WEBVTT - Tech News: Row Row Row your Roboat

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:20.639
<v Speaker 1>and all of all things tech. And this is the

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Tuesday, June eight, twent d twenty one.

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you were up in the wee hours of

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the morning today, if you were in the US, or

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're not in the United States, if

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you were just you know, up, you might have noticed

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that some popular websites were not up. They were down,

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>big big websites, including sites like Spotify, Twitch, Reddit, HBO, Max, Stripe, PayPal,

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and then news organizations like The Guardian, The New York Times,

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>CNN and many more. Also, some government websites in the

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>UK were down. So what was going on? One? I mean,

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>when this kind of thing happens, clearly something major is

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>going down on the back end. The possibility that all

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of these sites would suffer unrelated issues at the same

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>time is just too low, right, So what happened? Well,

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>apparently the root cause was a problem with a c

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>d N provider called Fastly, But that naturally raises a question,

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>what in the blue blazes is a c d N. Well,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that initialism stands for content delivery network, which kind of

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>gives you an idea of what it does, but it's

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a little you know, misleading as well. So a c

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>d N is a collection of Internet servers that are

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>distributed across different regions that collectively work to deliver faster

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Internet content to end users. It's kind of like an

0:01:56.240 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>edge network strategy essentially, you can think of it. It It

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>is almost like a dispersed team of experts who are

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>all working on the same problem, except, of course we're

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about computer servers here. And interestingly, these servers don't

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>actually host any content themselves. They aren't like holding the

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>videos on HBO Max or anything like that, so they're

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>not the repository of information that we find from the

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>various sites we visit and services we use. Instead, these

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>servers will load content into a cash memory, so you

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>can think of this as like very temporary storage, and

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>then they can serve that up to end users. So

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to watch a movie on HBO Max,

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the host server for that content could be sending out

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>data to c d end servers, which in turn consent

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that to you, and that helps relieve the host server,

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the one that actually contains all the stuff for real zs.

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>It saves them from having to handle all of that

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>load all by itself, and it helps ensure a faster

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>experience for the end user. But Fastly apparently had some

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of massive malfunction that brought down the c d

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>N system, and that meant that the support that these

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>these different sites usually have was suddenly gone. As a result,

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>millions of people found that numerous websites and services were

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>totally unreachable, and in the case of stuff like Stripe

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and PayPal, that could be a really big disruption for commerce.

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Plenty of small merchants depend upon these services, so this

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>was more serious than just not being able to watch

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a twitch streamer or have a twitch stream or access

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of Spotify playlist for an hour. Fastly was able to

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>resolve the problem after about an hour, with service appearing

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to be restored by noon in UK time. So it's

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:58.119
<v Speaker 1>a really good thing that Fastly's response didn't move slowly.

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Our next story for today's news makes me feel like

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I kind of got into a time machine and then

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>somehow went back to the late nineties and early two

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand's and that's because this story involves big music labels

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>suing the proverbial pants off of an Internet service provider

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>because of alleged piracy committed by that I s P

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>s customers. And y'all, we went through this two decades

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>ago and the music companies did not come out looking

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>real good back then, So what exactly is going on now?

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.119
<v Speaker 1>While back in two thousand eighteen, a group of music

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>companies that include Sony Music, no surprise there, Universal, and

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Warner filed a joint lawsuit against Cox Communications, and the

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>claim was that Cox did not do enough to curtail

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>piracy across its network as an I s P. The

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>claim said that despite these companies direct in Cox to

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>specific I P addresses that were linked to music piracy,

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the company didn't actually go so far as to ban

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>people from its service, and thus Cox was culpable for

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the losses that these companies suffered due to piracy. And

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, it is actually impossible to calculate the

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>losses from piracy because there's no way to establish if

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>someone would have purchased a piece of media legitimately if

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>they hadn't pirated it first. Because this isn't like physical media, right,

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>It's not like someone broke into a warehouse and stole

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a palette of albums or something. They took a copy

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of a digital file which can be copied infinitely. And

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>so unless you can actually prove that that person was

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>going to buy that digital media but didn't, then how

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>can you actually say the company was out any money?

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if I don't buy an album, right Like,

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>if I just decide, oh, I don't want that, well,

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not like I cost Sony Music money and that

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that seems like a pretty reasonable argument, right I decide

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't want that album, I didn't rob anyone of

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that sale. So you can't actually establish how much money

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>was lost as a result of piracy. There probably is

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>some amount lost, I mean, it's not like it's not

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>like it's a victimless crime. It's not that it's you know,

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>you just can't actually put a value to that loss

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>because there's no way of knowing what it could be.

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>And yet the jury in this case back in two

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand eighteen, actually they found uh in the favor of

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the music labels. In two thousand nineteen, not only did

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>they agree with the music labels, they agreed to an

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>award of nearly one hundred thousand dollars per instance of piracy,

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and there were more than ten thousand instances of piracy,

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>which meant that Cox's court mandated fine is that the

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar mark yaws a one billion dollars in fines

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to pay to these music labels. Anyway, obviously, Cox appealed

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that decision, and so that trial went to appeal, and

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year that appeals court upheld that first decision.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>So they said, no, the court got it right. And

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>now groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation or e f F,

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Center for Democracy and Technology and a couple

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of others have issued their own court filing regarding this case.

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>These organizations point out that the court decision is incredibly harmful.

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>If I s p s potentially face fines in the

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar range, they are far more likely to boot

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>people off their service if they get a notice from

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a music label. But it's never as simple as that.

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>For example, let's just take my house, right, I live

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>with my wife as long as you know she lets me,

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>which so far has gone pretty well. Don't mess this

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>up for me anyway. My wife and I use a

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>household internet connection, right, It's not like we have two

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>separate internet networks, and she uses one and I used

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the other. So if one of us were to run

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a foul because we were, you know, being a dirty,

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>dirty pirate and I don't know, we were like trying

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to steal the SpongeBob SquarePants musical soundtrack, our I s

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>P could get a notice from the copyright holder and

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>then give us the boot. But let's say that I

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>was just the one who did this, right, Like it

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>was just me that wanted that soundtrack so darn badly.

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>My wife is completely innocent. She doesn't know about it,

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>she's never listened to it. She certainly wasn't aware that

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I was stealing it. Well, clearly, if the I s

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>P boots us, that doesn't just affect me, It affects

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>my wife, who is completely innocent of having pirated the music.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>About how a simple sponge say bikini bottom And the

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>e f F points this out. It says, this is

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>just the tip of the iceberg, and IP address could

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>mean that the I s P has to boot off

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>an entire college, or a hospital, or a library, or

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>even municipality WiFi. I mean, the group rightly points out

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that these damages aren't anywhere close to the realities of

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>any harm suffered, and that it punishes the innocent as

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>well as the guilty. So essentially, these groups are saying

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that the court got it totally wrong, that the court

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>misinterpreted the law, and that allowing for an award that

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is completely out of alignment of any actual damage suffered

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is also unjust, and that the consequences will be catastrophic

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>because I s p s will be far more trigger

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>happy to boot people off of their service if the

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>if the alternative means that these companies are going to

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>get you know, hit by bill in dollar fines, so

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>this is just a bad situation. They also make the

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>point that the internet access these days is really an

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>integral component in participating in modern society, and if you

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>cut someone off from that, that's a non trivial problem.

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like saying, all right, well, because you you know,

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>stole a bottle of water at the local convenience store,

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we're shutting waters off at your house. Like that's not cool.

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>And Cox has appealed the court's decision, so this is

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>going to go to another appeals court. Uh And currently

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the company, the I s P actually has a lot

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of support behind it from various legal scholars and advocacy groups,

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting. I s p s frequently get a

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of flak because of anti competitive stuff that I

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>s p s tend to be at least tangentially involved in.

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>But in this case, you have a lot of people

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>siding with the I s P and we'll have to

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>where this goes next. Meanwhile, it's still a bumpy ride

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>for bitcoin. Back in March, the cryptocurrency hit an all

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>time high value of nearly sixty five dollars per bitcoin.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Later that value plunged to nearly half of that, in

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>fact lower than half of that at some points, hitting

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>close to thirty dollars, and after a brief recovery, the

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>value took another hit again earlier today. So what's going on, Well,

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>there are a few things that are happening all at

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the same time, and it's really impossible to say which

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>things are chiefly responsible for this. But one thing is

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we could be seeing a bear market in which the

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>value will be on the decline until enough people start

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>buying into bitcoin again on a really large scale to

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>cause this to switch over to a bowl market again.

