WEBVTT - From the Vault: Tea, Part 2

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is Robert.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 2>Lamb and I am Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday. We're

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 2>heading into the vault for an older episode of Stuff

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 2>to Blow Your Mind. This is part two of our

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 2>series on Tea. Part one ran last Saturday. This was

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 2>originally published February seventh, twenty twenty three.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the Immortal Dan Chew abandoned eating jade elixirs, picking

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>tea instead. He drank and grew feathered wings. The world

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is unaware of the mansion of imminent and hidden immortals.

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>People do not know of the palace of transmuting bone

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>into clouds. The lad of Cloudy Mountain blended it in

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a gold cauldron. How hollow the fame of the Man

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>of Chew and his book of Tea. Late on a

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>frosty night, breaking cakes off fragrant tea brewed to overflowing

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the pale yellow frog, I sip and am reborn. Bestowed

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>by the gentleman. This tea dispels my suffering, cleansing my

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>mind from worry and fear. Come morning, the emotions of

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the fragrant brazier remain intoxicated. Still we walk across the

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>clouds reflected in Tiger Stream in high song I send

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the gentleman off.

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. That is from

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a song of Drinking Tea on the departure of Zing

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Wrong by jou Ran. This particular bit of Chinese poetry

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I came across when I was reading a blog post

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>four ancient Chinese poems on tea in one Symphony. This

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was on the website Tranquility Tuesdays, and I found this

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>one interesting because the author of this piece pointed out

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that the piece that we opened the first episode off

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>with the seven bowls of Tea is just very well cited.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>You'll find it referenced in just about any history of tea.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>It frequently shows up on tea blogs and so forth.

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>The author here noted that, you know, given that it is,

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, over sighted, that one should also include other

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>poems of note, and this is one such poem well so.

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 2>In the original poem, I'd say the major theme was

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of the mounting levels of experience that come with

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>each successive cup of tea up until you hit the

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 2>danger zone, crossing the threshold from the sixth to the

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 2>dreaded seventh cup. In this case, what would you say

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 2>The main themes are I see here kind of a

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 2>community or a filial aspect to the tea talking about

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 2>you know, the lab bruise it, and then these two

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 2>drink it together. Sure exactly who these two people are

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be?

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's definitely more of an earth bound since here

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting you know. It is, of course beautifully written

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and has that kind of ethereal quality to it as well.

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>But the tea is not just taking you and transforming

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you into an immortal and sending you to a mythical lands.

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>It's making you feel reborn, but also all of the

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>world as well, or at least that's my interpretation of it.

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, Yeah, this is part two of our look

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>at Tea. We're already hearing from some folks regarding our

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>first episode, and in the second episode we're going to

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>continue the journey. So go back and listen to part

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>one if you haven't heard it yet, because in that

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>last episode we discussed the botanical facts concerning tea, as

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>well as some myths about its origin. But now that

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we've established what tea is and where it's spring from,

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and referenced some of the mythological ideas about tea and

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>read a couple of poems, this most recent was Tanged Honesty,

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:02.839
<v Speaker 1>by the way, at this point, I think it's time

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to discuss the history of tea in a little more detail,

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>especially as it concerns the ways that it can be

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>prepared and was prepared across time. So I think it

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, first of all, to just look at some

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 1>of the steps that are frequently employed in preparing tea

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>after it's been harvest what happens between it growing on

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the plant that we discussed in part one and somehow

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>making it into a cup or bowl of tea the beverage.

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, and so one thing we talked about in the

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 2>previous episode is how different types of tea that you get,

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 2>say black tea versus green tea versus white or oolong,

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 2>they will usually be from the same plant or the

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 2>same of a couple of variants of this plant, Camellia senensus.

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 2>There's one tea plant, and so the differences you get

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 2>in the different teas are based on how it is

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 2>processed and prepared.

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, right. So one of the books I've been looking

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>at here is Laura C. Martin's A History of Tea,

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think the author does a fabulous job laying

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>out the history and also the different steps involved in

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>creating these beverages of tea. She points out that no

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>matter what sort of tea preparation you're talking about, certain

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>steps are common to many of them. Not all varieties

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of tea involve all the steps, but it's worth going

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>over them all and then we can say, well, this

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>one doesn't involve this step, and this one does involve

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this step.

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So it starts, of course, with the gathering of

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 2>the leaves. Usually on tea farms, they will be collected

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 2>as flushes, these sort of top buds of a couple

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 2>leaves and a shoot coming off the top of the plant.

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Those will be harvested and the rest of the plant

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 2>will be left there to produce new flushes in the future.

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 2>And so you gather a bunch of these flushes of leaves,

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 2>and then what do you do with them?

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you could, I guess, just stick them in your mouth.

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. If you do that in certainly

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we have some of these tails of some of these

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>mythical origins of tea saying that's what happened, people stuck

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it in their mouth, And you know that might well

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>be connected to some of the original ways that human

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>beings explore the natures of the tea plant leaves and

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>even gain some of the effects. But if you just

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>stick them in your mouth and start chewing, it's going

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to be really bitter. So this is at this point

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>we have the first step of withering. So the fresh

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>green leaves and buds are dried out, either in a

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>heated room of some sort or they're left in the sun,

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and this causes the starch in the leaves to begin

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>transforming into sugar and the moisture content drops by fifty

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.799
<v Speaker 1>to eighty percent, and this allows the next possible step

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to take place, which is the rolling of the tea

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>leaves and then be able to roll it without breaking

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the leaves. This is something you might have to think

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>back to your childhood days of like playing with leaves

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and sticks. But sometimes if a leaf is fresh and

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you go to like roll it up, it's going to

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going to break, all right. The rolling part here

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is often done via machines today but was historically done

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>by hand, and the rolling without breaking here twists and

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>crushes the leaves in a way that releases SAP, exposes

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it to oxygen, and stimulates fermentation. Additional rolling and or

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>sifting may take place here as well, so that's step two. Now.

