WEBVTT - The Best ETF Launch of 2025

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Trillions.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric Belchunis Eric.

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 4>We have not had a big group episode of Trillions

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 4>for a long time, but we're going to do it today.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 3>We are, Yeah, we were due.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>We're going to.

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Talk about the best new launch ETF launch of twenty

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty five. And we brought a ton of colleagues from

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 4>within Bloomberg News and Bloomberg Intelligence, each of whom are

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 4>going to pick their candidate and then in a battle royale,

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 4>we're going to decide which one is the best pitch.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 5>This was something that Exchange Slash inside ETFs used to

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 5>do back in the day, and I participated in many times. Member,

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 5>I'm still salty over not winning for the Urini ETF

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 5>about four years ago.

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Still carrying that grudge.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but they stopped doing it, so I feel like

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 5>it's a we're gonna get time and let me throw

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 5>that up for years, gol. There's nine hundred and twenty

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 5>launches this year in the US alone so far. So far,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 5>they'll get a little bit to daylight and two hundred

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 5>or two thy four hundred worldwide. That's ten ETFs. Every day,

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 5>Every forty five minutes, a new ETF is born.

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Somewhere in the world easily.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it may almost double the old record. That's how

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:21.919
<v Speaker 5>many ETFs are hitting the market.

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Okay, we have, like I said, a large group of

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 4>people here. We've got Phil, Donna Hirich, Dniza Sikova, andre

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 4>yap Isabelle Lee, maybe me, Athanasio, Sarah Vegas, maybe you,

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 4>and judging it all David Papadopolos, an executive editor with

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg News, this time on Trillions, the Best ETF Launch

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty five. Okay, so first of all, we have

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 4>to bring David Papadopolos back in.

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 2>David, welcome back to Trillions. Thanks Joel.

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 4>It's been a while, it's been it's been a second,

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 4>but we're really excited to have you back. This is

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 4>also that awkward moment where we kind of give you

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 4>the mic and yeah, like we're a sidekicks my show

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 4>now to your show. Now, So how are you going

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 4>to be judging the pitches?

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>So I think a few criteria.

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 6>I mean, obviously it feels like it should be an ETF.

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 6>That's like of this moment, right, like of the current

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 6>trend sort of thematic that way, hopefully an ETF that's

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 6>got some stake, by the way, for those you know,

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 6>for the members that there, you guys, don't don't go

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 6>tweaking your changing your pitches as you as you hear this, uh,

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 6>something with a little bit of staying power. And obviously

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 6>marketability is super important. I guess, like listen, maybe performance

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 6>so far, but it's presumably it's a it's a fairly

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 6>short period of time to be judging that way.

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 2>So you're the market, You're the market.

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 6>I am the market.

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so it would appear all right, let's let's uh,

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 4>let's get down to it.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Who's gonna go first?

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 6>First up, we have isabel Lee Cross, asset reporter here

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 6>with Bloomberg. Isabelle, you have one minute, and then I

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 6>will ask perhaps a follow up.

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Question, and Eric and I might have some commentary, might have.

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 6>A snide co two which is by the way, which

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 6>is a little sketch because they're also going to be

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 6>pitching themselves. Don't let them get in your head.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 7>The snyder the better.

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 6>Here we are, okay, okay, you are on the clock.

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 7>So do you guys believe that everyone deserves a second chance,

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 7>from your ex, from your enemies, from your boss. So

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 7>this ETF gets point.

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 8>One for that.

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 7>I'm talking about the round hell Meme ETF tick Meme

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 7>stock ETF ticker is meme emmy round two for that.

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 7>So they're making a comeback. They closed in twenty twenty

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 7>three because they didn't get enough assets and they weren't

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 7>performing well basically, and then this year they relaunch and

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 7>now that they're in the market. The difference is last year,

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 7>last seconds, it was passive. Now it's active plus one point.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 7>Now I'm totally three. It's it's active now and they're

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 7>going to use a series of quantitative and proprietary data.

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 7>But basically it talked about meme and we know that

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 7>meme socks entered the lexicon during the pandemic. It died

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 7>on a little, but now it's back. Think open Door,

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 7>krispy Kreme, think all of the recent figures that are

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 7>meme ified today. So I really think that this and

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 7>the basis points is sixty nine, which is not inexpensive

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 7>four points for me.

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, all right, Meme interesting, certainly certainly topical meme stocks

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 6>are indeed back open Door, krispy Kreme and a company

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 6>founded by an old college buddy of mine by the

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 6>name of Beyond Me. Wow. Yeah, true story over both

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 6>bad basketball players on a bad college team. It's true.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 3>So lots of impact there, Yes, I know.

0:04:58.960 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Yourself.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting about that. There's little like asterisks there that

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 4>I like that you called that like it is a

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 4>new launch this year, but it has been here before.

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 5>By the way, meme has a great I almost think

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 5>it's an inverse indicator because it closed at the actual bottom,

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 5>and then since it's launched, the market's gone down, like

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 5>it might be like kind of kramer esque in its

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 5>ability picked. Yeah, and bottom ticked. When it first closed,

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 5>it bottom ticked, And it's interesting.

