WEBVTT - Everything You Need to Know About the AFC North

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation,

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 1>and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now,

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>here's your host, Paul. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. I

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>am Paul Chargie and my co host is Brian Johnson.

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>What's up, Charge, Good to talk to you. It's a

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>beautiful summer day. It's now summertime. It's taken a while,

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>but we're finally at summer. The depressing part, especially for

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>those of us in the northern parts of North America,

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the days are gonna start getting shorter. Come on already,

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not cool. And for those who don't know, Minnesota

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in the summertime is the absolute best. At its peak,

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the suns up at nine thirty at night. Still. Yes, yeah, yeah,

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's awesome. Yeah, it's an art. It is great. In

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>January it's dark at four. Uh so you know, we

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>pay the price for it. Other times, I'll take Minnesota

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>winters over living in Florida or Arizona in the summer

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>all day. I can't take Florida, I know, I can't

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>take the humidity. I used to live in Northern Virginia,

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>d C. And those summers were intolerable. Yeah, I can

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>do Arizona, even though I I just you know, I

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>know it's literally hundred and twenty degrees some days in

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the summer. But to me, that whole the whole dry

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>heat thing, it works way better than humidity. It is.

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna dive into the a f C North and

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit like we did with the a f

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>C East last week. The goal here is to tell

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you not what this each team did last year. She

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>already know that, but it's really forward looking, Brian, as

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to what each team is going to do this year.

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Which players we've identified that we like, how we think

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>this offense is gonna work, Coaching changes, personnel changes, all

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:58.919
<v Speaker 1>the stuff you need to know for the four teams

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of the a f C North. And before we get

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to that, let's mention guilloteen Leagues dot Com. Okay, we

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>are not open for business for the season. If you've

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>always wanted to try a guillotine league, this is your chance.

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>You We support private leagues. If you've got seventeen other people,

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>well actually or less, you can have a private league

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>with as few as eight UH. If you've got friends

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to play with, you can join a private league,

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or if you don't have friends you want to play with,

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>then you can join one of our public leagues, available

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>at a wide variety of price points depending on the

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>prizing you would like to win. So we hear you

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to check that out. Encourage you to join both, especially

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the brand new super Chop super job. Tell people about

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the super Chop format, Bryan. When the big books, uh quickly.

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It starts out as a regular guillotine league, but less teams,

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve twelve team league, twelve team league, twelve teams twelve

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>leagues with twelve teams in each league. UH start week one,

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, and just like standard UH guillotine um execution,

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 1>UH team eliminated every week. But come when you're the

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>last man standing, you join the other west men or

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>women standing for a brand new draft, sort of brand

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 1>new league. After week eleven, when you win your league playoffs, yes,

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>all the league's. All the league winners get together for

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a fresh draft of players, and then you play out

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. Last team standing wins the whole thing. Up

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen thousand dollars. You do this kind of format

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>so you can have the big bucks at the end.

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>It's very exact, up to fifteen thousand dollars with the

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>super chop at guillotea leagues dot com. Brian, Let's begin

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the a f C North with the Cincinnati Bengals. Now,

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>for regular listeners, they may know that this is your

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>new adopted favorite team. You were previously on the Giants,

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you gave up on them, and they still pay dave yentleman,

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>so I refuse to give them. Let's let's go to

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a team you're following very closely and has I think

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe if you know you'd if you asked me to

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>pick the team in the a f C that's going

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to improve the most by wins, I might just pick

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals were not for the fact that there's two

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>other really good teams in that division. But I think

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals get so much better this year. I do

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>as well, and reality football aside, they're gonna be one

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of the most full and fantasy football teams in that

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>in that division. UM real quick to recap last year.

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>UM Zach Taylor is returning as the head coach. He

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>also acts as the offensive coordinator for the Bengals. I

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>believe this will be his second year, maybe his third year,

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>still a still very young coach. Last year, Bengals finished

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty in yards per game twenty nine points per game. Obviously,

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>things went way south when Joe Burrow went down in

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Week eleven with the knee injury. He was posting pretty

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>good numbers. The Bengals weren't really necessarily winning games, but

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Burrows also just getting murdered behind that offensive line, which

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>will which we'll get into. But the Bengals passed the

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>ball a lot. They passed the ball over six at

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the time last year, that was thirteen most in the league.