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 2>One reason you might be rolling or sort of bruising

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 2>these leaves in some way essentially handling them roughly, is

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 2>in order to stimulate oxidation. Oxidation in general refers to

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 2>a broad class of chemical reactions that take place when

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 2>molecules are exposed to oxygen or another oxidizing agent, and

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>a core feature of an oxidation reaction is that the

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 2>molecules that are getting oxidized are losing electrons, but that

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 2>doesn't tell as much. It's usually it's some type of

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 2>chemical reaction. Now, it's interesting that the deliberate oxidation of

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 2>tea leaves is an important stage in their processing, especially

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 2>for producing darker teas, less so for greener teas, because

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 2>most often oxidation in foods is not something you want.

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 2>It's an undesirable outcome associated with spoilage and ransidity. So

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 2>some examples, and I guess these would be the closest analogies.

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 2>There are oxidation reactions of various types, like there's oxidation

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 2>of fats and so forth in oils. But for an

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 2>analogy in plants, think about when you cut an apple.

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 2>So you cut an apple in half and you leave

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 2>it out on the counter. What happens, Oh, it turns brown, right,

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 2>And this browning is not generally considered good. It's not

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 2>something that makes the apple harmful to eat, but most

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 2>of the time people don't find it very appetizing. It

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 2>changes the appearance and sometimes the flavor and texture as well,

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>and you know, tastes can vary, but most people would

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 2>not say that is a type of browning that they

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 2>seek out on purpose. And this is actually true of

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 2>many foods, especially fruits. So you can think of the

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 2>way avocados brown once they're cut or smashed and left

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 2>out on the counter, or potatoes or any number of

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 2>other plant based foods. The chemical reaction taking place here

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 2>is a form of oxidation called enzymatic browning and insomatic

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 2>browning is due to an enzyme called polyphenol oxidase. Fruits

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 2>and vegetables have compounds in them called phenolic compounds, and

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 2>when these compounds get exposed to both oxygen and to

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>that enzyme to polyphenol oxidase at the same time. They

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 2>react with the oxygen and go through a multi step

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 2>transformation process that ends with them turning into melanin. Melanin

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 2>is a natural brown pigment that you can find in

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 2>all forms of life. It's in plants, it's in fungi,

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 2>it's in animals including us. It's the brown pigment in

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 2>human hair and skin and inner irises. And so that

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 2>process naturally takes place once you cut an apple or

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 2>a banana or any of these foods. But how come

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 2>this chemical reaction turning phenolic compounds into melanin doesn't happen

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 2>once the when the apple is just like sitting there

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 2>on the counter uncut. How come it only happens once

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 2>you cut it. This is because in order for the

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 2>reaction to happen, we need three different substances to come

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 2>into contact with one another. So you need the phenolic

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 2>compounds the base molecules were transforming. You need the enzyme,

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 2>which in this case is polyphenol oxidase, and you need

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 2>the free oxygen in the air. And when all three

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 2>elements are present, there together, then you get this browning process.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 2>So in plant tissue, the enzyme, the polyphenol oxidase, and

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 2>the phenolic compounds are usually kept separate from one another.

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 2>But damage to the plant, such as cutting it open

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 2>or bashing it and bruising it, will rupture cells and

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 2>cause these chemicals to blend together and unite, And then

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 2>you expose them to air and the oxidation happens. Now,

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 2>coming back to what I said earlier, ensomatic browning is

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 2>considered undesirable in lots of foods like you know you

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 2>do you, but most people would rather eat their apple slices, bananas, avocados,

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 2>and so forth before they sit out on the counter

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>for a few hours and turn brown. The browned versions

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 2>of these plants kind of look and taste degraded, not

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 2>exactly fresh. But in other plants, the browning process has

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 2>a desirable outcome. It is used on purpose to achieve

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 2>desirable improvements in appearance, texture, and flavor. One example would

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 2>be in certain dried fruits like raisins go through enzomatic

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 2>browning it deliberately in order to create new and interesting

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 2>flavors that people like. And another example might be in

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 2>seeds or leaves used to prove strongly flavored caffeinated beverages.

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Oxidative browning is specifically sought out as part of the

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 2>preparation process for tea leaves. So you can think about

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 2>the process of say, rolling tea leaves around, like smashing

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 2>them or rolling them in a tumbler of some kind

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 2>in order to kind of like bruise and just rough

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 2>up the leaves to these get these different compounds coming together,

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 2>and expose them to oxygen to trigger the sprowning process. Yeah.

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I like to come back to the apple example, the

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>apple that's spilt, it falls out of the bowl and

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>falls off the counter and rolls across the floor. You know,

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the one that gets all bruised up, and those

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>bruises are brown. That's the oxidation taking place.

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. And again you know you don't usually want

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 2>that in an apple, but it turns out you do

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 2>it to a tea leaf, and oh it's producing all

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 2>these nice, interesting new aromas and flavors. It's making the

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 2>tea taste. I think a lot of tea producers would

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 2>say it makes it. It sort of takes away some

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 2>of the fresh, grassy flavor of green tea and introduces

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 2>these complex sweet flavors that taste more like a floral

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 2>aromas or like fruits.

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it creates this whole additional dimension of flavor. Now,

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>this this stage of oxidation here, Martin stresses that it

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is it's super important for determining the flavor destination of

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the tea. It typically takes about three hours if it

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is done. The leaves are left on trays and a cool,

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>damp place often and the oxidation causes them to turn

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>from green to kind of a copper color. They also

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>heat up during this phase, and you also and you

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>have to depending on exactly what you're doing with the

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 1>tea leaves, you may have to halt it as well,

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>because you don't want the oxidation to go too far,

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>because then you'll end up with what's described as kind

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>of a burnt taste. It's also really important to note

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.599
<v Speaker 1>here that not all teas go through this phase, and

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>this should seem pretty obvious that black tea does go

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>through the oxidation phase and is therefore fully oxidized. Yeah,

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that is why it is this black or red color.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And to and to pick up on and clarify

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 2>something you said a minute ago, heating, I think is

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 2>usually specifically used to stop the oxidation process. So if

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 2>you want a green tea that has a nice fresh,

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of grassy vegetable flavor and keeps its green color,

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 2>those are usually going to be heated earlier to stop

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 2>the oxidation from progressing any further, whereas a black tea

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 2>you would let go through way more oxidation before heating

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>it in a little oven.

