WEBVTT - Beating The Book: The 88th Masters Betting Preview

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday morning, April ninth, twenty twenty four. It is the

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Beating the Book Podcast, the eighty eighth Masters tradition, unlike

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>any other from Augusta, first major of the year, as

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>always Skill Alexander joined by a steamed panel of golf

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>experts for the second straight year. Kelly, you might have

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:24.959
<v Speaker 1>been on for three years, but for the second straight

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>year the duo here.

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we were going through like the history of Beating

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the Book Masters pod.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 2>This this is only my second year on.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so you and West both to two thirds of

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the long shots caring by long shots, I mean there

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is a podcast, a dedicated golf podcast that Vison has

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>called long Shots, a colloquial colloquially called it's called long shots.

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Is That's how Matt Brown used to do the promo.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brown too much of a divad to be on

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the show. It's not true. He's going to Augusta, so

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we give him an excuse. But the other two members

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>for a second straight year, the great Wes Reynolds everybody

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>co host of Vison tonight doing Wes, thanks for doing

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>this again.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm well, Gil, thanks for having me and.

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations on the future Jaeger fifty to one two weeks ago.

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Were you on Batilla?

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 4>I was not just for a placement market, but he

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 4>was very well tipped in the market and was able

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 4>to get at home in that playoff. Now, now, when

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 4>he heard his shoulder though in the playoff, all I

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 4>was like.

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Man, this is like very tennis. This is exactly hard. Gil.

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 4>I was like, man, this is like Ropp and Nadal

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 4>going to the trainer and like the fourpe said at

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 4>Roland Garros or something. But nevertheless, he got it home

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 4>after he got that shoulder taped.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>What Wes is referring to. For those who don't know,

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>ak Shee Batilla, who won the Valero Open this past week,

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>had a six shot lead going into the back nine,

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.639
<v Speaker 1>and then Denny McCarthy went ballistic, birdied ten, part eleven

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and then birdied twelve, thirteen, fourteen, fifty, sixteen, seventeen, eighteen,

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and it required Akha Batilla to have a tournament tying

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>putt on eighteen. It looked like he was going to

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>lose it in regulation, if you will, he sinks the

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>putt and in celebration it was It was a pretty

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.559
<v Speaker 1>tough putt too. It was not a short butt. In celebration,

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>he pumps his left arm and Batilla what we say, Wes,

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>he weighs what ninety seven ninety eight pounds roughly?

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he does this, big tall guy, big tall, skinny guy.

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 3>It was very It was very grammatica of uh.

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Very grammatica. That's why we have Wes on the show

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for reverences like that. Correct, was that Martin? Just to

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>get my grammatica's correct.

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 4>I believe it was Martine Grammatica. Okay, jumped on in

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 4>the field goal celebration and then stumbled to the ground

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 4>after that.

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>That's the right, one of the great moments in NFL

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>celebration history. So anyway, he dis he What we learn

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>on the playoff hole because they go back and play

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen again is that he's called for a trainer, and

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Wes is exactly right. This is like every tennis player

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>who falls behind, Oh my leg I need a trainer,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>just trying to like really like stay time. Sometimes it's legit,

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and in Batia's case, it was legit, and the announcers

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>were and I was texting Kelly. Kelly was on the

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>air because he couldn't really get it because he was

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>on the air. I'm texting Kelly. I'm like, the announcers

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>are speculating that he dislo that he heard his shoulder,

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>first heard his shoulder on the celebration, and then I

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh my god, it's confirmed. He partially dislocated

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>his shoulder. But it didn't matter in the end because

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>he was still able to hit an approach shot or

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the shot before the approach shot. And then McCarthy hid

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>in the creek anyway, and then I'm sure his elbow

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>his shoulder started feeling much better. It's tough to put

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>from the creek, Denny, Yeah, it is, Wes. Let me

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>just before, by the way, that's the voice of Kelly Bidlin.

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't assume that this audience knows who you are.

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You're like, yeap and like it's the Numbers Games. That's

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Biblin, along with Wes Reynolds two thirds of the

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>long Shots crew. And before I asked Wes this question,

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the third member of the panel is Sia Najade, who

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>we have on the radio side all the time. Sia

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is a host and analyst at sports Line and the

0:03:55.880 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Monumental Sports Network in Good Old DC, in the dmv

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>uh Sea comes to us. You won't be able to

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>see this, but he has a uh he has a

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the all time very good Santana Moss photo

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>behind him where he's thrown up the twenty one for

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Sean Taylor Jolways love Sea. Good morning, Thank you for

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>doing this man.

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 5>Good morning, listen.

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 6>I wish I was on the right side of Batilla

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 6>for the outright, but I had him for a first

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 6>round leader at sixty five to one. The reason I

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 6>bring that up is because it's I have a lot

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 6>in common with Akhabt. You guys know, I've told this story.

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 6>I've dislocated my shoulders seven times, like fully dislocated before

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 6>before the first yeah, before the first of seven playing basketball,

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 6>mostly before the first of seven. It would it would

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 6>go like Oxhays went, where it would pop out but

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 6>then pop right back in and basically be okay outside

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 6>of some soreness. So uh, anyway, I could very much

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 6>relate to that. It was painful for me to watch

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 6>after I realized what had happened when he was pumping

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 6>his fist, But yeah, that brought back some gruesome memories

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 6>for sure.

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Seven times.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it just like it.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna happen for the rest of your life, that

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just going to pop out now.

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 5>When it's in compromising positions.

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 6>Yes, it's usually like you know, playing basketball the football.

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 6>I put it in an awkward spot, weight gets pushed

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 6>against it, it comes out. It's very hard to put

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 6>it back out.

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't gonna ask about the compromise.

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 2>Now, are you like falling rigs at this point?

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 7>See, I like you against the wall like Mel Gibson style,

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 7>all badass.

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So you know before the before the anti semitism he's

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about.

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yeah, anti semitism.

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 6>The first four I was able to put it back

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 6>in myself. I'm kind of like wiggling into my shoulder.

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 6>The last three I needed assistance in a very very

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 6>big way.

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Wiggling into your shoulder. Oh man.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>And the last thing, I'm sorry, I don't mean to

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>belabor this, but the first the first time that it

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>dislocated was some traumatic event and then it just never corrected.

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 6>Well, the first time it dislocated, it popped right back in.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 6>That was kind of my high school days where I

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 6>realized there was a problem, But it wasn't so much

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 6>of a problem that the tears and all of that

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 6>stuff inside, like wasn't as big of a deal for

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 6>it to stay out, so it wasn't fully compromised, and

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 6>then it became fully compromised, and when it came out,

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 6>it stayed out.

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So wait, does this mean no one can bet on

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Batilla for the Masters because he qualifies for the Masters

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>with this win? But now, like, if you want it,

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>let's just say if you had an inkling to bet him,

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>And someone pointed out this morning it was a Hasselbauer

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>who was like, if he hadn't qualified, it would have

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>been exactly eighty eight golfers for the eighty eighth Masters,

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>So he fucked that up. Yeah, let's just say that,

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>what an ass. But if you if you had an

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>inkling to bet him, now would you not because of

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>this situation?

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 7>I'll answer this one first, because I don't know about you, guys.

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 7>He is definitely a guy that I had circled to

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 7>bet this week. Yet I mean, it's it's a major week.

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 7>You can always make so many cases for so many

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 7>guys that yes, Gil, that is pretty much all it

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 7>took for me to cross off my list.

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 2>This week, where I don't really know what his shoulder

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 2>is doing.

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 7>If it's in, it's out, can how easily can it

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 7>pop back out again? Like see is talking about. So yeah,

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 7>I did cross him off my list, Wes, Yeah, I

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 7>don't know. You guys handled him.

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, go ahead, let's see. I'm sorry, go ahead. No.

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 6>I was just going to say, like, I don't think

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 6>it's a problem, to be honest with you, because it

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 6>wasn't fully compromised in the sense of it like being

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 6>out for a while, that's when you really have to

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 6>stabilize and you got to worry about the join and

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 6>the ligaments around the join itself. The fact that he's

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 6>at a stage where it's popping right back in. It's

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 6>probably going to be some soreness for a couple of days,

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 6>but it's actually not going to affect his golf swing

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 6>at all. The fact that he had his hand up

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 6>in a non golf position when he was celebrating that putt,

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 6>by the way, great putt by him, But that's not

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 6>a position where you're putting your shoulder in, And therefore,

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 6>outside of a couple of days of soreness, I actually

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 6>think he'll be fine with his swing.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Same for you me.

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, yeah, I agree with in terms of the

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 4>diagnosis that Si, having had this injury before, just gave there.

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 4>But the one thing I will say, because as we're

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 4>as we're recording this, we're now getting the pairings being

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 4>released and oh yes, actually he is actually in the

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 4>apt one of the afternoon groups, which I do wonder

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 4>because all the top five in the betting, by the way,

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 4>are in the first the am wave on Thursday, and

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 4>if we get weather, I think it's going to be

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 4>in the afternoon. So I wonder if we're going to

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 4>get a scenario like we did last year where the

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 4>afternoon guys are going to have to make up to

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 4>get this back on time and you know, play twenty

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 4>eight thirty holes in a day or.

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Something like that.

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 4>So that's the only thing that I could see that

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 4>could be a bugaboo on this injury for betf he's

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 4>got to play a lot of extra golf.

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 3>If you get weather in that afternoon wave Thursday.

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Watch this bugaboo hip hop record? Who's the artist.

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Wes's Destiny's Child? Of course, I think, yeah.

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>No, but they had a bugaboo too, they had I

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>always thinking of a hip hop record, but yes, that's correct. Okay, yeah, okay, okay,

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>So I want to seize on the weather thing momentarily,

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>but before I do that, because there's going to be

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the beating the book. Audience may not be as familiar

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Long Shot Screw, but Kelly, Wes and Matt

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.199
<v Speaker 1>are going to do a live thing for those who

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>happen to listen to this today. They're gonna do a

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>live thing at eleven pm Eastern eight pm Pacific tonight,

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>which is the Tuesday before the Masters. Don't worry West,

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not actually it's not actually live, Kelly saying, we

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>just say it's live. By the way, I completely thought

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it was live, and Kelly like, burst my bubble.

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 7>I wonder what Killy gill all on at numbers. We

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 7>be so worried about it, Yes, acted like I had

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 7>the longest day at I mean.

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I was so confused for a moment. And for those

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>who were wondering, if I'm listening to this, why should

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I listen to that? Because you guys will go deep

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>dive into that more than you will hear necessarily.

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brown's picks as well.

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah we are.