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 1>Bull market is where the value starts to climb because

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>more and more people are buying into it. But a

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>different contributing factor could be that recently, the US government

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>managed to recover most of a ransom that Colonial Pipeline

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>paid to ransomware hackers earlier this year. Alright, so quick

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>summary of that story. Colonial Pipeline supplies fuel to the

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>eastern half of the United States, and the company was

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>hit with a ransomware attack that shut down its pipeline,

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>or really the company shut down its own pipeline sort

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:29.599
<v Speaker 1>of as a precautionary measure to make sure that the

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>malware did not spread throughout the entire system. But this

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>caused a short term gas shortage and a massive spike

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in fuel prices in much of the US, and then

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>the shortage got way worse because some people decided to

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>hoard gasoline, which is both selfish and stupid. Gasoline does

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>not keep forever, so if you hoard more than you need,

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a good chance that gasoline is going to essentially

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>lose its potency before you get around using it. And

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of course it's really dangerous to store gasoline unless you

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>have the proper storage containers, and a lot of people

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>were filling up all sorts of stuff with gasoline and

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>just creating massive potential disasters. Anyway, Colonial Pipeline actually got

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>things back in action fairly quickly, but it turned out

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the reason they were able to do so was that

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the company actually complied with the hackers demands and paid

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the ransom, which is something that most people, including me,

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>say is a dumb, dumb idea because it reinforces that

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.599
<v Speaker 1>strategy in the first place, and it makes future ransomware

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>attacks more likely. Bad move Colonial Pipeline. Now we hear

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that the US government was able to seize most of

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that ransom that was paid to the hackers, which of

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>course had been paid in cryptocurrency. And these kind of

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>stories definitely are a bad look for cryptocurrency in general,

0:13:55.360 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>which frequently gets associated with illegal and unseemly active ds. Now,

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to point out that's not necessarily the fault

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of the currencies. The idea behind cryptocurrency is that it

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>should be usable for any sort of transaction, not necessarily

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>illegal ones. But just like technologies such as peer to

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>peer networks, we see folks associate the technology with illegal

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>activity and these kind of stories don't help. And how

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>did the US recover more than two million dollars in

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>ransom Well, they apparently got access to the decryption key

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>for one of the ransomware attackers digital wallets, which is

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of like handing someone the key to a vault.

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And hearing that a government managed to take money away

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>from someone using cryptocurrency probably has at least some percentage

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin enthusiasts upset. Anyway, that may have contributed to

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>another slip in bitcoin value, which dipped below thirty dollars

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Oh I should also mention that just a

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>few days ago, Elon Musk once again managed to weigh

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in on this whole thing. He tweeted a breakup meme

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that he has fallen out of love with bitcoin,

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and the bitcoin value took a little hit at that point,

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to which of course lead to more complaints that Musk

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is manipulating markets. That's something he's been accused of multiple

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>times at this point. And what all this says to

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>me is that people should just stop following Elon Musk

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>on social media. That guy. All right, we have a

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>few more stories to get through today, but first let's

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. Having just spoken about, you know,

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>government turning the tables on tech, let's continue that for

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a second and talk about the FBI's massive staying operation

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>with regard to an encrypted mess saging service. So here's

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the pitch. You got your criminal types right, you got

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>your Tony sopranos and whatnot. These folks need to communicate

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>with one another, but they also need those communications to

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>be secure or else the heat catches on right next thing,

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've got the FEDS on your case. So

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you seek out services that allow you to communicate over

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>encrypted lines so that anyone who intercepts that communication will

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>just get absolute nonsense out of it. They'll be unable

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to tell what has been said between the two or

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>more parties. But what if it turned out that the

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>FEDS were the ones who designed the communication tool in

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the first place. Well that's what's happened here with various

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement agencies around the world, not just the FBI.

