WEBVTT - Rotation Out of Tech Is How To Make Money This Year: Nick Colas

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. We are going to

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>get to a guest I've been looking forward to for

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a while. Nick Kolis, joins us co founder of Data

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Trek Research, and he was one of my favorite guests.

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Um when I used to anchor out of New York. Um, Nick,

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it's your notes that I really loved. I used to

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>be on your mailing list. I feel like I got

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>kicked off at some point along the way. I don't

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>know that was perfect. Hype are there, Matt? You gotta be.

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>The commissions have to be there. But but um, today

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you come to us with a note, with a with

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a survey. Really the results of your bubble survey. You

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>had about four people, UM take the survey to tell you,

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, if they're seeing bubbles, what a bubble is,

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>which bubbles are most concerning? What was your big takeaway Nick,

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>from from the note from the survey. Sorry, yeah, well,

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>first all, we'll definitely put you back on the press

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>list for the product and apologize for for the for

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the omission um. The bottom line on this survey was

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>really interesting because what we asked people. We asked people

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different directions and asked them where they

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>see bubbles, And eighty five plus percent of people do

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>see bubbles in the market. And these are professional investors,

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>high network individuals, people who understand markets. Two see there's

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a bubble somewhere that by far the biggest one was bitcoin.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>They called out bitcoin by orders of magnitude more than

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>any other thing. So two hundred and eighty votes for

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>bitcoining and being in a bubble out of four hundred.

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>The next next one up nine votes for US large caps,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty four votes for US small caps. But so stocks,

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of bitcoin a lot. Hey, Nick, you

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>know you and I've been in this business a long

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>time and you kind of a similar history here in

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of time in the business. What do you make

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of SPACs, SPACs or something that we've seen in various

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>forms over the years, But boy, have they just exploded

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.119
<v Speaker 1>onto the marketplace. They have exploded. And we did ask

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>about SPACs and the survey and the majority of respondents

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>did see SPACs is emblematic of a larger bubble in

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>certain parts of tech. Look, underlying SPACs is a good

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>fundamental thing, which is maybe the I P O process

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit broken and vcs have to find

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>other ways to monetize their assets. Totally fair, but I

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>think the enthusiasm O respects is way overdone because they

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>so often linked to electric vehicles, autonomous vehicles, things like that.

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>That gets people all juiced up, and it does create

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a bubble in that segment of the

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>equity market for sure. I I don't suppose anyone mentioned

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>n f t s. Did you see that? Uh, Nick,

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>people are paying hundreds of thousands of dollars to buy

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>NBA moments, which are just actually video clips connected to

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a digital token that you don't even really own. Yeah.

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I I did a piece on n f t S

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>for a client's last night. It really is like, it

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>reminds me a lot of I don't know, if you

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>were crypto kiddies, the Etherium product back in twenty It's

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>the same company, dude, It's the same company, Dapper Entertainment

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>started the kiddies, and then the NBA hired them to

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>do these moments on top shot. You know, God bless them.

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>They figured out a way to pull some money out

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of this system, which is which is great. I just thought,

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like a Matt, you're a car guy. What if GM

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>were you to sell um fifteen second clips of the

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>first Corvette launch at the Waldorf in New York and

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty three, well exactly, or for the Mustang when

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>they unveiled it on the Empire State. This is the idea,

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and they could do that. And the idea would be

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that you got the only you know, authentic version, but

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone else can just get the clip on YouTube. Right.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But the Corvette guy, the Mustang guy, he's going to

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>want the original because he just spent three hundred grants

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>for his original fifty three that he's gonna want to

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>spend a hundred grand for the original video clip. This.

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I gotta rip up this grip for a second. Here.

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>We can do that in my Tom Keene, are you

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a bigger fan of the C one Corvette? A great

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>example was in the movie Less than Zero or of

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the C two, the split window is the one I love? Which, Nick,

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>which you think is? Or do you like one of

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>the newer ones? Look, I love the latest one flat out.

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's unbelievable. That's a great concept, and I'm

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>so glad they finally moved to mid engine. Other than that,

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 1>you've got to go back to the original. You gotta

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>go back to the source water goes back to Lake Victoria,

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing, and it's the c one, all right.

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking about expensive cars here, we're talking about

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>rare cars. So, Nick, when a client asked you to

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>write up a note and do some research on these

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>NBA clips, I mean, what does that tell you? Well,

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>it tells me that there's a lot of attention and

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>there are Look, I mean, this is one of those

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>things where you can make a lot of money very

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>quickly if you happen to be in the right space,

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're in the art gallery space, if you're in

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>the creative space. There's a shot here, and there's some

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>heavy money behind the centrition. Horowitz wrote up a large

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>blog entry on this very thing, and if you listen

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to Market and Ben's um Clubhouse chat a couple of

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.799
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, it very clearly fits into a much larger

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>scheme of a decentralized Internet, which is like their big thing.

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So what I try to do for clients is just

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 1>first of all, say like, yeah, this is coming and

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 1>if you happen to be in on this early, you

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>can make some money doing and no doubt about people

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>are doing it right now, and there's some ten gentle

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>things that big companies can do, but more than anything,

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.559
<v Speaker 1>just contextualize it as the Silicon Valley is very strong

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>attempt and this will be going for the next ten

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>years to decentralize the net and get away from one

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>aws one Apple app store and try to figure out

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>how to end run all the big tech giants. That's

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>what the Silicon Valley and the vcs are trying to do.

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>So you used to be a banker to doing the

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>same kind of things that well Paul was doing it

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>for for media um and telecoms right and you were

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>doing mostly the auto industry nick um equity offerings, advising

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>on M and A, etcetera. When and that going into

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the Internet bubble. Do you see any similarities between what

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at now and then or is the are

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the time periods just too different to compare. No, there

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>are similarities at the very highest level. And the similarity

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is the pandemic gave tech a huge boost, and they

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>both in stocks and in usage just societal usage, the

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>same way Internet one oh from seven to two thousand

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>did it for the first front of technology. And now

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>we're beginning to see the rotation, which is very much

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>like what it was in two thousand and one when

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>dot Com began to blow up. I remember looking at Vistia,

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at Forward, looking at GM and thinking why

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 1>are these stocks up so much even though we're clearly

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the cycle. It was just money

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>lead being tech and having to go somewhere else, and

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what was happening, and that's what's happening again now.

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>But you look like the good Year chart for the

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks. They're buying Cooper Tire finally, which

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is awesome, but man, that thing was just dead for

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>months and now it's coming back to life. Forward the

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>same way. So I think what you're seeing is money

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>rotating out of tech and back into the two older companies.

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And if you're just looking at independently, you think, what

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is going on here? And that's what's going on. Money

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is leaving tech and going into basic industry encyclicals, and

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we think that's going to continue. That's going to make

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>money this year. Hey, Nick, thanks for joining us. We

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>always appreciate getting your thoughts and your insight. Uh. We're

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>always afford to chatting with you and Nick call Us.

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Co founder Data Trek Research. Matt Nicks is one of

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the smartest folks. We talked to boy every time we

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>have them on. I learned a lot. And he's got taste. Yeah.

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Now I will disagree with him on that. I like

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to see two Corvette better, but I can admit that

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the greatest taste when it comes to

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>these things. I know that Nick and I both air

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>love for Ducati's and he has one of them, um

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>coveted UH sport Classics or he has the GT version

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>which they don't make anymore. So he's got the car

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>thing and that that's great. And you've got the less

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>than zero reference in there, which I totally got and

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>untillly down with. That's good for that. The spacks are

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>coming fast and furious. Dave Wilson, he brings us up

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>at Data on a daily basis on the new spacks,

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're coming from a wide variety of backers and

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>focusing on a wide variety of industries. It's kind of

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the new I p O, if you will, of recent months.

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>David Dwalt, he's the founder of a spack called night

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.079
<v Speaker 1>a Dragon. He was also the former CEO of fire

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Eye and McAfee. Uh, they are spack supposed to start

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>trading on the nastack today day. Thanks so much for

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>joining us. We appreciate it. Talk to us about Night Dragon.

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>What's the strategy here? Yeah, thank you, thank you for

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>having me. Yeah. So, you know, when I was CEO

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of McAfee, ironically, there was a famous cybers cruity tech

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>called night Dragon, and my researchers then sort of said, hey,

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>here's uh, here's one of those seminal moments in cyber security,

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and they named it night Dragon. But I always said,

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>if I ever built my own thing, it would be

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>called that. But hey, listen, night Dragons the whole platform.

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>We've been working hard as a team the last few years. Um,

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, funding investing into cyber companies from incubators to

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>early stage to now late stage kinds of companies. Um,

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>really the spack here, which is a you know, a

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>new type of product called the scale and get into that.

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>But really we wanted to help create companies are really

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>efficient way to go public and these would be top

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>tier cyber safety type companies that we know well as

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a team and we've known as you know, public company

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>executives and help them get to a high potential for

0:09:56.080 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>shareholder value. Dave um Night Dragon is an awesome name,

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>first of all, and you also have served as CEO

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of a number of other companies, including Fire. I that

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>name totally rules um McAfee isn't nearly as cool. I

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>would have changed that, But the point is you've got

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.599
<v Speaker 1>a ton of experience in this industry. And it was

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>pointed out to me earlier that SPACs maybe just a

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>way for people who don't have you know, ten million

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars to throw at um BC partners to get into

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>private equity. Do you think that's along the right lines? Well,

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it certainly is one route, especially if we start to

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>see the evolution that Spinning Eagle had, which is a

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>spack platform, you know, a super spact platform there. There's

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>there's new sec rulings coming out that you could do

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a multitude of SPACs in one vehicle, and you could

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>have two, three, or four or five of them, and

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you could have small, medium, in large type companies, you

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>d a into the back product. And so this is

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>here to stay. I mean there's no doubt about I mean,

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>deal certainty, deal closure. You know, management afloat, managing short positions,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, adding management teams into the board and advisors,

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing this with quality investors, quality leadership, and

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it's the right way to go, especially

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>especially if you have foreign national companies trying to come

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>into the US as well, and they want to use

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the listings and the investments as a way of gaining

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>scipious approval or government US access, getting more open markets

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to especially in national security and cyber world. You know,

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>these companies are often founded in Israel now or you know,

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world. In fact, you alluded to Firear.

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>That company was founded in Pakistan and you know we

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>brought it to the United States and helped vet it.

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>My other company for Scout, was founded in Israel. So

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, being able to be world class technology to

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the world stage is a little what this operating team

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>has been good at and so we have a lot

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of different targets in mind, a lot of different opportunities,

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>and uh, we think night dragons are really nice. Please

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>tell us on here to do it. Please tell us

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 1>before you make the offer so we can front run them.

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll try. What type of companies are technologies are you

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>guys gonna be focused on initially? Yeah, so you know

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.719
<v Speaker 1>our market segment, what we what we all know here

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is a collective team, you know, a hundred and fifty

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>years of collective experience by this team. But we're focused

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>on cyber safety, security and privacy. I always like to

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>say security from silicon to satellite. But the idea here

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is companies that really are in important threat areas. And

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>let me just explain for a second. You know where

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>do we see attackers really driving uh, you know, successful breaches.

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>What we trying to do is build commercial defense to

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>meet that threat. And we've identified ten different sectors that

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have multi billion dollar total addressable markets that we would

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like to target um our work towards. And they can

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>be everything from satellite leo's with lower orbit satellites and

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>now connecting everything from your watch to your car to airplanes,

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.079
<v Speaker 1>light shair safety, security, for Delta Airlines are aircraft are

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>now connecting up in the ways and the security there

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, needs to improve a lot. So there's really

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:36.439
<v Speaker 1>amazing space economy, safety, security opportunities, but all the way

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>down to identity management, cloud security areas, social network. If

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>anybody you know watched the last you know, four years,

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>we know manipulated information, false information, is you know here

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to stay? How do we fix that problem? We have

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>some really cool companies that are Night Dragon portfolio already,

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>as well as ones we know that can come and

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>meet these sector areas and we can help take them

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to their full potential. We believe as a public company

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>excellent Dave. Great to get some time with you. Fascinating stuff, Dave.

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>D Walt there who used to run uh fire Eye

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>McAfee document um now talking about his Night Dragons. Back

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of this lockdown, I was drinking a

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of beer, and I was gaining weight, and I

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>was kind of tired, and I thought, this is not

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a good idea. I've got to make a change in

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>my life, so I started drinking wine instead. I want

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to bring in right now. Steven Ranickally, Global beverages strategist

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>at Robbo Bank International to talk to us about the

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>impact UM, maybe a little bit longer term than than

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>what I've experienced of the lockdowns the pandemic on the

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>wine industry. UM, Stephen, thanks so much for joining us.

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming a lot of people are drinking more wine.

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that wrong? Well, you know that's first off, let

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>me say, I think you made a great switch switching

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>from beer to wine. That will make a lot of

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>fines that I deal with very happy. But you know,

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I think overall, when you look at it, people didn't

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>really drink much more. What you saw was a huge

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>shift in channels, right, so people, you know, they were

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we know that restaurants were shut down, bars restaurants shut down,

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, people were doing all their shopping at

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a grocery stores. So when you look at the numbers,

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that were put out oftentimes really just looked

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>at grocery stores and you saw this huge jump in sales,

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and everyone thought, oh, everyone's you know, everyone's drinking a

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>ton more. But really it was just compensating for the

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>loss of sales and the on premise and that, you know.

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But what was really important behind that is certain segments

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of the wine sector were hit worse than others because

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. Steve talked to us about the financial health

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of the wine industry. I'm wondering if it's if it's

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>like other industries that we've seen there in this past year,

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>where if you're a big company, good balance sheet, access

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to capital, you generally formed or fared better than maybe

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>an independent player who maybe again doesn't have access to capital.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about the wine industry, how those players

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>have fared. Yeah, I think I think what you've laid

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>out as a as a pretty fair assessment, and I

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>should say, you know, it's it's it's always a bit

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of a mixed bag. Even among some of the smaller players.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>If you had a really strong brand, really clear identity

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in the market, you know, some of those players did

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>really really well, didn't really miss a beat, but it

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>was really on the whole. I would say it was,

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, larger wineries that have the national brands, that

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>have good access to the supermarkets and the big retail accounts.

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Those players did did much better. They fared much better

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in than than a lot of the smaller players that

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you know lost not only you know, they lost out

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>on sales and restaurants. But also, you know, a lot

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of the tasting room traffic, a lot of the the

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>smaller guys depend on people traveling out to California, Oregon

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>visiting the winery and you know, and generating no sales.

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So those guys got hit kind of, you know, on

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>on both ends of that. So so when do you

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>steve When are some of those wineries going to open

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>up some of their tasting rooms just asking for a friend?

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's it's it's been touch and go. Uh,

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're all kind of waiting. I think we're

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.880
<v Speaker 1>all kind of looking at this and saying that by

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, hopefully by summer we're getting back to two

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>more normalized activity. Uh, you know, restaurants opening up, tasting

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>rooms and so forth, and so, you know, I think

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll start to get back to some level of normalcy.

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's gonna take time, you know, and especially on

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant side. You know, we've seen the numbers out

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>of the National Restaurant Association. There are a number of

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a large swath of those those independent

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>restaurants that are not going to fully recover. They're not

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>going to reopen right so that really kind of creates

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>some challenges and winners and losers within within the wine industry.

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Some you know, some of these winders will be much

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>more challenged than others. You know, I I would, It's interesting.

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>I would normally if I wanted to, um, go on

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a wine tasting. My dad loves the Silver oak Um

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>place out in in uh in Oakville, California, and so

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'd go out there. Um. But if we're stuck

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 1>in lockdown in New York. My buddy Neil Grossman has

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a vineyard now up by Millbrook, and I wonder if

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>more people are trying their local wineries, local vineyards just

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>because they can't get to Napa Valley. Yeah. I think

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>there's there's probably a fair amount of that, and there

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>will be right it's there, We're you know, moving back

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to visiting wineries and so forth. It's going to be

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.479
<v Speaker 1>a process. You know, we see some consumers, even with

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine, much more reluctant to travel. So I think

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a little bit of that. But also,

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the big winners in in has

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>been e commerce. Right, You've seen people shifting from from

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>restaurant sales to buying online and you know they're fine

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>ending their great wines and they can have those at home,

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, so finding ways I think the challenge

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>for the wine industry has been finding ways to connect

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>with the consumer where they are. Hey, Steve, you know

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>there's so many independent wineries out there. Are they going

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>to be? Are we going to see some consolidation in

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>this industry because maybe some of those smaller, weaker ones

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that are gonna be a little bit vulnerable here. Yeah,

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.239
<v Speaker 1>I think you know there's there we're certainly looking at

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and saying, you know, moving forward, we're seeing signs of consolidation.

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>We put out a note, you know, a couple of

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>last month that said, you know, when you look at

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the signs, were likely to see some consolidation.

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:41.479
<v Speaker 1>And we've already seen some really interesting moves. Um, you know,

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>we're larger reasonably sized wineries either going uh you know

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the spack route. You saw the Vintage Wine Estates deal

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that was you know, that was a huge deal, seven

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollar deal there you know, merged with us

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>back and and you know we had them. We had

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the CEO, Pat Roney on on on our podcast and

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we kind of talked about some of what they were

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>going through and and why this SPAC deal made sense.

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>It was a really interesting move, right, this rise of

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>spacts and how even that's playing in in the wine space.

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But even aside from that, you've had duck Horn announced

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>uh an I p O. You've had Virgin Wines in

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the UK announce an i p O. And we've also

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>seen kind of behind the scenes a lot of the

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>larger wineries that have come through, you know and reasonably

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>good condition, saying hey, maybe this is a good time

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>for us to make some acquisitions. Right, So it's an

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting time in the wine industry with a lot of

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of acquisitions and and uh yeah, I think

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll see more all right, Steve, thanks so much for

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>joining us. We always appreciate a Steve Ranically of Global

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Beverages Strategist at Robbo Bank giving us the state of

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the global wine market. The pandemic has upended, has disrupted

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>how we all work, or how many people work, with

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>many people being forced to work from home, changing our calendars,

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>changing our work days. Now, the question is, let's talk

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 1>about that five day work day. Is that something that

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 1>needs to be looked at. Let's turn to Stefan Nicola

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News in Berlin. Stuff and you've got a fascinating

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>story here. The four day work week gains popularity. What

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>do we know? Yeah, it is gaining popularity around the world.

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I talked with the CEO of a Berlin tech company

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and they had trials at four point five day work

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>week after the pandemic really put a lot of stress

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>on on its workers. And what they found out is

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>that sales grows employee satisfaction roles and client happiness roles.

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>So in January they decided to go for a four

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 1>day work week at full pay and full benefits, and

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the CEO told me the initial experience is really good.

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, Um, Stephane, congratulations because your story

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is the most read story on the Bloomberg over the

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>last eight hours. Seriously, there are thousands of stories on

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg and his is the most red So I

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>think that's pretty awesome. Um. Also, I learned something that

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know even as I'm an absolute Ford fanatic.

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Um just love the F one fifty. The Raptor is

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>my favorite truck of all time. So and I've been

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>to Dearborn a ton and I know the family and uh,

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the executives. I did not know. Henry Ford was kind

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of the first person to give workers two days off

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a week. It used to be that workers only got

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Sunday off, and Henry Ford's idea, much like with the

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>five dollar work day, was if I give them two

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>days off, they're gonna have more reason to buy a

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>car because they're gonna need it for um, you know,

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>driving around hanging out. And he was right and that

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>caught on, So, um, I think that's really cool, Stephan.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Are you hearing from employers now, like if they get

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:03.479
<v Speaker 1>three days off, they will totally stuff Well, you know,

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I think the working world in general

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>has changed, right. The pandemic has appended the way we work,

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 1>It has changed workplaces, it has changed companies. So authorities

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and employees around the world are rethinking the way they

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>put their employees to work. And one way is to

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>give them one additional day of weekend basically or you

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>know when when when they want to take Monday or

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday off. That's all the fine as well. It doesn't

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>necessarily mean these workers will output less. The CEO of

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a one told me they these his workers don't necessarily

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>just just cut full day of work, but they work

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>smarter and just as efficiently. So you know, things are changing.

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, this may just be you know, the first

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>first tendency of of a Ford like moment that you

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>ad it earlier, Matt. So, Stefan, it seems like maybe

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>there's some cultural issues here. Perhaps some folks in Europe

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>might be more open to it. Maybe some yeah, you know,

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean they take longer. You know, we Americans we

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>look over to some of these Europeans. We see, boy,

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>these they take these nice long vacations and they you know,

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's just perhaps they don't work as hard. There's

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a perception here in the US that maybe the in

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>countries don't work as hard as the French. Right, that's

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>specifically the French, because the Germans obviously work hard. Have

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>you driven a Mercedes lately? I mean yeah, come on,

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so, Stefan, is there do you think there's

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be some cultural geographic issues? Uh? Well, first of all,

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>surely there will be cultural and regional differences. If you

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>only think of let's say, Jack ma the co founder

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>of of Ali Baba, who sort of hailed the n

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>world work culture in China, that that grueling schedule that

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>has secured a success from many tech companies in Asia. Uh.

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, it'll it'll take a while until it will

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>catch on over there, and it may take a while

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>until it catches on in some other countries. But you know,

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this is not an isolated trend in Europe or in

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a certain country. We're talking about New Zealand, Japan, Spain,

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>even companies in the US have have tried this, So

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's not necessarily isolated to just one region.

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, Stephan, thanks so much. Stepan Nikola there with

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the most read story of the day, um and appetizing,

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>titilating four day work week. I don't really think it's

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>ever gonna go down, um globally, Paul. And it doesn't

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>seem like something that's going to happen in the US. Yeah,

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think what it's changed here is technology,

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:00.239
<v Speaker 1>because what we've learned during this pandemic, with technology, you

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>can be as productive or more productive in some cases

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.719
<v Speaker 1>with a much more flexible work environment. You don't need

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to be in a physical office for some roles. Uh.

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And again, as long as the productivity is there, then

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I would think managements the C suite would be open

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to some discussions. So I suspect that there might be

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>some changes coming along here that might be a little

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>bit more permanent I could buy. I'm hopeful. I'm hopeful,

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>But look I get so you and I work for

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the same company. I get thirty five days of vacation

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>every year. What do you get one? Am I? Oh, yeah,

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you're you're in Europe at twenty See that. I want

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to move back to the US so badly because I

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>miss football, and I miss pickup trucks and I want,

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a big backyard, but and at homecoming and

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, school sports. But I do not want to

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.479
<v Speaker 1>only have twenty days of vacation a year. The town's awful,

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and most Americans, I would argue, don't even take it

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>for a lot. Something happens. Thanks for listening to the

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three. On

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio