WEBVTT - Early Look at Week 13 NFL Lines (Ep. 135)

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, Welcome back to the Betting Crows Podcast, brought

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to you by bet MGM. I'm your host, Dan Harris.

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter at Dan Harris eighty.

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>It is entering week thirteen of the NFL season, which

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is crazy. We are here to take an early look

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.159
<v Speaker 1>at the week thirteen NFL lines. Here to do that

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>with me is the co host I will call you

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Bogman of our college football podcast. Here. It is Scott

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Bogman again, you know him from the College Football podcast.

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Is also co host of the Great in This League podcast.

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>You can find him on Twitter at Bogman Sports. Bogman.

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining me today. How you doing, Thank

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>you for having me.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing good.

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, I'm a Longhorns fan and there

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 3>four and seven nine you are, Yeah, yeah exactly.

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 2>That's like the hot tub time machine. What's that about? Yeah?

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 3>The and then Steelers fan. You know, my dad's I'm

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 3>from Texas. My dad's will say, by side of the

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 3>family's from Pittsburgh and they were miserable. So you know,

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 3>but it's okay because the NFL is still playing and

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 3>is still like watching football.

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's all I can do. As a Jets fan,

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>I can say that you know you can still watch

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>the NFL even when everything is going wrong. By the way,

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the joke about Bagman is I hope you're watching this

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>on our YouTube channel YouTube dot com Slash Betting Pros, which,

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you can win a free Saquon Barkley

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>helmet by subscribing and then going to Betting Pros like

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Complash helmet. That's all you need to do, just subscribe.

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And I was joking because Bagman is decked out head

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>to take out, that's right. And Longhorns gear right now,

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>which I'm decked out. You had to tell in like

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>fantas pros and betting pros gear. So that's how I roll.

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>But whatever doesn't matter all right. Early, look at the

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>week thirteen NFL lines. This is at halftime. Actually we

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>were recording this of the Monday night game between Seattle

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and Washington, so we'll obviously have to do a little

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of guesswork here when it comes to those teams

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>next week. First, let me remind you about the latest

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>offer from our sponsor that MGM new customers can bet

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars and win two hundred dollars if your team

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>scores a touchdown when you use the code juice one hundred,

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that's it bet ten dollars and then the NFL team

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to win the game, you win two hundred dollars if

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>your team scores a touchdown in free bets that is

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>available in New Jersey, Colorado, Indiana, West Virginia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Virginia, Iowa, Washington,

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>d C, Arizona, and Wyoming. All right, bogwin Thursday night game,

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we have the Cowboys visiting the Saints. The spread right

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>now is the Cowboys laying five. That's the consensus, but

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 1>there is four and a half. There are five and

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a half's out there, but right now it's five and

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the total is forty seven and a half. Any thoughts

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>on this one?

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, my instant thought is Dallas in the under

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 3>because what we saw offensively from New Orleans on Thanksgiving

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 3>was not great. And Taysom Hill is getting first team

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 3>reps now, so are they going to go to Taysom Hill?

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Is that gonna work? Are we getting Comarica be worse?

0:02:58.240 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Man, it can't be worse.

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 2>It can't be worse. Yeah? Are we getting Kamara back?

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Are we getting Ingram back or is it gonna be

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Tony Jones again, who I thought was going to have

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 3>a pretty decent game and was horrific. So it looked

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 3>like David Johnson out there. You know, maybe the Cowboys

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 3>are going to be down Zeke, but Paullard is a

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 3>great backup. That offense is good, the defense can play

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. Obviously, got a little job done Thanksgiving,

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 3>so they're going to come in a little bit hot

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 3>in this game too. So I like the Cowboys going

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 3>away even in New Orleans.

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's obviously Monday, so we don't have everything.

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I can say. What we heard today. Zeke

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>apparently practiced in full, which was surprising given that we

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:34.679
<v Speaker 1>heard that he was going to be in danger of

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>missing this game. Obviously, the Cowboys are going to be

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>without Mike McCarthy because he tested positive for COVID. We

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Expectedee Lamb to be able to come back, of course,

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and Maari Cooper should be back, and as you mentioned,

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it should be Taysom Hill. Mark Ingram practiced in full.

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara returned to practice but was limited. So we

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know what is happening right now with this game

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever I get. I'm, you know, for a Thursday night game.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll end at you know, at five, around

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>where it is right now. But I agree with you

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>on the under like, that's what it strikes me. Especially

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>with them going to Taysom Hill, there's gonna be a

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>lot more running, a lot more bleeding the clock. I

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think Dallas needs to go crazy. You know. The

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Saints defense, despite what we saw from Buffalo's generally pretty strong.

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm in agreement with you on that one. Let's

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>go now into our Sunday games. Let's start with the

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>wopping Giants visiting the Dolphins. The Dolphins are laying three.

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>The total here is forty one and a half, so

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty low. Obviously, the Giants coming off the big win

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>against Philadelphia. Not sure if it was the Eagles offense

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>or the Giants defense, but obviously the the Eagles were

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>held pretty much in check. The Dolphins meanwhile, riding high.

