WEBVTT - 10. Re-evaluation

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Murder in Illinois is a production of iHeartRadio. At this point,

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it was April of twenty twenty one, and the last

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>email I'd received from Christopher Vaughan began with Lauren, I'm

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>so sorry to have wasted your time. I am done

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>with the podcast. That email ended with I thank you

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for your compassion and your willingness to help. I wish

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you all the best, Chris. This was an unexpected and

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate turn, especially in light of the potential insight. Chris's

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>five page letter provided something I conveyed to his parents

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>on April first. It's so strange that he sent that

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to me, because today I got my first shot of

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine, so I'm that much closer to being able

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to visit with him. And I think you were right.

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>You both said that he knows what to expect from life.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Right now, well digitally.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 3>That's why he hasn't called us this week, because he's been.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Overthinking going through it. Going through a new trial is

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 2>like pulling chief with him. He doesn't want to go

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 2>back to Joli yet. He doesn't want to bring up

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 2>the loss of his children again. He doesn't want to

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 2>point a finger at Kim and then he gets scared.

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't want to put hope out there. He thought

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 2>that he was not good enough to take care and

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 2>watch over and save his children, and he doesn't want

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 2>it out there again that he was unable to do that.

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 2>For him, time has stood still.

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 4>That might be.

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Fourteen years later, but for him, I think he's just

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 2>rerunning it all the time.

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, like Gale said, he has nothing to do twenty

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 4>four to seven but think about this, and he's got

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 4>anxiety about going through this all again.

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, there are other avenues for post conviction relief other

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>than a trial.

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that would help, because right now Chris only sees

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 3>a retrial. I know that if we could actually get

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 3>to talk to him, visit him, and it would help

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 3>things a lot.

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I was becoming increasingly convinced that Bond's version, as laid

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>out in the letter, provided answers to issues I'd personally

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>had with both the prosecution and the defensive scenarios of

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the events. I have been through everything with a fine toothcomb.

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.239
<v Speaker 1>They theorize how he did it, but they can't explain

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>why there is no blood trail from the passenger side

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>if he was shot on one side and he was standing.

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>On the other he would have had to have walked

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>around the car. Are either the front or the back?

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>None of it makes sense. They proved motive, but they

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 1>never proved that he did it. Forensics are explained by

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>his version of what happened that day. I'm Lauren Bright Pacheco,

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is murder in Illinois.

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Gange Dilloy.

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 5>Cry Gange feel ground.

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's disappointing, yes, but understandable. I reached out to

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Bill to discuss Chris's email about no longer moving forward.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>There have been parts of his memories that he's kept

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>really hidden from himself and locked away for a long time,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and now they're all out there. He had to put

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>them on the page, and now he's living with them

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>on a daily basis. I told his parents that I

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>was going to keep corresponding with him and just ask

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>that he meet with me. At least his version of

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the events really seems to explain the forensics of the car.

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>If his letter ends up being backed up by your

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>crime scene reconstruction, is there another option other than going

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>through another trial, perhaps going to the ag or to

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the governor.

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, it's a lot on all of these

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 6>avenues are just extremely difficult, but executive clemency it stands

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 6>a better chance than going back.

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 7>To wil County.

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Executive clemency would be a possible way of avoiding another trial.

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It referred to the general powers of the President and

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of governors to pardon, grant, amnesty, communion, or reprieve to

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>individuals who've been convicted. Two days after that discussion, Gale

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>and Pierre called with news they'd finally heard from Chris.

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I immediately reached back out to Bill. They spoke to Chris.

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>They said, he cannot give up on himself, and he

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>cannot quit until he has sat with us in person

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and we've talked to him about his other options and

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>he's back on board.

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 7>That's great, That is a positive development.

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's stirred up all these feelings and emotions and memories,

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and on many levels, I think he's come to the

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>conclusion that it would be easier to just stay where

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>he is and live what he knows.

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 7>He just has resigned himself to just isolating, and it's

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 7>good that his parents were able to get through to it.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Another obstacle would be getting Chris to agree to share

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the information in that deeply personal letter he'd sent his parents.

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>It is also the only eyewitness account of the events

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that day, and if it does end up overlapping seamlessly

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:45.239
<v Speaker 1>with the forensics in terms of recreating the crime scene,

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it's ultimately the key to getting him out, and so

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.679
<v Speaker 1>we need to address it.

0:06:55.680 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 7>It's an incredibly difficult cases, it is, but having his

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 7>cooperation is essential.

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. It becomes very clear that he was incapable or

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>unwilling to defend himself until this point. So it is

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a breakthrough, you know, it's as if he was challenging

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>people to figure it out without his help.

