WEBVTT - The Cult of Osiris, Part 1

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>name is Robert.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 3>Lamb and I am Joe McCormick.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 2>And in this episode, we're going to be diving into

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>ancient Egyptian mythology once more to discuss an important deity

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:30.159
<v Speaker 2>connected to the topic of resurrection, which I think was

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:32.959
<v Speaker 2>probably on my mind over the weekend due to, first

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 2>of all, it was the Easter holiday. Also on Weird

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>House Cinema, which is of our Friday episode and the

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast feed, we talked about

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Five's Rises again. I did not think about this

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.319
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the holiday at all. I didn't think, oh,

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>this is our Easter selection. But then I noticed our

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>social media posts about it on Easter Sunday and it's like,

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, talking about the rise of Doctor Five's He's

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Rising again, and I was like, oh, wow, we sort

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 2>of accidentally nailed it there.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 3>It's a movie that has so many resurrections. It has

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Doctor Fibes himself coming out of a sort of a

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 3>chemically induced slumber where at the end of the first

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 3>movie he replaces his blood with embalming fluid and then

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 3>goes to sleep in a giant glass contraption under the floor.

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 3>At the beginning of this movie, he wakes up again,

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 3>So that's one sense of rising, though I guess it's

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 3>questionable whether he technically died or not there, so he

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 3>rises at the beginning of the movie. There the rest

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 3>of the movie is about him trying to literally resurrect

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 3>his wife Victoria played by Carolyn Monroe from the dead.

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 3>She sort of spins the whole movie in a glass

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 3>display case, and he is going to take her to

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 3>a temple in ancient Egypt under which lies the secret

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 3>to resurrection and eternal life. And he departs the end

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 3>of the movie on a barge singing somewhere over the

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 3>rainbow to take Carolyn Monroe down there and bring her

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 3>back to life. And I would mention a third resurrection

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 3>in the film, which is that the character Vulnavia, which

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 3>is melted like sort of a robot clockwork organism. We're

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 3>not exactly sure. From the first movie, it's doctor Phibes's

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 3>hinchwoman who helps him commit his quote amazing murders. She

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 3>is melted by acid at the end of the first

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 3>movie and then just inexplicably comes back in the second movie. Also,

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 3>they resurrect Terry Thomas. Remember, yeah, he bites it in

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 3>the first movie, and then he just comes back playing

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 3>a totally separate character in the second movie. And I

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 3>think that motif of coming back in bodily form but

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 3>playing a different character, maybe maybe it may have some

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 3>thematic resonance. That's right.

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 2>So what we're gonna We're gonna be talking about Osirius.

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Osyrus came up in Doctor fivee rises again,

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe they made passing reference to him. I think I

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 2>made passing reference to Osirius when we were talking about

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the film. But this is a deity best known for

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 2>his connections to fertility, to the ancient Egyptian underworld, and

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 2>to rights of mummification.

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 3>So, you know, I've seen lots of depictions of the

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 3>god o Cyrus before I was familiar with the imagery

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 3>associated with him. But something I had never noticed until

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 3>I was reading up in preparation for this episode is

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 3>that while on the top half of his body, he

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 3>is often depicted, you know, looking kind of like a

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 3>like a king or a pharaoh, you know, very stately,

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 3>with a beard, with his with his face exposed under

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 3>the crown and all that. If you look down at

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 3>the lower part of his body, apparently his legs are

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 3>depicted wrapped together in the in the wrappings of mummification,

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 3>so it's like the bottom half of his body is

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 3>already mummified.

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 2>That's right. Yeah, And I invite listeners who are in

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 2>a position to do so safely, to go ahead and

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 2>look up some images of historical depictions of Osiris from

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 2>ancient Egypt. Yeah, he's generally depicted as a mummified king,

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, bound as in is in the wrappings of mummification.

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 2>His skin, as is exposed, you know, in his face

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 2>and neck and hands, is apparently either black or green.

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>I tend to find more images of green color choices

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 2>though that may have at one point signified putrification and death,

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 2>but came to symbolize his connection to the cycle of

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>death and life, of resurrection and rebirth, particularly resurrection and

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 2>rebirth linked to that of plant life. On top of this,

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 2>he is generally depicted as wearing a crown, and he

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 2>brandishes a crook and a flail, so strong agricultural vibes already.

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 3>But also with power and authority, you know, it's the

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 3>crook and the flail and the autaf crown, the crown

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 3>I think of Upper Egypt. This is the imagery of

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 3>a king.

