1 00:00:01,720 --> 00:00:04,760 Speaker 1: It's very difficult to keep the line between the past. 2 00:00:04,519 --> 00:00:05,000 Speaker 2: And the place. 3 00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:09,479 Speaker 3: You believe that someone out of the past can enter 4 00:00:09,640 --> 00:00:11,840 Speaker 3: and take possession of a living beat. 5 00:00:11,920 --> 00:00:14,040 Speaker 1: We may be through with the past, but the past 6 00:00:14,160 --> 00:00:20,840 Speaker 1: is not through with us. Welcome back to the Next 7 00:00:20,880 --> 00:00:23,279 Speaker 1: Picture Show, a movie of the Week podcast devoted to 8 00:00:23,280 --> 00:00:25,320 Speaker 1: a classic film and the way it's shaped our thoughts 9 00:00:25,320 --> 00:00:28,200 Speaker 1: on a recent release. I'm Tasha Robinson here again. 10 00:00:28,000 --> 00:00:29,800 Speaker 2: With Scott Tobias Keith Phipps. 11 00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:31,880 Speaker 1: Oh, okay, good, we just have the one. 12 00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:35,040 Speaker 2: Scott, Tasha, I feel like Brito let Us is a 13 00:00:35,200 --> 00:00:39,200 Speaker 2: texturally displeasing. You don't want that crunch, you want a nice, 14 00:00:39,240 --> 00:00:41,400 Speaker 2: soft consistency with the burrito. 15 00:00:41,760 --> 00:00:44,319 Speaker 1: Great, we ended up with that, Scott, all right. Well, 16 00:00:44,360 --> 00:00:46,479 Speaker 1: you can't win them all. In our last episode, we 17 00:00:46,520 --> 00:00:49,360 Speaker 1: discussed Invasion of the Body Snatchers, the nineteen seventy eight 18 00:00:49,400 --> 00:00:52,400 Speaker 1: adaptation of a Jack Finney novel about alien invaders that 19 00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:55,800 Speaker 1: steal human forms and memories in the name of species survival, 20 00:00:55,840 --> 00:00:58,720 Speaker 1: and nineteen seventies paranoia. This week, we'll see how Philip 21 00:00:58,800 --> 00:01:01,600 Speaker 1: Coffman's brand of nineteen seventies paranoia compares to the twenty 22 00:01:01,640 --> 00:01:05,399 Speaker 1: nineteen brand with Jordan Peele's horror movie US, forcing a 23 00:01:05,400 --> 00:01:08,440 Speaker 1: privileged family to confront duplicates of themselves who've had a 24 00:01:08,520 --> 00:01:11,280 Speaker 1: much harder and more horrifying life. Jordan Peel has said 25 00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:13,920 Speaker 1: that his movie US is fundamentally about America and how 26 00:01:13,959 --> 00:01:16,640 Speaker 1: Americans tend to want to find a vaguely defined other 27 00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:19,480 Speaker 1: to blame for all its troubles, whether that other is 28 00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:21,720 Speaker 1: people from other countries who want to steal our jobs 29 00:01:21,720 --> 00:01:24,360 Speaker 1: and freedoms, or people within this country who are trying 30 00:01:24,400 --> 00:01:26,960 Speaker 1: to run things in ways we disagree with. Introducing the 31 00:01:27,000 --> 00:01:29,600 Speaker 1: film at itself by Southwest Premiere, he said he felt 32 00:01:29,680 --> 00:01:32,040 Speaker 1: Americans need to confront the idea that maybe the real 33 00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:36,040 Speaker 1: threat is us. Hence US, a movie where people are 34 00:01:36,040 --> 00:01:39,400 Speaker 1: confronted by exact duplicates of themselves, which seem to represent 35 00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:42,160 Speaker 1: roads not taken. We'll warn you on this one. A 36 00:01:42,160 --> 00:01:44,080 Speaker 1: lot of the experience of US comes in the ways 37 00:01:44,080 --> 00:01:47,120 Speaker 1: that the mysteries unfold, and it's impossible to discuss what's 38 00:01:47,120 --> 00:01:50,240 Speaker 1: both interesting and troublesome about this movie without giving away 39 00:01:50,320 --> 00:01:53,240 Speaker 1: things you're clearly meant to experience for yourself. So keep 40 00:01:53,280 --> 00:01:55,880 Speaker 1: in mind that this is a spoiler filled podcast, and 41 00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:58,160 Speaker 1: here we go with What's going on in Us. In 42 00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:00,680 Speaker 1: the film, Lapina Niango and Winced and Duke play a 43 00:02:00,720 --> 00:02:03,360 Speaker 1: couple Adelaide and Gabe, who are headed off to a 44 00:02:03,400 --> 00:02:07,000 Speaker 1: vacation with their two kids, teenager Zora and quiet kid Jason. 45 00:02:07,280 --> 00:02:09,560 Speaker 1: Their trip takes them to a Santa Cruz beach. Adelaide 46 00:02:09,600 --> 00:02:12,760 Speaker 1: remembers from childhood when she encountered a spooky double of 47 00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:16,079 Speaker 1: herself in a funhouse. Shortly after they arrive, that double, 48 00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:18,760 Speaker 1: now grown too adulthood, shows up at her home with 49 00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:20,919 Speaker 1: doubles of Gabe and the kids in tow, and a 50 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:24,519 Speaker 1: night of bloody mayhem ensues. Adelaide's double, who the script 51 00:02:24,600 --> 00:02:28,000 Speaker 1: name's read, has some pointed messages about Adelaide's life of 52 00:02:28,040 --> 00:02:30,880 Speaker 1: privilege and comfort and how it contrasts with the pain 53 00:02:30,919 --> 00:02:33,680 Speaker 1: and privation Red has lived with. Red in her band 54 00:02:33,720 --> 00:02:35,920 Speaker 1: want to kill Adelaide in her family and replace them. 55 00:02:36,040 --> 00:02:38,320 Speaker 1: This seems like a fairly simple metaphor about the rich 56 00:02:38,400 --> 00:02:41,800 Speaker 1: versus the poor in America, except that new elements keep emerging, 57 00:02:42,040 --> 00:02:44,160 Speaker 1: and every time the audience thinks it's got a handle 58 00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:47,200 Speaker 1: on the rules for Red's people, those rules change, shifting 59 00:02:47,200 --> 00:02:49,240 Speaker 1: the metaphor and the focus of the film. We'll get 60 00:02:49,240 --> 00:02:50,320 Speaker 1: into the details after this. 61 00:02:58,280 --> 00:03:01,600 Speaker 2: There's a family in our driveway. It's probably the neighbors, 62 00:03:02,160 --> 00:03:05,480 Speaker 2: but ask you have a family, How can I help 63 00:03:05,520 --> 00:03:05,799 Speaker 2: you out? 64 00:03:07,080 --> 00:03:11,760 Speaker 4: Zora, put your shoes on. If you want to get crazy, 65 00:03:13,120 --> 00:03:15,120 Speaker 4: we can get crazy. 66 00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:20,480 Speaker 1: What are you people? 67 00:03:23,639 --> 00:03:32,720 Speaker 4: They look exactly like us, they think like us, They 68 00:03:32,840 --> 00:03:33,639 Speaker 4: know where we are. 69 00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:36,960 Speaker 1: We need to move and keep moving. 70 00:03:39,600 --> 00:03:44,640 Speaker 4: They won't stop until they kill us and we kill them. 71 00:03:44,800 --> 00:03:47,080 Speaker 1: So, guys, normally we start this thing with what do 72 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:49,080 Speaker 1: you think of the movie? But I think there's actually 73 00:03:49,120 --> 00:03:52,120 Speaker 1: a bigger question here, which is how much are you 74 00:03:52,240 --> 00:03:55,200 Speaker 1: engaging with the bigger conversation about the movie? Like did 75 00:03:55,240 --> 00:03:57,440 Speaker 1: you just watch it? Or are you reading the umpty 76 00:03:57,520 --> 00:03:59,960 Speaker 1: Jillian like think pieces and analysis pieces around it. 77 00:04:00,160 --> 00:04:02,360 Speaker 3: I have a thing called insta paper where I read 78 00:04:02,440 --> 00:04:06,280 Speaker 3: later for articles which I theoretically get around to later. 79 00:04:06,760 --> 00:04:09,400 Speaker 3: But there's been so many interesting looking articles about this. 80 00:04:09,400 --> 00:04:11,920 Speaker 3: I haven't actually dug into that much, but I'm excited 81 00:04:11,920 --> 00:04:14,440 Speaker 3: to explore it. I think Matt Zeller sites referred to 82 00:04:14,520 --> 00:04:17,479 Speaker 3: the commentary around it as prismatic because there's just so 83 00:04:17,560 --> 00:04:20,240 Speaker 3: many different takes on it, and they're all intriguing and 84 00:04:20,400 --> 00:04:22,800 Speaker 3: necessarily wrong either. There's a lot of different ways to 85 00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:24,719 Speaker 3: look at this film, and I think that's part of 86 00:04:24,720 --> 00:04:26,560 Speaker 3: what makes it so compelling. 87 00:04:26,680 --> 00:04:30,280 Speaker 2: Well, there's the one about it being about how socialism 88 00:04:30,360 --> 00:04:33,039 Speaker 2: is bad. Is I think you can say that one 89 00:04:33,080 --> 00:04:37,480 Speaker 2: is wrong. But now I haven't been following the commentary 90 00:04:37,640 --> 00:04:40,400 Speaker 2: on the movie as much as I should, mostly because 91 00:04:40,600 --> 00:04:43,360 Speaker 2: I just have this mentality now as a freelance er 92 00:04:43,480 --> 00:04:44,920 Speaker 2: that I'm just going to move on to the next thing. 93 00:04:44,960 --> 00:04:47,480 Speaker 2: I'm just going to keep moving forward, and so if 94 00:04:47,520 --> 00:04:49,960 Speaker 2: the discussion is really about a film where all the 95 00:04:49,960 --> 00:04:52,600 Speaker 2: pieces are in, then I'm going to kind of move 96 00:04:52,640 --> 00:04:55,240 Speaker 2: forward to something else. But there's also a part of 97 00:04:55,240 --> 00:04:58,200 Speaker 2: me that's like gonna let this movie be a little 98 00:04:58,200 --> 00:05:01,120 Speaker 2: bit as slippery as it is. I mean, one of 99 00:05:01,160 --> 00:05:05,600 Speaker 2: the things that's both benefit and detriment with us, especially 100 00:05:05,600 --> 00:05:08,920 Speaker 2: compared to Peele's last film, get Out, is that it's 101 00:05:09,120 --> 00:05:12,159 Speaker 2: not as graspable as allegory. You think you have a 102 00:05:12,160 --> 00:05:14,800 Speaker 2: handle on what the film is trying to say, but 103 00:05:14,839 --> 00:05:16,840 Speaker 2: then it gets away from you, or it doesn't make 104 00:05:16,880 --> 00:05:20,320 Speaker 2: internal sense, or you know. I think the more the 105 00:05:20,360 --> 00:05:24,880 Speaker 2: movie explains itself, the more impossible I think it is 106 00:05:24,920 --> 00:05:28,359 Speaker 2: to understand or to really feel as consistent, you know, 107 00:05:28,400 --> 00:05:30,480 Speaker 2: And I'm trying to figure out how forgiving of that 108 00:05:31,040 --> 00:05:33,320 Speaker 2: I should be, because I think the film wants to 109 00:05:33,360 --> 00:05:35,839 Speaker 2: be telling us something and wouldn't have a line like 110 00:05:35,880 --> 00:05:38,920 Speaker 2: we are Americans if it weren't. But I think it's 111 00:05:39,040 --> 00:05:41,920 Speaker 2: it feels better to let a lot of that stuff 112 00:05:42,000 --> 00:05:45,320 Speaker 2: go and not try to pin the film to anyone 113 00:05:45,360 --> 00:05:46,080 Speaker 2: meaning or the other. 114 00:05:46,279 --> 00:05:48,960 Speaker 1: I guess I haven't been reading much of the let's 115 00:05:48,960 --> 00:05:51,800 Speaker 1: try to pin this to a specific meaning takes, but 116 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:54,559 Speaker 1: I've been reading about the symbolism. I've been reading about 117 00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:58,599 Speaker 1: some of the wilder fan theories. Rebecca Alter has a 118 00:05:58,640 --> 00:06:02,440 Speaker 1: really interesting piece at Vulture called Unpacking Reddit's Wildest Theory 119 00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:06,359 Speaker 1: about Us, which I read just like, Okay, here we 120 00:06:06,400 --> 00:06:08,800 Speaker 1: go with another one of these again. And when I 121 00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:11,120 Speaker 1: saw what the theory was, I was like, no, that's ridiculous, 122 00:06:11,360 --> 00:06:12,960 Speaker 1: And then I read the evidence for it. I'm like, 123 00:06:13,279 --> 00:06:16,120 Speaker 1: somebody thought through this, like really closely. And I'm not 124 00:06:16,360 --> 00:06:19,680 Speaker 1: entirely convinced that it's Jordan Peele rather than Rebecca, But 125 00:06:19,800 --> 00:06:23,880 Speaker 1: I respect a film that has this many moving parts, 126 00:06:23,920 --> 00:06:27,840 Speaker 1: that invites this kind of conversation, that supports this kind 127 00:06:27,839 --> 00:06:31,640 Speaker 1: of conversation, And I think Get Out was so complicated 128 00:06:31,680 --> 00:06:35,839 Speaker 1: and rich and nuanced, and then Us is so detail 129 00:06:35,920 --> 00:06:40,719 Speaker 1: oriented and referential, and it moved so rapidly in so 130 00:06:40,760 --> 00:06:43,960 Speaker 1: many different directions that both of those films encourage this 131 00:06:44,040 --> 00:06:47,120 Speaker 1: kind of conversation in a way that's very modern to 132 00:06:47,160 --> 00:06:49,560 Speaker 1: the film moment, you know, in the way that Westworld 133 00:06:50,040 --> 00:06:53,720 Speaker 1: was a show designed for the Reddit detectives to pick 134 00:06:53,760 --> 00:06:57,039 Speaker 1: over endlessly. This feels like a film that is designed 135 00:06:57,080 --> 00:06:59,200 Speaker 1: to be analyzed up one side and down the other. 136 00:06:59,520 --> 00:07:02,920 Speaker 1: In the theater, I enjoyed it as a scary movie, 137 00:07:03,360 --> 00:07:07,560 Speaker 1: as a well designed, well choreographed, like visually interesting movie, 138 00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:11,120 Speaker 1: but I walked out of it feeling pretty unsatisfied, and 139 00:07:11,440 --> 00:07:13,320 Speaker 1: like all of this conversation has kind of given me 140 00:07:13,360 --> 00:07:16,440 Speaker 1: that satisfaction. So I don't know how it would play 141 00:07:16,440 --> 00:07:18,480 Speaker 1: on a second viewing. I don't know what it's going 142 00:07:18,560 --> 00:07:20,640 Speaker 1: to look like ten years from now, But right in 143 00:07:20,680 --> 00:07:23,120 Speaker 1: this moment, I find myself respecting it more than I 144 00:07:23,160 --> 00:07:25,640 Speaker 1: necessarily did. Just from watching the film. 145 00:07:25,480 --> 00:07:27,320 Speaker 3: I get that, I think Get Out of such a 146 00:07:27,400 --> 00:07:30,640 Speaker 3: clean metaphor, it's just such a this what's moving about? 