WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Fed Decision, Germany Chancellor, China Eco

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our day

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Break anchors all around the world, and straight ahead on

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 2>the program, a look ahead to this week's Federal Reserve

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 2>policy meeting Now it may impact monetary policy moving forward.

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Plus a look at earnings from the media and entertainment

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 2>giant Walt Disney. I'm Tom Busby in New York. I'm

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Carolin London.

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 3>But we're looking at the many challenges facing Germany's new

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Chancellor as Fredrick Martz prepares to take up the job.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm Doug Krisner, exploring what's at stake in the US

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 4>China trade standoff ahead of some key eco data in

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 4>the week ahead.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>eleven three zero, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety two to nine, Boston, DAB, Digital Radio, London, Syrias,

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>XM one on and around the world on Bloomberg Radio

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby, and we begin

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Today's program just ahead of the Federal Reserve's third policy

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 2>meeting of the year, which kicks off Tuesday, ends with

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 2>a decision on interest rates on Wednesday. Amid a lot

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>of economic uncertainty and the impact of President Trump's ever

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>changing tariffs, the Fed has a lot to consider. For

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 2>some perspective on what it all means. Stuart paul Us,

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>economist with Bloomberg Economics, what do you expect the FOMC

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 2>to do on Wednesday?

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 5>We're expecting a rate hold. We're expecting the Federal Reserve

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 5>to keep the target federal funds rate in the range

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 5>of four and a quarter to four and a half percent.

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 5>We're expecting very little news to come out of the FOMC.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 5>We're expecting very little news to come in the way

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 5>of the Fed's balance sheet. All in all, it should

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 5>be one of the more boring FOMC decisions and press

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 5>conferences that we've had in a while.

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 2>So a boring press conference. However, a lot of turmoil

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 2>leading up to this, and there's a lot for the

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Fed to consider. Let's start with some of the good news.

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 2>And there is good news about jobs, right, we just

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 2>led this past week.

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 5>That's right, in April, there were one hundred and seventy

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 5>seven thousand jobs added, a four point two percent unemployment rate.

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 5>From the Fed's perspective, it's not just thinking about employment

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 5>chugging along, it's thinking about inflation pressures. We saw relatively

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 5>modest zero point two percent wage growth and earnings growth

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 5>during the month. So as employment is becoming a little

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 5>bit broader as the workforce is expanding, inflation pressures stemming

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 5>from the workforce are rather dull. And as we're heading

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 5>into this FMC decision, the latest inflation data that the

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 5>FED has in hand are basically showing muted inflation pressures

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 5>so far. But the question is going to be on

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 5>the Fed's mind just how much can we expect inflation

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 5>pressures to ripple through from tariffs, And some of the

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 5>internal models that we that we know that the FED

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 5>operates with are likely showing that risk is skewed to

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 5>the upside that we could see let's say three and

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 5>a half four percent core PCEE inflation at year end.

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 5>That would be up from about two point six percent

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 5>right now. The FED is seeing a relatively hot jobs number,

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 5>it sees inflation low right now, but risks skewed to

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 5>the upside, so all the more reason to stay on

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 5>hold when the FMC meets next week.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Those risks, I mean, we're hearing because it's the first

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 2>quarter earning season. We're hearing from a lot of companies,

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 2>big companies, no more so than GM that said these

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 2>tariffs could be a five billion dollar hit to profits,

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 2>just as past week, Apple finally comes out and says

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 2>nine hundred million dollars hit. So company after company Amazon.

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, a lot of uncertainty, a lot of people

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 2>fears of a recession. I mean, this is building and building.

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 6>That's right.

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 5>As much as I like to stay focused on the macro,

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 5>as much as I like to stay zoomed out at

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 5>thirty thousand feet thinking about capital investment in the workforce,

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 5>I think that the bigger thing next week is really

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 5>going to be earnings, because we're going to get to

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 5>hear from all these companies. We get to hear from FORD,

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 5>We're going to get to hear from AMD and some

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 5>of the tech companies that are thinking about exporting chips

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 5>and are thinking about regulation of AI and development and

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 5>other domestic investment. We're going to get to hear from

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.239
<v Speaker 5>some of the more consumer oriented companies like door Dash,

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 5>for example, that are really leveraged to consumers discretionary spending power.

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 5>And so I do think that more than the Fed's decision,

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 5>more than the economic data, let's say on the trade

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 5>balance that we're going to get next week data from March.

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 5>But what's really going to matter is the guidance that

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 5>we are getting from companies. And what we hear when

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 5>we look at high frequency surveys, for example, is that

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 5>companies are experiencing input cost pressures, they are planning to

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 5>pass those along to consumers.

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 2>But what we.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 5>Ultimately think is that with the saving rates so low,

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 5>with consumers stretched and relying on credit as much as

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 5>they are, when firms try to pass along those higher

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 5>prices are ultimately going to face retrenching demand from consumers.

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 2>We know sentiment from the University of Michigan polls at

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 2>a five year low. I mean, people are really worried,

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 2>that's right.

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 5>Sentiment is poor. Business investment plans are being put on

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 5>a hold. A big part of it just gets synthesized

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 5>in one measure, economic policy uncertainty. Our policy uncertainty index

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 5>is spiking through the roof no reason why it's because

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 5>policymakers are coming off as rather mercurial in changing trade

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 5>policy week to week. We just heard from Stephen Moran

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 5>from the Council of Economic Advisors, one of the President's

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 5>chief economic advisors, that we could expect to see a

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 5>trade deal with China perhaps in the coming weeks. Now

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 5>he's not one of the trade advisors, but everybody is

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 5>chirping up on what we can expect from trade policy.

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 5>Just when we thought we had an escalation with China,

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 5>we're now seeing perhaps there's going to be a de escalation.

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 5>There's no wonder. Uncertainty is through the roof, and sentiment

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 5>is down well.

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 2>A lot to watch out for. The Federal Open Market

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Committee's two day policy meeting, wrapping up this Wednesday, a

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 2>decision on rates and a press conference from Chairman Jerome Powell.

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Stuart paul, Us economist with Bloomberg Economics,

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>we turned out of the current earning season a number

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 2>of companies so far surprising to the upside. This week,

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>we hear from the media and entertainment giant, the Walt

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Disney Company that's out on Wednesday in the House of Mouse,

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 2>facing a lot of challenges right now, including a pullback

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 2>in consumer spending, a slowing economy, fewer tours coming into

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 2>the US and to its parks, and a lot of

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 2>competition for its streaming TV offerings. For more, we turned

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 2>to Geetha. Raganathan, Bloomberg Intelligence analysts on US media. Well, Geither,

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the last time we heard from Disney was before President

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump announced his tariffs, the trade wars with China, Europe

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 2>and other countries. How has all that impacted the company

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 2>and what do you expect to see from Disney in

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 2>its second quarter results?

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah? Absolutely, Thank you so much, tom So. Disney is really,

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 7>I think one of the most complex stories in the

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 7>media world. There are so many parts. There's so many

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 7>moving parts really as you think of the parks business,

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 7>the theme parks business, streaming, you know, you have a

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 7>presence in linear TV sports with ESPN, and then of

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 7>course the theatrical business and in box office. There's always

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 7>something to be concerned about here. So you're absolutely right.

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 7>In terms of parks, there is obviously, it is very

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 7>very sensitive to the overall health of the economy. And

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 7>why we are concerned about parks when it comes to

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 7>Disney is because this makes up about fifty to fifty

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 7>five percent of their profit, so this is really, you know,

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 7>the largest contributor of operating income. And while they had

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 7>initially guided to healthy summer bookings, you know, we've kind

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 7>of seen this deteriorating macro sentiment. So I think investors

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 7>are definitely going to be focused on that. Apart from

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 7>the general health of the economy. You know, as far

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 7>as you know theme parks are concerned. The one thing

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 7>that Disney investors are going to be super focused on

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 7>as any commentary that management can provide in terms of

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 7>competition from Epic Universe, which is a whole brand new

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 7>theme park that is coming out of Universal and will

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 7>be in Florida and is expected to be a very,

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 7>very big competitor because some of the initial reviews have

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 7>been absolutely amazing.

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 2>And just open this week right or this month?

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah it is, Yeah, it is going to open on

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 7>May twenty second. Yes, So you know, near term, I

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 7>think there's going to be a lot of wait and

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 7>watch with the theme park business. But I think medium

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 7>to longer term the business is definitely stabilizing, especially on

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 7>the streaming front. So we're definitely seeing a big improvement

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 7>in terms of streaming profits, with the company expecting a

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars in operating income this year, compared that to

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 7>about four billion dollars in losses just a few years ago.

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Wow, Well, let's go back to parks, because another

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 2>part of that is its cruise division, and as I understand,

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 2>it's just unbelievable the demand for these Disney cruises.

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 7>Yes, they have really made a huge push into the

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 7>cruise ship business. And this quarter is going to be

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 7>our fiscal second quarter when they report, is going to

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 7>be particularly interesting because you're going to have a full

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 7>quarter contribution from a new cruise ship, which is called

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 7>Disney Treasure, and which is expected to have been profitable

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 7>in its first full quarter. So it's going to be interesting.

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 7>We think that, you know, the cruise ship business is

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 7>going to go from you know, about two to three

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars in revenue to as much as four to

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 7>five billion dollars in just a few years time. So

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 7>this is going to become a major part of their

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 7>parks business. And the one thing that we've seen with

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 7>cruises as opposed to parks is you know, the demand,

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 7>as you just pointed out, is very very strong and

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 7>will be a stabilizing force for the entire experiences segment.

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 7>For Disney.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, I want to talk about its streaming TV unit.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 2>We have Disney Plus and Hulu and ESPN. Has there

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 2>been any let up, any signs of a letup in

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 2>advertising revenue where they really make a lot of money

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 2>from all these networks and their linear networks.

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 7>I think the general commentary tom on advertising is obviously

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 7>a very cautious kind of wait and see approach, because

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 7>when you head into an economic environment where you have

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 7>so much of volatility, the first sector that kind of

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 7>sees that pullback is of course advertising. Now there's both

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 7>good and bad with respect to Disney. So if you

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 7>just look at it from an overall company perspective, only

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 7>about fourteen to fifteen percent of Disney's revenue actually comes

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 7>from advertising, so exposure itself is not very very heavy.

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 7>You compare that to some of the other companies like

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 7>a Fox or a Warner Brothers Discovery, where you know

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.839
<v Speaker 7>almost thirty five to forty percent of revenues are coming

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 7>from advertising. So I think overall the exposure is fairly limited.

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 7>That said, if things go bad, they can go really

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 7>really bad. So if you're looking at a linear TV business,

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 7>and Disney has considerable exposure here, you know, whether it's ESPN,

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 7>whether it's the ABC network, we can see ads drop

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 7>almost ten to fifteen percent, and that is really not

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 7>good for the business. They do have a little bit

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 7>of a hedge because streaming ads or digital ads in

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 7>general have held up better than the linear TV side

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 7>of the business. But overall, it is definitely going to

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 7>be a very very cautious tone on the advertising business.

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 2>And let's turn to its film studio, because we've seen

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 2>some wild success as Captain America, Mufasa movie, some not

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 2>so great Snow White Mawana too, but still I suspect

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 2>they're all going to make money.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 7>They absolutely are, and we've seen you know, just if

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 7>you just think a few quarters ago, Tom, I mean,

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 7>this business was really really struggling. The content business as

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 7>a whole was in desperate need of a rejigger, and

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 7>we really had that with you know, inside out kind

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 7>of really you know, start this whole resurgence in the

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 7>box office unit last year and ever since then, it's

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 7>been great. You pointed out Mufasa that's done really well,

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 7>Moana did really well, and then of course you had

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 7>Captain America, and then we have the summer season for

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 7>Disney kicking off the summer box office season kicking off

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 7>with Thunderbolts, which is tracking to a very very strong

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 7>opening and should have a fantastic run just like Captain America.

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 7>You know, this is the next phase of the Marble

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.839
<v Speaker 7>cinematic universe. Should do really really well for Disney, and

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 7>they have a fantastic content pipeline coming out over the

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 7>next eight to ten months.

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Disney second quarter earning's coming out after Wall Street's closing

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 2>belt This Wednesday, our thanks to Getha raganoffin Bloomberg Intelligence

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Analysts on US media, coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend,

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 2>looking at the many challenges facing Germany's new chancellor as

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 2>he prepares to take up the job. I'm Tom Busby,

0:12:53.960 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 2>and this is Bloomberg. Is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 2>look ahead at the top stories for investors in the

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 2>coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York. Up later

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 2>in our program and look at what the Trump tariffs

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 2>could mean for China's economy. But first, Germany's next Chancellor,

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 2>Friedrich Mertz, will be officially confirmed in his role leading

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 2>Europe's largest economy. This week, it's been a rocky road

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 2>to the top of the conservative who will preside over

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 2>uncertain times? What does this path ahead look like for

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 2>the country's new leader. For more, let's go to London

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 2>and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak europe Banker Stephen Carroll.

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Tom It's been more than two months since Germany's federal election,

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 3>and now finally the country will have a new chancellor.

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 3>The Social Democrats who led the outgoing government have voted

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 3>in favor of a coalition deal with Friedrich Martz's Conservative alliance,

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 3>clearing the way for the Christian Democratic leader to be

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 3>confirmed as the country's next chancellor. The agreement, backed by

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 3>around eighty five percent of SPT members in an online ballot,

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 3>brings to a close a complex set of negotiations. The

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 3>deal also keeps the far right AfD out of power

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 3>after they won a historic twenty point eight percent of

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 3>the vote in February. As Chancellor, Frederick Martz will have

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 3>to deal with a delicate economic outlook. Germany saw just

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 3>meager growth than the first quarter, and its key industries

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 3>face the impact of US tariffs. He's already passed a

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 3>plan to ramp up defense and infrastructure spending in Germany,

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 3>and that's something the CFO of Deutsche Bank, James von

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Moltke says is already having an impact.

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 8>Well, there are two things going on that German economy

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 8>is obviously an export driven economy, so there's a significant

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 8>impact of tariffs, whatever the outcome will be in and

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 8>so there are scenarios around that as to what the impact.

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 8>But at the same time, you have this offsetting impact

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 8>of the fiscal reform in Germany and now several years

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 8>on infrastructure, defense spending. Obviously the sustainable and digital transitions

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 8>that are underway, so a significant investment volume, and so

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 8>corporates in Germany are sort of gearing themselves up to

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 8>manage that.

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 9>And in terms of of payouts and dividends and sort

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 9>of and buybacks and these sorts of things, is this

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 9>a moment to sort of preserve cash? How are you

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 9>thinking about that going into this way.

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 8>We're executing on the on the distribution strategy and policies

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 8>that we've laid out. So we've announced so far this

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 8>year two point one billion of distributions through dividends and buybacks.

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 8>We're executing on that. And to your question, all or

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 8>will will will reassess as time goes by, we see

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 8>the performance in the first and second quarters in the environment,

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, let's say ninety days from now, we'll have

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 8>an opportunity to reassess distributions later in the year.

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 9>And then I'd like to also just take a step

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 9>back and look at the sort of market architecture and

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 9>what we've seen over the last couple of weeks. And

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 9>I'll begin by sort of quoting some of your own

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 9>research back to you that the preconditions are now in

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 9>place for the beginning of a major dollar down trend,

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 9>expecting one thirty euro versus the dollar by twenty twenty seven.

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 9>How much of this damage do you think is permanent?

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 8>Well, look, that's our analysts are calling for relatively significant

0:15:58.200 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 8>structural change.

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 6>I do think that will take time.

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 8>There's been a what i'll call a break if you like.

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 6>In sentiment, but that sentiment I think.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 8>Will make itself felt gradually over time. It's had a

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 8>pretty dramatic impact on the euro dollar exchange rate already,

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 8>and a further drift you know, up from here, would

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 8>be impactful overall. I think the difference you're seeing is

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 8>that the policy changes are making the rest of the

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 8>world interesting to investors and changing the relative position a

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 8>little bit of the United States and Europe, but other

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 8>destinations as well.

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 6>In a sense, that's good.

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 8>I think it's been a wake up call for Europe,

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 8>whether that's the policy side of Europe or as we

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 8>talked about, the corporate side, and so there's an opportunity

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 8>to rebalance a little bit. But it'll have impact on

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 8>a number of markets, including currents.

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 9>And when you think about sort of the remaking of

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 9>that sort of global market architecture, does that mean that

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 9>European markets, that German bonds, that the year of plays

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 9>a larger role going forward, if not completely eclipsing the

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 9>United States, but certainly changes.

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 6>I don't think.

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 8>Again there's I don't necessarily think this is a zero

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 8>sum competition.

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 6>I really don't.

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 8>But the Bund is an anchor sort of investment and

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 8>anchor source of stability in the world, and that's really good.

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 8>In fairness, and one thing another thing our analyst said,

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 8>and this is true for the German government to have

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 8>announced as big a fiscal expansion as has taken place,

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 8>and for the long bond in Germany, the bond not

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 8>to have moved substantially in that time is a real

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 8>sign of confidence in Germany.

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 6>We actually think that the.

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 8>Economic health of the country and also its fiscal strength

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 8>in many respects, can be improved through this spending and

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 8>if you like, a rebalancing of the economy, more consumption,

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 8>more investment at home.

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 9>And I want to get into that, but I also

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 9>want to talk quickly also just about the foreign exchange market,

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 9>not just within the markets, but also your clients as

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 9>obviously companies that look at the outside world. You've seen

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 9>some wild moves on the exchange rate. How are your

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.479
<v Speaker 9>clients dealing with how are you sort of also in

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 9>intermedia and helping them sort of hedge some of that risk.

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 8>But we had we had tremendous volumes in those days

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 8>of early early April, so obviously we were managing our risk,

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 8>but we were also helping clients to manage theirs and

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 8>a there is a theme by the way of more

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 8>business coming to us because of clients seeking to work

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 8>with a European bank, and that that's also encouraging for

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 8>the business model. Again, rebalance is a little bit the

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 8>imbalance that has been strategically the case in the industry.

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 8>The clients were in those days reacting strongly to this

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 8>idea that that the dollar.

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 6>In the US long bond was no longer.

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 8>The risk off trade and where's that resulted in a

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 8>lot of movement and uncertainty with clients.

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 6>But all around the world is the honest truth.

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 9>And so trying to figure out the sort of German

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 9>fiscal expansion kind of conversation here there's so much bad

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 9>news price then, whether it's what's coming out of the

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.479
<v Speaker 9>United States, the sort of years of contraction within Germany.

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 9>Do you think that there is actually quite a bit

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 9>of good news that is not yet then, and that

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.199
<v Speaker 9>actually we can really see things take off materially in Germany.

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 6>I think so it'll take time.

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 8>I mean, as in the nature of a fiscal expansion,

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 8>the government needs to be put in place and the

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:14.479
<v Speaker 8>spending plans not just enacted but actually hitting. And so

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 8>we see this as a real support to the German

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 8>economy and the European more broadly economies in the years

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 8>really starting in twenty six.

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 6>But it's a sustained improvement. Now.

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 8>One thing that's important is what it does to confidence today,

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 8>and so we do expect some help in twenty five

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 8>in terms of overall confidence in households and corporates. Obviously

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 8>that confidence requires a resolution of the tariff war and

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 8>some of the other things that are live at the moment,

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.159
<v Speaker 8>potentially piece in Ukraine. So there's a lot set of

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 8>hanging in terms of confidence on the outcome of these events.

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 3>That was the Deutsche Banks CFO James von Maltkez speaking

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 3>there to Bloomberg's Oliver Krook. So what are the major

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 3>challenges awaiting Germany's next chancellor. I've been discussing this with

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 3>our Germany Bureau chief christ for our world.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 10>Pushing through economic reforms will will definitely be on top

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 10>of his list, and also will be particularly in focus

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 10>in coming days will be his efforts to liaise with

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 10>other European leaders like French President Imanuel Macron or the

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 10>Polish president tous Joined has been notably passive under outgoing

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 10>chance all of shots, and Mattz really has pledged and

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 10>maybe it like one of his top priorities to change

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 10>that and play also like a more active role on

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 10>the European stage.

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 3>Again, how quickly will the new government be able to

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 3>draw up a budget? I imagine another key concern.

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 10>That is actually definitely one of the most pressing issues actually,

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 10>since when the outgoing government decided on a provisional budget

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 10>for this year for twenty twenty five, there was a

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 10>gap of roughly twelve billion euros, that's about or close

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 10>to fourteen billion dollars. And since since that provisional budget

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 10>was announced, like some additional funding needs have actually come up,

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 10>So the latest number that has been floating around in

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 10>Berlin was about eighteen billion euros and the new government,

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 10>undeficult wish Melts will definitely need to address this sooner

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 10>rather than later to to basically plug these funding gaps.

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Of course, Germany in the crosshairs, as so many other

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 3>countries are too, of Donald Trump's trade tariffs too. Are

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 3>we likely to hear anything about trade policy from mer

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 3>It's in the coming days?

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 10>That does seem pretty likely. Melt has been quite outspoken

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 10>actually that the disruption from the from from the US

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 10>tariffs marked really like a significant shift for for for

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 10>Germany because the US is one of its key trading partners.

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 6>So we can.

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 10>Definitely expect them not just to meet with with Immanuel

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 10>McCrow in France and with other European leaders in the

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 10>individual like European Union member states, but also to show

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 10>up in Brussels to get involved in the European Union's

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 10>trade policy, because that that is actually like this, the

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 10>sort of like entity that discusses traits with with the US.

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:54.199
<v Speaker 3>How solid does this coalition look. The SPD have voted

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 3>for it, it has you know, gone through the period

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 3>of negotiations. But where should we be looking for potential

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 3>data in this new alliance.

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 10>This will definitely be a focus since the last government's

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 10>sort of constant bickering over over months and years actually

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 10>was really like one of one of its major problems,

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 10>and that actually disgruntled many many voters in Germany. Overall,

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 10>the SPD, the Social Democrats and the conservative blog that's

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 10>led by British mouts that do seem very determined and

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 10>so to reassure voters that they will make this cooperation work.

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 10>But there are there are definitely some some potentially contentious

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 10>issues there that will have to be addressed, particularly when

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 10>it comes to immigration for example, or social welfare spending,

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 10>where British Melts has sort of floated the idea of

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 10>pretty painful cutbacks and that that will be something that

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 10>will for the social Democrats will probably be difficult to accept.

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 10>So yeah, it's going to be really interesting to see

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 10>if they are or if they will be able to

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 10>find really like a common common ground. They are a

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 10>common line.

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 3>The biggest opposition this new government is going to be

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 3>facing comes from the fireright AfD party. They came in

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 3>second in the actions in February. They're leading the opposition. Now,

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 3>how much are the AfD's policies and politicians going to

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 3>put pressure on this new government.

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, they are definitely the biggest opposition party in the

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 10>new German Parliament after they secured just over twenty percent

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 10>of the votes in the last federal election in late February,

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 10>but they don't have direct influence on policy making on

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 10>a federal level. What we're seeing at the moment is

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 10>that like some of the some of the regional governments,

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 10>is like some of the German states where the AfD

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 10>has like a stronger presence that there, we can definitely

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 10>see that they are trying to disrupt and influence decision

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 10>making by blocking certain decisions on federal level. We're not

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 10>seeing that. I'm a bit reluctant to make a focus there.

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 11>Off while how long that will that will remain in

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 11>place or if they actually will have some sort of influence,

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 11>but for now their sort of potential to disrupt decision

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 11>making on a federal level is close to zero.

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Actually, talk us through some of the international challenges that

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 3>that Friedrich Martz will will also need to be addressing.

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 3>We know, before this new Bodista came into force, he

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 3>did manage to pass that bill which will ramp up

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 3>defense and infrastructure spending. That's going to be an interesting

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 3>one to watch for the domestic economy. But in terms

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 3>of Germany's place in the EU, how will Friedrich Martz

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 3>be playing that given the you know, obviously trade trade

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 3>tarff's being a big question there too.

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, defense spending will will definitely bun on one of

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 10>the one of the key areas, and that's like linked

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 10>to some of the trade deals that have been sort

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 10>of discussed over the past weeks and months. Yeah, both

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 10>both on national level and on European level, or on

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 10>natal level, I should say so. The German army originally

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 10>needs to be modernized to fulfill its obligations within NATO

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 10>and actually also be able to defend the country and

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 10>like modernizing the Bundes for Polish males will be hugely complicated.

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 10>Defense purchasing is as we all know that that's that's

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 10>a that's a pretty convoluted sort of process, a lot

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 10>of capacity restraints in the industry, and that is something

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 10>that we'll have to be addressed with both within the

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 10>NATO member states with the US administration oversly, because the

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 10>US is also like and when it comes to defense,

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 10>like a big sort of producer of like weapon systems

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 10>and ammunition. So that's definitely probably will be one of

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 10>the most sort of like difficult and complex of challenges

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 10>that that Melts will have to address.

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to our Germany Bureau chief Christopher rowold Well, the

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 3>full coverage of Friedrich Martz's first days is German Chancellor.

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 3>For you here on Bloomberg, I'm Stephen Carolyn London. You

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 3>can catch us every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak Europe,

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 3>beginning at six am in London and one am on

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street.

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Tom, thank you, Steven. And coming up on Bloomberg day

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Break weekend, we'll look at more economic data in Asia

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 2>that could offer fresh clues about the health of the

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 2>world's second largest economy. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg.

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global look ahead

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 2>at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby in New York. As US China tensions

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 2>flair under President Trump's tariff push, fresh data out this

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 2>week could offer clues about the health of China's economy.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>For some analysis, Let's get to the host of the

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Daybreak Asia podcast, Doug Krisner.

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 4>Tom. A trio of key Chinese economic indicators will land

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 4>in the coming week. We'll have the Taisheen Manufacturing PMI

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 4>will be getting the April inflation reports and new trade

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 4>activity data. Together they will provide a crucial read on

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:46.719
<v Speaker 4>China's economic momentum or lack thereof, at a time when

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 4>global markets are watching nervously for a closer look. I'm

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 4>joined now by John lu he is Bloomberg's executive editor

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 4>for Greater China. John joins us from our studios in Beijing. John,

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 4>we can talk about the inflation story in a moment,

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.439
<v Speaker 4>but I want to begin by trying to understand current conditions.

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Some of the recent data, as you well know, is

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 4>indicated a fair amount of weakness, and I'm thinking of

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 4>the PMI data in particular, which we had at the

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 4>end of last week. Give me your sense of the

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 4>macro right now.

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 12>I think there's a lot of concern at the moment.

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 12>The PMI data that you mentioned there, Doug, that came

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 12>in a week, there was a contraction. It was the

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 12>longest or the biggest contraction in manufacturing that I think

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 12>we've seen in about two years time, and so that

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 12>speaks to the weakness as a result of the liberation

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 12>tariffs Liberation Day tariffs that President Trump announced. Because that

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 12>PMI data was for the month of April, so it

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 12>was the first reading that we've had of what kind

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 12>of impact there has been on China's economy. And I

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 12>think there's a broad expectation that there will be more

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 12>weakness because of trade.

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 4>What about more stimulus and how might the government go

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 4>about it. I mean, some of this weakness is showing

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 4>up on the export side, which in the past hasn't

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 4>really correlated very strongly with trying to get domestic demand

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 4>put into a higher gear. Is this a particularly tricky

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 4>situation for Beijing right now?

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.719
<v Speaker 12>I think there's a general recognition in Beijing that the

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 12>way to offset the pain from the trade war is

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 12>to provide stimulus that will create domestic demand, so create

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 12>a market for these products that would have gone to

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 12>the US without these tariffs. But that potentially gives companies

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 12>here in China a chance to sell domestically to a

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 12>domestic consumer or a domestic company. And I think what

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 12>you will see is more and more stimulus in terms

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 12>of offering rebates for people who buy a car, or

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 12>buy a refrigerator, or buy some air conditioning, offering rebates

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 12>for companies that want to get new equipment, that want

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 12>to upgrade their production processes, things of that nature. But

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 12>as of now, we had this Pollit Bureau meeting in

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 12>April that really showed the government right now is sort

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 12>of in a wait and see attitude. The government said,

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 12>we are ready with an emergency plan when that is needed,

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 12>but they seem to be conveying an idea that so

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 12>far in the first quarter the economy is doing okay,

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 12>and they're waiting for more data and information before they

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 12>launched themselves into some dramatic stimulus.

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 4>In the last two week here in the US, President

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Trump held a rally in Warren, Michigan, and it was

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 4>there that he said countries from around the world have

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:37.479
<v Speaker 4>contracted his administration about trade deals. India may end up

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 4>being the first. We just don't know at this point.

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 4>But I'm curious what President chi chin Ping is trying

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 4>to do in the Asia Pacific and deals that he

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 4>may be looking to create with trading partners that China

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 4>already has in the region.

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 12>So I think the starting point of this discussion, I

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 12>think is the fact that China's does not seem to

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 12>be in a rush to get to the negotiating table

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 12>with President Trump. I think the trade war has done

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 12>something very pronounced here in China in that it's really

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 12>created this sense of patriotism. It's really rallied support around Xijingping.

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 12>And so whatever economic troubles there might be, whatever the

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 12>employment situation might be, going to the future, by and large,

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 12>people here in China are gonna blame the United States.

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 12>They're gonna blame President Trump. That is going to take

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 12>a lot of pressure off of President Xijingping, and it's

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 12>gonna make it easier for him to hold out for

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 12>a better deal. In the meantime, there is also a

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 12>lot of angst in countries around Asia, in Southeast Asia

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 12>and Japan and Korea about the tariffs that the Trump

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 12>administration has announced, and Beijing is trying to take advantage

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 12>of that by doing a charm offensive. Xiji Ping has

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 12>already visited Southeast Asia. Beijing has just allowed the first

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 12>K pop concert that's taken place in China in about

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 12>a decade, and so there is an effort to take

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 12>advantage of that situation by offering various types of inducements

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 12>for neighboring countries to increase their trade relationship with China.

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 4>I was reading a piece on the Bloomberg Terminal in

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 4>the last week. This is Wang Yi, China's foreign minister,

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 4>was saying that if nations choose to remain silent, compromise

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 4>and retreat, it will only lead to the bullies making

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:32.719
<v Speaker 4>further advances. This seems to be very much an anti

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 4>US message. I get that, but I'm wondering whether or

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 4>not there's a big audience for that right now in

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 4>the region.

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 12>I think there is. That message that Foreign Minister Wangi

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 12>delivered was at the meeting of Bricks Nations they're foreign

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 12>ministers that was held at the end of April, and

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 12>so I think in that setting there is a built

0:31:55.680 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 12>in audience for that message. Many of those countries Iran

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 12>is in that group, South Africa, Russia, Brazil. These are

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 12>countries that have always had a suspicion about American intentions,

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 12>if not outright hostility towards American intentions, and so in

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 12>that setting, I think he was speaking to the right

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 12>audience with that message. More broadly, I think it's trickier

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 12>to say when it comes to Australia or Japan or

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 12>South Korea, traditional American allies, how well that message, what

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 12>kind of mood that message will strike, because yes, these

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.479
<v Speaker 12>countries depend on China for their economic growth, but they

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 12>also depend on the United States a lot for their security.

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 12>And at the same time, those countries also are suspicious

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 12>of Chinese intentions. Japan, many Southeast Asian countries, the Philippines,

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 12>India have all had border disputes with China, territorial disputes,

0:32:56.400 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 12>and so that makes them less than enthusiastics about embracing Beijing.

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 4>So we've established the fact that the overall economy is

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 4>weak visa VI the PMI data, and we know that

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 4>the government has to do more to stimulate domestic demand

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 4>a lot more. Let's talk a little bit about the

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 4>inflation story now, is China still very much in a

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 4>deflationary trap right now, or there are green shoots emerging

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 4>that maybe prices are beginning to move higher.

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 12>I think we are still in a position where deflation

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 12>is the major concern. There may be some green shoots

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 12>in terms of services and in terms of retail spending

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 12>because the government has started to roll out more and

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 12>more stimulus. They've tried to roll out subsidies for people

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 12>who buy various products. They've started to invest in new projects.

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 12>China just approved a number of new nuclear power stations,

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 12>and so that investment will start making its way through

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 12>the economy. So some green shoots, but still I think

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 12>there's a major problem when you have such a big

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 12>trade relationship between the United States and China being essentially

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 12>cut off by the level of tariffs that have been imposed,

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 12>really shutting off in demand for many many Chinese factories.

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 12>And where those products are going to end up is

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 12>a big question, and I think there's a high likelihood

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 12>that you will see companies and manufacturers and suppliers try

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 12>to find a place to sell those products into you

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 12>by cutting prices.

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 4>So does that necessarily mean I hate to use the

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 4>term dumping. But that's what I hear when you kind

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 4>of make that point, and whether or not that's going

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 4>to leave China open to a lot of criticism.

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 12>So a lot of countries are worried about where these

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 12>Chinese products will go if they don't go to the

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 12>United States. That is a real concern, And that is

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 12>a real concern because of just what we're talking about,

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 12>manufacturers being incentivized to cut prices to get their product

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 12>moving out of the warehouse. Whether or not that will

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:08.919
<v Speaker 12>result in dumping, I think we have to wait and see,

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:12.240
<v Speaker 12>because what we have seen is the Chinese government telling

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 12>various countries in Southeast Asia, for example, that China will

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 12>not engage in dumping. And so there is a mechanism

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 12>by which the Chinese government could stop that sort of thing,

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 12>and so they may choose to do that in order

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 12>to take advantage of that opportunity we talked about.

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 4>So we know during the first Trump administration that supply

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 4>chains in China were being reconfigured to kind of remove

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 4>the thread of tariffs. A lot of that was accelerated

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 4>during the pandemic. But I'm wondering now whether or not

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 4>that's really gathered even more steam during the trade war.

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Are we seeing more and more companies kind of taking

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 4>their processes out of China and to countries like India,

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:56.240
<v Speaker 4>for example, just to maybe find a way of getting

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 4>into the good graces of the United States.

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 12>What we see is American companies like Apple. Apple has

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 12>announced that they are going to move all of the

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 12>production of their iPhones that they sell in the US

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 12>from China to India. So for an American company doing

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:17.240
<v Speaker 12>that makes sense. For a Chinese company, it makes less sense.

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 12>Because the Trump administration has made it a point in

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 12>their discussions with other countries, with Mexico, with India, other partners,

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 12>that they want to make sure that Chinese companies are

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 12>not re routing their products through a third country. And

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 12>so I think that has made it more difficult for

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 12>Chinese companies to make decisions about investing building big factories

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 12>in Brazil or Mexico or some other country. What instead,

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:49.240
<v Speaker 12>I think you are seeing a lot of Chinese companies

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 12>think about, is can I sell product in Brazil? Can

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 12>I sell product in Vietnam? Can I sell product in

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.479
<v Speaker 12>Eastern Europe? And if I can, then I will build

0:36:58.480 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 12>a factory there to do that.

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 4>We were talking a moment ago about how the trade

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 4>war has kind of incited a feeling of nationalism in China,

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 4>coming together to kind of coalesce around supporting the government's

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.760
<v Speaker 4>effort to fight this trade war. And I'm wondering whether

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 4>or not there is this feeling that we're in it

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 4>for the long haul and that China can really manage

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 4>to endure a great deal of economic pain for the

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 4>foreseeable future, or whether or not there is a level

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 4>of vulnerability right now that's being masked and there's a

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 4>breaking point that could happen in the next few months

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 4>if there is no resolution to this tariff story.

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 12>Unfortunately, I think we are in the early stages, the

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 12>early innings of this trade war, and right now both

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 12>sides are filling in a relatively strong position, and I

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 12>think that is mostly because the actual pain that will

0:37:56.600 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 12>be caused by this conflict is not being it's not

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 12>going through the economy yet. In this current situation in China,

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 12>people are feeling more patriotic. They're feeling like they want

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 12>to support their government, they want to support their president,

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 12>they want to fight this thing. As time goes on

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 12>and the economic reality sets in, the pain sets in,

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 12>I think that attitude will start to change and evolve.

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 12>I think there will be a more openness to negotiation,

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 12>and indeed, I think we probably will not get negotiations

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 12>until both sides feel enough pain.

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.919
<v Speaker 4>John, it's always a pleasure. Thank you so very much,

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 4>John Lou Bloomberg, Executive Editor for Greater China, and I'm

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:46.320
<v Speaker 4>Doug Christner. You can catch us weekdays for the Daybreak

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Asia podcast. It's available wherever you get your podcast. Tom.

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Doug. And that does it for this edition

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:55.879
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 2>at five am Wall Street Time for the latest on

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:00.879
<v Speaker 2>markets overseas and the news UNI To start your day,

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Buzzby. Stay with us. Top stories and global

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 2>business headlines are coming up right now