WEBVTT - How Senators and NFL Players Make High Risk Decisions

0:00:15.604 --> 0:00:16.084
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:21.604 --> 0:00:24.884
<v Speaker 2>Hey, the election's over. We tried not to overdose on

0:00:25.084 --> 0:00:28.404
<v Speaker 2>it too much, but we are genuinely curious what you

0:00:28.404 --> 0:00:30.284
<v Speaker 2>want to hear from us on Do you want more politics?

0:00:30.324 --> 0:00:31.844
<v Speaker 2>Do you want more sports? You want more poker, you

0:00:31.844 --> 0:00:35.124
<v Speaker 2>want more AI? Do you like the interview segments with guests?

0:00:35.524 --> 0:00:37.524
<v Speaker 2>Do you like when Marie and I disagree? Or do

0:00:37.564 --> 0:00:40.204
<v Speaker 2>you like more agreement? Or what is working for you

0:00:40.364 --> 0:00:43.764
<v Speaker 2>and what isn't. We would like you to send us

0:00:43.804 --> 0:00:48.044
<v Speaker 2>an email with feedback to Risky Business all one word

0:00:48.444 --> 0:00:58.524
<v Speaker 2>at pushkin dot fm. That's risky Business at Pushkin dot fm.

0:00:58.644 --> 0:01:01.844
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making better decisions.

0:01:02.164 --> 0:01:04.164
<v Speaker 1>I'm Maria Kannakova and.

0:01:04.124 --> 0:01:04.844
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nate Silver.

0:01:05.924 --> 0:01:09.404
<v Speaker 1>So today on the show, we are going to revisit

0:01:09.444 --> 0:01:13.284
<v Speaker 1>a Trump's cabinet picks. I say revisit because last week

0:01:13.484 --> 0:01:17.044
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the first cabinet picks and they've gotten

0:01:17.124 --> 0:01:19.964
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more extreme since then. So we're going

0:01:20.044 --> 0:01:22.324
<v Speaker 1>to go into the game theory of the confirmation process

0:01:22.404 --> 0:01:25.444
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate, what it means to cooperate and defect,

0:01:25.524 --> 0:01:28.164
<v Speaker 1>and how we think these confirmations might play out.

0:01:28.324 --> 0:01:31.764
<v Speaker 2>And then let's turn to the NFL where guardian caps

0:01:31.844 --> 0:01:33.764
<v Speaker 2>are now being compared on the field. These are things

0:01:33.804 --> 0:01:37.644
<v Speaker 2>that look a little gofy but protect you from concussions

0:01:37.684 --> 0:01:41.204
<v Speaker 2>much more effectively than a helmet alone. Very few players

0:01:41.244 --> 0:01:44.364
<v Speaker 2>are wearing means despite their medical benefit. We'll talk about

0:01:44.444 --> 0:01:46.764
<v Speaker 2>why and what the game theory equilibriums are there.

0:01:56.004 --> 0:02:00.164
<v Speaker 1>So let's get into it and start with your favorite topic,

0:02:00.284 --> 0:02:04.604
<v Speaker 1>Nate politics. Even though the elections are now behind us,

0:02:04.644 --> 0:02:07.604
<v Speaker 1>that does not mean we get to abandon the politics.

0:02:07.684 --> 0:02:11.204
<v Speaker 1>Fe you are not allowed to retire. We are still

0:02:11.484 --> 0:02:15.524
<v Speaker 1>talking about what's going to happen with this future administration

0:02:15.964 --> 0:02:19.164
<v Speaker 1>Trump two point zero. You know, last week when we

0:02:19.164 --> 0:02:22.604
<v Speaker 1>were talking about cabinet picks, one of the first picks

0:02:22.684 --> 0:02:26.404
<v Speaker 1>was Marco Rubio, and you know, we we talked about

0:02:26.404 --> 0:02:28.204
<v Speaker 1>that and it seemed like, okay, you know, this isn't

0:02:28.204 --> 0:02:31.364
<v Speaker 1>that bad. That seems that seems reasonable. Maybe the rest

0:02:31.364 --> 0:02:33.604
<v Speaker 1>of the cabinet will be quite reasonable as well. And

0:02:33.644 --> 0:02:37.284
<v Speaker 1>then obviously the day in a few days after we taped,

0:02:37.684 --> 0:02:41.524
<v Speaker 1>a bunch more nominations were released that were a little

0:02:41.524 --> 0:02:47.564
<v Speaker 1>bit more eyebrow raising in multiple instances. So let's talk

0:02:47.604 --> 0:02:50.764
<v Speaker 1>about those nominations, and let's talk about the process for

0:02:50.884 --> 0:02:53.684
<v Speaker 1>confirming them, how we think that's going to play out,

0:02:53.924 --> 0:02:56.524
<v Speaker 1>and what the decision game tree looks like for those

0:02:56.764 --> 0:02:58.844
<v Speaker 1>Senate Republicans who might be in a position to make

0:02:58.844 --> 0:03:00.004
<v Speaker 1>a difference. Yeah.

0:03:00.044 --> 0:03:03.044
<v Speaker 2>Cool, Yeah, Maria, I took a little break with my

0:03:03.124 --> 0:03:06.884
<v Speaker 2>partner and the cat skills. You a nice time. We

0:03:07.324 --> 0:03:10.564
<v Speaker 2>maybe took a hike. We are on the edge of

0:03:10.644 --> 0:03:16.084
<v Speaker 2>maybe hiking too far, too fast without enough water, So.

0:03:16.244 --> 0:03:20.724
<v Speaker 1>Talking about negative ev decisions, Nate, you should have read

0:03:20.724 --> 0:03:23.524
<v Speaker 1>one of the first posts I made on the Leap

0:03:23.644 --> 0:03:27.004
<v Speaker 1>about the risk taking calculus when one goes hiking. But

0:03:27.404 --> 0:03:29.684
<v Speaker 1>you're here, so it all worked out, But don't do

0:03:29.724 --> 0:03:30.364
<v Speaker 1>it again.

0:03:30.884 --> 0:03:32.764
<v Speaker 2>Once you're ninety five way to the tap and you

0:03:32.764 --> 0:03:33.764
<v Speaker 2>can't turn back, can you?

0:03:34.204 --> 0:03:38.804
<v Speaker 1>Yes? You can, absolutely, you can absolutely turn back even

0:03:38.844 --> 0:03:41.404
<v Speaker 1>when you are ninety eight percent of the way there.

0:03:41.724 --> 0:03:45.404
<v Speaker 1>You can, and you should. This is how accidents and

0:03:45.604 --> 0:03:48.884
<v Speaker 1>accidental deaths happen. And I love you, Nate, and love

0:03:48.924 --> 0:03:51.164
<v Speaker 1>your partner, and I want to see both of you

0:03:51.684 --> 0:03:53.804
<v Speaker 1>healthy and back in New York City.

0:03:54.164 --> 0:03:56.484
<v Speaker 2>It would have been a relatively cool way to if

0:03:56.524 --> 0:03:59.044
<v Speaker 2>you're going to die right on top of a mountain

0:03:59.124 --> 0:04:02.084
<v Speaker 2>and the catskills anyway, I.

0:04:02.044 --> 0:04:03.884
<v Speaker 1>Would give a very moving speech at your funeral.

0:04:04.804 --> 0:04:08.764
<v Speaker 2>Not able to escape politics, obviously, and the first big confrontation,

0:04:08.884 --> 0:04:13.244
<v Speaker 2>the first big test of Trump's will is these confirmation

0:04:13.404 --> 0:04:17.724
<v Speaker 2>picks of cabinet secretaries that might be a little unconventional,

0:04:20.124 --> 0:04:20.764
<v Speaker 2>and that's.

0:04:20.644 --> 0:04:22.044
<v Speaker 1>The understatement of the moment.

0:04:23.284 --> 0:04:25.684
<v Speaker 2>There are four that I think really are drawing the

0:04:25.724 --> 0:04:29.444
<v Speaker 2>most attention, which are at my gates AREFK Junior, Pete Hegseth,

0:04:29.564 --> 0:04:32.444
<v Speaker 2>and Tulsi Gabbard. Can tell you a story about Tulsi Gabbard,

0:04:32.444 --> 0:04:37.564
<v Speaker 2>who is alleged by Democrats to be like a in

0:04:37.604 --> 0:04:38.804
<v Speaker 2>the sphere of Russian influence.

0:04:39.164 --> 0:04:40.764
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's hear story time.

0:04:40.964 --> 0:04:44.484
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty, we went to New Hampshire and this

0:04:44.564 --> 0:04:48.924
<v Speaker 2>is just before the pandemic kind of shuts regular campaigning down.

0:04:49.844 --> 0:04:52.764
<v Speaker 2>A group of US five thirty eight ers and we

0:04:52.844 --> 0:04:56.404
<v Speaker 2>a little habit of like showing up unannounced at campaign

0:04:56.484 --> 0:04:59.644
<v Speaker 2>offices just to see what they're up to. It was

0:04:59.684 --> 0:05:01.564
<v Speaker 2>a cute little technique. And then I think some of

0:05:01.564 --> 0:05:04.604
<v Speaker 2>the campaigns got smart. At the Biden office, by the way,

0:05:04.604 --> 0:05:08.124
<v Speaker 2>it was totally empty except for the figures Skater Christi Yamaguchi.

