WEBVTT - CFB Week 4 Breakdown with Scott Bogman and Thor Nystrom (Ep 205)

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back, everybody. It's the Betting Pros College Football Show.

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm your host.

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Scott Bogman followed me on the Twitter at Bogman Sports.

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 2>I am joined as.

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Always by the you know, the the Pride of Kansas

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>at Thor k you on the Twitter machine. It is

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Thor and Eystrom. Your Jayhawks are rolling. Look, I hated

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it last year when they burned me. I went all

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the way out to Austin to see my Longhorns play.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>The Jayhawks upset him on a two point conversion at

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the end of the game when Texas climbed back into

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it after being down. But hey, they're making me money

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>this year, so we like them. I think we're gonna

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>ride that over again for Kansas this week. But Thor,

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you gotta be doing pretty good watching your Jayhawks year.

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>How's how's Week four treating you so far?

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 3>Any any weekend Jayhawk football wins, it's a good weekend.

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 3>And of course, the better team won last year in Austin,

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 3>and the better team certainly won yes or a couple

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 3>of days ago when they played Houston, just like it

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 3>did when they played West Virginia. So hoping Kansas can

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>keep it rolling. Their three and oh just like Thomas

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 3>the producer Syracuse Orange or three in all, and now

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Kansas gets Duke. So yeah, crossing the fingers, crossing the fingers.

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And my loser team is the only one ranked out

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of that bunch, and we're two and one. So you know,

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>played Alabama Hart but obviously I couldn't get it done.

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>But as always, we're gonna start with the Thursday and

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Friday games. We're gonna tell you where the cash is

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>on some of these games. We got a decent amount

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of spreads and a couple over unders. Then we'll hit

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the top five big games of the week and then

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about thor's differences. So let's start out with these

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Thursday and Friday games. We have six, but only five

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>are on the slate. In terms of betting, I believe

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Illinois plays like Chattanooga. Yeah, so there's no real line

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>in that game. So start out with Coastal minus two

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>at Georgia State the over and that one is sixty

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>one and a half. We got WVU minus point and

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a half on the road at Virginia Tech. That one

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>has kind of gone back and forth. Virginia at Syracuse

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Syracuse is minus eight and a half the overs fifty

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>two and a half in that game. That one is

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>on Friday, Nevada air Force. Another Friday matchup, air Force

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a twenty four point home favorite. I guess Nevada Nevada

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>has looked terrible forty five is the over in that game?

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>And Boise State fifteen and a half point road favorites

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>on the road against UTEP forty five and a half?

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 2>Is he over in that game?

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Or do you have any strong leans name of these

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Thursday Friday games? What are you looking at in this

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>grouping here?

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure, let's take them day by day on Thursday.

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting because sharpbetters they love two of this, so

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 3>they love both these games one particular side. I agree

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 3>with them on one of them, and I don't agree

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 3>with them on the other one. The side where I

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 3>agree with the sharp betters is Virginia Tech. I think

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 3>that's the objectively right side. Virginia Tech Day. Some things

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 3>they have not done very well this year. Other things

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 3>they're doing better, And I think they might be a

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 3>little bit better than people think. You know, people are

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 3>having a hard time getting it out of their head.

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Them getting upset by old dominion in that first game. Yeah,

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's just they're not bad. Yeah. I

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 3>mean they almost almost upset Virginia last week, you know,

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 3>for instance. And I think All Dominion's gonna win this

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 3>week handily too. But we'll get to that later on maybe.

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I mean, I've not been impressed with West

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Virginia on any of my viewings. I came into the

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 3>season lower on West Virginia than other folks. The one

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 3>thing that West Virginia has shown that they can do

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 3>decently well on offense this year is generate explosive runs.

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 3>But when the passing game isn't at least getting the

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 3>short completions, that bogs down too. They have to be

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 3>completing the passes to get teams away from from starting

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 3>to stack the box against some that Donaldson kid just

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 3>came out of nowhere. The problem has been West Virginia's

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 3>passing offense has not been as good I think as

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 3>some people had hoped. JT. Daniels, who has been run

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 3>out of his last two starting jobs. He has not

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 3>refound the five star pedigree that came out with, and

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 3>they don't have a really good receiving core. There's been

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of drops with West Virginia so far this year,

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 3>so I question whether they can pass the ball effectively

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 3>enough against West Virginia to open up the opportunities to

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 3>get those chunk runs disincentivized Virginia Tech from putting people

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 3>in the box, et cetera. Virginia Tech that what they're

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 3>best at. It's their defense. They struggle a little bit

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 3>on offense, of course, but if they can play the

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 3>low scoring, grinded out games, I mean, that's what they

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 3>want to do, and I think that they're going to

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 3>be able to get that here. I also like the

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>under probably, like you probably think that my adjusted total

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 3>in the game is forty one and a half, it's

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 3>fifty two and a half live. So to me, I'm

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 3>seeing more of a low scoring game that Virginia Tech

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 3>pulls out at the end of the game. My adjust

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 3>side on that game is Virginia Tech minus three point eight.

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 3>So I have the other team favorite. So I like

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Virginia Tech to pull you know, the small upset. I

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>won't consider an upset, but I think Virginia Tech is

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 3>gonna win the and the you know, like I was

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 3>alluding to the sharps are on Virginia Tech and Mass

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 3>In that game. The Sharps are also in mass on

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Georgia State. You know the game that kicks off. Oh,

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 3>it looks like the exact same time. I hate when

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 3>they do that on the Thursday nights. Give us give

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 3>us a split.

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Look.

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I gotta I gotta be honest, store, My Steelers are

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>playing tomorrow, so I won't. You know, I'll have it

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>on the second screen. But I know, and my family knows,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and my neighbors know that I'll be screaming at my

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>television for Pittsburgh. But I'll take a look at it.

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I don't like it when they do that.

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Either give us a late game or an early game,

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>just separate them a little bit. They even did that

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>on Monday Night Football, by the way, with those two

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>games starting in the middle of each other.

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't like that either.

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Like I prefer that though you don't prefer yeah, I mean,

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 3>because then they're not ending at the same time. The

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 3>progression is different.

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>You can well, no, no, no, but but I would

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>rather have one finish and then pick up the other one,

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, kind of like they do

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>NBA playoff games, like let them finished and then do

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the other one.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Would you rather have it? Would you rather have the

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 3>time stagger to start or at the exact same time?

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh, definitely Stagg.

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.559
<v Speaker 3>Who feels the same way apparently one for sure.

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 2>But do you have a you have a lean in this? Yeah,

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 2>in Georgia State.

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 3>In that one, I would be lean. So so the

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 3>first one is a bet for me. I am on

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Virginia attack. I I like Virginia attack. This one. I

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 3>lean the other way, but from where the sharp money

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 3>is going. But I'm not going to bet it because

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 3>I you know, I respect the sharp money. They might

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 3>be seeing something that I'm not seeing. But I like

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 3>Coastal Carolina in this game. You know, you have a

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 3>three and oh team against an O and three team,

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 3>and yet the majority of the money is coming in

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 3>on the oh and three team, even though the more

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 3>tickets have been bought on on Coastal Carolina. But the

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 3>Sharps were also on Georgia State last week when they

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 3>they definitely didn't cover I'm trying to remember who they

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 3>were playing, but the shar The Sharps seemed to believe

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 3>very much Charlotte to st Yeah, so they were on them,

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 3>and I think they might have even been on Georgia

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 3>State the week before as well, and we had talked

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 3>in our discard thing about how Chris Reynold's coming back

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 3>change the equation for Charlotte. So maybe you don't blame

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 3>the Sharps for not knowing he was going to be

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 3>back by It seems like that's a team where the

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Sharps have been higher on them throughout the season so

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 3>far and remain so now that sharp's very clearly, you know,

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, not all of them, you know,

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, however many there are, I'm sure

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 3>it's not completely uniform, but by the numbers, that's where

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 3>the money is coming in on on Georgia State. But again,

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Georgia State hasn't looked great this year. Definitely not as

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 3>good as we thought they would be, you know, I mean,

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 3>like I think some people were hoping that they could

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>sort of emerge near the top of that sun belt.

