WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week: Murphy, Barra, Summers

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. Market shruggle, higher consumer prices.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>The economy is in the process of rebounding. Will the

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>futteral reserve have its own digital currency? The financial stories

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>that cheap hard work. Many people think the eels are

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just going to keep marching up. We have more spending

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Congress. One of the big questions I

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>think on investor's minds inflations through the eyes of the

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>most influential voices. Larry Summer is the former Treasury Secretary

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Bryan Wynahan a backup America, Will Smart, CEO of Charlie Sharp.

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg wool Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Be careful what you wish for the economy rebounds, earnings beat,

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>but now we have to worry about all the pressures

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that come with that. This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week.

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Weston. This week we got more signals that

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the economy is roaring back from indications of GDP growth

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>over ten percent for the quarter and maybe eight percent

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>for the year, expecting growth to be at a better

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>rate than what we have seen so far, and earnings

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>that were so good that they raised questions about the

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>analysts who underestimated them, driven in one way or another

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>by the authorities opening economy back up. Broadway tickets go

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and sale today at capacity for theaters. The show's open

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>September four teeth. But then the jobs numbers for April

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>came in way below what anyone was expecting. Under normal

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>circumstances that would be a great month. We still have

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a steep, steep clime. We still have ways to go,

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.639
<v Speaker 1>which may be a blip, but there were other storm

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>clouds on the horizon with supply chains overwhelmed. We're having

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>regular conversations with the administration and members of Congress to

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>find the right solution. Growing fear of increased taxes and

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the ever present fear of inflation, made worse by Treasury

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Secretary yelling suggesting we might just see higher interest rates.

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>We've been through a year long health and economic crisis,

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>putting pressures on our governments like few have ever seen.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>But things appear to be coming back, and now we

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>have to think about how we're gonna pay the bills.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey is one of the states hit hardest by

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and already has one of the highest tax

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>rates in the country, So we asked its governor Phil Murphy,

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>what paying those bills may mean for taxpayers. Listen, we

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>we presented a budget six weeks ago that had zero

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>increases in taxes and fees. We want to protect the

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 1>middle class at every turn. We are the quintessential middle

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>class state, UH, and we want to regain that mantle.

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>We believe we're America's number one state to raise a family,

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and that includes making sure that the value proposition works

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>for families, particularly young families who are considering moving here

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>or staying here. I was gratified to see the census

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>numbers last week. We were the number one state in

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>America in terms of the amount by which we exceeded

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the estimate that was put out last year. That's for

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>a reason people are coming here to raise their family.

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>We've got to make sure that we continue to have

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the number one school's quality of life, great transit, but

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>also that the value proposition works in the senses. It

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>just came out there was a migration towards Florida, towards Texas,

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>towards some lower taxing states. How conscious are you of

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that as you set your budgets? How concerned are you

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that New Jersey could really lose some of the more affluent,

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in particular to places like Florida. Well, listen, New Jersey's

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>population grew over five percent over the course of the decade. Again,

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the space we occupy is that that moniker, which we

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>don't take lightly. America's number one state to raise a family.

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>We have the number one public education system in America,

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>top handful of healthcare system, a location second to none.

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>We're fixing transit um. The quality of life is exceedingly high.

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>That's our value proposition. Some states come at you so listen,

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>we want you to move here because we have low

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>taxes um. That's that's there. That may be their value proposition.

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Ours is a much more holistic and broader one. Governor.

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>You've identified specifically sixteen municipalities in New Jersey of over

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand people that you're below, led by a New

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Brunswick city. As you look at those, it looks to me,

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you know the states so much better than I do,

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 1>But it looks to me like they tend to be

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 1>lower income and yes, minorities. What are the specific ways

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>that you reach those populations. Yeah, you're absolutely right. I

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know that every one of the communities are our

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>majority communities of color, but they are largely and we

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't put that list up to name and shame. This

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is just to give people a sense of what the

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>remaining challenges. We have too many people right now declaring victory.

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Our numbers have gotten a lot better, but we're not

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>there yet. And so it's a variety of things. It's

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>role models getting vaccinated, it's mobile vans, it's houses of worship. UH,

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's getting to homebound individuals, homeless folks. UH, it's

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a whole of initiatives, federally qualified centers. There's no one

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>magic wand UH. As it relates to equity, we are

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>still on a journey. As we say often, the pandemic

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't create the inequities, it's laid them there in Our

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>vaccine program is a good example. Uh. It is a

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>work in progress. Governors, you know, well, there's a push

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>on to get people to go back into their offices.

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>We had golden sacks just say we want people back

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>by a date. Certain as that happens, that's gonna put

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>pressure on some of the transportation systems from New Jersey's

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>people commute into Manhattan right now, as I understand it,

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the public transit is really being avoided. Your down something

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>like sevent in your capacity. How do you respond to that?

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>First of all, financially, you can't run those transit authorities

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>very long down capacity, can you? Financially? There's a number

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of questions that are Number one, the federal help, whether

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it's prior coronavirus relief funds or American Rescue Plan money,

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>or or perhaps in this debated right now infrastructure plan.

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>We desperately need that help. Secondly, and J transit UH,

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>when we got into office, it was broken. It's fixed,

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and we've used the pandemic to fix it even faster.

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think folks are going to find a clean, safe,

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>reliable system. Thirdly, you didn't ask it, but one of

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the ways we're gonna get to vaccination is to get

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>our business community UH to be proactive, just as we

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>are at the state level. In fact, we had a

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>good call with the Chamber of Commerce on this topic

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>this morning, getting businesses to be just as forward leaning

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 1>into this as we are being as at the state level.

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the transit commuting reality will be slow to recover,

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think when folks come back and actually participate,

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>it will be a positive experience. That was New Jersey

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Governor Phil Murphy coming up, Big tech has more to

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>worry about than just inflation and supply chains, as the

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 1>antitrust challenges just keep fond coming this time for Apple.

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>That's next on Wall Street Week on Boombo. This is

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple's ten year relationship with Epic Games is unraveling in

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>court this week. It's all about Epics claim that Apple

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is using its market power to charge it too much

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>for selling its games and Apple's claim that Epic just

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to play by the rules. Apple says, if

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you build an app for our platform, first of all,

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you can only distribute it through their store. They don't

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>allow all competing stores, and that's totally un American and uncompetitive.

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand eleven, Tim Cook used Epics game Infinity

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Blade two to show off Apple's new and powerful iPhone

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>for s, but Apple's relationship with the GameMaker went even deeper.

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>In legal documents, Apple said it's spent more than one

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>million dollars marketing games for Epic and even added round

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the clock tech support for the GameMaker. The app store

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't just a store. It's like a studio, stock with canvases, brushes,

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and paint the tools that artists need to create their works,

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's a gallery where they can display and sell

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>their creations. The relationship began souring in two seventeen with

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the release of epics blockbuster hit Fortnite. After that, Epics

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>CEO and founder Tim Sweeney began publicly criticizing Apple's payment system,

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in which the company took as much as thirty of

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>sales and blocked many developers from using other payment methods

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>to avoid the fee. You can't have a tech monopoly

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>dominating all all interactions between consumers and businesses on a

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>scale of billions of users. The final blow to the

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>relationship came when Apple removed Fortnite from its app store

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>last year after Epic activated its own payment system. Analytics

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>firm Censored Tower estimates the app store generated twenty two

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in commissions last year for Apple from the

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>seven two billion dollars users spent on their devices. Who

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>are absolutely going to see some form of legislation or

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>additional scrutinary, So in the case of Apple, it'll be

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>probably regulating the App store Apples and trust problems aren't

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 1>just in the United States. EU regulators have accused Apple

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of violating competition laws by imposing unfair rules and fees

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>on music streaming services that are on the App Store.

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>We need any trust regulation to return to what it

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>used to be when we protected markets so that no

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>one could dominate and block new entrants, no one could

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>compete against people operating a marketplace. And so this week

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we saw the start of a three week courtroom battle,

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>complete with the Apple and Epic CEOs themselves taking the stand,

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>along with a whole lot of experts and no less

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>than the fate at the app store hanging in the balance.

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>But former Antitrust Division had Bill Bear and blue Berg

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>intelligence senior and a trust litigation analyst, Jennifer Ree. It's

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>an uphill battle for Epics David to beat Apple's goliath.

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>They need to prove first that Apple is a monopolist

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in connection with its App store and its requirement that

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you download through the app store for the iOS devices.

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And then they need to prove that the requirement that

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you go through the app store actually is an anti

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>competitive requirement as opposed to what Apple says, which is

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>something that is necessary to protect security and privacy of

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>its ioas usage. Jen, can you ever monopolize your own product?

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's in a sense what the claim is here, right, Yeah,

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it's iOS, we invented it, we have it, so yes,

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>we have all of it, you know, and this is

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>part of their uphill battle. I mean, you can, but

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>there are very very few court cases where that actually

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>was considered the an appropriate relevant market. It just it

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>rarely is, and that's going to be very difficult for them.

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And you can see that because in the again beginning

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the trial, epic is really hammered on competition, uh,

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and the lack of competition and the reason that all

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the other substitutes are different in our true substitutes. Bill,

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>how much of this you think might turn in the

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>end on Apple's claim as I understand that we need

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to do it this way for security purposes, there's a

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>really legitimate business justification even if you find we have

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>an apply power within our system. I think that says

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that exactly right, because being a monopolist is only one

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>step in the process of finding in any trust violations,

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you need to show to show that requirements that that

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple is imposing on on app developments are unreasonable for

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>any competitor. Really served no legitimate um justification. It does

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>strike me, jen that quite a few what we would

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>think of a tech companies have weighed in on the

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>side actually of Epic Games. Maybe the David in this battle, uh,

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>including Facebook and Microsoft is saying, we find it really

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult as well. We've tried to get in Spotify. Would

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that have any effect on the judge as a practical matter?

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think first of all, you know, in

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>my mind, you have to think about the fact that

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft is a big competitor to Apple. You know, in

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>many ways they're they both they compete in the sale

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of computers and they have opposing you know, operating systems.

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, Microsoft has something to benefit if Epic

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>wins this trial. And what Microsoft and some of these

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>other tech companies are providing is really anecdotal evidence where

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they do or don't compete, and the difficulties that they've

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>also had in negotiating with Apple to get their own

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>game stores or their own game streaming into the Apple

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>App Store. So it's anecdotal evidence. You know, at the

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, I think it has some influence,

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>but but not significant. Bill, give us a sense of

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>what the expert witnesses are gonna be testifying to, because,

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>as I understand, in most antitrust cases, really the economics

0:12:57.600 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>driving off a lot of it. The expert witnesses on

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>either side and the judge is really gonna put a

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of emphasis on that. What are they gonna be

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>testifying to. Why they're going to have this uh disputed

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>visions of what the market looks like? UM is UH

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is Apple by virtue of UH controlling what apps are

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>downloaded to iOS users, iPad iPhones? Uh? Is that actually

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>just one way of competing in US broader market where

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of ways of getting apps to other devices,

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.359
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of way for gamers to play games.

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Whereas the epic view is going to be no, no,

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a restrictive, narrow market, UH, where Apple is

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>able to control the environment for anybody who uses this

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:54.479
<v Speaker 1>DIOS system and basically ties the iPad and the iPhone

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 1>two downloading software at at commission rate. So they saw

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 1>for developers only through only through Apple's platforms, So they

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>will present economic governance that will suggest Apple has pricing

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>power that is suggested from an appoly power. Apple's econosts

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>will talk about all the other ways in which people

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>can play games, or download other apps, or use your

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>PC or your your map to to compete, thanks to

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Bill Bear of the Brookings Institution and Jennifer Ree of

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Coming up, just when the auto market wants

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to come roaring back, the lack of microchips reins it in.

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>We hear from GM CEO Mary bar On what she

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and her team are doing to manage the problem. That's

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is bloom

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. GM

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>announced its earnings this week and they were strong, very strong,

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>as the company sees demand for new cars come back

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>stronger and faster than anyone anticipated a year ago. But

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>there was a catch. A combination of a surging economy

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and a huge uptick in demand for consumer electronics has

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>led to a dire shortage of microchips. And it turns

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>out you can't make a car these days without some

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty sophisticated computers built right into those cars. We asked

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>GM Chairman CEO Mary Barra, how she's managing a problem

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that will caused her up to two billion dollars this year.

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>There's not a lot of transparency between the different automakers

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening. We're focused on GM and I think

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>what's been incredible is the work that we're doing with

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>our purchasing group, our engineering group, are manufacturing group in

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>sales and marketing and working with suppliers. You know, we've

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>been working to build strong relationship with our suppliers for many,

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>many years now, and there's just a t that is

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>looking understanding what chips are we going to have access to,

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>how do we allocate those to our highest demand and

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and products that we have limited or no ability to

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>recover because there's just such strong demand. We run those

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing operations around the clock and they're they're just being

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>creative and doing what engineers do of problem solving and

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases re engineering to get the chips

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to the right products and to just um find every

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunity we can to build a car, trucker crossover and

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>get it to the customer. So it's a mixed question

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>not just of the vehicles you sell, but also where

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you direct your chips. It sounds like you want to

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>direct it to the ones that really are the most important.

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Are you getting more chips? Do you think than you

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>would have expected, because if you're purchasing department, well, again,

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of transparent to say more than

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were very clear last year of what

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we thought the demand was going to be this year

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and the chips that we had ordered, and so you know,

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>we're continuing to work with the supply base on that

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and UH again, but it's I think it's looking for

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>every opportunity and managing it centrally and also working hand

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in hand with our j V and China, so across

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>the board, we are just really being I think the

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>team is being really scrappy and finding ways that we

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>can build the vehicles, not only full size trucks and SUVs,

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.239
<v Speaker 1>but also our electric vehicle programs. And I think it's

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>important to note that even with the challenges of the

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors UH shortage, there is no impact on our electric vehicles,

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>on our autonomous vehicles and the growth initiatives that we've

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>been talking about this first quarter. That was one of

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the questions I had, both for the Hummer that's coming

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>out later this year and then the lyric which is

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>coming at sometimes the first happened next year. Is there

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be any delay because of the chip problem?

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not, And I can tell you those vehicle programs

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.479
<v Speaker 1>are on track, and uh, I'm really excited to have

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>customers get in those vehicles and drive them because I

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be amazed. This problem isn't going

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>away in the sense that as you go forward, you're

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna make more and more cars, they are going to

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>require more and more chips. What is the longer term

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>solution to this so we don't have this sort of

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>problem you have this year? Well, I think we are

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>going to see recovery. We think Q two will be

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the weakest for the year. We'll see some recovery, recovery

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in Q three, Q four. Uh, And we're working on

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of long term strategies. I don't have anything

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to share right now, but there's a a you know,

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.239
<v Speaker 1>a whole um menu of things that we're working on,

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>processes that we're changing. Um. So more to come later

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in the year of how we'll make sure we're never

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in this situation again. But believe me, we have a

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>dedicated team working on that as well. When it comes

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to batteries, you've sort of vertically integrated, as it were,

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>where the joint venture where you're making your own batteries.

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there something like that perhaps that would make sense

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>for GM. You know, I'm not going to take anything

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>off the table. We're going to look at what what

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we can do to make sure that we have the

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>right number of automotive grade chips UH and that we

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it it doesn't constrain our growth because we see huge

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity not only with the product portfolio we have today,

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>but with the strong electric vehicle products that we have coming.

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>We hear some in Washington, both the Commerce Secretary and

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>also I talked to one of your Michigan representatives, Haley Stevens,

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>who suggested perhaps there needs to be some co investment

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>from the government as well as the private sector in

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>chip production. Does that make sense from your point of view?

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I think making sure we have a secure supply chain

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>um for the growth that I think we're going to

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>see it. I think it's something that we all have

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>to work together on, and we're having regular conversations with

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the administration and members of Congress to find the right

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>solution and we'll continue to do that. In your presentation today,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>General Motors really lays out a fairly robust program to

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 1>really go to electric vehicles and to really deal with

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 1>greenhouse gases over the longer term. You have very specific

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>targets you're setting out there. How do you hope to

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>achieve those? Well, I think it's making sure there's a

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>whole ecosystem that when a customer looks at can I

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>buy an electric vehicle, they say, I'm going to have

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a better experience when I buy an electric vehicle. It's

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be a beautiful vehicle. It's going to be

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in this segment that I want to purchase because we

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>can't you know, person if they want an suv or

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a crossover, they're not going to buy a sedan. It's

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>to meet them in the market where they want. But

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>then it's also making sure there's a robust charging infrastructure,

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and we're working on that as well, and that will

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>be not only what we're doing. For instance, we're putting

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>charging in our workplaces, but also working with communities and

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>then working with all the startups that are in this

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>business connecting those We just made an announcement that we

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>have now We're going to provide access to sixty chargers

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>across across the country to really give confidence to customers

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>as they buy an e V and if even if

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it's their only vehicle, that they're going to have a

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>robust charging infrastructure. And I think all those things combine,

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, beautiful vehicles, meets their needs, the right range,

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>and then charging available, customers are going to move to

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>e vs. That was GM chairman and CEO Mary Borrow.

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, we wrap up the week with our special

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>contributor Larry Summers of Harvard. This is Wall Street Week

0:20:53.440 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Weston from Bloomberg Radio. We welcome now our special Wall

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Street Week contributor, Larry Summers of Harvard. Larry, welcome, is

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>great to see you. So, first of all, start with

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>these jobs numbers. They were so surprising to so many people.

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Two sixty six thousand instead of one million. Some people

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>are we two million? Did they tell us anything beyond

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>this one data point? I think it's hard to interpret.

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>My senses that it's got a lot to do with

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the emerging labor shortages that we're hearing about almost everywhere

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that managers in many different places are talking about and

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>worrying about it, and if people can't find workers, employment

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:43.719
<v Speaker 1>can employment's got to go up. Evidence for that is

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that we really had an extremely strong average hourly earnings

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>print this month. Now it's only one month, and they

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>were down UH last month, but they were up at

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a nine annual rate UH this month. And probably the

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>figure was our officially held down by the fact that

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>most of the new jobs were in low wage sectors

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>like restaurants. So I think what we're seeing is more

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and more evidence of labor shortage, and maybe that will

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>prove to be transitory. Maybe it will turn out that

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>as people go back to school um more and more

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>people come into the workforce and will lose that sense

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of labor shortage. But as I look at the data,

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I see much stronger evidence that people who retired over

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the last year aren't coming back. I see more and

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 1>more evidence that people who in one way or another

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>have changed around their lives aren't coming back for a while.

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So I expect that as the economy grows rapidly, as

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody thinks it's going to over the next few months,

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that that labor shortage problem is going to grow. That

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be putting more and more pressure on wages,

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's ultimately going to move into UH prices. So

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I actually think there's reason to think that inflation might

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>even accelerate from where it is this summer, rather than

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 1>the deceleration that the Fed and the Treasury are so

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>confidently predicting. You know, it's further evidence for that view

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to look at the housing market. You see the prices

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of housing UH rising at incredible mid you know, double

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 1>digit rates in the teens. That probably is telling you

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that rents are going to be going up before long.

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>That's why people are buying these houses in part. That's

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly why private equities buying up a large amount of houses.

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 1>And right so far rental factor has been holding down

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the inflation in this season. That's about to change. So

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>between the inventory issues, the labor shortage issues, the rental

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>UH issues is UH. I have to say that my

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>concerns about inflation are increasing. Are we contributing to it

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>in part by keeping people on the sidelines because of

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>how much we're reimbursing them for being unemployed. That's something

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that both President Buying addressed this week and Secretary the

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Treasury yelling did They were both asked pointedly, you're paying

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>people a lot of not to work. Is that making

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the situation worth Both of them thought, that's not the problem.

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more a matter of having to stay

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>home to take care of kids or elderly relatives. What

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>do you make of that, respectfully, uh, I think it

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>is close to self evident that the fact that people

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>are being paid more to stay at home than they

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>would be to work, in millions of cases is reducing

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the available supply of labor. I think the fact that

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the fraction of the unemployed who are getting unemployment insurance

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is it record highs is contributing to people being more

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>picky about jobs. You can argue that it's really important relief.

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>You can argue that it's really important insurance that we're providing.

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But I don't see how one can plausibly say that

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>paying people more to not work than to work is

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>having no effect on the availability of UH workers. And

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we just need to recognize that it probably

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>was the right thing to do when we really wanted

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>people to be very careful to stay home and not

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>spread COVID. But I think it's very hard to justify

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>and rationalize them. Uh, right now, Larry, as a macro economist,

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>are you concerned at all that our models might not

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>really let us know where we are if we're driving

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the car too fast? Is the sphenometer working? Because we

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen this sort of phenomenon perhaps ever in the

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>history of our economy. And let's be frank, the jobs

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers came in very different from what econdoms thought there

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>were gonna be. At the same time, we never saw

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the kind of go down that fast come back that fast.

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And goodness knows, with all the monetary and fiscal stimulus,

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>do we really have a model that tells us where

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we are and where we're going? Look, I don't. I

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>don't think any of us can predict with great precision,

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think over confidence is a real Uh is

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a real problem. That's why I've always framed my prediction probabilistically.

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a one third chance this will all work out well.

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a one third chance that we're really gonna push

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the inflation rate up in the way we did after Vietnam,

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>during Vietnam and into the nineties seventies, And there's a

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>one third chance that we're gonna have some kind of

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>fiscal monetary collision. So I think you gotta recognize that

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>there's uncertainty. I think you can discern sort of broad

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>structure and trend of the way things are moving. And

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the law of supply and demand is more

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>reliable than most other economic laws. And it sure does

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>seem like demand is rising relative to supply, and that

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly points towards UH rising prices and some acceleration of inflation.

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's the tendency. But you're absolutely right, David,

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that there are both wild cards that come from the

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>outside and there are doubts about UH internal dynamics, and

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:48.719
<v Speaker 1>those are things that absolutely have to be UH factored

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>into UH the analysis UM in a in a clear way.

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, another thing to look at, just because they

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>reflect act a large number of views, and certainly one

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't always assume they're right, because they're often wrong. Is

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in markets? And what we're seeing in markets

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is that because the FED is so clear about its

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>reluctance to raise rates, UM, you're seeing very little movement

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 1>in nominal rates, but under the surface, you're seeing a

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>reduction in real interest rates and an increase in the

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation premium that's priced into the difference between nominal bonds

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh real bonds. And we haven't seen a three

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>or four month movement in inflation break evens that was

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>as large since these markets got invented, since these index

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>bonds got invented many years ago. The FED made me

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>very clear about that, but the former FED chair who

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is now the Secretary Treasury, Janet Yellen, wasn't quite clear.

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>This week. One of the big issues for investors was

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>when she came out and said in response to a question,

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>she said, well, look at and then we may get

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to a point where the market's heating up enough so

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that we actually have to increase rates. She came back

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>out afterwards. I said, well, I really wasn't trying to predict.

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, would you make of what she

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>had to say? I felt for Janet. I've I've been there.

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>People make comments, they get interpreted in a certain way,

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and the markets get very excited and see strategy where

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>there's only um innocent economic commentary. I don't think that

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is a big deal. On the other hand, what she

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>said was self evidently true that if the economy gets

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>going sufficiently strong, and there starts to be inflationary pressures.

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>As part of containing those pressures, interest rates will be raised.

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how a reasonable person could disagree with

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that statement, and the fact that that was so alarming

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in markets to the point where she felt it necessary

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to provide further clarification of that. I think points up

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>what is really quite dangerous in our macroeconomic strategy. Between

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>monetary and fiscal policy, we're creating a sense for markets

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's always going to be let the good times roll.

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think when people get the idea that the

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>punch bowls never going to be removed until they're actually

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>people staggering around drunk at the party, it makes it

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>more likely that the party is going to get out

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of control. Okay, thanks so very much to our special

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week contributor Larry Summers of Harvard. Finally, one

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.719
<v Speaker 1>more thought, adding a new letter to the C suite.

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>First it was CEO, then CFO, and c I O

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and CTO, oh and c d O, but what about

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>c h O. It's all about climate these days from

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>President Biden, putting climate at the very top of his agenda.

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Two companies like a b in BEV, linking how much

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>interest they pay to whether they accomplished greenhouse gas emissions

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>goals to investors like Sam Zell just not investing in

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas anymore at all, because the risk reward

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>has shifted in the wrong direction. Pretty much everyone agrees

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing and feeling the effects of climate change

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in the weather, and it turns out that the biggest

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>source of death from weather in the United States isn't

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>hurricanes or tornadoes, it is heat, which takes us to

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that new member of the C suite, the Chief Heat Officer.

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dade County has just appointed its first ever c

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>h O, and Athens in Freetown, Sierra Leone are soon

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to follow. Jane Gilbert is Miami Dade's interim c CHO,

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>working on ways to protect the most vulnerable populations from heat,

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>creating things like resilience hubs where people can go to

0:31:57.880 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>cool off when they need to, and working with the

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>employers to protect workers out in the noonday sun and

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>fields or in construction sites. She even wants to start

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>naming and ranking heat waves the way we do storms,

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>complete with early warning systems. So maybe coming soon to

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>an eyewitness news near you. We may well have the

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Doppler three thousand heat map that does it. For this

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>episode of Wall Street Week, I'm David Weston. This is Bloomberg.

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>See you next week.