WEBVTT - The Siren: Talons and Song

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 2>is Robert Lamb.

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:20.080
<v Speaker 3>And I am Joe McCormick. And once again October content

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 3>has spilled over the edge of the month.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>That's right. In today's episode, we're continuing our Halloween twenty

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty four express with an episode that was originally scheduled

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 2>for late October, but our episode on the Hogs of

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Hell went a little long, ended up going to two episodes,

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 2>so we bumped this one back a bit. It's a

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 2>topic we've touched on briefly before, but it's a great one,

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 2>taking us back to the world of oceanic monsters of

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>myth and legend. We're going to be talking about the siren.

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 3>The siren, so I realized, Rob correct me if I'm wrong,

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 3>But I realized, I think we both had we had

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 3>different theeomorphic hybrids in my and when we were separately

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 3>thinking about the siren. Because when I thought of the siren,

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 3>I first thought of sort of half woman, half bird

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 3>creatures that sing to the sailors. But I get the

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 3>impression that your mind first went to half human, half fish.

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 3>So I guess those are both within the siren tradition,

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 3>aren't they?

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 2>They are. This is one of the things about the siren,

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 2>as we'll discuss, is that there are takes on them

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 2>in which they are essentially mermaids. It's essentially some version

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 2>of the European North European mermaid tradition. There are versions

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 2>of it in which they are just sort of beautiful

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 2>ladies who sing sailors to their death, that sort of thing.

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 2>And then other times they are essentially what we might

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 2>think of as a harpie, you know, they are a

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 2>winged creature, perhaps like an all out vulture type being,

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 2>with even just the head of a maiden or the

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 2>face of a maiden.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 3>But in either case, I think we're to assume that

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 3>their voices may be lovely, but they sing sailors to

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>their doom.

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And that's one thing we can be sure on

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 2>when we look to really the most famous literary account

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 2>of the sirens, but also the one that continues to

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 2>raise a lot of questions because it does skim over

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 2>some of the details. As we'll discuss, we are, of

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 2>course talking about Homer's the Odyssey. I'm just going to

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 2>read a quote here. This is from the Samuel Butler translation.

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 2>I believe this is Circe warning Odysseus and his men

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 2>about the challenges ahead. First, you will come to the sirens,

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 2>who enchant all who come near them. If anyone unwarily

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 2>draws in too close and hears the singing of the sirens,

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 2>his wife and children will never welcome him home again,

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 2>for they sit in a green field and warble him

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 2>to death with the sweetness of their song. There is

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 2>a great heap of dead men's bones lying all around,

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 2>and the flesh still rotting off them.

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Number one, that's intense. Number two does not describe them physically,

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 3>and number three warbled to death.

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Warbled to death. You know which, if you got to go,

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>why not choose warbling? Why not? So this is you know, considered,

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 2>You know this is This is probably the most famous

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 2>literary description and non description of the sirens. But we

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of other materials that have depicted the sirens,

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 2>described them or depicted them visually that also sort of

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 2>compete with our imaginations here and end up in This

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 2>is often the case with these things ends up coloring

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 2>our absorption of Homer's original writings. We've had some great

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 2>cinematic sirens over time, we've have, for example, to get

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 2>into the adaptations of the Odyssey itself. There, of course

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the Three Sirens and No Brother, Where art thou? The

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 2>three strange women that appear as beautiful washer women singing

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 2>go to sleep, Little Baby. They of course lure in

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 2>del Mar and turn him into a horny toad sort of.

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Wait does he get turned back? I haven't seen this

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 3>movie in a while.

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, he doesn't. Actually, we end up finding out later

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 2>that he was never turned into a horny toad. He

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 2>was captured by authorities because he was wanted.

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, and they find him again in the movie

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 3>theater Do Not Seek the Treasure.

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but you know, it's a great sequence in the film,

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of laughs, and it works nicely in comparison

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.239
<v Speaker 2>to the theme of baptism that's also employed in the work.

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 2>Elsewhere in cinema, we tend to see the idea of

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 2>sirens employed more in terms of the evil mermaid. You

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 2>want to have a mermaid, but you want an evil one. Well,

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 2>you lean into this idea of the siren. Just a

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 2>few quick mentions, and I'm missing a lot of them.

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure there's two thousand and one's Daygone. This is

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 2>the Stuart Gordon film you have neat Split Tail that

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 2>kidnaped Mermaids. In that, There's a two and another two

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 2>thousand and one film titled She Creature that I have

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 2>not seen since two thousand and one, but I remember

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 2>having a nice little cast to it, and also having

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>a monstrous mermaid. More recently, I don't know much about

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 2>the plot details here, so I don't know where this

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 2>falls in terms of sirens, but there's a Polish musical

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 2>horror film titled The Lure that seems to have resonated

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 2>with a number of viewers. I've seen some nice reviews

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 2>of that. And then I think we've had at least

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 2>a couple of different Mermaids slash Siren TV shows in

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 2>recent decades, but I have not seen them, So we'll

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>have to lean on our listeners to write in and

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 2>tell us what those are like. Now again, to get

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>back to what we were just talking about earlier, Though

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 2>sirens are not definitively sea creatures or definitively mermaids, however,

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 2>it's impossible to separate the two completely, so you know,

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>we do have to acknowledge that to whatever extent. Sirens

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 2>are based in this idea of undersea creature as well,

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, the idea of people and creatures from beneath

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the waves. Naturally, it goes back very long ways. As

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>long as humans have gazed out across the waves or

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 2>peered down through clear waters from the side of their boats,

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 2>they've dreamed of a mirror world to our own, a

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 2>place where every animal has its watery reflection, where intelligent

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 2>human like beings, no doubt dwell as well, along with

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 2>various monsters and gods and so forth. There is a

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 2>paper by Nancy Easterlin. This is a two thousand and

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 2>one paper again back to two thousand and one that

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 2>we've we cited in a munch Older episode of the

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 2>podcast titled Hans Christian Andersen's Fish out of Water, and

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 2>she points out that the Babylonians recognize gods with fish

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 2>features or hybridity. You have like what Adappa, the fishermen

0:06:55.520 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 2>of Oneius, the teacher of wisdom, even Mighty Inky, the

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 2>ancient Sumerian water god, is sometimes depicted as having a

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 2>cloak of fish or scaled skin, and the chief place

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 2>of worship was a ziggurat known as the House of

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the subterranean waters, and additionally fishtailed gods, water dragons and

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 2>so forth found throughout the cultures of India, China and

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Japan and so forth. There's a quote from that Easter

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 2>paper she writes some other mythological sea beings and deities,

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 2>such as Poseidon and the Sirens were not originally associated

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 2>with water and piicine anatomy. The sirens were originally birds.

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 2>We'll get back to that in a minute, indicating that

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 2>divine power and womanly allure became combined with the power

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 2>and promise of the sea when ancient cultures overtook maritime

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 2>war and trade. So in that paper she gets into

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>a familiar theme on this show when we're talking about

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 2>deities and supernatural beings, is that, of course they are

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>passed down and they do not stay in one form

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 2>or another. They are reused, recreated, you know, different different,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 2>various relaunches and reboots of the brand over time, and.

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 3>In past episodes we've even talked about reasons for questioning

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the very idea of such a thing as a canonical

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 3>form of a deity or a monster or something that

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, that makes sense when you have something like

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 3>intellectual property like if a monster is the creation of

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 3>a specific author and they describe it a certain way,

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 3>and then other people could take the idea and vary it,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 3>but you would want to refer back to what is

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 3>the original one, you know, with like gods and monsters

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 3>and things that come out of folklore. You know, maybe

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 3>sometimes it makes sense to say there's basically an authoritative

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 3>version of a story, but most of the time there's not.

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes the characteristics aren't even given in the earliest works

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 3>that are still extant today. So like searching after the

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 3>canonical form of the monster or deity or whatever is fruitless.