0:04:58.000 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>They only ran the ball thirty nine point five for

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and that was bottom twelve in the NFL. So they

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>were much more of a past friendly team. That's because

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>they were behind a lot and don't expect that to

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>change a whole lot. Not a ton of draftable players

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>for the Bengals. Uh, it's really starting with the highest

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>drafted guy, Joe Mixing, Jamaar, Chase te Higgins, Tyler Boyd,

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and then Joe Burrow. Um, we won't even really talk

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>about the tight ends and help to to follow the

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>script from last week. We'll start with the the riskiest

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>guy based on a DP and I think most people

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>with lean Joe Mixon off the top of their head,

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>just based on last year. Only played six games, totally

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>lost season. But he's not the riskiest guy for me.

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's Jamaar Chase, who one of the three elite

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Bengals wide receivers. Amazing talent coming out of l s U.

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>As we all know, first wide receiver drafted in the

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>NFL Draft. Did not play last year though, but uh,

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>right now for L s U. That is so I'm

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a little concerned there. Um, you can have a slower ramp,

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's possible. Certainly Kenvia right now, he's going off

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the board wide receiver overall. That's that's so high and

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the highest of the Bengals wide receivers. But Tee Higgins

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>has proven himself to be a very good player like

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we thought he was going to be. And I don't

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>think there's suddenly going to get I don't think there's

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>suddenly going to change the whole scheme just to fit

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a rookie receiver. No, and don't forget Tyler Boyd who

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is going wide receiver thirty three, not far behind these guys.

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Strictly talking wide receivers, I'm going with the cheapest guy

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in Boyd who is a proven contributor with very high

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>upside on the in most weeks, at least when Joe

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Burrow is healthy. So for me, Jamaar Chase, I'm out

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in redraft. Of course I like his long term prospects

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than this year, but wide receiver twenty six,

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>when I can take a more proven guy like Chase Claypool,

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith, Schuster even and Odell Beckham a little sketchy,

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather take my chances on those somewhat proven commodities

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>over Jamar Chase, who, again a rookie, sat out last year.

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Joe Burrow isn't after last year, Well, the line

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>keep him alive again. It is a fair question because

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the line continues to be ranked. I think Pro Football

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Focus ranked the Bengals coming into this year, so the

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, current the current offensive line, I think they

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>ranked them thirtieth. The Bengals did draft Jackson Carmen, offensive

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>tackle lot of Clemson in the second round, so they

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>bolstered that line a little bit. But yeah, I'm just

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>out on Jamaar Chase and and Redraft this year. Um,

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>again two very good wide receivers in the room with them.

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And also the guy with the most upside is there

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>who could soak up significant targets and touchdowns, and that

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is Joe Mixon who I am going with as the

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>player with the most upside. UM. He's going, uh mid

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>second most leagues like RB twelve, which feels just about

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>right for me for for mixing. UM. People just remember

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>last year he played six games, didn't do much when

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>he played just a total total loss season, But the

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>years before mixing was seeing Bell cow usage two two

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunities in and that's cards and targets, uh, than in

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>three twenty three opportunities. Uh, it wasn't really racking up

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the touchdowns then, but that was John Kittena and I

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know what other MESSI or not. John I didn't

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>do that on purpose and Dton they're essentially the same

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>person at this point. Um. One had no hair and

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>one had red hair. That's a key distinguishing feature right there.

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>My bad anyway, Yeah, basically the same player. Geo Bernard's gone,

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a lot of people think mixing could

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>be sitting on a bigger PPR season than he's had

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in recent years, and that might be another factor in

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the case of Mixing. I'm surprised he's going where he's going.

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I really thought after last year and the fact that

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Mixings never been a gigantic fantasy producer. You know, he's

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>never been like a top five fantasy producer. He's always

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>been like RB ten, RB twelve, RB eight. I thought

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that coming off this this last season, that he would

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>fall farther than RB twelve, that he'd be more like

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 1>fifteen sixteen seventeen. You get him in the middle of

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the third round. I don't think you know, the middle

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 1>of the second round. To me, for Mixing, feels like

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you said, it feels about right. But again, he stays healthy.

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Burrows stays healthy, that receiving group fully clicks that line level.

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 1>If the line is not awful, there's there's top five

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>upside saying he'll get there. But the upside exists. Burrows fascinating.

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Just so many ways for him to win. Right now

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>with the three receivers, Mixing catching the ball, I just

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like and Burrow looks so good. He was clearly

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a candidate for highest upside to quarterback is this is

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like the deepest class of quarterbacks I can remember said

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback, it's there is certainly upside for Joe Burrow

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. Let's let's move over to the Cleveland Browns. Uh.