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Now, just this is a cultivation note, but I ended

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>up throwing it into my notes here, so I'm going

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to read it before I forget about it. Originally, tea

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>trees were, of course wild, and they would grow in

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the wild, and they grew quite tall. The higher leaves

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>were obtained by simply cutting down the tree. This wouldn't

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>work long term, of course, and so with cultivation comes

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the pruning and the non lethal harvesting of the leaves.

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So I just found that interesting.

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So that's why you get this process of like

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 2>taking the flushes off of the top instead of fully

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 2>culing the plant.

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but back to the process. Okay, so we've had

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we've had the first step here of withering, then rolling,

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>then oxidation, and then we get into the step of drying.

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a quick drying to stop the oxidation at

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>desired levels, So we've kind of alluded to this already

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>as well as to remove enough moisture to prevent mold

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>from forming. But you also can't dry it out too

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>much or the tea could again taste burnt or on

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the other end of the spectrum, it could lose its flavor.

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, And then with the fourth step done, we're

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>under the fifth and this is grating and sorting. Basically,

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>what you're left with. You got to figure out what

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got, and generally what you have is you have

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>whole leaves, you have broken leaves, you have the dinnings,

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and you have dust. Whole is the best, that's the

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>highest quality, while and then broken leaves and then fannings

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and dust that tends to go into cheaper things like

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, tea bags and so forth. Again, not all

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>teas go through all of these phases. Black tea goes

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>through all five. Oolong tea is partially oxidized. Green teas

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>are dried after rolling to prevent oxidation at all. White

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>tea doesn't go through withering, fermentation or rolling. Now, this

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't cover anywhere near all the teas out there. In

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the different types of teas, there are plenty of sub

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>varieties of each, and then there are blends as well,

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Like one common example is English Breakfast Tea, which is

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a blend of black teas.

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Now there's a whole other class of complex chemical reactions

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 2>that teas undergo, separate from the baseline oxidation process we've

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 2>been talking about, which is fermentation, a whole other thing

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 2>where you are deliberately introducing microbial growth to further create

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 2>complex flavors and aromas.

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right, And at this point I want to mention

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the poorer teas. These are a special case. These are

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>again one of my favorite tea varieties, and actually our

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>producer jj I was chatting with him he also really

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>likes these, and I imagine we have a number of

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>listeners who are fond of these as well.

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 2>But these are fermented teas, right, Yeah.

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>It's so these teas are generally made from larger, older

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>leaves that I believe Martin described as almost being kind

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of like hairy, you know, they're they're they're they're really

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>big old leaves. And also there's an enough moisture is

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>allowed to remain in them, so that they can continue

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.479
<v Speaker 1>to ferment for years. Uh. This is this is the

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>only variety of tea that improves with age. The teas

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>stored away in bricks or cakes. Also, they're often various wrappings,

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>like sometimes it's like a like a bamboo type situation

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 1>or some sort of fabric wrapping and and ends up

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 1>with just a wide beret of flavors that are at

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>least in my experience, unlike any other teas I've tried,

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>h they often have the ones I've I keep coming

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>back to have kind of a often kind of like

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a barnyard flavor, kind of straw or hay to them.

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>One of them that I really love is just especially dark.

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's like a bowl or a cup of midnight.

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>And like I say, they're often you often you'll find

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 1>these in kind of like a loose leaf situation, but

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you also find them in little pucks, little bricks, big

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>cakes that you have to chip away with a special

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>little ornate knife. I mean you could use a normal

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>butter knife or your car keys, I guess, but you know,

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>get into it. This is tea we're talking about. But

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>these have a fascinating history not only as just being

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>t bricks, but being used as money as well, with

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the prime example being taking place in Tibet. As Wolfgang

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Birch points out in the use of tea bricks as

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>currency among the Tibetans in the Tibet Journal, the Chinese

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>introduced tea to Tibet sometime prior to seven eighty c.

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>And while it was first used as more of a

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>pure bartering commodity, you know, I'll trade you a brick

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of tea for this, that or the other, it eventually

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>took on a form that we might reasonably refer to

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>as currency, a regimented system of tea e bricks based

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on the tea's quality and pureeness, and eventually imprinted with

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>trademarks and seals. So you might think of it almost like,

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, you think of like a bar of gold

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that has been imprinted with governmental information, Like here's the

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>seal of the of the governing body saying this is

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>an approved grade of gold, the amount of gold, et cetera.

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the exact same thing with these t bricks. The

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>governing authority has said this is such and such tea

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 1>of such and such quality, and it is a certain

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>amount of it. It's usable as currency in this scenario.

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. It makes me think, I don't know this,

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 2>but I'm wondering. So in this case, would this have

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 2>been a fermented type of tea since it's in yet form.

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 2>That makes me think about how, you know, if you're

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 2>going to try to use a commonly consumed, say food

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 2>or drink item as a currency, it would be difficult

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 2>to use one that quickly degrades in quality, for like

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 2>its use value. So if it's something we're freshness really matters,

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 2>you would not want the use value of your currency

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 2>to degrade fast over the course of a few months.

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.239
<v Speaker 2>But if it's like a fermented tea, you mentioned that

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 2>these get better with age rather than declining, so you

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 2>can at least hope your currency there keeps its value.

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Does that make sense?

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it would keep its value. Of anything, it

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>would increase in value, though I don't remember reading anything

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>about how that would be decided upon, but I guess

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it would be subject to like the going rate for

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>te's of a particular harvest and maturity level, you know,

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>like you all the information would be there on the seal.