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 3>There just is no original that we can access.

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we've talked about this before. You get

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of close to this idea when you look at

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 2>a multi author of franchise, like say Marvel Comics, where

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 2>you can set you know, you try to explain, like, well,

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 2>who's Venom. Oh he's a villain of Spider Man. Oh well, no,

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 2>he's also kind of a hero, he's kind of an

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 2>anti hero. Oh yeah, And sometimes he's just straight up

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 2>what we would think I was the protagonist of a story,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 2>So it just it changes. And there are probably better

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 2>examples than Venom to turn to there.

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, I think that's a good one, except it's

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 3>it's like that. But imagine if most Marvel comics were

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 3>lost and we don't know what they said or what

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 3>was in them, and we don't know where the first

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 3>appearance of Venom was.

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, But coming back to the siren and

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 2>getting into the Greek traditions here, we as the quote

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 2>we read earlier attests to we certainly experienced the sirens

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 2>and Homer's eighths century BCE work The Odyssey, and they

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 2>are described as malicious, doomy women when we put in

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 2>asterisk by that woman description, malicious do me entities anyway,

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 2>who hang out on rocks and sing to passing sailors.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 2>But Homer neglects to physically describe them at all. So again,

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 2>even by just briefly mentioning them as women, I'm airing

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 2>because he does not ascribe gender to these creatures. But

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the thing is, it's really hard not to be infected

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 2>by the various visual treatments of this encounter of these

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 2>creatures from throughout Western art, you know, which has often

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 2>served as a great opportunity to create dramatic and evocative

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 2>scenes that make use of, you know, the the unclothed

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 2>or partially unclothed male and female bodies. I was talking

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 2>about this with my son yesterday when I was researching this,

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 2>and I mentioned to him, and he already knows his

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 2>way aroun myths and monsters pretty well. I mentioned, you

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 2>know that that Homer never actually describes them. So they

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 2>could look like a woman, they could look like a

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 2>fish monster, they could look like a bird person. We

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 2>don't know. And he asked, well, could they just be

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 2>like a banana peal? And I I dare say they could.

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>And he does not say that they do not look

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 2>like banana peels, and provides no other physical description at all.

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 3>They could literally be Ronald MacDonald.

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 2>They could be. There's nothing in the Odyssey that says

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 2>they're not. So I was reading a bit more about

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 2>this in this is an older book. This is older publication.

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 2>This is from nineteen seventy The Homeric Sirens by Gerald K. Gressith.

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>This was publishing the Transactions and Proceedings of the American

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Philological Association, and in it the author spends a lot

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 2>of time talking about what at the time were like

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 2>two dueling interpretations of the sirens in Homer's the Odyssey,

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's interesting to look at them here.

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 2>So the first one that he references is the idea

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 2>that the sirens are soul birds, again playing on the

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 2>idea that in other texts we have the sirens described

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 2>an Avian term. And the connection here is that they

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 2>would be representations of the souls of the dead in

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 2>bird form, an idea that extends back through ancient Egyptian religion.

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 2>This was an idea champion by the German classical archaeologist

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Georg Viker. In short, this view sees the sirens as

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 2>things that emerge from hades and or the grave and

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 2>as Grethis explains, Homer likely wouldn't have thought that the

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 2>soul became a bird upon death in this scenario, but

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 2>he might have been influenced by older ideas still present

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 2>in art and culture of his time. Okay, then there's

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 2>this other idea, and that is that the sirens are

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 2>other world enchantresses. So an idea in this case champion

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 2>by German archaeologist and translator Ernst Bouscher in response to

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Vicker arguing that homer sirens are anthropomorphic. This view sees

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the sirens not as creatures of the afterlife, but as

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 2>something else that doesn't reside in Hades, though perhaps does

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 2>resis guide in a different other world and might not

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>even be directly malicious. That's the interesting thing about this

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 2>kind of view. They might be more in line with

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 2>muses offering song and information that were just not equipped

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 2>to resist. We just can't handle a song this beautiful

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 2>and or information that's tantalizing, and therefore we are just

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 2>drawn into it. And this actually gets into the vagueness

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 2>of how they actually bring about these men's dooms, because,

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 2>as Aggressive points out, we don't have an answer for

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 2>this in Homer either, and elsewhere, interpretations range from an

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 2>overt and then the sirens ad him sort of situation

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 2>to this idea that enraptured individuals just slowly die of

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 2>exposure on the shores of the sirens, like they're drawn

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 2>by the song, and then they just, you know, forget

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 2>to eat, forget to stay out of the sun, and

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 2>just waste away. And so in that scenario, it's like, well,

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 2>the muses, like they may not even be entities that

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 2>are aware of what they are doing. They're just sharing

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 2>song and information, but we just can't handle it as mortals.

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 3>That's fascinating, and it's funny because the interpretation I always

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 3>just had in the back of my mind isn't even

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 3>listed there, which is the idea that they sit on

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 3>the rocks and they sing to the sailors and they

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 3>draw the sailors in close, and the ship's wreck on

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 3>the rocks and the sailors drone. I don't know where

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 3>that idea came from, but that is what I thought

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 3>was being described in the Odyssey.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, Like I said, there are a lot of

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 2>paintings of the sirens and or Odysseus, and I think

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 2>they also almost at times subliminally charge one's understanding of

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 2>this scenario. And there are several of these that I

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 2>think I've just seen most of my life. There are

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 2>a couple in particular that pop up in the time

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Life Enchanted World book series, of course makes use of

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of excellent original art, but also a lot

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 2>of classic art as well too. In particular, John William

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Waterhouse is the Siren from nineteen hundred. This is a

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 2>like a vertical piece in which there is a nude

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 2>woman with a harp some kind of or is this

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 2>a lute?

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I believe it's a liar's Yeah, yeah, there you go,

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 3>U shaped stringed instrument.

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So she's playing it on the rocks, and there

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 2>down in the water below her is an enraptured male,

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 2>like a youthful male, who looks like he is probably

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 2>going to drown. And so like, I think this really

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 2>matches up with your read on it, and you know,

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I often I think thought about it in similar terms

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 2>looking at these images, like the sirens just draw you

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 2>in and then you know, stuff happens, but it's not

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 2>like they're biting into you or anything that's right.

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 3>But she in this in the waterhouse painting, the siren

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 3>does not look malicious. She does not look like she's

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 3>even really attempting to lure him. She's just kind of

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 3>there existing, And he is up to his neck in

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 3>the water, clearly about to die, looking like he has

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 3>this combination of just joy and tear or yeah.

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 2>And then the other piece that was definitely in the

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Enchanted World series is Herbert James Draper's nineteen oh nine

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 2>painting Ulysses and the Sirens. This is a very captivating

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 2>piece in which you see the familiar scenario that I

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 2>may again describe her in a second where, of course,

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 2>how does Odysseus how does he get past the sirens? Well,

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 2>of course he clogs the ear holes of all of

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 2>his men with wax, and then he himself is strapped

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 2>to the mast of the ship, and then they just

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>keep moving that way. The siren song doesn't infect the oarsman.

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 2>It infects him, but he can't do anything about it

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 2>because he's strapped to the mast.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 3>And this is usually presented as a result of curiosity,

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 3>like Odysseus wants to hear what the siren song is like,

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 3>but doesn't want to allow himself under its spell to

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 3>command his men to do otherwise, so he has himself

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 3>tied up on purpose.

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so in this particular piece by Draper, which

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 2>you know is widely available you can find it on

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 2>wiki commons, and so forth, we see, you know, this

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 2>crazed look on Odysseus's eye. He's completely enraptured, straining against

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 2>the ropes that bind him. Meanwhile, the naked sirens in

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 2>this case seemingly seeming to transform out of mermaid form

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 2>into humanoid form, just like the movie Splash as they

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 2>crawl on the ship. And of course this is a.

