WEBVTT - #400 Wrongful Conviction: Junk Science - Gunshot Residue Evidence

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, folks, Kate Judson here. I'm a lawyer and the

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>executive director of the Center for Integrity and Forensic Sciences.

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>We're back with another episode of Junk Science, a series

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we first released in twenty twenty, but these stories are

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>just as relevant as ever. This week's episode focuses on

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>gunshot residue, a form of forensic science that is still

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>used today. The techniques have improved slightly since the case

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in this episode, but they're still pretty unreliable. One of

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the biggest problems with gunshot residue evidence, or GSR, is

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>that we don't know how long it sticks around. Sometimes

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>analysts talk about GSR as though if you weren't at

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a firing range in the last four hours, there's no

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>reason for GSR to be found on you. But that's

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>not the case, especially in a country like ours where

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>firearms are ubiquitous. We don't know enough about transfer to

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>be confident that if you have GSR on your clothing

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>or body, that you got that residue from actually using

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 1>a firearm. Maybe you got it when you were arrested

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>because the police officer had it on him, or maybe

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you shook hands with someone earlier who'd recently been to

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a range. There are too many questions about persistence and

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>transfer for much of our historical testimony about GSR to

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>be trustworthy.

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 2>It's Saturday night. You're in your front yard working on

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.839
<v Speaker 2>your moped. Your dad is sitting on the picnic bench,

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 2>chatting with you as you install a new starter. You

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 2>and your friend Alan saved up all year so you

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 2>could each buy a bike. Neither one of them is

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>in great condition, but now that school is out you

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 2>have all summer to fix them up. After a little while,

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 2>your friend Chante arrives at your house and he says, hey,

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Alan's bike has a flat. He wants us to come

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 2>help him fix it. And you're thinking, again, his bike

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 2>is always breaking down. It's always got some kind of problem.

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 2>At first, you were a little jealous of Alan's red

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 2>raz but that guy keeps getting flats. You pat the

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 2>seat on your brown moped. It's pretty ugly, but at

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 2>least it's faithful. You ask your dad if it's cool

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>if you go over to Alan's grandmother's to get the bike.

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>He looks at his watch and says, well, it's pretty late,

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 2>but hurry up, go get it and you can bring

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 2>it back here to work on it. When you and

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Chante get to Alan's, Chante heads inside to help Alan

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 2>with the bike. Another flat, you say. When Alan comes

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 2>out of his house, don't even start, Alan says, tossing

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 2>you a can of soda. You hang out for a bit,

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 2>and then the three of you start walking Alan's bike

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 2>towards your house. You're teasing Alan about how often his

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 2>mopeed has problems when a green sedan coming from the

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 2>opposite direction stops right next to you. The man driving

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 2>the car leans out the window and says, hey, you

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.119
<v Speaker 2>guys have any dope Nah, and says we don't mess

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 2>with that shit. Yell at the guy, Hey, man, get

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 2>out of here, and the green car speeds off. You

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 2>walk a bit further down the block, and then you

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 2>hear shots ring out. Oh shit. All three of you

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 2>start frantically running down the street and don't look back.

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 2>You don't stop running until you get back to your house.

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 2>You look around, making sure no one's shooting at you,

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 2>and then you catch your breath. You, Shanta and Allen

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 2>talk about the gunshots for a few minutes. It's not

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>that out of the ordinary in this neighborhood, but still

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 2>it's totally scariest shit when it happens. The adrenaline finally

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 2>wears off and you start working on Allen's bike. There's

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 2>a nail in the tread of the tire. You pull

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 2>it out, plug the hole, and let the glue set.

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 2>After pumping up the tire and giving it a few

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>good pushes, Alan grabs his bike and begins to walk

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 2>it back down the street toward his grandmother's house. Once

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.839
<v Speaker 2>Alan gets to his street, he sees the green car

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 2>that stopped to ask for drugs, but now its front

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 2>end is just demolished. It's smashed into the side of

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 2>a house a few doors down from his grandmother's. There's

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 2>smoke and chaos and police just everywhere. Over the next

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 2>few days, you expect to see Alan riding his red

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 2>raz after all the tire is fixed, but you don't

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:41.559
<v Speaker 2>see him around the neighborhood. A week passes, you knock

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 2>on his door and his grandmother tells you that the

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 2>man in the green car had been shot. The cops

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 2>asked Alan to come to the police station to help

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 2>with the investigation. She expected Alan to be home that

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 2>same night, but he's being held in jail. She's afraid

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 2>and confused, and suddenly so are you. A few weeks later,

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 2>you're in your backyard, throwing a tennis ball against the

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 2>side of your house, worrying about Alan, wondering if he's okay.

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Out of the corner of your eye, you see some

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 2>people walking towards you, and it's four police officers. At

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 2>first you freeze, overcome with fear, and then you take off.

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 2>They took Alan for no reason. What's going to stop

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 2>them from grabbing you and doing the same thing. But

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 2>you're fourteen years old. They're bigger than you, faster, and

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 2>there's more of them. They catch up, grab you and

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 2>put you in handcuffs. Your first thought is I'm going

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 2>to disappear, just like Alan. You're putting an interrogation room.

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 2>You tell the officers what happened that night, the night

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 2>the guy in the green car got shot, how you

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 2>and Alan told him to go away. But they don't

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 2>want to hear the truth. They don't want to hear

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 2>anything you're telling them. One of the detectives, Scoots, is

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 2>seat closer to you. We know Alan did this. His

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:13.239
<v Speaker 2>hands tested positive for gunpowder residue. You know what that is, son,

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 2>We know he was involved. You're gonna tell us what

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Alan did. You're gonna tell us that Alan had the gun,

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 2>that you saw that gun, and that what he did

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 2>is he went up to that car that stopped and

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 2>he talked to the guy in the car, and the

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 2>next thing you knew was you heard gunshots and you

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 2>saw Alan running. And I'm gonna tell you something you

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 2>don't tell us exactly that. Here's what's gonna happen. You're

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna get charged with murder. You got that. You know

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 2>how much power these guys have. They already have Alan.

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Who knows what they're gonna do to you. You're petrified.

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 2>The walls feel like they're closing in on you. You figure,

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 2>I should just tell these guys what they want to hear.

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Then my parents can help sort this out later. So

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 2>you do what they say. You make up a story,

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 2>one that sounds like what they want to hear, and

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 2>they record it. You'll tell them anything just to get

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 2>out of that room. Before letting you go, the cops

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 2>tell you you're going to have to testify at Alan's trial.

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 2>We'll see you.

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Then.

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 2>A few weeks pass, and you're relieved when school starts again,

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe this will distract you from thinking about Alan, from

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 2>the feeling that it's your fault. He's still sitting in jail.

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 2>The day of Alan's trial, you and Chante decide you're

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 2>not going to show up. You're not going to testify

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 2>against your friend, lie again and dig a deeper hole

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 2>for Alan. But the cops show up at your school

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 2>and they bring you both to court. At Alan's trial,

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 2>an officer takes the stand and says that he personally

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 2>collected samples from Alan's hands. He swabbed the front and

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 2>back of them with Q tips and then tested those

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Q tips to see if there was gunpowdered residue present.

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>The officer testifies the defendant's right hand tested positive for

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 2>antimony and bury them two chemical elements that are present

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 2>in gunpowder residue. There is no doubt in my mind

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 2>that the defendant shot the gun that was used in

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:26.119
<v Speaker 2>this homicide. This is insane. You think you know Alan

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 2>didn't have a gun. He was with you when those

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 2>shots rang out. How can they just make this stuff up?

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 2>When you're on the witness stand, you glance over at

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 2>the jury. They're all sitting forward, staring right at you.

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 2>Through you. It seems. The prosecutors start asking you all

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 2>of these questions. Your answers are all over the place.

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 2>They barely make sense. You were told to tell lies,

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 2>but it's hard to keep it all straight because none

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 2>of what you're testifying to actually happened. But at seventeen

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 2>years old, Allan is convicted of murder and sentenced to

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 2>fifteen years to life in prison. The gunshot residue that

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 2>the police and prosecutor's claim was found on Alan's hand

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 2>is the only physical evidence linking him to the crime.

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 2>The story you just heard is based on the true

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 2>events of Raymond Carl Allan Warren's trial. He was convicted

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 2>of murder based on faulty gunshot residue evidence. The police

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 2>also chorused his two friends, Shanta and Antonio, into giving

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 2>false testimony saying that Allan committed the crime. Alan is

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 2>now in his forties and he is still in prison.

