WEBVTT - Changing Consumer Sentiment and TikTok's Chinese Influence

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power. CALLI

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Emily Chay. This is Broomberg Technology. I'm Caroline Hyde in

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>New York in Family Chin. Coming up in the next hour.

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>It's no longer full steam ahead for Silicon Valley. Consumer

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 1>sentiment is changing quickly, tech sector trying to keep up.

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll look at how Amazon and Apple really managed to

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.279
<v Speaker 1>win over these obstacles. Plus, the Chinese government tried to

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>create a stealth TikTok account to promote propaganda in the

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>US because to look at how Chinese state influence could

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>be reaching younger generations. And the FTC is singling caution

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to big tech Mergers chair Lena Khan ruled her staff

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to sue Meta over its acquisition of a VR company,

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>which wasn't necessarily an ex pens of deal to begin with.

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll discuss the aggressive tone this case is setting. We'll

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>get to all of that in about a moment, but

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>first let's look at Amazon proving its e commerce power

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and card computing businesses also helping turn out revenue that

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>even consumers the worry they're about inflation couldn't offset it

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>gave revenue forecast for as much as growth in the

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>current period. Really relieved investors, and we saw it in

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the share price reaction. Two thousand and nine best months

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and nine. Spencer Soperan covering it, particularly

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the consumer angle, and from the perspective, what's amazing is

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>before the earnings, we were really worried about what Walmart

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 1>was suggesting, what Best Buy was suggesting, and then roomth

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>just Amazon shows its power and pros. Yeah, there were

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and relief. The word you just used earlier is exactly right.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>There was these kind of expectations you know, kicked in

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and then uh, you know, the results kind of blew

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>those concerns away. So investors were very relieved both Amazon

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>can resume growth like you say up to in the

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in the current quarter, and also people that aren't spending.

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>They shed about a hundred thousand workers and and started

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>getting that spending in control, whereas previous quarter they had

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uh, concerns about over building and having

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>too many people, so investors were worried how long that

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>was gonna last and drag on. This quarter showed they're

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, starting to unwind that and starting

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to see see some uh some more positive signs and

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>with a positive size. Of course, the fuecast was what

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>relieved any more details you sat there on the cool yesterday,

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Annie Jasse or his team spell out how they managed

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the next quarter. Yeah. One one big thing, especially on

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the spending, was you know, investors are always worried about

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>how much how quickly is Amazon going to spend whatever

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>comes in, and because of that over build on their

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>delivery network, They're not They're gonna cool off on you know,

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>warehouses and delivery station and those sorts of things, but

0:02:58.240 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>they are going to spend more and it's going to

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>be more targeted on data centers and fueling its cloud

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>computing business. So they really gave a signal that they're

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>going to double down on the cloud computing and they're

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>expecting that to remain strong even as they kind of

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>cool off investing on the On the e commerce side

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and what so good or in this particular environment about

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Amazon visa v say the Walmarts, the best buys that

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 1>have such inventory loads that they now need to basically

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>cut the price off, is Amazon does have a very

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>different sort of business model behind it. How has that

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>helped to weather. Yeah, that's a great point. And uh

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and something that really shown in this in this earnings report,

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Amazon has this marketplace model where of the products sold

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in the second quarter, that's the highest set number has

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>ever been before come from these independent third party merchants.

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And the main thing that means is when stores like

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Walmart Target have this inventory risk and have to take

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>deep discounts on products they've already purchased before they reach

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>tell them. Amazon doesn't have that inventory risk. If a

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>merchant has to, you know, take the price down on

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>something to sell it, even if that merchant takes a loss,

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is not exposed. Amazon still gets a permission, Amazon

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>still gets paid to pack and deliver that product. So

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this, uh, this marketplace model kind of

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>shields it from this inventory risk that some of the

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>other retailers are basing. We really want to thank you

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>as always for bringing us the expertise when it comes

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>to Amazon. Spencers Sofa thumbs up, Happy weekend. Meanwhile, let's

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about the recent changes the navigation that these companies

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>having to do around consumer behavior, around sentiment. Because Jason

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Bilson needs with us principle at full run adventures, of course,

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of your portfolio very much around the consumer.

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>You of course in one of us a company that's

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>all about consumer engagement and sentiment, and I'm interested, Jason.

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>There was a particular note coming from Wells Fargo the

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>court Everyone's I know it caught yours too, saying basically,

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:55.799
<v Speaker 1>if we're in a recession alone, was told the consumer,

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>do you think that the consumer is resilient in this

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>current environment? Thanks for having me, It's a pleasure to

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>be on the program. Absolutely, We a foreignner, you know,

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 1>really believe in the resiliency of people. We hope people

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>at the center of everything we do, and we're optimistic

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>about the future. We saw consumers be incredibly resalment, resilient

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and adaptable during the pandemic, and we believe that that

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>will that will hold up, you know, through this economic

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>backdrop and in the long run as we think about

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the next decade ahead. Why you see consumers um spend

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>levels are high, you know, the sentiment, on the other hand,

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is low. They're really taking in what's happening right now,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're adapting and they're taking precautionary steps. So we're

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>hearing about you know, of consumers are, excuse me, are

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>creating a budget. Of consumers are creating a a a

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>savings account for an emergency fund. They're beginning to make changes,

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly for lower income consumers. We saw this with Walmart

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>coming out this week and lowering their profit target when

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>consumers are shifting dollars from from discretionary categories like apparel

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to categories that are more necessities like food. So consumers adapt.

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>That's their resiliency, right. They may face tough times economically,

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>personally or at a macro level, but they adapt, and

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>that where we see the resiliency coming in just and

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>also many of talked like there are different types of

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>consumers out there. There are the consumers that at the

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>moment are facing, you know, a balancing act. They cannot win.

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Groceries costs more, gas costs more, they are going to

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>have to contail their purchases. But then there's a more

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>luxury and purchaser who is able, despite perhaps their four

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>oh one k falling off a cliff and despite some

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of their stock prices having been damaged, are still willing

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>with the pent up demand to be traveling. And therefore

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio company away comes into my mind's eye, all

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>still willing to be buying an Apple iPhone or an

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a ring, which perhaps costs a little bit more. Are

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you thinking that this consumer is bifurcated. Absolutely, I think

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that that's true right now. I mean, I hope we'd

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly have our eye towards opportunities that are that have

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the lower income consumer in mind and increasing access increasing

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>costs for them. But I do think that we are

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>experienced that. I mean, the reality is that this is

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a complex and dynamic time for consumers. As we mentioned before,

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>spend is remaining high, sentiment is low. You know, on

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, consumers want to get out there and

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>live their lives coming out of the pandemic. They want

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to eat out, they want to travel. Uh. You know,

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, they have inflation steering them in

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the face and their dollars aren't going as far as

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>they used to. Yeah, I've heard much view that actually

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>this summer, they'll do it. This summer that like, I

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>am just caution to the wind. I'm getting on that flight.

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>It costs me a lot. But people are already buying.

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>For example, Walmart said, look, we think that the shopping

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>period for the September returned to school is actually be good.

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>But my warriors, I'm the parent. I'm looking at Amazon

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Prime Day and buying my kids their lunch boxes because

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want them to get more expensive. Are people

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>buying stalking up now and then perhaps into the winter

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and in the fall, that's when we start to pull back.

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a possibility of that. You know,

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>at this moment, we're seeing a shift and spend from

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>from durable goods, uh, these one time replacement purchases that

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>people made during the pandemic, and they're not putting dollars

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>towards that anymore. They're thinking about things like back to school,

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>like travel, some of the services that they didn't get

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to spend on in the last couple of years, you know,

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>with that in mind very much so though, I do

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>believe and see that that consumers, consumers are taking precautionary

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>steps and they will start to fall back. For the middle,

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>middle income and upper income, we haven't seen that effect yet.

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>For the lower income, we have seen that, and to

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>your point, you know, in the back half of this year,

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that's something that we have our eye on for sure,

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're looking at your portfolio at the moment, and

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>chime is one that comes to mind. And course you

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>were talking about how the consumers wanting to say you

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing a change in the way in which they're wanting

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to have savings for emergency rainy day funds. What about

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>just a desire to be in the market, a retail investor,

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>one that wants to be seeing and building wealth. How

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking about that from a fintech perspective as well.

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of energy around that, of course

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years. You know, I think

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the reality has set in. There's plenty of individuals that

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>got burned that we're tracing, you know, chasing Uh you

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>know what, what what I see as as a free

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>lunch and that just isn't a free lunch, And so

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the realities are setting it. I'm hopeful that that consumers

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>will want to continue to participate as retail investors. I

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>think that that is important increasing access to new categories

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of investments. This is this is critical for for broad

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>wealth creation. You know that being said, uh, chasing the trends,

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>people are feeling the pain of that right now, and

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that will probably color in shape how they

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>invest going forward. Jason, it is always fascinating to have

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>someone who is so early in one success story like

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Bonomous and then gone on to bm VC and thinking

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>about these sorts of consumer facing companies. We thank you

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>for runadventurous principle of Jason Bolstein. There really great thoughtful answers. Now,

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, this week we have the big news of

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the House and the Senate have passed the Chips Act.

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>The bill goes to President Biden's desk next to get

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>signed into law. Now, meanwhile, US itself as tightening restrictions

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>on China's access to chip making gear according to two

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>major equipment suppliers, which further under schools basically Washington's accelerating

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>efforts to we'll win out versus Beijing's economic ambitions. Let's

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>bring in Bloomberg's executive editor for Asia Technology, who happens

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to be in the US, Peter Alstrom. Thank you so

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. And we have seen already

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:59.239
<v Speaker 1>there were reports that America was leaning on European equipment

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>makers to stop setting over to Beijing into China and

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 1>now leaning on US manufacturers. Talk to us about the

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>latest news. We know, uh, that's right, Yeah, we had

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>two CEOs of chip equipment makers who came out this

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>week and talked about new restrictions, tighter restrictions on their

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>ability to export gear into China. And this is part

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>of, of of course, the ongoing tensions between the U S

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and China. The Biden administration has been following on these

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>plans to try to restrict China's ability to get the

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>equipment that they need to be able to make the

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>most advanced chips. So what these two CEOs have talked

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>about is that now they're widening the scope of that.

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>In the past, the hurdle was sort of ten nanometers,

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>which is really the most advanced chips, and now they're

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>expanding it to fourteen nimes um. And so the chip

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>makers are now pulling back and they're disclosing to their

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>investors that they have these tighter restrictions. And this is

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>part of this broader clash that the U S and

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>China are going through right now, where the US is

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to hold back China as it tries to build

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it's chip making expertise in particular, but more broadly the

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>ability to build its technology sector. China's response from your perspective,

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Peter Well, they've pushed back. They think that the US

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is unfairly trying to stop their rise in the technology area,

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that they want to be able to build these capabilities

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>within the country. They're investing billions of billions of dollars

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>into companies, into venture capital funds to be able to

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>um invest in semiconductors in particular because that's sort of

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the foundation of the tech industry, but also areas like

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence and robotics, autonomous driving, etcetera. Also, of course,

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the animosity, shall we call it that between China and

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>US on the tech level is also spread into the

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>world of social media, and time and time again we've heard,

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the likes of Meta say, you know, the reason

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we need to keep on building and scaling is because

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>otherwise China will come in, and they mean TikTok. TikTok's

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>already got a real foothold in the US, and then

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>might be reasons for concern. Can you elaborate a little

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>bit on what might be a so called propaganda uh

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>developments in that space. Yeah. TikTok, of course, is one

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of the apps that was developed by this Chinese company,

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Bite Dance. They have a whole bunch of them, but

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>TikTok is the one that's really taken off in the

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>U S. It's very popular with teenagers in particular, and

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's um first came under scrutiny under the Trump administration,

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>which planed on banning the app for a while, and

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they were going to force the company Bye Dance to

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 1>sell off ownership of TikTok. It's become very popular in

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>their concerns about national security. So the latest story that

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you're referring to is that we found information that the

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government had gone to TikTok and had tried to

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>set up a channel where they could put on their

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>point of view, their kind of nationalist a point of

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 1>view and advocate for the Chinese point of view in

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the world without disclosing where it was actually coming from.

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>TikTok in this case pushed back and said that they

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>would not comply with those regulations. They don't want to

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>be viewed as a propaganda arm of the Chinese government,

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>they saidainly don't, particularly when they do want to keep

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>on expanding in the Western world. And to that point, Peter,

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>there has been some interesting reporting from putting back just

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>about their foothold in gen Z and and the way

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in which gen Z use TikTok. Right, well, TikTok is

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>just exploding in popularity, and it has been for quite

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a few years. What's really changing now are a couple

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of things. One, TikTok is beginning to cash in on

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that popularity. They figured out how to use advertising to

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to bring in revenues, and we've talked about

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>how their revenues are surging. They're likely to go to

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>about twelve billion dollars this year. As part of that,

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>they're moving beyond their their old kind of platform. They

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>used to be viewed as mostly entertainment. They were short

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>videos that people would watch. If you had to search

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for something, you would typically typically go to Google, of course,

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>But now what you're seeing is that TikTok is actually

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>being used to find things in the way that you

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.239
<v Speaker 1>used to look on search, especially with the younger consumers,

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and getting that news as well. Executive editor for Asia

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Technology Peter Elstrom keeping it on linear TV for US

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>for the time being, but meanwhile coming up shares Intel

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>plunge today and the CEO told Bloomberg that it's stark

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>deserves to be down. Why now mere corporal moment. Will

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>share more in that interview. This is Bloomberg. Chip maker

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Intel has well slashed his sales and profit forecasts for

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the year. We heard that after the

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>bell yesterday, and of course CEO pat Girl Singer consider

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.479
<v Speaker 1>an Intel needs more time to make its products competitive.

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, while he, as should investors looked

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>at the current quarter will be the low point. Here's

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>some of his conversation with our colleagues and Edwards and

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>alex Steel. We expect two and twenty three to be challenging,

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and we had great winds yesterday that we announced with Amazon,

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, long term multigeneration partnership with Meta and uh

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, these are areas where we're going to go

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>fight every customer, every socket, every workload. But we expect

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that two and twenty three are challenging years until we

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>get the products that are just unquestionably the best in

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the industry. Macrowhead winds are they something that you are

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>factory into your expectations for the business, the extent to

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>which you want to invest in the business. You know,

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the enterprise market continues to be strong, it's really focused

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the weakness and the consumer market has been where we've

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>seen it quite acutely in this period of time. But

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>like semiconductors, you know, it's a cyclic industry and it

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>always has been, and we're going to embrace this and

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>make the company stronger, better, and you know, some austerity

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>helps to drive my transformation agenda more rapidly into the

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>company as well, and thus we feel like this is

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the bottom. That's what we clearly communicated in the earnings call,

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're off to the races to do

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>better for ourselves and for our shareholders into the future.

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>You guys also talked about UM, your new guidance for

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>full year gross margins coming in around A lot of

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts were really skeptical of that number UM after the

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>call that it's just too hopeful considering all the pricing

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>pressures that everyone's under on chips and increase process nodes costs,

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Um, what's the probability you're gonna have to

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>revise that lower? Well, we clearly set out a framework

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>of our financials that we are confident in that we

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>can meet and beat, so our confidence is high. We

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>also had some one time things in the quarter, like

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 1>inventory research that will naturally reverse. You know, some of

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>this was the dramatic swings that we saw in the quarter.

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, we weren't able to adjust our fixed costs

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>that quickly, so we'll have more time to do that

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of the year. And with new

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.719
<v Speaker 1>products ramping, you know, they're very negative and as they

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>start to ramp, you know, we get better margin structure.

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>So overall, we're confident in the guide that we gave

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>for the year, and we have a natural strength of

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>shipping more products in this in the second half of

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the year. Normal yearly cyclicality. Intel stock is down thirty

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>this year. It's down ten percent today. The market is

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>just not buying what you're selling. What is everyone getting

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>so wrong? Then I think we deserve to be down today.

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>And with the earnings that we report, the guidance that

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we gave, you know, it's a bit of a reset

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I think we've disappointed ourselves and our shareholders

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in that respect. At the same time, we've laid out

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>a multi year path to the future and we're confident

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>that that will be realized and we're getting more and

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>more proof points along the way, such as our technology

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and process. You know that area is one that everybody

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>has set is most critical. And Intel seven, Intel four

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:56.719
<v Speaker 1>got very positive reviews, were ahead of schedule, and Intel

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>three and eighteen A. And if I have leadership, process

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and capacity, you know Intel is going to do fine

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>for the future. We had neither. We're getting back both

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of those as we go forward. So we're working on it.

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>But clearly, this is a journey. It is a journey.

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>What difference will the Chips Act make to your journey?

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Chips Act is a seminal act for

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>this may be the most significant industrial policy legislation that's

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>been put in place since World War Two in the US.

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>This is huge. Clearly, we said, you know, we are

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>expecting and to be a beneficiary of that both in

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the near term right with the manufacturing offsets, and we

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>have an aggressive capital build for that. You know, the

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>tax benefits will be helpful, but long term, the research

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>portions of the bill are huge for long term leadership

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. This is good for the industry, it's good

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 1>for the United States, and Intel will be a beneficiary there.

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 1>And I'm proud to have played a part in getting

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it across the line. In tels, the pat gaussing on

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Blue Bay Team. Meanwhile, coming up, it is a date

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a judge decides when Musk Twitter trial when it's going

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to begin. Boy still until October. So Twitter's lawsuit against

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 1>billionaire Elon Musk over they canceled four billion dollar buy

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>out of the social media platform set for a five

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>day trial starting October seventeenth in Delaware. Twitch As lawyers

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>say they'll need only four days to prove Muskar is

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>misusing questions about spam and robot accounts as an excuse

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to walk away from the deal. Musk's arguing Twitter's handover

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of the so called bots material hasn't been robust and

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 1>the company's mishandling of that data provides a legitimate basis

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>for backing out. Kurt Wagner joins us, now, too well,

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>explain why we have to wait all the way until October.

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>But meanwhile we get the drip feed of news and

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>we understand Musk has indeed filed counterclaims in the lawsuit

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>over the buy out, but we're not gonna be able

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to read them. Yeah, exactly. I believe they're not public

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, so we can speculate as to what they

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>might say. And my guess is he's gonna say, hey, listen,

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing is a real issue, and you know, see

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you in October. We can talk about it. But as

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, you know, this trial, we knew it was

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be in October. The two sides were kind

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of arguing a little bit over when it was going

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to be. Twitter had wanted it to actually be a

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>week earlier than what it scheduled, which is right now

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for Monday, October se um. So clearly they were able to,

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, find a date that works for everybody, and

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll see you there five days, four days,

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>all of it. I mean, Delaware, a court in Delaware

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is known for speed, right, But is this particularly fast

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>or give it a context here? Yeah, it does. It

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>feels a little fast to me. But at the same time,

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so much this this, you know, feels like

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a sort of simple case in the sense that both

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>sides have already signed this merger agreement, right, we know,

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>um the issues at hand, right, it's this, it's this

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>body issue, and so um to me, it's like everything

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is already kind of laid out. And so as you

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, I think Twitter thought that they could do

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>this in even four days. The trial is supposed to

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>be five, so clearly they think they can make their

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>case quite quickly, and um, you know, we'll we'll find out,

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>but it sounds like it's going to be that five

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 1>day week, uh, and hopefully have a verdict or some

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of solution by the end of the week. October one.

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>For lawyers, three months is pretty short for our short

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.959
<v Speaker 1>term media mindset. It feels like an eternity. What are

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you expecting next? What do we look out for? Yeah, well,

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.719
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes, we're going to see both sides, you know,

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>doing all the things that you do for a trial. Right.

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be requesting documentation and providing documentation to

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>one another. They're going to be setting up witnesses, uh,

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of that stuff. I think in the meantime,

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>there is supposed to be a vote from Twitter shareholders

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 1>in September uh to kind of form formulas or formulate sorry,

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>the deal, excuse me for create the deal and make

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>sure everything is good to go. And um, that's going

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to be in September, And that's a way for them

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to try to show that they're moving forward with this

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>whole thing and they're not. You know letting this get derailed.

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.439
<v Speaker 1>It's a Friday. I don't know what my name is anymore,

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>let alone how I say formalize or formulate. Ko Wagner,

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much of being in the studio. Appreciate it.

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>They well. Meanwhile, Federal Trade Commissioner Chair that is, Lena

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Kahn is sending a pretty strong warning sign to Silicon

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Valley by trying to block metas pursuit of a VR

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>fitness app. Within can't overruled, actually her staf's recommendations to

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>allow Meta to buy the company as part of its

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>metaverse expansion. Now, that aggressive approach for a pretty minor

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>deal seemingly suggest that the FTC is going to play

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>hardball with big tech M and A, as if we

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>hadn't guessed that already. Plombergs Max Chafkin is here to

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>tell us first and foremost, NUNA can't overruling sort of

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>advice by her own economists, their own lawyers within the

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>FTC to say no, look, we're going to go ahead

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and pursue this case. How big a deal is that, Well,

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a big deal in a sense that what we're

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>finally seeing is Lena con sort of following through on

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>something that I guess a lot of political observers have

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>been expecting and that hadn't happened kind of in the

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>early days of the Biden administration because you had this

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to too deadlock on the FTC. UH. Now we have

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>another Democratic Commissioner, so it's three too, so all of

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, cases like this can proceed. And the rationale

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>here is basically that Facebook had already has dominance of VR, which,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>although it's a nascent platform, you know, is potentially an

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>important platform, and in acquiring this smaller company, as you said,

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>for not a huge amount of money that you know,

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>allows it to to extend its dominance. This is super

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>controversial kind of in Silicon Valley because what Facebook is

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>doing is something that not only has it been doing

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>for basically, you know, the last decade, but the entire

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>industry has been doing. Right. It's a totally part of

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the playbook that these small that these big tech giants

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>um look to get into new platforms like VR by

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.239
<v Speaker 1>doing uh purchasing, and and the FTC is saying, hey,

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, wait a minute, maybe it's not going to

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>work anymore. I mean, according to the House, what was

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it metro has made a hundred or so purchases of

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>smaller companies, and of course the FDC itself is already

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>pursuing a monopolization case when it comes to social media.

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>They now saying that, look, you're monopolizing the world of

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>virtual reality. But is Meta the main company that's going

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.199
<v Speaker 1>to be at risk here or is this more precedent

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>setting for an alphabet or a or an Apple. Well,

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's certainly something that Meta in particular has

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, employed extensively. You know, we're seeing separately. What

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>makes this case, this lawsuits so interesting is that separately,

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, um Mark Zuckerberg is running into real problems,

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>problems with growth, problems with you know, privacy, you know

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Apple stuff. And we're seeing you know, earnings

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that are disappointing. And the way that Facebook has gotten

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>around sorry, Meta has gotten around this, you know, in

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the past, is by buying companies. You know, when there

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>was the shift to mobile um some of that innovation

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>happened inside of inside a company, inside a company then

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>called Facebook. But but what really propelled uh Meta Facebook

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>two dominance was the acquisition of Instagram. Of course, that

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>was not a huge acquisition, not that much bigger than

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about here, and then the acquisition of

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>What's App and that is, you know, given it this

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>huge dominance of social media. You know, if Facebook had

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>its druthers, if Mark Zuckerberg had his brothers right now,

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, he'd probably trying to buy TikTok. Of course,

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of out of the question right now because

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>you know that CC is never going to go for that.

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>They won't even let him buy this tiny VR company.

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And of course, leading Colm, we knew that how writings

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in Academia was about Amazon and about the world of consolidation.

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of taking a bit of time, hasn't it

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to finally get this bite rather than the bog? Yeah,

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>And as I said, you know, we she has a

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>very narrow window and Bloomberg has written about this over

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of months. But because you you had

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a to two deadlock, she really wasn't able to do anything.

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>You get this new um Democratic Commissioner, and that gives

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>her a three to edge. It allows a case like

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this to proceed. But the issue is that once we

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 1>hit the mid terms, uh, if Republicans take control of

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Congress or take control of one of the uh, you know,

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>houses of Congress. As we expect, then you're gonna see pushback,

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>congressional pushback, probably from Republicans, and that's gonna limit her

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>ability to get things done. So there's this very narrow

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>window politically, and she is of course trying to pursue it.

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So so in that sense, it's not that surprising. Yeah,

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>of course the two Republicans voting against this action on

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the FDC. Max, always great to have your expertise with us.

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for most Max Chafkin. I have a great weekend. Meanwhile,

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 1>coming up, as the world slowly but surely still moves

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 1>towards Web three, as we like to call it, we'll

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about the need well maybe own your own digital

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>identity in domain names, unstoppable domains. It's just race and funding.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 1>It's the new unicorn in the Web three space. Tune

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in for the interview with the CEO of the spring Back.

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Time now for our crypto report, and here's some optimism

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to wrap up the week. Bitcoin Etheria, Well, it's two

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>largest digital tokens headed towards them best months this amid

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a revival of risk appetite in global markets. That's bringing

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>our crypto contributor Shnati Bassett, who, well, we know risk

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>assets were well played for the month of July. Absolutely,

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about what that means for bitcoin, because

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>on a seven day basis, Caroline, you're seeing it up

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>more than five percent. It is starting to waiver a

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit under twenty four dollars, but it does have

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a nice little rally. And you look at that rally

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>right here in the middle of the week, right after

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve raised interest rates. That was supposed to

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>be something that may have muted risk appetite, but it

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly did not in the case of bitcoin this week.

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And if you take a look at bitcoin over the

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>full year, where does that leave us in terms of

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>climbing back up towards where we were before? We have

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a long way to go, because we were closer to

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:05.959
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight thousand when we looked at it at the

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>high over the one year period, we're not even really

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>where we were for the average for the full year.

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>With the full year average was a little over forty one.

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So that twenty four thousand mark is exciting little jump

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you have here, it still is less than half of

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>where you were almost a third of where you were

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>at the peak uh in the last year. Let's look

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.479
<v Speaker 1>in etherium as well here, because actually you had an

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>even bigger jump this week in ethereum than you had

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in bitcoin. Of course, it is a smaller asset, is

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a smaller asset by it's a market value thirteen point

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>five percent jump there. So there's a lot of excitement

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>here about ethereum, about the merge that has anticipated in

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the coming months. So the question here is this is

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this a valuation play when you look at ethereum versus bitcoin?

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that a fundamental player? People more excited about ethereum future.

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at a year though you do have that

0:29:57.880 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>percent to client over the year in ethereum as well,

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>still a long way to climb back. Context is everything, Jannali,

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you, and you're gonna be sticking with us because

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to turn our attention to our next topic,

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>digital identities now unstoppable domains, talking evaluations. Web three digital

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>identity startup just become the latest crypto start up to

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>become a unicorn. Indeed, the crypto winter not actually affecting

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone in the same way. In place to say that

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Gold is with us CEO found a congratulations on

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the fundraise and stand being led by some key vcs

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in the space. Talk to us about what Unstoppable Domains

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do. Am I going to be buying

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Caroline dot high, dot ether or whatever it is in

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the future and what reason when I needed? Yeah, So

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we're on a mission to use their own identity to

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>all three billion Internet users on the planet, and we

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>do that by creating n f T s and in

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this case, in f T domains like Caroline do n

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>f T and we believe you're going to use that

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>not only for retending receiving crypto payments. So if you

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>believe in crypto, long term, everyone on the planet's going

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to be sending crypto to each other, So you're definitely

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to domain name to make that simpler. But

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we also think you're gonna use that to log into

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>all your different apps, and people are already doing that

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>right now for Web three applications, and we think it's

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>going to spread across to the rest of the Internet

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. The rest of the Internet. Talk to us

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>about how Unstoppable to the Unstoppable Domains is kind of

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>creating the next version of the Internet alongside you and

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>your rivals. What was the real pitch you had to

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>investors to really buy into the future here at a

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>time where we're facing so much pressure on the market overall. Yeah, Well,

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>people spend or more of their time online now just

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>staring at the screen, and less than one percent of

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that you own are likely digital assets. And

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we think that over the coming decades that's gonna change.

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So you can see a lot of value being created

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in crypto, trillions of dollars in value here. We think

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that's only going to increase. And uh, you know, you

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>see Mark Zuckerberg spending ten billion dollars to build the

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>meta person br and that just says to us that

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge bull market in digital assets over the

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>next decade. And we think that one of the first

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>things you're gonna want to own online is going to

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>be your name and your reputation. And that's really the

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>push behind digital identity. Oh, Matthew, I'm already thinking how

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>hard it was to get my Twitter name or my

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>website name or things like that. They're going to be countless.

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're gonna have to have like Caroline Hyde

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>version one to three like, what explain to me exactly

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>how it's gonna look, how it's gonna feel the domains. Yeah,

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 1>so you actually had a really good example there. How

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>much do you think, you know, Elon musk Twitter handle

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is worth to him, right, and it's probably worth a

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>million dollars? And the thing is he doesn't own that

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>name on Twitter, uh, and you know he could get

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>kicked off on Twitter and then and he could lose it, right.

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is kind of a whole promise of Web

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>three and crypto in general, is that you should be

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>owning these digital assets. And so instead of having like

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>one name on Twitter and a different name on Instagram

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and a different one on Reddit, you could have a

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>single name that you own and control inside your crypto wallet,

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and then you can use that to sign into these

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>uh different social applications, and then you would have a

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 1>consistent reputation. How expensive would it be? Like what what

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>if someone just went out there involved the celebrity ones up? Yeah? Yeah,

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So the domain names are anywhere from five dollars to

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>thousands of dollars. It's kind of like the traditional domain

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>name industry, with one major differences. There's no renewal fees.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>For n f T domains because they are blockchain assets,

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and through our partners, you can actually get domain names

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for freeze. So a lot of wallet apps now are

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>working with us to make sure that everyone who downloads

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:38.479
<v Speaker 1>a digital crypto wallet also gets a domain name so

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that they have an easy end point to deposit money

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>into their application. So there's not gonna be a barrier

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to entry here if someone wants to get on. But

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>then on the high end, we are seeing sales for

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>these domain names in the hundreds of thousands of dollars

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for some of the poor previeu ones. How help us

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>understand this? One of your investors in online talking about

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>how you're kind of what coin basis scripto you are

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to web three, What does that really mean and how

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>does that kind of put you at the center of

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>an industry in that kind of a way. Yeah, So, um,

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the very first simple use case is sending cryptocurrency, and

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>if you have like twenty or thirty different cryptocurrency addresses,

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna be able to remember all of them,

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're really long computer hex decimal addresses. So that's

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:20.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of like I P addresses on the Internet in

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the early nineties and everyone replaced those with domain names

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>like dot com and this is like that except for individuals.

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>So for dot com domain names, where you have you know,

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe cifty million businesses and three million registered domains. For this,

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we actually think it's gonna be every single user on

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. So that's three billion people, um with a

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>with an n f T domain to make it easier

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.839
<v Speaker 1>for people to find information about them, verify information about them,

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and send them money. So if you asked me like

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>what am I going to be using this for, um,

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we think it's gonna help you have portable reputation on

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. And so you know, we have two major

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>problems on the Internet. One right now is that you

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>actually can't own any thing, and then the other one

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is all these problems around frauds, spam bots, etcetera. We

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>actually just talked about with the Musk and the prior segment,

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and if you had portable reputation, you could actually help

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>solve that problem. So I'll give you for instance, um

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:18.720
<v Speaker 1>my dad actually bought tickets on eBay and it happened

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to be from a scammer. And the thing is is

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that scammer can actually just go and then start selling

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, fake tickets or whatever on a different website

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Marketplace. And because there's not a consistent reputation

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 1>across applications online, um, these applications can't check and see

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>if that person is potentially uh doing fraud. But if

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you had a consistent reputation so that you were Caroline

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>dot n f t on one platform, and then your

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Caroline dot n ft over here and your Caroline dot

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>n ft on Twitter, and then you have a consistent reputation,

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and we think that actually makes the Internet saver. Very briefly,

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Matthew and I understand it's a hard one to have

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to tackle, but you know, this is a time where

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>valuations of crumbles. You managed to get an above a

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>billion and a sixty five million amount, did you have

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to down down rade a little bit when you first

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>started having the conversations. So we've seen cooling across the

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 1>whole market, so unstop whole domains. There's no exception to that.

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And we're just fortunate enough to be working with some

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>investors who've been in space for a long time. Can

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>terrorist or leave for this. They've been investing in crypto

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 1>for tim plus years. So I would actually say that

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>founders out there looking to raise money. Um, if you're

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in it for the long run, then I think you'll

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>be fine going out and funding right now. It is

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>significantly harder than it was, but that's okay. I mean,

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're here to really create utility for users instead

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>of speculation, you'll still find a business model that works

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and you'll still be able to figure it out. Well said,

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think will thank you so much. See founder of

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Unstoppable Domains and Shinelli Bassett has always thank you so much.

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>We want to take a moment to look at the

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>relationship between Hollywood and anti abortion states. Now. We often

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>consider perhaps media companies, movie stars to be relatively outspoken

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>about the overturning of ROVERSUS Wade, even some attending protests sometimes,

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but the Hollywood machine is sort of not taking sides.

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:10.720
<v Speaker 1>It's spending billions in film and TV production in states

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>seeking to restrict or outlaw abortion. We want to talk

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:15.959
<v Speaker 1>about perhaps some of the tension there with Blue Begs

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Media and Entertainment editor Kelly Gilbam. Of course, who is here.

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>He's just got over COVID, So we thank you so

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:23.840
<v Speaker 1>much for doing it with us and and Kelly and

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:27.320
<v Speaker 1>what I'm really interested in is we're not going to

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>take sides either, because we know this as a nation divided,

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.800
<v Speaker 1>but talk to us about how there is a tension

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>perhaps between employees that work at certain media companies and

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the decision making process that media is in terms of

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 1>spending money and making movies and TV productions in states

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps some employees might feel don't reflect some of

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the way they want their us to reflecting hard position

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:54.879
<v Speaker 1>for these big media companies to be in today, you know, Hollywood.

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I think people they're kind of see the business says

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>both being part of culture and leading culture. So when

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.320
<v Speaker 1>there is a big social issue, UH, they feel strongly

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>about they like to be at the forefront of that.

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:10.399
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, UM, for each project that

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you see, each television show, each movie, these take years

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and years of planning. They're incredibly expensive, and every single

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>line item on the budget UM that can be removed

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>UM is going to be good for the overall production.

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes the financials mean the difference between something getting

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>made and not getting made. So states like Georgia, for example,

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that has UH tried to put in more restrictive abortion

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>laws have been really good at being the cheaper option

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for some of these companies, So they've got to balance

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>getting their projects made. But at the same time, they

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:51.399
<v Speaker 1>do have a lot of employees that are pretty outspoken,

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and not only that, but they've got business partners like

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 1>actors and directors that are outspoken to about their values.

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:02.399
<v Speaker 1>So they're trying to both run the companies and and

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>try to keep these employees happy and not make this

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a talent retention issue at the same time. Interesting the

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>talent retention and element of it, Kelly as well, are

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 1>their New states other states that are trying to woo

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the making of movies and TV in that place because

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>they say, look, we're not looking to change anything up

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of nobility to access healthcare. You know, I

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:28.319
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen. I did a lot of reporting on this,

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and I was a little surprised at the other states,

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 1>um that are not seeking to restrict abortion rights. Uh,

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not selling themselves quite as much. UM. I covered

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>one talked about one interesting case and a story I

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>wrote about a film called Eric LaRue. This is a

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>film directed by Michael Shannon. It actually was a project

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that was set to start filming in Arkansas. That's a

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>state that has some of the most severe abortion restrictions. UM,

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and the filmmakers actually decided to move to North Carolina,

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a more free state. But the film officials that I

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 1>spoke to in North Carolina weren't out there trying to say, hey,

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.240
<v Speaker 1>come here. They're just saying, you know, that's great. But honestly,

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we heard about it from you in the press. Um.

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're not trying to make that pitch that hard,

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it could be something that affects the

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>business long term. UM. If people are pressuring the executives

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of this company, if they're finding, you know, actors that

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:32.839
<v Speaker 1>are going to attract people at the box office don't

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 1>want to film in those states, it could be a

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 1>long term benefit for other states or other countries, Um,

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that both have financial incentives for filmmakers and are more

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:48.879
<v Speaker 1>free on the abortion issue. It's a fascinating read. Thank

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you so much for spending some time just outlining the

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:54.320
<v Speaker 1>depth of your reporting that went into it all. Kelly Gilblum,

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 1>of course she is immediate and entertainment editor here with Bloomberg,

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and of course that now does it from this edition

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Technology. We have a special episode coming up Monday,

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to focus on antitrust legislation, scrutinary, a big

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>tech in particular. We've just been discussing it, of course

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>with our own Max Traffkin about the FDC, the focus

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 1>on meta, so you do not want to miss that conversation.

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I meanwhile, of course catch the podcast. Can find it

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 1>on the terminals as online on apples, Spotify. I heart

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:23.799
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to miss that one either. Have a

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>wonderful weekend everyone, This is Bloomberg