WEBVTT - China Targets Foxconn; Hollywood Returns to Negotiating Table

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN.

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.960
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and ed Love Love.

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 3>We are live from London for the Bloomberg Technology Summit.

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyde and this is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 3>on the program, we'll speak to a range of UK

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 3>based tech entrepreneurs to discuss everything from much capital, fintech,

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 3>cybersecurity and so much more. Plus, China rattles foreign firms

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 3>again as it opens an investigation into one of Apple's

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 3>most critical suppliers, Fox Con details ahead. Plus we go

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 3>back to the picket line as Hollywood studios return to

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 3>negotiations with actors this week to end the month's long strike.

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 3>But first check in on those markets. And boy has

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 3>there been some volatility, particularly in treasuries, abbagailty Little, what's

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 3>the readacross here?

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's been tremendous volatility at the surface level, Caroline,

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 4>so much so let's actually start beneath the surface, because

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 4>if we had been looking at this board an hour

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 4>and a half ago, there would have been at least

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 4>some red on it. But we've had a flip to

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 4>the upside. Microsoft and Meta too. Of the megacap companies,

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 4>megacap tech companies that are reporting this week, Microsoft tomorrow

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 4>and Meta on Wednesday. A big piece of this turnaround

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 4>for sure from a micro standpoint and from Meta excuse me.

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 4>For Microsoft, one of the keys could be their outlook.

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 4>For Azure, that cloud business was a little bit disappointing,

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 4>plus color on AI. For Meta, it will be all

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 4>about whether or not they can maintain mid teens growth.

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 5>That could have a lot to do with price.

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 4>And we also have Bitcoin in rally mode up seven

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 4>of the last ninety days that is helping out Riot

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 4>platforms up ten point two percent and in video receiving

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 4>some favorable commentary from a Wall Street investment bank. Now,

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 4>let's put this together with the NAZAQ one hundred and

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 4>see what it means. Here's this roller coaster ride. Now

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 4>to your point at the lows, it was more of

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 4>a macro story, Caroline. The fact that you had that

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 4>ten year yield back above five percent following the two

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 4>year yield, the whole yield curve really flattening out. That

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 4>of course makes stocks look more expensive, but big cap

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 4>tech in particular, that growth, the liquidity, it tightens the

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 4>situation overall, but as the ten year yields slip back

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 4>to four ninety, take a look at the rally we

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 4>have plus some of those individual movers we were just

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 4>taking a look at now on the year.

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 5>It's very interesting because over.

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 4>The last three months we've had stocks down, the S

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 4>and P five hundred down about eight percent so on

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 4>the year up about ten percent, the Nazak one hundred

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 4>at one point up more than forty percent, so about

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 4>ten percent or so, very roughly coming off of both

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 4>of these indexes.

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 5>You can see though, that the.

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 4>Megacap tech indexes that have some of these stocks that

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 4>are reporting this week up much more. What makes us interesting, Caroline,

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 4>if we go into the Bloomberg terminal, it means that

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 4>the S and P five hundreds doing something that the

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 4>Nazak one hundreds not doing.

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 5>The Russell two thousand.

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 4>Led it, but the S and P five hundred on

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 4>the day was firmly below the two hundred day moving

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 4>average back above. It looks like we're probably going to

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 4>see some more weakness through the downside. The question is

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 4>will the Nazak one hundred of these big KEP tech

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 4>names file at some point? It could have just as

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 4>much to do with yields as it could with earnings

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 4>this week and.

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Next Macro Charts Tech. You do it all, Abigail, we

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 3>thank you. Meanwhile, of course, a key corporate story of

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 3>the day has been Chinese authorities again shaking the confidence

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 3>of foreign companies, in particular, that's with a series of

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 3>arrests across industries and an investigation into the all important

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 3>tech name that is fox Con. It's a key supply

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 3>to Apple, of course, and for more. We want to

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 3>really dig into this narrative. Riva Goujon's with us director

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 3>at the Rhodium Group, and really your expertise here, Weaver,

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 3>is so important you advise, of course within China, and

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested as to whether you think this is an

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 3>ongoing pushback because of well the tech issues that we've seen,

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 3>the rivalry between US and China.

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 5>Is it something different entirely.

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, lots of layers of intrigue here, of course. Now,

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 6>any multinational corporation operating in China knows that there is

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 6>always the risk of tax and compliance audits. This runs

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 6>from technology to retail, really across the gamut.

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 5>But in this.

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 6>Geopolitical climate, of course, whenever these moves are taken. There's

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 6>always the question of whether there's more of a political

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 6>tinge here of economic coercion, and of course Fox Convene

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 6>so closely tied to Apple is more of a question

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 6>mark here in terms of targeting. There have been rumors

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 6>of informal bands against Apple products. This comes in the

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 6>wake of revelations around Huawei's breakthrough making it a more

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 6>formidable competitor to Apple as well, So lots of different

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 6>things to entangle here. Other companies also facing crackdowns from

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 6>china S data security laws. But there's a bit more

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.679
<v Speaker 6>to unpack here on whether this is truly a case

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.799
<v Speaker 6>for coercion and how it could tie into the Taiwanese

0:04:58.800 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 6>election as well.

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's dig into that in a moment, Honhai Precision Industry.

