WEBVTT - CFTC Chairman Rostin Behnam Talks Cryptocurrencies, AI

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News.

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:09.160
<v Speaker 2>We do want to talk a little bit about what's

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 2>going on in the regulatory space when it comes to

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 2>cryptocurrencies and much more. It was a recent IMF working

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 2>paper that found that crypto mining could generate about sevent

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>tens percent of global carbon dioxide missions emissions by twenty

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven. We talk about crypto mining and the impact

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 2>it has on the environment.

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, indeed, and look, it's one of those key issues

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that we're thinking about as this issue, as this sector

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in crypto has been the focus of so much attention.

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>It's come up repeatedly in the presidential race this year

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>as well. It's just one of the many issues that

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>we want to get into with the Chairman of the

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>US Commodity Futures Training Commission at Russian benham Ross, who

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>joins us with us here in the Plaza Hotel Russ.

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Great to see you, Thanks so much, welcome for joining us. Look,

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about climate issues first, and this is why

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we're thinking about the impact of crypto, but also more broadly,

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>this is an area that you have lots of tentacles

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in your regulatory position.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us about the question.

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Of environmental impact when it comes to crypto, where are

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we thinking about regulation of Ryan Bosch, What sort of

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>rules are needed, what does the THEFTC have power over.

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, before we even get to the climate impact of

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 4>crypto and crypto mining, I think the larger question in

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 4>the US is the regulatory structure, or really the lack

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 4>of one. I've advocated for almost three years now that

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 4>there's a gap in regulation, and this is just a

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 4>product of the way the US regulatory.

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 3>System is set up.

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Multiple agencies, couple market regulators banking regulators, and for better

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 4>or for worse, we've seen a sustainability in the marketplace,

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 4>sustained demand by customers, both retail and institutional, and really

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 4>what we have to do is make sure that we

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 4>regulate it properly so that customers are protected.

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Market stability is their market resiliency.

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 4>If we can get there, and I think that would

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 4>be my priority, then I think the conversations about climate

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 4>impact energy usage for mining are important to ask an answer,

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 4>and I think those have been actually within the domain

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 4>of questions asked over the past couple of years. A

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 4>couple efforts by some of the miners to co locate

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 4>near power sources that are renewable or even nuclear, some

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 4>other efforts to change the way mining is done to.

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Reduce the carbon footprint.

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 4>But as we worked with Congress over the past couple

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 4>of years to think about legislative efforts, I know this

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 4>issue specifically was on their mind, and they wanted to

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 4>think about disclosures, transparency, information to get to the market

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 4>so that those economic incentives and preferences can essentially be

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 4>manifest through decisions about what tokens to buy or not buy.

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, and the energy component so much an important aspect

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 2>of the reliability right making sure that it continues to work.

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to the regulatory side. Donald

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Trump has kind of come out and said he's a

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 2>friend of crypto. It seems like Kamala Harris's campaign is

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 2>increasingly embracing towards the crypto world. In terms of your

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 2>push for more oversight of the crypto world, Would you

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 2>continue to do so under a Harris administration?

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I just to be no matter who.

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and as friendly as they might be.

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, to be clear, it's oversight driven by regulatory protection

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 4>and customer protections. This is not me as chair of

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 4>the CFTC advocating for the industry saying that crypto is

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 4>going to be the next great thing.

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 3>This is about my observation as the head.

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 4>Of a market regulator, saying there is a giant gap

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 4>in regulation. There are a lot of customers who are

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 4>either uninformed or don't really know the associated risks with crypto,

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 4>and we have to put the guardrails around this industry.

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 4>And those guardrails are the same guardrails that we put

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 4>around equity markets, derivatives markets, fixed income markets, et cetera.

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 4>No different, no different, but we have to think about Look,

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 4>there are going to be differences on custody, cybersecurity. There

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 4>are components of the financial asset digital assets themselves that

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 4>are very unique from securities or derivatives.

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 3>There's no doubt about that.

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 4>But if we think broadly from a principles based standpoint,

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 4>the markets structure components that have been put in place

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 4>for decades and have worked quite well for US markets

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 4>are the same ones we need to think about for

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 4>digital assets because there's a lot of questions about the

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 4>sustainability of digital assets. But here we are twenty twenty four,

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 4>moving into twenty twenty five FTX, other crises finance a

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 4>lot that we have brought on the enforcement side, and

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 4>there is still I don't know about insatiable demand, but

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 4>there is still demand from retail and institutional and they're

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 4>looking for regulatory structure so that they can increase those flows.

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>How open is the industry to regulation. I mean, it's

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously a conversation that's ongoing, and you've outlined the complexity

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of how the different agencies work in this front as well.

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Are they engaging?

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Is this something that you're actually able to see productive

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>results that won't end open a risk of overregulation.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 4>So this is really the tricky part of this because

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 4>I think I argue this often the US capital markets

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 4>are the best in the world because of the regulatory

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 4>structure we have, because of the legal structure we have,

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 4>because of the accountability there is is for bad actors

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 4>and those who violate the law.

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 3>So there are many actors.

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 4>I can't speak for the entire crypto community, but there

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 4>are many who have been very engaged with Washington, both

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 4>in Congress and the executive branch, to see what kind

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 4>of regulatory structure could work around digital assets. Will this

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 4>benefit them most likely? I've said this publicly in the past. Again,

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 4>to my point, US regulation is the reason in part

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 4>why US capital markets are the strongest, deepest, and most

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 4>liquid in the world, So they see a benefit to regulation.

