WEBVTT - QLS Classic: Sam Pollard

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Quest Love Supreme is a production of iHeartRadio. Ladies and gentlemen,

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of Quest Love Supreme. I mean

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>it's Quest Love and we have teams Supreme with us. Yea, hello,

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>how are you to day?

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 2>I am doing well, sir? How are you great?

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Is that a new microphone?

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Man?

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 2>It's like every day every time we do the show,

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 2>you you look at me more.

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Not something new.

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 4>It's not new though.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like we're meeting for the first time exactly.

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 2>Just looked at me.

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like we know each other since we were thirteen.

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll start a sugar Steve.

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 5>How you doing, man, I'm doing great. Nice to see

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 5>you and me are nice to see your team.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like a deflection. How you really? We're all

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of it all right. Now we're gonna rename.

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 2>You see.

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 5>Sugar Sugars, Double Sugars.

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Can we start calling you cannot do this on my watch, man,

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not because I'm gonna.

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for your concern. I'm going cold Turkey on

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 5>rock Cookie del I'm gonna be fine.

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 2>You are too old to be eating that. That's crazy.

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm done with all that.

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm done with it all right, Steve I'm now.

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Implement some sugarless snacks in your day. To me, it'll

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it'll work for you. Bill. How's life.

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Everything's good.

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 1>I can't play I'm cool and anything. Fine.

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, man, everything's cool over here. We're just chilling. Everybody's uh.

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 4>We staying staying low, staying healthy.

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Were good. That's good? All right? Well, ladies and gentlemen,

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I will say, probably during the pandemic, not only for me, well,

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I will probably speak for the team. We probably watched

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>or revisited more content from film and TV in the

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>pandemic than we normally have. And and I will personally

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>say that I have a new appreciation for the teams

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that make film. It's not just about the director just

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>about a particular actor or actress that you like. You

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>have to consider the producer of the cinematographer, the lighting director,

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.239
<v Speaker 1>and most importantly, the editing of the film. And so

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I will say that, as far as our guest is concerned,

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>started out his assent into the professional career of filmmaking

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>as an editor. First of all, in the groundbreaking what

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I call one of the first hip hop films, Style Wars,

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>not to mention as an editor for some of my

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 1>favorite Spike Lee films like Mobetta, Blues, Junkle Fever, Juice, Clockers,

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Girls Six, his documentaries for Little Girls, both of the

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>what I would call the New Orleans documentaries for the Levies,

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>not to mention also, I didn't realize Hooker's on the Point.

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that Wow, you.

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 6>On the stroll holes on a roll.

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I see, but the name remains the same.

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Candy She So, oh my god, you like memorize this film, dude,

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And you don't understand, bro, Me and my homies used to.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Watch because this is like I'm in like high school, right,

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 4>So me and my homies watch Hookers at the Point,

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 4>and then you come to school the next day and

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 4>know all that we'll be saying all the lines and classes.

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 4>I would like to.

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 7>Say that Hookers at the Point transcends all things.

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I also because both of my.

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Friends about Hooking the Point, like in a different way,

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 3>but I definitely watch them.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>This makes an official that Bill and are the same person. God, dude, O, guys, guys, guys,

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>hang on Inton is powerful. Shirley Chisholm and his forays

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>into uh directing documentaries, not to eyes on the Prize,

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>which I especially in light of uh Black Messiah and Jesus,

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh Jesus in the Black Messiah movie, him directing the

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Eyes on the Prize film too. I'm sorry, Eyes on

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the Prize too, of which uh the footage of that

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>film was used in in in uh in that particular film.

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>But there's also uh the Mister Soul documentary and his

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>his latest uh M l k FBI, which weighs heavily

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>into explores the what we can say, the harassment uh

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>in the monitoring of the jack Er Hoover led Bureau

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>into the life and uh kind of the affairs of

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Martin Luther King Jr. Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome to

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Quest Lifts, Sam Pollard, thank you. Okay, now back to

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>hookers on the point.

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 3>My god, what happened to.

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 2>Introver for you, sir, I'm sure terrible.

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 4>You've been out there fucking I even fucking.

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 8>Whole.

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 3>I don't memorizing, man, Bren, this is man.

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I got a stage reading.

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Wow. Man, she had to tone everything down.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Made an impact.

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>So how's it going right now? How are you doing?

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm good, man, I'm pretty good. You know. I'm working

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 3>on a new film about Arthur ash Wow. Yeah, hoping

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 3>to kind of set by June and you know, developing

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 3>some other stuff.

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'll let our I'll let our listeners know that

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you and I are actually partnering up for hopefully, uh,

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the near future, will have the definitive

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>film about the Negro League. You know, I've been pounding

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the pavement together, pitching to various companies and whatnot, So

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that's very exciting for me. Yeah, I'll ask. As I

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>said at the top, I didn't realize how important or

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>how instrumental editors are to a film. You know, a

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of the times, like people that aren't you know,

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>film buffs or whatnot, they just tend to think that

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>the director has complete control of everything, the screenwriting, everything,

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>but you know, almost feel as though the editor has

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the hardest job of setting the tone. So I'll ask you,

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>first of all, as an editor, the general rule that

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been taught is that once a film is done,

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you're basically to hand your entire footage to your editor

0:06:56.000 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and kind of sight unseen, just let them do their

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>thing and not micromanaged. Is that necessarily true or like,

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>what is the true job of an editor?

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, I would I would say this, I would say

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 3>in the fiction world, you know, when you when you're

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 3>doing editing a fiction film, you're given a script and

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, and everything that they shoot in that script,

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 3>you basically know exactly how to put together. Now, it

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 3>can change when you're sitting down editing sequences together, but

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 3>usually most directors leave you alone with a fiction film

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 3>that's sort of put together what we call the first

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 3>rough cut, you know, and then they come in and

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 3>they give reactions to everything you've cut outs for changes

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>and stuff, so that becomes a director's cut, you know.

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 3>So that's how it works in fiction film and in

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 3>the documentary world. The thing that one of the reasons

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 3>I became such a lover of documentaries is because, as

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 3>an editor, specifically, what you're speaking to a mirror. Many times,

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 3>when I was beginning to edit a documentary, the director

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 3>would come in with lots of footage and say, I

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 3>have this great idea to tell this story about hip

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>hop and break dancing and rap music, and I'm not

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 3>quite sure the order, but here's the footage, and then

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 3>they walk away and they give you, you know, give

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 3>me four or five, six months, seven months sometimes to

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 3>create the sequences, you know, and you're basically trying to

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 3>in some ways as the editor, read the director's mind

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 3>to get a sense of what the director is looking

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 3>for as you're shaping the sequences. Now, sometimes in the

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 3>documentary's the director comes in or he calls in and

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 3>he wants to see sequences to see where you're going

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 3>before you put the whole thing together, and you show

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 3>it to him or her and they react to it

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 3>and you make changes. But really in the furms of

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 3>the documentary, it's really the editors medium. The editor becomes

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 3>with the documentary much more so than with the features.

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 3>They become sort of the surrogate directors because they're shaping

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 3>the story arc, they're shaping the tone, the emotional tone.

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 3>They're shaping me sort of the up and downs of

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the film as it unfolds. So, you know, as a

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 3>young editor, that's why I mean, I was I was

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 3>pretty shy back then, so the idea of being a

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 3>director didn't then entice me. It was the idea that

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 3>I had all this footage. And you know the big

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 3>thing about editing documentaries is that you can hit a

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 3>home run. You can hear, you can hear, you can

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 3>hit a ball that just pop out, and you could

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 3>completely fail. And uh, you know that's the responsibility as

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 3>a documentary that you have to take on, understanding that

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 3>sometimes a director to walk in and say that you

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 3>have to see your first cut. Ah, Sam, this is

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 3>exactly what I was thinking about. This is my vision

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 3>of the film. You found my vision. Or they can

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 3>walk in into the editing room and they'll say I

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 3>have to look at your cut. They'll say, oh, Sam,

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 3>that's terrible. You didn't understand anything I was trying to

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 3>do with this footage. We're gonna have to start all

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 3>over again. I've been on both sides of the of

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 3>the of those polls. You know, when I was young,

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 3>I would be like, oh my god, I'm terrible. Nobody

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 3>loves me. It doesn't work. As i've gotten older, that's

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 3>part of the process. You realize that's part of the process.

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 3>You're never going to make it right the first time.

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 3>That's why it's called re editing and re editing. I

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 3>mean you listed the films like that edited for Spike,

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 3>and even on the feature films, I never made a

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 3>cut that Spike completely said, oh it's one hundred percent work. Well, Sam, no, chick.

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 3>It just doesn't work that way. There's always going to

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 3>be changes.

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Has there ever been a time where in your editing

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 4>career where you know, like you said, director comes to

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 4>you and says, hey, I want to tell this story

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 4>about breakdancing and hip hop or whatever, and so they

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 4>give you all this footage. But then during your editing

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 4>you kind of start putting together and you see, I

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 4>know this is what he thinks this is about, but

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a bigger story that can be told

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 4>that maybe he's missing or maybe now when I have

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 4>all these pieces together, he may think that it's about,

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, just hip hop and breakdancing, but there is

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 4>probably a deeper narrative that is starting to evolve as

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 4>I put this together. Has that ever happened?

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>How much leeway are you giving all the time?

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 3>That happens all the time an editor, As a creative editor,

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 3>you have to be open to the idea of seeing

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 3>the story in a different way and taking on that responsibility.

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna say, you say to yourself, should I show

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 3>it to the director this way? Because I think it's worked?

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 3>So should I say, Well, I'm not sure it works,

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 3>let me show it to the way he asked me

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 3>to do it. I have the I always had the

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 3>tendency to show it to him the way I thought

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 3>it would work better, you know, and that you know,

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 3>that's part of the gamble. Sometimes you show it to

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 3>him and they say yeah. Sometimes you shoot them they

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 3>say no, that's how it works.

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted for MLK FBI. Was it the decision

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 2>to not show the commentator the folks who were commentating's face.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Was that a SAM decision or was that just like

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 2>something that y'all had to established because I was noticing

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 2>and that was like a big different in a lot

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 2>of the documentaries that I see these days.

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 3>In that case, that was a SAM decision. Before we

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 3>even shot, I had said to the producer Ben Henden

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 3>that I didn't want anybody on camera. I wanted to

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 3>all be voiceover because I had seen a film that

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Amyl was involved in the music for a black power mixtape,

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, and I and they had no voice They

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 3>had nobody on camera in that film. I remembered that.

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 3>So when I got to do this one, I said,

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>we don't show anybody on camera. We're going to do

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 3>it all voiceover. And you know, that was a gamble,

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 3>but I was willing to take it.

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, what was it?

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 4>What was the artistic kind of choice? What drove that decision?

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 3>You know? I felt I felt that in this particular film,

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 3>I wanted people who were either close confidence or doctor King,

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 3>or whose stories could talk about the mythology, the built

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 3>and growing mythology, the FBI, and I just felt like

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 3>I wanted people to not see people on camera. I

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 3>just wanted them to be immersed in the footage and

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 3>hear the voiceover.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>That's what they do.

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 3>What happens when you put camera people on camera sometimes

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 3>it can it can break the emotional momentum of the footage,

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.839
<v Speaker 3>you know. So I felt like, no, keep them, keep

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 3>them off camera, keep the footage, keep the archival footage

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 3>front and centers of people will engage. Now, as you

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 3>saw in the epilogue, we did show their faces when

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 3>they sort of wrapped up about what they thought about

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 3>the tape being released in twenty twenty seven. Now, I

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 3>would say that wasn't my idea. I thought the epilogue

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 3>is should be all voice over too. But the editor,

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 3>this was Laura Thomas Selley, she had the idea we

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 3>should put them on camera, So when I saw the

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 3>cut and she put them on camera, I said, Wow,

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 3>I wish I could take credit for this, but.

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, because it was a payoff.

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>It was like a break payoff. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>fell down my own rabbit hole and just happened to

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>click on Black Power Mixtape. So apparently I won a

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Swedish Oscar didn't know that she did know they had.

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Apparently I won a gold Goold Bandage Award. Yeah, I

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>would have to. Yeah, this is the second time I

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>found out I won something and wasn't told. Uh. Oh,

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>this very web this very podcast won a Webby and

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we weren't told. So there's there's a history of that people. Yeah,

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>West Supreme, we win in awards and you don't even know.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 2>Trying to keep us down the man you know about.

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>That fan keep it us on, Sam. What what brought

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you to the film world or a passion? I'll say

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that mostly like from my point of view and my observation,

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>people easily jump into music, people easily jump into sports,

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>but I rarely hear of people successfully having a passion

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>for film and jumping into that world and like making

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a living and having a fruitful career in it. So

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>what started yours.

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Well here, I was a young man who grew up

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 3>in East Tarlow. I was going to Blue College with

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the majoring in marketing. I was in my junior year

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 3>and one day I looked around and I saw myself

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 3>being miserable taking all these marketing andstic statistics courses. And

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 3>I said, Jesus, I got to find some after school

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 3>activity to do. I just I can't handle this. So

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I walked across the street to the counselor's office. I

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 3>saw my counselor's wonderful African American lady, and I said,

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 3>I was looking for an after school in turn internship.

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 3>And she said, well, what are your interests? And I said,

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 3>one of the things I really loved growing up in

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 3>my teens, I loved watching all these old Hollywood movies,

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 3>you know. I watched all those Warner Brothers and MGM

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 3>and Columbia pictures and RKO movies, Arko Studio movies, and

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 3>I love them. So she said. There was a PBS

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 3>station in New York City WNAT in nineteen sixty eight.

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 3>After Doctor King's assassination. This felt it was important to

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 3>get more people of color behind the scenes shooting editing,

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 3>taking sound producing, and she said that they had a

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 3>one year workshop every year from sixty eight this was

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 3>nineteen seventy one, and they had on Tuesday nights they

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 3>would have these classes from six to ten where professionals,

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 3>professional editor is, professional cinematographers, professional sound people, professionals producers

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 3>would come in and teach you about the process of

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 3>making television and films. And then on the weekends you

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 3>would go out with your crew group of people. There

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 3>was like fifteen of us. They would pair us off.

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 3>We'd go out and shoot little films. Then we'd go

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 3>into come back to an editing space, and we'd learned

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 3>how to edit these films together. So when she first

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 3>proposed that to me, I said, my response to her

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 3>was I like watching movies, but I don't really care

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 3>about how to make them. I don't care. But she

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 3>was very persuasive. She got me to have an interview

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 3>and I got accepted to this program. And I did

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 3>that for one year. And the thing that I got

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 3>attracted to wasn't the shooting, wasn't the producing, wasn't the

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 3>sound mixing. It was the editing. Because I could be

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 3>in a dark room, I could by yourself. Nobody could

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 3>see me make mistakes. If I made a mistake, I

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 3>could undo the foodge and splice it back together because

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 3>we were cutting on film. And at the end of

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 3>that workshop, I said I was interested in trying. They

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 3>said they'd try to find you a job, and I said,

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 3>I was interested in finding a job in editing. And

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 3>one day I was working the summer of seventy two,

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 3>I was working at a marketing firm on thirty third

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 3>in Park Avenue, and my mother called me and said

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 3>that this production manager called and said they were looking

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 3>to interview me to be an apprentice editor on a

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 3>low budget feature film called Ganjia and Heads, directed by

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Bill Gunn. Bill Yeah, Bill Gunn, And most of the

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 3>crew was African American, but the editor was this Jewish guy.

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 3>His sister was this young white girl from Kentucky. So

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 3>I went and had an interview with this editor and

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 3>I got hired in nineteen seventy two. It's my first

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 3>first job.

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 4>And then Spike, he remade, that is the sweet blood

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 4>of Jesus.

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 3>He did it, the sweet blood of Jesus. Yeah, yeah, okay.

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Well you mentioned w ne Et earlier, did you were

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you interning there or.

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Just they had the workshop there. The workshop was part

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 3>of NAT.

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So did you have any interaction with like the well

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you directed Mister Soul, but the original Soul show, Like.

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 3>Did you work at all? No, it didn't work on

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 3>it all. It was it was you know, it had

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.239
<v Speaker 3>been canceled. By the time I got into that program,

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 3>it was sixty nine to seventy two, So by the

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 3>time I left the program, he had been canceled. I

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 3>used to watch it all the time. Yeah, what about.

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, they had like a lot of black productions. I

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>remember you remember a show called Rebop or.

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 3>That was rethought. Was not in New York, it was

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 3>in Massachusetts, Oh okay, But in New York they had

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Black Journal, they had Miss had Soul, they had like

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 3>it is Gil Noble on ABC. Bill was to produce

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 3>On Soul and some of the first African producers who

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 3>worked for Black journals, like Tony Batton and Saint Clair Bourne.

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 3>You know who I used to have who I who

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 3>became one of my mentors later in my career.

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what I wanted to know, Like, who were your well,

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>it's contemporaries at least starting out with you at the

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>same time, like I know that Uh uh what's his name?

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh director Dickerson? No, Uh, what's her name's father?

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 4>God, that's uh.

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>What's your names? Father?

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Stand was already director and soul in Black Journal. By

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 3>the time I got to the business, Sam, Sam was okay.

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>But what I wanted to know was like, was there

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:50.479
<v Speaker 1>uh like a crew of view as young black up

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>starts trying to get into film or was it just

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>all of you independently treading in?

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 3>The program I was in was like fifteen that us.

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 3>We're all African American, and some of us, you know,

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 3>got into the business. Some people went to CBS, some

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 3>people with the ABC, some people freelance like I did.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 3>That was the crew I was with, you know. And

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 3>then after I did the six months as an apprentice

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 3>editor on God and Hess, that same editor who hired

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 3>me then made me his assistant and I was his

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 3>assistant for three years from twenty two twenty three, twenty

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 3>four to twenty five years old. George Bowers No, No,

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 3>I met George right around seventy five. Had I sort

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 3>of was looking for a job and I went to

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 3>this editing room and George Bowers was editing a film

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 3>called Campdown on Cassini directed by Assy Davis with Ruby

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 3>d and Greg Morris from Mission Impossible. George turned me

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 3>on to doing a little film, had me he hired.

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 3>He got me hired to do a little film about

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.959
<v Speaker 3>the first three black mayors of major cities, Tom Bradley

0:20:55.000 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 3>of Los Angeles, Coleman, Coleman Young of the Detroit Accident

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 3>of Atlanta. And it was being directed by David Parks,

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Gordon Parks's son.

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Wow, oh wow, okay.

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 3>And I edited it that when I was like twenty

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 3>six years old. And then George hired me to edit

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 3>some films for him, and then he moved out to

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 3>California to direct some low budget features. That in nineteen

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 3>eighty I went out to la and directed and edited

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 3>it for him a film. I don't know if you

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 3>remember this film, Body and Soul with Leon Isaac Kennedy.

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 4>And yes, yeah, I know.

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 3>I edited that film in nineteen eighty.

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know this. I know of this film. Yeah,

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I was at the time in the seventies. Did you like,

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>what was your kind of your what in your mind

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>would have been your endgame or your your your goal

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to get to at the time when you were sort

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of finding your way in the early seventies.

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 3>My endgame was I had this dream of becoming a

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 3>big time featured film that, you know, I wanted to

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 3>edit feature films. That was the big time. That was

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 3>the goal, you know. Nineteen seventy, ninety, seventy seven, seventy eight,

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 3>I was adding docs, but I wanted to be at

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 3>a big time feature edited in George let me edited

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Body and Soul, and then I went back to New

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 3>York and I was adding more docs. And then George

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 3>did this film in nineteen eighty four with a young

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 3>Johnny Depp called Private Resort that I edited in California.

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 4>That film too, Man, I don't remember that one. I've

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 4>never heard of that one.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It feels like one of those films that would come

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>on prison or Showtime.

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 3>Actually, yeah, that's it was my Showtime.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 3>And then I and then I came back to New

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 3>York with some other films, and then I got hired

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 3>by Henry Hampton in eighty seven to work on Ice Too.

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 3>And I was working on Ice Too for like a year,

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 3>shooting and my first time producing. And then one day

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 3>I was living in the back base of Boston and

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 3>my son, who was ten years old at the time.

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 3>The phone rang. He picked it up and he said, Dad,

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Spike Lee, and I had just seen you the Right

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Thing in the movies. And I said, Jason, will you're

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 3>messing with me for a man, Spike Lee didn't call me.

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 3>It's not calling me, not Dad, Spike Lee. So I

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 3>down the phone and sure enough it was Spike and

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 3>a buddy of mine who was his production manager and

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Do the Right Thing had recommended me to Spike to

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 3>cut No Better Blues okay, and I turned him down.

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Wait wow, I turned him down the first time because

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 3>I was still in the middle of Eyes on the

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 3>Prize too, So I said, Spike, I'm busy. Thanks for

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 3>the call, but I can't I say no. And then

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 3>Saint clair Bourne had done a documentary about Do the

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Right Thing called Making Do the Right Thing, and I

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 3>had worked for Saint in the early eighties cutting two

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 3>or three films. And then Saint recommended me to Spike,

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 3>and about six weeks later Spike called me again, asked

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 3>me again to know better, and this time I said well.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 3>He said, let's meet up, and we were both going

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 3>up to the venue to Oak Bluffs and separately, and

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 3>we met up at Oak Bluff. We went to a

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 3>little coffee shop. We spent a half hour in that

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 3>coffee shop, and I basically talked myself at the taking

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 3>the job, because he didn't talk about.

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, you said that, and you know you wanted

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to concentrate on your your one project. And you said

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the word no, which I clearly don't know the meaning

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of that word. How many projects can you realistically juggle? Okay,

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll rephrase that, how many projects should you juggle any

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>calendar year? If you are an.

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Editor, you can't. You can't do but maybe one or two.

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you're actively working on a project.

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 3>It's very hard. If you're actually physically editing, it's very

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 3>hard to do another film unless you know, you know, Listen,

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 3>When I was a young man, I would do two films,

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 3>edit two films. I would edit probably somebody's film all

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 3>day in the day. It'd be my prime time job.

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 3>And I'd come home. I remember working in Washington on

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 3>a serious close Smithsonian World, and I would edit all

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 3>day from from like nine to six. I'd go home

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 3>and have some dinner and Saint I was doing a

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 3>film for Saint real dramatic film for Saint, and I

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 3>would edit for Saint from I would edit my apartment

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 3>on the steam back from like seven till midnight. So yeah,

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 3>I would edit two films. You know, that's when I

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 3>was a young man.

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 4>We don't do that type shit at the moment.

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 7>When it switched over to digital, did that help it all?

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 3>I could probably do three. Oh, I didn't sleep as much,

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 3>you know. But it's very hard when you're editing. You know,

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 3>it's easier to multitask when you're producing and directing somebody

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.959
<v Speaker 3>else's so you can. You can, you can do more

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 3>than one show you're producing directly because you know, you

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 3>know this. I mean, you got a team right now.

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 3>You got you got other associate producers, you got archival producers,

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 3>you got editors, so you don't have to do everything yourself.

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 3>You're not sitting there at the machine editing, you know.

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Actually, Bill brought up a point that I didn't think about.

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>At least for musicians. I feel like a lot of

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>us made the full like the full jump into pro

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>tools like around like ninety two, ninety three and full

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>fledged like in mid to late nineties. But for the

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>film world, when did that jump. When did that jump

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>with that paradigm shift occur, like from digital editing.

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 3>To around ninety four ninety five. Yeah, I cut my

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 3>last film. I cut the last piece on film for

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 3>Spike in ninety six. It was Girl six.

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that was done on film.

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 3>That was done on film. Then after Girls six, I

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 3>never did anything else on the shelf. It was fine.

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, full Little Girls was was digital. You know,

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Bamboozle was digital. Everything after that was digital.

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>How hard is that adjustment in learning new language? Learning?

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Like Protess steal all my questions all the time on

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>every show, Sugar, Steve wants to know how hard? Steve

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>asked a question.

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry, well, I just yeah, What was the transition

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:34.719
<v Speaker 5>like for you?

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Was it?

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 5>Was it exciting or frustrating?

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Or at first it was frustrating because you know, I

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 3>didn't think of myself as computer savvy, so I had

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 3>to I had to get up to speed. I'm working

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 3>on the computer and stuff and figuring out how to

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 3>do things technically.

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 5>Did how old were you? Sorry, how old were you

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 5>at that time?

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Forty five mm? So you know, it used to be

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 3>they used to have they used to have you could

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 3>call you Avid support all the time, and you had questions.

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 3>So the first film I could an avid, I think

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 3>it was an average support every day. You know, this

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 3>doesn't work. How do I make this work? Or do

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 3>I do this? You know? Avid support, avid support, you know.

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 3>But but you know I adjusted to it because I

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, I didn't want to stop editing, so you know,

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 3>I didn't want someone else to edit for me, so

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 3>I learned how to do it digital.

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 5>Did you find that you were able to be more

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 5>creative with digital or than you were with film as

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 5>an editor?

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 3>The big, the big advantage to editing digitally is that

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 3>you know, when you say edit film you want to

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 3>recut a sequence a different way, and say the old sequence,

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 3>you'd have to even make a dupe of the old

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 3>sequence and then unsplice all the shots to rebuild it

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 3>another way. Digitally, you can do it in one way

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 3>and then you can just do another version and you

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 3>keep the other one. You know, and you know that

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 3>to me was like a great sort of plus, I

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 3>could see three versions of my cut. Now. The issue

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 3>the challenge is is if you sort of don't make

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 3>a decision, then you say you got to see six

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 3>versions of your pet because then you can't make a decision.

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 3>You got to you gotta be mindful of how many

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 3>cuts you want to see before you say, okay, this

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 3>is the one. You know, maybe you make it so

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 3>real adjustment.

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as far as the quality is concerned, I know

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that as a musician, even though I do use digital technology,

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty much using that digital technology to make it

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>sound like I'm doing analog, trying to make it sound

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>as cheap and whatever. Like are you the type of

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>editor or do or do editors in general still try

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to I don't know, execute that same process as far

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>as uh, you know, like we we will use terms

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>like well, there's a warmth sound with analog that you

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>don't get with digital and it sounds fold. Is that

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the same with you?

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean you're still trying to You're still trying

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 3>to figure out when you're you know, in terms of

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 3>your aesthetic, how to make it still feel like you're

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 3>making a movie and you know, I try to do

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 3>a commercial, you know, so you're crafting it in a

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 3>certain way. So you're saying the film aesthetic that I

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 3>learned when it was film, I'm trying to apply that

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 3>to the digital technology. You know, I'm trying not to

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 3>edit films like what I would see the fast paced

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 3>commercials or something on you know, these music videos. I'm

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 3>still trying to bring to it the storytelling editorial storytelling

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 3>techniques I learned when I was editing film, you know,

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 3>and I try to still apply those, you know, And

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 3>then depends on who shoots your material. I mean a

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 3>lot of documentary filmmakers still have the ability to have

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 3>their camera people shoot it so it's twenty fourth rings

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 3>per second, you know, it looks like you're shooting it

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 3>on film. You know, sometimes you want to change the

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 3>textures and the coloring of it so it has a

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 3>more sort of film and texture. And think about all

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 3>those things you know, when you when you shoot, you go.

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 3>When you watch some of these films I've done in the

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 3>last few years, they all I still try to give

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 3>it a sort of an emotional film sensibility in terms

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 3>of the approach.

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>You know that That leads to my question, Okay, you

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>brought up Bamboozle. So at the time when we shot

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that with Spike, and Spike was explaining to me that

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Yo're going to shoot this all in digital, and I

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>think that was like new to him at the time,

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Like the way he shot that film was was way different.

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So even watching him on the set and how him

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and was Malik his his Linesman, I'm not.

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Certain cis shot.

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Now, when I saw that film and it was digital,

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it still had a I don't know what to call

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the type of film that like they use when they

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>do soap operas.

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 3>But that film because because that's what they wanted to.

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that is that video or is that? But that's

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>why I was asking was that done on purpose? Because

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>then you know you cut to cut to she Hate Me?

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>She Hate Me still had a kind of you don't

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>know if it's video or.

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.479
<v Speaker 3>Had the videos of the old television shows texture how

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 3>know as you're talking about.

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>But now it's like it's borderline, Like it feels like

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it's thirty five millimeters when I'm watching it. Like in

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.479
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, when I first got my digital TV, everything

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>felt like it's so proper. Maybe like after ten years

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of watching it, I've just conditioned myself to accept this

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is the norm. But are they still like rewriting the

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>quality of what digital is?

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, the thing you should remember, you know what your TVs,

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 3>you know there's settings in your.

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 4>TV and you got to set that frame rate.

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 3>You got to set the frame rate so it doesn't

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 3>look like digital. You go to these hotels sometimes you're

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 3>watching things and man, that looks you know, it looks.

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Like a play right, Yeah, it's so proper, right, But.

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 3>If you set your frame rate on your television, it

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 3>won't look like that. If you said it for twenty

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 3>four frames per second, they're gonna look like thirty frames

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 3>per second.

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Service love a good lesson, Let me go get my promote.

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 4>That's because on the new iPhones, like on the because

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 4>like I got the twelve, I got the twelve pro

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 4>macs and naked you can shoot it.

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 5>You can shoot.

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Thirty frames per second video four and then you can

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 4>shoot sixty frames, and the sixty frames just's yeah, it's like, nah,

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 4>it looks plastic like, it looks so real. It looks fake.

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 4>It's crazy.

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 3>The other thing is, you know, the other thing. The

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 3>other thing too is that with Bamboozle, Spike was shooting

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 3>on DV cameras, the first DV cameras, and the frame

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 3>rate was thirty frames per second, but it really had

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 3>a real digital feeling. What's happened with the cameras, those

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 3>DV cameras. Nobody uses those anymore. So the technology has improved.

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 3>So now when you shoot with these video cameras, they

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 3>and if you get to if you use the right lenses,

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 3>you can feel like you're watching films. You know, that's technology.

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So if they were well, I already know that they

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 1>did a uh like criteria, I know they did. Yeah,

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they already did a Criterion reissue. So what I'm asking

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is if there's a remastering process.

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 3>It will still look the same, so you.

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Can keep it looking just like it did in two thousand.

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because I just watched it too on Criteria. It

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:31.839
<v Speaker 3>looks the same. It looks just like it did when

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 3>they shot it. You're not going to be able to

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 3>change that. That look. That's the field that they got

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 3>and it's not going to change.

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>So at the time when you were doing it and

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>watching it was it was it sort of off putting, like, Okay,

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>is this going to be the future of movies now?

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Like is everything going to look like yeah, it was,

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I picked up a video camera and made

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it look like this, or yeah.

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 3>It's a little off putting. It definitely did but you know,

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 3>Spike was you know, Spike did it for a couple

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 3>of reasons. I mean, he had access to all these cameras.

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.439
<v Speaker 3>He shot with six cameras, you remember, Yeah, he shot

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 3>with lots of cameras. And also it had an impact

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 3>on the budget because shooting with those cameras, he didn't

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 3>spend as much money he was shooting on film. You know,

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 3>he did shoot the performance stuff with you know, with

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Tommy Davison and and Save You on he shot that

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 3>on film six Super sixteen, but everything else was video.

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I see, what is a question I had? Just

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 4>what is an example? And you don't have to, you know,

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 4>name any particular movies if you don't want, But what

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 4>is an example of just bad editing? Just kind of

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 4>just you know, just from a fundamental standpoint, because the

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 4>movies I watch and I'm just like, yeah, they felt

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:48.760
<v Speaker 4>like they could have cut maybe ten to fifteen minutes

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 4>out of that it felt too long or whatever. But

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 4>what is bad editing?

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 3>I never say that anymore, you know, Okay, but most

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 3>films when you watched him, I watched the film the

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Other Night from twenty fifteen with Sean Penn and Idris

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Elba and javardin called Gunman, you know, and they shot

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 3>all of it. But they shot and they shot in

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 3>South Africa, they shot in Spain, Barcelona, they shot in England.

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 3>And it's not a good film. It's not a good

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 3>film at all. But it's not about the editing. It's

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 3>not about the cinematography, because it looks great. It's edited

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 3>pretty well, ain'ty. Remember it's usually not bad editing. It's

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 3>usually bad scripts.

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:28.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, bad storytelling.

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a bad storytelling, you know, because the technology

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 3>has improved to such a degree that most films look fantastic.

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Most films are edited well. The problem is is the

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 3>story sucks. You know, So when the story sucks, it

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter how well it's put together, it just doesn't work,

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 3>you know. So I'm you know, I never really see

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 3>that term bad editing anymore. You know, it's really bad storytelling.

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was just so. Yeah, that was curious for

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 4>things cleaning it up, because I wonder like, yeah, where

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 4>is it? Where does it get made? Is it the

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:05.360
<v Speaker 4>story or is it Can you have a good story

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 4>and then a back cut can mess it up?

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's rare, you could, but it's rare. You

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 3>can definitely have a bad story and the cuts won't

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 3>help it.

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was going to say, I was going to say,

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:23.360
<v Speaker 1>what happens in the case of a film like The Irishman,

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:29.240
<v Speaker 1>which clearly I see more of it as a curtain

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:32.800
<v Speaker 1>call than I do a film like I don't know

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>if I would name The Irishman in my school, you know, no, no, no.

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is is that I enjoyed it, but

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I saw it more as a curtain call, Like, Okay,

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.479
<v Speaker 1>this is obviously the last time we're going to see

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Paccino and de Niro and Scorsese and school micer like

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 1>at this level and this intensity of a gangster film.

0:37:57.440 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of like, Okay, I forgave the fact

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:03.839
<v Speaker 1>that three hours and forty five minutes however long it was,

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>but in your mind. But I'm also not a film buff,

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>so there are a lot of things that I will

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>let slide that a lot of my film buff films

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 1>friends will just start criticizing. Now, I know it might

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 1>be sacrilegious or whatever, but what do you do in

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>what would you do in the case of a film

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like The Irishman, where well, here's.

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:29.839
<v Speaker 3>My take on the ash Man. And you know, there's

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 3>some people I know who love it, well, absolutely love

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 3>that film to me. To me, I feel like you

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 3>it was what I call Scorsese's sort of like the

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 3>last trail. You know, he's on this his swan song.

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 3>He'll make more films. But in terms of the Gangs,

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 3>to mill you, he should leave it alone because for

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 3>me it was too long and I didn't buy the

0:38:55.160 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 3>idea that Joe Peshew and de Niro look like young men.

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god? What is that about it? All?

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Is this effect?

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't work on everybody? Did they try?

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 3>It didn't work at all and did not.

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>But wasn't that also like a primitive like in my mind,

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>is that bamboozled in two thousand where it's just like

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>this new technology that they're working on. And obviously though

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 3>It could be one of those things where in ten

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 3>years people when need to visit that film say it

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 3>was a master piece. To me, it was too long

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 3>and it was a curtain call and you know, and

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't need to see the narrow but Joe Pesci

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 3>played gagsters ever again, you know, I agree, you know,

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 3>it was just you know, and you know you know,

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm a big fan of Marty films, you know, Raging

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Bull and Good Photos, even Casino, but this one.

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.320
<v Speaker 4>Was like yeah, casinos, yeah.

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 3>This one. This one was like, Okay, this is time

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 3>to stop this this journey, you know, the one.

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 4>I will say. The thing I liked about it that

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 4>I thought was interesting was that he he wore his

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 4>old films. You know, he was kind of shown as

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, glorifying the gangster life with Casino and Goodfellas,

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 4>you kind of should see the shiny side of it.

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 4>But with this one, it was more more so for

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:14.800
<v Speaker 4>lack of vetter termin It was just a blue collar gangster,

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 4>like he wasn't rich, he wasn't you know, you know,

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 4>he was just that. So I did think that that

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 4>was an interesting shift, you know, tone wise, But I agree,

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we need to see them play gangsters.

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 4>I think they don't have nothing new to say in

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 4>that way.

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 3>And it was watching, you know, even the scene I do.

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 3>I remember the scene Narrow's character beats up to kicks

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 3>the gangster in the street.

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Dude, he's like eighty years old.

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 3>I said, I said, this guy's an old man.

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he can his leg, but I well, see

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought that, uh, like, normally, especially if you watch

0:40:53.480 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Goodfellas and Casino, the way that Filma does cuts and

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>edits very intensely and things that you know, trademarks that

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Scorsese is known for. This was the first time where

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:14.399
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see that fast paced kind of editing action

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that makes it more intense. So I actually thought that

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>it was unique for them to do a slower a

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 1>slower cut kind of Scarsese gangster film. That wasn't.

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you could say that, you could say that, you know.

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 3>The other way to look at it, you know, is

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 3>that sometimes you know this sometimes when when when an

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 3>autist gets older, their their rhythms and their paces slow down.

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>See I thought that was on purpose, No, I you know, sometimes.

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 3>It is, and sometimes I mean I gave you a

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 3>great example, you know. You know, I've been doing the

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Max Roach film right right, And so you watch Max

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 3>in the forties and you listen to Max and the

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Poison and fifties of Quickly Brown, I mean everything is

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 3>in the seventies, he's still playing, you know, he's doing

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:09.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's drum also losses, but you can tell

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:10.360
<v Speaker 3>it's slowed down.

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, Wait, It's funny you said that. I had a moment,

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>probably one of Max's last public performances before he passed away,

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>where they set up this drum thing between him and I,

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and uh this, I feel so fuck boyish recalling this story.

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was like, all right, I got it.

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going up against Max roach Man. I better prepare.

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So I spent a month like working on my technique. No, well,

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the thing was I had going up against. I did

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:54.879
<v Speaker 1>this with Cindy Blackman maybe seven months before, and.

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Did it with Roy Haynes too, and this.

0:42:57.280 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Was four hundred No I know, No, I did not

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>battle Roy Haines, but I'm just saying that with Cindy one,

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I was way out of shape. I was like four

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred pounds whatever, and like three minutes into the solo,

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>she just dusted me. And I was like I was

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on my never again joined And so I was like,

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, Max Roach, I don't care, I'm gonna dust

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>his ass. And I didn't realize that he was like,

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, his late eighties and just he was just

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>happy to be there. He's like playing a little and

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I felt like an asshole at the end, like a man.

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I was showing out, and then I.

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Think too because by that point in your career you

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 4>don't really have anything left to prove. I mean, it's like, motherfucker,

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:43.839
<v Speaker 4>I'm Max Rose, Like, what that's it?

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:44.359
<v Speaker 3>You know what I mean?

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:47.800
<v Speaker 4>If I get I can play fucking spoons and bottles,

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 4>you know what I mean?

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Whatever, that's true, That's true, exactly true.

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about style wars for a

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of hip hop aficionados, especially old school cats like

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>between Wild Style and Star Wars like those are the first,

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 1>probably the two really authentic looks at early hip hop.

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>How did you did you talk about getting involved in

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>that that project and was it a big deal to

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you that that that sort of thing was greenlit to

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 1>make in the first place.

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:28.799
<v Speaker 3>Well, it was interesting the director Tony Silver. I was

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 3>working for Victor Kaneski, the guy who trained me, and yeah,

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 3>he had this editing service and we had been doing trailers.

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Tony Silvery used to do these movie trailers, these little

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 3>two three minute movie trailers, and we used to edit

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 3>those for Tony And one day he said he had

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a buddy named Henry Chaufman who would go up to

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 3>the Bronx and Queens and he would photograph and these

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 3>all these graffiti artists doing their thing, and he decided

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Tony decided to take a camera crew and start shooting.

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 3>And so he just started shooting all the guys, the

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 3>breakdancing and all the artists, you know, all of them.

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 3>And then he came to Victory and says, I got

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 3>all this footage. I don't have a lot of money,

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 3>but you guys, I'll pay something so we could start editing.

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 3>So in like nineteen eighty one eighty two, we started

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:16.400
<v Speaker 3>editing that film for not a lot of money, you know.

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 3>And I knew about the whole hip hop world, you know,

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 3>I knew about graffiti, but this was a deep dive.

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 3>It took us a whole year to edit that film,

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:28.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, because Tony was always changing every cuts we made.

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Held look at the cuts, O, this is not right,

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 3>this is not working, which we edit the restructure, We

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 3>edit restructure. And by the time that whole year was

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 3>over editing that film, I was so angry and disgusted

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 3>with Tony. I didn't want to see him again. Yeah,

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:46.840
<v Speaker 3>because we just worked so hard on it. It really

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 3>worked hard, and you know, I never realized that the

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 3>film would really take off like it did. You know,

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 3>we knew that it was an audience. We didn't realize it.

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:00.280
<v Speaker 3>We really had such a big splash. I mean even today.

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean I've had students, you know, in the last

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:07.360
<v Speaker 3>ten years who've seen that film. I mean even Spike

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:09.719
<v Speaker 3>said he didn't know I edited that film after I

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 3>did No Better Blues and saw my credits. What is

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 3>you edited one of the editors on the Star Wars.

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, man, you know.

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So you had no clue that this was something revolutionary.

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Like not.

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 3>I knew it was revolutionary, but I didn't realize it

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:25.319
<v Speaker 3>was going to have such a wide reaching impact, you know,

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:28.839
<v Speaker 3>because when we finished it, Tony took it away and

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 3>we knew it got in some festival. You know, we didn't,

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, back then, when I was editing films, I

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:37.400
<v Speaker 3>didn't think much about how where they were going to

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 3>go so much. I was just it was, you know,

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:40.799
<v Speaker 3>I was trying to make a good film and didn't

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 3>move on. So it was one of those things you said, Wow,

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 3>I really had an impact.

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess that said for me, the film seems so

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 1>guerrilla like, like did it have did they at least

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>go into the project with some sort of like plan

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:01.759
<v Speaker 1>or or was it just like we'll just shoot as

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:04.480
<v Speaker 1>we go along and try to make create a story

0:47:04.480 --> 0:47:06.879
<v Speaker 1>out of this, because it wasn't like they were there

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to teach us the history. It was almost like a

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:10.400
<v Speaker 1>reality show.

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 3>So it was it was gorilla or I mean, sometimes

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 3>they would they would go to these yards and they

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 3>would shoot the guys doing their thing. Sometimes they did

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 3>have a little bit of a plan, like when Case

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.399
<v Speaker 3>went into his house, you know, when you see Kase

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 3>walking through the projects, walking through the playground, walks to

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:28.680
<v Speaker 3>his house, the camera fan doll pans out. They decided

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:30.680
<v Speaker 3>to do that. Then they would have stars and they

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 3>sat down with Case and his two buddies and had

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 3>them drawing in cases telling you his story about how

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 3>he lost his arm and stuff right and seeing with

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:40.880
<v Speaker 3>those guys on the train when casing his guys up

0:47:40.920 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 3>on the L train, you know. And then you know,

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 3>like when we put the we did that montage that

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 3>was sort of Tony said, let's let's do a montage.

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:51.919
<v Speaker 3>Let's figure out a montage. So we found that song

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 3>when they're saying, you know, they're doing that wrap right

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 3>on the music, and we just created some of these

0:47:57.360 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 3>things were spontaneous, and these things were a little set up,

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 3>but most of those gorilla type filmmaking.

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, when you're in that situation, what happens if you're

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:12.959
<v Speaker 1>I assume that if you're editing already, you're at least

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 1>towards the end stage or the fourth quart of the project.

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 1>What if you're in a situation in which, uh, you

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:28.920
<v Speaker 1>have like way more broth, then you have stue content

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for that particular meal. In other words, like if you're

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:38.800
<v Speaker 1>editing and you're trying to create a sort of coherent

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>storyline and it's not all the way there yet, Like,

0:48:42.160 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 1>do you guys go back out to shoot some more stuff?

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Some Yeah, Sometimes if they have the budget and you

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 3>can get them to go back out, they do shues.

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:53.279
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes if they don't have the budget, then you got

0:48:53.280 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 3>to improvise even more to figure out how to make

0:48:55.480 --> 0:48:58.359
<v Speaker 3>it coherent and work. If you have more broth than

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 3>stu ste ingredients, you know. So the thing you always

0:49:03.120 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 3>have to remember when you make it a film is

0:49:06.200 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 3>always keep yourself, keep on your toes with the surprises.

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Never settle into the idea that, oh this is going

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 3>to be a material I have. I got to make

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:17.839
<v Speaker 3>it work this way you can always with film, it's

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:21.239
<v Speaker 3>really malleable. You can try different things and all the

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 3>time to come up with different ways and look at

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:26.959
<v Speaker 3>a sequence, you know, and a really good filmmaker will

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:29.920
<v Speaker 3>always be open to try different things, because if you're not,

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:32.799
<v Speaker 3>then someone's going to take it from you and say, well,

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's another way, because there's always another way

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:37.080
<v Speaker 3>to make a film always.

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:42.279
<v Speaker 7>Okay, Can you talk about your relationship with composers and

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:45.240
<v Speaker 7>music editors. I mean, we just we just recently interviewed

0:49:45.280 --> 0:49:47.759
<v Speaker 7>Terrence Blanchard, who I'm sure you know, and I've been

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 7>working on a bunch of films lately, and I find

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:53.759
<v Speaker 7>that that relationship is always very different as editors. Some

0:49:53.920 --> 0:49:56.319
<v Speaker 7>usually work with the same composers, some don't, and just

0:49:56.360 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 7>figuring out that situation and how that how to achieve

0:49:59.520 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 7>the best posts will think and what comes first?

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:02.439
<v Speaker 3>Music or not music?

0:50:02.480 --> 0:50:03.959
<v Speaker 1>What are you using? Ya ya YadA.

0:50:04.600 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 3>That's what usually in my process is, you know, I'll

0:50:08.080 --> 0:50:10.879
<v Speaker 3>put a cut together. Like I just mentioned this other

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:13.279
<v Speaker 3>film for HBO called Black Art in the Affence of

0:50:13.320 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 3>Life about these different artists from Carrie may Leans to

0:50:16.800 --> 0:50:19.759
<v Speaker 3>Carol Walker to Carrie James Bush. So we put the

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 3>film together and the editor said, what kind of tent

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 3>music going to use? I said, well, there's a composer

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:29.000
<v Speaker 3>out in La Na, Katherine Bostic, and I want to

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:30.880
<v Speaker 3>use her music. So she had done the music for

0:50:31.000 --> 0:50:33.799
<v Speaker 3>my August Wilson film, so I said, let's go back,

0:50:33.840 --> 0:50:35.960
<v Speaker 3>and I had her send me some of that music

0:50:36.000 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 3>that she had done for the August Wilson post. Let's

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:40.359
<v Speaker 3>use some of your music as temps. Send me some

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:43.080
<v Speaker 3>other pieces that you can use as temp and then

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:44.840
<v Speaker 3>we laid in some of her music. Some of it

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 3>worked and it didn't work. But when we got to

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 3>a cut where we had some of this tent music in,

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:51.720
<v Speaker 3>and then I had some other music that I found

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:54.239
<v Speaker 3>that I liked it I used. I use some Cold

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Traine music. I use some some Billy Straighthorn, which I

0:50:57.960 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 3>knew I couldn't keep because it was going to cost

0:50:59.640 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 3>too much money. So then we had a music session

0:51:02.640 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 3>where I said to Katherine, you know, here's the feel

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking for, here's the tonalities, you know, and I

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:11.120
<v Speaker 3>play an instruments I'm always talking about. Here's the kind

0:51:11.160 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 3>of instruments I want you to try. I want I

0:51:13.239 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 3>want flutes here, I want woodwinds here. I think you

0:51:16.160 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 3>should what's your instrument? I play flute. I used to

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:24.360
<v Speaker 3>play side yeah, okay, so so you know, and you know,

0:51:24.520 --> 0:51:26.880
<v Speaker 3>so I'm talking about the rhythm and the pace and

0:51:26.920 --> 0:51:28.920
<v Speaker 3>the tonal. Now, some people, you know, some of the

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 3>directors don't know music, can't use musical terms. They say,

0:51:33.480 --> 0:51:37.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, I wanted to be strong, I want to yellow. Yeah,

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 3>But I try to give them some real specific so

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:43.680
<v Speaker 3>I'll say, like i'm talking, I'm talking to this composer

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:46.759
<v Speaker 3>now about this zard astron And I said, you know, man,

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:49.359
<v Speaker 3>we're trying to create that seventies feel. So go back

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:52.239
<v Speaker 3>that sixties and seventies steel. Go back and listen to

0:51:52.280 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 3>the scores that Quincy Jones did for in the Heat

0:51:54.520 --> 0:51:58.080
<v Speaker 3>of the Night in the nineteen sixty eight called The Pawnbroker.

0:51:58.400 --> 0:52:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Listen to that rhythmic field, Listen to rhythm and the

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:03.080
<v Speaker 3>pacing of that. I want that kind of feel for

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 3>this score for this film, you know, you know, and

0:52:06.320 --> 0:52:08.799
<v Speaker 3>we're using we're keeping some music. We're having a film

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:11.799
<v Speaker 3>that when Art da Ash goes to South Africa, we're

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:17.560
<v Speaker 3>gonna use Gilbert gil Gilskharens Johannesburg. You know we're going

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 3>to use the temptations how I wish every grain, you know,

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:23.719
<v Speaker 3>but so listen to those pieces to see if you

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:27.239
<v Speaker 3>can sort of instrumentally replicate that feel for some of

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 3>the other sections of the film. So I mean, I'm

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:32.759
<v Speaker 3>trying to be very specific with composers, you know.

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:35.600
<v Speaker 4>Now, the fact that you can speak music and film

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:36.919
<v Speaker 4>that goes a long way.

0:52:37.080 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It helps.

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:38.279
<v Speaker 3>It really helps.

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for me, of all your work with Spike Lee,

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:51.319
<v Speaker 1>I will say, and it's weird, and I hope you

0:52:51.360 --> 0:52:55.240
<v Speaker 1>know this. This statement isn't hyperbolic or timely, only because

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the film has not been seen in thirty years for

0:52:58.840 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 1>some reason, he hadn't allowed it on streaming or whatever.

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:08.320
<v Speaker 1>But for me at the time in ninety one, watching

0:53:08.400 --> 0:53:15.319
<v Speaker 1>that taj Mahal scene jungle Fever, to me, that was

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I of all of it in Spike's whole canon, I

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:25.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think six minutes really hasn't gripped me or frightened

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:29.359
<v Speaker 1>me as much as watching that film like it wasn't

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>over exaggerated. And oftentimes you know, Spike will hammer point

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:35.960
<v Speaker 1>home with over exaggeration or that sort of thing. But

0:53:36.000 --> 0:53:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it was just like to watch that scene in its

0:53:40.200 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 1>six minute glory, like to the backdrop of Stevie Wonders

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:46.280
<v Speaker 1>living for the City and the way that was edited

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and all that stuff. Could you talk about just the

0:53:50.239 --> 0:53:53.880
<v Speaker 1>choreography of how that scene came to be?

0:53:55.040 --> 0:53:57.759
<v Speaker 3>I think, you know, you'd have to aspect this, but

0:53:57.800 --> 0:53:59.680
<v Speaker 3>I think he played that music and he was shooting

0:53:59.680 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 3>that scene oh wow, because it was interesting to me.

0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:05.960
<v Speaker 3>But when I cut that scene and Spotty said he

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 3>wanted to use Living in the City, I don't think

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 3>I made a music cut. You know, usually I don't

0:54:12.680 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 3>think I made a music cut. I know, if you

0:54:14.239 --> 0:54:17.719
<v Speaker 3>go back to you guys watch The Love Supreme at

0:54:17.719 --> 0:54:19.399
<v Speaker 3>the end of My Better Blues, I made a big

0:54:19.480 --> 0:54:23.320
<v Speaker 3>music cut there, you know, between when the Babies.

0:54:23.320 --> 0:54:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I made a big music cut there.

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 3>But on Living in the City, I don't think I

0:54:30.760 --> 0:54:31.640
<v Speaker 3>made a music cut.

0:54:32.880 --> 0:54:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Now, Sam, you know you got to break that down

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:35.840
<v Speaker 2>because I'm like, wait, music, what are you saying a

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:36.560
<v Speaker 2>music cut or.

0:54:36.600 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Music cart a music cut where you said you removed

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:41.319
<v Speaker 3>some of the music to make it.

0:54:41.239 --> 0:54:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Work to work in the scene.

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:45.520
<v Speaker 3>But this one, I don't think I made any music cuts.

0:54:45.560 --> 0:54:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Live in the City because I think with.

0:54:48.080 --> 0:54:52.960
<v Speaker 1>The exception of the occasional cut of them smoking crack

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:56.000
<v Speaker 1>across the screen, it almost felt like it was one

0:54:56.200 --> 0:55:00.120
<v Speaker 1>long take, but I know that you used multiple.

0:55:00.160 --> 0:55:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I used my mostle visual take. I'm talking about it.

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:03.839
<v Speaker 3>I didn't make any music edits.

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the music was it plays straight through.

0:55:07.600 --> 0:55:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Usually I make a music edit because the sequence is

0:55:09.920 --> 0:55:12.400
<v Speaker 3>too long. But the two films I never made a

0:55:12.480 --> 0:55:15.799
<v Speaker 3>music edit was on that one and the sequence in

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Girls six when what your name is? Going to the beach.

0:55:18.160 --> 0:55:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And how come you don't call me anymore?

0:55:21.360 --> 0:55:22.439
<v Speaker 4>And I love that.

0:55:22.680 --> 0:55:26.759
<v Speaker 3>Scene scene too, man, I don't think I made a

0:55:26.880 --> 0:55:28.879
<v Speaker 3>music cut, you know, the.

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:34.360
<v Speaker 1>First Catfish one film, the first the first two of

0:55:34.360 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the fly Out story going Wrong.

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:41.239
<v Speaker 3>It was it was almost like Spike It and Edit

0:55:41.400 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 3>had shot that scene in in the pace and the

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:47.319
<v Speaker 3>rhythm that I didn't have to. I made all these

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:50.279
<v Speaker 3>individual picture cuts that were but it was like they

0:55:50.320 --> 0:55:53.120
<v Speaker 3>were just right. Everything was just right. I was like, Wow,

0:55:53.160 --> 0:55:53.880
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't believe it.

0:55:54.160 --> 0:55:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I cut it at one point, I borderline felt like

0:55:58.760 --> 0:56:03.320
<v Speaker 1>he started with Living for the City and then somehow

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:07.640
<v Speaker 1>like wrote the film around that because I just.

0:56:07.600 --> 0:56:09.879
<v Speaker 3>What I think he did. That's exactly what I think

0:56:09.880 --> 0:56:12.360
<v Speaker 3>he did. Man, I think he Yeah. I think he

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:14.880
<v Speaker 3>started with the song and he then built the scene

0:56:14.880 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 3>from that because that's how it works.

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:21.279
<v Speaker 1>And dressed okay, yeah, because it's just so unusual too.

0:56:22.719 --> 0:56:25.000
<v Speaker 1>And again Living for the City is like six minutes long.

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:30.160
<v Speaker 1>But I just wondered how with editing is concerned, Like,

0:56:30.239 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 1>how is he like, because the timing has to be

0:56:32.719 --> 0:56:35.560
<v Speaker 1>perfect because literally, for the for those that haven't seen

0:56:35.600 --> 0:56:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the film, there's a scene where Flipper Purify played by

0:56:41.239 --> 0:56:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Wesley Snipes, has to confront his brother for stealing the

0:56:47.400 --> 0:56:53.520
<v Speaker 1>family television the TV. Yeah, Sam Jackson playing a crackhead

0:56:53.520 --> 0:57:00.359
<v Speaker 1>his older crackheat butter brother Flipper gataa data. As matter

0:57:00.360 --> 0:57:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of fact, I believe that cons had to invent a

0:57:03.640 --> 0:57:09.160
<v Speaker 1>category just so that Sam Jackson could win Best Supporting Actor.

0:57:09.239 --> 0:57:12.720
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have a supporting scene. So basically what happens

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is Wesley Snipe starts at one point in Harlem and

0:57:19.480 --> 0:57:23.160
<v Speaker 1>does a real time walk what seems to be four

0:57:23.200 --> 0:57:26.920
<v Speaker 1>blocks or whatever to a crack house, a crack then

0:57:28.520 --> 0:57:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of which once he gets there. You know, especially for

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:34.960
<v Speaker 1>ninety one, when people were still had their heads in

0:57:35.040 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the sand over the crack epidemic, like to visually see

0:57:39.440 --> 0:57:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that shot. I'm really shocked. We didn't even ask Spike

0:57:42.320 --> 0:57:44.200
<v Speaker 1>about the scene when he was on the show twice.

0:57:44.560 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I forgot.

0:57:45.680 --> 0:57:48.840
<v Speaker 2>But doesn't it pauls in the middle when when Leslie

0:57:48.880 --> 0:57:53.680
<v Speaker 2>has the conversation with was it Charlie Murphy Charlie okay, okay?

0:57:53.840 --> 0:57:56.880
<v Speaker 1>No, music is still going, music is still going, right,

0:57:57.120 --> 0:57:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So I guess what I wanted to like, did they

0:57:59.000 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 1>did they have to quirre gra that in terms of

0:58:01.520 --> 0:58:03.600
<v Speaker 1>or was that just great editing? Because as far as

0:58:03.600 --> 0:58:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, Wesley Snipe starts four blocks ahead, walks to

0:58:08.240 --> 0:58:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the Tasma hall four blocks later, confronts Halle Berry and

0:58:13.160 --> 0:58:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Sam Jackson, and you know, of course this has to

0:58:17.240 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 1>work in coordinance with with the song, you know, and

0:58:21.720 --> 0:58:22.720
<v Speaker 1>stopping to talk to child.

0:58:23.080 --> 0:58:23.800
<v Speaker 3>That's what I'm saying.

0:58:23.840 --> 0:58:27.320
<v Speaker 9>I think I think Spike played the track while he

0:58:27.400 --> 0:58:31.800
<v Speaker 9>was shooting as okay, because it almost works so perfect

0:58:31.840 --> 0:58:34.600
<v Speaker 9>when I cut it, I couldn't believe how it worked.

0:58:34.600 --> 0:58:37.040
<v Speaker 1>It works so well, right, Yeah, that to me is

0:58:37.080 --> 0:58:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like one of his I don't know, And again I

0:58:40.240 --> 0:58:44.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know timing wise, if it still could work in

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:48.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one. I beg him all the time, like

0:58:49.360 --> 0:58:51.960
<v Speaker 1>why haven't why is this the only film of yours

0:58:51.960 --> 0:58:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not, you know, available for screening?

0:58:55.080 --> 0:58:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Was he saying, I don't know.

0:58:57.280 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I you know, and it's weird. I've I've done some

0:59:03.120 --> 0:59:05.880
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, I've read a few blogs or whatever,

0:59:05.920 --> 0:59:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and they'll try to say like, well, you know, this

0:59:08.520 --> 0:59:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is his only film that wasn't as timely or you

0:59:12.160 --> 0:59:14.520
<v Speaker 1>know that sort of thing like it it didn't age

0:59:14.520 --> 0:59:16.640
<v Speaker 1>well or that sort of. I don't know, but he's

0:59:16.640 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of just he shruggish about it. But for me,

0:59:20.680 --> 0:59:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I I between Matt scene and the

0:59:24.640 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 1>final scene with Ozzie Davis and Sam Jackson, I thought

0:59:29.040 --> 0:59:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that was some of his most powerful visuals. So I

0:59:38.040 --> 0:59:40.400
<v Speaker 1>guess I want to jump into you as a director,

0:59:40.440 --> 0:59:43.560
<v Speaker 1>not just as an editor, as I mentioned at the top.

0:59:43.640 --> 0:59:45.280
<v Speaker 1>With Eyes on the Prize too.

0:59:45.880 --> 0:59:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 1>The aforementioned Jesus in the Black Messiah film is based

0:59:53.080 --> 0:59:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Judas and the Black I'm sorry I keep saying Jesus

0:59:56.680 --> 1:00:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the only one. Wait a minute, I've went on a

1:00:00.440 --> 1:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>record in other places publicly said Jesus and no one

1:00:03.880 --> 1:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>has ever corrected me.

1:00:06.560 --> 1:00:09.640
<v Speaker 7>That's because we weren't there, because we weren't there, and

1:00:09.720 --> 1:00:10.440
<v Speaker 7>that's what we do.

1:00:10.640 --> 1:00:11.360
<v Speaker 3>We correct you.

1:00:12.840 --> 1:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Anyway. So they use the footage from your documentary interviewing

1:00:20.040 --> 1:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I forget his name, Yeah, William O'Neill, and of course

1:00:27.280 --> 1:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>they they also note that he commits suicide the day

1:00:31.840 --> 1:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that Eyes on the Prize finally gets televised at the time.

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Why did you choose to uh include him in your film?

1:00:44.320 --> 1:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And was he as brash as that clip seemed to be.

1:00:50.440 --> 1:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, he kind of spoke with like no remorse, like, well,

1:00:53.320 --> 1:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>at least at least I did something.

1:00:55.560 --> 1:00:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I think he was. I think he was conflicted.

1:00:59.320 --> 1:01:01.480
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I think he was a complicated man.

1:01:01.520 --> 1:01:04.720
<v Speaker 3>And when when when? You know, because I didn't produce

1:01:04.760 --> 1:01:08.200
<v Speaker 3>that particular segment, but I was on the series and uh.

1:01:08.480 --> 1:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, I thought you directed.

1:01:10.600 --> 1:01:14.440
<v Speaker 3>That I didn't direct, but and you know, the producers

1:01:14.440 --> 1:01:17.960
<v Speaker 3>whose voices really asked the question was a woman, you know,

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:22.000
<v Speaker 3>so it's you know, I think I don't think of it.

1:01:22.040 --> 1:01:24.160
<v Speaker 3>I think he was a conflicted man. I just think

1:01:24.160 --> 1:01:25.920
<v Speaker 3>he was. He was torn, as you can see in

1:01:25.960 --> 1:01:29.400
<v Speaker 3>the film, and he caught up with him emotionally and psychically.

1:01:29.720 --> 1:01:32.720
<v Speaker 4>You know, you know, and also too they just didn't

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:35.600
<v Speaker 4>show uh well not the shortened movie, but I think

1:01:35.600 --> 1:01:37.880
<v Speaker 4>a lot of times context is lost on just how

1:01:37.960 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 4>young they were when they got involved doing this ship.

1:01:41.280 --> 1:01:42.960
<v Speaker 3>He was caught up, he was caught up between a

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:46.960
<v Speaker 3>rock and a hard place. Yeah, you know, so you know,

1:01:47.000 --> 1:01:50.160
<v Speaker 3>he was a conflicted man. So it's a sad story,

1:01:50.680 --> 1:01:51.760
<v Speaker 3>quite honestly, very sair.

1:01:52.480 --> 1:01:53.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:01:53.200 --> 1:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So with h m ok FBI, what what prompted you

1:01:58.840 --> 1:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to even return to the story or like to investigate

1:02:03.960 --> 1:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the story because I guess for a lot of people,

1:02:06.920 --> 1:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's there's sort of a fatigue on civil

1:02:09.720 --> 1:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>rights and how many ways we can tell the story.

1:02:12.920 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>How did you know that there was another story to

1:02:14.640 --> 1:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>tell that we weren't aware of?

1:02:16.600 --> 1:02:18.960
<v Speaker 3>It was a book. We read, this book by David Garrow,

1:02:19.080 --> 1:02:22.880
<v Speaker 3>historian about the surveillance of King by the FBI and Hoover,

1:02:23.000 --> 1:02:25.040
<v Speaker 3>and we thought it would be a good story if

1:02:25.040 --> 1:02:27.000
<v Speaker 3>we told it right, We thought we could make it work.

1:02:27.320 --> 1:02:30.360
<v Speaker 3>And you know the reality is is that I don't

1:02:30.400 --> 1:02:32.320
<v Speaker 3>think there's going to be a fatigue on stories about

1:02:32.360 --> 1:02:35.560
<v Speaker 3>King or Malcolm or even you know, Fred Hampton. I mean,

1:02:35.600 --> 1:02:38.280
<v Speaker 3>there's always an appetite and this is this is history now,

1:02:38.760 --> 1:02:41.360
<v Speaker 3>this is forty years almost fifty years ago, so this

1:02:41.400 --> 1:02:44.320
<v Speaker 3>has become really important history. So we thought we could

1:02:44.320 --> 1:02:47.280
<v Speaker 3>give it a new spin. You did, you did, and

1:02:47.320 --> 1:02:49.360
<v Speaker 3>that's what we did, you know, That's that's why we

1:02:49.400 --> 1:02:50.880
<v Speaker 3>did it. You know, it was a new way to

1:02:50.920 --> 1:02:51.640
<v Speaker 3>tell the story.

1:02:52.680 --> 1:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>How did you? As far as the film concerns, it

1:02:56.240 --> 1:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>really gets deep into how the FBI tries to to intimidate,

1:03:02.120 --> 1:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a manipulate and use propaganda against King, especially his uh

1:03:09.760 --> 1:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of philandering if you will with other women and

1:03:13.360 --> 1:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. Was there any apprehension whatsoever to

1:03:16.840 --> 1:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of let that cat out of the back even

1:03:19.040 --> 1:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>though these things are on record. I know they're on record,

1:03:22.800 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but the I don't think the average Joe likes says

1:03:25.360 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm a good FI and and you know.

1:03:28.880 --> 1:03:31.320
<v Speaker 3>There were reservations. You know, we we talked about it.

1:03:31.400 --> 1:03:33.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, we felt like, you know, what's going to

1:03:33.680 --> 1:03:35.440
<v Speaker 3>happen if we put this stuff in? You know, is

1:03:35.440 --> 1:03:37.760
<v Speaker 3>it gonna are we going to be doing this the

1:03:37.840 --> 1:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>service of the FBI. And we talked about it constantly,

1:03:41.080 --> 1:03:42.840
<v Speaker 3>but we knew that if we left it out, someone

1:03:42.840 --> 1:03:45.720
<v Speaker 3>would say, well, you guys really just you know, tried

1:03:45.720 --> 1:03:49.080
<v Speaker 3>to clean this up and not whitewashed actor King whitewash it.

1:03:49.160 --> 1:03:51.640
<v Speaker 3>So you know, we we talked about it, We talked

1:03:51.680 --> 1:03:53.600
<v Speaker 3>about we talked about it, We tried that, we tried

1:03:53.600 --> 1:03:57.360
<v Speaker 3>different versions of the section about supposed the supposed great

1:03:57.920 --> 1:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>until we felt we were doing we were being responded filmmakers.

1:04:00.960 --> 1:04:04.920
<v Speaker 3>So you know, it's it's never sometimes the decisions you

1:04:05.000 --> 1:04:07.520
<v Speaker 3>make are never easy, but you have to make a decision.

1:04:08.040 --> 1:04:10.320
<v Speaker 3>And that's that when we say, okay, let's make the decision.

1:04:10.320 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 3>We're going to put it in. We're going to try

1:04:11.600 --> 1:04:13.840
<v Speaker 3>to be responsible filmmakers and tell it in a way

1:04:14.240 --> 1:04:16.600
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't sound doesn't seem salacious.

1:04:17.000 --> 1:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Were there things that you discovered in Uh? Well, first

1:04:21.000 --> 1:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of all, what is the research besides the book? How

1:04:26.040 --> 1:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>much personal research do you as director have to do

1:04:30.440 --> 1:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and not just like okay with your team or that

1:04:32.760 --> 1:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of No.

1:04:33.280 --> 1:04:35.640
<v Speaker 3>No, you got to read books, you got to read articles.

1:04:35.680 --> 1:04:37.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, you try to do as much research as

1:04:37.520 --> 1:04:41.040
<v Speaker 3>you can so you understand the subject you're going to tackle,

1:04:41.720 --> 1:04:43.960
<v Speaker 3>and then you bring on an archivo producer to help

1:04:44.000 --> 1:04:47.160
<v Speaker 3>you find the material that you think can help visualize

1:04:47.240 --> 1:04:50.960
<v Speaker 3>and orally tell orally tell the story, you know, so

1:04:51.080 --> 1:04:53.160
<v Speaker 3>you always I mean, when you're making these films, you

1:04:53.200 --> 1:04:56.440
<v Speaker 3>got to do homework. You know, you could do homework.

1:04:56.520 --> 1:04:58.480
<v Speaker 3>You could you could do homework on any of these

1:04:58.600 --> 1:05:01.560
<v Speaker 3>documentaries for two three years before you make the film.

1:05:01.880 --> 1:05:04.400
<v Speaker 3>But sometimes you get schedules and you have to sort

1:05:04.440 --> 1:05:07.560
<v Speaker 3>of do it faster, you know. So I read the book,

1:05:08.080 --> 1:05:09.920
<v Speaker 3>I read some of the letters, I read some of

1:05:09.960 --> 1:05:14.040
<v Speaker 3>the friend of Freedom of Information Act material, you know,

1:05:14.480 --> 1:05:17.120
<v Speaker 3>and Ben did also, so we knew what we were doing.

1:05:17.600 --> 1:05:20.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, did the King family have well given especially

1:05:20.760 --> 1:05:23.160
<v Speaker 2>given who you are, did they have any like heads

1:05:23.240 --> 1:05:23.680
<v Speaker 2>up or.

1:05:25.520 --> 1:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

1:05:26.960 --> 1:05:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Because we know the King family is litigious. You know,

1:05:30.200 --> 1:05:34.160
<v Speaker 3>they're looking at they're looking to make money, you know,

1:05:34.400 --> 1:05:38.080
<v Speaker 3>and when they're making money, it's you know, we knew

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:41.040
<v Speaker 3>that they want to they want to charge for any

1:05:41.080 --> 1:05:44.240
<v Speaker 3>time you see doctor King's image or hear his voice.

1:05:44.360 --> 1:05:48.200
<v Speaker 3>And you know, the amazing thing, you know is that

1:05:48.280 --> 1:05:51.320
<v Speaker 3>they didn't shoot that footage. It was shot by networks

1:05:51.320 --> 1:05:54.320
<v Speaker 3>and stuff like that. But they feel proprietory sort of

1:05:54.360 --> 1:05:57.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, ownership of their father's image.

1:05:57.240 --> 1:05:59.760
<v Speaker 2>And this brings up a good subject because I we

1:06:00.200 --> 1:06:05.480
<v Speaker 2>this of Mike Africa and uh, well, I'm sorry the directors,

1:06:05.920 --> 1:06:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Tommy Tommy, yes, Tommy Oliver, I'm sorry who did it?

1:06:16.400 --> 1:06:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Who did their documentary? And it's interesting that people layman

1:06:19.960 --> 1:06:24.440
<v Speaker 2>don't understand how people get paid for like their appearances

1:06:25.040 --> 1:06:28.080
<v Speaker 2>in documentaries and things of that nature. And I was

1:06:28.440 --> 1:06:30.400
<v Speaker 2>I kind of learned a little on this process of

1:06:30.560 --> 1:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>a mirror doing songs of songs that shook, but just

1:06:33.560 --> 1:06:36.680
<v Speaker 2>of archival and breaking down like how it's not really

1:06:37.440 --> 1:06:41.800
<v Speaker 2>a money making situation with documentaries, right, Like you shouldn't

1:06:41.840 --> 1:06:44.479
<v Speaker 2>be thinking in that way, but when you do, there's

1:06:44.520 --> 1:06:47.480
<v Speaker 2>a way, there's a different way of doing things. Am

1:06:47.480 --> 1:06:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I wrong in saying that? Well, it's correct me saying

1:06:51.240 --> 1:06:52.440
<v Speaker 2>correctly If I'm not.

1:06:52.680 --> 1:06:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you should never you should never think you're going

1:06:55.520 --> 1:06:58.400
<v Speaker 3>to make a documentary to make money because that's not

1:06:58.760 --> 1:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>really ever happened.

1:07:00.320 --> 1:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>But even some of the participants who feel like they're

1:07:02.320 --> 1:07:04.320
<v Speaker 2>a part of this story and this mood, this this

1:07:04.400 --> 1:07:06.920
<v Speaker 2>project is going to make money. So if I'm seeing

1:07:07.000 --> 1:07:11.200
<v Speaker 2>on camera, then I should make a But even.

1:07:11.000 --> 1:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>If they break the record for highest documentary, the.

1:07:17.480 --> 1:07:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Rule of thumb is you should never pay a subject

1:07:19.640 --> 1:07:20.600
<v Speaker 3>to do a documentary.

1:07:21.680 --> 1:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I found out something in this process. Okay, Well, I

1:07:26.000 --> 1:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>found out that if the subject is the executive producer

1:07:30.960 --> 1:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of the project, like, that's kind of a conflict of interest.

1:07:33.800 --> 1:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>So that in other words, like because Wu Tang insisted

1:07:38.400 --> 1:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>on being the executive producers of that documentary, they're not

1:07:42.880 --> 1:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>eligible for uh you know, like awards. He's like for it.

1:07:48.320 --> 1:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess that would be an Emmy thing. They wouldn't

1:07:51.280 --> 1:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>be eligible. And also you cannot pay yourself. You can't

1:07:55.680 --> 1:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>pay a subject to be a talking head. However, right, however,

1:08:01.120 --> 1:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I found out there's a slight. I don't know if

1:08:05.680 --> 1:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the magician giving away that's.

1:08:07.880 --> 1:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>What I thought I was doing when I said the

1:08:09.520 --> 1:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>archival thing, right, yeah.

1:08:11.960 --> 1:08:14.600
<v Speaker 3>If someone has if someone has something that you wanted

1:08:14.600 --> 1:08:17.200
<v Speaker 3>to use in your film, arch title or skills.

1:08:17.240 --> 1:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you say quote archival.

1:08:19.560 --> 1:08:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you're paying your license in their materials that you

1:08:23.800 --> 1:08:24.120
<v Speaker 3>can do.

1:08:24.439 --> 1:08:28.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I will say that that's that's a loop

1:08:28.560 --> 1:08:32.799
<v Speaker 1>around it. You can do archival. Okay, Okay, that's the sort.

1:08:32.640 --> 1:08:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Of thing I'm never going to pay.

1:08:38.560 --> 1:08:42.880
<v Speaker 2>I got though, I get it together.

1:08:43.520 --> 1:08:44.599
<v Speaker 3>That may change it.

1:08:45.920 --> 1:08:49.799
<v Speaker 1>So, Sam, I just want to talk about the upcoming

1:08:49.880 --> 1:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>projects you have. Well, in particular the the the Negro

1:08:55.120 --> 1:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>League project that you're proposing. So since you're at the

1:08:58.040 --> 1:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>beginning of it, what in your like, in your mind,

1:09:00.960 --> 1:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>do you already have an outline of what you want

1:09:04.040 --> 1:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to achieve or is it still a thing where you

1:09:05.920 --> 1:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>have to see what you're given and then add to

1:09:09.960 --> 1:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it later, or.

1:09:11.640 --> 1:09:14.200
<v Speaker 3>It's a it's a combination of both. I mean, in

1:09:14.240 --> 1:09:16.960
<v Speaker 3>the case of the negro Leagues, we know we have

1:09:17.560 --> 1:09:22.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, uh, Bob Madley, Brian's father to help tell

1:09:22.040 --> 1:09:24.920
<v Speaker 3>that story, right, he's gonna We're gonna do it. And

1:09:24.960 --> 1:09:27.760
<v Speaker 3>I've been reading this book again, so we know we're

1:09:27.800 --> 1:09:30.439
<v Speaker 3>gonna have elements from his life to tell that story.

1:09:31.120 --> 1:09:33.000
<v Speaker 3>And then the other element I know that we're going

1:09:33.080 --> 1:09:35.799
<v Speaker 3>to have to tell the story is the archival images,

1:09:36.040 --> 1:09:39.200
<v Speaker 3>religion stills to tell the story. And we also have

1:09:39.920 --> 1:09:43.120
<v Speaker 3>this this this this box full of interviews that that

1:09:43.240 --> 1:09:45.559
<v Speaker 3>Byron did over the years, and I'm gonna use and

1:09:45.640 --> 1:09:48.120
<v Speaker 3>in this particular case, because some of it's not shot,

1:09:48.160 --> 1:09:50.439
<v Speaker 3>so well, I'm gonna use it as audio. I'm gonna

1:09:50.479 --> 1:09:54.240
<v Speaker 3>use it as audio only, okay, because I don't want

1:09:54.240 --> 1:09:55.800
<v Speaker 3>to see some of these people on camera. I'm gonna

1:09:55.800 --> 1:09:58.120
<v Speaker 3>do it audio to help tell that story, you know.

1:09:58.640 --> 1:10:01.160
<v Speaker 3>And the other element that that I you know, you've

1:10:01.200 --> 1:10:05.000
<v Speaker 3>heard me say this is to create these impressionistic recreations

1:10:05.040 --> 1:10:08.120
<v Speaker 3>of the fields, of the places they played, of the

1:10:08.240 --> 1:10:10.960
<v Speaker 3>of the of the locker rooms they were in, give

1:10:11.040 --> 1:10:15.280
<v Speaker 3>you a sense of that experience to make it. My

1:10:15.439 --> 1:10:18.320
<v Speaker 3>attitude is to try to make this film as poetic

1:10:18.800 --> 1:10:22.760
<v Speaker 3>and informative it's possible, you know, in a different way

1:10:22.800 --> 1:10:25.200
<v Speaker 3>than I've did in ok FBI. This one. I wanted

1:10:25.200 --> 1:10:27.720
<v Speaker 3>to have more poetry, you know, this, whereas I want

1:10:27.720 --> 1:10:31.479
<v Speaker 3>the music to sort of you know, replicate the period

1:10:31.520 --> 1:10:36.120
<v Speaker 3>that the negro leagues evolved through, you know. So that'll

1:10:36.160 --> 1:10:38.800
<v Speaker 3>take me back to this. There was a great musician

1:10:39.520 --> 1:10:43.120
<v Speaker 3>for my taste, you know, from the from the early thirties,

1:10:43.720 --> 1:10:48.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, you know name, what was his name, Ernie Fields.

1:10:49.200 --> 1:10:51.360
<v Speaker 3>He had he had he had a great jump band

1:10:51.360 --> 1:10:54.320
<v Speaker 3>in the thirties, and his music would be absolutely appropriate

1:10:54.360 --> 1:10:57.280
<v Speaker 3>for the negro leagues, you know, even quite honestly, you know,

1:10:57.840 --> 1:11:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Count Besie's early bands come out of that side. What's feel,

1:11:01.680 --> 1:11:04.040
<v Speaker 3>you know whatever, That would be a great feel for

1:11:04.080 --> 1:11:08.400
<v Speaker 3>that period. Also, you know, yeah, herschel Evans and Lester Young,

1:11:08.920 --> 1:11:12.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, and Ben Webster. You know. So my head's

1:11:12.200 --> 1:11:15.200
<v Speaker 3>already thinking the kind of musical template I want to

1:11:15.280 --> 1:11:16.920
<v Speaker 3>use to help tell this story.

1:11:18.080 --> 1:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>My final question is is there a film project that

1:11:21.360 --> 1:11:26.599
<v Speaker 1>you long to do that you haven't and that also

1:11:26.640 --> 1:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>includes nondocumentary stuff as well, like is there a fantasy

1:11:30.720 --> 1:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>film that you want to knock out the box?

1:11:34.560 --> 1:11:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Well? You know, I got the Max Shrow Show, which

1:11:36.760 --> 1:11:40.519
<v Speaker 3>is almost done tweaking now, and if I had, if

1:11:40.560 --> 1:11:43.960
<v Speaker 3>there's if there was a fantasy film I had to do. Man,

1:11:45.280 --> 1:11:49.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, I was listening to I would do a film.

1:11:50.360 --> 1:11:53.080
<v Speaker 3>I would do a film not about Blue Note Records.

1:11:53.520 --> 1:11:57.439
<v Speaker 3>I would do a film about the musicians who were

1:11:57.479 --> 1:11:59.720
<v Speaker 3>probably Blue Note Records, but who had a style that

1:12:00.120 --> 1:12:03.040
<v Speaker 3>the change from what I call that Hardbot period to

1:12:03.880 --> 1:12:08.880
<v Speaker 3>the post Coltrane McCoy tyner period. Listening to people like

1:12:08.960 --> 1:12:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Joe Henderson and Sonny Rollins, you know, Freddie Waits, you know,

1:12:14.439 --> 1:12:16.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, because I mean I'm so into the music

1:12:16.400 --> 1:12:17.760
<v Speaker 3>that's my head always, you know.

1:12:18.280 --> 1:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So basically the stuff that Ken didn't cover in

1:12:21.720 --> 1:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>his documentary.

1:12:23.439 --> 1:12:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Is exactly right, man, exactly right. Joe Henderson, Man, No,

1:12:28.840 --> 1:12:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Freddie waits you know.

1:12:30.040 --> 1:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I get it. Well, Sam, I thank you for

1:12:33.800 --> 1:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>coming on the show. We really appreciate it was fun.

1:12:36.000 --> 1:12:38.000
<v Speaker 3>It was fun, guys, and this.

1:12:38.040 --> 1:12:38.639
<v Speaker 4>Was super fun.

1:12:38.720 --> 1:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah man.

1:12:39.320 --> 1:12:41.240
<v Speaker 4>And if you see Brendon's telling myself what up?

1:12:41.240 --> 1:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Because give me that, give me that wrapp again?

1:12:43.080 --> 1:12:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Man for the opening.

1:12:44.640 --> 1:12:49.920
<v Speaker 6>Pimps on a stroll, Holes on the road, meet can

1:12:50.040 --> 1:12:55.879
<v Speaker 6>did she's looking Dan dig on a Friday night. Everyone knows.

1:12:56.080 --> 1:13:00.760
<v Speaker 6>The names change, but the game remain. It's the same.

1:13:03.120 --> 1:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who you are any more fun. I

1:13:06.280 --> 1:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>do not know who you are, ladies and gentlemen.

1:13:11.280 --> 1:13:12.479
<v Speaker 4>Who who's scoring?

1:13:12.640 --> 1:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>What's at the point?

1:13:13.600 --> 1:13:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Anybody?

1:13:14.280 --> 1:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Anybody you know?

1:13:20.360 --> 1:13:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Because because bo is his brother is Jimmy Owens a

1:13:23.680 --> 1:13:25.120
<v Speaker 3>trumpet player? Good night?

1:13:28.360 --> 1:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes that's crazy, all right? Well on behalf of like yeah,

1:13:33.080 --> 1:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>sugar Steve, I'm paying Bill and Fante and thank you

1:13:35.960 --> 1:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>saying Paula this quest left signing off we will see

1:13:38.320 --> 1:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you on the next go around and west left Supreme,

1:13:40.000 --> 1:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you good, take care of very yo.

1:13:44.320 --> 1:13:46.680
<v Speaker 4>What's up? This is Fante. Make sure you keep up

1:13:46.720 --> 1:13:49.400
<v Speaker 4>with us on Instagram at quls and let us know

1:13:49.439 --> 1:13:50.960
<v Speaker 4>what you think. And we should be next to sit

1:13:51.040 --> 1:13:53.639
<v Speaker 4>down with us. Don't forget to subscribe to our podcast

1:13:53.800 --> 1:13:54.160
<v Speaker 4>all Right.

1:13:54.640 --> 1:14:04.920
<v Speaker 8>Peace Must Love Supreme is a production on iHeartRadio.

1:14:07.840 --> 1:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:14:12.680 --> 1:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.