147 00:07:30,680 --> 00:07:34,040 Speaker 3: This is an extremely effective metaphor for depicting it and us. 148 00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:36,160 Speaker 3: I feel like there's a couple of different things going 149 00:07:36,160 --> 00:07:39,400 Speaker 3: on at once, the most obvious one being about the underclass, 150 00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:42,480 Speaker 3: about how your success in America means someone else's failure. 151 00:07:42,480 --> 00:07:43,920 Speaker 3: I mean, it's just set up in such a way 152 00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:48,960 Speaker 3: that prosperity for this group of people means poverty for 153 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:54,000 Speaker 3: this group of people. But also, you know, because the 154 00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:58,560 Speaker 3: other characters, because the alternate version of Adelaide's family that 155 00:07:58,600 --> 00:08:02,240 Speaker 3: we see is such a periodic version of the people 156 00:08:02,280 --> 00:08:05,160 Speaker 3: that we do know, it's sort of their most you know, 157 00:08:05,240 --> 00:08:09,240 Speaker 3: sort of fairal caricatures of their of the behavior we've 158 00:08:09,240 --> 00:08:11,440 Speaker 3: seen them undertake. It's also I think there's sort of 159 00:08:11,480 --> 00:08:14,720 Speaker 3: a psychological reading into it too, where this is what 160 00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:17,480 Speaker 3: we repressed, This is the worst of us, but just 161 00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:20,440 Speaker 3: because we don't express it or we try to tamp 162 00:08:20,440 --> 00:08:22,320 Speaker 3: it down doesn't mean it goes away. I think that's 163 00:08:22,360 --> 00:08:24,400 Speaker 3: a really interesting way to look at it as well. 164 00:08:24,440 --> 00:08:27,800 Speaker 3: And I think those can live side by side quite well, 165 00:08:27,880 --> 00:08:29,520 Speaker 3: and they do in this movie. But it's not an 166 00:08:29,560 --> 00:08:32,800 Speaker 3: easily penned in bit of symbolism, and I think that's fine. 167 00:08:33,160 --> 00:08:35,040 Speaker 3: I think, you know, I'm not a fan of the 168 00:08:35,080 --> 00:08:38,480 Speaker 3: Ready to detective approach to talking about pop culture. But 169 00:08:38,720 --> 00:08:42,000 Speaker 3: I do think spending some time poking around and exploring 170 00:08:42,720 --> 00:08:45,160 Speaker 3: what everything and you know how what all the pieces 171 00:08:45,200 --> 00:08:46,760 Speaker 3: of this movie are and how they fit together is 172 00:08:47,520 --> 00:08:49,080 Speaker 3: only makes it richard, and I'm looking forward to seeing 173 00:08:49,080 --> 00:08:49,440 Speaker 3: it again. 174 00:08:49,520 --> 00:08:52,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I think your first reaction has to 175 00:08:52,120 --> 00:08:54,600 Speaker 2: be doesn't work. I mean, I mean, I was somebody 176 00:08:54,600 --> 00:08:57,880 Speaker 2: who recapped two seasons worth of Westworld, and I think 177 00:08:57,960 --> 00:09:01,800 Speaker 2: the show was terribly crippled by the let's, you know, 178 00:09:01,880 --> 00:09:04,920 Speaker 2: get read and involved mentality and just like, let's make 179 00:09:04,960 --> 00:09:08,559 Speaker 2: this as convoluted and twisty and as much of a 180 00:09:08,600 --> 00:09:11,960 Speaker 2: puzzle box as possible, and then you lose the real 181 00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:16,400 Speaker 2: thematic resonence that I think makes the show interesting. That 182 00:09:16,520 --> 00:09:18,680 Speaker 2: was a big problem with the second season of West World. 183 00:09:18,960 --> 00:09:20,719 Speaker 2: I don't feel like that's a problem with us though. 184 00:09:20,760 --> 00:09:22,960 Speaker 2: I think what I like about Us is that it's 185 00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:27,400 Speaker 2: such a robust and confident second feature, and that Peel 186 00:09:27,480 --> 00:09:30,720 Speaker 2: I think has grown as a director from one film 187 00:09:30,760 --> 00:09:33,520 Speaker 2: to the next. Just the whole thing feels blown out 188 00:09:33,720 --> 00:09:37,000 Speaker 2: and exciting and engaged and not sheepish as a secon. 189 00:09:37,000 --> 00:09:39,920 Speaker 2: You know, he's not somebody who's making this second movie 190 00:09:40,200 --> 00:09:43,040 Speaker 2: in a cautious way, or trying to duplicate a past 191 00:09:43,080 --> 00:09:46,880 Speaker 2: success or trying to play it safe. I mean, he's 192 00:09:46,960 --> 00:09:49,360 Speaker 2: doing all kinds of interesting things. And one thing that 193 00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:53,480 Speaker 2: I really appreciate about us and about Peel in general, 194 00:09:53,640 --> 00:09:56,400 Speaker 2: is that he has the ability to sell you on 195 00:09:56,520 --> 00:10:00,520 Speaker 2: the mundane moments that other horror films all have. I mean, 196 00:10:00,559 --> 00:10:03,600 Speaker 2: even the masters like Daria Argento. You're gonna have some 197 00:10:03,679 --> 00:10:06,920 Speaker 2: dead space leading from one set piece to the next. 198 00:10:06,920 --> 00:10:09,840 Speaker 2: But what Peel is really good at is taking something 199 00:10:09,920 --> 00:10:13,280 Speaker 2: like a conversation and a station wagon and making it pop, 200 00:10:13,360 --> 00:10:16,520 Speaker 2: you know, making it lively, giving you a really good dialogue, 201 00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:18,760 Speaker 2: and always giving you something to look at and respond to. 202 00:10:18,920 --> 00:10:22,560 Speaker 2: He's there's really not a moment in this movie where 203 00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:26,280 Speaker 2: I was bored or disengaged or you know, just the 204 00:10:26,280 --> 00:10:29,360 Speaker 2: whole thing felt just kind of exciting on a superficial 205 00:10:29,440 --> 00:10:31,559 Speaker 2: level and a substantive level to experience. 206 00:10:31,720 --> 00:10:34,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, at the siege happens, the first siege happens, It 207 00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:36,880 Speaker 3: felt like very early in the film, and we get 208 00:10:36,920 --> 00:10:38,920 Speaker 3: the set up, we get the beach scene, and then 209 00:10:38,960 --> 00:10:41,640 Speaker 3: the other family shows up, and from there never really 210 00:10:41,720 --> 00:10:44,240 Speaker 3: takes the foot off the gas, there's some moments of 211 00:10:44,320 --> 00:10:47,480 Speaker 3: humor thrown in, and I don't think people haven't really 212 00:10:47,520 --> 00:10:49,719 Speaker 3: talked about that much of that. I've read that it's 213 00:10:49,920 --> 00:10:53,520 Speaker 3: pretty funny movie on everything else. But you know, I 214 00:10:53,559 --> 00:10:56,000 Speaker 3: was surprised by how the slow build up I was 215 00:10:56,040 --> 00:10:57,240 Speaker 3: expecting wasn't really there. 216 00:10:57,480 --> 00:10:59,160 Speaker 1: So I mean, it sounds like we're all kind of 217 00:10:59,200 --> 00:11:01,719 Speaker 1: sold on it as a discussion piece. Did you find 218 00:11:01,760 --> 00:11:03,400 Speaker 1: it scary? Does it work as horror? 219 00:11:03,440 --> 00:11:04,880 Speaker 3: I did. I thought it was a pretty exciting piece 220 00:11:04,880 --> 00:11:08,600 Speaker 3: of filmmaking. It didn't have that hereditary feeling that Scott 221 00:11:08,640 --> 00:11:11,080 Speaker 3: had where I wanted to flee the theater at any point, 222 00:11:11,120 --> 00:11:13,760 Speaker 3: but I did find it scary. I thought Neango's performance 223 00:11:13,840 --> 00:11:17,240 Speaker 3: as red was such an odd sort of you know, 224 00:11:17,400 --> 00:11:20,240 Speaker 3: parody of human behavior and in a really interesting way. 225 00:11:20,320 --> 00:11:23,240 Speaker 3: And I never really knew where that was going or 226 00:11:23,679 --> 00:11:28,400 Speaker 3: really what the others were up to, even at the 227 00:11:28,480 --> 00:11:30,120 Speaker 3: until the end of the movie, although I did guess 228 00:11:30,120 --> 00:11:32,120 Speaker 3: the big twist about about Reddin and. 229 00:11:32,200 --> 00:11:34,720 Speaker 1: Did you really yeah, pretty early on it came so 230 00:11:35,760 --> 00:11:36,040 Speaker 1: for me. 231 00:11:36,320 --> 00:11:38,800 Speaker 3: No, no, I I saw that coming in my allway. 232 00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:39,200 Speaker 1: Huh. 233 00:11:40,040 --> 00:11:42,600 Speaker 3: Well, I know I'm usually a person I'm not bragging 234 00:11:42,640 --> 00:11:44,520 Speaker 3: because I'm usually the last person to pick up on 235 00:11:44,600 --> 00:11:46,480 Speaker 3: it twist like that, but I that one. 236 00:11:46,520 --> 00:11:48,960 Speaker 2: I figured it out. Yeah, well it also, you know, 237 00:11:49,480 --> 00:11:51,880 Speaker 2: the film is basically sort of the horror version of 238 00:11:51,920 --> 00:11:56,840 Speaker 2: that Simpsons episode with the treehousehole horror thing where where 239 00:11:57,120 --> 00:11:59,080 Speaker 2: Bart has an evil twain lives in the attic and 240 00:11:59,200 --> 00:12:02,200 Speaker 2: eats fish heads, and the kid it turns out to 241 00:12:02,200 --> 00:12:03,559 Speaker 2: be the good one, right. 242 00:12:03,600 --> 00:12:07,760 Speaker 1: Yes, sort of, or doppelgangers here don't exactly turn out 243 00:12:07,760 --> 00:12:09,800 Speaker 1: to be the good ones. I mean despite that ending. 244 00:12:10,160 --> 00:12:12,480 Speaker 2: Yes, what I'll say about the scariness of this to me, 245 00:12:13,160 --> 00:12:16,720 Speaker 2: the scariness ended as soon as they entered the house. 246 00:12:17,360 --> 00:12:20,520 Speaker 2: I was quite on edge when this family is just 247 00:12:20,559 --> 00:12:23,400 Speaker 2: standing in the driveway and then trying to figure out 248 00:12:23,440 --> 00:12:25,840 Speaker 2: what in the world they're going to do. But once 249 00:12:25,960 --> 00:12:27,840 Speaker 2: they kind of get in the house, I mean, it 250 00:12:27,880 --> 00:12:30,640 Speaker 2: is it's exciting, intense, so like a thriller would be, 251 00:12:30,640 --> 00:12:33,800 Speaker 2: but it becomes basically a home invasion thriller. And that's 252 00:12:33,800 --> 00:12:36,520 Speaker 2: a slightly different genre for me than horror, and one 253 00:12:36,559 --> 00:12:38,760 Speaker 2: that is more about, you know, giving you a thrill 254 00:12:38,840 --> 00:12:39,920 Speaker 2: than scarying the hell out of you. 255 00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:42,440 Speaker 3: Yeah. I keep calling them the others because I'm thinking 256 00:12:42,760 --> 00:12:43,000 Speaker 3: the others. 257 00:12:43,040 --> 00:12:44,560 Speaker 1: Isn't the Home the Strangers? 258 00:12:44,840 --> 00:12:45,040 Speaker 3: Yeah? 259 00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:48,240 Speaker 2: Strangers? Oh yeah, that that is definitely. There's so many 260 00:12:48,280 --> 00:12:51,520 Speaker 2: film references in this movie, but The Strangers is certainly 261 00:12:51,520 --> 00:12:51,959 Speaker 2: one of them. 262 00:12:52,280 --> 00:12:54,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, let's let's get to the film references in a 263 00:12:54,760 --> 00:12:57,559 Speaker 1: in a minute. I think first it Scott. I think 264 00:12:57,600 --> 00:13:00,200 Speaker 1: I had the exact opposite reaction like I was. I 265 00:13:00,240 --> 00:13:04,560 Speaker 1: was really unnerved by the duplicates outside the house. But 266 00:13:04,840 --> 00:13:06,600 Speaker 1: at the same time, it kind of felt like it 267 00:13:06,640 --> 00:13:09,000 Speaker 1: felt like The Strangers. It felt like something I'd seen before. 268 00:13:09,040 --> 00:13:10,920 Speaker 1: I kind of felt like, all right, I know how 269 00:13:10,960 --> 00:13:12,480 Speaker 1: this is going to go. It's going to be a siege. 270 00:13:12,480 --> 00:13:14,280 Speaker 1: They're going to break in, it's going to be cabin 271 00:13:14,320 --> 00:13:16,120 Speaker 1: in the woods, they're going to be chasing them around. 272 00:13:16,480 --> 00:13:19,920 Speaker 1: And instead they broke in and started talking. And from 273 00:13:19,920 --> 00:13:23,240 Speaker 1: the moment Red started talking, I entered into this space 274 00:13:23,320 --> 00:13:27,000 Speaker 1: of this is deeply uncanny and I don't know where 275 00:13:27,040 --> 00:13:28,960 Speaker 1: it's going. And that, for me, was a lot more 276 00:13:29,000 --> 00:13:32,640 Speaker 1: frightening than an endless amount of, you know, chasing around 277 00:13:32,640 --> 00:13:35,400 Speaker 1: in the wood with knives would have been. So I 278 00:13:35,480 --> 00:13:37,880 Speaker 1: put so much of what works in this film on 279 00:13:38,160 --> 00:13:44,120 Speaker 1: Yongo's performance, specifically as Red, which just Incidentally, she apparently 280 00:13:44,160 --> 00:13:47,680 Speaker 1: recently revealed that that weird vocal thing that she's doing 281 00:13:47,880 --> 00:13:52,120 Speaker 1: is inspired by like an actual condition that some people have. 282 00:13:52,679 --> 00:13:54,240 Speaker 1: And now there are a bunch of people who are 283 00:13:54,320 --> 00:13:57,400 Speaker 1: up in arms about her mocking disabilities and saying that 284 00:13:57,440 --> 00:14:00,520 Speaker 1: people with disabilities are evil, and it's turned into whole thing. 285 00:14:02,640 --> 00:14:07,760 Speaker 1: So sometimes, well sometimes maybe you just shouldn't tell people 286 00:14:07,800 --> 00:14:10,480 Speaker 1: what inspires you because then they'll get on your case 287 00:14:10,520 --> 00:14:15,480 Speaker 1: about it. And yeah, it's her performance, her dual performance 288 00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:18,200 Speaker 1: for me just fundamentally makes this movie. 289 00:14:18,360 --> 00:14:20,440 Speaker 2: No, he's great for the reasons you mentioned though, though, Yeah, 290 00:14:20,520 --> 00:14:22,880 Speaker 2: the twist tip off is, you know, there the fact 291 00:14:22,880 --> 00:14:24,200 Speaker 2: that she can say things. 