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.239
<v Speaker 2>This is a side note. I wonder how economies are

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 2>different when they have a currency that does have in

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 2>some cases a use value of its own, like you know,

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 2>if you're not going to use it for trade, you

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 2>would use it for something else, like you would literally

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 2>eat it or drink it, versus economies that just have

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 2>a currency that is purely useless on its own, it's

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 2>only for facilitating trade, like US dollars.

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean for gold, I guess is not quite

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>an example of that, because even historically gold was still

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>desired as something that could be used for ornamentation, whereas

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>today it also has technology electronics uses as well.

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>The other really good example of this is the use

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of chocolate in some Mesoamerican cultures, where that the chocolate

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>was such a highly regarded commodity and one that I

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>guess had kind of generalized sizes and measurements that it

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>could be used as currency as well. Yeah.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Interesting question. Maybe we'll come back to that one day.

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So at this point that we might get more

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>into the timeline of tea with the primary interest in

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of the evolution of the way that it is

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>prepared and ultimately consumed. As we explored in the last episode,

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the origin of tea drinking is more mythology than historical fact.

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the those things where if you try

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and answer the question of, like, well, who invented tea?

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Who came up with this? It's basically lost to prehistory.

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>These are things where we have some interesting myths that

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of sum up some of the general ideas and

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>ultimately some of the general realities of how human beings

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>experimented with and chronicled the nature of their botanical world.

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But in general we can't answer it. There's no one person.

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Though again, some of these accounts do have a sort

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of an interesting shred of truth to them, like one

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of the ones that, in addition to the ones we

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>discussed in the last episode, there's one that Michael d.

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Co brings up in seventy Great Inventions of the Ancient

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>World in a chapter about I Believe Chocolate and Tea.

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>There's another myth where a past Chinese emperor was boiling

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>some water and some wild leaves just kind of blew

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>into his water, boiling in the pot, thus creating tea.

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>That of course sounds like pure myth and is not

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>like a real story, but it reminds me of our

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>episode on the invention of the cauldron, and about how

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>like a cauldron or any kind of container even like

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a skin of boiling water, Like what an essential laboratory

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that is for humans in ancient times? Figuring out what

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>things are and what they can be used for. Now,

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the question that may come up for some of you

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>might think, well, there's a great deal of Chinese literature

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>out there going back quiet a way. Can't we just

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>see when people first started writing about tea? And I

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>think this is a reasonable question to ask. But as

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Martin explains in the book, it's not quite that simple.

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And part of the problem is that the Chinese character

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>associated with t was previously used again in literature, in

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>writing to refer to other shrubs and plants. For example,

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>there are mentions of tea dating back to the fifth

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>century BCE, but it's thought that the character in question

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>here is just referring to south thistle, a plant sometimes

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>used in Chinese cuisine and native to Europe and Western Asia.

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, so yeah, frustrating trying to understand the history.

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, So we have to think about the fact

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that anytime something like this comes along, like it's not

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>just oh, we have this new thing, let's get a

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>new word for it, but that's in any language. That's

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily how it works. I'm reminded of all the

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 1>different apples that Europeans began to discover in the world

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 1>and report back, Yeah, palm de tear. So again, we

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 1>can't pinpoint a time when tea drinking began in China,

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but we can likely say it was certainly a thing

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>by the Han dynasty two o six PC through twenty

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty CE. Granted that's a large period of time, but

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>by that period people were drinking tea. It most likely

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>began in Sichuan Province in southwestern China and spread gradually

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of China, and would have reached northern

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>China by the Tang dynasty that period six eighteen through

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>nine o seven by the third century, though, according to Martin,

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we do have mentions in the literature of tea that

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we can more firmly connect to actual tea drinking, which

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>points out that Hatwo, a noted physician who may have

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>also developed one of the earliest forms of anesthesia, also

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>wrote about tea quote, to drink tea constantly makes one

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>think better.

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 2>That checks out, well, it depends on what you mean

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 2>by constantly. Yeah, I'm not sure about the particulars of

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 2>the translation. There By the way, the anesthesia that he

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 2>supposedly invented, I think they was reading that the name

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 2>literally transplates to cannabis boiling powder, but we still don't

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 2>know exactly what this supposed anesthesia contained. Also, a general

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 2>from the third century, lou Kuhn, wrote that he felt old,

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 2>depressed and needed some real tea when just the impression

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 2>he that he's out doing the military thing and he

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 2>just realizes, Man, I'm just I'm old, I'm sad, and

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I would just kill for an actual cup of tea

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 2>instead of I guess boiling various other things that we're

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 2>finding in in nature around us M. So you could

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 2>you could have fake teas. There's like, if you can't

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 2>get real tea from Camellia sinensis, you might just try

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>boiling other plant matter.

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, the history of tea is kind of

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>full of these examples, and not only the history of tea,

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>but I guess the history of of like pharmacology, and

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that's no pharmacology in general. I think we've touched a

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit on this before talking about psychedelics, where you'll

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>have some historians think you'll have one particular custom of

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>using a particular herb or plant that is growing in

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the natural environment. But what happens when people move? What

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>happens when there's a migration. Yes, in many cases you

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 1>can bring your plants with you. Sometimes those plants don't

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>survive though, Sometimes they can't be brought anyway, or you

0:26:58.119 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>just that the people that bring them are not able

0:26:59.920 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to keep those plants going in these new places they

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.679
<v Speaker 1>move to. And in those cases you might try to

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>find some sort of reasonable facsimile, like what's something else

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that does something that changes me a little bit when

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I boil it in water and drink it. So we

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>may come back to some of that in a pit.

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And then Martin also points that by let's say, around

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 1>three point fifty CE, there's a more detailed description of

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the tea plant that we seem pretty sure is an

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>actual description of tea. And this is provided by go

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Poo again around three fifty C.

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Now, I guess one thing I wonder is it's one

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 2>thing to talk about. Okay, we're taking leaves of this

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 2>specific plant and boiling them to make tea, But it's

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 2>another thing to think about, like all of the complex

0:27:56.400 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 2>preparation process steps and the different varieties of tea pretty today.