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 7>I know Cia does a lot of this too, but

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 7>very heavy heavy data driven that we're that we will

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 7>talk through that lens. That's what you'll hear a lot

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 7>more on the podcast, more so than I'm guessing what

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 7>you're gonna see us up with questions here for exactly,

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 7>we got to leave something for you that's right, so

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 7>you'll hear it much more through that lens on the podcast.

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I also want to say this that these are not

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>just three I use the word Schmendricks on a numbers

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>game this morning. These are not just three schmendricks of

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>golf Sea and he doesn't want to be known for this.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Hits a ridiculous percentage and I'm not even making this up.

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>A first round leader bets, which is maybe the most

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Even as I'm saying it, I'm like, this is the

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>most ridiculous thing in the world. But it's true. He does. Wes.

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Uh you helped me out here, Kelly. Is there anybody

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>who hits more outrights in anything than Wes Reynolds does

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in golf?

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 7>No, I mean that for a comparable sports No like

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 7>that is you're talking. We're talking about the two guys.

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 7>I mean for west Renolds. I think a lot of

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 7>people have been following this stuff for years with golf.

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 7>He hits outrights at higher rate than almost anybody I know.

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 7>It's seeing a shot absolutely the first round. He's become

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 7>the first round leader king over the past couple of years.

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>The sea things just a comical, It's unbelievable.

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 7>It is because I had, like, I had some success

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 7>that I stumbled into. I think, much like CEO when

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 7>we like all like kind of first round leader markets

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 7>became more widely available for whatever reason, I found myself

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 7>stumbling into success there. But it's like betting a first

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 7>quarter of an NBA game, right, Like it's.

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>Not really you're you're.

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Ideally letting your hondicap play out.

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way we're talking, like these guys aren't even here,

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>see is like it's not no, you're right, yeah, okay. So,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and I also just want to point out before we

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>get into this particular master's that you Kelly do By

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the way, Kelly's a great golf handicapper in his own right,

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you do things by model Wes. You don't necessarily do

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it that way, correct, How would you characterize it.

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 4>Kind of a combo platter? I'm not totally model driven.

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 4>A lot of it is a lot of it is

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 4>market driven as well. A lot of it is just

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, following this out the year, So it's not

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 4>like a particular model. It's more like a statistical context,

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 4>okay of things that I think are going to be

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 4>important on week to week basis.

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>By the way, how much like pressure do you feel

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>because you're so good at this? Like if you have

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a week or two or god forbid, god forbid Wes

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that you go a month without hitting an outright, do

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you like lose your mind? Do you start to get

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>high anxiety? Yes?

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 4>Yes, as a matter of fact, because look, look I

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 4>had a few week drought before I hit Jaeger in Houston,

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 4>and you know, and and and because of these droughts,

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 4>that's what led me a little bit more to like

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 4>placement markets, you know, the top twenties and the top

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 4>thirties where it's like, hey, can I still make money

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 4>when I'm not hitting out in an outright wager? And

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 4>and you know that that has helped me at least

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 4>most weeks. But but yeah, look, you know I put

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 4>a little bit probably too much pressure on myself. But

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, when you devote yourself to this, you obviously

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 4>want to get out what you put into it.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I love only vsent dot com slash picks page. When

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm lucky enough to be in the top three. It's

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>like Wes Renolds, like Gil Alexander two, he went three

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and two the last week for you know whatever. The

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>percentage ROI three and two right West Reynolds is in

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the first place. He's like one hundred and seventy eight

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>or something like that with all his plays fires Baby,

0:12:55.559 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and then Sia does things by locating and dislocating. What

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is your what would you say is your handicapping approach?

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 6>I would say it's a combo between Wes and Kelly's.

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 6>Like I tend to steer away from models, but I

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 6>got to admit, like the the things I'm looking at

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 6>are inputs into models. I'm just looking at it more

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 6>granularly hard word to say, by the way, So I'm

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 6>looking at strokes gain data mostly, but I'm just looking

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 6>at looking at a piece by piece because i want

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 6>to see, like even the smaller sample size sizes that

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 6>a model might show, like round by round, tournament by

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 6>tournament scoring, where whereas a model might just like you'll

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 6>collate all of that stuff over whatever, however many rounds

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 6>you want to do it, but sixteen, twenty four, fifty whatever,

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 6>I just want to look at it piece by piece.

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 6>So it's kind of a long way to do it,

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 6>but it's kind of using both approaches that Wes and

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 6>Kelly use.

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 7>Okay, so I probably should just clarify too. Matt Brown

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 7>often does this. So if I'm not sitting here coding

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 7>and like running all this stuff, I'm using a lot

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 7>of great stat engine websites that are out there, like

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 7>Fantasy National, ric, run good dot.

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Com, bet spurts, a lot of these guys that we've

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 2>had on the shows.

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>You mean, you're not scraping day.

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.079
<v Speaker 2>That might be shocking to you some of the y

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 2>the audience.

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right, that's very honest of you. So eighty eighth Masters,

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and again we should always point out with the Masters

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the most predictive of golf courses from one year to

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the next. Obviously, it's the only major that plays on

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the same golf course, and as we alluded to earlier,

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it is a smaller field than what we're normally used to.

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And we just mentioned eighty nine golfers here. With the

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>pairings coming out right now, and many of those not many,

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>but a more than negligible percentage of the eighty nine

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to be. As we like to joke every year,

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>winners from like the Eisenhower administration, right the Larry Mises

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of the world and years gone by and those kind

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bernard Langers and those kind of players. So you

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>really do have a smaller pool than normal. And let

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>me start with what West brought up. This is always

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the best place to start up if you look at

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the weather forecast in Augusta, and we know how weather

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>forecasts go, but right now we're seeing some rain and

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>wind on Thursday for the first round, and some wind

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday is supposed to glorious. So

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it's funny how you couched it, West, because earlier on

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game we had Drew densic On it's also

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a nice golf handicapper, and he was talking about how

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>he thought the advantage might go. Am I right about this, Kelly?

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>He did the opposite. He said the advantage might go

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to the afternoon Thursdays and the morning Fridays. Yeah's no correct, correct,

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And you off air, You're like, yeah, these guy everyone's

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>really like has assumptions about the weather and Wes is

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>saying the opposite now that you're sort of operating instinct,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is that the folks in the afternoon on Thursday might

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>get the worst of it.

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, look, it's hard to predict a weather bias. You know,

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 4>that's what we try to do every year. It's seemingly

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 4>for the Open Championship in July, but you know, more

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 4>often than not, the wind at least is going to

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 4>be more benign you would think in the morning.

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 3>And that's why I think, you know, on a.

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Just week to week basis on the PGA Tour, the

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 4>majority and CM maybe can confirm this or go a

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 4>diferent way with it, but it seems like a lot

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 4>of the first round leaders are in morning draws more

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 4>often than not on PGA Tour events. Guys that are

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 4>getting out and maybe those first ten to fifteen groups

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 4>in the morning. Now, keep in mind there's only thirty

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 4>pairings here at Augusta because there's only eighty nine players.

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 4>There's one group that's a twosome that I think is

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 4>the first out, and then you have threesomes throughout the rest.

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 4>So I think, like we were talking about with Patilla,

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 4>he's like in the twenty second of thirty groups, so

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 4>that would make him in the afternoon wave. But yeah,

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 4>look last year, obviously the weather turned this topsy turvy

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 4>or it looked like Group Kopka was very much the winner,

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 4>and then John Rahm had to go. You know, John

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 4>Rahm proved that you can come from the tough side

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 4>of the draw and obviously win here. So just because

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 4>you're on the bad end of the draw doesn't mean

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 4>that you can't try it ultimately.

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Yet John Ram the defending champion Scotti Scheffler. His only

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>major win was the year before that. All right, well, Wes,

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>have you seen any things I know I'm asking you

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to do two things at once here, but have you

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>seen anything in the pairings just on a glance that

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>makes you lean certain directions or makes you cross out anybody?

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, the featured pairing, and it's going to be in

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 4>the early wave on Thursday and then the afternoon wave

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 4>on Friday. Believe they are group number twelve, and you've

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 4>got three of the top four in the betting paired together.

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 4>So you have Scotti Scheffler paired with Rory McElroy and

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 4>Xander Schoffle. Oh, and they are paired together and The

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 4>group in front of them, I believe is John Ram,

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 4>the defending champion, Matt Fitzpatrick, and Nick Dunlap, who of

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 4>course was the amateur that won the American Express that

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 4>has since turned professional.

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so what is that? Does that do anything for

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you from a handicapping staff or not? Really?

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, it doesn't change it as much because look,

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 4>and Rory and Xander two that I do like this week,

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 4>at least on the.

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Short end of the board. But look, you're.

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 4>Gonna have to be paired and go against great players

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 4>if you want to do great things at Augustus, So

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't think you can be intimidated by that. Now,

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 4>I was mainly looking at okay, are some of these

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 4>guys going to be paired with Tiger? And that's where

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 4>it would have been a little bit of a concern

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 4>with me if they were gonna be paired with Tiger,

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 4>because look, that's gonna be obviously a big story. Even

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 4>though he's one hundred and fifty to one on the

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 4>odds board. Is is he going to be able to

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 4>make it? Is he gonna be able to make the cut?

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Is what is the physical toll going to be on him?

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Because last year, I thought the physical toll was at

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 4>least a little bit easier through the first two rounds,

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 4>simply because Louis Houstazen withdrew from that group. So keep

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 4>in mind he played in a twosome with Woke Neeman,

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 4>so that's a little bit easier than having to stop

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 4>and start with three players in the group. And just

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 4>the walk I think kind of got to him and

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 4>he made the cut on the number and then withdrew

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 4>over the weekend. So I wanted to make sure maybe

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 4>some of my guys were not paired with Tiger, because

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 4>if they see him struggling, it may weigh on them

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 4>a little bit, you know, to see if he's playing

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 4>bad and really struggling physically, especially the ones that are

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 4>like really close to him, like Justin Thomas and Jordan Speed,

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 4>but neither were paired with Tiger. As I'm actually scrolling

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Jason Mary, Yeah, I believe, And I think is that

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 4>a late.

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Perry and I believe?

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one twenty four.

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, by the way, you see this prop Micholson versus

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Tiger that some that some shops had where it was

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>like really tightly lined, and now I think Michelson's minus

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>one forty. Phil Mickelson, who, for those who forget finished

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 1>with a flourish last year, shot a sixty five on

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the final round and was he tied for second last

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>year in the end?

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Behind wrong. Yeah that's a curious line, don't you think.

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm not really surprised.