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 2>He's been there for over twenty five years, serving a

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 2>sentence of fifteen to life for a murder he did

0:09:54.200 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 2>not commit. I'm Josh Duben, civil Rights It's in criminal

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 2>defense attorney and innocent ambassador to the Innocence Project in

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 2>New York Today on wrongful conviction junk science. We examine

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 2>gunshot residue evidence. As listeners to the show, you've probably

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 2>heard how coerse confessions are used to convict innocent people

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 2>on another podcast in our feed wrongful conviction, false Confessions. Now,

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 2>the coerse confessions of Chanta and Antonio were certainly factors

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 2>in convicting Allan at his trial, but today our focus

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:35.719
<v Speaker 2>is on faulty forensic science, and gunshot residue certainly has

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 2>its issues that began almost a century ago.

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 4>When three dozen former Brooklyn Navy yard workers found themselves

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 4>irreparably poisoned by the asbestos they used in the construction

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 4>of the battleships that won World War Two. Perry White

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 4>and Arthur Luxembourg literally put everything on the line to

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 4>successfully represent them. Since then, they've chanted being the rights

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 4>of over fifty thousand regular Americans injured through the negligence

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 4>and malfeasance of mainly large corporations. Their ability to level

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 4>the playing field against seemingly insurmountable odds has led them

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 4>to litigate against opponents as diverse as big Pharma, all

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 4>the way to those responsible for rendering the water of

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 4>Flint Michigan Undrinkable whites and Luxembourg ticket personally when there's

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 4>a miscarriage of justice anywhere, and therefore they feel a

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 4>sense of responsibility to support Bramfel conviction podcasts. You can

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 4>learn more about them by visiting whites lux dot com.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 4>That's weitz lux dot com.

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 2>In nineteen thirty three, a group of American police officers

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 2>from several departments gathered in a lab at the police

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 2>headquarters of Mexico City. They were there to observe Tiodoro

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Gonzales demonstrate his new tech for testing gunpowder residue. The

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 2>test became known by many names, the dermal nitrate tests,

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 2>the glove tests, but my favorite might be the paraffin

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 2>gauntlet test. The officers watched as Gonzales poured white, hot

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 2>liquid paraffin wax over the fingers, hands, and wrists of

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 2>his lab assistant. A glimmer of discomfort flashed across the

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>assistant's eyes as the hot wax coated his skin. Next,

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Gonzales delicately wrapped the layer of cotton around the assistants

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 2>fingers and hands. Layer after layer of wax, then cotton

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 2>were added, until gloves began to form while the paraffin cooled.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Gonzales explained that after a suspect fires a gun, the

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 2>gunpowder residue becomes embedded deep in the pores of the skin.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Even weeks after a gun is fired, the hot melted

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 2>paraffin will open up the pores, mix with the oils

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 2>in the skin, and caused the porest to discharge the

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 2>gunpowder residue trapped within them. Part of this experiment included

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 2>Gonzalez's assistant firing a gun and then washing his hands

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 2>prior to them being wrapped. The American officers noted the

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 2>advantage of this technique. Suspects couldn't simply wash their hands

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 2>and avoid detection. Gonzales delicately peeled the gloves from the

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 2>hands of his assistant and then took them over to

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 2>the lab table and gently laid them down. He measured

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 2>a small beaker of a chemical solution that contained sulfuric acid.

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Drop by drop, he coated the interior of the gloves

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 2>with the mixture. Minutes later, dark blue specks the size

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 2>of pinpoints began to form, and Gonzales explained that these

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 2>blue dots indicated the presence of dermal nitrates from gunpowder residue.

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 2>The police officers huddled around the paraffine gloves to see

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 2>for themselves. After that, it took only a few years

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 2>for the paraffin test to become widely used in police

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:15.719
<v Speaker 2>departments across the United States. Within three years of Gonzalez's demonstration,

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 2>it was used as forensic evidence in the murder trial

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 2>of James L. Westwood in Pennsylvania. At his trial, the

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 2>state called expert witnesses who testified that gunpowder residue was

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 2>present on Westwood's hands, indicating that it was he who

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 2>shot and killed his wife. But Westwood's defense attorney called

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 2>his own expert witness, a chemist who had conducted his

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 2>own study and found that thirteen different substances could also

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 2>cause the blue dots to appear on the paraffin gloves.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 2>He cited things like ordinary soot, certain brands of toothpaste,

0:14:55.320 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 2>tobacco cigars, cigarette ashes, and different types of matches, but

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 2>none of that evidence mattered for the jury. Westwood was

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 2>convicted of the first degree murder of his wife and

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 2>sentenced to life in prison. By nineteen sixty seven, a

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 2>wider study concluded that rust colored fingernail polish and residue

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 2>from evaporated urine, soap, and tapwater would all test positive.