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you have any idea when that sort of thing

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 2>started to come online, or at least when we have

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the earliest evidence of that.

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is this is interesting because one thing that

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Martin points out is that early on tea was probably

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>not good. It would have been nothing like what we're

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>having today. It would have been we could almost think

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of it more as kind of this herbal soup, and

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you'd have various things added to it in an attempt

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to improve the flavor profile. And you might be thinking, oh,

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>like delightful flowers and stuff. No, things like onions might

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>be added. It is just a way to improve the flavor.

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>And I believe Martin, I believe mentioned that this probably

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>also didn't work. It was just so strong a flavor

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't really improve on it all that much. But

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you drank it because you know it was there were

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>already some healthful associations with it, and you know, maybe

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't making it was sick because it was boiled,

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. But during the time of the Northern Way

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty three eighty six through five thirty five, apparently the

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>tea processing had improved, at least to what we might

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>think of as a basic level. There are mentions of

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>cakes made of tea leaves that have been roasted. It

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>was probably still a lot cruder compared to things that

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>were gonna come, or certainly cruder than things that you

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>would think of today as desirable teas. But the journey

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>toward more complex flavors was underway, and I'm assuming you

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>were maybe not having to put onions in your tea

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>anymore now. During the fifth century CE, there's also examples

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of tea tributes being made to the imperial court and

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to the emperor himself, and also the emperor was said

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to have his own tea reserves as well, like these

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>were places where just the emperor's tea was grown. So

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>already it was presumably flavors are improving, and also the

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>ruling class, the elites of society are really getting attached

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to the idea of tea. But then the Tang dynasty

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>six eighteen through nine oh seven, this is the period

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in which we see Chinese tea in the form of

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>baked bricks of green tea, which are ideal for travel,

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>spreading to new parts of the Empire and beyond. Martin

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>also writes that this widespread technique also greatly improved the flavor.

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>The popularity of tea spread so much during this time

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that it was no longer just a drink of the

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>elite of the emperor and his court. It was a

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>drink for everybody, even peasants by this point were we're

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>getting in on tea culture. That doesn't mean everybody would

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>have access to the same tea. Of course, with the

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>type of tea you drank would be intrinsically linked to

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>your place in society, as would the various paraphernalia that

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>were used in tea preparation and tea consumption, but it

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>was essentially something that could be found throughout society. Also,

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>this would again have been exclusively green tea, as red

0:30:57.440 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>black tea would not be developed for centuries to come.

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>And this is the time of an individual by the

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>name of lou U. This would have been in the

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>eighth century. He was known as the Immortal of T

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the Sage of T, and he was author of the

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Classic of.

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 2>T The Classic of T. I see a similarity in

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 2>the English naming convention of some of these great old

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Chinese texts similar to like the Classic of Mountains and

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Seas exactly, Yes, I forget exactly what that is translated from, though,

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Like what are all the range of meanings in the original?

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, but certainly this is a common translation of

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>some of these important books. I would think you could.

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>You might roughly think of it the same way that

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>important books might in the Western traditions might be preferred

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to as like the book of such and such or

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a chronicle of such and such.

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Now, this is an interesting figure Louu though, because there

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>are a number of legends about him as well. You know,

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he's definitely a historic individual and author. It seems that

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>folks agree on that. But there are all these additional stories,

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>such as that he was abandoned and subsequently adopted by

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Buddhist monks. Also, there's this other story that he and

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I think these all kind of work together, or at

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>least were eventually stitched together into one narrative that he

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>was then trained. He then trained to be a clown

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in the opera, and this was his lifelong ambition, but

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>then he ended up becoming a scholar instead. He started

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>spending a lot of time in tea houses, which was

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a popular hangout at the time. And this reminds me

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit of accounts of tea and coffee houses in

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>later European history as a kind of like cultural incubator.

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a place where like the poet resides.

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah. And so he has this supposed trajectory that's

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting, Like he starts off as as an abandoned child,

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>becomes a monk, then becomes a clown, then becomes a scholar,

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and then essentially becomes the immortal of tea.

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 2>It implies tea being kind of like the highest level achievable.

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it does. And I think that matches up with

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the way that he was received and regarded. But it

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond like you might think, Okay, he wrote this

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>scholarly work about tea, and I bet the scholarly class

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>really loved it. But as Martin points out, this work

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>had a huge impact on tea and society, as it

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>gave agriculturists and farmers the first real written account of

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>how to cultivate and process tea. Everything before the Classic

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of Tea was just orally transmitted or was unknown to

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>individuals who might want to partake of it and cultivate

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>their own tea. His work made tea cultivation accessible, and

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it included everything that was known at the time about tea,

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>where you could grow it, how to grow it, how

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to harvest it and prepare it, the culture of drinking it,

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the twenty four implements required to prepare tea in the home,

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing.

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Whoa, that's a lot of implements, Yeah, and a lot

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 2>of just sort of advice on what is proper.

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Like. For instance, I was reading in Martin that he

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>was a big fan of using blue glazed cups to

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>enhance the green color of the tea, while he thought

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 1>that white cups or bowls would give it a distasteful

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>pink color.

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 2>This is interesting in part because it reminds me of

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 2>the passages in Plenty of the Elder where he's like, Hey,

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.399
<v Speaker 2>if you're gonna boil like some sweet sapa to drink,

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 2>you better do it in a lead pot instead of

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 2>a copper one, because the copper makes it bitter, the

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 2>lead makes it sweet. I assume he's not talking about

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 2>actual changes in flavor here, but truly just appearance. But

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 2>this is also quite observant because I think, as like

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 2>chefs and people who work in restaurants will tell you

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the appearance and color of your plates really does affect

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 2>how people perceive the food.

