WEBVTT - Monday night recap, low Gurley points, who is Gus Edwards, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy best Friends Forever,

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>m To To to Do Too, To Do Do Do

0:00:54.960 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Doo. Yeah. This is a as the

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends Forever here in the Fantasy Sports Radio

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Network alongside Frankie Stamford, I am Gregg Greggy Game God

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Aren't Late No Them. In twenty eighteen, over a hundred

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>ten points scored over a thousand total yards greg in

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a game that featured now QB one, q B two,

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>RB one, RB four, Wide receiver one two other top

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>twelve wide receivers, tight end one two. Defensive scores. First,

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>what if I told you that Rams would score fifty

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>points and Todd Gurley would have ten Fantasy points. That's

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>like the biggest thing of that game today is that

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley had ten fantasy points, probably his lowest output

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>all the year. It's the most it's the most fantasy

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.919
<v Speaker 1>football thing ever. Yeah, it just makes the most sense

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that in a game sixty three and a half point total,

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the highest total of all time, a hundred and five

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>points scored, twelve fifty five great, great game, four point

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>six yards per carry, added three receptions for thirty nine yards.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even crack hundred yards. He was not involved

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 1>in this game at all, man, Like I don't get

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you ever get it? Did McVeigh answer that question?

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Like why John Girley was not involved in this game?

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It was? It was crazy, man. This is back and

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>forth all night long. Um Sean McVeigh was going out

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of his mind on the sidelines, and you know it was.

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>It was crazy. This whole entire game was just crazy.

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill is ridiculous. Patrick Mahomes is the biggest arm

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen in my life. Jared Goff calm and

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>cool to pick sixes, the fun Wold for touchdowns. This

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is just a wild game in every sense of the word.

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Why y'alled? It was easily the best Monday Night football

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>game of all time. I know they said it was

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the highest score. It would end up being the highest

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 1>scoring game in NFL history. No, we finished eight point

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>UM to a game which Cincinnati, I wasn't Cleveland back

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand four, and then one back a little

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a little before that, um the highest game total a

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirteen. This want to finish with a hundred

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:26.119
<v Speaker 1>and five? Yeah? And uh look, just another six touchdown

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>performance from Patrick Mahomes, who has now done that twice

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>this year. Has thirty seven touchdowns through eleven games and

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is on pace for nearly fifty four passing touchdowns. I

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's like fifty three point eight. Obviously, we all

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>remember Peyton Manning sent a touchdown record with fifty five.

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes on pace for fifty four. It's been first

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>two season he had six touchdowns and they lost. You

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>have this guy in dynasty or a keeper league. God

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>bless your soul. It's a pathetic, pathetic. I'm in a league.

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm two and nine with Mahome was my starting quarterback.

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like the most barrassing thing I've ever seen in

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>my life. Patrick Mahomes, Antonio Brown and if you have

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>something that might be able to top. That had an

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>NFFC league where it was best ball, and I had

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley and I finished ninth out of ten teams.

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>That sucks, safe to say that was that was the

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Chris Hogan team. That was the Royce Freeman team. Not great, unbelievable, man, unbelievable.

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what to say about this game,

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooke, like, I was just thinking back. I don't

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>know why I keep doing this, but I keep thinking,

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the first thing I've really ever done this.

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I keep thinking to next year about how early some

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of these people go, like Patrick Mahomes gonna be the

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>first quarterback off the board, and rightfully so, um I

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>go back and like Tyreek Hill, We're gonna really have

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>this wide receiver one debate with Tyreek Hill again next year.

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:51.799
<v Speaker 1>That seems silly because he is Brandon like Brandon Cooks

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>and Robert Woods like, he's not your prototypical wide receiver one,

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we knew about. I don't care, it

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. He's the wide receiver one right now. And

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>for those people at home watching and listening are saying, well,

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>they played one more game. He's twenty seven to more

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to Michael Thomas. Now, Michael Thomas might be

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>able to do that in a game, but I'll bet

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the under entire Kill is still your number receiver through

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>eleven games. He's facing Atlanta possible. No, but like there

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>you go, like, I don't want to do this again anymore.

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go game by game anymore with

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Tyree Kill. He's a widers ember one. Brandon Cooks and

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods. Two guys you're gonna get a little bit later,

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm half next year in the third round, third

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>three or four turn, two or three turn, I'm gonna

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>just draft Robert Woods and Brandon Cooks. Give me Girly

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Cooks and Robert Woods, and that's my team. There's a

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>team in my lead the teams in the first place.

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the most points. He has Girly, Brandon Cooks and

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill at top radises are quarter try and get

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>as as many players on the most potent offenses that

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>you possibly could, and these are the two best, which

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is very obvious to say, yeah no, but look before

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the season, and you know this was it's obviously flawed

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>logic at this point. I realized that, and I think

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's fair to talk about we're trying to learn

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>from our mistakes obviously too. Before the season, I wasn't

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 1>that high on Jared Goff because I felt this defense

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be great, and I thought they'd be playing

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of leads, and I thought it would

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>just be a lot of Todd Gurley. Now we have

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>seen games where Todd Gurley takes over and it limits

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the upside of Jared Goff within those games. At least

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he's QB two. He's QB two right now, and he's

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>been phenomenal. I know, you know, Glory likes to bass

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff. He's a system quarterback. You know, there there's

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>another quarterback that people assume is a system quarterback because

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>he's played under one coach, he's played on the same

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>team his whole career. Say what you want abou him,

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>whether he's a system quarterback or not, a lot of

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>people consider him the goat. That's Tom Brady. So whether

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>or not you're a system quarterback or not, you still

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>need to make the throws. I mean, you still need

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to complete thirty one of forty nine pass attempt with

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>over four yards and four touchdowns. It's not just like

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>a Sean McVeigh robot robot who's going out there and

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>doing it for him, Like you still need to make plays.

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff is making those plays. So I look, I

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>was I think I had him as like my QB

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.239
<v Speaker 1>fourteen or fifteen in the in the pre draft season,

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and I was dead wrong on that, and I will gladly,

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>gladly admitted, Yeah, it's crazy, man, This this these two

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>teams are crazy that you're exciting with the The other

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>most wild thing about this, Frank, besides Tyder Gurley getting

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>ten points, it's the fact that if you started both defenses,

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you get like craft on the points. Did you though, Yeah,

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the Rams but like twenty fantasy points

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>last night because I figured the fact that they gave

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>up someone with so many points probably canceled out. So

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't because in mostlys, like once you put up

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>more than like thirty five, like you can't get any worse.

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So you can get negatives. Yeah, but you get like

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>negative four or something like that at thirty five. You

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>don't get like negative you don't get like negative ten.

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>You don't get like negative Tenant. He lit up fifty

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>he's still at the same negative four you know, two

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>defensive touchdowns, three interceptions, two fumble recoveries, three sacks, and

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs were the sixth best defense. Yeah, this is

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the most This is the most fantasy relevant game of

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>all time, and that game ever arguably the best running

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>back like that's probably gonna be like in this generation

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>like this chantasy running back, the number one overall pick

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>this year, the number one overall picked last year, last year,

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>this year, next year or whatever. And in the game

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that at Franks said it. That just spawned fantasy points

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that everybody, no matter who you started, if you're dest

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>for rams tight end, John Reynolds, Brandon Cooks, Robert Woods, Um,

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Chris Connolly, Travis Kelsey, Tyree Hill, kareem On, both quarterbacks.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>The only two players both defenses. The only two players

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 1>in this entire game that let you down are Todd

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Gurley and Sammy Watkins. That is it. Yeah, and od Man,

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the Sammy Watkins thing was. I

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>think they probably just did it as like a throw

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>them off kind of like distraction. Like yeah, I mean,

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins only played five snaps in this game. Um. Yeah,

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>But Josh Reynolds, I think that's a nice takeaway too, right,

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Like he had he had eight targets in this game.