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely so he is. He is very much like

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 2>an embodimentum of a mummified king. So let's get a

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 2>little bit into the myth of Osiris. Now, standard caveat

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 2>with mythology. You know, as usually is the case, we're

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 2>not dealing with a singular idea from a singular time

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 2>and place, but rather a figure and associated narratives that

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 2>stirred in the minds of ancient peoples for thousands of years.

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 2>We have various accounts of Osiris to go off of,

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 2>but our understanding of Osiris is also incomplete, and indeed,

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 2>we don't know with one hundred percent certainty what his

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 2>name even means. It might well mean the Mighty One,

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 2>but I think there are some other ideas out there.

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 2>There's plenty that experts have had to piece together about

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Osiris that is not explicitly obvious in the source material. Now,

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the books that I turned to for this

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 2>episode is the two thousand and two book Egyptian Mythology

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 2>by Geraldine Pinch. Pinch also points out that we don't

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 2>know when, how, and where Osiris was first worshiped. He

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 2>might have kicked things off as kind of a deified

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>pre dynastic king. He might have been an old vegetation spirit,

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 2>a god, or even a mother goddess. And I'm also

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 2>assuming based on this that you know, there might have

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 2>been some interplay between these concepts, you know, various varied

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 2>possible origins, gods that are combined into new gods and

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>so forth. Now, Pinch summarizes the sort of the what

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 2>you might think of as the canonical rise and fall

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 2>and resurrection of Osiris, pointing out that first of all,

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 2>he's generally thought to have been born with a crown

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 2>on his head. So taking that concept of born a king,

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 2>that is theay referenced in Christian hymns, sometimes referring to Jesus,

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 2>but taking it to a literal degree.

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Ah, So, whereas a lot of kings, say, might be

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 3>born with a right to the throne that has then

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 3>recognized in a coronation by placing the crown upon their head,

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 3>that this king is born with the crown already there, like,

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't need to be recognized.

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Exactly king at his birth literally because he's look, he's

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 2>wearing a little crown. I guess maybe the crown grows

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 2>with him. I mean, he's a god. He can do

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 2>these things. And fortunately his mother was also a god,

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 2>so he was the eldest son. It is that of

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 2>the earth god Geb and the sky god as Newt.

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 2>So in many respects, he is the place where earth

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 2>and sky converge. He's the very horizon. Now. Pinch shares

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 2>that some accounts allude to him overcoming his father in

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 2>a vicious dynastic struggle for rule, and one late text

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 2>claims that he died for the first time during this struggle. However,

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 2>she stresses that no accounts of Osiris's rule and his

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 2>death survive from before the Greco Roman period concerning this issue,

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 2>so but one way or another, he comes to reign

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 2>over Egypt with his sister consort Isis at his side.

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 2>But of course this rule does not last according to

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the pyramid texts of the Late Old Kingdom, so these

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 2>are for more than four thousand years ago. Osiris was

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 2>murdered by his brother Seth or Seth, who we've talked

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 2>about on the show before, in part because there is

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 2>some mystery and disagreement on what the set animal or

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Seth animal is that his iconography is based upon. But anyway,

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 2>we have this this brother Seth strikes his brother down

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 2>and tramples him and or drowns him in the Nile River,

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 2>and Pinch writes that a double death may have been

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 2>deemed necessary to kill a god.

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So, one way or another, either drowned in the

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 3>water or trampled or both, Osiris is dead.

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 2>That's right, He's overthrown, He's been murdered. And one way

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 2>or another, Osiris's dead body becomes fragmented, either via a

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 2>deliberate chopping up of his corpse by Seth or possibly

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>due to decomposition. In either event, the dead body of

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Osiris becomes divided into in some cases fourteen pieces, though

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.439
<v Speaker 2>sometimes it's like forty two pieces. A certain number of

0:08:55.520 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 2>pieces of the dead god come into circulation here. And

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 2>I think this varies from something that happens right away again,

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 2>like I've killed you and now I'm going to chop

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 2>you up, to something that Seth does later, like comes

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 2>and despoils the corpse of Osiris, or something that happens

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 2>naturally later on. In any case, the pieces are either

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 2>scattered or become scattered.

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so yeah, that's something I don't know if I

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 3>ever understood before. Do the pieces come apart as something

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 3>that his enemy does to him? Is it kind of

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 3>a William Wallace situation or is it more kind of

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 3>a some kind of magical principle at work.

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, based on my understanding of the different accounts that

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 2>are looking at here, it looks like it does vary,

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 2>and it also seems to vary whether those pieces stays

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 2>to some degree scattered or are truly brought together again.

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 2>It kind of I guess it kind of depends on

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 2>what sort of concepts are important to the story. That

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 2>may make more sense when I start talking about specifics

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 2>here in a minute. But in any event, it falls

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 2>to Isis to gather the pieces of the fallen Osiris

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 2>and seek his resurrection via powerful magic, with the aid

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 2>of Annibus, an underworld deity and thought a god of

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 2>magic who've also talked about on the show before. Now,

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Isis herself was the mother and throne goddess, so each

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Egyptian king is her child. It falls to her to

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 2>find and gather the pieces of slain Osiris to assemble

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 2>him and hold a long vigil over the corpse along

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 2>with their sister Nephthus, and they use a spoken magic,

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Pinch says, to drive away Seth the disturber. So I

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 2>guess there's this idea that even as they are trying

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 2>to bring him back, Seth is trying to disrupt their attempt.

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Almost like a scavenger or predatory animal circling. Yeah.

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Now, during this reassembly, Osiris is He's described by Pinch

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 2>as the inert one. So all of the pieces of

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Osiris are either in hair together or assembled into a

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 2>hole except for his fallas. And remember again that Osiris

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 2>is also a god of fertility, and by this Fallus

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 2>or depending on the story, by a flash of divine fire,

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 2>whatever the case Isis becomes pregnant with the son by

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 2>the deceased god. And this son is going to be Horace,

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the son destined to overcome Seth. So she raises Horace

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 2>in the marshes. She has to raise him in safety

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 2>and secrecy until he is old enough to challenge his

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 2>father's usurper, which he does. He defeats Seth and he

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 2>becomes the new ruler.

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:40.959
<v Speaker 3>Now I think you're going to get into this in

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 3>a minute. But that part of the myth is important

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 3>because this will come to have a great significance for

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 3>the succession in the real world of divine kingship as

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 3>a concept in Egypt.

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Right now. Another interesting part here is that despite Osiris's

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 2>connection with the concept of resurrection by many definitions or

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 2>in certainly sort of modern interpretations, and I guess like

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 2>dungeons and dragons to interpretations, he is not truly resurrected

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.839
<v Speaker 2>at this point. He does not become living flesh again.

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 2>He is not resurrected into this world.

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Right and this will be an important point of contention

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 3>for a question that I think we're going to get

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 3>into in part two of this series about the concept

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 3>of resurrection in ancient religions. But yeah, Osiris is not

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 3>thought to be raised back to the form and the

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 3>place where he originally lived. There is a instead, he

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 3>goes on living, but it is in a new form

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 3>in a new world. There is in a sense a

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 3>new Osiris.

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>That's right. So basically, the higher powers and other powers

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 2>of note here decide that okay, Osiris, you were just,

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 2>but your death was not just. So therefore he's permitted

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 2>to leave his now mummified body and become the Lord

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 2>of the dead in the afterlife, the judge and ruler

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 2>of the kingdom of the dead. And it seems like

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 2>a pretty cool gig to have a Pinch points out that.

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Quote.

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 2>At all periods. There are a few texts that describe

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Osiris as a terrifying figure who dispatches demon messengers to

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 2>drag the living into the gloomy realm of the dead.

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 2>So inert but not powerless by any means, and he

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 2>is just he is an appropriate judge. He said to

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 2>rule over the dead as when enifer, which either means

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 2>the one whose body did not decay, and we see

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 2>that again his connection to mummification and rights of mummification.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Though I think it's also, according to Pinch, sometimes translated

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 2>as the beneficent One. This was also apparently the title

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 2>for the high priest of Osiris in religious traditions. These

0:13:55.360 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 2>are the basic core myths concerning Osiris to consider, but

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, we always go deeper than that, like what

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 2>are we to make of these myths? What do people

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 2>think they meant? What did they signify? Why did they

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 2>have such you know, cultural significance, And again we have

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>to realize that understandings and interpretations change over time. Middle

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Kingdom rituals seem to associate the body of Osiris with

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 2>barley and the trampling seth. Again, remember the trampling being

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 2>part of the murder of Osiris. There seems to be

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 2>a strong case for associating that trampling with the donkeys

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 2>that would thresh the grain via trampling, thus linking his

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 2>death and resurrection in this earliest known example to the

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 2>cyclical reaping and sowing of crops.

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and again asterisk on the word resurrection there. But

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's an interesting thing how people often do

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 3>associate religious ideas of resurrection with the cycles of life,

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 3>in the cycles of plant life in the seasons. But

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 3>when you were talking about donkeys threshing grain, you know,

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 3>I made another kind of association there, which is that

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 3>the grain begins as something that is from the living plant,

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 3>but then when it is is put through agricultural processing,

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 3>it is in a way reborn, and it doesn't go

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 3>on to live again as a plant, but instead it

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 3>goes on to live in a different way. It becomes

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 3>something else, which is grain and ultimately food.

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, these different sort of phase changes occur. It has

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 2>also pointed out that you would have these ethyphallic figures

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 2>of Osiris that would be planted with crops, so they

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 2>would have like a representation of the god planted with

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 2>the grains, planted with the seeds that you know, that

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 2>would that would help enable everything to grow into its

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 2>next form.

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 3>If if phallic, does that mean that's a representation of

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 3>the god with an erection?

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's the literal, different definition though. I was looking

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 2>at an image of one of these figures in the

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 2>British Museum's website and and I'm not sure that that's

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 2>really as pronounced in this image, but but that is

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 2>that is all. That's how it's classified.

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh wait, I see it.

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's well compared to it's not as it's not

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 2>as as obvious as one might expect.

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's certainly not as obvious as you might see.

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 3>And like some other statuary from the ancient world.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I assume the thing is Ocyrus is wrapped in bandages,

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 2>so it's like it's he's not naked.

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 2>There were also New Kingdom period traditions that linked o

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Cyrus to water, with all the liquids of his putrefying

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 2>body being linked to the annual inundation of the Nile,

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 2>and not necessarily just putrefying liquids like you know, just

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 2>the various liquids of the body, but also like putrification

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 2>liquids thrown in there. So I don't want to make

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 2>it sound like it's all gross or anything. And at

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 2>least one tradition holding that his body parts are bare.

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 2>It's scattered sites throughout Egypt and the tomb of the

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 2>left leg on the Nile island of Baiga. I've also

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 2>seen this place referred to simply as the tomb of

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Osiris Uh. Anyway, different traditions hold that this is the

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 2>source of the inundation. Now I'm thinking about the underworld

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 2>and the cosmos of the ancient Egyptians, which I think,

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 2>on one hand, it's easy to think of that, Okay,

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 2>this is these are the worlds beyond our world, but

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 2>also they're kind of tied to to what is seen

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 2>and what is not seen, but kind of implied. Basically.

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 2>The one area I want to touch on here is

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 2>the idea of the sun bargs the manget, the boat

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 2>of millions of years that travels through the sky with

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 2>the sun and then down each night over the horizon

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 2>and then through the underworld to emerge once more on

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 2>the other side. And of course there's there's fighting that

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 2>takes place. It is like a kind of a it's

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 2>a perilous journey for the Sun through the underworld to

0:17:58.000 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 2>come back again when the sun rises.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a whole quest. It's a whole quest line.

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is which is at once again very epic

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 2>and otherworldly, but also tied directly to what we observe

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 2>occurring with the sun. Like, okay, the sun goes here

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 2>and then it goes under seemingly and comes back. What's

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 2>going on there? And then we have this mythic extrapolation

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 2>of that. But according to Pinch.

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 3>It's singing somewhere over the rainbow.

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 2>According to Pinch, the New Kingdom under and the New

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Kingdom Underworld books specify that during the darkest hour of

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 2>the night, the god that is that is driving the

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 2>sun barge ray or raw passes through the underworld chamber

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 2>where the body of Osiris rests, and in this moment

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 2>they become one soul and this allows Osyrus and all

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 2>the dead to live again. M So, now that we've

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 2>established some of the basics about this underworld fertility god.

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to get into the cult of Osiris a

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 2>bit more. Again, we don't know exactly when or how

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Osiris was first worshiped, or indeed the earliest form or

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 2>forms that he took in these ancient Egyptian belief systems,

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 2>but over time he becomes vitally linked with the cycle

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 2>of life and death, with crops, with the inundation, with mummification,

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 2>and the promise of resurrection.

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 3>And just a note on terminology. When we talk about

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 3>things like the cult of Osiris, cult in that sense

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 3>does not have the negative connotations that cult has in

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 3>the modern world. That's just the term you use for

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 3>like any any group in the ancient world that is

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 3>devoted to the care and worship of a god.

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Right now, one topic that I was really taken with

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 2>was discussion of the popularity of Osiris, and to a

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:44.479
<v Speaker 2>certain extent, the overall popularity of the ancient Egyptian religion, because,

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 2>on one hand, I don't remember where I read this,

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 2>but I know I've read commentary that the ancient Egyptian

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 2>religion was something very much all of the desert of

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 2>this nile nourished region and something that just did not

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 2>travel and was not picked up by other cultures in

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 2>a meaningful deeper way. But on the other hand, the

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 2>trappings of ancient Egypt clearly have fascinated other cultures for

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 2>an exceedingly long period of time, often in these waves

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 2>of Egyptomania, as it's sometimes termed. So I really wanted

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 2>to get into this latter idea a bit more so

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 2>I turned to various sections dealing with Osiris in the

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 2>excellent twenty sixteen book Egyptomania, A History of Fascination, Obsession,

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 2>and Fantasy by Ronald H.

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Fritz.

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so Fritz mentions that the aforementioned pyramid texts from

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 2>more than four thousand years ago refer to differing ideas

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 2>about life and death, but also they bring up the

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 2>rising popularity of Osiris within the pantheon. And I was

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 2>thinking about this as well. I think this is something

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 2>interesting to observe in religion, that it's mostly within these

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.199
<v Speaker 2>polytheistic traditions that you really get to see or in

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 2>the and or magic and this idea of the rise

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 2>and fall of particular gods and goddesses, as well as

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 2>the more like straightforward adoption of foreign originating gods into

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 2>a given pantheon. You know, we've discussed examples of this before,

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 2>but there's not there's either no room for this or

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 2>not as much room for this in monotheistic traditions.

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I guess it depends on the specific

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 3>monotheistic religion, but yes, like growing up a lot of people,

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 3>this is another one of the many ways that if

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 3>you grow up in a certain religious context, you might

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 3>just assume that all religions are similar to your religion.

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 3>So like growing up in a Christian context, I think

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people think that all religions have a

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 3>quote jealous God, like the like the Abrahamic faiths. Do

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 3>you know a God who says you shall worship me

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 3>and me alone? And there's basically one right way to

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 3>have a religion, and it's it's the one you've got,

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 3>whereas with a lot of polytheistic religions, it's it's much

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 3>more free form. You know that you can add God

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 3>on to the list of gods that you worship, you

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 3>can remove gods, you can sort of like just shift

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 3>your focus wherever you think it is best. And that

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 3>doesn't compute Like a lot of Christians look back on

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 3>the pagan context of the Roman Empire, say, and they

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 3>don't realize that. Like when you would be preaching about

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Jesus to Roman pagans, to a lot of them, they

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 3>just be hearing about this is well, this is another god.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I've got Apollo, and I've got Jupiter and these other

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 3>gods that I worship, and here somebody's talking about a

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 3>new one. Oh, except this is weird. They're telling me

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 3>that if I worship this new one, if I worship Christ,

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 3>I can't worship any of the others anymore. That would

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 3>be weird and different.

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like downloading apps for your phone, right, Like,

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 2>what's this one do? This is a new one. Sounds useful.

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 2>I'll get it too. Whoa this one says, I can't

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 2>use any other apps. I've just I've got to use

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 2>this one universal app for everything. Yeah, does it work?

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Is what it sounds like. If it's promises to do everything,

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 2>it probably doesn't do them as well as these specialized

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 2>apps that I already had.

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 3>But to come back to your original example, yes, sort

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 3>of the rise and fall in the popularity of various

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 3>gods within these polytheistic pantheons where you can believe in

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 3>multiple gods and devote whatever time and care you think

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 3>is appropriate to each one of them. I guess. You know,

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 3>the institution of a monotheistic faith like Christianity would be

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 3>an outlier there where it's like suddenly you pick that,

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 3>you pick the new God, the Christ, and you can't

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 3>believe in any of the others anymore. That one goes

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 3>right to the top. But with the others, yeah, you

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 3>do get to see these fluctuations over time.

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like some of the Christian examples we've looked at

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 2>in the past, it's like, oh, your God, actually it

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 2>can be part of this religion. But I'm sorry, they're

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 2>a demon now, Yeah, the demons were rebel angels that

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 2>our God defeated, so but yeah, we can work them

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 2>in as that. But then again, I was thinking about this,

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 2>it's like, well, well, we've also looked at examples where,

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, in various Greek myths where something that was

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 2>one a deity for a particular time and place then

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 2>later on becomes more of a supporting character or a

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 2>monster or something.

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 3>To that effect.

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 2>So it's something that takes place just in general, I guess,

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 2>and is not particular to monotheistic or polytheistic.

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 3>One way I.

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 2>Kept thinking of it those kind of like if you

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 2>had like a stock ticker for belief. You know, it's

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 2>like polytheism, you have a lot of different stocks that

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 2>are going up and down. But under monotheism, like you're

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 2>supposed to just have the one stock. Yeah, and you're

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 2>either all invested in that or people are falling out

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 2>of interest of that. I don't know. It's not a

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 2>perfect way of thinking about it, but it does seem like,

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 2>certainly with the polytheistic religions of the Greeks and the Romans,

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 2>there is a lot more openness to hey, there's a

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 2>new god this other country has, let's take a look

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 2>at it. Let's see what worshiping this god is, Like,

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 2>what's going to this cult?

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, there's a lot of just absorption of other figures.

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 3>One example that I I was just reading about earlier today. Again,

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 3>I think we're going to talk about this more in

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 3>the second episode is there's a Greek figure sometimes referred

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 3>to as a god. He was like a mortal lover

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 3>of Aphrodite named Adonis, who is very much thought to

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 3>have been derived from other deities other ancient Near Eastern

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 3>deities like Mesopotamian agriculture gods such as Tamuz or DEMUSI.

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 3>So it's just here's a cult figure from one part

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 3>of the world is absorbed into the number of gods

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 3>believed in in a different part of the world.

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 2>I just want to add a quick note since we

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 2>are talking at least briefly here about monotheism and polytheism,

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 2>and in an episode that deals with ancient Egyptian religion,

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 2>where we're not going to have time to get into

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 2>discussion of and Autanism here. But of course that has

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 2>been like a discussion I think we've touched on in

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the past, where as some experts agree or disagree on

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 2>whether Autanism is truly a monotheistic religion or should be

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 2>thought of as such. So that's a whole different subject

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 2>for another time.

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 3>The short version is one ancient Egyptian king tried to

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 3>elevate a particular deity from the Egyptian pantheon above all

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 3>others and make that the exclusive focus of state worship.

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, you can read more about that if you

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 3>go look up Autum.

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and basically after that king's death, everyone's like, well,

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 2>let's go back to the other thing. We were doing

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 2>where maybe not as into the sun disc as we

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 2>were pretending to be anyway, back to a cyrus here. So,

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Fritz writes that the Old Kingdom, so this is roughly

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven hundred to twenty two hundred BC, was more rigid,

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 2>was more formal, but that the Middle Kingdom to follow,

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 2>also known as the Period of Reunification from twenty forty

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 2>to seventeen eighty two BC, it was more balance, more sympathetic.

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.239
<v Speaker 2>There's great literacy, there is more of a melding of

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of high mythology and the folklore of the people,

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 2>and the rulers of this period promoted the worship of

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Osiris and the cult symphasis on resurrection and the afterlife. Now,

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's easy to take this last bit for granted,

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 2>because if you adhere to a religion, or you're closely

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 2>aligned with one or one or more religions via your culture,

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 2>your upbringing, or just your general interests, then the continuation

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 2>of the soul is not a radical concept. It's like

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to put yourself in a mindset where someone

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 2>is coming at you with some radically new concept of

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 2>religious continuation of the soul of some sort of immortality

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 2>of the soul, someone saying, hey, guess what, you know

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 2>that part of you that feels special inside your consciousness

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 2>and heart and all of that. What if that doesn't

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 2>have to be annihilated when you die? And I have

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 2>to stress. I say this as someone who was raised

0:27:55.680 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 2>in a Protestant church that even now sometimes for me

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 2>it's more challenging to exercise or entertain a worldview in

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 2>which there is no continuation of the human soul after death.

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.880
<v Speaker 2>And that's regardless of logic or reason. It's just such

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 2>a huge part of not only the Christian worldview view

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 2>but also the mainstream worldview that of course what we

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 2>have is special, and that somehow it continues on in

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 2>one form or another, either directly aligned with some sort

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 2>of belief system or just you know, in sort of

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 2>the general pop culture sense of like spirits and angels

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 2>and like, there's just something that must live on after

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 2>we die in our physical bodies. And there's nothing wrong

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 2>with that concept, I think, at least just when it's

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 2>employed in a way that gives us hope and peace,

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 2>though of course it can also be used for opposite aims.

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 2>But to bring us back to this period, in which

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 2>like the Cult of Osiris is rising and it's becoming

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 2>more and more popular. Imagine a religious world and a

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 2>worldview in which the afterlife is largely unavailable. It exists,

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 2>but it's not for the common people, not for most people.

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 2>It is for a very small percentage of people. It

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 2>is like the equivalent of like extreme opulent wealth in

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 2>our world, you know, like it is the SuperMansion with

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 2>the apocalypse bunker. You know it is. This is only

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 2>for a very small, very slender portion of society. It

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 2>is not for you. But during the Middle Kingdom you

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 2>have this ongoing democratization of the afterlife, fritz It describes,

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 2>and this was enhanced by the cult of Osiris. So

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I want to read a passage from Fritzer where he

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 2>goes through an example of this quote. Prior to the

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Middle Kingdom, Egyptians believed that all people possessed a ka,

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 2>or a soul or life force, but only rulers possessed

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 2>a ba, which was the individual uniqueness that constitutes a personality.

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 2>It required the ka and the Ba to be kept

0:29:56.280 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 2>united or at least in close proximity for immortality in

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 2>the afterlife. When the people of the Middle kingdom came

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 2>to believe that all humans had a ba. They were

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 2>conceding that everyone could enjoy the after life if the

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 2>proper burial rituals were followed. Yeah, so suddenly it's available

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 2>to everyone who at least can undergo the proper rituals.

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 2>And so you saw certain rituals become more popular and

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 2>are more present in the archaeological record, such as the

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 2>use of shabti statues. They begin to appear in more tombs.

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 2>These would have been like little representations of servants, servants

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 2>that would work for the deceased in the afterlife, like

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 2>this will be buried with you, and now you will

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 2>have a servant to help you in the afterlife. This

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of general idea we see in various other religions

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 2>as well. Okay, and so osiris becomes very popular within Egypt.

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 2>But then eventually the ancient Greeks and then the ancient

0:30:56.000 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Romans they also get a whiff of osiris and they're like, oh,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 2>we would like some of that as well. He points

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 2>out that the ancient Greeks and Romans were some of

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the initial egyptomaniacs, and while the Greeks found on the

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 2>whole that the religion of the Egyptians was profoundly different

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 2>from their own. They were intrigued by its systems of

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:19.719
<v Speaker 2>magic and by it, you know, its deities, just as

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 2>we are intrigued by these things today. And they did

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 2>recognize some fundamental similarities. He writes that the Greeks frequently

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 2>attempted to synchronize the gods of other cultures with their own,

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 2>and they certainly did this with the Egyptians. And actually,

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 2>for some Greek writers, these fundamental similarities were incredibly important.

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Right, So they might say, actually, we're talking about the

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 3>same god when we say this God and they say

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 3>that God. But we just have different names for the

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 3>same one here.

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, And they seem to take it even a step

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 2>beyond that, because it's one thing to say, well, you know,

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I have my concept of God and you have yours

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 2>on the same you know where else, really on the

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 2>same wavelength. But it's another to say your yours came first.

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure mine's just a knockoff of yours, you know.

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 2>And we kind of see this. According to Fritz So,

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 2>fifth century BC Greek historian Herodotus concluded that knowledge of

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the gods spread from Egyptian origins to the Greeks. So

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 2>it's like, well, the Egyptians discovered the gods first, and

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.959
<v Speaker 2>we just followed. We learned of this from them, And anyway,

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 2>he ends up drawing numerous lines between Greek gods and

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 2>possible Egyptian origins, though Fritz points out that there are

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 2>there are clear exceptions to this line of thinking, such

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 2>as Poseidon, who was apparently brought to Greece more from

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 2>the direction of Libya. Still, others made these connections. To

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Plutarch made these connections, so there seems to have been

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 2>at the very least like a recognized heritage in all

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 2>of this. Now that and certainly the Greeks and the

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Romans were particularly taken by not only a Cyrus, but

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 2>also isis Here's another bit from Fritz that I want

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 2>to read. Quote. Although in the modern stereotype the Egyptian

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 2>religion is depicted as mystical, mysterious and magical, Greek and

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Roman visitors did not see it in this way. Plutarch's

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 2>staunchly defended Egyptian religion as rational and ethical rather than

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 2>merely superstitious. Herodotus went so far as to credit the

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Egyptians with the invention of the common practices of ancient religion,

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 2>such as altars, statues, and temples dedicated to the various gods.

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 2>The cult of Isis became so populated that it spread

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 2>throughout the lands of the Hellenistic kingdoms and the Roman Empire.

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, first of all, ancient Egypt was simply so ancient,

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 3>like there were these remnants of great civilizations that had

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 3>been around for so long. We've mentioned this on the

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 3>show before, but the astounding fact that to the Romans,

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 3>like Plutarch, you know, the old King of Egypt, the

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 3>pyramids were older to them than the Roman Empire is

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:10.240
<v Speaker 3>to us. The distance of history there is is crazy

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:14.320
<v Speaker 3>to believe. So so there's there. On one hand, ancient

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Egypt was just so evidently ancient as a great civilization,

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 3>you could imagine things, many things you had might have

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 3>come from it. But then also, as you're saying, there's

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 3>just this clear spread of say, the cult of Isis.

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and at the same time, yes, sometimes attributing things

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 2>to the Egyptians that that they probably didn't invent, Like

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 2>Fritz mentions that that Diodorus credited of Cyrus with the

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 2>invention of great cultivation and ultimately wine making, though there

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 2>does not seem to be evidence of this, you know

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 2>that they're that wine and great cultivation has an Egyptian

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 2>origin now, but eventually we do see more of a

0:34:56.000 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 2>full on appropriation and recreation of Egyptian concepts. And in

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 2>one of the strong examples of this, and one of

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the concerns of Cyrus is the god so rapists, this

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 2>would have been a Greco Egyptian syncretic deity. So it's

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 2>it's like an amalgam of both Cyrus and in Oppus,

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 2>as well as aspects of various Greek deities, like I

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 2>think there's a little Zeus and Hades in there. This

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 2>would have been a being that would have that would

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 2>have become popular on under the Ptolemaic rule. But still

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.399
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't mean that, for instance, that doesn't really seem

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 2>to impact Isis. Based on what I've read, the worship

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 2>of Isis may have spread even more in Roman culture.

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Worship of Isis would travel along trade routes through the

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Mediterranean world into Spain and even to the British Isles,

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 2>so I think there I've read articles about archaeological evidence

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:56.320
<v Speaker 2>of Isis worship, like ancient Isis worship in London. So

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm not talking about like later periods of Egyptomania where

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 2>you had occultists and so forth bringing in the concept

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:08.839
<v Speaker 2>of isis, but kind of like original Isis worship, if

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 2>you will. But then again to the point, and I

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 2>don't want to go through all the examples of egypt Domania.

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 2>I do recommend everyone check out that book, because this

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 2>is a book that deals not only with like ancient

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 2>Egyptian religion and culture in its origin, but also these

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.320
<v Speaker 2>various levels of egypt Domania from like you know, dealing

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 2>with examples from say the Victorian world and the Renaissance

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 2>on up through like trashy be movies if like you know,

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 2>brief breakdowns of some really bad Mummy movies. But they

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 2>are examples of at least the reverberations of international and

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 2>multicultural interest in ancient Egypt. And it may in many

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 2>cases it might not be that deep. You know, it

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 2>might be just like, oh, I kind of like how

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 2>this looks and this sounds weird to me, so I'm

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna make a horror movie. But it's still you know,

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 2>reverberations are the same energy. But we'll mention one really

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 2>quickly so during Renaissance Egypt Doomania, there was still a

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 2>fair amount of pull toward Osiris. There's a character that

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 2>was an Italian who was originally named Giovanni Nani who

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 2>lived fourteen thirty two through fifteen oh two, went by

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 2>the name Viterbo, and he made various connections between Etruscan

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 2>traditions and the Egyptians. But he even went so far

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 2>as to claim that the Boreses were the descendants of Osiris.

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure what sort of supporting material he made

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 2>for that, but in anyway, Osiris would continue to serve

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 2>as a central figure in various waves of Egyptomania moving forward.

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:51.879
<v Speaker 2>So Osiris is invoked in various occultist movements. In Osiris

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 2>is definitely invoked by various ancient astronaut writers, and you

0:37:56.400 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 2>also see the use of Osiris in the movements of

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 2>Afrocentrists and also afro Futurists. It's just, I mean, he

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 2>is a powerful figure mythologically, and of course he's going

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 2>to We're going to keep coming back to him and

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 2>finding new ways to sort of think about him and

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 2>new ways to invoke him.

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, I think maybe that will do it for

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 3>part one of our series on Osiris, but we've got

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 3>more to talk about next time. That's right.

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:26.839
<v Speaker 2>We shall return in a part two and that will

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 2>be on Thursday. In the meantime, certainly write in if

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 2>you have feedback on this episode of other examples of osiris,

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 2>or isisigyptomania that you want to bring up. Everything is

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 2>fair game, but just a reminder. Stuff Blow your Mind

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:42.800
<v Speaker 2>is primarily a science and culture podcast, with core episodes

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 2>on Tuesdays and Thursdays. On Mondays we do listener mail.

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 2>On Wednesdays we do a short form episode, and on

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 2>Fridays we set aside most serious concerns to just talk

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:53.240
<v Speaker 2>about a weird film on Weird House Cinema.

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.280
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 3>topic for the future, or just to say hello, you

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 3>can email us at contact at stuff to Blow your

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:07.399
<v Speaker 3>Mind dot com.

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.