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, absolutely. And then of course there's so much

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>ritual on top of all of this, you know. Martin

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>stresses that while some of this might seem just you know,

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>over the top and perhaps too fancy, we have to

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>remind ourselves that this is a world where individuals like

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 1>lou U are striving for universal perfection. So that's and

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>we have to think about it too in light of Confucianism, Taoism,

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>and Buddhism as well, which are all important energies in

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 1>the world surrounding this growing tea culture. Now, the popularity

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Classic of Teas not only spread the word

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of tea, it also further enhanced its popularity and pushed

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>both greater tea trade and greater advancements in how it

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>was cultivated and prepared. Tea also spread throughout China during

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>this time because it had become just so embraced by

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Buddhist practice and culture. But it's also meant that when

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Buddhism fell out of favor during the decline of the

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Tang dynasty, tea culture did as well. And this would

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this was a trend that would recur when foreign invaders

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>would control parts of China, Tea culture would suffer in

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that area.

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, does that mean it was replaced by something or

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I wonder what caused that correlation.

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>It's based on what I was reading, and there may

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>be more nuanced to this, and more and more to this,

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>but it would just be a situation where it was

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>linked with the with the ruling party. You know, it's

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a top down cultural practice and without

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>without Tea culture emanating from sort of a you know,

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in radiating waves from the ruling body, it kind of

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>falls out of favor and you have people maybe following,

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to have cultural trans transmission taking place

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:47.760
<v Speaker 1>there too. Of course, because you also see in the

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 1>in the histories where you know, some some groups, say

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the Mongols becomes the ruling body in a part of China,

0:36:55.680 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>they also become more Chinese as they rule, So you know,

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the cultural transmission goes both ways. But it seems like

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you would have these situations where a foreign power would

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 1>take control for a while and yet just Tea popularity

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:17.760
<v Speaker 1>would wane, but then when inevitably Chinese rule was restored

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to these areas you would see the reverse and one

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of the examples of this would be nine sixty. See

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the rule of the Song dynasty brought tea back to

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the forefront. Its trade during this period became so important

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Imperial court found that they could just restrict

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 1>or manipulate the flow of tea to outlying regions if

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:41.239
<v Speaker 1>deemed necessary. So it would be a way to control

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 1>and manipulate other groups, such as determining how much tea

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>goes to, say, to bat or to the Mongols, or

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Turks and others. Almost kind of like a

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>spice trade of Dune sort of scenario, you know. And

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly that's the sort of thing that Frank Herbert was

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 1>thinking of when he was right. Maybe not tea specifically,

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>but obviously this control of a desired or vital resource

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>by one particular body.

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>It's also during this time period, Martin rights, that we

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>enter the second school or phase of tea. So this

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:20.879
<v Speaker 1>first phase had been the brick era. Again, we're talking

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>about those bricks of tea, you know, how it's dried

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and then often stored, et cetera. But then we're entering

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>at this point the whipped school and It's called the

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>whipped school due to the creation and popularity of dried

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and powdered green tea that was then whipped in boiling

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>water till it's foamy. This is what we typically call

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>macha tea today, and it was a huge hit during

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>this time period. Of course, has remained whip us.

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's interesting, Okay, I guess I do associate macha

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.760
<v Speaker 2>tea with looking kind of foamy, but I didn't realize

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 2>why that was. So it's like typically more of a

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 2>powder form that is whipped into the water vigorously.

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, like generally you'll have and we'll probably come

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>back around them to macha here in a bit and

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:08.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about it in especially in relation to Japanese tea culture.

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:10.720
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, even if you get it today, you're probably

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna get some sort of one variety or another of macha,

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps like a ceremonial grade tea. You're gonna put that

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in your in your bowl or cup, and once you

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>have the hot water, you're gonna you're gonna want to

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>whip it up. There's gonna be a special implement to

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 1>do that, and this of course can also be quite exceptional.

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So we go from brick to the whipped powder,

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:34.720
<v Speaker 2>and then does it does it change after that, because

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 2>that still doesn't resemble the most of the tea preparation

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 2>I can think of today, which is based on steeping.

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Right right, Well, that is gonna eventually be the third school,

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the school of steeping, as in like loose leaf tea especially,

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and we are still in this school today, Martin Wright.

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>So of course all three of these are still used.

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's gonna be a fourth phase

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of tea.

0:39:55.360 --> 0:40:07.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the laser school of tea.

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, there's more to the history of tea, and

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll keep going with the history of tea in a

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 1>future episode here, but I thought it might be fun

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:19.720
<v Speaker 1>at this point to discuss tea and health.

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier how Martin pointed out that by the

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.720
<v Speaker 1>fourth century CE, T consumption was probably part of daily

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>life for many in China, but it wasn't good. You

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>were having to mask it with things like you know,

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes things like citrus or ginger, which doesn't sound that bad,

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 1>but other times you're putting salt and onions in it,

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>all to try and make it more palpable. But you

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>were consuming it because it had perceived health benefits. You

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>also might just eat your tea leaves straight like a

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>vegetable in this time. Still, though again it would have

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>been bitter. It would not have been a pleasant experience.

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>You Also, I was surprised by this. You also might

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>have sniffed it like snuff, So that would be a

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 1>sort of a you know, an approach to powdered tea

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that I didn't think about. Also, not what I'm saying

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 1>anyone needs to try, but it was one method that

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>was used, as was sometimes using it externally, like you know,

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>applying it just to the skin, or perhaps to some

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of skin irritation like a poultice. Yeah, so it

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 1>was widely used during this time. Again not because it

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 1>was necessarily pleasant to have. But first of all, it

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>was associated with wakefulness and digestion, which I think these

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:32.360
<v Speaker 1>are both agreed upon effects of caffeine. If you've had caffeine,

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:36.720
<v Speaker 1>or explored caffeine, or even been around people that use caffeine,

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you probably know that this is the case. Like caffeine

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>can can wake you up, it can make you more alert,

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it can also speed up digestion. And yeah, and that's

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>why if you go to a coffee house or a

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>tea house these days, there may be a weight at

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the bathroom, and there may be a lot of people

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>with you know, a lot of crackling energy.