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>My next step was to reach out for advice to

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a prominent force in the innocence community, Jason Flam, the

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>host of the Wrongful Conviction podcast that bears his name.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Our pads actually crossed a few years back when I

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>picked up a freelance producing job for the Doctor Phil

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Show solely for the chance to meet Flom in person.

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:47.679
<v Speaker 1>As it turned out, he was listening to Murder in Oregon,

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>one of my previous podcasts at the time, and we've

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>stayed in touch since. As an aside, Jason's three decades

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of work in the field of justice, reform is as

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>impressive as his day job as a record label executive.

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>He's launched the careers of acts like Matchbox twenty, Katy Perry,

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and Lord. He's a truly impressive, inspiring guy.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 8>I am the founding board member of the Innocence Project

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 8>in New York, not the founder by any means, but

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 8>the founding board member of Big Difference. The founders, of course,

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 8>are Parry Schech and Peter Neufeld. I don't remember the

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 8>exact case, but I turned on the TV and there

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 8>was the story that the Innocence Project, which was a

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 8>brand new organization back then, had found the DNA in

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 8>a case of a guy who was about to be executed,

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 8>and at sort of the last hour, had ridden in

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 8>like the Avengers and proven that this man was innocent.

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 8>Not only did he not get execute it, but he

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 8>was freed. And I thought, that's the most amazing, craziest

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 8>shit I've ever heard. It never occurred to me back

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 8>then that innocent people went to prison.

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>That was thirty years ago, and ever since, Flohm has

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>become a power full voice for the powerless and voiceless,

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and well versed in the misconception surrounding wrongful convictions.

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 8>There's growing awareness, for sure about the scourge of wrongful convictions,

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 8>but I think it's probably hard for the human mind,

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 8>or the American mind, to process the idea that it's

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 8>as common as it is, because if you accept that,

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 8>then you have to also understand that it could happen

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 8>to you. The fact is, it happens all the damn time,

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 8>and social scientists different studies have estimated between four and

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 8>seven percent of people in prison are innocent in America,

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 8>some say as high as ten percent. I personally think

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 8>it may be higher because it's the guilty plea problem,

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 8>and that doesn't even take into account the huge number

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 8>of people that are in jail who haven't been convicted

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 8>of anything.

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Flom is all too familiar with the most sobering statistics

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>about our legal system, in particular pre conviction incarceration.

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 8>Almost five hundred thousand people in jail right now as

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 8>we're talking who haven't been convicted of anything, and the

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 8>majority of those people are actually innocent. So when you

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 8>add all those numbers together, you get to a really

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 8>high number of people that are actually innocent. I mean,

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 8>over two hundred thousand seems to be very likely two

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 8>hundred thousand people innocent of the crimes for which they're

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 8>serving time or awaiting trial is nuts. And every one

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 8>of them has a story and had dreams and hopes

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 8>and aspirations as a family of some sort. It's a massive,

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 8>massive problem. But I'm super humbled and grateful that people

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 8>listen to my podcast and are learning and getting involved,

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 8>and change is coming. It's happening right now.

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Change and reform he's dedicated to making sure also addresses

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the treatment of people after they've served their sentences.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, there's almost an analogy I would draw where you've

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 8>probably seen these cities and counties where they take the

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 8>spots where homeless people sleep at night, and they put

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 8>spikes on the benches and things. I mean, isn't it

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 8>bad enough that these people are without a place to live,

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 8>and now we're going to take away what little comfort

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 8>they may have been able to find under a bridge

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.599
<v Speaker 8>or god knows where. And it's sort of like the

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 8>same thing we do with people coming out of prison,

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 8>innocent or guilty, right where we should be providing them

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 8>with the tools that they need to re enter society,

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 8>to be able to go back to their community, to

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 8>their family, to their school and have a chance, a

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 8>real chance at rebuilding their life. Instead, we put up

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 8>roadblocks at every turn. Basically, they have to live a

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 8>life of purity and sanctity and perfection and promptness, and

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 8>they have to be on time for their parole officer

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 8>and whatever. They can't you need a poppy seat bagel

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 8>because they'll fail a drug test and otherwise they're going

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 8>back to jail. And of course there's all the other

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 8>barriers right into employment and housing.

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the other thing. I think that there is this naivete,

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this misconception that if someone is innocent and you can

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>prove it, that they're automatically welcomed back into society led

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>out of prison. And it's a huge hurdle. And that's

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>why I'm reaching out to you, because in the case

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>with Chris Vaughan, I didn't want to reach out to

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you actually until I felt that I could very clearly

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>articulate why I needed your advice and why I needed

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>your guidance and your help in this. With Chris's knowledge

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and his parent support, I'd sent Jason Bond's five page letter.

