WEBVTT - Wal-Mart Is Killing Small-Town America More Than Amazon, DeLong Says

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene with

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>David Gura. Daily we bring you insight from the best

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and of course

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Good Morning are you. When David Gurr

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and Tom came is to grow off off. We are

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>honored to have near a change with us from London.

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to her, you know moment. Thrilled to have

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>name a church with us, to uh distill some of

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the debates. Wonderful to have you and of course it

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>was really something to see Prime Minister Mainnaire speaking on

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the Queen Elizabeth the second. I guess that's what you

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>call that ginormous aircraft carrier. It's Portsmith. Am I pronouncing

0:00:56.320 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it right? Pronouncing you absolutely on pronouncing right, Tom. And

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>over here in the UK, I mean, focus is turning

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 1>to these position papers that the UK government is putting

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>forward in terms of what it wants from Breggsit. Of course,

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>what it wants and what it gets two very different things.

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I know that because I read my Patrick O'Brien long

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>time ago he is my most important guest of the

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 1>morning in the news. Slow has been extraordinary. Greg Valier

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>joined us earlier, I should say from Europe. Mr Valier

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>looks for resignations before Thanksgiving, including General Kelly greg Valier

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>looking for the President to possibly pall undert Mike Allen

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and axios on Gary Cohnes standing behind the President in

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that marble Atrium yesterday quote we're told Cone was somewhere

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>between appaulled in furious. He is not appalled in furious.

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>When you grow up in Pattison, New Jersey, you've seen

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it all. Bill Pascal joins us. He is the ninth

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Congressional District congressman. But that's not accurate. There's been a

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>redisc green in that it was at your grandparents that

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>came through Ellis Island. That is correct. It's a spiritual place.

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:11.839
<v Speaker 1>My my, my grandparents eight generations back, came in handcuffs

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>from a place called Scotland. This was a few years ago.

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>The synthesis that you have is original here because let

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>us explain to our global audience that Patterson, New Jersey

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is everything white supremacists and nationals are afraid of. Why

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>should they not be afraid of the ethnic mix of

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the ninth Congressional District because I believe that this is

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the very soul of America. Each group has had a

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult time, as I've said before, to get into the

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>dining room table. Uh, and difficulties are one thing, but

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they've always been able to reach it. I don't care

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 1>what the group is. I think this is important. I'm

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>When I was mayor of Patterson a few moons ago,

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed getting up a morning and not only thinking

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>about the agenda for the day, but I thought about

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>how am I going to get people to work with

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>each other with sixty two different ethnic groups and major problems.

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And city mayors will tell you this problems within those

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>groups because there are diversity within each group. This is

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>what makes a man. You can't stomp this. You can't

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>put up a wall to stop it. You can't put

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a a weapon out in front of you to stomp it.

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>This is America. I put out a photo of nineteen

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>twenties Ku Klux Klan and thank you Joshua Rothman of

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>University of Alabama for being with us on Monday. UH

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and true expert on this, someone with fact based knowledge

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of these these American hatreds intentions. And I put that

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>photo out and it was about Italians. When did the

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Italians not become the hated ones? When we got someone

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>else to hate? And that's the way it works, Tom,

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's the way it works. And now I get

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>after my attack you because I'm very very deep involved

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in Italian history and the Italian immigrants that came to

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.839
<v Speaker 1>this country. And I tell the Italians, you know, you're

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>turning your nose sometimes at certain people. Do you remember

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>what happened when we first got here. Do you know

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>what happened to your grandparents, your uncle's and your aunts,

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>how they were turned away they weren't good enough. We

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>can't accept that to anybody. Everybody's welcome. They come in

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>here in an orderly, lawful fashion, we should greet them.

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>This is what the basis, the nucleus of the nation is.

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 1>If you're joining us now worldwide and across this nation.

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Bill Pastcrow with us. He is the ninth UH Congressional

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>dist Congressman. And let me just cut it short. He

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is the congressman from Patterson, New Jersey. Let me bring

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a nera in London nearra Tom and Congressman Pascal, really

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>honored to speak to you. I just to let you

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>know where I'm coming from as we're talking about immigration here.