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>They're up to five and seven. They're in the playoff

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>chase somehow with this. Their defense is playing well. Two

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is playing well. Jayl'wadell's playing well. So what do you

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>think here with the Dolphins laying a field goal at home.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 3>I gotta tell you, Dan, I disrespected the Dolphins last week.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 2>I said, if you.

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Blitz Cam like you blitz Lamar, he's gonna get you apart.

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 3>He's a former MVP. He's gonna throw into the blitz,

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 3>not gonna be able to take him down. Good Lord

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 3>was wrong. He looked god awful. And the Dolphins defense

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 3>looks great. And it seems like ever since they've started

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Javon Holland every single playback there and something that Joe

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 3>and I have talked about on the IDP Show a

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 3>little bit that you know, this team has gotten exponentially better.

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 3>And Holland was a big part of the win against

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Cam Newton and the Panthers. He was the biggest part

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 3>of the win against the Ravens. And this team blitzes

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 3>more than anybody. Danny Dimes not great against the blitz.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna go with Miami to carve up the

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Giants at home.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>It's gotta be right, I mean, And admittedly I thought

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles were going to be able to cover whether

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it was three or three and a half. So maybe

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I disrespected, right, I disrespected the Giants perhaps too much,

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>or maybe I gave too much credit to the Eagles there.

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 3>I think that's more of what it was because I

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 3>picked the Eagles too, and and you know, our boy

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 3>Bubba and I kind of said that, you know, we said, hey,

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 3>look we're both picking the Eagles, so everybody gohe go

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 3>out and get the Giants, right, So, and that's exactly

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 3>how it worked out.

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree, though I think the Dolphins all are

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, relatively legitimate with how well you're benching the

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>defense playing. And again, you know Matt Parol, who owes

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to Daily Juice podcast, we do a last room. He

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>makes fun of me because he calls me a huge

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to a defender I don't love too. It was just

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>we were comparing it to what it looked like with

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Chakobe Brissett, and I said, Tua makes the offense at

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>least a little more competent. Yes, he makes some horrible

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>decisions and he makes some you know, bad interceptions, but overall,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the offense certainly looks more competent with him back there. Yeah,

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. At a field goal, certainly, I

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>like it there, so I would go ahead and take

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it now because I don't see it going under afield

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd be surprised if there was heavy action on the Giants.

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>If anything, I could see it moving up, so I

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>would go ahead and go there. We just talked about

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. They are visiting the New York Jets right now.

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>They're laying six and a half points. The totals forty five.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>We do have obviously some question marks here both quarterbacks. Really,

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jalen Hurts is dealing with a quote sore ankle.

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he ran for seventy seven yards against the Giants.

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how sword could be necessarily, but you've

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>got that. You've got some questions at running back for

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles, given that we don't know if Jordan Howard's

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>going to come back. Miles Sanders suffered an ankle injury

0:06:58.640 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in that game, so he was kind of not really

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it was mostly Boston Scott for the Jets. They do

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>beat the Texans, but you do have you know, Zach

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Wilson sort of, you know, limping around a little bit.

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't look like he's one hundred percent here. Maybe Corey

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Davis doesn't play, So some question marks abound. But under

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown here, six and a half of the Eagles

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>visiting the Jets.

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 2>I hate this game, doan.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I would take the Eagles just because I don't think

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 3>the Jets are a very good team and I think

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Zach Wilson actually makes them worse. I understand that you

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 3>need to start him to get him experience if he's

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 3>healthy enough to do it. I understand that way more

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 3>than starting Joe Flacco. Well, I don't know what the

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 3>hell everything and there. Even though Flacco didn't look bad.

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>But doesn't make it, didn't he never does really what

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>he's with the Jets go on.

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 3>But he's but he's not your answer. So you know, start,

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 3>try Mike White again. Let him go out there. You know,

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 3>That's what I would have done, but you know, I'm not.

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, they both, to be fair, they were both on

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the COVID list, and so maybe the Jets even knew that,

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah at the time, but they named him the

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>starter before that anyway, right right, yeah.

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 3>That was my my whole thing, like, why has Joe

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Flacco started a game for the Jets?

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh that is one hundred percent truy, Yes, yes.

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, just go with your youth because you're not playing

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 3>for this season anyway.

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 2>But I don't Philly is such a mess.

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 3>They don't like Jalen Hurts, which is weird because they

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 3>drafted him. I know this coaching staff didn't. But you know,

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 3>if you don't like him, why are you even giving

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:16.239
<v Speaker 3>him a shot?

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Maybe to drive up his trade value for next season

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 3>or something.

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 3>I just think the Jets are a bad team. So

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the Eagles and lay the points.

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 2>On the road.

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, it did look like, you know, Hurts until this

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>game had been playing very well, and I realized it was,

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a very run heavy offense and everything like that.

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But he was making his throst count. But you know,

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the way I looked at it, bagman is his young quarterback,

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Like he's bound to have games like this, right, and again,

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>they should have won that game had Jalen Rager been

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>able to hold on to any of the touchdown well.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 3>And Smith was wide open on those last two plays too,

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 3>so just throw him the ball.