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 4>We had somebody actually on Matt Humans and Ice program

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 4>last night, Vson, and I said, I really like Phil

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 4>over Tiger here, because Phil, even though he's not really

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 4>in contention on a week to week basis on Live

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 4>and it's fifty four holes, he still at least his

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 4>com playing competitive golf Tiger Woods, by the way, has

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 4>not finished four rounds in an official event I'm not

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 4>including the Hero Rule Challenge. Has not finished an event

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 4>where he's played all four rounds since the twenty twenty

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 4>three Genesis Invitational. So it's been over a year since

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 4>this guy has played four rounds in tournament play.

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, that's what I mean. Maybe I wasn't clarifying.

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't clear. I couldn't believe it was so short,

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>and minus one forty seems short to me.

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 4>Still for Micky, it was like it was like minus

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 4>one fifteen at bet mgm Over.

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I saw one that were even tighter.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 7>I mean I would be leaning Phill. You're not rushing

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 7>to be running out to bet though, I would not

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 7>be betting Tiger or Phil this week. All right, well,

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 7>let's start out with Let's start out with some outrights.

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 7>Sia has not a heart out but a heart ish out,

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 7>So let's just let's do outrights first, and then we'll

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 7>sort of throw at see his way. But Kelly, right now,

0:20:58.440 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 7>forty eight hours before.

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>The tournament, the tournament is who he use? It's the totement. Gil.

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>We don't like your con around here. Uh what do

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you have in pocket as an outright? And then what

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking about?

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 7>I think my outrights are settled. I think my outright

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 7>card is complete. There are definitely some bets I still

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 7>have to add as Vegas is taking its time to

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 7>post some things here in town. So the outrights are

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 7>about the only thing that is settled, I would say

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 7>for me right now, I have three that I made

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 7>over the past couple months. I have three that I've

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 7>made this week justin Thomas Hideki Matziyama, will zalatoris I

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 7>bet in the mid thirties over the past couple months.

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 7>I absolutely love Adeci this week, so much more that

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 7>I had it back on to him at a shorter number.

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 7>He might be my favorite. He is my favorite play

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 7>this week, no matter how you're playing him. Hideki Matziyama

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 7>is my favorite play this week. JT and Zalaturus had

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 7>some great stretches earlier or earlier in the season. Their

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 7>past couple events have both been a little mid not

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 7>so great. JT obviously the change a caddy with.

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Does that matter to you, by the way, so close

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to the event.

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 7>Because it's not just any bones it does, see it, Wes.

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 7>I don't know how you guys feel about this with JT.

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 7>In the amount of experience he has at Augusta, I'm

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 7>not worried about it as much, but I don't.

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 2>Know how you guys look at that.

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 6>I just think it's a sign that he's flailing more

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 6>than anything else. The timing of it just seems very

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 6>curious with a very respected guy on the back, so

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 6>it doesn't it doesn't inspire much confidence, let's put it

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 6>that way.

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, and with me. Look, Matt Minster is a

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 4>really good caddy. He was with Patrick Cantley for several

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 4>years and they had some success together, so I'm not

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 4>worried about the quality of service he's going to get

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 4>on the bag, but it does beg the question, like

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 4>Sea was saying, like, because I feel like Justin Thomas

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 4>has played much better this year than he had last

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 4>year where he was totally lost and missing cuts badly,

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.239
<v Speaker 4>but he's still kind of searching for something and that

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 4>gets in your head a little bit. And he hasn't

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 4>won since that PGA Championship at Southern Hills two years ago,

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 4>so he's.

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Certainly is question it.

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 4>But I think he is in better like pure playing

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 4>for him, just watching him than he was this time last.

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I agree with Wes. That's kind of why I

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 7>put the bet in it for the first place. I

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 7>think the consistency you're getting out of Zalatorus and JT

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 7>right now though, is a little shaky. So I didn't

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 7>go back in on those guys in any other markets

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 7>hit DECKI I did add the other outrights that I

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 7>did bet Wyndham Clark debutant tebut debutant, I did bet

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 7>him at thirty five to one, A little bit of

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 7>that I bet him in the top debutant market too.

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 7>I mean we'll hit on that, we get to other bets.

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 7>I did add a small outright bet on him though,

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 7>just because this mark the number I found thirty five

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 7>to one. He had been getting kept getting chopped down,

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 7>chopped down. Think I think he's mainly around twenty five

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 7>twenty eight to one in that range right now. So

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 7>that was part of the part of a number play.

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 7>And then this would be a I know he's on

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 7>CEA his card as well. Shane Lowry I do have

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 7>as an outright is my long bomb, my one long

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 7>kind of outright here for this tournament. Lowry was incredible

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 7>in Florida, has put together some great results. If we're

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 7>gonna talk about rain, we know this guy can play

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 7>in the rain. We've seen that plenty of times before,

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 7>done it at a very high level. So Shane Lowry

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 7>definitely is kind of the one long shot.

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I would say that I do have a lot of

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 2>interest in this week.

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Shane Lowry, who's top finish here was tie for third

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago at the Masters. Obviously the

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Open Championship his one major win, by the way, Dave Tindall,

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>for those who are golf hardos who are familiar with

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Dave Tindall across the Pond. He writes for Betfair. He

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>does his Master's formula every year. We just had him

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>on a numbers game where he has criteria for the

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>last ten Masters winners and he winnows it down on

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a point system to who actually has the most points.

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>First time he's ever had a tie at the top,

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>and it is hit, Decky and Rory tied as his

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>potential Masters winners per his formula. By the way, he

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>hit the runners up the last two years, so he

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't get that champ, but he got the number two spot. Wes.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I heard you mentioned Xander earlier, so I'm very excited

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to hear what you're about to say your outrights.

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah yeah, and Xander is on my card if you

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 4>really look, look, Scotty Scheffler has been, you know, the

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 4>man among mortals. I guess if you will, statistically not

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 4>just winning two events back to back at bay Hill

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 4>and at the Players, first guy to ever defend at

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 4>the Players in that event's history, but the guy right

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 4>behind him on a lot of these categories is Xander Schoffle,

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 4>and I have him int a little bit of a

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 4>better number. I think sixteen to one might be the

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 4>best you can get out there right now. But Xander

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 4>right now second total strokes gain top twenty and off

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 4>the tee approach around the green a little.

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Bit down the board.

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 4>Putting, he's eighty f where a Scheffler I think is

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 4>around one hundred mark. But Xander was fifth on tour

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 4>in the same category in putting last year, so it

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 4>seems like it can heat up at any moment. Xander

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 4>actually has the longest active consecutive cut strikes made on

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 4>the PGA Tour at forty two. He's nine ahead of

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 4>Scheffler and second at thirty three. Last cut was actually

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 4>at the Masters here two years ago, but he was

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 4>T three and twenty twenty one. That was the year

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Matsuyama one was T two and twenty nineteen here at Augusta.

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 4>I think he's been the second best player on the

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 4>PGA Tour this season. He's got six top tens. You know,

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of like, maybe I'm ready to get hurt

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 4>again with this guy, but it's long past time for

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 4>this guy to be second best. You know, he's always

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 4>kind of right there. I had him at the Players

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 4>and I felt.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Like man this is the time he's gonna win.

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 4>A really really big one here and just got passed

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 4>by Scotti Scheffler and ends up T two with Clark

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 4>and Harmon. So you know, Xanderschaffle was a guy. The

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 4>number is short, but I think it's short for a reason.

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>You're the reason I sees on that is for obviously

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>for the obvious reasons, because he has burned probably more

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>golf betters who had him in outrights than anyone that

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I can think of over time. But you're not the

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>only one to anecdotally anyway that seems to have landed

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>on him for this that are willing to go back

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>with him. So I thought that, I think that's interesting.

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, and you know there's on the shorter end Xander.

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 4>And then I did also play Rory speaking of getting

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 4>hurt again, if you've been betting him at the Masters,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 4>you've been getting hurt the last ten years as he's

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 4>trying to finish this Grand Slam. But I liked what

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 4>I saw at the Valero last week. One point eight

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 4>to eight strokes gain approach per round. That's the best

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 4>that he had done, I believe since the Canadian Open

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 4>two years ago, when he won because it came out

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 4>that he's been out to Vegas a few times working

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 4>with Butch Harmon, and you know, maybe Butch is a

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 4>good elixir.

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 3>At least in a short term.

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 4>So he's trying things, and he's off the PGA Tour

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 4>policy board, resigned back in December. Of course, he's been

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 4>the focal point of the PGA Tour versus Live divide,

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 4>I think as much as any other player, and I

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 4>think he kind of just wants to put that on

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 4>the back burner. It's like, man, I need to win

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 4>this thing. This is the last thing I have to

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 4>really accomplished as an individual player. So Roy McElroy, I

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 4>did have a little bit at thirteen, jakeen Neieman, I'd

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 4>still maybe play smaller at thirty to one. I got

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 4>fifty to one actually when he won the live event

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Jetta last month. But this guy, you look at the

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.199
<v Speaker 4>form on this guy. This guy has been terrific for

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 4>about the last five or six months really worldwide. He's

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 4>already won two live events. He's trying to get his

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 4>world ranking up because he mentioned after Mayacoba, hey I'm

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 4>not in the majors. He's ninety third in the world,

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 4>and this is a guy it's probably a top fifteen

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 4>or twenty player in the world if we're really, you know,

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 4>looking at it realistically.

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 3>But he's got to.

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Move that world ranking up just to get into the

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 4>US Open, just to get into the PGA in the

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 4>Open Championship. So this is an opportunity he's got to go,

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 4>you know where. Not if he doesn't win the thing,

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 4>he at least finishes like top three or four.

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 3>So juaque neieman.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 4>I played I would play at thirty a couple of

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 4>guys in like the mid forties and fifties because I'm

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 4>still finishing my card. Tony Fee now whose Majors form

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 4>has not been great lately, but before that bad run

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 4>was really good and I liked how he played in

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 4>Houston a couple of weeks ago, runner up, so really

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 4>good Tea Green and the putter's been good in three

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 4>of the last four starts. I played him about forty

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 4>five to one. And then another guy who's heard a

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 4>lot of people I'm going with all the guys that

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 4>are just heartbreakers this week Cameron Young fifty five to one,

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 4>who is actually I think in better form coming into

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 4>this Masters than last year when he was twenty five

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 4>to one and ultimately finished seventh. Seven runner up finishes

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 4>on the PGA Tour in the last three years for

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Cameron Young. But he's got the game here. He was

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 4>the early leader in round one last year. So I

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 4>just went on the drift here. I just went on

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 4>double the price for a guy that I think is

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 4>probably in better form this time around.

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Also in the same way that I brought up Tendall

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and who he landed on, I should bring up because

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you brought up Tony Fenew and because we can hear

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>gasps already when we bring up showflet or finale from

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>all golf betters listening to this. When Joe Peta our

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>friend who people know from baseball analytics and also analytics,

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>when he did the twenty nineteen Master's Tour Guide where

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>he had access to the proprietary Augusta data, his conclusion

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>was that Tony Feenow was going to win that twenty

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen Masters. He was actually the third round leader, if

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not mistaken, didn't get there. But Fenw's analytics on

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>this course over time are as good as anyone's. All right, SIA,

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>your outrights, And then that you can vomit out everything

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>else at this point too, but let's start with your outrights.

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I like what I had just heard from Wes

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 5>and Kelly.

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I don't know that brooks Kepka's name was mentioned,

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 6>but you know, I don't want to go narrative shopping

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 6>too much here, but the big game hunter thing actually

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 6>is true for brooks Keopka, And even though on Livy

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 6>he's not taking down tournaments, I do think Brooks is

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 6>one of those guys that none of us are going

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 6>to be surprised if he wins this tournament. I got

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 6>it at twenty to one. I think it's eighteen, maybe

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 6>sixteen to one in some markets. But again, I brooks

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 6>Kopka when he's not injured, because don't forget he missed

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 6>a couple of cuts here when he was kind of

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 6>dealing with injuries. But otherwise, I believe we've got two

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 6>second place finishes and a seventh place finishes over the

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 6>last five years, so I.

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 5>Really like him.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 6>I don't know that he's getting enough respect in the market,

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 6>and I do think that has something to do with

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 6>Live and just not really flashing.

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 5>On Live necessarily. But Hitdeki mounts Siyama.

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 6>Kelly mentioned him, and there's a guy that Wes mentioned

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 6>too that I'm really surprised about but is also on

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 6>my card. So I'm really happy to hear that. But

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 6>there's not much else we can say about Deckie. We

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 6>know the recent forum has been very good. I don't

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 6>know that there's anybody in this field. I mean, obviously

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 6>probably two or three that you can make the argument

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 6>for that's more comfortable at Augusta than Hideki mount Sciama.

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 6>We know he has the win in twenty twenty one,

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 6>but since twenty fifteen, for the record, to think about that,

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 6>it's a long time ago. He's made every cut Okay,

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 6>that's kind of impressive and finished inside the top twenty

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 6>eight out.

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 5>Of those nine times.

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 6>That is really really Oh by the way, the one

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 6>time he didn't finish inside the top twenty, he was

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.239
<v Speaker 6>a disgusting T thirty two. I mean, this guy is

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 6>just a walking top ten, top twenty machine at Augusta. Specifically,

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 6>he's got the around the green game. He checks to

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 6>weight it off, the tee boxes, long iron play. Obviously

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 6>around the Green is super solid for him. Absolutely love him.

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 6>Cam Young's the guy that I was surprised, Wes mentioned.

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 6>I'm really happy about it because I think Wes is right.

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 6>I think he is in better form now than he

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 6>was before. And for the record, this is his third

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 6>time at the Masters. He missed the cut his first time,

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 6>no shame in that debutante all that stuff.

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 5>But the second time he was excellent off the tee

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 5>and he was excellent with the putter.

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 6>He checks all the boxes I'm looking for with long irons,

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 6>off the tee, approach game, all of that stuff. What's

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 6>interesting about him, and maybe this is a small sample size,

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 6>but his around the green game is not very good. Right,

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 6>But at Augusta, the two times he's been there, he's

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 6>been relatively neutral. I mean, he hasn't had a poor performance,

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 6>hasn't had a great performance around the green. So I

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 6>think the argument can be made that he might actually

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 6>have some success here around the green.

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 5>And because he checks all the other boxes.

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 6>I think fifty five to one, fifty to one is

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 6>like borderline disrespectful.

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 5>I know he doesn't win. I get that part.

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 6>But we make the same argument about Xander Schaffley, and

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 6>I'm not sure the talent gap between those two is

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:01.479
<v Speaker 6>that dramatic so fifty five to one, fifty to one,

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 6>absolutely love Cam Young.

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, sea first round leaders where you've made your hay.

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'll make this super easy.

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 6>We talked about Cam Young getting getting in front of

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 6>it in the first round. I like him, I like

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 6>Kideki Matsuyama, I like Brooks Kopka.

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm going with my outright card.

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 6>Here's part of the reason I don't normally do this,

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:21.959
<v Speaker 6>but two weeks ago at the Houston Open, West Reynolds

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 6>had Steven Yeger Well, I had Stephen Yeger first round leader,

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 6>but I didn't have him in my outright card. Last

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 6>week I had akshe Batia first round leader. Turns out

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 6>that hit, but he didn't you know, I didn't have

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 6>the akhe Batia outright. And so that's two weeks in

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 6>a row where I've had the first round leader but

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 6>not the outright and it was the same guy. I'm

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 6>just gonna go ahead and go with guys that I

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 6>know can get out in front of it.

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean Decky, cam Young and Brooks.

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 6>They fit that profile and you know, most of them

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 6>very comfortable here. I think at their numbers, which are

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 6>in like the twenty eight to one range, and then

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.239
<v Speaker 6>then in Cam Young's case, I think he's in the

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 6>forty five to one range, like all three.

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Like the sound of that. By the way, I have

0:33:58.040 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>dare you not have Patiata win the whole?

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 5>I know, terrible, I know what I'm thinking.

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It's so funny because you guys do this so much

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.280
<v Speaker 1>more brilliantly than I do. But somehow in my head

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>hack golf better. I love Matsuyama and Keopka the most. Also,

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 1>and Kepka because, like you said, big game hunter, right,

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I hate not having him and then seeing that shitting't

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 1>e grin of his as he's just like, you know,

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 1>crushing of course, so I will be on him and

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>then Matsuyama. I've said this on a couple occasions this

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>week with Kelly. I just feel like if we on Vson,

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>for instance, maybe it's different with long shots, but on Vson,

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>if we somehow had a way of aggregating all the

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>time we've spent not only on a numbers geting on

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>every show talking about all the great golfers in the world,

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>from the Kepka's to the JT's, to the Speace to

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the Schefflers, to the Rams and beyond. I just feel

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>like Matsuyama is the least talked about of all of

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that tier of golfers. And I get it, all right,

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's not quite the top of the tip of

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 1>the top, but I just feel like he gets overlooked

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot. And you know, besides providing us with the

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>most iconic moment, or one of the more iconic moments

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 1>in Master's history with his caddy bowing at eighteen, which

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is just you know, it's chill inducing, I just I

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling about him as well. Take that for

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>what it's worth, which is not worth much, but that's

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Those are the two I landed on, SEEA so that

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you can go tell us all your other bets here.

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, by the way, one outright, I forgot, and I

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 6>think Kelly brought him up. I do like Shane Lowry

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 6>at sixty to one. I did want to point that out.

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 6>He's been really hot in Florida and let's see at

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 6>the Masters his last four T sixteen, third T twenty one,

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:40.439
<v Speaker 6>twenty five, and he's really coming in with good form,

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.879
<v Speaker 6>particularly with the iron. So I think sixty to one,

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 6>that's the fourth guy on my card. I just forgot

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 6>to mention him. So it's it's the three I mentioned

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 6>plus Shane Lowie. Okay, so just a couple other picks

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 6>turning matchups, I got two for you. I got Shane

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 6>Lowry speaking of over Colin Moore cow, I like Taylor

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 6>Moore over Eric Cole.

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 5>Taylor Moore in very very good.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 6>Form, some spike finishing positions. I do think he has

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 6>some top ten, top twenty potential. Eric Cole's game is

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 6>just not there right now for whatever reason. So Taylor

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 6>Moore minus one thirty over Cole. These are tournament matchups,

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 6>and then I'll just rattle off a few finishing positions

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 6>before I get out of here. Taylor Moore t forty.

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 6>I like that at plus money. That's plus one ten.

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 6>I like Lucas Glover, who has also in very good

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 6>form and has had some success at the Masters. Hasn't

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 6>played a lot of it. He played a lot of

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 6>it pre twenty fifteen, hasn't played a lot lately, but

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 6>when he has played, he's been okay. He certainly fits

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 6>the bill for somebody who would T forty here. I

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 6>like that at plus one oh five. Seawoo Cam minus

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 6>one ten at T thirty very comfortable Master's history for him,

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 6>I've got Shane Lowry T twenty at plus one fifty

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 6>and a sprinkle bet because I know people are going

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 6>to be hesitant to bet Cam Young to win it

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 6>for kind of obvious reasons. I think Cam Young in

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 6>the top ten market may may be the better play,

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 6>the more valuable play at plus three sixty. So that's

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 6>something I think you know again, those plus three sixty

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 6>plays when it comes to finishing market, you don't have

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 6>to put a full unit on that, right, You don't

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 6>even have to put a half unit. You can put

0:36:57.640 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 6>point three units on that to get a full unit.

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 6>So those are kind of like, if you like Cam Young,

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:03.840
<v Speaker 6>but you don't like him enough to bet him as

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 6>an outright, maybe you take him in the top ten

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 6>where I think he can firmly land at plus three sixty.

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sea, thank you so much. Man, appreciate it's

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing the shot. Everybody SI A N, E J A

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:21.320
<v Speaker 1>D on Twitter just like it sounds. Monumental sports network

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>and sports line host and analyst and of course a

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:29.879
<v Speaker 1>member or at least a resident of the DMV. Now,

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Sea, appreciate it.

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 5>Man, Thank you, Gil Kelly and Wes he soon and

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:34.879
<v Speaker 5>have a great week.

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:37.879
<v Speaker 1>You too, go get some winners. Seeing his shot kind

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to join us. He's got other stuff he's got to

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>do as well. By the way, Wes, let me just

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>point this out. When I asked about Bugaboo, I'm like

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking ed Og and the Bulldogs, and Wes comes in

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>with Destiny's shot, and I'm like, okay, West, it's on

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 1>top of him as always. Well, I was.

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 3>Trying to think of who you were thinking of. But

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 3>I do remember that song. I was like Destiny's Child

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 3>or was it a show?

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 4>It was one of those It's only two thousand, R

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 4>and B beyond Janus.

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:06.479
<v Speaker 7>It was great because I know you too well, both

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 7>well enough that I know Gil was trying to set

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 7>up the alley up to show off the West Reynolds

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:12.800
<v Speaker 7>knowledge and then he just came over.

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>The top of it. Yeah. By the way, we didn't

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>mention that on the show today. How great We did

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a whole show obviously at college basketball was big. The

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>most random moment of that game last night. Who was

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the kid on Purdue that had that dunk? Yeah? That

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>was that mountain heid Heidi.

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 2>I was out of my I was out of my

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 2>chair and we didn't bring that up on it.

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>We can't wear two hours. We didn't bring it up.

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Am I wrong in saying? That is easily one of

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the top five in game dunks you've ever seen in

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>your life at any level.

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 4>And yet they couldn't put it in the One Shining

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Moment and put it in video package at the end

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 4>of the night.

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, come on, you know I didn't even think

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 3>squeeze that right in. Yeah, I love.

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 2>One Shining Moment.

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 7>I was so mad how late it was last night,

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 7>Like it felt like it took for ever.

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know they forgot We're gonna have one Shining

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Moment the other broadcast.

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 7>I made sure to stay. I love one Shining Moment.

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 7>It's my favorite moment of the entire tournament. How was

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 7>that not in there?

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me go back to the expert West Reynolds.

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm more of a Teddy Pendergrass One Shiny Moment guy

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>than I am a loose.

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Shit I am too.

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 4>I love Luther, and you know they switched it with

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 4>a couple other singers, But yeah, Teddy Pandergrass. And maybe

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm old school too, because that's when my university was.

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot more relevant college basketball that be

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 4>in Indiana University, where they were always featured deep in

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 4>multiple times in the package.

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 3>When Teddy Pendergrass was doing the number.

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Real quick, I know we're talking golf. I'm so glad

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 2>you brought that up.

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Though.

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 7>I was like, I saw him like it was one

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 7>of those I saw coming. But I was like, all right,

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 7>what's this kid gonna do here? You know, like, what's

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 7>this this kid going to do on this put back?

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 2>There's no and you're like, oh my, well, one.

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Last college basketball question before we get back to golf.

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the golf people will forgive me, but I

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>have Wes here, so I want to ask him. My

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>big question last night was forget the fact that uk

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we know Yukon's domination against Perdue last night come

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>second half, but where do I arbitrarily made the year

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand? Where does that team rank for you since

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the year two thousand? Are they the best college basketball

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 1>team since that.

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Year in terms of a team that actually, you know,

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 4>finishes winning the championship?

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:27.399
<v Speaker 3>I think it's at least the.

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:31.359
<v Speaker 4>Best team since twenty twelve Kentucky, And then, of course

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 4>was the ad team that ended up winning at all.

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 3>That was Col's lone national championship.

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 4>Perhaps that has not been officially announced yet that he's

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 4>leaving Lexington, But yeah, I think in terms of like

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 4>the Ken Pomeroy I read this adjusted efficiency ranking, just overall,

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 4>it's the best team since twenty one Duke. So if

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 4>you go by that type of rating and put some

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 4>credence into that, I could certainly see that. But it's

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 4>at least the best team in over a decade.

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>For me, Doctor Bob had a non winner twenty fifteen Kentucky,

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the team that was undefeated that got to the Final.

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 4>Four, because I was there at that Final four in

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Indianapolis at Luca Stadium when Wisconsin knocked him off. So

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 4>that's why I said non championship team, because they did

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 4>get all the way to the final four undefeated, where

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 4>we're still waiting for that fully undefeated season since the

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 4>last time with seventy six Indiana.

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Kent Benson, Quinn Buckner, and Scott may Kelly.

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 2>You remember it, Oh yeah, sure totally.

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:32.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, you know what wish Nev was obsessed

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>with yesterday at the end that I can only say

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 1>this on the podcast, I can say that's the radio side,

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>wish nev yesterday morning goes, you gotta find this out

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>for me. Where's is this the in? How long was

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:46.760
<v Speaker 1>this the most white starters for both teams combined? Oh?

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>When was the let so.

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I literally about that earlier in the tournament.

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, you all were looking at a solar eclipse. I

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>was like a deep diving NCAA finalists for and the

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 1>only comp I could come up with. Now we're not

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>talking you know, pre nineteen sixty six UTEP because obviously

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the world was different and in a bad way. But

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the only comp I could come up was like nineteen

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight Duke Kentucky where they also had six Caucasian starters. Cittingway,

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that was wish cancerted yesterday.

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, then you know that's the day about college basketball. Now,

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 4>there was only one McDonald's All American, by the way,

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 4>in the final four Stefan Castle at Yukon, Wow, which

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 4>you don't get that very often. And the fact that

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:33.720
<v Speaker 4>it's get old stale now in college basketball.

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 3>It's all old stale all to portal.

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yeah, yeah, you got to get the Blue Chippers,

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 4>but you got to get older guys. Cam Spencer, by

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:43.919
<v Speaker 4>the way, who was he didn't get the most Valuable Player.

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 4>I think it was Tristan Newton. But Cam Spencer for

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 4>Yukon just turned twenty four on Saturday and I looked

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 4>it up. There were six NBA All Stars this year

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 4>age twenty four or younger.

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there was something where he's like, he's like older

0:42:57.040 --> 0:42:59.399
<v Speaker 1>and they listed all these NBA players. I'm like, camp

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Spencer's old with all those guys.

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, Paulo Boncaro is twenty one.

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's like way older than Bud Carrol. Anyway. Well,

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a golf podcast, but I'd love to get your

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on next year because if if Bama can stick

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>keep those guys, man, I think Bama's the play. But

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a big if. Uh Okay, back to golf, Wes.

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>What else besides your outrights do you have in pocket already?

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 1>What have you bet?

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna be playing and I'm actually gonna be adding

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:29.400
<v Speaker 4>after we're done here some placement markets.

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 3>One matchup I did play.

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:35.280
<v Speaker 4>I did play Patrick Reid plus one fifteen over Terrel

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:37.879
<v Speaker 4>Hatton and Teryl Hatton. If you were watching the live

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 4>dural event last week, he was in the mix didn't

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 4>get it done there. At the end, Dean Burdmester won

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:44.360
<v Speaker 4>the playoff over Sergio Garcia.

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:46.240
<v Speaker 3>But this is just terrel.

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Hatton has never really seemed to be comfortable at Augusta National,

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 4>has never really liked it here. He's got one top

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:55.319
<v Speaker 4>twenty and seven appearances. And Patrick Reid, who look is

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 4>not contending week in and week out on the Live Tour,

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 4>loves this play and he's still a magician around the

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 4>greens with scrambling and around the green, which I think

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 4>is going to really matter this week. So you know,

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 4>I was surprised see Patrick Reid that big of an underdog,

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 4>cause I did play Patrick Reid plus one fifteen over

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 4>Tyrollhatton on a matchup. And then for low amateur this year,

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:20.399
<v Speaker 4>I went with the big six to eight kid who

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 4>plays at Georgia Tech. You might remember if you watched

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:26.319
<v Speaker 4>the Open Championship last year he was the first round

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 4>leader there. And I went with Chrysto Lamprecked at plus

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:31.760
<v Speaker 4>two twenty five to be the low.

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Amateur here at Augusta National.

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 4>And that's always kind of a crapshoot market because you're

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:40.320
<v Speaker 4>getting the British Amateur you're getting the USM, you're getting

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 4>the Latino America Amateur, so you're getting only a few

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 4>in the field. But Christo Lampreck, look, I gotta think

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 4>he's at least played Augusta National several times, being a

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 4>member of the Georgia Tech Golf team, you know, and

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 4>being based at least in the state. So Christo Lampreck

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 4>plus two twenty five low am.

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:00.760
<v Speaker 7>Oh so say it might be a crap shoot market

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 7>for a lot of people out there. Wes Rynolds definitely

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:04.880
<v Speaker 7>has a better read on that kind of stuff than

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 7>most of us.

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll say that, much.

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Like Jason Weingarten doing baseball prospecially exactly. I think he

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 1>knows what he's talk exactly. By the way, about debutants

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:15.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's our annual, you know, entree to using the

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:20.359
<v Speaker 1>word debutants where no first time Masters player has won

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the Master since nineteen seventy nine. And Fuzzy Zeller, do

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you throw out all first timers to win it all?

0:45:26.440 --> 0:45:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Wes more more often than not.

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 4>Yes, But look, and I don't have any on the

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 4>on the card necessarily. But Kelly mentioned one though, that

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 4>usually you don't get a first timer that's already a

0:45:38.520 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 4>major championship winner, and you do have that this year

0:45:41.320 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 4>with Wyndham Clark. In terms of the debutant market, there's

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty by the way, this year in the eighty nine

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:51.239
<v Speaker 4>player field. Ludwig Obert, who you know, if you listen

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 4>to Launch every week, Ludwig Gobert is like price less

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:55.800
<v Speaker 4>than twenty to one. He's already won on the PGA

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 4>Tour and he's won on the DP World Tour. But

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 4>it's like this guy gets priced like he's a major

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 4>champion and now he's not. A guy I'm necessarily high

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:06.919
<v Speaker 4>on this week just because I think this, by the way,

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 4>is his the first major championship he's ever played.

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Ludvigobert, as much of.

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:14.120
<v Speaker 4>A star as he is, this is going to be

0:46:14.160 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 4>his first major championship appearance. So man, if he does it,

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 4>then then maybe he is the next big thing in golf.

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 4>And I think he is going to be, you know,

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 4>a pretty big player for years to come. But yeah,

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 4>you've got a lot of people in this debutante market,

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 4>but don't I don't bet him for the outright wins,

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 4>but I think certainly for placements and any type of props,

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:37.919
<v Speaker 4>I don't think you want to ignore these guys, because

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 4>keep in mind, will Zalatorus was runner up his first

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:42.279
<v Speaker 4>time a couple of years ago.

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Montsia Jonas Lexed.

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Actually many years ago, was a debutante in finished.

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 3>D two here.

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:50.560
<v Speaker 4>So don't think that these guys are just all going

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:52.359
<v Speaker 4>to be at the bottom of the board when you're

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 4>scrolling through. There's going to be a couple of these

0:46:55.040 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 4>guys that contend.

0:46:56.000 --> 0:47:01.279
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, I honestly, Wes, this is interesting is I

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 7>can remember it a long time that the the the

0:47:05.120 --> 0:47:09.439
<v Speaker 7>debutant market. God, I'm so sick of debutant and totality.

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm only like totality.

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 7>I'm already I'm only halfway done with probably Master's content

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 7>for the week. I'm so sick of saying the word

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:17.439
<v Speaker 7>debutante before you before you go west?

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you did you were? Did you look for the

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>clips yesterday? Did you did you see it?

0:47:21.280 --> 0:47:21.719
<v Speaker 3>I did not.

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 4>I called the coverage on television as I was doing

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 4>some uh some written work for the Masters stuff. We

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 4>were doing the same I saw well at my hometown

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 4>in Indianapolis. There was a big deal at the Indianapolis

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Motor Speedway. Yeah, which I guess is a pretty good

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 4>place to watch it. And uh yeah, so, uh yeah,

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 4>I was watching that all the day.

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 3>It's like, okay, they.

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Have totality here in New Hampshire, yes, but not yet

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 4>in Vermont.

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, the totality. The totality spots were great and

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>awesome and it must be so cool. But I have

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a working theory that people lie when they are in

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 1>other places. So like, there's people in Vegas I have

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:03.799
<v Speaker 1>when I was a kid in DC too. I have

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the same reaction in both both times where I'm like,

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see a thing and in both cases there

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:11.239
<v Speaker 1>were people in the same spot that I was like, oh,

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it was amazing. Are people lying? Wes? Really? Aren't people

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>full of it?

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think people want something kind of exciting and

0:48:19.640 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 4>in their life and then their lives do and you know,

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:25.319
<v Speaker 4>just want some kind of escapism from the normal day

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 4>to day news cycle that we currently have, so you know,

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 4>maybe a little bit of embellishment.

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Kelly said totality. I apologize. Go ahead, Yeah,

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you're fine. No, I was just are you kidding? Me?

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:40.760
<v Speaker 7>As fascinating with that as anybody, but no, the deputyp Market,

0:48:40.760 --> 0:48:43.600
<v Speaker 7>I think is really fascinating this this year. I mean,

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:45.640
<v Speaker 7>you brought up all thatself about Louvie Abert, but that

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 7>are o bear.

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 2>But this is like Wes.

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 7>I think that you know, the course, we're moving back

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:52.840
<v Speaker 7>some of the tea boxes, like I do think like

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 7>the course fits. Some of these guys game pretty damn well,

0:48:55.960 --> 0:49:00.400
<v Speaker 7>including Ludwig, including Wyndham Clark, including Aux Japetia. You know,

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 7>if his shoulder can stay in the socket, you know,

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 7>I think I think he's got.

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:06.920
<v Speaker 2>A fighting chance. Danny McCarthy's right there in that market

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:07.239
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:09.640
<v Speaker 7>So I mean we've had we've seen other guys that

0:49:09.640 --> 0:49:12.760
<v Speaker 7>have won this year, you know, obviously Pavone, Jake nab

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 7>Nick Dunlap. I'm I'm excited to see what some of

0:49:16.640 --> 0:49:18.360
<v Speaker 7>these guys can do. And I do have some betting

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 7>interest in Wyndham Clark. As you said, guy's already won

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:24.560
<v Speaker 7>a major. I don't really the experience of Augusta is

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 7>extremely important, but at the moment's not going to be

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:28.399
<v Speaker 7>too much more, that's for sure.

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Those are all your bets. You have other bets that

0:49:32.320 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you've made besides that, right, So.

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:34.760
<v Speaker 2>I got yeah, I got others.

0:49:35.120 --> 0:49:38.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I can roll through mine here quick, so outrights

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 7>already went through those top I have a big bet,

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 7>big bet top ten on Xander Schoffley. That's the way

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:45.600
<v Speaker 7>I chose to attack that. Completely agree with everything that

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:47.319
<v Speaker 7>Wes said, though I would have him as the second

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:50.399
<v Speaker 7>best guy you know on the PGA Tour right now.

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:53.840
<v Speaker 7>I think that there are the Masters is very interesting

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 7>to me this year because if you are someone who

0:49:55.760 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 7>focuses heavy PGA Tour as I do, and not as

0:50:00.760 --> 0:50:02.799
<v Speaker 7>much live, and West does a little bit more with

0:50:02.840 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 7>that stuff than I do.

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 2>The live guys.

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:09.359
<v Speaker 7>Yes, I think John Rahm, I think Brooks Koepka is interesting.

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 7>I think it's great. I think Jackie Neeman's interesting with

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 7>the year he's putting together. I think his odds have

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 7>maybe gotten a little too short though for me to

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 7>have much interest betting interest in him. So you kind

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:22.759
<v Speaker 7>of if you throw out the live guys, then you

0:50:22.800 --> 0:50:25.839
<v Speaker 7>can start picking through these PGA Tour guys and man

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 7>West like you could.

0:50:26.719 --> 0:50:28.359
<v Speaker 2>It's it's only a handful of.

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:31.360
<v Speaker 7>Guys that you could really make a claim that are okay,

0:50:31.440 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 7>this is a world class player who's in form coming

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 7>into this tournament that you can really that you can

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:40.840
<v Speaker 7>really feel confident backing, So I think that's part of

0:50:40.880 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 7>the reason why why I'm more confident putting some dollars

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:46.439
<v Speaker 7>behind Sanders Shoffley, then maybe a lot of people would

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:48.439
<v Speaker 7>be in this tournament because he is one of those

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:51.160
<v Speaker 7>guys who's been getting it done basically week in and

0:50:51.160 --> 0:50:54.399
<v Speaker 7>week out on tour this year. So yeah, I went

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:58.200
<v Speaker 7>top ten on him, heavy bet on top Hitdeki, top twenty.

0:50:57.960 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>If he finishes. If Shafley finishes twelve, will you never

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 1>ever bet on him again for the rest of the

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>calendar year.

0:51:02.760 --> 0:51:04.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I'll still better.

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I'll be.

0:51:07.719 --> 0:51:10.360
<v Speaker 7>Heavy bet on the top twenty on Hitdeki, Matsi Yama.

0:51:10.400 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 7>I will be adding uh finishing position markets here today.

0:51:15.160 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 7>Other guys that I will be adding Nieman I will

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 7>be mixing in somewhere. I think what I'm gonna do

0:51:19.600 --> 0:51:21.839
<v Speaker 7>with him is probably take a top ten shot. Either

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 7>he's got the game to show up and compete and

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:27.440
<v Speaker 7>he's right around there, or uh, we're all overrating what

0:51:27.480 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 7>he's done this year. So I'll probably play a top

0:51:29.320 --> 0:51:31.440
<v Speaker 7>ten on him.

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Shane Lowry.

0:51:32.800 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 7>Shane Lowry, I ended up playing in a couple matchups,

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:36.759
<v Speaker 7>so I might actually not play in any of the

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 7>finishing position markets, but I think a top twenty bet

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 7>on him is sound. See you brought Seawill came up.

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:44.680
<v Speaker 7>I will definitely be on him in a top twenty bet,

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 7>waiting for some pricing to show up on him. And

0:51:49.960 --> 0:51:53.360
<v Speaker 7>that's everything finishing position tournament matchups right now. I have

0:51:53.440 --> 0:51:56.840
<v Speaker 7>hit Deecki over Jordan Speith. I don't hate Speek this week,

0:51:57.040 --> 0:51:58.760
<v Speaker 7>but this is more of a price play only minus

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:00.680
<v Speaker 7>one twenty. I gotta lay with deck I've got Decky.

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate Jordan, So you just hate Jordan Smith

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in general. Yeah, he's a human.

0:52:04.320 --> 0:52:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Good point.

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:07.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I hate Jordan Speed in general. I hate how

0:52:07.080 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 7>much he talks to the damn Caber stuff. Just get

0:52:09.160 --> 0:52:11.479
<v Speaker 7>out of your game. But no, I think betting wise

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:13.279
<v Speaker 7>this week, he is a guy you could make a

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:16.080
<v Speaker 7>case for, but the minus one twenty not steep enough

0:52:16.120 --> 0:52:18.279
<v Speaker 7>for me to stay away from a Decky matchup over him,

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:20.719
<v Speaker 7>and I bet Lowry plus one oh four over call

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 7>him more a cow. I believe that was the one

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:25.359
<v Speaker 7>that Sea mentioned. I'm on the same exact matchup as him,

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:28.440
<v Speaker 7>and then Lowry plus one twenty over Matt Fitzpatrick mat

0:52:28.520 --> 0:52:32.400
<v Speaker 7>Fitzpatrick another guy that I don't think is gonna have it.

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:34.920
<v Speaker 7>He could have a good week, but he's not really

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:37.399
<v Speaker 7>high on my radar. Calinmore Kala not really a guy

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 7>that's put it all together. And then a couple other

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 7>props that I've bet so far, Wyndham Clark I mentioned

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:44.799
<v Speaker 7>as top Debutante, and then Corey Connors I bet for

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:45.839
<v Speaker 7>top Canadian.

0:52:47.640 --> 0:52:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Corey Connors is to hit the Gala.

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:52.000
<v Speaker 7>Were the guys that kind of just I just left

0:52:52.000 --> 0:52:55.839
<v Speaker 7>off my card for other bets that I'm interested in,

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:59.439
<v Speaker 7>But Corey Connors made it for top Canadian for sure?

0:52:59.560 --> 0:53:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, do we lose web? Okay? Did West gave out

0:53:04.560 --> 0:53:05.080
<v Speaker 1>all his plays?

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Right? Didn't he already?

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:08.920
<v Speaker 2>If not, they'll be up at Visa dot gum.

0:53:08.800 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Visa dot com slash picks. Uh, let's try to get

0:53:11.120 --> 0:53:13.000
<v Speaker 1>West back because I want to ask my final two questions.

0:53:13.600 --> 0:53:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So here are the final two final two questions. I

0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 1>want to get your thoughts on this one. First of all,

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:26.040
<v Speaker 1>who is the golfer that if they win or are

0:53:26.120 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 1>competing at the end, you're gonna have the most self

0:53:30.040 --> 0:53:32.879
<v Speaker 1>loathing over because you will not have any position on them,

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:34.560
<v Speaker 1>like who's the guy that you and by that I

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 1>mean obviously there's like, you know, millions of choices. Yeah,

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about someone who you're thinking about betting but

0:53:39.520 --> 0:53:42.360
<v Speaker 1>ultimately are not going to, and then they're gonna stick

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:44.239
<v Speaker 1>it up your you know what when all is said

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and done.

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:48.239
<v Speaker 7>Well, I just mentioned Connor's at the gala, but if

0:53:48.280 --> 0:53:51.719
<v Speaker 7>we're being honest, I wouldn't bet an outright on Connors anyways,

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:54.840
<v Speaker 7>So I guess the Gala might be the answer for me,

0:53:55.480 --> 0:53:58.440
<v Speaker 7>but it's also it's also Brooks Koepka.

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I is.

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:02.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I'm glad you brought this up because there's also

0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 7>the outrights. I rattled off like I'm I'm leaving room

0:54:05.760 --> 0:54:06.879
<v Speaker 7>to get in live as well.

0:54:06.880 --> 0:54:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so that was my second.

0:54:08.120 --> 0:54:10.759
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, like there are there are some guys at the

0:54:10.800 --> 0:54:13.400
<v Speaker 7>top of that board, whether it and mainly i'm talking

0:54:13.440 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 7>Scheffler Rom Koepka. Yes, yeah, those three literally those three

0:54:17.719 --> 0:54:19.640
<v Speaker 7>is what I'm talking about of where I would look

0:54:19.680 --> 0:54:21.040
<v Speaker 7>to get in live on one of those.

0:54:21.120 --> 0:54:23.680
<v Speaker 1>So these were exactly my my final two questions. And Wes,

0:54:23.680 --> 0:54:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you've given out all your bets already, so

0:54:25.160 --> 0:54:26.719
<v Speaker 1>I can ask you the final two questions.

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:27.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, so far.

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:30.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna add more over the over the next couple

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:31.120
<v Speaker 4>of days.

0:54:31.160 --> 0:54:34.120
<v Speaker 1>But so so the fun Yeah, the final two head, Oh, no,

0:54:34.160 --> 0:54:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you finish your thought, go ahead. I'm sorry.

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:37.480
<v Speaker 4>No, I was just gonna say I'm gonna add a

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 4>couple more of the placements. Usually I don't place those

0:54:40.040 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 4>on a week until like Tuesday or Wednesday, you know,

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:45.160
<v Speaker 4>just to kind of get a gauge of the market.

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:48.400
<v Speaker 4>But uh, that's what I have, at least at the moment,

0:54:48.480 --> 0:54:49.800
<v Speaker 4>but more to come, certainly.

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So here are the final two questions. They're not

0:54:51.719 --> 0:54:53.759
<v Speaker 1>the megapod questions, but they're at the final two and

0:54:53.760 --> 0:54:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and Kelly's right, they are kind of related. Which is

0:54:56.520 --> 0:54:59.240
<v Speaker 1>my standard question for golf. Is much of golf betting

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:03.360
<v Speaker 1>for many a self loathing, Like you think about betting

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a golfer, but you don't pull the trigger on it,

0:55:05.880 --> 0:55:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and then comes Sunday back nine. There they are either

0:55:08.920 --> 0:55:11.759
<v Speaker 1>in the lead or in contention. And so my first

0:55:11.840 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 1>question is, you know, which is the golfer that is

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:16.560
<v Speaker 1>going to cause you the most self loathing because you're

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:18.640
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have any money on it. But Kelly's right,

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:21.239
<v Speaker 1>my second question is actually related which is, on the

0:55:21.280 --> 0:55:24.439
<v Speaker 1>other hand, how much of your betting pie is going

0:55:24.480 --> 0:55:27.399
<v Speaker 1>to be in tournament. So Scheffler, who's four to one?

0:55:27.480 --> 0:55:30.240
<v Speaker 1>We all love Scotti Scheffler, for God's sake, I feel

0:55:30.239 --> 0:55:31.840
<v Speaker 1>like you should have a bet on him in every tournament.

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:35.120
<v Speaker 1>But at four to one, that's ridiculous, right, Like, no

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:37.600
<v Speaker 1>one's really betting him pre flop, and now I just

0:55:37.840 --> 0:55:41.239
<v Speaker 1>say no one. Someone is, But it's not like necessarily

0:55:41.280 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 1>something that you guys would do. Who is the golfer

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that you aren't going to have anything preflop, but you

0:55:47.440 --> 0:55:50.160
<v Speaker 1>will be quick to jump in on if a number

0:55:50.239 --> 0:55:51.520
<v Speaker 1>becomes more favorable.

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:56.120
<v Speaker 4>It might be It might be Patrick Cantley actually, because

0:55:56.160 --> 0:55:59.319
<v Speaker 4>he is drifted up to forty to one, and this

0:55:59.360 --> 0:56:01.120
<v Speaker 4>is a guy I have a prop bet on.

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Him to win a major this year.

0:56:03.239 --> 0:56:07.879
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, Patrick Cantley Victor Hoblin being another one. Those

0:56:07.920 --> 0:56:10.000
<v Speaker 4>are kind of the two guys that have drifted up

0:56:10.040 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 4>that I thought, Okay, this is their year going into

0:56:12.200 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 4>this year where they're going to finally win a major,

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:18.520
<v Speaker 4>and neither has really played that great. Can't Lay was

0:56:18.840 --> 0:56:21.319
<v Speaker 4>the fifty four hole leader at Riviera when I had him,

0:56:21.640 --> 0:56:23.920
<v Speaker 4>and as alators as well, and they got passed by

0:56:23.920 --> 0:56:28.239
<v Speaker 4>Matsiyama who shot that sixty two on Sunday to get

0:56:28.280 --> 0:56:31.319
<v Speaker 4>the win. But yeah, Victor Hoblin's kind of been a

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:34.000
<v Speaker 4>little bit off this year. You know, he has a

0:56:34.040 --> 0:56:37.280
<v Speaker 4>sports psychologist out there, he's had a different swing coach,

0:56:37.719 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 4>but yeah, he's got the potential, man, But I just

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:43.520
<v Speaker 4>am like, Okay, the day of the week, I don't

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:46.319
<v Speaker 4>put these guys on. Here are the weeks that they're

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:48.960
<v Speaker 4>going to burn me. So you always have that fomo

0:56:48.960 --> 0:56:52.000
<v Speaker 4>type of thing. I think, especially as a golf futures better.

0:56:52.080 --> 0:56:54.440
<v Speaker 4>But those are the two that I think have drifted

0:56:54.520 --> 0:56:56.520
<v Speaker 4>up a little bit where it's like, man, these guys

0:56:56.560 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 4>would be in like the teens or the twenty to

0:56:58.600 --> 0:57:00.480
<v Speaker 4>one and now you're seeing them like forty one out

0:57:00.480 --> 0:57:01.240
<v Speaker 4>there in the market.

0:57:01.520 --> 0:57:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Those are good answers. All right, I lied here here's

0:57:03.880 --> 0:57:07.239
<v Speaker 1>my last the last question. So Hoblin and Kent'tley would

0:57:07.280 --> 0:57:10.439
<v Speaker 1>would fill that bill. Who's the guy though that no

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 1>matter how good he's doing rounds one, rounds two, rounds three,

0:57:14.840 --> 0:57:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you're it's not gonna be a Hoblin or can't lay,

0:57:16.800 --> 0:57:18.880
<v Speaker 1>but you're still gonna be like I'm still not betting

0:57:18.880 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 1>this guy. There's no way I'm betting him. This can't

0:57:20.800 --> 0:57:25.280
<v Speaker 1>be real, It's not happening. Is that a Tyrrell Hatton

0:57:25.400 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of guy?

0:57:26.640 --> 0:57:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Wes who you got?

0:57:28.480 --> 0:57:30.439
<v Speaker 3>Oh Man? Probably?

0:57:30.480 --> 0:57:32.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know if I could pick on guys,

0:57:34.600 --> 0:57:35.080
<v Speaker 2>that would be.

0:57:35.040 --> 0:57:35.800
<v Speaker 3>A good answer.

0:57:35.880 --> 0:57:36.720
<v Speaker 1>That is a good answer.

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:39.919
<v Speaker 4>You don't feel like, Okay, it's his time. You feel

0:57:39.920 --> 0:57:42.360
<v Speaker 4>like eventually he's going to have a time, but is

0:57:42.400 --> 0:57:44.720
<v Speaker 4>it going to be here? Like can this really happen

0:57:44.880 --> 0:57:47.440
<v Speaker 4>like that? That seems like something that only Tiger Woods

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:50.600
<v Speaker 4>would do, like when his first ever major on you

0:57:50.640 --> 0:57:54.400
<v Speaker 4>know that early in his career. But uh uh, A

0:57:54.440 --> 0:57:56.320
<v Speaker 4>couple guys, even though I did bet him on a

0:57:56.360 --> 0:57:59.200
<v Speaker 4>matchup that I won't have on an outright just because

0:57:59.240 --> 0:58:01.160
<v Speaker 4>the form, the form isn't there.

0:58:01.640 --> 0:58:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Is Patrick Reid.

0:58:03.120 --> 0:58:05.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, like last year we were watching this when

0:58:05.160 --> 0:58:07.360
<v Speaker 4>the live guys all kind of got ignored in the

0:58:07.400 --> 0:58:09.520
<v Speaker 4>betting market and drifted up too far and then they

0:58:09.520 --> 0:58:13.000
<v Speaker 4>played really well well now, especially if like Brooks and

0:58:13.200 --> 0:58:16.400
<v Speaker 4>you go walking Neeman in there too, and maybe even

0:58:16.400 --> 0:58:19.240
<v Speaker 4>to Shambo where it's kind of like, okay, everybody knows

0:58:19.280 --> 0:58:23.480
<v Speaker 4>that these guys, you know, yeah, are still at least playing,

0:58:23.640 --> 0:58:26.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, somewhat competitive golf, whatever you think of the

0:58:26.160 --> 0:58:29.400
<v Speaker 4>live tour. But Bryson to Shambo actually a name I

0:58:29.480 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 4>just mentioned. That's a guy I will say because his distance,

0:58:32.400 --> 0:58:35.080
<v Speaker 4>he's still number one in distance, He's still got some

0:58:35.200 --> 0:58:36.360
<v Speaker 4>touch around the greens.

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 3>But I just don't feel and remember he had that.

0:58:39.040 --> 0:58:41.320
<v Speaker 4>Quote where it's like I feel like sixty seven's even

0:58:41.400 --> 0:58:44.480
<v Speaker 4>party had that asenine quote and then he proceeded to

0:58:44.480 --> 0:58:47.600
<v Speaker 4>shoot I think like several over. But Bryson to Shambo,

0:58:47.760 --> 0:58:51.800
<v Speaker 4>just to me, on these greens, I never trust him, yeh.

0:58:51.840 --> 0:58:54.320
<v Speaker 4>I never trust him on these bent grass greens, on

0:58:54.360 --> 0:58:57.200
<v Speaker 4>these slick greens. So that might be the one where

0:58:57.240 --> 0:58:59.080
<v Speaker 4>it's like, oh, this can't be real, like he's about

0:58:59.080 --> 0:59:00.000
<v Speaker 4>to falter at some point.

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:02.520
<v Speaker 7>I I as I was scrolling down the odds board,

0:59:02.520 --> 0:59:03.960
<v Speaker 7>that was the next name I was gonna mention.

0:59:04.000 --> 0:59:05.280
<v Speaker 2>I think Ludwig maybe.

0:59:05.040 --> 0:59:06.880
<v Speaker 7>A little unfair because we're picking on one of the

0:59:06.920 --> 0:59:09.800
<v Speaker 7>new bee kids for guys that have been here before,

0:59:09.960 --> 0:59:12.640
<v Speaker 7>who have you know, who have won, uh, you know,

0:59:12.720 --> 0:59:13.760
<v Speaker 7>on tours before.

0:59:13.800 --> 0:59:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Bryson Deshamba would be I'm with Wes.

0:59:15.760 --> 0:59:18.360
<v Speaker 7>I don't think there's any situation where I'd be like,

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:20.439
<v Speaker 7>oh man, I missed out on Bright's.

0:59:20.160 --> 0:59:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I forgot he said that too.

0:59:21.720 --> 0:59:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the uh, I think the one that's fascinatings.

0:59:24.480 --> 0:59:26.720
<v Speaker 7>Going back to you, like your your in tournament question

0:59:27.000 --> 0:59:29.920
<v Speaker 7>is like, you know, see see what we talked about, right,

0:59:30.000 --> 0:59:32.960
<v Speaker 7>does so much with first round leaders. I'll be dialing

0:59:33.000 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 7>back a little bit that, you know, some of my

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:38.040
<v Speaker 7>first round betting, which is then going to impact me

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:40.480
<v Speaker 7>dialing back how much kind of in tournament stuff I'm

0:59:40.520 --> 0:59:43.680
<v Speaker 7>doing simply because of because of this weather, And I

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:46.760
<v Speaker 7>don't know that I'm gonna feel confident enough by Wednesday

0:59:46.880 --> 0:59:49.600
<v Speaker 7>night to really I mean, we'll see stuff changes and

0:59:49.640 --> 0:59:52.880
<v Speaker 7>there might be a window there where you actually do think, uh,

0:59:52.920 --> 0:59:55.160
<v Speaker 7>there's some groups that have a really big advantage. But

0:59:55.960 --> 0:59:59.000
<v Speaker 7>we're sitting here on Tuesday morn late morning right now,

0:59:59.080 --> 1:00:01.240
<v Speaker 7>and Thursday it looks like it could be a complete

1:00:01.480 --> 1:00:02.800
<v Speaker 7>wash out from start to finish.

1:00:02.880 --> 1:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh you pointed it out last year, like what if

1:00:04.480 --> 1:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it just completely gets a limit.

1:00:05.960 --> 1:00:08.120
<v Speaker 7>And that there's that right west, Like I know, we

1:00:08.200 --> 1:00:10.120
<v Speaker 7>try to talk about these weather windows, but like there's

1:00:10.120 --> 1:00:12.160
<v Speaker 7>a lot of times it's just a wash out and

1:00:12.240 --> 1:00:16.240
<v Speaker 7>everybody gets pushed back, so you sometimes bet. You know,

1:00:16.280 --> 1:00:19.720
<v Speaker 7>golf betters can outthink themselves sometimes when they try to

1:00:19.720 --> 1:00:23.040
<v Speaker 7>look for those advantages. So I'll tell you if it's

1:00:23.120 --> 1:00:25.800
<v Speaker 7>if it's looking like it looks right now, I can't

1:00:25.800 --> 1:00:30.280
<v Speaker 7>imagine I'm gonna have much much invested on Thursday outside

1:00:30.320 --> 1:00:33.200
<v Speaker 7>of my top guys like c Us mentioned, like, I'll

1:00:33.200 --> 1:00:36.000
<v Speaker 7>still bet Decky first round leader because I'm loaded up

1:00:36.040 --> 1:00:37.320
<v Speaker 7>on him so heavily already.

1:00:37.880 --> 1:00:40.320
<v Speaker 2>H but honestly, that could be it. That might be

1:00:40.360 --> 1:00:41.240
<v Speaker 2>it for first round.

1:00:41.280 --> 1:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Did we have a master's that ever went to Monday?

1:00:43.240 --> 1:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Didn't we?

1:00:44.680 --> 1:00:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Yeah, yeah, we've had We've had it a couple.

1:00:46.680 --> 1:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I thought so. Okay, listen, appreciate it from

1:00:50.840 --> 1:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>both of you guys. I hope that gave some folks

1:00:53.520 --> 1:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>some food for thought. And I asked that last question

1:00:55.560 --> 1:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>not to like embarrass you guys if those guys end

1:00:57.760 --> 1:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>up being at the top, but just to let other

1:00:59.840 --> 1:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>folks know what you guys are thinking in terms of

1:01:02.080 --> 1:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>if you have the instinct to bet Bryson to Shamba, well,

1:01:04.360 --> 1:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>these guys might not still even if he's playing well.

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Phil Mickelson might be in that same category.

1:01:09.720 --> 1:01:11.680
<v Speaker 7>The last note I'll add on Brooks like, there's also

1:01:11.800 --> 1:01:15.280
<v Speaker 7>like this is live Betting's live betting doesn't matter what sport, right,

1:01:15.280 --> 1:01:18.200
<v Speaker 7>I can say it's really easy for me to sit

1:01:18.280 --> 1:01:20.240
<v Speaker 7>here on a Tuesday and say I would love to

1:01:20.280 --> 1:01:23.200
<v Speaker 7>grab Scheffler Ram or Brooks live. Yeah, but of course

1:01:23.240 --> 1:01:25.600
<v Speaker 7>I could be beating myself up on Monday if Brooks

1:01:25.760 --> 1:01:28.160
<v Speaker 7>the first round lead and goes wired to wire to

1:01:28.160 --> 1:01:28.800
<v Speaker 7>win the damn.

1:01:28.720 --> 1:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And you might change your mind. And by the way,

1:01:30.240 --> 1:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that's like from our perspective, like sports betting one oh one.

1:01:34.000 --> 1:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>What what annoys us most is when people think we

1:01:39.120 --> 1:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>must be beholden exactly to the picks we make in

1:01:42.680 --> 1:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the moments that we're doing a show or a podcast,

1:01:44.760 --> 1:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>when in fact we're all live betters too right the

1:01:47.760 --> 1:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>moment they just give a clean example this when the

1:01:49.480 --> 1:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>FedEx Cup happened a few years ago, the three tournament

1:01:52.640 --> 1:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Arc and I had Koepka Betts and I talked about

1:01:56.120 --> 1:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>keptain Keppa, but there was a moment on Sunday where

1:01:58.920 --> 1:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I could grab Rory back to just make sure I

1:02:01.320 --> 1:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't lose everything. And you had to time it perfectly,

1:02:04.040 --> 1:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and you had to be present and your girlfriend or

1:02:06.000 --> 1:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>your wife couldn't be bothering you, But that's these are

1:02:09.320 --> 1:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the things that go into all of betting, and so yeah,

1:02:12.320 --> 1:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we'll see how it plays out. I do

1:02:14.840 --> 1:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>think though, that the weather point is a good one,

1:02:17.080 --> 1:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, also just for newer golfers, the

1:02:19.960 --> 1:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>quickest way to ruin is not everybody's West Reynolds, right mere,

1:02:23.720 --> 1:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Mortals don't hit out rights on a regular basis. So

1:02:26.440 --> 1:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the quickest way to what we call a betting leak,

1:02:30.000 --> 1:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and I've talked about this on a numbers game recently,

1:02:31.920 --> 1:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>might be golf outrights. Like if you bet too many

1:02:34.240 --> 1:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of them pre flop, it's probably a losing proposition, right Like,

1:02:38.000 --> 1:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Not everybody's going to hit these at a high rate,

1:02:39.920 --> 1:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>so just be mindful of that. You guys have long

1:02:43.800 --> 1:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Shots Live eleven pm tonight Eastern, eight pm Pacific Wes

1:02:48.640 --> 1:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and Matt Brown. The name of the podcast is

1:02:51.560 --> 1:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>called long Shots. Is the live different from the podcast? Yeah,

1:02:54.440 --> 1:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it would just be reposted. Oh, just rehost.

1:02:56.680 --> 1:03:01.000
<v Speaker 7>So yeah, the show again, not live.

1:03:01.520 --> 1:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll do it.

1:03:02.080 --> 1:03:05.280
<v Speaker 7>Live once again, not live, not be waiting to see

1:03:05.360 --> 1:03:07.080
<v Speaker 7>us outside of the Circus studio.

1:03:06.760 --> 1:03:09.720
<v Speaker 4>At that time, live to tape there you go live

1:03:09.800 --> 1:03:11.560
<v Speaker 4>to tape, so we call it in the biz.

1:03:11.600 --> 1:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So you mean to tell me you're not doing this

1:03:13.160 --> 1:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast a live podcast and a podcast podcast is correct? Yes, okay,

1:03:18.560 --> 1:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>long Shots is the name of the podcast. Though they

1:03:20.280 --> 1:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>do it every week and three of them at least

1:03:22.040 --> 1:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>when Matt shows up, they do all three of them.

1:03:24.440 --> 1:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt is at the Masters, so we're all jealous of him,

1:03:26.400 --> 1:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'm just spoking fun good for him. Have you

1:03:28.040 --> 1:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>ever been to the Masters? West?

1:03:30.040 --> 1:03:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I have not. It's a bucket list item.

1:03:34.160 --> 1:03:37.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they don't. They don't like my kind there, Augusty either.

1:03:38.320 --> 1:03:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Midwest Hillbillies.

1:03:39.680 --> 1:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well we don't really like West. Rentalds coming down here,

1:03:44.720 --> 1:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>all right. Wes Reynolds at Wes Reynolds one. That's the

1:03:47.200 --> 1:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>number one on Twitter. Also the co host of v

1:03:49.520 --> 1:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>sent tonight with Matt Humans what is that six pm?

1:03:53.160 --> 1:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Is it? West?

1:03:54.240 --> 1:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>It is?

1:03:54.800 --> 1:04:00.240
<v Speaker 4>It is now eight pm Pacific in AM Eastern and

1:04:00.280 --> 1:04:03.680
<v Speaker 4>then and then replay us going into Mitch and Paul h.

1:04:04.320 --> 1:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So you guys are on like four or five consecutive

1:04:06.360 --> 1:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>times through the night. Yes, okay, yes, And then Kelly

1:04:08.680 --> 1:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Bidlin at Kelly Bidlin that's k E.

1:04:11.240 --> 1:04:11.760
<v Speaker 3>L L E.

1:04:11.920 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Y B y D l O N on Twitter. Uh.

1:04:15.280 --> 1:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>He is uh the producer number nine of a numbers

1:04:19.120 --> 1:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>game week days here on the network. Really really is

1:04:23.480 --> 1:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>my sidekick, for God's sakes, He's on the air all

1:04:25.680 --> 1:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>the time. In fact, if you Parson out, Kelly talks

1:04:27.920 --> 1:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>more night Uh and then will say that and what's

1:04:31.960 --> 1:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>your what's your show on the weekend when.

1:04:34.120 --> 1:04:37.640
<v Speaker 7>Beds Sunday with Dustin Sweetelson, Yes, three to seven Eastern.

1:04:38.200 --> 1:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Wes, thank you Kelly. Listening to long Shots tonight.

1:04:41.560 --> 1:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with all your bets. The Adya the Masters

1:04:44.080 --> 1:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>from Augusta