292 00:14:24,440 --> 00:14:28,800 Speaker 1: So among the umpty bazillion references to other movies, the 293 00:14:29,240 --> 00:14:31,120 Speaker 1: one that we I think most have to talk about 294 00:14:31,160 --> 00:14:34,120 Speaker 1: here is the fact that in that opening shot of 295 00:14:34,160 --> 00:14:37,760 Speaker 1: the TV doing the hands across America ad there is 296 00:14:37,960 --> 00:14:42,520 Speaker 1: a series of VHS boxes for Chud, which, as we know, 297 00:14:42,600 --> 00:14:43,840 Speaker 1: is about monsters underground. 298 00:14:44,120 --> 00:14:48,880 Speaker 3: No back up there, It's about cannibalistic humanoid underground dwellers underground. 299 00:14:49,240 --> 00:14:49,440 Speaker 2: Huh. 300 00:14:50,040 --> 00:14:52,520 Speaker 1: There is a box for night Mare on Elm Street, 301 00:14:53,160 --> 00:14:58,680 Speaker 1: which there's some debate about exactly how that's being referenced here. 302 00:14:58,720 --> 00:15:01,440 Speaker 1: But it's a touch stone in some ways. And there's 303 00:15:01,440 --> 00:15:04,280 Speaker 1: a box for the Right Stuff, which seems to be 304 00:15:04,360 --> 00:15:07,040 Speaker 1: baffling people a little in terms of how it applies. 305 00:15:07,080 --> 00:15:10,160 Speaker 1: But the Right Stuff directed by one Philip Kaufman, and 306 00:15:10,240 --> 00:15:12,920 Speaker 1: I think it's just meant to q us into the 307 00:15:12,920 --> 00:15:14,200 Speaker 1: invasion of the body statures. 308 00:15:14,360 --> 00:15:18,280 Speaker 3: That's interesting because I could beyond the presence of a 309 00:15:18,320 --> 00:15:21,040 Speaker 3: government program of some kind. It was like the vaguest 310 00:15:21,040 --> 00:15:24,120 Speaker 3: possible connection you can make. But the Goodies isn't there too? 311 00:15:24,240 --> 00:15:27,359 Speaker 3: I believe another film about underground adventures. 312 00:15:28,040 --> 00:15:30,480 Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, and also it was of course interesting to 313 00:15:30,520 --> 00:15:34,880 Speaker 2: see that distinct to VHS Box of the Right Stuff 314 00:15:35,040 --> 00:15:37,920 Speaker 2: probably featured in Captain Marvel as well. I know, I'm 315 00:15:37,920 --> 00:15:40,480 Speaker 2: ready like another one in weeks of each other. It's 316 00:15:40,560 --> 00:15:42,440 Speaker 2: very strange. 317 00:15:42,680 --> 00:15:46,240 Speaker 1: Kaufman is just out there doing his like his promo thing, 318 00:15:46,320 --> 00:15:47,760 Speaker 1: trying to get his box in there. 319 00:15:48,040 --> 00:15:49,240 Speaker 3: People caught up on the Right Store. 320 00:15:49,280 --> 00:15:51,120 Speaker 2: It wasn't a huge hit in theaters. It did not 321 00:15:51,160 --> 00:15:52,640 Speaker 2: do as well as it should have, and so people 322 00:15:52,680 --> 00:15:54,360 Speaker 2: caught it up with it at home. 323 00:15:55,280 --> 00:15:58,440 Speaker 1: Are there any other film references in this that particularly 324 00:15:58,600 --> 00:16:00,000 Speaker 1: like caught you or interested you? 325 00:16:00,200 --> 00:16:02,360 Speaker 2: I mean to me. One of the key references is 326 00:16:02,360 --> 00:16:06,000 Speaker 2: to the film Don't Look Now. Speaking of past ps 327 00:16:06,080 --> 00:16:09,880 Speaker 2: shows just this idea of this trauma that happened at 328 00:16:09,920 --> 00:16:14,520 Speaker 2: a certain age, and it reverberating through time and person 329 00:16:14,880 --> 00:16:18,360 Speaker 2: being triggered into revisiting these moments by being in a 330 00:16:18,360 --> 00:16:21,480 Speaker 2: certain place or you know, seeing a certain symbol, and 331 00:16:21,080 --> 00:16:24,160 Speaker 2: that that visual symbol it takes on a significance that 332 00:16:24,240 --> 00:16:27,120 Speaker 2: it wouldn't have otherwise. I mean, that feels so indebted 333 00:16:27,160 --> 00:16:27,920 Speaker 2: to Don't Look Now. 334 00:16:28,000 --> 00:16:30,520 Speaker 3: The really obvious one is Jaws, which is just, you know, 335 00:16:30,600 --> 00:16:32,880 Speaker 3: he just signposts that by having a kid wear a 336 00:16:32,960 --> 00:16:35,680 Speaker 3: Jaws T shirt but then making the beach a scene 337 00:16:35,680 --> 00:16:38,160 Speaker 3: of tension and Jaws almost seems like a challenge because 338 00:16:38,160 --> 00:16:40,280 Speaker 3: it doesn't seem the kind of it's the place you think, 339 00:16:40,320 --> 00:16:43,080 Speaker 3: you know, you relaxing your mind on a beach, and 340 00:16:43,480 --> 00:16:46,600 Speaker 3: to do that here and also realize you had to 341 00:16:46,640 --> 00:16:49,600 Speaker 3: like avoid doing exactly what Jaws did. I think it's 342 00:16:49,760 --> 00:16:52,520 Speaker 3: it's really interesting what he does with that, and it's 343 00:16:52,600 --> 00:16:55,360 Speaker 3: like the last sort of peaceful moment this film has 344 00:16:55,400 --> 00:16:58,200 Speaker 3: before anything, before all hell breaks loose. 345 00:16:58,320 --> 00:17:02,000 Speaker 1: There's also that moment where Adelaide's mom says that they're 346 00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:05,199 Speaker 1: filming a movie on the Santa Cruz Boardwalk, which is 347 00:17:05,359 --> 00:17:08,359 Speaker 1: very clearly meant to be Lost Boys, the Joel Schumacher 348 00:17:08,440 --> 00:17:12,000 Speaker 1: Vampire film, which is a junkie ass movie from my youth. 349 00:17:12,240 --> 00:17:15,399 Speaker 3: Oh, here come the letters. I love that movie. 350 00:17:15,680 --> 00:17:17,399 Speaker 1: I love it too. It's a junkie ass movie for 351 00:17:17,520 --> 00:17:20,040 Speaker 1: my youth that I have a Let me finish my 352 00:17:20,119 --> 00:17:23,000 Speaker 1: sentence before you write the angry letters. Oh wait, I'm sorry, 353 00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:26,200 Speaker 1: it's the Internet. I'm getting tweets now and we haven't 354 00:17:26,200 --> 00:17:27,160 Speaker 1: even posted this. 355 00:17:28,400 --> 00:17:31,720 Speaker 3: To cancel, Tasha, I. 356 00:17:31,720 --> 00:17:34,840 Speaker 1: Have such a love for that movie, so of course, 357 00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:38,000 Speaker 1: just having somebody throw a completely throw away a line 358 00:17:38,000 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 1: towards it kind of gave me a hohot. And then 359 00:17:40,800 --> 00:17:43,800 Speaker 1: there's a little reference towards Big, with the idea of 360 00:17:43,800 --> 00:17:45,879 Speaker 1: that Alleide does not big enough yet to ride the 361 00:17:46,000 --> 00:17:48,760 Speaker 1: roller coaster, which I guess happens at the beginning of 362 00:17:48,920 --> 00:17:52,480 Speaker 1: Big as well, and leads to the main character there 363 00:17:52,480 --> 00:17:55,320 Speaker 1: wishing he was big. Just the degree to which he 364 00:17:55,480 --> 00:17:59,280 Speaker 1: sandwiches in these little things in passing. Is this lazy 365 00:17:59,359 --> 00:18:02,760 Speaker 1: pop culture collection of references or is this as much 366 00:18:02,800 --> 00:18:03,720 Speaker 1: fun as I think? 367 00:18:04,200 --> 00:18:06,800 Speaker 3: I think? It's both he's a very movie literate filmmaker. 368 00:18:06,840 --> 00:18:10,760 Speaker 3: But I think also a film that's so interested in 369 00:18:10,800 --> 00:18:14,400 Speaker 3: how the past connects to the present and how yesterday's 370 00:18:14,440 --> 00:18:18,119 Speaker 3: semi misguided charity movement becomes this sort of a symbol 371 00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:21,560 Speaker 3: for the failure of that kind of charity and then 372 00:18:21,720 --> 00:18:25,920 Speaker 3: also returns as a strange parody between the others, emerging 373 00:18:26,640 --> 00:18:30,520 Speaker 3: the inspiration for these dappelgangers, just to announce their presence 374 00:18:30,560 --> 00:18:34,679 Speaker 3: to the world. This this for you know, forgotten moment 375 00:18:35,320 --> 00:18:38,359 Speaker 3: in American history or semi forgotten moment in American history, 376 00:18:38,520 --> 00:18:40,639 Speaker 3: doesn't really go away, it just returns. And this is 377 00:18:40,640 --> 00:18:43,080 Speaker 3: the sort of grotesque form I don't I think it's fine. 378 00:18:43,119 --> 00:18:45,760 Speaker 3: I think I think that kind of film is you 379 00:18:45,760 --> 00:18:47,680 Speaker 3: can pack as many references you want to, and it's 380 00:18:47,760 --> 00:18:48,480 Speaker 3: it's appropriate. 381 00:18:48,600 --> 00:18:51,760 Speaker 2: Of course, Famously, Hands Across America did not, you know, 382 00:18:52,280 --> 00:18:53,399 Speaker 2: fully work. 383 00:18:54,359 --> 00:18:57,280 Speaker 3: So it's not fully worked, really raise that much money. 384 00:18:57,440 --> 00:18:59,719 Speaker 2: But I do like the idea that maybe the idea 385 00:18:59,800 --> 00:19:02,919 Speaker 2: of them, you know, there's there's some revenge in rising up, 386 00:19:02,960 --> 00:19:04,960 Speaker 2: but also let's just do it right this time. Let's 387 00:19:05,000 --> 00:19:07,440 Speaker 2: do Hands across America. We'll go, We'll get it across 388 00:19:07,560 --> 00:19:10,199 Speaker 2: the seas. And the in the mountains at the end, 389 00:19:10,200 --> 00:19:12,520 Speaker 2: it's like all these places where the where the connections 390 00:19:12,560 --> 00:19:13,960 Speaker 2: weren't made, They're going to make it happen. 391 00:19:14,560 --> 00:19:16,560 Speaker 3: Now those lesseners may not even know what hands across 392 00:19:16,560 --> 00:19:19,399 Speaker 3: the America is. I wrote a little explainer for Slate, 393 00:19:19,520 --> 00:19:22,880 Speaker 3: but just just briefly, it's the same organization that did 394 00:19:23,359 --> 00:19:26,359 Speaker 3: the We Are the World were inspired to organize this 395 00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:30,320 Speaker 3: event that on May six was going to be a 396 00:19:30,400 --> 00:19:33,400 Speaker 3: human chain from sea to Shining Sea, and everyone from 397 00:19:33,720 --> 00:19:35,840 Speaker 3: Ronald Reagan to Chewbacca was going to be. 398 00:19:37,280 --> 00:19:38,040 Speaker 2: By the country. 399 00:19:38,440 --> 00:19:40,879 Speaker 1: It's a big The problem Isbaca is a big Wookie. 400 00:19:40,960 --> 00:19:42,439 Speaker 1: He's got a he's got a big reach. 401 00:19:43,359 --> 00:19:46,359 Speaker 3: There were large gaps, and the other problem is they 402 00:19:46,760 --> 00:19:49,280 Speaker 3: raised a fair amount of money, but it also costs 403 00:19:49,280 --> 00:19:50,720 Speaker 3: a lot of money. I think they were left with 404 00:19:50,760 --> 00:19:53,359 Speaker 3: like fifteen million dollars to distribute, which is you know great, 405 00:19:53,560 --> 00:19:56,639 Speaker 3: you know not the we're not going to end homelessness 406 00:19:56,680 --> 00:19:57,360 Speaker 3: with us. 407 00:19:57,240 --> 00:19:59,960 Speaker 1: Well, you have a hard time ending homelessness with anyone 408 00:20:00,080 --> 00:20:03,840 Speaker 1: charity movement. There is a lot more to discuss about us, 409 00:20:03,920 --> 00:20:05,840 Speaker 1: but there's also a lot to discuss about invasion of 410 00:20:05,840 --> 00:20:08,600 Speaker 1: the body snatchers. So why don't we stick the two 411 00:20:08,640 --> 00:20:11,119 Speaker 1: of those things together. We'll be right back after this 412 00:20:11,200 --> 00:20:13,439 Speaker 1: break to talk about the connections between us and invasion 413 00:20:13,480 --> 00:20:14,280 Speaker 1: of the body snatchers. 414 00:20:20,320 --> 00:20:21,520 Speaker 2: Okay, let's call the cops. 415 00:20:22,720 --> 00:20:24,960 Speaker 4: I did. They're fourteen minutes away. 416 00:20:25,119 --> 00:20:32,840 Speaker 1: What fourteen minutes Okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, Jason. 417 00:20:32,600 --> 00:20:33,440 Speaker 3: Give me the bat? 418 00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:36,040 Speaker 2: What that the baseball? Bat? 419 00:20:36,080 --> 00:20:36,440 Speaker 3: The bat? 420 00:20:36,480 --> 00:20:39,639 Speaker 2: There's one in the court. Thank you. All right, hold 421 00:20:39,680 --> 00:20:41,680 Speaker 2: on this, Let's try this again. 422 00:20:42,280 --> 00:20:44,360 Speaker 1: No no, no, no, no, no, no no no. 423 00:20:45,160 --> 00:20:54,040 Speaker 3: All right, yeah, I got this now. 424 00:20:54,080 --> 00:20:56,360 Speaker 4: I thought I already done, told y'all to get off 425 00:20:56,440 --> 00:21:00,160 Speaker 4: my property. Okay, so if y'all want to get crazy, 426 00:21:00,480 --> 00:21:05,880 Speaker 4: we can get crazy. Not a cops already on big way. 427 00:21:06,160 --> 00:21:08,240 Speaker 1: Now it's time for connections, when we bring these two 428 00:21:08,280 --> 00:21:10,480 Speaker 1: films together and talk about all the things they have 429 00:21:10,560 --> 00:21:13,840 Speaker 1: in common. I want to start with the world's pettiest thing, 430 00:21:14,280 --> 00:21:17,040 Speaker 1: which is the fact that the others, as you keep 431 00:21:17,080 --> 00:21:20,639 Speaker 1: calling them in US, wear these red jumpsuits and the 432 00:21:20,680 --> 00:21:23,600 Speaker 1: single brown glove. And Jordan Peele has confirmed that as 433 00:21:23,680 --> 00:21:27,520 Speaker 1: like a reference a visual reference to Michael Jackson in 434 00:21:27,560 --> 00:21:30,879 Speaker 1: the thriller video to his obsessive single gloved like to 435 00:21:30,920 --> 00:21:34,040 Speaker 1: the red jacket that he wears. The costume designer has 436 00:21:34,080 --> 00:21:37,440 Speaker 1: done interviews about how these things were inspired by Michael Jackson. 437 00:21:37,880 --> 00:21:40,920 Speaker 1: It all hinges on the Thriller shirt that Adelaide ends 438 00:21:41,000 --> 00:21:43,439 Speaker 1: up wearing in the opening scene. So what are we 439 00:21:43,520 --> 00:21:46,760 Speaker 1: to make of the fact that we've got Leonard Nimoy 440 00:21:46,840 --> 00:21:49,080 Speaker 1: walking around an invasion of the Body Snatchers in this 441 00:21:49,320 --> 00:21:52,119 Speaker 1: bright red jumper with a single brown leather glove on 442 00:21:52,720 --> 00:21:54,600 Speaker 1: like that cannot be a coincidence? 443 00:21:54,880 --> 00:21:57,760 Speaker 3: No, I mean, Jordan Peele did press for this movie 444 00:21:58,119 --> 00:22:01,280 Speaker 3: in the exact same outfit that Jack Nicholason Warren is 445 00:22:01,280 --> 00:22:01,800 Speaker 3: shiny and. 446 00:22:01,720 --> 00:22:02,840 Speaker 1: Something that's amazing. 447 00:22:02,920 --> 00:22:04,879 Speaker 3: I love it so much. I think with Henry, if 448 00:22:04,920 --> 00:22:06,840 Speaker 3: you think it's a reference to something, it probably is 449 00:22:06,880 --> 00:22:07,960 Speaker 3: a reference to something. 450 00:22:08,119 --> 00:22:11,560 Speaker 2: The glove looks more similar to Body Snatchers than Michael Jackson. 451 00:22:11,960 --> 00:22:15,439 Speaker 2: Aesthetically speaking. It's so brown leather glove right in both cases. 452 00:22:15,800 --> 00:22:18,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean it's not. It's like a driving glove 453 00:22:18,760 --> 00:22:22,680 Speaker 1: in US and in Body Snatchers. It's this weird sort 454 00:22:22,680 --> 00:22:27,880 Speaker 1: of like hatch on a strap thing. Apparently Nimoy came 455 00:22:28,000 --> 00:22:30,439 Speaker 1: up with it as just a way to distinguish the character, 456 00:22:30,560 --> 00:22:33,159 Speaker 1: because like a friend of his was wearing something similar 457 00:22:33,160 --> 00:22:35,600 Speaker 1: to cover up a burn on his hand. So it's 458 00:22:35,680 --> 00:22:38,320 Speaker 1: just like this weird little character twitch that he thought 459 00:22:38,320 --> 00:22:41,760 Speaker 1: would be interesting. But it's memorable because it's so weird, 460 00:22:41,960 --> 00:22:44,800 Speaker 1: because it's so distinctive. There's a moment midway through Body 461 00:22:44,800 --> 00:22:48,159 Speaker 1: Snatchers where Brook Adams and Veronica Cartwraiders standing next to 462 00:22:48,200 --> 00:22:52,000 Speaker 1: each other and they're both wearing these vibrant red dresses, 463 00:22:52,200 --> 00:22:56,040 Speaker 1: like throat to knees red dresses. They're different designs, but 464 00:22:56,080 --> 00:22:59,240 Speaker 1: they're the same color. And again I was thinking, this 465 00:22:59,440 --> 00:23:02,879 Speaker 1: just feel like the jumpsuits. This feels like something that 466 00:23:03,000 --> 00:23:08,159 Speaker 1: Kaufman designed to pop off the screen, and again nobody's 467 00:23:08,160 --> 00:23:10,800 Speaker 1: bringing it up. I couldn't find a good picture of 468 00:23:10,800 --> 00:23:12,240 Speaker 1: it online or I would have put that one on 469 00:23:12,280 --> 00:23:15,680 Speaker 1: social media too, But it just it feels like this 470 00:23:15,880 --> 00:23:18,720 Speaker 1: has to have been an influence on these red jumpsuits. 471 00:23:18,760 --> 00:23:21,800 Speaker 1: It's the same color red, and it's so odd that 472 00:23:21,840 --> 00:23:25,159 Speaker 1: he would have two women like wearing these things that 473 00:23:25,320 --> 00:23:31,120 Speaker 1: look like Handmaid's tail costumes almost in the same sequence. Obviously, 474 00:23:31,160 --> 00:23:33,440 Speaker 1: they do pop off the screen because it's bright red 475 00:23:33,480 --> 00:23:36,160 Speaker 1: in a dark background. But it's just it's so odd 476 00:23:36,200 --> 00:23:39,480 Speaker 1: to me that people aren't bringing this up as they're 477 00:23:39,520 --> 00:23:41,919 Speaker 1: obsessively mining this movie for connections. 478 00:23:42,119 --> 00:23:44,320 Speaker 3: Yeah, I know this movie is stuck around. I don't 479 00:23:44,320 --> 00:23:47,000 Speaker 3: know if it's necessarily like the first movie people would 480 00:23:47,040 --> 00:23:49,760 Speaker 3: even think to go to though, even despite the similarities. 481 00:23:49,800 --> 00:23:52,480 Speaker 3: Except for us, we're on. 482 00:23:52,480 --> 00:23:55,119 Speaker 1: The cutting edge of US journalism. What do you guys 483 00:23:55,119 --> 00:23:58,720 Speaker 1: make of how the two films handle the duplicates storyline, 484 00:23:58,760 --> 00:24:01,840 Speaker 1: the idea of like the sort of metaphorical there's another 485 00:24:01,920 --> 00:24:03,439 Speaker 1: version of you kind of image. 486 00:24:03,640 --> 00:24:06,000 Speaker 2: I mean, for one, I guess in us we're meant 487 00:24:06,000 --> 00:24:08,960 Speaker 2: to sympathize a bit with the others in a way 488 00:24:08,960 --> 00:24:12,160 Speaker 2: that we're not. In body Snatches and body Snatchers, they're 489 00:24:12,240 --> 00:24:16,520 Speaker 2: an alien force of unambiguous evil. You know, it's an 490 00:24:16,560 --> 00:24:19,440 Speaker 2: alien invasion movie. So they're taken over. But in us, 491 00:24:19,480 --> 00:24:22,360 Speaker 2: the others are us, and so we have to contemplate 492 00:24:22,680 --> 00:24:25,399 Speaker 2: what relationship they have to the characters, and then and 493 00:24:25,400 --> 00:24:29,640 Speaker 2: then how what relationship we the viewers have to those 494 00:24:29,680 --> 00:24:37,000 Speaker 2: fellow Americans that are unseen and undesirable and not privileged 495 00:24:37,040 --> 00:24:39,399 Speaker 2: in our out of sight. So the film isn't forcing 496 00:24:39,480 --> 00:24:44,320 Speaker 2: us to confront and to some extent, sympathize with the 497 00:24:44,320 --> 00:24:46,560 Speaker 2: threat that the characters have been faced with in. 498 00:24:46,400 --> 00:24:48,919 Speaker 3: Invasions body stashes. I think the horror comes from the 499 00:24:48,920 --> 00:24:53,000 Speaker 3: idea of losing your identity, whereas in this I think 500 00:24:53,080 --> 00:24:55,840 Speaker 3: it really kind of comes in us. It's more of 501 00:24:55,880 --> 00:25:00,159 Speaker 3: sort of the horror at seeing a twisted version and 502 00:25:00,200 --> 00:25:04,119 Speaker 3: of yourself. These people, the doppelgangers, aren't necessarily there to 503 00:25:04,760 --> 00:25:06,480 Speaker 3: I guess they do a fair amount of replacing, but 504 00:25:06,880 --> 00:25:10,600 Speaker 3: no one's going to mistake these doppel gangers for the original. 505 00:25:10,760 --> 00:25:14,600 Speaker 3: Their personalities are incredibly different. Where I think the horror 506 00:25:14,600 --> 00:25:17,080 Speaker 3: and invasion of body seeschers comes from, you know, what 507 00:25:17,119 --> 00:25:20,360 Speaker 3: if I disappeared and nobody noticed? What if you know 508 00:25:20,800 --> 00:25:23,960 Speaker 3: everything that makes me me? It can be successfully duplicated. 509 00:25:24,359 --> 00:25:27,480 Speaker 3: It's a different kind of scary what if I'm disposable? Right? 510 00:25:27,520 --> 00:25:30,119 Speaker 3: What if I'm disposable? I feel not as like what 511 00:25:30,160 --> 00:25:31,920 Speaker 3: if I'm going to get my throat slipp by someone 512 00:25:31,920 --> 00:25:33,800 Speaker 3: of the most just like me? Which is a scary 513 00:25:33,840 --> 00:25:36,439 Speaker 3: prospect of its own way, but it's less of a 514 00:25:36,480 --> 00:25:38,000 Speaker 3: philosophical sort of horror. 515 00:25:38,080 --> 00:25:40,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, I feel like there's so many different versions of 516 00:25:40,680 --> 00:25:44,240 Speaker 1: the body Snatcher's theme. And some of them. It seems 517 00:25:44,280 --> 00:25:46,560 Speaker 1: like you're meant a little bit more to, if not 518 00:25:46,600 --> 00:25:49,919 Speaker 1: sympathize with the body snatchers, at least think maybe this 519 00:25:49,960 --> 00:25:52,199 Speaker 1: wouldn't be the worst thing. It might be bad for 520 00:25:52,280 --> 00:25:55,159 Speaker 1: individual people, but maybe it wouldn't be so bad for 521 00:25:55,280 --> 00:25:58,439 Speaker 1: humanity as a whole. We might lose love, but if 522 00:25:58,480 --> 00:26:01,359 Speaker 1: we lost hate in the process us would that be better? 523 00:26:01,640 --> 00:26:04,480 Speaker 3: Tasha, You're way too persuasive on this front, are you 524 00:26:04,560 --> 00:26:05,080 Speaker 3: one of them? 525 00:26:05,760 --> 00:26:07,439 Speaker 1: I've got this pod over here that I was going 526 00:26:07,520 --> 00:26:10,160 Speaker 1: to send home with you. But in us, like, there's 527 00:26:10,160 --> 00:26:13,119 Speaker 1: no question of that. Like the world that the duplicates 528 00:26:13,119 --> 00:26:15,879 Speaker 1: are creating, we've seen what that world looks like, and 529 00:26:15,920 --> 00:26:20,399 Speaker 1: it's incomprehensible. It's inhuman. First of all, it involves a 530 00:26:20,440 --> 00:26:23,439 Speaker 1: whole lot of stabbing. But second of all, it's just 531 00:26:23,520 --> 00:26:26,920 Speaker 1: like the inmates come out of the asylum, and there's 532 00:26:27,000 --> 00:26:30,040 Speaker 1: never a sense that, you know, things might settle down 533 00:26:30,119 --> 00:26:34,280 Speaker 1: into a quieter like a much less human, a much 534 00:26:34,320 --> 00:26:38,560 Speaker 1: less warm, a much less spontaneous and emotional and nuanced 535 00:26:38,560 --> 00:26:41,880 Speaker 1: in creative world, but at least like a quieter, calmer 536 00:26:41,920 --> 00:26:45,879 Speaker 1: one that's not going to destroy the planet. The people 537 00:26:45,920 --> 00:26:48,200 Speaker 1: in US we don't know what that world's going to 538 00:26:48,240 --> 00:26:51,399 Speaker 1: look like, although that that weird final image of the 539 00:26:51,480 --> 00:26:55,840 Speaker 1: line of them maybe suggests less chaotic than would think otherwise. 540 00:26:56,080 --> 00:26:58,720 Speaker 1: But as far as sympathizing with the other goes, I'm 541 00:26:58,760 --> 00:27:01,679 Speaker 1: really curious what the final twist in Us does to 542 00:27:01,760 --> 00:27:06,280 Speaker 1: your sympathies, because for me, it really threw my feelings 543 00:27:06,320 --> 00:27:10,320 Speaker 1: for Adelaide, Like we see this family that's trying to 544 00:27:10,480 --> 00:27:13,359 Speaker 1: just trying to survive, just trying to fend off these monsters, 545 00:27:13,640 --> 00:27:15,400 Speaker 1: and then we find out in the end that well 546 00:27:15,400 --> 00:27:17,640 Speaker 1: one of them actually is one of the monsters. Did 547 00:27:17,640 --> 00:27:19,400 Speaker 1: it change how you felt about the film at all? 548 00:27:19,640 --> 00:27:22,400 Speaker 1: You saw it coming so far in advance, Like, did 549 00:27:22,400 --> 00:27:23,480 Speaker 1: it change your calculus? 550 00:27:23,520 --> 00:27:25,400 Speaker 3: I think it's just another complication of it. I think 551 00:27:25,440 --> 00:27:27,840 Speaker 3: it's it's a it's a messing movie by design, the 552 00:27:27,880 --> 00:27:31,080 Speaker 3: feelings that wants to evoke are messy as well, and 553 00:27:31,119 --> 00:27:34,399 Speaker 3: by putting, you know, making that switch in between the 554 00:27:34,400 --> 00:27:38,040 Speaker 3: two camps, it's just more even more complicated. And the 555 00:27:38,119 --> 00:27:41,320 Speaker 3: fact that's the I mean, it's almost kind of you 556 00:27:41,359 --> 00:27:43,439 Speaker 3: get to throw in another reference. It's almost sort of 557 00:27:43,560 --> 00:27:47,280 Speaker 3: a trading places thing as well, because the idea that 558 00:27:47,320 --> 00:27:50,639 Speaker 3: this you know, everyone we see these toppel gamers are 559 00:27:50,640 --> 00:27:54,440 Speaker 3: all fairal semi human in many ways. But the one 560 00:27:54,440 --> 00:27:57,160 Speaker 3: who had a chance, who had the opportunities, who had 561 00:27:58,119 --> 00:28:01,960 Speaker 3: some privilege, was able to, you, carve out a nice 562 00:28:02,000 --> 00:28:06,119 Speaker 3: life for herself, educate herself, and and so on. So 563 00:28:06,800 --> 00:28:10,920 Speaker 3: if you want to see this whole strata of people 564 00:28:11,200 --> 00:28:13,879 Speaker 3: as subhuman, you can't because that's not the case. 565 00:28:14,040 --> 00:28:16,879 Speaker 2: And yet, and yet she's not changed by that, though. 566 00:28:17,000 --> 00:28:21,240 Speaker 2: I mean, this is an extraordinarily long con when you 567 00:28:21,240 --> 00:28:23,440 Speaker 2: think about it. I mean, she doesn't that this other 568 00:28:23,520 --> 00:28:26,800 Speaker 2: has taken on since she was what eight or something 569 00:28:26,880 --> 00:28:28,720 Speaker 2: like that, or ten or however the old the kid 570 00:28:28,800 --> 00:28:30,880 Speaker 2: is at the beginning of the movie, and that she's 571 00:28:31,040 --> 00:28:34,520 Speaker 2: gone all the way through to adulthood, she's gotten married, 572 00:28:34,600 --> 00:28:36,800 Speaker 2: she has two kids, they have money, they go on 573 00:28:36,880 --> 00:28:41,239 Speaker 2: nice vacations. For that not to have really altered the 574 00:28:41,280 --> 00:28:43,160 Speaker 2: plan in any way is kind of strange. 575 00:28:43,440 --> 00:28:44,880 Speaker 3: What do you think about it? Isn't it a point 576 00:28:44,920 --> 00:28:48,400 Speaker 3: of clarity? The idea was that Adelaide, the Adelaide on 577 00:28:48,440 --> 00:28:51,040 Speaker 3: the surface, does not know this is going to happen, right, Oh. 578 00:28:50,960 --> 00:28:54,000 Speaker 1: I don't think she knows that the chuds are coming. 579 00:28:54,120 --> 00:28:56,160 Speaker 3: If that's right, you're asking exactly. So she's kind of 580 00:28:56,320 --> 00:28:59,560 Speaker 3: she's basically just divorced herself from that chud world. 581 00:28:59,840 --> 00:29:03,840 Speaker 1: I think the implication is that she's like I find 582 00:29:03,840 --> 00:29:07,320 Speaker 1: it impossible to believe that she's actually completely forgotten it, 583 00:29:07,360 --> 00:29:08,960 Speaker 1: but I think she's repressed. 584 00:29:08,520 --> 00:29:12,240 Speaker 2: It, right exactly of the flashbacks of her as a 585 00:29:12,320 --> 00:29:14,800 Speaker 2: kid just kind of like, ah, right, I'm kind of, 586 00:29:15,320 --> 00:29:16,600 Speaker 2: you know, hatching the scheme. 587 00:29:16,640 --> 00:29:18,360 Speaker 3: I think the only scheme is to fit in with 588 00:29:18,520 --> 00:29:19,440 Speaker 3: the above ground people. 589 00:29:19,600 --> 00:29:21,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that the scheme that we see. 590 00:29:21,720 --> 00:29:23,120 Speaker 3: She's not like the leader of the chads. 591 00:29:23,360 --> 00:29:26,680 Speaker 1: Yeah. I think that we're meant to interpret the scheme 592 00:29:26,720 --> 00:29:29,000 Speaker 1: in one way, but that's not actually what the scheme is. 593 00:29:29,080 --> 00:29:30,480 Speaker 3: I want to make sure we're on the same page 594 00:29:30,520 --> 00:29:31,240 Speaker 3: in terms of no. 595 00:29:31,400 --> 00:29:32,600 Speaker 2: We weren't. We weren't. But I guess. 596 00:29:32,600 --> 00:29:35,960 Speaker 1: I mean, I think that there's there's enough going on 597 00:29:36,280 --> 00:29:39,880 Speaker 1: in us and that some of it is obscure enough. 