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 3>It's the public arm of Fox Cohn basically saying they

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 3>will collaborate with authorities. And indeed you mentioned this is

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 3>in some ways to do with reviewing of land use

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 3>and in particular tax audits. Tell us a little bit

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 3>more about the added complexity that the founder of Fox

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 3>gone or Honhai, has stepped down of course, because he's

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 3>running for the Taiwanese election.

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 6>He is, and of course that changes up the race

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 6>a bit. He's running as an independent, and this is

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 6>a very complex electoral dynamic for Beijing in trying to

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 6>favor an outcome for the KMT which is more friendly

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 6>to mainland policies. It's hard to conclude though, that a

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 6>move against Fox KHN would translate into a political favorability

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 6>toward Beijing. When it comes to the upcoming Taiwan election

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 6>in January. You know, there's a question of whether Terrygo

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 6>his participation in the race would divide the opposition vote

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 6>in a way that undermines the KMT favors the DPP,

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 6>which Beijing would not like to win. But still that's

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 6>a very complex logic chain, and I doubt that these

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 6>moves against Fox con would translate into Terrygo actually pulling

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 6>back from the race. So again, I think there's a

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 6>temptation to see everything as a highly politicized move. But

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 6>here I think we need to take a closer look

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 6>at Apple's diversification moves, other electronics companies and their diversification moves. China,

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 6>of course, has a very big impulse now to strike

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 6>back at US led technology and investment controls. We just

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 6>had another round of US led ship controls, which is

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 6>putting a lot of pressure on major US tech partners,

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 6>to include Taiwan. So that is really I think the

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 6>hypothesis to test here.

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 3>When you put, of course you say it's easy to

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 3>go for the highly political lens, go for the highly

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 3>economic lens, because all of this comes in a much

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>tougher context for China.

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 6>More broadly, absolutely so, anything perceived as retribution are falling

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 6>into the scope of tightening laws around counter espionage and

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 6>countering any type of perceived espionage activity, you know, crackdowns

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 6>around data security. In general, multinational corporations are already on

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 6>high alert, and this certainly doesn't help the souring investment climate,

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 6>as we've already seen FDI inflows into China have been

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 6>leveling off, particularly since twenty nineteen. That's been very worrying,

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 6>to the point where you see the State Council of

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 6>China putting out all kinds of pledges to say it's okay,

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 6>you know, we're doing things to promote foreign investment, to

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 6>include very notable things like easing cross border flows in

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 6>data regulations, a big ask for many of these companies.

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 6>At the same time, every time that the US engages

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 6>in another round of technology and investment controls. There is

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 6>this impulse and to strike back, and you're seeing this

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 6>through landmark legislation coming out of China, everything from counter

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 6>kind of espionage law, the foreign relations law. It's a

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 6>form of codifying retribution. And so as we start to

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 6>see things translate into actions. For example, MOFCOM export controls

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 6>on artificial and natural graphite. Artificial graphite is a very

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 6>critical input for eed batteries. We've seen recent restrictions on

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 6>gallium and germanium experts. Those are important for semiconductor manufacturing.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 6>And so all of this only underscores the unreliability of

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 6>China in these critical value chains, and so that can

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 6>energize diversification moves. But of course China's looking to show

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 6>where it can create pain in the here and now.

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 3>And it infects pain on its own publicly traded companies.

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at the Stall fifty index, which is only

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 3>conceived of about three years ago to really try and

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 3>be the rival the version, the Chinese version of the

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 3>NASDAQ one hundred, and it's hit a record low since

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 3>its inception. We are worried about growth concerns we're worried

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 3>about global liquidity and a weak export outlook, not to

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 3>mention some of these political elements to it all, So

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 3>go back to what you advise clients.

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 5>In the here and now.

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 3>Ever, of course you are someone who need client engagement

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 3>for Rodium's China corporate advisory. If I'm about to think

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 3>about entering the country, do you say I wouldn't.

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 6>Well, it depends on where you are, which value chain

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 6>we're speaking of. Even as diversification is happening. You can

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 6>look at Apple for example. You can even look at

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 6>fox CON's footprint and how it has a notable presence

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 6>in China, but you know emerging presence in places like India, Mexico, Vietnam.

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 6>So that trend is happening, of course, But these companies

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 6>are also greatly exposed Apple in particular, And as these

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 6>companies are engaged in this balancing act, it is very

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 6>important to understand the intent behind China's policy moves this.

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 6>It's caught between trying to promote a healthier foreign investment

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 6>climate to counteract the forces of its structural economic downturn,

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 6>and that is something that is going to last for

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 6>a while. At the same time, to stay alert to

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 6>US LED and partner moves on technology and investment controls.

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 6>This is a fast evolving space. There is a lot

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 6>packed into the for example, the four hundred some pages

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 6>of controls that came out just last week from the

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 6>US that is making it very hard for technology companies,

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 6>in particular at the leading edge to continue operating in China.

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 6>You only have to look at a company like Samsung

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 6>for example, to see how actively they are diversifying outside

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 6>of China already. So lots of moves in play balancing

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 6>acts are hard to pull off in those geopolitical climate

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 6>but really depends on what where you have a credible

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 6>competitor in the Chinese space, where you're at the leading edge,

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 6>and where are their opportunities lie outside of China.

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Such complexity and you help break it down. Thank you,

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 3>Va gujan O the Roodium Group for expertise. The Bloomberg

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 3>Technology Summit is going to kick off tomorrow right here

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 3>in London, showcasing whole range of startups, maybe in the

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 3>biotech field, the healthcare stand.