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>He's pretty good.

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.239
<v Speaker 2>He won a Heisman Trophy, so you know, yeah.

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>So bizarre I would I would go under a touchdown

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>with the Eagles here. Again, you know the fact that

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the Jets beat a crappy Texans team really obviously shouldn't

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>mean much. They did not look good in the game,

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>so I would go with Eagles, But I admit that

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not running out to bet the Eals laying six

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half points at this game, but if I

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>had to go one way, I would go there. Other

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>than that, it's pretty much a stay away from me.

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>How about the Cardinals here visiting the Bears. The Cardinals

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>are off of bye. They should get Kyler Murray back.

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>They hopefully will get DeAndre Hopkins back. Although Cliff Kingsbury

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>was noncommittal on both, seemed to suggest optimism with it.

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I expect Andy Dalton to continue to start here for

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bears. I don't know if Justin Field is gonna

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 1>be back. I don't know if Alon Robinson's going to

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>be back. They obviously have a little bit of an extra,

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, layoff here because of the Thanksgiving game. So

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in this game they're laying against seven and a half

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals and you've got the total at forty five

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Any feelings here.

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Cardinals big.

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 3>I think the Cardinals are a really really good team

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 3>this year and the Bears are really really bad.

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I think that's.

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Simply what it comes down to I think I would

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 3>lay the seven if Colt McCoy starts this game with

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 3>two weeks of rest, you know, with the weapons that

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 3>the Cardinals have against the weapons that the Bears have,

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 3>and the Bears are a team that is seemingly packing

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 3>it in. Yes, they barely beat They barely barely beat

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Detroit on Thanksgiving. That should have been a loss for

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 3>them most likely. But the Cardinals, I mean, I don't

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 3>believe any of these Kingsbury to.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 2>OEU like Kingsbury.

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Kingsbury has He's in the NFL and he has the

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 3>best ou quarterback of the last ten years already, So

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 3>why would he want to, you know, take a step down.

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 3>So I guess maybe for job security and that type

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 3>of stuff because the NFL, you know, not for long.

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 2>It's what that stands for.

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 3>But I'll take I'll take the Cardinals their defense too

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 3>against Andy Dalton. I think just on that alone, I'm

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 3>not really worried about what the offense is or how Hopkins,

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 3>how healthy Hopkins or Murray are, because I think they

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 3>beat the breaks off the Bears without Murray or Hopkins.

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 2>So I'll lay the points. Take the cards here.

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So you did say seven, just to be clear, it's

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. Doesn't matter to you though, right?

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Like what?

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>So okay, very good. How about the Vikings visiting the Lions.

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings now are laying seven and the total is

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>forty six and a half. The one thing we if

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>we know something for sure, it's that the starting running

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>backs for both teams are not going to play in

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this game. Dalvin Cook can have missed a few games

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 1>here with the shoulder. DeAndre Swift almost certainly out here

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>with the shoulder injury. So it's the backups that Shamal Williams,

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it's Alexander Madison. What do you think here? Divisional game?

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Obviously laying seven? But in fact, hold on, hold on,

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>hold on, Bagwin. I think you've been on the show

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>one time before, I think, and I think it was

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings, and I don't know if it was ten

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Lions or if it was seven, but I

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>know you were all over the Vikings in that game,

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>if memory serves, Is that right? Does that sound right?

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean that does sound like me? So okay, but

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 3>but look the Lions. Uh, you know, the Lions play hard,

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 3>so it's hard to pick against them. But it seems

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 3>like every week it's one more piece of that team

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 3>goes down, you know. And they haven't won a game,

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 3>but they're pretty good against the spread. So and they're

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 3>at home here and they had extra rest. So I'll

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 3>say this, I ain't gonna be betting this game. I'll

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 3>just say that just straight out. I will not be

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 3>laying my money on this game at all. I'll take

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 3>the Lions against the spread. Give me the Lions at

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 3>home and the points against the Vikings. I think the

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Vikings are an exponentially better team, but for whatever reason,

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 3>they you know, they're five and six for a reason.

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Two.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, the Lions are zero to ten, but they've

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 3>been in the last three games that they've played. I

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 3>think I don't think they're gonna win this game, but

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I think they can not lose by more than seven,

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 3>So let's get them. I think this is like a

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 3>four or five point game.

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 2>God.

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 3>I the Vikings defense just doesn't do anything for me

0:12:56.280 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 3>right now. The secondary is not great and the line,

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, losing Hunter, losing Griffin, they're going to get

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 3>run on. So Jamal Williams is healthy. I think they're

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 3>going to get run on a little bit so I

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 3>think this is a you know, under and take the

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 3>home team.

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, okay, because I you know, for me, I thought,

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the lines are going to be

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>able to put up some points here, and I realize

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll probably be able to run it, but I think

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>they will be able to pass as well. So I

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of lean the over interesting because I do think

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that the Vikings are going to be able to put

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>up points here. The Vikings are weird, man. They come

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>out and half the time you're like, this team could

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>put up forty five points if they wanted to right now.