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>And this is an offense that took a massive step

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 1>forward under who would ultimately become NFL Coach of the Year,

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Stefanski. In many ways, Stefanski emulates his former employer

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota with a run heavy attack that ads its quarterbacks

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to execute a handful of key plays rather than asking

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback to go, like, win every game with your

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>arm um, which I think is very smart. And it

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it turned and Baker Mayfield turned in a very good

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 1>season last year. Cleveland was top five in rushing attempts

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and bottom five in passing attempts last year. And that's

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>because they've got Nick Chubb, who's awesome, Kareem Hunt who's

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>very good, and um and again, and I just think philosophically,

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this is what Kevin Stefanski was raised in. And look

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>what it got them to last year through the playoffs.

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a good team. There was a quote from Travis

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey about two weeks ago in which he said, the

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>biggest threat to the Chiefs, I'm paraphrasing, the biggest stretch

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Chiefs is the Cleveland Browns. And He's right.

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Defense massively improved in the in the off season. What

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>was the There was a crucial play when the Browns

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Chiefs played in the a f C Championship, Right,

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I remember there was a Cleveland got jobbed on something.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Um Rochard Higgins. Remember it was like the phone lot

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of bounds and that was yes. And that's definitely the

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:49.119
<v Speaker 1>end zone deal. So the stuff is tough. Baker Mayfield

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is um it doesn't like I said, doesn't have to

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 1>throw off him. That doesn't mean that he was conservative

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 1>in what they asked Baker Mayfield to do. So don't

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>confuse a lot of volume with Mayfield into thinking that

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>they didn't take shots sound Field with Mayfield, because they

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>really did. They've got that powerful, effective running game that

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>pinches the defense is up close to the line of

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>scrimmage and then here comes Baker Mayfield over the top. Now,

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb Kareem Hunt were both in the top ten

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in seeing eight men in the box, which again I'm

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>telling you, you know, defense has really stacked the line

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of scrimmage for Chubb and Hunt, so that Baker Mayfield's

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>nine intended air yards was the NFL's fourth deepest last year.

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So he's throwing over the box and so he was

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>throwing downfield. So even though he wasn't throwing for volume,

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>he was executing the big plays that fantasy owners do

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>want to have. And I love that about Makefield Mayfield

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and also blessed with the league's longest time to throw

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield at three point zero five seconds. That's a

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>full second law younger then Ben Roethlisberg, who will talk

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>about in a minute his white outs. Odell Beckham returns

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.599
<v Speaker 1>from his Week seven a c L injury and is

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>on track to be available in training camp and the

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>start of the season. I saw someone tweet and it's

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>probably true. I didn't I didn't verify it. But the

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>last time Odell Beckham was a wide receiver on the

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>top twelve wide receiver. So is Jordie Nielsen? Are you serious?

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>That feels like a long time ago, doesn't it? Wow?

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Odell's first the six full games that he played last

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>year in his first year with Kevin Stefanski. We're very inconsistent.

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>He had two very good games, he had two very

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>bad games, and two just right in the middle. Um

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Stefanski has been adamant that oh b J is part

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of the team's future, that they planned to use him significantly,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>and really, when you look at the rest of the

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Browns wide receivers, yeah, Odell Beckham is gonna be a

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>big part of this because the only guys really aren't

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>at all that promising. I don't think Jervis Landry, no

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>love well, we'll get him. I did say all of them.

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Um troubling last or, Odell Beckham had the league's lowest

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>yards after catch one point eight yards. You played six games.

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's not like a two game sample size.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a six game sample size. One point eight yards

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>after catch for Odell Beckham, and that should worry you.

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>You can fall forward for forward for one point eight yards. Uh.

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry is a known quantity who has been incredibly

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>consistent throughout his career. You know the deal here, Short targets,

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>short catches, a few touchdowns. You want like four or

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>five six touchdowns in the season. Jeffers Slander is your guy.

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Um Donovan people Jones saw his snap count skyrocket in

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the season, and then later into

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. He put together three really strong games in December,

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>which gives you a suggestion that he will continue to

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>get more use this year and in this his second season.

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Donovan People Jones, there there's a scenario here if you

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>believe Odell is kind of hooked between the injuries and

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you know how long it's been you mentioned Jordy Nelson era,

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>how long it's been since he was a really good

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. There's a scenario where Donovan People's Jones gets

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot more time, and then that doesn't all have

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to come out of Odell Beckham. You know, you're outside

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>receivers to start the season are gonna be Odell Beckham,

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Landry in the slot and and Donovan People's Jones. Chard

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Higgins is out of this thing. I think that they

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>did draft and I'm not too concerned this year, but

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Schwartz in the third round as a speed guy,

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>speed guy, I don't think he I don't think he

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>will be a reliable factor this year. I like that

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>they added a speed guy because, as I mentioned earlier,

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Baker mayfield these deep passes that he throws. They don't

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>have speed at the receiver position until he came along,

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And so I think he's he's gonna be at all.

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>He will splash with some big plays over the course

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of the season, but I don't expect him to be

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a sizeable factor throughout the year. Uh, Fantasy owners are

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be frustrated again by the Oounds tight ends. This

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is a mess. Sophomore Harrison Bryant only posted one fantasy

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>relevant game as a rookie last year, but on this show,

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that was very impressive. He had a two touchdown game

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>last year and you called that um And I don't

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>know if it was Hooper out that game. I don't.

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you know he wasn't. It was just

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a great matchup and it was And I remember rolling

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>him hard on d K because he was like too

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>grand yeah, and Beckham probably just got hurt and stuff

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>like that. So anyway, so Bryant averaged about forty snaps

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>per game, which is more than you want if you

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>own Austin Hooper, but not enough if as you want

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>if you own Harrison Bryants, So that parts a little

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>bit troubling. Austin Hooper averaged fifty one snaps a game.

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>That's only an eleventh snap difference. If you think Harrison

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Brian gets better this year his snaps, you go to fifty,

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hooper could regress down to closer to forty, and

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe those two swap for each other. And basically the

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>long short of it is, neither one is all that

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>fantasy viable. There's there's just too much competition at the

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>tight end position, not in redraft. I like Bryant. Uh

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So Hooper's contract by the way, so let since you're

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about I looked it up. Um Hooper is getting

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>cut at the end of this year. Two is his

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a there's a big jump in Hooper's salary. They're

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to pay him that. So Hooper will get

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>restructured or cut at the end of this year, and

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>then it's Harrison Bryant's job in two. All right, let's

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about the running backs. It's a contract here for

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb and he is going to get paid, and

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll probably be by Cleveland because this is

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a run first team and they know Jubb is great.

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Last year, as I mentioned earlier, you saw eight men

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>in the box more than any other player with his

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>number of carries. He had a d ninety carries and

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>he saw more eight men in the box than anybody else.

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Yet he's somehow finished first in yards per carry over

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>expectation at one point seven five yards per carry over

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>x expectation according to next Gen Stats, and his five

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>point six yards per carry was second only to J. K. Dobbins.

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>We will talk about later. If Kareem Hunt wasn't in

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the picture, by the way, probably the two best running

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>backs ever played together in NFL history. Possibly um Hunt's

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>got his stains on his career, of course, But if

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Hunt was out of the picture, Chubby is right in

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>one oh one oh yeah right, you know if you yeah,

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>if you told me that caree months gonna go down

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in a freak dirigible accident in week one, Chubb could

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>be the first player taken. For sure. As it stands,

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Hunts sipens off work. But I wonder if ultimately, in

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>some ways it doesn't serve to keep Chubb healthy and

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>efficient so that Chub doesn't hit the three touch mark,

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>which we kind of love his fantasy guys. But on

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the other side of it, Chubb's always is always because

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the relatively modest volume that he gets. He's always fresh,

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and he runs so hard. Hunt did sign a contract

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>extension last year. UM, but averages almost as many total

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>touches as Chubb does, in part because he catches more passes.

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>But Hunts receiving is weirdly underutilized in this offense and

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>only throw to him three times a game. So I'm

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>you know Hunt to me is Uh is a prototypical

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>flex player. I don't think I want him as an

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>RB one or two if I can avoid it. Uh.

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>He feels like a flex style running back. So who's

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the riskiest player at his current ADP? I think it

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is Cream Hunt. He's going off the board running back

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, which is kind of a lot when you

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>know that the best work goes to Chubb and Chub

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>is so good. UM the player with the most upside

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>compared to a DP. I really struggled with this, really

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>struggled with this. UM. I ultimately settled on Odell Beckham,

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>who's currently wide receiver twenty six going in the sixth round. UM,

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>after Jamar Chase, give me Beckham Beckham over him all day? Right,

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Baker through twenty six touchdowns like last year, let's say

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Baker gets a little bit better this year, another year

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in this in the system, and Odell Beckham is healthy

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>all season. You know what if he gets to thirty touchdowns,

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>how many of those thirty go to Odell Beckham? Jarvislanders