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>In addition to extensive background information, crime scene reports, depositions,

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and build Clutter's twenty ten detailed summary, which made the

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>case for murder suicide based on forensic evidence.

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 8>I often think that the only thing worse than being

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 8>wrongfully convicted and sent to prison for the rest of

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 8>your life or death row, or any any variation of that,

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 8>is being wrongfully convicted of murdering a relative, particularly a child,

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 8>your own child, or a parent or sibling. I guess,

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 8>but something about the child or the parent is particularly

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 8>difficult for me to process. Arresting him at the funeral

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 8>is just particularly six scenario. And you know, but it

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 8>goes on all the time, right, It's like, what are

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 8>the authorities kicking people's doors allegedly looking for drugs? If

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 8>you're looking for drugs, why not wait till somebody emerges

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 8>from the house in the morning and arrest them. Then

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 8>you know. But it's all it's all just backwards, and

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 8>it's all designed for maximum cruelty and abuse. That's the

0:13:57.760 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 8>system that we're in, and he unfortunately caught the very

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 8>worst of all of it.

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I wanted Flohm's seasoned opinion to weigh in on the

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>one I was finally ready to voice.

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 8>The letter.

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, it's like you take an overlay, and all the

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>missing puzzle pieces just materialized and you could see for

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the first time the clear picture, and it just makes

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing that much more tragic. Actually, on so

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>many levels.

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 8>Jason.

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>You have the defense theory, which didn't make sense because

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to believe the reason why he couldn't remember

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>anything was dissociative amnesia, and that he was in the

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>car when the kids were shot, and that he rolled

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>forward in kind of a frozen state, and that he

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>sat back into her blood. None of that made sense.

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But the prosecution's theory made no more sense, and it

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't until you get his letter and you realize that

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>he was behind the car, heard this explosion inside the car,

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that as he was opening the driver's side she shot

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>him once, tried to get back in, she shot again,

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and then shot herself. So when he sat back down

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>into the driver's seat and turned around to check on

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the kids, her blood was all over his back, but

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>her body was also slumped, and in his panic, he thought,

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll drive to go get help, and in doing so,

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>he tried to pull her belt which she had taken off,

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and his blood from his wounded left wrist was all

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>over the belt, and his hands were shaking so much

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>while he was trying to buckle her in because she

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>was also blocking that buckle, that the blood pooled on

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the council and then he gave up because he was shaking,

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and it retracted and went back and he got out

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of the car. But that's why none of his blood

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>is on the exterior perimeter back or front of the car.

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>If he had shot her, there would have been blood

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>all over him and he would have had to have

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>walked around. And it wasn't until Chris wrote the letter

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>which I had shared with you, that I started this

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:27.359
<v Speaker 1>thinking what if he were innocent? And now I sincerely

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:34.239
<v Speaker 1>feel he is. Chris Vaughn allowed himself to be convicted.

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>He was incapable or unwilling for fourteen years to adequately

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>defend himself. In many levels, it's just this perfect storm

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of tunnel vision, confirmation, bias, character assassination, and then blood

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>splatter evidence, which it's this interpretive science, which is like

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>reading an ink block. Blood spatter expert Paul Kish was

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>utilized by the prosecution to contend that the blood spatter

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>evidence did not conform with Vaughn having left the vehicle

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 1>before his wife was shot, due to the presence of

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>his blood on the seat belt console and droplets on

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the passenger side. Obviously, Kish wasn't privy to Bond's latest revelations,

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>but even at the time of the trial, Kish conceded

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that he couldn't rule out murder suicide based on the

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>blood evidence either. Here again is Jason Flamm.

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 8>Let's talk about blood spatter because I think people watch Dexter,

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 8>they watch CSI or whatever they watch, and they have

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 8>this totally unrealistic view. Because the National Academy of Sciences, right,

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 8>the real thing, right, the people who we should hold

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 8>in the highest regard, in two thousand and nine did

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 8>a very intensive study real scientific integrity, and they were

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 8>extremely critical of a number of the junk sciences. But

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 8>I think they saved some of their strongest words for

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 8>blood spatter, and among other things, that this blood spatter

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 8>analysis is more subjective than substantive.

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>It's whatever you want to say, and it can be

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>used to prove whatever you want to prove given most scenarios.

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 8>No, you're absolutely right. It is the probably the worst

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 8>of all the junk sciences, and to call it a

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 8>science is ridiculous. Right, you can take a forty hour

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 8>course to become a bloodstained pattern analyst and then you

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 8>can actually go and testify in court. It's ridiculous. It's

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 8>absurd because the people are getting up and testifying as

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 8>experts forty hours. What can you learn in forty hours.