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 5>That's for example.

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 3>During a series of discussions about the UK's global role

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 3>in the most pressing questions in technology today, whether it

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 3>be climate change, whether it be AI as well, and

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 3>in fact, just in a few weeks the UK government

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 3>plans it can mean hundreds of international finances executives of course,

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 3>government leaders to promote well some investing opportunities in British companies,

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 3>including those working on nuclear fusion, on deep tech, but

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 3>most notably thinking about how AI safety can be deeped

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 3>and seeped.

0:11:58.080 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 5>Into the global narrative.

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Right now, let's dive deeper into the world of the

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 3>tech scene here in the UK with a standout startup.

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 5>Philip Benemoth's the leader, the CEO of Zilch.

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 3>It's Europe's fastest growing fintech company, to go from Series

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 3>eight to Unicorn status in just fourteen months self professed growth.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 3>And I'm interested at this time that what have been

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 3>your business model? And I know it's of consumer credit

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 3>basically reducing costs. How has that managed to see that

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 3>growth in what has been a much tougher time for

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 3>tech more broadly form.

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think what's interesting to note here is that

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 7>the landscape, which if I kind of paint the picture

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 7>a little bit, it'll explain why we're seeing this disproportion

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 7>that growth to the rest of the market, and that

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 7>is that the landscape today is.

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 8>That we have high cost of capital.

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 7>What that typically means is that your high street lenders,

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 7>your banks tend to actually withdraw themselves from lending, so

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 7>you have financial exclusion at its highest. So the demand

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 7>goes crazy for credit products. At the same time, you

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 7>have the cost of living has gone up, and so

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 7>you have demand from the mass market is really intense

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 7>for credit products. And typically what happens is you have

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 7>lenders actually thrive in a market like this, but they

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 7>make a lot of money off the customer. What's unique

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 7>about Zilch is that we found a way to generate

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 7>ad revenue from brands when our customers shop, and we're

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 7>using that to offset the cost of credit to customers

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 7>whilst servicing this mega demand. So for us, we're seeing

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 7>ultra high growth through the next year to two years

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 7>based on all of this coming together. Of course, most

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 7>uniquely providing lots of savings. We're talking about hundreds of

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 7>millions in savings in interest and fees for consumers as

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 7>they use our product and move away from traditional lending

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 7>products like revolving credit cards and things like this.

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 3>So that's the opportunity they can improve a credit score

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 3>not have to depend on credit cards. I'm interested in

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Philip as well as a South African entrepreneur to come

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 3>and build in London.

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 5>Why.

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think it's part of why there's the

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 7>Tech Summer tomorrow. There's a lot going on in London. Obviously,

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 7>we look at the market here and say, you know,

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 7>we really wanted to have that was going to hours

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 7>access to Europe, of course to the United States.

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 5>And you still got access to Europe, and we still do.

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you know a lot of people, of course

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 7>have spoken about Brexit, and what does that change the

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 7>reality of the situation is is that you just need

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 7>to make sure your licensing is correct and you understand

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 7>how to operate in that environment. Regulation, by the way,

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 7>as long as it's clear, is a fantastic thing. We've

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 7>also said this for our industry, which is why Zilch

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 7>is one of the only regulated providers in the space.

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 7>We're calling for regulation in B and PL and so

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 7>i'd make this come in the vein that you just mentioned.

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 7>As long as the rules are clear, you can engage

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 7>with those rules and you can transact.

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 8>And so we do have access to Europe.

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 7>We understand Europe very well from the United Kingdom and

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 7>equally the United States, which is a massive opportunity for us.

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 7>So we really wanted to be in London. We think

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 7>we can control what we're doing from here really well.

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 7>Great unique pool of talent, lots of walks of life

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 7>and different types of backgrounds in our business, and we

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 7>really wanted that diversity in the company as we built

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.359
<v Speaker 7>this mass spirational product, something we want everyone.

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 3>To enjoy, mass rational About those that you were in

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 3>for money, you just said, of course you're now viewed

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 3>as a unicorn. Money has been allocated from venture capital.

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Is that pool of money UK based and is it

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 3>firm at this moment when people are questioning those sorts

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 3>of valuations.

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 8>I think it just depends on the business.

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we've seen a lot of companies raising flat rounds,

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 7>up rounds. You've also seen of course down rounds. There's

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 7>been an adjustment, There's no doubt about that. The way

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 7>we think about it ourselves is do you have enough

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 7>capital and do you have a sustainable business model to

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 7>get yourself to break even and beyond right now in

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 7>this market? I think that's how we see at least

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 7>our company and you know, the strong view is as

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 7>long as you can demonstrate that and that is the case,

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 7>you're probably quite a standout business right now.

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 8>And that's not because there's a lot of.

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 7>Terrible businesses just because a lot of money was chasing

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 7>high yield.

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 8>They wanted growth at all costs.

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 7>And the meant is the problem with that is they

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 7>sacrifice the margin and a real business model in some

0:15:57.600 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 7>cases for that. And the chickens are coming home to

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 7>If you have a real profitable margin and you've got

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 7>enough capital to get to break even or beyond, we

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 7>still think that you can demonstrate the real value in

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 7>your company and you can grow in and beyond your valuation.