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>UH law enforcement in Australia and other places have played

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a major part as well, and they all work together

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in order to make this happen. It started out back

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in and it became known in turn only as Operation

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Trojan Shield. So law enforcement created a what was said

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a secure messaging app called a NOM a

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>n O M. The phones that a NOM we're on

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>couldn't make calls. They weren't enabled to make phone calls

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>or really do anything else other than use this app.

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>This a no mapp. They could only really communicate that way,

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And the FEDS made sure that these phones would only

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>be available through the black market, and that made them

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>look real legit shady, like this is this is illegal stuff,

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and so the only way to get it is through

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the black market, and thus it seems in a weird

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>way legitimate. Right. So some Australian agents who were deep

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>undercover had phones with a NOM on it, and they

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>gave those phones out to high ranking profile members of

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>various crime groups and syndicates and families so like the

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>mafia and outlaw biker gangs and stuff like that, and

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>gave them recommendations to use the app for communication. Those

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>recommendations filtered through the various organized crime groups with more

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 1>people switching over to it, believing that this would mass

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 1>their activities from government agencies. But in fact, the law

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>enforcement groups had backdoor access to that messaging the entire time,

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and they can monitor communications and set up a massive

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>sting operation. So law enforcement intercepted millions of messages between

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>folks like drug traffickers and weapons smugglers, Asian crime syndicates,

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>outlaw biker groups, and more. And the public only learned

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>about this operation on Monday, when it was revealed that

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement had made hundreds of arrests, like around eight

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred of them all around the world. Yauza and now

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>for a story about Apple, actually a couple of them.

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>The company recently announced some privacy related features at the

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Worldwide Developers Conference or w w d C, and one

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of those is called Private Relay, which sounds really interesting.

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>It prevents any entity from tracking your browser history that

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>includes your I s P and it includes Apple. So

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in other words, you can browse using Private Relay and

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>there's no there's no one out there who's tracking which

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>sites you have visited during that browsing session. However, this announcement,

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>which I think is really cool. I think private Relay

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting. I'm very curious how it actually works.

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>But there is a qualifier, and that is this feature

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>will not be available worldwide. Apple is not going to

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>make it available in Saudi Arabia, China, South Africa, Belarus, Egypt,

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Kazakhstan and a few other countries. The company so far

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>has not actually commented on why these regions will not

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>have access to this particular feature, but I'm pretty sure

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>most of us can make at least some educated guesses,

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>because in many of these countries, governments are not too

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>keen on citizens having unfettered and thus uncontrolled access to

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the Internet for various reasons. In places like China, accessing

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>sites outside of the country itself typically requires you to

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>make illegal use of VPNs to spoof where your location is,

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 1>and that way you can bypass the Great Firewall of China.

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>But should China come after a VPN service, then the

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>user data that that VPN service is steward of could

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>be at risk. So let's say that it's a VPN

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that keeps at least a short term record of what

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>sites users have accessed. Well, if China goes after that

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>VPN service, they could presumably get hold of that information

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>and thus ultimately come after citizens who are making use

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>of that VPN service. Now, some VPN services are great

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and that they wipe all that data very quickly regularly,

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 1>so that there's nothing for anyone to get hold of.

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>There's no there's no uh, no footprints left behind or

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. But not all VPNs are like that.

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you've got, you know, the power of the

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government coming after you, you might be compelled to

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>hand over user data. So a feature like private relay

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.239
<v Speaker 1>could serve as a protection against that. You can use

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>private relay in conjunction with a VPN and leave no

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>trace behind and thus have better access to information. Well,

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>I would hazard a guess that the Chinese government really

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want Apple to include a feature that would allow

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>citizens to potentially bypass national restrictions on Internet access. And

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>China represents a truly huge market for any company. I mean,

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's more than a billion people live in the country,

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>so obviously it's an enormous market. So most companies are

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>not so firm in their convictions about providing stuff like

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>privacy and security in order to give up on that

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>lucrative a market. Apple is by no means the only

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>company to make allowances for governments that a lot of

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>folks would refer to as oppressive. So while I am