0:05:08.284 --> 0:05:12.284
<v Speaker 2>That was interesting. At the Mayor Pete office. You know,

0:05:12.324 --> 0:05:15.644
<v Speaker 2>the instantly recognized us and like tried to usher us out.

0:05:15.764 --> 0:05:21.204
<v Speaker 2>Very organized. But Telsea Gabberd has this giant empty office

0:05:21.404 --> 0:05:24.564
<v Speaker 2>and the only clerk or employee there had a thick

0:05:24.684 --> 0:05:29.804
<v Speaker 2>Russian accent. I'm just saying this actually happened. Uh, just

0:05:29.884 --> 0:05:31.004
<v Speaker 2>a little data point there.

0:05:31.924 --> 0:05:34.324
<v Speaker 1>I love it that that is good story time. I

0:05:34.324 --> 0:05:37.204
<v Speaker 1>didn't know where that uh, where that story was going

0:05:37.284 --> 0:05:39.924
<v Speaker 1>to go, but but that's that's good story time. Yeah.

0:05:39.964 --> 0:05:43.724
<v Speaker 1>So these when I say eyebrow raising, I meant eyebrow raising.

0:05:44.044 --> 0:05:48.404
<v Speaker 1>So obviously Telsea gabbert we we know that there are

0:05:48.804 --> 0:05:53.404
<v Speaker 1>rumors of Russia loving her. You've got our kid, Junior,

0:05:53.444 --> 0:05:56.964
<v Speaker 1>which is the one that I am really worried about.

0:05:57.084 --> 0:05:59.884
<v Speaker 1>We talked a little bit last week about the potential

0:05:59.884 --> 0:06:03.004
<v Speaker 1>harm that could come to science during a Trump administration,

0:06:03.684 --> 0:06:10.044
<v Speaker 1>and this just seems to highlight that that the potential

0:06:10.044 --> 0:06:13.004
<v Speaker 1>harm is probably is going to be actual harm. So

0:06:13.444 --> 0:06:17.324
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, we have people being put

0:06:17.404 --> 0:06:21.004
<v Speaker 1>up for appointments where either they have no qualifications or

0:06:21.004 --> 0:06:24.564
<v Speaker 1>they have anti qualifications in things that are actually going

0:06:24.604 --> 0:06:29.324
<v Speaker 1>to stop very important research from happening for at least

0:06:29.324 --> 0:06:33.164
<v Speaker 1>four years, probably longer, because we know that the ramifications

0:06:33.164 --> 0:06:35.364
<v Speaker 1>of this can really well, the.

0:06:35.324 --> 0:06:39.884
<v Speaker 2>Average cabinet pic I think is measured in days. That

0:06:40.004 --> 0:06:40.364
<v Speaker 2>is true.

0:06:40.644 --> 0:06:42.724
<v Speaker 1>You know what, You know what, Nate, I actually didn't

0:06:42.764 --> 0:06:45.084
<v Speaker 1>think of that that you've given me hope for the

0:06:45.124 --> 0:06:47.684
<v Speaker 1>first time in a week. We do know from his

0:06:47.804 --> 0:06:51.244
<v Speaker 1>last administration that yes, the average tenure of some of

0:06:51.284 --> 0:06:53.044
<v Speaker 1>his picks is not long. So that's good.

0:06:53.844 --> 0:06:56.164
<v Speaker 2>So there's that just for a baseline. If you get

0:06:56.204 --> 0:06:58.564
<v Speaker 2>at polymarket O, the bending sites are similar. I consult

0:06:58.564 --> 0:07:02.044
<v Speaker 2>for poly Market. Gates has a thirty percent chance of

0:07:02.044 --> 0:07:05.484
<v Speaker 2>being confirmed, Tulsa Gabberd's seventy nine percent, RFK seventy six percent,

0:07:05.884 --> 0:07:08.804
<v Speaker 2>and Pete Haggs seventy six percent as well. I'm trying

0:07:08.844 --> 0:07:15.284
<v Speaker 2>to wonder if I'd take over under on those seventy.

0:07:16.244 --> 0:07:19.044
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so Gates is the only one that they are

0:07:19.084 --> 0:07:20.764
<v Speaker 1>thinking as an underdog right now.

0:07:21.484 --> 0:07:23.844
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Gates is the one where you have and now

0:07:23.844 --> 0:07:25.284
<v Speaker 2>he can start to get in the game theory where

0:07:25.284 --> 0:07:29.924
<v Speaker 2>you have like a lot of leaked reports of Republicans saying,

0:07:30.124 --> 0:07:33.884
<v Speaker 2>oh everybody in the sentence against him. There are dozens

0:07:33.884 --> 0:07:37.884
<v Speaker 2>of picks against him, but the fact that, like you

0:07:37.924 --> 0:07:40.404
<v Speaker 2>don't have senators by name kind, they're saying, oh, everybody

0:07:40.404 --> 0:07:42.444
<v Speaker 2>else is against them. They're not saying I am against him.

0:07:42.484 --> 0:07:45.284
<v Speaker 2>They're saying other people my vote against him. So now

0:07:45.284 --> 0:07:46.844
<v Speaker 2>we start to get in the game theory here where

0:07:47.124 --> 0:07:49.284
<v Speaker 2>I have no doubt. First of all, Gates is seen

0:07:49.404 --> 0:07:54.204
<v Speaker 2>as a loose cannon, as I minished lots of rumors

0:07:54.244 --> 0:08:00.164
<v Speaker 2>of sexual and drug related promiscuities and infidelities and generally

0:08:00.164 --> 0:08:03.644
<v Speaker 2>being a difficult colleague. Right, so I have no doubt

0:08:03.724 --> 0:08:07.804
<v Speaker 2>that in a a private vote, what's the term of

0:08:07.804 --> 0:08:11.844
<v Speaker 2>looking for a vote, an anonymous vote, that Gates and

0:08:11.884 --> 0:08:14.244
<v Speaker 2>maybe even all these people would go down. Right. The

0:08:14.324 --> 0:08:18.484
<v Speaker 2>issue is that is that if you oppose Trump, then

0:08:18.524 --> 0:08:21.004
<v Speaker 2>Trump can try to kind of like nuke you from

0:08:21.524 --> 0:08:28.124
<v Speaker 2>from orbit. So to do a basic math check here, Republicans,

0:08:28.204 --> 0:08:31.604
<v Speaker 2>assuming that David McCormick wins in Pennsylvania, some networks haven't called.

0:08:31.604 --> 0:08:33.124
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't seem to me like there's a path back

0:08:33.164 --> 0:08:35.484
<v Speaker 2>for Bob Casey, but there will be a recount. But

0:08:35.524 --> 0:08:42.844
<v Speaker 2>assuming fifty three, you have two Lisa Murkowski and Susan

0:08:42.884 --> 0:08:46.764
<v Speaker 2>Collins who have repeatedly defied Republicans Susan Collins is up

0:08:46.764 --> 0:08:50.484
<v Speaker 2>for re election in twenty twenty six in what's now

0:08:50.524 --> 0:08:52.644
<v Speaker 2>a pretty blue state, Ma, Ma, and all the all

0:08:52.684 --> 0:08:56.244
<v Speaker 2>the liberals who like taxes, actually main doesn't particually high taxes, right,

0:08:56.364 --> 0:08:58.964
<v Speaker 2>they kind of moved to Maine, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont,

0:08:58.964 --> 0:09:00.964
<v Speaker 2>staying very blue. She's in a very difficult race, and

0:09:01.004 --> 0:09:02.804
<v Speaker 2>so she's not going to vote for any of these,

0:09:02.844 --> 0:09:07.484
<v Speaker 2>I don't think. And Lisa Rakowski, I assume has shown

0:09:07.644 --> 0:09:09.804
<v Speaker 2>enough willingness to defy Trump in the past that she

0:09:09.884 --> 0:09:14.284
<v Speaker 2>won't either. But still Republicans have, uh, you know, fifty

0:09:14.324 --> 0:09:16.284
<v Speaker 2>three fifty one. They only need fifty because Jade Vance

0:09:16.364 --> 0:09:18.964
<v Speaker 2>is the vice president, so they can afford to lose

0:09:19.324 --> 0:09:23.564
<v Speaker 2>one more. And so who are the two more that

0:09:23.684 --> 0:09:27.324
<v Speaker 2>will vote to oppose? And the answer is, I've been

0:09:27.324 --> 0:09:30.684
<v Speaker 2>trying to do some data work on looking at the

0:09:30.724 --> 0:09:35.164
<v Speaker 2>partisan loyalty and the ideology of different Republican senators. Like

0:09:35.164 --> 0:09:39.964
<v Speaker 2>there's not like an obvious like third name. Before you

0:09:39.964 --> 0:09:41.844
<v Speaker 2>would have said you need a fourth name too, right

0:09:42.244 --> 0:09:45.924
<v Speaker 2>before you would have said Mitt Romney. But Mitt Romney's

0:09:45.924 --> 0:09:48.924
<v Speaker 2>been replaced by actually a relatively moderate Republican in Utah

0:09:48.964 --> 0:09:51.004
<v Speaker 2>name I think John Curtis, let me dibble, Chick, it

0:09:51.004 --> 0:09:56.924
<v Speaker 2>is John Curtis. You have some newcomers like McCormick and Pennsylvania,

0:09:56.964 --> 0:09:58.604
<v Speaker 2>and you would think in the long term, I mean,

0:09:58.644 --> 0:10:00.284
<v Speaker 2>he you know, he won the race if he does

0:10:00.324 --> 0:10:03.244
<v Speaker 2>win by zero point three points or something of Pennsylvania's

0:10:03.244 --> 0:10:05.204
<v Speaker 2>a swing state, but it's six years out until his

0:10:05.284 --> 0:10:09.924
<v Speaker 2>next re elect and these kind of younger, newer Republicans

0:10:10.084 --> 0:10:17.884
<v Speaker 2>tend to be very conservative. It's quite generational where where

0:10:18.444 --> 0:10:21.324
<v Speaker 2>you know, the traditional kind of Chuck Grassley's of the

0:10:21.364 --> 0:10:26.404
<v Speaker 2>world are the types who will who will stand for

0:10:26.644 --> 0:10:28.724
<v Speaker 2>order in the US Senate and think the Senate needs

0:10:28.764 --> 0:10:31.604
<v Speaker 2>to play an important role. But the younger guns tend

0:10:31.644 --> 0:10:33.404
<v Speaker 2>not to. They to say, well, I'm just gonna be

0:10:33.444 --> 0:10:36.244
<v Speaker 2>Trump Trump, Trump, and then you know, maybe when reelection

0:10:36.404 --> 0:10:40.124
<v Speaker 2>maybe not right. Tom Tillis in North Carolina, I believe

0:10:40.124 --> 0:10:43.324
<v Speaker 2>he's up to reelect in twenty twenty six as well.

0:10:43.364 --> 0:10:47.124
<v Speaker 2>That's the other race that Democrats will really target. He

0:10:47.204 --> 0:10:52.524
<v Speaker 2>has shown more streaks of moderation. Lindsey Graham on paper

0:10:52.644 --> 0:10:55.644
<v Speaker 2>is more of an institutionalist Senate candidate, but he seems

0:10:55.644 --> 0:10:58.124
<v Speaker 2>to I don't know, I'm not sure what I'm trying

0:10:58.164 --> 0:11:02.164
<v Speaker 2>to imply here, But Lindsey Graham seems very reluctant to

0:11:02.364 --> 0:11:06.124
<v Speaker 2>defy Trump. And there's a lot of revenge motivated politics,

0:11:06.124 --> 0:11:08.804
<v Speaker 2>like Democrats this or that other bad thing. Right now

0:11:08.804 --> 0:11:13.284
<v Speaker 2>it's our turn. And so you know, John Thune, the

0:11:13.404 --> 0:11:16.124
<v Speaker 2>incoming majority leader, might be one canny for some of these,

0:11:16.164 --> 0:11:18.764
<v Speaker 2>but there's not like there's not like an obvious third

0:11:18.804 --> 0:11:20.804
<v Speaker 2>and fourth strikes.

0:11:21.644 --> 0:11:24.644
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think that when we're talking about the

0:11:24.684 --> 0:11:29.164
<v Speaker 1>game theory, right, we're we're looking at a decision matrix

0:11:29.164 --> 0:11:31.524
<v Speaker 1>where you look at kind of the payoff structure. Right,

0:11:31.844 --> 0:11:34.804
<v Speaker 1>if we think about it in terms of a prisoner's dilemma,

0:11:34.804 --> 0:11:37.884
<v Speaker 1>which this kind of is, you can cooperate, right, so

0:11:37.924 --> 0:11:41.404
<v Speaker 1>you vote with the Republicans or you defect, which means

0:11:41.444 --> 0:11:44.204
<v Speaker 1>that you join kind of the Democrats in opposing some

0:11:44.244 --> 0:11:48.004
<v Speaker 1>of these picks. And then but we if we look

0:11:48.044 --> 0:11:51.924
<v Speaker 1>at the incentives, I think that in the immediate time horizon,

0:11:52.484 --> 0:11:58.084
<v Speaker 1>the disincentive to defect is so ridiculously strong, right because

0:11:58.124 --> 0:12:00.284
<v Speaker 1>we what do we know about Trump? We know he's

0:12:00.484 --> 0:12:03.564
<v Speaker 1>vindictive as fuck, right, Like he does not like it

0:12:03.644 --> 0:12:06.604
<v Speaker 1>when people go against him. He's going to be president

0:12:06.684 --> 0:12:10.004
<v Speaker 1>and he has a lot of authority, and we have

0:12:10.204 --> 0:12:13.924
<v Speaker 1>already seen during his presidency and in the last four

0:12:14.044 --> 0:12:16.404
<v Speaker 1>years that people say a lot of shit about him

0:12:16.404 --> 0:12:19.364
<v Speaker 1>in private and then they still go and support him

0:12:19.404 --> 0:12:22.844
<v Speaker 1>in public. Right, they are completely two faced in this.

0:12:23.044 --> 0:12:24.804
<v Speaker 1>And if you think about this kind of as like

0:12:24.844 --> 0:12:30.084
<v Speaker 1>a time horizon, right, like you're gonna like shit's going

0:12:30.164 --> 0:12:32.804
<v Speaker 1>to hit the fan with Trump much sooner than you

0:12:32.844 --> 0:12:35.404
<v Speaker 1>will be padded on the back and said you did

0:12:35.444 --> 0:12:38.044
<v Speaker 1>the right thing for our country. Right. It's kind of

0:12:38.084 --> 0:12:40.084
<v Speaker 1>like climate change if you think about it, right, They're

0:12:40.084 --> 0:12:43.804
<v Speaker 1>like these abstract incentives like I stood up for democracy,

0:12:43.924 --> 0:12:46.444
<v Speaker 1>like I stood up for not you know, putting a

0:12:46.484 --> 0:12:50.004
<v Speaker 1>potential Russian operative or someone who's anti science in a

0:12:50.004 --> 0:12:52.964
<v Speaker 1>position of science. Blah blah blah. It's very abstract for

0:12:53.044 --> 0:12:57.324
<v Speaker 1>it versus I'm going to get punished, like bad things

0:12:57.364 --> 0:13:00.044
<v Speaker 1>are going to happen to me, and you know, I'm

0:13:00.044 --> 0:13:02.724
<v Speaker 1>going to really feel it if I step out of line.

0:13:02.884 --> 0:13:06.244
<v Speaker 1>And so I just I do not see that there

0:13:06.284 --> 0:13:09.204
<v Speaker 1>will be kind of this wave of Republicans breaking ranks,

0:13:09.244 --> 0:13:11.444
<v Speaker 1>Like I think that there's even a good chance that

0:13:11.484 --> 0:13:13.084
<v Speaker 1>Matt Gates is going to get confirmed.

0:13:14.324 --> 0:13:16.204
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, you know, the one pushback is I

0:13:16.444 --> 0:13:20.044
<v Speaker 2>wonder if if we're being proper about the prisoner's element,

0:13:20.204 --> 0:13:25.484
<v Speaker 2>I actually think that like defection actually is voting for

0:13:25.524 --> 0:13:26.124
<v Speaker 2>these picks.

0:13:26.684 --> 0:13:30.884
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I guess that's the We can frame it either way,

0:13:31.084 --> 0:13:33.204
<v Speaker 1>and like then you'll just flip my arguments. But why

0:13:33.244 --> 0:13:34.404
<v Speaker 1>is defection voting?

0:13:34.844 --> 0:13:38.484
<v Speaker 2>Because cooperation is from the perspective of the prisoners, who,

0:13:38.524 --> 0:13:43.164
<v Speaker 2>in this I guess somewhat literal sense, are Republican senators, right.

0:13:43.404 --> 0:13:47.244
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that they think that Matt Gates being

0:13:47.284 --> 0:13:50.644
<v Speaker 2>Attorney General would be good for the Republican Party. It

0:13:50.644 --> 0:13:53.444
<v Speaker 2>would necessarily even be good for Trump. I mean, he's

0:13:55.484 --> 0:13:59.164
<v Speaker 2>politely described as a as a loose canon, high risk

0:13:59.444 --> 0:14:03.124
<v Speaker 2>of scandals, to high profile position, of playing into every

0:14:03.204 --> 0:14:06.404
<v Speaker 2>critique that Democrats have. And now all of a sudden,

0:14:06.404 --> 0:14:10.124
<v Speaker 2>we're in an anti incumbent moment, and now Democrats gonna

0:14:10.124 --> 0:14:12.364
<v Speaker 2>be pushing back in twenty twenty six, I mean, the

0:14:12.364 --> 0:14:16.084
<v Speaker 2>the you know, if they pick up those two sentencets

0:14:16.084 --> 0:14:19.444
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned in Maine and North Carolina, then it's forty

0:14:19.524 --> 0:14:23.284
<v Speaker 2>nine point fifty one and they have opportunities two years

0:14:23.364 --> 0:14:25.404
<v Speaker 2>later to then take back the Senate. If there's a

0:14:26.164 --> 0:14:29.604
<v Speaker 2>president Gretchen Whitmer or Jos Shapiro or Raphael Warnock in

0:14:29.604 --> 0:14:36.004
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty eight and the House where Democrats almost won

0:14:36.084 --> 0:14:38.404
<v Speaker 2>the House this time, I would have to imagine in

0:14:38.444 --> 0:14:40.124
<v Speaker 2>a midterm year their favorite to pick up the House.

