WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2022 NFL MegaPod Super Bowl LVI Props Edition

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Check it down Man, No down Man, Surtursday morning, February two.

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>It is the Beating the Book podcast, the last mega

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>pot of the year. It's Kill Alexander Live from the

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>d where Mike Palm is absent today. Are we allowed

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to say why Mike is absent? Todd? Do you know?

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Are we allowed to say why? I don't know about

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the allowances or disallowances. All right. In that case, Mike

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>is a new father. So there you go. That's why

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike is not here with us. We assume that's the reason.

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations to Michael Palm. Todd is in the his Mom's

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>cork Addict there in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. You good, Todd. I

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>am not a new father as far as I know. No,

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>that is correct. Uh. And for those who are wondering

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>either can you can you tell the bridge story? Did

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you tell the bridge story on the podcast last week?

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Or was that on the radio? At the way and

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>at the way end, I was just talking about where

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the casino is that I go to every night. My

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>office is literally it's literally a mile or two from

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>my house, and I drive directly over that bridge park

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>and then I drive back at one o'clock in the

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>morning after the Late West Coast Games. I drove home

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at one o'clock in the morning the night before and

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.839
<v Speaker 1>my friend Sean said, now you broke the bridge. That's

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>just great. Seven o'clock in the morning. The bridge fell down,

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and we can laugh about it because nobody get nobody died, right,

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>nobody died. Nobody died. Okay. What's the name of the

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>bridge at Pittsburgh. I think it's called the fern Hollow Bridge.

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>We always think of it just the Region Square bridge

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to get over a region square. But it's a real

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>pain in the neck. Is now to go to my office,

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go all the way around. There's no more

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>bridge there. It's a real thing. I was thinking. Is

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the universe trying to tell me there's something wrong with

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>going over to my office? We're very interesting our guests

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for Super Bowl fifty six. Nobuddy is more appropriate to

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>have as a guest for the Super Bowl then Rufus, Peabody,

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody Rufus on the show. Thank you Rufus for being

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast for the second time this season. Appreciate it.

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And second time in studio. That's right, second time studio.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way, if I'm sounding a little weird. It's because, Uh,

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I was just let out of quarantine and I thought

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>I was over this COVID thing, and all of a sudden,

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>like it's like the Revenge of the Universe on me,

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and I can't breathe all of a sudden. So if

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I pass out in the middle of the show, you'll

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>know why over the ear and over the mic. Proper

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>protocol here, I'll be fine. Just so you know that

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>people are not booing that's rude. They're saying rude for

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>rufus the crowd, you know, the crowd, right, big crowd.

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we're gonna get through our prop bets.

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk a little in game props. We're gonna

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>talk I will anyway exotic props offshore because that's what

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>people are here for. They want to know about the

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>anthem and about Emma em and dre Verry J. Blige,

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm all here for it. That's what I'm here for.

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 1>As far as Super Bowl fifty six is concerned, and

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you're both very excited about that portion. Uh,

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Super fifty six, the Bengals and the Rams. This has

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>toggled between four and four and a half. There is

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a three and a half out there now, but yeah,

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it's toggle between four and four and a half the whole.

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the old time here, it's four now. Consensus in

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>favor of the Rams total is down at forty eight

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.399
<v Speaker 1>and a half. It opened at fifty I believe got

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>down a forty nine and a half forty nine forty

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. It is stated at forty eight

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half for a long time also, And so

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>rufus will start with you just on the on the

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>line and the total itself. Do you have any bets?

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Did you make a bet? Do you plan on making

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>any bets? I do not have a bet. I you know,

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>if I get a good Rams money line at some

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>point I might make that bet. I lean Rams, but

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I have been focused on profits and the line is

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty close to my number, my numbers minus four and

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a half without any home field of image to the Rams.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've heard different arguments of how much home

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>field advantage they should get. And let's and let me

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>just say this about your money, your call on the

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>money line on the Rams that we say this every

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>year for the last quarter century. This is what Christie

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Andrews estimates for about the last quarter century. For whatever reason,

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>people the casual better bets the Super Bowl differently than

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they do dogs during the regular season. So during the

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>regular season betting behavior is usually take the dog plus

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the points for whatever reason, and no one really knows why.

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>The last years, when betting the Super Bowl, people tend

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to take the dog on the money line, and what

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it creates is this artificial muting of the favorite on

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>the money line. So I remember, like a few years

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>ago when the Patriots playing the Falcons, for instance, was

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that three or three and a half a little smaller

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>than this spread, but you could get like offshore of

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots line. Money line got all the way down

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to like minus one forty if I recall. So that's

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>the kind of opportunity you're talking about. I guess the

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl middle has exist for a long existed for

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a long time. It's because people You have a lot

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of people that are betting, like once a year just

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Super Bowl, right, and those kind of people

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to bet um, they don't want to

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>lay mine, they don't want to bet a favorite on

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the money line. They want to bet favorite on the spread. Um.

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Because you know they would like that regular payout. They

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>don't want to lay minus one seventy, But if they're

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>beating the underdog, they want the They want that sort

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of lottery payout, but the bank for the buck. They

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 1>they also don't understand the point spread. Many many people

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>do not still understand the point spread. Have you ever

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>tried explaining the point spread to a novice? It really

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like a very complicated topic, but try explaining

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it to people and you will very very quickly understand

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the trouble that human beings have with mathematics. So the

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>question is, how do you explain it? I feel like

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>different people explain it different ways. Well, I mean, maybe

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just their explanations that well that that's a good point, rufus,

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think it's accurate in this case because

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually pretty pretty articulate and explaining things. He's not

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>questioning your are being articular. You say, how does one

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>explain that to the novice? Right, I'll tell you how

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I would explain it. I would say, oh, if the

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>spread is three and a half, what that means is

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>is that the team that is favored by three and

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a half must win. By four or more points for

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you to cash your bet, whereas if you bet on

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the underdog, they must win out right, or even if

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>they lose by three or fewer, you will win your bet.

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>That's how I would explain. Oh, you know what I

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>would say. I'd say that number next to it. You

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>just add or subtract that number to your team's total

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>and compared to the other teams, and whichever is higher wins.

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh you see that will confuse people. Well, it's just

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>like minus. You know, your team's total minus three and

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 1>a half against their total. That sounds so logical to you,

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>But that would confuse me. If I didn't know what

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>what you were talking about, I'd be like, what I've found, examples.

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I've found giving them examples is the only way that

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it really penetrates their brains at times. For instance, if

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a four point line and I say, if the

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>final scores one to seventeen, who would win? Yeah? No?

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And then if the scores to eighteen, who would win?

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>If it was sixteen, who would win? You know? That

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the only way they get eeen, I

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>think I have an exact defar eight team. Do you

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>so diver telling you the story about me being behind

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the book at the South Point during the Falcons Patriots

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl when it was to the Patriots. So yeah,

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>so this is it has to do. I had the

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>nine the Patriots to score exactly nine ticket when it

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>was nine. That's my whole story. So I used to

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>do it those days. Now I do the full bed

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>cast for Vison, but those days I only used to

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>do the first half. And so after the first half

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I would I would. I didn't want to travel home

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>because I missed the second half. So I'm like, where

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>am I going to hang out for the second half?

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>This places of Madhouse. Oh, I'll go back with Chrissie

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and Jimmy Vicara and Vitty and I'll watch Super Bowl

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and quiet back there. So I go back there. Remember

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it was twenty eight to three a half time. Famously,

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>people the only Super Bowl where people remember a mid

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>game score more than they do the final score. So

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty eight to three, and the Patriots score a

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdown to make it twenty eight to nine, and I

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>think Gostkowski missed an extra point. If I'm not they

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>did not go for two. Yeah, I don't think so,

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I could be wrong, But that's not the point. They

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>ended up on nine. And so I'm back there and

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Chrissie has Chris Andrews, who runs the South Point Hotel casino,

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>their computer back there, they can look at all their

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>liability for any number of their hundreds of props. And

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>so all of a sudden, like he was all jovial,

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden, he like his face

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>turns a little like sour, and I'm like, what's wrong?

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Like I know him well enough where I can something's wrong.

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>He goes, ah, and you know his face. He goes,

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we really don't want this to end up on the nine.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And I go why. He goes, let's just say we're

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in for six figures if the Patriots end up on

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the nine. I go, really do I exactly? Yeah. Keep

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in mind, in real time it only ended up being

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes, because the Patriots famously came back and not

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>only got off the nine but won the game. But

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for those fifteen minutes of real time, not even football time, Chris,

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>he's dying. Back then. I'm like, do I know the

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>person who has the nine? He goes, yeah, you do.

0:08:56.160 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>What was the odds? I don't know I tweeted out

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the ticket after it lost. Actually, I was like, man,

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I had a little sweat for a little while. Um,

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>I it was pretty high. I don't remember exactly if

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you could check my history common I mean, I mean,

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess nine is that you get the field goals.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's about it. Three field goals or a touchdown

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in its extra point and field goal. Right, well, it

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.719
<v Speaker 1>was nine for you know, brief about a time and

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that it wasn't anymore. But that was my Yeah, that

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>was I don't think I ever told you that story.

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>The So okay, um Todd, do you have a play

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>on either the side or total. I mean, I'm not

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna play a pre game. I mean, I don't play

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>any of the game's pre game pretty much, so why

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>would I play this one pre game? I'm gonna play

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it under. I mean, if I had to you forced me,

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I would play the under forty eight and a half

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>or I would play the Cincinnati team total under twenty

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>one and a half. That's probably the best one that

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>I would play, would be the Cincinnati under twenty one

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half team total. Why is this night different

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>from any other night? Is what you're basically exactly. It's

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a minished ton of kind of first of all monished

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to Okay, well, I wanted to ask, can I ask

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>rufus a quick question about props? Whatever? Kind of interesting?

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Um ruff is one of the things. I mean, I

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>don't play a lot of props. I've played more props

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this year, but I don't really play a lot of

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>props in general. But the the thing that I always

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>wonder is if you when you're making, when you're playing

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>your props, aren't you aren't they a lot of them

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>correlated to what's happening in the game. So can you

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>get in a situation where, let's say you've made a

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred props, if one team doesn't win, you're gonna lose

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of them or something? Does that happen? Or

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>is there some non correlation ability for you to have

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>so many different props that the result of who would

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>win does not really come into effect? And if that

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>is the case, If the former is the case, then

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>won't you be just rather better betting the teams themselves?

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's a really good question. I think it's one

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of complicated, and I don't know all the

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>exact correlations Um. Certainly a lot of the props are

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>based on the point spread and the total are and

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>so what I guess what the way we anticipate the

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>game playing out as a result of that. So, for example,

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals are four and half point underdog, which means

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>um a four and a half pourn underdog on average

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>when they have the ball will be trailing by three

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>point one points every snap on their average snap will

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>be down three four points. I know that sounds like

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a larger number than you'd expect, right, But if you

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>think about it, if the line was pick, even if

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the lines pick the average UM, well, the team that

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>is pick is going to be trailing on average on

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>their snaps because you know, think about the game starts

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>at zero zero, team goes up seven. Oh now the

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>other teams down seven. They have the ball down seven.

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So because you're getting the ball after the other team does, right. So, um,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>but you're saying in a pick game, they're gonna they're

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be they're gonna be down more than they're up

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>when they have the ball. Yeah, both teams will be

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>down more than they're up when they have the ball.

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Think about it. If you've never thought about It's kind

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of counterintuitive, but it makes sense because it's you get

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball after the other team has that they score

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>then you know, anyway, we're getting off track here. Um, yes,

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>they're they're definitely things that are correlated, but there's also

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>things that are sort of um, and I don't want

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to say anti correlated, but but correlated the other way.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>So for example, if I'm against a team's passing game, Um,

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>let's say I was against you know, um, the Bengals

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>passing game and against all the Bengals wide receivers. You know, certainly, um,

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I knew that Jamar Chase had nine

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>catches for a hundred and seventy yards, then my expectation

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>for Tee Higgins is gonna be less than not knowing that.

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So so there's there's negative correlation there, right, So um,

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 1>they're there. You know, certainly you can get um one

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of these really bad outcomes, um, which basically bad outcome

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>for me means things happening that are exciting for the

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>average fan. I root for the most boring Super Bowl

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>ever typically, but um, most of these um, you know,

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>there I bet enough esoteric stuff and that that that

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you know, even if if the you know,

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>unless it's like a crazy offensive game. Um, I'm I'm

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>not in that that much trouble. I mean, obviously I

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>could still be in trouble, but you know, just but

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's not correlated to a huge offensive game. All right.

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me step in here before you ask

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>more questions, Toddles, let's just establish for the audience some

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>street grid here for Rufus. I know you downplayed this

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>when you are in a numbers game earlier this week.

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But the reason that Rufus is appropriate for the Super Bowl,

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>perhaps more than he's he's appropriate every week, but perhaps

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>more than anything any other time of year, is because

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>this was Super Bowl props. Was when you were back

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>with your team back in the day. This was kind

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of your week, This was your thing, right, and you

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>made you made out very well doing this. You acknowledged

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you weren't the first person to do this, but you

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>were the first person, at least at least to my knowledge,

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that got notoriety for doing that. Is that fair? I

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's fair. Yeah. And and do you find that

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities are fewer and further between, or do you

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>think that there's still quite a few of those opportunities. Still,

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's still quite a few opportunities. The opportunities

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>are not as large as they used to be, not

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>as large, not as large. It's the aren't as big

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>as right. You don't have the same gravy you used

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to have in terms of sports book prop openers, So

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot there's books have more surface

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>area to defend now, especially with these same game parlays

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that, which honestly, I'm sure there's a

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>ton of value to be found there. It's it's not

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>something I've really looked into. Um, I'm you know, I'm

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>at the point where I'm betting props. I would say

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>once a year, but I actually bet in the last

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>two weeks also, so um so a few times a year,

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>just because probably there it's a it's a lot of

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>manual work, there's a ton of art to it, um,

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>But there are I think opportunities are a little bit different.

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>They're smaller, but a lot of it now is betting

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>very close to game time after the blick has driven

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>up prices. So the public loves betting on things to happen.

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.359
<v Speaker 1>They like betting receivers to go over players to score touchdowns,

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>um on a safety, on defensive or special teams touchdown.

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And so the opportunities there, especially with marquee players to

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of bet unders close to game time after the

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>public is exactly like under receiving yards you think it's

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>going to get blown way out it is. I mean,

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of course I think it is. I mean he's averaged

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and eighteen or hundred and seventeen receiving yards

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>per game. Not to interrupt your flow, but that's so

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the biggest bit of macro advice we can give,

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>right generally speaking, if you're thinking about betting over on

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of guys and those kind of props, you

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>should have already been them. Yeah. And if you if

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to bet Cooper cup over, the best time

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to bet it is right now. If you wanted to

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>go under, wait as long as you yes, and especially

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>so wouldn't you say, because we now have more and

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>more states and just this week, right, just not this week,

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>but just this past month, New York in Louisiana are

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>brand new. This is entire new generations of people that

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>do have not bet illegally right, have not bet with

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a local bookie, have not been offshore, who have waited

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>for their legal opportunity to bet, and this is their

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>first crack at doing this stuff. That's a total that's

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a total overwave of betters. You would imagine if it's

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>an unknown, it's an unknown, how much it's gonna affect

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>these books pricing, how much they're going to respond and say, oh,

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we're gonna leave. You know, we know

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that people betting the over, we know we have the

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>edge there. Um let him that the over will take

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>on liability versus let's say, you know what, this is

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>too much liability, let's move this number. Because I think

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the European books um, the DraftKings fan Duels of the

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>world bet MGMs, Caesar's um there. I don't know if

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I should call Caesar's European. I don't know, are there,

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>um well, we all are Caesars are. But those books

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>tend to, especially with prop markets, they tend to be

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>less responsive to bets in terms of moving their prices.

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Um and they you know, like, you can bet something,

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I won't move. They just will limit you or something

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>like that. I don't know. Um versus books in Vegas,

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you bet they move the line, you bet, they move

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the line, and so yeah, you know, they obviously are

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>moving lines, but it's it's less it's less responsive. They're

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>more like, Okay, we have our algorithms being we're sticking

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>with this a little more. Yeah, whereas Vegas reacts pretty dramatically. Okay,

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>So by the way, I would, I would question Gilly

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>whether in New York is going to be that big

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>a deal. I think. I mean, when I lived in

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 1>New York, everybody was betting already. So it's like now, granted,

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Louisiana maybe, but in New York, it seems to me

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>that everybody was already betting. Now maybe they're gonna all

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>bet legally legally, What is the what's the point of otherwise, Oh,

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought you meant that they that they wouldn't have

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>had access to this kind of stuff in the past.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that the the prop markets that we're talking

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>about that are largely legal, right that we're talking about,

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that they could be affected an entirely more dramatic way

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that they ever have been before. I don't think that's

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a nutty statement. I didn't say it was nutty. I

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>just think that the theoretically that I think a lot

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>more people were exposed in New York than you would

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 1>think otherwise. But maybe I'm wrong. No, No, I wasn't

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to be naive about the fact that they didn't

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>find other ways to bet, or maybe they crossed the

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>state line in some cases. But I'm saying there is

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a large group of that of that population. Let's say

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>if it's I mean, they just made one point six

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>billion in legalized betting in a three week span, or

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>at one point six billion and handle in New York.

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>It just destroyed New Jersey in three weeks. How much

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of that was the free play promos? Though? Maybe that's

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the big question. That's a big question. But it's

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>also also it's also not a standard Sunday of football either.

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Imagine they have sixteen games to bet on. What that

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>number is going to be like? And I guess all

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying Todd is but Meltzer. Meltzer made a very

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>good point that per capita was actually lower than which

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is interesting, which is now online. I just mentioned so

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>that So what I'm saying is of that of that

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>huge swath of influx, there's got to be a bunch

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of that a huge percentage of that as people who

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 1>have just we don't have to. I'm with you, I'm

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not arguing with you. I'm just I'm just by

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>the way. I do have a pre flop bed. I

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>have the bagels at plus four and a half. I

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>don't It's not a big bed. I took it. Could

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>I see the Rams crushing him? I could go to

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>see the Rams winning. I could, But Burrow has shown

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>me enough despite his poor offensive line. I'll take the point.

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So I do have that bed going. Just to be

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 1>clear on my side, Uh, your favorite prop bet, so

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>have you? So you're waiting for a lot now, a

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>lot more than you used to rufus, you're waiting to

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>bed of the ones you've made so far? How many

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>have you made so far? As first of all, Um, well,

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>what percentage of the total that you will make have

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you made so far? How about that? How many will

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a kickoff? How many? I'm trying to think

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>more in terms of volume, UM, I would say I

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>probably Well, I've only made about a third of the

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>bets that planned to make a third of the money down, Yeah,

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>which is third very different than what it used to be.

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Very different. It used to be like eight was down

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>by this point. Wow, So things have changed, it is. Yeah,

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think I could get of my ev

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>if I just waited until Super Bowl weekend of bet.

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>When did you figure out that that change needed to

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>be made? Well, it's not that the change needed to

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be made, it's just that there weren't as many opportunities

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 1>early to get and so I've realized that over the

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>last few years. You know, I might bet something. I

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great bet on you know, the when

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the lines come out and you know, game damn getting

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the same line or better after the you know. So

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm basically waiting on all my unders and except for

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>like sort of the niche markets like first reception length

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, where I don't think that's going

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to get a ton of public action. But in terms

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of the bigger player markets, you know, the Cooper Cup,

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards for the game, Cooper Cup, police score touchdown,

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm waiting on those. You have a Joe Mixing bet

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that you made, though, correct or yeah, I bet Joe

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Mixing under receiving yards and a half. Would you get it?

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we got anywhere between twenty and a half

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and twenty six and a half. And you're thinking, all

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that is, why do I like the bet? Ye, Well,

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>my numbers like it. I haven't projected lower. Um. The reason,

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>I guess a big part of that. You know, he's

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>he has been a much more active part of the

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>receiving game the last few weeks. I'm actually actually against

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs maybe not quite as much. I have to

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>like see what that number was there, But um, I

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>think there is a bit of recency bias three for

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven last week, actually, Um, but they have there

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>are those, I guess with the Chiefs game. Notwithstanding, have

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>been games where there have been either positive or neutral

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:44.120
<v Speaker 1>game scripts for Cincinnati. They've been UM in the lead

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>or it's been a close game, whereas UM. You look

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 1>in the mid season stretch where they're involved in some

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 1>blowouts and uh, he was much less of a factor

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in the receiving game. And if you look at it, um,

0:21:55.960 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>his his participation receiving game is very very direct. We

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>linked to what the score differential is and what the

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>game script is. So UM in obvious passing situations, b

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Ryan's in so mixing, mixing gets his receptions and his

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards when the Bengals are basically leading or the

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>game is very close, when they're trailing, Yeah, when they're

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>when they're trailing, and you know, when they're trailing, p

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Ryan is the guy that is much more involved in

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the receiving game. So there you go, and probably much

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>more involved in the game period because they're not exactly.

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting because you think, like, okay, if if

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>if a team is trailing, you know, they're going to

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>be throwing the ball more running back is gonna be

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 1>running back gets receptions from that. But it's actually kind

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>of the opposite with the Bengals, Like I mean, at

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>least for mixing, they're up Mixing is going to be

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>involved in the passing game. This is why it's so

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting now with the end game props, where I find

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.239
<v Speaker 1>that you know when you're getting when you're looking at

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the end the Obviously, the the end game is huge

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>for the line and it's also huge for the props.

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you know, if a team is at head

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>one to three, you know and the running back, your

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>your primary running back has say fifteen yards, they're gonna

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>make him only like say thirty five for the full game.

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Because they know he's not going to be running the

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>ball like you just said. And the reason I brought

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>it up now, it's just because you you had that

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>whole discussion about mixing mix. It will be out of

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the game because the Bengals can't run the ball down

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>three and the third quarter. So and you see a

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>similar thing with the passing yards. The passing yards number

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>goes way up for a team that's down a locked

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>they figure, oh my gosh, she's gonna they're gonna have

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to throw all the time. Now, sometimes they overinflated. I

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't been noticing, for instance, when a team's losing big

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>in the first half, say twenty one three is a

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 1>perfect example. Late in the first half of a guy

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>has fifty passing yards, his number will be like two sixty,

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>So they think he's gonna get two ten passing yards

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in the second half because you're gonna be chucking it

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>every play. So I mean, whether that's true or not

0:23:57.560 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in a particular game, obviously you have to take each

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>one do an accoun but it is kind of interesting

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>how the the game flow is so much of a

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>part of these props. So I think that was really

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>interesting what you were just telling us about do you

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>do any of games like that? Now I'm too, I'm stressed, eating, stress,

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>drinking at that point. At that point, just trying to

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>log tickets that I bet right before the game started

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.959
<v Speaker 1>to how will where like if you have what percentage

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of of if you bet thirty, can you keep track

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of all of them in your head? Or you just

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>focused on a few of them the ones that are

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the most outlay for you know, I mean basically every

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>play like we'll have we'll have like a drunk grading

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>sheet open where we can kind of grade, and there'll

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>be many mistakes found the next day. But basically you

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>know where some of us will be grading as things

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>happen like oh ship, we've lost that language happen what

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll you'll figure it out the next day. Some will

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>be mistakes well yeah, yeah, I mean we go through

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>our tickets one by one and make sure and people

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>double check everybody else has taken that kind of thing. Like,

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would feel like you're probably the more

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>reliable of the budge. I would have been about that

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>so much. So much of the props, though, can be

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>can really come down to like one situation like, for instance,

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of a team is driving with two thirty five left

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in the first half, and they don't get the first down,

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>and therefore the other team is going to get another

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>chance now at the end of the first half, and

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be throwing the ball. That's an extra

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, fifty or sixty yards of passing, possibly for

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a particular passer or for those receivers. So it's very

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting how the game flow is huge, which I mean

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>or do most books now offer this todd I'm not

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to be naive, but here in Vegas we don't

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>have it. Off course, don't have it in many cas

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Regular season has regular season NFL has in game props

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>fan old draft kings. Now, depending on who you are,

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you might not be able to bet them, like I'm

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>not really able to bet them at Draft Kings, but

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the the you know you can if you're just a

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>regular recreational better you can bet all these things in

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 1>regular games. And if so, of course you can do

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it for the Super Bowl. But even regular games have it,

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, all these games have it all right. Here

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>are the props that I have bet already. I'm not

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>sure if I'm adding more. A couple of these. A

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>few of these might not even be there anymore, and

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in fact, I'll update them for you. One was no

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>touchback on the opening kickoff. This was a complete intel

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of bet so back in the day with this,

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 1>I used to go through on shows. Oh, this is

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the percentage of times this kicker kicked in the end

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>zone and resulted in touchback. And this is the kind

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of times percentage of times it was deferred on kickoffs,

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. Pat McAfee had this podcast last year.

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>He kicked in the Super Bowl when he was with

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the Indianapolis Colts when they played the Saints. Right, but

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 1>he did the kickoff they did the opening? Was was

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 1>he there? Opening? Was he the kickoff kicker? And he

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>for thirty at least I believe that's the case. Yeah,

0:26:57.720 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>now you're now you're having me confused. But I believe

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the way for thirty. Uh. You know what what

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>he basically said was during a regular season game, opening kickoffs,

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:10.199
<v Speaker 1>the kickers get to mess around with the football for

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.959
<v Speaker 1>about thirty minutes. They get to wear it in, they

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>get to kick it, they beat it around, and the

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>ball by the time the game starts is you know

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 1>tenderized if you will, that's my word, not his. In

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl that does not take place. You do

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>not let me finish, and you'll get the whole story.

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>So so you so basically you don't get to mess

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>around with the football and when you show up for

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the opening kickoff, because their whole point with this kick

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is to just send the ball into the Hall of Fame.

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So you just show up. You didn't get to mess

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>with the ball for thirty minutes. And he says it's

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like kicking a brick and so um. Then as soon

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>as the play is over, they package the ball and

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 1>they send it to Kim right that or they package

0:27:55.880 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it up to to be sent to Canton and so so, yes,

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty six of the last twenty eight Super Bowls have

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>resulted in no touchback. Now, some of those were back

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>when they kicked off from a different yard line most

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 1>of them, most of them, but eight of the last

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>ten no touch back from the current yard marker. For so,

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>so that's the story. And so by the way, like

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>with Harrison Butker, he told this last year before the

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs Buck Super Bowl, Harrison Bucker and was in that game.

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>So it was like plus two seventy to not be

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a touchback. Now it was only like it was anywhere

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>between like plus one plus one sixty. And my argument

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.239
<v Speaker 1>was anything in plus money based on that kind of

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.719
<v Speaker 1>intel is still probably a good bet. Now it's a

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>coin flip at William Hill, I wouldn't bet it anymore

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.719
<v Speaker 1>because if Evan McPherson kicks it, he could catch it. It

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>It could go into the end zone for all I know.

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>But when it was plus money, if you can still

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>find it plus money, I would bet it no touch back. Yeah,

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is you know, I think I think

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I laid a price on on it to be a

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>touch back without that intel earlier on. But that I've

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>heard this, I'm getting off. This reminds me of the

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis Colts versus the Chicago Bears. If you remember correctly,

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Bears had a guy named Devon Hester on

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the team. I went to Vegas. I was living in

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>l A. I went to Vegas um to play for

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl, and I made one or two prop beets.

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>One of them was that the Bears would never lead

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in the game. I think it was like plus one

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy the Bears will never lead in the game, and

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking the Bears had Rex Grossman at the quarterback position,

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I had Hayton Manning at the quarterback position. I thought

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a very good chance the Bears would never lead.

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I also thought the Colts wouldn't be stupid enough to

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>kick it to Devon Hester when he had only returned

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>about five thousand kicks for touchdowns that year. Well, guess what.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>They decided to kick it to Devon Hester and then

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>got destroyed the rest of the game. So I was

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a very unhappy camper that day about the opening. That

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>one that one lost quick. Uh. The other one is

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I laid this is not for everybody, but I laid

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>minus three thirty on there would not be a missed

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>extra point in this game. Uh. Evan McPherson and Matt

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Gay combined this year postseason and and regular season one

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>oh three for one oh six, one oh three out

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of one oh six on their extra points, and that's

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>plus rate. Um. I know there's more math to it

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>than making it just this simple, but even at a

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>minus three thirty price, which converts to about seventy six,

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that's still a good bet. To me. Minus three sort

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of indoors have you been to that stadium, talk, it's

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a cardboard. I've been there. Look, I

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was there, and I was cold like it was. It was.

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>It was freaking cold in there, like it was. I

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>was there for the Chiefs Chargers game, which is an

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>incredible game. By the way, Was that the one that

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>was delayed? One of them was delayed? Yeah, Monday, that football.

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I was delayed in getting there because

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of l A traffic, So I got there late in

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the second literally a storm landed on top of sofa. No, No,

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't that one. I wish this was the game

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>when it was fourth down at the times and they

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>kept going for it, right, Yeah, I was right. It's

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>smart coaching on both sides, and and everybody was like,

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>why don't they just kick field goals? Exactly that game,

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>But it was I remember also looking at the I

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know what, what do do you call the band or

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the ribbon on the on the top of the upright,

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it was moving. It was moving a little bit so

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>because you, I mean, the ends are open a little bit.

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>You're it's it's a canopy. So I think temperature, I mean,

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>temperature has an impact. Although I looked at the weather.

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be expected, it's gonna be seventy one. It's

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's not. If it was fifty degrees, then that

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>would totally impact kickoffs and extra points. By the way,

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>what about the one that's minus five hundred that the

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>team will differ? I saw that this even got a

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>regular news story in Yahoo. There's nothing more than there's

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>no better free money bet. Then the team will defer

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>minus five hundred or it's it's somehow awarded that the

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>team will you know, whoever wins the coin toss will

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>elect to defer or something something to the effect. And

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it's minus five and it doesn't Well, no, it's too

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it's too it's too low because every team differs when

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't. Almost every team deffers when they win the

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>when they win the coin toss. That actually every team defers.

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah I didn't know that, Yeah really, yeah, almost, it's

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>about it's something like seven out of I didn't know. Yeah, yeah, everybody.

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>The first it used to be Bruce arians used to

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>not deffer, but even he defers. Now, So do you

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>make any prop bets? Um? I made just a couple,

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>but not nothing made you just like rams more first downs. Um,

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple other ones, but I'm not I'm not

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>well enough versed on the props. Two tell you you

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>should be following me on the props. Here is my

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>one sort of p s A every year that we

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>do on the Super Bowl show. And we've done this

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>for over a decade now. When when you ask bookmakers,

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>what is the prop that most trips up the public?

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Longtime listeners to the megapod know where I'm going with this, rufus,

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious your thoughts on this. Everybody offers you know

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>what I'm you know about today? That's the one so

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>three unanswered so the casual better And again, if you're

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>new to this, you'll see this prop. Will a team

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>score three unanswered not including extra points? Right, Well, they

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>have three unanswered scores, and so the the yes is

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>like minus two and the no is about plus one seventy,

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>And the average better will look at that and'll be

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>like three unanswered scores, the no is plus one seventy.

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>My god, these are two really great teams. How is

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the no plus one seventy? And I'm totally betting that.

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>But the truth is that it happens all the time

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>four unanswered scores, it correctly flips. But three unanswered scores

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and that is actually priced appropriately. So that's the yeah,

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that prop is is is correctly priced, and so people

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't go nuts betting the no all that it could hit.

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's not like there's value on it as as

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it sort of meets the eye kind of thing. But

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>see that's a that's another one of these correlated kind

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of situations because I'm sure in games that there are

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 1>more one sided games, there's probably more of that three

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 1>in a row thing happening. So that's I just find

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the props to be, like, you know,

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>very very correlated to game. Am I wrong about that?

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Rufus No? I mean you're right that obviously a blowout

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>it's more likely. But even in a closer game, even

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:32.879
<v Speaker 1>in a game it's a pick, it's still it's still

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 1>very likely because and think about like you had, think

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>about Bengals Chiefs, right, one team has it, takes a lead,

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the other comes back. That kind of thing happens a lot.

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And what's interesting is that there's higher the total. The

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 1>more chances there are for three unanswered scores, you have

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>more opportunities. But at the same time, the higher the total,

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the the less independent who uh each score is. So

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, because interesting, right, it's it's it's sort of

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>these conflicting things, right because you score, then the other team.

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's less likely you're going to have a

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>team that doesn't score for a few possessions a good point,

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but I thought of it that way. Yeah, that's that's interesting.

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 1>The rivers. Do you have any aboard you wanted to

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>share that you've done already or is that the only

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>one that bix it? Would um any other? I mean sure,

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Like here, you guys talk right now and I'll find

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>something that well, let me let me do my exact

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you. I'll give you another one that somebody

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 1>gave me that that is good. This one, uh, the

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>two minute warning will land exactly on two minutes is

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>one that a very respected person uh told me to

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>bet and it was it's I think it's like minus

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to seventy five minus two hundred and one of the

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 1>halfs and minus two and the other half. Um, I

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know anything about that one because

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't pay attention to that. But they seem to

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's a really good one. That is a

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>good bet because you you just sort of like in

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 1>your mind's eye, you can already think of how many

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>times does it you know, it does a play go

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>past it and land on like one fifty seven or

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>one fifty six. It seems like way way rarer than

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that betting line indicates. I need, like, yeah, that's an

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting one. So you would think it would land maybe

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 1>say twenty of the time, as opposed to you know,

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>where it's being priced more like maybe not even Yeah, yeah,

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good bet. Yeah. I'm literally like

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 1>scrambling to query this right now just so I can see. Yeah,

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting to me. I know, I think he's right.

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a very good bet. So here's what

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Rufus is looking at up and before he provides with

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>another bet. Here, So here, my here, my thoughts on

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the exotics, if you will, which are available more offshore

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 1>than they are. But everyone on this bag of pot

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.320
<v Speaker 1>through the years wants to hear about this. So Mickey Guyton,

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>who I was unfamiliar with, is a country singer. She

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is singing the national anthem, uh, the national anthem. The

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>only evidence of her singing at national anthem on YouTube

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is is she did one in front of It was

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:04.399
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d C. It was in front of some

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>very elaborate orchestration, maybe even the National sem any orchestra

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>for all I know, And it was done at some

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 1>event and she sprinted through it like she just it

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 1>was like she was double parked outside or something. She

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:22.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't like one. I mean the whole video was one,

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>so it was under that, right, So okay, I heard

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 1>could be So the first Super Bowl prop that came

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>out was at nine seconds, so one. So you would

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>think you'd be like, oh, well, she's got to be

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:38.800
<v Speaker 1>an under then, right, No. I immediately thought to myself,

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, there is no possible way that she is

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>going to sing anything quicker, Like, no way, you know,

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>as quick as she did in that video, she's gonna

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely milk it more than that. Ninety five seconds is

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievably low number for a national anthem. So I said,

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a oh like around two minutes, like she give

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:03.439
<v Speaker 1>take a few seconds. So I said, yeah, I said,

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>over on this, and now I'm told that it's already

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>at one forty. So apparently everybody else had the same

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>exact thinking that I did. So now I'm not sure

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 1>how how much I would bet that anymore. Right, Like

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>it's getting I'm playing in game. I'm doing the game,

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>but in gaming vanthem uh. And then and then the

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the other one that we've made hay on here through

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the years is and I'm not sure how many places

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 1>you can find this on because I find this a

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>little scarcer this year than in previous years, just on

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 1>my sort of anecdotal look. But I know like a

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>place like uh, the old bow Dogs of the World, Bovada,

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>right that I think they still have this. If you

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>can find what song will be played first at the

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>halftime show, that's always the big one. We've hit this

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 1>many years. Um it is again, It's Dr Dre, It's Eminem,

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:05.760
<v Speaker 1>It's Mary J. Blige, is Missy Elliott, it is Kendrick Lamar.

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:09.799
<v Speaker 1>It's a whole hodgepodge of hip hop. It is it

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:13.399
<v Speaker 1>like everybody gets a song or guess I guess it's

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>like people don't even know what's gonna happen. Yeah, so

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, my I have some history with these artists

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:23.839
<v Speaker 1>in terms of following their careers. To me, there are

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 1>only two candidates, only two candidates for for what the

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:32.879
<v Speaker 1>first song will be? Uh, and there's only the only

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>two possible candidates on those are are California Love, which

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>was Dre's biggest which he had with Tupac and obviously

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl is being played in California. And then

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the other one is Eminem's big hit from eight Mile

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>called Lose Yourself, which is the you only get one shot.

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>People know that song, right, one opportunity. What about California Girls?

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that? It no idea what you're talking about? Alright?

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So um so to me, it's only between those two solves.

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>One of those is going to be the opener and

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>one of those is going to be the clothes. Today

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on a numbers game, I said Californy. I didn't. I

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't mention lose yourself, but I said, I said, it's

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>either California Love or and before I got to say

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 1>lose yourself, Crack Bill Crackerburger goes, I'll tell you right now,

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not California Love. So my betting advice based on

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that reaction from Crack is that Eminem's Lose Yourself will

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>be the first song played on the Super Bowl half

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>do you get multiple choice on that they give gives

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you They typically give you anywhere between five to eight songs.

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So lose yourself, Rufus. I know you do things by

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, but can you can you argue with that

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable Rufus model had Rufus model had love yourself? My

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 1>mom loves itself too much? Sometimes the problem Rufus Rufus

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 1>model has a lot of love in it. You know,

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I like I like I like models, and I like

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 1>loving myself. Who doesn't? So yeah, you know, I'm just

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave it at that. So there it is, lose yourself,

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Lose yourself. Eminem that's gonna be your first song. And

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I oh, that's a Ladies and Gentleman star of last

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>week's megapod Uh Ladies and Gentleman Brian Ortega's with us. Brian,

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:29.759
<v Speaker 1>you were phenomenal on can we Brian? Can we hear

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you on the air or you're just talking to our

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>ear talking to her here? Okay? So Brian Ortega, who

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 1>was the star of last week's Man's Guide to Sin

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 1>City The Vegas Lifestyle podcasts into my ear, saying that

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 1>California lovel will be the last song. Is that what

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:52.359
<v Speaker 1>you're saying? Okay, so we're we're consensus here, California Love

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be the last song. Lose Yourself is going

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to be the first song. So lose Yourself as the

0:41:57.040 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>answer to the first song. Uh, and we steak megapod reputationally.

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>But the way we don't have that in Pennsylvania. I

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's off of this stuff is down rufus. Did

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you do the query about the two minute warry thing? Um?

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I tried to. I feel like I messed it up somehow.

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>How do how does would figure? I'm literally looking at

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the play by play and just saying, Okay, is there

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a play where like variable where the place started exactly

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>two minutes or seconds left in the second quarter? But

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I didn't need to get rid of penalties

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 1>and ship like that. Okay, do you have one more

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:30.279
<v Speaker 1>proper so you want to share with us? Um? I

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>mean I have a lot of propers, I bet, but

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the question is at least spill um. Okay, I'll share

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 1>an over I bet, actually, because that's something that's been

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that basically, UM. I like Van Jefferson over two and

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a half passing receptions at plus one ten. Okay, yeah, um,

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's you go ahead, no, he I guess his

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean his role has been Um, well, he's still

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 1>gotten a lot of snaps and ran a lot of

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 1>routes the last few weeks. He just hasn't had a

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of catches and Odell Beckham has gotten a lot

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>more catches than he has. But Odell Beckham is basically

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:04.439
<v Speaker 1>in the Robert Woods role. Um. I mean statistically they're

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of roles are fairly indistinguishable. Um, at least last

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. Um what Robert Woods did the first nine

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 1>weeks this season when he was healthy. So UM, I

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think I mean Van Jefferson's role has certainly, I

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 1>mean his his target share has decreased a lot in

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 1>recent weeks. But he he was banged up a little bit.

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know that McVeigh said that there was

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the week against the Niners that Ben Scaroni was in

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>like for a potential game winning drive, um in like

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>crunch time instead of Van Jefferson. And he he said

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>when asked about it, Um, McVeigh said, oh, you know,

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we were just trying, like we like Scaronik, We're trying

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it out. But I mean I think, you know, I

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:41.800
<v Speaker 1>don't buy that exactly. I think that I think he

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 1>was banged up a little bit. I mean, his his

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 1>snap counts are back up the last two weeks, and

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>so I think that maybe there's a bit of an

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 1>overaction of those um sort of weeks where he wasn't

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 1>really involved as much. And this is all correctly based

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>on it snap counts and more specifically targets. Yeah. Yeah,

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So I look at right, I project out snapcounts and

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>routes run, and then I projected out of guy's target

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it's her route run, okay, and then whether they got

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to catch the ball orvan Jefferson over two and a

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>half receptions? Yeah, okay, I like that, which he has

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 1>not gone over two and a half in and even

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 1>his last four games. You get plus actually haven't gone

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 1>over a lot recently. But sorry, plus money plus money, Okay,

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I like it. Rufus flora is your want to give hate?

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I hate over? So this was like this is an

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:28.439
<v Speaker 1>over that you know, I I just like, I plug

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 1>my nose and I bet the over, and I don't

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>bet that much on overs because I feel like, you know,

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:33.839
<v Speaker 1>if they lose, I just feel like very bad about myself.

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Just to be clear, you're not the guy at the

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:38.240
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl party who, while everybody else is enjoying themselves,

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you're in the corner on a white board trying to

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>figure out the results of your brother. That's not you.

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>You are fully immersed in the in the drinking and

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>eating of a Super Bowl, and you'll worry about the

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 1>props afterwards. I'm worried about the problems while I'm drinking

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and eating. Well, okay, I just wanted to make it's

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of a combination. It's it's it's basically yes, okay,

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:00.760
<v Speaker 1>but I mean a white computer screen. Why is Rufus

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>so annoyed in the corner He's trying to figure out

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 1>if fan Jefferson is gonna get a third catch. I'm

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:08.359
<v Speaker 1>drinking and eating during every football game, so if you're

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:11.400
<v Speaker 1>wondering about that, But here's here's the question I have

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for you. Um, did this just happened? The seventies Sixers

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:23.359
<v Speaker 1>acquire James Harden? Oh my goodness, it happened. Wait let's

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:27.479
<v Speaker 1>do the Wait a minute, So it did happen, So listen,

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you have there's a brief basketball aside, so listen. On

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Primetime Action I'm saying. I'm telling Kelly Bilin and Matt Brown,

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, how real do you think it's Hardened and

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Simmons thing is? And those two guys basically laugh me

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 1>off the show. They're like, it's less than zero percent chance, Gill.

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And then last night Matt conceded it was a three

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 1>percent chance. It is happening. Seventy Sixers acquired James Harden

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in a trade for Ben Simmons. Nets also get Seth Curry,

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Andre Drummond and two first round picks. Did the did

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers just give up everything to get Hardened? Good? Lord?

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Hard is damaged Goods? I mean, he's never been a

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>winner anyways, why would you want him away? That's what

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. With his NBA stuff, don't laugh me off

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the show. This ship always happens. Wow, watch college basketball.

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>The NBA is no betting association. Um, can I ask you,

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 1>if it's a quick question, what he thinks about? Okay, so,

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>so the so? The the narrative obviously of this game.

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess the biggest narrative, and I don't watch all

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the regular sports talk show nonsense, but I would say

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 1>probably the regular narrative is can the can the Bengals

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>block the l a Rams fierce pass rush because they

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to be able to block anybody's pastors. If so,

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>is it possible that um Burrow will throw the ball

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:49.719
<v Speaker 1>quicker and meaning have more routes to maybe quick dump

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:52.919
<v Speaker 1>off passes to say a tight end or something like that,

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 1>or whoever, right, whatever you would whatever answer you would

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:00.040
<v Speaker 1>have to the fact we can't block these guys and

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to get rid of the ball quickly. Do

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you think that that is going to have a big

0:47:04.520 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 1>effect on on the props, especially for the receivers. Yeah,

0:47:07.200 --> 0:47:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it could, and and and maybe a little

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 1>yea more more more running the ball too. I think

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:16.399
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, if they get if they get behind there,

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:18.399
<v Speaker 1>they could be in trouble. Though, given the fact that

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 1>you're right, they cannot block and the Rams certainly have

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 1>every fearsome pass rushing I have I have I have

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 1>bur projected to be sacked three point five five times.

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:30.400
<v Speaker 1>That is a lot. That is a very large number.

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>How many three point five five? Wow? Yeah? So uh,

0:47:35.640 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not the XS and os guy, Todd,

0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 1>but I can see that happening for sure. The thing

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 1>is I don't know. I mean, the whole point here

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is like coaches come up with game plans that they

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>don't expect the other teams to be ready for and

0:47:47.160 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. So you know, if if every team

0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 1>knew what the other team exactly was going to do,

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:55.560
<v Speaker 1>then UM, well then it would be a lot easier

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and they would not be very good coach. So I

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 1>also heard also heard as to talk about this on

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>his radio show about the UM odds on the yards

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>are not exactly as they should be for a four

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorite, something to the effect that

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals were a little more inflated. I think I

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:20.439
<v Speaker 1>have that right. Too many sected, I mean I someone

0:48:20.520 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>told them about this too. Someone told me that as

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I said said this, I don't know what that means

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:28.359
<v Speaker 1>exactly though, that like somehow the people too many yards.

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:30.480
<v Speaker 1>But the correlation he was saying like this, there are

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 1>correlation yards, UM that a certain like a four and

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:36.279
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorite means that that team is going

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to get, say twenty five more yards in the game.

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I forget exactly what he said. Something that times Okay,

0:48:43.760 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, oftentimes the team that loses the game, UM

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 1>has more yards because it's it's especially if you're trailing,

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get a lot of a lot more yards

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:55.040
<v Speaker 1>but fewer points. Right, So I'm thinking he's talking about

0:48:55.040 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 1>on average, but I guess I don't know exactly what

0:48:57.680 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he said, so it doesn't really make a lot of sense.

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:01.719
<v Speaker 1>First off. Also, it's team specific. I don't know if

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about yards for the team overall, like a

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 1>prop like how many yards will the rams or anglic

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:10.360
<v Speaker 1>or is it just like the individual player props and

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:13.359
<v Speaker 1>adding those together, because I mean, we will say that

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:17.840
<v Speaker 1>he had some kind of correlation to both of those. Okay, Okay,

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I hear you. I'll have to listen to it. Maybe

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:23.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know how to where we're the radio,

0:49:23.280 --> 0:49:24.880
<v Speaker 1>where to find the radio. It was on like some

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Fox Sports thing that I listened to for a couple

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of minutes, and he was talking about it. I found

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it pretty interesting that was which one is specific? That one? No,

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a proper he was he was talking about

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>forensic was talking about the the correlation of the point

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:42.279
<v Speaker 1>spread to the yards is awful a little bit for

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>one team or the other, meaning a four and a

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:47.400
<v Speaker 1>half point favorite should be a certain amount more yards

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's not really correct for this game or something.

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And I don't remember exactly what he said, but it

0:49:52.640 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 1>was something to that fact that I thought maybe Rufus

0:49:54.680 --> 0:49:57.680
<v Speaker 1>would know about it. Anyways, we could talk more more

0:49:57.719 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 1>of Rufus's props, because I find him interesting. One or

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>two more Rufous. I mean, I have lots of problems,

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:05.759
<v Speaker 1>but but I'm I'm I'm going to respond to what

0:50:05.800 --> 0:50:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you asked me. Okay, all right, how but what's the

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 1>juiciest one that you think that you love? The juiciest one,

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Like when you first got it, you were like, oh

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, this is so juicy. I don't know, there

0:50:17.719 --> 0:50:20.279
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that much that was super juicy. I mean, I

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>guess when I first saw Odell Beckham's receiving yards number,

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 1>um like sixty five and a half. And but it's

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 1>gone up since then. I think it'll keep going up.

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I like that too high. What is the one I

0:50:34.000 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 1>think you already related to? One of the the touchback

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, what's the one that you are

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:41.680
<v Speaker 1>slightly regretful over? Oh? I made a bad bet. I

0:50:41.719 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 1>made a bet on no um on humor not to

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:50.239
<v Speaker 1>get a touch back minus two eight five at circa UM.

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 1>At the opener, I think I I somehow like I was.

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:55.399
<v Speaker 1>I pulled over. Circuit props came out like about five

0:50:55.400 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 1>minutes before I thought they would, and so I was

0:50:57.400 --> 0:51:00.160
<v Speaker 1>not at the destination I was hoping to be at. UM,

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:01.839
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't home. So I literally had pulled over by

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the side of the road, pulled out my computer and

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>was trying to bet these things when they came out,

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and so UM I think I literally, well, I kind

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of did some back of the uenble of calculations on

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that one. I didn't have a number ready for it.

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And then when I actually got into the nitty gritty

0:51:16.719 --> 0:51:20.439
<v Speaker 1>of it and looked, UM, I found that I wasn't

0:51:20.480 --> 0:51:22.359
<v Speaker 1>just a bad bet. It was a very bad bet,

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:24.239
<v Speaker 1>and I like the other side of it. So I

0:51:24.360 --> 0:51:26.759
<v Speaker 1>ended up but I will say, because they moved the

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 1>line so much. I ended up betting minus two eighty

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 1>five on the no Hubert. Well, I bet I bet

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 1>plus sorry, I bet plus two nine on the Huber touchback,

0:51:35.800 --> 0:51:38.759
<v Speaker 1>and then I came back and bet no minus two

0:51:38.760 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 1>eighty five. So I locked an old prophet there with

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 1>my bad bet yeah, I mean I'd rather not have

0:51:44.520 --> 0:51:47.759
<v Speaker 1>like had to lay all that money to win that

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:50.800
<v Speaker 1>very small small amount. But what's the what's the biggest

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 1>outlet you have on any of these props? What's the

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>one that um is the most? Probably te Higgins under

0:51:55.640 --> 0:52:00.440
<v Speaker 1>receptions Maybe I don't know te Higgins under receptions alright

0:52:00.640 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 1>under five and a half. Was there was there a

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:04.760
<v Speaker 1>year that you look back all the Super Bowl props

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that you remember as you were the granddaddy of them

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:09.880
<v Speaker 1>all where you made the most. Hey, well, my first

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:14.319
<v Speaker 1>my first two years ever betting props were probably like

0:52:14.360 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the best in terms of r o I percentage. So

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the first year I hit, I didn't even watch the game,

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers Cardinals Super Bowl, And I still remember telling

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody the LVSC office, um or I think Brian Blessing

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:28.000
<v Speaker 1>can come around and asked us to predict our final score,

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and I said twenty three, which ended up being the

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>actual final score. Um, yeah, I know I should have

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:36.239
<v Speaker 1>been betting these like fan duel exact score teams, right,

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Um that was just like top of like I was like, yeah,

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like a reasonable score. But that Super Bowl

0:52:41.480 --> 0:52:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I hit, I didn't watch it because I was too nervous.

0:52:43.160 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I borrowed money from friends. I had people invest in me. Um.

0:52:46.520 --> 0:52:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I made like a I think the money that was bad.

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I made a dollar profit out of like sixty invested

0:52:52.239 --> 0:52:54.279
<v Speaker 1>because I hit Gary russell first touchdown. That was a

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 1>big one. Gary Russell. Yeah, do you have a first

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:01.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdown for this? Yeah? Yeah, I bet cam Makers at

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.120
<v Speaker 1>at plus seven fifty and higher. I make it plus

0:53:04.120 --> 0:53:06.759
<v Speaker 1>six seventy. Somebody was asking me about that on Twitter today,

0:53:06.760 --> 0:53:08.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about cam Makers first touchdown? There?

0:53:08.560 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>You go? I like it, Um, But the next one.

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 1>I still remember the end with the Peyton Manning Um,

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it was oh Saints to beat the Colts. I had

0:53:16.200 --> 0:53:20.279
<v Speaker 1>both exact as. I hit um Reggie like Manning under

0:53:20.320 --> 0:53:22.399
<v Speaker 1>his Wayne unders. I still remember the fourth down pass

0:53:22.400 --> 0:53:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and headed for Wayne going in complete and like jumping

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:26.920
<v Speaker 1>on the shoulders of one of my business partners, and

0:53:26.960 --> 0:53:29.799
<v Speaker 1>we were just like because we like, basically there, you know,

0:53:30.160 --> 0:53:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that was a huge leverage play there. If he scores

0:53:32.320 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that touchdown, man, he goes over yards. Wayne goes over yards. Man,

0:53:35.680 --> 0:53:40.359
<v Speaker 1>he goes over touchdowns and and everything and it all won. Yeah.

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So that was How about the Steeler in the Steelers

0:53:43.560 --> 0:53:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, I had over twenty three and a half.

0:53:45.880 --> 0:53:49.880
<v Speaker 1>First half, it's ten seven Kurt Warners at the Steeler

0:53:49.960 --> 0:53:53.000
<v Speaker 1>four yard line. There's about twelve seconds left in the

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:55.520
<v Speaker 1>first hour. I have over twenty three and a half.

0:53:55.920 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just hoping for a touchdown for the Cardinals, right

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:02.799
<v Speaker 1>because I'm ten at the half, because I have over

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:04.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty three and a half. And he throws it to Harrison,

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and Harrison is rumbling, bumbling, stumbling down the sideline with

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a convoy of Steelers and a convoy of Cardinals, and

0:54:12.640 --> 0:54:15.040
<v Speaker 1>he gets tackled at the at the what is either

0:54:15.120 --> 0:54:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the one yard line or in the ends, and they

0:54:16.920 --> 0:54:19.680
<v Speaker 1>call it a touchdown. But it was extremely close on

0:54:19.719 --> 0:54:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the on the replay and barely the nose of the ball.

0:54:23.120 --> 0:54:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And when I see the replay of the of the

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 1>of the of the play now, I noticed that the

0:54:28.160 --> 0:54:30.560
<v Speaker 1>guy who made the tackle, Larry Fitzgerald, who came from

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:33.080
<v Speaker 1>all the way on the other side, he was standing

0:54:33.080 --> 0:54:36.160
<v Speaker 1>out of bounds when he first touched Harrison, and I

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:38.839
<v Speaker 1>was wondering, if you're standing out of bounds and you're

0:54:39.000 --> 0:54:41.720
<v Speaker 1>holding a guy, is the guy still considered in bounds

0:54:41.800 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 1>or out of bounds. I think you're out of bottles.

0:54:44.360 --> 0:54:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure you're out of bounds. You should be right.

0:54:46.719 --> 0:54:51.040
<v Speaker 1>You can't make a tackle from out of bounds bounce, Like,

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is there some rule against making a tackle while you're

0:54:53.640 --> 0:54:56.120
<v Speaker 1>touching out of bounce on him? Yeah, if you're I mean,

0:54:56.280 --> 0:54:58.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll think about it. I've never seen something penalized for

0:54:59.719 --> 0:55:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm never seen it either. But if you watch the replay,

0:55:01.800 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll notice that if a guy is completely a guy

0:55:06.000 --> 0:55:10.239
<v Speaker 1>is out of bounds and he's making a can you

0:55:10.280 --> 0:55:12.759
<v Speaker 1>tackle a guy? I would assume. So, really, why, I

0:55:12.760 --> 0:55:14.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know, because I've never seen a rule against it.

0:55:14.520 --> 0:55:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen How many times have you seen the

0:55:16.120 --> 0:55:18.680
<v Speaker 1>guy could tackle someone from out of bounds? I think

0:55:18.719 --> 0:55:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I taped it. I mean, especially if there's a fumble

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:22.880
<v Speaker 1>or something or like, I don't know, I mean, I

0:55:22.920 --> 0:55:26.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know. There's a bubble and there's somebody touching the

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:27.920
<v Speaker 1>guy who's out of bounds. Technically he's the guy. Like

0:55:27.920 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the guy recovers it, he's out of bounce, he's trying

0:55:30.080 --> 0:55:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to recover it. He's touching the guy he makes the tackle.

0:55:32.000 --> 0:55:33.400
<v Speaker 1>That's not a penalty. But how many times have you

0:55:33.480 --> 0:55:36.200
<v Speaker 1>seen a receiver and the first contact the person to

0:55:36.200 --> 0:55:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to have him be ruled down is a guy that's

0:55:39.640 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 1>out of bounds making the tackle. I don't think you

0:55:41.680 --> 0:55:43.320
<v Speaker 1>see that now. I feel like you can see it

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:47.399
<v Speaker 1>on a fumble recovery like near the sideline. No, you'll

0:55:47.400 --> 0:55:49.400
<v Speaker 1>see the fumble recovery with a guy out of bounds.

0:55:49.400 --> 0:55:51.160
<v Speaker 1>But I'm saying that. No, No No, I'm saying the tackle

0:55:51.239 --> 0:55:53.360
<v Speaker 1>because he's also going for the fumble. He's out of

0:55:53.400 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 1>bounce like angled in. He's the guy slides. There's a

0:55:56.960 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>billion guys sliding towards the sideline, and there's a bunch

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of guys. Some of them are landing out about some

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of them are landing inbounds, are touching each other. That

0:56:04.040 --> 0:56:07.439
<v Speaker 1>happens each other. I don't think the show has taken

0:56:07.480 --> 0:56:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a turn with it. I don't. I don't know about that. Guys.

0:56:09.800 --> 0:56:11.320
<v Speaker 1>We Well, this gives me an opportunity to take to

0:56:11.600 --> 0:56:15.080
<v Speaker 1>take to say two things. Look at that I can

0:56:15.120 --> 0:56:19.080
<v Speaker 1>look at that play. It's amazing because one yeah, One,

0:56:20.040 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder if that James Harrison touchdown would have

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>withstood replaced scrutiny of today forget Larry Fitz heard that

0:56:26.760 --> 0:56:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of bounds. Would the ball have been ruled over? Right? Yeah?

0:56:31.840 --> 0:56:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I know they did, But today seems so much more

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:38.719
<v Speaker 1>pickyune right, Today seems so much more scrutinized. The other

0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:41.279
<v Speaker 1>thing is it gives me an opportunity to say, the

0:56:41.320 --> 0:56:45.400
<v Speaker 1>greatest NFL stat there ever is there's never been. Larry

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Fitzgerald has more tackles then he has dropped than he

0:56:50.320 --> 0:56:54.400
<v Speaker 1>has dropped passes in his career. That is the most

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:59.000
<v Speaker 1>incredible staff You know, you know, you know what it means.

0:56:59.040 --> 0:57:01.319
<v Speaker 1>It means that that too many interceptions have been thrown

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to him. He hasn't won enough. Is that where you

0:57:03.880 --> 0:57:06.200
<v Speaker 1>got it? I don't know. Well, his quarterbacks. He played

0:57:06.239 --> 0:57:07.920
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of quarterbacks who through a lot of

0:57:07.960 --> 0:57:11.200
<v Speaker 1>bad passes. But yeah, that was that was one of

0:57:11.200 --> 0:57:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the most I'll never forget that super I was at

0:57:13.560 --> 0:57:16.479
<v Speaker 1>the Mandalaid Bay and I'm like losing my mind because

0:57:16.520 --> 0:57:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Harrison intercepts and now he's rolling, He's rumbling down the sidelines.

0:57:19.720 --> 0:57:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you realize how long that play was? Because there

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was literally a convoy of guys and I'm thinking to myself,

0:57:25.080 --> 0:57:28.000
<v Speaker 1>if he gets tackled, it's it's over. There's no way

0:57:28.040 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that there was like five Steelers and six Cardinals running

0:57:31.280 --> 0:57:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with him. It was incredible. By the way. By the way, yes,

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I've googled this. In college football, you can come back

0:57:38.600 --> 0:57:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in the field of play and make a tackle. I

0:57:40.040 --> 0:57:42.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't have an answer for NFL, but

0:57:42.760 --> 0:57:44.960
<v Speaker 1>come back, come back in the field of play. Yes,

0:57:45.200 --> 0:57:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about making a tackle. Yes, what, you can

0:57:47.400 --> 0:57:49.120
<v Speaker 1>go back in the field of play and make one.

0:57:49.240 --> 0:57:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying when you're out of bounds. I think you

0:57:52.800 --> 0:57:55.480
<v Speaker 1>guys are mistaken about that. When you're out of bounds,

0:57:55.760 --> 0:57:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you and you're the first person to make contact and tackle.

0:57:59.040 --> 0:58:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't you're not a how to do that all

0:58:02.840 --> 0:58:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the time? You don't know. I'm not saying. I'm not

0:58:05.040 --> 0:58:06.800
<v Speaker 1>saying you see it all the time. I'm saying what

0:58:06.800 --> 0:58:09.840
<v Speaker 1>what Rufus is saying is theoretically possible. I remember millions

0:58:09.880 --> 0:58:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of games where they fumble the ball towards the sideline

0:58:13.280 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's six guys over there on the sidelines. Some

0:58:16.400 --> 0:58:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of them are touching out of bounds, some of them

0:58:18.080 --> 0:58:20.400
<v Speaker 1>are not. So I could see how he's what he's

0:58:20.400 --> 0:58:22.240
<v Speaker 1>saying is also true. I'm not sure I love how

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in the same sentence, You're like, no, I'm not saying

0:58:24.120 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it happens millions of times, but I've seen millions of times.

0:58:27.760 --> 0:58:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Well no, but I have seen millions of times fumbles

0:58:29.920 --> 0:58:32.480
<v Speaker 1>on this near the sideline where guys are rolling around.

0:58:32.800 --> 0:58:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that means. That for sure you

0:58:35.560 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 1>have to Yeah, you can't be out of bounds and

0:58:37.440 --> 0:58:40.320
<v Speaker 1>recover the fumble. But I'm we're talking about tackles here, man,

0:58:40.360 --> 0:58:43.040
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about tackles, right. But what he's saying is

0:58:43.040 --> 0:58:45.080
<v Speaker 1>if a guy could if a guy fell on the

0:58:45.120 --> 0:58:47.440
<v Speaker 1>ball just like a half a foot by the by

0:58:47.480 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the aut of bounds and another guy from the other

0:58:50.040 --> 0:58:52.680
<v Speaker 1>team is laying on top of him and half out

0:58:52.720 --> 0:58:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of bounds, they would call it a tackle, which is

0:58:55.200 --> 0:58:59.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of similar to this scenario. Because they're saying, I'm

0:58:59.480 --> 0:59:01.920
<v Speaker 1>just confused. Let's let's say you. Let's say you recover

0:59:01.960 --> 0:59:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the ball at half a yard from the from the

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:05.840
<v Speaker 1>out of bounds and you're not out of bounds, and

0:59:05.880 --> 0:59:09.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a thousand guys jumping on top of you to

0:59:09.200 --> 0:59:11.360
<v Speaker 1>also get the ball, and some of those people are

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:14.240
<v Speaker 1>touching out of bounds and they're on the other team.

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Are those people credited with the tackle because they're touching

0:59:18.320 --> 0:59:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you even though maybe their leg is out of bounds.

0:59:20.640 --> 0:59:23.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what Rufus is saying. See, that's what I'm saying.

0:59:26.800 --> 0:59:30.280
<v Speaker 1>That I have the NFL rule book open here, I

0:59:30.320 --> 0:59:33.880
<v Speaker 1>can't be very exciting here. I'm I'm having trouble finding it,

0:59:34.320 --> 0:59:36.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, gentlemen. It's a big rule book. Though. It's

0:59:36.440 --> 0:59:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a big rule book. All right. I think we've we've

0:59:38.440 --> 0:59:40.360
<v Speaker 1>done all we can do. Unless rufus again, I know

0:59:40.400 --> 0:59:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to be provoked into you want to be prompted.

0:59:42.960 --> 0:59:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Just one more problem, Yeah, and I know how much

0:59:46.160 --> 0:59:51.120
<v Speaker 1>exciting I don't know. I mean, I sell to bet,

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:54.520
<v Speaker 1>how rufus? How about this? I know you don't in

0:59:54.720 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 1>game prop bet, but if you did in game prop bet,

0:59:58.120 --> 1:00:01.160
<v Speaker 1>would you what would you be looking to do or

1:00:01.200 --> 1:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>not looking to do in a scenario for example? Excellent

1:00:03.800 --> 1:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>exit question, good question. Honestly, I don't know. I mean,

1:00:06.760 --> 1:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know how well these things the game

1:00:09.600 --> 1:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>scenarios are priced in. You know, maybe you don't think

1:00:13.000 --> 1:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>they're priced in enough. So they are priced there are priced.

1:00:16.240 --> 1:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're they're priced to withstand your modeling.

1:00:18.960 --> 1:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's put it that way. Well, I've never modeled in games,

1:00:21.160 --> 1:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>so I think they probably are priced to withstand it.

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But why don't I just give you one one more prop?

1:00:25.400 --> 1:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I like, actually, is is the score not to be

1:00:27.520 --> 1:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>tied after zero zero? I make the price minus you

1:00:31.680 --> 1:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>can get minus one ten um in a lot of

1:00:33.800 --> 1:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>places the score not to be tied. That doesn't include

1:00:38.600 --> 1:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>like after a touchdown, before the extra point, so it's

1:00:41.400 --> 1:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>after just like just like for three unanswered scores. So yes,

1:00:46.120 --> 1:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm betting that there will not be a tie after

1:00:47.920 --> 1:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>zero zero, which is done pretty poorly this postseason if

1:00:51.600 --> 1:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you put betting that, by the way, because there were ties, well, yeah,

1:00:55.440 --> 1:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>every game comes back and goes to overtime and it's

1:00:57.720 --> 1:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>one by a field goal. I mean the one in

1:01:00.760 --> 1:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that vein is will the game be decided by exactly

1:01:03.720 --> 1:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>three points? No, I've seen that at minus five hundred better.

1:01:07.360 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>My prices minus five fifty on it. You can actually

1:01:09.680 --> 1:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>find that. You can you can evaluate that one using

1:01:12.080 --> 1:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the unobated alternate lines calculator. If you if you look

1:01:15.280 --> 1:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>at you go, you put in minus four and a

1:01:17.320 --> 1:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>half for the line. Look um, put in an alternate

1:01:20.320 --> 1:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>alternate line. I can't speak anymore. Of minus three and

1:01:22.960 --> 1:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a half and then alternate line of minus two and

1:01:25.080 --> 1:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a half, and look at the difference between those two.

1:01:26.760 --> 1:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Calculate the percentages for the implied probabilities and do the

1:01:30.440 --> 1:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>same thing for plus two and a half and plus

1:01:31.920 --> 1:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>three and a half. Add those together you have your

1:01:33.840 --> 1:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>chance of the game lands on exactly three. Okay, So

1:01:38.320 --> 1:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a recency bias because like every playoff game,

1:01:41.680 --> 1:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it seems like has been decided by exactly three points.

1:01:44.480 --> 1:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And last week I got burned. I laid minus seven

1:01:46.760 --> 1:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred at the south point that on the bet Rams

1:01:51.200 --> 1:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>will win by exactly three points. No, no, minus seven hundred. Brutal,

1:01:56.840 --> 1:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>great great bet, bad result, great bed bad result. First

1:02:00.320 --> 1:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and first and first intent from the twelve yard line,

1:02:02.920 --> 1:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and the idiot runs the ball right into the line

1:02:05.240 --> 1:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to of course give us second and eleven. You know

1:02:07.960 --> 1:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no way they we're gonna get toushed one. But

1:02:09.600 --> 1:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you know your reaction there, rufus. You know what that says.

1:02:11.640 --> 1:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It says that you bet the process. That's right. You

1:02:15.040 --> 1:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>gotta you gotta be you gotta be comfortable with that. Uh.

1:02:18.360 --> 1:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>By the way, here's one that I would like to

1:02:19.760 --> 1:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>just say real quick, cam Akers. If the Rams get behind,

1:02:23.080 --> 1:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you can bet all the cam Akers you want running under,

1:02:25.600 --> 1:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>because they'll just they'll abandon the run. They're not gonna

1:02:28.400 --> 1:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>run that much anyways. But even if they were to run,

1:02:30.880 --> 1:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna run because they're ahead. If they're behind, they're

1:02:33.960 --> 1:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna throw that football. And I don't think cam

1:02:36.640 --> 1:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Akers is gonna get his yards, and I don't think

1:02:38.400 --> 1:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>they'll bring it down far enough. So for instance, if

1:02:40.840 --> 1:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>cam Akers has say ten yards early, and they're down

1:02:44.240 --> 1:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>seven somehow, you know, and then now they move it

1:02:46.800 --> 1:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>from from whatever it is now to like say forty

1:02:49.520 --> 1:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>or thirty five, betted under cam Akers ain't gonna get

1:02:52.040 --> 1:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the ball if they're down. I love it. I like that, Todd.

1:02:55.640 --> 1:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Very nice again to hear in the state of Nevada.

1:02:58.280 --> 1:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Sure wish you could bet that gout a way, h huh.

1:03:02.680 --> 1:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I think similarly mixing as well, but just because of

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>what Rufus said about p Rhyan, but to be more

1:03:08.840 --> 1:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in the passing give it. I think it's even more

1:03:10.440 --> 1:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>so for the Rams. I would say the Bengals, it

1:03:12.520 --> 1:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>seems like they I mean, they won't abandon. No, they don't,

1:03:16.920 --> 1:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they say fairly balanced. I mean, of course, if you're

1:03:18.920 --> 1:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>down big, you're gonna abandon at some point, but I

1:03:21.240 --> 1:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>mean mixing they were down what was the score on

1:03:23.840 --> 1:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>their final drive before a time three? They're still running

1:03:26.920 --> 1:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the ball. They were still they still and they were

1:03:29.160 --> 1:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>still running. Which is that in it? Yeah, Naji Harris

1:03:34.520 --> 1:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is the one guy that they messed the props up

1:03:36.880 --> 1:03:39.919
<v Speaker 1>for because the Steelers will even run down twenty nine

1:03:39.960 --> 1:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing against Minnesota and down. The Steelers were down a

1:03:43.080 --> 1:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>zillion times this year and and usually means you can

1:03:46.680 --> 1:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>just play the running backs under for those teams and

1:03:49.120 --> 1:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>usually win. But you can't with Naji because they're always

1:03:51.680 --> 1:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>going to give it to Naji. They never abandoned the

1:03:53.480 --> 1:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>run even though they can't even run. But it's kind

1:03:55.560 --> 1:04:00.959
<v Speaker 1>of interesting. You can't run, can't pass, Lose yourself, first song,

1:04:01.760 --> 1:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>first song, Super Bowl half time show, lose yourself. You

1:04:04.720 --> 1:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>remember nothing else from this podcast. That's a whole different shows.

1:04:11.240 --> 1:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a whole different shot. Uh, that doesn't for the

1:04:14.560 --> 1:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Mega pod. That does it for the Mega Pod, for

1:04:16.120 --> 1:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the year, for the year, for the year, for the well,

1:04:19.400 --> 1:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>for the season. Anyways, there's no offseason. Yeah, no, I

1:04:22.240 --> 1:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I do. I'm gonna do Tennis Grand Slams. I've committed

1:04:25.400 --> 1:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to doing Tennis Grand Slams, moving a little drifting from

1:04:28.680 --> 1:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>baseball over time, moving towards tennis. And plus we don't

1:04:32.720 --> 1:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>even know if there's gonna be baseball, for God's sakes,

1:04:35.360 --> 1:04:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just ridiculous that that's the best tweet

1:04:37.680 --> 1:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>during that Chief's Bills masterpiece was Dan Haren, the former MLB,

1:04:41.960 --> 1:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the former Major League Baseball pitcher, tweeting, just so you

1:04:44.960 --> 1:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>guys know baseball is in the lockout. It right in

1:04:47.760 --> 1:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the Bills and the Chiefs dramatic finish.

1:04:50.480 --> 1:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>That was awesome, Just so I can so I can

1:04:54.600 --> 1:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>heckle Tim Anderson and have him yell back at me

1:04:56.960 --> 1:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>like that like last year, and then Gilly's all me

1:05:00.280 --> 1:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>on ESPN way Big to Anderson's home behind the dugout.

1:05:04.720 --> 1:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>God wished if I can't believe he actually started screaming

1:05:09.160 --> 1:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>back on me, hysteric, putting his weight on the scale.

1:05:12.280 --> 1:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>We look forward to random college basketball tournaments where you

1:05:14.880 --> 1:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>hecko as well. You know what I tried. I went

1:05:17.680 --> 1:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Duqueenne UH Saint Bonaventure game and I put

1:05:20.760 --> 1:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>up some videos. But the problem is there was too

1:05:22.360 --> 1:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>many people there and it was too loud in the

1:05:24.920 --> 1:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in the in the in the stands. It's much better

1:05:27.880 --> 1:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>when you gotta go to like a Robert Morris game.

1:05:30.360 --> 1:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Robert Morris is a moon township. How's your golf betting going?

1:05:34.360 --> 1:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>By the way? Um, I mean I had a great

1:05:36.960 --> 1:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>year last year. I'm not a great start of the

1:05:39.160 --> 1:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>season so far. Down a little bit, but well that's

1:05:41.600 --> 1:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>what we're We're five weeks into the year or something.

1:05:43.600 --> 1:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>But Todd, I actually I'm going to tease something for you.

1:05:45.800 --> 1:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>It anobated we're about where we're coming out with um

1:05:48.400 --> 1:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in the next few weeks. A tool for in game

1:05:51.960 --> 1:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>college basketball betting, basically value of points. So like you

1:05:55.400 --> 1:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>see minus three and a half with three minutes to go,

1:05:58.160 --> 1:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>this is the score differential or whatever. I don't know, Um,

1:06:00.720 --> 1:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what's minus two and a half? What's minus fort and alp?

1:06:02.400 --> 1:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Like how much of those points worth? So if you're

1:06:03.800 --> 1:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>line shopping between books, I think that's uh, oh yeah,

1:06:07.080 --> 1:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that's awesome. I'll have to definitely check that out. And

1:06:09.600 --> 1:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>college basketball has turned around for me. Uh last year,

1:06:12.280 --> 1:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I had an amazing season. This year, I was down

1:06:14.760 --> 1:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for about the first month and a half and now

1:06:16.960 --> 1:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I've turned it around and I'm up in college basketball.

1:06:19.880 --> 1:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So college basketball has been you know, it's starting to

1:06:22.520 --> 1:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>really turn to the upside for me. UM. The one

1:06:25.840 --> 1:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that you may notice, I don't know if you

1:06:27.400 --> 1:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>notice this roof, is you may not watch a lot

1:06:29.440 --> 1:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of college basketball. They don't fail as much late in

1:06:32.160 --> 1:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>college basketball as they were in previous years. So in

1:06:34.640 --> 1:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the past, if the team was ahead by legs, say

1:06:37.120 --> 1:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>five points with forty five seconds left, they would fail immediately.

1:06:40.840 --> 1:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And this year they're not doing it as much. Experience analytics,

1:06:45.320 --> 1:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there's too much uh NBA influence, UM, the

1:06:49.440 --> 1:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>kids are. I think that the coaches are starting to think, okay,

1:06:53.320 --> 1:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>well we have a better chance if we can just

1:06:55.320 --> 1:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>get a stop down five and then hit a three

1:06:57.760 --> 1:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>with fifteen seconds left and then go from there. I

1:07:00.200 --> 1:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know whether they're right or they're wrong. To me,

1:07:02.520 --> 1:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it still seems like you have a better chance of

1:07:04.480 --> 1:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>these kids missing the free throws and you should foul sooner,

1:07:07.680 --> 1:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>but they don't seem to be doing it. The the

1:07:09.920 --> 1:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>other thing that is just an incredible, incredible pet peeve

1:07:13.440 --> 1:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is they don't know that how to do the two

1:07:14.760 --> 1:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for ones at the end of the first half, if

1:07:16.480 --> 1:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>they have the bath with fifty two seconds left, it's unbelievable.

1:07:20.000 --> 1:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>It drives you absolutely crazy. So you know, anybody who says, oh,

1:07:23.520 --> 1:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>when did you ever coach a college basketball game? I

1:07:26.000 --> 1:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>don't need to coach a college basketball game to know

1:07:28.880 --> 1:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>some of these things are maronic. And there's definitely my

1:07:32.120 --> 1:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>biggest pet peeve is the whole thing about if you're ahead,

1:07:35.200 --> 1:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I hope I'll say this right, if you're a head

1:07:36.920 --> 1:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>in the college basketball game and you're trying to milk

1:07:39.320 --> 1:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>clock some of these teams immediately inbounds the ball, just

1:07:44.240 --> 1:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>take your time. The clock is moving, it just keeps running.

1:07:47.320 --> 1:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>You could like the ball could drift away, and it's

1:07:49.640 --> 1:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like and they race the inbounds and then they have

1:07:52.280 --> 1:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a jacked up possession when they should have been wasting

1:07:54.880 --> 1:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the time at the front end of that possession anyway, right,

1:07:57.800 --> 1:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and then it's just it's just brain head basketball drives

1:08:01.400 --> 1:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>me nuts. Take four seconds every time, didn't know it.

1:08:04.200 --> 1:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Just stand there and be like, okay, one, Yeah, games

1:08:07.440 --> 1:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>have been one and lost on that kind of stuff,

1:08:09.440 --> 1:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>because that stuff adds up um all right, but you

1:08:12.360 --> 1:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>know what, you know, we We've never coached basketball, so

1:08:14.520 --> 1:08:16.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we know. Yeah, we must not know anything,

1:08:17.200 --> 1:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, Todd, thank you for a season's worth. Mike

1:08:20.000 --> 1:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Palm h in memoriam. I don't know where he is,

1:08:22.880 --> 1:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>but he's a father. You guys broke up on me

1:08:25.280 --> 1:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>at the end. I can't hear you. Well, we're just

1:08:26.880 --> 1:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>saying thank you for you for doing the podcast for

1:08:28.880 --> 1:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole year. Todd. We appreciate it, man. Thank you

1:08:31.200 --> 1:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for all your efforts, all your songs. You know what

1:08:34.120 --> 1:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>your best performance was that one show where you were

1:08:36.680 --> 1:08:39.639
<v Speaker 1>totally serious. You were awesome that. I wish you could

1:08:39.640 --> 1:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>hear you. Oh you can't hear me anyway. Being serious

1:08:42.920 --> 1:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Todd on a one with Chris and Adam surt Off

1:08:45.000 --> 1:08:47.479
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago was spectacular. Rufus, Thank you

1:08:47.600 --> 1:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>very much, sir. Twice this year. Uh, maybe not as

1:08:50.960 --> 1:08:52.519
<v Speaker 1>fun as doing our numbers game thing where we just

1:08:52.520 --> 1:08:55.519
<v Speaker 1>talk about everything else besides sports, but we'll get back

1:08:55.520 --> 1:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to that eventually. No, I mean sports in my life too. Yeah,

1:08:58.479 --> 1:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you all for listening. In luck with Super Bowl

1:09:00.920 --> 1:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty six with all your bets. Thanks for listening, Megapod,

1:09:04.520 --> 1:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing makea b but the meeting of the book podcast

1:09:06.120 --> 1:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back. Tennis, golf, whole bunch of stuff. The

1:09:09.720 --> 1:09:12.519
<v Speaker 1>NFL Draft we'll do all of in the off season.

1:09:12.680 --> 1:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, Yeah,