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 2>This image, of course, like a lot of the later

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 2>treatments of Sirens, is of course very there's a certain

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 2>sexual politics to all this and gender politics to it,

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 2>because it's clearly showing like the feminine form is the

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 2>aggressively alluring temptation that is coming at the men on

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 2>the ship.

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it looked There are very different implied situations

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 3>in these two paintings, Like in the Waterhouse painting, I

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 3>don't know, you could interpret it multiple ways, but it

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 3>doesn't look obvious to me. Like I said that the

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 3>siren is even trying to attract the man, She's just

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 3>sitting there. She might just be minding her own business. Yeah,

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 3>and he's raptured. In the second painting, the Draper painting

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 3>from nine These these are beings that are obviously trying

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 3>to seduce the men, and they are posed with seductive

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 3>ill intent.

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So these are the two that I was most

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 2>familiar with. But there's a third I want to mention,

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 2>and this is the Sirens and Ulysses from eighteen thirty

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 2>seven by William Edie or Eddie I'm not sure which,

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 2>but this one is also tremendous. I was not familiar

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.959
<v Speaker 2>with this but in this one, we see the sirens

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 2>on their rocky island in the foreground, and in the

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 2>background we see Ulysses send a ship and there's a

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of struggling going on there. But in the foreground

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 2>the sirens are just kind of like, hey, sirens, party,

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 2>come on over, guys. And then next to them we

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 2>see rotting bodies and bones. It's quite quite a quite

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 2>a scene.

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 3>It is wonderful. But to your point, yeah, I interpret

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 3>this one more along the lines of the waterhouse painting.

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 3>There's no indication that that their attention even has anything

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 3>to do with the men on the ship.

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, So I already rolled through the basic

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 2>scenario with Odysseus and the Odyssey and how they get

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>past the sirens. But we have another encounter, and this

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 2>one is detailed in the Argonautica from the third century BCE,

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 2>and this one involves Jason in the Argonauts, how did

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 2>they defeat the sirens? Well, they brought Orpheus along with them,

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the most famous bard of Greek mythology, at least as

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 2>far as mortals go, and his song is even sweeter

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 2>than the sirens. So you know, they explode or something.

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 3>It's the Devil went down to Georgia.

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, actually, as Apollodorus described it, I believe the sweet

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 2>song of Orpheus causes them to throw them selves into

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.719
<v Speaker 2>the sea and become rocks. And it would turn out

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>that these were like the terms of their power, that

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 2>if their song ever failed to enthrall someone, then they

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 2>have to die. They were done for. And there are

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 2>similar accounts with the Sphinx as well, you know, like

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 2>if it's riddle as guest, it has to throw itself

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 2>off a mountain, that sort of thing.

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Wait, now that I said it, I'm trying to remember

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 3>what happens to the devil at the end of Devil

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 3>went Down to Georgia. BET's a fiddle of gold against

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 3>your soul. But what happens if Johnny wins.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 2>He gets to keep the golden golden.

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Devil's just out of gold fiddle. That's it.

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there was some I forget who, some stand up

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 2>comedian I think, was talking about how you know, it's

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 2>clear that the Devil's music is more impressive in that

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 2>particular song, we still give the wind to the mortals.

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 2>But yes, I agree, it is like very much like

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the Devil goes down.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 3>To Geordia which text came first. I'm not sure.

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Now the exact number of sirens fairies. They're like between

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 2>two and five, depending on what telling you're looking at.

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 2>They have various names, different there are different takes on

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 2>their parentage as well. Again, it's just how many there

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 2>are to begin with, but their exact nature in large

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 2>part due to Homer being vague about it. This has

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 2>always been an area of discussion, and apparently it's not

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 2>the only area that Homer's vague, and for instance, according

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 2>to Gressith, he never explains that the cyclops as one eye.

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 2>So I think there are moments like that where we

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 2>just kind of like assume, like we like we know

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 2>as the as the reader what it's supposed to be

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 2>or what it becomes canonized as later. But you can

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 2>apparently get into discussions with any of this of like, well,

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 2>what did the original author intend? What was the shape

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 2>of it? Then?

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, of course, then again, they because most of these

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 3>stories would be drawing on pre existing concepts and stuff,

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 3>you never know, like what did people just naturally assume

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 3>when you name a character or type of being, Like

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 3>what did the reader bring to the reader or listener

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 3>bring to the table.

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that's one thing that Gressi gets into as well,

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 2>is that you have to end up looking for these

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 2>answers in the contemporary religion, but also in contemporary folklore,

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 2>to whatever extent you can pick at it through other sources. Now,

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I picked up a couple of my favorite monster books

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 2>for a little more on these sirens, and I was

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 2>looking at Jorge Luis Borges's Book of Imaginary Beings, and

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 2>he points out three different traditions. He points out that

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Avid describes them as golden birds with the faces of virgins.

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 2>He points out that Paulinius of Rhodes described them as

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 2>women with the lower half of sea birds. And then

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 2>much later medieval heraldry and bestiaries tend to present them

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 2>just as straight up mermaids, again fusing these older classical

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 2>tellings with Northern European traditions of mermaids. And I think

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.239
<v Speaker 2>it's this is a reality you just can't get away from. Then,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 2>when you keep tugging at siren myths, because the terms

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 2>are often used interchangeably, like some some tales of the siren,

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 2>you could sort of maybe make a better case that

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 2>these are actually mermaid stories. But some of them are

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 2>very are very juicy, and I just couldn't resist getting

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 2>into a particular one. This is one that Borges also

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 2>talks about. This This would have been the sixth century

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 2>in northern Wales. It is said that a siren was

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 2>caught and baptized, eventually becoming a saint in some traditions,

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 2>by the name of Murgan or Murrgan, which I believe

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 2>means Seaborn. She was reportedly carried to her baptism in

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 2>a vat, and I believe and this is also tied

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 2>to an Irish legend of lie Bon, and in fact

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I often I have elsewhere seen this character referenced as

0:23:55.800 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 2>li Bon Murrgan, for example. I've also seen Morgan described

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 2>as an early discredited saint, so I don't know if

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't believe that she is officially a saint in

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 2>the Catholic Church. This would have been around what five

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 2>eighty eight CE, I think, But she had a feast

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 2>day at one point, and it was January twenty seventh,

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 2>which I think is also devoted to various other saints

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and so forth.

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 3>This is an interesting story, but I'm thinking about the

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 3>symbolic implications of the baptism of an animal that lives

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 3>under the water.

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, And it comes back to what we were

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 2>talking earlier about baptism and sirens and no brother where

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 2>art thou. There's apparently a more complete telling of this story,

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and I found it in Carol Rose's Spirits Farries, Leprachauns

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 2>and Goblins, where this luban murrgan. She starts out as

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 2>a human, a human daughter of the High King of

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Ireland and a goddess Iatawan I believe is her name,

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 2>and she's just a normal human child. But then she

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 2>is caught in the flood of a sacred spring with

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 2>her dog and carried to an underwater cavern and she's

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 2>trapped there for a year. But then she prays that

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 2>she might be free like the fishes, and so her

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 2>lower half becomes like a fish, and her dog transforms

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 2>into an otter.

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 3>Well that is appropriate because otters are good boys.

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 2>Three hundred years later, enter a cleric by the name

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 2>of BioC and he hears her singing and then you

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 2>know he's drawn to her singing. So they meet and

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 2>she asked him to bring her to Saint Comgall, an

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 2>actual historic saint, and this is where the vat comes

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 2>into the picture. They throw her in a vat and

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 2>she is willingly, you brought to the saint so that

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 2>she may be baptized. But at her baptism she is

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 2>or upon her baptism she is faced with a choice

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 2>another three hundred years of life or immediate entry into heaven.

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 2>So you know, do not pass go directly to heaven.