0:14:40.204 --> 0:14:42.604
<v Speaker 2>And that means that, like they can throw a big

0:14:42.684 --> 0:14:46.724
<v Speaker 2>wrench in Trump's agenda and do a bunch of investigations

0:14:46.764 --> 0:14:51.244
<v Speaker 2>and whatever else. So they want to they want to

0:14:51.244 --> 0:14:55.924
<v Speaker 2>cooperate with one another, but individually, their incentives are to defect.

0:14:55.964 --> 0:14:56.124
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:14:56.164 --> 0:14:58.644
<v Speaker 2>If you're not Alow, he's the weird case because he's

0:14:58.684 --> 0:15:01.644
<v Speaker 2>kind of in this electoral zone, right, But if you're away, so.

0:15:01.564 --> 0:15:03.924
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna you're flipping. You're flipping what I said, And

0:15:03.964 --> 0:15:06.844
<v Speaker 1>I actually agree that that makes sense, that the that

0:15:06.924 --> 0:15:10.604
<v Speaker 1>the labels of cooperation into action should change. And it's

0:15:10.644 --> 0:15:12.524
<v Speaker 1>funny that it's funny that you say that because I

0:15:12.524 --> 0:15:14.484
<v Speaker 1>actually thought ahead of time. I was like, wait, which

0:15:14.484 --> 0:15:17.124
<v Speaker 1>ones are the co operators and which ones are the defectors.

0:15:17.324 --> 0:15:19.004
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't clear cut to me, But I think your

0:15:19.044 --> 0:15:23.284
<v Speaker 1>argument makes a lot of sense. So basically what we're saying, though,

0:15:23.324 --> 0:15:26.164
<v Speaker 1>is that the incentives are basically for all of the

0:15:26.244 --> 0:15:27.324
<v Speaker 1>Republicans to defect.

0:15:31.844 --> 0:15:44.684
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right back after this message now, and the

0:15:44.684 --> 0:15:49.924
<v Speaker 2>person it's the elemit. You can't communicate these guys, can

0:15:52.484 --> 0:15:56.684
<v Speaker 2>you know? So yeah, one way to do it might

0:15:56.724 --> 0:15:59.484
<v Speaker 2>be to say all of us are going to vote

0:15:59.484 --> 0:16:01.804
<v Speaker 2>against them, right, or a very large number of us,

0:16:01.844 --> 0:16:04.564
<v Speaker 2>and so therefore if you want to try to primary

0:16:04.644 --> 0:16:08.004
<v Speaker 2>thirty of us, then then go right ahead, right right.

0:16:09.444 --> 0:16:15.804
<v Speaker 2>You know what probably happens usually in the modern day politicians, presidents,

0:16:15.844 --> 0:16:18.444
<v Speaker 2>I should say, or set up majority leaders don't like

0:16:18.524 --> 0:16:22.884
<v Speaker 2>to bring votes to the floor in lest they think

0:16:22.884 --> 0:16:25.084
<v Speaker 2>they can win. Right, So maybe the answer is, like

0:16:26.044 --> 0:16:31.724
<v Speaker 2>there is some pretense for why Gates drops out conditional

0:16:31.884 --> 0:16:34.244
<v Speaker 2>upon him being nominated in the floor, then I guess

0:16:34.284 --> 0:16:36.964
<v Speaker 2>he's probably a favorite. I mean, look, I I don't know.

0:16:37.084 --> 0:16:41.884
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just like with the other three, you

0:16:41.964 --> 0:16:48.884
<v Speaker 2>can kind of I think our k juniors wacky. I think,

0:16:49.044 --> 0:16:51.484
<v Speaker 2>you know, I worry, I'm boring. I worry most about

0:16:51.484 --> 0:16:53.404
<v Speaker 2>the vaccine stuff, even though he's kind of said, oh,

0:16:53.444 --> 0:16:55.564
<v Speaker 2>I won't fuck with vaccines too much. I mean there's

0:16:55.564 --> 0:16:58.884
<v Speaker 2>a long track record of I also, you know, I

0:16:58.924 --> 0:17:02.404
<v Speaker 2>part of me wondering strategically whether Gates is like a

0:17:02.444 --> 0:17:07.484
<v Speaker 2>sacrificial lamb to say, Okay, you get this one scalp, right,

0:17:07.524 --> 0:17:09.124
<v Speaker 2>but you better not fuck with me on the rest

0:17:09.124 --> 0:17:12.604
<v Speaker 2>and the kind of like an exploit implicit equilibrium there,

0:17:13.644 --> 0:17:14.644
<v Speaker 2>and that.

0:17:14.324 --> 0:17:19.044
<v Speaker 1>That really sucks because not only is RFK junior, not

0:17:19.084 --> 0:17:22.484
<v Speaker 1>only is he anti vaccine, but he has also said

0:17:23.564 --> 0:17:28.004
<v Speaker 1>during his campaign that he wanted to pause all funding

0:17:28.204 --> 0:17:32.924
<v Speaker 1>and all research and of infectious disease period to give

0:17:32.924 --> 0:17:35.484
<v Speaker 1>it a rest, Like, dude, we didn't do well during

0:17:35.484 --> 0:17:38.124
<v Speaker 1>the first pandemic. This is not this is not gain

0:17:38.164 --> 0:17:42.844
<v Speaker 1>of function research. This is just general research into infectious

0:17:42.844 --> 0:17:45.284
<v Speaker 1>disease that does not seem like a good thing to do,

0:17:45.404 --> 0:17:48.284
<v Speaker 1>right to just pause all of that funding. We know

0:17:48.364 --> 0:17:51.084
<v Speaker 1>that fetal cell research is going to stop like this,

0:17:51.244 --> 0:17:54.524
<v Speaker 1>These are really really important things that have really big

0:17:54.564 --> 0:17:57.964
<v Speaker 1>consequences for public health and for the future. And I

0:17:58.124 --> 0:18:02.484
<v Speaker 1>just like, to me, that's an incredibly like if Matt

0:18:02.524 --> 0:18:05.204
<v Speaker 1>Gaetz is a sacrificial lamb, then we have some scary

0:18:05.244 --> 0:18:09.564
<v Speaker 1>picks ahead of us, right, including that including putting, you know,

0:18:09.604 --> 0:18:13.604
<v Speaker 1>the pentagon in the hands of someone what are his qualifications? Right,

0:18:13.724 --> 0:18:17.164
<v Speaker 1>Like this is this is to me, it's a little

0:18:17.204 --> 0:18:19.404
<v Speaker 1>bit it's it's not a little bit, it's a lot

0:18:19.444 --> 0:18:22.644
<v Speaker 1>bit frightening to think about that. But I think, you know,

0:18:22.964 --> 0:18:26.364
<v Speaker 1>I just do not see how the game theory works

0:18:26.404 --> 0:18:31.364
<v Speaker 1>for anything other than confirmation at the beginning, and and

0:18:31.564 --> 0:18:35.484
<v Speaker 1>that you know, maybe Matt Gates has withdrawn, right, like

0:18:35.524 --> 0:18:38.564
<v Speaker 1>maybe that doesn't actually ever come before the Senate, like

0:18:39.084 --> 0:18:42.964
<v Speaker 1>as you suggest, might might end up happening. But if

0:18:43.004 --> 0:18:45.644
<v Speaker 1>the other ones all get confirmed, like, this is going

0:18:45.684 --> 0:18:47.204
<v Speaker 1>to be a pretty scary administration.

0:18:48.844 --> 0:18:50.124
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean the other thing you think about is

0:18:50.124 --> 0:18:52.964
<v Speaker 2>whether there are any Republicans who don't care because they

0:18:53.204 --> 0:18:58.364
<v Speaker 2>plan to retire. Mitch McConnell is an interesting one, another

0:18:58.404 --> 0:18:59.924
<v Speaker 2>one who has had some health issue. Has been in

0:19:00.004 --> 0:19:03.524
<v Speaker 2>office for one, two, three, five seven terms. Now his

0:19:03.644 --> 0:19:06.044
<v Speaker 2>intent is unknown as to whether he's running in twenty

0:19:06.124 --> 0:19:09.724
<v Speaker 2>twenty six or no. I mean, look, I think politicians

0:19:09.764 --> 0:19:19.924
<v Speaker 2>are ninety eight percent craven opportunity. Yeah, right, he won

0:19:19.964 --> 0:19:22.084
<v Speaker 2>the popular vote, right, I mean, he improved his margin

0:19:22.204 --> 0:19:25.044
<v Speaker 2>and like all but two or three states or something

0:19:25.084 --> 0:19:31.484
<v Speaker 2>like that, right, and so, but I don't know. And

0:19:31.564 --> 0:19:34.044
<v Speaker 2>it is a repeated game in the sense that Trump

0:19:34.044 --> 0:19:35.924
<v Speaker 2>will do other things that they don't like and like

0:19:36.004 --> 0:19:38.604
<v Speaker 2>if you kind of have to, like if you capitulate.

