WEBVTT - Top 5 Denzel Washington Performances with W. Kamau Bell (Archive)

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>What kind of a show you guys.

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Putting on here today?

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 1>You're not interested in Armed now? No, look, we're going

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>to do this thing. We're going to have a conversation.

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Hey, film spotters, we have another archive drop in your

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:21.319
<v Speaker 2>feed with our conversation, A long conversation, I think, a

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>fun conversation about Spike Lee and Denzel Washington's fifth collaboration

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 2>as director and actor, Higas to lois coming this Friday.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 2>We wanted to put our top five Denzel Washington performances

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 2>back in your feed. This is from twenty seventeen. We

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 2>had w Camal Bell on the show. Among the many

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 2>things that he does, Josh, he had a CNN show

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Emmy nominated, The United Shades of America. He directed the

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Peabody Award winning documentary We Need to Talk About Cosby,

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 2>And he had a podcast that ran a regularly between

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifteen and twenty nineteen that was appropriately for our

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 2>purposes called Denzel Washington is the greatest actor of all

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 2>time period.

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 3>Great show, great guest, and looking back at my list, Adham,

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 3>I'll just say my number one pick my own eyebrow raised,

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'll have to I'll have to give that a

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 3>fresh listen and see if I convince myself. Sometimes sometimes

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.639
<v Speaker 3>that happens here on the show. So hopefully listeners will

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 3>enjoy a fresh here or maybe listening to again our

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 3>top five Denzel Washington performances. That's from May twenty seventeen.

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 2>And if you want access regular access whenever you want,

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 2>you want to dip into the archive and here shows

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 2>like this. That is a benefit of being a Film

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Spotting Family member and you can learn more at Filmspottingfamily

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 2>dot com. Enjoy mister w Come Out Bell. Many of

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 2>you may know Bell for his politically charged stand up.

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 2>His new comedy album with semi Prominent Negro was just

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>released this week. He's also the host of CNN's United

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Shades of America, which just got picked up for a

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 2>second season, not to mention his live monthly radio show

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 2>and the politically reactive podcast that he co hosts. But

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 2>the reason he's with us today is because he thinks

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Denzel Washington is the greatest actor of all time period.

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 2>And we know this because he co hosts another podcast

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 2>called Denzel Washington is the Greatest Actor of All time period.

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 2>Come out, You are a very busy man. Thank you

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 2>so much. For taking time for us today.

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. When you say it like that, I started

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to get sleepy.

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 4>I bet it's a lot. How do you pull all

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 4>that off?

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I just sort of, you know.

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a fond option of after I had

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 5>I had another TV show Totally Biased, where I was

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.399
<v Speaker 5>like there for like twelve and fifteen hours a day,

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:41.679
<v Speaker 5>and then when that was over, I was like, I

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 5>don't want to ever have to commit that much time

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 5>to one project ever again.

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I would like to do lots of things that take

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit of time.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's good. Here, I got another one for you. Okay,

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 3>can you add a fourth podcast? I want you to

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 3>do something on the Forest Gump sequel, the one that

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 3>you speculated about in one of your early episodes when

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 3>that finally comes out. I just wanted to do episodes

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 3>catalog in that movie. Can you do that for me?

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 5>I think I'll have to get rid of another podcast

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 5>where I add another podcast. I'm always like going, I

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 5>could do a podcast about this, and I look at

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 5>my wife.

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>You can't exactly. I'm always coming with more ideas.

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you know, so it's a but yeah, certainly

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 5>I think there's more podcasts in my future. I just

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 5>think I'm gonna have to suspend some while I would

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 5>I share.

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Sure, that's a that's a sound move.

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 2>So when we announced that we were going to do

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 2>this look back at Denzel Washington's career tied in with

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 2>a magnificent seven review, we heard from a lot of

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 2>people on social media saying, you got to get come

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>out bell On, you got to get someone from that

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 2>show to talk about Denzel Washington. And the good part

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>was we were way ahead of those den Zel It's

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 2>we had already reached out to you. So we are

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>very excited to have you on and that that term

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 2>den Zelot. All of our best ideas come from our listeners.

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Did you coin that expression or is that a pre

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 2>existing thing that you latched onto?

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 6>No, it wasn't.

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 5>It didn't exist. We sort of, I mean I came

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 5>up with the title. I'll take credit for that. I'm

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 5>a big fan of like crazy long titles, like my

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 5>new We just announced that I have a book coming

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 5>out that also is a crazy long title. I just think,

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 5>as everybody else, every other podcast and title has gotten shorter.

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 5>For example, like Cereal is number one podcast, but you

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 5>have no idea. What that's about when you just say

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm listening to Cereal, so I just feel like I

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 5>just want a podcast. It's very clear what it is,

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 5>so that you know what you're getting into. But then

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 5>it was actually me and Kevin Avery. We both we

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 5>actually shared it's going to be so much more boring.

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 5>We shared the same comedy manager for a while and

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 5>she was the one who's like, you should call your

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 5>people Denzel Itz, and we were like, thank you, comedy manager.

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 5>This is the very rare time our comedy manager actually

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 5>has a good idea. So no offense every comedy manager,

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 5>but she, Carrie Smith, she was like that, and so

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 5>that's where it came from. So but you know, since then,

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 5>the Denzels have come up with lots of things that

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 5>have been incorporated into the podcast.

