WEBVTT - Sabotage Season, Already?

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>source for the nation's best fantasy.

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Speculation and advice. Now, along with the guys.

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>From Guillotine Leagues dot com, here's your host, Paul.

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. It is week number eleven.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Joining me today Scott Fish and in studio Brian Johnson. Ye,

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 3>welcome back.

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 2>What's up boys? Good to be here.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 4>Word on this street? Is my return more anticipated than

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 4>that of Christian McCaffrey.

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 2>That's just what I'm hearing.

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, very similar.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 5>Okay, yeah, it feels accurate rocking.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 3>The fantasy football world.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Similar. Yes, I'm back. Yeah.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 3>And your achilles in better shape. Your achilles is in

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 3>fantastic shape.

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:51.639
<v Speaker 2>They are feeling pretty good.

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 3>I've been checking them out.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Don't knock on though, don't chinx me all.

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Right with the achilles, We will be sure not to

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 3>do that.

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 5>That's why he wears Georges is to show off, show

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 5>off your chilles.

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, absolutely, you have great in caprice.

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I want to tell you that I call them flood pants.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>That's what I had grown up.

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna break down every game Fantasy Football Weekly style,

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 3>with letter grades on every player. We're gonna do take

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 3>a chance on me with nine players that you would

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 3>not normally start. But you can hear I've got a

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:23.279
<v Speaker 3>tremendous receiver option coming up. Ooh, three tough questions. As always,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 3>premature speculations, only around for a couple more weeks. Enjoy

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 3>it while you can. We'll jump in the Fantasy Football

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 3>Weekly time Machine a little bit later in this show. Brian,

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 3>it's been a while since you been here. We're gonna

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 3>go right to you. Jacksonville taking on Detroit. Are there

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 3>any Jaguars to play in this game?

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Not many in this matchup with the big kiddies.

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Starting with the running backs for the Jaguars, I wasn't

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 4>give Travis Etna see if Tank Bigsby were to sit,

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 4>but it sounds like Bigsby is going to play with

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 4>his ankle injury, so I have both etn and Bigsby

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 4>on the bench. If Bigsby is active. If Bigsby's out,

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 4>I will give etn ac. But it's not a great

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 4>matchup for either. Only one running back has topped forty

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 4>receiving yards against Detroit, so no receiving angle there, and

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 4>they're very tough against running backs.

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 2>On the ground.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 4>No opposing back has breached one hundred yards against the Lions,

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 4>and then Detroit has also allowed just a rushing score

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 4>at the position in three the last four or they

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 4>have not allowed a rushing score in through the last four.

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Over to the receiving game for the Jaguars. Brian Thomas

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 4>Junior BTJ. Gonna give him a C if he plays

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 4>with the chest injury. He should. We all know that

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Mac Jones is going to be the quarterbacks. Let's a

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 4>downgrade for the entire passing game. But BTJ has accounted

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 4>for twenty six percent of the Jaguars air yards recently

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 4>the highest share among Jaguars receiver receivers. Detroit is allowing

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 4>more than one hundred and eighty yards per game to

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 4>wide receivers in games script should favor the Jaguars pass game,

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 4>So I will give BTJ as C. But Gabe Davis

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 4>is on the bench. He is questionable to play, but even.

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 3>He always off.

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, bet she's always on the bench.

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Evan Ingram not on the bench, show and give him

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 4>the b anger has led the Jags in slot routes

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 4>in the two games without Christian Kirk and last week

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Ingram led the entire team with nearly a forty percent

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 4>target share. Since Week five, Detroit has allowed the most

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 4>receiving yards per game slot receivers, which is basically what

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 4>basically what Evan Ingrim is right now.

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 5>So I mean they're the second worst on the season too.

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 2>And speaking of bad mac Jones, he is on the bench.

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's on the bench, even though he's gonna throw

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 4>a lot in this game, most likely over to the

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 4>Detroit side, Jamiir Gibbs and David Montgomery, You're gonna give

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 4>both of them an A.

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be a lot of a's for the Detroit here.

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean Gibbs and Monty had the same number of

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 4>opportunities this season. Those are carries and targets, so they

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 4>are splitting the load. But it's a great matchup against Jacksonville,

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 4>who has surrendered twelve total touchdowns over their last eight

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 4>games to running backs.

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Is this the rare double Fonsie.

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 2>The double Fonsie, you.

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Gotta call it? This is Phonsie's your guy.

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 4>I can't use I can't use the Fonzie on two guys.

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 2>That's not very efficient.

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 4>Over to the past game, Amanros Saint Brown gets an A. Shockingly,

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 4>the Jaguars are not one of the teams who picked

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 4>another wide receiver.

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Over sun God.

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 4>But I still love uh Amanra on this matchup, and

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 4>Jamison Williams he gets to be.

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Jamo and sun.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 4>God were the only wide receivers who were targeted for

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Detroit last week, so they're the only two years starting

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 4>against Jacksonville, who has allowed the seventh most catches and

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 4>the fourth most yards to wide receivers this year. Over

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 4>to the tight end spot, Sam Laporta real iffy with

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 4>a shoulder injury. If he does suit up, I would

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 4>give him a bee. If he's out, people will go

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 4>to Brock right, but I think it's Zane Zilstra Who

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 4>you want Zilstra.

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 2>I can't go either way.

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 4>It's a great matchup though it is for every line,

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 4>but the Jaguars allowing more than five catches and sixty

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 4>yards per game to tight ends. But if you're banking

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 4>on Laporta, don't you gonna need a backup plan in place?

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 4>And lastly, in a Jared goff it's the Jaguars help

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 4>of allowed multiple touchdown passes and six or.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 3>The last eight. Gotta love Gough, He'll bounce back from

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 3>the five interception game.

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 2>I believe so.

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, five interceptions a lot worse than three, right, Yes, Okay,

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 4>just wanted to make the king fans.

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Be aware of that.

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 5>You're getting it. Check out.

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 2>Okay, good making sure.

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Scott Raiders taking on the Dolphins. And you know, we

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 3>were all really high on Brock Bauers coming into the season.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 3>You don't mind starting with Brock.

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 5>Here's the thing.

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 3>He is quietly on pace to set the all time

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 3>rookie receiving record. Nobody talking about it. What Brock right

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 3>is doing to the tight end position is no less

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 3>than what Jaden Daniels is doing at the quarterback position.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 3>No talk about Brock Bauers possibly in any way, shape

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 3>or form winning rookie of the.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they don't give it to quarterbacks. That's why it's

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 5>just the only give what it is. But yeah, absolute

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 5>monster year. That's why the A grade on him. Dolphin

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 5>have allowed ten for seventy one to tight ends last week,

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 5>A score of the week before McBride went off for

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 5>like one hundred and twenty four the week before. You're

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 5>not benching him. He's got double digit fantasy points in

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 5>all but two games, so eight grade on Black Bowers.

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 5>Let's stay in the passing game here, Gardner Minshew. I

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 5>have a bench grade on the Dolphins. Have allowed multiple

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 5>scores and two of the last three, but that was

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:24.119
<v Speaker 5>Kyler Murley and Josh Allen. Minshew has topped two hundred

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 5>yards just once in the last five weeks, and that

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 5>was two hundred and nine yards. He barely top two hundred.

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 5>He needs scores and he's just got three in those

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 5>five games, so he's on the bench. I do have

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 5>a B grade on Jacoby Myers, who he's been good

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 5>for a long time. We talked about this last year,

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 5>but since DeVante Adams went out in Week three, no

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 5>receiver outside of Myers his top forty one yards. So

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:47.799
<v Speaker 5>all the rest are on the bench. Yeah, for sure,

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 5>there were three random scores, but good luck predicting those.

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 5>Myers himself though, six plus catches and three straight thirteen

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 5>plus Fantasy points in those three averaging no target. Are

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 5>nine targets per game since Week three win Adams went out.

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 5>That's a lot of volume.

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Yep, that would be if he finishes that way. I

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 3>think the I think the target leader right now is

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 3>at like eight and a half targets per game.

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, neighbors, Yeah you've You've heard me go over it

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 5>a couple times this season. But the Dolphins rank was

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 5>a bit of a mirage. Early in the season, the

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 5>top target getter against the Dolphins for wide receivers six

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 5>for even one hundred and eleven and one six for

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 5>fifty and nine for ninety eight. In the last three weeks,

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 5>there was even another seven for eighty in there. I

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 5>got to be grade on Jacoby Myers. I like it.

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 5>Over to the running game, I have bench grades on

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 5>all of them. But I understand the dart throw on

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 5>Alexander Madison just because of the pure volume. But he's

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 5>top sixty five total yards just once this year, and

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 5>it took twenty six touches.

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 3>To get that meager number.

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 5>Likewise, Miami and I picked sixty five specifically because like

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 5>Miami hasn't allowed a rusher to hit sixty five yards

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 5>since Week five.

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, So why are we not benching Alexander Madison Here.

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 5>He's getting three catches a game and he's getting fifteen

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 5>touches a game. All right, it's the volume seed. Actually, no,

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 5>I had a bench, I said a bench. He's a

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 5>dart throw. He's a dart throw bench Ah.

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, when I hear dart throw, I think nope or startable.

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 5>I have a bench. I have a bench grade with

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 5>the dart marker in case you're really frisky. Okay, over

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 5>over on the Miami. By the way, it's a mere

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 5>white eleven for twenty four yards in the last three games.

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 5>He's so inefficient it's ridiculous bigness by all of us. Really,

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 5>Miami onto the Miami side to a tag of a

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 5>tongue of Iloa. Bench grade here leads the league in

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 5>completion percentage, but that's due to being dead last in

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 5>average intended air yards five point four yards downfield, average

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 5>completed air yards three point four yards downfield. He's dumping

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 5>it off and leads the league in shortest time to throw,

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 5>so they're hit. Their offense is get the ball out

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 5>quick to your running back. Yeah.

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 3>This problem is that doesn't equal fantasy points. No field

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 3>passing for Devon.

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 5>If only they had players that can catch doudfield, right,

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 5>I can't think of anybody. Yeah, only averaging two hundred

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 5>and thirty yards and a score with no multiple score games.

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 5>I know the Raiders just got torched by Burrow and Mahomes.

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 5>But this isn't really the Miami offense right now, so

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 5>he's on the bench. I do have a B grade

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 5>on Tyreek Hill though, double digit Fantasy points in the

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 5>last three straight, although last week he had to get

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 5>saved with the score. But he does have a great

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 5>matchup against Jack Jones, who's allowed a one hundred and

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 5>six rating against and three scores three of the seven

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Las Vegas scores allowed to wide receivers. Jalen Wattle I

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 5>have on the bench. Is that controversial or not?

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Not really? Honestly, if you'd have benched him in their

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 3>whatever ten games this year, I don't know if I remember,

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 3>for they had their buy now games this year, you'd

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.839
<v Speaker 3>have been right on like eight out of the nine.

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 5>Waddle hasn't topped four catches since week one. He hasn't

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 5>topped sixty yards since week one.

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 2>I was about to say, you might put him on

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the waiver wire at this point. Not the bench.

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 5>Sabotage drop, Oh not much of the sabotage.

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well we'll find out. We're gonna talk little sabotage drap.

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it gets the tougher draw of Jacorey and Bennett

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 5>allowing just thirty six percent come depletion rate in sixty

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 5>point eight percent rating against. Raiders haven't allowed a sixty

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.319
<v Speaker 5>yard receiver since Week four and just three on the

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 5>year total. Just a bad spot for him, so he's

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 5>on the bench. John O'smith. John O Smith, however, is

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 5>gaining a B grade, averaging about five catches per game.

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 5>The last two weeks, the Raiders have been torched by

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 5>tight ends. Gasseki went off last week, Kelsey went off

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 5>the week before, just a bee as JOHNO doesn't quite

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 5>see the volume that those guys do. Though. Devin Devon

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 5>a CHAN however, A grade at his best, he's at

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 5>his best with like that ten to twelve rushes and

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 5>like five catches per game. Yes, and that's kind of

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 5>what he's been doing lately. He's averaging six for fifty

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 5>through the air in two of games. So that's eleven

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 5>Fantasy points right there in PPR. So that's already getting

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 5>you to a B. Then you add on the ten

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 5>to twelve rushes. I have an A grade for him there.

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 5>Raheem Mostert. They said last week's was games completely for

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 5>that unique game script.

0:10:57.960 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Interesting that the one carried.

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Mike McDaniel said that that was specifically for that

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 5>game script, so there's hope for him. I could give

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 5>him a seat. I'm going to give him a bench though,

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 5>because Jalen Reight got five carries and I don't know

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 5>how much they're going to start to split, so I'm

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 5>going to keep him on the bench right now.

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agreed with that. We're gonna try to sneak

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 3>in one more Green Bay taking on Chicago. Lots of

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 3>variables with the Bears right now, coaching change, possible team

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 3>implosion or possible team rally, maybe benchings. They've got three

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 3>injured offensive linemen, a couple could miss the game. Josh

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Jacobs will start with an eight grade. The surest easiest

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 3>way to beat the Bears is on the ground. They've

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 3>got a strong secondary, which will outline in a second volume.

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Backs farewell against Chicago. Backs with sixteen or more carries

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 3>average one hundred one total yards and almost a full touchdown.

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 3>He's averaging Jacobs eighteen carries, so he's above that threshold.

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Emmanuel Wilson not really a threat. He's had just four carries,

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 3>four carries and four carries the last three games, so

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 3>we got an eight grade on Josh Jacobs in this one.

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the passing game and my favorite angle

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 3>for the Packers, Tucker Craft sitting on a big game.

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 3>The Bears are getting nuked by tight ends over the

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 3>last month, opposing tight ends averaging seven catches for eighty

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 3>nine yards. Oh, if that were applied to the full season,

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 3>they would be easily the worst tight end defense in

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 3>the league. And Chicago's been rocked recently by Austin Hooper

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 3>Elijah Higgins.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, all pros, all pro I mean literally, they're professional.

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 5>They're all professionial, all professionals. That's right.

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.199
<v Speaker 3>Since Luke Musgrave's serious ankle injury back in Week four,

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Craft has seen all but three targets to Green baysed

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 3>tight end position, So a great spot for him. In

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 3>an A grade on Tucker Craft, Jalen Reid Jay didn't.

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.719
<v Speaker 3>Reid comes in with a B grade. He runs from

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 3>the slot, so he's gonna avoid elite cornerback Jalen Johnson

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 3>we'll talk about in a minute. Instead will face Kyler Gordon,

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 3>who is also good. He's just not elite. Gordon hasn't

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 3>allowed a touchdown all year, he's giving up just thirty

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 3>yards per game in his coverage. That said, Reid is

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 3>the best slot receiver Gordon has seen all year, and

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 3>he's just a good player. So he's still in at

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 3>a B grade. Here, Romeo Dobbs slumps down to a

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 3>C and maybe even a bench grade. He's gonna see

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of Jalen Johnson, maybe the league's best cornerback.

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Johnson's average game allowed in his coverage is insane one

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.719
<v Speaker 3>and a half catches, twenty one yards per game and

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 3>zero scores. Dobbs has massive downside in this one. In fact,

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm putting him on the bench. Out of the bench, Romeoops,

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 3>there you go. Your dart throw is Christian Watson. So

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 3>if Johnson's gonna be on Dobbs, Watson is going to

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 3>see Tyreek Stevenson. You all remember Tyreek Stevenson from the

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Hail Mary play with the Washington Commanders. You know that

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 3>worked out. He's now allowed two scores in his last

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 3>three games. He's Pro Football focuses eighty sixth ranked coverage cornerback,

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 3>and even though he's not on the field a ton,

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 3>he's on a lot more than other receivers that you

0:13:58.080 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 3>could go through down the depth chart, and I think

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 3>he's got a chance here at one of those Christian

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Watson patented big big games or at least big plays.

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 3>So that leaves us with Jordan Love. His grind injury

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 3>fully healed. Love put up two very good games against

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Chicago last year. He finished his quarterback two and quarterback

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 3>three for those two weeks in the matchups against Chicago,

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and his receivers matchups range in the a's, b's, and c's.

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 3>So I've got a B grade on Jordan Love in

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 3>this one. On the Chicago side, the entire passing game

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 3>is obviously on the bench, obviously, and there's no helping

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 3>this group right now, and they've lost the benefit of

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 3>the doubt. Including DJ Moore. Here's the yardage of his

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 3>last four games. Twenty yards, twenty seven yards, thirty three yards,

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 3>and twenty four yards no scores. He is the eighth

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 3>highest paid wide receiver in the NFL.

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, he runs routes out of bounds. He runs right

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 2>out to the bench.

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, just doesn't tell you the route, now, Yeah, that's right.

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Continue your out route all the way into the bench

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 3>and just sit down. So and this and more is

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 3>the good receiver of this group, so they're all out.

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Last guy we're going to talk about here, DeAndre Swift.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Swift had a great October, but its November and September

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 3>were miserable. As you look at the totality of the

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 3>struggles of this offense, have weighed a DeAndre Swift down.

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 3>I expect a lot of volume from Swift in this game,

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 3>but let's watch the tackles, right, Braxton Jones, Darnel Right,

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 3>If they're not healthy enough to block in front of him,

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you can start him. If they do go,

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 3>then I'm okay with a C grade on Swift. Mostly

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 3>through volume packers right in the middle of the league

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 3>in every run defensive metric, and man, do they need

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 3>to get some running game going in Chicago. Get a

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 3>little heat off that passing offense. When we come back,

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 3>take a chance on me. Nine players that you can

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 3>start that you normally would not. Many of these guys

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 3>are available on the waiver wire. Will tell you who

0:15:50.760 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 3>they are when we come back. Take a chance on

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 3>me nine players not normally in your starting lineup. Find

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 3>out who you can pick up off the waiver wire potentially,

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 3>and start. We begin at the quarterback position and Scott

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Fish or.

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 5>Possibly just a guy you have been starting that's on

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 5>your bench. For me quarterback this week week, I'm going

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 5>with Justin Herbert. Bengals allow the fourth most fantasy points

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 5>to quarterbacks, allowing bottom ten in attempts, completions, passing yards,

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 5>passing touchdowns. They're also the worst in the league against

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 5>fantasy quarterbacks on the ground. Justin Herbert ran it nine times.

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 5>Last shot nine times. Yeah, shot on the uphick. But

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 5>that also kind of tells you that maybe that ankle

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 5>injury that started the season, maybe that was the cause

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 5>of some of the low volume and the lack of

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 5>running and rough day against Tennessee last week obviously, but yeah,

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 5>despite that, he has three hundred plus or multiple scores

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 5>and four straight I like.

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 3>I like that they're opening up the passing offense more.

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 3>And it might just be because JK. Dobbins isn't running

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 3>like he did earlier in the year yea, so maybe

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 3>they're forced to. But I like that we're getting some

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 3>volume out of Justin Herbert. Nap Brian, let's go to

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 3>yr take a chance at me quarterback.

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of mobile quarterbacks, how about Drake May has.

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 2>The Rams this week at home.

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 4>May is second in scrambling yards versus pressure among quarterbacks.

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I bet he is.

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 4>He has even played. He has even played four and

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 4>a half games. Drake May is averaging the season nearly Yeah.

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 4>On the season, he's averaging nearly ten yards per carry.

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 4>He has two hundred and thirty three yards on twenty

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 4>five carries. Put that into perspective. Anthony Richardson has two

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 4>hundred and forty two yards on forty one carries. Josh

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Allen two sixty one on fifty five. Drake May is mobile,

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 4>af like he has established, has to be a very

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 4>nice rushing floor. And there's upside potential in the passing

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 4>game here against the Rams, who have allowed the eighth

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 4>highest passing yards per game, the eighth highest passer rating,

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 4>and the second highest pass yards per attempt. So I

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 4>was begging you to trade Drake May to you in

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 4>the Empire earlier this season.

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Charge.

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much.

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 2>You're welcome. I am so upset Drake May baller.

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Russell Wilson, I don't even know if he qualifies for

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 3>take a chance on me. I don't know.

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 5>You know, some of these are just guys. You don't

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 5>start very often.

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 3>Right. Let's wake up to Russell Wilson, who's finished as

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 3>a top ten quarterback in two of his three starts,

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 3>and this is the easiest matchup of his year, at

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 3>least until he plays the Ravens again next month. Baltimore

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:40.959
<v Speaker 3>gives up the most passing yards three hundred and fourteen

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 3>per game, the most passing touchdowns two point one per game.

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Five of the past six quarterbacks to face the Ravens

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 3>have thrown multiple touchdowns, and four of the past five

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 3>have topped three hundred and thirty four yards. Kyle Hamilton

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 3>may not play in this game. It's all set up

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 3>for another solid finish for Russell Wilson.

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 4>I saw that Wilson needs two touchdown passes and he

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 4>will be the He led the most touchdown passes since

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Ben Roethlisberger retired, and.

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 2>He's any Steeler.

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 3>That's four games.

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 2>That's four games.

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's gonna be game four and he's gonna top

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 3>anything Kenny Pickett did in the season. Unbelievable. Let's go

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 3>to the running back position, and it is thin this week.

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 3>We as a group, we struggle. Yeah, fine, guys here.

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 5>And this might be another one. He's on a roster,

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 5>but you haven't been starting him because he hasn't been

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 5>gaining a lot of yards. Minds, Nick Chubb. The Saints

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.959
<v Speaker 5>and Browns are tied for the second most rushing plays

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 5>over twenty yards allowed, and which is good for chob

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 5>and Kamara on the other side of that same matchup,

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 5>but Saints are fourth worst against runners, allowing the highest

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 5>yards per carry at five point two per clip, which

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 5>is again very good for Job. Seventh most total yards,

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 5>second most scores allowed to backs, good spot for job, Brian, you're.

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Taking a chance with me running back?

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Denver's Audric estimay at home against the Falcons. Now

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 4>adds are Estima was added in your league this week,

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 4>use the top pickup among running backs, But you're questioning

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 4>if you should start him against the Falcons, and I

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 4>think you should. Estimate led the Broncos backs an opportunity

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 4>share last week, also average and impressive two point one

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 4>yards per contact after attempt. Javonte Williams and Julia McLoughlin

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 4>have not been getting it done. Estimate should be the

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 4>lead back against the Falcons, who have allowed the eleventh

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 4>highest explosive run rate in the twelfth most rushing yards

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 4>per game to the position.

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, I can't. It's very rare that I throw

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 3>to take a chance to be a player who I

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 3>probably would not give a letter grade two. But again,

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 3>if pickens are thin this week, so just work with me.

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 3>Here and a bunch of teams on by Houston running

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 3>back dare Agon Bowwalla. Sure, here's the thinking. You have

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 3>to think two things are going to happen. One, Houston

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 3>is going to blow out the Cowboys, much like the

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Eagles did last week. Obviously, the Dallas offense looks dead

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 3>in the water, and here's Houston. They're going to get

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 3>an uptick with Nico Collins coming back. And then secondarily

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 3>you have to think into this as well. Houston needs

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 3>to start taking some mileage off of Joe Mixon. He's

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 3>averaging a league high twenty six carries per game. They

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 3>can't keep running Joe Mixon like this. So if youu

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 3>sting his way ahead, Daria Gumbowale is the backup right now.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Damian Pierce, still hurt, may play in this game. But

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 3>why would you bring in an injured player with a

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 3>groin injury into a blowout game? I don't think Pierce

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 3>is going to be a factor here even if he's available.

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.959
<v Speaker 3>So in last week's blowout against Dallas, the Eagles backup

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 3>runners totaled seventy three yards. The week before that, Atlanta's

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 3>backup Tyler L. Geers scored a touchdown. So, Daria Gumbowale,

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 3>I get it.

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 5>It is thin week. I'm gonna throw the two from

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 5>the last matchup on here as bonus is where raheem

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 5>mostered in what could be a blowt on Miami side.

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 5>He gets a bunch of run at the end and

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 5>a miredula in the blowouts. He gets three plus catches

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 5>in each of the blow outs because he's in there

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 5>on passing down work. I could see four or five

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 5>catches out of that.

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 3>So some deep Darth throws, some deeper Darth.

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 5>Throws because they weren't as deep as week.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, I like it. Go to the receivers, Scott.

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna get a little grimy here, actually, Marquez Valdez

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 5>scantly as you like to call it. The New Orleans

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 5>Saints Cleveland allows the fifth most Fantasy points to the

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 5>perimeter and have allowed the fifth most twenty plus yard receptions.

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 5>MBS's average depth of target is twenty three yards. He's

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 5>kind of saying he is kind of their deep guy.

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Last week he led with all the injuries they have

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 5>out there, he led the wide receivers in routes, run targets,

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 5>red zone target snaps, all of it. So he could

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 5>be out there quite a bit again this week. Jamal

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 5>Williams is out, so they only have one. He could

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.479
<v Speaker 5>be out there a lot. A couple of deep targets

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 5>is all it'll take.

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 3>It's not gonna be Mason Tipton.

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'll tell you that. Yeah, he is not working.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 3>No, that is not working out, Brian, You're taking chance

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 3>from your receiver.

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.959
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm gonna get even grimier. M I Nngo

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 2>and Mingo.

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 5>Was his name.

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 4>I got Jonathan Mingo. No, I'm just kidding. I'm not

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 4>doing that. I'm still laughing at that trade. I decided

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 4>to take a shot at the old Jared Mingo traded.

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 4>Hilarious anyway. In reality, I have Ricky Parasol of the

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 4>forty nine ers at home against the Seahawks. A lot

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 4>of malice defeat in forty nine er Land Pearsall might

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 4>be fourth or fifth in the pecking order, but he's

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 4>worth a dart throw against the Seahawks, who have allowed

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 4>the fourth most fantasy points per game and the third

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 4>most receiving yards per game to boundary wideouts. That is

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 4>what pearsall is. So let's go Ree bulletproof.

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Dalton Kincaid has been ruled out of Sunday's big matchup

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 3>with the Chiefs. That puts Dawson Knox on the field

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 3>for almost every snap, maybe all of them, who knows,

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 3>against the league's worst tight end defense, Kansas City dead

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 3>last in receptions and yards allowed to tight ends, Kansas

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 3>City giving up seventy eight yards per game to the position.

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 3>That is ten more than the thirty first ranked tight

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 3>end defense. And if you think Dawson Knox isn't a

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 3>big enough name for you, let me mention this last

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 3>week against Kansas City, Adam Trautman and Lucas Krawl combined

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:02.199
<v Speaker 3>for fifty five yards against Kansas City. Dawson Knox I

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 3>love him. This week. I could build whole DFS lineups

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 3>just around Dawson Knox.

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Fort Knox.

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 3>He's like, let's go Fort Knox on that. I like it.

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 3>Let's also go to the Los Angeles Rams taking on

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots Brian Kyron Williams one of my very favorite

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 3>plays of the day. I've either got him first or

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 3>second among my running back rankings this week.

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, easy for my boy, Kyron.

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 4>New England allowing more than one hundred and forty five

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 4>combo yards and a touchdown per game to running backs.

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 4>So you are starting Kiren obviously, you are going to

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 4>start Poka Nakua as well. He gets an A fourteen

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 4>targets for Puca last week, the rest of the Rams

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 4>wide receivers combined for sixteen. Now this is on a

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 4>like a per game basis. We know Puka's missed some time. Yeah,

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 4>but he's being targeted even more this year than in

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 4>his than in his historic rookie season last year. His

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 4>target up percentage was twenty eight percent last year, thirty

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 4>two percent this year with a Cooper Cup pretty healthy,

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 4>So Puka in line for a big game. Cooper Cup

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 4>has potential as well, but only b for him. Volume

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 4>in game script are a bit of a concern for

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Cup and Pooka for that matter, But still going to

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 4>start Cup. New England is allowing only twelve catches unless

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 4>than one hundred and fifty yards per game to white

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:14.719
<v Speaker 4>House as a whole not great, but I don't know

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 4>how you're sitting Cooper Cup in any format.

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 3>The thing I like about Cup is the Patriots' best

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 3>corners of the two outside corners, and so I like

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 3>working around those two. And I think I'm more optimistic

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 3>about Cup than you are here.

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, they'll work the middle of the field

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot.

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 4>And that's why I kind of like Davis Allen tight

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 4>end for the Rams, not my boy Colby Parkinson. Sadly

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 4>it appears to be over for Colby. I was in

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 4>on him in the preseason. But it is a great

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 4>spot playing tight end for the Rams and a good

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 4>matchup for Davis Allen, who caught five of six targets

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 4>last week. New England allowing nearly five catches and fifty

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 4>yards per game to tight ends. We'll take that in

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 4>the wasteland if you're desperate. Davis Allen is out there,

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 4>so I grab him if you need him. But I

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 4>do have Matt Stafford on the bench. Just because all

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 4>his receivers have starting grades doesn't mean they're all going

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 4>to come through. They just have that potential. Stafford zero

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 4>or one touchdown pass in seven of nine games this year.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Not great.

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 4>Feels like more of a Kiren game this week. So

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Stafford on the bench over the New England side. Most

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 4>of them are on the bench, but not Ramandre Stevenson.

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Gonna give him a bee.

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 4>Since Week eight, Stevenson has played at least seventy percent

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 4>of the offensive snaps in every game, averaging twenty touches.

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 2>That's basically bellcout territory.

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 4>And Rombo has a nice matchup on paper against LA,

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 4>allowing one hundred and forty four combo yards to backs

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 4>on nearly thirty touches per game. So I like Stevenson.

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't like Kishan Butte to Mario Douglass or Jalen Polk.

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 4>You just don't know who's going to get it done

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 4>in this game. So they're all on the bench for me.

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Hunter Henry is not though he gets to see opposing

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 4>tight ends or averaging five catches sixty yards per game

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 4>against the Rams. Will also take that in the tight

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 4>end Wasteland and Drake may I love him.

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Might take a chance on me quarterback.

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there we go, Ramondre Stevenson. Sadly, you know running

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 3>backs have a short life span and this one is

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we're gonna lose one of the really

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 3>good Ramandre Stevenson's years behind this terar offensive line, and

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, just a season that was over before it

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 3>started with the Patriots. Whereas in some other universe, Romandri

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Stevenson in twenty twenty four is a fourteen hundred yard

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 3>rusher with thirteen touchdowns.

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 2>You know he would been the best running back in

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 2>the Belichick era, right.

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean pretty much arguably, although Belichick would always

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 3>have that Spike, the weird Spike year where somebody would.

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 5>Go Cyrus Gray or whatever was that his name, Jonas

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 5>that was.

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 3>A spike game. I'm thinking of the Spike seasons called

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Carrott Blunt when he led the NFL and rushing touchdowns

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 3>one year. Rn Jarvis green ellis there we go some

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 3>of the classics from the Belichick era. When we come

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 3>back Browns and Saints. There's not a lot to like here,

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 3>but it's Yolo Winston in a revenge game? Are you

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 3>starting Jamis Winston Cedric Tillman find out when we come

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 3>back Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 3>We've got a block of games for you. Paul Chargia

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Scott Fish and Brian Johnson with you, Scott we Go

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Brown's Saints. I don't know where this qualifies on the

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 3>revenge scale.

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 5>Because everybody likes Jamison.

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 3>With Jameis Winston, everybody had nice things to say about him.

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I don't sense that there's like a

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 3>real like revenge motivation here. But Brian, Brian's the official

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 3>revenge spokesperson here at at a revenge counter. What do

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 3>you what do you think it's moving?

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh, let's put it that way, talking about this revenge game.

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Because he had to move from Yeah, yeah, that's.

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 2>What I'm talking.

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's what you meant.

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited.

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 5>Okay, put it all right. I'm I do have a

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 5>se grade on Jameis Winsday.

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 3>I like it more than you do.

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 5>Even Yeah, well I could be talked into a bee

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 5>very easily, honest one, as you got. He's second behind

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 5>only Anthony Richardson in average completed air yards when connecting

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 5>its downfield. Really to know when's surprised with Jameis Winstein.

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 5>The Saints rank middle of the pack against quarterbacks due

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 5>to mostly being a bend, don't break type of defense.

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 5>They allow the fourth most yards. They have three hundred

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 5>plus yard passers and half their games, but just eight

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 5>passing touchdowns allowed in on the season.

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 5>Reminder that Marshawn Latimore is no longer there. I know

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 5>he missed some time anyway, but he's no longer there.

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 5>Just two multi score games against the New Orleans Saints.

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 5>So I have a C grade. You could talk me

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 5>into a bee because I have grades on basically all

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 5>his receivers in this one.

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Cedric Tilman, I think, and Latimer would have been perfect

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 3>on Cedric Tillman because Tilman's a big bodied, physical receiver.

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 5>As long as Tilban's on the right, because they're on

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 5>the left, gad right. Latimore stays on one side, stays

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 5>on the right. Uh yeah, Cedric Tillman. I have an

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 5>A grade on Tillman weeks seven through nine, the three

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 5>weeks before the bye, Tilman was Fantasy Wide Receivers number

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 5>one wide receiver love twenty one for two fifty five

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 5>and three scores on thirty two targets in those three games. Now,

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 5>two of them were Jamis games. The third one Jamis

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 5>came in at the end, but he targeted Tilman three

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 5>times and the two point conversion caught a twenty five

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 5>yard er. Saints. This allowed the six most receptions, third

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 5>most yards to wide receivers. But here's where Tilman comes in.

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 5>Third most pass plays over twenty yards, the most pass

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 5>plays over forty yards allowed. That's Tilman. He's the deep guy.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.479
<v Speaker 5>He's the deep guy all right. On Tilman, I gave

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 5>him in a I gave him to May because he's

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 5>getting a few deep shots per game, catching three of those,

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 5>and two scores on twenty plus yards from Tilman, so

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 5>eight grade there. I have c grades on Judy and

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 5>more because the target distribution is actually very even with

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 5>Winston more twenty one targets, Tilman twenty, Judy nineteen in

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.239
<v Speaker 5>these two games. Just a lot of targets for all

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 5>of them. But Jerry Judy hasn't scored Week one, Elijah

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 5>Moore hasn't scored this year, so that's really tough. The

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 5>Saints allowed the most fantasy points to the slot completely

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 5>and as I just mentioned, more leads and targets with

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 5>Winston out there, the low a hot sucks and Morse

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 5>catch right of eleven of those twenty one sucks. But

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 5>he's getting the volume, he's getting the work. Jerry Judy

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 5>has five plus catches and seventy plus yards in both

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 5>Jamis games. They're getting just enough to be C level,

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 5>so I got C grades on them, David and Joku.