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, we we had seen the growth of that

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 3>program under Sean Elliott, and they were bringing so many

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 3>guys back and stuff like that. But the quarterback hasn't

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 3>looked good in the limited exposure that I've gotten to him.

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 3>There's been some accuracy, a version there and when the

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 3>passing game is not going, the running game is played down.

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 3>They also haven't played as good on defense. It's the

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 3>reason that they're on three. They also have injury concerns

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 3>in this game. It's there's too many guys to list.

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 3>But Georgia State has like five key contributors that are

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 3>questionable right now, and I don't know if they're gonna

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 3>play or not, or if they do, are they going

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 3>to be compromised, et cetera. Coastal Carolina was the team

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 3>that lost everybody over the offseason except for Grayson McCall.

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 3>But you know, we see what they've done in the past.

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 3>You were just sort of in the early season trying

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 3>to get sort of a read on how good that

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 3>team is. Now, we'll have a better idea coming out

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 3>a Thursday night. But I like Coastal Carolina more heading

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 3>in than Georgia's State. But you know, again, just because

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.599
<v Speaker 3>of what the market's telling me and my experience with this,

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to bet that out of respect for

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 3>some of these sharp players, but I would lean Coastal Carolina.

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, what do you like in the Friday games?

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Like we mentioned before, we've got Virginia at Syracuse, Nevada

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Air Force, Boise State at UTAP and look, if you

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have a good lean, we can skip them. But

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>do you like anything for Friday Night?

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 3>I got one bet on Friday Night and the other

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 3>two I have what I would feel like are legitimate leans,

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 3>even though I haven't met them yet. I like Syracuse

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 3>a lot on you know, in the first one. That

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 3>game kicks off at six pm Central, seven pm Eastern.

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not just saying that because Thomas is producing

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 3>and he'll make my screen go black if I if

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 3>I go the other way with Virginia. But I don't

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 3>understand why this line is not already in the double digits.

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 3>It seemed like, you know, it opened at Syracuse minus eight,

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 3>and I was talking on the Sunday Show with Thomas,

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 3>this thing's going to be double digits in a blink,

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 3>and it actually was like it toggled up to like

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 3>minus ten on Monday. But it's weird because there's been

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 3>a little buyback since then. And I don't know who's

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 3>betting on Virginia. I don't know what you could have

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 3>seen of Virginia to this point to be confident in them.

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Virginia has very clearly taken numerous steps down since the

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 3>end of last season. Lost the coaching staff, They lost

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 3>their entire offensive line, a couple of them to graduation.

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 3>The rest of them just up and left. You know,

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 3>the center went to Michigan and etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. So

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 3>you had to you had to replace the coach, Jeff,

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 3>You had to replace the entire offensive line. The defense

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 3>already wasn't very good. You were just sort of hanging

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 3>your hat on the idea that they had a star

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 3>quarterback in Brennan Armstrong and then four NFL receivers. Well,

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 3>the problem so far is the offensive line is so leaky.

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 3>On the Virginia side, Armstrong can't even sit back there

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 3>and survey for the receivers. He's getting pressure immediately. They're

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 3>running running game, which wasn't good before, it's still not good.

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 3>And so it's like this one dimensional offense who is

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 3>being extremely handicapped by the offensive line that they're playing behind.

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 3>It has taken, you know, sort of taking the wings

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 3>off of the aerial attack. And then on the Syracuse side,

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 3>you tell me how Virginia is going to defend this offense.

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how they defend either the running game

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 3>of Schrader and Tucker. I think they're going to run

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 3>all over them. I also don't know how Virginia is

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 3>gonna defend the sideline of sideline passing game, which Syracuse

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 3>did not. I mean, they had the dominant run offense before.

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Now they have the sideline to sideline passing game as well.

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how Virginia is going to defend any

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 3>of it. My ad justed line on this game is

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 3>Syracuse minus twelve point eight. I don't need to me personally.

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't even think that goes far enough. If I

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 3>was to send this line, it would be more like

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Syracuse minus fourteen minus fourteen and a half. If you

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 3>can get Syracuse in the single digits, absolutely by the ticket.

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to some games with an enormous

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>amount of cash on one side, and thora I wrote

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>on the sheet.

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 2>It's in the private chat there.

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I put the tickets on there as well, so you

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>can see where all of these games are. We're going

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to start with UCF minus twenty versus Georgia Tech that's

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>got ninety nine percent of the cash on it, which

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>was just a crazy amount.

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Usually just don't see that.

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Uga minus forty five has considerable amount of cash on that.

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Utah at Arizona State. Of course, Arizona State just firing

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Herman Edwards has an enormous amount of cash. That one

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is actually much closer on the tickets. Georgia and Utah

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>much closer on the tickets. Is a big discrepancy in

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>UCF Utah minus or excuse me, Memphis minus eleven and

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>a half versus North Texas has got a big chunk

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a little closer in the tickets than normal. Auburn

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>minus seven against Missouri has a massive amount of cash.

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Southern minus ten versus Ball State as well in

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>unlv at Utah State minus two and a half has

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a big amount of tickets.

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 2>So when you look at.

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Those games, is there one or two that you either

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>love you're definitely on the cash side, or that you

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>just despise and you say, how can we be laying

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>this many points? Because there's no underdogs in this that

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>are getting the cash. It's all favorite. So a lot

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of people think that these teams are just going to

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely dominate.

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 3>There's a couple of these that I've already bet and

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 3>then there's a couple that I have leans on that.

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Let me ask you first that the UCF Georgia Tech.

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 3>So that's ninety nine percent of the money is on UCF,

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 3>but only fifty two of the tickets. Is that what

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 3>it is? Yes?

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's uh, I mean that's what I saw yesterday.

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, the uh that one.

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Let me give you an updated number on that one.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for it real and as you are, you know,

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 3>I'll just sort of fill the audience in and we

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 3>talked a little bit about this one on on the discord,

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 3>uh that we do right before this where.

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Ninety six it hasn't moved a bunch.

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Wow. Yeah, the UCF, not only, of course, are they

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 3>the objectively better team, and not only do you wonder

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 3>about Georgia Tech's mindset and how their effort is going

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 3>to be in this game because the Jeff Collins era

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 3>we have reached just about midnight when he turns into

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 3>a pumpkin. I don't know if it's gonna happen after

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 3>this game, the game after that, we'll see. We've had

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 3>one coach firing each of the last two Sundays. Are

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna get Jeff Collins On on Sunday, We'll have

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 3>to see it's it's it's definitely in play. Uh Jeordia Tech.

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 3>They're a team that doesn't do anything good. But the

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 3>thing that they're objectively the worst at it's defending the run.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 3>That's what you see. It's by far what UCF does

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 3>the best. Uh you know, I mean UCF has. The

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 3>quarterback is very much John Rey's plumbley, very much in

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 3>line with the quarterbacks that how do I put this?