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Right they got Kirks Kirk it is Kirk and they're

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 3>putting up points. You get bad Kirk and they're in

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 3>the game with whoever they're playing.

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's also something that like good Kirk isn't like

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I got good Kirk this game. It's like I got

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>good Kirk on this drive. I got bad Kirk on

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the next time drive. Yeah, that's the problem that you

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>can never really rely. That's why I can't take the

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Vikings at this point, because I just don't know who's

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>going to try. I mean, the Vikings obviously are motivated.

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>They're five and six. That is in the thick. Now,

0:13:57.880 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you know you got seven playoff teams, that's in the thick.

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>They this win, you assume they'll come out. But yeah,

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the Lions just play hard wherever they are, Like, I

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>root for them to get a win. So I actually

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 1>do think there's going to be scoring in this game.

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>So I actually kind of lean a little bit towards

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the overend this one. Not crazy, though, you lean a

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit towards the under How about the Colts visiting

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the Texans. Tough loss here for the Colts. They are

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>laying eight and a half, the totals forty six. I

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>imagine you're gonna see quite a few Jonathan Taylor carries

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in this game, given all the talk here about how

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Frank Rake coach that game. The Texans obviously coming off

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a bad loss to the Jets. Torod Taylor will start

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in this game, according to coach. So what do you

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>think here? Bagwin? Eight and a half is a big number,

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>but you think the Colts can cover it?

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 2>I do not care.

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 3>I think the Colts are the second best team in

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 3>the AFC right now. They went toe to toe with

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Tampa Bay, and yes they lost, and they were at home,

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 3>but Tampa Bay is the best team in the NFL,

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 3>I think, so at least the most complete team. So

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the Colts. I'll lay the points. I think

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 3>this is a stomping. You know, the Texans are uninspired

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 3>right now. They've got nothing. They've released their best running back,

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, releasing Philip Lindsay. I think he was the

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 3>best RB on that roster left, So I don't know

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 3>what the hell they're doing right now. In terms of

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 3>fantasy there's just no one to start on this team either,

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Like even Brandon Cooks is getting less targets, which brought

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 3>out there. So I got to take the Colts and

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I'll lay the points and I'll take the under two.

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I will. I will also go with the Colts. The cult.

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>The issue with the Cults that they have this incredible

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>ability just to not put away games like that, like

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>absolutely ridiculous. How they they just can't finish skims. There

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>are times you watch them and they're winning a game

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>by you know, two touchdowns, and then they just take

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>their foot off the gas, which I would worry about

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>here if the Texans weren't so terrible. And I think

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that they can do that, and you know, not put

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>their foot on the throat and still in the end

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>cover this game, you know at eight and a half,

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So I like it there as well. How about the

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Bucks visiting the Falcons. They are laying eleven. The total

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is fifty and a half on the spread, so you've

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>got obviously the Bucks. You know, they come back, they

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>win this game. The running game looks great, Gronk looks great.

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>They probably will get Antonio Brown back here, although there's

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously a little bit of a question mark for the Falcons.

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>They get back Cordero Patterson. That certainly helps the way

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>their you know, offense looks as a whole. Not a

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>dominant performance against Jacksonville or anything like that. Kyle Pitts

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>hasn't done anything in five weeks, so you know, who knows.

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>But a divisional game, Falcons hanging on to the edge

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of the playoff race, eleven points, bot win. What do

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you think I'm laying it?

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 3>This is not a week of great games, right, This

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 3>is a betting week. So you got to pick a

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 3>side and roll with it. That's what you have to

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 3>do this week because there are a lot of lopsided

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 3>games it looks like, and this is definitely the biggest

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 3>one of them. I'm going to take Tampa Bay lay

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 3>the points. And I know people are going to point

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 3>out that look earlier in the year, Atlanta played Tampa

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Bay Hart and came back on them and put up

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 3>some points, and I understand that, but they also that

0:16:54.120 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Calvin Ridley they had a healthier team. This the Bucks

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 3>coming off that buy and putting up thirty eight on

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 3>the Colts is just showing me that they're at their

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 3>peak right now. So, especially if Antonio Brown comes back,

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I think they're gonna steamroll Atlanta.

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 2>I'll take the Bucks.

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 3>I'll also take the over because I think we will

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 3>get a little bit of that back door right of

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta pushing in the second half because they're gonna scrap

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 3>the run and just pass. And so I'll go with

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Tampa Bay, but I'll also go with the Over.

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm with you on both. Actually, Bogwin, I do

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>think that this is a game that Tampa makes a

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a statement here, especially like we said,

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>if Brown is back. But yeah, I mean Brady didn't

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>even play that well. They still put up thirty eight points,

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, on a good defense, So it really was

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.959
<v Speaker 1>an impressive thing. I think the Bucks get rolling here

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>as well, and I agree with you that I could

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>see the Falcons basically putting up some garbage time points

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>even if they can't eventually cover the spread enough to

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>get to the over. So we're on the same side

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of that one. This one I am interested to watch here.