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 7>And that's really how we thinking about our business. So

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 7>pools of capital wise, I mean, I think in the

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 7>UK we sometimes underestimate. Second deepest pools of capital on

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 7>this planet are in the United Kingdom, But we certainly

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 7>do see in our business are spread of capital from

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 7>the US and the UK. And that begs the question

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 7>where do you go next? What do you do next?

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 7>As a company which we are evaluating right now.

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, leave using on the idea that we're seeing some

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 3>are raising of funds from Philip Bellamont of Ziltch will

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 3>be at the Bloomberg Technology Summit tomorrow.

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 5>We thank him very much for joining, and we'll be.

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Talking about that wealth of more money coming from various

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 3>pools later in the show.

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 5>Whether it's of course well vcs.

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 3>We've got Emily Heath, general partner over at Cybersecurity VC

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 3>firm cyber starts joining us as she wants to discuss

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 3>some of the trends she's seeing across the sector. And meanwhile,

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 3>let's just get in the public markets for a moment

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 3>as well. Let's tune into what's happening with the shares

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 3>of Airbnb again, a rally on our hands, a bounce

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 3>back from what has.

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 5>Been so questions regarding regulation.

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 3>We're just talking a lot about financial fintech regulation there

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 3>and certainly in New York. Airbnb has been a focus

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 3>in terms of regulatory pushback. We're currently go up almost

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 3>four percent from New York, usually from San Francisco, usually

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 3>from London.

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 5>Today. This is a bluemotechnology. Look.

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 3>We were remiss if we weren't thinking about some of

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 3>the geopolitical situation that we currently live within. And it's

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 3>notable that in the concerns around conflict in the MIDDLEAE.

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Government and private companies are looking to continue to beef

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 3>up their cybersecurity and cyber startups are turning two venture

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 3>capital firms like cyber Starts for backing. So far, it's

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 3>portfolio is valued at one thirty billion dollars. Joining us

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 3>now from London is Emily Heath, general partner at Cyberstats.

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 3>It is wonderful to have some time with you and Emily.

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 3>You're British originally, so I am now based in SF.

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 5>You have worked for a whole host.

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Of companies across industries such as airlines, but you've been

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 3>of course docu signed being a key company and that

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 3>you were chief information security officer. Now you're using expertise

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 3>to allocate capital.

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 5>Yes, why are cyberstats.

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 9>Cyberstrates has a very very unique model.

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 10>We're a very small but mighty cyber only venture capital

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 10>firm and there's a secret source behind this firm.

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 9>They're very small.

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 10>There's three partners, two in tel Avivan, Me and San Francisco,

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 10>and we each bring something very very different. We've got entrepreneurs,

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 10>we've got a traditional venture capitalists and myself being the practitioner,

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 10>so when you think about bringing the operational experience to

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 10>young founders that are in the very early seed stages,

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 10>we forget sometimes as practitioners how much value we can

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 10>actually add to these young companies to make sure that

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 10>we stress test the problem statements that they have and

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 10>make sure that they're building long lasting, meaningful companies.

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Founded in twenty eighteen by a Sequoia partner but also

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 3>the godfather of the Israeli cybersecurity scene. Israeli just talk

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 3>to us at the moment about how you are seeing

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the ecosystem affected there. You must have, of course, a

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 3>large Mountain portfolio company is based there.

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 10>Yes, in fact, every one of our portfolio companies is

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 10>based in Israel.

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 9>And there's a sadness.

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 10>I mean, there's an absolute, profound sadness amongst the community

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 10>right now. And on a personal level, I don't think

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 10>I've met a single founder that hasn't been affected in

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 10>some way, whether they know somebody who has been murdered,

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 10>somebody that's missing, or somebody that's been profoundly affected. So

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 10>on a personal level, it's struck really really close to

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 10>home for us. On a professional level, however, I am

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 10>so impressed with the resilience of the Israeli people and

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 10>of the Israeli startup community.

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 9>It is absolutely incredible.

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 10>I think this concept of business continuity and resilience is

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 10>something that we talk about all the time.

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 9>Israelis have this natural ability.

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 10>To think about what that actually means because they're used

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 10>to living in turmoil. This is, of course unprecedented, but

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 10>what it means is they were prepared in able to

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 10>bounce back. Now, some of the portfolio companies have had

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 10>some of their stuff that are now on reserve duty.

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 9>There's people in the United States that.

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 10>Are standing in for them, but business has remained relatively unaffected.

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 9>I would not say it's business as.

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 10>Usual by any stretch, but these are resilient people who

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 10>really truly have continuity plans that have gone into effect.

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Geopolitics is complex, so too is the world in which

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 3>you work of cybersecurity, and I'm wondering what therefore problems

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 3>they are generally trying to tackle. What ways in which

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 3>you're seeing your startups your portfolios managed to outperform it

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 3>in a market context.

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 5>It's been very difficult, but.

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 9>It's all about the people.

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 10>I mean our philosophy first, as we invest in people,

0:20:57.920 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 10>most of the companies that we invest in haven't written

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 10>a single line of code when we give them seed funding.

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 10>So as I said earlier, they stress test the problem.

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 10>One of our main portfolio company is Unicorn, called whiz

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 10>fastest growing software company on the planet, ever faster than Twitter, Airbnb.

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.719
<v Speaker 5>How he's measuring that based on growth.

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 10>So they've been around for three years, ten billion dollar

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 10>valuation and over three hundred million dollars in revenue in

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 10>just three years.

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 9>So just the trajectory of the growth.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 10>Because these founders, there's some of the second time founders,

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 10>so they've been there don't before and that definitely helps.

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 10>They listen to the market and have adjusted to the

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 10>market very easily during times which are very tumultuous. And

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 10>again we want to make sure we're solving very real problems.

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 3>Emily, we're going to talk about some of those challenges

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 3>and opportunities a little bit more. Of course, it's going

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 3>to be attending the Bloomberg Technology Summit tomorrow. Emily Heaths,

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 3>general partner at Cyberstats, and look, we're going to be

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 3>discussing a little bit coming up on the LP side

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 3>of the equation pension funds. How are informs here in

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the UK going to change the game. This is Bloommeg Technology.

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Blue Bog Technology. I'm karenin Hyde, London

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 3>today and for the next few days. Meanwhile, let's get

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 3>a quick check on the market instead, are training worldwide

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 3>for you because it has been a volatile day with

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 3>yields on the higher side, but they actually have pulled back.

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Now we're down some five six basis points on the tenure,

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 3>having eclipsed five percent. Of course highcens more than a decade,

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 3>two decades. We're now pulling back to four point eighty

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 3>five on the tenure. That leaves some breathing rooms from

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 3>the growthier names. Now's that one hundred managers to rally

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 3>on the day up some eight ten percent as we

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 3>anticipate some key earning something some Microsoft from Alphabet after

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 3>the bell. Of course, looking at that tomorrow, I'm looking

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 3>at New York crude though still off by two percent.

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 5>But elevated. We're at eighty six dollars.

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Of course, this is in a geopolitical context where we

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 3>are awaiting whether or not indeed the conflict between Israel

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 3>and Hamas is indeed escalated in any way.

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 5>For now, we damp down some of those concerns.

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Move on to what is of course a key risk

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 3>asset of choice when it comes to technology. Bitcoin it

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 3>has been on a run where up almost three point

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 3>three percent thirty thousand in excess of that now key

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 3>technical level, and of course, as many anticipate, perhaps the

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 3>sec it pulled back from its cases versus ripple. Are

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 3>we looking towards some sort of etf in the future,

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Is in indeed some sort of well haven?

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 5>That's a key question.

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, we want to talk a little bit more about

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 3>some private markets, an allocation of funds. Here in the UK,

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 3>some of Britain's largest pension firms have committed to allocating

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 3>a minimum of five percent of defined contribution funds to

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 3>unlisted equities by twenty thirty, So I think startups. The

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 3>aim is to unlock over perhaps fifty billion pounds of

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 3>new capital by the end of the decade. Joining us

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 3>now is someone who's spearheading this entire movement. Nicholas Lyons

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 3>is the Lord Mayor of the City of London. Where

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 3>you oversee basically the economy of the square mile. You

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 3>try and anticipate the ways in which we can make

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 3>it thrive and One way is you think allocate pension funds,

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 3>of which you come from Phoenix Group a pension focus.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 5>Why startups? Why is that a benefit?

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 11>Well, look, the starting point about pensions is to get

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 11>the best returns for pension savers and that you know,

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 11>we must never move away from that as a fundamental underpin.

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 11>Here the most successful pension funds in the world usually

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 11>you know the Canadian state pension funds. The Aussie supers

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 11>have between thirty and fifty percent of assets invested in

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 11>unlisted asset classes of infrastructure, real estate, private credit and

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 11>private private equity. So we need to get the pension

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 11>system in the UK, of which is over four trillion

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 11>pounds more invested in productive assets to give better returns

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 11>for pension savers. The reason that I particularly focused on

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 11>late stage venture capital is, as you've heard earlier, there

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 11>is good incubator and ceed capital in the UK, but

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 11>often our high growth companies, and we are brilliant at

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 11>these high growth industries of tech, fintech, green and renewable tech,

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 11>clean tech, biotech, life sciences. Got four of the best

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 11>ten universities in the world, so one of the best

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 11>twenty universities in the world but too many of these companies,

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 11>once they sort of prove their business model and looking

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 11>for accelerator financing, have to go externally for capital. And

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 11>I want us to marry up that need with an

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 11>opportunity to get the best returns for our UK pension service.

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 11>Why should I mean, we love Ontario teachers pensions, but

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 11>why should Canadian teachers be benefiting from the incredible entrepreneurial

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 11>spirit in the UK.

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 3>So it's about allocating British pensioners funds or future pensioners

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 3>funds to a UK ecosystem as well, because will they

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 3>not therefore be able to access private markets outside of

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 3>the Unitedloate?

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.239
<v Speaker 11>They will absolutely And I think the idea here is

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 11>that it's not just the what about allocating five percent

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 11>of DC pension funds, which you know we think by

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 11>twenty thirty, just because DC pensions are growing by ten

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 11>percent per annum, we're going to have between a trillion

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 11>and one point three trillion pounds and DC pensions, so

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 11>it is about fifty billion pounds. I'd like a significant

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 11>chunk of that to be allocated to a future growth fund,

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 11>which has the advantage as a collective investment fund of

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 11>being able to get the enormous diversification of risk that

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 11>actually you need when you're talking about companies at that

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 11>early stage.

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Can you give us a context system why why the

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 3>UK has been reticent psychologically, culturally to invest in that

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 3>way from its pensions funds.