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 2>She chooses heaven. So anyway, it's a lovely little little

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 2>bit of folklore there. I like it quite a bit.

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 2>And they're apparently depictions of the saint here, Saint leban

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 2>or Saint Morgan, and yeah, sometimes she's depicted with a crown,

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 2>yeah quite oh and then and some depictions you also

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 2>see her order there beside her.

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's adorable.

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 2>So essentially, you know, we have these Northern European mermaid traditions,

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 2>not to be confused with similar tales from around the world,

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 2>merging to some extent with classical tales of sirens, but

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 2>plenty of winged descriptions remain that ultimately line up more

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 2>with what you might think of today as a heartbeat.

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, ancient wind spirits eventually transformed into fiends through

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 2>tellings of Greek myth depending on how you slice it.

0:26:55.160 --> 0:27:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Harpies and sirens may have been both female bird human hybrids,

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 2>but of different demeanors. So harpies you can think of

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 2>more as vengeful cannibal to spoilers, while sirens are alluring,

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 2>musical beings of temptation and is. If faced with both,

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 2>you'd need to fight the harpies off with physical weapons,

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 2>while the siren demands a more cerebral approach. So you know,

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 2>in some ways, they're kind of if you're looking at

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 2>them both as avian beings, they're kind of reflections of

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 2>each other, one targeting the body and the other targeting

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 2>the mind.

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Interesting.

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And we mentioned earlier the idea of the siren

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 2>as a feminine monster, and Carol Rose in Giants, Monsters

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 2>and Dragons discusses this. Briefly points out that in medieval

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 2>European traditions, the siren takes on various symbolic powers. Quote

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 2>for her attributed where the comb and the mirror of vanity,

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the fish or eel symbols of the entrapped Christian soul

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 2>ensnared by luxury and vice, the small dragon the symbol

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 2>of her liaison with the devil, and her nakedness taken

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 2>as a sign of wanton sexuality. So then and to

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 2>this day, in some depictions we see the siren presented

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 2>as this monstrous female temptress, a corruptor of menfolk, but

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 2>also like this, indeed, like something that has been summoned

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 2>up to test ones resolve. Still, as Rose points out,

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 2>there were still descriptions of the siren as a bird

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 2>woman you know, well, you know, out of of the

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 2>ancient world, pops up in the seventh and eighth century,

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 2>leaving Monstroum also a twelfth century Latin Bestiaria, which describes

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 2>them in much more harpy terms as winged, rock dwelling

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 2>beasts well that will not only lure sailors to their death,

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 2>but pounce on them with flesh rending talons. And then

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 2>during the nineteenth century we even see again kind of

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 2>like bumping up against all of these depictions of sirens

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 2>as mermaids and naked women in the water, we see

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 2>John William Waterhouse's eighteen ninety one pain Ulysses and the Sirens.

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 2>And what do we see here? We see big birds

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 2>with the heads of women, and they are the ones

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 2>as sailing ulysses strapped to the mast and his various oarsmen.

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's no ambiguity about their intentions. Here they are

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 3>swarming the boat.

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes these are Yeah, these are definitely aggressive human headed

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 2>birds here. Waterhouse it would seem drew more on those

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 2>classical Greek descriptions and depictions on vases and urns rather

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 2>than what his contemporaries were doing.

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting because I think it's the same painter, John

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 3>William Waterhouse that did the siren from nineteen hundred we

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 3>talked about earlier, the much more haunting an ambiguous image.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can't help, but one I don't know much

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 2>about about the man in his work, and you know

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 2>who's painting for. But I wonder if with the nineteen

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred someone was like, I'd like you to draw me

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 2>a siren and no birds this time, John, I wanted

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 2>to be a lady.

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 3>The one from nine years later does seem a little

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 3>little more mysterious and maybe mature.

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 2>And to be clear, these are just a few, like

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 2>very famous examples of sirens and paintings from this period.

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 2>There are others, So if you have favorites, feel free

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 2>to send them into us, and you know, I'd love

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 2>to take a look at them.

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, absolutely, Contact at Stuff to Blow your mind

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 3>dot com. Get in touch as always. Now, the idea

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 3>of the siren song luring sailors to their destruction by

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 3>one means or another got me thinking about nature. I

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 3>was wondering, are there any predators in nature that have

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 3>the genuine biological equivalent of a siren song? A sound

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 3>or a song or a vocalization that lures pray to

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 3>their doom. And after I did a little digging, I

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 3>discovered the answer is yes. Apparently it is not very

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 3>common in nature, at least as far as we know.

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 3>But there is one excellent example I want to talk about,

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 3>and this predatory song involves an animal that we just

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 3>did a series on earlier this year, the cicada. In

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 3>this case, the cicada not as the predator, but as

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 3>the prey. So I'm going to be referring to one

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 3>major source here, a zoology paper from two thousand and

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 3>nine published in Plus one by David C. Marshall and

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Kathy B. R. Hill called versatile aggressive mimicry of cicadas

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 3>by an Australian predatory Katie did So. This paper begins

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 3>by talking about the concept of mimicry in nature. Mimicry

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 3>in the animal kingdom is when an animal has an

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 3>adaptation that makes it seem like something other than what

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 3>it is, and this can take a lot of different

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 3>forms and serve a lot of different purposes. A lot

0:31:55.840 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 3>of animal mimicry is defensive in purpose and visual in format.

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 3>So a vulnerable prey animal might try to fool predators

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 3>into leaving it alone, perhaps by looking like something totally

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 3>uninteresting to the predator, like a leaf, or like another

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 3>animal that tastes bad and is non nutritious. In some cases,

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 3>visual defensive mimicry makes the prey animal look threatening. It

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 3>makes it look like a different animal that is dangerous

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 3>and could put up a fight, or one that is poisonous.

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 3>But there are non visual forms of defensive mimicry as well.

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 3>For example, a prey animal can smell like something uninteresting

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 3>or something dangerous, so that's defensive mimicry. But there's also

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 3>what's called aggressive mimicry. This is when an animal disguises

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 3>itself for aggressive purposes, usually to attract or gain advantage

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 3>over prey if the mimic is a predator, or over

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 3>a host if the mimic is a parasite, and apparently

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 3>one of the most common strategies for aggressive mimics in

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 3>nature is to exploit mating drive. So it's like, hello,

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 3>fellow conspecifics, I am a member of your species and

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm very sexy. So the authors give some examples of this.

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 3>One is the bolus spiders collectively known as a Mastophora,

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 3>which have been documented to attract male moths of at

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 3>least two different species by copying the sex pheromones of

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 3>female moths of those same species, so this would be

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 3>aggressive mimicry by smell. There's another interesting example, which is

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 3>predatory fireflies known as Fouturis versicolor, which these animals use

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 3>flashes of light to initiate mating within their own kind,

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 3>but they can also copy the courtship flashes of females

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 3>of other firefly species to trick the males of those

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 3>species into getting close for a mating opportunity, and then

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the predatory fireflies just eat them, so this is aggressive

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 3>mimicry by visual signal, and the authors note that this

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 3>case is particularly interesting because the predatory fouturist fireflies can

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 3>copy the flashing patterns of eleven different prey species of fireflies.

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's incredible versatility in the predatory mimic behavior, and

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 3>it's an interesting evolutionary question in cases like this how

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 3>that much versatility in the predatory behavior comes about. The

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 3>authors speculate that it might be possible in part because

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 3>in this case the predator and the prey are closely related.

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 3>But whatever the explanation there, both of these previous examples

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 3>work by the predator falsely appearing to be a female

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 3>conspecific that is ready to mate, either by smelling like

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:52.800
<v Speaker 3>one or looking like one. This paper presents an example

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 3>of aggressive mimicry that is interesting for several reasons. Like

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 3>the fireflies, the predator in this case shows versatility in

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 3>altering the mimic behavior to match multiple different prey species.