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>It is the Chargers are visiting the Bengals. The Bengals

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>here at home are lay The total is fifty and

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a half. Bogman. The game that I probably liked the

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>most last week was the Steelers getting the four and

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>a half from the Bengals, which was blown out of

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the water five minutes into that game. The Bengals are

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a team that I fade every single time, and they

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>just make me look stupid for the most part, other

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>than that game against the Browns, which I faded them correctly.

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers are a little Doctor Jekyl and mister Hyde.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't know what you're going to get from them in

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>any given week. How do you handicap this one again?

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals laying three at home in the total of

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty and a half.

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Why like what the Bengals have done since their bye

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 3>week is really refocus on the run game. And give

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 3>the ball to Joe Mixon, who you know. You have

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Jamar Chase, you have Teagans, you have Joe Burrow, c

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 3>j Uzama is a great pass catcher, and Tyler Boyd

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 3>would be in number one or number two on a

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 3>lot of teams. So the offense is good, but it

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 3>needs to run through Joe Mixon. Everything works through him.

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 3>And we saw it against the Raiders, we saw it

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 3>against the Steelers. How about we see him against the

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 3>worst rush defense in the NFL in the Chargers. Justin

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 3>Herbert isn't playing good ball right now. He's kind of

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it's a ball or if he's

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 3>been readjusted on or what has been happening with him,

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 3>but he's been making some bad decisions. I'll take the

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Bengals and lay the three points at home in the

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 3>jungle for them, and I'll take the over in this

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 3>game because I think the Chargers aren't gonna put up points.

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 3>The Bengals defense is the one thing. You know, they're

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 3>very you know, like Kirk Cousins. Sometimes they play really well,

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 3>sometimes they play really bad. But I like the over

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 3>here and I will take the Bengals.

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I lean towards the Bengals as well.

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the big deal is with Herbert. I just

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's the offense that he's in at this point.

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>I feel like last year's offense with Anthony Lynn was

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>very cub friendly. This one's a little more complicated, and

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have these days where he looks good and

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have plenty of days where he looks bad.

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I lean the Bengals right now. I don't

0:19:57.960 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>have a great feeling about it again, just because I

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>feel like the Bengals. I've constantly felt the Bengals are overrated.

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>So for them to basically, you know, be a favorite

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>against the decent Chargers team troubles me. But at the

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>same time, if I have to go in a way,

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I am going that way. Let's go to the Rams

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>laying twelve and a half, who at home against the

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville Jaguars and the total forty eight. I feel like

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>all the quote smart money will be like, well, you

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>got to back the Jags. I mean, this is sort

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of what it is like it is every week, but

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I can never back the Jags essentially, So what do

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you think you're at twelve and a half.

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not taking the Jags, so they just the

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 3>offense cannot put up points their last couple of games

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 3>here fourteen against the Falcons, ten against the Niners, seventeen

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 3>against the Colts, since nine against the Bills nine was

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the win. But they have to stop an offense to

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 3>win a game here, and they're not stopping the Rams

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 3>at all. So I would lay the points here. I

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 3>hate this over, I ain't touching it, but I will

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 3>take the Rams and lay the points.

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm definitely avoiding the total. I lean the Rams

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>as well, just because again it's really difficult to see

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>how they are going to stop this team, the Jaguars

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in the end. Even though the Jaguars defense has as

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a whole play better. They have played better of late,

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>probably last like four or five weeks. But I mean

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>even Atlanta, you know, they put up twenty one. They

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>could have put up more if they needed to. And

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>I do think again that the Rams they need to

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>win now. They are sliding obviously, so they need to

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>come out. They need to make a statement with both

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>their offense and their defense, and I think they do here.

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a get right spot for them at home so

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. Even with the big spread, I

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>will lay it. How about the Washington football team visiting

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. The Raiders currently are laying two and a

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>half points. The total is forty nine. Again, we are

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>recording this in the middle of Monday night football, so

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>who knows what happens right now. Washington did just hope

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not spoiling anything. They did just take the lead

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>on a touchdown here, so you know two and a half.

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 1>This might be very different when you look at it

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and you listen to this podcast. But as of right now,

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders at home two and a half total forty nine.

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Who is making this schedule, by the way, like they've

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 3>been really good about the schedule. But then you get

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders who played on Thursday versus is Washington who

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 3>played on Monday. Doesn't seem to fair to me. I'll

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 3>take the Raiders because of that. I think Washington's gonna

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 3>have less rest. I think, you know, the Raiders at home.

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 3>Of course, they may be down Waller, but Foster Morrow

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 3>is a pretty good replacement. I don't particularly care for

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 3>either one of these defenses, but I think if you

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 3>give Derek Carr a little bit of time to prep

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 3>for this game. He can carve somebody up. So this

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Washington football team, I almost said it, defense has been

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 3>playing much much better since their bye week, so they

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 3>have been a little more what we expected in the

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 3>beginning of the season versus what we actually got, which

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 3>was the worst pass defense in the NFL, and you know,

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 3>just bad matchups for them.

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 2>But I like the Raiders here.

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 3>I think their defense isn't great, but they can bow

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 3>up every once in a while. A lot of replacement

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 3>on that Washington offensive line, particularly at the center spot

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 3>there mentioned today.

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 2>I think they're down the third or fourth.

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Guy here, So I'll take I'll take the Raiders at

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 3>home and lay the two and a half the total.

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't I'm not gonna have a good lean either way,

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 3>but I would go under.

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Does it matter to you whether or not Darren Waller

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>plays in this game because he is deemed weak to

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>week with the strained it band or whatever it is.

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't suit up here, I think that's what

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it is. That right? Did I make that up something?

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 2>And it sounds like something for my car, so.

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I may have made it up entirely, but I did

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>see he was weak too weak today, So I mean,

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>but again, he may play this week. And again they

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>did not think that it was particularly a bad injury

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. Yeah, something with his knee, ye

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>or something.

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it does matter. Obviously, Waller matters. But I'll

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 3>say I like Foster Moro as a replacement. You know, yeah,

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 3>he's a good receiving tight end, not the greatest blocker.

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 3>But I also like what they've been doing on offense

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 3>more going to Josh Jacobs and relying on him more.

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why they went away from that so

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 3>much in the beginning of the season. Jacobs is a

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 3>good back, and I know he's a little banged up

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 3>and all that stuff, but if he was that banged up,

0:23:58.200 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 3>then give him some weeks off.

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 2>Don't give him the all ten times. Never understood that.

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 3>So I like the Raiders in this game. I think

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 3>they go to Jacobs more. You rely on Waller in

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 3>the passing game less, and uh, you know, Washington gets

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 3>way less rest than they do.

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>So give me the Raiders and you did see again

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Jackson get more involved here in this game, which

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>they really need to do to be able to open

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>up the field a little bit more, at least throw

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.239
<v Speaker 1>a couple his correct You gotta show you got It's

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a show me. We always say, you know, give me

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a right, give me, give me a show me. You

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>know pitch in baseball, right, just yeah, show me change up,

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>just so we know that you have this in your arsenal,

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>so I can at least have it in the back

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of my mind. That's what they need to do. They

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>did in this most recent game. And again coming off

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>that big win there, let's go to the Ravens visiting

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>your Steelers. The Ravens are laying three and a half.

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>The total is forty four. I mean, bogwin, it's your team.

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I again, I thought that they would cover that spot.

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a Tomlin spot, the underdog. Nobody believes in us.

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>We the Bengals embarrassed us in the first game. Let's

0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>show up here, and they were getting a little hell

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>there on defense. TJ. Watt was placed on the COVID

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>list today, so obviously that's going to be a big loss,

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>assuming that he can't come back from that. The Ravens,

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you know Lamarthro's four intercepsions, but they still win the game.

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about this one?

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that the Ravens are going to destroy my

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Steelers this week. And I do not say that with

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 3>any joy, and I hope I'm wrong. But the Steelers

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 3>defense got blueprinted against Detroit in that overtime tie. They

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 3>ran the ball and it was all because this wasn't

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 3>their game plan going in. Jared Goff got hurt, and

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 3>they said, we'll just run it all day, and they did,

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 3>and they ran for over two hundred yards. And then

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 3>the next week Steelers give up a ton of yards.

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 3>And this weekend Cincinnati, they give up a ton of

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 3>yards to Joe Mixon. So I expect Lamar and Freeman

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 3>and Murray and you know, probably a pitcher two to

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Duverney and Marcus Brown and those guys. I expect them

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 3>to run the ball down the Steelers throat, especially if TJ.

0:25:58.200 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Watt is not there.

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 3>So you know, the Steelers defense has had a lot

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 3>of injuries, but even Devin Bush is bad. He is

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 3>not healthy from his knee injury. You know, Joe Shobert

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 3>is okay, but he can't be in six places at once.

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 3>You have one of the best playmaking free safeties. Ryan

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Clark talked about this today and he's basically a fifth

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 3>linebacker because no one up front is making the tackles.

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 3>So it's a mess in Pittsburgh on the defensive side

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 3>right now, which we've known it's a mess on the

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 3>offensive side the whole year. But you know, you're bad

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 3>on both sides of the ball. It makes for a

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 3>pretty bad team. So give me Baltimore and I will

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 3>lay the three and a half and the under because

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers.

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Are I, you know, the total. I don't have a

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>great sense of yet. I would lean the undervad you,

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>but I don't see how you avoid the Ravens here, Like,

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean that the Steelers look absolutely terrible, Like just

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>everything about them looks terrible. And you're right their defense,

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, but their offense also looks completely out of sync.

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 1>And it's not like you have any alternative to go

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to because he can't go to Mason Rudoff or anything

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.439
<v Speaker 1>like that. But I mean, Ben looks it's.

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Just people want them to go to Mason Rudolph. I

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 3>was like, did you watch him play the game? He

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 3>is work like I'll take fifty Prothlisberger all so hey

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 3>sold I and Rudolph.

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because again we saw in the Chargers game at

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>least like he's capable of sort of, you know, making

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>things happen once in a while. I don't really think Rudolph is.

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But still at this point, you know, with as bad

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 1>as the Ravens looked in that game, I still think

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>they come out and I still think they kind of

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>boat race the Steelers a little bit in this one.

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So I agree with you here. How about the forty

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>nine Ers visiting the Seahawks. They are laying two and

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a half. The total is forty six and a half. Again,

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>they're playing right now. I mean, you know, we're just

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>at a halftime here, Bogman, but watching Russ does not

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>look back. Okay, hopefully he does not look back at all.

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>He looks terrible. They look terrible. So I imagine that

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:44.959
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be two and a half by

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the time people listen to this. I could be yeah, yeah, I.

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Think you're right, dude.

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 3>This uh, this Seahawks team, we know they're bout on defense.

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 2>They have been all year.

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Even though Jamal Adams got his second pick of the year,

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, uh, and he is now past Vince will

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.959
<v Speaker 3>Form in career interceptions at four. By the way, so

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 3>congratulations to Jamal Adams. But yeah, Russ doesn't look right,

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 3>and ye know the defense is bad. It's kind of

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 3>like what we were talking about with Pittsburgh, right, we

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 3>know the defense is bad, your offense doesn't look right.

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Carson has done for the year. They haven't figured out

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 3>this run game yet. You gotta take the Niners. They're

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 3>on a heater. They did just lose their best player

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 3>for a h two in Deebo, and that is very,

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 3>very unfortunate because Deebo is the most fun player to

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 3>watch in the NFL. Like you know, I loved him

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 3>coming out of South Carolina as happy he went to

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the Niners. So the Welsh and I could both love him,

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 3>right because he's a huge Niner fan. So, but I

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 3>think Eli Mitchell and Jimmy g has been playing well.

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Iyaka is back in this game. They're gonna have to

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 3>utilize kittlemore. Kittle has to play better, but I think

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 3>they have enough juice on offense and defense. Like you said,

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 3>I think this number is gonna be bigger in a day,

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 3>so by the end of the week, it's gonna be

0:28:57.680 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 3>pretty big. So I would get in on the Niners.

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, yeah, I agree, and you know without Deebo. It's

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>weird with Deebo because he has been such a huge

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>part of their offense over the last especially the whole year.

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>But the last two games is two catches. That's so bizarre.

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>He's just doing it all on the ground as a

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>running back, right like NonStop, and he really does add

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a layer. Thing with Kittle is. I was joking about

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it with some guys here, just like it would be

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.239
<v Speaker 1>so much better for his you know, for people who

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>play fantasy for his fantasy value, if he wasn't such

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>an elite blocker that he's just I mean, you just

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>watch him in any of this run game. But their

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>run game is working. Garoppolo is playing well. Now that

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>could end on a dime, you know, but they're just

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 1>playing way too well right now. I think they're on

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a roll here. They sense that playoff Berth. I think

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they're going for it. I think they win pretty easily

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>right now. The Seahawks. I mean, maybe they do win

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>this game, Bogman, they're down right now, but you know,

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>regardless they have I'm impressive.

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Russell would have to show a lot in the

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 3>last quarter and a half here or whatever. We have

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 3>in this game for me to be convinced that he

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 3>is back, because he had one huge play locket when

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 3>he was absurdly open, just no one was around him.

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 3>And you know, one one touchdown drive that's just not

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 3>gonna get it done. Washington's defense been playing better, not

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 3>that good though.

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I agree with you. Sunday Night football, Broncos

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>are visiting the Chiefs. Chiefs are laying ten. The total

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is forty seven bogwin.

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 3>What do you think, Well, I think I'm not touching

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 3>it is what i'd say at this point in the week,

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 3>because everything adds up.

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs look good on.

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Offense, they look good on defense, but for whatever reason,

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 3>you get them in this rivalry game in particular, and

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 3>these teams play each other tough. When the Broncos are good,

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs play them tough. When the Chiefs are good,

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos play them tough. So I won't mess with it.

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 3>If I had to pick, I would take the Broncos

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 3>and the ten going to arrowhead the over, I mean

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 3>in a Kansas City game, I just still I'm gonna

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 3>take the over, which.

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't hit a lot.

0:30:57.920 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Correct.

0:30:58.320 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, you feel like.

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 3>An idiot if you don't take it, you're like, of course,

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City scored thirty five in the first half, what

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 3>was I thinking by taking this under? So I'm more

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 3>confident than that. But I'll take I'll take the Broncos

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 3>and lay the points just because I've seen this game

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 3>play out this way.

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think the problem again with the Chiefs is well,

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm joking about the overs because yeah, you can take

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the under and then it you know, four seconds in,

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it can be over because of just how quickly they

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>can score. But I agree that the spread just for

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a divisional game like this, for two teams that know

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>each other well, with the Chiefs again still not being

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>like back, like they're not fully sort of what they

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>were at their apex or anything like that, even with

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Edwards a layer back ten just seems too much for

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>me at this point for a Broncos team that you know,

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>just kind of whooped on the Chargers a little bit,

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:45.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, and the divisional game, it strikes me as

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>too much. I'm not running out to bet at Bogman

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>right but if I had to right now, I would

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.239
<v Speaker 1>take the points here, the ten points and just sort of,

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, hope that they keep it close to this point.

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Are the Chiefs? Are the Chiefs the best team in

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 2>the AFC?

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Maybe I don't. I don't want to.

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Who else would it be? Bogwin, If you say the.

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's them podcast, I think it's them, the

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Cults and the Bills right now, that's okay?

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, i'd pick between, so you wouldn't take the Patriots?

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Who leads us into our next game? The Patriots on

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night Football visiting the Bills. The total is forty four.

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>The Bills are laying a field goal at home. Bogmin,

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>talk me through it.

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, another game that I'm not running out to bet.

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 3>I'll say that I'll take the Bills at home here,

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 3>and I think we've seen a little bit better. But

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 3>it seems like with the Bills they take two steps forward,

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 3>one step back, two steps forward, one step back.

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Is this their step back game? Or is this the

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:43.719
<v Speaker 2>you know?

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 3>All right, Look, we're tired of Mac Jones, so we're

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 3>gonna just blitz the crap out of him and make

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 3>him beat us. You know, we're gonna stop the run.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna make Mac beat us. And if they beat us,

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 3>then fine, I mean they just lost Trey White. That's

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 3>huge for the Bills. You know, Trey White the best

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 3>second in a good secondary, so that is a big

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 3>piece that they lose. But the Patriots aren't beating people

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 3>on offense or beating people on defensive skillect.

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 2>And maybe they will. They'll stop Josh Allen.

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 3>We saw the jag stop him, right, and I get it,

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 3>But I think it's more about Josh Allen stopping Josh

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Allen and making bad decisions than it is about being

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 3>schemed up because if he gets rolling, there's nobody that

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 3>can stop him. It's just like Patrick Mahomes right, he

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 3>is the guy that stops himself. So I think Buffalo

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 3>wins this game at home. I don't like it, not

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 3>going to touch it right now. If we get more

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 3>news about stuff later in the week, maybe I'll make

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 3>a a harder line decision. But right now, go to

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 3>my head, I take Buffalo and I take the under,

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 3>because both these defenses can play well.

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I would take the under for sure. That is the

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>way I lean at forty four, and I lean the

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Bills for a few reasons. Number One, again, I do

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>not think the Patriots are quite as good as they

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>have shown. I mean, I think that they've had some

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>soft opponents, and again, you face Tennessee, you can't say

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>they're soft opponent by any means. But obviously they were

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>playing without anybody on offense here week last week and

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>just watching you know, Mac Jones, and I was listening

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to it. At one point I had to leave my

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 1>house for I don't know, like twenty minutes or something,

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and in the middle of it, I'm listening to the

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>game on the radio and they're talking about how Mac

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Jones went through a period where he looked really confused,

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like there was like a couple of drives in the

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 1>middle of the game, I think early in the second

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>half or something where he just basically looked like a

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>rookie quarterback where he was overprocessing, he couldn't sort of

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>do it. And I really do think like Jones has

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>played really well when he has, but he's played well

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:36.919
<v Speaker 1>because the game has made so simple for the way

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of they've laid it out, because they're so successful

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 1>running the ball, because the defense is playing so well.

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's see how that works against the Bills in Buffalo,

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. As it gets colder with

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a raucous crowd on Monday night football. I just don't

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>see them going in there and winning that game for me.

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So if it's three, if it's less than three, certainly

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I would take And I think it ends at three.

0:34:57.400 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Boggs like, I don't. I don't see this moving. You know,

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 1>it could move. Have a point, I guess, depending on

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:03.399
<v Speaker 1>which way the money comes in. But three feels right

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>even the match team team right. Three. I take it

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>at three. I think the Bills win here and again,

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>so you know, if it's field goal or less, I

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 1>would be willing to take it. But yeah, I hope.

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So again you most people know I live in New England.

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I married it to a Patriots family. My life has

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>been relatively unbearable for the last like twenty years, so

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's hope for my own bristles like that.

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>That's how it goes. Bogwin. I'm so glad you can

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>fit me in. I know you have seventeen more podcasts

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to do tonight already. It's ten twenty here in the

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 1>East Coast, so I'm glad I'll let you go to it.

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Just remind everybody where they can find you.

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you can find all my work on my Twitter

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 3>app Bogwin Sports. You go to in this league dot com,

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 3>check out the ITL Patreon. Joe and I do the

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Betting Pros College Football Show every single week. We do

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 3>the IDP Show for subscribers every single week as well.

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 3>I write an article for Betting Pros every week as well,

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:54.439
<v Speaker 3>so please check those out. And yeah, I'm online star

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 3>as well sports Grid. Like, like Danny said here, I've

0:35:57.840 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 3>got eight million podcasts now NonStop.

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you like my voice? You can hear it all

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the time.

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I do. I do like your angelic voice. But I

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 1>do appreciate you coming on again. I like talking to

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 1>you anyway. Yeah, oh of course you do great work.

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, let's hope there are some winners right now,

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, this is this is time for some betting

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.240
<v Speaker 1>this weekend in these football games for sure. So everybody,

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining us again. The Bogman will be

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 1>back with Joe on the College Football Betting Podcast, and

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I will back later this week giving our three best

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>bets of Week thirteen of the NFL season. I'll talk

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to you again then