WEBVTT - Surveillance: Debt Ceiling with Dimon

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:07.119
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Keen, along with Jonathan Farrow and Lisa Abramowitz.

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Join us each day for insight from the best and economics, geopolitics,

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 2>finance and investment. Subscribe to Bloomberg Surveillance on demand on Apple,

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Spotify and anywhere you get your podcasts, and always on

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg dot Com, the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 2>Lisa Bramwitz and Tom Keen right now, and what we'd like.

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>To do is go to Paris. And it is a

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Paris of.

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.319
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan that is important in World War One. They

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to get the pronunciation wrong in Francine. Lacua

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.919
<v Speaker 2>is gonna correct me. It is Catore's plus vendome and

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 2>it was the commitment of the JP Morgan bank to

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>France in the heat of World War One. She is

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>joined in Paris with James Steman, Our Francy and Laclosx.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>How is like pronunciation?

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Fancye Tom full marks for French pronunciation. You're almost French.

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm so excited for you. I am delighted to be

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 3>joined by Jamie Diamond. JP Morgan Chairman and Chief executive officer,

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for joining us. As always, debt ceiling or

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 3>banking turmoil? What are you most.

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 4>Worried about you'd be here?

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think the debt steeling is potentially catastrophic. Yeah,

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 5>so that's a whole different issue. Hopefully won't happen. You know,

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 5>the banking crisis I still believe will kind of sort

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 5>its way through, and it's not anything like eight or

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 5>nine owing a couple of people off size, with all

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 5>these various things which you knew about. So hopefully you

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 5>know it's getting near the tail end of that.

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 3>But if you're Janet Yellen right now, what would you

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 3>do differently?

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 5>I don't know. I think we need to finish the

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 5>bank crisis. I think we've been we've had an uncertain

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 5>policy on mergers. This first horizon deal. I think we

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 5>have to assume they'll be a little bit more so,

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, whatever the FDI C, the occ the Fellow Reserve,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, whatever they need to do to make it better,

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 5>they should do be thoughtful, be very forward looking. You'll

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 5>not be surprised constantly because some of these things have

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 5>been known about for quite a while. And so we've

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 5>handled three SVB signature first Republic and.

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 3>So yes, asking, but I think it's very important.

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 5>The regional banks who I've been speaking to like every

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 5>day for the last week, they're quite strong. You know,

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 5>they're quite worried because of the you know, run and

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 5>deposited all that, but their financial results are good. The

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 5>financial results are gonna be good, okay next quarter. You know,

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 5>they're earning money. They get a very good clientele, very diversified.

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 5>Uh uh, and they're they're quite strong.

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 3>So Jenny for like a comprehensive solution. So if you're

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 3>asking Jennet Young to get the job done, what does

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 3>that look like that solution?

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 4>Ask for compreend solution.

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 5>Why not just be prepared for problems? There's no, we

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 5>don't need a comprehend solution.

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 3>What do we need right now? Do we regulators to

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 3>look at short sellers of banks?

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 5>Yes, you know, like, look, my folks are telling me

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 5>that that's not the problem. The short selling ban if

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 5>you actually analyze stocks and short doesn't seem that big

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 5>a deal. I think they may partially wrong because, as

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, some people are unscrupulous and they use other

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 5>means to go short.

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 4>I think that if you look at the detail.

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 5>The SEC has the enforcement capability to look at what

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 5>people are doing by name, in options, derivatives, short sales,

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 5>and they should go if someone's doing anything wrong, people

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 5>are in collusion, or people going short and then making

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 5>a tweet about a bank, they should go after them

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 5>and vigorously, and they should be punished to the full

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 5>extental law allows it. So I think it's possible to

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 5>taking place. We have no evidence of it, but you know,

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 5>my experience in life has been don't assume too much.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that they're looking into it?

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 4>I hope so. I don't know.

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 3>When you look at some of the position of JP Morgan,

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 3>of course you didn't really buy any long dated bonds,

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 3>and at the time a lot of people said, look

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>stop boarding cash. Do you think regulators and investors had

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 3>pushed some of these banks to take unwarranted risk.

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I do, but let's be clear the people to blame,

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 5>or the banks and the bank boards and things like that.

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 5>Having said that, I think there would be the humility

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 5>on the part of regulators. That the Federal Reserve itself

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 5>never forecasts going up. Not one Fed governor forecast it.

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 5>And whether you forecast it or not, you should be

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 5>stress testing people for it. Their stress tests always had

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 5>low rates. We always knew about uninsured deposits, and there

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 5>were huge incentives that banks to put securities in health

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 5>and maturity, lower capital requirements, huge incentives own treasuries, lower

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.679
<v Speaker 5>capital requirements, and they counted for liquidity. And I'm hoping

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 5>all that gets looked at, and they should look at

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 5>and say, oh, okay, we're a little bit part of

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 5>the problem as opposed to just pointing fingers.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 3>So this is what not a regulation problem, it's a

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 3>supervision problem.

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a.

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 5>Little bit of both. They become very related. I mean,

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 5>supervisors look at are you doing the right thing by

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 5>regulations and so, and like even the stress tests, I've

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 5>always thought that you know, when you have one stress

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 5>test and you have a company completely focused on that

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 5>for three months, you know, does it lull people have a

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 5>false sense of security that all these other things aren't

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 5>gonna happen. And all these other things in history always happen,

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 5>and so you know, I think it was a little

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 5>bit of a mistake that one stress test. I'm not

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 5>asking to do many at this level of detail, but

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, our stress test is two hundred thousand pages long.

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 5>Do you think that last one hundred thousand pages added value?

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 5>And my view is it did not.

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Do you think? But things will change because of this

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 3>is just like a catalyst.

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 4>We's gonna get worse for banks.

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 5>I think that people they're just more regulations and more

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 5>rules and more requirements. I hope they do it very

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 5>thoughtfully because you know, if you we love the community banks,

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 5>the regional banks, we're the biggest banks of those folks.

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 5>But you know, if you overdo certain rules, requirements, regulations.

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 5>You know, some of these community banks tell me to have,

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, more compliance people than loan officers, you know,

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 5>and so at one point you make it harder for

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 5>them to do business. There are already hundreds of rules

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 5>in place in a lot of ways, it's the mix

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 5>of the rules. If you're gonna change the liquidity and

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 5>maybe not capital. If're gonna change capital and maybe not liquidity.

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 5>If you're gonna add t LAC, then maybe you should

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 5>do something with deposit insurance.

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 4>They should.

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 5>They should sit down and have a very thoughtful conversation

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 5>about what those things are and what we want the

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 5>outcome to be. If you look at the present outcome,

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 5>a lot of things are leaving banks and they should

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, I'm not And if that's what they want,

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 5>so be it. But that should be done with the forethought.

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 5>That should not be done because you just putting rules

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 5>and regulations in place and you don't know the consequences.

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 4>The mortgage business, for example, is.

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 5>You know, largely not largely, eighty percent out of banks today,

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 5>and just be careful about what you what you wish for.

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 3>So you bought First Republic, you've had I imagine how

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 3>a good look at what's inside? It's what did you

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 3>find out?

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no, we had to go look before we bought it.

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's reassuring. But anything that you shigned.

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 5>Up to eight hundred people working around the clock for

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.799
<v Speaker 5>a long time to look at something like that.

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 4>And and in reality, look, they did some things.

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 5>Really well, like if you talk to their customers, I've

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 5>getten calls and emails and great great culture, great customers

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 5>and things like that. Their credit is kind of pristine.

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 5>You know, that's good. So of course we marked all

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 5>the market and roll in very good shape. And we've

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 5>had all the in trade exposure together. We've got thousands

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 5>of people now going out learning about what.

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 4>Their best is.

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 5>We want the best of both about the kind of

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 5>company that comes in our highway, our way or the highway,

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 5>and so there's no surprise there. You know, it's if

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 5>it had to make sense for shareholders. But you know,

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 5>this notion, this notion that it was unbelieva in it

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 5>was a nice thing for shows that's why I have

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 5>to do that. But we also really did it to

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 5>assimilate the bank in a way that's very safe for

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 5>the system and didn't cost uninsured deposits, didn't cost the ft,

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 5>it costs the FDA C as little as possible. But

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 5>I also want to point out I'd be fine if

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 5>they want to change the rules a little bit to

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 5>make it easier for a regional bank to buy a

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 5>big bank. And the other thing about big banks, which

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 5>again is I know, I know, but the thing about

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 5>big banks, we need healthy big banks. We are the

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 5>best banking system in the world, you know, and you

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 5>want that very big, yeah, but we're not. Banks are

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 5>becoming smaller or smaller as a part of the global system.

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 5>So when they look at banks, they say, oh, it's big,

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 5>But when you look at the banking system to the system,

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 5>mortgage have left, a lot of private credits left, certain

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 5>trading functional left, A lot of things are gonna leave.

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 5>You have Apple, you have the neo banks. You have

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 5>you better be a little more thoughtful about when you

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 5>say we, you mean banking per se and so.

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 3>But the US, the Americans, should not fear too much

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 3>finance consolidation in your hands.

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 5>No, because you know, most of our size accrues to

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 5>our clients. So if you look at you know we

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 5>do most large small banks can't do. We do like

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 5>banking large corporations of fifty countries around the world to

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 5>move ten trillion dollars a day. You know, it's hard.

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 5>So these are these are big, complex things. We're not

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 5>big and complex. We want to be for big and

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 5>complex because the Pee we serve a bigger comp We

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 5>bank countries, the World Bank. You know, we do a

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 5>lot of things. And yes, we also bank consumers in the

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 5>United States. So but I want the community banks to thrive.

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean, like I said, we want to do everything

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 5>can help them. We didn't want this to happen. We

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 5>didn't cause to happen. The second happened, we knew it

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 5>was bad for old banks.

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Are you too big to fail.

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what that word means anymore. I mean,

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 5>we're not gonna fail, and I don't know if that means.

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 5>But we certainly didn't mean it to be an advantage.

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 5>Like so, you know, we've asked all our people when

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 5>this crisis happened, I don't want anyone listing any client

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 5>or any bank or from any of the any bank's,

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 5>regional bank or community bank, et cetera.

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 3>So is there anything else that you'd that you'd be buying.

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean some of the smaller banks fault, you know,

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 3>fun that's it.

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 5>No, I mean, we're gonna have a lot of blowback

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 5>and having bought this one, but it was the right

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 5>thing to do, you know.

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 4>But we'll get the blowback.

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 5>But again, my job is this people at this thing

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 5>they always look at like the financial deal. Forget the

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 5>financial deal. Eight hundred people working around the clock. Ten

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 5>thousand people deployed now to consolidate systems, risk fraud, credit payments, branches,

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 5>real estate vendors, technology. It's a lot of work, you know,

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 5>and it just tracks us from those other things. And so,

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, like I said, we did it. It was

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 5>marginally benefits for shareholders. It was good for the system.

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 5>But and you know we got now we have to

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 5>be prepared for the other side of that mountain.

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 3>How worried are you about the dead ceiling? So Donald Trump,

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Yester the town Halicynna did not seem too worried, and

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 3>to actually told Republicans to stick to their guns.

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's one more thing he does know very much about.

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 5>It may be put in two categories. One is actual default.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 5>That is potentially catastrophic. And you can go through a

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 5>million ways, but everyone, anyone's anyone knows that's potentially catastrophic.

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.239
<v Speaker 5>And I don't think that's gonna happen because it gets catastropericy.

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 5>And the closer you get to it, you will have panic.

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 5>And so the closer you get you have markets get volatile.

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 5>Maybe there's Doc mar go down the treasury. Markets will

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 5>have their own problems.

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 4>It's amazing.

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 5>You already have certain T bills it's trading three percent

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 5>and right next to them five percent.

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:39.839
<v Speaker 4>This is not good.

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 5>And people just remember the American financial system is the

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 5>foundation to the to the global economics system. And so

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.599
<v Speaker 5>and the closer we get more panic, we might get downgraded.

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 5>The last time we were downgrade. We had like sixty

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 5>five or seventy percent debt to GDP. Now it's one

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 5>hundred and five. Now our deficits are two or three

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 5>times that that we had back then. So you know,

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 5>we better be very careful. And I wish we didn't

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 5>get through at all. I'm respectful of both sides who

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 5>you know, one side wants to use the makeup for

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 5>we've got jam down their throats, you know. And I

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:11.719
<v Speaker 5>would love to get rid of the debt ceiling thing,

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.719
<v Speaker 5>but please negotiate a deal.

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that it'll be at the end of

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 3>the day of the markets that will spur a deal

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 3>that we have to get to the point where there's

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 3>where there's panic.

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 5>It's a really bad idea because panic becomes something that

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 5>is not good and it could affect other markets around

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 5>the world. But yes, at the end of the day,

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 5>if it gets to that panic point, people have to react,

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 5>and we've seen that before. Another thing about markets is

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 5>always remember panic is the one thing that scares people

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 5>like they take irrational decisions. I remember, even in eight

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 5>people are selling certain securities at forty percent of what

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 5>they would.

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Be worth if we had a great depression.

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 5>But they were like, I want out, I want cash.

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm not betting my family's money on this and my

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 5>company's money. People will panic, and again we got to

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 5>be very careful about getting close situation that causes that.

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Do you get a call from Janet yelling about this?

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm not gonna talk about personal calls.

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm getting We've all spoken about that's youlling, I mean

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 5>everyone's that's.

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's no for big banks, are you ready? Actually, how

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 3>do you prepare for possible?

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 5>Have a group of people who are very smart we're

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 5>looking at again, it's very unfortunate, it's time consuming. Hopefully

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 5>won't happen, but it affects contracts, collateral clearing houses, clients,

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 5>and affect clients differently around the world. You have to

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 5>then anticipate what people are going to do, which is

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 5>very different than the legality of it. And you know,

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 5>and the closer we get, the more those kind of

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 5>that war room will start. Now it's taking place once

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 5>a week, but my guess is sometimes.

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Call it May twenty.

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 5>First it'll be every day, and then it'll be three

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 5>times a day, and then it'll be much more conversations

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 5>with clients. But what they need to do to help

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 5>get them through it and things like that. It's very unfortunate.

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 5>It should never happen this way.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Fortress Diamond is always about the balance sheet. Should there

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 3>be a special commission looking at debts in the US

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 3>that you should run?

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 6>Oh?

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 4>God, no, why not? I don't want to.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 3>On China, they went after tech, they're looking out at finance.

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 3>What kind of message does it tell companies that want

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 3>to do business there.

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think we say they're looking at finance. It's

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 4>been very limited.

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 5>They've been very much more careful about touching the financial system.

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 5>Who we're outsiders. But look, this is a serious subject

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 5>and anything that relates to national security. I'm a patriot first,

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 5>and I'm going to salute my government, So put that.

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 5>But put that aside. What the government should do and

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 5>it wants to do, and is now say they are

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 5>going to do, is have conversations. They're gonna be tough,

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 5>but they should be thoughtful. Certain things are really national security,

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 5>certain things are not, you know, and we shouldn't confuse

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 5>the two Americans. Shine of a lot of common interest climate,

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 5>nuclear pliferation, anti terrorism, global stability, you know, and we

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 5>have differences. You know, we're capitalists, they're not, you know,

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 5>And it's okay, we could short that out, but we

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 5>need to keep the Western alliances together, not just around

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 5>war and Ukraine, but around strategic economic relationships, including trade,

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 5>including trade.

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 4>We can't take trade.

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 5>Off the table every time we talk to Europe or

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 5>Asian and stuff like that. So I would go back

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 5>into TPP, I would surround the world. I'd want to

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 5>keep the world safe for democracy, and I want to

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 5>have open markets, particularly Europe. And I mean I was

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 5>here last time is when we passed Iraq. A lot

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 5>of great things that act, but there are things I

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 5>don't like, like too much social engineering side of it,

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 5>but also a pistol off all of.

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Our allies put on the China side. So if they

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 3>if they start doing more noise on finance, does that

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 3>hurt Chinese growth?

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 5>Like probably, I think you've already seen it's not trade,

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 5>but you've seen investment going both ways coming down. And

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 5>that's okay in the short run and the long run,

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 5>we should say what and the government's got to decide

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 5>this is not gonna be business companies designed, should they?

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 5>So when Congress criticizes business sometimes there may be truth

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 5>to that. They have to decide what is okay, what's

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 5>not okay?

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 4>What do they want? What security?

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 5>And that's around trade, that's around investment, that's around sharing ipay, I.

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Give you a million pounds or maybe you take it,

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, your own million pounds? Where'd you invest.

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 5>Organ I wouldn't buy sovereign debt anywhere? Why, I think

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 5>there's too much The amount of fiscal stimus took place

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 5>and still surging through the system, the amount of QI.

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 5>These were extraordinary numbers, and not just in the US,

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 5>but in Europe and in other parts of the world. Now,

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 5>when I say extraordinary, I mean extraordinary, And therefore I

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 5>think there's a chance you have more inflation than people think.

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 5>So while the FED controls short rates, they don't completely

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 5>control longer rates, and then you could see longer rates

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 5>ticking up because of higher inflation, and even if there's

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 5>a mild recession, they continue to tick up. You know

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 5>a lot of US experience that in the seventies and eighties,

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 5>and I would be a little worried about that. So

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 5>rates are kind of low, spreads still kind of low, okay.

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 3>So you're not putting them in suffering.

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 5>Where are you putting that million I'm central banks.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 3>For stability. If you look at fragmentation, I mean, the

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 3>world seems a little bit odd, like equities are doing

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 3>one thing, but we keep on being told there's a recession.

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Why is there this massive adusyncrasy.

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 4>That's the contradiction.

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 5>There's still consumers in America job unemployed three point five percent.

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 5>Home prizes have gone up for ten to fifteen years.

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 5>Stock prize has gone in for ten to fifteen years.

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 5>They have a trillion dollars more in their checking accounts.

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 5>They're spending that money. You see it in travel, you

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 5>see it in restaurants, you see it, and you've been

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 5>around here and you see in hotels, you see it.

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 5>That's all good, but the excess money is being spent down.

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 5>So the bite of that is going to happen later

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 5>this year early next year. And the bite of QT

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 5>hasn't happened yet. So if you have higher inflation, so

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a reasonable thing to say those things

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 5>are coming to fruition.

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Maybe sometime in the end of the year.

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 5>We don't know the effect of that, you know, if

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 5>there's I mean, I would take a mild recession and

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 5>happily right now, I am far more concerned about geopolitics, Ukraine, trade,

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, Russia, our relays with China, et cetera. And

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 5>I always have to mind all of our public America

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 5>has a seventy five thousand per person GDP, China's is fifteen.

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 5>We have all the food warn and energy we want.

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 5>They import ten million barrels of oil a day. I

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 5>mean it's not They're not a ten for giant and

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 5>that's a four foot pigmy.

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 4>We have to manage ourselves back. I think we can

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 4>grow more and more thoughtful.

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 3>So you know, a lot of people say it's commercial

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 3>real estates. I mean we talk about nothing else. Everybody

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 3>knows that that could break. Is there something that we're

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 3>not seeing that could break?

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 5>I think it's amazing when you talk about Marcus that

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 5>sometimes it's and the press sometimes like a bunch of

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 5>birds flocking to one thing with endless comments about it.

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that's an issue.

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 5>So you know, if you look at office real estate

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 5>in be and C real estate with private problem Chicago,

0:17:54.440 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 5>New York, Partland, Seattle, but probably not Nashville, Tampa, Orlando, Miami,

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 5>et cetera. So you got to you gotta be a

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 5>little more thoughtful about it. And I think if I'm

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 5>the number, banks have six hundred billion of office commercial

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 5>real estate. You know, they had a cushion even dropped

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 5>in value their self equity in it. Maybe something that

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 5>will go bad, particularly the recession, they're gonna be okay.

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 5>It may take a few banks down. That's normal. Stuff

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 5>that isn't abnormal. What is abnormal is the war trade

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 5>the future of democracy. That is abnormal. I'm much more

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 5>concerned about that than the.

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 3>Markets trade that.

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 3>If there's a big geopolitics, there's there's how do the

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 3>markets talk them do that?

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Look, if I was a what's cautious, I remind you

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 5>of I'm not. Businesses aren't there to trade its. Sometimes

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 5>they do serve our clients, okay, and so we're gonna

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 5>serve our clients no.

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Matter what happens.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 3>Very quickly, final question, how are you feeling about the

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Epstein deposition this month?

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 5>I am so sad that we had any relays with

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 5>that man whatsoever. You know, we had top lawyers of

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 5>value in this, from the SEC, Enforcement, the DOJ. You

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 5>know obviously have we known them, we know today we

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 5>would have done things differently. But it's very unfortunate and

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 5>I have deep respect.

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 4>For these women.

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 5>That doesn't mean reliable for the action of an individual,

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 5>but I do have deep respect for them.

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 4>My heart goes out to them and.

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy daviond thank you so much for your time today.

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you, Francy Lacua, thank you so much.

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 2>It's the conversation with the chairman and the chief executive

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 2>officer of JP Morgan. I would really underscore off of

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 2>his annual letter, his focus on geopolitics, and as he

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 2>says in his letter in his Wall Street Journal essay

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 2>of a number of months ago, he is very concerned

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 2>of the Western alliances, including France. Lacroix from Paris this morning,

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm joining us now, John writing on his Bank of

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 2>England City Group come out. They say we got it wrong.

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 2>We were calling recession doom and gloom, and your United

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Kingdom it looks more resilient. Do you buy the resilience?

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 7>The UK is a small, open economy and what happens

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 7>in the rest of the world is going to be

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 7>very important for the UK. I'm still a bit skeptical

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 7>on that. I think the full impact of adjustments post

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 7>breaks it. That's still out there for the UK. But

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 7>what I'm more skeptical about is the decline in inflation,

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 7>where the inflation rates in the UK is currently ten

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 7>point one percent and within a couple of years they're

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 7>down to basically one percent. And I don't see how

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 7>you get that kind of inflation drop with an interest

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 7>rate of four and a half percent. I'd be very

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 7>surprised if in the US we're above five percent we've

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 7>got and the inflation problem is not as bad as

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 7>in the UK, that there's more rate hypes than the

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 7>market has priced.

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 2>You are the single best person I know in the

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 2>world qualified for this delicate question. I began this morning

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:13.479
<v Speaker 2>with Jeffrey U on this I was thunderstruck by what

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 2>the PhD from Stanford, Hugh Pill said this morning about

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 2>begging United Kingdom people to spend less money. It reminded

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 2>me back to the thirties Clement Attlee the elites telling

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 2>United Kingdom please don't spend money. I'm absolutely the non

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 2>American like language that we hear out of the United

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Kingdom elites and authorities now is absolutely exceptional.

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think it's a very I create, but I

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 7>think it was a very interesting that dun com. I

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 7>think it was brought up just the other day about you.

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 7>There's too many Keynesians, there's too much group think. Inflation

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 7>is a product in the end of too much money

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 7>chasing too few goods of services. And it's not about,

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 7>in my opinion, how much consumers spend. You know, that's

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 7>part of the transmission mechanism of rate hikes soften the

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 7>housing market, they ultimately soften consumer spending. But you know,

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 7>if the banking then to put more thought in the

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 7>first place to not if saying true with the Federal Reserve,

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 7>and they put more thought in the first place to

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 7>not letting the inflation genie out of the bottle, he

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 7>wouldn't be out there begging down consumers not to spend

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.959
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you know, or saying people have got to

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 7>get used to being worse.

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 2>So just because of time, John, I want to bring

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 2>this over and you know we're talking here, folks about

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 2>a middle twentieth century theory of theology. If you will,

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 2>in the United Kingdom, do youse censor Kinesi and tilt

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 2>at the federal system of the United States, do they

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 2>have illusions of a demand side ordering of people to

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 2>spend less money here, or are we do a new

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 2>regime in America?

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 7>Well, this exact actly what the Fed's trying to do.

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 7>But what has prevented monetary policy from biting on the

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 7>economy was all of the fiscal injections, the income support

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 7>provided during the pandemic, which ended up in people's bank accounts.

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 7>So at the peak, people had two and a half

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 7>trillion dollars more in aggregat in their bank accounts than

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 7>they would have had had there not been a pandemic.

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 7>So it's very hard to slow the economy down on

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 7>the consumer side. It's much easier on the house.

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 2>And Olivia Bonchari calls the Biden stimulus do you? And

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.479
<v Speaker 2>Conrad to Quadro suggests we've run out the stimulus and

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 2>now we're back to some form of normal American economy.

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 7>I don't think we've run out all the stimulus. It's

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 7>probably close to a trillion dollars still of excess savings,

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 7>but we have seen an adjustment in the savings rate,

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 7>which is still lower than one would expect given more

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 7>inflation is given where interest rates are, people are still

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 7>spending more than you would expect given fundamentals. Because of this,

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 7>these excess savings that have got thirty seconds.

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a recession call?

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 7>I think that in both the UK and the US

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 7>it's inevitable but not imminent. The inversion of the three

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 7>months T bill to the tenure yield has invariably correctly

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 7>predicted recession a year or so out. Now we may

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 7>have a rolling recession, the housing markets in recession, the

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 7>manufacturing sectors in recession. The service sector is still going

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 7>relatively speaking strongly. So maybe it's a rolling recession, but

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 7>I think it's inevitable.

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 2>John Rny think you're just bringing up there with his

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 2>experience with the Bank of England, the federal reserve system.

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 2>He is with breing a capital. We have to get

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the bank at Horneman. But but Lisa, I'm sorry to

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 2>for just three point eight five seven eight percent. We

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 2>are now fifteen full basis points in on the two

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.959
<v Speaker 2>year yield. In a long cup of SANCA. I mean,

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 2>it's amazing how we moved.

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 8>Yes, And at the same time, the volatility in the

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 8>two year really is what gets my attention, let alone

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 8>which direction it's going. In the fact that a whipsaws

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 8>back and forth, how do you get any stability given

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 8>some sort of risk appetite without that joining us now

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 8>to discuss as we head into a really important our.

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 8>Megan Horneman, chief investment officer at Verden's Capital Advisors. Meghan,

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 8>as we look for the data in the US in

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 8>a half an hour time, how much are you expecting

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 8>it to really represent the strength the resilience that so

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 8>many people are rejecting right now as simply a passing phenomenon.

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 9>I think that there is some inconsistency in what we're

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 9>seeing in from whether it's the labor market showing showing strength,

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 9>but then there's really that's the only thing from an

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 9>economic standpoint in the US that's showing strength. Whether you

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 9>look at manufacturing or you look at housing, all of

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 9>these things are that we're headed towards a downturn. And

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 9>then you take into into account the federal reserve tightening

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 9>cycle and then the tighter lending conditions. These things are

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 9>going to start to filter into data, not right away,

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 9>but we think in the rest of this year.

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Megan, I want to go to your heritage, leg Mason

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>in Baltimore. All the great value house action of leg

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Mason non de Deutsche Bank is a substantial East Coast

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 2>competitor to JP Morgan. We're going to talk to Jamie

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Diamond here in about nine minutes. He's salvaging our banking

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 2>crisis as it is. Is he going to have to

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 2>do more from where Verden sits?

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 10>Yeah?

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 9>Unfortunately, I don't think the regional side of the banking

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 9>crisis is over. I do think that the bigger banks

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 9>are going to have to step in and do more.

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 9>What's changed If you look at over the past couple

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 9>of weeks since he came in and rescued the last bank,

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 9>nothing's changed from a regulatory standpoint, nothing's changed from the

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 9>Federal Reserve. In fact, the only thing that's changed is

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 9>that the Federal Reserve has said, hey, we're not going

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 9>to see rate cuts right away. So the pressure that

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 9>was on the small and MidCap banks earlier this year

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 9>with higher interest rates and taking losses there, that still

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 9>is the case, and that's going to be a problem

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 9>for these banks. So in the absence of knowing anything

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 9>that's changed, I don't think that that, unfortunately is over.

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 9>So I think there's going to be more to come.

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 2>You have the advantage of not being Manhattan based. How

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 2>does commercial real estate look like for Verdun's capital. I mean,

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 2>I know it's off your remit, but what is all

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 2>the analysis you see that you listen to on CIRE.

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 9>It's something that we're concerned about. I don't think that

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 9>it's being talked about enough. Obviously we're concerned just because

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 9>of a slowing economy and higher vacancies, but then you

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 9>kind of the double effect on that is that we

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 9>have higher interest rates and then you throw on top

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 9>of that that we have this maturity wall. That's where

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 9>the big concern comes in. So between twenty three, twenty

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 9>four and twenty five, these are big years where there's

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.479
<v Speaker 9>going to be these commercial real estates. Loans are going

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 9>to have to refinance, and they're refinancing at higher rates

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 9>as well as in a situation where you have tighter

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 9>lending conditions.

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 8>That's an area of concern, an area of strength that

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 8>we may get a better sense of at about twenty

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 8>minutes time as we get the PPI, the factory input

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 8>prices that comes out in the US, it's expected to

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 8>be significantly below CPI, that sort of headline consumer figure

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 8>which is being captured as profits at a lot of

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 8>companies that are actually increasing their profit margins at a

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 8>time when people expected them to shrink for them to

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 8>absorb some of the inflation against some pushback by consumers.

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 8>Is this giving you optimism to go into certain stocks,

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 8>to go into certain credit.

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 9>No, Unfortunately, at this time, I think that that's probably

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 9>short lived. The consumer is weak. We've seen that in

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 9>some of the recent data, and we've also seen that

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 9>with the fact that they're relying a lot more on

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 9>credit card debt, they're not spending the way that they

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 9>used to. If you looked at even the CPI report

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 9>yesterday that show that airfare is actually starting to come down,

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 9>So you're starting to see some weakness in that part

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 9>of the market, part of the economy that was consumers

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 9>were really spending money on, so your leisure and hospitality.

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 9>There's a lot of cracks surfacing, So I'm not optimistic

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 9>that that businesses can continue to pass on those costs

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 9>without it further hurting the consumers.

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 8>So are you basically in the camp that there is

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 8>going to be this inflation that will accompany the weakness

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 8>that we see as it accelerates throughout the end of

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 8>the year. Basically, what's been pushing everybody to keep going

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 8>into bonds.

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I do think that we are going to be

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 9>looking at again slowing inflation, a slow down the economy,

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 9>most likely a recession. The inflation situation has been improving

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 9>and we can't deny that.

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 3>But there still is a lot of work to go.

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 9>The biggest inconsistency, and you mentioned that people are going

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 9>into bonds, The biggest inconsistency that we see is that

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 9>investors are pricing in rate cuts, and that's not something

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 9>that we see. The FED is not there. They don't

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.479
<v Speaker 9>have the ability to do that with inflation where it is.

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 9>They can't come in with a stop and go approach,

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 9>which is what they did in the seventies and eighties,

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 9>which proved to be not the right thing to do.

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 9>I think they're going to stay on hold. Interest rates

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 9>will stay higher for longer. They've made it clear in

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 9>their last meaning that they will sacrifice economic growth to

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 9>achieve their goal of bringing inflation down. So I think

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 9>the bomb market's not necessarily pricing that in. Unfortunately within bonds.

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 9>I think the best place to be right now is

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 9>just to park money in cash, have dry powder, take

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 9>advantage of opportunities because they will arise in the second

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 9>half of this year.

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 2>And then on equity markets, do you deploy that cash

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 2>here or do you just wait, wait, wait.

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 9>It depends on what we see from an equity standpoint.

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 9>I think equities are similar to bonds to the equity market. Specifically,

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 9>some of the high growth technology names. These are I

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 9>think still too high from a price to earnings multiple.

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 9>I think they have room to decline and kind of

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 9>realize the fact that the Fed's not going to come

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 9>in and save the day. They've been able to do

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 9>that in the past, They're not able to do it

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 9>this time around. So I think there's going to be

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 9>some correction here in US equities.

0:30:58.120 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Megan, thank you so much.

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Megan Horneman there with Vernon's Capital Advisors.

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Thomas A.

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Taurus has had a fixed income research it's Chigus, a

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 2>bird company and joins us this morning. You have the

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 2>advantage of down the hall is one. J Trnard Jason

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Trennard looking at the equity market, folding in the JP

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Morgans of the world into your fixed income analysis. What

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 2>is a strateigous view on the length of this banking crisis?

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Does it get fixed?

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 11>What's your definition of fixed? Do we have more bank

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 11>failures along the way, probably. Does it become systemic risk,

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 11>particularly to Ciffy's, Probably not. Does it become a risk

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 11>to super regional banks, probably not as well. But is

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 11>there incremental credit tightening to the US economy from.

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 8>This ahead of US?

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely?

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 11>And with monetary policy acting with the lag we have

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 11>to assume there are more shoes to drop here and

0:31:58.680 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 11>more banks to fail.

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Which spread a comparison of two yields is most valid

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 2>to you to get the temperature of PacWest and other banks.

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at three months tenure, but there's debt sealing

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 2>issues in that as well. Which spread tells the best story?

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 11>Well, three months tenure might be a better measure for

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 11>banks because you're looking at funding cost relative on the

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 11>front end of the curve versus there. Essentially, what are

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 11>they they potentially getting for yield for new assets they

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 11>might be purchasing. But I don't think anything really gives

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 11>you a good picture of how much their net interest

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 11>margins have compressed over the last two years. I mean

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 11>those are probably zero to negative at this point in time,

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 11>given where they bought those assets, Those long duration assets

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 11>might have been bought at a yield of two to

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 11>two and a half percent, and their funding costs today

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 11>might be four and a half to five and a

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 11>quarter percent.

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 8>This is a really important point that we have moved

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 8>from just simply deposits being there too. Even the deposits

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 8>staying are going to be a problem, given how much

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 8>they're going to have to pay to keep them. From

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 8>your vantage point, what are you expecting in terms of

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 8>the number of failures and the ramifications for monetary policy

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 8>in broader market conditions.

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 11>Well, probably low double digits, maybe high single digits, So

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 11>maybe not many more to come, and fairly small in size.

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 11>But you got to remember, though, that's the norm over

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 11>any given two three year period in the past. Keep

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 11>in mind, from nineteen eighty to about nineteen ninety two

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 11>we had over a thousand bank failures. In the last

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 11>dozen years we've had about a dozen failures. Sore, you

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 11>can say we're overdue. So the norm might be two

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 11>to three per year on average.

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 8>Well, but this is the question, right, if it is

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 8>just the norm, is it not? Setting any alarm bells

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.959
<v Speaker 8>doesn't change anything with respect to the rate hiking cycle.

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 8>It doesn't change anything with respect to your approach to

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 8>what you invest in.

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 11>Well, let me answer this. From our Fed's perspective, this

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 11>absolutely should change their perspective and what they do going forward.

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 11>You have monetary policy acting with the lag, you have

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 11>multiple bank failures, and you have at best multiple banks

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 11>are going to be a negative net interest margin for

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 11>at least the next twelve months. That's a reason to

0:33:56.680 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 11>pause rate there. Mission is not accomplished on inflation, but

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 11>that's a good reason to pause tightening to see how

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 11>the incremental tightening from the critic tightening that is to

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 11>come plays out. You may end up having to hike

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 11>again in the future, but this is a good opportunity

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:09.240
<v Speaker 11>to pause.

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Briefest on James Diamond coming up here in forty five

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 2>minutes as well, This conversation is frankly just as important

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 2>because you're in the trenches looking at the ramifications of

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 2>a trust in the JP Morgan Company or from a

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 2>frankly Bank of America to save the day. Are they

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 2>going to come in and have to save the day again?

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they're going to have to.

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 11>Whether they do come in and make additional plays here

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 11>that I can't speak to, but I don't think they're

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 11>going to need to. I think that this is a

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 11>system that essentially your super regionals are in good standing

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 11>right now, your cities are in good standing. You're talking

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 11>about smaller banks going forward, There's going to have to

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 11>be consolidation in the regional banks. Some of them may

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 11>be boring.

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't mean to interrupt, but this is an important

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 2>nuance within a bidding process where the government's forced to

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 2>take a little bitter or just in a normal m

0:34:57.719 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 2>and A context.

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 11>Both could have could have additional failures where there are

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 11>essentially negative net asset values there that government is forced

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 11>to take the lowest bidder. But you should also be

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 11>expecting going forward to see a typical m and A

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 11>where some regional banks consolidate and become superregionals going forward,

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 11>and even some superregionals may grow themselves to become to

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.760
<v Speaker 11>breach that Siffy threshold. That should be the expectation going forward.

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 11>The reality is, I think the US banking system is

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 11>migrating more towards what you might have in Canada or Australia,

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 11>where you have a few very large dominant banks. It's

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 11>not going to be three or four like you have

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 11>in those regions. It might be eight to ten in

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 11>the US.

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 8>Let's toff tail this question about financial stability and to

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 8>what we're going to get in about fifteen minutes, which

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 8>is the latest reat on inflation as well as the

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 8>labor market. There is a question about whether there is

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 8>more strength and whether what we've seen in the banking

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 8>sector is more of the normalcy, as you point out,

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 8>rather than a sign of some sort of massive fissure.

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 8>If it is a sign of strength, what does that

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 8>do in terms of the stickiness of inflation as well

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 8>as growth, just like what we saw over in England.

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well, I think you had mentioned earlier discussion on

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 11>sales from places like Proder luxury goods. The US economy

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.720
<v Speaker 11>still continues to be driven by a consumer, which whether

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 11>they're spending more than they can afford, it's irrelevant. They're

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 11>still spending more and the labor market is not yet

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 11>rolling over, So there's still strength to the consumer side.

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 11>There's still strength to the labor market, and in particular

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 11>in the retail space and in in luxury space, in

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 11>the leisure space. So there's still strength to come in

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:30.800
<v Speaker 11>the US economy, and there's still likely to be sticky inflation.

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.319
<v Speaker 11>What that means is that even if the Fed pauses here.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 11>They're not likely to cut as soon as the market

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 11>is pricing, and the market is pricing in rate cuts

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 11>for we'll say July to August. That seems too early

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 11>given how sticky inflation is and how strong the labor

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 11>market continues to be. We do think the labor market's

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 11>going to roll over, but we think inflation is going

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 11>to remain sticky, which means that there's going to be

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 11>more stress on banks because the Fed funds rate is

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 11>going to remain at this five percent to five and

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 11>a quarter percent longer, and you're going to continue to

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.879
<v Speaker 11>drag drag on credit formation and stress on banks because

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 11>net interest margins is going to remain negative for longer.

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 8>How do you play this, because it's really against consensus

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:09.280
<v Speaker 8>at least as it's being played out in market pricing.

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 11>Well, that's a tough question because right now you look

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 11>at equity valuations, they don't reflect a recession risk, and

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 11>they also don't reflect the fact that there's credit tightening

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 11>to come later on. Same thing for corporate credit markets,

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 11>spreads are a little bit too tight at these levels.

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 11>So I think you play this by being very cautious.

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 11>You continue to hold cash at elevated or above average levels,

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.240
<v Speaker 11>and you wait for something to break to the downside.

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Two part question.

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 2>We got to be quick because of the time we're

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.280
<v Speaker 2>trenderd on the equity market. Is he called a bottom

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 2>of the bear market in October or does he have

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:40.720
<v Speaker 2>a more cautious few more cautious.

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:43.959
<v Speaker 11>We're expecting equity prices equity valuations to dip lower again.

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 2>So you had a ten yere yield four point two

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 2>zero percent, The ten year yield is crater down. What

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 2>are the ramifications to you if the ten year breaks

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 2>down to a new lower yield below three point three

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 2>zero percent.

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 11>Well, so we're our forecast is about three to two

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 11>for a bottom this cycle. We could easily on intery

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 11>day get down close to three. If we get down

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 11>two or below three, it tells us that something is

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 11>breaking on the credit side. That's bigger than a regional bank.

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 11>That would be my takeaway from that.

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Qus you valuable, Tom, Thank you so much. Tom. Stores

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is where this was Strateigua.

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 8>It's a bird company, Brian Weezer, isn't we just got

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 8>one out? In terms of Disney, he is a principal

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 8>at madisone and Wall covering all things media for decades.

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 8>There is a question here about why this is surprising,

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 8>given that this transition was going to be awkward from

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 8>a cable to streaming, and it's a rocky process amid

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 8>a lot of economic uncertainty.

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I don't think it's that surprising. I mean, this

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 10>was never going to be a better business than the

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 10>one that it's replacing. They had a fort nearly forty

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 10>percent margin business in the Media Network's division back in

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 10>ten years ago. And you're getting in care, more costs

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 10>for marketing, more costs for streaming, physically delivering content, and

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.439
<v Speaker 10>then you need way more content to make this whole

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 10>thing work, and you can't force sleep. This is the

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 10>right thing to do. It's the right way to make

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 10>a business that survives for fifty years and beyond. And

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:08.439
<v Speaker 10>that's why I said what it was an analyst covering

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:10.959
<v Speaker 10>the stock thinking, oh, it's the best the fair price

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 10>right now, and that's kind of what's played out for everyone.

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 6>Brian.

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:19.720
<v Speaker 8>There's this concern as we try to grow subscriber bases,

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 8>or as different people, different streaming companies try to expand

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 8>their user base, do you continue to raise prices, what

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 8>do you prioritize either increasing subscribers or increasing revenues. How

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 8>is does he doing on that front, given that they

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 8>came in with a pretty disappointing projection of just growth.

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, here's the thing. They can continue to raise prices

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.720
<v Speaker 6>and still grow subscribers on a earier basis.

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 10>I think they'll continue to do so, as other services

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 10>will when they raise prices. The problem is that that

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 10>money is coming out of traditional PATV. I publish something

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 10>on my sub stack this past week pointing out there

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 10>there is about one hundred billion dollars of spending in

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 10>the United States at least by consumers on PATV services

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.320
<v Speaker 10>now declining in terms of actual spending.

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 6>That's one hundred billion dollars of money that can go

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 6>into these streaming services still, but it's going to come

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 6>out of PATV.

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Where are sports in five years? Brian Disney has a

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 2>huge effect on sports with the ESPN, I get it,

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 2>But where is the Brian Weezer view on sports entertainment

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 2>in five years?

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:24.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it will still be super important.

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 10>I mean, but Bob Iger, at least, why is enough

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 10>to point out that there is an inevitability to ESPN

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 10>in particular eventually.

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 6>Having a slagship services and streaming service.

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 10>The reality is that not everyone needs to watch everything

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 10>that's on ESPN or on traditional TV sports, so it

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:47.720
<v Speaker 10>may end up being a little bit more niche maybe

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 10>not as ubiquitous as it has a historical United States.

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I look at Disney and I look at a creative

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:57.320
<v Speaker 2>guy as well. Is there a lot of cost coding

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 2>to do? Is Disney and for that matter, other companies

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 2>like it. Is there a lot of fat there to cut?

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Or are they bear bones right now?

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 10>You know, they talk certainly about containing their increases in

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 10>spending on content, and it's hard to say what's that is.

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 6>I mean, certainly there's a great story.

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 10>In the journal about what's happening for a paramount on

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.239
<v Speaker 10>content spending on Yellowstone and other related shows, and that's

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.720
<v Speaker 10>a good example. Maybe a bit extreme in terms of spending,

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 10>but I think in general that the thing is if

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 10>you spend more money on programming, you will get more viewers. Right,

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 10>they will continue to grow the platform, the streaming platform,

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 10>as long as they continue.

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 6>To increase their spending overall on programming. Obviously, they need

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 6>good editorial choices and good content.

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 8>We used to say content is king and today, we're

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 8>talking about cost cutting and a lot of these different platforms.

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 8>If anyone goes anywhere near social media, they'll see a

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 8>discussion of the writer strike in Hollywood. That's affecting a

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 8>whole host of different streaming networks. And I wonder how

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 8>dovetailed these ideas. Are this idea so that writers want

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.760
<v Speaker 8>to get paid, that content wants to get rewarded given

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.720
<v Speaker 8>the years of large s and the networks just aren't

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 8>willing at this time. How much is that going to

0:42:09.760 --> 0:42:12.319
<v Speaker 8>be a persistent battle based on the dynamic that we've

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 8>been talking about.

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:17.399
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I worry about that because I'm not sure how

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 10>First of all, both sides on the strike might be

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 10>too optimistic in their expectations where the industry's going to evolve.

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 6>Again.

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 10>I've rolled up all spending on video, including theatrical spending, DVDs,

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 10>whatever the left of that streaming atv ette, and basically

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 10>I calculate about a one percent growth rate over the

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 10>last fifteen years every year on average.

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 6>Maybe that's about right.

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 10>Going forward, it's all shifting towards the far less profitable

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 10>businesses streaming, so there's less money to divide up.

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:50.839
<v Speaker 6>Whatever the outcome is Brian.

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 8>There was also discussion just to finish up here with

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:58.200
<v Speaker 8>Disney about declining revenues on their cable networks from advertisers.

0:42:58.640 --> 0:42:59.839
<v Speaker 4>How much of this is.

0:42:59.840 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 8>Companies not necessarily having the extra money to advertise. How

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 8>much of this is just all of the advertising moving

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 8>to Google, to Facebook or Meta to all of these

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 8>other social media platforms.

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 6>That's been a big factor for sure.

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 10>I mean, we're seeing television has probably declined by high

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 10>school digits at this point. I don't think I'll say

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 10>that bad all year long. It'll probably get less bad

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 10>as your progress is.

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 6>The typical advertiser is absolutely shifting their spending primarily.

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 10>I think package goods companies are shifting spending into retail

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:34.399
<v Speaker 10>media networks. We're just doing possibly well. TikTok for now

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 10>is at least still doing really well. There's a lot

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 10>of new places that are seeing a lot of growth.

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:41.760
<v Speaker 10>And Uber is an ad platform. Walmart selling ad that's.

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Where Brian, Thank you Brian Weiser from Madison and Wall

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:47.399
<v Speaker 2>with an update there and streaming and.

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:48.759
<v Speaker 1>A lack of profit out there.

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast on Apple, Spotify and

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:57.240
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live every weekday,

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 2>starting at seven am Easternloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 2>tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can watch

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:10.840
<v Speaker 2>us live on Bloomberg Television and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. I'm Tom Keen, and this is Bloomberg