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>singling out Apple here because that's what the story is about,

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>I do want to make it clear they ain't the

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>only ones who do this sort of thing. It's not

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>like Apple is being particularly disingenuous. Uh, this is pretty

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>much across the board. Next, we have a story about

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a lawsuit aimed at Apple. This one claims that the

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>most recent versions of iOS have caused older phones to

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>encounter performance issues, namely around slower processing speeds and shorter

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>battery life. Now, if this sounds familiar, it's because we've

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>actually seen this happen a few times before. But the

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>argument now is that as Apple releases new hardware and

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>new versions of iOS, it is at least somewhat intentionally

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>designing the OS to make older iPhones perform at a

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>substandard level as part of a planned obsolescence strategy, thus

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>incuraging customers to upgrade to the latest version of the iPhone.

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>The complaint actually includes this passage quote Apple benefits from

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>not having to tell existing and prospective iPhone users that

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>updates touted to add desirable features and to fix security

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>and other bugs have a significant countervailing downside in the

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>form of decreased processing speed and battery life end quote. So,

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in other words, this complaint is saying Apples hyping up

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>all the new features of the more recent versions of

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>iOS in an effort to convince people to download those updates.

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But then the update allegedly nerves older iPhone models and

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>thus pushes customers to have to buy new iPhones. So,

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in other words, they're saying that this is this is

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>unfair market practices essentially, is what this comes down to.

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'll have to keep an eye on this and

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>see how this goes. Typically you see issues like this

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>gets settled out of court. It's very rare that it

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>actually goes the distance. In drone news, for the first time,

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 1>an unmanned aerial vehicle served as the refueling aircraft for

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a piloted US jet fighter in mid air. The drone,

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 1>manufactured by Boeing, connected via hose to the jet fighter

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>as the two flew over the midwestern United States in

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 1>a four and a half hour long test flight. So

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the drone flew ahead of the jet fighter and so

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it extended a hose behind it, and it was the

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>jet fighter pilot's job to position the jet so that

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it could follow the drone at the proper distance and

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>dock with the end of that hose, and then the

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>refueling followed more than three gallons of fuel were transferred

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>from the drone to the jet fighter. So the test

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>was a success, and it could point to a future

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 1>in which militaries are able to free up pilots from

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>flying refueling missions. You know, they could shift that responsibility

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>over to unmanned drones and the human pilots could be

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>then go on to perform or mother tasks, presumably you know,

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>ones that are are more oriented towards specific mission goals

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to support. So that is interesting. And finally,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about autonomous cars and trucks and drones and stuff,

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>but now it's time to talk about autonomous boats. Over

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>in Amsterdam, the city is testing out autonomous boats in

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>its various canal systems. The row boats, which is not

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a rowboat as in row row row your boat, but

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>as in a robot boat, are part of a five

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>year project to test how the boats will be able

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to navigate the various waterways of Amsterdam and how they

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 1>might become an integral part of Amsterdam's transportation infrastructure. So

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the proposed uses for these boats include promoting tourism.

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a big one, so allowing tourists to get around

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the city in an interesting way, also to reduce traffic

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>congestion Sterdam's roads, because the canals are actually underutilized compared

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to the surface roads of Amsterdam, and because the boats

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>are actually modular in design and thus can easily fit

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>together to create larger structures. They could possibly serve as

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>floating bridges or stages should the need arise. But that's

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>all going to be in the future, because as of

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, the engineers at M I T and other

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>places who are working on this project, they say that

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the boats are probably two to four years out from

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>having a sophisticated enough navigation and UH and and motor

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>system to get around reliably and safely without having an

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>operator on board, So it will be a little while

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>longer before they can enter full operation, assuming it all

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>works out. But next up, I say, is Venice, because

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I want my robot gondolier baby. I want that that

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>robo voice singing out as we go through the canals

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of Venice. A guy can dream. I'm wouldn't a robot

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>be cute wearing a little striped shirt and little straw hat.

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm just saying. Anyway, that's it for the

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>news for today. June one. If you have suggestions for

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.199
<v Speaker 1>topics I should cover on tech Stuff, reach out to

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter. The handle is tech stuff hs W

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.