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Contact with any of these objects would create blue dots

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 2>to appear on the gloves in a paraffin test. The

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 2>paraffine test is no longer being used today, and the

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 2>science behind testing gunshot residue has changed. By the time

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Allan was arrested in nineteen ninety four at sixteen years old,

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 2>officers used a new version of the test. It's called

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 2>the atomic absorption test, but that test has many of

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 2>the same reliability problems as the paraffin glove.

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 3>None of the evidence that was used to convict it

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Alan has withstood the test of time. The test used

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 3>to indicate that he had gunshot residue on his hands

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 3>is no longer considered reliable.

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 2>So joining us today is Joanna Sanchez and she's from

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 2>the Wrongful Conviction Project at the Office of the Ohio

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Public Defender and we're super excited to have her today.

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 2>She's currently representing Alan, whose story we talked about at

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of this episode. Now, Alan's full name is

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Raymond Carl Allan Warren, and Joanna might refer to him

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 2>as either Allan or Raymond, but don't get confused, okay,

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 2>because Raymond and Alan are the same person. So Joanna,

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 2>it's great to have you here today, and I'd like

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 2>you to start by telling us a little bit about Alan.

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 2>What was he like as a sixteen year old living

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 2>in Dayton, Ohio.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Alan was, by all accounts, a normal teenager. He had

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 3>a few brothers and he's very close with them. He's

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 3>close with his mother, very close to his great and

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 3>mother had lots of friends in the neighborhood, would spend

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 3>time with them. Alan loves working on cars, so that

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 3>was something he spent a lot of time doing, both

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 3>fixing cars and painting them, playing basketball. And now you know,

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 3>I've known him now for six years. He's a very engaging,

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 3>caring person, very talkative, has strong relationships with his family

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 3>and friends. Still, okay, So.

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 2>I want to get into the details of the crime

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. So police officers arrive on Allen Street

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 2>the night when he had been fixing his moped and

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 2>this green car had crashed into the side of a

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 2>house and the driver is shot. So what makes them

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 2>even decide to go after Allan as a suspect in

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 2>the first place?

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's a matter of circumstance, the boys

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 3>they worked on their scooters for a period of time

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 3>after they heard the gunshots, and then in order to

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 3>go home, Alan had to essentially go through the crime

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 3>scene because it happened on the street he was living

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 3>on with his grandma's. So Alan that night told the

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 3>police about this encounter with the victim, and the police

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 3>asked him if he was willing to come down to

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 3>the police station to give a statement. So he voluntarily

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 3>went to the police station and also voluntarily submitted to

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 3>a gunshot residue test. And the result of that gunshot

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 3>residue test was that Allen tested negative on his left

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 3>hand even though he's left handed, and the palm of

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 3>his right hand, though tested positive for two elements that

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 3>are known to be in gunshot residue. And I honestly

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 3>think once that gunshot residue test came back, they just

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 3>became laser focused on Alan.

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.239
<v Speaker 2>So tell us a little bit about that test. What

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 2>exactly did gunshot residue testing entail at the time when

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Alan went down to that police station.

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 3>So, gunshot residue testing, the idea behind it is that

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 3>one person shoots a firearm, particles will be admitted that

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 3>will land on their clothing or their hands or their face,

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 3>and that those particles can then be tested. You can't

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 3>see them, but they can be tested and tell to

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.239
<v Speaker 3>please something about whether the person being tested might have

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 3>shot a firearm. All gunshot residue testing is not a

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 3>simple yes or no test. This is gunshot residue or

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 3>it's not. What it's really testing for is the elements

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 3>that are known to make up gunshot residue. So specifically,

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 3>they test for three elements in most circumstances, and that's lead, barium,

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 3>and antimony. In Raymond's case, they actually only tested for

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 3>two of those elements, and what they used was an

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 3>atomic absorption test, which is now largely out of use,

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 3>and that's because it has a high risk of producing

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 3>false positives. So the reason the AA test is unreliable

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 3>is because it tests for elements that are also present

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 3>in items that are completely unrelated to guns. So as

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 3>a result, a person who's never touched or been near

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 3>a gun could falsely test positive.

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 2>So Joanna, give us an example. What are some things

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 2>that Alan might have touched that would make him test

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 2>positive for gunshot residue.

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Brake linings are one example of an item that has

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 3>the same elements as gunshot residue, and on the night

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 3>of the shooting, as we know, Raymond, who frequently was

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 3>working on cars, had contact with brake linings while he

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 3>fixed his motorized scooter. So the AA test as used

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 3>in Raymond's case is problematic because we can't know if

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 3>those two elements came from gunshot residue or if they

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 3>came from brake linings or some other substance that has

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 3>those same elements as gunshot residue.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned that the AA test, the atomic absorption

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 2>test that was used on Allen, is not really considered

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 2>any more to be dependable, but they're still using gunshot

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 2>residue as a form of evidence. With new tests, has

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 2>signs progressed in any significant way since the AA test.

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Gunshot residue testing generally has progressed somewhat. The AA test

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 3>is no longer really in favor because of its limitations,

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 3>and there was a switch over in the mid two

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 3>thousands to a test called sem EDS, and that test

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 3>was better in that it not only would tell an

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 3>analyst whether those elements were present, but also could tell

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 3>them the shape and size of the elements and sort

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 3>of how they functioned together, whether they were fused, whether

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 3>they were the shape of a sphere, all things that

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 3>would be important for distinguishing between gunshot residue and let's

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 3>say another substance. And so in order for an analyst

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 3>to have any confidence that something is actually gunshot resume,

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 3>they'd need to do that sort of morphological analysis and

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 3>also compare all of the elements in that gunshot resduce

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 3>sample with all of the elements and other substances so

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 3>that they can actually eliminate other items.

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So that sounds like it does have the potential

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 2>to be more accurate test because you're able to look

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 2>at the residue under microscope and tell that the molecules

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 2>actually come from a gun and can't be from anywhere else.

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 2>But is this a perfect fix?

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Even if that's done properly, there's still a second issue

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 3>with gunshot rescue testing, and that's the reason why the

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 3>scientific community has really pulled back from this testing, and

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 3>that issue is contamination. So gunshot residue is incredibly transferable.

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 3>It's very easy to pick it up by touching a

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 3>surface that's contaminated with gunshot residue. So if I were

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 3>to shoot a gun and shake your hand, you could

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 3>very likely test positive for gunshot residue. And with that

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 3>that creates just too big of a risk for environmental contamination.

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 3>And what it means is that, you know, people who

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 3>touch the back of police cars, handcuffs, police officers, police stations,

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 3>there's a good chance they could pick up gunshot residue

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 3>from those surfaces, even though they themselves never touched a gun.

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 3>And we know that happened to Raymond's case because he

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.439
<v Speaker 3>was transported to the police station in the back of

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 3>a police car and then held in an interrogation room

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 3>for several hours before he was actually tested. If on

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 3>the call before that police officer had taken somebody who

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 3>shot a gun down to the police station, that person

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 3>could have left gunshot residue there and then Alan gets

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 3>in the car and picks it up. And there have

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 3>been studies across the country that show that kind of

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 3>thing occurs. So there was a study in Colorado where

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 3>they tested I think forty police cars excuse me, twenty

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 3>six police cars, and they found gunshot residue particles and

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 3>fourteen of them. So this kind of transference is very

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 3>common unfortunately, So and.

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, in hearing this, I got to tell you

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 2>this is like it's startling, it's scary, and you initially

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 2>start to see think, well, how many people might have

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 2>been wrongfully convicted when the evidence in their case was

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 2>just gunshot residue on their hands. I mean, you have

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 2>to admit it's pretty compelling evidence for people that don't

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 2>know otherwise. And I mean what I mean for people

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 2>that don't know otherwise, I'm talking about jurors. So with

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 2>that in mind, how big of a role did faulty

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 2>gunshot residue evidence plane Allen's case?

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 3>The gunshot residue evidence here was critical in Alan's trial.

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 3>The examiner when he testified, what he said was that

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 3>this positive test means one of three things. Either Alan

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 3>shot a gun, Alan was a victim of a shooting,

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 3>or Alan handled ammunition. But we know he wasn't a victim,

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 3>and both of the other options still implicate him, whether

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 3>he's shooting a gun or handling ammunition. What the examiner

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 3>left out is the fourth possibility that this is contamination

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 3>and the fifth possibility, which is that it's not gone

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 3>shot residue at all. It could just be barium and

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 3>antimony on Alan's hands as a result of him having

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 3>contact with Brake Linings earlier that night, and that is

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 3>the entire scope of the physical evidence in this trial.

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 2>So as a result of this bogus gunshot residue evidence,

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Allan gets sentenced to fifteen years to life. He's only

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 2>seventeen years old. I mean, what options did he have

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 2>to seek recourse? How would one go about proving that

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 2>gunshot residue evidence is false.

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 3>It's incredibly difficult for anybody who's incarcerated to collect the

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 3>evidence or knowledge necessary to file a new trial motion

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 3>or raise a claim that they are wrongfully convicted. So

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 3>part of that is he's locked inside, can't go out

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 3>and conduct any sort of investigation. He lacks the funds,

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 3>so he doesn't have the ability to hire an attorney

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 3>or an investigator or an expert witness to go get

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 3>this evidence. Alan was challenged and that he couldn't even

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 3>get the records in his case, So if he wanted

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 3>to write a motion for a few years, he did

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 3>not even have a copy of his transcript that would

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 3>have helped him to do that. So there are so

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 3>many barriers. He's a smart guy, but he's not an attorney.

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's why we say people should have attorneys.

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 3>To litigate these complex issues is incredibly difficult, and it's

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 3>all the more so for somebody who's a teenager and

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 3>they're incarcerated. They don't have access to these things. And

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 3>so he fought on his own for years and years

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 3>to try to challenge his conviction. The kind of changes

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 3>and evolution with gunshot residue was happening, but he did

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 3>not really know that. He didn't have access to forensic

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 3>science articles or expert witnesses, so he wasn't even aware

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 3>that that was necessarily an issue in his case. And eventually,

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen ninety nine, Chante Hunt gave a statement and said,

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.239
<v Speaker 3>I lied because I was scared. Alan was with us

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 3>when we heard the shots, so he could not have

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 3>shot the victim. And in two thousand and eight, Antonio

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 3>gave a very similar statement saying, again, I was scared

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 3>and this is a lie, and I did not come

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 3>forward for all these years because I was scared of

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 3>perjury charges.

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Now the Innocence Project has become involved in Allen's case,

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 2>and you and your co counsel are fighting to get

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 2>allan justice. But as our listeners know by now, as

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you and I can agree, this problem is

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 2>so much bigger than Alan's case. What needs to happen,

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 2>in your opinion, to make sure things like gunshot residue

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 2>evidence stopped being used to convict innocent people so that

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.479
<v Speaker 2>this doesn't happen again and again and again.

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 3>I think police officers and lab examiners should be careful

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 3>about when they do gunshot resdue testing and only do

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 3>it in the very optimal circumstances, if at all. I

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 3>think there are some police officers who feel that it's

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 3>just a piece of the puzzle and it's a helpful

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 3>tool and the investigation. But I think the risk with

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 3>that is that it leads to tunnel vision. You know,

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 3>once you have that piece of evidence, you become fixated

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 3>on a suspect, and our courts, our judges, need to

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 3>look at it critically as well. The court is the

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 3>gatekeeper of expert testimony and forensic evidence that comes in,

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 3>and what we're seeing is that some courts are limiting

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 3>what can be said about gunshot rescue evidence, but they're

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 3>still allowing it in. And I think at some point

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 3>we hit a breaking point where the risk of prejudice

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 3>for this evidence outweighs the benefit of it because it

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 3>is so unreliable in so many different aspects. That are

0:28:56.520 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 3>we risking swaying the jury with evidence that really isn't

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 3>reliable enough and shouldn't be presented at all.

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 2>All Right, So that certainly addresses what people involved in

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the justice system can do. But what can everyday people do.

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 2>We have a lot of our listeners asking us, you know,

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 2>what can I do to help? So please tell them

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 2>things they can do to make sure that this kind

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 2>of junk science stops being used and it gets out

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 2>of our criminal justice system once and for all.

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 3>I think the biggest thing is people sharing this information

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 3>and sharing podcasts like this, sharing when somebody is exonerated

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 3>based on forensic evidence that we now know has been discredited.

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Is the more people that know about this, I think

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 3>the more the system will improve. I think the impact

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 3>of sharing this podcast and sharing his story is that

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 3>more people hear about it, and then they take that

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.959
<v Speaker 3>knowledge with them when they vote, and they take that

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 3>knowledge with them when they interact with public officials and

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 3>ask them, how do you approach wrongful convictions? How do

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 3>you approach forensic science. Are there laws in place that

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 3>allow for these convictions to be challenged appropriately? And I

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 3>think having the knowledge that's gained from listening to a

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 3>podcast like this equips people with the sort of the

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 3>talking points and the ability to ask those questions of

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 3>public officials.

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 2>So tell us a little bit about where Alan is

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 2>now and what options are left for him at this point.

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Now, Alan had litigated emotion asking for a new trial,

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 3>and we stepped into that litigation on his behalf in

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty fourteen, and it's kind of been up and down

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 3>through the courts over several years. But earlier this year

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 3>the Supreme Court of Ohio decided not to take his case.

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 3>So where we're at is we continue to fight for him,

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 3>and we believe strongly in his innocence and that he

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 3>was wrongfully convicted. And so we're moving forward. We're hoping

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 3>to find new evidence or hoping that a new avenue

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 3>of relief opens up that allows Alan to challenge his

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 3>conviction and hopefully one day go home.

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Look, Joanna, I my heart sort of you know, aches

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 2>for you and for Alan really, because I have been

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 2>there before. I know that when cases you know, don't

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 2>work out, you know, on our initial first try or

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 2>first fifteen tries, and go the way we need them

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 2>to go, because our clients are innocent, and we know

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 2>they're innocent. It can be so frustrating. What's your reaction

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 2>when you have setbacks like this. I know that I've

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 2>wept on my wife's shoulder before, I know that I

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 2>have punched walls. I've had the spectrum of emotions. But

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, tell me a little bit about what it's

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 2>like for you when you know you're faced with setbacks

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 2>like this, and you know what it's like with Alan

0:31:58.240 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 2>still sitting in prison.

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 3>I think the important thing we do is we kind

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 3>of keep moving forward and keep thinking about our clients,

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 3>keep thinking about Alan and what he's going through. And

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.239
<v Speaker 3>it's so important that we stay in the fight and

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 3>continue to be a voice for those people. And I

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 3>hope one day it's not this way. But I know

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 3>for me, I look at all the two thousand plus

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 3>exonerations that we know about, and I see that those

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 3>are never easy, right. They come after setback, and people

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 3>have to try multiple different times, multiple different ways. And

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 3>so I hope that at some point in time it

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have to be that way. But at least for now,

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 3>I know that it's absolutely worth it to keep fighting

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 3>for this person and to keep hoping that one day

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 3>something we do works and somebody pays attention and that

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 3>he gets the justice he's do.

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, I tell people all the time that these

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 2>wrongful convictions are super difficult. You have to fight tall odds,

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 2>you have to keep on fighting forward in the face

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 2>of constant rejection from appellate courts. And if you're not

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 2>willing to deal with sepacks, if you can't pick yourself

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 2>up and dust yourself off and keep charging up that

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 2>steep slope, you're really in the wrong business. And it

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 2>really does take a team effort. So the more you

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 2>can share these stories, the better off we're all going

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 2>to be, because there's power in numbers, and there's power

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 2>in a collective message. So I hope you will do

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 2>just that. Please share our podcast and take action, whether

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 2>it be writing your local judges as I often implore

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:43.719
<v Speaker 2>you all to do, or ensuring that when you vote,

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 2>you are voting for those judges and the jurisdiction which

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 2>you live that actually have the qualifications and the temperament

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 2>to be open minded and thorough such that they won't

0:33:56.520 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 2>blindly accept that legal precedent equates to liability. Sometimes bad

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 2>science remains in our system of justice because it goes unchallenged.

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 2>It's up to all of us to shine a bright

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 2>light on these junk sciences and force a reckoning. Next week,

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 2>we'll explore the junk science of tool mark identification with

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 2>science journalist Tim Recorth. Wrongful Conviction Junk Science is a

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 2>production of Lava for Good Podcasts and association with Signal

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Company Number One. Thanks to our executive producer Jason Flamm

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 2>and the team at Signal Company Number One executive producer

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Wardis and senior producers Karen Kornhaber and Britz Spangler.

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Our music was composed by Jay Ralph. You can follow

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 2>me on Instagram at dubin Josh. Follow the Wrongful Conviction

0:34:55.760 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 2>podcast on Facebook and on Instagram at Wrongful Conviction on

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Twitter at wrong Conviction