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 3>But unlike the fireflies, the predator is not closely related

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:14.280
<v Speaker 3>to the prey in a phylogenetic sense. And then, also,

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 3>though I didn't notice this priority claim in the paper itself,

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 3>a couple of news and blog sources I was reading

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 3>about the paper say that this was the first scientifically

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 3>documented case of an aggressive or predatory mimic relying on

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 3>sound rather than on visual or smell based cues, though

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 3>this mimic the mimic in question also does use visual

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 3>mimicry as a secondary appeal. I can't confirm there were

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 3>no earlier documented examples in nature, and I'm a little

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 3>curious why I found that claim in the popular sources

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 3>and not in the research itself. But I did not

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:51.439
<v Speaker 3>find any earlier examples. So if that is true, this

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 3>is the first documented case. Or sound is the medium

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:00.320
<v Speaker 3>being used for the aggressive mimic to mimic something that

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 3>gets it access to its prey. Wow, So what is

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 3>this dangerous mimic? Well, it is the spotted predatory katie

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 3>did or Chlorobalius leucoviritus. So this is a large green,

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 3>green and white patterned katie did or bush cricket. It's

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 3>a species native to Australia, mostly found in the dry

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:26.800
<v Speaker 3>interior regions of the continent, and it preys on multiple

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 3>different species of cicadas belonging to the tribe Cicadatini, among

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 3>other things. It's got multiple prey, but it likes to

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 3>eat these cicadas of Cicadatini. Now it's important to note

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 3>that these prey cicadas rely on a two part acoustic

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 3>signaling behavior to initiate sexual pair formation. And when we

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.479
<v Speaker 3>did our series on cicadas, we talked a lot about

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 3>the songs of cicadas, how they use sound in their

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 3>their mating behaviors. But in this case, these specific cicadas

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 3>rely on what the authors call signal responds duets. So

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 3>when it's time to mate, the male cicada initiates with

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 3>a song particular to its species, and then if a

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 3>female is nearby and she's receptive to mating, she will

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 3>reply with a series of wing flicks, which can be

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 3>recognized visually if you're very close. But more importantly, the

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:25.240
<v Speaker 3>wingflicks produce an audible sound that matches with that specie

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 3>specific mating call put out by the male. So the

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 3>wingflicks can usually be heard for a range of several

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 3>meters and they will help the male locate the female

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:40.400
<v Speaker 3>the author's right quote. Because a wingflick reply is structurally nondescript,

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 3>it must closely follow the queue in the male cicada's

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 3>song in order to be recognized. But this leads to

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 3>a kind of interesting situation where a clicking sound that

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 3>has roughly the right sound quality and the right latency

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 3>meaning I interpret this. I hope I'm right about this.

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 3>I think they're talking about the the time delay between

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the end of the male cicada song and when the

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 3>clicks start and stop in response to that. If it

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 3>has these sonic qualities correct, it can be interpreted as

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 3>a female sexual signal by the male cicada. And as

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 3>an example, the authors mentioned that with some of these

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:24.439
<v Speaker 3>cicadas in the tribe Cicadatini, you can attract males by

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:26.839
<v Speaker 3>like snapping your fingers if you time it right with

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 3>respect to their songs. But different species listen for different things,

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 3>and some are more wary than others. I guess some

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 3>just kind of rush right in there. Now, coming back

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 3>to the katie DIDs, Chloribelius adults are most active in

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 3>the summertime, and you will tend to find them perched

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 3>in the upper branches of small trees and large shrubs,

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 3>where they can take advantage of their green and white

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 3>camouflage coloration pattern to hide in the foliage and rob

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 3>I've attached a couple of pictures for you to look at,

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:59.280
<v Speaker 3>where one is against a white background where this animal

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 3>is very easy to say see. Another one is of

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 3>its standing in the tree branches, where it's much easier

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 3>to see how it would just kind of blend in,

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 3>especially if you weren't looking very close.

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it is often the case. Right when you

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 2>look at the specimen more in its natural habitat, it

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 2>does blend in.

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 3>So what do these kadieids do to mimic and hunt

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 3>the cicadas they eat? Well? The authors write that they

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 3>can quote attract male cicadas Hymiptera cicatada by imitating the

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:36.320
<v Speaker 3>species specific wing flick replies of sexually receptive female cicadas.

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 3>This aggressive mimicry is accomplished both acoustically with tegmental clicks

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:46.839
<v Speaker 3>and visually with synchronized body jerks, so it's a two

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 3>part mimic They imitate both the sounds and the visually

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 3>recognizable body movements produced by female cicadas that are ready

0:39:55.680 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 3>to mate, attracting male cicadas from the surrounding area, and

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 3>when the male cicada gets close enough, the katie did

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 3>will promptly snatch it, bite into it, and eat it.

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 3>And observations of these predatory encounters find that the kdi

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 3>did typically just eats the whole thing. The entire cicada

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 3>except for the wings, and they leave the wings behind.

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 3>And I thought that was interesting because I recall from

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 3>our series on cicadas this was also true of some

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 3>bird predators, which would eat the whole cicada except the

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 3>wings and then just leave pairs of wings everywhere.

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh interesting.

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Now, one really interesting thing that the authors point out

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 3>is that these predators are able to not only reproduce

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 3>the different specific sounds of a bunch of different cicada species,

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 3>experiments showed they can reproduce the songs of cicadas they

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 3>have never come across before. So this acoustic mimicry is

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:53.280
<v Speaker 3>not just a singular, evolved, pre programmed behavior, but it's versatile.

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 3>It is a versatile adaptable capacity to mimic and respond

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 3>to cicada calls. Interestingly, and perhaps relatedly, Chlorobelius also uses

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 3>acoustic signals for its own reproductive purposes. So when it's

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 3>time for this KTI did to mate, the male KTI

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 3>DIDs will produce a trilling sound with a file and

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 3>scraper system on the edges of their fore wings, which

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:20.879
<v Speaker 3>is thought to attract females which are interested in mating. Now,

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:23.399
<v Speaker 3>coming to the discussion section of this paper. It's worth

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 3>noting that this is not the only way that the

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 3>mating call of a cicada could be used to help

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 3>a predator eat a cicada. The predator could, for example,

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 3>just follow the song to its source and eat the male,

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 3>and many predators do exactly this. They do follow the

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 3>mating calls of prey animals to hunt. But this is

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 3>a different strategy like the siren, or at least one

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 3>version of the siren. The kti did lures victims to itself,

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's kind of interesting to consider. It's

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 3>like a different evolutionary investment. I don't believe the authors

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 3>say this, so this could be on the wrong track,

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 3>but I was personally wondering if it could have something

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 3>to do with the fact that the katie did already

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 3>has a cryptic coloration pattern. It has camouflage, and so

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 3>the fact that it may be using camouflage for one thing,

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 3>it may be using camouflage defensively to hide from its

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 3>own predators, from birds and so forth. You know, whatever

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 3>preis on it, it may be able to get double

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 3>use out of that by specializing in a type of

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 3>predation that allows it to hold still and hide among

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 3>the leaves and have its prey come to it right right.

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 2>And also I guess maybe it's helpful if it's this way,

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't have to worry about the predators that could

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:38.240
<v Speaker 2>potentially be seeking out the mating call of their very prey.

