WEBVTT - China's iPhone Ban and Instacart's IPO

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>From Marhard where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Ludlove.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Heide of Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York,

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 2>and I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Apple wiping out as much as two hundred billion

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 2>dollars in market value. That's as China broadens its iPhone. Man,

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 2>we'll discuss the outlook for the company and what it

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 2>means for US China relations.

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 4>And we'll dive deep into the world of artificial intelligence

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 4>with the CEO of Imbu, which just raised two hundred

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 4>million dollars, and we speak to the former CEO of

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 4>r go Ais he embarks on a new mission with

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 4>more than a billion dollars in backing expected to come

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 4>from SoftBank.

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, Instacart preparing to said it's IPO price range as

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>soon as Monday, as the startup is gearing for its

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 2>road show. We'll bring you all that and so much more.

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 2>But Ed, the market is being dictated front and center

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 2>by what is happening with Apple right now.

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and that's exactly how we frame it. The news

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 4>Chinese authorities, according to Bloomberg sources, are thinking about expanding

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 4>a ban on the iPhone in state enterprises and in

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 4>government agencies.

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 3>The market reaction is clear, with.

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Off session lows in Thursday session down around three percent,

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.639
<v Speaker 4>but just following the open we were down five percent.

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 4>That was putting us on track for our biggest single

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 4>day drop since September of last year, so in a year,

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 4>and on a two day basis, we were headed for

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 4>our biggest two day drop since May of twenty twenty two.

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 4>That tells you the severity of the action, and we

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 4>will look at some of the suppliers later in the

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 4>program who are also moving to the downside. You talked

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 4>about at the top of the show that two hundred

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars in market cap shed because of what's been

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 4>reported over the last twenty four hours. That was on

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 4>a two day basis. Where we're at now two point

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 4>seven to seven billion or eighty billion dollars approximately in

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 4>marketcap eighty to ninety billion shed this morning alone. And

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 4>you think about Apple as the biggest constituent of both

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 4>the S and B five hundred, then as that one

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 4>hundred Carr, You're absolutely right. It's being felt much more

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 4>broadly in financial markets this Thursday. Let's get the details

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 4>and what's happening with China's reported Apple ban with Bloomberg's

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Mark gum and chief correspondent for Apple, Mark tell us

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 4>what we know at this state.

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Ed, thank you for having me.

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 5>What we're reporting is that government owned companies, government agencies,

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 5>those types of government affiliated organizations, in addition to the

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 5>government itself is either banning or plans to ban the

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 5>use of iPhones and other foreign built devices or foreign

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 5>devices from foreign run companies to China within the region. Now, Tip,

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 5>this is clearly having a major impact.

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 3>On the market.

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 5>Like you said, a couple hundred billion dollars of marketcap

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 5>getting wiped away because of this news. And one thing

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 5>I want to clarify is I think investor can Burns

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 5>is not so much on lost unit sales from a

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 5>potential ban like this from these agencies, but it's what

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 5>it means for Chinese nationalism and if people in China

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 5>are going to decide to no longer buy iPhones in

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 5>some quantity because of this, So it's not the government

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 5>employees that investors are concerned about but if this is

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 5>going to create some sort of domino effect for the

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 5>iPhone's penetration within China.

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.399
<v Speaker 2>And Mark of course, Ed shouts out that the suppliers

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 2>are under pressure, market valuations being lost with Qualcom Skyworks,

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 2>we think of Micron technology as well.

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 6>What about the supply side, What about the.

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Amount of manufacturing that's done in China by Apple?

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean if you think about the larger Apple

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 5>ecosystem in supply chain, right, when Apple is impacted by

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 5>something like this, it's not only landing at Apple's doorstep,

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 5>it's all the suppliers that contribute to the company's products,

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 5>right Qualcom you mentioned there's other technology makers Micron and

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 5>such that you mentioned that could be fearful of further

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 5>bands impacting them down the road for products that their

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 5>components are in. Certainly this is a concerning but we

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 5>have to see exactly how widespread this becomes. If you

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 5>look on social media China Mobile, there was a rumor

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 5>yesterday going around that China Mobile would not be procuring

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.839
<v Speaker 5>iPhone fifteen units as part of this band. Given China

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 5>Mobile is a state run carrier. It's a major carrier

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 5>with nearly a billion customers there.

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 3>So that was quite scary.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 5>But the carrier has come out through state media and

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 5>denied the idea that they're not going to be working

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 5>with Apple, so that is a positive there. But we

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 5>really have to see how widespread this becomes and how

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 5>this is going to impact the minds of consumers. Obviously,

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 5>this band comes at the same time that Huawei and

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 5>other Chinese phonemakers are upping their game in China too,

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 5>so clearly, just days ahead of Apple's big iPhone fifteen launch,

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 5>there is some concern going on in China. But we

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 5>still need to see how broad this goes.

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 6>Well said regarding Huawei.

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Will dig into that in a moment, but for now,

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 2>we really sang Mark governman, of course our chief really

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 2>correspondent on all things Apple, and let's get the investigate.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's get a conversation with Alet Young now chief investment

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 2>strategists at a quantitive research firm, Map Signals, and Alec

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 2>did you agree with Mark there that really this is

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 2>the concern of not just state run businesses, but the

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 2>fact that this is Chinese nationalism, This is a consumer

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 2>no wanting, no longer wanting to purchase Apple products.

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 7>Well, thank you for having me.

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 8>Certainly a very noisy situation around Apple right now. There's

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 8>no question that part of the negative inferences that are

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 8>swirling around right now is this idea that Apple gets

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 8>caught up in a nationalist rivalry between the US and China.