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 5>I got a B grade on the lead. The lead

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 5>tight end against the Saints has top forty yards in

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 5>all but one game, so consistently getting yards on them,

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 5>but only one score. As evidenced by earlier they're just

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 5>not breaking. They're not allowing the passing touchdowns, but they're

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 5>allowing ten tons of yards. The last two were four

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 5>for fifty five, four for eighty seven from the tight ends.

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 5>In Djoku himself four straight games with five plus catches

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 5>averanerging about fifty yards. So if you're telling me five

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 5>for fifty and a coin flip for a score, that's

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 5>that's probably a B grade out of Ndjoku. And of

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 5>course Nick Chubb was my take a chance on me

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 5>runner over on the New Orleans side, I do have

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:07.719
<v Speaker 5>a bench grade on Derek Carr. I know he's been

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 5>C level serviceable since his return. With that two hundred

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 5>and fifty yards and one to two scores, this is

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 5>a top ten Browns pass defense against the pass that

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 5>have allowed multiple scores and lots of yards and four

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 5>straight I get that, but let's look at let's look

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 5>at what they've done the first half of the season.

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 5>Prescott Lawrence, Daniel Jones, Minshew held completely down under two

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 5>hundred or around two hundred the last five games. Jane Daniels,

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 5>Jalen Hurts, Joe Burrow, Lamar Jackson, and Justin Herbert are

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 5>the ones that scored all those points. Derek Carr is

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 5>more like the first half, so I can see given

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 5>him a C grade. It might it might be a

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 5>place where he'll have to throw a lot, but I

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 5>think I think I'm gonna leave him on the bench.

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 5>Marquez Valdez Scantling was the only receiver I would I'm

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 5>willing to start in this pass offense, and I gave him.

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 5>I take a chance on me player Taysom Hill. I

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 5>get the dart throw, like he had sixty three percent

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 5>participation last week. He was running routes a lot. Andy

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 5>got four carries because they don't have anyone behind Kamara,

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 5>and they don't have any wide receivers, so he's got

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 5>to be out there a lot. So I get the

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 5>dart throw. I still wouldn't do it. It's a tough

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 5>defense against tight ends. I wouldn't do it there. I

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 5>can elaborate if you want, but you know they're top

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 5>seven in a lot of categories against tight ends. B

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 5>grade for Alvin Kamara. The Browns allow a lot of explosives,

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 5>second most rushes over twenty plus yards. They rank six

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 5>best against fantasy running backs. And the part where which

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 5>really sucks for Kamara is the Browns allow twenty four

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 5>scoreless yards per game against backs, no scores, and just

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 5>twenty four in the air. Yes, excuse me, in the air.

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 5>That's Kamara's game. I'm gonna go with the Kamara side

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 5>because I feel like he's the best one they will

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 5>have faced out of all of them. He's averaging five

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 5>plus catches in seven straight. They just have no receivers.

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 5>They're gonna have to get that five plus catches in

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 5>fifty to sixty yards that he's averaging. So pair that

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 5>with the fifteen team plus touch volume he gets. I'm

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 5>gonna give him the B grade in this one.

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Taysom Hill as a goal line threat as well.

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, very possible, very possible. That's why he gets the dart.

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 5>I him on the bench, But he gets the dart for.

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 3>That Ravens taking on the Steelers in a huge mismatch.

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:18.760
<v Speaker 3>The kryptonite for the Ravens and Lamar Jackson is the Steelers.

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk this through here. Dereck Henry, I believe, is

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 3>sitting on potentially a huge volume game the Steelers. The

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 3>pass rush for the Steelers so good, it's just easier

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 3>to run on them if you can. The Steelers just

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 3>a middle of the pack run defense, and the Ravens

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 3>rank number four in ESPN's run block win rate. So

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Henry should be sitting on a very big game. And

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 3>of course you were going to start him anyway, but

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 3>no hesitation here whatsoever. Let's go over to the passing game. Say,

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Flowers has been an all or nothing fantasy producer, and

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 3>a lot of that is if Henry just dominates the game,

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.399
<v Speaker 3>then there's not enough ball to go around for Jay

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 3>Flowers sometimes, and he posted it up last week, but

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:00.720
<v Speaker 3>he was solid in four of the five games prior

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 3>to that. And Jay Flowers is also really good, so

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean there's that too. Flowers runs from all parts

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 3>of the field, evenly left right slot, and that means

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 3>he'll see all three of the Steelers starting cornerbacks, and

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 3>really none of them a troubling matchup. They've got PFF

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 3>rankings in coverage as cornerback seventy, cornerback eighty nine, and

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 3>quarterback one hundred.

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 5>Dait was Porter one of those one of those.

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Really, you know, I've got this theory on Joey Porter Jr. Okay,

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 3>if his name was I don't know, Willie Jackson, we

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't think anything about him. But his name is Joey

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Porter Junior.

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 5>He went for a long stretch last year, allowing like

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 5>twenty some yards per game. But yeah, maybe this year.

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he's just kind of a guy this year.

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 5>Okay, that's interesting. Interesting.

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 3>Mark Andrews surged last week with Isaiah likely out, but

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 3>likely's probably going to come back for this one. Andrews

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 3>has scored in four of the last five. Steelers are

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 3>one of the better tight end defenses, but good tight

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 3>ends find their way to productive days. Kyle Pitts, zach Ertz,

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Brock Bauers, Jake Ferguson.

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 5>I wanted noted for the record. He just called Kyle

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 5>Pitts a good tight end.

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 3>I said, good, Yeah, good.

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna talk about Kyle Pitts a little later on

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 2>this show.

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 3>And that'll be the rest of the show.

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 5>How did Brad get the Felcons again?

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 3>How did that work out?

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>He? Uh?

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Those receiver are those tight ends averaging six catches for

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 3>fifty yards. So Mike Mark Andrews a C grade with

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 3>likely and a B grade without likely in this matchup.

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's go over to by the way. If you haven't

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 3>dropped Deontay Johnson yet, drop Deontay Johnson. Let's go to

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 3>the Pittsburgh side. Russell Wilsons might take a chance on

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 3>me quarterback. Let's go to George Pickens surging under Russell Wilson.

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 3>He's finished as a top four Fantasy wide receiver in

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 3>two of three Wilson starts. And as I mentioned last segment,

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Ravens safety Kyle Hamilton may not play in this game

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 3>after his ankle sprain last week. And Hamilton is the

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 3>perfect guy to pick up coverage at George Pickens. He's

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 3>so big and physical. Pickens is just gonna dominate the

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 3>rest of the cornerbacks.

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 5>I love that took a couple of year, but Wilson,

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 5>someone finally realized you just have to throw it within

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.280
<v Speaker 5>nine feet. The right of George Pickens, and he's gonna

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:07.760
<v Speaker 5>grab it with two fingers, which.

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Kenny Pikett couldn't do. He couldn't put it with the

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 3>ninth feet of George Pickens. He runs overwhelmingly on the

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 3>left side of the field. That's the aforementioned matchup against

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Brandon Stevens, who ranks his corn as Pro Football focuses

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 3>cornerback one hundred and ten. I think there's only one

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirteen ranked cornerbacks. It's that bad. Love George Pickens.

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Here a gray. The only other element of the receiving

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 3>game is Pat Fryarmouth, who hasn't actually been helped by

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 3>Russell Wilson as much as other Steelers, as usage has

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 3>actually gone down, averaging just two catches for twenty nine

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 3>yards under Russ. But the Ravens are such a leaky

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 3>tight end defense that I think Friarmuth is still startable here.

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:50.919
<v Speaker 3>They're giving up sixty eight yards per game. Last week,

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 3>Tanner Hudson and Mike Caseki combined for ten catches and

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 3>seventy two yards against Baltimore. For the past five opponents

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 3>of top sixty one one tight end yards, so friar

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 3>moves in play here c grade on him, and then

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 3>we've only got the running backs left. Naji Harris, He's

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 3>looked vastly improved under Russell Wilson. Under justin fields, Harris's

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 3>average finish was running back twenty seven under russ it

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 3>vaults up to running back thirteen with touchdowns or one

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 3>hundred yards in every game or both. But the Ravens

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 3>run defense is elite. They've allowed the second fewest rushing yards,

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 3>just fifty six per game. No opposing runner his top

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 3>fifty two yards against Baltimore, which is we're running in

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:38.800
<v Speaker 3>we're heading into week eleven and nobody's top fifty two yards.

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 3>That's amazing. Also, Baltimore sees the league's lowest rushing play percentage,

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 3>just thirty three percent. Your hope here for Naji Harris,

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 3>your best hope is receiving production. Five straight opponents have

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 3>caught at least forty two yards against Baltimore. Harris could

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.240
<v Speaker 3>help out through the air here, and especially with Jalen

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Warren who's got a issue. We don't know for sure

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 3>if he's gonna go, and he might be a game

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:06.280
<v Speaker 3>time decision on that back. And if that's the case,

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 3>then I like Najie Harris more than the sea level

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 3>I've got him at. I'd move him up to a

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 3>B grade if warrent sits. And either way, because there's

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 3>such a tough run defense, we're not gonna start.

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 5>And Harris has a back injury. I mean he'll go,

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 5>but man, yeah, banged up.

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 3>I believe, I'm not positive. I think they took him

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 3>off the injury report on Friday. OK, We're still monitoring

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 3>that one. Yeah, all right, Brian. Our final matchup for

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 3>this segment, Atlanta Falcons taking on the Denver Broncos. Are

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 3>you gonna start with Kyle Pitts in this one? Are

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.320
<v Speaker 3>we gonna just? Is that just your whole plan? Is

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 3>that the only reason you're here?

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:39.720
<v Speaker 2>I kind of wanted to build up to the thoughts,

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 2>but why not a Kyle? We'll get into why.

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't like this game for the Falcons wide receivers,

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 4>but I love it for Pitts, who owns an impressive

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 4>two point eight yards per route run against single high

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 4>safety coverage.

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 2>That is an elite clip.

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:00.879
<v Speaker 4>The Broncos deploy a ton of single high Denver, also

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 4>allowing more than five catches per game to tight ends

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:07.879
<v Speaker 4>Monster games for Brock Bowers, Travis Kelcey against Denver. Yes,

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:10.240
<v Speaker 4>I put Kyle Pitts in that range, so I love Pits.

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 2>He gets an a. Darnell Moody and Drake London, I

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 2>don't love them as much. They both get a.

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 4>See bad spot for both, probably especially London, who will

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 4>be shadowed by Patrick Surtan for the majority of the game,

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 4>one would think, but maybe Mooney sees one, Sir Tan Mooney,

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:27.320
<v Speaker 4>pretty good receiver as well. You'd be the best receiver

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:29.800
<v Speaker 4>on the Bears if you still in Chicago anyway, Just

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 4>to see for both though. The Broncos allowing the twelve

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 4>fewest PPR points per game to wide outs, and whoever

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Sirtan is on, he just erases wide outs, so Kirk Cousins,

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 4>just to see for him. I like Pitts, I don't

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 4>love the receivers. As I just mentioned, only Lamar Jackson

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 4>and Patrick Mahomes were able top two hundred and forty

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.760
<v Speaker 4>passing yards against Denver this year. Multiple passing scorers allowed

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 4>in just two of ten games for the Broncos. It's

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 4>all gonna be all about Bijon and Pitts on this one.

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 4>I got an a On Bijon. Denver allowing nearly one

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty convoy yards per game to running backs.

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 4>They surrendered nine catches to Kansas City's backfield last week.

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 4>Bijon is one of three running backs with at least

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 4>forty catches on the year.

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:10.439
<v Speaker 2>He is a great receiver over to the Denver side.

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Not a lot here.

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 4>Audrick Estime liked Tim he was might take a chance

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 4>with me running back. I do like Courtland Sutton. The

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 4>Falcons are gonna be without two starting cornerbacks and a

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 4>third depth corner.

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Sutton's targets. Since his zero target game.

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 4>In Week seven nine ten eleven, Sutton has been a

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 4>top twenty four wide receiver in the last four out

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 4>of four of the last five weeks yep. And last

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 4>week Sutton had the highest the highest average separation score

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 4>and route win rate among all wide receivers. Wow, and

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 4>that was against Kansas City's Trent McDuffie nice, who is

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 4>an elite corner So Cortland Sutton is coming on.

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:48.319
<v Speaker 2>He's bon Nicks's favorite target by far.

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 5>I need charges expertise on that cornerback situation. They have

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 5>six corners, three are out. Are those three out there

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 5>gonna get tired. They might.

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Actually you could look that's that is a thing that

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 4>happens because because of the thinness at quarterback cornerback Devon

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:08.840
<v Speaker 4>Vley Dart throw cee. If you're looking, if you're desperate

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 4>for a wide receiver, he appears to be the wide

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 4>receiver too for the Broncos.

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 2>But that's kind of been a turnstile.

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 4>Really, I don't love him, but if you're going to

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 4>pick when it's VLA, no tight ends for the Broncos,

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 4>but Bo Nicks B grade.

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 2>Sorry thor if you're listening, might he's borderline?

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 4>He's borderline A in this matchup, Nicks has more rushing

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 4>touchdowns than Breis Hall and Josh.

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Jacobs this year.

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:35.480
<v Speaker 4>His rushing ability makes him a borderline take on in

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 4>almost any matchup, but again, this matchup a good one.

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 4>He's got the rushing floor, which is very safe for Nicks,

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:45.280
<v Speaker 4>and Atlanta has allowed multiple passing touchdowns in sixth straight

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.360
<v Speaker 4>and seven of their last eight games.

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 2>So screw it A grade bow Knicks.

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 5>I'll be honest, but I was looking at it. Take

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 5>a chance on me players. I legitimately felt he was

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 5>too good to put in that segment.

0:42:58.120 --> 0:42:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I could see it.

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 4>I'll say that too for the you gamblers out there.

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Bo Nix has really narrowed the gap for Rookie of

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 4>the Year. He's second behind Jayden Daniels. Now Caleb Williams afterthought,

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 4>Bong gone factor right now and Drake may surging. But

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm making some bets on Nixon may in the event

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:18.240
<v Speaker 4>that something happens with Daniels, who was already fading.

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 2>The delta, you know, is huge.

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 5>Maybe with the change in offensive coordinator the Bears, you know,

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 5>Caleb Williams will get back in the race.

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, good one.

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 3>That's so very optimistic of you.

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:30.760
<v Speaker 5>We hope it was actually meant as a transition.

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, I got you now, I got you now.

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.760
<v Speaker 3>I think the betting odds last I saw Jadeen Daniels

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 3>minus two thousand to win Rookie of the Year. Bo

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Nicks plus eight hundred. That's the delta you were talking about.

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and Daniels was more than one hundred to one

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:48.720
<v Speaker 4>before Thursday night, and that has fallen off a cliff.

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Ye and Nick Nix coming on.

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 3>Is coming on when we come back. Three tough questions.

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:56.800
<v Speaker 3>See if you go three and Ozero with our panel

0:43:56.840 --> 0:43:58.720
<v Speaker 3>of experts as we run through some of the hardest

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:04.240
<v Speaker 3>questions in fantasy football today, including the Chicago offense. Scott Fish,

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:32.880
<v Speaker 3>does it get better? Play along when we come. Welcome

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:36.279
<v Speaker 3>back Fantasy Football Weekly Hour number two. I am Paul

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:41.759
<v Speaker 3>Charchian with me today, Scott Fish, Brian Johnson. Guys, it's

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 3>time to play three tough questions. Let's quest Jabe number one.

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Can you sabotage drop? C? D. Lamb? And I suppose

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 3>because we haven't talked to sabotage drop yet this year,

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:55.760
<v Speaker 3>I should explain what the sabotage drop is, or like Scott,

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 3>you can if you want to do you want to

0:44:57.040 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 3>throw your hat?

0:44:57.560 --> 0:44:59.400
<v Speaker 5>No, no, you can do it. I can do it.

0:44:59.440 --> 0:44:59.839
<v Speaker 5>I don't care.

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 3>The sabotage drop is the single most hardcore move in

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:03.800
<v Speaker 3>fantasy football.

0:45:03.840 --> 0:45:06.439
<v Speaker 5>That is not where I would have got but that's good.

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:07.399
<v Speaker 5>It's a great move.

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:11.320
<v Speaker 3>It is You have to have yards of steel to

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 3>perform the sabotage drop.

0:45:13.880 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 5>And that surgery is expensive, very expensive.

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Here's the core premise. You are going to outright drop

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 3>a big name player who you feel will be a

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:30.359
<v Speaker 3>net negative on whoever picks that player up. Now as

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 3>an example, Jordan Addison is not a sabotage drop. Javonte

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:39.319
<v Speaker 3>Williams is not a sabotage drop. Big name players Dobbins, Yes,

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 3>he would be a sabotage drop. He's not not the

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 3>guy we're gonna We're talking about Cedee Lamb right now.

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 3>But yes, I mean, if that's that would be Super Bowl.

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Somebody else is going to use precious fab or their

0:45:51.600 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 3>their number one waiver priority, or.

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Just start them when they shouldn't and also.

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Start them when they shouldn't. If you believe that this

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 3>players truly going to be a net negative, then you

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:04.320
<v Speaker 3>sabotage drop that person. And even if every game is

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 3>not negative, some of them are going to be harmful games.

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 3>So that brings us to ceed Lamb. Yeah, and I'll

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 3>restate the question, Scott Fish, can you sabotage drop Seede Lamb?

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:18.399
<v Speaker 5>No, No, you can't. His trade value is just far

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 5>too high, and a trade to actually get something makes

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:24.839
<v Speaker 5>far more sense than just dropping him out right, even

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 5>if it's even if it's getting low Bald or selling low.

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 5>Their pass schedule is one of the easiest, and Rush

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 5>Lance Rush Cooper Rush or Trey Lance may just lean

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 5>on Lamb and hyper target him. Weeks fourteen through sixteen,

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 5>they play literally the three worst pass defenses currently. I'm

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 5>not straight up dropping him because the hope that he

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 5>hurts another team for a couple random weeks. It's not

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 5>worth what you can possibly get in return, or if

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 5>you make the playoffs, what you might get from a

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 5>hyper targeted even in a bad offense Ceede Lamb.

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm going with no, Okay, Brian, can I sabotage drop

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:03.439
<v Speaker 3>Ceedee Lamb?

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 4>You you're probably gonna have some points, You're gonna make

0:47:07.480 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 4>some good points why you should.

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 2>But I'm gonna agree with Scott and say you can.

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:14.360
<v Speaker 4>It's a luxury to sabotage drop someone, especially of Cede

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Lamb's caliber, and he was able to produce last year

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:20.960
<v Speaker 4>with Cooper Rush, and last week he should have caught

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 4>a touchdown if not for the Sun in this poorly

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 4>engineered stadium in Dallas.

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, no, you can't drop Ceedee Lamb. But it's

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 2>it's a valid question. I will give you that. But

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 2>here's why we're wrong.

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 5>Let me ask you to this.

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, here we go.

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Remember the Miami offense without Tua Tyreek Hill during that stretch. Yeah,

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:44.919
<v Speaker 3>was terrible, and he materially hurt his He materially hurt

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 3>all of his fantasy managers because you started him every

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 3>week because you had to, because his name was Tyreek Hill,

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 3>and you suffered with him. Ask this, and I honestly

0:47:57.239 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 3>don't for sure know the answer to this, but could

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 3>you get through your playoff run with three straight good

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:07.839
<v Speaker 3>games from Cede Lamb in a Cooper Rush or Trey

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Lance led offense? And if the answer is no, you

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:14.359
<v Speaker 3>don't think you can get three straight playoff wins, then

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:17.920
<v Speaker 3>do you want him on your team? I like what

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:20.359
<v Speaker 3>you said, Scott about trading. I would try to trade

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:22.479
<v Speaker 3>Ze trap so low, I try to say, I would

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:24.720
<v Speaker 3>try to see I try to get something of value

0:48:24.760 --> 0:48:28.399
<v Speaker 3>for Ceede Lamb. If you can't, then I still then

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:30.759
<v Speaker 3>I endorse the sabotage drop. So I will say no

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:34.280
<v Speaker 3>for now on this, although I have no faith whatsoever

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:38.960
<v Speaker 3>in the Dallas offense. But if you can't get something

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 3>reasonably valuable for him, the most valuable, the most value

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 3>you may have is reckon somebody else's team.

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:47.920
<v Speaker 5>Ceedee Lamb with Cooper Rush two years ago without Prescott

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 5>seven for seventy five, eight for eighty seven, and one

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 5>six for ninety seven and one five for fifty three,

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:53.799
<v Speaker 5>five for sixty eight.

0:48:53.960 --> 0:48:55.800
<v Speaker 3>As we discussed you were you were not here on

0:48:55.880 --> 0:48:58.759
<v Speaker 3>the show last week. We acknowledged that. But okay, that

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:00.800
<v Speaker 3>is when Zeke and Paul were running.

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 5>This is a very good point. Then it was a

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 5>very good offense. It was a very good They won

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 5>all but one of those games.

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:09.400
<v Speaker 3>That's right. So that's right, very true. This offense with

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 3>no running game is just dead in the water.

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:15.239
<v Speaker 4>But we're looking at a lot of garbage time this

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:17.960
<v Speaker 4>year for Ceedee Lamb, which he wasn't getting last year

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 4>on a good team, good offense, so that could bode

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 4>well for pay.

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:25.799
<v Speaker 2>Really is a tough question. Number two.

0:49:26.080 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 3>With the change of offensive coordinator, does the Bears offense

0:49:29.280 --> 0:49:33.640
<v Speaker 3>get better, worse or stay the same. I'm sure it

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:35.359
<v Speaker 3>can get worse, Brian, what do you think?

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:37.319
<v Speaker 5>Wait? Did we get an answer on see Lamb?

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I said no, no, ok but we're close close shop

0:49:41.000 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 3>at first. If this question were after trade deadlines, I

0:49:45.760 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 3>would be it'd be a different answer. Okay, Brian, Chicago

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:51.399
<v Speaker 3>offense better worse? Are the same?

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:54.239
<v Speaker 4>You want to say it can't get any worse. But

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:57.319
<v Speaker 4>you know what gets worse is their schedule. I mean,

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:01.760
<v Speaker 4>this offense wasn't getting it done against New England, Arizona, Jacksonville.

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:07.399
<v Speaker 4>Now we're looking at Green Bay, Minnesota, Detroit, San Francisco, Minnesota, Detroit. Again,

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:12.960
<v Speaker 4>that is a murderers row basically for all Bears offensive players.

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 2>So no, it's you know, it's gonna get worse. It's

0:50:15.640 --> 0:50:18.800
<v Speaker 2>getting worse. This team is lost until they fire the

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:21.280
<v Speaker 2>head coach. It's it's it's done done in Chicago.

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 5>I think you might have started to convince me Scott.

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:27.840
<v Speaker 3>With a change of offensive coordinator, does the Bears offense

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 3>get better, worse or stay the same.

0:50:29.600 --> 0:50:31.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I was gonna go with it can't get worse

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:34.960
<v Speaker 5>because it's bottom three in about a dozen categories. It's

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:38.320
<v Speaker 5>bottom ten and about a dozen more, you know, and

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 5>those are big ones like yards allowed, yards per play allowed, sex,

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:45.680
<v Speaker 5>points scored. But like it's not like random, you know,

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 5>high level stats. It's like the big ones. Bruh. So yeah,

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:56.279
<v Speaker 5>this it's it's interesting. Their new offensive quarter took over

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 5>play calling for Frank Reich in Carolina last year for

0:50:59.800 --> 0:51:02.960
<v Speaker 5>last ten or so games, immediately beat CJ. Young with

0:51:03.160 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 5>Bryce Young or CJ. Stroud with Bryce Young. But then

0:51:06.320 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 5>Bryce Young didn't top two hundred yards for the rest

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 5>of the year after that, five scores in eleven games.

0:51:13.840 --> 0:51:16.399
<v Speaker 5>I think Brian might be right. I had stays the same.

0:51:16.480 --> 0:51:18.799
<v Speaker 5>It's just gonna continue to be bad. But Brian might

0:51:18.840 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 5>be right. I'm gonna go stays the same. I'm gonna

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:21.960
<v Speaker 5>stay there, but it's gonna stay bad.

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:25.239
<v Speaker 3>Let me give you the Bears points by quarter since

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:27.319
<v Speaker 3>week seven right into week eleven. So this is going

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 3>back at waste there buy in week seven. Zero is

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 3>points per quarter. So I'm gonna give you twelve numbers

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:45.279
<v Speaker 3>zero zero seven eight zero nine zero zero zero. We're

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:48.600
<v Speaker 3>in the matrix three yeah, zero zero. Who knew we'd

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:49.839
<v Speaker 3>go binary on this show?

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Listen to that.

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:54.400
<v Speaker 3>That is insanely feeble.

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:55.800
<v Speaker 2>So the Bears.

0:51:55.960 --> 0:51:59.319
<v Speaker 3>You alluded to this a little bit, Scott. Last year,

0:51:59.800 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 3>the Bears fans and the organization cackling with delight at

0:52:04.080 --> 0:52:07.399
<v Speaker 3>the failures of Bryce Young as they saw the number

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 3>one pick in the draft heading there.

0:52:09.320 --> 0:52:11.560
<v Speaker 5>The late let's get this guy. They're like, let's go

0:52:11.680 --> 0:52:12.200
<v Speaker 5>get that guy.

0:52:12.280 --> 0:52:15.719
<v Speaker 3>Let's get the offensive coordinator that led Bryce Young to

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:19.080
<v Speaker 3>be one of the biggest first overall flops in memory.

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:21.880
<v Speaker 3>They're like, oh, we need that guy, so they put

0:52:21.960 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 3>him on staff. And then when Matt Eberflus has got

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:30.080
<v Speaker 3>an opening at offensive coordinator, he's like, Okay, we've got

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:34.359
<v Speaker 3>the least accurate passer in the league. Our passing games

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:37.520
<v Speaker 3>completely dead in the water. We're thirty first in passing yards.

0:52:38.600 --> 0:52:42.200
<v Speaker 3>I know just the guy to make our interim offensive coordinator.

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:44.280
<v Speaker 3>It's our passing game coordinator.

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:48.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I can't let me reiterate. They had two hundred

0:52:48.760 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 5>plus yards passing twice in those eleven games with him.

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:55.919
<v Speaker 3>I don't. I can't come up of the scenario where

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:58.919
<v Speaker 3>it gets any better. It feels like it can't get worse,

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:01.640
<v Speaker 3>although Brian's online to schedule it suggests it could get worse.

0:53:01.680 --> 0:53:02.880
<v Speaker 3>But I on, how you get worse than that?

0:53:03.280 --> 0:53:03.320
<v Speaker 1>What?

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:05.480
<v Speaker 3>I just that series of numbers I just read.

0:53:05.360 --> 0:53:08.400
<v Speaker 4>On Does it get better if Tyson Bagent takes over

0:53:08.480 --> 0:53:09.320
<v Speaker 4>as starting quarterback?

0:53:09.360 --> 0:53:11.719
<v Speaker 2>Who, by the way, his dad is the one who's

0:53:11.760 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 2>starting those leagues and all these things.

0:53:13.280 --> 0:53:16.560
<v Speaker 3>It's not true, but it's not a bad idea. Probably

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:19.879
<v Speaker 3>if it's your dad going to be leaking stories about

0:53:19.880 --> 0:53:21.799
<v Speaker 3>how you're going to replace me as host on the show,

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:26.920
<v Speaker 3>because that's probably actually going forward well. Denver running back

0:53:27.000 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Audric Estimate most commonly finish as a running back one

0:53:31.040 --> 0:53:33.759
<v Speaker 3>running back to flex or bench. Scott.

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:38.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. So, as many noted in their Waiver wire articles

0:53:38.239 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 5>and stuff this week, it is not a good schedule

0:53:41.760 --> 0:53:45.880
<v Speaker 5>for the rest of the season for top twelve run defenses.

0:53:45.920 --> 0:53:47.839
<v Speaker 5>A couple in the top seven or eight, one middle

0:53:47.840 --> 0:53:50.320
<v Speaker 5>of the pack, couple decent matchups, but they also have

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:53.879
<v Speaker 5>a bye. It's just a tough schedule. It's not even

0:53:53.920 --> 0:53:56.279
<v Speaker 5>out of the question. The other to stay or get

0:53:56.360 --> 0:53:58.800
<v Speaker 5>more involved in some games. The other two backs in

0:53:58.840 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 5>that backfield, McLaughlin and Javonte Williams. But no targets, minimal

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:05.919
<v Speaker 5>pass game work, and by minimal, I mean he's run

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:09.800
<v Speaker 5>five routes all year. Rodric Customy has He's not involved

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:11.799
<v Speaker 5>in that, and that's how he came out as an

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:15.920
<v Speaker 5>early down bruiser. That's who he is. I'm I'm gonna

0:54:15.960 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 5>go flex because maybe they lean on him, maybe he

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:21.000
<v Speaker 5>gets the volume, but that's about as high as I

0:54:21.080 --> 0:54:23.160
<v Speaker 5>can you know, confidently.

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:27.239
<v Speaker 3>Go okay, flex for Scott Brian rest of the season, well,

0:54:27.239 --> 0:54:29.719
<v Speaker 3>a estime most commonly finished is a running back. One

0:54:29.840 --> 0:54:31.479
<v Speaker 3>running back to flex or bench.

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:34.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not a lot to add on to what Scott said.

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:38.960
<v Speaker 4>It's really it's a volume bass play for SMA week

0:54:39.000 --> 0:54:41.239
<v Speaker 4>in week out. I think he'll hold onto the job

0:54:41.239 --> 0:54:44.719
<v Speaker 4>because Javonte Williams and McLoughlin they're just not getting it done.

0:54:44.760 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 4>That they've fallen out of favor with Sean Payton and

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 4>there's another running back in the mix.

0:54:49.200 --> 0:54:51.600
<v Speaker 2>But he is nothing. It's all estimate, but the schedule

0:54:51.760 --> 0:54:55.680
<v Speaker 2>not great. He's flex.

0:54:55.760 --> 0:54:57.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't have much to add Sorry, flex, I'm

0:54:57.840 --> 0:54:59.479
<v Speaker 4>with Scott took all my talking points.

0:54:59.520 --> 0:55:01.400
<v Speaker 5>Okay, up, I'm.

0:55:01.239 --> 0:55:04.279
<v Speaker 3>Gonna mention this about Estima's game last week. It was

0:55:04.360 --> 0:55:06.680
<v Speaker 3>just three point eight yards per carry, but it was

0:55:06.719 --> 0:55:10.960
<v Speaker 3>against the Chiefs. Yeah, yeah, great, Rundy. In fact, we're

0:55:10.960 --> 0:55:14.280
<v Speaker 3>gonna start talking about this more. This Chiefs run defense

0:55:14.640 --> 0:55:19.360
<v Speaker 3>is starting to look his historically good. And it turns

0:55:19.440 --> 0:55:23.880
<v Speaker 3>out the fifty three yards Audric Guestimy had against the Chiefs,

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:27.440
<v Speaker 3>it's the second most rushing yards of any opposing running

0:55:27.480 --> 0:55:32.880
<v Speaker 3>back all year, including Derek Henry, Bjon Robinson, Alvin Kamara,

0:55:33.360 --> 0:55:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Jordan Mason on a bunch of carries. Estimate faces Atlanta

0:55:38.160 --> 0:55:40.880
<v Speaker 3>this week. That's a kind of a neutral matchup. I

0:55:40.960 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 3>think he does okay here, and I think there's a

0:55:43.280 --> 0:55:47.160
<v Speaker 3>scenario where this Denver team's starting to look a lot better.

0:55:47.320 --> 0:55:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Bonix is bringing balance to the offense. Estimate might just

0:55:51.440 --> 0:55:55.120
<v Speaker 3>turn into the workhorse back they wanted Javonte Williams to be.

0:55:55.920 --> 0:55:58.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm actually feeling a little more optimistic than you guys

0:55:58.320 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 3>are running back who are okay, Estimate, it's all speculative

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:07.160
<v Speaker 3>running back to Odder Estimate. Scott. Let's go to the

0:56:07.200 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Cincinnati Bengals taking on the Los Angeles Chargers to it.

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:15.879
<v Speaker 3>His Chargers defense so very improved from last year's defense. Still,

0:56:16.000 --> 0:56:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Bengals are going well right now. T Higgins is coming back.

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Where do you want to start with the Bengals?

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:23.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Yeah, we can start in the passing game with

0:56:23.400 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 5>Joe Burrow. The charges of the fifth best against fantasy quarterbacks,

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:29.719
<v Speaker 5>which is truly incredible. Give it the gauntlet of all

0:56:29.760 --> 0:56:33.439
<v Speaker 5>pro quarterbacks they faced. I feel Gardner Minshew, Bryce Young

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:38.160
<v Speaker 5>Justin Fields twenty twenty four, Patrick Mahomes, Bryce Young, Justin Fields.

0:56:38.960 --> 0:56:42.640
<v Speaker 5>I mentioned him early season. Bonix Kyler Murray, Spencer Rattler,

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:45.640
<v Speaker 5>Jamis Winston, and Will Levis would have completely lit them

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:48.120
<v Speaker 5>up like that is a That is a gauntlet of

0:56:48.200 --> 0:56:53.120
<v Speaker 5>amazing professional quarterbacks that have led to that awesome ranking

0:56:53.239 --> 0:56:57.840
<v Speaker 5>for the Chargers defense. All right, second lowest rate of

0:56:58.000 --> 0:57:01.040
<v Speaker 5>pressure but with the fewest if you be knockdowns and

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:03.840
<v Speaker 5>fewest hurries. So I think Joe Burrow is gonna actually

0:57:03.840 --> 0:57:06.680
<v Speaker 5>have some time to sit back and pick away at

0:57:06.760 --> 0:57:10.440
<v Speaker 5>this defense. Joe Burrow leading the league in the temps

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:13.440
<v Speaker 5>yards passing scores, averaging two hundred and seventy plus yards.

0:57:13.480 --> 0:57:16.600
<v Speaker 5>He's got nine scores nine times in the last two weeks.

0:57:16.640 --> 0:57:19.040
<v Speaker 5>I have an A grade on Joe Burrow. I believe

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 5>Jamar Chase is an obvious A at this point with

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:24.040
<v Speaker 5>the way he's playing. I don't think I need to elaborate,

0:57:24.120 --> 0:57:26.360
<v Speaker 5>So I'm gonna move on to T Higgins, who is

0:57:26.480 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 5>expected to come back and play this week, who have

0:57:29.240 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 5>a C grade on C grade partly in due to

0:57:33.440 --> 0:57:36.040
<v Speaker 5>partly due to possible limitations in his first game back,

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:38.400
<v Speaker 5>but in the three games with T. Higgins or the

0:57:38.520 --> 0:57:41.040
<v Speaker 5>three games with T Higgins out, Yo C Vash and

0:57:41.080 --> 0:57:43.760
<v Speaker 5>all the arrest basically did nothing. So even if he

0:57:43.920 --> 0:57:47.200
<v Speaker 5>does miss, they're all on the bench. With T. Higgins

0:57:47.280 --> 0:57:49.640
<v Speaker 5>his four games before missing time, he had double digit

0:57:49.760 --> 0:57:53.200
<v Speaker 5>fantasy points in four straight, over six catches and over

0:57:53.280 --> 0:57:56.400
<v Speaker 5>seventy five yards in them, scoring three times in those

0:57:56.440 --> 0:57:58.720
<v Speaker 5>four games, I could go a be. My only worry

0:57:58.840 --> 0:58:00.760
<v Speaker 5>is he doesn't play a full cup element of snaps.

0:58:00.920 --> 0:58:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Have you seen the thing with the practice hill and

0:58:03.400 --> 0:58:07.920
<v Speaker 4>T Higgins? Apparently there's a practice hill against ten feet

0:58:08.120 --> 0:58:10.720
<v Speaker 4>I know, but whenever he's coming back from injury, if

0:58:10.760 --> 0:58:12.880
<v Speaker 4>he runs up the practice hill, he's coming back.

0:58:12.960 --> 0:58:14.720
<v Speaker 2>That's how you gauge his return.

0:58:15.200 --> 0:58:18.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna I have a C grade on Gsecki here.

0:58:18.120 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 5>The Chargers have allowed nos coaster tight ends, but Kelsey, McBride,

0:58:21.240 --> 0:58:25.560
<v Speaker 5>Bowers all did very well. I might actually I have all.

0:58:25.560 --> 0:58:27.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna put Gasecki in the bench. I'm gonna put

0:58:27.560 --> 0:58:30.120
<v Speaker 5>it on the bench and C grade if T. Higgins

0:58:30.480 --> 0:58:33.600
<v Speaker 5>somehow doesn't go. Because in the three games without Higgins,

0:58:34.120 --> 0:58:37.880
<v Speaker 5>twenty three targets very fiable fantasy days and all of them,

0:58:38.560 --> 0:58:40.920
<v Speaker 5>he's really on that border of a C grade right there.

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:45.160
<v Speaker 5>Chase Brown B grade has every single running back touch,

0:58:45.240 --> 0:58:48.280
<v Speaker 5>said Zach Moss has been out real all, like fifty

0:58:48.360 --> 0:58:51.439
<v Speaker 5>four or fifty six of them every single touch they allow.

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:53.960
<v Speaker 5>The Chargers allowed the six fewest yards and just two

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:56.960
<v Speaker 5>total touchdowns to running backs this year, so it's a

0:58:57.040 --> 0:58:59.919
<v Speaker 5>little tougher spot. They've allowed the third fewest fantasy point

0:59:00.600 --> 0:59:03.320
<v Speaker 5>to the position, so Chase Brown's going to need that

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:07.440
<v Speaker 5>twenty plus touch volume he's recently seen. Only the only

0:59:07.560 --> 0:59:11.920
<v Speaker 5>back to top seventy rushing yards against the Chargers was

0:59:12.040 --> 0:59:15.400
<v Speaker 5>James Connor and it took nineteen carries. Kamara also did well,

0:59:15.480 --> 0:59:17.840
<v Speaker 5>but he needed that six for fifty five through the air.

0:59:18.200 --> 0:59:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Chase Browns might help that way.

0:59:20.160 --> 0:59:22.240
<v Speaker 5>That's where I'm going. Chase Brown the last two games

0:59:22.280 --> 0:59:25.920
<v Speaker 5>with no Zach Moss, nobody else in the backfield, fifteen catches,

0:59:26.040 --> 0:59:28.200
<v Speaker 5>he gets all their work, So I'm gonna give him

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:30.920
<v Speaker 5>the B grade here Over on the Chargers side, Justin

0:59:31.000 --> 0:59:32.960
<v Speaker 5>Herbert was might take a chance on me quarterbacks, so

0:59:33.240 --> 0:59:36.040
<v Speaker 5>I obviously like the passing game a little bit, but

0:59:36.240 --> 0:59:39.440
<v Speaker 5>just C grades on Ladd McConkie and Quenton Johnson. In

0:59:39.480 --> 0:59:42.160
<v Speaker 5>the last three games, six wide receivers have eighty plus

0:59:42.240 --> 0:59:45.480
<v Speaker 5>and or a score against the Cincinnati Bengals, partly due

0:59:45.520 --> 0:59:48.120
<v Speaker 5>to the shootout nature of those games, which we could

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:51.840
<v Speaker 5>see here. Ladd McConkie is the target leader. He's the safer,

0:59:51.960 --> 0:59:54.880
<v Speaker 5>more consistent option, six plus targets in all but two

0:59:55.480 --> 0:59:57.840
<v Speaker 5>games this year, but he is going against one of

0:59:57.920 --> 1:00:01.280
<v Speaker 5>the league's top slot corners in Mike Hilton, who's a

1:00:01.320 --> 1:00:04.360
<v Speaker 5>big reason why the Bengals rank fifth best against the slot.

1:00:04.440 --> 1:00:07.000
<v Speaker 5>So it's a little tough draw for him there. Yeah,

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:10.080
<v Speaker 5>but the Bengals are, however, bottom ten in receptions in

1:00:10.160 --> 1:00:12.439
<v Speaker 5>yards alowed to wide receiver and they allow the fourth

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:14.640
<v Speaker 5>most to the perimeter. As bad as they are as

1:00:14.720 --> 1:00:16.720
<v Speaker 5>good as they are in the slot, they're bad on

1:00:16.800 --> 1:00:19.400
<v Speaker 5>the outside. So I have a C grade on Quentin Johnson.

1:00:19.720 --> 1:00:23.240
<v Speaker 5>Andy gets this great matchup against the struggling cam Taylor

1:00:23.280 --> 1:00:26.400
<v Speaker 5>Britt allowing a one oh seven rating in his coverage

1:00:26.640 --> 1:00:29.200
<v Speaker 5>and he's allowed five scores this year, so we might

1:00:29.240 --> 1:00:30.360
<v Speaker 5>see a score there from q.

1:00:30.800 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 4>Here are the wide receivers with more touchdowns in Quentin Johnston,

1:00:34.720 --> 1:00:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Jamar Chase Sun God, Mike Evans, McLaurin, Drake London, Marvin

1:00:38.160 --> 1:00:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Harrison Junior.

1:00:38.920 --> 1:00:39.600
<v Speaker 2>That's it, Jase.

1:00:40.960 --> 1:00:44.200
<v Speaker 5>I do have Josh Palmer on the bench, averaging thirty

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:47.280
<v Speaker 5>four point two yards thirty four point two yards per

1:00:47.400 --> 1:00:52.160
<v Speaker 5>catch over the last three. Will Disley's getting a C grade.

1:00:52.560 --> 1:00:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Bengals are bottom six and receptions yards and scores to

1:00:55.600 --> 1:00:59.400
<v Speaker 5>tight ends, rounding them out as the third best matchup

1:00:59.400 --> 1:01:01.000
<v Speaker 5>to the position. And so I got a C grade

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 5>on him because he's averaging five plus catches in three

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:08.960
<v Speaker 5>last four. Over to the run game. JK. Dobbins sixteen

1:01:09.000 --> 1:01:12.680
<v Speaker 5>plus touches in every game and the one he got rest.

1:01:13.320 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Sorry.

1:01:13.760 --> 1:01:16.000
<v Speaker 5>Nine different backs have scored against the Bengals in the

1:01:16.080 --> 1:01:18.720
<v Speaker 5>ten games. Among non scores, there was a ninety plus

1:01:18.880 --> 1:01:21.320
<v Speaker 5>yard game, one hundred and eight yard plus game. His

1:01:21.520 --> 1:01:25.040
<v Speaker 5>fifteen plus touches should be worthy of the C grade.

1:01:25.080 --> 1:01:28.960
<v Speaker 5>And Gus Edwards ten touches in his return, but four

1:01:29.080 --> 1:01:31.200
<v Speaker 5>of those were on one drive late in the second quarter,

1:01:31.360 --> 1:01:34.600
<v Speaker 5>kind of giving rest to Gus Edwards. Another two were

1:01:34.640 --> 1:01:37.560
<v Speaker 5>in a drive where Hassan Haskins scored and Dobbins was

1:01:37.560 --> 1:01:40.640
<v Speaker 5>getting rested. It seems like he only played fifteen snaps

1:01:40.640 --> 1:01:43.040
<v Speaker 5>and got those ten touches. It seems like he's just

1:01:43.160 --> 1:01:44.200
<v Speaker 5>there to rest Dobbins.

1:01:44.680 --> 1:01:47.200
<v Speaker 3>So bench grade, I'm playing I'm not playing two Edwards.

1:01:47.560 --> 1:01:51.600
<v Speaker 3>I need more proof he's back. Yeah, when we come back, Vikings,

1:01:51.920 --> 1:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Titans will tell you what to do with that matchup

1:01:54.120 --> 1:02:04.840
<v Speaker 3>when we return. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly, a block

1:02:05.000 --> 1:02:08.480
<v Speaker 3>oh matchups for you, beginning with Vikings taking on the

1:02:08.600 --> 1:02:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Tennessee Titans. For Justin Jefferson, it is a tricky matchup,

1:02:13.120 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 3>but he's an eight grade because he's justin freaking Jefferson.

1:02:17.120 --> 1:02:19.919
<v Speaker 3>And even with the three interceptions thrown his way last week,

1:02:19.960 --> 1:02:22.040
<v Speaker 3>he walked away with a decent box score. When he

1:02:22.120 --> 1:02:24.600
<v Speaker 3>faced Sauce Gardner and DJ Reed, he walked away with

1:02:24.640 --> 1:02:28.840
<v Speaker 3>the decent box score. So we're still automatic a Justin Jefferson.

1:02:28.960 --> 1:02:31.040
<v Speaker 2>It was only two interceptions that one hit the ground.

1:02:31.560 --> 1:02:34.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well tell that to Sam Darnald. I will,

1:02:34.800 --> 1:02:35.120
<v Speaker 3>all right.

1:02:35.480 --> 1:02:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I wish I could.

1:02:36.560 --> 1:02:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Jordan Addison comes out of the C grade. Sam Darnald

1:02:39.160 --> 1:02:42.000
<v Speaker 3>missed some opportunities to find Addison last week, opting to

1:02:42.040 --> 1:02:44.600
<v Speaker 3>throw in, opting to throw to like triple cover Justin

1:02:44.640 --> 1:02:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Jefferson instead, which actually I'm fine with that. He can

1:02:48.280 --> 1:02:50.440
<v Speaker 3>try to reverse course on Sunday. Here, the Titans have

1:02:50.520 --> 1:02:54.720
<v Speaker 3>allowed the fewest yards to wide receivers and only one

1:02:54.840 --> 1:02:57.440
<v Speaker 3>hundred and ten per game. Only one wide out has

1:02:57.600 --> 1:03:03.200
<v Speaker 3>topped sixty seven yards and they've given up just zero

1:03:03.200 --> 1:03:05.680
<v Speaker 3>point six to six wide receiver scores per game, so

1:03:05.840 --> 1:03:08.240
<v Speaker 3>two thirds of a wide receiver touchdown per game. That

1:03:08.640 --> 1:03:11.640
<v Speaker 3>is all Jordan Addison C grade in this one. Staying

1:03:11.840 --> 1:03:13.120
<v Speaker 3>on the receiving part of the game.

1:03:13.240 --> 1:03:13.479
<v Speaker 5>TJ.

1:03:13.600 --> 1:03:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Hockinson b great back to full usage ran routes on

1:03:17.080 --> 1:03:20.080
<v Speaker 3>seventy one percent of the Vikings pass plays last week,

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:23.880
<v Speaker 3>a gaudy thirty percent target rate. And while the Titans

1:03:23.920 --> 1:03:28.600
<v Speaker 3>look like a dominating tight end defense, they haven't played

1:03:28.680 --> 1:03:31.080
<v Speaker 3>very many good tight ends. And the two best guys

1:03:31.120 --> 1:03:34.760
<v Speaker 3>that are close to Howkinson's level, Sam Laporta Dalton Kincaid

1:03:35.280 --> 1:03:38.160
<v Speaker 3>put up a respectable forty eight yards and fifty two yards.

1:03:38.240 --> 1:03:40.880
<v Speaker 3>They one of them scored a touchdown. So Howkinson's in

1:03:40.960 --> 1:03:43.560
<v Speaker 3>with a B grade here for Aaron Jones Titans. No,

1:03:43.600 --> 1:03:45.720
<v Speaker 3>actually I should finish with Sam Donald since we're talking

1:03:45.760 --> 1:03:48.240
<v Speaker 3>passing game, just to keep the theme going coming off

1:03:48.280 --> 1:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>his worst game is a Viking last week. Sorry, Brian,

1:03:52.680 --> 1:03:54.880
<v Speaker 3>this is not a great spot to expect a bounce back.

1:03:54.960 --> 1:03:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Titans have been a great pass defense all season long,

1:03:58.200 --> 1:04:03.040
<v Speaker 3>only Josh Allen hasped two hundred and six passing yards.

1:04:03.440 --> 1:04:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Two hundred and six is nothing, Well, only one guy

1:04:05.760 --> 1:04:08.280
<v Speaker 3>stopped it. Titans ranked number one in passing yards allowed

1:04:08.360 --> 1:04:10.360
<v Speaker 3>just one hundred and seventy one per game. It's a

1:04:10.440 --> 1:04:12.840
<v Speaker 3>tough spot for Sam Darnold. Just the se grade here.

1:04:13.440 --> 1:04:16.840
<v Speaker 3>And lastly, Aaron Jones. Titans are also a good run defense,

1:04:16.960 --> 1:04:19.360
<v Speaker 3>just not as dominating, quite as dominating his air. As

1:04:19.360 --> 1:04:22.680
<v Speaker 3>a pass defense. The last two opponents, including the run

1:04:22.720 --> 1:04:26.320
<v Speaker 3>heavy Chargers, averaged just three point one yards per carry

1:04:26.560 --> 1:04:30.400
<v Speaker 3>against Tennessee on the full season. Only one back his

1:04:30.520 --> 1:04:33.560
<v Speaker 3>top sixty two yards against the Titans. And I'd like

1:04:33.640 --> 1:04:35.000
<v Speaker 3>to tell you that Jones can make up for a

1:04:35.000 --> 1:04:37.520
<v Speaker 3>difficult ground matchup with some success through the air. But

1:04:37.640 --> 1:04:39.320
<v Speaker 3>the Titans are great there too. They gave up the

1:04:39.400 --> 1:04:43.320
<v Speaker 3>third fewest receiving yards to runners. So yeah, I can

1:04:43.400 --> 1:04:45.600
<v Speaker 3>only get you to a C grade on Aaron Jones

1:04:45.720 --> 1:04:48.600
<v Speaker 3>in this game. Titan's side of this is a shorter

1:04:48.760 --> 1:04:50.960
<v Speaker 3>story to tell. Exart't many guys you'd even think about

1:04:51.000 --> 1:04:54.800
<v Speaker 3>starting here, but let's go to Tony Poulla. First looks

1:04:54.880 --> 1:04:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Pollard so much better as a Titan than he was

1:04:57.640 --> 1:05:01.760
<v Speaker 3>as a Cowboy last year. He's run with previously unseen power.

1:05:01.920 --> 1:05:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Get this, Tony Pollard three point eight yards after contact. Wow,

1:05:07.040 --> 1:05:10.400
<v Speaker 3>that is third best in the league. You're in Derek

1:05:10.600 --> 1:05:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Henry territory at three point eight yards after contact. Minnesota

1:05:15.200 --> 1:05:19.200
<v Speaker 3>though a daunting run defense, particularly when linebacker Blake Cashman

1:05:19.680 --> 1:05:21.919
<v Speaker 3>plays and he is back from injury. In the six

1:05:22.000 --> 1:05:24.800
<v Speaker 3>games Cashman is played, the Vikings are giving up three

1:05:24.880 --> 1:05:27.480
<v Speaker 3>point seven yards per carry and they've only given up

1:05:27.520 --> 1:05:30.960
<v Speaker 3>one rushing touchdown against in those six games. So I've

1:05:31.000 --> 1:05:33.440
<v Speaker 3>only got the C grade on Tony Pollard. Tad J.

1:05:33.600 --> 1:05:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Spears finally healthy. He looked really good last week, but

1:05:35.840 --> 1:05:38.480
<v Speaker 3>he just doesn't get enough carries to hit a C

1:05:38.680 --> 1:05:41.360
<v Speaker 3>grade here, especially against a good Vikings defense. He is

1:05:41.480 --> 1:05:45.400
<v Speaker 3>on our bench. Let's go to Calvin Ridley along with

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Marvin Harrison. I think Calvin Ridley is the most boom

1:05:48.760 --> 1:05:52.040
<v Speaker 3>or bust receiver in the league. He's finished as a

1:05:52.120 --> 1:05:55.600
<v Speaker 3>top six or better receiver three different weeks this year,

1:05:56.160 --> 1:05:59.040
<v Speaker 3>and then he's also finished as wide receiver thirty nine

1:05:59.160 --> 1:06:02.320
<v Speaker 3>or worse five different times. On the show A couple

1:06:02.360 --> 1:06:04.960
<v Speaker 3>of weeks ago, Thorn noted that Brian Callahan is throwing

1:06:05.240 --> 1:06:09.720
<v Speaker 3>fewer moonshots to Ridley and he's become more productive as

1:06:09.800 --> 1:06:12.520
<v Speaker 3>his A dot has come back down to like NFL

1:06:12.680 --> 1:06:15.880
<v Speaker 3>average wide receiver a dot and that's been good for

1:06:16.000 --> 1:06:19.000
<v Speaker 3>him and that could account for his recent uptake in productivity.

1:06:19.280 --> 1:06:21.439
<v Speaker 3>The Vikings allow the third most yards to wide outs,

1:06:21.520 --> 1:06:25.120
<v Speaker 3>third most Fantasy points to wide outs, although they completely

1:06:25.200 --> 1:06:28.440
<v Speaker 3>contained the meager passings stylings of the Colts and Jags

1:06:28.440 --> 1:06:30.360
<v Speaker 3>the last two weeks. And it's not much better here.

1:06:30.800 --> 1:06:32.960
<v Speaker 3>I can get you to a C grade on Calvin Ridley.

1:06:33.440 --> 1:06:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Will Levis I considered him as a bye week dart throw.

1:06:38.080 --> 1:06:40.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you guys, tell me he's got this yielding

1:06:40.760 --> 1:06:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Viking secondary that goes into his shell when Minnesota gets ahead,

1:06:43.880 --> 1:06:46.200
<v Speaker 3>which is possible in this game. They're favored by six points.

1:06:46.720 --> 1:06:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Levi is coming off his best game of the year

1:06:48.600 --> 1:06:50.520
<v Speaker 3>last year, and maybe his best game is a pro

1:06:51.160 --> 1:06:56.520
<v Speaker 3>last week against a better secondary Los Angeles. To his credit,

1:06:56.600 --> 1:06:59.800
<v Speaker 3>will Levis has stopped producing those eye rolling turnovers that

1:06:59.840 --> 1:07:01.960
<v Speaker 3>he was known for throughout most of the rest of

1:07:02.040 --> 1:07:04.840
<v Speaker 3>his career, just two picks in the last three games.

1:07:04.960 --> 1:07:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota's allowed the fifth most fantasy points to quarterbacks. They

1:07:08.960 --> 1:07:11.160
<v Speaker 3>did shut down Mac Jones and Joe Flacco the past

1:07:11.200 --> 1:07:13.959
<v Speaker 3>two weeks. If you're in a pinch Will Levis, nobody

1:07:14.000 --> 1:07:15.840
<v Speaker 3>took him as they're taking chance on me quarterbacks. So

1:07:15.840 --> 1:07:17.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm assuming I've got no takers here.

1:07:17.480 --> 1:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>No.

1:07:17.760 --> 1:07:21.200
<v Speaker 4>I love him in daily daily fantasy for sure. And

1:07:21.280 --> 1:07:23.480
<v Speaker 4>he's got uh yeah, he's got the high ceiling. And

1:07:23.680 --> 1:07:28.120
<v Speaker 4>if he crashes, that's what that's what Daily Fantasy Sports crash.

1:07:29.560 --> 1:07:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Donald Donald, I'll go see grat on Will.

1:07:34.280 --> 1:07:36.720
<v Speaker 5>I found something interesting. I saw something interesting about Donald

1:07:36.800 --> 1:07:39.280
<v Speaker 5>last week is that he's one. He's top ten in

1:07:39.360 --> 1:07:43.080
<v Speaker 5>a lot of categories when under pressure. When blitzed. Last week,

1:07:43.160 --> 1:07:46.120
<v Speaker 5>they only blitzed him once and he threw three picks. Wow,

1:07:46.520 --> 1:07:49.040
<v Speaker 5>dropped back to let him throw and give him time,

1:07:49.400 --> 1:07:50.760
<v Speaker 5>and he threw three picks.

1:07:50.920 --> 1:07:51.560
<v Speaker 3>That's wild.

1:07:52.200 --> 1:07:53.120
<v Speaker 2>I saw two.

1:07:54.240 --> 1:07:57.760
<v Speaker 3>I saw two point five picks. I saw this stat.

1:07:58.880 --> 1:08:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Vikings blitzed the seton and most among all starting quarterbacks

1:08:02.280 --> 1:08:05.880
<v Speaker 3>this year, Will Levis is the second worst quarterback in

1:08:06.000 --> 1:08:06.720
<v Speaker 3>blitz situation.

1:08:06.800 --> 1:08:09.480
<v Speaker 5>Okay, nice, Now, it's there's a.

1:08:09.480 --> 1:08:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Lot of things working against Will Levis in this game,

1:08:11.320 --> 1:08:14.280
<v Speaker 3>but there is some upside as well, Brian, let's go

1:08:14.320 --> 1:08:17.799
<v Speaker 3>to Seattle taking on San Francisco. Do I understand this correctly?

1:08:18.280 --> 1:08:22.679
<v Speaker 3>The Seattle Seahawks starting center just quit the game.

1:08:24.320 --> 1:08:27.200
<v Speaker 2>To retire twenty seven years old. Started every game.

1:08:27.640 --> 1:08:30.160
<v Speaker 5>Bet Seattle better than at halftime during the game.

1:08:30.560 --> 1:08:33.040
<v Speaker 4>There is that I've seen that happen power He gone,

1:08:33.160 --> 1:08:36.439
<v Speaker 4>so yeah, so downgrade for I was gonna start with

1:08:36.560 --> 1:08:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Kenneth Walker. Well, first, I want to mention Seattle San Francisco.

1:08:39.720 --> 1:08:40.920
<v Speaker 4>This is the second meeting they played.

1:08:40.920 --> 1:08:41.400
<v Speaker 2>In Week six.

1:08:41.439 --> 1:08:44.360
<v Speaker 4>Seattle won thirty six to twenty four, high scoring game.

1:08:44.520 --> 1:08:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Looking at that again this week. But man, starting with

1:08:47.720 --> 1:08:51.040
<v Speaker 4>Kenneth Walker, I had a p grade. I guess I'll

1:08:51.160 --> 1:08:51.400
<v Speaker 4>keep it.

1:08:51.640 --> 1:08:53.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what happens when your center retires on

1:08:53.960 --> 1:08:57.800
<v Speaker 2>a Friday, but I'll stay with the B for Walker,

1:08:57.880 --> 1:08:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess.

1:08:58.439 --> 1:09:00.880
<v Speaker 4>Walker only total thirty two rush seen yards on fourteen

1:09:00.920 --> 1:09:02.960
<v Speaker 4>attempts in the first meeting, but he did manage to

1:09:03.000 --> 1:09:06.280
<v Speaker 4>score on the ground, and he caught eight passes against

1:09:06.280 --> 1:09:08.880
<v Speaker 4>the forty nine ers, who have allowed multiple running back

1:09:08.960 --> 1:09:12.559
<v Speaker 4>touchdowns in two of their last three games. Dallas backs

1:09:12.640 --> 1:09:15.240
<v Speaker 4>dropped the doughnut during that span. On a surprise so

1:09:16.280 --> 1:09:18.599
<v Speaker 4>b for Walker, even though they need a new center

1:09:18.880 --> 1:09:21.439
<v Speaker 4>starting center in Seattle. Over to the pass game, DK

1:09:21.600 --> 1:09:23.439
<v Speaker 4>Metcalf says he is good to go. He will make

1:09:23.479 --> 1:09:27.080
<v Speaker 4>his return. Just to see for DK though saw eleven

1:09:27.120 --> 1:09:29.080
<v Speaker 4>targets in the first meeting this season, but only caught

1:09:29.120 --> 1:09:32.080
<v Speaker 4>three for forty eight scoreless yards, and since then, the

1:09:32.160 --> 1:09:35.080
<v Speaker 4>forty nine ers have allowed just two wide receiver touchdowns

1:09:35.400 --> 1:09:37.479
<v Speaker 4>and both of those went to Cede Lamb in Week eight,

1:09:37.880 --> 1:09:41.479
<v Speaker 4>who was targeted seventeen times in that game. So not

1:09:41.760 --> 1:09:46.280
<v Speaker 4>good prospects for DK Metcalf and or Jackson Smith and Jigba.

1:09:46.880 --> 1:09:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Just to see for him.

1:09:48.000 --> 1:09:52.080
<v Speaker 4>JSN had a monster game in Week nine with Metcalf

1:09:52.400 --> 1:09:53.280
<v Speaker 4>out of the lineup.

1:09:53.640 --> 1:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>That said, tough matchup, but on paper not as bad

1:09:58.280 --> 1:09:59.519
<v Speaker 2>as you would think. It seems.

1:10:00.479 --> 1:10:03.040
<v Speaker 4>JSN runs the majority of his routes from the slot

1:10:03.360 --> 1:10:05.680
<v Speaker 4>now that Metcalf is back, and the forty nine Ers

1:10:05.680 --> 1:10:08.519
<v Speaker 4>are allowing the most yards per pass attempt to slot

1:10:08.600 --> 1:10:12.519
<v Speaker 4>wide receivers nine plus yards healthy number. So JSN is

1:10:12.600 --> 1:10:15.320
<v Speaker 4>startable even with Metcalf back. But Tyler Lockett is not.

1:10:15.800 --> 1:10:18.240
<v Speaker 4>He's on the bench. Although he scored in the first meeting.

1:10:18.520 --> 1:10:21.080
<v Speaker 4>He's the third fiddle now with Metcalf back in the lineup,

1:10:21.439 --> 1:10:24.559
<v Speaker 4>Noah aj Barner, we're binging both tight ends for Seattle,

1:10:24.920 --> 1:10:27.519
<v Speaker 4>but Gino Smith, I will give a ce Gino Smith,

1:10:27.600 --> 1:10:30.439
<v Speaker 4>by the way, the NFL's leader in passing yards per game,

1:10:30.880 --> 1:10:33.240
<v Speaker 4>the only quarterback over two hundred and eighty yards per game.

1:10:33.320 --> 1:10:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Only one quarterback one other quarterback is over two hundred

1:10:36.200 --> 1:10:40.559
<v Speaker 4>and seventy. Gino had three hundred and twelve yards, one touchdown,

1:10:40.640 --> 1:10:43.400
<v Speaker 4>two interceptions in the first meeting. Kind of feels like

1:10:43.479 --> 1:10:46.760
<v Speaker 4>he could replicate those numbers. The forty nine ers are

1:10:47.040 --> 1:10:49.559
<v Speaker 4>allowing less than two hundred and ten passing yards per game, though,

1:10:49.840 --> 1:10:53.000
<v Speaker 4>and they own an eleven to ten touchdown to interception ratio.

1:10:53.080 --> 1:10:56.559
<v Speaker 4>So a tough matchup, but likely you can start Geno.

1:10:56.600 --> 1:10:58.400
<v Speaker 4>You're certainly starting in super flex, but he could have

1:10:58.439 --> 1:11:01.160
<v Speaker 4>a better option, So a soft seed Gino over to

1:11:01.200 --> 1:11:05.519
<v Speaker 4>the forty nine er side. No c's here, really, a's everywhere.

1:11:05.560 --> 1:11:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Starting with Christian McCaffrey. You've waited forever for him to

1:11:08.439 --> 1:11:11.040
<v Speaker 4>come back. You're definitely starting him against the Seahawks allowing

1:11:11.080 --> 1:11:13.639
<v Speaker 4>more than one hundred and fifty combo yards per game.

1:11:14.200 --> 1:11:16.960
<v Speaker 4>Two running backs over to the passing game. I'm starting

1:11:17.000 --> 1:11:19.840
<v Speaker 4>with George Kittle, Gonna give him an ah, having an

1:11:19.920 --> 1:11:22.439
<v Speaker 4>absolute monster year that no one is giving him enough

1:11:22.479 --> 1:11:22.800
<v Speaker 4>credit for.

1:11:22.880 --> 1:11:25.560
<v Speaker 2>He's top twenty yeah, among wide receivers.

1:11:26.040 --> 1:11:29.840
<v Speaker 5>He's averaging over three Fantasy points per game, above the

1:11:29.960 --> 1:11:31.479
<v Speaker 5>second tight end team block viers.

1:11:31.560 --> 1:11:33.679
<v Speaker 4>He should be in the in the combo for offensive

1:11:33.720 --> 1:11:35.720
<v Speaker 4>player of the year. In my mind, he's in the

1:11:35.800 --> 1:11:38.920
<v Speaker 4>week run blocker as well. He's almost, you know, a

1:11:38.960 --> 1:11:41.880
<v Speaker 4>great offensive lineman. But anyway, five for fifty eight and

1:11:41.960 --> 1:11:44.000
<v Speaker 4>two touchdowns in the first meeting this year, So a

1:11:44.200 --> 1:11:46.920
<v Speaker 4>for Kittle. Going to the wide receivers, I'm not starting

1:11:46.960 --> 1:11:49.400
<v Speaker 4>with Deebo Samuel, I'm starting with Jawan Jennings.

1:11:49.320 --> 1:11:50.519
<v Speaker 3>Baby, he gets an a.

1:11:51.000 --> 1:11:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Your guy just three catches.

1:11:53.280 --> 1:11:55.560
<v Speaker 4>For twenty seven scoreless yards in the first meeting, but

1:11:55.640 --> 1:11:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Brandon Aiyuk was active for that game. In jennings first

1:11:59.200 --> 1:12:01.240
<v Speaker 4>game without you in the lineup, who was out for

1:12:01.280 --> 1:12:04.799
<v Speaker 4>the year, Jennings led all forty nine ers with eleven targets.

1:12:05.200 --> 1:12:08.960
<v Speaker 4>Jennings averages more than two point eight yards per route run.

1:12:09.200 --> 1:12:12.759
<v Speaker 4>That's on par with Justin Jefferson. He's a wide receiver

1:12:12.880 --> 1:12:14.680
<v Speaker 4>one for the remainder of the year. As far as

1:12:14.720 --> 1:12:16.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm concerned, I think we all can agree on that.

1:12:17.479 --> 1:12:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Watch his ankle injury. He does, he has been laboring

1:12:20.120 --> 1:12:22.880
<v Speaker 3>with that through practice. He's gonna play, is expected to play.

1:12:22.920 --> 1:12:24.840
<v Speaker 3>But just keep an eye in Jennings ankle injury. But

1:12:25.000 --> 1:12:26.320
<v Speaker 3>we agree, we love that guy.

1:12:26.680 --> 1:12:28.479
<v Speaker 2>You still gotta love Debo, Go and give him a B.

1:12:28.760 --> 1:12:31.320
<v Speaker 4>Deebo Samuel, of course, one hundred and two yards and

1:12:31.439 --> 1:12:34.400
<v Speaker 4>a touchdown receiving in the first meeting. He also added

1:12:34.479 --> 1:12:37.040
<v Speaker 4>fifteen rushing yards in that game. I mentioned that because

1:12:37.080 --> 1:12:40.320
<v Speaker 4>over his last four games against the Seahawks, Deebo has

1:12:40.400 --> 1:12:42.800
<v Speaker 4>totaled five total touchdowns, two were rushing.

1:12:42.880 --> 1:12:43.800
<v Speaker 2>So a B for Debo.

1:12:44.200 --> 1:12:46.479
<v Speaker 4>Ricky Parisols might take a chance on me wide receiver.

1:12:47.200 --> 1:12:50.800
<v Speaker 4>And do you think I like Brock Party in this game? Hey, yes,

1:12:51.000 --> 1:12:54.320
<v Speaker 4>a grade rock Party, but not two fifty five and

1:12:54.479 --> 1:12:55.559
<v Speaker 4>three in the first meeting.

1:12:56.880 --> 1:12:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's us four good numbers.

1:12:58.400 --> 1:12:59.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, those are good numbers.

1:12:59.240 --> 1:13:00.800
<v Speaker 3>All right. Let's se if we and zip through Colts

1:13:00.840 --> 1:13:03.800
<v Speaker 3>and Jets. Scott for the Colts side. Anthony Richardson's back

1:13:03.840 --> 1:13:06.920
<v Speaker 3>at the Helm. He was not a fantasy factor in

1:13:07.040 --> 1:13:09.639
<v Speaker 3>his first stint as a starter for the Colts.

1:13:09.840 --> 1:13:12.960
<v Speaker 5>No, I have the entire Indianapolis Colts passing game on

1:13:13.120 --> 1:13:16.280
<v Speaker 5>the bench in this one. The Jets d has allowed

1:13:16.360 --> 1:13:21.720
<v Speaker 5>the sorry Anthony Richardson's season high in passyards this year

1:13:22.120 --> 1:13:25.479
<v Speaker 5>two twelve, with an average well below two hundred. It's

1:13:25.560 --> 1:13:28.040
<v Speaker 5>the forty plus yard rushing average that you're clinging to,

1:13:28.200 --> 1:13:30.640
<v Speaker 5>but it's nothing where it was last year and no

1:13:30.880 --> 1:13:34.080
<v Speaker 5>rushing scores. We wondered going into the season if Jonathan

1:13:34.120 --> 1:13:37.719
<v Speaker 5>Taylor would affect that part of his game. And Taylor

1:13:37.840 --> 1:13:41.360
<v Speaker 5>leads the NFL on inside the five touches per game. Wow,

1:13:41.439 --> 1:13:44.759
<v Speaker 5>so yes, it affected that. So over to Jonathan Taylor.

1:13:45.120 --> 1:13:47.880
<v Speaker 5>The Jets are allowing the fifth most rushing touches touch

1:13:48.000 --> 1:13:52.120
<v Speaker 5>it touches the tenth most rush yards. Teams kind of

1:13:52.200 --> 1:13:54.559
<v Speaker 5>have to turn there because they can't pass on the Jets.

1:13:54.920 --> 1:13:57.840
<v Speaker 5>Taylor himself averaging twenty touches per game for one hundred

1:13:57.840 --> 1:13:59.920
<v Speaker 5>and four yards twenty plus in four The last five

1:14:00.520 --> 1:14:02.880
<v Speaker 5>similar volume backs had one hundred and fifty two yards

1:14:02.920 --> 1:14:04.800
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and two hundred and fifty two hundred two

1:14:05.280 --> 1:14:08.400
<v Speaker 5>wow two to sixty five and one oh six, So

1:14:08.760 --> 1:14:11.680
<v Speaker 5>a lot of volume from twenty plus touch It's not

1:14:11.840 --> 1:14:15.000
<v Speaker 5>a slam dunk a grade because the Jets are boasting

1:14:15.080 --> 1:14:18.120
<v Speaker 5>good numbers and yards per carry allowed only seven scores

1:14:18.120 --> 1:14:21.200
<v Speaker 5>allowed on the season, but twenty plus touchbacks get there,

1:14:21.240 --> 1:14:23.400
<v Speaker 5>and Jonathan Taylor is one of those. So it's only

1:14:23.439 --> 1:14:26.080
<v Speaker 5>a B grade here. As if you're wondering about the

1:14:26.160 --> 1:14:30.880
<v Speaker 5>other pass catchers, Michael Pittman, since uh, Michael Pittman sensed

1:14:30.960 --> 1:14:33.599
<v Speaker 5>his back injury that he's been dealing with, we're looking

1:14:33.640 --> 1:14:36.599
<v Speaker 5>at thirty five yards, sixty three yards, sixteen and fourteen,

1:14:36.640 --> 1:14:39.040
<v Speaker 5>and then he missed a game. I can't give I

1:14:39.120 --> 1:14:41.360
<v Speaker 5>can't give him a grade against the top five defense

1:14:41.439 --> 1:14:43.360
<v Speaker 5>in receptions, yards and scores a lot of to wide

1:14:43.400 --> 1:14:47.680
<v Speaker 5>receivers Alec Pierce, same deal he has. He's got a

1:14:47.880 --> 1:14:50.559
<v Speaker 5>two big games, but otherwise it's like one big catch

1:14:50.600 --> 1:14:51.240
<v Speaker 5>a game and that's it.

1:14:51.360 --> 1:14:52.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and this is the Jets defense.

1:14:52.960 --> 1:14:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Yes, let's just moved. Let's just move.

1:14:55.080 --> 1:14:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Josh Downs is great, but that's also a tough matchup

1:14:57.280 --> 1:14:58.320
<v Speaker 3>in the slot against my mind.

1:14:58.200 --> 1:15:00.599
<v Speaker 5>And he's terrible with Richardson except for the one game

1:15:00.680 --> 1:15:04.880
<v Speaker 5>we didn't see commedians. Right over to the Jet side,

1:15:04.920 --> 1:15:08.320
<v Speaker 5>Aaron Rodgers C grade. Before last week, Rogers had multiple

1:15:08.320 --> 1:15:11.439
<v Speaker 5>scores in five straight you know, overall, seven multiple score

1:15:11.479 --> 1:15:13.720
<v Speaker 5>games out of the ten. But the yardage is like

1:15:13.760 --> 1:15:16.479
<v Speaker 5>two and twenty five a game, so he needs the scores.

1:15:17.040 --> 1:15:19.439
<v Speaker 5>The Colts have allowed the fifth most yards, but they've

1:15:19.479 --> 1:15:22.840
<v Speaker 5>only allowed five scores of the last six games.

1:15:22.880 --> 1:15:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Here.

1:15:23.840 --> 1:15:25.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't I just I only have a C grade

1:15:25.760 --> 1:15:28.120
<v Speaker 5>on Aaron Rodgers here he could get it, though he

1:15:28.200 --> 1:15:30.280
<v Speaker 5>could get a B grade. I suppose I have a

1:15:30.400 --> 1:15:33.160
<v Speaker 5>B plus grade on Garrett Wilson in a B minus

1:15:33.240 --> 1:15:36.479
<v Speaker 5>grade on DeVonta Adams. What I mean, Well, they're both

1:15:36.560 --> 1:15:39.600
<v Speaker 5>B grades, but Garrett Wilson is clearly well above it

1:15:40.360 --> 1:15:42.520
<v Speaker 5>and DeVante Adams is clearly.

1:15:42.560 --> 1:15:45.000
<v Speaker 3>WE got rules here. We operate under rules. Scott.

1:15:45.080 --> 1:15:48.120
<v Speaker 5>You know that Garrett Wilson has tied for the NFL

1:15:48.200 --> 1:15:51.519
<v Speaker 5>league in lead in red zone targets. Six wide receivers

1:15:51.520 --> 1:15:53.280
<v Speaker 5>in the last three weeks have gone for eighty plus

1:15:53.400 --> 1:15:56.439
<v Speaker 5>and or a score against the Colts, who are allowing

1:15:56.479 --> 1:15:58.519
<v Speaker 5>the seventh most yards to wide receivers. So I like

1:15:58.600 --> 1:16:01.080
<v Speaker 5>them both, but Wilson I like a whole lot more.

1:16:01.240 --> 1:16:05.240
<v Speaker 5>Five plus catches in all but one game. Wilson does

1:16:05.320 --> 1:16:07.920
<v Speaker 5>get the tougher matchup against Jalen Jones, who had two

1:16:08.000 --> 1:16:10.760
<v Speaker 5>picks last week. Hasn't allow to score all year, a

1:16:10.880 --> 1:16:14.200
<v Speaker 5>fifty two percent completion against fifty seven rating against. But

1:16:14.320 --> 1:16:17.880
<v Speaker 5>Davante Adams has not been getting the yardage despite seeing

1:16:17.920 --> 1:16:20.320
<v Speaker 5>the target volume, and he's dealing with an illness and

1:16:20.520 --> 1:16:23.519
<v Speaker 5>a wrist injury. But those ten targets per game, I

1:16:23.640 --> 1:16:25.680
<v Speaker 5>love that. I love the connection with Rodgers, and he's

1:16:25.760 --> 1:16:28.559
<v Speaker 5>gained forty percent of the end zone targets with Rogers.

1:16:28.920 --> 1:16:31.360
<v Speaker 5>He's just not getting the scores of the volume just yet.

1:16:31.479 --> 1:16:34.080
<v Speaker 5>But I still got a B grade on him. Breese

1:16:34.080 --> 1:16:37.040
<v Speaker 5>Hall B grade on him. He's been between eighty and

1:16:37.160 --> 1:16:40.519
<v Speaker 5>ninety yards and fourteen to seventeen touches three straight, you know,

1:16:40.600 --> 1:16:43.600
<v Speaker 5>the games with DeVante Adams, but just one score, and

1:16:43.680 --> 1:16:46.600
<v Speaker 5>that is partly due to Rogers being top five in

1:16:46.760 --> 1:16:49.960
<v Speaker 5>red zone and inside the five pass attempts. When he

1:16:50.040 --> 1:16:52.240
<v Speaker 5>gets down there, he's not headed off. He wants to find.

1:16:52.439 --> 1:16:55.840
<v Speaker 5>He wants to find those scores. So he's taking those opportunities,

1:16:56.000 --> 1:16:59.160
<v Speaker 5>as is Braylan Allen, who's taking seven to ten touches

1:16:59.200 --> 1:17:02.200
<v Speaker 5>and being super inefficient with them. He's on the bench

1:17:02.240 --> 1:17:06.719
<v Speaker 5>because since we two that game, he scored twice super inefficient.

1:17:06.840 --> 1:17:09.800
<v Speaker 5>In fact, he ranked second worst in rushing over expectation,

1:17:10.720 --> 1:17:14.840
<v Speaker 5>barely beating out Zamir White. We thought he looked good,

1:17:15.040 --> 1:17:17.439
<v Speaker 5>I just said everything, but he's been bad, so he's

1:17:17.520 --> 1:17:19.280
<v Speaker 5>on the bench. Be great for Hall if you miss that.

1:17:19.640 --> 1:17:22.200
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's take a break. When we come back

1:17:22.560 --> 1:17:24.960
<v Speaker 3>premature speculation, We'll give you some players you'll want to

1:17:24.960 --> 1:17:27.360
<v Speaker 3>pick up now that other people will be trying to

1:17:27.400 --> 1:17:29.599
<v Speaker 3>pick up next week. They'll already be on your lot

1:17:29.760 --> 1:17:35.200
<v Speaker 3>in your roster. And the best extra divisional rivalry in football,

1:17:35.479 --> 1:17:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs Bills bring down that game. When we come back

1:17:39.280 --> 1:18:01.719
<v Speaker 3>Fantasy Football Weekly, I'll save in a Fantasy Football Weekly,

1:18:02.000 --> 1:18:06.240
<v Speaker 3>we start by jumping into the FFW time machine for

1:18:06.400 --> 1:18:09.439
<v Speaker 3>premature speculation. Guys you want to pick up now that

1:18:09.520 --> 1:18:11.120
<v Speaker 3>others will be trying to pick up next week. We

1:18:11.240 --> 1:18:12.160
<v Speaker 3>begin with Scott Fish.

1:18:12.320 --> 1:18:12.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:18:12.640 --> 1:18:14.560
<v Speaker 5>Since I'm such a rule breaker today, I'm gonna go

1:18:14.600 --> 1:18:17.160
<v Speaker 5>with two of them. I'm going with Juju Smith Schuster

1:18:17.240 --> 1:18:19.519
<v Speaker 5>of the Kansas City Chiefs taking a shot that he

1:18:19.720 --> 1:18:22.479
<v Speaker 5>becomes that seven for one hundred and thirty yard guy

1:18:22.600 --> 1:18:25.720
<v Speaker 5>that overtook the Rashi Rice Roll earlier in the year

1:18:26.400 --> 1:18:29.880
<v Speaker 5>thirteen percent rostered and the second one Davis Allen, just

1:18:30.040 --> 1:18:33.519
<v Speaker 5>two percent roster. His snap percentages have gone from four

1:18:33.600 --> 1:18:36.000
<v Speaker 5>to twenty two to thirty nine to fifty five to

1:18:36.240 --> 1:18:39.720
<v Speaker 5>eighty percent. Last week he had five for thirty six

1:18:39.800 --> 1:18:41.880
<v Speaker 5>on six targets. He's got four red zone targets in

1:18:41.920 --> 1:18:43.880
<v Speaker 5>the last two weeks. He's taken over that Rams tight

1:18:43.960 --> 1:18:44.280
<v Speaker 5>end role.

1:18:44.400 --> 1:18:47.719
<v Speaker 3>Rams tight end Davis Allen. Yeah, premature speculation, player, Brian.

1:18:47.800 --> 1:18:49.200
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna stay with the Rams and go with their

1:18:49.240 --> 1:18:52.720
<v Speaker 4>backup rookie rookie running back Blake Korum. I mentioned him

1:18:52.720 --> 1:18:55.920
<v Speaker 4>because Kyen Williams he handles ninety percent of the snaps,

1:18:55.920 --> 1:18:58.120
<v Speaker 4>but if something were to happen to Karen Williams, Blake

1:18:58.200 --> 1:19:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Korum would step right into that workload. No other backup

1:19:01.240 --> 1:19:03.559
<v Speaker 4>running back could say the same. Really in the league

1:19:03.640 --> 1:19:06.120
<v Speaker 4>right now in the Rams have a top five schedule

1:19:06.200 --> 1:19:08.640
<v Speaker 4>remaining for running backs in terms of how easy it is,

1:19:08.760 --> 1:19:09.759
<v Speaker 4>So go grab.

1:19:09.680 --> 1:19:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Korum if you have been an open spot.

1:19:11.040 --> 1:19:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna push some booty at you. Kayshawn Bouti dismissed

1:19:15.400 --> 1:19:19.680
<v Speaker 3>earlier in this show by Brian Johnson, he dismissed. But

1:19:19.800 --> 1:19:22.680
<v Speaker 3>if you think Drake May is an improving passer, like

1:19:22.800 --> 1:19:25.679
<v Speaker 3>I do, know this, over the past three weeks, Kaishan

1:19:25.720 --> 1:19:29.719
<v Speaker 3>Butte has turned into Bouti has turned into May's most

1:19:29.840 --> 1:19:33.800
<v Speaker 3>targeted receiver. Jalen Polk's dropping off a lot. I don't

1:19:33.800 --> 1:19:36.680
<v Speaker 3>know that he's a special player, but somebody's gonna get

1:19:36.680 --> 1:19:39.120
<v Speaker 3>paid if Drake May keeps getting better, and I think

1:19:39.280 --> 1:19:40.599
<v Speaker 3>it's Kaishawn Bouti.

1:19:41.080 --> 1:19:41.400
<v Speaker 5>I like it.

1:19:41.479 --> 1:19:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the Chiefs taking on the Bills. This

1:19:44.160 --> 1:19:46.680
<v Speaker 3>is the best extra divisional rivalry in football. And I'm

1:19:46.720 --> 1:19:49.240
<v Speaker 3>going to begin with Travis Kelcey, who's an obvious a.

1:19:49.680 --> 1:19:52.960
<v Speaker 3>He scored twice in the January meeting between these two teams.

1:19:53.360 --> 1:19:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Moving on to trickier matchups, DeAndre Hopkins gets pushed to

1:19:57.080 --> 1:20:00.320
<v Speaker 3>the outside with the return of Juju Smith Schuster, and

1:20:00.439 --> 1:20:03.879
<v Speaker 3>there he's got a tough matchup against Christian Bentford, Russeuell Douglass.

1:20:04.240 --> 1:20:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Those guys are very good. Benford Ranks is profo about focus,

1:20:07.479 --> 1:20:11.080
<v Speaker 3>is fourteenth best cornerback, and Douglas is nearly as good.

1:20:11.360 --> 1:20:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Hopkins had a huge game two weeks ago that was

1:20:13.080 --> 1:20:16.320
<v Speaker 3>against a very bad Tampa secondary. This is a much

1:20:16.360 --> 1:20:19.240
<v Speaker 3>tougher one, and he's only a C grade. Juju also

1:20:19.320 --> 1:20:21.320
<v Speaker 3>comes in with C grade. He's gonna run from the

1:20:21.360 --> 1:20:23.880
<v Speaker 3>slot a lot if what we saw a month ago

1:20:24.040 --> 1:20:26.880
<v Speaker 3>is any indication in his one game as a starter there.

1:20:27.240 --> 1:20:30.000
<v Speaker 3>And he's got a nice matchup against Bill's slot corner

1:20:30.080 --> 1:20:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Tarron Johnson. Johnson giving up an eighty percent completion rate,

1:20:33.640 --> 1:20:35.800
<v Speaker 3>sixth worst among all cornerbacks, and he gave up a

1:20:35.840 --> 1:20:38.639
<v Speaker 3>touchdown last week as well. And then there's Xavier Worthy,

1:20:38.680 --> 1:20:41.840
<v Speaker 3>who I'm just I'm completely done with him. Thor's thorn

1:20:41.920 --> 1:20:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Eistrom's worries about Worthy have turned out to be completely true.

1:20:45.040 --> 1:20:47.960
<v Speaker 3>He is an all or nothing fantasy vertical route runner

1:20:47.960 --> 1:20:51.320
<v Speaker 3>who needs long bomb completions. And here's the real clincher

1:20:51.360 --> 1:20:53.240
<v Speaker 3>to leave Worthy on your bench this week for a

1:20:53.280 --> 1:20:56.120
<v Speaker 3>guy who needs long bombs. The Bills allow the second

1:20:56.280 --> 1:21:00.320
<v Speaker 3>shortest average completion in the league. So Xavier Worthy on

1:21:00.520 --> 1:21:03.400
<v Speaker 3>our benches, and that leaves us in the passing game

1:21:03.439 --> 1:21:07.439
<v Speaker 3>with just Patrick dump off Mahomes. He's quarterback thirteen on

1:21:07.520 --> 1:21:10.400
<v Speaker 3>the season. He's averaging barely one touchdown pass per game.

1:21:11.080 --> 1:21:13.360
<v Speaker 3>At the Buffalo's I've already talked about a good, not great,

1:21:13.400 --> 1:21:16.280
<v Speaker 3>but a good secondary, and just the explosiveness is missing

1:21:16.360 --> 1:21:19.400
<v Speaker 3>from the Chiefs offense and it's reflected in mahomes average

1:21:19.439 --> 1:21:23.240
<v Speaker 3>depth of target. On the season, Mahomes is twentieth in

1:21:23.400 --> 1:21:25.800
<v Speaker 3>a DOT and over the past month he's all the

1:21:25.800 --> 1:21:28.880
<v Speaker 3>way down to twenty six. These short passes just don't

1:21:28.880 --> 1:21:32.440
<v Speaker 3>help the fantasy game. And then just scream Hunt really languishing.

1:21:32.560 --> 1:21:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Is a runner just averaging just three point six yards

1:21:35.280 --> 1:21:39.280
<v Speaker 3>per carry, but so much volume that it's become really

1:21:39.439 --> 1:21:42.600
<v Speaker 3>fantasy viable in almost every game because he gets the

1:21:42.640 --> 1:21:45.519
<v Speaker 3>ball so much. Since becoming the starter, Hunt leads all

1:21:45.640 --> 1:21:49.479
<v Speaker 3>backs in rushes per game at twenty two and fortunately

1:21:49.520 --> 1:21:52.080
<v Speaker 3>against Buffalo runners who have at least eighteen carries are

1:21:52.120 --> 1:21:54.720
<v Speaker 3>averaging one hundred and thirty yards in almost a full

1:21:54.920 --> 1:21:58.400
<v Speaker 3>touchdown per game. So a B grade on Kareem Hunt.

1:21:58.680 --> 1:22:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's go over to the Buffalo side. I told you

1:22:00.720 --> 1:22:03.400
<v Speaker 3>earlier in the show. Dawson Knox may take a chance

1:22:03.479 --> 1:22:06.080
<v Speaker 3>on receiver, Take a chance on me, receiver, love him here.

1:22:06.880 --> 1:22:09.280
<v Speaker 3>The other receivers is a little bit trickier. On Khalil

1:22:09.400 --> 1:22:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Shakir has been exceptionally safe in PPR formats because he's

1:22:13.120 --> 1:22:15.519
<v Speaker 3>been good for six or seven catches for fifty or

1:22:15.560 --> 1:22:19.360
<v Speaker 3>sixty yards in every game. The bill slot receiver is

1:22:19.479 --> 1:22:21.840
<v Speaker 3>more effective when he doesn't have to carry the passing game.

1:22:21.880 --> 1:22:23.280
<v Speaker 3>And I do worry a little bit about that here

1:22:23.280 --> 1:22:25.600
<v Speaker 3>because Keon Coleman's not gonna go Dalton Kin Kaid's not

1:22:25.680 --> 1:22:29.639
<v Speaker 3>going to go Shakier becomes a focus of the passing game,

1:22:29.720 --> 1:22:31.720
<v Speaker 3>and I don't always know that that he's able to

1:22:31.800 --> 1:22:34.920
<v Speaker 3>carry that. Fortunately, Kansas City gives up the second highest

1:22:34.920 --> 1:22:38.240
<v Speaker 3>percentage of Fantasy points to the slot. Well, that's good

1:22:38.360 --> 1:22:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Khalil Shakir play. So he's a C grade. If I

1:22:40.720 --> 1:22:43.000
<v Speaker 3>didn't say Dawson Knox B grade, he's a B grade.

1:22:43.320 --> 1:22:44.599
<v Speaker 5>And I'm take a chance.

1:22:44.880 --> 1:22:46.040
<v Speaker 3>You might take a chance with me play, So I

1:22:46.120 --> 1:22:48.760
<v Speaker 3>do like him. My bench player around the bench is

1:22:48.840 --> 1:22:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Amari Cooper. I just don't know how much we can

1:22:51.000 --> 1:22:53.519
<v Speaker 3>trust him yet because we just haven't seen him healthy

1:22:53.800 --> 1:22:56.639
<v Speaker 3>in a full role with this offense, and I worry

1:22:56.640 --> 1:22:59.639
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna get shadow coverage from excellent cornerback Trent McDuffie.

1:23:00.160 --> 1:23:02.320
<v Speaker 3>In his coverage, he gives up just two catches for

1:23:02.479 --> 1:23:05.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine yards, although weirdly, mcduffey's given up touchdowns in

1:23:05.840 --> 1:23:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the back to back games, which is not normally like him.

1:23:08.680 --> 1:23:10.840
<v Speaker 3>And then where does that leave us with Josh Allen?

1:23:11.800 --> 1:23:14.759
<v Speaker 3>In the playoff matchup last January, Kansas City held Josh

1:23:14.880 --> 1:23:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Allen to just one hundred and eighty six passing yards

1:23:17.160 --> 1:23:19.799
<v Speaker 3>and one touchdown, but he ran in two scores. Kansas

1:23:19.840 --> 1:23:22.519
<v Speaker 3>City's given up some big quarterback rushing days, so Josh

1:23:22.560 --> 1:23:24.640
<v Speaker 3>could help with his legs. Don't love most of his

1:23:24.760 --> 1:23:27.559
<v Speaker 3>receiving options. I've got a B grade on Josh Allen

1:23:28.040 --> 1:23:29.600
<v Speaker 3>in this one. Let's hope he can run for a

1:23:29.640 --> 1:23:31.920
<v Speaker 3>little bit more than what I like his receivers to do.

1:23:32.240 --> 1:23:35.840
<v Speaker 3>And then the lastly, James Cook a brutal matchup against

1:23:35.880 --> 1:23:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Kansas Kansas City run defense that is starting to look

1:23:38.560 --> 1:23:41.640
<v Speaker 3>historically great, giving up just fifty two rushing yards per

1:23:41.720 --> 1:23:45.200
<v Speaker 3>game three point two yards per carry. They rank fourth

1:23:45.240 --> 1:23:49.200
<v Speaker 3>in run defense success rate. Where Cook typically spikes is

1:23:49.280 --> 1:23:51.560
<v Speaker 3>in blowout wins. And I don't think we're going to

1:23:51.600 --> 1:23:55.240
<v Speaker 3>get a blowout win against an undefeated Chiefs team here.

1:23:55.800 --> 1:23:57.519
<v Speaker 3>I can only get you to a B grade on Cook,

1:23:57.560 --> 1:24:00.680
<v Speaker 3>and I really strongly considered a seed grade, Brian, you've

1:24:00.720 --> 1:24:03.439
<v Speaker 3>got our final matchup. It's Houston taking on Dallas.

1:24:04.080 --> 1:24:05.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we probably should have closed with the your game

1:24:05.920 --> 1:24:09.240
<v Speaker 4>because this one is not nearly as interesting. To be honest,

1:24:09.280 --> 1:24:12.280
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be a Monday night stinker. But apparently

1:24:12.360 --> 1:24:14.479
<v Speaker 4>they can flex Monday night games now, which they should.

1:24:14.560 --> 1:24:16.240
<v Speaker 3>They should have not here, but for now we're.

1:24:16.080 --> 1:24:17.800
<v Speaker 4>Stuck with this on Monday Night. Let's start with the

1:24:17.840 --> 1:24:19.839
<v Speaker 4>Houston side and Joe Mixon.

1:24:20.360 --> 1:24:21.479
<v Speaker 2>Easy A for Joe.

1:24:21.960 --> 1:24:24.400
<v Speaker 4>The Cowboys are one of the biggest run funnels in

1:24:24.479 --> 1:24:27.559
<v Speaker 4>the league. Over the last four games, Dallas has yielded

1:24:27.600 --> 1:24:30.639
<v Speaker 4>more than twenty seven rush attempts per game to running backs,

1:24:30.960 --> 1:24:33.400
<v Speaker 4>who have averaged nearly one hundred and thirty rushing yards

1:24:33.479 --> 1:24:34.120
<v Speaker 4>during that span.

1:24:34.680 --> 1:24:35.799
<v Speaker 2>So easy a for mixing.

1:24:35.960 --> 1:24:38.360
<v Speaker 4>But that's why Dariogunbawale was your take a chance to

1:24:38.400 --> 1:24:40.599
<v Speaker 4>be running back Charch and I agree. They're not gonna

1:24:40.680 --> 1:24:42.519
<v Speaker 4>need mixing for a full game, one would think, and

1:24:42.560 --> 1:24:44.200
<v Speaker 4>they want to save them a little bit for the

1:24:44.240 --> 1:24:47.160
<v Speaker 4>playoff stretch. So Ogunbawalle viable in this game.

1:24:47.200 --> 1:24:47.639
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

1:24:48.200 --> 1:24:52.320
<v Speaker 4>Nico Collins will be viable. Thankfully, he will play, so

1:24:52.760 --> 1:24:55.800
<v Speaker 4>he and Tanked'll get a B b here kind of

1:24:55.880 --> 1:24:58.360
<v Speaker 4>just for volume concerns, but it is a good matchup

1:24:58.439 --> 1:25:01.280
<v Speaker 4>on paper. Since Week five, Dallas has allowed the ninth

1:25:01.360 --> 1:25:04.120
<v Speaker 4>most receiving yards per game in the eighth most fantasy

1:25:04.200 --> 1:25:06.600
<v Speaker 4>points per game to perimeter wide out. So it be

1:25:07.120 --> 1:25:10.360
<v Speaker 4>for Nico and Tank Dell Sadly, I have Dalton Schultz

1:25:10.400 --> 1:25:12.719
<v Speaker 4>on the bench in a revenge game against his old team,

1:25:13.240 --> 1:25:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Dallas allowing just three catches and forty two yards per

1:25:16.360 --> 1:25:18.479
<v Speaker 4>game to tight end. So Schultz is on the bench

1:25:18.600 --> 1:25:21.320
<v Speaker 4>even in the wasteland, and I will give CJ. Stroud

1:25:21.360 --> 1:25:24.080
<v Speaker 4>to see now that Nico says he will play. Dallas

1:25:24.120 --> 1:25:27.280
<v Speaker 4>has allowed multiple passing touchdowns in four of their last

1:25:27.520 --> 1:25:30.200
<v Speaker 4>five games. But again, game script a bit of a

1:25:30.280 --> 1:25:33.519
<v Speaker 4>concern here, but Stroud is startable but not an elite

1:25:33.520 --> 1:25:38.479
<v Speaker 4>option by any means. Over the Dallas side, not elite options.

1:25:38.560 --> 1:25:43.519
<v Speaker 4>Tom Rico Dowbell the softest of seas for the back

1:25:43.560 --> 1:25:46.880
<v Speaker 4>who projects to be the lead back for Dallas. He's

1:25:46.920 --> 1:25:49.000
<v Speaker 4>basically the only running back on roster who is in

1:25:49.240 --> 1:25:52.400
<v Speaker 4>dust at this point when we're talking Dalvin Cook, Ezekiel Elliott,

1:25:53.400 --> 1:25:54.120
<v Speaker 4>Leonard Fournette.

1:25:54.120 --> 1:25:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Is he a cowboy yet.

1:25:55.240 --> 1:25:56.559
<v Speaker 5>Was tried out with him this week.

1:25:56.600 --> 1:25:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think.

1:25:57.520 --> 1:26:00.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't think I would start you got fish over.

1:26:01.240 --> 1:26:03.679
<v Speaker 4>I'm starting Rico Daddle still with the Sea, but again

1:26:03.800 --> 1:26:07.040
<v Speaker 4>awful matchup. He is a warm body. If you need one,

1:26:07.240 --> 1:26:08.519
<v Speaker 4>doubt all is your dude.

1:26:09.000 --> 1:26:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Ceedee Lamb.

1:26:10.040 --> 1:26:13.760
<v Speaker 4>We're not sabotage dropping him yet he gets a Sea

1:26:13.840 --> 1:26:16.559
<v Speaker 4>in this one. He'll get peppered with, peppered with targets

1:26:16.680 --> 1:26:20.360
<v Speaker 4>as he did last week forty target share, but they

1:26:20.400 --> 1:26:23.880
<v Speaker 4>will be of poor quality from Cooper Rush or Tray

1:26:24.040 --> 1:26:26.599
<v Speaker 4>End or Trey Lance. We might see some Trey Lance

1:26:26.640 --> 1:26:29.760
<v Speaker 4>in this game. Hopefully garbage time can save us c

1:26:29.920 --> 1:26:32.080
<v Speaker 4>ed here. We know the sun won't be a factor

1:26:32.360 --> 1:26:34.000
<v Speaker 4>for Ceedee Lamb on Monday night.

1:26:34.080 --> 1:26:34.680
<v Speaker 2>So he got that.

1:26:35.400 --> 1:26:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Yes, my squinting, my Jonathan Mingo joke bombed and take

1:26:40.160 --> 1:26:42.080
<v Speaker 4>a chance on me, but not taking a chance on

1:26:42.240 --> 1:26:47.240
<v Speaker 4>Mingo or Jim.

1:26:45.479 --> 1:26:47.920
<v Speaker 2>One day, am I ng O? No, He's He's never

1:26:47.960 --> 1:26:51.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna be startled. I'm still laughing at that trade man,

1:26:51.160 --> 1:26:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Jerry Jones. Something else.

1:26:52.240 --> 1:26:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Jake ferguson a tight end. You think you could trust

1:26:55.120 --> 1:26:58.320
<v Speaker 4>every week, can't trust him this week unfortunately, with Cooper

1:26:58.400 --> 1:27:00.439
<v Speaker 4>Rush at quarterback and I'll throw the out there for

1:27:00.560 --> 1:27:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Jake Ferguson, sadly one of only two players who have

1:27:03.760 --> 1:27:07.280
<v Speaker 4>more than fifty targets on the season and zero receiving touchdowns.

1:27:07.320 --> 1:27:12.360
<v Speaker 4>The other Trey McBride why sixty five targets, zero touchdowns

1:27:12.720 --> 1:27:16.919
<v Speaker 4>and last league Cooper Rush. Oh no, slash Trey Lance. Probably,

1:27:17.200 --> 1:27:17.920
<v Speaker 4>I would start.

1:27:17.760 --> 1:27:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Trey Lance first, even though he's not the starter, in

1:27:21.000 --> 1:27:24.000
<v Speaker 3>the hopes that Trey Lance relieves Cooper Rush and then

1:27:24.120 --> 1:27:25.759
<v Speaker 3>runs ye for a bunch of success.

1:27:26.400 --> 1:27:29.320
<v Speaker 4>You're in a Dynasty Empire league or even a super

1:27:29.360 --> 1:27:31.320
<v Speaker 4>Flex league, Go grab Trey Lance.

1:27:31.360 --> 1:27:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Why not.

1:27:32.040 --> 1:27:33.559
<v Speaker 4>They're going to take an extended look at him at

1:27:33.600 --> 1:27:36.000
<v Speaker 4>some point, doubts he would think. So if he's out there,

1:27:36.120 --> 1:27:36.559
<v Speaker 4>go get him.

1:27:36.720 --> 1:27:40.719
<v Speaker 5>Great show, guys. I don't do this often, but Fatas

1:27:40.720 --> 1:27:43.120
<v Speaker 5>Secures dot org is a charity I run. Yeah, we

1:27:43.280 --> 1:27:45.519
<v Speaker 5>love it. We got toy shopping coming up. We're gonna

1:27:45.680 --> 1:27:48.639
<v Speaker 5>spend tens hundred over well over one hundred thousand dollars

1:27:49.000 --> 1:27:52.519
<v Speaker 5>twenty thirty different cities. But fantasycres dot org. You can

1:27:52.600 --> 1:27:55.919
<v Speaker 5>donate there. Try to convince your league to add add

1:27:56.000 --> 1:28:00.240
<v Speaker 5>some charity to their charitable element, to their lead absolutely, dude, Yeah,

1:28:00.320 --> 1:28:00.519
<v Speaker 5>do it.

1:28:00.760 --> 1:28:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Everybody throws in an extra ten bucks.

1:28:03.160 --> 1:28:05.080
<v Speaker 5>It adds up, it really does, and we can do

1:28:05.160 --> 1:28:05.960
<v Speaker 5>a ton of good with it.

1:28:06.080 --> 1:28:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Absolutely. Fantasycares dot com also dot org. Yeah, thank you,

1:28:09.840 --> 1:28:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Santasycarees dot Org. Joining Gullotine League.

1:28:13.800 --> 1:28:14.400
<v Speaker 5>It's not too late.

1:28:14.600 --> 1:28:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Eight weeks of guillotine action available for you. There's still

1:28:19.000 --> 1:28:21.560
<v Speaker 3>plenty of time to join a free or paid Guillotine

1:28:21.720 --> 1:28:24.160
<v Speaker 3>league with friends or strangers. However you want to play.

1:28:24.200 --> 1:28:26.080
<v Speaker 3>You can do it at guillotine leagues dot com.

1:28:26.160 --> 1:28:29.559
<v Speaker 5>We got twenty seconds left at Scottfish on Blue Sky.

1:28:29.720 --> 1:28:31.960
<v Speaker 5>The fantasy community on Blue Sky is blowing up right

1:28:32.040 --> 1:28:33.920
<v Speaker 5>now at Scottfish one.

1:28:33.600 --> 1:28:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Scottfish Blue Sky. There you go. Thanks everybody. We'll talk

1:28:36.200 --> 1:28:38.559
<v Speaker 3>to you next week. Best of luck in week number eleven.