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 2>But it's worth it because, as Lou Tong said, it

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 2>searches the dry rivulets of the soul, helps you find

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 2>the stories of five thousand scrolls. Yeah, I'd say that

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 2>still checks out caffeine effects on cognition.

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, though it was also used during

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>this time as of treatment for everything from poor eyesight

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to skin and organ issues. It was also considered a

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>strong preventative medicine and something that positively impacted one's chi.

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 1>So we again, so we're seeing like the full spectrum

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>here of possible and perceived uses for tea that benefited

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:32.320
<v Speaker 1>your current ailments, prevented other ailments, and maybe even affected

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:37.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of spiritual energy concepts regarding the functionality of the

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>human body.

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, now, because we've raised the question in the historical

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 2>context here of beliefs about t and its positive impacts

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 2>on health, I think it's worth looking at what's some

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 2>of the modern major nutrition science findings on the health

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 2>effects of tr But strong caveat I'm not going to

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 2>go deep on this because I just feel personally, like,

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, we look at a lot of different domains

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 2>of science, and I feel like there is no quicker

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 2>way to lose your mind than looking for scientific papers

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 2>on a question of is this common food or drink

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 2>item good or bad for your health? Coffee, tea, chocolate, wine,

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:20.719
<v Speaker 2>a million other things. It always seems like there are

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 2>just reams of conflicting results, some of which sound prima

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 2>faci absurd and probably are, you know, like a study

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 2>show wine cures heart disease or something like that. And

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 2>I detect the presence of persistent methodological problems with attempts

0:43:35.840 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 2>to look at this kind of thing specifically, like does

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:41.880
<v Speaker 2>a common food or drink item that people consume for

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 2>pleasure or for other reasons have you know, X broad

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 2>health effect. But with that caveat, I'm going to cite

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 2>the findings of a major meta analysis that I looked

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 2>at from twenty nineteen. So this was by Mengshi Yi

0:43:58.080 --> 0:44:01.760
<v Speaker 2>called Tea Consumption and Health Outcome Umbrella Review of Meta

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Analysis of Observational Studies in Humans. This was published in

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:09.280
<v Speaker 2>the journal Molecular Nutrition and Food Research and twenty nineteen.

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 2>So this study is an umbrella review, also known as

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:15.239
<v Speaker 2>a review of reviews, which kind of gives you an

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 2>idea how much research there is on the topic, so

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 2>to picture where this rests in the research hierarchy. Of course,

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:26.240
<v Speaker 2>you can have individual studies or experiments on the effect

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 2>of tea on some particular outcome, and then you can

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 2>have a paper a level above that, which is a

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:35.480
<v Speaker 2>review or a meta analysis, which compares and analyzes and

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 2>usually averages the results of many different individual studies of

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 2>a bunch. You know, it collects everything it can find

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.439
<v Speaker 2>in the literature and says, when you compare all these

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 2>what results poke out. And then if you have enough

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 2>of those reviews within a subject area, you can have

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 2>an umbrella review, which is a review of reviews. And

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 2>sometimes umbrella reviews are going to have like a broader question. So,

0:44:57.040 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 2>for example, you can have a meta analysis of studies

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:04.840
<v Speaker 2>on the relationship between T and cardiovascular disease, and another

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:08.480
<v Speaker 2>one comparing studies on TA and various cancers, and then

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 2>you could maybe have an umbrella review looking at all

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 2>those meta analyzes to understand the relationship between T and

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 2>health outcomes. More generally, Okay, so sorry about all that preamble.

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, what did this umbrella review find in the

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 2>existing literature as of twenty nineteen. Well, it looked at

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 2>ninety six meta analyzes addressing forty different health outcomes and

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 2>it concluded that overall, studies showed greater evidence for health

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:36.319
<v Speaker 2>benefits than for harm to health from T consumption. So

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 2>they say, quote dose response analysis of T consumption indicates

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 2>reduced risks of total mortality, cardiac death, coronary artery disease, stroke,

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:50.360
<v Speaker 2>and type two diabetes melitis with increment of two to

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 2>three cups per day. Beneficial associations are also found for

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 2>several cancers, skeletal, cognitive, and maternal outcomes. Harmful associations are

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:02.359
<v Speaker 2>found for a soft geal cancer and gastric cancer when

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 2>the temperature of intake is more than fifty five to

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 2>sixty degrees celsius. So this leads them to the conclusion

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 2>that except for the upper digestive cancer risk that may

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 2>be associated with drinking very hot tea and again greater

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:19.880
<v Speaker 2>than fifty five to sixty degrees c is about one

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 2>thirty one to one forty degrees fahrenheit. Unless you're drinking

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 2>tea that hot or hotter, normal levels of tea consumption,

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:29.920
<v Speaker 2>such as two to three cups per day, appear safe,

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 2>and those levels of tea intake are even associated with

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:38.239
<v Speaker 2>a broad range of apparently positive health effects, the ones

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned in a minute ago. However, this is a

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 2>very important thing to stress. They acknowledge the difficulty in

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 2>disentangling regular dietary TA consumption from possible confounding variables, and

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:54.759
<v Speaker 2>so they argue that to really conclude that the observed

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 2>associations are causal, So you know, for example, finding that

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 2>t consumption two to three cups per day might be

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 2>associated with like reduced risk of cardiac death or something

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 2>like that. In order to really be sure that the

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:11.239
<v Speaker 2>tea is the cause of that and not just some

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:15.320
<v Speaker 2>random association, you would need to do randomized controlled trials.