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>not a touchdown? Guy um Kareem Hunt might catch four,

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Chubb might catch two, tight Ends might catch eight. I mean,

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten could go to Odell Beckham. So I

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>think he's the player with the most upside. Let's take

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a break. When we come back, we'll break down Baltimore

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and Pittsburgh are favorite players for versus ADP are riskiest

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>players a DP will break down the offenses when we

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>come back. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Jarchie and

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson with you. We're breaking down the a f

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>C North and the Baltimore Ravens. Brian, Yeah, we just

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about a very run heavy team in the Browns,

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>but no team was more run heavy than the Ravens

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>last year, who ran the ball fifty percent. At the time,

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it was the highest clip in the league. Now, of course,

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 1>they run their quarterback more than any team in the league,

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and that adds to the overall run total and it

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely does. And if you're the you have the highest

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>run play percentage, that means you have the lowest pass

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>play percentage in the league. Baltimore dead last there, of course,

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>UM nine in points per game. Last year, the offense

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>was very effective, but only nineteenth in yards In essencely

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it took a major step back from when it was

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>most in the NFL. UM same coaches in play though

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>from last year. In twenty nineteen, John harbaughd head coach

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Greg Roman and an offensive coordinators who know, big change there,

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Roman says, and he says, it's like every offseason we're

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna pass more. But you know what, do some degree.

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Greg Roman just is Greg Roman, and you know he

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>is the guy who who you know, we've learned that

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Greg Roman is. He's he's uh, he is a run

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>first offensive coordinator. Yeah, and uh, they've got some good

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 1>running backs into with J. K. Dobbins, Gus Edwards who

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>they like a lot, and even Justice Hill. Justice hillisn't

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Chopped Liver by any meating well, he's played like chopped

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Liver in in the smattering of work he's gotten in

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>his career. Chopped Liver is the saying, though, right I

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it means other than who wants to

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>eat chopped liver? Have you ever even eaten? I have,

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and I did not like it. I didn't like it either.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in a household w my mom loved liver,

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>cow tong Nope, thank god. Um. And when my dad

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>would go out of town, which he did all too

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>often for work, she would then use that as the

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to cook the liver because she didn't have to

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>hear any flag from my dad. And that meant me

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and my brother got stuck with the plate that shows

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>up for dinner with liver and lima beans. You're like, oh, man,

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I'm thinking of this, but have

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 1>you ever had octopus? Yeah? So like some of the

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 1>best meat I've ever had. I would that. Really, it's

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>so chilly. You didn't get the robbery. Maybe I didn't.

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I meant bad. Well he was in Minnesota. We don't

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>get done anyway. Part of it? What were we talking about? Well,

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg Roman for a while. Um, well, we'll stick with

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the running backs and I'll call out my riskiest player

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>for the Ravens, and that's J. K. Dobbins, who was

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the highest raven drafted among all positions right now, He's

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>going off the board at running back sixteen, right after

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Swift, Antonio Gibson, before guys like Clyde Edwards, A Lair,

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders, Josh Jacobs. We don't really like him here

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>on this show. Guys, we do like Chris Carson right

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>after there. So looking at Dobbins, just worried about the volume. Again,

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw it last year. Didn't get a ton Baltimore

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't an though, you know at the end of the

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>year when he was getting just like twelve touches, touches

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>he was cashing on in those opportunities. He was. Yeah,

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>he scored in seven straight games from Week eleventh to

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to the wild card game. He totaled eight touchdowns during

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 1>that span. But and that was when they started to

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>phase out mark Ingram at the you know, on the

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>second half of the season, and they they started ratcheting

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>up his workload, not to like, you know, workhorse caliber,

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>but it was still just like an even split with

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>with like you said, during that hot stretch, Uh, he'd

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>never topped fifteen carries, never had more than two catches.

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>And again, the thing is he didn't need him mo.

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 1>He was still effective, but I don't. Yeah, he was effective,

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>but I don't care looking at his a DP where

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>he's getting drafted. It's expensive for a guy who touches

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the ball. I need more guaranteed touches. And I think

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he has two hundred, two hundred and fifty opportunities carries

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>and targets this year, not the three D three that

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see from guys going right in his range. Again, um,

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I think c h gets that kind of volume. Antonio

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>give Gibson hopefully, and guys going after Chris Carson you

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.479
<v Speaker 1>like a lot and way down the not way down

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the list, but rby Miles Gascon. I would rather wait

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>around my gass and then take J. K. Dobbins. I

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>just think there's he he could live up to that ADP.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't see him going higher than RB fourteen, but

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I certainly can see him going lower, just based on

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the volume. And of course Lamar Jackson steals touches at

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the goal line and all everywhere everywhere else, so that

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>there's that. Uh, let's talk about Lamar Jackson really quick

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>two years ago led the NFL in passing touchdowns. Unbelievable

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>right passing touchdowns last year. Only six didn't have any

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers last year, though his wide receivers were betting

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>better than um. Mark Andrews took a step back. Um.

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Long story short, I think there's room for Lamar Jackson

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to get better as a passer people who are writing

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>him off as of right now. They added a first

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 1>round pick to the wide receiver group, which I'm sure

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna talk about in a minute. And that's promising.

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, and and Jackson was a candidate for my

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>highest upside player. He could easily revert back to form

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that whole team good. And if he does that, then

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, he's the bell of the all over again.

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>But he's not your highest upside player because I know

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>who it's gonna be. I think, and I think you

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and I are in lockstep on this lay the rouser,

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the University of Minnesota rouser. Oh, you were thinking Mark Andrews,

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards. God, nobody wants Gus Edwards and he gets

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>half the carrier run that must run heavy offense in

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. That is. I do like the angle there,

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>but I love that angle. I would rather pay Gus

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Edwards a DP. We look with ADP, I don't have

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in front of me, um Gus Edwards a DP than

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>J K. Dobbins ADP to me, it's and it's it's

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>not even all that close. Oh no, it won't be close.

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Is gonna be RB thirty five. He's like round eight.

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm still going with Rashod Bateman, whose wide receiver sixty

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>seven right now, and he is the best wide receiver

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>on the roster. He probably is the best receives the

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 1>best wide wide receiver on roster. Yes, he is a rookie,

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, um but polished route runner, great hands, not

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>a freak athlete, but he is a lion athlete, uh,

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt. And when you look at the range

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of guys going before Rashad Bateman, I want to barf

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Henry Ruggs, t Y Hilton, Jalen reagor Nicole Hardman, Corey Davis.

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Bateman is the number one wide receiver on the team.

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Not the number one receiver. That's Mark Andrews, who was

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>also Canada downside downside from me, that tight end four.

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>He sees under a hundred targets going after you. Guys

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like Hockinson and Pitts who are gonna see a hundred

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>plus targets in my mind, but I still think Uh

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Andrews can live up to that. That ADP a tight

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>end for But anyway, it's Rashad Bateman for me. I

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>think he leads the team at least the wide receivers

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and targets catches yards. He's gonna be a safe seven

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to eight targets per game guy. I feel four to

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 1>five catches UH with a significant upside a wide receiver

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty two. There's plenty of room. There's plenty of room there.

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards a d P. I'm gonna I as I recall,

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it's round eight, But I I could be wrong about that,

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's going off the board like running

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>back forty something in that ballpark. And to me, that's

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>just it's such a good value for a guy who

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>know is gonna get almost half of the work, and

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they love to use him near the stripe. They you know,

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:20.360
<v Speaker 1>they'll run Gus Edwards near the end zone. So RB,

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>there we go. Pith, Yeah, that's right, I thought I

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>said eight earlier. It's like that it's right rounded left.

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>He's right in the right, like the kind of the

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>backup range. You expect the Tony Pollard, Naheem Himes, Jamal Williams.

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>But the difference is, I can I know Gus Edwards

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to get a bunch of carries in every game,

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and that I can't say that about those guys. Okay,

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>R B forty RB forty one, RB forty three. Which

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>one you pick in you got Zack Moss, Tony Pollard,

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards. I like all three. I like all three guys,

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>but I would take Gus Edwards in most formats because

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of this certainty of his role. You know, Tony Pollard

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>may he only had like two Fantasy relevant games last

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>year and he he probably does. Or Zeke has to

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>just get even worse than he was last year, which

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is possible. Um and Zack Moss is you know, well,

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a good opportunity by low on Zack Moss.

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>We still still plenty of questions about him. We'd we'd

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>be discussed him in detail in the last podcast last week, right,

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>so we got we had a co upside players of

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens. I like it. Let's pivot to the Pittsburgh Steelers. First,

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>understand my predilection on the Steelers overall this year. I

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>see massive risk with this team, and I'm gonna outline

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it for you over the course of our conversation here.