598 00:29:39,960 --> 00:29:43,000 Speaker 1: I do think that where the film becomes problematic is 599 00:29:43,240 --> 00:29:47,960 Speaker 1: sometimes not really knowing like how any of this could 600 00:29:48,120 --> 00:29:53,360 Speaker 1: possibly meaningfully work. Like, I feel like everything that you 601 00:29:53,560 --> 00:29:56,600 Speaker 1: don't understand in Invasion of the Body Snatchers in terms 602 00:29:56,600 --> 00:29:58,719 Speaker 1: of how could this possibly work? Like how could they 603 00:29:58,720 --> 00:30:02,360 Speaker 1: have built those those pods centers so quickly? Or how 604 00:30:02,440 --> 00:30:06,520 Speaker 1: are they communicating with each other? All falls into kind 605 00:30:06,560 --> 00:30:10,120 Speaker 1: of a place of you know, where it's alien mysticism. 606 00:30:10,240 --> 00:30:13,719 Speaker 1: It's all stuff that can be obscure without hurting the story, 607 00:30:14,000 --> 00:30:16,360 Speaker 1: whereas there's an awful lot in us that you're just like, 608 00:30:17,120 --> 00:30:19,840 Speaker 1: but those rabbits live in the real world. They come 609 00:30:19,920 --> 00:30:23,480 Speaker 1: from the real world. They're real rabbits. So theoretically they 610 00:30:23,520 --> 00:30:26,920 Speaker 1: need food and they're producing poop and then maybe having 611 00:30:26,920 --> 00:30:29,959 Speaker 1: baby rabbits right and left, and that's why the chuds 612 00:30:30,080 --> 00:30:32,600 Speaker 1: still have something to eat. But how could any of 613 00:30:32,600 --> 00:30:36,560 Speaker 1: that system work and still leave that place glistening clean? 614 00:30:36,920 --> 00:30:40,400 Speaker 1: Like there's just a lot of but how is this happening? 615 00:30:40,840 --> 00:30:42,800 Speaker 3: Yeah? I can't get hung up. 616 00:30:43,280 --> 00:30:46,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, exactly. I mean it's not a film that, 617 00:30:46,960 --> 00:30:49,160 Speaker 2: for all these little reasons, holds up to a huge 618 00:30:49,160 --> 00:30:54,040 Speaker 2: amount of scrutiny, because yeah, it's but which is again fine. 619 00:30:54,080 --> 00:30:56,720 Speaker 2: I mean I do like how different it is from 620 00:30:56,760 --> 00:30:59,160 Speaker 2: Get Out in that sense that we Get Out as 621 00:30:59,240 --> 00:31:02,200 Speaker 2: much tidier and more programmatic in approach than this one, 622 00:31:02,240 --> 00:31:04,600 Speaker 2: And so I think it's there's a certain amount of 623 00:31:04,640 --> 00:31:08,320 Speaker 2: growth on the part of Peel as a filmmaker, audacity 624 00:31:08,360 --> 00:31:11,280 Speaker 2: to allow this film to be just to kind of 625 00:31:11,440 --> 00:31:13,520 Speaker 2: blow out as much as it does, and maybe not 626 00:31:14,320 --> 00:31:16,160 Speaker 2: entirely makes sense. 627 00:31:16,360 --> 00:31:18,800 Speaker 1: I just I find it fascinating that the film is 628 00:31:19,360 --> 00:31:23,400 Speaker 1: sturdily enough constructed to support like an endless amount of 629 00:31:23,560 --> 00:31:28,880 Speaker 1: theorizing about the relationship between Pluto and Jason, but can't 630 00:31:28,920 --> 00:31:32,480 Speaker 1: handle the single question of who's feeding the rabbits. Yeah, 631 00:31:32,520 --> 00:31:35,240 Speaker 1: it's just it's a weird thing. Moving on to another connection, 632 00:31:35,320 --> 00:31:37,959 Speaker 1: I think it's interesting that both of these films kind 633 00:31:38,000 --> 00:31:41,440 Speaker 1: of play with the idea of like horrible friends. I 634 00:31:41,720 --> 00:31:45,720 Speaker 1: think it's really unclear in US what exactly Adelaide and 635 00:31:45,800 --> 00:31:49,680 Speaker 1: Gabe are getting out of their relationship with Tim Heideker 636 00:31:49,680 --> 00:31:53,360 Speaker 1: and Elizabeth Moss's characters. These two people who are apparently 637 00:31:53,400 --> 00:31:56,360 Speaker 1: their best chums, and they're just they're kind of awful people, 638 00:31:57,080 --> 00:31:59,920 Speaker 1: Like in the same sort of way that Donald souther 639 00:32:00,080 --> 00:32:03,040 Speaker 1: One's character defends his friendship with Nimoy and kind of 640 00:32:03,120 --> 00:32:06,480 Speaker 1: forces Jeff Goldbloom to get along with him. But you're like, 641 00:32:06,840 --> 00:32:09,600 Speaker 1: but what do they see in each other? Like Nimoy's 642 00:32:09,680 --> 00:32:13,640 Speaker 1: character is kind of a terrible person. Uh, And I 643 00:32:13,720 --> 00:32:15,719 Speaker 1: just I think it's interesting that both of these films 644 00:32:15,760 --> 00:32:19,360 Speaker 1: just kind of like play with relationships that invite you 645 00:32:19,440 --> 00:32:21,240 Speaker 1: to ask, why are any of these people friends? 646 00:32:21,400 --> 00:32:24,280 Speaker 2: That question was a lot harder to puzzle out in 647 00:32:24,400 --> 00:32:28,160 Speaker 2: us because you don't really see how these two couples 648 00:32:28,160 --> 00:32:31,040 Speaker 2: could be really close friends, and even their kids are 649 00:32:31,080 --> 00:32:32,600 Speaker 2: not the same age and so they can't. It's not 650 00:32:32,640 --> 00:32:34,280 Speaker 2: like you could say, well, there's maybe in a past 651 00:32:34,320 --> 00:32:37,840 Speaker 2: where the kids would play together, the husband's worked together. 652 00:32:37,880 --> 00:32:39,680 Speaker 3: I think that's how they're tied together. It's sort of 653 00:32:39,680 --> 00:32:42,880 Speaker 3: I think it's sort of an obligatory away from work 654 00:32:42,960 --> 00:32:45,520 Speaker 3: fun time for the sake of this business relationship. 655 00:32:45,560 --> 00:32:47,800 Speaker 2: Maybe it was the thing like yeah, we're just we're hey, 656 00:32:47,840 --> 00:32:49,760 Speaker 2: we're going to be in Santa Cruz too, and we 657 00:32:49,840 --> 00:32:52,760 Speaker 2: can kind of, yeah, hang out one night or something 658 00:32:52,840 --> 00:32:54,600 Speaker 2: like that, or like on the on the beach one 659 00:32:54,680 --> 00:32:55,320 Speaker 2: day or so there's that. 660 00:32:55,280 --> 00:32:58,720 Speaker 3: Weird competitiveness between them too. As he got the new car, 661 00:32:58,800 --> 00:33:00,600 Speaker 3: I think it's a new car and just kind of 662 00:33:00,600 --> 00:33:01,880 Speaker 3: like there to rub it in his face. 663 00:33:01,920 --> 00:33:06,680 Speaker 2: So yeah, I love the different tone that Hidaker and 664 00:33:07,200 --> 00:33:09,280 Speaker 2: Moss bring to the table of as. I mean, it's 665 00:33:09,280 --> 00:33:12,720 Speaker 2: almost like, you know, it reminded me of the characters 666 00:33:12,720 --> 00:33:14,280 Speaker 2: and who's afraid of Virginia Woolf? 667 00:33:14,600 --> 00:33:16,920 Speaker 3: Yeah, for sure the katy I was looking for this 668 00:33:17,000 --> 00:33:19,600 Speaker 3: Katie Hasty and Entertainment Weekly has a couple of great 669 00:33:19,680 --> 00:33:23,120 Speaker 3: tweets about Elizabeth Moss's characters. I'll just read them. The 670 00:33:23,200 --> 00:33:26,280 Speaker 3: Vodko clock and royal windeness of Elizabeth Moss's character and 671 00:33:26,440 --> 00:33:29,360 Speaker 3: us really, if peripherally, illustrates such a dark culture of 672 00:33:29,400 --> 00:33:32,000 Speaker 3: women's cute relationship to alcohol and the very pervasive of 673 00:33:32,200 --> 00:33:36,240 Speaker 3: of alcoholism. There's ruins to it, the offspring and the spouse. 674 00:33:36,280 --> 00:33:38,040 Speaker 3: Like you know, she is like, you know, sort of 675 00:33:38,080 --> 00:33:41,120 Speaker 3: a fun drunk, but there's you can kind of even 676 00:33:41,160 --> 00:33:42,680 Speaker 3: though you only see a little bit of it there, 677 00:33:42,720 --> 00:33:44,720 Speaker 3: you can kind of see the toll that's taken on 678 00:33:44,800 --> 00:33:47,280 Speaker 3: her kids, who kind of turned out to be terrors, 679 00:33:47,280 --> 00:33:51,520 Speaker 3: and the horrible relationship that she has with with Tim Heideker, 680 00:33:51,760 --> 00:33:54,000 Speaker 3: whose character clearly has some issues of his own. 681 00:33:53,920 --> 00:33:58,240 Speaker 2: And I think Hidaker handles the other character so brilliantly. 682 00:33:59,520 --> 00:34:01,560 Speaker 2: At the same time, it's so funny. It's like a 683 00:34:01,600 --> 00:34:04,200 Speaker 2: silent comedy because he's a you know it can be 684 00:34:04,240 --> 00:34:05,760 Speaker 2: a big guy and the way he's the way he's 685 00:34:05,760 --> 00:34:08,719 Speaker 2: photographed makes him seem you know, like a monster, but 686 00:34:08,760 --> 00:34:12,040 Speaker 2: he's also you know, a stumbling drunk as well, and 687 00:34:12,080 --> 00:34:15,000 Speaker 2: the way those two things come together again gives the 688 00:34:15,040 --> 00:34:18,040 Speaker 2: film another a different flavor and makes it makes it fun. 689 00:34:18,239 --> 00:34:20,520 Speaker 1: I think both of these movies do some interesting things 690 00:34:20,520 --> 00:34:24,400 Speaker 1: with inviting people to play dark versions of themselves. Like 691 00:34:24,480 --> 00:34:29,040 Speaker 1: I don't feel like Nimoy's pod version of himself feels 692 00:34:29,160 --> 00:34:32,480 Speaker 1: all that different, as Keith comment, and all that different 693 00:34:32,480 --> 00:34:35,120 Speaker 1: from the non pod version of himself, assuming we've seen 694 00:34:35,120 --> 00:34:38,880 Speaker 1: a non pod version of himself. But the difference between 695 00:34:38,960 --> 00:34:43,720 Speaker 1: Jeff Goldbloom as a stressed out poet who half owns 696 00:34:43,760 --> 00:34:48,240 Speaker 1: a mud bath company and you know, monster version who's 697 00:34:48,239 --> 00:34:51,000 Speaker 1: only interested in telling people to shut up and sit 698 00:34:51,040 --> 00:34:55,040 Speaker 1: down and conform, is really stark, and the performance is 699 00:34:55,080 --> 00:34:58,120 Speaker 1: really interesting. And then you look at something like Winston 700 00:34:58,200 --> 00:35:01,719 Speaker 1: Duke and Us and like the different between that just 701 00:35:01,800 --> 00:35:07,080 Speaker 1: like affable, charming dad joke telling everybody get along, hang 702 00:35:07,120 --> 00:35:11,960 Speaker 1: out with Tim Heidecker kind of guy, and the like mute, grunting, 703 00:35:12,160 --> 00:35:17,799 Speaker 1: animalistic version of himself as an other. I think it's 704 00:35:17,840 --> 00:35:21,600 Speaker 1: just is like the physical performance alone is very interesting. 705 00:35:22,080 --> 00:35:25,200 Speaker 3: He's not scary at all as the dad, and he's 706 00:35:25,239 --> 00:35:29,080 Speaker 3: his physicality in a really different way as the doppelganger. 707 00:35:29,280 --> 00:35:32,360 Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, that's an interesting thought because the dappelgangers 708 00:35:32,400 --> 00:35:37,200 Speaker 2: and us do contrast so sharply with their human selves, 709 00:35:37,200 --> 00:35:41,120 Speaker 2: accept for Adelaide and her other where they do have 710 00:35:41,200 --> 00:35:43,799 Speaker 2: this thing in common and they are having this conversation 711 00:35:43,920 --> 00:35:45,960 Speaker 2: and they feel like extensions of each other in the 712 00:35:46,000 --> 00:35:48,600 Speaker 2: way that the other characters don't in their doppelgangers don't 713 00:35:49,000 --> 00:35:51,560 Speaker 2: because maybe or how they have that shared history that 714 00:35:51,680 --> 00:35:53,560 Speaker 2: the other characters don't have with their doppelgangers. 715 00:35:53,680 --> 00:35:55,839 Speaker 1: I do have to give a shout out for us 716 00:35:55,880 --> 00:36:00,160 Speaker 1: as shatty right Joseph who plays Zora the Teenager, I 717 00:36:00,200 --> 00:36:04,160 Speaker 1: honestly think one of the strongest weirdest performances in that film, 718 00:36:04,520 --> 00:36:07,560 Speaker 1: apart from Lapita Yango's, is the way she brings her 719 00:36:07,640 --> 00:36:13,120 Speaker 1: cross her doppelganger as just this like eerily smiling, like 720 00:36:13,480 --> 00:36:17,479 Speaker 1: nightmare version of teen perfection. You know, the non other 721 00:36:17,719 --> 00:36:20,759 Speaker 1: version of her is a kid who's just edging into 722 00:36:20,760 --> 00:36:23,480 Speaker 1: teenager and is just like just learning to kind of 723 00:36:23,560 --> 00:36:26,440 Speaker 1: sass her parents and roll her eyes at how lame 724 00:36:26,480 --> 00:36:30,160 Speaker 1: everything is. And then we see the perfect, polished version 725 00:36:30,160 --> 00:36:34,200 Speaker 1: of her who never stops smiling, and it's deeply unsettling. 726 00:36:34,360 --> 00:36:34,640 Speaker 3: Yeah. 727 00:36:34,680 --> 00:36:36,520 Speaker 2: Well, also think I think there's a sense that she 728 00:36:37,520 --> 00:36:41,680 Speaker 2: really wants to do this. You know, she's very engaged 729 00:36:41,719 --> 00:36:44,440 Speaker 2: in being you know, in the hunt. So yeah, that 730 00:36:44,680 --> 00:36:49,120 Speaker 2: of the doppelganger characters she has projects the most kind 731 00:36:49,160 --> 00:36:51,160 Speaker 2: of creep in menace for me for sure. 732 00:36:51,239 --> 00:36:53,320 Speaker 1: What do we think about how the two films use humor. 733 00:36:53,880 --> 00:36:56,320 Speaker 1: I mean, both of them kind of have their lapses 734 00:36:56,360 --> 00:36:57,399 Speaker 1: into jokiness. 735 00:36:57,719 --> 00:37:01,040 Speaker 2: As I said previously, that's a bit big plus for 736 00:37:01,360 --> 00:37:04,160 Speaker 2: the Peel film to be able to have as many laughs, 737 00:37:04,239 --> 00:37:04,600 Speaker 2: isn't it. 738 00:37:04,840 --> 00:37:06,960 Speaker 3: I don't know if I'll ever not laugh at a 739 00:37:07,040 --> 00:37:10,560 Speaker 3: voice recognition gone wrong. Yeah, Oh that's okay. It just 740 00:37:10,600 --> 00:37:11,399 Speaker 3: works every time. 741 00:37:11,480 --> 00:37:14,319 Speaker 2: Oh that was so it was such a perfect song 742 00:37:14,480 --> 00:37:17,080 Speaker 2: choice too. I mean, I guess there's not as much 743 00:37:17,320 --> 00:37:20,920 Speaker 2: comic relief in the Kaufman version, but it is it's 744 00:37:20,920 --> 00:37:23,520 Speaker 2: sprinkled in there. And you know, particularly I think of 745 00:37:23,600 --> 00:37:27,920 Speaker 2: that tension between Nimoy and gold Bloom, I think that 746 00:37:27,960 --> 00:37:30,200 Speaker 2: I think the film has some good comic payoffs on 747 00:37:30,239 --> 00:37:30,879 Speaker 2: that and. 748 00:37:30,840 --> 00:37:34,480 Speaker 1: Just the weirdness of gold Bloom's non pod character. Although 749 00:37:34,520 --> 00:37:37,480 Speaker 1: I still find the dog in the mask thing hilarious, 750 00:37:38,080 --> 00:37:41,640 Speaker 1: like like laugh out loud. Okay, that's weird and uncanny, 751 00:37:41,680 --> 00:37:42,960 Speaker 1: but it's still pretty darn funny. 