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 3>So the basic idea for the show when you set

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 3>out at the very beginning, you know, just go through

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Denzel's films, talk about all these performances. Has that vision

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 3>been pretty much a compl as you're approaching i think

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 3>almost one hundred shows now or has it changed a

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 3>little bit along the way, And basically, what does it feel.

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Like to do this now?

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 3>This many episodes in I.

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Mean, I think it really started to shift really early on.

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 5>The idea is that we were review every Denzel Washington

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 5>movie and therefore approved that he was a greatest actor

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 5>of all time period.

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>But very early on.

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 5>We started people reaching out to us because Denzel is

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 5>an icon and also a very unique icon.

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hanks is also an icon, but.

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 5>There's other white guys, like, you know, there's like, you know,

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 5>if Tom Hanks walks into a room and the other

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 5>side of the room, like George Clooney walks in the room,

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 5>we got two guys, two icons in the room. But

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 5>Denzel's sort of singular in that in that there's not

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 5>another actor of his era that holds a similar space.

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Samuel Jackson's great, Morgan Freeman is great, but

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 5>he's kind of the king, you know. Yeah, And so

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 5>I think that, like very early on, we people started

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 5>coming into that. But then it also very quickly turned

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 5>into a thing that was just generally about diversity in Hollywood.

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, at the time we started doing the podcast,

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 5>like Oscar so White kicked up again, right, we also

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 5>are talking about like they're also Project green Light. The

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.239
<v Speaker 5>season of Project green Light had all that weirdness around

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 5>diversity and Effie Brown going when Matt Damian was like,

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 5>diversity is on camera, not behind the camera. And I

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 5>was a big fan of that show, and Kevin's a

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 5>big fan of Matt Damon, So we had to have

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 5>a lot of debates about that, and I mean, I

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 5>think one of the greatest things that the show has

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 5>done is that, you know, we talked to Ryan Coogler.

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 5>Now he's obviously he's the director of a Rocky Now

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 5>we talked about his favorite denselboes, but it was a

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 5>really in depth discussion about creed like and luckily, our

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 5>fans have grown with that and there and they like that.

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 5>So we find that we don't actually have to do

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.239
<v Speaker 5>an episode that's even fifty percent Denzel for our fans

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 5>to keep up with it, because Denzel just sort of

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 5>turns through a discussion about diversity in general.

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 2>No, that's really interesting how it's evolved to that. So

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 2>we are going to get to your top five Denzel

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Washington performances, which I imagine was incredibly difficult considering how

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 2>big of a fan you are and considering how many

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 2>great performances he has given a little bit of set

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 2>up here and if I got any of these numbers wrong.

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure someone out there will correct me. I looked

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 2>at his IMDb page, counted forty four feature film credits.

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Of those, I've seen twenty six of them, so I

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know how good that is or not. I don't

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>know if you've seen all of them or not. Come

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 2>out you can tell us, but I've seen twenty six

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 2>of those.

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 4>Forty four.

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>He's made five with Tony Scott the director he's worked

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 2>with the most, Spike Lee four times, Antoine Fuqua now

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 2>three times, ed Zwick three times. He of course, has

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 2>won two Oscars. And I got this from the five

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 2>thirty eight dot com article speaking of those think pieces

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 2>come out the four types of Denzel Washington movies. They

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>have him ranked twenty ninth all time in terms of

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 2>box office. His films have made over two point two

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars domestically. So just a little bit of background there.

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's actually go ahead and get to your picks. And

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 2>how did you even begin to come up with your list?

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, we talked about this in the podcast.

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 5>I actually learned this from people coming on the podcast,

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 5>because some people we make everybody come on and say,

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 5>what are your top five favorite Denzel Washington movies, and

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 5>very quickly people were like, do you mean favorite performances

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 5>or favorite movies? Like there this sort of like split

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 5>between a Denzel Washington movie I enjoy or performance that

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 5>I think is transformative and relevatory. And I never hadn't

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 5>thought of it that way. So only through other people

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 5>coming to the podcast, you like Dave Ziron, who's the

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 5>great political sports reporter, came on with two lists and

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 5>now that's a pretty common thing for people to do that.

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 5>And or Ryan Kugler, we call it cooglering, who would

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 5>have like tied for number five.

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Is four movies I can relate that happens on this show.

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah, so yeah it's called cooglering.

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so yeah, so for me, like my favorite movies

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 5>are pretty different than this list.

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Of my favorite performance Okay really.

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 5>Uh yeah, no there's only one, well there's two, I

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 5>guess it's I mean, that's not great, but yeah there's

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 5>three on here that I would have a couple I

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 5>would have put on my list of favorite movies. But

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 5>then later through doing the pod, because I'm like, I'm

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 5>just saying that so I sound smart, It's that actually true?

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, just to jump in real quick, I'm curious

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 2>because we may sprinkle in our choices. I know we

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 2>did come up with our top five as well. Josh,

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 2>did you end up in a similar place or are

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 2>you like me and kind of have your five favorite

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 2>Denzel movies that also happen to correspond with your favorite performances.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 3>I went with performances. But for me, the tough thing

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 3>was we have a poll going on right now between

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 3>best Denzel performance or another poll asking for your favorite.

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 3>So this is a whole other can of worms come

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 3>out that you can get into. And so I got

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 3>turned around in that a little bit, which has been

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 3>really tough.

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and we are going to get to those results later,

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 2>but I guess I'll give a little bit of a

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 2>spoiler a good example there. I think I don't have

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 2>him in front of me, but Malcolm X, I think

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 2>one for best performance, but Training Day wins for favorite, right,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 2>And there is a big distinction between those two performers.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what I'm talking about.

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 5>Like people, there's a sense that we talked about this

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 5>in the podcast, there's a sense black people really like

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 5>to not like Training Day because, like you know, he's

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 5>just playing a bad cop, but you cannot deny the

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 5>immense fun it is to watch him in.

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 4>That performance totally.

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, you can sort of get on your high

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 5>horse and go, I don't think it's good that you

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 5>want to Oscar for that, And that's also a discussion

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 5>we can have. But I'm somebody who came around to

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 5>that and be like, this is just a good I mean,

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 5>it's like he is so he chews up every bit

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 5>of scenery and it's so fun to see an actor

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 5>like that get the be allowed to sort of just

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 5>run all over the screen. It's like, whereas Malcolm X,

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 5>he literally does the right thing. Yeah, pun and it's

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 5>a great performance. But it's like, if, honestly, I think

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 5>I always think of it this way, if there's two TVs,

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 5>or on one TV, there's two different movies playing Malcolm

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 5>X to Training Day, that's how you figure out your

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 5>favorite the one. You go, well, I gotta go watch this,

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 5>and I I'd watch a little bit of Malcolm X.

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 5>Eventually I can get the Training Day before. He says,

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 5>King talking.

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 4>Exactly.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so did either of those make your top five?

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Then both of them?

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe? No? We talked about again. So this is top

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>five performances.

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:35.719
<v Speaker 4>That's right, performances.

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>So number five, I'm going to say Hurricane.

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Hurricane is I used to be one of my

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 5>favorite movies, but if you watch the movie, it's a

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 5>little bit heavy handed. And they also have to cover

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 5>a lot of time, and so it's just that thing

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 5>where movies have to cover a lot of time, they

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 5>sort of like things sort of get attenuated. But that

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 5>movie did bring me to read about Ruben Hurricane Carter

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 5>a lot.

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 5>But his performance in that movie, the fact that he

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 5>plays a guy from like eighteen to like I don't

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 5>know sixty, and it's not totally unbelievable, and in fact,

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 5>he was forty five years old and ripped in the

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 5>boxing scenes. Yeah, and it has a classic Denza watching line,

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm fifty.

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 4>Years old, the quivering lift everything. Yeah, fifty years old.

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 7>I've been blocked up for thirty years.

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 2>It's funny about that movie because in that poll question

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 2>that we're referencing, we gave like the top six answers

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 2>we thought would be the most common and we didn't

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 2>list Hurricane among them, And then we had other where

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>people could write in and Hurricane scarcely got mentioned. Do

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 2>you think that there is a valid reason or any

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 2>reason that you can come up with why that movie

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>for some reason just hasn't held the same esteem over

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 2>time since it came out.

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it has.

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 5>The biopic problem that, like, you know, it's hard to

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 5>sort of like when you really need to cover a

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 5>person's whole life, it's hard to do a great job

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 5>with that, or a thorough job with that, Like you know,

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 5>every biopick should actually be like a season of television

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 5>where it's like, you know, instead of like cramming all it.

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Also, I think it got a lot of heat at

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the time.

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 4>I remember that, yeah, because.

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 5>They played a little fast and loose with some of

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 5>the facts, which I felt like, do we all see

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 5>a beautiful mind? Was that guy like like a positive reprobate,

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 5>like you know exactly, but the movie he's.

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Just a crazy match genius.

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 5>I feel like that was to me like a little

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 5>bit of of institutionalized racism, where like, oh, so this

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 5>black guy gets heat for playing fast and loose and

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 5>then not as fast loose as the facts as other

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 5>biopics do regularly.

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's sort of.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 5>That affected it and also I think it's a little

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 5>bit like if you want to watch Hurricane, you might

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 5>as well watch Malcolm X because it's basically a better

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 5>version of that movie.

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a black guy.

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, he has been in a number biopick, so you know,

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 3>maybe once those start getting ranked in people's minds, Hurricane

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 3>falls to the bottom.

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, might be.

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.199
<v Speaker 1>I just think Hurricane is not really he's great in it.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not.

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I said this very it's not a ton

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 5>of fun like I think. So it's not like like

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Malcolm X, even though it's tragic, seeing him be Malcolm

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 5>X is fun. It's just it's amazing and you're like, oh,

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 5>this is one of the greatest things I've ever seen.

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 5>So Hurricane is great, but I think it doesn't It

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 5>maybe doesn't age as well as these other ones. But

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 5>his performance is absolutely top notch.

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a clear one there. As you were saying that

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 2>would fit here into your top five. Performance has been

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 2>not your top five Denzel movies. What about your number four?

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>My number four, I'm going to say a Soldier story.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Love it.

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Soldier story is like the first I think, I mean,

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 5>maybe he did maybe he did the carbon copy movie first,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 5>but we don't really count that, ye, But yeah, Soldier

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.719
<v Speaker 5>story is really like a great movie because it's a

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 5>murder mystery and Denzel starts out being what you would

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 5>think is like, Oh, this guy's got nothing, and then

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 5>eventually the reveal, it's like, oh, this guy's got a

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 5>lot more than I expected, you know, no spoilers. And

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 5>I think that, like, it's sort of interesting that he

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 5>ended up being such a leading man because it's really

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 5>a that is a really character performance, Like it's not

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 5>dominated by him being like the best looking, handsome guy,

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 5>Like he's sort of a he's sort of a nerd

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 5>for lack of a better word. He's wearing glasses and

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 5>he sort of thought as like not being really worthy

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 5>of anyone's respect in a movie.