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 8>Almost nothing. There's nothing scientific about it. It's foolishness, that's

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 8>what it is, except for the fact that the consequences

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 8>are so extremely serious and real. So that should have

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 8>been the end of it. It should never have been

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 8>used again after that was made clear. But again the

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 8>courts fall back on themselves and the system protects itself.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 8>It doesn't protect the people. It doesn't work for the

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 8>Chris Bonds, it doesn't work for any of the people

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 8>it's supposed to work for, which are the people whose

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 8>lives are in the hands of the system that is

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 8>supposed to protect their rights and all of our rights.

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 8>And once once it starts down a road and that

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 8>television sets in, as you said, Lauren, they will find

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 8>ways to railroad you and they just put these blinders

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 8>on and it doesn't matter. And as I was listening

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 8>to you talk, it occurred to me that Chris is

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 8>exactly the person that we were referencing a few minutes ago, right,

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 8>because he didn't believe that he could be wrongfully convicted,

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 8>which is why he didn't really mount the defense. First

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 8>of all, this poor guy's just lost his entire family.

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 8>He's just seen his entire family dead in front of

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 8>his eyes. Right, he saw his kids murdered like seconds earlier,

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 8>bleeding to death whatever the backseat of his car, and

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 8>then his wife. Now grant that he wasn't badly hurt,

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 8>but I've never been shot. I'm sure it's kind of traumatic.

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 8>To be shot twice and then find your family dead

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 8>is something nobody should ever have to go through. And

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 8>it's unbelievable to even imagine what the hell. And it's

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 8>also disgusting for us to think that we know how

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 8>someone should or should not act that has been through that.

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, you're right, he was on his demeanor. He

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't act the way he should. I think that he

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to implicate his wife because he felt guilt

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that he thought that his actions drove her to do

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>something so horrific and out of character.

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 8>And you know, in my view, he's guilty of being

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 8>maybe not the best husband. But I'm not going to

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 8>sit there and judge him, and I would say that

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 8>no one else really should either. We don't know what

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 8>was going on in their relationship or in their home,

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 8>and that is also not a crime. It might be

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 8>a moral failing, but it's not a crime. And also

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 8>that I think he was in a certain way protecting

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 8>the reputation of the woman that he had been married to.

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 8>But this also reminds me, Lauren of, in a certain way,

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 8>the case that we covered on wrongful Conviction, the Larry

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 8>Delile case, right where Larry was in his car with

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 8>his four kids and his wife, gas pedal jammed and

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 8>the car went screaming into the river off a dock,

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 8>and he and his wife I don't think they could swim,

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 8>but they managed to get out, and the kids were

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 8>tragically drowned. And then started this narrative where he's not

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 8>emotional enough, the press is stalking him at his house.

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 8>He's they were sitting outside, he and his wife having

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 8>an iced t or a beer or something. Now, he

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 8>was on a lot of medications after this. He was

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 8>taking so many pills to try to deal with this

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 8>unimaginable trauma. But they wanted to believe what they wanted

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 8>to believe, and I think in that case, people couldn't

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 8>process the idea that this car could have malfunctioned in

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 8>such a way with such awful consequences. So even when

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 8>the evidence emerged that is in fact exactly what happened,

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 8>and even when it became clear that one hundred and

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 8>seventeen I think other cars of this exact same make

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 8>and model had been recalled because the accelerator jammed. And

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 8>even though his wife said the accelerator jammed, the story

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 8>got out there in the media that he had confessed.

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 8>That's debatable, but Larry is still in prison now thirty

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 8>I think it was nineteen eighty nine. So yeah, this

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 8>unfortunately is going back to what your question from earlier.

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 8>This is terribly, terribly common, and we need to overhaul

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 8>the system. And you know, Lady Justice, with the scales,

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 8>it's not a realistic depiction at all of our system. Yeah.

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, this concept that justice is blind.

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 8>I think it's deaf, and it's interesting as it relates

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 8>to this case, right to the advant case, because you know,

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 8>another thing that I think is really not in the

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 8>public consciousness is that science and justice are practically opposite.

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 8>Science is based on the analysis of data and information

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 8>that is processed in a way that is scientific, and

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 8>justice is based on precedent. Right. So while science moves forward,

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 8>justice looks backward. And some of these junk sciences are

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 8>similar in certain ways, right, just as with bitemark evidence.