752 00:37:43,040 --> 00:37:44,239 Speaker 2: Do you think it was Yeah, I guess it was 753 00:37:44,280 --> 00:37:46,080 Speaker 2: probably intended. Is sort of a shock. 754 00:37:46,200 --> 00:37:49,640 Speaker 3: Laugh yeah, and laugh, and then you'll dream about it 755 00:37:49,640 --> 00:37:50,799 Speaker 3: for the rest of your life. 756 00:37:52,600 --> 00:37:54,640 Speaker 1: Apparently there used to be more laughs in the film, 757 00:37:54,680 --> 00:37:57,400 Speaker 1: and the studio told Kaufman to take him out, Like 758 00:37:57,640 --> 00:38:00,480 Speaker 1: he described a test screening where people but we're going 759 00:38:00,520 --> 00:38:03,840 Speaker 1: back between back and forth between laughing and horror, and 760 00:38:03,880 --> 00:38:06,719 Speaker 1: how he they were told to kind of cut some 761 00:38:06,760 --> 00:38:07,240 Speaker 1: of the laughs. 762 00:38:07,280 --> 00:38:08,120 Speaker 3: It's not a bad note. 763 00:38:08,160 --> 00:38:08,640 Speaker 2: I don't think. 764 00:38:08,719 --> 00:38:11,000 Speaker 3: I think that film works best if at a certain 765 00:38:11,000 --> 00:38:12,000 Speaker 3: point you stop laughing. 766 00:38:12,160 --> 00:38:14,120 Speaker 1: I'm gonna say the same thing about us, Like I 767 00:38:14,160 --> 00:38:17,759 Speaker 1: didn't love the Alexa joke, much like I didn't love 768 00:38:17,800 --> 00:38:22,440 Speaker 1: the comic interludes in Get Out. Like for me, successfully 769 00:38:22,480 --> 00:38:26,239 Speaker 1: pulling off tension and horror is so complicated and difficult, 770 00:38:26,280 --> 00:38:31,080 Speaker 1: like deliberately puncturing it. It always surprises me when filmmakers 771 00:38:31,160 --> 00:38:34,200 Speaker 1: choose to do that outside an actual horror comedy. 772 00:38:34,480 --> 00:38:36,600 Speaker 3: I think at a certain point you have to stop though, 773 00:38:36,640 --> 00:38:38,279 Speaker 3: and I think I think US does that as well. 774 00:38:38,760 --> 00:38:41,000 Speaker 3: After a while the laughs dry up. 775 00:38:41,360 --> 00:38:42,960 Speaker 2: I don't know, maybe you still have all this stuff 776 00:38:43,040 --> 00:38:46,440 Speaker 2: with Heidaker and Moss and when they turn and everything. 777 00:38:46,800 --> 00:38:49,440 Speaker 3: I mean after that I turned, but when they're yeah whatever. 778 00:38:49,640 --> 00:38:52,120 Speaker 2: Yeah. Maybe. So I'm fine with comic relief and my 779 00:38:52,280 --> 00:38:55,080 Speaker 2: horror films as long as it feels organic and not 780 00:38:55,080 --> 00:38:58,040 Speaker 2: not forced. I don't feel like it breaks up the 781 00:38:58,120 --> 00:39:00,960 Speaker 2: tension too much, and it can and sort of enhance 782 00:39:01,040 --> 00:39:03,160 Speaker 2: the entertainment value. I mean US as just a wildly 783 00:39:03,280 --> 00:39:06,960 Speaker 2: entertaining movie. I don't know, it could have been scarier 784 00:39:07,080 --> 00:39:09,879 Speaker 2: for the less funny, I'm not sure. Well. 785 00:39:09,880 --> 00:39:13,800 Speaker 1: We talked some about the sound effects in uh Body Snatchers. 786 00:39:13,840 --> 00:39:16,440 Speaker 1: In particular, we talk a little about the music in 787 00:39:16,480 --> 00:39:20,920 Speaker 1: both movies, like the score in US by composer Michael Abels, 788 00:39:20,960 --> 00:39:23,640 Speaker 1: who also did the score for Get Out. It's just 789 00:39:23,680 --> 00:39:29,200 Speaker 1: so strong. I think it's it's mostly like drumming and chanting. 790 00:39:29,320 --> 00:39:33,680 Speaker 1: It's there's just a sense of again tension and otherworldliness 791 00:39:33,719 --> 00:39:37,160 Speaker 1: about it, especially early on, that I think really contributes. 792 00:39:37,440 --> 00:39:40,480 Speaker 1: But part of what it contributes is that uncanny feeling 793 00:39:40,600 --> 00:39:43,640 Speaker 1: that we get from the sound effect and Body Snatchers, he's. 794 00:39:43,480 --> 00:39:45,279 Speaker 3: Crazy someone I look forward to hearing aary more of it. 795 00:39:45,320 --> 00:39:47,600 Speaker 3: And I think in both this and in Body Snatchers, 796 00:39:47,719 --> 00:39:51,719 Speaker 3: or they're not traditional film scores or not the expected 797 00:39:51,880 --> 00:39:55,480 Speaker 3: sounds necessarily and the qualities you point out about the 798 00:39:55,600 --> 00:39:58,120 Speaker 3: ES score if I you know, I don't think they're 799 00:39:58,160 --> 00:40:01,279 Speaker 3: necessarily the obvious tones to go for in the sort 800 00:40:01,280 --> 00:40:03,080 Speaker 3: of movie, but it works out really well. 801 00:40:03,200 --> 00:40:06,000 Speaker 1: I think. Just to wrap up, like we've we've written 802 00:40:06,120 --> 00:40:08,880 Speaker 1: between the three of us a ton about how horror 803 00:40:08,920 --> 00:40:12,160 Speaker 1: movies tend to reflect their era and how horror is 804 00:40:12,200 --> 00:40:16,520 Speaker 1: just one of those genres that inevitably kind of kind 805 00:40:16,560 --> 00:40:19,880 Speaker 1: of tells you what people find scary at a certain time. 806 00:40:20,239 --> 00:40:22,280 Speaker 1: You have any thoughts on how either of these films 807 00:40:22,280 --> 00:40:24,600 Speaker 1: we talked to for a bit, I guess about seventies 808 00:40:24,640 --> 00:40:29,319 Speaker 1: paranoia and you know, the Parallax view era filmmaking of 809 00:40:29,960 --> 00:40:33,560 Speaker 1: just don't trust authority, don't trust anything that anybody has 810 00:40:33,600 --> 00:40:37,680 Speaker 1: to say. How does us compare in terms of channeling 811 00:40:37,719 --> 00:40:39,640 Speaker 1: like modern horrors, modern fears? 812 00:40:39,719 --> 00:40:43,440 Speaker 3: Well, I think ultimately it's another way it works. Is 813 00:40:43,640 --> 00:40:46,759 Speaker 3: one of the shadow results of success is you get 814 00:40:46,800 --> 00:40:49,040 Speaker 3: all this stuff, but then someone of them might take 815 00:40:49,080 --> 00:40:52,240 Speaker 3: your stuff away, you know, And that's the central family 816 00:40:52,320 --> 00:40:56,759 Speaker 3: has enjoyed a certain amount of benefits of the economy, 817 00:40:56,960 --> 00:41:00,799 Speaker 3: and that could change. They could you know. The thing 818 00:41:00,880 --> 00:41:04,520 Speaker 3: about having a doppelganger who's living this deprived existence is 819 00:41:04,880 --> 00:41:07,400 Speaker 3: maybe you could switch places with them, and that maybe 820 00:41:08,719 --> 00:41:10,760 Speaker 3: that's another way this film is scary. 821 00:41:11,120 --> 00:41:13,359 Speaker 1: I feel like both of these films just kind of 822 00:41:14,080 --> 00:41:17,160 Speaker 1: rely heavily on the idea that other people are essentially 823 00:41:17,239 --> 00:41:22,160 Speaker 1: unknowable sure that it's just very difficult you can maybe 824 00:41:22,239 --> 00:41:24,680 Speaker 1: know the people who are closest to you, and body 825 00:41:24,680 --> 00:41:29,040 Speaker 1: Snatchers in particular, I think makes a strong point that 826 00:41:29,320 --> 00:41:31,880 Speaker 1: the people who are closest to you, or the people 827 00:41:31,880 --> 00:41:33,640 Speaker 1: that you know best, the people that you might be 828 00:41:33,640 --> 00:41:36,479 Speaker 1: able to rely on most in a pinch, but out 829 00:41:36,600 --> 00:41:40,279 Speaker 1: beyond the immediate circle of your loved ones and your 830 00:41:40,360 --> 00:41:44,080 Speaker 1: friends is a vast, vast circle of people you don't 831 00:41:44,120 --> 00:41:46,719 Speaker 1: know and may have a very hard time understanding. And 832 00:41:47,040 --> 00:41:50,799 Speaker 1: as they form political movements or social movements, as they 833 00:41:51,320 --> 00:41:54,560 Speaker 1: engage in group behavior that you can see in public places, 834 00:41:54,600 --> 00:41:57,120 Speaker 1: they become just more and more mysterious and more and 835 00:41:57,120 --> 00:41:59,960 Speaker 1: more threatening. If you allow yourself to be threatened by it. 836 00:42:00,040 --> 00:42:03,480 Speaker 3: I thought another some contemporary resonances in Invasion of the 837 00:42:03,480 --> 00:42:07,040 Speaker 3: Body Snatchers too, which anyone wants to remake it for 838 00:42:07,200 --> 00:42:11,960 Speaker 3: twenty nineteen. Here's my free screenwriting idea is so much 839 00:42:12,000 --> 00:42:16,600 Speaker 3: the idea of people being radicalized online and suddenly believing 840 00:42:16,680 --> 00:42:18,960 Speaker 3: things they didn't believe before, and all of a sudden, 841 00:42:18,960 --> 00:42:22,759 Speaker 3: you know, we have a film critic friend who talks 842 00:42:22,800 --> 00:42:25,080 Speaker 3: about a friend of his who's always send to him 843 00:42:25,120 --> 00:42:28,400 Speaker 3: Jordan Peterson videos to watch, and you know, these these 844 00:42:28,880 --> 00:42:33,399 Speaker 3: ideas that spread like I don't know, seed pods, there's 845 00:42:33,400 --> 00:42:37,799 Speaker 3: something through the Internet, and I think there it works 846 00:42:37,800 --> 00:42:40,399 Speaker 3: as a metaphor for that. However, many decades before that 847 00:42:40,760 --> 00:42:46,160 Speaker 3: particular form of ideologies and strange ideas and hateful thoughts 848 00:42:46,200 --> 00:42:47,760 Speaker 3: spreading even existent. 849 00:42:48,040 --> 00:42:49,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I mean, I mean that's the nice thing 850 00:42:50,000 --> 00:42:53,960 Speaker 2: about this Invasion story is it's adaptability different. I mean, 851 00:42:54,000 --> 00:42:56,640 Speaker 2: I think if I recall that var Our film, I mean, 852 00:42:56,680 --> 00:43:00,279 Speaker 2: which takes place on a military basis about conformity, which 853 00:43:00,320 --> 00:43:02,480 Speaker 2: seems like kind of seems kind of a natural for 854 00:43:02,520 --> 00:43:05,160 Speaker 2: that setting, but I would say, like with us, I mean, 855 00:43:05,200 --> 00:43:09,920 Speaker 2: that's so reflective of an era of fierce division, between 856 00:43:10,040 --> 00:43:13,080 Speaker 2: people in the country of us not being able to 857 00:43:14,080 --> 00:43:17,480 Speaker 2: get along see each other, you know, and being able 858 00:43:17,480 --> 00:43:20,040 Speaker 2: to you know. I mean, if we're sort of literally 859 00:43:20,080 --> 00:43:24,360 Speaker 2: divided amongst ourselves, you know, war with ourselves. That I think, really, 860 00:43:24,880 --> 00:43:29,240 Speaker 2: you know, reflects this very fraud and fractured and tense 861 00:43:29,400 --> 00:43:33,240 Speaker 2: and hostile time in America. So I think it's plugged 862 00:43:33,280 --> 00:43:34,120 Speaker 2: right in there. Yeah. 863 00:43:34,120 --> 00:43:35,839 Speaker 1: I think there's always going to be a space for 864 00:43:36,160 --> 00:43:39,800 Speaker 1: films about our fear of other people and our fear 865 00:43:39,920 --> 00:43:43,080 Speaker 1: of what we could become, and fear that we're maybe 866 00:43:43,719 --> 00:43:46,760 Speaker 1: individually speaking, not the most important person in the world 867 00:43:46,920 --> 00:43:52,719 Speaker 1: and not necessarily irreplaceable. Speak for yourself well. Invasion of 868 00:43:52,719 --> 00:43:55,200 Speaker 1: the Body Snatchers is available on DVD and Blu ray, 869 00:43:55,360 --> 00:43:59,080 Speaker 1: and for digital rental via streaming services like Voodoo and iTunes. 870 00:43:59,360 --> 00:44:01,959 Speaker 1: US is currently in the theaters. We'll be right back 871 00:44:02,040 --> 00:44:14,520 Speaker 1: with Your Next Picture Show. Finally, it's time to catch 872 00:44:14,560 --> 00:44:17,000 Speaker 1: each other up on films or film related items we've 873 00:44:17,040 --> 00:44:19,719 Speaker 1: seen in the interim since our last podcast. We call 874 00:44:19,760 --> 00:44:21,680 Speaker 1: it Your Next Picture Show in the hopes that it'll 875 00:44:21,719 --> 00:44:24,640 Speaker 1: put some interesting choices in your radar. Scott, what in 876 00:44:24,680 --> 00:44:26,080 Speaker 1: the film world has been good for you. 877 00:44:26,080 --> 00:44:28,200 Speaker 2: Lately well, I wanted to do kind of a mini 878 00:44:28,280 --> 00:44:31,240 Speaker 2: roundup of some of the highlights of the True False 879 00:44:31,280 --> 00:44:34,480 Speaker 2: Film Festival I went to earlier this month that I 880 00:44:34,520 --> 00:44:37,520 Speaker 2: know are coming out and that people can catch pretty 881 00:44:37,560 --> 00:44:43,080 Speaker 2: soon on either on streaming services or in theaters. The 882 00:44:43,120 --> 00:44:45,719 Speaker 2: best film I saw at True False is a movie 883 00:44:45,760 --> 00:44:51,040 Speaker 2: called American Factory. This is a documentary that Netflix picked up. 884 00:44:51,080 --> 00:44:55,400 Speaker 2: It's about this Chinese company, window company named Fuyau, that 885 00:44:55,440 --> 00:44:59,160 Speaker 2: took over a shuttered GM plant in Dayton, Ohio and 886 00:44:59,400 --> 00:45:03,120 Speaker 2: took over in There was this absolutely massive culture change 887 00:45:03,120 --> 00:45:06,160 Speaker 2: in terms of what they expected from American workers and 888 00:45:06,160 --> 00:45:09,440 Speaker 2: what they actually got from American workers. The safety conditions 889 00:45:09,440 --> 00:45:12,680 Speaker 2: which ended up being quite deplorable, the wages which were 890 00:45:12,680 --> 00:45:14,600 Speaker 2: also not not up to up to snuff. I mean, 891 00:45:14,600 --> 00:45:18,680 Speaker 2: there was just a whole It's such a It's a fascinating, funny, 892 00:45:18,800 --> 00:45:24,600 Speaker 2: humane film about different approaches to culture and labor and 893 00:45:24,680 --> 00:45:28,680 Speaker 2: how difficult it is for you know, the global economy 894 00:45:28,719 --> 00:45:35,799 Speaker 2: to function smoothly. So it's endlessly fascinating and something you 895 00:45:35,800 --> 00:45:38,440 Speaker 2: can unpack from a million different angles. Maybe it's something 896 00:45:38,480 --> 00:45:40,520 Speaker 2: we can put a pin and catch later, but it 897 00:45:40,560 --> 00:45:42,839 Speaker 2: is going to be on Netflix. At some point. They 898 00:45:42,840 --> 00:45:45,560 Speaker 2: haven't announced when. Another film that's going to be on 899 00:45:45,640 --> 00:45:48,719 Speaker 2: Netflix that I saw that just was announced today. It's 900 00:45:48,760 --> 00:45:51,040 Speaker 2: coming on the service on May first. It's called Knock 901 00:45:51,080 --> 00:45:54,920 Speaker 2: Down the House. This is a film by Rachel Lears 902 00:45:54,960 --> 00:46:00,760 Speaker 2: about four you know, insurgent leftist candidates in their attempts 903 00:46:00,800 --> 00:46:05,280 Speaker 2: to seek public office. And of course what's so exciting 904 00:46:05,320 --> 00:46:08,040 Speaker 2: about about it is that one of those four candidates 905 00:46:08,080 --> 00:46:13,880 Speaker 2: is Alexandria Acazio Cortez. And it is remarkable the degree 906 00:46:13,880 --> 00:46:17,799 Speaker 2: to which this film was absolutely on the ground floor for, 907 00:46:18,200 --> 00:46:20,759 Speaker 2: you know, the year's biggest political story. I mean, they 908 00:46:20,840 --> 00:46:25,279 Speaker 2: catch Acasio Cortes when she's a bartender and when she's 909 00:46:25,400 --> 00:46:28,000 Speaker 2: actually at a point where she's just considering running. I mean, 910 00:46:28,040 --> 00:46:30,319 Speaker 2: that's how early they get her. And you get these 911 00:46:30,360 --> 00:46:34,080 Speaker 2: angles on this momentum that's building around her campaign, and 912 00:46:34,160 --> 00:46:37,120 Speaker 2: also just the sheer shock of her winning, which which 913 00:46:37,200 --> 00:46:39,919 Speaker 2: which nobody expected to be. The one poll that ran 914 00:46:40,400 --> 00:46:44,080 Speaker 2: prior to the election itself had her down over thirty points. 