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:17.719
<v Speaker 2>And this is often true. I think when you're looking

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 2>at connections between like common food or drink items and

0:47:21.200 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 2>health outcomes, you might find that any random thing. People

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:27.920
<v Speaker 2>who eat kelp on a regular basis have a lower

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:31.799
<v Speaker 2>risk of pancreatic cancer, but that doesn't actually show that

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 2>it's the kelp that makes the difference. It could be

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 2>that people who have a lower risk of that cancer. Also,

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 2>for some reason, just happen to eat more kelp, And

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the best way to establish the kelp is the cause

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 2>would again be to do a randomized controlled trial, which

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:48.759
<v Speaker 2>is the gold standard use for testing new drugs and

0:47:48.800 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 2>so forth, but not always used to examine the health

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 2>effects of common food and drink items such as coffee, chocolate, tea,

0:47:56.560 --> 0:47:58.840
<v Speaker 2>all these things that you see a million conflicting study

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:02.760
<v Speaker 2>results on tea helps this health effect, and then another

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:04.880
<v Speaker 2>study says on maybe it doesn't. So in the end,

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it's hard to get very solid results on

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:11.879
<v Speaker 2>these kind of food and drink items. But at least

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the existing research today makes it look like broadly tea

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:17.800
<v Speaker 2>is pretty safe to drink as long as you're drinking

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:21.839
<v Speaker 2>it within moderation and not super hot, and may in

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 2>fact have some positive health benefits associated with it, but

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 2>don't bank on those too much.

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, these are all great points, Like depending on the study,

0:48:30.440 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you might be it might be a situation where it's

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the tea cakes that are causing all of the positive

0:48:34.440 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>health effects.

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, it may not be causal about drinking the

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 2>tea at all. Maybe it's that people who have lower

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 2>risk of whatever are also just for some reason cultural

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:45.399
<v Speaker 2>or otherwise more likely to drink tea. Or it could

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:47.800
<v Speaker 2>be that the act of sitting down and drinking something

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 2>warm from a cup. I mean, I don't know what

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:51.759
<v Speaker 2>all they compared it to, what controls they used on

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 2>all these different experiments, because there have been a lot

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:56.799
<v Speaker 2>of them. But that's where the research show looks like

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 2>it lands today. But I did want to note that

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 2>positive health effects of tea could exist and might also

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 2>be construed, not in an absolute sense, but in the

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 2>sense of comparing tea to alternatives, to other things you

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:13.640
<v Speaker 2>could consume instead of tea.

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And in this I want to turn to a

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>quote from the herbal classic that I think we reference

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 1>this work in the last episode. It is attributed to

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Shinnong again, the divine farmer with the crystal stomach that

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:33.839
<v Speaker 1>is in some of the myths, is attributed as discovering tea,

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and the quote resis follows in translation, quote Tea is

0:49:38.000 --> 0:49:42.320
<v Speaker 1>better than wine, for it leadeth not to intoxication, neither

0:49:42.360 --> 0:49:44.839
<v Speaker 1>does it cause a man to say foolish things and

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:48.919
<v Speaker 1>repent thereof in his sober moments. It is better than water,

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 1>for it does not carry disease. Neither does it act

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>like poison as water does when it contains foul and

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 1>rotten matter.

0:49:55.960 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Hey, that's the couple of I would say, quite solid observations.

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think it's fair to agree that

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the over indulgence of tea is less of a public

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 1>or health or safety issue compared to the consumption of alcohol.

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And then, as Martin points out in her book,

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:18.239
<v Speaker 1>this last bit is also certainly true. Tea prepared with

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:21.279
<v Speaker 1>boiling water would rid the water of many of the

0:50:21.320 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 1>inherent pathogens. So if you're just looking at the difference

0:50:24.600 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>between having a hot cup of tea and drinking or

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:33.160
<v Speaker 1>rain water or something or any kind of water that

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>might be on hand for pure drinking purposes, the tea

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is a healthier choice historically speaking, that seems quite true

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 1>as long as people are, of course not consuming that

0:50:43.040 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 1>seventh cup of tea and you know, rapturing themselves to

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the Holy Mountain.

0:50:48.800 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, you don't want to accidentally fly to pung

0:50:51.680 --> 0:50:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Lie before you get to work in the morning.

0:50:53.840 --> 0:50:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Right. And yet, to your point, just the idea of

0:50:57.480 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 1>your drinking tea, then what are you not drinking? You're

0:51:00.239 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>not drinking alcohol. You're not drinking wine, you're not drinking

0:51:04.560 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 1>water that may, given the circumstances, might not be the

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:12.839
<v Speaker 1>purest or the healthiest choice at that time. Yeah, this

0:51:12.880 --> 0:51:13.680
<v Speaker 1>is all fascinating.

0:51:13.960 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that's going to do it for part two, right, Yeah.

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I think this is all we have time for in

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:20.479
<v Speaker 1>this episode, but we'll come back for a part three.

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna look a little more at the history and

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:26.040
<v Speaker 1>evolution of tea and possibly get into some other tea

0:51:26.080 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 1>cultures as well, and we'll see what else comes up.

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:31.239
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime. We'd love to hear from everyone out there,

0:51:31.239 --> 0:51:32.920
<v Speaker 1>because I know we have a lot of tea drinkers

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:35.360
<v Speaker 1>out there, tea drinkers from different parts of the world,

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:41.360
<v Speaker 1>different tastes, different experiences. We'd love to hear everything you

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 1>have to say about the matter, So write in let

0:51:44.640 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 1>us know. I'd love to hear from you. A reminder

0:51:47.080 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that core episodes of Just to Blow Your Mind published

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Monday is listener Mail. Wednesday is

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a short form artifact or monster fact, and on Fridays

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:57.239
<v Speaker 1>we set aside most serious concerns to talk about a

0:51:57.239 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>weird film on Weird House Cinema.

0:51:59.280 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Huge thanks to our our audio producer, JJ Posway. If

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:03.920
<v Speaker 2>you would like to get in touch with us with

0:52:04.040 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 2>feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest a

0:52:06.600 --> 0:52:08.680
<v Speaker 2>topic for the future, or just to say hello, you

0:52:08.719 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 2>can email us at contact at stuff to Blow your

0:52:11.640 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Mind dot com.

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:52:23.640 --> 0:52:27.480
<v Speaker 3>more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 3>or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows.