WEBVTT - Part One: Inside Fox News with Katy and Cody

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>What's slowly destroying the brains of the people who raised

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>us my various Rupert Murdoch properties. I'm Robert Evans, host

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Behind the Bastards, and today we have a very

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>special episode. Before we get into that, I'm going to

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>bring on my my co hosts, my once in Future

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast buddies, Cody Johnston and Katie Stove Daniel forty five

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:37.599
<v Speaker 1>straight seconds of air horns here, followed by a lap track. Yeah, beepeep,

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>How's how's everything going? Midc Yeah? Yeah, oh wow, Cody,

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I might try to have you do a couple of

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch lines for us, a little bit like Ringo. To me,

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it sounds a little bit like my Boston and Colson.

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>It would be so much, It would be so good if,

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>like his historically, you could go back in time and

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>switch them so that, like Tucker, Carlson was kind of

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the most replaceable beetle and Ringo was a fascist on

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>mets um. Anyway, how are you? How are you guys? Oh, Robert? Okay,

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>more specific question, have any of you, like had a

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>complications among your loved ones as a result of a

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Rupert Murdoch property. I just laughed, and it's been a

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that has complicated my life with a number of

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>family members, and it's a kind of a thing that like,

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a couple of cousins, and every now and

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>then we'll talk, like, you know, something will be going around,

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. I'm trying to be vague in the

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>interests of like family piece. Something will be going around

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be like, yeah, it's fucking Tucker Carlson or

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever like started started this saying this bullshit. Now a

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>bunch of the people, bunch of the very nice people

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>who raised me, believe something terrible. Um, and it's it's

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>deeply frustrating, it's very effective. Yeah, it's um, it's and

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's been kind of this black box up until recently,

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Like every now and then you would get these lawsuits

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>involving Fox, you know, and a bit, one little bit

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of it would go viral and you'd see in like

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>all of the lefty newspapers whatever, Oh Fox argues that

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>they're not you know, a news agency or whatever, that

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a character or yeah. But we we we we

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't gotten like a tremendous amount of detail about what

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>inside the company looks like until very recently. Now, you

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>have y'all been paying much attention to the Dominion lawsuit

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>against Fox News. No, it's no that that's that's good,

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:52.959
<v Speaker 1>you're I'm aware of it. So there are there are yeah, yeah,

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>there are two big lawsuits that Fox is fighting off

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. One is from Dominion Voting Systems, which is

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 1>in I think twenty eight states, and it's a one

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>point six billion dollar defamation suit. And there's also a

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>two point six billion dollar defamation lawsuit from Smart Mattock,

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>which I think was only in one state. But there

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>were a bunch of Fox allegations that they were like

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>hacking the election. We'll get into the details of all

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>this in a little bit, but um, it's it's been

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting because you know, for years and years and years

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>there have been Fox has been what I would morally

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>consider not in a legal sense because they haven't been

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>found guilty this in a legal sense, but I would

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>morally consider them to be doing slander on a pretty

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>regular basis against a wide variety of people. I think

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that's fair, Yeah, fair statement to make a fair statement

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of protected opinion. But Dominion chose to fight back, and

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I think there's an argument to be

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>made that they had more of a solid legal ground

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>than a lot of the people that Fox has targeted

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>over the years, or that Fox personalities have targeted over

0:03:55.680 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the years. Um but they they they sue Fox, and

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>throughout twenty twenty two, they put together this team of

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>lawyers who started running through a laundry list of Fox

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>News producers, line executives, and on air personalities and in

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>deposing them. Right, so, you sit someone down, You sit

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Sean Hannity down, you sit Tucker Carlson down, you sit

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Lachlan Murdoch down, who who's probably going to be the

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>heir to Rupert Murdock's fortune, and you ask them questions

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>about what happened in you know, this kind of spate

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of disinformation, and if they lie, they can go to jail,

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>right Like it's a crime to lie in a deposition.

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And in order to help enforce that, there's also a

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>process called discovery where Dominion's lawyers got access to what

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a mountain of text messages, memos, emails

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>from Fox personalities in order to hold them accountable because

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you can actually see what they were saying to each

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>other in addition to what they claim during the deposition

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and the questions that Dominion asked. They spread well beyond

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of just the specific allegation Fox personalities made against

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Dominion and went more broadly into Fox company culture and

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>how decisions filtered both up and down from management. And yeah,

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>it's as a result, it's given us kind of the

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>most complete look inside Fox and the most complete look

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>at like the kind of human beings who work there

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and how they talk amongst themselves, and how they kind

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of what they see, like the moral universe they inhabit

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in a way that I never thought we actually were

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>going to get evidence of. And so that's what I

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>want to go into this week because there's there's a

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount here. It's worth noting before we start that

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Fox is in actually some potentially serious financial trouble. We're

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>talking between these two lawsuits, somewhere around four billion dollars

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that they could be found liable for. And this is

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in addition to the one point two billion that Fox

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>is paid over the last decade due to the phone

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>hacking scandal that racked the Sun and News of the World.