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's a very good point because as we talked

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 3>about it in our cicada series. I don't know with

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 3>this specific Australian family with the Cicadatinian Australia, but in

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 3>most places everything eats cicadas when the cicadas come out

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 3>their dinner for everything out there, and most of the

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 3>things that are eating them, or at least a lot

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 3>of the things would be big enough to eaticated it

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 3>as well. Right now. The authors in this paper argue

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 3>that the katie DIDs versatility and mimicry probably follows from

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:09.919
<v Speaker 3>the application of a few simple rules. For one thing,

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Since they're game to eat pretty much any cicada and

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 3>not just one particular species, they can probably ignore everything

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 3>about the male cicada's song except whatever part of it

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 3>cues the female cicada to respond, so there's less information

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 3>to process. Just tune most of that out focus on

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:31.479
<v Speaker 3>whatever part you need to pay attention to to time

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:35.800
<v Speaker 3>your response, your clicks and response, which is typically probably

0:43:35.840 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 3>something about the onset of a pause at the end

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 3>of a song segment. And this was funny because it

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 3>made me think about like text message scammers who are

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 3>going to possibly ignore basically everything you type to them

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 3>and just be looking for a couple of keywords to

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:52.759
<v Speaker 3>advance the scamscript to the next waypoint.

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Hmmm, yeah, I mean often predatory. There you go, efficiency, yeah,

0:43:58.640 --> 0:43:59.839
<v Speaker 2>predatory efficiency.

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 3>But in general, the authors point out that a complex

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 3>adaptation like the kd did has here, it requires multiple parts. Right,

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 3>You've got to have sound producing organs, which they do

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:14.760
<v Speaker 3>in the four wings. You've got to have sound perceiving organs.

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 3>You've got to be able to listen so you know

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 3>what to respond to. And you've got to have the

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 3>neural processing required to make that match right, to produce

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 3>the appropriate sound to match the call you just heard.

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 3>And fortunately for the kd DIDs, they already have all

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 3>three capabilities for use in their own mating. Remember that

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:37.400
<v Speaker 3>from earlier they also use sound in their own mating. However,

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:42.319
<v Speaker 3>there's an interesting complication here, which is that if this

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 3>predatory mimicry of cicada mating duets were based on the

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 3>mating behavior of the predator species, you would expect the

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 3>kd DIDs to also engage in duets, and as far

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:56.760
<v Speaker 3>as the authors could tell, this was not the case.

0:44:56.800 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 3>The kd DIDs do not seem to do male female duets. Instead,

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 3>it seems as of the time of this paper that

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 3>males generally produce a song which attracts a silent female

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 3>to its source. So the male makes a song, the

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 3>female comes and finds the male. But the authors acknowledge

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 3>that not a lot is known about this katie did species,

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 3>so maybe some information is missing here. And also just

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 3>a reminder that I said there was both an acoustic

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 3>and a visual signal that the katie did also does

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 3>this body jerking behavior which accompanies the mimicry clicks, and

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 3>it does not seem to be physically necessary to make

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 3>the click sound, so it's probably also a mimic behavior

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 3>in this case to kind of look like a female

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 3>cicada flicking its wings between the leaves, so the male's like,

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 3>oh yeah, I see it right up there, and the

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 3>male's crawling up and then it gets.

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Eaten fascinating it, I mean as lines up with the

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 2>basic siren script right absolutely.

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 3>But in fact, to come back to the Odyssey, one

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 3>thing we see in the Odyssey is that the prey

0:45:57.800 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 3>of the sirens, at least one one member of the

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 3>sirens prey has a clever workaround a way of avoiding

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 3>the sirens song by plugging the ears of the men

0:46:12.320 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 3>rowing the ship and by lashing himself to the mast

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 3>so that the sirens wouldn't get him. This is what

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Odysseus does, and you could see that as the beginning

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 3>of a possible arms race in adaptations between sailors and sirens.

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:27.760
<v Speaker 3>And in fact there may be a fairly complex predator

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 3>prey arms race in evolution between these cicadas and the

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:34.839
<v Speaker 3>katie DIDs. So here to read from the paper the

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 3>author's write quote. Even though Cobonga ox lay, the species

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 3>we observed being attracted by Chlorobelius luco viridus, has a

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 3>structurally obvious song cue and an easily timed repetitive rhythm,

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 3>we have found this species to be extremely resistant to

0:46:52.840 --> 0:46:57.040
<v Speaker 3>our artificial signals. Poorly timed finger snaps cause males of

0:46:57.080 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 3>many species to become wary with k i ox lay

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 3>an especially strong example. Perhaps persistent aggressive mimicry by Chlorobelius

0:47:06.400 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 3>lucoviritis has selected kox lay males for greater sensitivity to

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 3>the occasional, poorly timed click. This possibility also suggests an

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:21.719
<v Speaker 3>additional evolutionary route for the cicada prey, the addition of

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 3>false cues that elicit premature katie did replies without queuing

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 3>female cicadas, whose response depends on a particular combination of

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:36.440
<v Speaker 3>song elements. Long continued selection of this sort might account

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:42.359
<v Speaker 3>for the extraordinarily complex songs of many Australian cicatatine species

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:46.760
<v Speaker 3>found in the arid Acacia dominated habitats where see Lucoviritus

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 3>is most common. So that's very interesting. We may have

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 3>some cicada odysseuses on hand who have evolved a defensive

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:59.879
<v Speaker 3>reaction to this type of predatory mimicry by, for one thing,

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:05.879
<v Speaker 3>throwing out some decoy sound signals that are not going

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:08.799
<v Speaker 3>to get females of its own species responding. But if

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 3>you do hear clicks in response to them, that's something

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 3>to be afraid of. Lets you know there's a monster

0:48:14.239 --> 0:48:20.320
<v Speaker 3>nearby and then also perhaps by being more sensitive to

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 3>incorrect timing on the response clicks in the duet.

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. Interesting, So yeah, so their use of the song

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 2>become becomes more nuanced in a way, in a way

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 2>to outwit these pretenders. Yeah, I mean one is tempted

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 2>to make various comparisons, to say, conversations between humans, perhaps

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 2>in a dating scenario, you know, like a first date

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:51.360
<v Speaker 2>where one might throw out, hey, you know, did you

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 2>see such and such movie? And I thought it was

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:55.919
<v Speaker 2>pretty good and they're like, yeah, it's great. Well, then

0:48:56.080 --> 0:49:00.479
<v Speaker 2>you know that's a red flag fill in your own example. Well, sorry,

0:49:00.520 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little slow today. I can't come up with

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:04.839
<v Speaker 2>a good example that we can all stand behind as

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 2>being the red flag for a first day.

0:49:08.040 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 3>But I absolutely understand what you're talking about, sort of

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:15.759
<v Speaker 3>tossing out a sonic conversational bait to draw out the

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 3>attention of anything that you should be avoiding.

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well this is fascinating and again more evidence to

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:25.680
<v Speaker 2>a point that we're always making on the show, and

0:49:25.680 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 2>that is that anything you find in myth and in

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:36.400
<v Speaker 2>legend and fictional monsters, there is almost always something equally

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:37.880
<v Speaker 2>weird in the natural world.

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:41.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's you know, through doing a lot of these

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:45.200
<v Speaker 3>October Monster episodes, I find it varies how close of

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 3>a match we can find in the natural world. Sometimes

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:50.919
<v Speaker 3>there's just not something in nature that is a real

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 3>tight fit on whatever fictional example we're talking about, But

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:59.759
<v Speaker 3>there's always something more amazing. Yeah, but this was a

0:49:59.800 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 3>case where I was shocked how close the fit is,

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 3>especially with the Odysseus cicadas. To be clear, that's not

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 3>their biological name, that's just what I'm calling him.

0:50:08.560 --> 0:50:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Now, all right, I have one more little curiosity to

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:27.239
<v Speaker 2>consider here. Take it from the cabinet of curiosity, if

0:50:27.239 --> 0:50:32.720
<v Speaker 2>you will, because it concerns a very learned individual who

0:50:33.200 --> 0:50:36.360
<v Speaker 2>seems to have thought very long and hard on the

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:40.160
<v Speaker 2>reality of sirens, as well as the reality of some

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:44.839
<v Speaker 2>other things that I don't think one typically thinks of

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:48.839
<v Speaker 2>as having an objective reality. So I ran across this

0:50:49.080 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 2>in Literature and Lore of the Sea, edited by Patricia

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:56.839
<v Speaker 2>Ann Karlson, specifically, in an article titled the Extraordinary being

0:50:57.360 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Death in the Mermaid and Baroque literature Eileen S. Goodman,

0:51:02.640 --> 0:51:05.320
<v Speaker 2>She points out the seventeenth century German polymath and Jessuit

0:51:05.400 --> 0:51:10.080
<v Speaker 2>scholar Athanasius Kircher, who is sixteen o two through sixteen eighty,

0:51:10.120 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 2>in one of his natural history volumes, seems to give

0:51:13.520 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 2>serious consideration to not only the objective reality of Noah's Ark,

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 2>which isn't completely out of the ordinary. He still see

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:24.760
<v Speaker 2>that kind of thing going on today, but also spends

0:51:24.760 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time trying to figure out where Noah

0:51:27.120 --> 0:51:29.120
<v Speaker 2>put all of the sirens.

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:31.319
<v Speaker 3>Right next to the unicorns.

0:51:31.360 --> 0:51:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, well, we'll get to unicorns. He also believed in them.

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 2>I guess brief refresher for those of you who don't

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 2>remember the story of Noah's Ark is this Old Testament

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Book of Genesis tale concerning the Great flood and one

0:51:47.000 --> 0:51:50.040
<v Speaker 2>anti Theiluvian patriarch's mission to save all of the world's

0:51:50.080 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 2>animals from the flood in a great big boat. It's

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:58.240
<v Speaker 2>one of various great flood myths found throughout the ancient world. Obviously,

0:51:58.320 --> 0:52:00.920
<v Speaker 2>this is not a story that easily endures. Is very close,

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:04.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, literal scrutiny. When you dig down into the

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:07.799
<v Speaker 2>two by two details of the endeavor. I think you

0:52:07.840 --> 0:52:09.960
<v Speaker 2>know a lot of us who grew up, you know,

0:52:10.000 --> 0:52:11.960
<v Speaker 2>going to Sunday school class. You reach that point where

0:52:12.000 --> 0:52:14.239
<v Speaker 2>you're like, wait, how does this work? Now? Wait to

0:52:14.360 --> 0:52:18.280
<v Speaker 2>two of each animal, you know, and then various questions arise.

0:52:18.680 --> 0:52:21.279
<v Speaker 2>But Kircher was very into figuring out exactly how all

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:26.319
<v Speaker 2>of this would work, and he, to be clear, seems

0:52:26.440 --> 0:52:31.560
<v Speaker 2>to have believed in the reality of mermaids or sirens

0:52:32.000 --> 0:52:36.240
<v Speaker 2>as well as unicorns, based on some like the tail

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:40.200
<v Speaker 2>and the bones of a mermaid that were in his museum.

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:43.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, so he had empirical evidence.

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:46.879
<v Speaker 2>He's like, we have evidence, this is what these were.

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:50.879
<v Speaker 2>And he describes them as amphibians and stresses that there

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:54.839
<v Speaker 2>is some controversy as to whether these particular amphibians were

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 2>or were not received into the arc. And I imagine

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:00.839
<v Speaker 2>some of you might have wondered about this, how did

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:03.960
<v Speaker 2>what happened to the mermaids? So he explains in his writing,

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 2>well that others have said, well, perhaps they lived on

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:10.880
<v Speaker 2>the outside of the arc, outside of this great boat,

0:53:11.120 --> 0:53:15.040
<v Speaker 2>perhaps in some sort of a nest, something like a

0:53:15.160 --> 0:53:16.320
<v Speaker 2>fixed to the hole.

0:53:17.680 --> 0:53:20.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm finding it a little confusing here because I would

0:53:20.280 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 3>not normally think that aquatic animals needed to be taken

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:25.839
<v Speaker 3>onto the arc at all, which I guess is part

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:28.560
<v Speaker 3>of why he's classifying them as amphibians that like, they

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:31.200
<v Speaker 3>can't live their entire lives in the water. They must

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:33.440
<v Speaker 3>come to dry surface at some point.

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so there was some disagreement with people asking the

0:53:38.520 --> 0:53:40.960
<v Speaker 2>same questions here. Where did the mermaids or sirens go?

0:53:41.520 --> 0:53:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Some said they stayed in nests on the outside of

0:53:43.480 --> 0:53:47.839
<v Speaker 2>the arc, but Kircher dismisses the idea, stating that this

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:50.640
<v Speaker 2>is a This is a quote translated quote from his work,

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 2>as referenced in that article by Goodman Holy writ is

0:53:56.000 --> 0:53:58.759
<v Speaker 2>in agreement on the matter of the little stalls into

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:01.880
<v Speaker 2>which the animals were district and it does not teach

0:54:02.000 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 2>that any existed outside. And I believe he argues against

0:54:05.680 --> 0:54:08.359
<v Speaker 2>the idea that any creature lived outside the ship during

0:54:08.400 --> 0:54:14.920
<v Speaker 2>the cataclysm, like even fish. I mean it, it's I

0:54:15.719 --> 0:54:19.359
<v Speaker 2>have no answer there. It's like, even if you're even

0:54:19.400 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 2>if I'm going to assume that fish surely get away

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:25.280
<v Speaker 2>with living outside of the arc. I think he's making

0:54:25.320 --> 0:54:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the case that amphibian creatures could not. They would have

0:54:28.920 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 2>to be aboard the arc. H Okay, So I'm assuming here,

0:54:34.040 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 2>based on what I'm reading, that Kircher is arguing that

0:54:36.680 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 2>the sirens would have ridden inside the arc, and I

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:45.040
<v Speaker 2>have to acknowledge that, yes, that sounds ludicrous to even

0:54:45.120 --> 0:54:48.239
<v Speaker 2>be wondering about that. But I also I don't want

0:54:48.239 --> 0:54:52.080
<v Speaker 2>to give everyone the wrong idea about this man, because

0:54:52.120 --> 0:54:54.960
<v Speaker 2>by all accounts he was. He was a brilliant mind,

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:58.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, a brilliant man of his time, sometimes described

0:54:58.239 --> 0:55:02.120
<v Speaker 2>as being the last man to know everything. So this

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:08.400
<v Speaker 2>is a guy who studied religion, linguistics, geology, medicine. He

0:55:09.000 --> 0:55:12.200
<v Speaker 2>tried to decipher ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics and claimed that he

0:55:12.280 --> 0:55:17.240
<v Speaker 2>had translated them, but apparently not. He wrote an encyclopedia

0:55:17.400 --> 0:55:23.320
<v Speaker 2>on China. He kept a vundokama, or a cabinet of curiosities,

0:55:23.360 --> 0:55:26.440
<v Speaker 2>and he spent the majority of his career at Roman College.

0:55:26.800 --> 0:55:31.400
<v Speaker 2>He was fascinated by fossils. He made proposals about the

0:55:31.400 --> 0:55:35.440
<v Speaker 2>cause of plague that apparently line up with some of

0:55:35.239 --> 0:55:39.240
<v Speaker 2>the actual the actual reality of it. He was intrigued

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 2>by various devices, made little inventions. He was a science

0:55:42.719 --> 0:55:46.120
<v Speaker 2>superstar of his day, even if he's often eclipsed in

0:55:46.160 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 2>our recollection by such contemporaries as Galileo. And there is

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 2>the fact that he seemed to believe in the existence

0:55:52.520 --> 0:55:56.360
<v Speaker 2>of both mermaids and unicorns based on the evidence in

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:57.080
<v Speaker 2>his museum.

0:55:57.520 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, well, I mean this would be, by no

0:56:00.400 --> 0:56:03.440
<v Speaker 3>means the only example of a truly brilliant mind in

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:07.400
<v Speaker 3>history who spent a lot of time obsessing over minutia

0:56:07.480 --> 0:56:11.160
<v Speaker 3>based on false premises. Yeah, you know, the all the

0:56:11.160 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 3>devotion to to alchemy and trying to trying to work

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:17.800
<v Speaker 3>things out based on the literal interpretation of the Bible

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:18.600
<v Speaker 3>and things like that.

0:56:19.640 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of books have been written about him,

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:25.400
<v Speaker 2>and I ran across there's actually a review of a

0:56:25.480 --> 0:56:29.839
<v Speaker 2>particular book about him. This was in this case, the

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:33.880
<v Speaker 2>review was written by the Vatican Observatory's brother, Guy Konsumajno,

0:56:34.600 --> 0:56:36.680
<v Speaker 2>who I had the pleasure to hear speak here in

0:56:36.680 --> 0:56:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta many years ago. Was not speaking about this. Who

0:56:40.000 --> 0:56:45.319
<v Speaker 2>was speaking, I believe about religion and extraterrestrials, the sort

0:56:45.320 --> 0:56:49.640
<v Speaker 2>of like speculative material. But yeah, he wrote this article

0:56:49.640 --> 0:56:53.319
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty one titled a mishmash of brilliance and absurdity,

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:56.440
<v Speaker 2>and he stressed that, yeah, there's here's this guy Kirchner,

0:56:56.480 --> 0:57:00.000
<v Speaker 2>who was brilliant, you know, was obsessed with optics, acoustics,

0:57:00.239 --> 0:57:03.560
<v Speaker 2>you name it just like everything that could be learned

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:07.440
<v Speaker 2>or known about the world. He was all in on it.

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 2>But on the other hand, he wrote three volumes on

0:57:11.680 --> 0:57:14.080
<v Speaker 2>how Noah managed to fit all of the animals and

0:57:14.120 --> 0:57:17.440
<v Speaker 2>their food into the arc, and then also speculates about

0:57:17.840 --> 0:57:18.959
<v Speaker 2>the sirens as well.

0:57:19.560 --> 0:57:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Isaac Newton, one of the most brilliant minds of all time,

0:57:22.560 --> 0:57:25.920
<v Speaker 3>was spent a huge amount of intellectual energy obsessed with

0:57:26.080 --> 0:57:30.640
<v Speaker 3>interpreting his with like his interpretations of Biblical prophecies.

0:57:31.840 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Kanzemaijno writes quote, Kirchner makes a fascinating contrast in style

0:57:37.520 --> 0:57:41.520
<v Speaker 2>with Galileo. While both were shameless self promoters, Galileo was

0:57:41.600 --> 0:57:45.720
<v Speaker 2>far more rigorous, focused, and polemical in his science. Kirchner's

0:57:45.720 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 2>theme was simply wonder and delight, reporting marvelous machines and novelties,

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 2>like a seventeenth century version of Ripley's Believe It or Not.

0:57:53.880 --> 0:57:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, Far be it from me to find fault there

0:57:56.720 --> 0:57:58.880
<v Speaker 3>in wonder and delight.

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know it kind of you know, drives

0:58:02.240 --> 0:58:04.560
<v Speaker 2>home that you know. Wonder and delight are great, but

0:58:04.800 --> 0:58:07.800
<v Speaker 2>they too can be kind of a siren song, steering

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:12.040
<v Speaker 2>you off into I mean in the worst cases, you know,

0:58:12.440 --> 0:58:16.040
<v Speaker 2>misinformation and delusion, but even into maybe just ideas that

0:58:16.120 --> 0:58:20.600
<v Speaker 2>are not ultimately that productive but maybe entertaining. I don't know.

0:58:20.680 --> 0:58:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Did Kirchner's three volumes on Noah's art like hurt anything,

0:58:25.160 --> 0:58:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Did his belief in the physical reality of unicorns and

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 2>mermaids hurt anything? Well? Maybe not, Maybe it's fine.

0:58:31.480 --> 0:58:33.640
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's hard to say about that kind of thing, though,

0:58:33.640 --> 0:58:37.280
<v Speaker 3>I would say in general, it's absolutely the case. I

0:58:37.320 --> 0:58:41.160
<v Speaker 3>think that the estheticization of ideas can in some cases

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:45.280
<v Speaker 3>have very negative consequences. Appreciating ideas primarily for whether they

0:58:45.320 --> 0:58:47.800
<v Speaker 3>are fun or exciting or how they make you feel,

0:58:47.920 --> 0:58:51.400
<v Speaker 3>with not enough appreciation for testing whether they are true,

0:58:51.520 --> 0:58:53.680
<v Speaker 3>can be in fact quite dangerous.

0:58:54.280 --> 0:58:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, We've We've discussed multiple times in the show

0:58:56.760 --> 0:59:02.640
<v Speaker 2>various hypotheses that you know, sometimes are quite enthralling and

0:59:03.200 --> 0:59:07.640
<v Speaker 2>and even inspiring, but are they the best hypotheses with

0:59:07.720 --> 0:59:11.240
<v Speaker 2>which to understand the universe? And that's not always the case.

0:59:12.160 --> 0:59:16.040
<v Speaker 2>And if you just follow what's exciting, then you're, you know,

0:59:16.080 --> 0:59:18.600
<v Speaker 2>you're in search of with Leonard Nimoy or something, you know,

0:59:18.640 --> 0:59:20.800
<v Speaker 2>you're you're in the realm of let's just talk about

0:59:20.840 --> 0:59:24.560
<v Speaker 2>these ideas because they are entertaining and not because they

0:59:24.600 --> 0:59:26.880
<v Speaker 2>actually explain the world around us.

0:59:27.440 --> 0:59:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, though, if we can make a persuasive case, I

0:59:29.880 --> 0:59:33.680
<v Speaker 3>hope we could convince you that you can put truth

0:59:33.760 --> 0:59:37.160
<v Speaker 3>testing as the first priority and ideas can still be fun.

0:59:38.040 --> 0:59:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, So you know, don't put wax in your ears.

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Put put put a little Stuff to Blow your Mind

0:59:43.000 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 2>in your ears and hopefully that'll help you out. All right,

0:59:47.080 --> 0:59:48.880
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna go ahead and close up this episode, but

0:59:48.920 --> 0:59:50.960
<v Speaker 2>we'll remind everyone out there. The Stuff to Blow Your

0:59:50.960 --> 0:59:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Mind is primarily a science and culture podcast, with core

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:56.080
<v Speaker 2>episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays. We do a short form

0:59:56.120 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 2>episode on Wednesdays, and on Fridays. We set aside most

0:59:58.520 --> 1:00:00.920
<v Speaker 2>serious concerns to just talk about a we film on

1:00:01.040 --> 1:00:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Weird House Cinema. If you listen to us on Apple

1:00:04.040 --> 1:00:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Podcasts or what have you, make sure you're subscribed to

1:00:07.560 --> 1:00:09.880
<v Speaker 2>the show. If you haven't reviewed us, give us a

1:00:09.920 --> 1:00:12.240
<v Speaker 2>nice review. Maybe touch up that old review. I don't know,

1:00:12.520 --> 1:00:14.760
<v Speaker 2>but you know, the stars help, the nice words help,

1:00:15.320 --> 1:00:18.320
<v Speaker 2>and likewise, it's the If you're on Instagram, you can

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:20.920
<v Speaker 2>follow us. We are stb ym podcast.

1:00:22.000 --> 1:00:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Huge Thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

1:00:26.080 --> 1:00:27.600
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

1:00:27.600 --> 1:00:30.160
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

1:00:30.160 --> 1:00:32.280
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

1:00:32.440 --> 1:00:35.000
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

1:00:35.040 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com.

1:00:43.880 --> 1:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

1:00:46.880 --> 1:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app

1:00:49.840 --> 1:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows

1:01:02.480 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is the West or