0:13:58.360 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, where are you from?

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 8>Peter's Hollywood, California by way of Alabama.

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So you see, I enlisted in forty two.

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 7>I thought we'd get a chance to fight.

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 8>So did you know the sergeant?

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 7>Well, no, son, he was already with the company when

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 7>I got a sign and pfc's and sergeants we don't

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 7>mix too well.

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So you played both for him?

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 7>Oh yes, sir, I played shots though, and did you

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 7>like the sergeant, no, sir, you see where it goes

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 7>back to the team. So stone ass felt the stone ass.

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 7>But I'm the only one who called him now, So

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 7>sergeant water soon didn't mean no offense.

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 5>Leading actors don't normally start out that way. They normally

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 5>start out as leading, you know, it's like it's a

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 5>real character role. Later he would have been cast in

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 5>the role that Howard Robbs would have played if they'd

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 5>done that movie.

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Again.

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's right, he kind of is encourage under fire, right, Yeah.

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he does the same thing.

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 5>So I think it's really a testament to the fact

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 5>that we've sometimes in the modern era, we forget that

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 5>Denzel if he was less good looking, he would have

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 5>been a great character actor.

0:14:58.880 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 3>That's absolutely right.

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's too.

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 5>Good looking, too tall, too good looking to be a

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 5>character actor. And also I think that he actually was

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 5>in a soldier's play, which is why he played the

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 5>same role in the movie. He was in the soldier's play,

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 5>And we had David Allen Greer on the podcast, who

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 5>was also in a soldier's play that also starred Samuel Jackson.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 5>Was also in that play in New York and told

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 5>great stories of like actors in the late seventies and

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 5>early eighties, those guys all being in a play together.

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Amazing.

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that movie is one. It came out in eighty four.

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I was nine or ten years old then, and I

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 2>watched it all the time. For some reason, I think

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 2>my dad exposed me to it and I became obsessed

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 2>with it because it would be on HBO all the time,

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 2>and so I would just see it constantly. And I

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 2>do remember him very vividly from that film. And then

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I remember getting into high school my senior year and

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 2>having to write a paper for an English class on

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 2>the Melville short story Billy Bud that was made into

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 2>a movie in the sixties with Peter Yusunoff, and that's

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 2>basically a soldier story, is basically Billy Bud, but set

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 2>obviously in the army. So yeah, and I love that

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 2>movie in that book too. So that's one that has

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 2>always stuck with me. It's a great choice.

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 9>Sixty years a Whistler Black Home. Two legendary mountains, thousands

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 9>of stories, from skiing on the back of glaciers to

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 9>pushing the limits. We've carved our legacy into this terrain.

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 9>Now it's your turn experience North America's largest ski resort

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 9>for yourself with world class snow sport events, Conscious to

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 9>the Edge of the Mountain, gravity defying fire and ice shows,

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 9>and more. This winter, go beyond plan your trip to

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 9>Whistler Black Home.

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 4>What about your number three.

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Number three glory?

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 5>I think, I mean, it's like I sort of struggle,

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 5>like maybe it should be higher. I mean, he basically

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 5>that's when for a lot of black people, he became like, oh,

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 5>so we're gonna put him on a post this stamp

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 5>someday that he's gonna be like, he's gonna get his

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 5>birthday off one day, Black.

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Household, We're gonna be in the back of Haptis Church.

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 5>Fans all for that scene where he plays a very

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 5>complicated character, again a character, it's something a character actor

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 5>would do because he's not the good guy in the movie.

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 5>He's a very complicated character, and characters sort of want

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 5>to hate, but Denzel Washington's charisma sort of makes it

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 5>that you're like, I.

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Want to hate you, but I can't. And it is

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, glory.

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 5>Tire is a thing like you can say this the

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 5>body I almost had a glory to people because of

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 5>that movie.

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>The fact that he cried out of one eyeball.

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean it became like this, words like not always

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 5>per forwards, but he's doing a magic trick.

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And I mean it's to this day you can say.

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 5>To most black people of you know, probably go Glory here,

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 5>and they know what you're talking about.

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Most many people do know what you're talking about.

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 5>But I think it's just like it was when he

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 5>became bigger than just an actor in that movie.

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's a movie. Again.

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 5>You don't get to see a movie where he's acting

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 5>up against Morgan Freeman and Andre Brower and you know,

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 5>big ups for what's his name, Farris Bueller in that vie.

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 5>What a lot of white guys would I would have

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 5>been mad at that they were on screen, but I

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 5>would be like, move out of the way so I

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 5>can get to But he sort of plays a very

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 5>good like I'm not supposed to be here, but I

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 5>have a lot of Respector Matthew Broder watched that movie.

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm like, he could have been blown off the screen,

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 5>and he he sort of let his naive tate laugh

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 5>him not to be blown off the screen. Glory, that's

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 5>when he becomes a force to be reckoned with.

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, button up that column, sucking that gut, tucking them

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 6>big black lips. Lighten your skin, shrink up that nose.

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to listen to this.

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 6>Where you going?

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Boy? Let me buy, Let you buy, Let you buy.

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 6>Let me tell you something.

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Boy.

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 6>You can march like the white Man, you can talk

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 6>like him, you can, you can learn his songs, you can,

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 6>you can even wear his suits. But you ain't never

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 6>gonna be nothing to him but an ugly ass chimp

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 6>in a blue suit.

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 4>Oh you don't like that, dude, No, m.

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 6>But what we gonna do by it? You want to

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 6>fight me? Boy?

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Huh?

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 6>What you gonna do by it? You want to fight me,

0:18:59.200 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 6>don't you?

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 3>There's no denying though that Denzel just man handles that movie.

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's not really supposed to be the one

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 3>thing you come out of it thinking about. You do,

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 3>and you do?

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>You absolutely.

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it's the potent combination of swagger and anger

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 3>that he has in that role. And it's you're right,

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 3>that is a much more watching scenes from Glory again,

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 3>it's a much more complicated character than I remember in

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 3>my memory. It's not the sort of postage stamp character

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 3>that we might think of. He's really complicated and troublesome

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 3>and conflicted, and man, making a breakout performance out of

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 3>something like that takes a special sort of skill.

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and that was his first Oscar And I think

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 5>also I think about that as we talk about the

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 5>current era of like people don't understand how can Colin

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 5>Kaepernick say such mean things about America and say he

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 5>still likes a merit.

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's complicated and you.

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 5>Know, like go watch Glory, Denzel ends up basically showing

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 5>pride in his in the flag, you know, like well

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 5>at the same time hating everything the flag has created.

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:03.479
<v Speaker 5>So I think it's a for a black person. It's

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 5>like that character is very relatable. It's like I totally

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 5>get that, Like, you know, it's not love it or

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 5>leave it, it's like hate it and fix it.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that's my because we just got done talking

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 2>about last week on the show Born on the fourth

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 2>of July, so this topic seemed very relevant. And then

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I just actually watch Glory for the first time. Somehow

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 2>in the eighties I missed it. I knew that I

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 2>had to cross this one off before I talk to

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 2>you or talk to anybody about Denzel Washington, and yeah,

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 2>his performance is there's no doubt it's a standout and

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 2>that interesting combination you pointed out, Josh of the kind

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 2>of swagger and anger and that sense of righteousness is

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 2>something we get. That really comes through in a lot

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 2>of really good Denzel performances. But then on the flip

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 2>side of that are the ones where it always feels

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 2>like he's repressing that and that's fascinating too, and that

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 2>comes through actually little bit, I think in his character

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 2>in The Magnificent Seven, the more quiet, reserved ones, but

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 2>there's always something underneath the surface you're just waiting to

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 2>spoil over, to bubble over.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 3>I think that struggle over the idea of righteousness is like,

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 3>if you look at Denzel Washington as an aw tourist actor, like,

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 3>what's the through line in almost every one of his performances.

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 3>It's that and you see it right here in Glory.

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, great, pick number two.

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Number two.

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 5>We're going with Training Day, which I training Day can

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 5>easily be number one, but I don't want to get

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 5>black people mad at me, so I'm gonna say number two.

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Look at their training Day.

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 5>I mean, that movie only works as well as it

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 5>does because you have a history of Denzel Washington's career

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 5>behind it to sort of know where he came from.

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 5>And so I think if he had done Soldier Story

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 5>and then Training Day, you'd be like, okay, so he

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 5>just kind of a jerk, you know. But because we'd

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 5>had a history of Denzel Washington being like this sort

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 5>of like you know, a post Malcolm X, like he's

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 5>our savior, he's black, you know, he's black Jesus or

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 5>Jesus as some.

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 4>People say, there you go.

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 5>You have this sort of history of him being like

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 5>this sort of like he's he's our avatar for positive

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 5>black male role models. And then in Trading Days, it's

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 5>like a meta performance because we're like, how you're watching

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 5>the character of Alonzo do all these horrible things.

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>We're like, Denzel, how could you do this?

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 5>And at the same time, again, his charisma comes through

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 5>as that character given to another actor would just be like,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 5>you know, it would have been like bad Lieutenant whe

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 5>hyper kn't tell you, just like I just hate you,

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, Like, which is fun to watch, but it's

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 5>not a box office hit. I think it's denzel'scharisma that

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 5>turns that into a box office hit. And again shout

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 5>out another white guy, Ethan Hawke. I condescended his performance

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 5>with the Warrantine, and I'm like, you have to be

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 5>a strong actor.

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you put up with that with that guy? You

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>know for the whole movie? Be truly effective.

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 6>A good narcotics agent must know and love narcotics. In fact,

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 6>a good narcotics agent should have narcotics in his blood.

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna smoke?

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Tang?

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Nope, you are hell if I am.

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah, you know, no, Wow, you're a moment some

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 8>of your Jesus fraid No, man don't know.

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 5>This is my job. Is your job.

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't do that.

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 6>Smoke it, huh, saying a test.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Just take a hit, take a man, Listen.

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 4>I became a cop to stop people.

0:22:58.440 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, blah blah blah blah blah.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 10>It's not a review board, and I ain't cocaine.

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 5>Take a hit, noo.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 2>I think, in general, a lot of us I've noted

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 2>this recently because I think Ethan hawks had an amazing

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 2>run over the past couple of years. In particular, I

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of us condescended to him for some

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 2>reason as not a heavyweight enough actor. And I think

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 2>he's proven us all wrong here recently, I.

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Like the idea of his performance in Training to being

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 3>a meta performance that in the way you talked about,

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 3>but also because when I watch it, I feel like

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 3>he's screaming at Oscar voters the whole time. I don't

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 3>know what you've been waiting for, but fine, here it

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 3>is brates them into giving him his best actor Oscar,

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 3>which they finally did.

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, as the great comedian Greg Proops said, and I

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 5>was one of tho jokes I wish I had written.

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 5>And he said this before he won the Oscar. He's like,

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 5>and finally they're going to give this. Guys played Beco

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 5>and Malcolm X and Ruben Hurricane Carter. They're getting give

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 5>an Oscar for playing peptatious McGee.

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Pretty much times, I was just like, that's good, that's

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 2>so great. All right, Well, what's what's better than training Day?

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 4>What's your number one performance?

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm X is the Michael Jordan of Denzel Washington movies.

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 5>Like, it's just like you can sort of argue against

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 5>it for fun as not being the greatest, but that's

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 5>the greatest performance because it's also the most important performance

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 5>because when he took the movie, Malcolm X. There was

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 5>a lot of talk of like can he pull this off?

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot like amongst the black comunty, he's too

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 5>dark skinned to do this. He doesn't look enough like Malcolm.

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 5>We should get a lighter skin guy. There's all this

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 5>sort of talk about this book is impossible, Spike Lee's

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 5>doing it. It's Spike Lee going to do a good job.

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 5>Is he able to do an epic movie like this?

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, Spike Lee ran out, like ran out of money,

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 5>and then like black celebrities gave him money to finish

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 5>the movie. It all is tied into also the fact

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 5>that it was one of the first movies sort of

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 5>that went viral before it came out through the X

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 5>caps and the X shirts that people were.

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Like, people like Michael Jordan were wearing.

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 5>Like, so the movie marketing became a part of the story,

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 5>Like I had an X shirt and an X cap

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 5>and I didnt even wear baseball caps. But it was

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 5>just like it was a phenomenon, a cultural phenomenon. But

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 5>now movies trying to replicate. Every movie tries to replicate

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 5>sort of like a viral marketing campaign, and Spike Lee

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 5>sort of pioneered that with Malcolm X and that movie.

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 5>Without that movie, I wouldn't have read The Autobious Malcolm X.

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 5>When I did, I was like, oh, I should probably

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 5>read the book before I see the movie.

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So and that book changed my life. And Denzel, there's

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>moments in that movie.

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.199
<v Speaker 5>If you've seen a lot of pictures of Malcolm X,

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 5>and you see Denzel that movie, he looks like Malcolm X,

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 5>which doesn't make sense because he doesn't look like Malcolm NEX.

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.360
<v Speaker 4>You're absolutely right, and so that's why.

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 5>And he's always talked about like he's a very spiritual,

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 5>religious man. He keeps one down low a lot of times,

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 5>but it's like he really feels like he was channelling

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 5>Malcolm X. And I'm like, I don't know enough about

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 5>that to know if that's true. But there's times that

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 5>movie go it doesn't make sense he looks like Malcolm X,

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 5>even though he doesn't. And I mean there's this, I mean,

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 5>you know, one of the most quoted speeches in my

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 5>life that we use as part of the rating system

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 5>on the show is oh, I say, and I say again,

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 5>you've been had, you been took, You've been hoodwig, bamboozle,

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 5>let as stray run him up.

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:54.719
<v Speaker 1>This is what he does. I just did a very

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>poor job of it.

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 5>That speech is like, again, it's like, it's just one

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 5>of the things where you can say that to probably

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 5>a certain generation of black people, like go oh yeah,

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 5>Malcolm X. And the finally about that, there's no evidence

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 5>that Malcolm X ever said that, the real Malcolm X,

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 5>but it's one of the most quotable and again, we

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 5>didn't land on Plymouth Rock. There's no alpha evidence that

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 5>the real Malcolm X said that I've ever seen, but

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 5>Denzel said it, so now it's one of those popular

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 5>Malcolm xIC quotes. Like he sort of took over the

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 5>legacy of Malcolm X in that movie in a way

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 5>that you realize is so gigantic when you compare that

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 5>to and not not putting out his performans.

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>But like Will Smith and Ali that's it's fine. Yeah,

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's not bad.

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 3>I think there's something similar between those two performances though,

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, I mean Donzel's is far superior, but both

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 3>are taking actors who are known for their charisma, right,

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 3>they just have this molten hot charisma and playing figures

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 3>from the history who had the same thing and so

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 3>that could go really poorly, but somehow I think will

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Smith pulls it off. But even more so Washington, they

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 3>managed to morph those different types of charisma into something

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 3>that's wholly new, like what you're talking about, Kamal. Where

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 3>those speeches are considered, it's not Denzel, it's not Malcolm X.

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 3>It's this holy new thing that is so powerful. It

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 3>has this pop cultural cachet now that that we all recognize.

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna tell you I really.

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 8>Every election year, these politicians are set up here to pacify.

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 8>Just sit here and set up here by the white man.

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 4>This is what they do.

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 10>They send jougs in Harlem down here to pacify it.

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>They send alcohol down.

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 10>Here to pacify it. They send prostitution down here to

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.959
<v Speaker 10>pacify it. Why you can't even get drugs in all

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 10>them without the white man's per missions. You can't get

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 10>prostitution in hollow without the white man's permission. You can't

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 10>get gambling in Holland without the white man's the mission.

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 10>So every time you break the seal on that liquor bottle,

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 10>that's a government seal you'll break, I say, and I

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 10>say it again. You've been hand You've been depend Goodwin.

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and like I said, I think like and again

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 5>not I think the Ali movie like it didn't. I mean,

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 5>it works fine, but I don't think it was like

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 5>it's transcendent and some stuff.

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>For reasons that aren't to do with will Smith. I

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to put it on him.

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 5>I think with the Will Smith performance, I feel like

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 5>there's a difference between Sometimes in that performance, I can

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 5>hear him doing the impression. Yeah, no, compre where's with Denzel.

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't hear him do I don't hear Denzel and

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 5>about at all? Like, oh, this is just footage of

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 5>Malcolm X. They got I thought he was more light

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 5>skinned anyway.

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, so with Malcolm exit number one, really that perfect

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 2>crossover then the synthesis of great movie and great performance.

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 2>And I'm with you completely, Josh. Were you number one

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm X as well in your list?

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 3>I had he got gamess my number one gel performance.

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 3>And that's only because I revisited a fair amount of

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 3>it in the last week. I had forgotten how good

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 3>that movie.

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've got it at number four.

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh, good, good, excellent. I mean it's this is again

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 3>like in Glory A really complicated in some ways, nasty guy,

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 3>far nastier than than the character and glory, but the

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 3>way the shades he brings to that and he got

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 3>game and plus that doctor j Affro. I mean that

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 3>might have put it over the top for me at

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 3>number one.

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean that movie is amazing. That's a movie that

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 5>I haven't seen as much as the other Denzel movies.

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 5>And I think that it's like a classic Spike Lee movie,

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 5>and that's kind of a trojan horse.

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>You think it's about one thing, but it's really about

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>another thing.

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, and uh but when I watched when I rewatched

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 5>his performance the movie for the podcast, I was like, oh, yeah,

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 5>this is way better than I remembered. And we had

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 5>Spike Lee on our podcast and it was a great episode.

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 5>We did, like all talked about all the movie to

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 5>work and Denzel. It's also a thing where I told

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 5>Spike like, I wouldn't have picked when you had Rayald

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 5>in that movie back in the day.

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I was like, why this guy?

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 5>And then it real ends up being one of the

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 5>greatest basketball players in the history of all period, Like that,

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 5>you're smarter than.

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Me, Spike Lee.

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 4>That's yeah, exactly.

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's great.

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 5>Kevin Avery one is Kevin averys Denzel, who's the cost

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 5>of my podcast. One of his favorite Denzel scenes in

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 5>the movies, and he got game when he hits a

0:29:58.200 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 5>guy in the.

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Throat man and he is so vicious there, and I

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 3>love the touch at the end where and this speaks

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 3>to the layers of his character he runs. You know,

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 3>it's not like this big victorious. He is the tough guy.

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 3>He you know, he he just knocked this guy out,

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 3>but then he also realizes what that means for him

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 3>in his life and he takes off running down the street.

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 4>I love that touch.

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, No, it's like it's at that moment where he

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 5>hits the guy, the guy goes down, he also says

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 5>like keep breathing, breathe, and then.

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 4>That's such a Denzel moment. Yeah, I don't really want.

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 5>To hurt you, but you know, but also, oh shitoving

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 5>to get out here exactly. I mean, there's there's so

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 5>many like I'm sort of upset that I didn't get

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 5>man on fire on here because I think.

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 2>That's well, that's yeah, keep going to that's a good transition.

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe real quick as we consider any other movies you

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 2>did strongly consider or ended up as honorable mentions, as

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 2>we've mentioned a couple of the ones for our list,

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 2>and we're certainly not going to go into any detail

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 2>at this point because you've done an amazing job illustrating

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 2>why Denzel's so great in your picks. But I had

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 2>number five deja vu because I felt like I needed

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 2>a Tony Scott film here, and their collaboration being obviously

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 2>the one that he's collaborated with that director the most,

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 2>and I was thinking about it just in terms of

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Man on Fire or some of these other titles, the

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 2>taking of Pellam one, two three. If you had another

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 2>movie star in any of those roles, say someone like

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Bruce Willis, who I think is a fine movie star,

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 2>would he have ever been able to bring an ounce

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 2>of the emotional complexity and depth that righteousness, but then

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 2>couple that with that kind of vulnerability or that humanity

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 2>that he brings that makes those movies rewatchable. Denzel is

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 2>the reason why I mean Tony Scott. I know a

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of us have come to appreciate his filmmaking more

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 2>over the years, but it's Denzel that makes those movies

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 2>worth revisiting.

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 4>I think what about you come out? You sound like,

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 4>you're not a big fan of that film of Deja Vu.

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know, I mean I enjoy that movie.

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 5>It's just it's one of those things where it's like

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 5>there's some movies this is true of all actors, where

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 5>I think he's great in that movie, and I think

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 5>Denzel does elevate a movie beyond where it can only

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 5>like you can take a bad movie, it's like, you know,

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 5>it becomes better with Denzel. That one, to me just

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 5>feels very much like I like watching that movie, but

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 5>if it had been Tom Cruise, I wouldn't have stepped

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 5>near it, you know, like I wouldn't have liked it.

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 5>So it's like the movie in and of itself to

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 5>me is it's a very sort of mainstream Hollywood vehicle, sure,

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:12.959
<v Speaker 5>which I'm not anti that, but it doesn't it feels

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 5>like and Denzel's got a lot of those on a

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 5>thing where you're like, this could have been I think

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 5>he brings lot to it, but it could have been anybody,

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 5>Whereas like Malcolm X is either Denzel or nobody else,

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 5>Like you know, Training Day is either Denzel or it

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 5>becomes a much different movie. Deja Vu might have been

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 5>a bigger hit with Tom Cruise because he's a white guy,

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 5>and we tend to enjoy white guys running around after

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 5>explosions more than we like black guys doing it.

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>You know what I'm saying.

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 4>No, No, very valid.

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Though to my point, I don't think I would want

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 2>to go back and rewatch the Tom Cruise version.

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 4>But Denzel.

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Cruise, Jack Reacher. I'm looking forward to the sea.

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Aren't we?

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 4>So real quick, I'll just list him number four. I had,

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 4>he got game number three.

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I had Devil in a Blue Dress, And this is

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 2>one where if I was just ranking the movies, it

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 2>might be lower. But I love his easy rollins. I

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>love every bit of that, and of course love don

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Cheetah's Mouse as well. Number two Inside Man and one

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm X so three of the Spike Lee movies in

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 2>there in my top five.

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 3>What about you, John, I've got Devil in a Blue

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Dress right there at number three too. I think that

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 3>speaks to his timelessness. I mean, he slips into that

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 3>what is it about nineteen forty fifty familiar post World

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 3>War so easily, and that puts him up there with

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 3>the all time actors. When you can do that shift

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 3>shift Eras. So I had Flight at five, a movie

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm very mixed on, but man, he just about pulls

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 3>that thing out in the last ten minutes. Isn't quite

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 3>able to Malcolm X. I've got at four because I

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 3>do really like him so much in Devil in a

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Blue Dress. At three that might be a sexiest performance

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Devil in a Blue Dress for sure. Glory I've got

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 3>up there at number two, and then as I mentioned,

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 3>he got Game is number one.

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So come out any other thoughts on any of

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 2>those or any of the other films that you regret

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 2>that you couldn't squeeze in there. Yeah.

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean there's a film that I've really come to

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 5>respect a lot because of the podcast and that when

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 5>I rewatched it, I was like, oh, this is even

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 5>more important than that. I think it's the sort of

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 5>and I think a lot of people made me respect

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 5>it more. But I watched it and I was like, this

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 5>film still holds up that it just didn't make it.

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 5>I just did and if I put it in I

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:00.719
<v Speaker 5>would have been trying to sound smart. But Philadelphia is

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 5>maybe the most interesting Denzel Washington movie that there is,

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 5>just the fact that he be in the course of

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 5>the movie goes from homophobe to not homophobe. And he's

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 5>a black man, which in the black community there's a

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 5>lot made out of us being more homofog to other people,

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 5>which I don't believe to be true. But Tom Hanks

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 5>gets the credit for Philadelphia, but Denzel's character is the

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 5>anchor of the movie.

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree. I actually just saw parts of that

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 2>movie recently on TV. Hadn't seen it in years, and

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 2>some of those courtroom scenes are fantastic, and Denzel is

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 2>why and Jonathan Demi's camera and those point of view

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 2>shots where he's talking right to us as the jury

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 2>as the audience, I think are really effective. You're right,

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Denzel is great there. He also worked, of course with

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Demi on The Manchurian Candidate, which maybe not as good

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 2>as the original Mantor in Canada, but still a quality.

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I like that one. His I mean, Meryl Streep is

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.320
<v Speaker 1>amazing in ventoring candidate. It's just which is funny.

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 5>That's what we had Spike Leeless his top five Denzil

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 5>watching movies, but we wouldn't let him put his own

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 5>movies in there.

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And so he listed Manchuuring Candidate, which I was like interesting.

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, yeah, well we will definitely link to that

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 2>episode in our show notes at filmspotting dot net, the

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 2>one with Spike Lee and link to your podcast. And

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 2>I can't say how much fun this was. Thanks so

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:11.919
<v Speaker 2>much for taking the time again, come out, thanks, come.

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Out, Thanks for having me happy to do it. This

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>isn't an election, This is a coup.

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 6>This is in our own country, a regime change in

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 6>our own country.

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 7>Then don't then.

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 8>This is rich people, manchurian global funding, bad science to

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.479
<v Speaker 8>put a sleeper in the White House. And that's what's

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 8>going on, Rosie, that's what's going on.

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 2>You'll hear me joke about this in the show on Friday.

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 2>But yes, he did just openly laugh at me at

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 2>one of those picks. But Josh, I'm standing by it.

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:46.280
<v Speaker 2>What other choice do I have. It's on the record.

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 2>It's on the record, isn't it Our Thanks again to

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 2>w camal Bell. That was a fun show and we

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 2>have another fun show talking about Denzel Washington coming up

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 2>this Friday, our review of Spike Lee's latest Highest to Lois.

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 2>You have complete archive access as a Film Spotting family member.

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 2>You also have other benefits like monthly bonus shows, a

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:12.399
<v Speaker 2>weekly newsletter, and early access to events a whole lot more.

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Learn more at film spotting family dot com.

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:16.320
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening.

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore. The fine.

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Film spotting is listeners supported. Join the film spotting family

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 2>at film spotting family dot com and get access to

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 2>ad free episodes, monthly bonus shows, our weekly newsletter, and,

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 2>for the first time, all in one place, the entire

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 2>film spotting archive going back to two thousand and five.

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 2>That's a film spotting family dot com panically