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a team that in almost every scenario I

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>will not take a Steeler at his average draft position,

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and I see a very possible significant real life regression

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and fantasy regression for this Steelers. They have a great

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>defense and that's going to keep them I think at

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>around the five mark for total wins that defense. But

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm very nervous about the rest of the team. So

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about beginning with the quarterback. In his eighteenth season,

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Ben roethlis Burger is teetering on cooked cooked. He played

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>badly for stretches last year, and his arm was clearly

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>degraded from previous seasons. I felt, now remember the season

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>before last, he missed the whole year. Then last year

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>he came in through a lot of passes because the

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>running game was terrible and um and at the end

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of the day he ultimately got two decent stat lines.

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>But just the eye test, if you watched two Steelers games,

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you know he didn't look the same. It was painful. Um,

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>he didn't throw deep and that was the biggest change

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>from last year. He used to be, you know, this

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>big statue figure in the pocket and slinging deep balls around.

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>He threw the fifth shortest average intended yards and in

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>part because he had the fewest time in pocket, barely

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>two seconds to throw the ball. No starter had less

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>time in the pocket than Ben Roethlisberger. Um. Also with Ben,

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, he offered the team an offseason pay cut,

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>which has this underlying suggestion that Ben believed that he

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>might get replaced or cut or whatever. And he early

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in the season went to the team and said, I'll

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>take a pay cut to play one more year. That

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>worries me a little syndrome. That's a great question. I

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>mean it feels that way, doesn't it. Um. You know,

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I think just last year, I feel like he succeeded

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>from a fantasy standpoint more. It's just like grit and

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>volume than actual ability anymore. Um. He did score in

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>every game last year, and that part was great, But

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm nervous about the volume coming back and some other things.

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Last year through six eight passes, which was second most

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of any of his seasons. And in addition to the

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>six eight passes, remember he threw sixty eight times in

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:20.959
<v Speaker 1>the playoff loss one game, sixty eight passes. Um that

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I I worry about all of that volume on his

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>arm in this his eighteenth season. Um. The good news

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is he's surrounded by weapons and weren't talk about them

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in a second. The bad news for Ben Um is

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line is ranked twenty nine by Pro Football

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Focus for this coming season, and the team barely addressed

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>it in the off season. They've got three news starters,

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>none of whom look promising. They have one returning starter,

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Chuck woma Okah four, and he's flipping from right to

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>left tackle. You know, I don't want a new left

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>tackle for Ben Roethlisberger and the fact that last year's

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>was terrible, but I don't want a guy who's not

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the position going to left tackle. They only

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>drafted one lineman in in the draft, and that was

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth round. Um, Dan More, Dan More, That's it, Um,

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know how. You know, how does Ben

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>get better with a makeshift line that's being reconstructed on

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the fly without obvious talent improvements. Remember they lost Markue's

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Pouncey retired in the off season. This is is a

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>bad line, maybe the worst line in football. So let's

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about receivers for a minute. Deante Johnson managed to

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>get himself benched from drop for drops last year, as

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you probably remember, um, but he's a high volume guy.

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>He ranked sixth last year among all wide receivers and

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>targets even with the benching, and that allowed him to

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>leave the Steelers and targets and yards. He's now in

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>his third season. He could get even better and he

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>could pull away from the rest of the pack of

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers wide outs, especially we can convert more of

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>those passes into touchdowns, which he was just a also

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>touchdown producer. Last year, Jujus miss Schuster resigned with the team.

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And remember he went into free agency as a as

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>an unrestricted free agent and he had like no takers

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and eventually, after I don't know, like ten days of

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>free agency, Juju just resigned with the team on a

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>very team friendly deal. I think the Patriots could have

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>gotten to Juju's for what they paid, like I know,

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>such a bad deal. Um. The issue for Juju and

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>what you need to know about him, the lack of

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>depth of target and yards after they catch Juju catch

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 1>his short passes and then gets tackled quickly. That's bad

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:42.240
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy. He had the second shortest average depth of target,

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>just five point eight yards according to Next Gen Stats,

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 1>second shortest average depth of target and he turned one

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>targets which is plenty and only eighty one yards. That's it.

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a major reversal from the big plays that

0:34:57.760 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Juju was making in his first couple of seasons in

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:02.399
<v Speaker 1>the league, and it's been this way for two years

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>with j Do silver lining. He did finish strong though

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>last year. He had touchdowns in seven of his last

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>ten games. After the touchdown totals were good for him

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>in the second half, but that was the only thing

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that saved him and kept him fantasy relevant were the touchdowns.

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Didn't didn't have over a hundred yards until that that

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>playoff game when he had nineteen targets, sixty passes past attempts.

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Ben jujus one eight targets and I said only turned

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>into eight hundred thirty one yards. Justin Jefferson turned one

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred twenty targets into almost double the yards fourteen hundred.

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>So then let's go to Chase Claypool, who became the

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Steelers downfield. Thready average thirteen point two yards per target,

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>which was among the deepest in the NFL. He's now

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in his second year and he's got room to get

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot better, which is a scary proposition for a

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:54.760
<v Speaker 1>guy with his build and ability to win contested catches.

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>But behind this terrible offensive line, does Ben have the

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>time to target it? Chase Claypool downfield? Chase Claypool. Give

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit of a Kelvin Benjamin vibe. No, no, no, no,

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>he is I I do not see Kelvin Benjamin. Yeah.

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>I got burned so bad on that hot start that

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Kelvin Benjamin had six years ago, and I'm Kelvin Benjamin

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 1>is going to be awesome. I did not pan out

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>at all. Um behind you know again, I worry about

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>setting up Claypool downfield. Mind a bad offensive line and

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 1>that provides the downside for Claypool only. Other receivers of

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 1>note here, Eric Ebron will be the focal point of

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the tight ends until Pat friar Muth is ready to

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>take over next season. Abron's on the last year of

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 1>his deal. Friar Muth will be the starter next year.

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:47.839
<v Speaker 1>For those of you in Dynasty, and Empire leagues. Um,

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you know the deal on Ebron medium to low volume

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 1>and you're hoping for you get one of his four

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.879
<v Speaker 1>or five touchdowns this season. And this division is so

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 1>each team is so muddled at almost every Asian you

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, like a lot of a lot

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of wide receivers ends. It's an issue. You know. Where

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers aren't muddled. Running back Nag Harris. It will

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>be the Week one starter and likely a workhorse back.

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>He is a true three down back, particularly if if

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>his past blocking improves. And it's not bad, but it's

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>got plenty of him to get better. Harris has no

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>threat on roster to take meaningful carries away from him whatsoever.

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>He has built for goal line use. He will get

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>carries inside the five and that is a huge ticket

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to fantasy success. But there are dangers here. First, um,

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>they need a far more balanced attack than last year

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>when the Steelers through the ball the most times in

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 1>the NFL and they ran the third fewest times. So

0:37:57.560 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>they need to have more of a commitment to the

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>run clear lead and I'm sure they'd like to get

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>back to being more of a balanced attack, but they

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 1>have to for Nagi Harris to be as effective as

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>he could be. And then again, and I hate to

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>keep pounding on this, the offensive line is horrible. Harris

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to have to make his own yards a

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>lot and he's not going to get a lot of help.

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Harris can catch, but will they throw to him. Pittsburgh

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>targeted its runners just eighty one times last year and

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>James Conner was twenty seven among runners last season in targets.

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 1>So how much will they throw to Harris is an

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>open question. You don't want to get too excited about

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the offseason O t a practice videos, but some of

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the Harris footwork it looks good. He looks different than most.

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 1>For sure, he is a good player, and if he

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 1>had landed someplace else, we'd be talking about. Harris is

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially a first rounder had he picked you like a

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 1>perfect landing spot, um, But as it stands, I'm not

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.479
<v Speaker 1>sure that this is it riskiest player at his current

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.320
<v Speaker 1>ADP to me is Juju Smith Schuster. He's wide receiver

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty two in the seventh round, and as I mentioned earlier,

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>hard to be a reliable fantasy producer and you're catching

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the ball at or near the line of scrimmage and

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>doing nothing with it afterwards. And the player with the

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>most upside compared to a DP probably Chase Claypool at

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver twenty nine in the sixth round. And he's

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>got special traits, he's got a big body, contested catches.

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>And if Benn has still got a thirty touchdown season

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 1>left in that arm, or even like a twenty six

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>touchdown season left in that arm, Chase Claypool to me

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>is the odds on favor to catch the most touchdowns

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>on the team. I dig it. Thank you for listening.

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>We've broken down the a f C North next week.

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>A f C what do you want to do? West South?

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Did you say, AMC? No, you hear what you want

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to hear? AMC, AMC to the moon. Not financial advice

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>out there, unless you A f C South sounds good

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>because traditionally it goes east north, alf I think west whatever.

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Uh So we'll do a f C South next week.

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate everybody who listened. Remember to go to Guillotine

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>leagues dot com. We encourage you to check that out

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 1>as well. We'll talk to you next week, everybody, Bye bye.

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of I heart Radio.

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from My heart Radio, visit the i

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.