915 00:46:44,120 --> 00:46:47,480 Speaker 2: It was a shock to everyone. So it's fascinating. You know, 916 00:46:47,560 --> 00:46:49,760 Speaker 2: she dominates the film. I mean, clearly it was a 917 00:46:49,800 --> 00:46:54,640 Speaker 2: situation where the filmmaker Rachel Lears had footage of all 918 00:46:54,760 --> 00:46:56,920 Speaker 2: four of these women, and then you know, the documentary 919 00:46:56,960 --> 00:47:00,840 Speaker 2: is almost knocked off, balanced by Acasio Cortez, but it's fascinating. 920 00:47:00,840 --> 00:47:04,280 Speaker 2: And the other three women from you know, one in Nevada, 921 00:47:04,320 --> 00:47:08,040 Speaker 2: one in Missouri, one in West Virginia, all are interesting. 922 00:47:08,040 --> 00:47:09,920 Speaker 2: And I also kind of give you a sense of 923 00:47:09,960 --> 00:47:12,920 Speaker 2: like where things are at in the Democratic Party and 924 00:47:12,920 --> 00:47:16,720 Speaker 2: and the potential for you know, a much more leftist, 925 00:47:16,800 --> 00:47:20,279 Speaker 2: much more progressive future than what we were used to. 926 00:47:20,520 --> 00:47:21,960 Speaker 2: So that's pretty good. And then the last one I 927 00:47:21,960 --> 00:47:25,160 Speaker 2: wanted to recommend is a film called Midnight Traveler. It's 928 00:47:25,200 --> 00:47:28,200 Speaker 2: going to be a silloscope. Just picked it up. Say. 929 00:47:28,280 --> 00:47:30,360 Speaker 2: It's a film that was shot on three phones. It 930 00:47:30,400 --> 00:47:34,120 Speaker 2: was about about a family. Hassan Vazzili is the director. 931 00:47:35,040 --> 00:47:38,520 Speaker 2: He is wife and his two children flee Afghanistan because 932 00:47:38,520 --> 00:47:40,879 Speaker 2: the Taliban of call for his death. He's an artist 933 00:47:40,960 --> 00:47:44,160 Speaker 2: who had this cafe that ran a file of a mullah. 934 00:47:44,520 --> 00:47:46,680 Speaker 2: So they're on the run and they spend three years 935 00:47:47,560 --> 00:47:51,600 Speaker 2: in peril, and all at peril is captured via phone 936 00:47:51,680 --> 00:47:55,080 Speaker 2: and was sent to a French filmmaker. And her name 937 00:47:55,080 --> 00:47:58,560 Speaker 2: is Emily Madavian and she assembled the footage and put together, 938 00:47:58,600 --> 00:48:00,840 Speaker 2: but I think is almost like the visual equivalent of 939 00:48:00,880 --> 00:48:02,800 Speaker 2: like a message in a bottle. I mean, this family 940 00:48:02,880 --> 00:48:05,319 Speaker 2: is still in trouble, They're still in Germany, They're still 941 00:48:05,360 --> 00:48:07,759 Speaker 2: they still have not figured out where their home is 942 00:48:07,760 --> 00:48:10,759 Speaker 2: going to be. And it is a very interesting sort 943 00:48:10,760 --> 00:48:13,520 Speaker 2: of inside look of what refuge you like is really like. 944 00:48:13,640 --> 00:48:16,200 Speaker 2: So those are the three films i'd recommend, American Factory 945 00:48:16,600 --> 00:48:18,960 Speaker 2: and Knocked on the House, which you're both Netflix, and 946 00:48:19,080 --> 00:48:22,319 Speaker 2: Midnight Traveler, which will come out via a soloscope lader 947 00:48:22,320 --> 00:48:22,640 Speaker 2: in the year. 948 00:48:22,680 --> 00:48:24,600 Speaker 1: I'm really excited about the chance to see Knocked on 949 00:48:24,680 --> 00:48:27,360 Speaker 1: the House. That's It's been at a couple different festivals 950 00:48:27,360 --> 00:48:29,759 Speaker 1: that I've been at where the times just haven't lined up, 951 00:48:29,800 --> 00:48:31,680 Speaker 1: but I have heard so many good things about it. 952 00:48:31,600 --> 00:48:33,680 Speaker 2: It's pretty emity for it. It's yeah, I mean, just 953 00:48:33,680 --> 00:48:35,920 Speaker 2: just to see that part of it's lightning in a bottle, 954 00:48:35,960 --> 00:48:38,719 Speaker 2: that specific it just I mean, apart from its other qualities, 955 00:48:39,320 --> 00:48:42,239 Speaker 2: and I think it really reinforces her story in a 956 00:48:42,680 --> 00:48:46,840 Speaker 2: strong way, makes her authenticity, her charisma, all that stuff 957 00:48:46,880 --> 00:48:49,360 Speaker 2: comes through so so strongly in that movie. 958 00:48:49,400 --> 00:48:52,200 Speaker 1: Tasha, Well, I would not be doing my job as 959 00:48:52,200 --> 00:48:54,520 Speaker 1: a married person. If I did not, in fact take 960 00:48:54,520 --> 00:48:58,120 Speaker 1: this opportunity to plug my husband's podcast, I'm honestly a 961 00:48:58,200 --> 00:49:01,720 Speaker 1: huge fan of Immunities, the drama that he's been doing 962 00:49:02,200 --> 00:49:05,280 Speaker 1: just finished up its third season that very much comes 963 00:49:05,280 --> 00:49:09,680 Speaker 1: off of Invasion of the Body Snatcher's style stories. It's 964 00:49:09,800 --> 00:49:13,560 Speaker 1: specifically about an alien takeover the world that happens through 965 00:49:13,800 --> 00:49:18,240 Speaker 1: people looking at each other, and it's very much a 966 00:49:18,080 --> 00:49:21,440 Speaker 1: like a Body Snatcher's story about people whose individuality and 967 00:49:21,560 --> 00:49:25,480 Speaker 1: uniqueness disappears when they're taken over, but their personalities remain. 968 00:49:25,880 --> 00:49:28,600 Speaker 1: I love this story. But more to the point, given 969 00:49:28,600 --> 00:49:32,560 Speaker 1: that he has just wrapped up a four podcast series 970 00:49:32,640 --> 00:49:35,239 Speaker 1: about the Body Snatchers movies, if you want to hear 971 00:49:35,239 --> 00:49:37,200 Speaker 1: more about this film, or if you want to hear 972 00:49:37,320 --> 00:49:40,759 Speaker 1: in depth analysis of the nineteen fifty six version or 973 00:49:40,840 --> 00:49:44,360 Speaker 1: the other two versions which are perhaps somewhat less classic 974 00:49:44,400 --> 00:49:46,759 Speaker 1: and memorable but still have a lot to talk about, 975 00:49:47,520 --> 00:49:50,879 Speaker 1: you can go look him up. The podcast is called Immunities. 976 00:49:51,320 --> 00:49:55,720 Speaker 1: The discussion of the Body Snatcher's movies are rolling out 977 00:49:56,320 --> 00:49:59,600 Speaker 1: currently and you can find it at Dueling Genres, the 978 00:50:00,280 --> 00:50:03,880 Speaker 1: podcast network that he belongs to. But in terms of 979 00:50:04,440 --> 00:50:08,920 Speaker 1: more filmic stuff, There's a little film from two thousand 980 00:50:08,920 --> 00:50:11,480 Speaker 1: and two called Lost in La Mancha, which is a 981 00:50:11,520 --> 00:50:16,840 Speaker 1: delightful documentary about Terry Gilliam's miserable failure and an attempt 982 00:50:16,960 --> 00:50:19,359 Speaker 1: to put together a film called The Man Who Killed 983 00:50:19,400 --> 00:50:23,080 Speaker 1: don Quixote. That film is now finally coming out. I 984 00:50:23,120 --> 00:50:24,880 Speaker 1: know that there are people that don't believe it. My 985 00:50:24,960 --> 00:50:27,080 Speaker 1: husband every time I bring it up, laughs at me. 986 00:50:27,440 --> 00:50:30,520 Speaker 1: I say, I've seen this film. I actually sat through 987 00:50:30,560 --> 00:50:32,560 Speaker 1: the whole thing. It exists, and he's like, yeah, whatever, 988 00:50:32,640 --> 00:50:36,600 Speaker 1: this is a cute prank. But no, Terry Gilliams Man 989 00:50:36,640 --> 00:50:39,400 Speaker 1: Who Killed don Quixote is actually in the world. It 990 00:50:39,520 --> 00:50:43,400 Speaker 1: is coming to theaters on April tenth as part of 991 00:50:43,760 --> 00:50:47,800 Speaker 1: a Fathom event, so like one of those strange special 992 00:50:47,800 --> 00:50:50,400 Speaker 1: event things that will be like seven hundred theaters and 993 00:50:50,440 --> 00:50:53,600 Speaker 1: then it's going to have a theatrical run starring April nineteenth. 994 00:50:54,080 --> 00:50:59,200 Speaker 2: Get all those prints around, Prince. 995 00:50:58,280 --> 00:51:01,359 Speaker 1: Someday their film prints will come. I tried to make 996 00:51:01,400 --> 00:51:04,360 Speaker 1: an argument for doing a Man Who Killed don Quixote 997 00:51:04,800 --> 00:51:07,400 Speaker 1: paired with another Gillium on this podcast, but there are 998 00:51:07,480 --> 00:51:09,399 Speaker 1: so many other things coming up that we want to hit. 999 00:51:09,760 --> 00:51:11,839 Speaker 1: We don't think we're going to get to this one, 1000 00:51:12,200 --> 00:51:14,200 Speaker 1: so I figured I would just bring it up. It's 1001 00:51:14,239 --> 00:51:18,440 Speaker 1: been getting some bad, bad reviews, and I understand why 1002 00:51:19,040 --> 00:51:22,840 Speaker 1: for people perhaps who are not as into the Terry 1003 00:51:22,880 --> 00:51:27,160 Speaker 1: Gilliam story as I am. I feel like it's a 1004 00:51:27,280 --> 00:51:31,239 Speaker 1: lesser Gillium In some ways, I feel like it's repeating 1005 00:51:31,440 --> 00:51:35,520 Speaker 1: some themes that he's just obsessed with over the course 1006 00:51:35,520 --> 00:51:38,759 Speaker 1: of his entire career, about the place of fantasy and 1007 00:51:38,800 --> 00:51:42,680 Speaker 1: storytelling and escapism in the world, About the way that 1008 00:51:42,719 --> 00:51:45,400 Speaker 1: the world presses down on us and makes us all crazy, 1009 00:51:45,719 --> 00:51:49,200 Speaker 1: about the way that creativity is your only outlet, and 1010 00:51:49,760 --> 00:51:52,400 Speaker 1: pretending the world is something other than it is is 1011 00:51:52,440 --> 00:51:54,640 Speaker 1: the only way to make the world better than it is. 1012 00:51:55,440 --> 00:52:00,160 Speaker 1: So in some ways, watching it is like experiencing a 1013 00:52:00,320 --> 00:52:02,759 Speaker 1: best of But I feel like this one goes in 1014 00:52:02,800 --> 00:52:05,200 Speaker 1: the direction of the Fisher King in terms of being 1015 00:52:05,320 --> 00:52:07,759 Speaker 1: a little more tight and pointed about some of these 1016 00:52:07,800 --> 00:52:11,000 Speaker 1: themes than some of his films are. It centers on 1017 00:52:11,040 --> 00:52:14,880 Speaker 1: a performance by Adam Driver that I think is just delightful. 1018 00:52:15,280 --> 00:52:19,319 Speaker 1: He kind of famously lost his original Don Quixote for 1019 00:52:19,360 --> 00:52:22,799 Speaker 1: the film and replaced him with Jonathan Price, who he's 1020 00:52:22,840 --> 00:52:25,600 Speaker 1: been working with since Brazil, and he just seems a 1021 00:52:25,640 --> 00:52:28,680 Speaker 1: really appropriate person for the role. It is a Terry 1022 00:52:28,680 --> 00:52:31,520 Speaker 1: Gilliam movie. It is shaggy, it is anarchic, it is 1023 00:52:31,600 --> 00:52:35,239 Speaker 1: all over the place. Its themes are being shouted through 1024 00:52:35,239 --> 00:52:39,360 Speaker 1: a megaphone. But it's also funny and strange and sad, 1025 00:52:39,440 --> 00:52:42,279 Speaker 1: and I think it's pretty delightful. I would like for 1026 00:52:42,360 --> 00:52:45,080 Speaker 1: people to see it, even if Terry Gilliam himself has 1027 00:52:45,120 --> 00:52:49,879 Speaker 1: become a deeply problematic fave of late with his delightful 1028 00:52:49,960 --> 00:52:54,239 Speaker 1: comments about me too and representation and how people, just 1029 00:52:54,719 --> 00:52:57,160 Speaker 1: women just have to sleep with Harvey Weinstein to get ahead. 1030 00:52:57,200 --> 00:53:00,960 Speaker 1: That's just the way the business works. I understand people 1031 00:53:00,960 --> 00:53:03,840 Speaker 1: who want to cancel Terry Gilliam. I will never be 1032 00:53:03,880 --> 00:53:05,839 Speaker 1: able to cancel him because he made my favorite film 1033 00:53:05,880 --> 00:53:09,560 Speaker 1: of all time. So I'm telling people, you know, he's 1034 00:53:09,600 --> 00:53:15,200 Speaker 1: got a movie. It's coming out into theaterland. It's Hush, 1035 00:53:15,239 --> 00:53:19,080 Speaker 1: you Pod, Creature, You Pod. Scott's favorite film of all 1036 00:53:19,080 --> 00:53:22,000 Speaker 1: time is tideland my favorite film of all time is Brazil. 1037 00:53:22,239 --> 00:53:24,600 Speaker 1: I still really like Terry Gilliam. I wish he wasn't 1038 00:53:24,600 --> 00:53:27,920 Speaker 1: being a jerk right now. Go see his movie Keith on. 1039 00:53:27,760 --> 00:53:30,920 Speaker 3: The Sunday I saw the passing of Larry Cohen, the 1040 00:53:31,280 --> 00:53:35,759 Speaker 3: B movie filmmaker who made one memorable film after the 1041 00:53:35,800 --> 00:53:38,560 Speaker 3: other in the seventies and eighties. Last year's till the 1042 00:53:38,560 --> 00:53:41,400 Speaker 3: release of a film called King Cohen, director by Steve Mitchell, 1043 00:53:41,400 --> 00:53:45,120 Speaker 3: which is a really nice overview of Larry Cohen's career 1044 00:53:45,719 --> 00:53:52,120 Speaker 3: that gets into his methods and the madness behind him. 1045 00:53:52,200 --> 00:53:54,160 Speaker 3: And some of those early films were just shot on 1046 00:53:54,200 --> 00:53:57,399 Speaker 3: the streets in New York, no permits, just show up, 1047 00:53:57,440 --> 00:54:00,799 Speaker 3: shoot and leave before anyone can notice. And he talks 1048 00:54:00,800 --> 00:54:03,120 Speaker 3: to people who work with like Fred Williamson as someone 1049 00:54:03,120 --> 00:54:05,439 Speaker 3: who starred in a lot of his films, and also 1050 00:54:05,480 --> 00:54:07,799 Speaker 3: people that appreciate his work like J. J. Abrams and March. 1051 00:54:08,120 --> 00:54:10,680 Speaker 3: He's on there singing his praises as well. I recommend 1052 00:54:10,760 --> 00:54:14,799 Speaker 3: this movie before so, I know, definitely if you want 1053 00:54:14,800 --> 00:54:16,640 Speaker 3: to know more about Coen, it's a good place to look, 1054 00:54:17,080 --> 00:54:19,560 Speaker 3: just to go a little deeper. Some Coen films that 1055 00:54:19,600 --> 00:54:21,480 Speaker 3: you might enjoy if you just want to sample, if 1056 00:54:21,480 --> 00:54:24,000 Speaker 3: you're sort of intrigued by the obituaries or breaking Cohen, 1057 00:54:24,520 --> 00:54:27,840 Speaker 3: I would go with the stuff, which is this strange 1058 00:54:27,880 --> 00:54:31,319 Speaker 3: sort of anti consumerism of film he made in the 1059 00:54:31,520 --> 00:54:34,800 Speaker 3: nineteen eighties about a food product that consumes the people 1060 00:54:34,800 --> 00:54:38,680 Speaker 3: that eat it, or alternately. Probably the weirdest family he 1061 00:54:38,719 --> 00:54:41,520 Speaker 3: made was called God Told Me To, which is probably 1062 00:54:41,600 --> 00:54:44,560 Speaker 3: less set about the better, but it's about a policeman 1063 00:54:44,640 --> 00:54:50,200 Speaker 3: investigating some very strange crimes that seem to have a 1064 00:54:50,239 --> 00:54:53,239 Speaker 3: bunch of unrelating people creating murders in the same way, 1065 00:54:53,320 --> 00:54:57,240 Speaker 3: including Andy Kaufman in one scene. It's a very odd 1066 00:54:57,280 --> 00:54:59,279 Speaker 3: movie that goes to some very strange places. But that's 1067 00:54:59,280 --> 00:55:02,080 Speaker 3: part of what makes Cohen appealing is he had a 1068 00:55:02,160 --> 00:55:07,920 Speaker 3: very peculiar vision. He made sort of wild. He was 1069 00:55:07,920 --> 00:55:11,480 Speaker 3: a great idea man. He created these wild premises and 1070 00:55:11,800 --> 00:55:15,960 Speaker 3: would just kind of make films for the audience that 1071 00:55:16,000 --> 00:55:19,200 Speaker 3: are willing to go places with them and with actors 1072 00:55:19,200 --> 00:55:21,000 Speaker 3: who were willing to play along. He had sort of 1073 00:55:21,000 --> 00:55:24,680 Speaker 3: a little stable of regulars like Michael Moriarty, who would 1074 00:55:24,680 --> 00:55:28,440 Speaker 3: just show up and do very intense method of performances 1075 00:55:28,440 --> 00:55:30,759 Speaker 3: in the middle of these genre movies. There really wasn't 1076 00:55:30,760 --> 00:55:33,040 Speaker 3: anyone else like him, and I think there were, you know, 1077 00:55:33,120 --> 00:55:35,720 Speaker 3: would be better if there were more more like him today, 1078 00:55:35,960 --> 00:55:38,520 Speaker 3: But he left behind it a very fine body of 1079 00:55:38,560 --> 00:55:39,920 Speaker 3: work that's worth exploring. 1080 00:55:40,160 --> 00:55:43,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean it's so much fun watching his films. 1081 00:55:43,320 --> 00:55:45,400 Speaker 2: I mean, they're none of them he's never made like 1082 00:55:45,440 --> 00:55:49,520 Speaker 2: a flawless film. No, they always have these concepts that 1083 00:55:49,800 --> 00:55:53,480 Speaker 2: just weren't quite realized as perfectly as you'd want them 1084 00:55:53,480 --> 00:55:57,240 Speaker 2: to be. But they're full of surprise, isn't fun. Q's 1085 00:55:57,239 --> 00:56:00,239 Speaker 2: are really good. One good one, and I'm with you 1086 00:56:00,520 --> 00:56:04,200 Speaker 2: on the Stuff, which has the line everybody has to 1087 00:56:04,239 --> 00:56:05,720 Speaker 2: eat shaving cream every once. 1088 00:56:05,520 --> 00:56:06,000 Speaker 1: In a while. 1089 00:56:07,400 --> 00:56:08,560 Speaker 2: So I like that. 1090 00:56:08,880 --> 00:56:10,960 Speaker 3: Like even like later in his career, he was just 1091 00:56:11,239 --> 00:56:15,960 Speaker 3: a great idea guy. He wrote the first script of 1092 00:56:16,000 --> 00:56:19,080 Speaker 3: Phone Booth, in which someone is trapped in a phone booth, 1093 00:56:19,239 --> 00:56:21,400 Speaker 3: and he followed it with the script for Cellular, which 1094 00:56:21,400 --> 00:56:24,440 Speaker 3: should follow someone using a cellular phone. So it's kind 1095 00:56:24,440 --> 00:56:26,640 Speaker 3: of like we did the stationary phone. Maybe let's do 1096 00:56:26,680 --> 00:56:28,120 Speaker 3: the Phone on the run. 1097 00:56:28,239 --> 00:56:30,759 Speaker 2: Definitely. Yeah, No, I think if you're a genre fan, 1098 00:56:31,040 --> 00:56:32,799 Speaker 2: you have to have spend some time with Larry Cohen. 1099 00:56:32,880 --> 00:56:35,160 Speaker 1: I just never quite got over the poster for Q 1100 00:56:35,440 --> 00:56:38,719 Speaker 1: with its tagline its name is quetzal quattal. Just call 1101 00:56:38,760 --> 00:56:40,960 Speaker 1: it Q. That's all you'll have time to say before 1102 00:56:41,000 --> 00:56:41,800 Speaker 1: it tears you apart. 1103 00:56:42,280 --> 00:56:44,480 Speaker 2: That's a great line. That's a great tagline. 1104 00:56:44,520 --> 00:56:45,680 Speaker 1: It's such a great tagline. 1105 00:56:45,760 --> 00:56:46,520 Speaker 3: Great poster too. 1106 00:56:46,719 --> 00:56:48,680 Speaker 1: Yeah, if that was one of those films that UH 1107 00:56:49,320 --> 00:56:51,880 Speaker 1: kind of based on the poster and the tagline and 1108 00:56:51,880 --> 00:56:54,839 Speaker 1: the image like obsessed me as a kid, and then 1109 00:56:54,840 --> 00:56:56,759 Speaker 1: I finally saw it as an adult and I'm like, 1110 00:56:57,160 --> 00:56:59,200 Speaker 1: this is so much more fun than I would have 1111 00:56:59,200 --> 00:57:02,319 Speaker 1: thought it was. You know, it's not very scary, but 1112 00:57:02,360 --> 00:57:10,200 Speaker 1: it's a really enjoyable film. Well, that's it for this 1113 00:57:10,360 --> 00:57:12,400 Speaker 1: edition of the Next Picture Show. Our next pairing will 1114 00:57:12,400 --> 00:57:15,960 Speaker 1: come out April sixteenth and twenty third, Genevieve, what are 1115 00:57:16,000 --> 00:57:16,720 Speaker 1: we doing next? 1116 00:57:17,000 --> 00:57:19,960 Speaker 5: In the new DCEU movie Shazam, a fourteen year old 1117 00:57:19,960 --> 00:57:23,800 Speaker 5: misfit gets transformed into an adult superhero. He has super strength, 1118 00:57:23,920 --> 00:57:26,680 Speaker 5: he's bulletproof, and he can almost sleep tall buildings in 1119 00:57:26,720 --> 00:57:29,160 Speaker 5: a single bound. But he can also buy beer and 1120 00:57:29,200 --> 00:57:30,880 Speaker 5: all the junk food he wants because he has the 1121 00:57:30,960 --> 00:57:34,200 Speaker 5: superpower of being a grown up. In that respect, Shazam 1122 00:57:34,200 --> 00:57:36,360 Speaker 5: has drawn a lot of comparisons to the nineteen eighty 1123 00:57:36,400 --> 00:57:39,600 Speaker 5: eight Coming of age Fantasy Big, a connection that acknowledges 1124 00:57:39,640 --> 00:57:42,600 Speaker 5: by paying homage to the film's most famous scene In 1125 00:57:42,640 --> 00:57:44,480 Speaker 5: our next set of episodes, we'll look at Big and 1126 00:57:44,520 --> 00:57:46,560 Speaker 5: Shazam and what they tell us about boys in their 1127 00:57:46,600 --> 00:57:49,480 Speaker 5: early teens suddenly turning into men and how that gift 1128 00:57:49,560 --> 00:57:50,600 Speaker 5: can seem like a curse. 1129 00:57:50,800 --> 00:57:52,640 Speaker 1: In the meantime, we'd love to hear your feedback on 1130 00:57:52,680 --> 00:57:55,640 Speaker 1: this week's discussion of Invasion of the Body Snatchers US 1131 00:57:55,680 --> 00:57:58,000 Speaker 1: and anything else film related you'd like to talk about. 1132 00:57:58,160 --> 00:58:00,400 Speaker 1: We want to include your thoughts on future eppisodes of 1133 00:58:00,440 --> 00:58:02,760 Speaker 1: the show. You can leave a short voicemail at seven 1134 00:58:02,760 --> 00:58:05,320 Speaker 1: to seven three two three four nine seven three zero, 1135 00:58:05,720 --> 00:58:08,240 Speaker 1: or email us at comments at Next Picture Show do Net. 1136 00:58:08,400 --> 00:58:10,760 Speaker 1: We may post your response on Facebook for discussion or 1137 00:58:10,800 --> 00:58:13,640 Speaker 1: read it on a future episode of the show. Finally, 1138 00:58:13,800 --> 00:58:16,240 Speaker 1: before we close out this week's episode, where can we 1139 00:58:16,280 --> 00:58:17,480 Speaker 1: find everyone these days? 1140 00:58:17,600 --> 00:58:19,720 Speaker 3: Keith Oh you can find me on Twitter at kfips 1141 00:58:19,760 --> 00:58:22,600 Speaker 3: three thousand. You can find my writing at places like 1142 00:58:22,720 --> 00:58:28,600 Speaker 3: Vulture and Slate and The Verge, Polygon Decider. I'm all 1143 00:58:28,600 --> 00:58:30,800 Speaker 3: over the place these days. Scott, how about you? 1144 00:58:31,080 --> 00:58:33,920 Speaker 2: You can find me on Twitter at Scott Underscore Tobias, 1145 00:58:33,960 --> 00:58:37,800 Speaker 2: and you can find my work times Vulture, in pr 1146 00:58:38,280 --> 00:58:42,560 Speaker 2: The Ringer. I have a piece on the Matrix that 1147 00:58:42,600 --> 00:58:47,040 Speaker 2: I'm sure that has already torn up the Internet as 1148 00:58:47,040 --> 00:58:50,000 Speaker 2: we're recording it. It runs, it's running tomorrow, so who 1149 00:58:50,040 --> 00:58:50,640 Speaker 2: knows how. 1150 00:58:50,880 --> 00:58:52,960 Speaker 3: What's what's what's the just to this piece? What's it about? 1151 00:58:53,000 --> 00:58:56,760 Speaker 2: It's about the mailieability of it in terms of the 1152 00:58:56,760 --> 00:59:01,200 Speaker 2: way it's interpreted. About how you can have people on 1153 00:59:01,280 --> 00:59:03,280 Speaker 2: the alt right red pilling you, and you can have 1154 00:59:03,360 --> 00:59:06,160 Speaker 2: people who see it as a as a trans allegory 1155 00:59:06,200 --> 00:59:09,480 Speaker 2: and a metaphor for change, and how you come across 1156 00:59:09,520 --> 00:59:11,640 Speaker 2: both of those readings, and how those readings of the 1157 00:59:11,640 --> 00:59:16,520 Speaker 2: film were not didn't really service until recently, and we're 1158 00:59:16,520 --> 00:59:18,160 Speaker 2: not really part of the way the film was received 1159 00:59:18,200 --> 00:59:20,480 Speaker 2: in ninety nine. So it gets it all that stuff. 1160 00:59:20,680 --> 00:59:22,480 Speaker 3: We should do a Matrix episode. 1161 00:59:23,160 --> 00:59:25,120 Speaker 2: He should. That's a great idea. 1162 00:59:25,160 --> 00:59:27,600 Speaker 1: Compare it with the other two Matrix movies. Everybody would 1163 00:59:27,680 --> 00:59:31,320 Speaker 1: enjoy that well. Tasha, I am the film and TV 1164 00:59:31,520 --> 00:59:33,640 Speaker 1: editor at the Verge dot Com. You can find my 1165 00:59:33,680 --> 00:59:36,280 Speaker 1: writing over there. You can find me on Twitter at 1166 00:59:36,440 --> 00:59:39,480 Speaker 1: Tasha Robinson. You can find me on an upcoming or 1167 00:59:39,560 --> 00:59:43,160 Speaker 1: possibly outgoing by now episode of Pop Culture Happy Hour 1168 00:59:43,200 --> 00:59:45,320 Speaker 1: where they had me on to talk about what we 1169 00:59:45,400 --> 00:59:48,920 Speaker 1: do in the Shadows. Our producer geneviev Cosky is on 1170 00:59:49,000 --> 00:59:52,680 Speaker 1: Twitter at geneviev Coski. She's the deputy TV editor over 1171 00:59:52,720 --> 00:59:55,360 Speaker 1: at Vulture, where you can find possibly her work and 1172 00:59:55,440 --> 00:59:58,920 Speaker 1: definitely many many things she was commissioned and edited. You 1173 00:59:58,960 --> 01:00:01,320 Speaker 1: can stay updated on the New Picture Show or find 1174 01:00:01,320 --> 01:00:04,440 Speaker 1: our keynote essays, which we've started posting online by visiting 1175 01:00:04,560 --> 01:00:07,400 Speaker 1: Next pictureshow dot net. Find us on Twitter at Next 1176 01:00:07,400 --> 01:00:10,240 Speaker 1: Picture Pod and on Facebook at Facebook dot com slash 1177 01:00:10,360 --> 01:00:13,720 Speaker 1: Next Picture Show. And if you haven't subscribed to the 1178 01:00:13,760 --> 01:00:17,440 Speaker 1: show on Apple Podcasts already and you've tuned me out 1179 01:00:17,440 --> 01:00:21,640 Speaker 1: because you've heard this so many times, please consider it anyway, 1180 01:00:21,840 --> 01:00:25,920 Speaker 1: because Apple Podcasts subscriptions are an important way of getting 1181 01:00:25,960 --> 01:00:30,360 Speaker 1: podcasts more prominence and more listeners. I don't know why 1182 01:00:30,360 --> 01:00:32,120 Speaker 1: I'm singing. I think the pods have taken over. I'm 1183 01:00:32,200 --> 01:00:36,000 Speaker 1: very tired. I just I just need some sleep, It's 1184 01:00:36,000 --> 01:00:36,520 Speaker 1: all I need. 1185 01:00:36,720 --> 01:00:40,720 Speaker 2: What would our level of appreciation be for ratings and reviews, Tasha, 1186 01:00:40,800 --> 01:00:43,000 Speaker 2: if people were to go on Apple podcasts, think. 1187 01:00:42,840 --> 01:00:46,560 Speaker 1: Our appreciation would be pretty high. Unlike pod people, we 1188 01:00:46,640 --> 01:00:49,240 Speaker 1: still have need for love and hate. We want to 1189 01:00:49,240 --> 01:00:51,640 Speaker 1: hear your love. Hell will take your hate. 1190 01:00:52,240 --> 01:00:57,960 Speaker 2: We won't just like you if you don't like the show, 1191 01:00:58,680 --> 01:00:59,160 Speaker 2: I mean, if. 1192 01:00:59,040 --> 01:01:01,040 Speaker 1: You don't like the show, effect that you're still listening 1193 01:01:01,040 --> 01:01:06,200 Speaker 1: through this rambling closing is why did they listen to 1194 01:01:06,280 --> 01:01:08,800 Speaker 1: every last second of this podcast just to boo us? 1195 01:01:09,040 --> 01:01:11,920 Speaker 1: We don't know, but we would like to continue doing 1196 01:01:11,960 --> 01:01:14,880 Speaker 1: this podcast, and that means finding new listeners to keep 1197 01:01:14,880 --> 01:01:17,680 Speaker 1: the show going, and every thumbs up helps us do that. 1198 01:01:18,520 --> 01:01:20,640 Speaker 1: Thanks to Dan the Snake Jakes for his assistance in 1199 01:01:20,720 --> 01:01:23,480 Speaker 1: producing this podcast. The Next Picture Show is proud to 1200 01:01:23,480 --> 01:01:26,520 Speaker 1: be part of the Film Spotting family of podcasts. Please 1201 01:01:26,560 --> 01:01:27,400 Speaker 1: tune in next time.