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Gusmells On fetishizes he's like sort of in the same

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 3>bucket as like a Nick Marshall, where it's like, you know,

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, like they they you know, I

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 3>burnet Cam Newton for the one year, but like with

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 3>you know exactly it's it's it's a guy with who

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 3>can scramble, who can also he has a little bit

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 3>of arm strength, and his biggest weakness by far is accuracy.

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Gus has always been to work with those guys.

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 2>That's just the easiest.

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll fix them, you know, Uh, they've got the arm,

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they've got the wheels.

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll fix the accuracy.

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>That's like that's the arrogance of most coaches, is I

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>can fix anybody, right.

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And and I think you know the way Gus

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 3>sees it is when my running game is humming, and

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 3>if I have a quarterback like that, it will be

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 3>because his offensive lines are typically good, the running back

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 3>talent is typically good, the running back room is typically deep.

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 3>That that once that thing gets rolling downhill and they

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 3>start playing the tempo and it's like six yard run,

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 3>they sprint back to the line, snap it right away,

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 3>five yard run and then you know, stuff like that.

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 3>The defense gets on their heels and then that's when

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 3>you open up the passing game. So you can sort

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 3>of solder over some of the accuracy limitations just by

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 3>getting the defense on their heels and all of a sudden,

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 3>we do the quick pass off to the left, you know,

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. Gus we talked and you know in the

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 3>previous show about how Gus had some very weird play

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 3>calling tendencies against Louis that may have cost UCF that game,

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 3>But that was a game where UCF was trailing by

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 3>a possession or whatever for a large part of it.

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 3>You wouldn't anticipate that they're going to be trailing against

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Georgia Tech. So the game script that you need to

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 3>get the blowout would seem to be right there for

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 3>you where because once UCF gets that double digital lead,

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 3>that's when they become crazy scary because now it's the

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 3>sprint back to the line and they're run and run

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 3>and running, et cetera. They don't have to put John

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Reeve's plumb lee back in the pocket and ask him

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 3>to survey, which is what they did way too much

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 3>against Louisvillan. Again, in my opinion, that gave the game

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 3>away through that they match up well here. But this

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 3>is a very big number, especially when you're not crazy

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 3>confident in UCF. But there's no chance I would bet

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Georgia Tech in that game. If I had to bet,

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I would definitely be leaning in UCF.

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Are there any other games out of this group that

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you have a good lean on between? Yeah, the Jive

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Utah Lane fourteen, Memphis eleven and a half, Auburn seven,

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Southern ten, and you don't beat two and a half.

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 3>So that I have one on this group of games.

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 3>I have one ticket purchased so far. Uh. That ticket

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 3>was on Auburn minus six and a half. It's now

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 3>ticked up to seven. I totally understand that. I think

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 3>that the line, this line is going to be above

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 3>seven by the time it kicks, who knows, maybe even

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 3>by the time we get off, you know, get off

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 3>the recording. It it opened low because nobody wants to

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 3>bet on Brian Harrison, and everybody expects Brian Harson not

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 3>to be their coach next year. I understand all that.

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 3>I also, you know, we talked about this before, but

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Brian Harson's game plan in the last game against Penn

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 3>State was one of the dumbest things that I seen

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 3>all season. It was even dumber than Gus letting Plumby

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 3>throw thirty three times in a close game against Louisville

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 3>where Penn State's defense they really really struggle tackling. They're

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 3>they're tackling conversion rates bottom ten in the country. And

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 3>Auburn did not give the ball to the guy who

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 3>is the hardest to tackle on their sideline, Tank Bigsby,

0:17:57.600 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 3>touched the ball eleven times in that game. It just

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 3>made absolute no sense. Yeah, the game was just getting

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 3>away from Auburn, and Harson seemed to be panicking more

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 3>and more as it did. This game. You know, we

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 3>talk about like the game scripts and what that facilitates.

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 3>You would not expect Missouri to be able to ambush

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Auburn in this spot. Missouri has bad quarterback play Number one.

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 3>The receiving room is not as good as people wanted

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 3>it to be. Yet, you know, they had signed Luther Burden,

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the five star receiver. I think people thought he'd come

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 3>in right away and be like the college version of

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.479
<v Speaker 3>Randy Moss. He's not playing well so far. Like I mean,

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 3>he's playing and he's getting some catches, but like you know,

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 3>on a personal basis, it hasn't been the best. That

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 3>the routes are clearly not totally polished yet, the ball

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 3>scales need a little bit of work, et cetera. The

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 3>rest of their receiving core is not that great. It's

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of cast sass from other schools or else

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 3>guys that were stuck you know, on the depth chart

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 3>like earlier in their careers, et cetera. And then the

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 3>running game they I mean, that's what last year they

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 3>funneled all the touches to Tyler Bade, both in the

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 3>running game and also in the receiving game. Tyler Baty,

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 3>of course, is now on the Baltimore Ravens that Missouri

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 3>now has gone to this like they're rotating like three

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 3>different guys in It's Nathaniel Pete and then like two

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 3>other kids, two other lower profile kids that they didn't

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 3>sign in the portal. I don't love that offense. I

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 3>don't love their offensive line either, and I certainly don't

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 3>like Missouri's defense. You would like to think that that

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 3>Harson now going back to the Auburn side, that Harson

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 3>is going to listen to all the criticisms over you

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 3>know that he's been hearing for the last three or

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 3>four days, not about him personally, but about game planning.

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Get the friggin' ball to Tank Bigsby. If Tank Bigsby

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 3>has twenty or more touches in this game, I'm telling

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 3>you Auburn is going to cover. I do. I do

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 3>like Auburn for all those reasons. My line is also

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 3>closer to Auburn minus ten. Auburn's defense is really good.

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 3>That that hasn't changed there, and unlike Penn State, they're

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 3>reliable tackling. Penn State might have more dudes, you know,

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 3>in terms of athletes and stuff like that, but overall

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 3>over the entire body of work. Auburn has been at

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 3>least more reliable with their run fits and then converting

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 3>the tackles. Missouri doesn't have the singular athletes that the

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Penn State offense had where, yeah, you know where they

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 3>could start out running people once they got into space

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 3>between Singleton and a couple of those receivers. Missouri doesn't

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 3>have guys like that. So I like Auburn to control

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 3>that game and to win by double digits in a

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 3>get right game for Brian Harson that he badly needs.

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 3>It's not just that the context of the short term.

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 3>If you look at the rest of Auburn's schedule after

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 3>this Missouri game, it is about as grizzly of a

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 3>schedule as you're going to see, you know, for the

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 3>last eight games or whatever it is. Brian Harson needs

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 3>this game to keep his job. He I don't think

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 3>he'll get fired if he loses it, but he's going

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 3>to lose a whole bunch of those last eight games.

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.479
<v Speaker 3>So this is a must have and they know it.

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 3>I do like Auburn in that one. The other ones

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 3>for me are more leans or else thought experiments. I

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 3>guess I would say I have thought about I almost

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 3>don't even want to admit this one. This is one

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 3>of the bets that stinks. So it's not just to

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 3>hold your nose game. It stinks so much that I

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 3>don't even want to admit publicly that I've been thinking

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 3>about betting on this team, and I actually still might.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 3>It won't be in my column, but I actually might

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 3>have a bet on this team live and again, of

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 3>trepidacious to say it, but I'm absolutely considering betting on

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 3>Arizona State against Utah. I can't believe I'm saying it,

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 3>But where the line is going.

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 2>These games go either way. After you fire a coach.

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>You talked about the dead cat bounce and all of

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that before, these games go one of two ways where

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it's either they get slaughtered, you know, because their coach

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>has gone and they're upset and they have not putting

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>forth the effort, or they go out there and they

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>play way better expected. Because this was a long time coming,

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>and the Herm Edwards one was just so clear and

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>obvious that this was going to happen as soon as

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 1>they had an embarrassing loss happening against East Michigan.

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Goodbye her So yeah.

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well it was quite obvious to the twenty plus

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 3>guys that left in the transfer portal from Arizona over

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 3>the offseason, maybe not as clear to the guys that

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 3>Herm ended up signing to replace them. I'm sure Herm was,

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, sort of selling like I'm gonna be here

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 3>for your entire time. But yeah, I mean, you saw

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 3>between the defections the coaches have and the roster where

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 3>that thing was going, and then you know, they had

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 3>so many different new players, which made it even harder

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 3>for her at the beginning of the season. Doesn't excuse

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 3>the EMU thing at all, and it turned out to

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 3>be the h what would you call it, the anvil

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 3>that broke herms back in this case where it didn't

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 3>really seem like the guy that hired him, the Ray

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Edwards whatever or Ray Anderson right the ad whatever his

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 3>name is, he didn't really care about the scandal so

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 3>much as losing to EMU. You know, like he just

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 3>let Herm survive that thing until they lost the EMU

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.719
<v Speaker 3>and then it looks like Anderson fired Herm Edwards when

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 3>he was literally walking off the field.

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I think they said, I think they were in that meeting.

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>They're like we're gonna have him tomorrow, and maybe.

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 3>I would love to have the audio avoid he caught

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 3>up to her and walking off the field. We got

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 3>the video, we don't have the audio. It's possible that

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 3>he was fired right then. If not, I think the

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 3>AD already knew he was going to get fired. But

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 3>as far as this game, going back to your point,

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 3>if there's anyone out there that has against the spread

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 3>data of the week after a coach gets fired in

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 3>college football going back years and years, please reach out

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 3>to me on Twitter. My handle is at thor Ku.

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 3>My dms are open, Please send it to me. I

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 3>was looking around mostly because I'm too lazy to go

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 3>case by case beyond last year. I can tell you

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 3>last year, I wasn't too lazy to accrue those numbers.

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 3>Last year it was even it was like there was

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 3>like twelve instances of this or ten it was something

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 3>like that, but it was five hundred against the spread.

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 3>It was like six and six against the spread for

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 3>the team. Of course, Nebraska last week. Talking about the

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Sharps being wrong, they were wrong on Nebraska last week.

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 3>All the Sharks were on Nebraska last weekend that game,

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 3>they they were They had a ticket bonfire in the

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 3>second court early in the second quarter of that game.

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 3>It was over Nebraska. You didn't get the bounce up

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 3>performance with Arizona State. We'll see if we get it.

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 3>It's certainly possible, but I think that the real point,

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.199
<v Speaker 3>at least with recent history, until I can get some

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 3>historical data if anyone else is a crew to my

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 3>working theory on this is don't don't don't. Don't rotely

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 3>go one way or the other of just assuming that

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 3>the team that just fired its coach is going to

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 3>continue to be awful, nor should you consider that they're

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 3>going to play way up the next week. It remains.

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Like everything.

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Like everything, it all depends on the handicap in question.

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 3>In this one, I am showing value on Arizona State objectively,

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 3>even though I toggle them down in my power rankings.

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 3>My line on this game is Utah minus nine point

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 3>one and and now the the line was up to

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 3>sixteen and a half at one point. Maybe it's down

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 3>to fifteen and a half or fifteen right now, but

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 3>over the two touchdowns, objectively, that is too many points

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 3>to give. It seems like a reaction to Oklahoma smoking

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Nebraska last week, even though that doesn't have anything to

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 3>do with this game or people wanting to be out

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 3>on Arizona State. And look, nobody loves Utah more than me.

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 3>Nobody was banging the drum more for Utah. Nobody liked

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Utah more In the opener against Florida's still passed that.

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I didn't get the cover in that one, But I

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 3>do like Utah as a team. This doesn't have anything

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 3>to do with Utah. This has to do with the

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 3>line going way above what it should be just because

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 3>of the circumstance of the week, when we know at

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 3>least over the last year and a half with the data,

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't affect it one way or the other. I

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 3>mean the right around five hundred. As far as the

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 3>week after you fire or your coach, I would absolutely

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 3>lean Arizona State. With where this line has gotten. They

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 3>tacked like eight points onto that after Arizona State fired

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Herm Edwards. HERM Edwards is not worth eight points. It

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 3>has gone above what it should be. But I haven't

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 3>bet it yet. I need to get some you know,

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 3>the you know some to plug my nose. But I

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 3>absolutely might bet Arizona State hard. Lean on Arizona State.

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 2>That's that's a take your medicine bet right there.

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Sure a couple of overs here thor before we get

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to the top five games, app State for James Madison

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>over fifty nine has a huge liane, but the tickets

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>are less than fifty percent on the over most tickets

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>on the under, which is just crazy. Wku versus Florida

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>International sixty five and a half is getting hammered with that.

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Over Miami versus Middle Tennessee over fifty two and a

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>half is getting smashed on both sides, cash and tickets.

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And then Washington versus stand for Over sixty three and

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a half, hard on the cash, not so hard on

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>the tickets. So you got any good lien on a

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>total between these four games?

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Store, Yeah, these are none of these are the I

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 3>do have two totals in my column. None of these

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 3>are those. But it's interesting because the market is in

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 3>line with where my system is pointing you. The Middle

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Tennessee Miami game, when I what is that live Scott

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 3>that the total it was?

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I will double check, but it was and a half, yes.

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 3>Okay, and that's that's what I had my sheet too.

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 3>My adjusted total in that game is sixty three point

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 3>five as well above what what you know what what

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 3>they put out in Vegas. So I'm my system would

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 3>definitely be pointing you at at the over middle. Tennessee

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 3>can throw the ball around a bet. You know, they

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 3>they went they they've understock still. They've always been about

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 3>having like the the quick, small, darty guys on the

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 3>outside and the short game. But they've gone even more towards,

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 3>you know that way by by bringing in this air

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 3>raid offensive coordinator. They can move the ball through the

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 3>air a little bit. Not a great team, but they

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 3>can move the ball through the air a little bit.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 3>And then Miami last week, you know, maybe this line

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 3>there the total. Maybe it started out a little bit

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 3>depressed because Miami scored in the single digits against Texas

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 3>A and M.

0:27:57.880 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 2>But Scott couldn't punch it in.

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah about this last week We're driving and driving and

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>could not This was the definition of bend but don't break,

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>where most college defenses are bend and then break.

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, but we had a y and m executed

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 2>it perfectly.

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Last week. We had a wild stat where Miami last

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 3>week became the first team since at least the year

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 3>two thousand, I don't know how far this calls back.

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 3>To get twenty or more first downs without an offensive

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.880
<v Speaker 3>touchdown crazy unthinkable to move the ball as effectively as

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:31.719
<v Speaker 3>Miami did without without cashing one eventually in Miami's up

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 3>don't downgrade Miami's offense because of what happened last week.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 3>A and M has a good defense and they're still

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 3>moving the ball on Obviously, they had the struggles within

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 3>the red zone. They'll have to figure that out against

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 3>better defenses. But I still trust that offense to move

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 3>the ball. They have a good offensive line. They have

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 3>a first round NFL, first round NFL draft prospect at quarterback.