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 8>And so what I mean by that is a judge

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 8>will look at a case and say, well, there's another

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 8>court that ruled that bite marks are okay. Even though

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 8>you have a huge body of evidence that you've just

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 8>presented that shows that bite marks are as unscientific as

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 8>could be, I'm going to allow it because another court

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 8>allowed it. Justice should be about making sure that, whilst

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 8>mistakes will always be made, that we minimize those mistakes,

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 8>and that people who don't do their jobs. And that

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 8>extends to the defense bar as well. If you have

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 8>a defender public or private who shows up drunk or

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 8>doesn't mount any defense re client, or is corrupt in

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 8>any way, they should be disbarred, just like an other

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 8>profession's and it almost never happens on the other side.

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 8>On the prosecution side, we know that police and prosecutors

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 8>lie with impunity, as do Unfortunately many forensic examiners. They

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 8>either lie or they just don't know what they're talking about.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>And while there are many cases worthy of Jason's help,

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>he agreed to explore whether Vaughn's was worthy of re examination.

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 8>That's unbelievable. Yeah, Kafka meets Victor Hugo in the worst

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 8>possible ways, and I feel, as you do, compelled to

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 8>want to help him.

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Next, I LinkedIn with Bill Clutter to discuss more details

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>about the case.

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 7>Sergeant Gary Lawson had already formed an opinion from day

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 7>one that Chris Vaughn committed the murder of his wife

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 7>and three kids. Sergeant Lawson's theory just conflicted with the

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 7>ballistic evidence. We conducted our own examination of the Ford expedition,

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 7>and Tom Bevell, our bloodstained expert, notices that in the

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 7>back of the Ford Expedition, behind where the children were seated,

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 7>there's a third seat and there was a bullet lodged,

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 7>and so he asked to get a doll rod. He

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 7>put it through the back of the seat where Cassandra

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 7>was seated in the middle of the two other children,

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 7>and pushed it through the third seat where the bullet

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.719
<v Speaker 7>was lodged. It showed that the shot that killed Cassandra

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 7>was fired from the passengers seat, and then Luke Caid,

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 7>who was a ballistic expert, inspected the vehicle again with

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 7>laser and so clearly that shot came from where Kim

0:26:56.440 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 7>was seated. And the irony about this whole case the

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 7>state doesn't they acknowledge that the crime scene evidence suggests

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 7>a murder suicide, but that Chris Vaughn was this mastermind,

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 7>that he was so smart that he read this article

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.959
<v Speaker 7>in PI magazine, which you know they fingerprinted. His fingerprints

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 7>weren't on it, and the article was the cover story

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 7>about it was a detective from New York City. It

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 7>dealt with staging a murder to look like a suicide. Well,

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 7>the example that he was writing about was some case

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 7>where a woman had been strangled to death by the

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 7>killer and then the killer stages it to look like

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 7>she had hung herself and committed suicide, totally separate, and

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 7>so they tried to infer and to argue with the

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:50.479
<v Speaker 7>jury that somehow, but it's all confirmatory biased. The police

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 7>see that article, they say, ah, he must have staged

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 7>it to look like a suicide. But that was their case.

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, bail and I want to say that this is sadly,

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 8>tragically not an uncommon narrative right where law enforcement decides

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 8>that the person who they claim to be the perpetrator

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 8>is both a deranged psychopath and a criminal mastermind.

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 8>I believe when it's caught up along with the media

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 8>shit storm and the heightened emotions around a case like this,

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 8>it's like the thing just grows and everyone is able

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 8>to put on the same set of blinders and go, yep,

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 8>that must be what happened. To any trainee investigator or

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 8>first year law student, or someone who even watches TV

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 8>crime shows. You could look at us and go, no,

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 8>just no, that's not how this could have happened. The prosecutor,

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 8>I'm sure, would have had the jurors in the palm

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 8>of his hand as he or she presented this narrative

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 8>because they don't want to believe that mom killed the

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.479
<v Speaker 8>kids and there's nobody alive to blame.

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>But to challenge Bond's conviction, both the state scenario and

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the one recently conveyed in Chris's letter would need to

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>be scientifically tested to know which one aligned with ballistic

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and blood evidence. In regards to the crime scene.

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 7>The state's theory that Paul Kish testified to that Kim

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.719
<v Speaker 7>was her seat belt was buckled when she was shot

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 7>and killed, but that Chris unbuckled it to somehow stage

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 7>the crime scene. I always felt all along that would

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 7>have been virtually impossible. The way her body was positioned.

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 7>He would actually have to move her body to try

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 7>to unbuckle her seat belt it was buckled. And then

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 7>the second thing is her blood would be somewhere on

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 7>that seat belt as that seat belt's retracting. So that's

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 7>one scenario that we'll test. But the other one is

0:29:55.760 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 7>whether Chris the act of trying to buckle her in

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 7>which he describes in his statement.