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I did come to the UK back in ninety two,

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>not just as an immigrant, but a refugee from Sarajevo

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in Bosnia. So I'm very familiar with, um you know,

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>that that side of things. But also I spent a

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>year actually in Virginia after school and before starting university,

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>at a university there, so I'm somewhat familiar with how

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>things felt in that state. I do remember well in

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the canteen of the university at the time that even

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.799
<v Speaker 1>though there was never sort of any sense of threat

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of um you know, the sort of racial integration,

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the African Americans would sit separately in the canteen. Now,

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously the district where you are very different to that.

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>But we are talking here about Charlottesville in a state

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like Virginia, how easy is it going to be to

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>actually reverse what we've seen over there? And it was

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>so elegantly said by Narra. Let me cut to the

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>American directness, how do we make parts of this nation

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>like New Jersey or we can't back off. We can't

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we must insist that this is a land of opportunity

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>for all, and we're not saying that we open up

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>our borders. And you know, eups having problems with immigrants

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>coming in the refugees. We understand that, but we're not

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>going to stop being who we are. And because of

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>non facts, and we blame immigrants for loss of jobs

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that is absolutely not proven by anybody. Uh, we blame

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>anybody for any of our problems, crime problems. You know what,

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>when people were dying in the streets of Patterson in

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties and sixties on heroin, you know, those people

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know what they're doing anyway. Now that suburban kids

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>are dying on opiates, it's a whole different story. Now

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 1>we got hope, We got programs to everybody. I support

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>those programs. I want to run point on those programs.

0:06:56.400 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>We are all equal, period. I want to talk about

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Elaine Chow standing behind the President yesterday. Full disclosure, folks,

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Chow and I know each other fairly. Well, she's

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>been very kind. Who I was watching You were watching

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>her like I was watching her and you were watching

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>her for a reason. Well, no, but she come on,

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>she came off the boat. Let's from Taiwan. She grew

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>up outside l A very basic, very simple. What do

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you need to see from the Republicans the public servants

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>like Secretary Chow As Greg Villiers says, when do they

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>start resigning? Is that what moderates need to see. Yeah,

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and your torn between loyalty to your president, which you

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>should have, but there's a point beyond which the president goes.

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>You got to make decisions for yourself. You gotta stand up,

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>resign or speak out privately to him. If he continued

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to do this, I'm out of here. You're gonna get

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody else to take my place. He's got to understand

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that this is not his business. His his his work

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is being president of the United States. He never made

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that transition from his job beforehand to the presidency of

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the United States. He is, you know, he's almost like

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Cornelius Vanderbilt. Cornelius Vanderbilt said, very specifically, Uh, you know

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the law, I'm I have the power. We could go

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for hours with you this morning, correct, So we're gonna

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>run out of time here. I'm so sorry for that.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Where's the Barbara be Connable Barbara be Connable of Western

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>New York sat Richard Nixon down and said, enough, we're

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just not to that stage yet. We're not and that

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>we're not to that stage yet, and most Republicans are

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>still afraid. On Sunday if I go to mass hopefully

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>try to do that every week. You here are the

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>folks saying, be not afraid. What are they afraid of?

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>This is America. If he can't do it here, go

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to Russia, go to China, then why wouldn't you do that? Well,

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>because you know you have a limited amount of freedom here,

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>or because we can express ourselves. This is what makes

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>us the greatest country in the world. And yet we

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>diminish ourselves when we try to categorize and say no,

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>these people can't be allowed. And I was very angry,

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>uh when the President said there'll be no uh refugees

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>from X amount of countries, no Muslims allowed. Are we

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>kidding ourselves? That's that's something from the eighteenth century. We're

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>living in the twenty one century. Now. Do we have

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>any problems? Of course, we have problems, and they'll always

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>be problems. We need to stand up to it. We're

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>never gonna have a seamless system. Thank you so much.

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Bill Pescrow with us an important conversation after emotion that

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>we saw yesterday, a particular thank you, and she will

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>continue with this neighbor change in London, talking there about

0:09:53.679 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>her first days in UH, the United Kingdom, march in London.

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm tom Keene uh Ian. Where am i am in

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 1>New York? My had is spinning folks. After the last

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>six seven days, We're gonna try to digress for a moment.

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>We will return to UH the emotion and the debate

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>of what we're seeing in our political economics. But right now,

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>someone that writes incredibly thoughtful notes synthesizing our macro view

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>on investment, on finance and economic Sebastian Gali is at

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Bank. Sebastian, you have an optimistic view on the

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>American economy and you've just written a thoughtful piece on

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:47.599
<v Speaker 1>this overused, dreaded word innovation. What is innovation? Innovation is

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the ability to create new products. It's either because you're

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>reacting to your competitors or simply because you are innovating yourself.

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And there are two types of innovations. One which is

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>what we call breakthrough, which is very rare. Break them

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>ald in a sense and the most of the innovation, though,

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is more incremental. So you change small stuff, you change

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the coffee cup, you change the way people behave a

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but you don't change them on the so

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>near If I change my bow tie, that's incremental innovation.

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Sebastian Um this all as well, you arguing your piece

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>depends on where we are in the cycle. Are American

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>companies innovating enough given where we are in the business cycle?

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>The answer is probably no. They It looks like the

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>funding simply for people who actually take a lot of

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>risk is not that available. So you have the Elon

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Musk of the world, which are a bit the exception

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in the system. It looks like the broad set of

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>people who would take more risk and try to push

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>new products which are completely new, are unfortunately not getting

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>through and getting enough funding. At this point in time.

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>The market is very risk of appetite fool it loves

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to take risk, but actually if you go down to

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>private equities, it probably is actually far more risk averse

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>than you show you at this point in time. Right,

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And how is this then feeding through to the productivity issue? Well,

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you have two things. You have to look at. The

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>people who actually provide productivity through innovations are mature sectors.

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You can think of a company like heind sketch Up,

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, without knowing exactly what they do, um they

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>would basically try to innovate, try to reduce their costs,

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and try to create demand for new products that they do,

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and that ends up basically feeding productivity. Then you have

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>companies which are high added value products that they basically

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>create a new Apple or a new iPhone, which is

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a breakthrough in any way shape or form

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>might be, but in terms of productivity, is not necessarily

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>helping you a lot because they want to gain market share,

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>gain more demand rather than use their costs. The President

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>with his tweet this morning on the innovation and the

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Amazon makes the presidents sure it was wildly non economic,

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say in its In its you explain to

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>people that agree with the President that Amazon has stolen

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>jobs from towns cities. In the Borders bookstore at the

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>corner of Park Avenue in fifty seven Street, it has

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it has to produce basically the amount of bookstores. And

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>then Amazon has opened its own bookstore somewhere in New York,

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>so it is also opening its own bookstores because it's

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that good. Jeff, I know, Jeff listens, they gotta make

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>a better bookstore. Continue the I have in the view

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>on it whatever, but they are it's it's creative destruction.

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>If you if you live in New Jersey, you can

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>see that you're living in X factories, whether it's lipped

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and tea, whether it's in the coffee producers of the time.

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And we change the adapt and they they're part of

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that process of adaptation. The question is whether it goes

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>too slowly or too fast, and the should answer it

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go very fast whatsoever? Yeah, I would I would

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>editorialize here that we've innovated the coffee some days at

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance down to a thin soup. Oh, I'm very

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>innovative when it when it comes to coffee, certainly. But

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>just a brief question to you, Sebastian. On FX, we've

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>got the euro a little weaker on a report that

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Mario Draggy actually won't deliver a fresh policy message at

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Hole. Why is Draggy not pushing back on the

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>stronger euro because we're not in a crisis situation than

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the euro Zone. Things are going pretty darn well, now,

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>if you look at it from the Italian point of view,

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>or it used to be in the Spanish point of view,

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of a Greek point of view, then that you might

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>be a bit more concerned. But the demand internally in

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Arizone is is going pretty well. It's not

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a crisis situation. Therefore, they're not targeting the currency. They

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>used to target the currency, they did it deliberately. It's

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>no longer the case. Do you agree with your colleague

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>dominic constom of a larger real growth in America? I

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's a structial thing. I mean in the sense

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that real interest rates are not relatively high, but inflation

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>remains subduced potential growth, and the actual growth is decent enough.

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And one of the reasons is there are a structural

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>reason why the CPI is going to stay sticky and

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>on the low side for a significant amount of signed

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and one of it is because labor market is say,

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a global one. Sebastian Golly, thank you so much.

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for for being with us for a lengthy

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>time today. Within all the news slow he is with

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that Deutsche Bank. This is joy. We're gonna speak in

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>our next section about all that's going on with our president,

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the emotions of this nation. But now we celebrate his book,

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and it will always be his book. Michael Baron joins us,

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>joining us on our phone line. Michael, I've already ordered

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and eighty pages for myself and my

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>colleague David Gura. I'm fascinated by the piecing together of

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>your new almanac of American Politics. What was the Trump

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>effect on writing this edition of your Street? Well, it

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously it means that you're writing something that you gotta thinks.

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>You're writing something that's rather different from what you expected

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to be writing about, because I, like most of the people,

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>did not think Donald Trump would be elected president. I

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>mean I I think he had towards the end of

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the campaign that he had about one on a three

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>chance of winning. That's similar to what needs silver strife.

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>There a website calculated um and what the result teaches

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this is that one out of three actually happens one

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>out of three times. This was the one out of

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the one out of three and and so forth. So

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it would be on something I think, you know, historical perspective,

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the number of votes that changed the percentage of the electorate,

0:16:54.800 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that change was actually not huge. Uh. If you take

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a look at comparing say the nineteen seventy two election

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>was seventy six or in the nineteen seventy six with

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>nine eight n nine, A lot more votes shifted between

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>those two elections within those four years than between two thousands,

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand and sixteen. You know, your pieces together, the Richard Cohen,

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>James Barne, and of course the legendary Charlie Cook. What

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>is the vignette out of the two thousand eighty pages,

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>what is the one essay or article that really stuck

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>out to Michael Barrowne. Well, then the article and sort

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>of struck out to me was when that I wrote

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and in which I, as I recall, I started off,

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>UM with the fact that Donald Trump was a person

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that most people have told was not a political person

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>before he stepped down that escalator in June fifteen, two

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:05.479
<v Speaker 1>years ago. UM. Donald Trump was present at the UM

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>ceremony dedicating the various non Narrows Bridge in November nineteen

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty four. UM. And that's you know, a small crowd

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of dignitaries, UM people led by mar Wagner, by Governor Rockefeller,

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>by the Robert Moses, the legendary builder of New York

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>bridges and parks and so forth. Um, he was eighteen

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>years old. He was a student for him. Um what

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>was he doing in that crowd? And the answer, obviously

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is that his father, who had made many political connections,

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>particularly the Brooklyn Democratic machine, had gotten him a ticket.

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>And there he is watching the dedication of the largest

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>bridge in the world and the greatest city in the world,

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in the greatest country in the world. You know you're

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>getting the picture. He's part taking of this event in

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>uh eat and he notes if he notices later that

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the name of the British designer wasn't mentioned, And he

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>told interviewers when I built something, they're going to mention

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>my name. Interesting that. Now let's do this, Michael. Let's

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>come back and we want to talk to you near

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a change and I want to really dive into your

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>thoughts as you're right for the Washington Examiner about what

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>we've seen since Charlotte's Ville. We are thrilled to bring

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you this warning Michael Baron, folks, I can't say enough

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>about the acquisition. It's expensive price. Warning. Barron's gotta you know,

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>pay for the Trump Tower. Cocktails. It's eighty dollars. It's

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the best eighty dollars you will spend on the Almanac

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>of American Politics two thousand eighteen near a church in London.

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Keaton, New York, and we are honored to

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>have with us Michael Barone. In two he put out

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a small book that I guess most people ignored. You

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>should see what it goes for on e Bay right now.

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like a treasured It's I got a Game of Thrones,

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those books in the Citadel. He's out with

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>his American Almanac of American Politics. Look for that in

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the next few days. I've already bought my copy. Michael

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>bronachros Riding in the Washington Examiner. Michael, Republicans now and

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>modern Republicans have to figure out what to do with

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>their president with all of your district by district experience.

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>For example, how will the Bucks County, Pennsylvania Republican eighth district,

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>How will that congressman respond? I mean, just to give

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>an example of one Mr Phizpadrick down there, what a

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>mainline Republicans do well? The uh the eighth Congressional district,

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>which is roughly coincident with Bucks County, Pennsylvania, suburban county.

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>What will the Republican in lower Box down by Bristol,

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the Delaware where were the industrial area? Uh, he will

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>have some good things to say about Donald Trump, and

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>he will emphasize that he positive things that he thinks

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Mr Trump has done. When he gets into upper Bucks County,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the kind of leafier area with a much higher percentage

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>of college graduates and hiring income people, he will lament

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Mr Trump's tendency to tweet off the top of his

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>head and some of the mistakes that the President Trump

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>has made or some of the things that may not

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>be mistakes from his point of view, but they are

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 1>unpopular among the college educated group. That's a classic district

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that's divided between um non college graduate whitees lower Bucks

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 1>who moved towards Donald Trump is compared with two thousand

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve and other recent elections in between college grad voters

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>who who moved away from Donald Trump. And that's a

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of Yeah, that's a kind of vignette, folks, you

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>can get in Rowan's American Almanac of American Politics. Let

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>me bringing my colleague in London with Michael Barron Nera.

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Tom, Michael Burrone. Great to speak to you. So,

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>while we've been talking through all the media about ceo

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is abandoning the president all morning, I've been thinking to myself,

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>what does Gary Cone make of all this? And as

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>if it read my mind, the New York Times headline

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Gary Cone is said to be deeply upset by the

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>last few days. What will be more damaging to this

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>administration in your view? More abandonment from CEOs of the

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>businessman president or abandonment by his closest political aids. Uh well,

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the lad it would be more dangerous or

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>problematic for him. You know, we've had a number of

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>accounts from let's conservatives called mainstream media of people leaving

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>with Trump administration. Some of those accounts have been accurate,

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>is have not. So I'm old enough to remember lots

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of administrations where we were told somebody was leaving and

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>they ended up not doing so. As for the CEOs

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of companies, um, I kind of sniff a certain amount

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of political correctness. They're similar to what we saw from

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of public Google when he fired and when

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>after proclaiming that Google believes in free speech and open

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>airing of discussion from its employees, then fired an employee

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>who said something that the CEO and uh, certain people

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>within the corporation. It said, you know, some of the

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>upset some of the employees. He mischaracterized what they said.

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's right. As American voters are concerned

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that most of them think that CEOs really provide the

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of guidance they necessarily want. You can get a

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>certain number of voters to think a lot of ceo

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>should be in jail. Um, they don't usually specify what

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>offense they think they should be in jail from there. Rather, uh,

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you hear politicians of both parties. No bankers

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>went to jail as a result of the two thousand

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and eight so forth. So I don't think that's as

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>damaging to Mr Trump as the as as major departures

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in his administration might be. Right, Well, you you talked

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>about political correctness. I mean, everybody is asking why the

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>President has responded the way he has to what happened

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in Charlottesville. We had a great piece on the Bloomberg

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>by one of our columnists, Timothy L. O'Brien, who said,

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not about politics, it's his long history of race baiting.

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Should we in fact be surprised by any of this, well,

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's always seen to be surprised by what

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump does. I think to characterize what he what

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>he said is race baiting, UH is somewhat unfair. You know,

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>as far as I'm concerned, Mr Trump, it was a

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of days late and saying many of the things

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>about this pro Nazi group that was UH staging the

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>initial UH meeting there He's gonna attacked in the press conference,

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>but for the press statements in the press conference yesterday,

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>for saying that there was violence on both sides, that

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is among the so called white supremacy groups or whatever

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to call them, and by the groups of

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>h they call themselves anti fat that they're talking about

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>anti fascism, and they and they proclaim that they have

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a right to use physical violence against people who make

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>statements they disagree with. That's uh American, Michael, Like, I

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>get the idea that there is an imbalance here or

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>polarity and you're gonna get violence on both sides. No

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>one just agree reason with that. But in the time

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>that we've got left with you, what with all of

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>your encyclopedic knowledge of the Republican Party. What does the

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Party of Lincoln do with this president? That's the money question.

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean as I speak, MSNBC showing a picture of

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a younger George Herbert Walker Bush when Michael Barone launched

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>out your classic book, what does George Bush Senior's party

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>do with Donald Trump? Uh? Well, one of the things

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that Jurch H. W. Bush did when he was president

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>was after David Duke, the yeah so self appointed klu

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>klux Klan leader in Louisiana emerged as the one Republican

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>running in front run off into Louisiana schristopergotten Louisiana, Jared J. W.

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Bush came out against him, said the was your vote

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>for the Democratic Do you need to see that just

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>but within your heritage and the important place that you

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>are in conservative American politics? Do you do you need

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to see statements by our former presidents to bring this

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 1>president president to task or is that asking too much

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of them? Well? I think, uh, I don't, I don't know.

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I suppose former former President Bush is uh is over

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>an eighty years old now, so I think asking him

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to make public statements maybe uh a little much for

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the more recent President Bush And has made a policy

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of saying very little UH condemned President Obama, I mean

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>his eight years of presidency, even though the President Obama

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>had some really harsh things from times time to say

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>about him. Uh. And has employed the same thing for

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Mr Trump, although he obviously was not a Trump supporter.

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think that a lot of Republicans

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>have come in and said that they don't you know,

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>they condemn uh this uh, you know, Nazi race, white nationalism,

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 1>racism which so far as I can determine as a

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 1>few shared by a microscopic percentage of the American public

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that you can always find some not somewhere to believe

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that it has made of green cheese. But um, it's

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>a small group. But when it's pursuing violence, and when

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>one of its members committed what looks to me to

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>be like a murder, a horrible crime, UH, condemnation is

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>an order and has been forthcoming from many people. And

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I regret that Mr Trump didn't start off with a southemnation,

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a specific condemnation of this group. And if you wanted

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to add that these left winging a typis are committing

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>violent s across the nation in the ways that are

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>also repugnant. Um, he might have made that, Michael, the

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>first one. We gotta leave it there, Michael Brown, thank

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Congratulations on our two thousand eighteen edition,

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousand pages, folks, the Almanac of American Politics. This

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is my interview of the day on NAFTA.

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Brad de Long has not only been a leader in

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>our economics, someone that conservatives have to read is someone

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.479
<v Speaker 1>I hate the word Brad progressive, so I'll go with liberal,

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>but also someone with an acute understanding of our economic history.

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>He is, of course at Berkeley, Brad, wonderful to speak

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to you today. Is the NAFTA today that we're amending

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is it anything like the NAFTA of or um? The

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>NaSTA today is little like NaSTA nineteen because of the

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty two years that have happened since I'm a huge

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>amount of water has flowed under the bridge since then.

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>NAFTA back in nineteen ninety four and nineteen ninety five

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>was largely a bet for Mexico that if Mexico could

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>get the United States to promise that it would not

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>raise tariffs or quotas, on Mexico that Mexico could develop

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>more rapidly, become richer, and so be a better neighbor

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>for the United States. That promise kind of paid off

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>about a third UM. Some good things happened, but Mexico

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>got a huge hanking financial crisis out of it, and

0:30:56.400 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Mexican growth overall has been very disappointing over the past generation.

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>What NAFTA has done is it's been a much bigger

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>than expected boon for the United States UM lots more UM,

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>cheap and relatively high quality goods coming in from Mexico

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and the ability of United States firms to significantly improve

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>their competitive position with respect to competitors in Europe and

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Japan by creating an integrated, integrated North American value chains.

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Can we get a dialogue from President Trump from the

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross that dovetails their political pressures

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>into a successful amendment of NAFTA because they don't agree

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>with the statement you just made, do they? Well, it's

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to know what they agree with. UM that the

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>story coming from I think Jared Kushner or Jared Kushner's

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>people on their direct line to the New York Times

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>is that Wilbert Ross ran at O'donald Trump's office with

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a map showing that trump Land was the part of

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the country that the most hurt by NaSTA aggregation, and

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what led Trump to back off his initial kind

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of campaign claimed that he was going to get rid

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of NaSTA very early, and instead shift to this, well,

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>g we have to renegotiate it. Um. So it's very

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>una what the Trump administration thinks about this eventually, since

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>if you look, if you look at what they're asking

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>for right now, um, one of the major things seems

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to be that they're asking that Mexico and Canada agree

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.239
<v Speaker 1>as part of the renegotiation of Naska agreed to the

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.959
<v Speaker 1>things that Mexico and Canada agreed for the Trans Pacific Partnerships,

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>which Trump bitched on the very first day. I look

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>bread at the agel and you're you're truly one of

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>our authorities on economic history. One of the great things

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>is to take whatever you defeated in the election, rename it,

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and put your brand on it. Are we going to

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>do that with t p P. Everybody's shot down t

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>p P. And now that whoever's won, Clinton or Trump,

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>they both were against it. They're gonna essentially do TPP

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>but not call it t p P. Is that where

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>we're heading. Well, that's what seems to be the Trump

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>administration's negotiating position, or at least the negotiating position of

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the Trump staff and the Trump Cabinet members who are

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>running this thing. It's not at all clear that's what

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the President wants to do. Um. The President seems to

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>have this idea that each country's trade should be balanced

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>with every other country's trade every year, and that if

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>your country ever has a trade deficit with another country,

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that means you're a lous. We have seen, we've seen

0:33:56.920 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>so we've seen, Brad, going back to Chumpeter and Thomas

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>mccraw's Outstanding Profit of Innovation, my book of the Year

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 1>ages ago, Brad, we've seen creative destruction. The President today

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>went after Amazon. Now that's in retail. I get it.

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But you are one of our authorities on the creative

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>destruction of industry in America. Is there any grain of

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>truth to what the President said that Jeff Bezos has

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>failed cities, towns, and states across this nation. Um, will

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I say that the thing that's failed, the things that's failed,

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the downtowns of kind of small city America. UM is

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:47.479
<v Speaker 1>not Amazon nearly so much as Walmart. UM. Amazon has

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>gotten a lot of people, a lot of very good

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff cheap um shipped through UM, you know, through information

0:34:57.280 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and then through shipping dissemination. Amazon is an update version

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of what Sears Roebuck on Montgomery Ward did a century

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a century and a half ago in terms of getting

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the goods of America's high productivity factory out to people

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>who didn't live right next door to a huge store.

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And so he had fifty years during which Spears and

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery Ward were dominant. But then with the coming of

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the automobile, you no longer had to wait for the

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>post office to bring your kind of large refrigerator from

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery Wards. You could go drive, and it shifted back

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to retail. Now it's shifting back again to distribution. This

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is very normal. UM. What's not normal is that Trump

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is met at Visos because Visos owns the Washington Post

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't think the Washington Post is being nice

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>enough there. Didn't view this as economic policy. This is

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:53.479
<v Speaker 1>you said, mediapol. Let's come back with Professor DeLine. Lots

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 1>of talk about I really want to address a labor

0:35:55.320 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 1>economy in his important work on labor share in UH

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 1>NAFTA as well. We've got to get to that in

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>our next UH section. I should point out that Professor

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>DeLong and Professor Davidovitz seemed to agree about the Walmart

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>effect versus the Amazon effect. That's something that UH we

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 1>have as well. Folks. There are a certain number of

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>essays a year which stopped the economic profession. They can

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes be in fancy magazines that only academics read. They

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.760
<v Speaker 1>can be out on the internet. They can be something

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>as simple as a Bloomberg View essay. One of them,

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>on January this year, was written by Jay Bradford DeLong.

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Let me read the entire title off the vox website.

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>NAFTA and other trade deals have not gutted American manufacturing period.

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>It was hugely controversial at the time and led to

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>what every good academic wants, which is massive follow up

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in positive and negative reviewing critique. Brad DeLong of the

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>University of California at Berkeley is with us now, Brad,

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>eight months on from your important essay, what has been

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the summed criticism are our our academics in agreement with

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you that NAFTA and other trade deals did not gut

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 1>American manufacturing. UM. I think there's a distinction people like

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to draw between trade policy on the one hand, UM

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 1>trade effects on the second, and globalization on the third. UM.

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Trade policy I think almost everyone agrees has had little

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>effect UM in terms that if we hadn't done NAFTA,

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>if we hadn't let China allowed China to join the

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>World Trade Organization, that America today would look very much

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>like it does. That whatever problems America has UM are

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>not at all due to making quote bad trade deals,

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>and on the flip side, whatever advantages America has are

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>not at all due to quote bad trade deals. Then

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you get into the question of the effects of international

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>trade on the US economy given the other policy mistakes

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we're making, And there there's a real debate about how,

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>given our other policy mistakes, given large deficits at the

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>wrong time under Reagan and George W. Bush, given insufficient

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 1>deficits at the right time when the economy was deeply depressed,

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>how much trade has been a net plus or net minus.

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 1>And that debate is serious and ongoing very quickly. Here

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>what's the and the third one is globalization as a whole.

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>That because of globalization, we no longer have a lock

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:10.279
<v Speaker 1>on making the high value manufactured and a lot of

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 1>America's prosperity for fifty years was based on the fact

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that we had the old about the only efficient factories

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and that meant we could buy lots

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of good stuff cheap from abroad. We no longer have

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that advantage. We have to completely no longer have a

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>manu effect amount not playing high high value bread factory.

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>And that's natural, that's that wasn't an advantage we could

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>sustain forever what happened. And you have been good on this,

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Feel Burger and others have been very good on this,

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 1>really across party politics. The people that lost their jobs

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 1>low wage textile manufacturing is one example. They were supposed

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to get help, slash subsidy, slash a life forward given

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>these effects. Am I right that the lackey and individualistic

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 1>society of America failed those people? And can we learn

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>from that in these new negotiations? Well, I think CATAF.

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Actually it wouldn't have failed. Those quotes those people unquote

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>had Newt Gingrich not becomes speak of the House in January.

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>You know that is all the labor market stuff that

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Bob Reich as Labor Secretary was quick, and it was

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:32.839
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be kind of round two of the Clinton administration,

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 1>after the kind of Round one of get economic growth,

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:40.280
<v Speaker 1>going round two of making sure the growth was equitable.

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Um that second part collapsed when the Republican the Democratic

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Congressional majority built it a way in the election of

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:52.799
<v Speaker 1>and was never has never been revived. UM. So I'm

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>not sure if it's a failure of America as a

0:40:56.680 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>system or the result of one bad election that produced

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>people not willing to follow through on the policy promises

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that Clinton had made and that George H. W. Bush

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>had made before him. That said, virtually nobody was unhappy

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>with NaSTA in the late nineteen nineties. You wander around

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>America in the late nineteen nineties, and the last thing

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>people are worried about, um, his NAPTA. People are excited

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>about the Internet. People are seeing large real wage growth

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>all over the economy for the first time ever. People

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>are upset because California's housing prices are blooming and it's

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 1>expensive to move to Silicon Valley. But you kind of

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>NaSTA killing the American economy was simply not a thing

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>um from a professor. We've got to leave it there

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.280
<v Speaker 1>because of time, but thank you so much and congratulations

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on the impact of your January essay on NAFTA bred

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>that DeLong is at the University of Californi when you

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Berkeley really appreciate his time. UH today, thanks for listening

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer.

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene. David Gura is at

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>David Gura. Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide.

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.