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>He was third, he was he was behind Brandon Cooks

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and Robert Woods. It's what we expected. But still, if

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you started him six for eight and a touchdown, I

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>think you feel pretty good about them going into the by. Yes, again,

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>he's not Cooper Cup. Cooper Cup might have been the

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>most dependable of these wide receivers when he was completely healthy.

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>That was again before he injured his knee for the

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>first time. He's not gonna get to that level. But

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>can Josh Reynolds be a top thirty six wide receiver

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in this offense? He absolutely could. Yeah, absolutely, And we're

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about the tight ends a little bit later

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>on on this program and certainly on the Vanduel Hurry

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Up as well. But I think they're gonna be viable also,

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And I get it, like when everybody shows up, it's

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot more exciting, right, I completely understand that, and

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Josh Reynolds takes that Cooper Cup role, But I think

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 1>you're also gonna see increase with Tyler Higbee and Gerald

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Everett The problem is you're not gonna know which one

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is gonna get the increase because Tyler Higby was the

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>one that was awesome last light. He had six catches,

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>which is I leave at season high, get a season

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 1>high and yards, I want to say, but there's Gerald

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Everett that caught the two touchdowns, including the game winner

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Los Angeles. So I don't really I have

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to look into this war, Frank, I don't know how

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>they differentiate which tight ends on the field when I

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't really know, um, but because they played

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the Rams, they have value. Yeah, so I know coming

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>into this game it's it's a completely frustrating situation coming

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>in and it still is because, as you mentioned, Tyler

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Higbee had the yards and the receptions, but Gerald Everett

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>called the touchdowns, and coming into week Levin it was

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Higby is on the field more, but Gerald Everett

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>runs more routes, so he's not on the field as often.

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>He's probably not as good as a blocker as Tyler Higbee,

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>but he's running more routes, so they look at him

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>as the more competent pass catcher of the two. But

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, with Tyler Higbie, is on just being on

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the field with this offense as potent as it is,

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>it's going to create opportunities for you. I will say,

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you've been structurally at the tight end

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>position all year and in fact the Cooper Cup went down,

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, given what they just did mon night

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>football against the Chiefs, these two guys are on your radar.

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>They are on buy in week twelve. But it is

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely going to be a frustrating situation. I don't know

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that you can pencil either one in as anything better

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>than stream based on matchup a high end tight end too.

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Like they're not gonna be top twelve guys, Yeah, probably not,

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Probably not top twelve guy reliably. Um going forward? What

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>is this dude to Patrick Mahomes and Todd Gurley's m

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>v P race to put Drew Brees on the front

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>because people were saying that last night. No, I think

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it's very close, and I don't knock people for putting

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees in that conversation. I mean, the guys playing

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the best football of his career, arguably at you know,

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>his age, the completion percentage, what he's doing, like getting

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody involved. We just saw tray Kuan Smith have a

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>breakout game this week. So it doesn't matter who the

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>name is on the back. He throws to any buddy

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>throughout his career and he's been amazing and he's again

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>arguably having the best season of his career now. So

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to We have a lot of games left.

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to determine a lot of it.

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>But uh, look, the Saints have now rattled off what

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>nine in a row. They lost in Week one against

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay, So I think the fair question. I don't

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>think as good as Todd Griley has been, I don't

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>think that they will ever give it to a running back,

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>like we're gonna really really need something spectacular, and the

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that he didn't score touch on in this game,

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>we're probably not ended. We're not gonna get to that

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>level of like Ladinian Thomason that we were hoping for,

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>like the thirty one total touchdowns. I think that's not

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen now. But yeah, I think it's it's probably

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>between Drew Brees and Patrick Mons. Yeah. I don't know

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>how it's not homes I really don't, But yeah, I

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>know three interceptions doesn't look great, like he made some

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>bone head passes down he did, and he's just trying

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to make something happen late in the game. Like it

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't great decision making by any means, but there's thirty

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>seconds left in the game. You just kind of like

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>haul it up there and and and see what happens.

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>So I don't necessarily blame him for it. And remember

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 1>he's still through for over four five hundred yards nearly

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>five hundred yard seventy six touchdowns, so he's still right there. Yeah,

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>he's They're both right there. Patrick Mahomes Andrew Brees, they

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>love for Jerry Goff maybe in that race, I don't

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>think I don't think he'll get any consideration, really, I

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>mean I don't. Look, he's played phenomenal again, and you

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>know he's he's the one. He's the one who's executing

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the Seaun McVeagh system, which is as amazing as it is, um.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know that just the numbers overall that

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that Drew Brees, like Drew Brees and Patrick Mamomes are

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 1>still like a step ahead of him in terms of

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.479
<v Speaker 1>numbers he's putting up. But Jared Goff has played phenomenally

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>here and uh, it gives me hope. Gives me hope

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 1>as a Jets fan. And Sam Donald that if the

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Jets can find the right offensive mind, maybe they can

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>turn around and bringing Levy on balance happen. It's amazing

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>how that happens. Of course, the rest of the show

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>will will give you your waiver wire um Hey adds

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>for this week, we'll do a lot and listen, we

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>understand this playoff push. There's two more teams and buy

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of course the Chiefs and laz You have a lot

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of people you have to replace this week, so we're

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna do the best we can to try to help

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you do just that. From the next forty minutes of

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the program. Frankie, Yeah, and the question, I've already gotten

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot and that's why I made it. The The

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Twitter poll for today at Fantasy BFFs on Twitter is

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>again Mahomes and Golf run By. So, which QB are

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you looking at to stream this week? Because there's a

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of names that are out there and you know

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>people you might be interested. Jameis Winston, Lamar Jackson, Baker Mayfield,

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Nick Mullins. I considered those four kind of like the

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>top ones just based on matchup and if you wanted to,

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I know you're not gonna want to, Greg, but throw

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Eli Manning in the mix just because the Eagles secondary

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is as bad as the four guys you mentioned before. Eli,

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I think are in the top four the guys you

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>had in the poll. I believe in the tough Eli

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and Nick Mullins back to back. In my rankings, I

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>have Eli one spot higher than him, but I would

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>say definitively Winston, Jackson and Baker. And again we don't

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>know if Joe Flack was gonna return, because they've already

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned there's a possibility he could. But if Lamar Jackson does,

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>then those three I would say our ahead of Eli Manning.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I agree to me. The Jamis Winston's the answer to

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that question. But you don't know if he's gonna pulled

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the halftime or Ryan Patrick. I know it's very high floor,

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's low ceiling. Is high ceiling floor? Yeah, And

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the true Jamis Winston would be the guy I

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>would go with. It's funny because the guy that is

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in second place in my home league right now, he's

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterbacks, Patrick Mahomes, and he picked up Ryan Fitzpatrick

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a week or two ago preparing for this bye week

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>facing San Francisco. Now Jamis Winston's out the right idea,

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>They totally Jamis Winston's out there, and I want to

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>be like to his opponent, like you should go bid

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>on Jammeis Winston because this is clearly what his plan is.