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 8>If iPhones, for example, were to become stigmatized throughout Chinese

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 8>society over the next few months to the point that

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 8>it depressed demand, those types of narratives inevitably are popping

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 8>into investors' minds right now.

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 7>But I think it's.

0:05:54.640 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 8>Worth noting that so far the ban in the government agencies,

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 8>we're looking at about a half a million units according

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 8>to a lot of the Wall Street research that I'm reading,

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 8>and that's out of a total run rate over the

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 8>next twelve months of about forty five million iPhones in China.

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 8>So the current band impacts a little over one percent

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 8>of the units. Obviously, if it spreads to state owned

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 8>enterprises and it winds up having a bigger societal impact

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.559
<v Speaker 8>in China on iPhone usage, it would be much worse,

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 8>much bigger, But at this.

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 7>Point it's fairly contained.

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 8>It's also worth noting that Apple has been gaining market

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 8>share in China over the last few years, about three

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 8>hundred basis points in the last twelve months.

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 7>It is true that Huawei.

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 8>Is launching more competitive bones, so you know, it'll be

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 8>interesting to see how that dynamic evolves. But the current

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 8>context is that Apple's doing very well in China.

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 2>Its valuation is done very well as well. Do you

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 2>think that basically this is a bit of a perfect storm.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Therefore we're seeing the sort of market cap erosion because

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 2>of how well tech companies have outperformed. Because we're at

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>a twenty nine times future earnings, Yeah, I.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 8>Think the streets at about six fifty for next year,

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 8>so we're actually at twenty seven and change on the

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 8>forward multiple right now.

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 7>But there's no question that.

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 8>When the stock peaked at one ninety eight a few

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 8>weeks ago, it was around thirty times. It was priced

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 8>to perfection. So this type of news is not going

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 8>to be greeted favorably. In addition, we've got macro issues

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 8>with rising rates that can also pressure equity valuation.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 7>So I think this is a healthy pullback.

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 8>But in terms of the bigger question, does this change

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 8>the bulkcase for Apple of the long term, I definitely

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 8>think the jury's still out. You know, there's probably some

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 8>legitimate signal in today's news, but there's also a tremendous

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 8>amount of noise, yes and overreacting to knee jerk noisy

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 8>media driven things around this.

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 7>Stock and many others.

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 8>Frankly, has it historically been a great way to make

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 8>money on Wall Street?

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 2>And was interesting is that Apple has a big event

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 2>coming up pretty soon. But Apple has also been pretty

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 2>dedicated to China in terms of what.

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 4>They've said, at least, this is the big question for

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 4>me alec. Right last quarter they said that there was

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 4>a swing in China to eight percent revenue growth in

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 4>Greater China from a three percent decline the prior quarter.

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 4>But it's what they called switchers, consumers in China that

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 4>were buying an iPhone for the first time or switching

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 4>from a domestic or other international brand. I acknowledge what

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 4>you just said, but look at the market reaction and

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 4>explain to us whether this is knee jerk or it's

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 4>the market recalibrating what they heard from Apple in that

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 4>earning school.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a little bit of both.

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 8>Obviously, it's knee jerk because investors have to react to

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 8>the news as it breaks.

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 7>We can't control when we get the news, but.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 8>Definitely a recalibration of potential, you know, revenue headwinds, earnings

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 8>headwinds is definitely in the calculus here. But you know, ultimately,

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 8>you know, American investors were not used to gauging, you know,

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 8>government intervention of this magnitude. It's normally about the free

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 8>market deciding who's got the best product. I think on

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 8>that basis, it's clear Chinese people love iPhones, but obviously

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 8>when we have you know, the.

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 7>Government's hand at play so heavily.

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 8>It's difficult for Americans to read because frankly, it's not

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 8>something that we're used to in our home market or

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 8>really in most major markets around the world.

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 7>So we'll have to see how it plays out. But

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 7>unless you know, the government.

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 8>Takes a very heavy hand, you know, I don't think

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 8>this is going to really be looked back upon as

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 8>a major negative, game changing inflection point for the company.

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, at the question of the day here, I'm

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 4>going back television has been is tech in trouble? You know,

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 4>in the year of Ai, the year of the FED

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 4>and valuations? Is geopolitics in China now kind of an

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 4>equal weighted risk factor.

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean it's definitely I don't know about equal weighted.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 8>We've got a lot of other macro issues we're contending with,

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 8>but certainly geopolitical risk with China is at the top

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 8>of the geopolitical risk table, and certainly you know the

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 8>situation with Taiwan and now just this general competitive tension

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 8>that we seem to have going on with the Chinese.

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 8>The Trade Secretary's recent visit Jui Romando didn't really go

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 8>over that well. So it's definitely something that investors are

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 8>going to have to monitor, especially in light.

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 7>Of the.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 8>Recent regulations around semiconductors and you know US banning their

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 8>access to certain high end semis. They're trying to do

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 8>the same to us in other areas. We've got Nvidia involved,

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 8>So it's definitely something that investors are going to have

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 8>to watch.

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 4>Alec Young, chief investment strategist at MAP Signals, thank you.

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 4>A perfect segue, because the other top story is s

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 4>k Heinex has opened an investigation into the use of

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 4>its chips in the latest phone from Huawei after a

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 4>tear down commissioned by Bloomberg of the latest device revealed

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.479
<v Speaker 4>that s ke Heinez's memory and flash storage was inside,

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 4>though the Korean maker confirmed to Bloomberg it has not

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 4>worked with Huawei and it has been adhering Caroline to

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 4>US sanctions. This is an incredible story and.

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 2>This is where politics and of course supply chain really

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 2>intertwine and timing. We were just mentioning Gina Romando, of

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 2>course was over there in China Commerce Secretary. At that

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>exact moment, Huawei very quietly unleashes this new product, the

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Mate sixty. We all wonder where the chippers come from.

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 2>Is s mic Smick as has known, or have they

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 2>been bypassing some of these very stringent what do they

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 2>call it, sort of a high walls the ability of

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the US seemingly been trying to cut them off from

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the supply chain that they still manage to access.

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 4>This is how it came about. Huawei put out the

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.719
<v Speaker 4>Mate sixty pro. Bloomberg News got their hands on one,

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 4>took it to Tech Insights, they did a tear down.

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 4>One of the main processors was made in China by Smick.

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 4>And now they've uncovered two memory chips nand in a

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 4>high end or next gen d ram that are covered

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 4>by sanctioned sa Gainitz has responded straight away saying, look,

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 4>we didn't know about this, We did not work with Huawei.

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 2>And meanwhile, it's been this sort of moment to celebrate

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 2>for the Chinese at least this idea that they're able

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 2>to produce these incredibly powerful chips in their own country,

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 2>supply them, and therefore make an incredibly powerful new phone

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 2>that some analysts are saying, could this be the Apple

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 2>killer in China? And the question is is how much

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 2>they have managed to really build and operate and become

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 2>self sustaining when it comes to their own semiconductors in China.

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 2>We continue to dig into that key geopolitical story. We

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 2>continue to think about the knock on a Fox effects

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 2>for the entire border market ed because this is a

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 2>key concern China US what it means for Apple. Of course,

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 2>when you've got the big bell, whether that is Apple

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 2>under pressure, you're going to have the whole nastac.

0:12:58.360 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 6>On the downside.

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 2>But just think who was thinking was it was actually

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>in the green earlier trade. It's now off by more

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 2>than two percent. We're seeing some other key players, and

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 2>we've mentioned the suppliers to Apple being under pressure, The

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Coal com for example two year yield. Though interesting that

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing the bond market just get a little bit

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>of bid on the front end. Now we've seen, of

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 2>course many wondering about where.

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 6>We see the federal reserve go.

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 2>The job bless hims today once again strength in the

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 2>US jobs market. But for now, maybe we get a

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 2>little bit of buying moment after the sell off that

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 2>we've seen in the bond market of late. Euro under

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 2>pressure because we've got very weak European data over all,

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the really peeking out the tiniest bit of growth in

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 2>the second quarter. What does that mean for the ECB

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 2>The euro is down versus the US dollar, so much

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 2>more to come on the macro and the micro. This

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 2>is win bog technology.

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Time for talking tech.

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 4>First up, California Governor Gain having use and signed and

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 4>executive order on AI regulation that it instructs state agencies

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 4>to examine how artificial intelligence might threaten the security and

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 4>privacy of California residents, while also authorizing state employees to

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 4>experiment with AI tools and try integrating them into the

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 4>state's operations.

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Use some tol Bloomberg News.

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 4>There's a Pandora's box being opened here and we just

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 4>want it done in a safe way. Plus billionaire Patrick

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Drahi's debt laid in telecommunications empire Altice is weighing the

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 4>sale of its French data centers in a deal valued

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 4>at one point one billion dollars, as well as the

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 4>sale of part of the capital of Altis France, and

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 4>options for Portugal Telecom and its ad tech company Teeds.

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 4>All of this in an effort to shore up confidence

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 4>in his network of businesses, which have been battered by

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 4>a Portuguese corruption probe targeting key figures linked to our teas.

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 4>And Finally, a fintech owner in London is facing allegations

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 4>that he helped notorious drug traffickers attempt to launder hundreds

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 4>of millions of euros through a crypto exchange platform. The

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 4>thirty eight year old Italian is alleged to have converted

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 4>piles of cash into crypto accounts for a criminal gang.

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 4>The case puts the British financial technology scene under fresh

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 4>scrutiny amid fears that its weak controls are enabling the

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 4>movement of illicit funds around the world.

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Caroline really global set of stories there and and look

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 2>now we're going to return a bit more to home

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 2>and for the IPO market, we are gearing up online

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 2>grocery delivery startup and indeed on more broadly e commerce tools.

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Instacart it's preparing to set a price range for its

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 2>IPO and start its investor roadshow as early as the

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 2>coming Monday. Boy, have we got this back to school

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 2>feeling right now? And I'm pleased to welcome to the

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 2>showroomg Ryan Gould, who really can set the scene of

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 2>what story they're going to be trying to tell investors

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 2>on this roadshow come Monday.

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thanks, Caroline.

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 9>I think you know, there's certainly some energy as we

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 9>head into this back to school period. Dare I say

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 9>probably a little bit of cautious optimism. You know, there's

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 9>a set of new IPOs that sort of been talked

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 9>about for you know, months, if not years in instacar case.

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 9>You know, as we said, instacart is about to said

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 9>it's price range as early as Monday, kick off a

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 9>road show, and then they could look to price it

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 9>as soon as the nineteenth, so almost a week later

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 9>trading on the twentieth. I think, you know, this is

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 9>a point that you know, we're starting to see people

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 9>sort of jostling for position. Armor is already out there.