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clutter believes by demonstrating how each scene unfolded and

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>by testing which scenario is supported by the actual crime

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>scene evidence, he can call Vaughn's guilt into question. Jason

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Plomm agreed that there was enough reasonable doubt to question

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Vaughan's conviction and to warrant mounting a crime scene reconstruction.

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 8>Because there's this freaking thing in the Constitution where it

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 8>says innocent until proven guilty, and there's that other thing

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 8>about reasonable doubt. I don't know how and when that

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 8>went out the window. But we need to restore those principles.

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But crime scene reconstructions cost money. Bill Clutter had applied

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>for a fund that could potentially cover the costs of

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>one for Vaughn and was waiting for news on that grunt.

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 8>If there's anything that I can do, if there's a

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 8>financial support, if there's a need for a task that

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 8>you can't get the money for it, I mean, I

0:30:58.360 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 8>will just call it.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 7>Here's what I want to do, and I'll send you

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 7>the grant. But we're going for the grant too, fun

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 7>the crime scene reconstruction. I'd like to get this crime

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 7>scene reconstruction done by August.

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, let me know. I'm I'm happy to

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 8>write a check if that's what's needed. You know, I've

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 8>been lucky enough to make some money and this is

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 8>what I decided choose to spend it.

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And suddenly, with that act of unexpected generosity, Christopher Vaughan's

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>conviction was that much closer to getting a very real

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and very significant chance for reevaluation. It was about this

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>time that we uncovered a potentially troubling timeline concerning Christopher

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Vaughn's indictment in July of two thousand and seven, Bill

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>was going back through the discovery from the Vaughnd case

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and happened upon a phone record memo regarding a conversation

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>between the state and its DNA testing lab.

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 7>The decision to arrest Christopher Vaughan was made on Friday,

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 7>June twenty second. He was arrested the next day, right

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 7>before the funerals for his family were to begin, and

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 7>that decision really focused on two issues. One was Chris's

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 7>inability to remember how his wife's blood was transferred to

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 7>the back right side of his jacket and the belief

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 7>that he had staged the crime scene by unbuckling his

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 7>wife's seat belt, and that was based on Bob Deal's

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 7>observations that there was a large saturation stain on his

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 7>wife's passenger seat belt that appeared consistent with her bleeding

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 7>onto the seat belt. That assumption turned out to be

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 7>wrong and it was disproved by DNA testing. All of

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 7>the blood turned out to be Chris's blood, and that

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 7>wasn't discovered until about a week after they arrested Chris

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 7>when the DNA results came back.

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>So what day did the DNA results come back and

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>what did they show and who was aware? Pay close

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>attention to the timeline and details you're about to hear.

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 7>We obtain a phone conversation log that was kept by

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 7>the crime lab. The general practice of the forensic scientists

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 7>or to keep telephone logs of contacts with investigators and

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 7>even private investigators like myself. On June twenty seventh of

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 7>two thousand and seven, at around ten am, Kelly Crachnach

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 7>from the Joliette Crime Lab contacted Sergeant Gary Lawson and

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:00.959
<v Speaker 7>she gave him a verbal report of the DNA results,

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 7>which included one of the stains on the passenger seat belt,

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 7>and that stain turned out to be Chris's blood, not

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 7>Kimberly's blood as they first believed.

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm reading it now and it says reason for call.

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Ten am, June twenty seventh, two thousand and seven, I

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>called to speak to Gary Lawson. I gave him verbal

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>DNA results on the latest batch of exhibits. He asked

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>me to inform the State's Attorney's office. I'll give them

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a call period and then what happens. She had left

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a message and that would have been according to the memo.

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>At ten thirty five am, and then what happened.

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 7>And then she got a call back by both Jim Glascal,

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 7>the state's attorney, and his assistant, John Connor, And that

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 7>was at two o'clock. And there was a later call

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 7>at four just to confirm whether they wanted the statistical

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 7>analysis of the DNA and this is the probability of

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 7>the DNA, and that occurred around four pm.

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>So it is your understanding that they should have known

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>whose blood was on the retracted belt at that point.

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 7>At that point, yes, based on the DNA results that

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 7>were given to them.

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Vaughan was indicted the following month. An indictment requires

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the state prosecutor to go in front of a grand

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 1>jury and present evidence of the alleged crime and ask

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.919
<v Speaker 1>the grand jury to bring charges against the defendant. All

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 1>capital crimes and those for which the death penalty as

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 1>a punishment must be presented by indictment. You're about to

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>hear the exact transcript from the closed grand jury testimony

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that was presented on July twenty fifth, two thousand and seven,

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.720
<v Speaker 1>nearly a month after it was known that the DNA

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>results on the retracted belt belonged to Christopher, not Kimberly Vaughan.

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 7>This is where Sergeant Lawson testified before the grand jury

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 7>which ultimately indicted Chris and there was a series of questions.

0:35:58.400 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 7>He was asked about the seat belt.

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I will read the part of the female prosecutor and.

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 7>This is one of the other prosecutors, Leah Norbitt, and

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.240
<v Speaker 7>she's talking about the crime scene investors.

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:14.879
<v Speaker 1>They looked at the seat belt right, yes, and on

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that seat belt as if the seat belt were pulled

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to be seat belted. Someone in correct, there was blood

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 1>on that seat belt, was there not?

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 7>Yes, it was.

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And when Kimberly Vaughan was found by the paramedics and

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>by the police, she was not wearing a seat belt.

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 1>That's correct, and that is significant because she was wearing

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that seat belt when she was shot.

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:43.280
<v Speaker 7>That's correct.

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>What's problematic from your viewpoint about that testimony in front

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 1>of a grand jury, which means, if I'm not mistaken,

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that he could not have been cross examined. It was closed, right.

0:36:56.800 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 7>The problem is is that they've got DNA testing that

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 7>contradicts their initial assumption that this was Kim's blood, and

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 7>the DNA testing contradicts that initial assumption. So you can't say,

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 7>based on the DNA testing that she was seatbelted when

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.239
<v Speaker 7>she was shot, because her blood wasn't on the seat belt.

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 7>That's the problem with that testimony.

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, they would have had verbal confirmation of the DNA

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>results a month earlier, on the twenty seventh of June,

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>but when would they have had written confirmation?

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 7>And this is where it becomes problematic because after Sergeant

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 7>Lawson gives that testimony, there's a DNA report that stated

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:47.280
<v Speaker 7>the day after, which is July twenty six, two thousand

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 7>and seven. But the problem is we found in discovery

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 7>that same report had been actually dated July third, two

0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 7>thousand and seven, three weeks before he gave that testimony.

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 7>And on that report there was dated July third, There

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 7>was in handwritten notes draft at the top and on

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 7>each page. So it appears that it gives sergeant loss

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 7>and plausible deniability about the results of the DNA having

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 7>it dated the day after he testified at the grand jury,

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 7>and the report was actually dated July third, about three

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 7>weeks before he testified, and so it really raises all

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 7>kinds of questions as to who directed the DNA analyst

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 7>Kelly Craajenek to mark draft. If that's her handwriting, what

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:38.760
<v Speaker 7>was the purpose of marking a draft.

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Was there any difference between the version that's marked draft

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>on the third of July and the final version, which

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is dated the day after the closed grand jury testimony.

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 7>The only difference is the day. The reports are identical.

0:38:56.680 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 7>The conclusions of the DNA results are identical. The only

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 7>thing that's different is that changing of the date on

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 7>the report.

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 1>How do you characterize that.

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 7>It smells of fraud. That's what it smells to me.

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 7>It really deserves further investigation and to get to the

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 7>bottom of why that report was manipulated. I've never seen

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 7>it in my thirty five years of investigating for police

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 7>reports and forensic labs. I've never seen this ever in

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 7>my career, and so it really begs the question why

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 7>was it done and who directed.

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:32.439
<v Speaker 8>It to be done.

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Why would the date have been changed to the day

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>after loss and testified when it was known that he

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>had this information a month before that time. If this

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was done intentionally, it does give the appearance that, in

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 1>order to secure Christopher Vaughn's indictment, the prosecution was trying

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to hide the fact that this information was known at

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the time of loss and testimony. I reached out to

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the office of the Will County States Attorney to request

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>four clarification. After sending two emails, I followed up by

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:08.760
<v Speaker 1>phone and was informed by James Glasgow's director of public

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Affairs that mister Glasgow was not interested in providing a

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>statement or response. With that in mind, I wanted to

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:20.240
<v Speaker 1>speak to a legal expert and get their thoughts. Richard

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Kling is a clinical professor of law in Chicago at

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the Kent College of Law and a practicing defense lawyer.

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts just on the fact of Will

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 1>County State's attorney seeking a grand jury indictment as opposed

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to a preliminary hearing.

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 9>In most of the murder cases, the state's attorney generally

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 9>takes it to the grand jury. It's not unusual in

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:46.240
<v Speaker 9>my experience. The vast majority of murder cases and sex

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:48.240
<v Speaker 9>cases are taken directly to the grand jury.

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Although the DNA testing had disproven the initial theory that

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Kimberly Vaughn was wearing her safety belt when she was

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:01.720
<v Speaker 1>shot allegedly, Sergeant Gary Lawson appeared before the grand jury

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and testimony was elicited that suggested that Kimberly Vaughn was

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>wearing the seat belt at the time of her death.

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Having read over that transcript, how would you characterize that

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 1>testimony in light of the fact that he knew the

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>results a month before.

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 9>It certainly erroneous, Whether it was mistakenly erroneous or intentionally erroneus.

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 9>Obviously I can't get into somebody else's mind, but it

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 9>was certainly a mistake to bring that in front of

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 9>the grand jury the way it was.

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Would you categorize it as misleading?

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 9>Well, it is misleading to the grand jury. Realistically, they

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 9>didn't have the full story.

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And I know that in Illinois police are were and

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>are allowed to lie to a suspect during interrogations to

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>coerce our confession or secure a confession. I should say,

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>is there any scenario in which an officer of the

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.720
<v Speaker 1>law would be allowed to lie on the witness stand?

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely? Not that the law is abundant. Police officers are not

0:41:58.880 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 9>allowed to lie to grand juris.

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Kling was already very familiar with the Christopher Vaughn case

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and investigating Innocent's efforts on his behalf. For him, it

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 1>called to mind another famous Illinois case which we referenced

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in a previous episode that led to the abolishment of

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the death penalty in Illinois and involved the vilification of

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>another investigator, much along the lines of Bob Dial's experience.

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 9>The parallels are spookily similar to the extent that Mike Callahan,

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 9>who was the state police officer when forty eight Hours,

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 9>was going to do a piece about Randy's tidel he

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 9>was asked by the state Police to investigate, essentially to

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 9>make sure that they were covered. And what happened with

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 9>Callahan is that he ended up finding out that the

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 9>state police had screwed around with a lot of stuff,

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 9>as well as the local police, and he eventually went

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 9>from being a decorated lieutenant in charge of the whole

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 9>district to writing traffic tickets. In I fifty five, the

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 9>parallels are very similar to the extent of the state

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:58.879
<v Speaker 9>police was asked to do an investigation to make sure

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 9>that the Witleck title came went well, and when Palahan

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.239
<v Speaker 9>came to the conclusion it didn't go well, he ended

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 9>up getting xed. And it's similar here.

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately, former Illinois State Police investigator Michael Callahan would vile

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a civil lawsuit which determined his constitutional rights had been

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>violated by his superiors. He wrote a book detailing his

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>experience called Too Politically Sensitive. As mentioned previously, the two

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 1>men convicted for murders they did not commit, HERB Whitlock

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and Randy Stidle, were ultimately released as a result of

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the corruption a misconduct Callahan uncovered. Stitle had been imprisoned

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>for seventeen years, Whitlock for twenty one. Back to Richard Klang.

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think the bottom line is, I would hope

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:44.479
<v Speaker 9>is that the state police, as well as the rest

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 9>of the world, is not interested in having somebody who

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:50.280
<v Speaker 9>was innocent convicted, and hopefully they would want to reopen

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 9>it and hopefully the result for mister Vaughan will be

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 9>the same that it was for Whitlock.

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Ands title, Richard Kling is very clear on where he

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>stands in regards to Christopher.

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 9>I was a public defender in Cook County for ten years.

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.319
<v Speaker 9>In November, I will have been practicing fifty years. I've

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:10.800
<v Speaker 9>tried over five hundred murder jury cases, including DNA, so

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 9>I'm not just speaking from the standpoint of academia. I'm

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 9>speaking from the standpoint of being in the trenches, and

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 9>I think it's a case that needs to be reevaluated.

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 4>Cay you he the.

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 5>Gry out O feel the ground holding load?

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Are you.

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 1>On the next Murder in Illinois? I finally meet Christopher

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Vaughn in person. Right as we get closer to the

0:44:56.800 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 1>prison is absolutely pouring quorks of lightning before Bill Clutter

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:07.319
<v Speaker 1>takes on meticulously mounting an ambitious crime scene reconstruction. We're

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>all going to get the visual of every scenario, and

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:14.239
<v Speaker 1>that's important that we'll put Bond's version of events to

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the test.

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 8>As you pull back these layers, it becomes so painfully obvious.

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Murder in Illinois is a production of iHeartRadio. Executive producers

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:32.959
<v Speaker 1>are Lauren Bright Pacheco and Taylor Chackoine. Written by Lauren

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Brett Pacheco and Matthew Riddle, Story editing by Matthew Riddle,

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:40.719
<v Speaker 1>editing and sound design by Van Tyre and Taylor Chaqoine.

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Featuring music by Cicada Rhythm with new compositions engineered and

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:47.400
<v Speaker 1>mixed by Van Tyre and Taylor Chackoine.

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:51.240
<v Speaker 6>You see the Ground.

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, check out the iHeartRadio app,

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get the stories that matter

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:24.239
<v Speaker 1>to you,