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that legal? How is that an etiquette? That's too snaky?

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>That's definitely snaky. Um, but it's something I would condone do.

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I think his king his brother Actually last week was

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>was facing someone who had a quarterback on a bye

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>or two weeks ago rather um, and he picked up

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick even though he has your bree is just

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to block the opponent from getting him. And apparently the

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>guy freaked out on him, like out fine, I told

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>him to deal. I was like, yeah, why not, sneaky snake.

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just so obvious. I haven't actually looked in my

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>league what quarterbacks are available, Like James Winston's got to be.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson's probably out there too, Yeah, Lamar Jackson, James

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Winson only owned in of league. Jameis Winston. Yeah, so

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>both those guys are out there, so I'll get somebody,

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So whatever, I'm not gonna get him. It's not gonna

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>get involved. I'm just not getting get him off with this. Yeah,

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>James Winston, Lamar Jackson, Nick Bolin's that's that San Francisco's

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Sama Bay matches. Do you have it over under on

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that yet? I'm sure we Doan Francisco Tampa Bay fifty five?

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>It's no free. Tampa Bay total has consistently been over fifth.

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Last night was the easiest. Why don't we Why don't

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we put our money on that last night? I liked

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the over when it was put all our money on that.

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Like everything we have everything, we have bucks and giants.

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Actually like the underlives. Don't play it under against Tampa Bay.

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll take it ready. Here, we get you the quarterbacks.

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the running backs and wide receivers you

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>need to pick up. We'll tell you how much the drop.

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>We know how important he is to you make the playoffs.

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Get that push, Frank and I will help you do

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that when we come back next. The Fantasy Best Friends

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Forever Daily Rhodo dot Com learned from the game's best

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>DFS players. We don't just give you premier advice. We

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>play every day, all major sports, all year round. We

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>never stop industry leading DFS tools and custom projections, and

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>now the Daily rodo dot Com Optimizer in minutes building

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>optimized line up for cash games and turneys. Learn from

0:17:50.520 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the game's best DFS players joined Daily rodo dot Com

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>back with you, fantasy best friends forever, Fantasy Sports Radio Network.

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>We're here to remind you that don't be it's hurkey.

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Heading over to roder dot com, enter the promo code

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>t G eighteen access your free five day trial. It's

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a five day trial Daily roader dot com before games

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>sleep for the NBA to night, so this is probably

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>good time to use it, although you may want to

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>wait for Sundays. It's hard because it's a five day trial,

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>right and promo coach t G eighteen, and it's free

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>for Thanksgiving, so you obviously want. It's a five day trial.

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's say Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday,

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Sunday some someday. Here's a question, Frank, what up do

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you do the trial to night and get in on

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the four game slate? Do it or do it tomorrow

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so you include Sunday. When do you sign up for

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 1>the Daily Roado re trial. Do you do it to night,

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>you don't get the Sunday games. But if you do

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it tomorrow you get some of the games, but you

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>miss on a fun four games late tonight. I would

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>do it tomorrow, Okay, get more. Yeah, the Wednesday games

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>four days, Thursday football, you get the full NBA Fridayday Friday,

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and then you get Sunday as well. As long as

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you do it at some point, I mean, why would

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>It's free? Um, and we'll do it tomorrow all right.

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Promo code is t G eight teen. That's promo code

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Daily Roder dot com free access for five days to Thanksgiving.

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You get free access. Why wouldn't you do it? It's

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>t G eighteen Daily Rotor dot Com. There's literally no

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>reason not sign up. It's you just get access to

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>everything that we use every day and a chance to

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>win some money and if you like it, well you

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>sign up for good. So there you go. T G

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>eight teen, which is Thanksgiving eighteen. That is the promo code.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>The promo code is t G eight team. Let's get

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>into the way every wire, Frank, I want to start

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>with the running backs. US Edwards is owned in zero

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of leaks. There's not a single person that I

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 1>know that owns Gus Edwards. Well, I did get a

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>text message from my cousin who said, oh damn, this

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is on Sunday afternoon. I just dropped Gus Edwards, who

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>was my buddy's a big cousin, is a big Rutgers fan.

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So because I just dropped Gust Edwards in my Dynasty

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>League this week, that is a terrible feeling. And this Sunday,

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>how this is literally Sunday at three thirty. How much

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>do I spend to pick him up? Like, dude, you

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>asking me this on Sunday And he's like, yes, that

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>terrible feeling in Dynasty too, because it wouldn't surprise me

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>one bit. We've seen this how many years in a

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>row now where a Raven's running back emerges in the

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>second half and that guy performs like legit RB two

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the way. Now, I'm not saying that's

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely going to happen with Gus Edwards, but we've seen

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it happen a while now. Alex Collins did it last year.

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Who was who was the other journeyman running Bamath that

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 1>they had a couple of years ago. Justin cour St

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Justustin for set another perfect example. Second half of the

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>season was phenomenal. The next year, everyone drafting in the

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>third or fourth round let us down. So basically, don't

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>draft Gus Edward next year. Don't draft Alex Collins next

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>year unless we get a new coaching regime in for

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore Ravens. But this has happened far too often.

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards, if if Josh Adams is not available in

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>your league, because I would still want would rather have

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Josh Adam. I'm just talking in terms of like racking

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the running backs. If Josh Adams is not available in

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>your league, Gus Edwards is the next running back up.

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Again Alex Collins has not run how coming. It's really

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting because you've been off the Eagles ever since I've

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>known you. When it comes to the backfield. You didn't

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>want him last year, you don't want him this year.

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Why is Josh Adams, see who is owned six percent

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of leads right now according to CBS Sports, Why Josh

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Adams over Gus Edwards Because you love the Ravens backfield,

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the big Alex Collins guy. You talked it out last week.

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You had the situation right, just the guy wrong. Why

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Josh Adams over Gus Edwards. It has to do a

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>lot with the matchup, and I know a lot of

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>people are win now mode I need to win. I

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>really really like the Eagles matchup for against the Giants,

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and I know the Ravens are facing the Raiders this

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>week as well, so that is a good match up

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 1>on paper. But we know a little bit more about

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>who the who the Eagles are gonna use. And I

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>never thought I would get to this point because Greg

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>has referenced and I'm not big on Doug Peterson because

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>he likes to run out running back by committee. He

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>runs out a trio of running backs. But based on

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the usage that we saw last week, I had to

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>at least somewhat trust the eye test what he showed

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>us and the fact that Josh Adams was in on

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, fifty percent of the snaps, which was you know, um,

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it was higher than normal for a lead running back

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Philadelphia Eagles. So he said something. He said

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>he was going to get Josh Adams more involved. That's

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly what he did. Uh. Josh Adams scored a long

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdown against the New Orleans Saints, who are very potent defense.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>He was actually used more in the past game as well,

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm buying into Josh Adams at least for this week.

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Greg against the New York Giants, who just allowed one

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>yards rushing to Peyton Barber. They've kind of they've slapped

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>off in the in the run defense department once Snax

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Harrison has left the team. So all those things, it's

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of like every thing is is trending in the

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>right direction for Josh Adams right now. And I don't

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 1>want to pooh poo Gus Edwards. I know everyone's still

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out who the hell is This guy

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>played four years at Rutgers and he played another year

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 1>at Miami and he was great this past week. But

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>hen we trusted again. What I said yesterday about the

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Ravens running backs is maybe Gus Edwards gets the first

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>series if he's not performing well. Alex Collins gets a

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>second series. If he does perform well, then maybe it's

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>an Alex Collins game. It's a very fluid situation which

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>is going to is going to evolve within the game

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>based on who's performing well. So there's a lot of

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.959
<v Speaker 1>volatility with that situation, I just trust Josh Josh Adams

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>more this week, given the matchup and the fact that

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I do expect him to be the lead running back

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>at least for one more week. Both matchups are good.