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 9>It's the biggest ipea of the year. They've got their

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 9>price range, could be pricing soon. But you know, there's

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 9>certainly some energy, I would say, and I think probably

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 9>there are quite a few investors who are starting to

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 9>feel a little more constructive about how we think about

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 9>hypos in the US.

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Mangled great to have them on very early to the game.

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 2>In terms of Bloomberg, I think we've just welcomed into

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the company and already right here I'm going to beg technology.

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 6>Time now for work shifting.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 2>It's where look we look at the changing landscape of

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the labor market amid advances in technology and today. But

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 2>job Stata initial jobbers claims in particular showing resilience in

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 2>this workforce lowest levels for job as claims amid a

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 2>resilient labor market for the US, But there are issues

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 2>historic labor force games we've actually seen in particular for women,

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 2>while could be eroded, could be stalled as a panemic

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 2>era lifeline.

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 6>To daycare providers expires, with more than.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Seventy thousand childcare programs estimated to be in danger of closing.

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Joining US now to discuss look whether technology can.

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 6>Off set this setback.

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 2>Alan of Ekowitz is a general partner at Spring Bank,

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 2>which invests in early stage companies building look infrastructure to

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 2>enable working women and families to succeed and ultimately, can

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 2>technology be any sort of solution in this scenario. It

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 2>seems like a terrible scenario at that.

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so it's not a great scenario. It's pretty bad timing.

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 10>We're here at the start of the school year. Against

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 10>most expectations, the percentage of moms of young children in

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 10>the workforce is actually higher than ever having recovered post pandemic,

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 10>which has huge consequences for women's lifetime earnings and career trajectories.

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 10>But as you just meant it, mention, we're about to

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 10>lose twenty four billion dollars in stimulus, which might put

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 10>three hundred children's childcare slots it.

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 7>At risk, and of course put it risk the.

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 10>Ability for all of these women to continue to participate

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 10>in the workforce. And to be really clear, of course,

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 10>this isn't just a mom issue. It's an economy issue.

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 6>It's an inviolent issue.

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 2>And you say, rightly, so it's an impact on GDP,

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 2>on earnings. What about though anyways that in companies you

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 2>invest in can be some sort of support amid perhaps

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 2>slowing money funds coming towards these childcad.

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so you know, of course, innovation can't replace infrastructure

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 10>and public policy, it can augment. So technology and startup

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 10>solutions can't print money. But there's a lot that we

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 10>can do to make it easier for families to find access,

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 10>VET and pay for childcare, and of course for care

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:48.719
<v Speaker 10>businesses themselves, which are often pretty small mom and pop operations,

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 10>to run more efficiently and effectively. So maybe I'll give

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 10>one example from our portfolio, and also happy to talk

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 10>more broadly about areas where we think technology can make

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 10>a really big impact. But we're investors in a wonderful

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 10>company called Wealthy, which combines digital tools, AI and world

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 10>class human expertise to basically serve as a care coordinator

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 10>for the employees of some of the US's largest employers

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 10>like best Buy, Cisco, Hilton, and basically they match families

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 10>with care professionals, automate workflows, automate workfloads to get tasks

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 10>done faster while they're looking for a home healthcare aid,

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 10>pure aging mother, or backup childcare for your kids so

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 10>you don't have to miss work. So that's just one

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 10>example in our own portfolio. But you know, we think

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 10>beyond backup care and childcare specifically, there's a lot of

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 10>opportunities for technology to improve the overall care economy, ranging

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 10>from you know, first it can make hopefully care jobs better.

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, dare I say artificial intelligence in that sentence?

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 10>Listen if we're if we don't talk about AI, are

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 10>we even doing a technology show right now? Surely you

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 10>know we know that, for instance, healthcare worker burnout is

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 10>an enormous problem in the industry across the care co

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 10>I mean, there's one point eight million vacancy US right now,

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 10>and for instance, things like automation or AI supported charting

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 10>and documentation could cut that work dramatically, giving people time

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 10>back in their schedules, hopefully improving some of the burnout crisis.

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 10>So that's you know, that's just sort of one one area.

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 10>You know, I think there's also a lot of room

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 10>to use innovation and technology actually even make care more affordable.

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 10>One of the things we hear from providers is that

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 10>even with government subsites in place, it can take beats

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 10>or months or those childcare payments from the government to

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 10>be sent to providers. And these are often low margin

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 10>businesses that are kind of operating months to months because

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 10>of the operational complexity and collecting that data. And there's

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 10>a lot of room for sort of modernized financial rails

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 10>and technology to move that flow.

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 4>Alana, the fear is that the tap of stimulus money

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 4>just just closes abruptly right later in the year. But

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 4>the problem of the last twelve months has been actually

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 4>getting money to people. And I wondered how closely you're

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 4>tracking sort of the fintech solution that brings government infrastructure

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 4>into the twenty first century.

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So, you know, I think there's a lot we

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 10>can do to improve the rails on how money flows

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 10>between careers and receivers, also insurance companies, employers, and the government.

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 10>We've actually been seen a decent amount of startup activity

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 10>in this space, even outside of care whether it's trying

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 10>to make it easier to access government benefits like food

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 10>stamps through companies like Propel, companies like Promise Pay that

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 10>make it easier for folks to make payments to the

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 10>government and interact with government services.

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:37.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a lot of room you know.

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 10>Look, we're all used to being able to do basically

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 10>anything from our phone, right to do our job, find

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 10>out hotel, do everything else. And I think that there's

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 10>a real push to sort of modernizing the government experiences

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 10>into our daily lives.

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 2>Alana Bakowitz from that collective, we thank you for joining

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 2>us on what is a pretty dramatic childcare cliff.