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>You're both UK Murdoch properties, are you? Did you guys

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>hear remember do you guys recall much about the phone

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>hacking scandal. Not a lot of details, but I remember

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the basic story. Yeah, the gist of it is that

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Brooks, who edited both of those publications and went

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>on to lead their UK publishing arm, and Andrew Colson,

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>who was an editor at News of the World, and

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>five of the papers journalists conspired to hack the voicemails

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of more than six hundred people over a six year period. Yeah,

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it's so. They hacked like a bunch of public figures

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and celebrities. But what really got them in trouble was

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 1>they hacked the voicemail of a murdered schoolgirl, um, in

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>order to like what, Yeah, it's fucked up like that

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is unbelievable. I mean it's no, it's unbelievable. Yeah, I

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>mean it, Yeah, it's it's I think what's really unbelievable

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is that Rupert Murdoch claimed whence this came public, that

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>he'd had no knowledge of it. Um, he told me

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>this is very fun. Actually, Cody, I'm gonna I'm gonna

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>toss this text into the into the chat and you

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>can you can do your Rupert Murdock boys. Oh god, yeah,

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you're a really good Foilfield people I trusted. I'm not

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>saying who let me down? And I think they behaved

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>disgracefully and it's time for them to pay. Wow, I

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>think you're the one that led us all down by

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that accent. No, I think that's a flawless Aussie. Thank you.

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I just mean I've worked on it. Yeah, it's it's okay.

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Most people who do an Australian accent it just winds

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>up really Boston. So you know, I'm glad that I

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>got New Zealand that happened crooking. So that's that's very funny.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Um that he's like, oh, those bad Fox News reporters,

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make him pay. I had no idea this

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>was happening as the CEO of Fox News. A lot

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of people wondered whether, you know, sorry, I'm sorry, like

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it's time for them to pay. Is such a weird

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>thing like phrasing for like you could make that happens.

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah, like be you know, taken to account

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>or like yeah there should be consequences, like it's time

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>for them to pay. Such a who phrasing whoever needs

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to kill them is what he's saying. Yeah, Okay, um, yeah, yeah,

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's yeah, it's it's it's good, good old fashioned, weasely bullshit.

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>So now, obviously, legally I can't say that Rupert certainly

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>knew something. But we are in the United States and

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I can say which I couldn't say if we were

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. It seems kind of weird and suspicious

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that he wouldn't know anything about this massive hacking scandal

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>as journalists and editors engaged in. And while I'm not

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>going to push much further than that, because he is

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire with a lot of lawyers, what I will

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>do is quote a Fox News article about the UK

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Parliamentary Committee investigation into the hacking scandal. Quote from Fox News.

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Although Rupert Murdoch and his son James were not accused

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>of misleading parliament, the committee said it was simply astonishing

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that they only realized that the hacking was not confined

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to one rogue reporter in December of twenty ten. The

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.679
<v Speaker 1>report said that they should ultimately be prepared to take

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>responsibility for the willful blindness of News International and News

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Corporation over the scandal. Aside from the four hundred and

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>fifty four million they spent on legal fees. Yeah, yeah,

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that's good stuff. So sketchy as that all was. The

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>phone hacking scandal did not wind up doing Murdoch or

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>News Corp any like permanent harm. But Dominion's lawsuit included

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>not only depositions under oath, but again this expansive discovery process.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So suddenly we know exactly what Rupert Murdoch's involvement was

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>here to a degree of legal certainty. I should also

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>note here because it's very funny that dominions lawyers to

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>post Sean Hannity for more than seven hours and honestly,

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>moment of silence for those lawyers because they had to

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>talk to Sean Hannity for seven hours. Brutal, that's hazard pay.

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, I hope they hope they have. They had

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to take frequent breaks. Yeah, they needed some MDMA and

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a therapist. Shit. So the bulk of the questions asked

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and materials provided have to do with discussions around the

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>decision of several major Fox stars to host Sydney Powell

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>on their pro Remember Sidney Powell, Yeah, she was a

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>former lawyer for Donald Trump who filed lawsuits in numerous

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>states attempting to overturn the results of the election. Now

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>she spent most of her time since twenty twenty fighting

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>disbarment hearings. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like she's going to

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>get disbarred. I think the case wound up being in Texas.

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>But in the heavy days after November second, she started

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>massaging a collection of deeply questionable sources to argue that Dominion,

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>which ran voting machines in twenty eight states and smart

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Mattock quote ran an algorithm that shaved votes from Trump

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 1>and awarded them to Biden. There's a lot more to

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>her allegations, and we'll cover those presently, but that's what

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you need to go to start. And before we get

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>into all that, I wanted to begin this episode by

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>giving you guys an example of how good journalists treated

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Sydney Powell, because we're going to spend most of this

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>time talking about how Fox did. I want to play

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 1>a clip from an interview she did with an Australian journalist,

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>so Cody, you can brush up on your accent working

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>for ABC four Corners, an Australian news agency. Yeah, it's

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's good stuff that Smartmatic shifted votes from Trump

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to Biden in multiple battleground states. That was your argument,

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't it that there was an algorithm run the machines

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>via the software of it, shaved votes from Trump and

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>gave those Biden. What actual research or bactricking did you

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>do at the time to find out what smartmatics actual

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>involvement in the election was. If you work for smart matter,

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Smartematic that the election. I think it's incumbent on both

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of us to know what smart matos involvement was. It

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>seems like a pretty foundational fact. Confused right now about

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>why you're here because you made a series of very

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>strong allegations against smart Mating, containing many errors of fact.

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you accept the fact now that the company that

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you accused of stealing a national election only operated in

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>one county in LA in California, one county, one state. No,

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not prepared to accept that fact. I think smartmatics

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>involvement was far more significant than that. I think they're

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to minimize their involvement, of course, I do. You

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>said that smart matic owns dominion. How do you justify

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the basic factory error interview. We're not even in the

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>area of great dispute. These are the simple and she

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>gets up, what did she think this was? What did

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:12.719
<v Speaker 1>she think she was showing up for? Which she interview like,

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I love fuck Sydney. Legitimately, what did you think they

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>were going to ask? Think they were going to do

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>what Fox did? Actually, I think is the answer. It's like,

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>can you tell me you're just any any reason for

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you to have made these claims? Do you work for them? Yeah?