0:19:38.724 --> 0:19:40.844
<v Speaker 1>Now, I think you're you're kind of lining yourself up

0:19:40.844 --> 0:19:43.884
<v Speaker 1>to capitulate, They're right.

0:19:44.204 --> 0:19:47.244
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, I mean I think you're supposed to like throw.

0:19:47.324 --> 0:19:50.444
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like I believe in this and things and life.

0:19:50.604 --> 0:19:52.164
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you kind of roll over for somebody,

0:19:52.204 --> 0:19:54.804
<v Speaker 2>then they kind of correctly assume that you'll roll over

0:19:55.884 --> 0:19:57.844
<v Speaker 2>the next time. And it's often best to like draw

0:19:57.924 --> 0:19:59.764
<v Speaker 2>a line in the sand early if you're playing in

0:19:59.804 --> 0:20:01.244
<v Speaker 2>like I mean, you know, one thing a lot of

0:20:02.204 --> 0:20:04.724
<v Speaker 2>a lot of players do is is and it's gonna

0:20:04.764 --> 0:20:08.284
<v Speaker 2>be dangerous actually, right, But like you know, if it's

0:20:08.324 --> 0:20:11.804
<v Speaker 2>the first hand of the tournament and uh, and you

0:20:11.924 --> 0:20:14.644
<v Speaker 2>raise and get three bets, so a player re re raises,

0:20:16.324 --> 0:20:20.524
<v Speaker 2>you know, most humans, most poker players, psychologically, the first

0:20:20.524 --> 0:20:22.924
<v Speaker 2>time it happens, you're more likely to get a call

0:20:23.044 --> 0:20:25.924
<v Speaker 2>or even a four bet. It's harder to get that

0:20:26.004 --> 0:20:28.484
<v Speaker 2>kind of aggressive action through the first time. People look

0:20:28.524 --> 0:20:32.524
<v Speaker 2>at as a proxy for future aggression, so intuitively they

0:20:32.564 --> 0:20:34.964
<v Speaker 2>I think probably under understand that.

0:20:36.124 --> 0:20:38.044
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I think I think that's right. I'm just

0:20:38.244 --> 0:20:41.444
<v Speaker 1>remembering this one tournament where I played where a new

0:20:41.844 --> 0:20:44.044
<v Speaker 1>guy came to the table. I three bet him and

0:20:44.084 --> 0:20:46.604
<v Speaker 1>he just ripped it for like eighty big lines than

0:20:46.644 --> 0:20:48.444
<v Speaker 1>someone else three bet him, and he did the exact

0:20:48.444 --> 0:20:51.044
<v Speaker 1>same thing over. I don't think anyone three bet.

0:20:50.924 --> 0:20:55.804
<v Speaker 2>Him again, like the last hand of the day or

0:20:55.924 --> 0:20:58.724
<v Speaker 2>the last hand before a break, right, people kind of

0:20:58.764 --> 0:21:00.764
<v Speaker 2>want to go and break do whatever they're going to do.

0:21:01.964 --> 0:21:05.324
<v Speaker 2>But then you're like, Okay, you're fucking exploiting me, right, bathroom,

0:21:05.364 --> 0:21:06.964
<v Speaker 2>and now you're three betting me, and so fuck you

0:21:07.004 --> 0:21:07.644
<v Speaker 2>them all in.

0:21:09.484 --> 0:21:11.844
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, you know, one of the things you said

0:21:11.844 --> 0:21:14.284
<v Speaker 1>that was intriguing to me that it seems like a

0:21:14.284 --> 0:21:16.564
<v Speaker 1>long shot. But I'm curious whether you actually think it

0:21:16.644 --> 0:21:19.484
<v Speaker 1>might happen, Like, do you think that there's like a

0:21:19.564 --> 0:21:24.044
<v Speaker 1>scenario where Republicans can get like thirty people to defect right,

0:21:24.084 --> 0:21:26.844
<v Speaker 1>where it can be like a I don't think so.

0:21:26.964 --> 0:21:28.524
<v Speaker 1>Like I think there are just too many people who

0:21:28.604 --> 0:21:32.084
<v Speaker 1>believe in Trump and who and who actually like you know,

0:21:32.204 --> 0:21:39.164
<v Speaker 1>don't don't want to defect but or cooperate. How likely

0:21:39.364 --> 0:21:40.484
<v Speaker 1>is a scenario like that?

0:21:42.364 --> 0:21:46.284
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they certainly haven't shown much backbone in the past,

0:21:46.364 --> 0:21:48.204
<v Speaker 2>and in some ways Trump has like more of a

0:21:48.244 --> 0:21:51.484
<v Speaker 2>mandate than he. I'm like, I think the equilibrium might

0:21:51.524 --> 0:21:55.004
<v Speaker 2>actually be that like that gates get sacrificed and the

0:21:55.004 --> 0:21:59.764
<v Speaker 2>others go through, you know, and then they can say, okay,

0:21:59.764 --> 0:22:02.404
<v Speaker 2>well we do aligned somewhere, right, we do relign and

0:22:02.404 --> 0:22:07.124
<v Speaker 2>gates are just so unacceptable on many different yeah levels

0:22:07.124 --> 0:22:10.564
<v Speaker 2>and kind of almost almost care and tease like a

0:22:11.964 --> 0:22:14.804
<v Speaker 2>either a circus act or an administration that really kind

0:22:14.804 --> 0:22:18.284
<v Speaker 2>of overreaches and it becomes like harder to rain Trump

0:22:18.324 --> 0:22:20.284
<v Speaker 2>in later. And I don't know, I don't talk to

0:22:20.364 --> 0:22:23.484
<v Speaker 2>Republican or Democratic senators for that matter, right, I mean,

0:22:23.484 --> 0:22:25.924
<v Speaker 2>if you hear reporters who do, they're like, well, in private,

0:22:25.964 --> 0:22:27.244
<v Speaker 2>they're pretty reasonable.

0:22:27.244 --> 0:22:31.164
<v Speaker 1>Well exactly in private, Like you have to do that

0:22:31.204 --> 0:22:34.124
<v Speaker 1>shit in public, Like it doesn't count if it's in private.

0:22:34.204 --> 0:22:37.204
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, like that's it only counts if

0:22:37.244 --> 0:22:39.444
<v Speaker 1>you actually publicly then do it and put your money

0:22:39.484 --> 0:22:41.644
<v Speaker 1>where your mouth is. It's like it's like people who

0:22:41.684 --> 0:22:45.564
<v Speaker 1>can confidently to go back to poker very quickly. It's

0:22:45.684 --> 0:22:48.844
<v Speaker 1>like the you know players on stream who always know

0:22:48.884 --> 0:22:51.284
<v Speaker 1>what the correct thing to do is right and who

0:22:51.364 --> 0:22:53.644
<v Speaker 1>confidently say, oh, you have to call here, you have

0:22:53.724 --> 0:22:55.724
<v Speaker 1>to race here, you have to show if you have

0:22:55.764 --> 0:22:57.524
<v Speaker 1>to do this, you have to do that right the

0:22:57.644 --> 0:23:00.684
<v Speaker 1>chat experts. And then when you get them into that

0:23:00.724 --> 0:23:03.964
<v Speaker 1>spot playing live without seeing the cards, all of a sudden,

0:23:04.044 --> 0:23:07.004
<v Speaker 1>all of that expertise goes out the window and they

0:23:07.004 --> 0:23:09.404
<v Speaker 1>have zero dollars in earnings as opposed to the people

0:23:09.484 --> 0:23:12.484
<v Speaker 1>they're criticizing. So if you do things from a you know,

0:23:12.724 --> 0:23:18.204
<v Speaker 1>backseat driver, I don't know how many other analogies.

0:23:17.564 --> 0:23:19.164
<v Speaker 2>I can what they can also get.

0:23:19.004 --> 0:23:20.324
<v Speaker 1>Through in there, it doesn't matter.

0:23:20.364 --> 0:23:25.524
<v Speaker 2>What they can also do is draw lots right where

0:23:25.884 --> 0:23:30.124
<v Speaker 2>the let's say the fifteen Republican senators who are somewhat

0:23:30.884 --> 0:23:33.604
<v Speaker 2>reasonable go into a room and they have it's like

0:23:33.604 --> 0:23:36.924
<v Speaker 2>the NBA a lottery, right, and they pick thirteen names

0:23:36.964 --> 0:23:39.564
<v Speaker 2>and the final two have to just effect from Trump on.

0:23:39.684 --> 0:23:42.604
<v Speaker 2>Everything's knowing they'll be. But the way it works, you

0:23:42.604 --> 0:23:45.884
<v Speaker 2>have little favors. Right. Maybe let's say, uh, you know,

0:23:46.004 --> 0:23:49.924
<v Speaker 2>let's say that one of them is from Tennessee, and

0:23:49.964 --> 0:23:53.524
<v Speaker 2>then you know, the senator from I know, Jim Rish

0:23:53.604 --> 0:23:55.564
<v Speaker 2>from Idaho gets the last draw. They're like, how would

0:23:55.564 --> 0:23:57.564
<v Speaker 2>you like to be the president of the University of Tennessee?

0:23:58.124 --> 0:24:00.764
<v Speaker 2>Jim Rish GYGA football team.