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 6>This is really much.

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to blue though technology. Ed Lovelow here in

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco and Caroline heard in New.

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 2>York and Ed, let's get to what is a geopolitical picture,

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 2>a macro picture that just questions time and time again,

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 2>canon as that can technology stocks outperform, managed to continue

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 2>to gain when we're seeing rates on the higher side,

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 2>when you're seeing you for a little, contensions build between

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the US and China, and ultimately when we start to

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 2>question valuations.

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 6>Today is another day of.

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Losses on the n as that big tech really feeling

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 2>the brunt of some sentiment souring and also economic data

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 2>slowing in Europe, also slowing in China. I shine a

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 2>light on what's happening to the yarn that trades offshore.

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 6>It's actually at a sixteen year low. The US STORER

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 6>has been outperforming because.

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 2>This economy seems to still be managing to weather the

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 2>storms that are being felt elsewhere. I'm looking a what's

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 2>happening in a two year yields actually getting a bed

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 2>after we've sold off.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 6>It's back below five percent.

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 2>But nevertheless, this focus on the federal reserve and what

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 2>it does to curtail inflation and very resilient jobs market,

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 2>which we've got in the jobs jobless claims data a

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 2>little bit earlier today. Yet more evidence of that going

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 2>to some of the individual names. Because we know the

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 2>story of the day is basically a tech one.

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 6>It is that of Apple.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 2>It is of course the concern that China will be

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 2>pushing back on allowing its own employees, government employees from

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 2>buying Apple iPhones. And what does that mean in terms

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 2>of a consumer pushback? Apple under pressure off by more

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 2>than three percent. We've seen, of course, watching ondred billion

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 2>dollars in terms of market value falling over the last

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 2>couple of days. Was seeing Qualcom suppliers really.

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 6>Feeling the pain. Actually we go to SPLC.

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>It's a supply chain that you can see on the

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Qualcom kind of getting twenty two percent of its

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 2>revenue from Apple, a key supplier, and we're looking at

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:37.959
<v Speaker 2>T Mobile though I wanted to give a little bit

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 2>of row of green today T Mobile actually giving money back.

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 2>We learned that yesterday dividends they're going to be buying

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 2>back shares, and of course that's always music to an

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 2>investor base. Is here also some bi reports saying that

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 2>look the Apple iPhone fifteen, that's going to help the

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 2>likes of T Mobile.

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 4>H Yeah, I'm not doing much to put green on

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 4>the screen today. Let's get back to that top story

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 4>in the world of technology, China planning to expand a

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 4>bag on the use of iPhones for government backed agencies

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 4>and state companies that according to Bloomberg's sources, this all

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 4>happening in Apple's biggest individual, foreign market and global production based.

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 4>Apple as well as the relevant Chinese agencies, did not

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 4>respond to requests for comment on the Bloomberg story.

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now Bloomberg.

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 4>Kdie lines out of DC and quickly this is becoming

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 4>a tit for Tat twenty four hours ago, the journal

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 4>report on some government agencies Bloomberg reporting more it follows

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 4>the Gina Ramondo trip to China.

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 11>It does the Commerce Secretary made a trip to Beijing,

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 11>of course, just last weekend, she following Secretary Jennet Yellen,

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 11>the Secretary of State Anthony Blincoln.

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 6>The climate on Boijeon.

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 11>Kerry as well, all an effort to shore up the

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 11>relationship between the largest economy in the world and the

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 11>second largest economy in the world. In Ramondo specifically trying

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 11>to ease the path of US businesses doing China. She

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 11>talked a lot while in China about the uncertainty of

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 11>operating in that market, given headlines like what we they

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 11>are seeing take place with Apple, the idea that a

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 11>ban on iPhone would expand from sensitive departments too, as

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.640
<v Speaker 11>you say, a government backed agencies state on enterprises. It's

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 11>not clear based on our reporting, how many companies or

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 11>agencies could eventually adopt these restrictions, but obviously a massive

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:17.959
<v Speaker 11>risk to a company like Apple who is so dependent

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 11>on China. A from a supply chain perspective, a lot

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 11>of iPhones in the first place are made in China

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 11>in factories they're employing Chinese people. But also from a

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 11>revenue perspective, this is a market that made up about

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 11>a fit of their revenue in the latest quarter.

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 2>You put that context so perfectly, Katie. But also the

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 2>context is that this is a building concern not only

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 2>from competition. We think of Huawei and its latest phone,

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 2>reveal what that does for Chinese sales for Apple, but

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 2>also what that means for the relationship when we're thinking

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 2>of Huawei and its access to chips that the US

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>is trying to prevent them getting. Can you just give

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 2>us any update to what stake Sullivan and the like

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 2>of implementing on that.

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, this is a very prevalent topic of conversation here

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 11>in Washington now, because, of course, it was just last

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 11>week that Huawei announced its smartphone that it had really

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 11>said was a triumph against US sanctions because it was

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 11>made using Chinese made chips from SMIC. So in theory,

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 11>what China is saying is that they were able to

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 11>get around sanctions, do this in spite of sanctions. What

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 11>we're hearing from authorities here in the US on Capitol Hill,

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 11>for example, though, is that this we have actually been

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 11>done in violation of sanctions. Congressman Michael McCall, who of

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 11>course is a Republican he chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee,

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 11>was speaking overnight saying that smi C may require an

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 11>investigation because he thinks it's obvious the company violated sanctions

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 11>by supplying components to Huawei, and of course this is

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 11>a company that's on the entity list here in the

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 11>US for national security concerns, and that's been echoed by

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 11>others as well. Mike Gallagher, who chairs the China Select

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 11>Committee in the House, also was saying that the US

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.640
<v Speaker 11>may need to look at a ban or an ending

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 11>of all experts to both experts, rather to both Huawei

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 11>and SMI C. It is this idea of national security

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 11>risk on the part of the U s US being

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 11>paramount and more restrictions potentially being looked at as a

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 11>result of that, so as Ed was saying at the

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:08.959
<v Speaker 11>very beginning, it is this kind of tit for tat idea.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 11>The US moves to restrict one thing, China moves to

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 11>restrict another, and it seems like this is just the

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 11>pattern that we are in at this point.

