings. And so I'm

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily sure it's a prudent move for Netflix to

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of hold back when you have competition ratcheting up

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>so fiercely. That said, uh, and we always defer to

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you a gitab but just to challenge you a little

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>bit um, you know, they did have the first mover

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>advantage the name. I mean, you know you're gonna cancel.

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to cancel some streaming, Netflix wouldn't be

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>first on your list. It would probably be last on

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the list for for a lot of people. And and

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the past word strategy is kind of interesting. Is there

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 1>some room there? The past word strategy is definitely interesting,

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>But remember you have trained people over so many years

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>now to kind of do this. They almost encouraged it

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, and so now suddenly to kind of

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>clamp down on it. Uh, is I don't know if

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>if it's really kind of going to bring in the

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>results that they're hoping it will. And remember that first

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>introducing this in Latin America, and Latin America is is

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>a very very price sensitive market. You have consumers who

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>are you know, where the elasticity demand is extremely high.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not really necessarily sure it's going to do

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot in terms of boosting top line revenue.

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>That said, it's definitely a step in the right direction.

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to wait and water and see how that

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of plays out. Um, so yeah, I think they

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>are taking a lot of that. There are a lot

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of good initiatives in in the in the pipeline. But again,

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this is still very much a weight and watch story.

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And one one of the interesting things with Ozark. I

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>guess that was one of the first where they sort

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of delayed the final episodes or split it into and

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it is not a strategy that kind of helps rather

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>than you know, blow everything out of the door at once,

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that you sustain your subscribers. That's actually a great point,

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and that staggered release schedule actually ted Sarandos just mentioned

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>this on the call. He said, the main reason for

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the staggered release of you know, Stranger Things, for instance,

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>one uh one drop in in in May and the

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>second drop in July was really because they hadn't finished production.

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>They hadn't wrapped up production on all of it. Of course,

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it does help, it does help with the with with

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the subscriber churn numbers. And I'm just wondering, alright, we

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>we have to go You're one of our favorites love,

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>You are rung and often Bloomberg intelligence. This is Bloomberg