0:24:03.084 --> 0:24:05.044
<v Speaker 1>Now the impressions are coming out. I love it.

0:24:06.164 --> 0:24:08.644
<v Speaker 2>They should draw the should and one of them should

0:24:08.684 --> 0:24:12.044
<v Speaker 2>be the fall Guide. You know, there are benefits to

0:24:12.044 --> 0:24:15.724
<v Speaker 2>being the one outlier Republican maverick.

0:24:17.364 --> 0:24:20.604
<v Speaker 1>With that, let's take a short break and switch to

0:24:21.364 --> 0:24:35.764
<v Speaker 1>actual quarterbacks and talking about football. So, the NFL has

0:24:35.924 --> 0:24:39.524
<v Speaker 1>just announced that players are allowed to wear guardian caps

0:24:39.884 --> 0:24:42.444
<v Speaker 1>when they're playing footballs. So a guardian cap, it's like

0:24:42.484 --> 0:24:46.324
<v Speaker 1>this padded thing that you put over your helmet that

0:24:46.364 --> 0:24:50.244
<v Speaker 1>will lower the risk of concussion. They're already being used

0:24:50.324 --> 0:24:54.004
<v Speaker 1>during practices and now players can wear them during games

0:24:54.084 --> 0:24:57.644
<v Speaker 1>as well. But a lot of players, the vast majority

0:24:57.644 --> 0:25:00.964
<v Speaker 1>of players, in fact, the vast vast majority of players

0:25:01.564 --> 0:25:05.084
<v Speaker 1>are not wearing them. And so I want to talk

0:25:05.124 --> 0:25:08.844
<v Speaker 1>about what that decision calculus is, Like, why would you

0:25:09.244 --> 0:25:12.244
<v Speaker 1>not where something that you know is going to make

0:25:12.804 --> 0:25:15.444
<v Speaker 1>the game much safer for you and that is going

0:25:15.524 --> 0:25:17.924
<v Speaker 1>to improve your long term health outcomes?

0:25:18.404 --> 0:25:22.724
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean some of my input on this or

0:25:22.764 --> 0:25:26.164
<v Speaker 2>inside of this. So from my book, I interviewed a

0:25:26.204 --> 0:25:29.084
<v Speaker 2>friend of mine who's a former NFL player named Dave Anderson,

0:25:29.324 --> 0:25:32.484
<v Speaker 2>and really good guy now runs a sports data company,

0:25:33.764 --> 0:25:37.284
<v Speaker 2>and you know, he described the culture of the NFL

0:25:37.404 --> 0:25:40.444
<v Speaker 2>where it really is a and I like football, not

0:25:40.484 --> 0:25:43.964
<v Speaker 2>trying to be a prude here, right, but it really

0:25:44.044 --> 0:25:48.164
<v Speaker 2>is like an almost warlike environment, right where it's like

0:25:48.364 --> 0:25:51.844
<v Speaker 2>next man up and careers are short. And also you know,

0:25:51.884 --> 0:25:55.044
<v Speaker 2>you have good data on like quarterbacks and a few

0:25:55.044 --> 0:25:57.084
<v Speaker 2>other positions, but for the most part, all the alignment

0:25:57.244 --> 0:26:00.724
<v Speaker 2>right are it's hard to evaluate, and so if you're

0:26:00.804 --> 0:26:08.804
<v Speaker 2>seen as not being tough, then then you might not

0:26:08.964 --> 0:26:11.724
<v Speaker 2>get that next opportunity, right, And he's like, yeah, there

0:26:11.724 --> 0:26:14.444
<v Speaker 2>are guys who like are you know, who are these

0:26:14.444 --> 0:26:16.844
<v Speaker 2>guys who are you know, big gracious football players. But

0:26:16.844 --> 0:26:18.324
<v Speaker 2>if you're not willing to get in there and like

0:26:18.364 --> 0:26:23.124
<v Speaker 2>get your head knocked around, then then then they'll you'll

0:26:23.164 --> 0:26:24.324
<v Speaker 2>be bypassed.

0:26:23.884 --> 0:26:27.964
<v Speaker 1>Right, absolutely, absolutely. I think that this macho culture has

0:26:28.044 --> 0:26:29.764
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with it, and a lot to

0:26:29.804 --> 0:26:33.004
<v Speaker 1>do with the reluctance to adopt something that is clearly

0:26:33.044 --> 0:26:36.684
<v Speaker 1>beneficial for you. By the way, speaking of psychology, names matter,

0:26:36.924 --> 0:26:41.284
<v Speaker 1>words matter. Who the hell decided to call these guardian caps? Right,

0:26:42.204 --> 0:26:45.404
<v Speaker 1>I'm wearing a guardian cap, you know, like my little

0:26:45.444 --> 0:26:49.484
<v Speaker 1>grandmother cap that's guarding my head. Like call them something

0:26:49.524 --> 0:26:52.924
<v Speaker 1>manly and macho, right, Like, I don't know, we can

0:26:52.964 --> 0:26:55.964
<v Speaker 1>think about much better names that would make people want

0:26:56.004 --> 0:26:58.644
<v Speaker 1>to adopt them more than Guardian cap. But that's just

0:26:58.684 --> 0:27:02.644
<v Speaker 1>an aside. So I think that that what you're saying

0:27:02.764 --> 0:27:06.244
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely true. We do have this culture. And by

0:27:06.284 --> 0:27:08.884
<v Speaker 1>the way, I've seen some football games, like football's fun

0:27:08.884 --> 0:27:10.884
<v Speaker 1>to watch, part of me doesn't want to see it

0:27:10.924 --> 0:27:13.244
<v Speaker 1>because like every time someone gets hit on the head,

0:27:13.324 --> 0:27:16.204
<v Speaker 1>you know, every time someone's neck snaps, I just want

0:27:16.244 --> 0:27:18.084
<v Speaker 1>to close my eyes, you know, and just say, oh

0:27:18.084 --> 0:27:21.804
<v Speaker 1>my god, concussion. No no, no, no no. But yeah,

0:27:21.844 --> 0:27:25.724
<v Speaker 1>I understand it's a fun game to watch, but you know,

0:27:25.804 --> 0:27:31.084
<v Speaker 1>gladiatorial contests used to be fun too, where people actually died.

0:27:31.764 --> 0:27:35.124
<v Speaker 1>And to me, like this is this is the continuation

0:27:35.204 --> 0:27:38.204
<v Speaker 1>of that people have loved blood sports and watching people

0:27:38.284 --> 0:27:41.604
<v Speaker 1>get hurt and watching people go at each other, having

0:27:41.684 --> 0:27:46.084
<v Speaker 1>people play war on the field over and over and over.

0:27:46.124 --> 0:27:49.044
<v Speaker 1>This is not something that's new to America, Like this

0:27:49.124 --> 0:27:52.684
<v Speaker 1>is this is something that I think has been an

0:27:52.884 --> 0:27:56.844
<v Speaker 1>ingrained part of culture. I just wish that, you know,

0:27:56.924 --> 0:28:03.684
<v Speaker 1>we would actually understand why it's so incredibly important to

0:28:03.684 --> 0:28:07.164
<v Speaker 1>to try to to try to go back on that.

0:28:07.444 --> 0:28:10.364
<v Speaker 1>You remember a few weeks ago, Nate, we were talking

0:28:10.364 --> 0:28:12.564
<v Speaker 1>about the value of a human life. Right, what was

0:28:12.604 --> 0:28:15.644
<v Speaker 1>that number that you seem to have at the tip

0:28:15.684 --> 0:28:19.484
<v Speaker 1>of your finger. Ten million. So when people tell me that,

0:28:19.564 --> 0:28:22.644
<v Speaker 1>you know, football players their salaries are, you know, way

0:28:22.684 --> 0:28:26.044
<v Speaker 1>too high, I'm like, no, actually, the salaries are just

0:28:26.124 --> 0:28:31.404
<v Speaker 1>right and sometimes too low, because they are literally just

0:28:32.204 --> 0:28:35.884
<v Speaker 1>taking a flyer on their life, on their future, sanity,

0:28:36.284 --> 0:28:39.204
<v Speaker 1>on their brain function, on They're taking years off of

0:28:39.244 --> 0:28:41.804
<v Speaker 1>their life because a lot of these, you know, repeat

0:28:41.804 --> 0:28:46.404
<v Speaker 1>concussions are going to mean that you die ten years sooner,

0:28:46.804 --> 0:28:50.484
<v Speaker 1>twenty years sooner, that your healthy years are just completely reduced.

0:28:50.884 --> 0:28:54.124
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, they should be paid these insane premiums because

0:28:54.164 --> 0:28:57.644
<v Speaker 1>they are leveraging their health and their life for your

0:28:57.724 --> 0:29:00.924
<v Speaker 1>viewing pleasure. And I just wish that we could get

0:29:01.124 --> 0:29:04.244
<v Speaker 1>past that culture and understand, you know, the importance of

0:29:04.284 --> 0:29:08.404
<v Speaker 1>protecting these players and not forcing them to make that choice. Right,

0:29:08.964 --> 0:29:12.284
<v Speaker 1>instead of saying you can wear Guardian caps, why doesn't

0:29:12.324 --> 0:29:15.204
<v Speaker 1>the NFL go and say from now on, this is

0:29:15.244 --> 0:29:17.964
<v Speaker 1>the new helmet, right, this is the new regulation helmet

0:29:17.964 --> 0:29:19.244
<v Speaker 1>that everyone wears.

0:29:20.404 --> 0:29:22.004
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, at first yet the name and

0:29:22.004 --> 0:29:24.244
<v Speaker 2>then at first I thought it was like, when I

0:29:24.244 --> 0:29:26.324
<v Speaker 2>first heard about it was guardian cups, and I wonder

0:29:26.324 --> 0:29:28.844
<v Speaker 2>if you got extra protection for your manhood and how

0:29:28.884 --> 0:29:33.244
<v Speaker 2>that would be different. Maybe that's funny. I mean the

0:29:33.244 --> 0:29:36.964
<v Speaker 2>other thing about these helmets or cups caps.

0:29:36.724 --> 0:29:40.764
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, right, if they didn't even call them a helmet,

0:29:40.764 --> 0:29:43.644
<v Speaker 1>they called them a cap, please continue.

0:29:43.444 --> 0:29:45.484
<v Speaker 2>Right, You look, they look a little weird, right, I mean,

0:29:45.484 --> 0:29:47.244
<v Speaker 2>they're they're raw form. They kind of it's like turtle

0:29:47.324 --> 0:29:50.324
<v Speaker 2>shell look, and then you can kind of like drape

0:29:50.364 --> 0:29:52.964
<v Speaker 2>like the team's logo over it, but like so it

0:29:53.004 --> 0:29:55.564
<v Speaker 2>stands out and kind of everybody is kind of saying, Okay,

0:29:55.564 --> 0:29:58.804
<v Speaker 2>there's a guy who's taking extra protection, right, I mean,

0:29:58.884 --> 0:30:02.164
<v Speaker 2>you know, so some places will say that, like I

0:30:02.204 --> 0:30:04.564
<v Speaker 2>don't like the way it feels, and you know, if

0:30:04.564 --> 0:30:09.044
<v Speaker 2>the compromises performance, then then whatever, right, I mean, you know,

0:30:09.164 --> 0:30:12.244
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if it's true that a purchect performance, then

0:30:12.284 --> 0:30:13.884
<v Speaker 2>there's something there. But I think it's more that it

0:30:13.964 --> 0:30:17.204
<v Speaker 2>looks Yeah, it looks like this is the sport. It's

0:30:17.244 --> 0:30:22.204
<v Speaker 2>not the most progressive culture, and you're selecting for people

0:30:22.204 --> 0:30:27.644
<v Speaker 2>who were selected for for their aggression and tolerance for risk.

0:30:27.684 --> 0:30:31.284
<v Speaker 2>Because every position in the field except perhaps a kicker

0:30:31.804 --> 0:30:35.444
<v Speaker 2>and a punter are undertaking significant risk every time they

0:30:35.444 --> 0:30:38.124
<v Speaker 2>take the field, right, And I mean you you know,

0:30:38.284 --> 0:30:40.364
<v Speaker 2>a huge percentage of players are going to face a

0:30:40.364 --> 0:30:44.204
<v Speaker 2>severe injury at some point in their careers. It's kind

0:30:44.204 --> 0:30:48.844
<v Speaker 2>of normal, unfortunately. And like one of the things Dave

0:30:48.884 --> 0:30:51.444
<v Speaker 2>Anderson told me is that, yeah, if I text my

0:30:51.644 --> 0:30:53.764
<v Speaker 2>being a play for the Houston Texans, mostly if I

0:30:53.844 --> 0:30:57.684
<v Speaker 2>text my chet group of like human group chat excuse me,

0:30:57.724 --> 0:31:00.964
<v Speaker 2>of Houston Texans buddies who played golf with or fans

0:31:01.004 --> 0:31:04.284
<v Speaker 2>football with or whatever, then probably half of them are

0:31:04.284 --> 0:31:06.324
<v Speaker 2>not really in great shape right now. Right, they can't

0:31:06.444 --> 0:31:10.924
<v Speaker 2>do normal things that are normal forty something formerly healthy

0:31:10.964 --> 0:31:13.604
<v Speaker 2>athletic male would do, and like, so they're already kind

0:31:13.644 --> 0:31:18.604
<v Speaker 2>of like making this sacrifice. Yeah, so look, I mean

0:31:18.644 --> 0:31:21.404
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, the equilibrium is probably that the

0:31:21.484 --> 0:31:26.124
<v Speaker 2>NFL has to like mandate maybe certain positions wear it

0:31:26.604 --> 0:31:30.284
<v Speaker 2>or rookies after a certain date where it and also

0:31:30.324 --> 0:31:33.484
<v Speaker 2>work kind of technology to make it more esthetically pleasing.

0:31:33.524 --> 0:31:35.564
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure there's been resources poured into that.

0:31:35.684 --> 0:31:39.164
<v Speaker 1>Right, absolutely, absolutely, And I do think that though that

0:31:39.204 --> 0:31:40.884
<v Speaker 1>the mandate has to be it has to come from

0:31:40.884 --> 0:31:44.764
<v Speaker 1>the top, Otherwise I don't see this change happening, and

0:31:44.964 --> 0:31:47.724
<v Speaker 1>we already, by the way, see the players wearing them

0:31:47.804 --> 0:31:51.084
<v Speaker 1>during practices, and I don't think there's any impact on performance, right,

0:31:51.124 --> 0:31:54.324
<v Speaker 1>So everyone wears them during practice, and your eye will

0:31:54.364 --> 0:31:56.964
<v Speaker 1>get used to it. It's going to stop looking goofy.

0:31:57.324 --> 0:32:00.324
<v Speaker 1>Just think for a second, like try to visualize different

0:32:00.324 --> 0:32:03.764
<v Speaker 1>sports uniforms. A ton of sports look goofy if you

0:32:03.844 --> 0:32:06.444
<v Speaker 1>just think about it in the abstract. But we're used

0:32:06.444 --> 0:32:08.844
<v Speaker 1>to seeing it, so it looks it looks totally normal, right,

0:32:08.884 --> 0:32:11.844
<v Speaker 1>It just looks like the uniform for that sport. So

0:32:11.884 --> 0:32:14.884
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, two years from now, people

0:32:14.924 --> 0:32:18.404
<v Speaker 1>won't remember. Let me give you another example, skiing, right,

0:32:18.444 --> 0:32:21.324
<v Speaker 1>So downhill skiing, no one used to wear helmets. So

0:32:21.444 --> 0:32:24.844
<v Speaker 1>I started skiing when I was four years old, and no,

0:32:24.924 --> 0:32:28.524
<v Speaker 1>but not a single helmet to be seen, right, Everyone's

0:32:28.564 --> 0:32:31.604
<v Speaker 1>just wearing hats. Then you start seeing a few people,

0:32:31.764 --> 0:32:35.604
<v Speaker 1>very early adopters wearing helmets after research came out became

0:32:35.684 --> 0:32:37.764
<v Speaker 1>clear you know how important it was, how much it

0:32:37.804 --> 0:32:41.364
<v Speaker 1>could protect you. And my family was actually incredibly early

0:32:41.444 --> 0:32:45.124
<v Speaker 1>on that we basically immediately got helmets, and I never

0:32:45.164 --> 0:32:47.844
<v Speaker 1>wanted to wear one because I looked silly, right because

0:32:47.884 --> 0:32:50.404
<v Speaker 1>none of the other kids were wearing them, but we

0:32:50.484 --> 0:32:53.844
<v Speaker 1>did anyway, and now you can't. Every single person on

0:32:53.844 --> 0:32:56.724
<v Speaker 1>the mountain wears helmets, right Like, there's if you're the

0:32:56.764 --> 0:32:58.964
<v Speaker 1>person who's not wearing a helmet, you look like a

0:32:59.044 --> 0:33:02.044
<v Speaker 1>dumbass and people are like, who is this absolute idiot

0:33:02.404 --> 0:33:05.204
<v Speaker 1>not wearing a helmet when everyone knows that you have

0:33:05.284 --> 0:33:08.124
<v Speaker 1>to wear a helmet? And this happened in a decade,

0:33:08.324 --> 0:33:11.804
<v Speaker 1>right like it was actually incredibly short when you think

0:33:11.804 --> 0:33:15.044
<v Speaker 1>about it, from everyone just wears your winter hat to

0:33:15.204 --> 0:33:18.724
<v Speaker 1>every single person wears a helmet, So these changes are

0:33:18.764 --> 0:33:23.244
<v Speaker 1>absolutely possible, and it doesn't it no longer looks goofy.

0:33:23.804 --> 0:33:26.044
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you look like an idiot for doing something different.

0:33:26.244 --> 0:33:28.404
<v Speaker 1>So I'm willing to bet that if we see a mandate,

0:33:28.444 --> 0:33:31.884
<v Speaker 1>we're going to start seeing you know that we will

0:33:31.884 --> 0:33:34.084
<v Speaker 1>no longer even notice and be like, oh, you know,

0:33:34.124 --> 0:33:37.604
<v Speaker 1>look how silly that looks. And we know that there

0:33:37.604 --> 0:33:43.964
<v Speaker 1>are sports that have huge risk injuries, huge potential for

0:33:44.164 --> 0:33:48.484
<v Speaker 1>concussions where the concussion rate is actually incredibly low, such

0:33:48.524 --> 0:33:52.484
<v Speaker 1>as racing. Right so Formula one happening in Las Vegas

0:33:52.484 --> 0:33:56.404
<v Speaker 1>in a few days, race car drivers those collisions. Holy shit, right,

0:33:56.764 --> 0:33:59.324
<v Speaker 1>Like you would think that these guys would just like

0:33:59.364 --> 0:34:02.204
<v Speaker 1>have concussions all the time. No, because they have these

0:34:02.324 --> 0:34:05.364
<v Speaker 1>crazy helmets that not only protect their heads, but protect

0:34:05.404 --> 0:34:08.764
<v Speaker 1>their necks and protect them from kind of that sort

0:34:08.764 --> 0:34:11.684
<v Speaker 1>of whiplash that is what actually causes concussions a lot

0:34:11.724 --> 0:34:15.844
<v Speaker 1>at the time. So you have these things that we see,

0:34:15.884 --> 0:34:18.084
<v Speaker 1>we have the technology, we know how to do it,

0:34:18.444 --> 0:34:21.724
<v Speaker 1>we know how to protect people, and yet there's this,

0:34:21.964 --> 0:34:25.364
<v Speaker 1>just as you pointed it out, we're coming full circle.

0:34:25.404 --> 0:34:29.444
<v Speaker 1>There's kind of this macho false bravado that makes it

0:34:29.484 --> 0:34:33.044
<v Speaker 1>seem not manly to protect yourself. I hope that we're

0:34:33.124 --> 0:34:35.964
<v Speaker 1>able to kind of turn that around because I want

0:34:36.004 --> 0:34:38.644
<v Speaker 1>people to be able to enjoy sports. I want people

0:34:38.684 --> 0:34:41.004
<v Speaker 1>to be able to enjoy football, and I want these

0:34:41.884 --> 0:34:46.124
<v Speaker 1>players to have good lives and healthy lives ahead of them.

0:34:46.324 --> 0:34:47.924
<v Speaker 1>You know. I don't want them to have to mortgage

0:34:47.964 --> 0:34:52.764
<v Speaker 1>their marriages, their children, their future, everything just to bring

0:34:53.004 --> 0:34:55.124
<v Speaker 1>some people pleasure for a few years.

0:34:56.044 --> 0:35:01.484
<v Speaker 2>Now. Look, I mean again, self selected for muchismo population,

0:35:01.684 --> 0:35:05.084
<v Speaker 2>and like you know, a kind of common theme of

0:35:05.124 --> 0:35:11.364
<v Speaker 2>the show is that behaviors that seem irrational aren't necessarily irrational,

0:35:11.604 --> 0:35:13.684
<v Speaker 2>I you know, because it's kind of how you define

0:35:14.164 --> 0:35:16.964
<v Speaker 2>rationality and if you lose the prestige or but yeah,

0:35:17.004 --> 0:35:19.884
<v Speaker 2>I look, I mean, you know, if you have some

0:35:19.924 --> 0:35:24.924
<v Speaker 2>prominent players too who are like, I'm a unimpeachably cool

0:35:25.044 --> 0:35:29.684
<v Speaker 2>NFL player and now I'm wearing this thing, right, then

0:35:29.804 --> 0:35:32.604
<v Speaker 2>then that might change things a little bit. It's not

0:35:32.644 --> 0:35:35.724
<v Speaker 2>like they're you know, in hockey. I mean, you know,

0:35:35.964 --> 0:35:37.484
<v Speaker 2>some of these guys have like golden locks and the

0:35:37.484 --> 0:35:39.884
<v Speaker 2>good looking guys, and they were afraid of decreasing their

0:35:39.924 --> 0:35:44.604
<v Speaker 2>marketability right when the helmets came in and and but

0:35:44.804 --> 0:35:47.084
<v Speaker 2>in football, you already don't really see the guy's face, right,

0:35:47.124 --> 0:35:49.764
<v Speaker 2>they already have have a helmet on, and like it

0:35:49.844 --> 0:35:51.524
<v Speaker 2>just seems kind of weird that, Like, I mean, so

0:35:51.604 --> 0:35:57.124
<v Speaker 2>obviously from the league's perspective, why is there no mandate?

0:35:57.204 --> 0:36:01.564
<v Speaker 2>I mean, because the NFL is incredibly resilient and popular,

0:36:03.324 --> 0:36:05.324
<v Speaker 2>you know. But like the part of what's happened to

0:36:05.404 --> 0:36:08.084
<v Speaker 2>is I think kind of football had gotten more like

0:36:09.524 --> 0:36:11.844
<v Speaker 2>kind of you know, there were risks that liberals were

0:36:11.844 --> 0:36:13.844
<v Speaker 2>worried about concussions in the NFL, and that kind of

0:36:13.924 --> 0:36:19.324
<v Speaker 2>like died down a little bit. I think because football

0:36:19.364 --> 0:36:22.564
<v Speaker 2>occupies this unique place in American society where people like

0:36:22.564 --> 0:36:26.324
<v Speaker 2>it precisely because it's violent, and precisely because like it's

0:36:26.364 --> 0:36:30.244
<v Speaker 2>this proxy for kind of like risk taking. But yeah,

0:36:30.324 --> 0:36:30.964
<v Speaker 2>don't I don't know.

0:36:31.924 --> 0:36:34.844
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Well, we'll see what happens. But I hope that

0:36:35.404 --> 0:36:37.284
<v Speaker 1>I hope that the tides are shifting and that we

0:36:37.364 --> 0:36:42.364
<v Speaker 1>will see change in the coming years. By the way, Nate,

0:36:42.804 --> 0:36:45.764
<v Speaker 1>while you and I were talking, Trump said that he

0:36:45.884 --> 0:36:49.644
<v Speaker 1>was going to be nominating medmet Oz to oversee Medicare

0:36:49.684 --> 0:36:53.484
<v Speaker 1>and Medicaid, who will be working closely with RFK juniors.

0:36:53.484 --> 0:36:57.284
<v Speaker 1>And we have this dystopian RFK and doctor OZ combination.

0:36:57.684 --> 0:36:59.724
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I feel not available for anything.

0:37:00.764 --> 0:37:04.164
<v Speaker 1>Yeah to me, wow, like I this is not a

0:37:04.204 --> 0:37:05.844
<v Speaker 1>reality that I could have predicted.

0:37:07.484 --> 0:37:09.764
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it kind of is pretty I mean, watched

0:37:09.764 --> 0:37:10.284
<v Speaker 2>a lot of TV.

0:37:13.804 --> 0:37:17.444
<v Speaker 1>That's I guess that's true. I guess that's true. Let's

0:37:17.444 --> 0:37:20.804
<v Speaker 1>see what happens next week. But these uh, these picks

0:37:20.844 --> 0:37:26.484
<v Speaker 1>are getting more and more absurd, and the qualification levels, yes,

0:37:26.564 --> 0:37:29.284
<v Speaker 1>being on TV seems to actually be a very high qualification.

0:37:30.244 --> 0:37:33.684
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember the ad that Mimute OZ runs about

0:37:33.684 --> 0:37:35.164
<v Speaker 2>complaining about the price of Crude Tae.

0:37:37.924 --> 0:37:44.804
<v Speaker 1>Yes in the grocery store completely. I do remember that ad,

0:37:44.844 --> 0:37:48.484
<v Speaker 1>and I think we should all start rewatching it, rerunning

0:37:48.484 --> 0:37:51.884
<v Speaker 1>it to try to get people to to understand what's

0:37:51.924 --> 0:37:56.084
<v Speaker 1>happening that cruditay Ad Wow, what it Well? We we

0:37:56.124 --> 0:37:59.004
<v Speaker 1>started with the cabinet, let's end on this absurdist note,

0:37:59.244 --> 0:38:01.044
<v Speaker 1>and now all I can think about are crud de

0:38:01.084 --> 0:38:14.644
<v Speaker 1>te and doctor us. Let us know what you think

0:38:14.684 --> 0:38:18.004
<v Speaker 1>of the show. Reach out to us at Risky Business

0:38:18.044 --> 0:38:22.924
<v Speaker 1>at pushkin dot FM. Risky Business is hosted by me

0:38:23.124 --> 0:38:24.564
<v Speaker 1>Maria Kondakova.

0:38:24.364 --> 0:38:25.684
<v Speaker 2>And byb Nate Silver.

0:38:26.364 --> 0:38:29.924
<v Speaker 1>The show is a co production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia.

0:38:30.444 --> 0:38:34.004
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Isabel Carner. Our associate producer

0:38:34.044 --> 0:38:37.604
<v Speaker 1>is Gabriel Hunter Chang. Our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:38:38.204 --> 0:38:40.324
<v Speaker 2>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:38:40.364 --> 0:38:42.324
<v Speaker 2>so all the people can find us too. And if

0:38:42.364 --> 0:38:44.604
<v Speaker 2>you want to listen to an AD free version, sign

0:38:44.724 --> 0:38:47.404
<v Speaker 2>up for Pushkin Plus for six, ten and nine a month.

0:38:47.444 --> 0:38:50.284
<v Speaker 2>You would access to AD free listening. Thanks for tuning in.