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 7>That they reserved the ticker almost like they knew it

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 7>was gonna make a comeback, all right.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Also, this is one of the only self lazaruses.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 5>What I mean by that is a lot of times

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 5>the ETF dies and another issue goes, ooh, let's let

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 5>me try that. This is the first time where the

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 5>same issuer killed the ETF and said, let's resurrect our

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 5>own ETF.

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 3>I've never seen that, So let's.

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 7>End this podcast because I clearly went.

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 6>Thank you, thank you, so I guess questions from me

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 6>is uh aum so far? And I guess is about

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 6>so like, just tell me your vision for this thing,

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 6>giving its rocky past. Is this like a a one

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 6>year ETF play, a five year ETF play, a tenure?

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 6>What what's what's your time horizon for this thing? What

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 6>does success look like for this ETF?

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 7>I feel like assets is always a success. But the

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 7>past one it was just a passive ETF. It just

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 7>trapped an index. Now it's active and they will rebalance

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 7>every two weeks, as opposed to in the past where

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 7>they rebalance every month. Because, as we know, meme sentiments

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 7>change within a day or something. If you just find

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 7>yourself in Reddit, which I've been using a lot more.

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 7>By the way, I best hair straightener, I read it,

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 7>best restaurant reddit.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 9>It.

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 8>No, I don't do that.

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 2>She's like playing into the meme vibes.

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 6>Yes, all right, uh Eric Joel, any final comments?

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 2>Let's keep it moving? Who's next?

0:06:55.000 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 6>Thank you? Will next stop? Another cross said superstar for

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 6>us here it's you are on the clock.

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 10>Just to say, not that I'm competitive, but Isabelle's ETF

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 10>was down ten percent last week. My ETF everyone cares

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 10>about dividends. Everyone is asking about dividends. But there are

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 10>two big problems about dividends. That they underperformed the index, uh,

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 10>and that they have a tax track. And I have

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 10>a proposal to fix that. Allto cobbets in ETFs, it's

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 10>all the buzz.

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 7>Uh.

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 8>When it comes to banks, everyone has been doing it

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 8>for a.

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 10>Very long time, but now you can see it in

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 10>an ETF is based off commos. It's seventy four basis point,

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 10>which for kind of a sophisticated trait, I would say

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 10>it's relatively cheap. Of course, it's index base, which is important.

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 10>There are a lot of single stock ones that are

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 10>very voatile, come with a lot of issues, but index

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 10>base obviously is much more balanced, less likely to get

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 10>big losses.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 11>Uh.

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 8>Then we have yields all.

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 10>For fourteen percent and coupon which is one of the

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 10>highest in that divident category. And at the same time

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 10>we're talking about performance, there is.

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 2>A time is up. Yeah, okay, well there, yeah, I

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 2>think we.

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 8>C a I E okay, and I'm sure we have

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 8>more questions.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 6>It's a I E that doesn't exactly like like it

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 6>almost it almost it almost looks like.

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 5>I think they call it kaya ya. That's you'd have

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 5>to be the parent of. We had the guy on

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 5>last week, actually did we had the issue we're on?

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 8>Well what was his this?

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 3>But we had thirty he had forty five minutes.

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 5>She tried to squeeze what might be, in my opinion,

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 5>the most complicated ETF I've ever seen in my life

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 5>up in a minute.

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 3>I know it was worth it.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 4>Clock management did get you a point of super ambitious, so.

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 6>You weren't even focused so much on winning yourself as

0:08:58.120 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 6>you were taking down.

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 8>That's why strategy. That's strategy, all right.

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:04.959
<v Speaker 4>I think we could probably help her pitch out a

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 4>little bit which was divd in. ETFs were a hot

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 4>topic this year. This one distinguishes itself in that space.

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 4>That would have been my the TLDR.

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 10>I didn't even mention tax efficiency.

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 5>I would have gone, will going do you like fourteen

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 5>percent yield?

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 2>There you go?

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 6>I mean, that's is it like anytime I hear fourteen

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 6>percent yield, immediately go to bullsh But is it like,

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 6>is it a real fourteen percent?

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 8>Well it's not my ATF, that's all they say.

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 3>It's fourteen but you're selling it for the purpose.

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 8>Of selling it. Yes, it's real.

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 6>All right, then it seems like a good deal, right,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 6>I mean yeah, but I also got I got some

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 6>land to sell you in buld area.

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:50.719
<v Speaker 8>That has a high yield.

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 6>All right, thank you, dinny.

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 8>Thank you.

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 5>This ETF, by the way, I got to say, has

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 5>had inflows every week since it's launched, since June.

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 3>That's really really rare.

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 6>What is uh? What's to tell you?

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm up to about half a billion, okay in six months?

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it is? Is it a bit of a juggernaut?

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 6>I bet you what is me? I bet your mime

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 6>has like nineteen million dollars.

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't have a lot.

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right.

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 6>Next up on the mic, one of our crack ETF

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 6>research associates, Andre, Yeah, Andre, welcome, you are on the clock, sir.

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 12>My pitch is a round hill Humanoid Robotics ETF. Human

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 12>I picked this ETF because basically, I'm just a disillusioned

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 12>millennial and this one just fits with my theme perfectly.

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 12>So we have the AI bubble and everybody has an

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.079
<v Speaker 12>AI e TF. This one right here is going to

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 12>give us robots. It's gonna arm sky nets with the terminators,

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 12>it's going to bring to an end. And that's why

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 12>I like this ETF. So it has companies like Tesla,

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 12>Ubi Robotics and Video, has eight sorry about thirty million

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 12>in assets with an expense ratio of zero point seventy

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 12>five percent. I like it just because it's something different.

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 12>It's a new twist on the AI bubble. So that's

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 12>basically it for me. That's my pitch.

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 4>Wow fast, Yeah that was that was fast, by the way,

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 4>walking to trillions first time on.

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 6>But but there's a little bit of it might be

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 6>a little bit of a tell Andre when you say

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 6>at the end it's a new twist on a on

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 6>an E t F bubble.

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 3>So I think he said ay AI.

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 6>Bubble, I misad that's what I actually meant. I remember

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 6>I'm jet lag.

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 4>I have a question, which is why this one and

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 4>not cooid, which is the other human.

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 12>Ticker counts for a lot. If the ticker doesn't make

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 12>it pop, you're not gonna remember it. And this one

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 12>just said I.

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Think you just stole Joel's I talked about it and.

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 6>Human human is good.

0:11:55.559 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 2>That is a good ticker. What's the exact.

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 6>But why is it human? Why isn't it robot.

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 12>I don't understand, because it's going to replace humans essentially, humanoids,

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 12>not ex so they're building humanoid robots essentially to take

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 12>the place in the labor.

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 6>But is this just because this is like their helpers,

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 6>their helpers childhood, like galactic fantasy of yours or you

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 6>really believe in the atf oh.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 12>I wasn't joking when I said I'm a disillusioned millennial.

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 12>Let's just give the terminators their time to shine.

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 6>Okay, all right?

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean to be fair, you've ever seen that Boston

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 5>Dynamics video once every six months with a robot like

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 5>does a somersault grabs a gun and start shooting? And

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 5>you're like, holy, I think those are the videos that

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.839
<v Speaker 5>if you extrapolate that ten twenty years is where I

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 5>think this videos Like they're doing new stuff now, That's

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 5>what I'm saying, and they now they sometimes the robot

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 5>can fall over, get back up and like break dance.

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 6>It's just an interesting moment to pitch us. You know,

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 6>you know the AI, you know the whole way.

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 2>This is like the thing after the AI thing.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 6>Though, this is like it's gonna it's gonna survive that

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 6>I mean they're.

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Like cockroaches, these robots, like I mean, they just need

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 4>a charge.

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 12>If we think about it, like terminator AI sky in it,

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 12>we need the actual terminators to actually complete the circles.

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 12>So we have That's where I'm going with it. We

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 12>got this go to the natural conclusion.

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 5>This is as far as I've seen anybody take a theme.

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah that's pretty I mean, but it's all dust. Yeah,

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 5>and all the money being thrown at AI.

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 3>I mean, something's gonna happen.

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, they're gonn to be thrown AI, including thirty million,

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 6>just got started to six months than you, sir. Okay,

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 6>So next up a man who needs no introduction, just the.

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Co host of the podcast, Joel Weber.

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So maybe you've heard of K pop Demon Hunters

0:13:55.640 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 4>and the song Takedown. My role is to provide an

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 4>ETF that I feel like is going to be taken

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 4>down by the competition here. But I've picked the ticker

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 4>texan te x in, which is an I shares ETF

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 4>that launched over the summer. It does not have a

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 4>whole lot of assets, but if you know anything about Texas,

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 4>it's larger than life.

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 2>And this is a bet on Texas.

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 4>So biggest holding is Tesla, followed by Exxon Mobile. It's

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 4>kind of a great one, like get oracle As number

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 4>three so really Chevron number four, Caterpillar number five, all

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 4>of these companies have huge presences in Texas. We know

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 4>that Texas is the future of business, and you're like Texas,

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 4>you're either with us or against us.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 6>I gotta say, I'm surprised. That was kind of cool.

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 6>I mean, you don't read into that. I mean, I

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 6>don't know when he first came with Texan, I was

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 6>and I was I was looking. Uh, I was thinking

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 6>I was going to be disappointed, but that was kind

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 6>of fun. I mean I could. Uh. I don't know

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 6>it goes anywhere.

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 4>I gotta tell you. Bloomberg News has not written about

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 4>it once. I don't think the I has written about

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 4>it at all.

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of a little sleeper.

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it might have made Katie's newsletter.

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right it Okay.

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 3>The other thing is you get that okay minus one

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a.

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 5>Tax tailwind, right, because when you move there, you pay

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 5>less taxes.

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Right. This is a play for the future.

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, there was a Nashville ETF that had the same pitch,

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 5>but it closed.

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Phil Phil Donna has a criticue But but you can.

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 6>It doesn't matter.

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 3>It's a political play totally for the moment.

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 6>That's the story of the But see, I could see

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 6>Texan working out in Nashville.

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 2>That's not Texas. That's not Texas, that's Tennessee.

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 3>You know what, you know what the Nashville ETF.

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 5>All the hospitals are there, So it ended up being

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 5>like this ipso facto hospital ETF. But it is too specific.

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 5>But they also had an Oklahoma ETF back in the day.

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 5>And this is the second attempt to Texas. So they've

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 5>tried these, so that this one by I Shares is

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 5>I think probably the biggest reason it might succeed.

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 6>But when you said at some point here I believe

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 6>you said, it doesn't have a whole lot of money

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 6>under management.

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 2>It does not.

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 4>Million you know, like we have not we have not

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 4>seen a lot of investors pile into this.

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 2>But you know, keep in mind it's a big state.

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I think Texans will invest in Texas. All right, It

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 2>all come around, all.

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 6>Right, that's cool.

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 2>I like it.

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 6>Joel, Thank you sir.

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 2>You're welcome.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 6>Next up is our cross asset team leader here at

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Mail Donna Hirich.

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Wow, we're just.

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Uh on the clock.

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 13>First of all, everything is bigger in Texas except for

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 13>Joel's ETF. Second of all, Andre chose human even though

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 13>there was an ETF that launched before it based on

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 13>humanoid robotics, and he didn't even know that humanoids are

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 13>already in existence. What's your I'm just poking holes in

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 13>everybody else's argument. The best and most innovative ETF of

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 13>the year goes to xdiv XTIV. It's another round hill

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 13>ETF and this one will invest in other s and

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 13>p five hundred ETFs for you. So it's going to

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 13>be tracking the market, except it jumps out of those

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:38.239
<v Speaker 13>ETFs before the ex dividend date, and that way you

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 13>can avoid a big tax hit.

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I see, that's it.

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 13>It's so simple, it's genius, it's innovative. Nothing like this existed.

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 13>Tax avoidant tax awareness has been a huge theme in

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 13>ETFs since the birth of ETFs.

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 6>You're in a time pal.

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 8>This brings it to a whole new level.

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 6>Okay, so my question for you is it's a whole

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 6>new strategy.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 4>First of all, you just dig, you know, drag everyone

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 4>else and then like exactly by the.

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 6>Way at the end my pitches, I can't remember everybody

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 6>else sucks. I could have kept going about how everyone

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 6>else sucks. Yeah, So again, the name x div's a

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 6>little bit like hi, whatever the other one was. It's

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 6>not like, doesn't exactly like roll off the tongue. But

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 6>what does history tell us about how avoiding taxation? And

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 6>this little tax avoiding scheme? How much does it juice returns?

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 6>What is the data tell us?

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 13>Pal juice returns the data.

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 5>You want returns of this versus what.

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 6>I think Winkler used to call this show up and

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 6>throw up.

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 3>You're allowed one terminal lifeline?

0:18:58.680 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

0:18:58.960 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 8>Can I call it?

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Friend? Is this also a roundhill? Yes, it's a third

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 3>round hill? My god? Are they paying us? Okay?

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 5>This year XTIV is beating VU by thirty four basis

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 5>points and it's only been a couple months, so annualized,

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 5>that would be an extra forty basis No, annualize, that's

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 5>an extra two percent a year.

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 6>Eric might win for this.

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 5>I wish I was lying because I am also in

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 5>this competition. But again, I'm just looking at a small window.

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 3>But so far, something's working.

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 6>And history though will tell us that in general, this

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 6>kind of this kind of scheme works, is that.

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Right, generally speaking, I also think advisors are real concerned

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 5>with after tax returns. I mean, in the end, your

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 5>returns are after inflation, after tax, that's like your real return.

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 5>And so this is why it's important. But it's tough

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 5>to get people off.

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Of VU and S and P.

0:19:54.640 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 4>Just to be clear here, the strategy was flamethrower, and

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 4>it works.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 3>I know. I happen to be in the end zone

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 3>just standing there.

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 8>You're wide open.

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 13>This is for retail investors, this is for institutions, this

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 13>is for international institutions, this is for everybody.

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 6>Okay, excellent, wil Donna, thanks for playing.

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, we just had an addition.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 4>James Safert, who's a senior research ETF analyst at Bloombergan Intelligence,

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 4>was caught on some terrible public transit woes and then

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 4>amazingly just charged through security literally walked in and we're

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 4>just going to make him do his pitch. He's not

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 4>hurt any of the other pitches. If you don't win,

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 4>no you no, it's bad. It's yeah, I think you're

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 4>gonna win. So whatever you're going to pitch.

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 5>It may help him because you won't spend thirty seconds

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 5>trashing everything.

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 6>You have one minute to pitch, James. You are on

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 6>the clock now.

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 9>Okay, So anyone who knows me is not going to

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 9>be surprised that I'm going to pitch a crypto ETF.

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 3>So the one I'm gonna go with.

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 9>There's a few that you go with, but I'm gonna

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 9>go with the bitwise b Soul or Bitcoin bit Wise.

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 9>Solana ETF first full spot crypto staking ETF.

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.959
<v Speaker 9>It launched into when people were kind of I mean,

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 9>right now, it's not a great time to be in crypto.

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 9>It's down pretty bad. Uh, and it's still one of

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 9>the best launches of the year. If you look at

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 9>volumes the easiest way to see how good of a

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 9>launch and ETF has had. It's second only to another

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 9>crypto ETF. But Solana itself is a much smaller market

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 9>cap than the one that I'm I just referenced. So

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 9>XRP is a is a bigger product in the crypto world.

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 9>But uh, Solana is a little more interesting to me

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 9>just because of the staking aspect. It's something that is

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 9>brand new. It's taken in. It took in over two hundred.

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 6>Million dollars in day one ten seconds.

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 3>And it's just it just proves that.

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 9>Despite even when the market is going bad and against you,

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 9>in the crypto world, these ETFs the top two are

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 9>crypto assets.

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 6>Okay, you're out a time.

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 2>That was good.

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 6>Interesting, Well, of course somebody, somebody, Joel had to pitch we.

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 2>Needed crypto to be on the list, and James delivered.

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 6>At the risk of you saying this is Papa Opples

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 6>making it about Papa Apples again, I will just say,

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 6>my brother, and this helps your pitch is obsessed with Solona.

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 6>There you go, which makes me extremely dubious. Uh ten

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 6>million on day one you said it taking no so.

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 9>Day one trading was fifty seven million at its launch

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 9>last month it was the largest.

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 2>We just had an extra PETF to pass it.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 9>So now it's the second largest launch as far as

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 9>volume goes.

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 2>And it took an over two hundred million dollars in

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 2>day one.

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 6>So what's the what's the fee you have?

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 5>I think it's point two, but I actually I'll tell you,

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 5>hold on, I'm the life doctor, bel this is going

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 5>to be I think it's point two two.

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 6>All right, Trenz. Anything for I.

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Think is to just you know, walk out of here

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 4>on the high like, go get some ice water.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Well I have a question for him.

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Well you know that, and it's still to be clear,

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Well, crypto it's a tricky.

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 4>Moment pitching anything crypto current going down.

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 5>I think that's why I would say I think you

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 5>have to sell everybody in twenty seconds on why salon

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 5>a long term.

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean it's it's if you look at crypto, right,

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 9>if you're looking at blockchain technology, these crypto technologies you

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 9>have on one end of the spectrum Bitcoin super decentralized,

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 9>super secure, it's a little slow, it does a few

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 9>things extremely well, and then there's this whole other spectrum

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 9>of like less decentralization, maybe a little bit less secure,

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 9>more open, can do a lot more things than just

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 9>transfer money. Solana is competing on that other end of

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 9>the spectrum without being a completely centralized entity. So it's

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 9>competing with ethereum. It's a little more centralized in ethereum.

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 9>Some people listening to this will jump out of their

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 9>screens at me saying that, but it basically is trying

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 9>to compete with things in the traditional financial world, traditional

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 9>technology world, while also taking aspects that made bitcoin as

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 9>successful as it was.

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 6>Good stuff, James, thank you. Next up, we have a

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 6>fellow Greek eighth and Sarah Vegas, research associate here at

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg eighth. Then hit us.

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I don't even need a minute because this is

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 11>so easy. But just based on the picks, we have

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 11>Crypto that's down thirty percent, the most complicated etf ever

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 11>and a bunch of other ETFs have like no assets. Right,

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 11>did I get it right? Just what's so easy? It's

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 11>v bill, which is the Vanguard zero to three year

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 11>Treasury etf It's got four billion dollars. What is so

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 11>great about this is Vanguard never launches ETFs. It's like

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 11>an oxy moron to have new launches and have Vanguard

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.479
<v Speaker 11>in there. So it's their first launch in about eight years.

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 11>It's bonds. They never competed in this space. It's got

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 11>four billion in assets, it's only seven basis points. It's

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 11>up three percent this year. Uh, it's they're competing with

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 11>you know, the likes of some other cash like ETFs.

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 11>But I think they don't launch products lightly, and when

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 11>they do, they make a really big slash in it.

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 11>So yeah, I think simplicity wins in this year of

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 11>like crazy launches. I'm gonna go the complete other way

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 11>and just go with like bonds, which I think is

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 11>just like bill bill Yeah, so just like short term treasuries.

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Got it?

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Wow?

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 6>Okay, I mean hard to argue some of that. I mean,

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 6>as do you like shiny objects or or super.

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Super basic foundation.

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 6>The crypto guy like as but al right, not right enough?

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 6>So as not only the Greek connection, but also as

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 6>someone who's been a little comfortable in cash for a while,

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 6>in Vanguard cash for all. I mean, I don't know,

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 6>it's kind of I kind of speaking to me seven

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 6>BIPs now, right. The thing is, what these guys are

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 6>going to say is sure, pal three percent so far,

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 6>four percent at the end of the year. But how

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 6>how how do you like that when I'm when I

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 6>make up two thousand percent score in a couple of years.

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 6>What's your response to that?

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean, you're not going to be one hundred

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 11>percent in it, right, So I feel like these are

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 11>the this is going to be the position.

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 3>That bails you out of like the big draw downs

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 3>that we have.

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 11>Like, yeah, obviously cash is never going to be as

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 11>good as three X and video or two X and video.

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 11>But I think it's a nice ballast compared to other bonds, right,

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 11>like the AG and things like that. I think that

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 11>that stuff has let you down. Cash has actually been

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 11>pretty reliable as like a hedge recently.

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 6>What are the chattering class?

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 4>I just think everybody else is you know, pitching, uh,

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, new fangled objects and you know the voice

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 4>of sanity is entered the room.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean four cent yield in basically no risk

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 5>is pretty attractive, especially with market really high and people nervous.

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 5>And I agree, I would almost rather own this than

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 5>the agriabond index because this won't go down like the

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 5>AG goes down a lot with stocks. The only thing

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 5>here is if the Fed starts cutting, this will be

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 5>less attractive obviously.

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, I just think in general, I mean

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 6>my two cents is what was it was to sell

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 6>off in the bomb market in late twenty twenty two, where.

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 3>The AG went down thirteen percent? Cash did nothing, So

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 3>you did better in cash.

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 6>Like it sort of blew up the whole bond proposition

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 6>at that moment, and as I saw it, and so yeah,

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 6>bills are bills? Are bills? Is it really the first

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 6>and eight years from Vanguard?

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 5>No, no, well they've done active though, maybe the first passive.

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 11>Yes that I should say you only had per minute that.

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Actually that's like a.

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 5>Great they've actually looked like wait, actually launched Wait a second, no, no, no, no.

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 6>No, no, bactual mistakes. He's got to come up total.

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 3>This year he've launched this year of ETFs this year?

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 11>Yep, this was v buil was their first launch this year?

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 6>It's any of this stuff their first this year?

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 11>No, within the last like what was their last launch

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 11>was like twenty fourteen.

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 2>When they lost last year?

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 6>Bust his chops?

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 11>Are you what active did they they launched? That was

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 11>this year or last year? I think they're all this

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 11>year launches.

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so it is a slight Actually.

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 3>You're saying this was the first of many launches they launched.

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Show me what they launched last year? Okay, give me,

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna take a second. I want my life all right,

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 3>here we go.

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 6>Okay, here's that actually should have been established? You get

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:41.479
<v Speaker 6>one terminal.

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 5>We got a lot of nerds in here. How many

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 5>ETFs you think van cards launched this year? Let's get

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 5>some guesses here.

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 2>James was close.

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 11>It's like ten or eleven.

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 6>Seven or ten? Not I go eight then seven to.

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 5>One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight nine ten eleven.

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 6>Wow, So what are you talking about that?

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Because they haven't?

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 5>Bill, wasn't their first one launch this year? We'll launched

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 5>the same day as Vegas. Okay, so these two but by.

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 6>The way, twenty four.

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:11.719
<v Speaker 3>Here's the other problem.

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 5>They launched one in November of twenty twenty four and

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 5>another one in January of twenty twenty four.

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Two of them. What wasn't they've launched multiple et like,

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 3>like I should have said, all right, you had.

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:24.239
<v Speaker 2>You were you were?

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 6>I was going so well, I should have for the

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 6>kids listening at like.

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 5>The bond Lance Armstrong doping, it's like it's all ruined.

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 2>It was their first bond, first bond launch.

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Don't worry, I got your back with mine.

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 6>Do you want to you want to try that again?

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 3>I want to stay with the doping allegations. Okay, So

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 3>if I win, is this going to come back?

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Probably?

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 6>Bro? He did?

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 3>I love that. He took the whole like moral high horse.

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 5>He's like they never launched any ETF and so for

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 5>them to launch. It came down from the heavens and

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 5>they said there shall be an ETF today, And it's like, oh,

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 5>actually there's been twenty in like two years.

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I think before that they didn't have a launch for

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 2>like seven.

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 3>At some point there was a year or two at

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 3>some point here.

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 6>The more yeah, he won't give it up. Yeah yeah,

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 6>the more you talk together.

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 4>All right, I got one final pitch. Eric, You've got

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 4>a mess on your hands.

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence. You're gonna mop that up.

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 6>Your guys are uh yeah, the least by the way, Eric,

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 6>I'll say you so far. I feel like the least

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 6>factual pitch is so far I've come from your crew.

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Leric, you got a pitch I do?

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 6>All right, Eric, you are on the clock, sir.

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 5>All right, this one is just as boring as Athanasio says.

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 5>I know you thought I was gonna pick like a

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 5>two x quantum ETF, but this really stuck out to

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 5>me this year global x.

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Us five hundred ETF. Okay, well, who cares?

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 5>Right, Here's why this is interesting. First of all, it's

0:30:56.400 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 5>only two basis porta picker g x LC two basis points. Really,

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 5>the ticker on an s and P five hundred should

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 5>mean nothing.

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, anyway, the reason this is.

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 6>Interesting, respond to the crowd, Yeah.

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 5>This tracks the five hundred biggest thoughts in America. You

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 5>may be like, well, so does the SMP.

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 3>No, it doesn't.

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 5>The S and P is an active fund. That index

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 5>you need to have four quarters of positive earnings. Then

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 5>there's this secret committee that meets in a smoky room

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 5>somewhere and decides what can go in route. Remember when

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 5>they wouldn't let Tesla in. Well, over the last ten years,

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 5>the index this GXLC tracks is beating the S and

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 5>P by seven percentage points. Why mostly because they didn't

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 5>let Tesla in. This one did same with Strategy, and

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 5>there's been many others where this will have all the

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 5>stocks when they're big enough and you're not relying on

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 5>a secret committee of who knows who?

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, how do.

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 6>You respond to here?

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 2>What are the assets there? Let's just hear Eric admit it.

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 6>I gotta get then abound a battery.

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, there's only four million now.

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 5>Because global x is not known for beta, it'd be

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 5>like Vanguard launching like a humanoid ETF. It probably would

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 5>take a minute, but still, I'm just going on the

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 5>idea and the launch and the novelty.

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 3>And it's a fact.

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 5>And also this is truly passive. If you're in the

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 5>S and PIF hundred, you're not really passive. You are again,

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 5>you're giving that you're close to passive.

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 6>So you're saying that essentially all of us out there,

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 6>all of us who think we're passive investors, were actually

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 6>investing in active fund.

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, there's a committee of like nine people who you

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 5>don't know, nobody knows. It's like remember see the Mob documentaries,

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 5>where like the committee meets and like decides like who's

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 5>gonna die that year.

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 6>It's a sectually who's going to vote on this?

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 8>Uh?

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, pitch if actually does.

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 3>That's what this does.

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 5>That's why like Strategy did again they caught they checked

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 5>every box. Tesla checked every box. Microsoft was famously not

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 5>let in when they checked every box.

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 6>So it's interesting, But is there is there a company

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 6>or two or five right now that you could think

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 6>of it that is unfairly being left out as a result.

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 6>Wait a minute, the crowd has a thought.

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 9>Erics twenty stocks that are that are eligible but not

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 9>in there, and there's over sixty stocks in the index

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 9>that are technically wouldn't be eligible today.

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 6>At that So this is interesting.

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 11>This is a backdoor crypto pitch for her strategy, that's what,

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:14.959
<v Speaker 11>because he wants strategy to be in the index.

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:17.719
<v Speaker 2>So what's the methodology here?

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 3>The five hundred biggest stocks in five hundred biggest done?

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 5>Okay, ask someone to ask somebody on the street to

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 5>describe the S and P five hundred.

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 3>They can.

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 5>Now I'm going to say, as an investor who does

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 5>own the S and P five hundred in my four

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 5>one K, I'm fine owning it. I'm just saying this

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 5>is a little potentially tighter and more passive, and it's

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 5>even cheap than two BIPs.

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 6>Do you own this one? No? It just came that

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 6>four million dollars your.

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm not allowed to give investment.

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, speaking of mysterious processes, and uh, you know, smoke

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 4>filled the rooms with heavy curtains, h David Pappadopolis.

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 6>Uh you then, can I have a minute.

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Looking gars and considering your options you take, We're going

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 4>to give you one minute with your thoughts.

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we'll be back in a minute. Welcome back, David.

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:15.479
<v Speaker 6>Thanks?

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 2>How is that smoke filled room two?

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 6>Cigars later, Yeah, some more stting, right, yeah, I uh

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 6>I no, no, there's no horse, no no no. And

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 6>after after great thought, I have I have a verdict.

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to start with that or do you

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 2>want to? I want to.

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 6>I've graded everyone and we'll go from worst or last

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 6>to best least best, right, and.

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 5>There is I do feel like there's some millennials in

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 5>the room. Okay, I know you guys can't handle just

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 5>pure worst. Okay, so least best to best best.

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 6>Least best a k biggest flop our pal bill Donna, damn,

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 6>it was the shade. It was just basically it was

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.479
<v Speaker 6>just just too angry. Your pitch was just too angry.

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 6>I couldn't It was just too angry, too angry, all right,

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:13.360
<v Speaker 6>you know you're trying to sell me on something. You

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 6>can't be that angry.

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 2>But you're in good.

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 6>Company because your pal and it's just too just too

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 6>much of.

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 2>A mouthful, the whole cop kind of like a.

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 6>Fish, a fish called Wanda, Like I just couldn't get

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 6>it out. And it's the dividend, the whole dividen fourteen percent.

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, right, what you beat your pals? Uh? Next?

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 6>Uh uh, mister bell cheernis what four million dollars?

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:53.720
<v Speaker 3>I crushed it like I legit, objectively crushed it. Okay, okay,

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 3>well listen listen here.

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 6>You can't you can't beat all the one last time.

0:35:59.400 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Don't know.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 5>All I want is I want to see a copy

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 5>of his trading report in the next year. He's gonna

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 5>legit buy the ticker I went over.

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 6>I'm just saying, all right, now, we're starting to get

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 6>up towards the top. I got James next, right off

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 6>the right, off the bus or the subway, right in

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 6>solid pitch Crypto though, as the crowd, you know, as

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 6>the crowd was pointing out, though it was simultaneously greatly

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 6>courageous and a little kind of reckless to pitch Crypto

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 6>at a moment like this when it's puke and its

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 6>guts out. But that was all right, mister humanoid himself.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 6>Andre's up next. Kind of fun sal But you know,

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 6>I'm still maybe just me being stupid. I just don't

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:46.320
<v Speaker 6>know about the human ticker for a robot.

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 12>Have you seen the terminator?

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 6>I don't know, have youator.

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:53.439
<v Speaker 3>Even like the ones?

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 6>But you see what I'm saying. She remains She remains salty.

0:36:58.280 --> 0:36:58.720
<v Speaker 6>And angry.

0:36:58.800 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 2>This is what you know.

0:36:59.840 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 5>You just have to I gotta say, though, the idea

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 5>of disqualifying him because human is a bad ticker.

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:07.320
<v Speaker 6>It is.

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 3>They are called humanoids. I'm still name the industry gave them.

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm aware of the he's not.

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 6>I'm just not feeling. I mean, there's a lot of

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 6>stuff that the industry pitches. Private credit will also tell

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 6>you a lot of things about private credit.

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 2>But I noticed Prove did not have a have a cameo.

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 6>Joel comes in third. I think the bronze just because

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:31.800
<v Speaker 6>Textan Now Textan is kind of I feel like that

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 6>was fun, unlike human. I just thought Textan was good.

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 6>It's gonna go nowhere. To be clear, thea's got no chance,

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 6>but it's fine.

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Black Rock says otherwise.

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 6>But okay, Isabelle Lee runner up?

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 9>No?

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 2>You would?

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 6>You know, we're only down to two people, so you propose.

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 3>You you give it to Lance Armstrong.

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 2>The cast their negative don't.

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 6>Well, here's another final thing.

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 6>That was what put it over the top of the

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 6>lancing because Lance and I actually share the exact same

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 6>birthday month. No v Bill, I mean, come on, what's wet? Yeah,

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 6>it's what wait a minute, it's one of many factors.

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:24.280
<v Speaker 5>Right listen, I bet you their favorite actor is John Stamos.

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 5>That's how messed up they both are.

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 6>But we will we will be getting lunch together at

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 6>at uh. Yes, clearly, well, I like, I mean at

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 6>a time all the I mean you no, basically, among

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 6>other things, you could take the au m of all

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 6>these other a TF combined and it would not even order.

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, so it was an a competition.

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, Ethan, Uh, do you have anything else

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 2>you'd like to say? Any final word?

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 11>I'm clear of the doping allegations.

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 6>And let me ask, let me ask the trillion's host,

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 6>who would you not choosing your own, who would you

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 6>have chosen for this one?

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 5>Me?

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 3>I probably would have chosen Andres because because I think

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 3>this is a thematic etf. When I'm out in my

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 3>regular life, a lot of people are like, what's a

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 3>good stock pick?

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 5>And I'm like, I don't cover stocks. But when I

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 5>eventually say I cover the markets or whatever, They're.

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Like, I want AI exposure. That's what everybody says.

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 5>That's the thing this I like because it's going, it

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:36.839
<v Speaker 5>is even going further, and there's so much money being

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 5>poured into it, and it doesn't have a lot of overlap.

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 5>You add like one percent of a humanoid ETF to

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 5>your otherwise boring vanilla, it's a nice little spice. So

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 5>I just I just think that's a and human is

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.400
<v Speaker 5>a good ticker. That's why I would have given it

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:52.439
<v Speaker 5>to him. And the whole Terminator thing. I think about

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 5>that constantly when I see these videos. I think about Terminator,

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 5>and I think about Minority Report. Remember when they sent

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 5>the spider robots and to get the guy. I'm like,

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 5>the futures gonna be a combination of Minority Report in idiocracy.

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 3>That's my theory. I know it's a weird mashup, but.

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 6>So for posterity. If Paulus was the judge, Yeah, Winter Joel.

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 2>You know, I kind of liked Meme.

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:15.839
<v Speaker 4>I thought that was you know, of all the things

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 4>that you could have thought would have happened this year,

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 4>like the resurrection of a meme stock ETF, Like that's

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 4>just kind of you know, bonkers.

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 6>But I mean, like Texan, it's also gonna puke it

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:26.839
<v Speaker 6>scots out.

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 2>But that's the point.

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 4>It's like, you know, there's there's a there's an indicator there.

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 5>The other thing for meme is uh, if you again,

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 5>if you're a boring investor, you add a little meme.

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 5>You have to worry about what these whack job traders

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 5>are doing. It just covers the stocks they're into and

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 5>you get a little taste of it. Which of these

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 5>ets are you most likely to invest in?

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 6>Oh?

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:45.760
<v Speaker 2>He knew, he gave it to it already.

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Besides, besides g x LC do.

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 6>You like g XLC? All right, so the dividends will no?

0:40:53.440 --> 0:41:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Man, basically just say so we can all leave, maybe

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 3>maybe yours.

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 6>Eric, meme, not a chance in hell. The bell I

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 6>already got plenty of best new lunch text texting is fun,

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:14.399
<v Speaker 6>but no, like I mean, actually no, this I should ask.

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:16.919
<v Speaker 6>Eric's gonna be like, I really want And that's.

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Why he's like, I really want that.

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 6>What about some of the venezuela and bolvars are hand

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 6>I hand you just cut edit.

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 2>We're just gonna turn the volume down.

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 3>Hold on one other question.

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:30.399
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Let's say I know you're a horse track guy

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.359
<v Speaker 5>and you like gambling. Let's say you had a ten

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 5>thousand dollars of your money right and you had to

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:38.439
<v Speaker 5>place it right now, even money on all these Which

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:39.800
<v Speaker 5>of these were the best performance?

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 6>Twelve months from now, twelve months from now, just twelve.

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is an investment advice.

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 6>Yo.

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh you think cash is gonna win over the next Wow?

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 3>He No, you could be right. That's that's just a

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 3>barish call basics.

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 6>So that's why it's taking months. If you alread to

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 6>give me a longer period, I wouldn't go be your bill.

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, twelve months, Okay, you might be right.

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we'll come back in twelve months. Clock starts now. David,

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 2>thank you very much for joining us. Everybody else thank

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 2>you as well.

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to Trillions until next time. You can

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:15.800
<v Speaker 4>find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 4>or wherever else you'd like to listen. We'd love to

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 4>hear from you. Hit us up on social I'm at

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 4>Joe Weber Show, He's at Eric Balcina's. Trillions is produced

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 4>by Magnus Hendrickson. Brendan Newman is our executive producer. Sage

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Bauman is the head of Bloomberg Podcasts.