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Josh Adams against Josh Adams against the Giants, and certainly

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards against the Raiders. You like both of them,

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I've been the Josh Adams guy. I've been

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to tell you to pick him up for a

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks now, so so I like him and

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I probably agree that I go with Josh Adams over

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Edwards because it went surprised me if all of a sudden,

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Alice Collins is the guy again. Josh Adams. Every time

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>he's got an opportunity, he's just been better. He've been

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>better than coracle Man, He's been better than Wendell Smallwood

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and Doug Peterson promised to give us more Josh Adams

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>and that's exactly what he did. Let me throw this

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>out there at your Frank, if both of guys are

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>out there, how much are you bidding on him again?

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. I'm not sure how much fab people

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>have left at this point. That's why I don't. You

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>don't give me a number. I'm just saying I'd like

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to rank the running backs at this point because look,

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>if you really really need a running back, you're probably

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>blowing the rest of your fab on one of these

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>guys this week. So if I had to rank him,

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it would be Josh Adams number one, and then I

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>would put Gus Edwards second. And and like what we

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>said about the Ravens running backs, like, there is definitely

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 1>a chance that Gus Edwards is just the guy for

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the year. John Harba came out after

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the game and said, all right, this is the running

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>back that they've been looking for. They've been looking for

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a north south runner, a strong runner. And that's exactly

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.400
<v Speaker 1>what he did. Exactly what he delivered again a hundred

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>yards rushing and a touchdown. So there's a chance I

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>would say, you know, he might have a higher ceiling

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 1>than Josh Adams the rest of the way. But given

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that volatility, and you know that the Ravens coaching staff

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't know who they're necessarily going to use, his

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>floor is also lower than what I think we expect

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>at Josh Adams. I just expect a little bit more safety,

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>which I never thought I would get to with the

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Eagles running backs. But even what we saw last week

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and Doug Peterson delivering on his promise, I do trust

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>him more than I do Gus Edwards. Is it possible

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>if Joe Flaccer comes back, this role for Gus Edwards

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>is diminished. Maybe there's something to working with Lamar Jackson

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that backfield. Is that possibility. It's definitely a possibility because

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Alex Collins has been their majority of the season with

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Joe Flacco and he hasn't run very efficiently. He's had

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a few games where he's run well, but for the

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>most part, we've known that when Lamar Jackson is on

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the field, this team has run better with the football. Obviously,

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that takes into account what Lamar Jackson does running the football,

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>but this has been with any football team in the history,

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Like when you have Michael Vick on the field or

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Tyrod Taylor. That helps the running backs because defenses have

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to account more so for a running quarterback running the

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>ball out of the backfield and and ultimately that opens

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>up more running lanes for the running back. So that's

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a good point. If Joe Flacco does play it might

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.239
<v Speaker 1>limit the upside. Maybe we don't see. I don't know.

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just so hard to say. What do you expect

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>from Gus Edwards moving forward? Like this is probably gonna

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>be his best game of the season. Can we say

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that definitively No, but it's more than likely not. Gus

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Edward was prior to this game. In his debut against Tennessee,

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>he had ten carries. This is a blowout. Baltimore beat

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee's twenty one nothing back in Week six. Since that moment,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>of course, Joe Flacco being the starting quarterback two carries

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>against New Orleans, two carries against Carolina, one carry against Pittsburgh.

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Now the seventeen carriers came out of the by so

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's possible. Jaron Harba John Harbaugh reevaluated his team

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is like, listen, I want to get this guy more involved.

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>He is. He's more talented than we're given him credit for.

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 1>We have to get him the ball. That's possible. And

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the schedule, and Frank's talked about it a lot. The

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>schedule really lines up very very nicely for Gus Edwards

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with Oakland, Atlanta, UH Casey, Tampa Bay and then the

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Chargers in week sixteen. It lines up very very well.

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>You could be a league winner. He definitely could be

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>a league winner. I'll do, I'll be I'll be very

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact about it and hopefully knowing my league's listening.

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>I have thirty four dollars left. How much have I

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>been on them? All of it? Every time? Were your

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>current running mix? Is Josh Adams available? He's on my

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>team already my other running backs sakewon Barkley. So Josh

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Adams is your r B two and Kenny and Drake

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is my RB three. For the sake of the Florio

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>situation last week, I'm going to tell you to bid

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 1>um dollars on Gus Edwards this week, twenty seven dollars

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it is, and and hear the call part, okay, cool,

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, all right? And it's interesting because I was

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at some of the other players that are available

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this week outside of Josh Adams Um and Gosh Edwards

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>to the running back it's not really much that I want,

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I have Rex burkehead already in my ir. We've

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>talked about that the last couple of weeks. Then you

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>get some of the passing down bash, but in particular

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Elijah McGuire, uh and THEO Rittic both are pretty widely available.

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with Riddy because I actually like

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Rick more than like McGuire. But I've read the stats.

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>How listen theory hasn't scored like years at this point,

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and the reason you like Riddick is just carry on.

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Johnson's out for the next couple of weeks, certainly out

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this week on Thanksgiving me which means it's all about

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the Garrett Blunt. That's all about theoretic. I expect the

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>lines to be down against the bruising embarrass defense, which

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>means a lot of dump bumps the theoretic. That's why

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's an option. If you're desperate running back,

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you lost Ted Gurley, lost Cream Hunt, you have nobody

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to pick up. I prefer THEO this week till Garrett

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Blunt and Elijah McGuire. Yeah, I think that's fair. I

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's fair to say. I also throw a Jennal

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Richard if he's still floating out there. He saw more

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>carries this week than he normally does because Uh, Doug

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Martin was dealing with some kind of phantom ankle injury

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in the second half, which was annoying for me because

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Doug Martin has done nothing but do his job and

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>he's running effectively, which crazy, Like I'm complaining here about

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Doug Martin on the Raiders like this shouldn't be a thing.

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>But I started him last week in the flex and

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>uh DeAndre Washington was getting goal line opportunities and he

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>did not run well. It just seemed like John Gruden

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>was doing that thing where he benches his best players.

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>But Janaln Chards saw Levin Carreys last week for sixty

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>one yards and then he also added his normal four

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>targets three year septions thirty two yards. So if Janalen

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Rechards sus to be used more in the ground game

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.479
<v Speaker 1>in addition to what he's been doing as a pass catchers,

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>than Janaln Rechard is also. I mean, I don't know

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.239
<v Speaker 1>why he would be available. We've been talking him up

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>since Marshawn Lynch went down. But if for some reason,

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Richard is out there, he's another guy I'm looking at.

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I know John Gruden compared him to some Tampa Bay

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Bucks I'm assuming running back from the nineties, some guy

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>who caught rush for a thousand and ran for It

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>was like Michael Pittman, who was it wasn't Thomas Jones

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>rush rush for a thousand and ran rush for a

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand and and received a thousand Thomas Jones. No, it

0:29:55.840 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't work done. No, it was like a not no. Okay,

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>um amo Zoe, I can't find it. I'll find it

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>for you, Okay. I like Jayalen Richard though, and I'm

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>with you on THEO Riddic. The Lions are four point

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>home dogs on Thanksgiving. I know it's a bad matchup

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>against Chicago, but I think we see some kind of

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>classic Lions here where they're not gonna have a run

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:23.959
<v Speaker 1>game to speak of. I think we actually see more

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Zack Zenter running the football of than we do. Let

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. Yeah, and they've already kind of spoke

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>about that they're gonna try and get Zack Center involved.

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe Legarrett Blunt has uh something like twenty one

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards on his last sixteen rushing attempts, so he's

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>been god awful. But I think they used THEO rick

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>as an extension of the run game in this one.

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I just give him a lot of short passes. He's

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>already kind of provided as say flour for PPR in

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of weeks and he's been on the field.

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we see a more classic Detroit Lions offensive

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>attack in this game, where they really do have to

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>pass the ball more than usual because even when Zack center,

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be able to run the football

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:01.239
<v Speaker 1>against So I again, you ranked it. You don't want

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to necessarily give up how much Josh Adams, Gus Edwards theoretic?

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>What are the other names you mentioned? Listen, if you

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>do have fab let, if you have thirty dollars of

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you have twenty dollars of how much of that do

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you put up theoretic? How important is it to grab him? Yeah,

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you have twenty or thirty dollars and you're

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>picking up theoretic, I'm assuming it's because you don't have

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>girl or you don't have Koreem Hans, right, Like theoretics

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>not the winner. Yeah, Like, realistically, you're picking up theoretic

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>because of like the final bybeek here in week twelve.

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>You're not picking him up just because they're like, oh,

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm intrigued by theoretic. You want them for

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>this week because Harry on, Johnson is gonna be out

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and carry on. Johnson could miss more time. So, but

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>he's in that jail. And Richard mold Like he doesn't

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>have immense upside, but he's gonna give you a safe

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>floor for PPR. So if you have twenty bucks, I'll

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>spend maybe about half of it, eleven twelve dollars if

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you have if you have thirty, you know, maybe fifteen

0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>sixteen something like that. Okay, you mention neo. Elijah McGuire,

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned the Garret Blood. I don' want like Garret Blood.

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw a dollar, a couple of dollars on Zack

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Center if I'm that desperate. And you get to Elijah McGuire,

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>who had the week off of the by only seeing

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>increased Jets heavy underdogs against New England this week, which

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>should be good for the passing down back. McGuire. The

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>player was Charlie Garner. Greg Charlie Garner, former Raiders running back.

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>While you you screwed me out because you said bucks. Yeah,

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>he said Raiders. I might have gotten Charlie Garner. OK.

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what Charlie Garner didn't. He was good. Charlie

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Garner was before me. It was before your football watching time,

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>not like before you were born time, but the Garners

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>before your football watching time. So it's interesting that they

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>referred to him as having Charlie Garner type upside, which

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>is a one thousand yard rushier and one thousand yard receiver.

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Never did that in a season. Yeah, I had nine

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred sixty two rushing yards and one receiving yards. That's

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:57.719
<v Speaker 1>what he was referring to. Ninety one receptions PPR year

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>out of that, that's what he's referring to. He did

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>bring it into Tampa Bay after that, but it didn't matter.

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>It is, so that was that's who they were referring

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to with the jail in. Yeah, okay, jailer shard talented

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>guy actually started to reflex. Jakes just texted me about FLEX.

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize like how badly I checked it On Sunday.

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I want to stop looking at it.

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I've got a lot of points against Jake in Flex

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and PBR. How much did you put up one six? Yeah,

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that's got to be among the highest year. We're tied

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>at seven in four. Man. You and I lets BFFs

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>holding it down in the Flex League. Man Fantasy League

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of Experts. I guess we're I guess we're finally experts.

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>We did it. We did it, Yeah, very well in

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy League of Experts. I'm actually the defending champion.

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>You are indeed, Um, you know my my second RB

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>spot's been an issue all year and the reason I

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>bring this up is because my second RV is jailing Shards.

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>He not a PBR league. Well, I know you had

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Marshall Lynch, so yeah, you picked up for shard it.

0:33:56.080 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Did you know quasi Marshall Lench? You know who I'll

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>be picking up this week's Edwards? How much fab do

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>you have? Probably more than me. Probably use your fab

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot, still haven't. I don't have a lot of

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>josh Ads. This thing is not Adam. I'm excited you're

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna pick up both of them. Anyway, he's not a

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not available, So Gus Edwards, I have fifty hours

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>left my fab blow it all boat and Gus Gus

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>bus No, that's that's from No. Come on, Greg. Actually

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>like the movie Somebody Music quotes man and someone used

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:41.760
<v Speaker 1>it on Twitter reference. This is a movie I've watched

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 1>more than anyone should watch this. It's a stupid comedy

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that helps narrow it down. Boy, No, it's pretty close though,

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>us us dun dumber what don dummer? Pretty close to

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Let me know when you give up give up bench warmers?

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Never seen mench warmers? What? We got some work to do, Greg,

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to start on movies, Frank, Yeah, I

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>know there's a lot of movies I haven't seen. But

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>bench Warmers, come on. I don't even know. I don't

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:18.919
<v Speaker 1>even know what it's about or who's in it. Bench

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Warmers about a team of like misfit baseball players. It's baseball.

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I wou guess football has Rob Schneider, Rub Schneider has

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Rob Snyder, Nick Schwartzon has the guy who played Napoleon Dynamite.

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you know it's dumb, but it's like funny, Dug

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>John Hater. It's a great movie. That's that's great, all right?

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Give you the running backs, wide receivers. The wide receivers

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>are the tight ends to pick up that covers your way. Next,

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>it's much smaller. Groups will break it down the best

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we can. Fantasy best friends Forever, Frank Snapple, Greg, we

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>come back after this. If you're someone that needs fantasy

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>sports advice every day. The Fantasy Sports Radio Network has

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you covered. When you download the n T s Y

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network GAP, you get the top fantasy advice

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>every single day right through the weekend. Be sure to

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to our weekend warriors like College Football Today. Welcome

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to College Football Today. Weekend fantasy updates called me the

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>fantasy Jesus in this league is never short of exciting

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:17.959
<v Speaker 1>at I t L and it was so much more.

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Download the Fantasy Sports Radio Network GAP in the iTunes

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and Google play Store now and keep the best fantasy

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>experts right in your pocket all day long and all

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>week long. Back with you, fantasy best friends forever. Fantasy

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network Here, what gos alloud? Back? A loud

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>spike there? Sorry about that. More think about it, the

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>more I realize you'll probably hate the movie The Best Warmers. Okay,

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>have you seen Grandma's Boy? Yeah? You like Grandma's that's funny.

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you liked you get super high before you saw

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>bench Warmers? What do you get super high before you

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>saw bench Warmers? It's a big, a fair question, is it? Yes? Wow?

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Very very tough crowd. I m dB five point six

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>out of ten yeah, I'm sure it's not actually from

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Ron Tomatoes. Um, it's a little bit better than that

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>great movie. Greg the bench Warmers reference. I don't know.

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I didn't really hear. Well, that was Grandma's Boy.

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what I thought it was to be honestly. Anyway,

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.280
<v Speaker 1>come up next, Tollent Fantasy Sports. That way, it's Corey,

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Daggers, Menchu the Fantis Formal Frenzy, followed by Rhodo

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Experts in the morning, followed by Fantasy Sports Today with

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Blewett and Dean. After that, Gt. D. Gabe and Cam

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Will had the covered from four till seven. At six

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.399
<v Speaker 1>o'clock hour once again, as always is line up locked

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>live four games in the NBA slate to night at

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>seven pm, Scout Fantasy Sports with Adam RNA's those are

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>your program that's your programming guy, profession of the day.

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 1>All times are Eastern and we go until PM. We

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 1>got Greg. It was a schedule. I wasn't letting you

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 1>do it anymore. No, I was asking me what he got.

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Like after that, Wow, what's up next? The number one

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 1>college BASKETBA player in the country just coming into Memphis. Uh,

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like Memphis. Penny Hardaway doing a fantastic

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>job at the University of Memphis. He's just got like

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>three top tender cruits. After nobody hears to Memphis. Was

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:25.399
<v Speaker 1>he the head coach? So they used to have team

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that they'll have since Derrick Rose, right, Yes, so they

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>head Jelly Calip, Harry Right and Derrick Rose and all

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>what they did in Memphis. Then they run in. They

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>brought back Josh Pastner, who was like fine. It was

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like a kind of like a fine coach, and they

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>were always like a okay team essentially, and then they've

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>run Tubby Smith, which is like a disaster. Likes it.

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>He's not that fat. What's so Tubby Smith is my

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>name was Tubby Smith. I would I would eat more

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:57.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty piece chicken nuggets. So Tubby Smith is he former

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like Kentucky coach before um, he's a Kentucky coach after

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Rick Patino was a Kentucky coach and all won a

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>national championship there and then like that fire, he went

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to Minnesota that was a disaster, went to like Texas Tech.

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, Now he's at Memphis and now

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>he went to Memphis and he just like totally disregarded

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 1>like the entire Memphis culture and didn't play the game.

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And Thenny Hardway was like the head of the lead

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a team in Memphis, and he went to Memphis and

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>he was a huge superstar at Memphis, and how he's

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 1>been like disregarded all of that and then he got

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>fired and they just said, Penny you can coach the team. Now.

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Penny's got like all the best players Memphis. Do you

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 1>know so much about like random stuff? I don't know

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>how you retain all this information. Well, you retained a

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of it, but I don't know, like I wouldn't

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to like right now, just trying to retain

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 1>information for the NFL and the NBA is like a

0:39:57.239 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 1>daunting task, right. I don't know how you find the

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.879
<v Speaker 1>time to like fit in college basketball and you still

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of mingle with like college football. I know you

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>watched like the terms sometimes and stuff. Yeah, I mean,

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know. I think the thing is, I

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>don't get near these details in view. You get very

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>obsessed a good way with the details, and I'm just like, yeah,

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that sounds good. That's usually my okay, So let's get

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.399
<v Speaker 1>to the wide receivers this week. Problem is there there

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 1>aren't many. The guys were a bunch, but we've talked

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>about them a lot, exactly because still not owning enough percentage,

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>which is weird. The guys that we're gonna mention we

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned really every week. And as as I was putting

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.279
<v Speaker 1>together the hurry of Rundown, I know you were doing this.

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>And so he's good with the players that we have

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>match because that means we're we're talking about the right players.

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>But I was shocked to see the key QCs only

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>owning thirty three percent of leagues. It made no sense.

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I was shocked to see d J. Moore slightly under

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty of leagues. I was stunned to see Anthony Miller

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:52.919
<v Speaker 1>slightly over fifty percent of leagues. It didn't make sense

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:55.799
<v Speaker 1>to me. Like the fact that Trey Kawon Smith is

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>over his own more than Kiki and d J Moore

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Miller shocked me, really didn't. That's just that's people

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>buying into the Saints offense right and and Drew Brees

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and rightfully so um and I'm not surprised by that

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, and even Tray Kwon Smith's ownership percentage

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 1>should jump this week, but it's not surprising. I saw

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 1>last week. The reason I wrote about Kiki in the

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Best Fantasy five, the five players that I'm higher on

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:22.279
<v Speaker 1>than the consensus, was he was owning less than thirty

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of leagues. And like, guys, don't forget what Kiki

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 1>did when he was healthy with Shawn Watson in the

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>two games where he was really healthy and thriving, fifteen

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>targets against the Colts, and then he had seven targets

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the next week against the Cowboys, and he holds in

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown that week as well. And what did he

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.919
<v Speaker 1>do this week? All he did was lead the team

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and targets on a a team that has DeAndre Hopkins

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>as their wide receiver. One led the team in receiving

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>yards as well, so I had the same amount of

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>receptions as DeAndre Hopkins. Deshaun Watson likes this guy, and

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and he should after tomorrow, after tonight and after tomorrow,

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 1>because I know some people's waivers run now Wednesday into Thursday.

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.879
<v Speaker 1>By Thanksgiving. Heke q ts ownership percentage should be over

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>at the lowest. I agree with this, mad This made

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:11.399
<v Speaker 1>sense to me, Um, But all these guys are all

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>very similar. I think they all have the ability to

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 1>be UH high end wide receiver. Threes in all honesty,

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 1>DJ More, Anthony Miller, well going, John, that's where he's

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 1>coming next. Uh? DIDG Moore Anthony Miller? J Moore, did

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>you agree with him getting drafted in the first round?

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember. I think I don't like wish you

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:30.879
<v Speaker 1>washing like, No, he's not really a first round wide receiver. Yea.

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was a high and wider second round

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>widter sper like. I thought Calvin Ridley should have went

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him, So I was very surprised when he didn't.

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Um More, Anthony Miller, track, and you got to Josh

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds in there as well. I think this is a

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>good crew of guys. I would love to know how

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you rank it, Frank, Yeah, so I think it's I

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:51.479
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good question. Um So I'll start with

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I think number one on this list. For me, it's

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:59.360
<v Speaker 1>actually it's it's gonna be your guy. It's gonna be

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 1>d J. Moore. I put d J. Moore first on

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>this list. It's forty forty nine percent owned flashed his

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 1>upside of what he can be when he's targeted heavily.

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And I mentioned this yesterday. Devin Funtis is an unrestricted

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:13.720
<v Speaker 1>free agent this year for the Carolina Panthers. Now Curtis

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Samuel is coming on a little bit. They invested a

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>draft pick in him one year ago. Uh and and

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the obviously they used the first round pick on d J. Moore.

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're starting to see the change of

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:26.240
<v Speaker 1>guard here at the wide receiver position for the Carolina Panthers.

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:28.439
<v Speaker 1>And d J. Moore was tied for the team lead

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 1>with eight targets over a hundred and fifty yards. He's

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>a nightmare after the catch. I mean, this guy is

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 1>a yack monster. He's extremely explosive. Called a touchdown in

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 1>this game, called a touchdown on Darius Slay, one of

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the better cover corners in the NFL. So I think

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it's very close when we're talking about we're splitting hairs

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:46.759
<v Speaker 1>here between which wide receivers we want. But I think

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 1>d J. Moore is a guy who can have a

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>consistent role with the Carolina Panthers for the rest of

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the season. I know Cam Newton spreads the ball around,

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 1>but he's he's starting to he's starting to develop that

0:43:56.040 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>rapport with d J. Moore, and obviously the draft pedigree

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:02.879
<v Speaker 1>is there with him. Next up, I'm gonna go with

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I know he's on by, but I'm gonna take Josh Reynolds. Man.

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was intrigued by what I saw in

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 1>this performance. He was targeted eight times. Yes it was

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:14.240
<v Speaker 1>behind Brandon Cooks, and yes it was behind Robert Woods,

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but still had eighty receiving yards, had a touchdown. There

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 1>was a point in this game where whether it's in

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the third or fourth quarter, I tweeted out last night,

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>he was leading the team in targets, receiving yards, and receptions.

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And then obviously Brandon Cooks and Robert Woods had strong

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarters. But he was used heavily in this game.

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 1>And it's a very very potent offense. So he's again

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:36.799
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna do with Cooper Cup did exactly. But

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that he can be a top thirty six

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. He can be a wide receiver three in

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>this offense. I do believe that. So I'll rank Josh

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds uh number two on this list. It's close, man,

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it's close between Tray, Kwan Smith, and Kiki because

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Tray Kwan on any given week has higher

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:56.240
<v Speaker 1>upside than Kiki QT. But I'll take Keiki just because

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of what I think he's gonna provide floor wise every

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>single week. Think he's gonna be involved, especially for PPR.

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 1>He's in the wide receiver three conversation to Marius Thomas,

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>put this guy in the back of a milk carton.

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:08.479
<v Speaker 1>He was nowhere to be found in this game. Wasn't

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 1>even targeted a single time. And I just read to

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:13.399
<v Speaker 1>you what Kiki QT did this past week in terms

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of his usage. Next up, I'll have Trey Kwan Smith

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:18.839
<v Speaker 1>just for those games where he still plays at home

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 1>against the New Orleans. I know they have a game

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in Dallas, so that's a game inside of a dome

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 1>as well, where he might be able to do work

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in that matchup. But the reason why I ranked Trey

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Kwan Smith behind all these guys, and again, I know

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 1>he has a big upside. We saw what he can

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:34.480
<v Speaker 1>do this past week, but he's only had these big

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 1>performances when he's home inside of domes. So what happens

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:38.879
<v Speaker 1>in the games where he's still at doors, he's still

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be very boom or bust for me. So I

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:43.240
<v Speaker 1>just think that these other guys have a safer floor.

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:46.320
<v Speaker 1>You can count them more week in week out. Um,

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>this is me splitting hairs once again. So tray Juan

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Smith fourth. I'll put Anthony Miller fifth. I like Anthony

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Miller a lot. Again. I talked about him last week,

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Greg and I was excited about him. He scored another touchdown.

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>He's an absolute gamer. He's a good route runner, strong hands,

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and again the Bears traded up to get him, so

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously they're going to use him. But I just think

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 1>that there's more volume with some of these other offenses.

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>The Bears don't throw all that much. We saw Taylor

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Gabriel get involved again this week. Allen Robinson is there,

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Toreko when is there? So there's a lot of mouths

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:17.439
<v Speaker 1>to feed. I like Anthony Miller a lot. I think

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>he deserves to be in this conversation. It's really those

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 1>five guys, and then much lower down the list is

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Ellington. If you're just really desperate when you're suffering

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:27.879
<v Speaker 1>from the Marvin Jones injury, he was targeted nine times.

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:30.360
<v Speaker 1>He had six receptions for fifty two yards, So this

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is a desperation call. He's much lower than these others.

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But this group of five wide receivers is really really

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:37.560
<v Speaker 1>bunched up and it's hard to split hairs. But I'll

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>rank dj more number one. Greg. Yeah, so for me,

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:42.839
<v Speaker 1>And it was a really good breakdown all of that,

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Frank and I understand it. For me, I'm probably gonna

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 1>go in a bit of a different direction. I think

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go with. I've listened to shows where they

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 1>ranked tra kuon Smith number one, and I understand it

0:46:55.040 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's the Saints offense. We just saw what his

0:46:57.000 --> 0:47:00.480
<v Speaker 1>upside was. Thirteen targets, ten receptions. It's hard to argue that.

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I just think he's gonna be a little bit boom

0:47:02.480 --> 0:47:04.520
<v Speaker 1>or bust depending on where he's playing that week. For me,

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:06.799
<v Speaker 1>i'm gonna have out of these five guys, I'm gonna

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 1>have Anthony Miller ranked last. I would think, Um, I

0:47:10.719 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 1>think that the upside is just capped, like like he's

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>not getting these huge yards chunks. He's scoring touchdowns three

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 1>of his last five games, but you're not gonna see

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like a ten for a hundred games Randony million, like that,

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not possible. So he's gonna be five for me.

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Four's gonna trade Kulan Smith. He's amazing at home, you

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 1>want to use in whatever he's home. But on the

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 1>road it's a little bit of a different story. It's

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the track me and I think there's just

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of bus potential here compared to some

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:36.279
<v Speaker 1>of the other three guys. So, um, I'm gonna have

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 1>ant tray Kuon Smith ranked four at number three. For me,

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 1>as I continue to go backwards, these are much closer.

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Like I think these three are closer than the other two,

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 1>at least for me, I have them four or five

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:51.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty easily. Um for me at number three, I

0:47:52.960 --> 0:47:55.359
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna go with DJ Moore at three. Oddly enough,

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I know who's your number one guy, but I think

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.800
<v Speaker 1>at um, I think at number three, I have DJ

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Moore only because Greg Olsen's presidence is there. CJ. Mccafy, Um,

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey is the number one option no matter what

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in that offense. After Christian McCaffrey, you have Greg Olsen,

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you have Devn Funches, and maybe d J Moore is

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the number one option. Now, maybe maybe that's the truth,

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we're right, And we talked about that yesterday,

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:20.359
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna be number three for me. At number two,

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be Josh Reynolds because Josh Reynolds is the

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 1>third option in the officense, but it's the best offense

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. We saw what he could do last night,

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and if he's using like Cooper cup role, he's gonna

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 1>be a league winner. And I'm gonna be very depressed.

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And I admit everything I have for Josh Reynolds a

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:35.319
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, which leaves a number one for me.

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:39.399
<v Speaker 1>My guy, k qt e key, do you love me?

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I did? How much I love Kiki Man. I think

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 1>he's just the ever reliable slot receiver for the Houston

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Texans to Marius Thomas has proven to be an absolute

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing slot Yeah, I was good. He's going to be

0:48:52.400 --> 0:48:55.000
<v Speaker 1>an absolutely nothing in this offense thus far. And you know,

0:48:55.080 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins is the alpha male for sure. But it's

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:04.359
<v Speaker 1>just slot thoughts, spot Stot. It's not stot slot everybody, nice, nice,

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Greggy the year of the slot. We're coming up with

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 1>songs on the fight here. I will mention Greg d. J.

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Moore's upcoming schedule Seattle this week, Tampa Bay the best,

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:16.759
<v Speaker 1>third most fantasy points. Cleveland the tenth most fantasy points

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers, New Orleans the most, Atlanta the fourth most.

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Week seventeen is the Saints again an upcoming schedule really good, beautiful,

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:28.319
<v Speaker 1>fair enough. The wide start was very close. Take your

0:49:28.320 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 1>pick to make sure you get one of them. All right,

0:49:30.680 --> 0:49:32.760
<v Speaker 1>all of them. We're gonna sign. We're gonna signed off YouTube.

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Now come up next, Fantasy Football Frenzy, The Corey, Jim

0:49:35.520 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Closer Chris vent Shra. If you're listening to

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, subscribe like rate us five stars and leave

0:49:41.000 --> 0:49:42.719
<v Speaker 1>a comment you're listening a lot on the radio. Will

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:45.799
<v Speaker 1>go another five minutes or so. Frank, I do want

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to get to the tight ends before we get to

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the streaming defenses. Um, the tight end position. I'm going

0:49:50.400 --> 0:49:52.680
<v Speaker 1>back to my man Cameron Ray O. J. Howard believed

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a high ankle sprain potentially. Um, we know

0:49:56.080 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston's back in the saddle. Jamis Winston, No no,

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:03.280
<v Speaker 1>O J. Howard. Very good combination for Cameron Bright. Yeah, absolutely,

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that one. Uh. And he's only owned

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:09.919
<v Speaker 1>in about nineteen percent of leaks, which is actually higher

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:12.400
<v Speaker 1>than I thought it would be considering these other ownership

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:14.480
<v Speaker 1>percentages for a tight end, But I agree with you.

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Cammon Brad, Jamis, Winston, Ran Fitzpatrick, whoever has been in there.

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 1>They liked to throw to the tight end. They utilize

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 1>that position. We know that Winston and Braid, you know,

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I've had a rapport in years past. Hasn't necessarily been

0:50:24.920 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 1>there this year, but they like throwing to the tight

0:50:27.440 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 1>end in Tampa. So if O. J. Howard is down,

0:50:30.640 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 1>expects expects to miss time. Cameron Brad, at least for

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this week, looks like he is is the number one

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 1>AD at the tight end position. I will mention John

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 1>hut Smith, while he didn't score a touchdown this week,

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was targeted U target heavily in this game. He had

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 1>what six for forty five, not a not a great

0:50:46.239 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 1>yardage game, but in PPR you get ten points out

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of your tight head and he's been in He's been

0:50:50.120 --> 0:50:52.720
<v Speaker 1>involved in the red zone all the other weeks leading

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>up to this past week where he know again he

0:50:55.000 --> 0:50:56.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't score a touchdown, but was good for a PPR.

0:50:57.160 --> 0:51:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll mentioned John h Smith. Then the overly man, Antonio Kates,

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 1>coming off his best game of the season eight yds

0:51:03.560 --> 0:51:05.799
<v Speaker 1>in a touchdown. He's behind these other two definitely, but

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he was worth mentioning just based on based

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:10.440
<v Speaker 1>on the performance he had the Rams tight ends. Um

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned at the top of the show. Do you pick

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 1>those guys up over over a Cameron Braid or John No,

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'd rather have Cameron Brad, I'd rather have

0:51:17.280 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 1>John new Smith. But I'll take them over Rants. I'll

0:51:20.520 --> 0:51:23.320
<v Speaker 1>take them over over Rands, I'll take them over Antonio Gates.

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:26.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a crap shoot there, like I have Would you

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:27.759
<v Speaker 1>have it? Who would you rather have? The guys were

0:51:27.760 --> 0:51:31.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioning this week, the Rams, John new Cameron, Brad Gates

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 1>or my man, let's do it more time? Can you

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:42.760
<v Speaker 1>take me high man? I'll definitely take Brayton, John new Smith.

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>He's like in that conversation with the Rams guys, they

0:51:47.000 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 1>have more, they have more upside. Would He's in the

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:53.319
<v Speaker 1>same categories Gates? Okay, sorry, okay, you were the hire man.

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:57.839
<v Speaker 1>We're the highest man. Alright. Streaming defenses for this week.

0:51:57.880 --> 0:51:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I spoke last week by the Buffalo Bills and the

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Bills go forward? Did they sneaky good defense? Next three

0:52:01.960 --> 0:52:04.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks they get the Jags Dolphins and Jets can't so

0:52:04.440 --> 0:52:06.360
<v Speaker 1>much better than that. So I like the Bills a

0:52:06.360 --> 0:52:09.080
<v Speaker 1>lot this week. I like the Patriots certainly this week

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets. Those are my two favorite of the

0:52:10.960 --> 0:52:13.480
<v Speaker 1>ones who probably could stream where you looking, Frank, Yeah,

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to throw the Chargers out there. They're likely

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:19.080
<v Speaker 1>widely owned already, but they're facing the Cardinals if they're

0:52:19.120 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 1>still out there in your league. They got Joey Bosa back.

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe he played something like, uh like thirty snaps

0:52:24.040 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Uh. And the Cardinals offenses has been

0:52:26.480 --> 0:52:29.239
<v Speaker 1>great all season long. Josh Rosen is gonna be prone

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to get sacked and get so I like the Charges

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Uh. And then I'll mention the Colts just

0:52:34.360 --> 0:52:36.720
<v Speaker 1>because they played really well last week against the Tennessee

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Titans at home, and they get the Miami Dolphins. You

0:52:39.320 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's gonna be Tannehill or Brock Osweiler,

0:52:42.000 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 1>but either way, Dolphins offense is not scaring a lot

0:52:44.440 --> 0:52:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of people. And then the Cowboys, who you know, have

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:49.600
<v Speaker 1>been up and down this year. They started off really hot,

0:52:49.640 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and there was like a stretch where like they weren't

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 1>playing well they didn't perform against the tight ends and

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles UM, but then they did well this past

0:52:57.080 --> 0:52:59.280
<v Speaker 1>week against the Falcons. They have a strong pass rush

0:52:59.440 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're going up against Washington, who their offensive line

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:04.239
<v Speaker 1>is decimated, and they're playing with Colton McCoy is their

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:06.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterback on Thanksgiving. So I think those are kind of

0:53:06.880 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the five streaming defenses this week. I like the Cowboys

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 1>against Washington, all right, So there you go. I also,

0:53:11.680 --> 0:53:15.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're you're absolutely desperate, um, who else do they

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:19.600
<v Speaker 1>pick up? There's there was I was I'm desperate in

0:53:19.719 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 1>leagues that the Cardinals defense I picked up last week.

0:53:21.760 --> 0:53:23.319
<v Speaker 1>So I put in a cleaning of the Browns against

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, which is heat frank Um the Browns of

0:53:26.440 --> 0:53:28.799
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals and the Mond Browns defense showed up played

0:53:28.840 --> 0:53:30.759
<v Speaker 1>well against the Falcons before the bye week. And then

0:53:30.800 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I also put in the Seahawks as well. Seahawks Greggy

0:53:36.360 --> 0:53:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the twelve man on the road in Carolina? In Caroline,

0:53:40.040 --> 0:53:42.279
<v Speaker 1>are you out of your mind? Greg? Hey, it's been

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Cardinals against the Charger. Yeah, that's my thought

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:49.400
<v Speaker 1>on all right, So there you go. That's our show today,

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 1>really good one. We hope we helped. We'd love to

0:53:51.280 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 1>find out who you got who you dropped? Uh and

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and hey, tomorrow could be the last trade deadline edition

0:53:56.120 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of the programs. You want to watch, that for sure.

0:53:58.239 --> 0:54:00.120
<v Speaker 1>For Frank Stample, my name is Greg saw In The

0:54:00.120 --> 0:54:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Frenzy comes your way next with Corey Parson,

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Jim Day and Chris Svenca. Have you great afternoon, Get

0:54:05.840 --> 0:54:07.920
<v Speaker 1>those waiver wire claims in. I'll see you right back

0:54:07.920 --> 0:54:10.400
<v Speaker 1>here tomorrow, we hope.