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 3>They have a lot of guys on the ELTs. Even

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 3>without Ristrepo, they still go three or four deep in

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 3>guys that are dangerous, you know. In their receiving core,

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 3>they have two tight ends that might play in the NFL,

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 3>two different ones. And the running back room now has

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 3>gotten quite good since they've gotten Henry Perish. You had

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 3>him to Knight and and some of those other guys.

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Some of those other guys, you know, it's sort of

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 3>you think of like Swiss army knife and having different utilities.

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Before that's all they had. Now you had Parish to

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 3>that whose skill set is a little bit more fleshed out.

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 3>You allow the guys behind him to do the situational

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 3>stuff that they're good at. Remember last week when you

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 3>were talking about A and M about how Auchain's game

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 3>had played a little bit down with out Spiller. Could Spiller,

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 3>could you know he could handle the load and do

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 3>do that sort of stuff. Miami didn't have that guy before,

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 3>but now they sort of do with Parish, a guy

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 3>that can handle heavy usage. So I like that offense.

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 3>I think Middle Tennessee's offense probably better than people think.

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 3>And Middle Tennessee's defense ain't gonna put up any sort

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 3>of a fight, So I, you know, I definitely like

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 3>that one the over the Western Kentucky game two. My

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 3>system loves that one.

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 2>My sside think, yeah.

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, my system set that one at seventy four and

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 3>a half. Florida Internationals defense is one of the three

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 3>worst in the nation. Western Kentucky they can't wait to

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 3>find a spot for Austin Reid to be able to

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 3>have his get right game. They played pretty defent last week.

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 3>The receivers were dominating Indiana's secondary As expected, Reid has

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 3>gotten a little bit better each game. He was a

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 3>kid who who they signed was that D two player

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 3>of the year. Brought him in to replace Bailey Zappy.

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 3>The first couple of games, the offense wasn't quite as

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 3>explosive as we'd like, but again he was learning the

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 3>system and it's gotten a little bit better, a little

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 3>bit better, a little bit better. I think this is

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 3>a game where they go absolutely ballistic. FIU does not

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 3>have the bodies in the secondary to be able to

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 3>match up with Western Kentucky across the formation and FIU

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 3>on their side. Western Kentucky defense, of course, has been

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 3>no great shakes this year. They you know, they gave

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 3>up what twenty five points to an FCS team, and

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 3>and last week against Indiana India, they did hold Indiana

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 3>down to at the start of the game, but then

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 3>the one drive they needed to stop them, they couldn't.

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Indiana drove the length of the field three minutes left

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 3>and you scored that touchdown then got the two point conversion.

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 3>I think FIU will be able to put up some

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 3>points against Western Kentucky as well. I was leading the

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Western Kentucky side earlier in the week because Vegas put

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 3>out a bad number. It was like Western Kentucky minus

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty six or twenty six and a half when it open.

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 3>The market justifiably bunched Western Kentucky up to you know whatever.

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 3>It is now like a thirty thirty one point favorite. Yeah, my,

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 3>just a line on that is thirty two point four.

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 3>But with the line movement the way that it has,

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 3>I can't bet Western Kentucky anymore. I also can't I'm

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 3>certainly not gonna betting on FIU. The play in that

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 3>game for me would be the over for sure.

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it looks like you can get it at thirty

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>one or thirty and a half now, So, like you said,

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that has expanded a bunch. Let's get into these top

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>five games. Or we've got number five Clemson at number

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty one week Forest. Clemson is a seven point favorite

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in that game. Looks like you like Clemson in that

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>one Florida number twenty on the road against number eleven Tennessee.

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Kind it season ten and a half point game. You're

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of right on the line in that one. Sixty

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>two and a half is the over. Number ten Arkansas,

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>number twenty three Texas A and M. Texas A and

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>M is a home favorite by two and a half points,

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of right in line where you're at as well.

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Baylor number seventeen at Iowa State.

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Iowa State is a two and a half point favorite

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in that game, and number fifteen, Oregan on the road

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>is a touchdown favorite by seven at Washington State. Fifty

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half is the line in that game.

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So any significant leans in these big five games that

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone's going to be watching the nationally televised ones here.

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I lean hard on Clemson if that number is

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 3>at seven, you know, like you were sort of alluding to,

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 3>my adjusted line in that game is closer to Clemson

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 3>minus ten. I want to see. There's a couple of

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:52.719
<v Speaker 3>different things. First of all, is Brian Breese. I assume

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 3>that he is going to play. He didn't play in

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 3>the last game because tragedy his sister died with brain cancer.

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Certainly understand and it would also be understandable if he

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:06.239
<v Speaker 3>missed more games than the one. The game that they

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 3>played before was against Louisiana Tech. They didn't necessarily need

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 3>them to beat Louisiana Tech. This game far more pressing,

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 3>especially against that slow mesh that that Wake Forest does.

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 3>How do you defeat the slow mesh. It's blowing it

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 3>up at the mesh point, right, It's it's getting that

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 3>immediate pressure with your defensive line. Well, that's what Clemson

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 3>does the best of They have the best front seven

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 3>in college football. And I say that knowing how good

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 3>you know. For instance, Georgia's front seven is et cetera.

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 3>But Clemson has four different guys that are going to

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 3>get drafted high starting along that defensive line. They have

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 3>multiple rotational guys in the defensive line after that that

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.719
<v Speaker 3>are going to be drafted, perhaps even in the middle rounds.

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Then they might have the best lineback in college football

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 3>in that Simpson kit. So they have all kinds of

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 3>talent up front. They have disrupted that slow mesh in

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 3>the past, and it totally screws up that the timing

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 3>of that wake Forest offense. The reason that the wake

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 3>for is the slow mesh that it discombinedbulates other defenses. Again,

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 3>you take that away. If you can disrupt that, you

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 3>have to hurry up the quarterback, hurry up the running back.

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 3>They could drop the ball. They can make bad decisions

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 3>from there. The routes of the receivers aren't able to

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 3>fully flesh out and flow route. So we'll see about that.

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 3>I do think Clemson matches up well. Sam Hartman has

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 3>only been back for a couple of games since coming

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 3>back from that illness. I just think the seven number

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 3>is a little bit too low. But there's some of

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 3>these unanswered questions that I have, and I can also

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 3>say I know that Wake Forest is the sharp side

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.800
<v Speaker 3>so far predominantly, that's where the money of the sharps

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 3>have been going towards that way. So because of all,

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, sort of my questions about it, I sort

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 3>of talk myself out of betting on a lean so

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.280
<v Speaker 3>far on Clemson. But if I do bet that one,

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 3>it'll be Clemson as long as that number stays at seven.

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not interested if it toag goles up to seven

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 3>and a half. If it goes to six and a half,

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm definitely buying a Clemson ticket for sure. So we'll

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 3>we'll just see the way that that one goes. The

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 3>Florida Tennessee one, I can't touch the side because first

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 3>of all, I don't trust Florida. Second of all, Tennessee

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 3>is beaten around two Patsy's and then the other game

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 3>when they played a legitimate opponent. They probably should have lost.

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 3>That they were down on Pittsburgh for most of the game,

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 3>and then I had to come back to.

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 2>The very end, and then you got hurt, right then, yeah.

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Exactly right. They Yeah, Tennessee injured Slovis and then Pittsburgh. Yeah. Yeah.

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 3>That you also have in this game of key contributors

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 3>on both sides where we don't know if they're gonna play,

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 3>and seeming like they might not from what I'm hearing.

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Cedric Tillman's the big one on the Tennessee side. Uh,

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 3>And it seems like at least, well, my birdies are

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 3>telling me, well, we'll see when it comes to Saturday.

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.399
<v Speaker 3>My birdies told me yesterday that Jordan Travis wasn't gonna play,

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 3>and then you were. You kicked the walking boot and

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 3>he was back out of practice today. I don't know

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 3>if he's gonna play either. But like you know, it's

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 3>the college football injury thing. It's a whole nother can

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 3>of worms that we don't have the time to get into.

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 3>But the fact that they don't have to report the

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 3>injuries at all, I mean, not even accurately.

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>The fact that you have to be the spymaster varies

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to figure it out.

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 3>You do have to be various. Yeah, you gotta send

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:11.399
<v Speaker 3>your little Birdie's in. You gotta do the whole thing.

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 3>But you know, with Tillman, we don't know what the

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 3>status is yet, but it does seem like those around

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 3>the team right now they lean towards him not playing. Then.

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 3>On the also, Jabari Small one of their rotational backs.

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 3>They have a couple other ancillary parts as well that

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 3>are questionable. On the Florida side, the biggest one for

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 3>them is Ventro Miller, their linebacker. Ventro Miller has had

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 3>durability questions the past three years. Really when it's really

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 3>weird to watch Florida's defense, regardless of who the coaches were, Mullan,

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 3>the assistants, NAPI, or now, every time Ventro Miller is

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 3>in the game, Florida's defense plays up. Whenever Ventro Miller

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 3>is not in the game, it plays down. That much

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 3>is irrefutably true. So if Ventro Miller is not playing

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 3>against Tennessee, you like the matchup with Tennessee's offense against

0:36:56.840 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 3>Florida defense. If Ventro Miller is playing for Florida, you

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 3>would like Florida's defense in that matchup a little bit more,

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 3>especially if Tillman isn't playing. But my number is really

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 3>close to what the Vegas number is. I'm not showing

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 3>any real discrepancy at all. All Yeah, it's too close

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 3>to call. And I also don't know about these key players,

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 3>what's gonna happen with them. My system, though, I will say,

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 3>leans heavily towards the over of this game, but again

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 3>that's not counting et cetera. Tillman if he ends up

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 3>being out, which does compromise that that Tennessee receiving court

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 3>because when he plays, they got three studs out there,

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 3>it's really hard to defend them. So right now, I'm

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 3>definitely not going to play the side no matter what.

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 3>No matter what I hear, I will consider an overplay.

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I would love to hear that Tillman is going to

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 3>play and that Miller is not going to play, and

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 3>then I would get real confident in it. But I

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 3>just don't know that yet. So I'm waiting on some

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 3>information there. In emigaanst Arkansas, I'm staying away from that one.

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't have. I don't have a good read on

0:37:57.680 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 3>either of these two teams. I've tried to fade both

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 3>of them. So far, I've gotten closed, but no cigar.

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 3>I tried to fad Arkansas and the opener against Cincinnati.

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 3>I thought Cincinnati had a real shot to win that

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 3>game outright as a six and a half point underdog,

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 3>and because of the circumstances in that game, Arkansas not

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 3>only ended up winning it but ended up covering. I

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 3>think they won by seven and covered by half a point.

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 3>And then A and M last week, you know, like

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 3>I tried to bet Miami plus six and a half,

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 3>and even though Miami actually had a good offensive game,

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:27.760
<v Speaker 3>they also had a good defensive game, they still failed

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 3>to cover that game because I couldn't punch the touchdowns

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 3>and once I got into the red zone. So I

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 3>don't feel like I have a great read on either

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 3>of these teams yet A and M. I do. My

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 3>system has A and M favored by four point two points,

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 3>so I guess my system would slightly lean towards A

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 3>and M. But I'm definitely not gonna be touching that one.

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Baylor Iowa State. That's a really interesting one, especially with

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 3>where the market has taken that line where it opened

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 3>as Baylor minus one or one and a half and

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 3>now it's Iowa say minus two and a half or

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.760
<v Speaker 3>even three at a lot of books right now. That's

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 3>it makes you scratch your head a little bit because

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know any sharp that thinks at full strength

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 3>both these teams that Baylor is not the better team

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 3>than i Aowa State. But unfortunately for Baylor, they're not

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:20.359
<v Speaker 3>at full strength. They have numerous guys that missed last week,

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 3>and we don't know yet, but it doesn't seem to

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 3>be trending well. The starting running back Ta McWilliams, their

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 3>slot receiver Baldwin, the tight end Sims. I'm not even

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 3>hitting all of them. There's even more guys. They're a

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 3>little bit compromised, so they have some injury concerns there,

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 3>and especially the thing that concerns you is the skill

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 3>guys if they're out again. Blake Shapin has not looked

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 3>as good as It's not me Baylor. Baylor thought Blake

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Shapen was gonna look better. They wouldn't have told Jerry

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 3>Bohannon to go and kick rocks and leave if they

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 3>knew that that shape wasn't gonna play as well. You wonder,

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 3>is that because Shapan's been playing with skill guys that

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 3>he didn't think he would be because of the injury concerns

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 3>early on, or is shaping just not quite as good

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 3>as they thought. Baylor's also played you know, they played

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 3>byu that you know, they they played some teams so

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 3>far they have you know, it hasn't been like Minnesota

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 3>playing three cupcakes whatever. So so that stuff's up in

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 3>the air with them, and and and perhaps because of that,

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 3>that's why this line has moved to Iowa State minus three.

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.240
<v Speaker 3>I I know someone very close to the Baylor program

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 3>who over the years has helped me out quite a

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 3>bit with Baylor handicaps, because it seems like he's on

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 3>every single time. I messaged that guy to ask him

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 3>what he thought about this game, and he did not

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 3>sound very confident on the Baylor side. And typically, I

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 3>mean when he is confident, he'll let you know that

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.359
<v Speaker 3>he is confident. He is not confident in this game,

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 3>perhaps because of a confidence of those factors. I can't

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:46.879
<v Speaker 3>bet Baylor because of all those different reasons. I also

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 3>don't love Iowa State. Though they have a decent defense,

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 3>the offense is super duper young. They didn't do much against.

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 2>I lost everybody year.

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Literally, Yeah, perty bresol the tight ends, most of

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 3>the offensive line. Against Iowa, they didn't do a ton

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 3>on offense. They ended up winning anyway because of the

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 3>fumble at the goal line by Potty Bomb and then

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:07.839
<v Speaker 3>they had the I always stated their one good drive

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 3>coming off of that, But I it's hard to trust

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 3>them against Dave Randon defense too, So you're sort of

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 3>on both sides being like, who can I trust? Classic

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 3>stay away game. The Oregon Washington State game is interesting

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 3>in from an information perspective. For me, I don't see

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 3>an edge on this one, you know, just in terms

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 3>of the numbers. I guess my numbers would slightly lean

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:29.759
<v Speaker 3>Oregon at at I think I got Oregon minus eight

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 3>point eight. But I it's hard for me to take

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 3>them off of their triumphant win last week when they

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 3>slapped around BYU.

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:41.439
<v Speaker 1>We've seen them look really good and really bad, so

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to know who the real Oregon is right now.

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 3>Well said, it's sort of you know, I'm coming to

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:48.360
<v Speaker 3>you live from Minneapolis. It's sort of like the Vikings

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 3>in the first two game. They flapped around the Packers

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 3>and then they got slapped around by the Eagles.

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 2>It was I had them in that game yesterday.

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's the inverse in this case where Oregon got

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 3>absolutely annihilated. It just got to run over like the

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, coyote or whatever in the first game by

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Georgia and then in the last game they were the

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.320
<v Speaker 3>team slapping around by the seem We mentioned that you

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:11.760
<v Speaker 3>know that have beaten Bailet pulled that game out in overtime.

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:14.359
<v Speaker 3>But BYU in that game was without both their their

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 3>their top two receivers, Gunner Romney who hasn't played yet

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:20.280
<v Speaker 3>this year, and then Poka Nakua, so b Yu is down.

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 3>And BYU went into that game off of that win

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 3>against Baylor where they sort of had to figure things

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 3>out and then scratch and claw and then pull it

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 3>out in overtime, force overtime, then pull it out and overtime.

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 3>Now Oregon comes in off that win, which is big

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 3>for them. Now you have to travel out to the

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 3>polue out there in Pullman, Washington, out up in the

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 3>wilderness to play this Washington State team who has definitely

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 3>played better than we have all anticipated so far. But

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:48.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know anyone that can get their fingers totally

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 3>on Washington State. They're not Mike Leach's Washington State. They're

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 3>not Nick Rolovich's Washington State. This team is something different.

0:42:56.920 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 3>They've clearly improved on defense. The offense will see they've

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 3>done a better job of not putting themselves into bad spots.

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:07.719
<v Speaker 3>I think that maybe you would have thought heading in

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 3>because cam Ward last year in the FCS, even though

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 3>he put up Bazooka numbers, he threw a whole bunch

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 3>of interceptions. Washington State is doing a better job of

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 3>at least controlling the ball on offense, but they have

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:20.720
<v Speaker 3>not been as explosive nor I think as efficient overall

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 3>as they have been in the past. This one, for me,

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 3>it could go either way. I feel like Washington State

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:29.840
<v Speaker 3>is licking its chops with the situational spot. It's in

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 3>getting that Oregon team off that win over BYU feeling

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:36.720
<v Speaker 3>itself slapping around BYU. Now they come in there, maybe

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 3>you ambush them, But Oregon they're feeling good too. I

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 3>think they think that they figured things out after that

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 3>the disaster of the opener. For me, that's an informational game,

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 3>and I think we're gonna get some good information out.

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Of it, all right, Going to the games that you

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>like thor we only have two this week. Cincinnati is

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 1>a fourteen point favorite, you like them much more than

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 1>that against Indiana, and Louisiana is a nine point home

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>favorite again or a road favorite, excuse me, against Louisiana Monroe,

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:06.799
<v Speaker 1>and you like them significantly more than that.

0:44:06.840 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Tell us about those games, if you would.

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So one of these my system loves it and

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.240
<v Speaker 3>I love it, and then the other one my system

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 3>loves it and I can't go with my system on it.

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 3>The one that we both love is Cincinnati. Yeah, And

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 3>producer Thomas will know all about this one, because Ray,

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 3>when the lines dropped on Sunday, it was I was

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Jim Kramer, bye bye, bye, bye bye hammer Cincinnati because

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 3>the books made a mistake opened it in single digits.

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 3>You knows, Cincinnati minus eight or whatever because Indiana is

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:40.640
<v Speaker 3>undefeated in fluke circumstances. We'll talk about that in a second.

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 3>But indeed it got immediately hammered up to Cincinnati minus

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:46.320
<v Speaker 3>fourteen by the time people woke up on Monday morning

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 3>with Cincinnati minus fourteen and already jumped six points just

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 3>because of the market movement on it. And but even

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 3>that didn't go far enough. Like my addressed line in

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 3>that game was like nineteen point eight, I guess, and

0:44:57.640 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and so then you know, got to fourteen by Monday morning,

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.240
<v Speaker 3>and then now it's up to sixteen and a half.

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:05.400
<v Speaker 3>I still don't think that's far enough for me. Until

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 3>this thing gets up to twenty. It is too short.

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 3>It just is Look at the resumes. Throw out the records,

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:14.919
<v Speaker 3>but look at the resumes and what actually happened. Yes,

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Indiana's three and zero, but in the first game they

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 3>pulled a game out of their butts against Illinois where

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:21.840
<v Speaker 3>they were down for a lot of it, and then

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 3>they had to drive the length of the field the

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.880
<v Speaker 3>very end to pull that game out after Brett Beilham

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.360
<v Speaker 3>and made all those stupid decisions when he got first

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:29.799
<v Speaker 3>and goalne and was just run up the middle, run

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 3>up the middle, run up the middle, run up the middle,

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 3>turn the ball over and then Indiana go is ninety

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:36.440
<v Speaker 3>nine years thir whatever. And then the next week Indiana

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:39.839
<v Speaker 3>hosts Idaho, who not only is Idaho and FCS team,

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 3>they're not a particularly good FCS team. Last year they

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:44.759
<v Speaker 3>went four and seven. They'd lost the game heading into

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 3>the Indiana one Idaho led Indiana on their home field

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 3>ten to nothing at halftime. Indiana had to rally in

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the second half to beat them. And then last week,

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, we were talking all week love Western Kentucky.

0:45:55.560 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Love Western Kentucky. To upset Indiana. Don't even need the points.

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 3>We tuck. It was a six and a half point underdog.

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 3>They controlled that entire game. They did whatever they wanted

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 3>to do, but Indiana justs hung around. You know, it's

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 3>like the Teddy KGB.

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, hang around, hang around allgtor blood exactly.

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Indiana just they hung It kept feeling like it

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 3>was on the precipice of getting out of hand on

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 3>the Western Kentucky side, where you know, they would score

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 3>a touchdown and then you know it's gonna like, you know,

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 3>there's gonna be like sixteen points and then Indiana would

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 3>have to go yolo in their passing game, we'd get

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 3>a pick six and the route would be on. But Indy,

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 3>it didn't happen. Indians kept hanging around, hanging around. They

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 3>got the ball with three minutes left, they were down

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:37.840
<v Speaker 3>by eight. They drove the length of the field, scored

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 3>the touchdown, got the two point conversion at the very

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:43.720
<v Speaker 3>very end, twenty seconds left, forced overtime. Western Kentucky missed

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 3>the field goal in the front end of it. Indiana

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 3>gets their field goal in the back end. So they

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 3>ended up winning that game, another game that they had

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 3>absolutely no business winning. So Indiana is a three to

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:55.400
<v Speaker 3>zero team who really should be one and two. And

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:58.720
<v Speaker 3>the game that you know again the win was against

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 3>FCS Idaho when they didn't look good in that game either.

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:04.919
<v Speaker 3>And on the Cincinnati side, I sort of think it's

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:09.240
<v Speaker 3>the opposite. They maybe should have beat excuse me, Arkansas

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 3>in the opener. That thing didn't go their way. But

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Cincinnati is a solid team. Last week they started out

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:18.760
<v Speaker 3>sluggishly against Miami of Ohio, who's an above average MAC team,

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 3>but then Cincinnati just slapped them around after halftime. They've

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 3>covered every line of that one, both the side, second

0:47:25.200 --> 0:47:28.880
<v Speaker 3>half line, everything like that. Cincinnati is more talent than

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 3>people think. And now that the quarterback play is established.

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 3>After in camp, you know they were wondering, we're gonna

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:35.920
<v Speaker 3>go Bryant, Are we gonna go pray or how you know,

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 3>what are we gonna do? What are we gonna do

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 3>in the running back room, there's so many different names.

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 3>They've sorted through that stuff now and now also the

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:44.399
<v Speaker 3>receiving course is starting to become more solidified as well.

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:47.880
<v Speaker 3>I love Cincinnati in this game. Again, this line should

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 3>be Cincinnati minus twenty or minus twenty one, as long

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:52.759
<v Speaker 3>as you can get it under that, and certainly if

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:55.879
<v Speaker 3>you can get it fourteen or least by Cincinnati, that's

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:58.279
<v Speaker 3>It's one of my favorite plays of the week. And

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 3>getting it even lower made me even more confident. But

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 3>even in fourteen or you know, between that and seventeen,

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:07.360
<v Speaker 3>definitely a bye. The one where it's not that I

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:09.840
<v Speaker 3>disagree with my system, it's I just can't get my

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:13.719
<v Speaker 3>finger on this one. My system loves Louisiana or as

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 3>some people will call him, Louisiana Lafayette. Yeah, at UO Monroe.

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:23.200
<v Speaker 3>In this case, my system has Louisiana or Louisiana Lafayette

0:48:23.239 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 3>by seventeen and a half, and the live line has

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 3>come all the way down to Louisiana minus nine. The

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 3>reason that I can't bet it it's twofold. I have

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 3>been a little bit higher on UE Monroe than the market.

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:39.560
<v Speaker 3>They swapped out their coordinators. They had Rich Rodriguez, an

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 3>offensive coordinator before and Rich Rodrigez had already started as

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 3>early what do you call soft quitting. Rich Rodriguez had

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 3>already started his soft retirement. But before that, and Uele

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Monroe is not equipped to run his offense even when

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 3>his kid was the quarterback. And then they had an

0:48:56.120 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 3>equally big dope as a defensive coordinator. They swapped those things.

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:02.759
<v Speaker 3>They went back and got the defensive coordinator that they'd

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 3>had Matt Lubik the last time that they were good

0:49:04.640 --> 0:49:07.399
<v Speaker 3>on offense. You bring him back in. The offense has

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:10.719
<v Speaker 3>ticked up early on in the season, and the defense.

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 3>It's not that the talent has jumped up, but they

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 3>seem to be more at least on the same page,

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:18.560
<v Speaker 3>which is an upgrade over what we saw last year.

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Louisiana a team that had been dominant in that conference

0:49:22.200 --> 0:49:25.760
<v Speaker 3>for the past several years under Billy Napier. You lose Napier,

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 3>but not only that, Napier took some players with them,

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:30.800
<v Speaker 3>your best players. They lost some of the other players

0:49:30.840 --> 0:49:33.919
<v Speaker 3>as well. They had lost all the NFL running backs

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 3>that you remember from recent years, like in your memory,

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 3>like Elijah Mitchell and Vegas and all REGs. To what

0:49:41.560 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 3>I call Regas to Riches. I used to call that

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Trey Regas kid. But anyway, they had all these different,

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:48.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, NFL guys that they lost previously, and then

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:50.360
<v Speaker 3>you lose a bunch of the guys that transfers some

0:49:50.480 --> 0:49:53.759
<v Speaker 3>of them with Napier. They're still trying to figure things out,

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 3>and like I said, I can't get my finger on

0:49:56.120 --> 0:50:01.080
<v Speaker 3>that team yet. Qualitatively, this line should be higher. Just

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:04.200
<v Speaker 3>that's dictated by the talent levels on both teams. Louisiana

0:50:04.280 --> 0:50:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Lafayet certainly is the more talented team here, and they're

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 3>more talented enough to justify a double digit spread on

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:13.360
<v Speaker 3>the road. It's just again, You and Roe has taken

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a step up. We're talking about

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 3>the dregs of the FBS, but they have taken an

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:20.439
<v Speaker 3>objective step up, whereas Louisiana Lafayette we know that they've

0:50:20.480 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 3>taken multiple steps down. The question becomes just how far

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:28.319
<v Speaker 3>has Louisiana fallen. We're gonna get a better sense after

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 3>this game, because if they boat race you wom and

0:50:30.200 --> 0:50:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Roe at Uo Monroe. Uh. You know, I think I

0:50:33.200 --> 0:50:35.239
<v Speaker 3>think some of the people that adjusted them way way

0:50:35.280 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 3>down in their power rankings to justify a bet on

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 3>you Monroe, which which is clearly happening. That's why this

0:50:41.160 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 3>line has dropped as far as it right then you

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 3>could sort of start toggling it back for you all Offayette,

0:50:46.840 --> 0:50:49.319
<v Speaker 3>But I just can't trust them yet. It's like I

0:50:49.320 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 3>don't know them. I don't know who the person on

0:50:51.239 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 3>the other end of the door knocking is, you know,

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:55.880
<v Speaker 3>and I don't have the people, so I don't know

0:50:55.920 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 3>if I can open that door or not. I know

0:50:58.320 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 3>I can't trust me yet.

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Look, I agree with that.

0:51:02.400 --> 0:51:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Anything else for week four, I mean I think we

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 1>covered most of it here, So anything else from you Thor,

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that's all I got, That's all we got, It's all

0:51:11.520 --> 0:51:11.879
<v Speaker 1>we need.

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:14.319
<v Speaker 2>So that is going to wrap it up for us.

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Remember you can follow us on the Twitter at Bogman Sports,

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for myself, at Thor ku for Thor and Thor. What

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 1>do you have coming up this week? What's on docket

0:51:23.160 --> 0:51:23.400
<v Speaker 1>for you?

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? We got the best bets call. I'm coming out tomorrow.

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:28.960
<v Speaker 3>It's into the Publisher. Should be up by the morning

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:31.959
<v Speaker 3>whenever you guys wake up. Then on Saturday, My show

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:35.040
<v Speaker 3>with Mike Ferrell, the Kickoff Show starts at ten am

0:51:35.080 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Eastern nine am Central. We go for ninety minutes and

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 3>hit as many games we possibly can on the cart sides, totals, props,

0:51:42.520 --> 0:51:44.759
<v Speaker 3>the whole gamut. So definitely check that out if you.

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Haven't, absolutely and for me, you can catch me here.

0:51:48.120 --> 0:51:50.440
<v Speaker 1>You can catch me on Fantasy Pros with Joe Pisa,

0:51:50.480 --> 0:51:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Piatzac and IDPs and Thorn and I also do a

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros Discord chat every single Wednesday at five pm Eastern.

0:51:57.239 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 2>It's free, it's f R double.

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:00.839
<v Speaker 1>If you guys got a bet you want to come

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in and ask us about it, please feel free to

0:52:03.680 --> 0:52:06.839
<v Speaker 1>join us. We'd love to take your questions have I mean,

0:52:06.880 --> 0:52:08.960
<v Speaker 1>we go through games in there, but we just haven't

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 1>been getting a lot of questions, so we love something

0:52:11.200 --> 0:52:11.760
<v Speaker 1>We've answered.

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Every single literally every Lewis raised their hand, we've answered.

0:52:14.880 --> 0:52:16.879
<v Speaker 3>So if you guys want to talk to us, want

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:19.360
<v Speaker 3>to get a pick in, ask a question, we will

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:21.920
<v Speaker 3>call on you up up front. If you're in there,

0:52:22.000 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 3>you raise.

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Your hands absolutely.

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I also do a Betting Pros Twitter space on Friday

0:52:26.160 --> 0:52:29.360
<v Speaker 1>at five eastern as well, so please join me in that.

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>If you would catch me on CF you winning edge

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:35.040
<v Speaker 1>as well, talk to college football with my guys Nick

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:38.439
<v Speaker 1>and Savier over there as well, so but that'll wrap

0:52:38.480 --> 0:52:40.239
<v Speaker 1>it up for us. Good luck and you'll see you

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 1>guys next week. Have a great Week four everybody,