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 11>I think it's a combination of things. Part of it

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 11>is cultural. I think since you know two thousand and eight,

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 11>we've been pretty risk averse as a financial ecosystem. The

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 11>regulators have been given a primary objective of making sure

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 11>we didn't have a repeat of that. We looked after customers' interests,

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 11>quite right, but we need to give them and we

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 11>have now given them a secondary objective of competitiveness and growth,

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:51.719
<v Speaker 11>so they have another lens through which to look at

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 11>these things. But I think one of the biggest issues

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 11>is that we've not had that sort of culture, particularly

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 11>of investing in late stage venture capital, and North America

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 11>has really stolen a march on us in that regard.

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 11>So we get a lot of our companies going flight,

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 11>getting on a plane, going to the West Coast and

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 11>looking to raise money over there, and they can continue

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 11>to do that, and they should continue to do that.

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 8>We should still.

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 11>Get lots of international capital coming into the UK, but

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 11>I want us to get some UK money. Working to

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 11>fifty billion is a good start.

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting that, of course, this comes hot on the

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 3>hills of m a UK based company listing in the

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 3>US for deeper to capital reasons. Also in a global

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 3>context of the technologies sector having been pretty hard hit

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 3>in the rise of yields, borrowing costs going higher growth,

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 3>your names have been hurt unless your AI focused in

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 3>some way. What has been the conversations, like with the

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 3>pension industry, of which you're somewhat apart. We're not on

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 3>sort of loan to the City of London. What have

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 3>they been like, where's the reticence been in this world?

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 11>There hasn't really been much reticence. Nine of the largest

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 11>players representing sixty five percent of the DC market have

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 11>been supportive of this and signed the Mansion Has Compact

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 11>in early July when the Chancellor was at Manchien House

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 11>and was able to announce this. So I think there

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 11>are very big players like Aviva LNGMG, who got big

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 11>asset management capability, including in the private equity sector, who

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 11>would like to say, well, yeah, we're happy to sign

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 11>the Mansion Has compact. But we think we can do

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 11>that ourselves. There are lots of others. Because we have

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 11>a very very broadly diversified pension system with lots of

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 11>small players. They need a collective investment fund that they

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 11>can use as the vehicle through which to invest in

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 11>this asset class. But I think by creating a fifty

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 11>billion pound war chest, if you like, and with much

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 11>of this going into a future growth fund, we'll be

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 11>able to change the culture. We'll be able to develop

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 11>a real ecosystem.

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 8>Not just of It's not just about capital.

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 11>It's about making sure that we've got really strong non

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 11>executive directors and mentors who can help these companies and

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 11>also prove the equity research that we write on tech companies.

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 11>I'd say there's actually a significant differential at the moment

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 11>in the quality of tech research that happens in the

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 11>US and in the UK. So this is not just

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 11>a silver bullet. We have got to change the culture

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 11>and there's a lot of work that's involved in this.

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 5>No to the cell side, I'm interested just to end it.

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Law mare on the idea of whether this money automatic

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 3>goes to British based venture capital companies or are we

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 3>going to suddenly see a flock of SF based funds

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 3>come in and want to make the most of this

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 3>poor capital.

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 11>I think we again if you come back to this

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 11>first mover, which is that we have the desire to

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 11>deliver the very best possible returns for pension savers. Therefore

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 11>we need to make sure that they have a diverse

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 11>and not just UK but also international exposure too. But

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 11>we have got such good companies. The fact of it

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 11>is the most sophisticated investors in the world come here

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 11>to invest in the best of British. So let's let's

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 11>invest alongside those sophisticated investors and deliver great returns to

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 11>pension savers and get some of these companies listing in

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 11>the UK. In five years time, if we're successful with

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 11>the Mansion has Compact and what we're doing with DC Pensions,

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 11>we'll have five five billion pound ten billion pound twenty

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 11>billion pound tech companies in the foot.

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 3>See one hundred not just a delivery, Nicklas, Lions delivered.

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 3>We thank you so much for joining us, the lawn

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Mayor of the City of London ahead of what is

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 3>a big event that they'll be throwing on Wednesday coming

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 3>up in fact, we're going to be talking with a

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 3>key venture capitalist who does allocate money into the UK

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 3>and Europe more broadly of VC. Spotlight time is upon

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 3>us and we're going to be talking about the tech

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 3>scene in here in London with Harry Nellis of Excel

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Partners from London. Today, we're going to be watching the

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 3>shares of certain companies related to crypto. We're just showing

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 3>how bigcoin is uperforming for a variety of reasons. Well,

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the key names that are invested in

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the crypto space, whether it be right Platforms for example

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 3>carrying up eleven percent on the day. One of the

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 3>key out performers from London. There's a Blomberg Technenergy time

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 3>now for talking tech. First up, Apple is hoping to

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 3>incorporate artificial intelligence into some of its key services thinks

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Siri of course the App store as well Apple Music.

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 3>In fact, Bloomberg's Mark German says Apple is exploring new

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 3>features such as auto generated playlists. Are the LM functions

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:40.719
<v Speaker 3>similar to those already found in Spotify or Microsoft Office. Meanwhile,

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Benge Capital firm Peak fifteen Partners of course previously Sequoia

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Capital in India, says AI startups are dominating its accelerated

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 3>program PEAK fifteen and indeed it was present in Southeast

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Asia as well.

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 5>Says that ten of the thirteen.

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Startups in its cohort are in the AI and deep

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 3>tech field. The VC firm has invested as much as

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 3>three million dollars in capital to startups thus far, plus

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft will invest roughly three point two billion dollars to

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 3>grow its Australian data centers. The US tech company plans

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 3>to expand its cloud computing and AI infrastructure over the

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 3>next couple of years. Is largest investment to their country

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 3>in forty years. In fact, Australian Prime Minister Anthony at

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Albany's is currently on a four day visit to the

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 3>United States. Oh, there's lots of billions and millions being

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 3>thrown around. Let's do a little bit more in our

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:30.959
<v Speaker 3>venture capital scene here in London. Axcel has been on

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:33.479
<v Speaker 3>the ground in Europe for twenty three years, opening its

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 3>London office all the way back in the year two

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 3>thousand and The firm has made investments.

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 5>In some of the key standout names.

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 3>That about performed, you know, Spotify, super Cell Delivery. Axcel

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 3>partner Harry Nenness is now joining us to discuss an

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 3>evolution in the ecosystem that has exited founders, has money

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.479
<v Speaker 3>that gets reinvested into the tech scene, does it get

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 3>reinvested here in Europe? Do you founders leave the likes

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 3>of Spotify Delivery to go build their own companies?

0:32:58.640 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely?

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Recently that are study and I showed that two hundred

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>unicorns in Europe have in fact generated twelve hundred new

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>startup companies.

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 2>And that is critical for the.

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Ecosystem because for an ecosystem capital entrepreneurs, but also repeat

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>management teams. And that is finally now starting to happen,

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>which was very different from twenty three.

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Years ago when the market was very very early.

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and it took a while to build such unicorns.

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean when you say that there have been more

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 3>than two hundred, I think it's exactly two hundred and

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty one unicorns in the region. People might be soly

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 3>surprised by that, do you think, I mean, what key

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 3>areas have we seen billion dollar companies founded here in Europe?

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, it was our conviction twenty three years ago that

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it was indeed possible for Europe to generate these billond

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar outcomes.

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Our investors doubted it at the time. In fact, we had.

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>To wait five years for that first Unicorn to show up,

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and then three more years for the second one.

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:57.479
<v Speaker 2>To show up.

0:33:57.520 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 5>What was the first one here?

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>The first one was Skyper, of course, and then my SQL.

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 2>In two thousand and eight.

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:09.240
<v Speaker 1>So the big sectors that have generated is online games,

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>super cell, enterprise software, click tech, consumer technologies including Skypes,

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.439
<v Speaker 1>so a variety of things in fact, which is one

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things that characterized at very early market you

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>couldn't really specialize in anything. You have to be very

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>broad because innovation happened across the board, but very shallow.

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Later there weren't many companies of the same type.

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting, of course, of Skype was Nicholas Zenstrom, who's

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 3>gone on to found his own VC. When you think

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 3>of Atomaco and I'm interested in like that was early

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 3>days sort of artificial intelligence, before AI was cool to

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 3>be saying in every single Lexican, but what are you

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 3>seeing in terms of AI proficiency here? We're about to

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 3>have an AI summit about the regulation, the safety is

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 3>that key AI expertise and businesses being built.

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, there's many universities across Europe that have generated very

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting founders and deep technology insights into artificial intelligence.

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 2>We've been funding a number of those.

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>And artificial intelligence is really impacting a number of themes

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're investing in already, enterprise automation. With artificial intelligence,

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you can actually improve that. Cybersecurity powered by artificial intelligence,

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you can actually make that better. So we see artificial

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>intelligence as a major paradigm shift the new platform, if

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you will, after many of the others. So we had

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, we had mobile, we had cloud computing, Now

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we have AI.

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Why then, let's play the cidic and the counter or

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:41.919
<v Speaker 3>to this narrative of one that is optimistic. Why then

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 3>do you think there is this worry about post Brexit

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 3>London not being an ecosystem for Europe. Why then do

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 3>you think perhaps in a current market cycle has been

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 3>very difficult, we're not getting companies raising their funds in

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Europe instead arms going to the US for the deep pockets.

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think there's been a We've gone through very

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>strange period during COVID where there was enormous amounts of

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>capital available and enterprise is actually over bought software that

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is now over So we're going through this transition period

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>where people are trying to find a new price at.

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:17.439
<v Speaker 2>Which deals will be done.

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>And the reality is that many software companies and other

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>tech businesses just had so much money that they hadn't

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't have.

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 2>To raise more money.

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're now entering a stage where they are running

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:31.919
<v Speaker 1>out of money. We think in the year to come,

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>we all have to raise more money and then we'll

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>discover where.

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 2>That price is.

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 5>Does that mean?

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 3>And we actually had for example, anow Doogils of the

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 3>Female Founders Fund in New York saying that there are

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 3>going to be about a thousand unicorns that are going

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 3>to have the rubber hit the road. They're not going

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 3>They're going to run out of money and likely won't

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:51.919
<v Speaker 3>find new funding. Do you think that we will see

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 3>an awful lot of unicorns suddenly exploding?

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's two hundred billion dollars of dry capital

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>on the side clients.

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Waiting for market discovery of new prices.

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's plenty of money available for unicorns.

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be an environment in which flat

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is the new up. So if you can raise money

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>now at the price where you raised money three years ago,

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that will be victory. In fact, in the subsector of software.

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We did a study and of the two hundred unicorns

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in software, only ten percent of them actually had to

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:34.720
<v Speaker 1>do financing, and half of those actually financed at flat

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>or up prices, and only a.

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Fraction of them down. So I don't think it's going

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 2>to be that bad.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 3>What about more international funds such as yourself, you allocate

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 3>money around the world accel as a.

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 5>Worldwide known name.

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Are more international vcs West Coast bace vcs those in

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:53.280
<v Speaker 3>emerging markets?

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 5>Are they coming here to Europe?

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, because Europe has become a really interesting market. What

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:01.720
<v Speaker 1>we saw twenty years ago people are seeing now, namely

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Europe is a real innovation happens everywhere, including Europe. It's

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a great market to be at. It's a great advantage

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for us who have been here for so long. But

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>many of our competitors are now here as well, which

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.359
<v Speaker 1>is good because you cannot have an ecosystem with only

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>a few investors.

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 3>What does this ecosystem seem like, look like, sound like

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 3>from a diversity perspective, How does Europe, for example, compare

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 3>with Silicon Valley where people are always bringing their hands

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 3>and rightly so that there is a lack of diversity

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.360
<v Speaker 3>in founders, and indeed the VCS allocate to them.

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 2>I think Europe is not different from the US. It's

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 2>very similar in that sense.

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 3>So underrepresented can do better. How are you seeing it

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 3>try to do better?

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:49.399
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody is making a considered effort in order

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:51.959
<v Speaker 1>to get it into the right direction. But it also

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 1>has a lot to do with what happens before we

0:38:55.280 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>meet entrepreneurs, like education, primary education, college education. That all

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>is up to the people whom we end up seeing

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>as entrepreneurs.

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 3>So fix it in several steps before as well. Harry Nas,

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 3>it's great to have some time with you. Thank you

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.800
<v Speaker 3>for joining here in London. Of course, he's of Axcel

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 3>and a key BC here in the UK space.

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 3>The film version of Taylor Swift Stadium Tour held onto

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 3>the box office lead for a second straight weekend, out

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 3>drawing a new Martin Scorsese drama from Apple. Of course,

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.919
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Swift the Area's tour brought in thirty one million

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 3>dollars in North American ticket sales, while Killers Are the

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Flower Moon, first ever big screen released from Apple Original Films,

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 3>it opened to sales of twenty three million dollars Meanwhile,

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 3>sticking with the film industry, we've got to be talking

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 3>about the Hollywood studios and the SAGAFTRA Actors' Union apparently

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 3>resuming negotiations tomorrow, more than a week after suspending talks

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 3>aimed at resolving a month long dispute.

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 5>Joining us Now, as Blomberg's.

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:05.879
<v Speaker 3>Felix Jennet, who you know, we must key think through

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 3>some of the sticking points. What is a stumbling box

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 3>still remaining for the actors when the writers have moved on.

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 12>It's mainly two things that are remaining. One is the

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:17.240
<v Speaker 12>compensation from streaming services and how that will go to actors.

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 12>And two is protections from artificial intelligence.

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 3>Okay, a lot of the AI concerns, for example, have

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 3>been held by smaller acting positions, bit parts and the like.

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 5>But now we.

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 3>See big actors coming and weighing in to try and

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 3>push on those studios.

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 5>How are you seeing George Clooney's.

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Voice and now others added to the arena Scott Hanson.

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 5>In the Night.

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I think that's just evidence of the mounting frustration

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 12>in Hollywood. I think there was a lot of hope

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 12>that when the writers reached an agreement a month ago

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 12>with the studios that the actors would be able to

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 12>take that template and follow quickly. But that's been a

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 12>month now it hasn't happened.

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 8>So, you know, last week you saw.

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 12>George Clooney and another a bunch of other A list

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 12>Hollywood actors jump in, you know, set up the zoom

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 12>call with the union leadership, you know, toss around a

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 12>bunch of ideas, hoping maybe that would resolve things.

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:11.800
<v Speaker 8>It seemed to have done nothing.

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 12>I think the consensus was that their ideas weren't going

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 12>to move the needle enough.

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 3>It was interesting that some of the big wigs on

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 3>the other side of the equation, so JOHNA. Langley or

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:26.280
<v Speaker 3>of NBC, or whether it be Bob Byger himself for Disney,

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 3>they got around the table with the writers. Do you

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 3>think the same thing's happening here with actors.

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think they're involved.

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 12>I think, you know, again, the main problem is that

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 12>the union has this idea of you know, initially they

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 12>proposed taking the percentage of all streaming revenues.

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 8>I think it was two percent, then one percent.

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 12>Then they came back with this idea, Okay, we're not

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 12>going to take a percentage. We'd like, you know, a

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 12>pern assessment per subscriber, and you know, I think the

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 12>top studio bosses, including people like Ted Surrandus and Netflix

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 12>has said that's, you know, that's a bridge too far.

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:00.399
<v Speaker 5>It feels like tax.

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:02.360
<v Speaker 12>We're not going to do that, and that was really

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 12>the last thing that broke off the negotiations.

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:09.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, we'll see how they reform tomorrow. Felix. Great to

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 5>have your perspective on it. We thank you.

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, that does it for this edition of Blombag Technology.

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:16.239
<v Speaker 3>Do not forget to check out our podcast and you

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 3>know it tomorrow because we've got the big event, Bloombog

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Technology Summit