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 3>The word often thrown around is legitimacy.

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 4>But again I want to pull back to what my

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 4>responsibilities are, Protecting customers, protecting market resiliency and in essence

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 4>sometimes financial stability. And as I continue to see this

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 4>market EBB and flow and go through it's sort of

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 4>organic growth, I can't help but raise a red flag

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 4>and say, look, we're seeing this market grow.

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 3>We need to protect customers.

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 2>That's what would you say in terms of the powers

0:05:56.040 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>that are necessary in order for any kind of over

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 2>crypto by the CFTC to really work.

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this is a unique part, like we have two

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 4>market regulators CFTC SEC.

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 3>There is a question about around some tokens.

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 4>I've articulated and advocated that bigcoin and ether are commodities

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 4>under existing law.

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Congress wants to change existing law. That's we still debate.

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Sure, but look, we've brought a lot of enforcement cases

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 4>and we bring them through. You know, the authority we

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 4>have over commodity assets, which in many cases is bitcoin

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 4>and ethereum, but ultimately it's registration of exchanges, it's registration

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 4>of broker dealers, it's registration of custodians, clearing houses, data repositories,

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 4>the same again, core components and core regulatory tools that

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 4>we use, and with those registration requirements come ability to

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 4>surveil markets, ability to collect data, and ability to examine

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 4>market participants.

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>What is from what you're hearing from the election compaign

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>because we ask about it, because it's coming up with

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>alarming regularity, someone would say, in how often it's mentioned,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>what are you hearing that sounds like a good idea

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>or that sounds like a bad idea in terms of

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>where regular regulation should be going from here.

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 4>So, look, we don't want to undermine existing law. We

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 4>don't want to change existing protections that exist for markets

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 4>like derivatives like stocks and bonds.

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 3>We want to.

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 4>Apply what we've learned and what we have in terms

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 4>of authority to regulate markets to crypto. And it's about engagement.

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 4>It's about understanding what the technology is. It's understanding what

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 4>new risks or new variations on existing regulatory tools we

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 4>would have to apply. But I often go and I've

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 4>had conversations with lawmakers in both the Senate the House.

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 4>There have been a lot of really interesting efforts and

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 4>credit to those who have led the way in both

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 4>the House and the Senate to draft bills to contemplate

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 4>giving the CFDC the authority. It's a unique circumstance where

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 4>the CFTC regularly it's commodity derivatives markets, but not the

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 4>underlying market. So we have this gap in commodity cash

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 4>markets or spot markets, and this is where we find

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 4>ourselves with digital assets, all right, So.

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 2>We're still trying to figure out digital assets. We throw

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence into the mix, right increasingly, not new finance

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 2>community has been using it for a long time. I

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 2>do wonder if you guys are planning what tools you

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 2>need to have in place to kind of oversee that aspect.

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, it's important question.

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 4>And at this point, almost nine or ten months ago,

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 4>we put out an advisory, a request for comment, a

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 4>consultation document, and in my mind, the steps we needed

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 4>to take as an agency was one information gathering, engagement,

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 4>getting better and smarter ourselves so that we can think

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 4>about what existing rules apply to AI and where there may.

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 3>May be gaps in the space. So we're working through

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 3>some of those comments.

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm hopefully going to come out with some form of

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 4>advisory guidance in the near future.

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 3>But it really is can hingin on us being.

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 4>Thoughtful about how AI has been used thus far and

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 4>how it may be used in the future.

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Are you talking to big tech about this?

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 4>We look, when we consult we are as we cast

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 4>a very wide net. We want to learn from everyone,

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 4>and that not only includes the individuals who are directly

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 4>registered or participate in our markets, but it certainly is

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 4>the tech companies who are building these AI platforms and

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 4>models that are essentially being used by the financial institutions.

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>We're here, of course talking about climate issues, the global

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>business form or kind of take it that into the start

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of it now in just over thirty minutes time, the

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>CFTC recently product guidance on voluntary carbon credits. I'm curious

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.719
<v Speaker 1>about the voluntary nature of that, whether that's something that's

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be relevant and enforceable, given that that's the

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>framing that we're given on this area.

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so not unlike crypto in some respects, we've seen

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 4>voluntary carbon credit futures contracts listed over the past couple

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 4>of year, derivatives and once we have futures and derivatives

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 4>listed on our registered exchanges.

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 3>I use this phrase a lot we have as.

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 4>An agency of vested in in the health of the

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 4>underlying market, and in this case it's a voluntary carbon market.

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 4>We want to make sure there's resilience in health and

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 4>high integrity in that cash market, so it's reflected in

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 4>the markets we regulate. Ultimately, from a broad perspective, if

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 4>we're going to transition and hit our twenty fifty targets,

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 4>our one point five target, we're gonna need voluntary carbon markets.

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 4>We're not gonna be able to wean ourselves off of

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 4>coal and some fossil based carbon based energy sources. So

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 4>we're going to need a way to allocate capital transition

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 4>to the Global South and other nations that need to

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 4>transition to low carbon intensive energy sources.

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Twenty seconds Election betting. I know you guys don't like it.

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 2>You've recently lost a court case very quickly. Nothing you'll

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 2>warm up to.

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 4>It's not about what I like or don't like. It's

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 4>not about what the agency likes or doesn't like. It's

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 4>about what the law says, and the law in our

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 4>view says that election betting is against.

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>The law that's found them. Thanks very much for joining us,

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>THEFTC chair