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any evidence that they were present in

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>more than one county in Los Angeles? Can you show

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>your work, Sydney. It's a simple question, Sydney. Um. We

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>will talk about where her what her sources later And

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to spoil it, but it involves decapitation.

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I know, I know, I know that's going

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to be started that word. I thought you were going

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, DiCaprio no, but no, no, no. I do

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>believe everyone involved was older than twenty one, so he

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>was unlikely that we have played a role. Yeah. Yeah,

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So we will continue our main source for today with

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>our main source for today, which is the public version

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>of a filing by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News.

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>This is a brief in support of Dominion's motion for

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>summary judgment on liability. I'm going to explain the legally shortly.

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>The document opens up with several quotes, however, and I

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>think these are interesting. Quote Number one, seventy one million

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>voters will never accept Biden. This process is to destroy

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>his presidency before it even starts. If it even starts,

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>we either close on Trump's victory or delegitimize Biden. The

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>plan all caps that. Steve Bannon to Maria bartar Romo

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>on November tenth, twenty twenty. Maria bartar Romo is a

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Fox News financial journalist and TV personality who hosts Mornings

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>with Maria and Maria Bartaromo's Wall Street. She used to

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>work at like CBS. She was like a fairly respected

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>border before all this um. When you google her name,

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Rick Wikipedia provides this poll quote. As a reporter, I

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>approach every situation knowing that everyone has his or her

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>own agenda. It's not a bad thing. It's just a fact, Okay,

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean not untrue. For example, the agenda you and

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Steve Bannen hatched to de legitimize the Biden election. The

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>only thing, yeah, the only thing that I would push

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>back on is the it's not a bad thing part. Yeah, yeah,

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is a bad thing in your case,

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>because your agenda was to overturn a democratic election and

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>commit treason. It certainly can. Yeah. Yeah. If the thing is,

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>for example, installing a dictatorship, then yes, that personal Agendato, Tomato, Robert.

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>If your personal agenda is increased post office funding, then

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:54.359
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it's okay. Yeah, yeah, we could give that a path. Yeah.

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>So Maria started Fox's troubles when she interviewed Sidney Powell

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>right after the election on November eight, twenty. She said, quote, Sydney,

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the dominion software. I know they were

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>voting irregularities. Tell me about that. And Powell replied, that's

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>putting it mildly. The computer glitches could not and should

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>not have happened at all. This is where the fraud

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>took place, where they were flipping votes in the computer

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>system or adding votes that did not exist. Now, immediately,

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you. I've practiced for years now. Immediately

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>after airing this, Rupert Murdoch sent a message to one

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of his producers saying it was very hard to credibly

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>cry foul everywhere because Trump had lost multiple swing states. Yeah,

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>it's hard point yeah, yeah, yeah, And it's one of

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>those things. You can see why there was an interest

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of the Fox personalities using Sidney Powell to

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>tie in Dominion to this because they were they were

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>active in a bunch of different swing states and kind

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of creating this and pushing this conspiracy allowed them to

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>explain how all of those swing states had broken against Trump,

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>which was the thing that Fox's reporting had led folks

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to believe was not really possible. Dominion's filing notes that

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Fox was aware that these claims were bogus from the jump.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And here's a message from Sean Hannity to Fox Politics

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>editor Chris Sterwalt that whole narrative that Sidney was pushing.

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I did not believe it for one second. No reasonable

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>person would have thought that Stirwalt gets fired after this.

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, so the motion itself opens with this.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Fox knew from the top down. Fox knew that the

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Dominion stuff was total bs. Yet despite knowing the truth,

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>or at minimum recklessly disregarding that truth, Fox spread and

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.479
<v Speaker 1>endorsed these outlandist voter fraud claims about Dominion, even at

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 1>as it internally recognized the lies as crazy, absurd, and

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>shocklingly reckless. Those are all quotes from Fox executives. So

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>this all serves to support dominion's key contention that Fox

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.479
<v Speaker 1>knew their claims were false unless they reported on an

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>election fraud in a way that demonstrated actual malice without

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>resort to motive or other circumstantial factors. That's the legal

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>term for they're completely at fault and they don't even

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have a right to defend themselves, right, Like, that's that's

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>basically what complicit. Yeah, that's that that's more or less

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>what they are saying here, because like this is a

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>motion for summary judgment. So the thing that they're saying is,

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we want the judge to just kind of rule on

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>this right now based on the merits of the case.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>We think that this is such a clear case that

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like there's there's really nothing else to say, um, based

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 1>on the information that discovery and the depositions have drug up,

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Like it's like on its face prima facy or whatever,

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>however the fuck you're supposed to pronounce that, Um, this

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>is just such an obvious case that we want a

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>ruling right now, um, which is rare. You don't generally

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>get that, especially with very large lawsuits like this. We'll

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>see what actually happens. Um. But based on the reporting

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>they've put together, I think I think they have a

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>strong yeah. Yeah, um. So I want to continue from

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the motion. But first, you know what motion. I want

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to urge people towards forward, pulling out that pulling out

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>that wallet, Abby, pulling out that wallet. That's right, baby,

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>m shrimping the dingo ate your baby, that's right. Yes,

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's Australian for purchase these products and services.

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>No one knows why we're back quite quite quode. I'm

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you the rest of the episode to figure

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>out what that acronymics on it. So, um, I want

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to continue from the motion here. Fox's correct call of

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Arizona for Joe Biden triggered a backlash among its audience,

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and the network was being rejected. That's a quote from

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a Fox executive. Rival net network such as Newsmax took

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the opening by promoting an alternative universe another

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.199
<v Speaker 1>quote of election fraud. So Fox went on a war footing,

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>caring more about protecting its own following viewership than about

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the truth and the words of Fox News is SVP

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and managing editor of the Washington DC Bureau, Bill Salmon,

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's remarkable how weak ratings make good journalists do bad things.

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I might have a couple of notes for that, including

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea that there were many good journalists at Fox News.

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>But that's where I went as well, Yeah, that's that's

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>where I might have an issue. So next dominion goes

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>on to assert why this is different from most defamation lawsuits. Normally,

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>plaintiffs proved defendant's actual malice, whether they knew it was

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>false or in fact entertained serious doubts as to the

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>truth of the statement by inference, as it would be

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>rare for a defendant to admit such doubts. And they

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>cite Solano versus Playgirl in that here, and they note

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that here overwhelming direct evidence establishes Fox's knowledge of falsity,

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>not just doubts. And I want to I want to

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Clanov Playgirl case. That it's a two

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand and two ninth Circuit Court case that dominion brings

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>up here because because it's kind of interesting. And then

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in the January nineteen ninety nine issue of Playgirl magazine,

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>there was a cover photograph of actor Jose Solano, who

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>played someone called Manny Gutierrez in Baywatch from ninety six

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to ninety nine. Solano had not posed for or given

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>an interview to Play Girl, and he did not consent

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>for them to use his image. He was shown shirtless

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and wearing red lifeguard trunks and had like a bunch

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:26.959
<v Speaker 1>of models surrounding them on the front cover in like

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a suggestive way that was kind of like meant to

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>portray an image of him as a less wholesome character

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>than he personally portrayed himself as. And since he hadn't

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>actually like sat down to be interviewed or anything by Playgirl,

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>his argument. Salano's argument was that they were basically there

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>was essentially direct like they either knew that what they

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>were doing was false or they had serious doubts as

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to the truth of the statement. Right, Like that's kind

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of the case that's being cited here as like a

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>previous example of um of precedent, and Salano won the

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>case and established damages. I think it's I don't know,

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's interesting that they're they're falling black on

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>this Playgirl case is sort of evidence of like this

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is the most this is like this is the most

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>um directly similar kind of irresponsibility from like a major

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a major media network in the recent past. UM Dominions

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.959
<v Speaker 1>lawyers note that Fox to fame their company, uh not

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>once or twice, but many times over a period of months.

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>H Tucker Carlson accused Dominion of committing quote, the single

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>greatest crime in American history. Um. Yeah, and so again

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.479
<v Speaker 1>that's yeah, it's pretty hard to mitigate that. I know, right,

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a few genocides, there's a lot of Yeah, that

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>sounds pretty hyperbolic, oh, Tucker, and that that's that's going

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to come back to bite Tucker in the ass in

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a very short time. Here. UM Dominion notes that while

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>defamation cases tend to involve just the malicious acts of

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>either an individual employee at a company or maybe a

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>small group of people at Fox, literally dozens of people

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>with editorial responsibility were involved, which is part of why

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, we just want the judge to rule on

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this because the irresponsibility is so deep and far reaching.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>M Fox, for their part, it admits Sidney Pale and

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 1>her team never provided Fox with any evidence as to

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>her claims. Dominion, by contrast, made thirty six hundred separate

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>communications to Fox, with a dozen separate and widely circulated

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.360
<v Speaker 1>fact check emails, each pointing the third party information debunking

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the claims. I bet the algorithm did something, no to

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it made it lies? Well, yeah, because Sydney stuff just

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>trended so well. Yeah, yeah, I love that clip of

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>her talking. They love just like being like, an algorithm

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>did it. There's a seister algorithm. It's always, it's always

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Algorithm's so easy to point to the thing that nobody

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>actually understands very well. That's the fun thing about algorithms,

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's about to be the fun thing about AI

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and deep fakes and that and that. Like, as far

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>as most people in media are concerned, it's just magic.

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>And so like, if you're a bad actor, like literally

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone at Fox, you can just use the word algorithm

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>or now it's yeah, deep fake. It's easy. Yeah. Um,

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just like saying a wizard did it, but some

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of plausible explanation for an implausible thing. Yeah. And

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm torn on this because I do

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>think we need more wizards in American politics, but not

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>not like this, not like this. No, no actual wizards

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>computer wizards, not computer wizards, real wizard wizards. No wizards,

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>yeah wizards, Yeah, like Gandolf. Yeah, I want Gandolf to

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>have his own like fascist news show where he supports

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Rhonda Santis in removing books from from elementary schools. That's

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>what I want, That's what even like a Gumbledore, I

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Well, Gandolf in particular Hosts he got radicalized

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 1>after they banned indoor smoking. That really that really that

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>really got him. Well yeah, he's a big anti masker too.

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Dumbledore and JK are type still so mm hmm yeah, problematic. Yeah,

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just glad he's dead. Um. So now Dominion is yeah,

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>moving for summary judgment, which again has a there's a

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>very high burden of evidence when you ask a judge

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to do this. Dominion argues that they can cross it easily.

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Quote Fox falsely claimed. Number one Dominion committed election fraud

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>by rigging the twenty twenty presidential election. Number two Dominion

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Software and algorithms manipulated vote counts in the twenty twenty

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>presidential election. Number three Dominion is owned by a company

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>founded in Venezuela to rig elections for the dictator, Hugo

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Chavez and number four Dominion government official machines. This is

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>what this is what false the claims. But yeah, these

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>are the claims. They have to be ver falls. Yeah, yeah,

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to prove it, like Dominions saying these

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>are obvious false claims, Like yeah, this is the only

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 1>evidence that they have that would make what they did

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>responsible if these were true, and it's it's patently ridiculous.

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Um so the number four oh yeah, number four Cody

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is Dominion paid kickbacks to government officials who used its

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>machines in the twenty twenty presidential election. Um yeah, this

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>is like, these are pretty serious allegations to make with

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>absolute there's not quite no history. Oh again, we're building

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>towards what the evidence here was for the greatest crime

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 1>in American history. So Dominion insists that it's irrelevant that

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the accused statements that I just read were made by

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>guests of Fox rather than the hosts. Yeah, and basically

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.239
<v Speaker 1>they're like, look, Fox is a publisher. Every statement that

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:51.199
<v Speaker 1>they choose to put out without contradiction or questioning is

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>something they are publishing. If you were to have Sidney

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Powell on and then question her like that, ABC four

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>current Corners journalist died. That's okay, Then you don't have

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to defend what she's said, because you're deliberately like questioning

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>its accuracy, you know, like you're actually trying to report.

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>But if you just let somebody talk as Fox News,

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you are publishing their allegations. Yeah. There's also like there's

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a supportive language that a lot of Fox News, I

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>mean all of them, I guess, maybe use when dealing

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>with these topics because of stuff like this, because they

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 1>know they can't say one hundred percent, but they're not

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>always great at it. Yeah, and they maybe they won't

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>get away with it. Yeah. I mean it's like, uh,

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you know when when when the three of us were

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>trying to launch that podcast on your network, and you

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>guys wanted to report on breaking news, and I wanted

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to make a series of allegations against the Home Depot

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Corporation um and and these of one bad time you

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>had at home Depot. Yeah. Well, and because of the

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>tunnels underneath home depots where they traffic, well, I probably

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't make another trafficking children joke. The last one we

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>made went badly against us all see it. I can't

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>imagine why Robert, this is me being a responsible publisher.

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Yeah, recognizing that the years of lawsuits from

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>home Depot when we tried to put that out are

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>not worth repeating a second time. See, unlike Fox, some

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>of us can learn your lessons. Go to home Depot,

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.360
<v Speaker 1>did it dot Org? Anyway, let's move on. Let's move

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>on here. So yeah, the bulk of Dominion's assertion is

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that they are due summary judgment because Fox editorially employees

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated actual malice. Prevailing on summary judgment in this case

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:37.479
<v Speaker 1>requires that they show just one person acted with malice

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>free false claim about the company. And this is where

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that's really interesting to us comes in. Quote,

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>as Tucker Carlson told Sidney Powell November seventeenth, you keep

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>telling our viewers that millions of votes were changed by

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the software. I hope you will prove that very soon.

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>You've convinced them that Trump will win. If you don't

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>have conclusive evidence of fraud at that scale, it's a

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>cruel and reckless thing to keep saying. And then on

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>November twenty first, Carlson texted, it was shockingly useless to

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>claim that Dominion rigged the election. If there's no one

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>inside the company willing to talk or internal dominion documents

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>or copies of the software showing that they did it,

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and as you know, there isn't, which is is a

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear evidence that Tucker knew that what Sidney was

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>saying was wildly irresponsible. Yeah, oh yeah, no, I mean

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you're right. I'm wondering how like much pushback? Like what

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>qualifies pushback? Right, because again, what he said was like,

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>well this is a very it's compelling, and you've you've

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>convinced people, but you need to show evidence, so like

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you know the thing that he does and he knows

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that he's doing. Yeah yeah, Now. Dominion furthermore alleges that

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the statements Fox made are what you call, again per

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>se defamatory. This means that they alleged that the dominion

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that the defendant committed a serious crime, and those allegations

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>injured the defendant in their trade or profession. The key

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>here is that when a statement is per se defamatory,

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the injured party doesn't need prove specific damages to establish liability, right,

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>not per se? Yeah, not per se. I love you,

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you know lawyers, those wacky guys. Per Se defamatory so

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Dominion also notes that Fox cannot claim they had some

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of a right to report on Powell's allegations against

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Dominion on the basis of newsworthiness, since doing so would

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>require them to report accurately that Powell had no evidence

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to back up her assertions. Discovery has given Dominion some

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting ammo here, including a text from Rupert Murdoch asking

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Suzanne Scott, current Fox News CEO, whether it was quote

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and here's Murdoch again, unarguable that high profile Fox voices

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>fed the story that the election was stolen and that

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>January sixth was an important chance to have the results overturned.

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>That is Rupert Murdoch telling the CEO Fox. It is

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a unarguable that high profile Fox voices fed the story

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that the election was and that jan six was an

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>important chance to have the results overturned. That's Murdoch's saying,

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we absolutely caused January or help. That is nuts, an

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:14.959
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable thing that he just said, Yeah, what he texted

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>his coworker. He texted the quiet part. You can't just

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>say that, Yeah, maybe you can't. He did. He did.

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>That's that's maybe I should have been paying attention to

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>this story we did January. That's that Rupert Murdoch quote.

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>We did January six. You put that on some merch.

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to get that lady Murky by the

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Secret Service. Yeah, that's that's Rupert Murdoch for you. That's

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a joke. It's not legally actionable. Uh So Fox News

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>responded to Murdoch's like state, but basically Murdoch is like,

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm fairly certain that we contributed to this. Do we

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>have evidence of like our voices feeding, like our people

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>feeding the story that the election was stolen? And executives

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>responded to him with fifty examples of this um, which

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>again really making the lawyers at Dominion's job easy for them.

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>That's so they can't even be like Dominions like dug

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>up all these examples and Fox those aren't examples, they're

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>like noreast sign it signed Rupert. Yeah from Rupert. Here's

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>some perfect evidence. I hope, I hope it gave him

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>indigestion when he had to hand over all of his

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>fucking text messages to these rhea. I agree with you, Katie.

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I hope, I hope he was shitting a sand bag.

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>So to spool boys, I hope. Yeah, Rupert Murdoch's shit.

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a video going around. I tweeted it recently. If

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a guy like getting sucked down into a grain silo,

0:32:57.440 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the consistency of that is awful. Yeah, stay the

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>fuck away from grain silos, Yes, Joe, don't stay away

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>from them. Shoot them at a distance, talking about readily

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>grain silos, and I was like, what's that about? Didn't investigate? Now,

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I know. I came from a small farming town where

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>every year people would die in grain silos, Grain silos

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and drunken ATV rides. Um, those were two of the

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>leading causes of death. Um. If only Fox News had

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a similar record. I'm going to continue quoting from the

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>dominion lawsuit, as Rupert Murdoch told Suzanne Scott, who's again

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Fox in the aftermath of January sixth,

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>All very well for Sean to tell you he was

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in despair about Trump. But what did he tell his

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>viewers When Rupert Murdoch watched Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>spin their lives on November nineteenth, he told Suzanne Scott

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>terrible stuff, damaging everybody. I fear Scott concurred, Yes, Sean,

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and even Piero agrees. They talk about judge Janine Pierrouh.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>My god, yeah, look at all the damage. We're cozy. Yeah. Wow,

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we're really fucking some shit up there. Um, you know

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>who else is fucking like all those other times? No

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.919
<v Speaker 1>speaking of fucking shit up, but like in a good way,

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in an ethical, capitalist way where we all learn about

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>what kind of mattresses we need. Cody, A lot of

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>people don't know this about you. You prefer to sleep

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we call it PEB and J style, with a mattress

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.479
<v Speaker 1>below you and another mattress on top of you. Makes

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>me feel secure, that's right, A little bit um, a

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit cozier, a little bit more weight than a

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>weighted blanket. Yeah, I'm not rustling around. Yeah. If you

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have guests over, they can stay on top. This is

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this is the difference between us, Cody. I prefer to

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>sleep literally PEB and J style, where once a week

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I bake two large bedside sheets of bread and I

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 1>fill them with jam and with peanut butter, and I

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>just I just roll around in a naked all night

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>and then in the morning my breakfast is ready. Oh,

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I just licked myself clean like a lizard. Like that's good.

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm good the mattresses. Yeah, anyway, here's some real ads. Ah,

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>we're back. I hope you enjoyed those good words from

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the good people at Jeff Jeff. It mixes well with

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:30.919
<v Speaker 1>your sweat. Um. Oh man, you're gonna steal the big

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Jeff account from me, Cody, We're waiting w dot Patreon

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>backslash hit him up. Jeff a lot of money here, potentially. So.

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I find compelling about the allegations

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Dominions lawyers have put together is the fact that Fox

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>execs were aware ahead of time that Trump would claim

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>fraud if he lost. Now, this suggests you might say

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>something of a conspiracy, a loose plan to find a

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>serviceable election fraud argument and then push it whether or

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>not it's true. In the words of Chris Sterwalt, Fox's

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>politics editor, who again gets shit canned after this, during

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the relevant timeframe, long before the election, Chris says, Trump

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>started making the claim that the only way he could

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>lose the election was by fraud, or that the only

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.240
<v Speaker 1>way he would not prevail would be if it was stolen.

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>He had laid that predicate down throughout the spring and

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>into the summer, and it was very well known and

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>understood by everybody in the business that this was the

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 1>gambit that he was making. That's a straight quote from

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Sterwalt's deposition. Now Sterwalt Welt said this under oath, and

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>dominion adds that other Fox executives made similar statements under oath.

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>They understood that Trump was laying out a false line

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time so that he could justify contesting the

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>election even if the evidence did not support it. As

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the COVID nineteen pandemic made more male in voting inevitable,

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and understanding evolved that the discrepancy between in person counts

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and mail votes would provide an opportunity to question the election.

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So before the election, Fox personalities were talking about like, well,

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:08.399
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have all the in person votes get

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>counted first, but then the mail ins are going to

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:12.399
<v Speaker 1>come and it's going to cause a sudden shift. And

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that what's funny is that we were all talking about

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 1>how they were going to be doing this. Yes see,

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we're not so different after all, Katie, We're all things. Yeah,

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we created I'm gonna quote again from Chris Steerwaltz deposition. Here,

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>election day votes are going to skew heavily Republican. Early

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>in absentee votes are going to skew heavily democratic. If

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you stretch out the period of time over which that's

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:42.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be counted, it's going to create a false

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 1>It could tend to create a false impression about the

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>direction that the election was going to go overall um.

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:51.880
<v Speaker 1>He noted that political professionals and political journalists at Fox

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>universally understood this phenomenon, also termed the red mirage and

0:37:56.600 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the blue shift. Yeah, so that's good. That's good, good

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that they just said all this. Now, dominion just happened

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to be in a position at the nexus of all

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>these facts, which made them a convenient scapegoat for false

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 1>claims of election fraud. Discovery in this case also gives

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>us some insight as to communications between Fox employees and

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>members of the Trump team. When Fox called Arizona first

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 1>at eleven twenty pm, a member of Trump's team called

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Fox's Washington Bureau managing editor Bill Salmon and told him

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 1>it was quote way too soon to be calling Arizona.

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>White House chief of Staff Mark Meadows followed up shortly thereafter,

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>just as angry and Fox viewers were even more enraged.

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Quote on November fifth, Fox's chief White House correspondent told

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Salmon and FANC president Jay Wallace, we are taking major

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 1>heat over the AZ call. Our viewers are also chanting

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Fox News sucks. Something I have never heard, something I

0:38:57.080 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>have never heard before. Why, I've definitely heard that. UM.

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Listing Dominion also cites internal Fox emails, stating, holy cow,

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>our audience is mad at the network and they're all

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 1>caps furious. Um. It is at this point that we

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>get to one of the more into because again, parts

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:24.879
<v Speaker 1>of this are redacted, and the way that redactions work,

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you don't you don't always know why, right, Um, Like,

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that's sometimes yeah, yeah, But there's there's uh the

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>like immediately following those internal Fox emails. Um, there's this

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 1>paragraph that begins the backlash was so strong that and

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>then the rest of the paragraph is all blacked out. UM.

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I am no idea what that's going on about, but

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I hope we find out some days. Um. And the

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>mystery of what that paragraph holds is made all the

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>more enticing by what comes next. Fox hosts Tucker Carlson,

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Laura Ingram, and Sean Hannity immediately understood the threat to

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>them personally. Carlson wrote his producer Alex Piffer on November fifth,

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>we worked really hard to build what we have. Those

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>fuckers are destroying our credibility. It enrages me. He added

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that he had spoken with Laura and Sean a minute

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>ago that they are highly upset. Carlson noted, at this point,

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>we're getting hurt no matter what. Phifer responded, It's a

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 1>hard needle to thread, but I really think many on

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>our side are being reckless demagogues right now. Tucker replied,

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of course they are. We're not going to follow them,

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and then he added what Trump's good at is destroying things.

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 1>He's the undisputed world champion of that. He could easily

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.280
<v Speaker 1>destroy us if we play it wrong. This is awful

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and so good it is. There's so much going on

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>there too, because He's like, first off, I'm furious they're

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>destroying our credibility by questioning the narrative that Trump's election

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:53.919
<v Speaker 1>was stolen from him, Right, That's what they're doing that's

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 1>destroying our credibility, is they're making the audience distrust us

0:40:57.000 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 1>because the audience will only believe the lie that the

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>election was stolen. But then he's like, fuck these people

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 1>who spread the election lies in the first place, because

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>they're being reckless demagogues and we're not going to follow them.

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:12.439
<v Speaker 1>But also Trump is a destroyer and I don't want

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 1>him to destroy It's this incredible mix of totally aware

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of how much of a lie that they're spreading, and

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:25.240
<v Speaker 1>also comprehensive cowardice. Yeah, and a history of that knowledge too,

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>because even the they're all they're acting like demagogues. Of

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 1>course they are, is what he's saying. Yeah, imply like,

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:33.919
<v Speaker 1>of course they are. That's what they do, That's what

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:40.760
<v Speaker 1>we are, right, Yeah, Yeah, they don't mind that part yep, Nope.

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So Dominion Next presents evidence that Summit Fox sought to

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:50.919
<v Speaker 1>actively reign in this disinformation. Chief political correspondent Brett bare

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly told colleagues that there was no evidence of fraud,

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and he alerted his boss when Maria Barbaromo posted baseless

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>allegations of vote dumps social media, telling him we have

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to prevent this stuff, we need to fact check. And

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:07.399
<v Speaker 1>it is a note of how bad this is that

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Brett Baar is the is the voice of recent center

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of the company out. Yeah, Like I I'm like, I

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>understand kind of because Shep Smith was like the other

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>guy at Fox there was not not not a completely

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>broken monster. Um. It's fascinating to me, like what these

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 1>guys must have told themselves in order to keep doing this,

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 1>because they clearly have some ethical center, right, because this

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is also like it's interesting because this is just about

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 1>this one yeah topic. Yeah, and I can't imagine just

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 1>now do all the rest? Yeah, yeah, what have you

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 1>been saying about everything? Yeah? Yeah, because one of two

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 1>things is true. Either Brett does this with everything that

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Fox lies about or this was the first time he

0:42:56.840 --> 0:43:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was like, well this is a bridge too far, right, Yeah,

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 1>like everybody like textasure like this is damaging. How we're

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna do this and play it in a lie to people? Yeah? Yeah,

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I kind of suspect because you remember there's

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that thing, Um, oh god, what's her name? The lady

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>with the TV show who's like very popular liberal news person.

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Um racial matter. I was literally she put anyway whatever, Um,

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe I forgot her name. Um, But like

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 1>she's made comments about Tucker being a nice guy in

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 1>person and like they're friendly together, and I kind of

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>suspect that's what's going on with Brett, where it's like

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a certain degree of like malfeasance and propaganda that

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:45.720
<v Speaker 1>like his friends, who you know, are elsewhere in media

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and politics. Don't mind from Fox Right, but this denying

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the election entirely trying to inciting this fucking seditious act

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of January sixth, that was fucking a step too far,

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and it was it was gonna make him look bad

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 1>in front of his friends, so he had to. I

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I don't know Brett Bete, but clearly for

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>some of them there's a line. By November sixth, Rupert

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch had stated the same fears as Brett Bear and

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Warren CEO Suzanne Scott. If Trump becomes a sore loser,

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 1>we should watch Sean especially, and others don't sound the

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>same union Sean, He's gonna be a wildcard on this

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>one if Trump ties to make himself a dictator. That

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 1>same day, Sidney Powell was a guest on lou Dobbs Tonight,

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>where she told viewers about a supposed CIA program called

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Hammer and Scorecard. Hammer was a government supercomputer, she told viewers,

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and Scorecard was a program that would allow it to

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 1>change votes. She told Fox viewers, this quote explains a

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of what we're seeing. After the broadcast, a viewer

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 1>emailed Brett bar about Hammer and Scorecard. He forwarded this

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>to Fox president Jay Wallace and asked, what is this?

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>What the fuck is this? So there is evidence that

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch even took steps with one of his other properties,

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:08.240
<v Speaker 1>The New York Post, to stop stolen election conspiracy theories

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>from spreading. On November seventh, the Post published an editorial

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>begging Trump to admit he'd lost and quote get Rudy

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Giuliani off TV Murdoch. One of the things that discovery

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 1>revealed is Murdoch thanking a Post employee for ensuring the

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>editorial was spread, so he had no problem with like

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:30.919
<v Speaker 1>manipulating his various periodicals in order to get this message out,

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 1>which is particularly interesting to me given another factor revealed

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>by the dominion lawsuit. Dominion alleges Rupert Murdoch provided Donald

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump's senior advisor and son in law, Jared Kushner, with

0:45:41.239 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 1>confidential information about the Biden campaign, and specific they gave

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Kushner access to Biden campaign ads before publication, and information

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>on his debate strategy. Dominion does not go into more

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:55.359
<v Speaker 1>detail here. That is just an allegation that they make

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in their filing. Fox, for their part, say that Dominion

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is mischaracterizing the acts here, and they further note quote

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Dominion cherry picks any sound bite it confined from any

0:46:04.760 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>corner of the Fox organization, even though it admits in

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 1>its brief one hundred and seventeen pages later that most

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of the evidence is utterly irrelevant to the legal issues

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in this case. Dominions focus on such irrelevant evidence demonstrates

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:18.399
<v Speaker 1>that it is more interested in headlines than in law

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>or fact. And what's compelling to me about this is

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's not entirely wrong. I don't think they're Dominions

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 1>wrong on the facts. They are including a lot of

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>shit in here that is not specifically targeted towards their lawsuit. Right,

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that is not specifically about claims Fox made about Dominion.

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I think their strategy here is to try and improve

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>how comprehensive the malice and irresponsive delivers a Fox also

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the culture and what this Yeah, yeah, painting a full

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>picture here, yeah, And I think what they're doing is fair.

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I also kind of suspect that a piece of it

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 1>also is them being like, well, they fucking dragged our

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 1>name through the mud, and we can do that without

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>lying about I'll be fun pieces of shit. Well we

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 1>can throw down. You want to throw down, motherfuckers? Try me. Yeah,

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what this is. But right now, do you want

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to motherfuckers? Want to throw down by telling people your plugs?

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>This is part one. We're done. This is part one.

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>We're done. We're done and done a being bought a

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 1>boom baby and then the lessons. Yeah, and everything was

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>good forever. Yeah, this wraps up. Yeah, we've got piece

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of shows for you to check out. Plug the podcast

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Even More News. Oh but you guys have a podcast

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and um and we talk about stuff. We shoot the ship,

0:47:45.800 --> 0:47:48.959
<v Speaker 1>we make jokes, we have fun guests. Sometimes Roberts a guest. Robert,

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>would you like to come on our show again soon?

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll typically love to come down the show again. I've

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 1>been meaning to get into podcasting, so this could be

0:47:55.800 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a really good I think that you'd be really good interesting, interesting, interesting,

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Cody plug our other things. Oh yeah, we have another

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:09.239
<v Speaker 1>show called some More News. Um. It's also available as

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a podcast if you'd like. It's on YouTube dot com

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>as well as a video. There's stuff in it with

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:19.319
<v Speaker 1>puppets are there sometimes and check out our Patreon dot

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>com s. Last some more news support those things. Yeah, furthermore, furthermore,

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:31.720
<v Speaker 1>things to be continued doing when we return. Yeah yeah,

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:35.880
<v Speaker 1>what yeah, how are you doing? Like, would you flex

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for us? Maybe? Like lay down, take those shoes off,

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:41.359
<v Speaker 1>get that shirt off too, you know, come on, come

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:44.360
<v Speaker 1>on asking them to flex their cuddle up with me?

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Just just just come on, get on, get on in here.

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Another mattress, mattress on top of us. Just make that

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a double texts. We got ourselves get covered in peanut

0:48:56.239 --> 0:48:59.760
<v Speaker 1>butter and jelly together. Kay, this guy, maybe watch season

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:03.480
<v Speaker 1>one of True Detective. You know, good stuff, good stuff,

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. It's a great season. I did. I rewatched

0:49:06.640 --> 0:49:11.719
<v Speaker 1>it recently. It's I love that show, that season, just

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for the Regila to do of it, that show. Um, anyway,

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:18.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go dig out my generator from this pile

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of fucking snow. Yeah, and I'm gonna rewatch True Detective

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 1>season one again again already. Wow, I'm not going to

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 1>do either of Those Things behind the Bastards is a

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>production of cool Zone Media. For more from cool Zone Media,

0:49:33.719 --> 0:49:37.319
<v Speaker 1>visit our website cool zonemedia dot com, or check us

0:49:37.360 --> 0:49:40.359
<v Speaker 1>out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:41.359
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts.