WEBVTT - Three Takeaways from the 2021 Ryder Cup

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the Frida Egg Podcast. I'm Garrett

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Morrison and this episode is brought to you by Dream Golf.

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>If you are a longtime listener to The Friday Egg,

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you probably know about Dream Golf, though you may not

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>know them by this name. They are the people behind

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Bandon dune'es Cabot Cape, Breton, Sand Valley, basically the best

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 1>golf destinations in North America. Big things are happening at

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>those places right now. Bandon Dunes recently announced that it

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>will host a bunch of USGA Amateur championships over the

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>next twenty three years, starting with the twenty twenty two

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>us Junior Amateur. And over in Wisconsin, the Ledo Golf

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Club is being restored near Sand Valley. We wrote about

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the Lido on our website. It was considered the greatest

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>golf course in the world by many historians and by

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>many players at the time, and right now Tom Doak

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and his team are trying to bring it back in Wisconsin.

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So to celebrate these exciting developments, Dream Golf is hosting

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a giveaway that gives you a chance to win a

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>trip to either Bandon Dunes or to Sand Valley. Next July.

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>You could either be among the first to preview the

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>lido or you could be on site at Bandon Dunes

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>during the twenty two US Junior Amateur. The Dream Golf

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Giveaway is open to all subscribers. Enter by September thirtieth

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>for your chance to win a four day, three nights stay.

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Visit dreamgolf dot com Slash Giveaway to submit your entry.

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>That's dreamgolf dot Com Slash Giveaway, all right. So the

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty Ryder Cup of twenty twenty one is in

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the books. The US team won by a score of

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen to nine, so it was not really close. It

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was a historic blowout, but it was still fun to

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>watch this team matchplay. Team matchplay is always magical and

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Whistling Straights I thought showed out pretty well. It was

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>an interesting venue. So there's lots of cool stuff to

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about. What went wrong with the Europeans, what went

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>right for the US, Whether this tells us anything about

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the future of the Ryder Cup. That kind of stuff

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>so plenty to synk our teeth into. And to do that,

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>we are trying a new format in this episode. I'm

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>going to call up three different people and to ask

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>each of them to give me their biggest takeaway from

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the week. Two of these people you've heard from recently

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast. Shane Ryan, came on in July to

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about various things, including his book on the writer

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Cop that he's working on. Shane is a writer for

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Golf Digest and he was at Whistling Straits this week

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to cover the tournament. Another voice you'll recognize is Joseph Lemanna,

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>who's a very smart data analyst. Earlier this month, Joseph

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>joined me on the podcast to discuss the strategy of

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>team matchplay. But the first guest you'll hear from in

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>this episode is Ben Coley. Ben writes for the UK

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>based Sportinglife dot com and he is an outstanding writer.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>As Brendan Porath has said, he's delightfully British in his

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>prose style, which is a compliment. So I was eager

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to get his biggest takeaway from this very tough week

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>for European golf, So let's get right to him.

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 2>I miss the green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 2>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my.

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Ball in a fried egg Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>egg Frida, egg, Frida, egg, Brian egg Frida, egg.

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Bride egg Lie. I'm about ready to run off the

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 2>ump course.

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>All right. So this is less of a big takeaway

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>moment and more of an instant reaction because the Ryder

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Cup has just concluded. We've just gotten the final score

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen to nine. They're probably doing the trophy presentation

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. I don't know. The TV is not on,

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>but I have Ben Coley with me. Ben, First of all,

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>how you doing?

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Good, thank you. It's been a long week, you know,

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 3>you know how it is, and the late nights don't

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 3>necessarily seem worth it when you when you get a

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 3>pummeling as Europe have had. And I am I'm not

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 3>particularly patriotic person actually, but when it comes to the

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Ryder Cups, I suspect a little bit like we saw

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 3>with Rory McRoy today, albeit obviously on a different level,

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 3>something switches, some sort of switch and it becomes very important.

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 3>So it's been a chastening few days. But look, I

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 3>think Europe have just been beaten by one of the

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 3>greatest teams in golf history. So I guess we shouldn't

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 3>lose too much sleep over it.

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so do you find yourself kind of going into

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a ryder cup thinking I'm not going to get emotionally

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>involved this time, and then it just happens to you somehow.

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Pretty much, although the emotions are different this time, you know,

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 3>there's been a lack of Jeopardy, hasn't there. I think

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 3>from a very early stage, I think most of us

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 3>felt that the tide was going to turn significantly back

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 3>in favor of the US this week. And it's just

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 3>a real shame that for me anyway, I'm sure for

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 3>American less so, but it's just a shane that Europe

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 3>never really got a foothold. You know, it was always

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 3>going to be hard without the fans there, and to

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 3>not in any way do anything to really silence the

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 3>American fans or at least give them pause was a shane.

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 3>The writing was on the wall from I don't know

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 3>the time I went to bed on Friday.

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 4>So.

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe even before that, it just felt like, in that

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>very first session, like it was just the US players

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>were in good form. In the European players, you could

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>just see it. None of them were playing well except

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Spaniards.

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 3>That's it. I mean we arrived, we arrived within an

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 3>aging side, four players in their forties and you know,

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 3>just straightforwardly not as good a team as the USA.

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think when I guess it's a bit simplistic,

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 3>but when you have that, you need them to underperform

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 3>first and foremost, and you need to be absolutely on it.

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 3>And if you look back to Paris, I mean, I

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 3>know there are obviously some big problems in the US camp,

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 3>but as well as that, I think it was lost

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 3>a little bit in the aftermath and all the Patrick

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Reid fall and Tiger and feel and and Bryce and

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 3>even that, Europe got everything right and their form players,

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, really produced and the player who had the

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 3>best summer for Europe, Francesco Molinari, went and made history

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 3>for Europe. And that's how much has to go right

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 3>for Europe to win. You know, it felt like that

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 3>was a dominant win. Well, there's a whole new definition

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 3>of dominance just just been written this afternoon, and that

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 3>underlines the scale of the challenge for Europe. They have

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 3>to get so much right and the US have to

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 3>get so much wrong. And fortunately for US, over the

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 3>last twenty years, the US have played their part in

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 3>getting things wrong, but I think they've just figured it

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>out maybe.

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>So so what is your one big takeaway?

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 3>I guess despite all that, my big takeaway is that

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 3>Europe has some questions to answer, but that Europe should

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily panic about what might be over the next

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 3>four or five ryder cops, because I think, first and

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 3>foremost we shouldn't underestimate home advantage. And although I know,

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, nineteen nine, you can probably argue that it

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 3>flatters Europe because they'll, you know, for a good while

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 3>today twenty two six appeared to be on the cards,

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 3>and I think there was probably a lack of real

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 3>intent among those later matches, which is normal. But despite

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 3>the scoreline flattering Europe, I think it would be remiss

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 3>to dwell too much on it and to think that

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 3>it means US will go and run up a sequence here,

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 3>because two years is a long time in golf. I

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 3>think you look at that twelve and you think, well, yeah,

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 3>the US would probably be very very happy if that's

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the twelve in Italy, but it won't be. You know,

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 3>it almost certainly won't be, and we've been in that

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 3>situation Europe. You know, when we've won Madina say you

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 3>know that, you kind of think, well, yeah, we'll take

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 3>those twelve again at Glenn Eagles and there was some

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 3>turnover and we were lucky. We got Victor Debuisson just

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 3>happened to be in that eighteen month window where he

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 3>was good enough to play in a Ryder Cup, and

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 3>not only that, where he looked like he was born

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 3>to playing a rde A Cup. And Europe could find

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 3>those players again, right, I mean, I think back to

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Francesco Molnary and I think for the overwhelming majority of

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 3>his career, I have not thought he would be a

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 3>particularly effective match play player. I think he said himself,

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 3>he'sn't like it, he's not mean enough. But for that month,

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 3>those months, he was virtually unbeatable, and I don't think

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 3>you can always plan for that. You can't, so, you know,

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, so much is said about how Europe have

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 3>outthought the United States, and you know, with Paul McGinley

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 3>and the use of data and all those things which

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 3>will remain important, but I thought the best thing America

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 3>could do here was just simplify and let their players play.

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 3>And I think in having a I mean I love

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 3>what Strika said about all twelve of them having better

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 3>resumes than him, because it just showed what his role

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 3>had to be there. And I think I've gone off

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 3>on a tangent there, but I think the real point

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 3>is that Europe have got some very difficult questions to answer,

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 3>which I'm happy to talk about. But I think I

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 3>think panic would be the wrong way to do it,

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 3>because you know, we have good young players coming through

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 3>we have now that added reason to that sort of

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 3>shock to say, look, you guys, aren't Europe aren't better

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 3>at this than USA. They just were for a while,

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 3>and hopefully that will shake us up and we can

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 3>come out fighting in Rome. I'm convinced we'll do that.

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, So, to put a finer point on the

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>argument that you're making here, there are those right now

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>who are saying this is the beginning of a new era.

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is the beginning of an era of

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>US dominance that we all thought was coming, you know,

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago, but now it's arrived and Europe

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to lose the next fifteen Ryder Cups. So

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you would say that's an overreaction. We don't know what

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the landscape is going to look like in two.

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Years, Yeah, which is a little bit sitting on the fence,

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 3>and I'll give you some of the problems Europe have got, Like,

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 3>there are problems. I think never more so has the

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 3>European Tour been a feeder tour to the PGA Tour.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 3>And I think we're probably seeing the end of that

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 3>era of players and some of them talking about it

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 3>in these videos that europe have put out earlier in

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 3>the week, you know, with the number of when they

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 3>got their first cap or whatever, a lot of them

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 3>will say, we play for the European Tour. Well, is

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Victor Hovlin playing for the European Tour. He's never experienced it,

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, he's come over and won on it because

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 3>he can, but he's not a European Tour player. He's

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 3>a European player and that's a big difference, and it

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 3>is a problem for Europe because as you see, you know,

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 3>if I think about one of maybe the more promising

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 3>young Europeans, a kid called Vincent Norman who's turned pro

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.079
<v Speaker 3>this year, He's played really really well in a few

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 3>European Tour events. Where was he playing last week? Stage

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 3>one corn Ferry Tour qualifying school. There's no question where

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 3>he wants to be if he can choose. And that

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 3>is a problem for Europe because as we lose Poulter,

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 3>which I think we may, as we lose Westwood, which

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 3>I think we have, we lose that belief that the

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.719
<v Speaker 3>European Tour means something. And that's a big, big problem, right,

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 3>But US might have their problems too, and I think

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 3>one of them, I'll be honest. One, you know, maybe

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Reedal does a favor and qualify for the team. Two,

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 3>maybe Tiger Woods will captain it. And Tiger could be

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 3>a great captain. But I think the dynamic they found

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 3>for this one and maybe they'll they'll let Steve Stricker

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 3>have another go. I think that really helped America to

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 3>not have someone there on the sidelines who is better

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 3>than you and better than you will ever be, you know,

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that helps. I think we've seen any number

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 3>of players struggle to play with Tiger, but I think

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 3>it could be hard to be captained by it. Obviously,

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 3>he did it in the President's Cup and they won,

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 3>but it was tight and he was still a player,

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 3>and it's the President's Cup, right, I think in the

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Ryder Cup. That would add a new dimension that would

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily work. And it's things like that that can

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 3>go wrong, you know, you know, any number of things

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 3>can happen to the players as individuals and the other thing.

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if we're talking about a perfect storm here,

0:11:56.040 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 3>we've got no Tiger, no read, no European, a big

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 3>golf course, and out of sorts European team. Everything went right,

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 3>and you know that will happen from time to time.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 3>But no way is the Rider Cup going to turn

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 3>into a processional contest where one team is dramatically overshadowing

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 3>the rest. I just don't see that. I think Europe

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 3>will remain really competitive in Europe, and especially if they

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 3>can start going to some of the courses which would

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 3>suit the more than Marco Simone might, which is a

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 3>bit of a worry. But we'll see about that in

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years, right.

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not sure anybody knows quite what to expect

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>from that course. I think the Americans will probably be

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>annoyed by it, based on what some of the European

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>tour players have said about it. Lots of blind shots,

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. In any case, some of the European players

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>might be more familiar with it, assuming that the members

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of that team play on the European Tour in twenty

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, which is not entirely guaranteed as you're saying.

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I completely agree with you, and I

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>think that people forget. You know, you're saying that a

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>lot has to go right in order for Europe to win,

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and that may be true. Obviously America has the US

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>has the more talented players right now, but I think

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>also a lot went wrong for Europe this week. I

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>think that there just were an extraordinary number of really

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>good players who just were not in good form, and

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>so you know that explains the blowout. But you know,

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>two years from now, you don't know who's going to

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>be on a hot streak. I think we all knew

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>who Francesco Mullinari was in twenty seventeen, twenty sixteen. You know,

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>he was a great player, but he was nowhere near

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the player that he was in twenty eighteen, specifically when

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>for a bit there he was like the best player

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in the world. You don't know who on the European

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>team is going to emerge that way potentially in twenty

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, and there are some younger players among the

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Europeans who could all of a sudden kind of level

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>up and get to that next level. I look at

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the Hoyguard twins, Rasmus and Nikolai Hoygard. I think I

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>got the name right there, I hope. So in any case,

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>those two are are sensational players. They're winning on the

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>European two are at a very young age, and they

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>have games that you know, sort of resemble their American

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>counterparts to a great degree. So if Simone, Marcus Simone

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>ends up being a course that suits an American style

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote American style of play, then that might not

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>be too much of a problem for them. Who knows

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>what they're going to be doing in twenty twenty three,

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>those kids might be, you know, on another level by

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that point. So I think you're right to put out

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that note of caution that two years is a long

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>time for younger players to emerge. It's also a long

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>time for established players to all of a sudden find

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>something more.

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Exactly that exactly that I mean, Nicola, I just you

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 3>wan to Marcus Simony a few weeks ago.

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's a nice thing that's right, Yeah, extly there

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you go.

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Into the future, and I think, I mean, that's the

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 3>obvious thing. Like people will probably turn it around and say, well, okay,

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 3>what's your succession plan? You know who? Who are these players?

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's the point. You don't have to know,

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's no way I know. Okay, he wasn't

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 3>the most important player on the American team by any stretch,

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 3>But Harris English was not a Ryder Cup player had

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 3>this taken place as scheduled. Jordan Speith wasn't a Righter

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Cup player had it taken place as scheduled, right, which

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Fowler might be back on the team in two years,

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 3>don't you know, Let's not assume that we know everything

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 3>because what we learned over the last three days and

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 3>to your point around things going wrong, I mean, ultimately

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Europe needed their best players to perform. And you know,

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to get hung up on the Rory thing.

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 3>I think people stopped listening to what I say about

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Rory McRoy, to be quite honest with you, But I

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 3>think if there are parallels, you look back to Port Rush.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 3>I've seen Rory like that twice one port Rush, where

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 3>his valiant effort to make the cut was in vain

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 3>on the Friday and he burst into tears.

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And today and you're talking specifically about the interview he

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>gave after winning his singles match when he was in

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>tears and saying, you know, I don't think I did

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>enough this time, and this means a lot to me.

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, somebody on Twitter tells me it wasn't actually crying,

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 3>but they isn't it. He certainly, he certainly broke down.

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 3>He was overcome with emotion, and so was the impoulter

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 3>at points, probably for different reasons. But Rory, you know,

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 3>he's fascinating, isn't he. But we'ld do another podcast maybe.

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 3>But at Port Rush in twenty nineteen he realized what

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 3>home meant and all these other things. And although okay,

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 3>it's not translated into what I hoped it might, which

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 3>is the Masters and everything else that we demand from him,

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 3>he did return to the top of the sport in

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the six months after that, right, he was languishing, but

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 3>that period, you know, Okay, won the Players that spring,

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 3>but from he went on, he won the FedEx Cup,

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 3>he won a World Golf Championship, and he really reminded

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 3>himself of what he was capable of and maybe in

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 3>two years. I mean, this will have been humiliating for

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Rory McElroy this week to not play every session, to

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 3>contribute one point, and to know that everywhere people like

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 3>me and others are on Twitter saying oh yeah point

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 3>when it doesn't matter Rory McRoy, here we go. You know,

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 3>it's the equivalent of what happened at the Master's last

0:16:59.920 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 3>night November. He'll know that, and it will it will

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 3>spark something and John Rahm and Sergio I hope can

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 3>we can see that again? And you know there was

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 3>talk of a bad relationship there, but I would hope

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 3>this week solved it if it needed solving. And as

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 3>you say that, there are many more players who come through.

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully Sam Horsefield won't defect. That'd be a problem.

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>In Florida.

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 3>He's been in Florida since he was five years old. Yeah,

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 3>worried about that. We've got loads of good players. I

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 3>just they need to find a way to make sure

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 3>the European Tour retains purpose. I think that's the number

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 3>one thing. And one of the things they'll talk about

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 3>is getting another team competition back up and running. We

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 3>had the Sevy Trophy. We had the Eurasia Cup and okay,

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:47.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the best players didn't play, but Eurasia

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Cup twenty eighteen, Tommy Fleetwood was there, Alex Norrin was there.

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 3>They both played important roles in Paris, and I think

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 3>they've got a feel for it and that would really

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 3>help in somewhere or another. It would help connect them

0:17:57.720 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 3>because I think there's been a lot said in the

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 3>past out how well europe do connect that sort of

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 3>shared bond of being outsiders on the PGA Tour or

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 3>whatever it may be. They come from very different countries

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 3>and different backgrounds, but that shouldn't be taken for granted.

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 3>That things need to happen to make sure that remains.

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, you need Rory to be taking people like

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Bob McIntyre under his wing on the PGA Tour week

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 3>to week. You know, you need that. You need players

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 3>to look out for each other and to form those

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 3>bonds that Americans, and particularly this set of Americans have

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 3>formed in college. You know, I know it's not you

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 3>know now they all love each other because they've won.

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 3>I know there's probably more to it there, and there

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 3>certainly is on some levels, but fundamentally, there's a lot

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 3>to be said for that. They've grown up competing against

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 3>them with each other, and Europe won't have that same experience,

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 3>so they need to find other ways to bridge that

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 3>gap and to form the bonds that have worked for

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 3>the US this time.

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if the great European players of the future are

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>not going to be playing as much on the European Tour,

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>then that has its drawbacks in the sense that one

0:18:57.440 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of the things that Team Europe had going for it

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in the past is that a lot of these players

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>knew each other pretty well from extensive experience on the

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>European Tour. So perhaps there needs to be a new

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>milieu in which they are interacting with each other and

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>bonding with each other, though some would argue that that

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is American universities and the PGA Tour. At this point

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>for Europe, that's a much more common path for those

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 1>players than it has been in the past.

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it certainly isn't it. I'm sure it will continue

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 3>to be. Certainly when I look down the best amateurs

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 3>coming through for Europe that invariably now in the college

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 3>system in the US. But there are other ways to

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 3>do it, you know that. I think Padrick Harrington doesn't

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 3>need to be criticized for the things he did prior

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 3>to this week, and even picking apart his decisions now

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 3>after a result like that would be futile really, But

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 3>I think they need to just be thinking about that,

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 3>and they will be, but I think they'll do it

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 3>in a measured way. You know. The one thing as

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 3>well is that, yeah, these guys who are leaving now

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 3>they become captains. And I know Steve, it doesn't always translate.

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Steve Stricker was not a very good I had a

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Cup player. You know, he is by definition of good

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 3>captain because they've won nineteen nine. But hopefully the things

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 3>that Lee Westwood and Ian Poulter and Graha McDowell and

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 3>so on can bring to that team room can have

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 3>some significance, you know. And also it was not, you know,

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 3>in any way a massive factor, but Europe will get

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 3>to the next Ryder Cup having been five years out

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 3>from the last time. They got proper support and that's

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 3>going to make a big difference. And you throw all

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 3>those things together and the fact that there will be

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 3>people like the Hoyguard Twins watching these Americans, you know,

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 3>rightly enjoying themselves on the eighteenth Green. It's gonna be

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 3>hugely motivating in the same way that when Justin Thomas

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 3>sat and watched the Miracle at Madonah when he was what,

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, twenty years old, he wanted to go and

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 3>be the one who got redemption for that. And I

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 3>guess they have it in a form, so game on,

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 3>I suppose, But I'm certainly not resigned two years of

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Europeans struggle. I get enough of that from my other sports.

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 3>But where Europe Team Europe are concerned, they can be

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 3>really to want to figure it.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Out, all right, So, Ben, I would imagine that you

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>have some Ryder Cup wrap up content in the works.

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Tell the people where they can find that when it

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>comes out.

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of you. Yeah, Sportinglife dot com is where

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 3>I will will put all that on paypers if I

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 3>have time. I've got to preview the Dunhill Links Championship

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 3>tomorrow and all the fun that intels goes on.

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Yea, I mean, that's a that's a fun tournament though.

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>That's that's cool. I mean to get to see the

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>players go to the Old Course every year. That that's

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a fun feature of the European Tour.

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 3>It is the perfect way to recover from a chastening

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Rider Cup defeat. You know, great courses, a good field,

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 3>a significant tournament in European tour terms, and and yeah

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 3>we can just we can. You know, come Sunday we'll

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 3>have forgotten all about this.

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, get some sleep tonight, Ben, Thank.

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 3>You so much, Thank you, Garrett.

0:21:54.480 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Next up, Joseph Lamangna. All right, so Joseph, the Ryder

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Cup has just wrapped up. What are some of your

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about how things went this week? Was it was

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 1>it fun for you to watch on TV? Before we

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>get to your big takeaway was, what's your situation there?

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Did you watch the whole thing?

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.719
<v Speaker 4>I did. I watched pretty much every shot on Friday

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 4>and Saturday, I watched most of Sunday. The suspense wasn't

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 4>quite there, but I really enjoyed it. I thought Steve

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Stricker did a really good job from his captain's picks

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 4>press conference onwards. I was really encouraged by everything I

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 4>was hearing. So it's nice that it panned out well

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 4>for him and for the rest of Team USA. I

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 4>was excited to see a victory.

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this was a pretty solid captaincy. I mean so

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've had a previous podcast where we talked

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>about the strategy of team match play of the Ryder Cup,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of what we talked about was the

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>strategy from the captain's perspective, right, because that's the main

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of strategic component of the Ryder Cup that you

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>could make alterations too, really, and so you know, against

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>that kind of rubric that we developed in that podcast,

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you think Steve Stricker did pretty well.

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 3>I do.

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 4>I think all of the big concepts that we had

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 4>talked about, he did a really good job of recognizing

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 4>the differences in players' skill sets. He did a good

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 4>job recognizing that some players are better for one format

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 4>than the other. All of the big points, I think

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 4>he did a great job. There are a couple small

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 4>things I might have done differently, though I'm not convinced

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 4>it would have achieved a much different result. Team USA dominated,

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 4>and overall, I really think he did a great job.

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it seems like neither of the captains could do much.

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Ben said something about this in the conversation I just

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>had with Ben Coley. He said something to the effect of,

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>we might as well not really nitpick Patrick Harrington's performance too.

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Much because whatever he could have done differently might not

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>have made a difference in the ten point margin that

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>ended up being being there at the end of the day.

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So it is kind of hard to critique the captaincies.

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>But you mentioned that there are a couple of things

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>that you might have done differently. I was actually curious

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>about this. I was thinking about this, you know, while

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I was watching the Ryder Cup. I was like, clearly,

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a good performance by Team USA, but that

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that Steve Stricker did everything right right. That's

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the fallacies that happens with Ryder Cups is

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that we assumed that the losing captain did everything wrong

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.239
<v Speaker 1>and that the winning captain did everything right. That's not

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the case at all. So what were some of

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the small things that you noticed that you might have

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>done differently.

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Again, overwhelmingly think he did a good job, so I

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 4>don't want to come off as too critical of him.

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.199
<v Speaker 4>But one example would be on the Saturday four balls

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 4>he played fee now in English, and I understand those

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 4>guys played well on Friday, but I still think it's

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 4>worth of zooming out and saying who gives you a

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 4>better chance of winning? Here, Shoffley can't Ley or Fein

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 4>now English, And that's one of those where I'm pretty

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 4>on the extreme. I want the best players on the

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 4>team playing as much as possible. I think that those

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 4>two give you a better tech chance and female English.

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 4>Does that change the result? I don't know, We'll never know,

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 4>but that's the direction I would have gone in particular

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 4>on that matchup.

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, here's one. I don't like the Jordan Speath Justin

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Thomas pairing, especially for alternate shot. I just don't like it.

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>And you could see it because I believe Justin Thomas

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>ended up teeing off on the odd holes, which gave

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>him those shots at the par threes. And I guess

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the reasoning there is that he's obviously a great iron player,

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and so put him on the par threes. But that

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>ended up putting Jordan Speith on some of the most

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>difficult driving holes on the course, which is not where

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.719
<v Speaker 1>you want Jordan Speith. And so I think the problem

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>is not so much that decision to put him on

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:45.479
<v Speaker 1>those specific holes, but it underlines the fact that they

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't really be paired together. They should be paired with somebody,

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>perhaps who's really strong driving the ball at least speaf

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>should I think.

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 4>I agree with you. In four sums, especially at Whistling Straits,

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 4>I would not have a team of two golfers who

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 4>are not great at driving the ball. When I created

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.719
<v Speaker 4>my I didn't put justin Thomas and Jordan's speech together

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 4>in the forresomes format. Jordan actually drove the ball a

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 4>lot better than I expected him to. But I don't

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 4>think that doesn't invalidate the point. Right, If that's not

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 4>evidence that that was a good pairing. If Jordan goes

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 4>out there and drives it poorly, we're having a completely

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 4>different conversation.

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 3>So I'm with you.

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't love that pairing in foursomes, especially since there

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 4>are so many good drivers on that team you could

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 4>have paired those guys with, right.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.919
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of yeah, exactly, there's plenty of great drivers

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of the golf ball in the US team. But here

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we are critiquing the captaincy of somebody who just went

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and nine. So so that just shows you the

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>complexity of this job of pairing up players and coming

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>up with a strategy for team match plays.

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 4>So well, sorry, one quick point on that as well.

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 4>When you're talking about, you know, reconfiguring pairings a little

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 4>bit here and there. Those are small things ultimately, and

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 4>I think Steve Stricker did the big things very well.

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 4>He left Dustin Johnson on the golf course for five sessions,

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 4>and that is crucial captaining. I think he got almost

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 4>everything correct, and we can nitpick the small things, but

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 4>overwhelmingly I think he did an excellent job.

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, DJ out there for five sessions was fantastic because

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the common sense approach to that would have been to say,

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 1>he's a little bit older, we got arrest him. But no,

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was playing wonderful golf and he was.

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>He's so well suited to that course. You called it

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in our podcast together a couple of months ago when

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you said DJ could be a star.

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 1>This is his perfect moment to perform really, really brilliantly

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 1>in a Ryder Cup, and he did, and Stricker just

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 1>went back to him time and time again and it

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>worked out five ZHO zero exactly.

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 4>And I feel that way whether a player is playing

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 4>unbelievably well or not. The example for me would be

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 4>Rory McElroy. He wasn't playing great, but I'm still playing

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 4>him in all five sessions as Team Europe even though

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 4>he's not playing great because that team is so weak

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 4>at the bottom, you can't convince me Rory isn't giving

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 4>you more perform than you know, the tenth eleventh person

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 4>on Team Europe. So it's a big point. You got

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 4>to have the best players on the golf course and

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 4>rest isn't worth of sacrificing points upfront. That equation doesn't

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 4>check out all right.

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So what's your one big takeaway from this Ryder Cup.

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, my biggest takeaway is that golf is far more

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 4>compelling when greenside bunkers represent an actual hazard. You know,

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 4>there was a significant penalty to finding green side bunkers

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 4>at Whistling Streets, and it makes the entire test far

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 4>more comprehensive and more compelling from a viewer's perspective and

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 4>from a competition perspective. In twenty fifteen, at Whistling Straits

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 4>for the PGA, it was harder to get up and

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 4>down out of a greenside bunker than at any other

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 4>venue on tour by over five percent an up and

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 4>down percentage. Similar thing this week during the Ryder Cup,

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 4>really hard to get up and down, and that just

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 4>makes iron play so much more of a test, and

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 4>it also feeds into the distance advantage that we're talking about.

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 4>I think that's the leap that people need to make.

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 4>It's a lot easier to control a shot from one

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 4>hundred and forty yards than from one hundred and fifty

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 4>five or even as you move back farther, So I

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 4>think that's almost a necessity to testing professional golfers.

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a number of directions we can take this, but

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that's so right. That was so much a part of

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>why this course was fun to watch in this format

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>because we saw a lot of different shots. We didn't

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>just see the players who were playing well. We saw

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the players who were missing greens, and we saw what

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>was happening, and what was happening were some really, really

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>strange shots that we just don't see every week on

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour, where guys were blading it out of bunkers,

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the shots were rolling past the pin and over the green,

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and we saw guys hacking out of big bushes and

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>big clumps of grass, and there was just such a

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>variety of terrible lies that they could find next to

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the and even on the sides of the fairway. If

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>they hit it arrently enough to actually get off of

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the corridors at Whistling Straits, which we're fairly wide when

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you include the short rough. But yeah, especially around the greens,

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>some of those shots were so so hard, and we

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>just did not see players playing out of bunkers and

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>reliably sticking it next to the pen. Yeah.

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 4>My favorite example was on Friday four Balls, Bryson had

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 4>like a three hundred and ninety five yard drive on

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 4>thirteen into the green side bunker and that was a

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 4>very challenging up and down. He did nothing with it,

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 4>ended up, you know, I think he made par. But

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 4>on the PGA Tour week in and week out, if

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 4>there's a drivable par four and you put it on

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 4>a green side bunker, you have a little green to

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 4>work with. That's a routine up and down. So it

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 4>just completely changes the complexion of the golf course when

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 4>Bryson he can't just hit into those green side bunkers

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 4>and expect a consistent lie and an easy up and

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 4>down opportunity.

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>We saw that a few times from Bryson this week,

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>where yeah, he was trying to drive a lot of

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>greens at Whistling Straits, and we saw him get into

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>some really, really, really hairy positions next to the greens,

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and again, that's just something we don't see. When he

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>gets the ball up near the green on a par

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>four in a regular PGA Tour event, we are expecting

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a birdie, and that just wasn't necessarily the expectation this week.

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Even though he ended up playing pretty well, I don't

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>think he played quite as well as people thought he did,

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, he was. You know, when he was getting

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>up near those greens, part of you was wondering would

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it have been a better call to just lay back

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and guarantee yourself a lie in the

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>fair way or the short rough.

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:39.479
<v Speaker 4>And I know some people have made the point of well,

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 4>how do you even make bunkers more challenging? I think

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 4>it's a good example of how really small bunkers can

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 4>be some of the most effective traps. When you have

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 4>a really inconsistent lie, your feet are out of the bunker.

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm not an architecture expert by any means, but that

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 4>seems like something you could replicate on many courses throughout America.

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 4>You don't have to have these bowl shaped, large bunkers

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 4>that provide the same lie every time, so it doesn't

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 4>seem like you have to have ridiculous terrain to create

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 4>a difficult up and down.

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, a lot of the bunkers that we see on

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>TV in these tournaments on the PGA Tour are kind

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of like, you know, they have a fairly flat bottom

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to them, and the rest of the bunker kind of

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>feeds to that flat bottom, and so we see a

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of the same kinds of lies out of bunkers

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>where you know, the player's feet are not up on

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the lip, they're just in the middle of the bunker.

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>That's where they tend to end up. And they have nice,

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of consistent softish sand and they just know what

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that shot is. They would rather have that shot than

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a weird lie in the rough at Whistling Straits. The

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>sand in those bunkers, first of all, is not your

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>regular PGA Tour sand. And then yeah, the crazy bunker

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 1>shapes there. You have all sorts of different things going on.

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes the bunkers are tilted, they're not always flat on

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the bottom. Often you're finding your self ending up in

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>these weird little corners of the bunkers because they've got

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>these squiggly shapes to them, and so yeah, all of

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that factored in, and then you have what's going on

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>outside of the bunkers, which is often even worse.

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it just creates a much better dynamic players. When

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 4>a pin is tucked near a bunker, you know, it

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 4>gives you some hesitation before just taking that flag on

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 4>right away. It's a much better test. You can see

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 4>it on other courses on tour where the bunkers that

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 4>are much more difficult to get up and down out

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 4>of better iron players succeed. So I think that's a

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 4>big part of why Dustin Johnson and Calm Morikawa performed

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 4>so well this week. There's two of the best iron

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 4>players in the world, and you know, it gives them

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot more freedom to take on the pins they

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 4>want to take on, and you know, play a little

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 4>bit more conservative when they need to be.

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So when you have these wild kinds of surrounds with

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 1>really severe penalties for missing the green, you mentioned, iron

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>play gets emphasized a lot. And that's that's you know,

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you would assume that right if you hit the green,

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>then you know you're not in the weird position. Are

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>there any other effects that these wild surrounds have on

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the way that a course plays that are not as

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>obvious as good iron play is rewarded.

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 4>I would say distance is the other big part of that,

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 4>because again, the difference between one hundred and seventy yard

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 4>shot and one hundred and eighty five yard shot is

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 4>pretty big. That would be true even if the same

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 4>golfer we're hitting each shot, but the golfer who's fifteen

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 4>yards farther is also the player who's longer, so now

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 4>they're hitting an even shorter iron in Then if you

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 4>drop the ball in the same spot for a player

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 4>who hits it shorter. So the difference between hitting a

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 4>nine iron and now potentially hitting a six iron somebody

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 4>who's you know, fifteen twenty yards behind them is really large.

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 4>Just allows you to control the ball so much better,

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 4>and that obviously fed into the United States hand being

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 4>such a longer team this week.

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, Joseph, thank you so much for coming on

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. People can find your work at Finding the Edge,

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 1>a substack newsletter. Are you planning to do a kind

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of wrap right cup wrap up kind of thing.

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'll do a Ryder Cup recap, just going over

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.839
<v Speaker 4>some of the decisions Stricker made and talking a little

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 4>bit about where some of the outperformance for Team USA

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 4>came perfect. Thanks so much, thanks for having me, Garrett,

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 4>really appreciate it.

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>And finally let's go to Shane Ryan. You just saw

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the press conference, Shane, So what was the press conference?

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>What was the vibe like there? I didn't get to

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 1>see it myself. I know it was on TV, but

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I was podcasting during it. So what was going on there?

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? So you were talking about the American one or both?

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I mean both of them, actually, both of

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>them can be interesting. The Europeans the loser's press conferences

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>for the Europeans have traditionally been less interesting than the

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Americans loser press conferences. But how were both of them?

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? So the Europeans are very very emotional.

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 3>I was.

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I think I counted five of their team that cried,

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 2>either be at the press conference or like before after

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 2>the golf ended. Poulter was crying, Rory you probably saw

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 2>on TV, was crying, Paul Casey, Lee Westwood, and Tommy

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Fleetwood all of them cried, and yeah, there, you know,

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 2>it's funny. They love I don't know if they love

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 2>each other. But for this week, it's like they do

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 2>love each other and they definitely love being part of

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Team Europe, and they have this weird bond that it's

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.479
<v Speaker 2>kind of hard to understand, I think for Americans because

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.399
<v Speaker 2>they don't have it in quite the same way. But yeah,

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 2>they sit there like it's very different than when the

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Americans lose, whether either like backbiting or just go home

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 2>with no drama. But the Europeans are crying and saying

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 2>how much they love each other and all this stuff.

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 2>So that's pretty interesting. Like Shane Lowry, you gave a

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 2>really emotional answer about what it meant to play, saying that, like,

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, at the time of my life, we're down

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 2>by six points, like how great was to be when

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 2>we're winning, And then the Americans came in We're all drunk.

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Of course, DJ was talking like trying to convince Steve

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Stricker to get a tattoo on his app and he's like,

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll do it too, I'll do it too, and just yeah.

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Jordan Speed was the one most in control

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 2>and ended up taking most of the answers because nobody

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 2>else could focus long enough to keive a serious answer.

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 2>And then Steve Stricker's in the backgrounds kind of just

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 2>like being himself, being like, yeah, we tried really hard

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:27.839
<v Speaker 2>this week. Yeah, humble Wisconsin version of himself. I don't

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 2>even know like if he got drunk at all, but

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 2>if he did, the only effect it had was to

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 2>like make his cheek slightly redder, but didn't change his

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 2>personality when Iota and yeah, then you know, justin Thomas

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 2>forced Brooks and Bryce and to hug in front of everybody.

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 2>It's like he basically wouldn't let it go until they

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 2>had done that. Yeah, So it's just really funny, and

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:54.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're very happy. One thing that's I think

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 2>pretty interesting is they all seemed to understand that in

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 2>order to kind of consolidate this, they do have to

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 2>go win one on European soil, you know what I mean,

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Like that's the next great challenge. And they were already

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 2>according to Davis Love, They're already coming up to him

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 2>and going like, get me to Rome, get me to Rome,

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 2>like I really we run to go win. And the

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 2>funny thing is that Europeans are also like I cannot

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 2>wait for Rome, like we wanted to. We want to

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 2>get this cup back. So already you know, if you're

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 2>if you're a Ryder Cup freak, like I am already like,

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 2>oh man, Rome's gonna be so good. So yeah, it

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 2>was good. You know, they were all happy and it

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 2>was a fun experience, and obviously they just you know,

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 2>wiped the floor with them this week. It was totally

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 2>totally a wipeout.

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 1>One of the reports from the ground at Hazel teen

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:42.919
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen was that the American team was relatively

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>subdued in victory, surprisingly so to the extent that Rory

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>McElroy was looking at them and saying, hey, guys, come on,

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>let's get the party going. Aren't you guys happy that

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you won? Was there? I don't know if that's necessarily

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a perfectly accurate characterization of what happened and after that

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cup. But was the American team more joyful this time?

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Was there more of a celebration going on, would you say?

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Or or was it similar?

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think so, So I missed the trophy ceremony

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 2>when I think they were like in the midst of

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 2>their drinking and stuff.

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>But certainly when the drinking started immediately after the matches ended,

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, as soon as somebody finished in match,

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>there was a drink in their hand basically right away.

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, they give Spith the Ultra and then like

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Xander I think, chougged a high noon.

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>In front of the I don't know how you can

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>get drunk on michelob Ultra. How is that even possible?

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 2>That would be a great question. I don't know.

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 1>You have to drink a lot of it.

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it would take a long time, no, I think,

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 2>uh yeah. So it was a little weird because not

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 2>everybody was there when Colin Moricala won it on eight.

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 2>In fact, I think the only two players there were

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.799
<v Speaker 2>Schefler and to Shamba other than Marikala, and it was

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 2>like there were a bunch of people around sixteen at

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 2>one point, but it just didn't work out. The Ryder

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Cup's weird that way. You never kind of know, like

0:39:58.120 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 2>what's going to happen and who's going to clinch the

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 2>winning point. So it actually like more Kawa on seventeen

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 2>made a birdie to go one up and that actually

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 2>guaranteed the US fourteen point five points, and so technically

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 2>that was the like clinching point, and yet it wasn't

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 2>up on the scoreboard yet, so nobody thinks of it

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 2>that way. But at that point, the US had won

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the Ryder Cup, barring morikwa like stripping naked and tackling

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 2>a marshal or something to like to get dec'ed or

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, like anything short of like all you have

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 2>to do is like finish the match. And then the

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 2>funny like it was a kind of a weird situation

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 2>where I'm eighteen, Marikawa had a putt to win the match,

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 2>and like the situation was if he made the putt,

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 2>your the US would have fifteen points, which is a victory,

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 2>and if he missed the putt, the US would have

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 2>fourteen and a half points, which is a victory. And

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 2>so he had this weird situation where it was a

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 2>putt to win the Ryder Cup no matter what happened,

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Like like imagine that. It's so funny, like, yeah, make

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 2>or miss your team wins the Ryder Cup, congrats, And

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 2>he missed it. He missed it, and that was the

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 2>winning Ryder Cup moment, and so it was like what

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 2>an anti climax because if you had made it, the

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 2>place would have gone bonkers because that would have been

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 2>like an emphatic like we just won the Ryder Cup.

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 2>This made putt. Instead, you won the Ryder Cup with

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 2>a missed putt, and so everybody was like, oh, then

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 2>then the scoreboard change and then people started cheering. But

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 2>you didn't have the whole team there, So long story short,

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 2>there was no like one galvanizing moment like there was

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 2>at Hazel Team where Ryan Moore kind of secured it

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 2>and everybody was there when he did. Yeah, and then

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 2>they just failed to like know how to celebrate like

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 2>in this case. I think they would have done a

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 2>better job, and they did later, but they like nobody

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 2>was there when it happened, and it was just kind

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 2>of weird that way.

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, it happened so early in the day that,

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>as you say, people weren't waiting around, right, So there's

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of a weird vibe because most of the

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 1>team is out still playing their matches at this point.

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, almost all of them are still playing.

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, Yeah, it was such a blow.

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Captains were like with DJ by accident or something.

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 1>So right. Well, so obviously, as you mentioned, you were

0:41:55.440 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 1>there covering the event for Golf Digest, and you're also

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 1>engaged in a long term Ryder Cup project. That's going

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to result in a book, and so, you know, I

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>thought it would be interesting to get a big takeaway

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>from you about what this Ryder Cup meant. And you know,

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if you want to put it in

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>historical context or not. I know you're thinking in that

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 1>way in terms of, you know, what this Ryder Cup

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 1>represents in the long history of Ryder Cups. But in

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:29.880
<v Speaker 1>any case, what do you think is your big takeaway

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>at this moment from this event?

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll give you a couple like overarching ideas that

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm having is that the first one coming into this

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 2>my theory was that, you know, America can't lose this

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Ryder Cup. It would have been a really bad Ryder

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.799
<v Speaker 2>Cup to lose because they had this task force after

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourteen. Twenty fourteen was a disaster that could not

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:50.839
<v Speaker 2>be ignored and so it spawned like this reckoning where

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 2>we go, what the hell do we do? You know,

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 2>that's a US team like going, how do we start

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 2>winning these things? Invented this task force and actually seem

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 2>to have some really like positive developments out of that

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 2>to win at Hazel Team. But then they go to

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Paris and just get you know, absolutely destroyed by the Europeans.

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 2>And so from there, I don't think you can come

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 2>back and lose on home soil and still think that

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:13.840
<v Speaker 2>you've made any progress or that you have any idea

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 2>how to beat the Europeans. Ever, right, so there were

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:18.879
<v Speaker 2>those stakes coming in. So what the US did first

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:20.919
<v Speaker 2>of all was they held serve and they prove that,

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:22.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, or they at least left the idea open

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:25.479
<v Speaker 2>that all the things they accomplished with this task force

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 2>are really working. And they won, of course by historic

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 2>margin nineteen to nine. It wasn't just a victory, it

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 2>was a really emphatic good victory. And so what that

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 2>did I think is it sets up a chance for

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 2>the US to win in Rome, and then, you know,

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 2>give weight to this idea that this young generation of

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Americans who grew up watching Tiger Woods and are just

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:46.839
<v Speaker 2>kind of like these swaggering alpha males, like the entire team,

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 2>like they're like, you know, like watching Shuffler go beat

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Rohm today. It's just an example like nobody is scared

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:54.760
<v Speaker 2>of anything. And granted Ram is tired and all that stuff,

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 2>but they're really good. And so yeah, they go win

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:59.240
<v Speaker 2>in Rome, and then you've got a whole narrative switch.

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 2>But the other thing, just on like a sort of

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 2>micro level, is just what a great job Steve Stricker did.

0:44:05.800 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I just super super impressed with him in terms like

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 2>everything from you know, accepting more captain's picks when it

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:15.239
<v Speaker 2>was offered to him, knowing that, you know, captain's picks

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 2>play better than the guys who qualify at the bottom

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 2>of the table, usually giving himself that flexibility. The captain's

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 2>picks he picked, you know, the way he set up

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the course and everything like that, which is you know,

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 2>getting to be like pretty normally everybody kind of knows

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 2>how to do that. But then his like leadership style,

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 2>he like squelched the Brooks Brice and stuff right away.

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 2>He knew that these guys didn't need big speeches or

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 2>inspirational videos or anything like that. He cut all that

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 2>stuff out. His whole thing was like, I'm gonna prepare

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 2>like crazy, But as far as the players are concerned,

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 2>all they have to know is like who they're gonna

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 2>play with early, They're gonna know exactly what their role is.

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna let them know that there's gonna be no

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:55.359
<v Speaker 2>curve balls, no confusion beyond that I'm just gonna try

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 2>to make life easy for them so they can go

0:44:57.160 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 2>out there and be who they are, which is this

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:03.760
<v Speaker 2>really powerful, great team. And you know, he did everything

0:45:03.840 --> 0:45:06.279
<v Speaker 2>so well. One little thing I learned today was that

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Brooks and Bryson were so willing to like, you know,

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 2>be part of the team that they told him like,

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 2>we'll play together if you want it, and he and

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 2>his vice captains were thinking, like, oh, maybe that would

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 2>be really cool. But then Stricker had the instinct of like, actually,

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 2>if we do that, Brooks Bryson is going to become

0:45:22.239 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 2>like the over like the overwhelming story instead of the

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 2>team being the story, which he wants. So he had

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the instinct not to do that. He didn't take Patrick

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 2>reed like, there's all this stuff he did that was

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 2>so smart. I think that you look at it, it's like, yeah,

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 2>the US was superior and like they were gonna have

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the advantage coming in. But Stricker did absolutely everything he

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 2>needed to do to set these guys loose, to just

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 2>decimate the Europeans, and I thought that was like really cool.

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 2>But speaking more broadly and historically, the fact that he

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 2>is doing all that stuff and that he learned from

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 2>a Dina and he learned from Glenn Eagles very good

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 2>sign for the Americans that they could have a really

0:45:56.800 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 2>good template moving forward the way the Europeans have had

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:02.919
<v Speaker 2>for like forty years, and this could be a thing where, yeah,

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 2>in like six or seven years you might be going, oh, man,

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 2>like maybe the US is just going to like dominate.

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:07.839
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 1>There seemed to be a building narrative early in the

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>week that Steve Stricker wasn't doing well, that he was disengaged.

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 1>He had just been playing on the Champions Tour and

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do well in the press conference with Patrick Harrington,

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and there there was a little bit of a groundswell. Now,

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:27.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's one of those things where, you know, Ryder

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Cup weeks are kind of like choose your own adventure,

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>where you know, reporters have to kind of set up

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a number of different options for where the week could

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 1>go because nobody knows, nobody has any information. You have

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:40.279
<v Speaker 1>to figure out something to do for those first four

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 1>days of the week, which get to be way too

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:46.879
<v Speaker 1>long for the media. And so there were some people

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:51.319
<v Speaker 1>who were kind of casting doubt on Stricker's captaincy. Did

0:46:51.360 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you have any sense early in the week I know

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:56.759
<v Speaker 1>from your articles that you are pretty positive about the

0:46:56.840 --> 0:46:59.359
<v Speaker 1>job that he was doing early on, But did you

0:46:59.440 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>censor did you see any indications that things might not

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 1>be going that way?

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 2>You see? You know, there's like to pat myself on

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:09.399
<v Speaker 2>the back, like I predicted an American blowout. It felt

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 2>like that was was what I did. I got the

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 2>sense ever since, so there's a lot we don't know.

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:15.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, like a month ago, we didn't know what

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:17.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of captain Stricker was gonna because we're not inside

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 2>those doors. But from the minute he did his press

0:47:19.760 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 2>conference after making his captain's picks, all the way through

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 2>this week, I sensed nothing except that he was doing

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 2>a really good job. Now, I am a big fan

0:47:28.719 --> 0:47:30.919
<v Speaker 2>of like reading into history and reading into the right

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 2>information to make like good predictions in terms of the

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Ryder Cup. I like that aspect of it. But as

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 2>you were alluding to, there are people who get absolutely

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 2>lost in the stupidest details and so like, yeah, like

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 2>there was somebody who came up to another reporter, a

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 2>European after their first press conference and was like, oh,

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Carrington just ran circles around Stripper in that press conference,

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:54.000
<v Speaker 2>And you're like I think even said like one mil

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:57.040
<v Speaker 2>to the Europeans or something. You're like that doesn't matter,

0:47:57.200 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 2>like don't like it's so stupid. And then another thing

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 2>is like the inspirational video came out where it was like,

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, only one hundred and sixty four have ever

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 2>played for Team Europe and there's been like three hundred

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 2>astronauts in space or something like. Personally, I always kind

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 2>of find that stuff a little bit cheesy. That may

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:18.280
<v Speaker 2>just be because I'm a cynic or something, but sometimes

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:21.279
<v Speaker 2>they're really cool. But ultimately it's a video, you know

0:48:21.320 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 2>what I mean. Like these things can be good supplements

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 2>if your team responds to that kind of stuff, or

0:48:26.440 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 2>like in Stricers case, it may be good not to

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 2>do it because it's like your team won't respond to

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:34.239
<v Speaker 2>that in any case. Like a lot of people extrapolate

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:36.520
<v Speaker 2>from that and go, look what Europe does. Look look

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 2>at their spirit like this video, like they act like

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:41.360
<v Speaker 2>the video is gonna make a difference, or like the

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:43.359
<v Speaker 2>fact that they wore cheese heads, you know what I mean,

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 2>out in front of the crowd. You saw that, and

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 2>it's like, look at them, They're getting the crowd on

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 2>their side and it's like, don't get lost in the

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:52.160
<v Speaker 2>small stuff. Like I guarantee you come Friday, this crowd

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:54.239
<v Speaker 2>is going to be like hostile, you know what I mean,

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Like to the Europeans, the fact that they wore cheeseheads

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 2>is not gonna make any difference. The video won't make

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:01.839
<v Speaker 2>any difference. Look at the stuff that actually matters, which

0:49:01.880 --> 0:49:03.880
<v Speaker 2>is how the teams are being managed and how people

0:49:03.920 --> 0:49:07.239
<v Speaker 2>feel and like who's dispensing the right information to their team.

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 2>And then you know broader stuff like you know home

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:12.360
<v Speaker 2>course advantage, which has become really really enormous in the

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Ryder Cup. So yeah, there was that stuff during the week,

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 2>but you almost just have to laugh at it when

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 2>people bring it up because it's so irrelevant. But people

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:22.680
<v Speaker 2>love to just like see these little details and go, oh,

0:49:22.719 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 2>look at this video with the astronauts, like now europe

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 2>can't lose, you know this it's bizarre.

0:49:29.080 --> 0:49:31.719
<v Speaker 1>So I can see, you know, it's always hard to

0:49:31.800 --> 0:49:34.480
<v Speaker 1>predict what's gonna happen in the next Ryder Cup. I

0:49:34.520 --> 0:49:37.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about this with Ben Coley earlier, where you know,

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:39.800
<v Speaker 1>two years is a long time. A lot can happen.

0:49:40.160 --> 0:49:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Certain Europeans can European golfers can emerge, and we can

0:49:45.160 --> 0:49:48.440
<v Speaker 1>find ourselves in a situation in you know, twenty twenty

0:49:48.480 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 1>three where the European team is actually favored. That seems

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>unlikely at this point, but it might happen. But at

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the same time, it's fun to try to predict this stuff.

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And so I guess the way I'd put it is,

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:04.279
<v Speaker 1>if you were to build a case that this is

0:50:04.320 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of an era of American dominance in the

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cup, would you be more able to build a case,

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:15.719
<v Speaker 1>a convincing case for that, or to build a convincing

0:50:15.800 --> 0:50:20.680
<v Speaker 1>case that home course advantage has become so significant that

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:23.359
<v Speaker 1>we are simply in a period of the Ryder Cup

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:26.440
<v Speaker 1>where the home team is just going to have a really,

0:50:26.480 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 1>really good chance at blowing the other team out.

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:31.319
<v Speaker 2>I think the latter. I mean you look at two

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:34.080
<v Speaker 2>thousand or the stat which is that since two thousand

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 2>and six, however many Ryder Cups there have been since then,

0:50:37.480 --> 0:50:40.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot the home team has gone into Sunday singles

0:50:40.880 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 2>with a lead every single time, and the smallest of

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 2>those leads was nine to seven. There's been a bunch

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:48.319
<v Speaker 2>of ten six leads. Obviously it was eleven to five

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 2>this year, and so that shows you, like, yeah, the

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:54.080
<v Speaker 2>home team does incredibly well impairs. We had Madina where

0:50:54.080 --> 0:50:56.800
<v Speaker 2>the Europeans were able to reverse it in this incredible, weird,

0:50:56.880 --> 0:50:59.800
<v Speaker 2>anomalous day. But other than that, the home team is

0:50:59.800 --> 0:51:02.800
<v Speaker 2>one every Ryder Cup, right, So yeah, gun to my

0:51:02.840 --> 0:51:04.680
<v Speaker 2>head right now if like you're asking me to predict,

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Like you make a great point. We don't know what

0:51:06.719 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 2>the teams are gonna look like in two years. We

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:10.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know what the captains are gonna be, like you

0:51:10.680 --> 0:51:12.520
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean, that is a huge deal to me,

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:14.719
<v Speaker 2>Like how will the captains manage? You would like to

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 2>think that there have been enough examples of good captains

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:19.759
<v Speaker 2>on both sides now that you're gonna have two good

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 2>captains and that would be good. But don't forget that

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:24.319
<v Speaker 2>the Europeans get to control the course and so they'll

0:51:24.360 --> 0:51:27.400
<v Speaker 2>do everything they can to like make it so these bombers,

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:30.080
<v Speaker 2>like these US bombers can't go nuts like they were

0:51:30.080 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 2>in Whistling Straits. So yeah, gun to my head, Like

0:51:32.560 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 2>I think europe should be favored right now for the

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:38.120
<v Speaker 2>next Ryder Cup, and I think it's easier to make

0:51:38.160 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 2>that case. But you can certainly say like, yeah, look

0:51:40.440 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 2>at the way these US players play, they're fearless. You're

0:51:43.080 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 2>probably gonna see at least eight of those guys on

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the on the Rome team. Yeah, they could win too,

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:50.160
<v Speaker 2>but I like the European case a little bit better.

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah all right, So Shane, obviously people can find your

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 1>work on Golf Digest dot com. But I'm curious, is

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 1>there another Ryder Cup Run podcast coming out after this

0:52:01.960 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cup?

0:52:03.239 --> 0:52:05.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I'll keep doing the Ryder Cup Run. So I

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 2>did three episodes from Whistling Straight and then I did

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:09.960
<v Speaker 2>the last one Saturday night, and it was basically like,

0:52:10.000 --> 0:52:11.839
<v Speaker 2>we don't need to do another one Sunday, and I'm

0:52:11.880 --> 0:52:14.680
<v Speaker 2>sticking by that, like, we know, we knew this Saturday.

0:52:14.680 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 2>It was over by Saturday, and I hit all the

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:19.640
<v Speaker 2>main points, and you know, there's a ton of content

0:52:19.680 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 2>out there for you to consume about this Ryder Cup

0:52:21.640 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 2>if you'd like. But in terms of like how I

0:52:23.840 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 2>like to approach it, of looking at the history and

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 2>looking at the tactics, nothing that happened on Sunday was

0:52:28.600 --> 0:52:31.319
<v Speaker 2>incredibly relevant because it was just it was always going

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 2>to be an American win. It was always going to

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 2>be a blowout. Only interesting thing at the end was

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:37.359
<v Speaker 2>are they going to set the record? And they did so.

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:40.200
<v Speaker 2>But I will continue to do Ryder Cup run episodes

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:42.400
<v Speaker 2>for previous Ryder Cups all the way up to the

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:44.879
<v Speaker 2>publication of my book, which will happen in May, which

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:46.720
<v Speaker 2>will be a little bit about the Ryder Cup history

0:52:46.719 --> 0:52:48.839
<v Speaker 2>and a lot about the twenty twenty one Ryder Cup

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:51.400
<v Speaker 2>that we just saw. So yeah, people can find me

0:52:51.480 --> 0:52:53.560
<v Speaker 2>on both places, and my book is available for pre

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:55.279
<v Speaker 2>order now should anyone.

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Be so wow? Yeah? Yeah right, it's available for pre

0:52:58.640 --> 0:53:00.760
<v Speaker 1>order and you've got to write it the next.

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, yeah. So I'll keep doing that. I love

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the Ryder Cup and it's been really fun to do

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:09.719
<v Speaker 2>those projects in the podcast. People seem to like it

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 2>so great.

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:23.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, thank you so much, Shane. Thanks This episode

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Friday Podcast was a bit of an experiment.

0:53:27.560 --> 0:53:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You can always rely on us to try new things

0:53:29.640 --> 0:53:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and keep refreshing the format. If you have thoughts about

0:53:32.280 --> 0:53:34.440
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing, maybe throw us a rating and review

0:53:34.560 --> 0:53:37.600
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes. Those really do help new listeners find us here.

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.