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Cara and Kaylee to appoint that Kaye made a minute ago.

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 4>City Groups put a note out since we've gone on

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.719
<v Speaker 4>air basically saying what Kaylee did that we don't know

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 4>how many companies or government agencies or people in them

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 4>using iPhones, But it's probably the case that they were

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 4>already transitioning away from iPhone anyway, so it might have

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 4>limited impact. I guess that that note, Kaylee speaks to

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 4>the point that relations between the US and China, in

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 4>spite of Ramondo's visit, are still not good, right.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 3>We're not in a good place right now.

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 11>No, absolutely not. And this is the tricky dance. On

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 11>the one hand, you are trying geopolitically to make sure

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 11>that the relationship is more stable or at least the

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 11>two sides are talking. On the other hand, to protect

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 11>national security interests or economic interests or otherwise. You also

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 11>are seeing very targeted action that works in theory against

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 11>China's interests, things like the executive order on outbound investment

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 11>into certain areas of technology like quantum computing, artificial intelligence, semiconductors.

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 11>It makes it very difficult for countries to interact with China,

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 11>to engage with China, but also clearly for companies themselves

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 11>to figure out how exactly to navigate this market. And

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 11>to the point of the City Group note you were

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 11>just talking about their ed this is the idea that

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 11>it may not just be necessarily about iPhone sales, but

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 11>more broadly about the environment and the uncertainty around.

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 2>It and no wonder Therefore, in videos down you're seeing

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 2>the likes of Tesla down other companies with big exposure

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 2>to China, and I just think of the rm IPO

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 2>that's coming as well. Kaeline's brilliant to break it down

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 2>from a Washington perspectively. Thank you, let's just shift gears.

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 2>But it's probably also home that Washington hasn't Zion because

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Crypto is where we're going next. But it's an update

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 2>on the FTX case. Former executive Ryan Salem is planning

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 2>to plead Gill to criminal charges over the collapse of FTX.

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 2>According to sources, now Sellon was a co chief executive

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 2>of FTX is Bahamas subsidiary before the exchange basically imploded

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 2>last November. Le's for again, someone who's been all across

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 2>it the Mootionnali Basse for more and perhaps given the

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 2>other key executives before, this isn't too much of a surprise.

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 12>One thing that is potentially different here is whether or

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 12>not he will cooperate. That has not been ascertained yet.

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 12>According to this scoop by our own EVA, Benny Morrison,

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 12>who has really been reporting on Ryan Salem's role in

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 12>this for many months now. Remember when the initial issue

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 12>had come to the fore in the Bahamas, it was

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 12>Ryan Salem himself who had really brought the case to

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 12>Bhaman officials very specifically that customer funds may have been

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 12>coll mingled.

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 6>And so to come.

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 12>Back around in this fashion is quite interesting because even

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 12>though he may plead guilty to certain charges criminal charges,

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 12>it's not clear what his level.

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 6>Of cooperation will be.

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, the timing is interesting and Beau because Sam Bankman

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 4>freed himself, I think, is scheduled to stand trial one

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 4>month from now. You know, does that contribute to that

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 4>court case?

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 6>It certainly could.

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 12>And remember the other folks at Alameda and FTX who

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 12>have already come forward, they are cooperating, and so we

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 12>know that whether or not he does testify, it definitely

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 12>adds another element to this trial. Remember, I just kind

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 12>of want to talk about their relationship for a moment here,

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 12>because I had a lot of my own reporting around it.

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 12>I had interviewed actually both men right before the collapse

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 12>of FTX. I spoke to Ryan Salem just a week

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 12>or so before. The interesting thing about both Ryan and

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 12>Sam Bankman Fried here is they were not always in

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 12>the same place. Ryan was back and forth between the

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 12>DC suburbs and Bahamas. When I spoke to the people

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 12>around them, I was always told that they kind of

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 12>kept separately. You had Ryan Salem really donating to the

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 12>tune of twenty four million dollars to Republican candidates, when

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 12>Sam Bangman Free was donating to tens of millions to

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 12>Democratic candidates. They seem to have some pivotal differences. So

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 12>Ryan Salem's role in all of this is certainly interesting

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 12>leading up to this trial, though still very early to

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 12>tell exactly what that.

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Would be interesting those political donations, you remind us for

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 2>us withdrawer, they withdrew the campaign finance law issues being

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 2>alleged these particular men Ryn.

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Part of this.

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 12>Issue here also was how the money was used to

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 12>the point you're making, and the campaign dance violations was

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 12>a definite worry here until those violations were withdrawn. But

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 12>remember that they still are a big question mark about

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 12>the role of cryptocurrencies in Washington and why these senators

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 12>had taken the money in.

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 6>The first place.

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 12>What was ultimate motive I'm going back to our initial

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 12>reporting because remember it was not a little bit of money.

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 12>Both of these men were donating almost more than anybody

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 12>else in the most recent cycle. And I'm just going

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 12>back and looking to remember here, Ryan Salem, there were

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 12>some pro crypto, very clearly pro crypto candidates that he

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 12>was giving to make no bones about it. Remember when

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 12>Sam was giving, he mostly said that this was a

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 12>matter of pandemic preparedness and altruism, effective altruism, but not

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 12>a matter as Ryan had said more explicitly about crypto.

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 12>Ryan had also had donated to you very plainly here.

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 6>A lot of.

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 12>Candidates were ties to Donald Trump. They had different rationales

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 12>for why they gave, and so it's kind of hard

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 12>to tell at this point what the motive was.

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Bloomboag Snali B's sick such deep reporting on what has

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 4>been an endless saga. When you'll be back for more,

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much. Okay, I'm next coming up on

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Technology.

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:46.719
<v Speaker 3>Keep on Trucking.

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 4>The founders of the former self driving unit of Ford

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 4>and Volkswagen are back and they're launching a new autonomous

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 4>trucking startup. The co founder and CEO Brian Seleski joins

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 4>us next in an exclusive interview.

0:32:58.200 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.719
<v Speaker 4>The founders of r Go AI, the autonomous vehicle company

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 4>that was shut down last year, are back and they're

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 4>at it again with a new self driving business, this

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 4>time focused on autonomous trucking rather than consumer cars. It's

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 4>called Stack AV, and it's backed by none other than SoftBank.

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 4>One Pittsburgh official told Bloomberg he expects SoftBank's commitment to

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Stack to be more than one billion US dollars. Let's

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 4>bring in Stack AV co founder and CEO Brian Celeski

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 4>for more on his new venture.

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 3>In an exclusive conversation.

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 4>Brian, just start by explaining what you're doing with Stack AV,

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 4>what the technology is, and what the end goal is.

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's great to be here.

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 13>Well, as you said, we're announcing the formation of our

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 13>new self driving startup called stack We're building fully autonomous

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 13>class eight trucks and we're looking to solve really some

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 13>of the biggest issues that the trucking industry faces, whether

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 13>it be driver shortages, retention, issues, over the road, safety,

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 13>and just the inefficiencies that we saw in the supply.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Chain during the pandemic.

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 13>We really think self driving trucks has a huge opportunity

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 13>here to solve some of those issues.

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Brian, you're coming out of stealth, and whether it's

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 4>with more than a billion dollars or not, you've kind

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.839
<v Speaker 4>of moved very quickly to grow. Where will you need

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 4>to spend Like, talk to me about the talent costs,

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 4>the compute costs.

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 3>In your project.

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 13>Well, our priority is to build a great company that

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 13>can really scale and move fast and realize those benefits.

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 13>You know, there's the number of people like it's required

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 13>to build this technology is enormous. The capital needs are

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 13>obviously large, but our priority is to build that fantastic

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 13>team and to really get the technology deployed as quickly

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 13>as we can and get test vehicles up and running.

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 13>We are a new company, but we have been moving

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 13>quickly and just excited about the team that we built.

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Brian, you've always looked more holistically at autonomous technology.

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 4>This is a very specific technology and use case. It's

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 4>very similar to what Aurora is doing, and so I

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.280
<v Speaker 4>just wondered why you sense this was the best way

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:30.760
<v Speaker 4>of commercializing.

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 13>Well, you know, we think that the business model is

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 13>really interesting. The cost of goods have really to ship

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 13>goods has really increased substantially. We know a lot of

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 13>small businesses are feeling the pain times to deliver our

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 13>increasing across the industry, especially in larger markets. So we

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 13>just think that autonomous trucking has the ability to address

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 13>a lot of those inefficiencies. And it just it isn't

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 13>just in the autonomous part of it, the self driving

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 13>aspect of it. It's also in the scheduling and the

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 13>overall logistics, the way the system works. There's just a

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 13>lot of opportunity for improvement. And we think not just

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 13>taking the benefits of AI, but also the benefits of

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 13>generative AI, and a lot of the latest advancements that

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 13>we've seen over the last year we think can really

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 13>be applied to the entire logistics equation.

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 6>So, Brian, does that speed up things?

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Because ultimately the Ford VW backing became impatient.

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 6>I think it was.

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Quoted that one Ford executive said it was easier to

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 2>put a man on the moon than it was to

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 2>get autonomous driving really up and running. Did you just

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 2>need a different mindset of length of time to commit

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 2>capital here?

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think this requires patient, long term capital. It requires.

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 13>And it certainly requires a big vision in order to

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 13>make this happen. But at the end of the day,

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 13>we want to improve people's lives. We want to we

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:58.320
<v Speaker 13>want to improve the overall cost structure in that entire

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 13>supply chain. Then the only way we're going to do

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 13>that is by making big changes to how it works right,

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 13>and that means anytime you're working on sort of a

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 13>world scale problem, that means that you have to really

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 13>you have to really work in the details, and you

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 13>have to take a big vision and try to make

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 13>it a reality. That takes capital, it takes time, and

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 13>I think what you're seeing in the field in general

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 13>is that you know, different companies are sort of playing

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 13>to their strengths and how they feel they can be

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 13>most successful and adapt their business. What's unique and exciting

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 13>about this is that soft Bank has a large commitment

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 13>to AI in general. They believe in the power that

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 13>AI has in transforming our everyday lives and making it better.

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's where stackav comes out of.

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 13>Is doing that, doing that and applying it to applying

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 13>it to try it.

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Brian SoftBank said, they're not just backing you with capital,

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 4>but also with AI competence as well. Could you just

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 4>explain that, is that your point of differentiation here your

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:00.720
<v Speaker 4>access to software and talent.

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 13>Well, we have access to the entire SoftBank group, the

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 13>entire team. They've been wonderful and giving us such a

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 13>huge lift and getting the company started. They see a

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 13>lot in terms of business models and what works and

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 13>what doesn't. We've seen a lot our team in terms

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 13>of what works and doesn't and to be able to

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 13>see around the corners with the.

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>How to build the technology.

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 13>And so at the end of the day, putting those

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 13>two brains, if you will, together, we think we have

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 13>a really differentiated story and in a very compelling team

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 13>that can win here.

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 6>And well that's happening.

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Stack av co founder and CEO Ran Celeski brilliant to

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 2>have you.

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 6>We thank you.

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 4>AI startup in View, the company formerly known as Generally Intelligent.

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 4>It has just raised two hundred million dollars Series B

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:56.359
<v Speaker 4>an evaluation of over one billion dollars. Joining us now

0:38:56.360 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 4>on set is kenjun Q, CEO of MBU. You also

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 4>secure ten than h one hundreds and that's become like

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 4>the badge of honor for people building a foundation model.

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 4>So what was more important the cash or the compute.

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 14>Both honestly, so cash is much easier to come by

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 14>than compute, and we managed to get our compute quite

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 14>early because we saw this coming and so we're very

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 14>excited to have both.

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Was that the structure of the deal?

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:22.839
<v Speaker 4>I have to ask the videos one of your back

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 4>is a Nvidia's book back to many Did they just

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:29.280
<v Speaker 4>participate in the round or was their payment in chips?

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 3>If you see what I.

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 4>Mean, No, it's all cash, well cash and is a

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 4>quick follow on what are you building? I mean, we

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 4>know a few companies building one hundred billion parameter to

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:39.839
<v Speaker 4>foundation models, that's right.

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 14>So we're really focused on AI agents, which are systems

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.399
<v Speaker 14>that can take action in the world and help us

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 14>as people accomplish much larger goals. So today's AI systems

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 14>they generate an output, but they're not going to go

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 14>off and do a bunch of research if you're writing

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 14>an essay and come back and restructure the argument and

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 14>think through and reason through what's happened. And so we

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 14>build systems optimized for reasoning so that we can end

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 14>up with AI that can actually help us do you

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 14>know what we say? What we want and not just

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 14>what we say.

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 2>What's amazing, Candrin is two hundred million for a bold

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 2>focus on AI agents that people actually haven't been able.

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 6>To play with or see your touch. Maybe one of

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 6>your key backers has.

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 2>But I'm interested as to how far down the road

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 2>you are in terms of development from real perspective.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it's a great question. I think it's always hard

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 14>to tell. We are quite excited over the next couple

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 14>of years to hopefully have things that people can use.

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 14>It might be sooner, it might be later.

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 6>I think, you know, just.

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 14>Like how Apple for Apple iPhone was under development for

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 14>ten years before it came out, It's not going to

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 14>be ten years. But there is a right time for

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 14>technology to be taken to market, and there is a

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 14>such thing as bringing it to market too early. So

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 14>we really believe in serious use, seriously using these systems

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:01.800
<v Speaker 14>ourselves internally every single day and having some beta users

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 14>that are using them every day. And that's what teaches us, Okay,

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 14>this is good enough, this is not good enough. We

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 14>need to improve the reasoning models in these ways.

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting the previous founders that was just talking

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:14.399
<v Speaker 2>about the need for patient capital and looking at your

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 2>cap table, it kind of looks similar.

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it's not a normal.

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Cap table in terms of VC money because in fact

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 2>it's the Astera Institute and actually kind of a not

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 2>for profit.

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 6>You've got in video, you got cruise.

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Are they behind you in the idea that this is

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 2>going to take some time?

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 14>They are, and that's actually what we were looking for

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.800
<v Speaker 14>in this round. I think something that's important to remember

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 14>is that open Ai didn't ship chat GBT until five

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 14>six years after they were founded, and it's whenever we're

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 14>building a really deep technology technological breakthrough like this that

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 14>run time is necessary.

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Kenja, can you tell me a little bit about your

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 4>business and company. Are you highly concentrated in San Francisco?

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 4>Are all of your talented engineers here and if so,

0:41:57.520 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 4>why San Francisco.

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, that's a great question. We are primarily based in

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 14>San Francisco in person in the office every day, and

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 14>we do have some remote team members, remote engineers. We

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 14>structure it as a kind of hub and spoke model

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:12.839
<v Speaker 14>where the collaborative hub is optimized for collaboration in San

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:16.479
<v Speaker 14>Francisco and remote team members are optimized for autonomy because

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 14>that's often what we want remotely. San Francisco is just

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 14>a great technology hub. You know. We host lots of

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 14>events this Thursday Nights in AI series and meet a

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 14>lot of people here, have a lot of potential customers here,

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 14>so it's a good place to be.

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 6>A decade in the making.

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 2>You are building what the archive then that group house

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 2>of like minded thinkers and builders and still focused on

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the SF beat. Really overall, we thank you in bu Ceo,

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Candre and Q joining us.

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 6>What amazing show. But that does it for this edition

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 6>of Bloomberg Technology yet.

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, don't forget.

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 4>You can recap on our podcast wherever you get yours, Apple, Spotify, iHeart,

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 4>and on Bloomberg from here in SF and New York.

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:54.880
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology