WEBVTT - Lakers Need Consistency, Zaccharie Risacher Making The Leap, Suns Cooked

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>The volume, the finals are here. The only thing for

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>sure is it's the last time to bet on college

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>basketball this season. It's been an amazing ride to get here,

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>full of the unexpected happenings. Maybe there will be more.

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Get in on all the action, expected and unexpected with

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings Sports Book. With live betting, exclusive content, promos, and parlays,

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings is the ultimate college basketball destination for March. Ready

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to make your first bet, check out the matchups and

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>pick a team to win. It is that simple. I

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>have a big Arizona fan here from twoson Arizona big

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>underdogs against Duke this weekend. If you believe in the

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Wildcats and their chances to win, They're currently listed

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>at plus four thousand on Draft Kings first time. Here's

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>something special just for you new DraftKings customers. Bet five

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars to get one hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets.

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Instantly bet the unexpected with Draft Kings Sports Book. Download

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the DraftKings Sportsbook app and use code hoops that's code

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>hoops aps for new customers to get one hundred and

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars in bonus bets When you bet just five

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>bucks only on DraftKings. The Crown is yours. Gambling problem

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>called one eight hundred Gambler New York call eight seven

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>seven eight Hope en Y or text Hope n Y

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to four six seven three sixty nine. In Connecticut, help

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>us available for problem gambling called eight eight eight seven

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG dot org.

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill Casino and Resort

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas twenty one plus. Age in eligibility varies by jurisdiction.

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Void in Ontario, new customers only. Bonus bets expire one

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance. For additional terms

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and responsible gaming resources, say DKG dot co slash audio.

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, welcome to hoops tonight. You're at the volume

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>heavy Monday. Everybody. Hope all of you guys had an

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>incredible weekend. It is good to be back. I had

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.559
<v Speaker 1>a very fun weekend at the sphere with my wife.

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>We went to three Dead shows and just an incredible experience.

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I've seen them. I think I was talking through this

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>with my brother last night. I think I've seen nine

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Dead shows now, so I think I officially qualify as

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a deadhead. I've really grown to appreciate that as like

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the final opportunities we have to see in

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>old school jam band in their prime. And it's been

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. That said, it's time to get

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>serious about the NBA. We are three. I was thinking

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>about this when I was recording with Colin last night.

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, if you haven't seen that yet,

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>go to the Colin Coward podcast YouTube channel. We talked

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>last night. We talked a bunch of Celtics, we talked

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of Thunder, we talked some Lakers, we talked

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.119
<v Speaker 1>to some Cooper Flag. We got to do a bunch

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, so make sure you guys check that out.

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>But while we were talking, we were thinking about the

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>next time we're gonna record, and it's gonna be in

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>two Sundays. Two Sundays from now, we're gonna know four

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 1>of the eight first round series, and that following Sunday

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna know all eight of them, and we're gonna

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>have series previews and we have the play in tournament.

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>There's just so much exciting basketball ahead. It feels very

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>very much like the calm before the storm. But that's it.

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad I got to take a little bit of

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a break and do some traveling, but I'm excited to

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>get back to it. Today. We're going to be talking

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of Lakers after their uneven road trip,

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>which has shown a lot of extended stretches of dominance,

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 1>but also some execution lapses, including a catastrophic loss in

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Chicago to the Bulls. Or we're talking a little bit

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>about that. I want to shout out Zachary Rissache, who

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>had a career high thirty six points last night, and

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>there was some stuff with him that was popping in

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a film session I did with him surrounding a Hawk's

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Rockets game about a week ago. So I want to

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of talk a little bit about Zachary Rissache's rookie season.

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>And then at the tail end of the show, I

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>think we finally saw the nail, the final nail go

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in the coffin of the Phoenix Suns last night, as

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they just got demolished by the Houston Rockets. So I

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>want to talk a little bit about the Suns at

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the tail end of the show, and then we are

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>going live tonight after the TNT Slates so we're going

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to be hitting Celtic's Grizzlies as well as Lakers Rockets

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in tonight's show. You guys are the joke before we

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>get started. Subscribe to the Hoops Tonight YouTube channels. Miss

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>any more of our videos, follow me on Twitter at

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>underscore jsonlt so you guys don't miss show announcements. Don't

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>forget about a podcast feed wherever you get your podcast

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>on our Hoops Tonight. It's also super helpful if you

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>leave a rating and a review on that front. We

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>also have brand new social media feeds on Twitter, Instagram,

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook where Jackson's doing some incredible work this year.

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you guys follow us there, and then, last

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>but not least, keep dropping mail bag questions and YouTube

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>comments so we can keep getting to them throughout the

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>remainder of the season. We're doing a mail bag I

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>think I'm recording one tomorrow, so make sure you get

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of mail bag questions in the comments of

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>this video for what we're recording tomorrow, which I believe

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to air on Wednesday. All right, let's talk

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>some basketball. So after the Pacers game, I talked a

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>lot about the idea of the Lakers having these brief

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic lapses in execution that are costing them games or

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>costing them opportunities to close games out more comfortably. Since

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the Pacers game, they lost an absolutely insane game against

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bulls. The Bulls made eleven threes in the fourth quarter,

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>including a half court shot from Josh Giddy to win it.

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>And a win in Memphis against the Grizzlies similarly where

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>they led by twenty and then ended up trailing in

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter. And the Grizzlies have been spiraling a

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and they just fired their coach, but they

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 1>have a ton of talent. Joan Morant was back. They

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>were the five seed, I believe at the time, or

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the four to five seed. They had the same record

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>as the Lakers, a couple of quality opponents on the

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>road that the Lakers dominated for stretches, yet still had

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>to manage to almost lose. I talked about those issues

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>after the Pacers game, and a couple of great examples

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>in the two following games. Again, they've played three good

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>teams on the road in this three game span. The

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Pacers had won seven out of eight. The Bulls had

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>won eight out of ten. And the Grizzlies were in

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a cold spell, like we said, but their five seed

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>and they've been great at home all year. The Lakers

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 1>led by at least seventeen points in all three of

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>those games. They led by twenty against Memphis, they led

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>by eighteen in the fourth quarter of the Bulls game.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Yet they trailed in the fourth quarter of every single

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>one of those three games. Actually managed to lose one

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.799
<v Speaker 1>of them. And if it wasn't for a Lebron tapping

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>at the buzzer against Indiana, they would have gone one

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>to two in those three games. Long extended stretches of

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>dominance undone with these brief catastrophic laps As an execution

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>the Grizzlies game, I was watching it yesterday in the

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>morning before we went to the airport. They were up

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty to thirty. On a Lebron James shot put them

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>up twenty. The Grizzlies cut that twenty point lead to

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>six in four minutes. Imagine dominating a team for a

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>quarter and a half and losing ninety percent of that

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>progress in a four minute span where you let go

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>of the rope. It ends up being the same issues

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>every single time. One of these two. On offense, they

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>walked the ball up the floor slowly. They usually succumbed

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to ball pressure and either get too deep into the

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>shot clock and have to take bad shots, or they

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>end up having to face a trap or something like that,

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and Lebron, Luca or Austin will be sloppy with the

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>way they handle that ball pressure and they'll turn the

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>ball over and they'll end up going the other way

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in transition. On defense, and this is one of the

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>most interesting things about this Laker defense. Their defense is

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>predicated on keeping the ball in front of a defender,

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>always keeping someone between them and the rim, so they

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>have to make something over the top. You'll see with

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>their dribble penetration the way they handle it like the

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>guy on the ball has a job to slide his

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>feet and contain the ball. Great example I thought from

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the Grizzlies game was Austin Reeves. I thought Austin just

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>did an excellent job for most of the game in

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>reps against John Moran and against Desmond Bain, sliding his feet,

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>absorbing contact, flattening out drives. That's what you want to do,

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but inevitably you're gonna give up dribble penetration. This Lakers

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>team is going to give up dribble penetration. They have

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>too many of those slower footed guys on the floor.

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Foot speed is not necessarily the strength this Laker team

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>outside of a handful of guys, right So from there

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>they have a plan. They're always funneling towards the sideline

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're offering help from the baseline. And generally speaking,

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>if a guy gets beat off the dribble, that guy

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>who's guarding the ball will just bail and run to

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the next rotation and there will be somebody almost to

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>like it kind of feels almost like catching, like the

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>guy is the helper is catching the drive, sitting in

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>his stance, arms out wide, right around like that first block,

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>second block, waiting for the guy on the drive in

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>help as the team rotates around him. And that's how

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers deal with dribble penetration. They basically switch on

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the drive. If that makes sense that that's the type

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of scheme requires a lot of hard work. The on

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>ball guy has to rotate out of it. The helper

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>has to be there in time. There are these brief

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>openings where guys have to rotate to shooters. It's a

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of running, a lot of reading the play, a

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of communication. And when the Lakers do those things

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>this year, they've been great defensively. They did it consistently

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>for a few months there from mid January to early March,

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 1>right and we've seen flashes of it in the last week.

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>They hold Chicago to seventeen points in that third quarter

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>when they go on their big run to take the lead.

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>They shut Indy down in that second quarter when they

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 1>first took their big lead in that game. But since

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's injury, it's been a we'll do it when we

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like it kind of thing. And again like when

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in the two main ways that I see them let

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>go of the rope in these like kind of catch

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>help type of rotation situations, it are like at the

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>end of the Indie game, Lucas starts getting beat off

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the dribble, Ruie starts getting beat off the dribble. The

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>catches were not there. The Lakers were just hugging up

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>off the ball, leaving dudes on an island, and they

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>were giving up easy like concession driving lamps. Again, that's

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental part. So what makes their defense good is

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>they're loaded up, they have their help ready, they rotate

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>out of it, and they literally almost blew a game

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in Indiana by completely stopping that at the tail end

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of the game. The second way that you'll end up

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing it is in overhelp situations. This we saw in

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the Bulls game. It's okay to acknowledge that the Bulls

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>shot eleven for fourteen from three in the quarter. That's

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>insane under any circumstances. A lot of impressive shot making, right,

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but you have to find a way as a defense

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to make guys uncomfortable, to make them miss, And there

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>were several execution errors in that quarter which are going

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 1>to breed a red hot shooting stretch. They helped off

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of the strong side corner twice in that fourth quarter

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 1>against the Bulls. You guys have probably heard this before,

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>this concept of don't help off the strong side corner.

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a very specific reason why you don't want to

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>help off of the strong side corner. It is the

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>easiest pass in the world basketball player to make. You're

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>funneling guys towards the sideline. Guys on the left wing,

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>he rips to the left, the guy sliding with him,

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>he's got dribble penetration. What's the easiest pass in the

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>world for that guy to make is if the guy

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in the left corner steps over and it's like, okay,

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>little ten foot chess pass to a wide open guy

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>standing in the corner literally ten feet away, writing clear view,

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it's an easy pass to make. Right what you're supposed

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to do in that situation. That guy, if he wants

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>to gap to where he feels comfortable closing out, that's

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing where he just reaches and recovers. But that's

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>not the guy you ever want to concede the pass to.

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>You have help coming from the baseline. When the help

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>comes from the baseline, there's a way to beat that help,

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>but it is a substantially tougher pass. Now imagine a

0:11:56.080 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>different scenario, left wing rip, left dribble penetration. We have

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Lebron on Kevin Herder in the left corner in the

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter of the Bulls game. Lebron helped off Kevin

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Herder got a wide open three, and he nailed it.

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's say Lebron's gapping but stays in control of Herder.

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Now the help comes from Jackson Hayes along the baseline,

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>who's open the skip for a left handed dribbler trying

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to go across his body and acrossed helpers covering twenty

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>five feet in the air thirty feet in the air

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to get to the open man. That's why you don't

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>help off the strong side corner. It's simply about knowing

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 1>where the help is coming from and making the passer

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>make a more difficult pass. A more difficult pass over

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a longer stretch of space that's looping or deflected or

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>not on target is much easier for your defense to

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>rotate out of. That is basketball one oh one. There

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>were two strong side corner helps that gave wide open

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>threes to Kobe White and Order in that fourth herder

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in that fourth quarter. Those are execution errors. Jackson Hayes

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>overhelped on a drive left Nikole Vusovich wide open at

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the top of the key. Again, we talked about this.

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>When a guy has a drive flattened out and under control,

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>he now has to take a contested, off balance layup

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>substantially lower percentage shot on a two. Like if he

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>goes forty five percent on that layup, that's zero point

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>nine points per shot. Your defense can live with that

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's the straight line drives where it's like he's going

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to make a layup every time. That's when you need

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to be there and ready to help. You overhelp, give

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>up a wide open three to Vusovich. Luka had a

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>very similar one where a driver was contained, left Patrick

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Williams wide open at the top of the key. Lebron

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>two awful reps in the final minute uh go screen

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>from Kevin Herder that the Lakers were switching all night.

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>It was a clear switch. Lebron looked like he was

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>on the bus because they're up, you know, five or

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>six with less than a minute left. He thinks the

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>game is over. It's not over. He's lazy. He's on

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>He's standing upright out of his stance. Kevin Herder slips

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 1>out of the screen, hits a wide open three the

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>possession before the Kobe White three that gave him the lead.

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Lebron overhelps on Avusvich upper like kind of left wing

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>area catch, ends up leaving Patrick Williams wide open in

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the left corner right before he threw the ball away

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>throwing the ball to Kobe White. These are execution errors.

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I saw a lot of Laker fans saying like, oh,

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I cannot believe the Bulls shot eleven for fourteen from three.

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>We have got to get out of this mindset of

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking that shooting is all just luck. It is not.

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>You can play teams into missus and makes to a

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>certain extent, I would argue that process has a much

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>bigger role in shot result than luck, even though we

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>can acknowledge that luck does play a role. And again,

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>like the Lakers, they they have an opportunity to win

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the title this year, but there are certain non negotiables

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>things that they absolutely must have tightened up if they're

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna get to where they want to go, and one

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of them is they have to be the best defensive

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>version of themselves, which is going to require a wire

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to wire level of execution. I know they can do it.

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>They held what six or seven straight teams to one

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and two points or fewer. They are capable of

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>doing that. They have not been doing that since Lebron

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>James came back from injury. I just think it's at

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>least worth acknowledging as a trend and something to keep

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>an eye on. The bottom line is the Lakers just

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>played three good teams on the road, went in methodically

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>dominated them to large leads, and yet they were one

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Lebron tip in from going one and two. I'm not

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to be all gloom and doom. I'm still super

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>high on the Lakers. I was listening while I was

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>on the airplane yesterday to Pet and Darius from Laker

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Film Room, and Darius Oreano does great work. He also

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>writes for Lakers dot com. He was talking about how

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>he viewed these two games, these two kind ugly games

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to Indiana and Chicago, as part of the Lakers returning

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to form before the Lebron injury. I totally agree. I

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>do think that these last three games are a sign,

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>especially after they looked bad against Orlando and what was

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the of the first Chicago game, they are progressing towards

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>being what they were before the Lebron injury. I am

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>still super high on this team. I'm still very tempted

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to pick them to win the West when we do

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>our playoff predictions in the coming weeks. But I wanted

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to harp on these execution lapses because I do view

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>them as a non negotiable thing. If how many champions

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>do you know of an NBA history? They had a

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>reputation for extended like or like consistent three or four

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>minute stretches in every game where they just don't play

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>hard and they don't execute and they hemorrhage leads. It

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>burns you, it does, don't tell me it doesn't. It's

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>happened so many times in NBA history that the Bucks

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Raptors series, when they had that big lead in Game

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>four before they blew it the the the Lakers, excuse me,

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Heat blowing that game to the Dallas Mavericks

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>in Game two back in twenty eleven. There are so

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>many examples in NBA history where series who the trophy

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>goes to swings on a team blowing a lead, a

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>team not finishing the job. Job's not finished until the

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>buzzer sounds, and that is a very important hallmark trait

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>for NBA champions. And I just would like to see

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>before we get to mid April, I would like to

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>see a week or two stretch where the Lakers show

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that consistent level of execution from buzzer to buzzer again.

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>We are going to be covering the Lakers Rockets game

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>tonight on YouTube, including the Celtics Grizzlies game live on

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube after the final buzzer of that last game. Let's

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>move on to Zachary Usache in the Hawk. So he

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>drops the career high thirty six in a dominant victory

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>over the Bucks. So the third game this year he

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>scored over thirty points. Zach's played twenty seven consecutive games.

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>In those games, he's averaging fifteen point two points per game.

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>He's shooting fifty two percent from the field forty three

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>percent from three on over five attempts per game. He's

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>showcasing a little bit more of a quick release against

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks. Hit a couple of no dip jumpers. Those

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>are where the ball is already is caught in the

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>pocket and you flow immediately into the shot instead of

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>having to catch somewhere else and then dip down into

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>your release and like kind of restart your chain of

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 1>energy from the floor up to the top of the shot.

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>He's showing a lot of really high level scoring. I

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about this concept for a minute because

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really important part of team building

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>moving forward in the NBA. Scoring is the ultimate compliment

0:18:57.520 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to playmaking. I've been thinking a lot about this content

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>at this season. When you have elite playmaking on your team,

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Guys like Trey Young, guys like Lebron, Luca and Nicola Jokic,

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>these really really high level passers. You need elite play

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>finishing to pay those sequences off. Whether it's a vertical

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>spacer like Aaron Gordon alongside Jokic, or Derek Lively alongside Luca,

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Hayes alongside Luca, or a deadly spot up guy

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>someone like Kyle Korter back with Lebron when he was

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Cavs, or Malik Beasley playing with Kid Cunningham.

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Guys that can pay off these sequences from your playmakers.

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>But one of the manifestations of that type of player

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that I've been talking a lot about this year, I've

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>been referring to it as the weak side scoring forward.

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>This is why I went into detail about the strong

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>side corner help thing that we talked about earlier. The

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>same concept is built into pick and roll coverages too.

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason why they don't offer low man help

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>out of the strong side corner. They offer low man

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 1>help out of the weak side corner. Why do they

0:19:57.640 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>do that? So that for the same reason on an

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>ISO drive, if a guy's getting downhill in a ball screen.

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>The opening for him as a playmaker is across the

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>court and across his body. That's the goal. You want

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to make it across the court and across the body,

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>across as many help defenders as possible to make that

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>past difficult, right, but that is ultimately the opening, and

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>all of the best playmakers in the league consistently capitalize

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>on those openings. We've talked about this concept a ton

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>making reads in pick and roll. What are my reads?

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Big man steps up, I'm making a read based on

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the role man or the weak side corner, based on

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>what the low man does. If the loeman steps over,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm skipping it. If the one man stays home, excuse me,

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm throwing the lob. If the big man drops back

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and the guard is chasing, my read is to shoot

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in the mid range. My read is to get as

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>close to the basket for as high percentage of a

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>shot as possible. Those are the pick and roll reads.

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>And so when these teams, the majority of teams are

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>bringing their big up to the level and bringing the

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>low man over, that skip passes open, and those skip

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>passes are going to be made, especially by Trey young.

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>In these sorts of situations, there's a bunch of different

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>ways that you can look to score right. It's not

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>just hitting spot up threes. It's running your lane in

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>transition as an athlete, it's driving closeouts. It's oh, they

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>switched a screen or we ran in transition and got

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a cross match, and now there's a guard on this forward.

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>You need that forward to do a lot more of

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this high level scoring. These are professional scorers, but primarily

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>in an off ball context. Examples are like Michael Porter,

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Junior og An, Andobi Ruy Hatcha, Mura, DeAndre Hunter, Lori

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Markenen is kind of a high end version of that

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Jazz Denny Avdia, even though he's been doing

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>more on ball stuff as of late, Kyle Kuzma, PJ Washington,

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>this is becoming an extremely important archetype in the NBA.

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Zachary Rissaschet has been doing some of the best week

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 1>side scoring work you'll see out of a rookie four

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>starts in transition. I was watching the Rockets Hawks game

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>from about a week ago. You can find him on

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter feed. I shared some clips, but Zachary Rissachet

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>was amazing in transition in that game, just literally out

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>running everybody up the floor, didn't matter if the rebound

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>was captured and he was on the baseline. He was

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>sprinting and it was so visually jarring that I clipped

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>these examples and I put them on my Twitter feed

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>for you guys to see. Watch these three clips. Watch

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the way Zachary Rissache runs. Watch when he gets his

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>head of steam, how it literally looks like he's moving

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a different speed than everyone else on the floor. He's

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a gazelle. It's crazy. And he'll get two or three

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>wide open attempts at the rim every game just by

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>running the floor. And that pairs perfectly with Trey Young,

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>who's one of the best hit a head passers in

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the league. I had to coach my last year in

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>college at Arizona Christian University. Shout out to Jeff Rudder.

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>They just won their conference. Turn him in on a

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>buzzer beater, crazy buzzer beater, and then they made it

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to the final four before losing Naia tournament. But he

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>used to say to all of us that you can

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>manufacture twelve points a game just by getting a transition layup,

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.679
<v Speaker 1>running the floor, crashing the offensive glass and getting to

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the foul line once per half. It's such a simple

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>way to produce in a basketball game. And even if

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you take the foul line part out, because obviously there's

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:26.959
<v Speaker 1>some out of your control stuff there with the whistle,

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>if you just crash the offensive glass and you just

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>run your lane in transition and you get one bucket

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a half each, that's eight points right there. You're one

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>bucket away from double figures. It is such a simple

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>way to produce in a basketball game. Run every time,

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>crash every time. And he presents such a massive passing

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>target for Tray because he's so athletic, so rangy and long.

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>He caught a behind the back lob from Trey in

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks game where he dunked it behind his head

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's just a massive passing target. Then in the

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.719
<v Speaker 1>half court, as we talked about, when they load up

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the strong side in those skips, it's just like king

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of the court. When you're playing with your buddies on

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>short closeouts, you need to knock down threes. He's starting

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that at a really high level. In this

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven game span, he's at forty three percent on

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>over five attempts per game. Now, what's gonna start happening.

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>If he can maintain that level of shooting for a

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>substantial amount of time, he's gonna start getting chased off

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the line. And that's where I think he has a

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>ton of potential as a score. He has downhill burst

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>attacking close outs. He had a dunk against Shangoon in

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the Rockets game where he drove a close out off

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the left wing and just hammered it with his left

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>hand on Shangon's face, a wildly athletic play. He has

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>good footwork on like spins in Euros. He had a

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.959
<v Speaker 1>bucket against the Nets. Driving a close out against Nick

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Claxton in the left corner. He jabbed, got back to

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it deep in the corner with a hesitation drib will

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>cross back over, got into the lane, pump, faked, pivoted

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>over his right shoulder on his step through for a

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>left handed finish. That's a really high level scoring move.

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>He had one on Harden off the left wing, jabbed left,

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>drove right, snatched back to the left, drove high gather

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>through zubach and finished at the basket. These are really

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>high level scoring moves attacking with an advantage in those

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>king of the court situations. He had a left to

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>right euro against Zubatch a couple weeks ago where he

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>drove out of the corner. Like left to right euro

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most complex footwork pieces you'll see

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 1>for a right handed player. Most guys don't know how

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to do it, and he still has a ton of

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>growth in front of him. Shooting hot for a couple

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of months is not the same as being an elite shooter.

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>We've all seen it. This guy's shooting forty three percent

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>from three over his last whatever. Games. You gotta do

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it for a long stretch of time before teams game

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>plan for you in that way. That that will take

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a few years probably, but that will be what truly

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>unlocks his off the dribble game, because I don't think

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>like as good as he is in the open court

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>as an athlete, he's his start stop quickness isn't quite

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>as impressive as his athleticism in the open court, which

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to make it so it's a little harder

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>for him to beat people off the dribble unless his

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>jumper comes around, which again will take some time, but

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>that's part of his development. He still needs a lot

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of improvement on the defensive end too. His athleticism has

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>not translated yet as like a really high level off

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>ball defender. He's often a bit behind the play on

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>his help rotations, which prevents him from having an impact.

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>That's about processing speed. That's about like learning the actions

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>so well that you know what's gonna happen as it's developing,

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>so that you can be there a step earlier. And again,

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>as we talked about, his start stop quickness isn't as good.

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>That's why that processing speed is going to be so

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>important for him because he's gonna need to be there

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>sooner in terms of the way he's reading these plays.

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But the bottom line is he's a rookie that projects

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the best people at his particular

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>job in the NBA, which is being that weak side

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>scoring forward, which is verying for Hawks fans. I think

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it might officially be over for the Suns. They got

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely smacked by the Rockets last night. Shane Gouon was

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>cooking all their bigs again. Jalen Green poured in another

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty three points email Udoka in the second quarter brought

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>out that zone defense that they that he's been using

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch for the last month or so, and they

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>immediately sparked a massive run in that second quarter and

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>they never looked back. It was a complete and total

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>physical domination by Houston. They out rebounded them by six,

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>They forced nineteen turnovers, They scored thirty four points off

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>of those turnovers. They won the fast break points battle

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>thirty two to eight. Houston scored forty points in transition

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>in total in this game. But I want to focus

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>on Phoenix here for a second, because we're gonna hit

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Houston in tonight's show as they play the Lakers again.

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going live on YouTube tonight after the T and

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>T slate. What did I say about Phoenix a month ago?

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I said they struck me as the stereotypical, older veteran

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>team that knows deep down that they don't really have

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a chance to win anything this year. And the way

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that that's gonna manifest is in these short week or

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.479
<v Speaker 1>two long bursts where they compete and they look they

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>look decent, they defend their rebound, they do their jobs,

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 1>but that they inevitably let go of the rope because

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>they can't sustain it, because they don't believe, and that's

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>exactly what just happened. They won five out of six,

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>some quality wins versus the Calves and the Bucks. They

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:30.239
<v Speaker 1>were defending in rebounding top ten and both. I think

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 1>they might have been top five in both over that span.

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But the NBA schedule does not let up. Boston came

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to town without Tatum and kicked their ass. Then it

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>was Minnesota, then it was Houston, a couple of these big,

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>strong athletic teams that were going to truly test Phoenix's

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>commitment to the work, and instead of hanging onto the rope,

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>they just completely let go of it. One thirty seven

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>point four defensive rating in the last three games, they

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>gave an offensive rebound on thirty five percent of opponents misses.

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>That's damagingly bad. And now Katie has an ankle sprain,

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis is back, and the MAVs are climbing in

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the standings. We talked before the year that there was

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be a team that had dead serious championship

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>aspirations but that would miss the playoffs entirely, and no

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>matter who that would be, it would be a catastrophe.

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And it looks like it's going to be the Suns.

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I keep watching them and thinking that it's not a

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Durant and Devin Booker problem. But at the same time,

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's worth mentioning that neither of those

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>two guys can really leverage their physical gifts on the game.

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Katie has length and he has mobility that helps him

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>on defense, but he carries a massive offensive load, so

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>he can't devote too many resources to that end, and

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>he's not very strong. He can be pushed around, which

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is very very dangerous quality for a front court player.

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Defensively on the glass duck ins things along those lines.

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>It's tough to do that job. Outside of like rangey

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>rotating and rim contests. There's just a limitation when you

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:15.959
<v Speaker 1>can't win the ground battle. And again, it's just one

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of those things where you watch these other teams. It's

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>like watching Houston Jalen Green can leverage his athleticism to

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>get to spots. Shane Gouon is bullying these dudes. When

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you watch these teams that have these players, where it's like,

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I can inflict myself physically on the game to assist

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>my team in these key areas that they need help.

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Devin Booker and KD are not necessarily as capable. This

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>is why I still believe it's worth exploring the idea

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of keeping those two. They still give you such a

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>high offensive floor in terms of shot quality. I would

0:30:56.400 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>still just look to find every discount bruiser I can

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>find at every position group and try to breed that

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>culture around them, because regardless of what direction you go

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>this summer, even if you do choose to get rid

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of Kevin Durant or Devin Booker or both, you still

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>need an organizational identity. I talked about this concept after

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics win against the Suns last week. I talked

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>about it with Colin Coward last night on his show.

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>You need an organizational identity that is separate from your stars.

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And so regardless of what direction you go, you need

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to begin the process of establishing that new owner, new coach.

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>You need to start establishing a basketball culture. This season

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>was a massive step back. And so that's the thing, like,

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>unless you think there's some magical trade that's going to

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>just solve all your problems, which I don't think there is,

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you need to begin the process of changing that culture anyway.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And so from that standpoint, if you tweak things enough

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>around those two, that's where Kevin Durant, Devin Booker's upside

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>can actually start to lift you to where you want

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to go. But this is a team that is completely

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>let go of the rope, and I think I would

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>be stunned at this point if we got to see

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>them play meaningful basketball here in a couple of weeks.

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, guys, that is all I have for today,

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is I should say for this morning. We'll be back

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>tonight live on live on YouTube after the T and

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>T games. There is always a sincerely appreciate you guys

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>for supporting me and supporting the show, and I will

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>see you later tonight. What's so guys? As always, I

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you for listening to and supporting OOPS tonight. They

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>would actually be really helpful for us if you guys

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>would take a second and leave a rating and a review.

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>As always, I appreciate you guys supporting us, but if

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you could take a minute to do that, I'd really

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. The volume