1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,800 Speaker 1: Let's get to Jack McIntyre. Jack is the global portfolio 2 00:00:03,840 --> 00:00:07,840 Speaker 1: manager at Brandywine who joins from Philadelphia. Thanks for being 3 00:00:07,880 --> 00:00:09,879 Speaker 1: with us, Jack. It was all about the FED obviously 4 00:00:10,000 --> 00:00:13,480 Speaker 1: today a lot of volatility and markets. I think participants 5 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:16,840 Speaker 1: are struggling to make sense of what they're hearing. One moment, 6 00:00:17,160 --> 00:00:20,520 Speaker 1: Pow will suggest, hey, you know, we've got a long 7 00:00:20,560 --> 00:00:23,240 Speaker 1: way to go before we're done, and the next breath 8 00:00:23,239 --> 00:00:25,639 Speaker 1: he seems to suggesting, hey, we might be near the 9 00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:28,479 Speaker 1: end of the tightening cycle. There is so much tightening 10 00:00:28,480 --> 00:00:32,000 Speaker 1: that's already occurred. Let's not forget right. I mean, we've 11 00:00:32,040 --> 00:00:34,360 Speaker 1: taken the FED funds rate, or the FED has from 12 00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:37,560 Speaker 1: near zero to around four and a half percent right now. 13 00:00:37,640 --> 00:00:39,680 Speaker 1: Are you of the belief that you know, the kind 14 00:00:39,680 --> 00:00:43,080 Speaker 1: of the classical thinking here long and variable lag. Are 15 00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:47,480 Speaker 1: we still expecting a lot more um negative impact from 16 00:00:47,560 --> 00:00:51,360 Speaker 1: from higher rates or is that less clear now to you? 17 00:00:52,120 --> 00:00:55,720 Speaker 1: So you know, I'm in the camp that there's been 18 00:00:55,800 --> 00:01:00,320 Speaker 1: a tremendous amount of cumulative tightening of financial conditions. You know, 19 00:01:00,480 --> 00:01:04,039 Speaker 1: we talk a lot about uh FED funds, the policy rate, 20 00:01:04,440 --> 00:01:08,319 Speaker 1: but there's been a tremendous amount of tightening in other 21 00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:12,440 Speaker 1: areas as well. So yeah, I kind of was thinking 22 00:01:12,520 --> 00:01:15,920 Speaker 1: that the statement might kind of infer that as opposed 23 00:01:15,959 --> 00:01:18,760 Speaker 1: to ongoing, they might say additional rate hikes something to 24 00:01:18,840 --> 00:01:21,520 Speaker 1: kind of send a message that they were getting a 25 00:01:21,520 --> 00:01:24,240 Speaker 1: little bit closer to the end. But I still believe 26 00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:26,480 Speaker 1: that's going to be the case, because I think the 27 00:01:26,520 --> 00:01:30,480 Speaker 1: economic data is going to take us in that direction. 28 00:01:30,760 --> 00:01:33,640 Speaker 1: And I get it. You know, the Fed and Powell 29 00:01:33,680 --> 00:01:37,720 Speaker 1: in particular, they don't want equities to be off to 30 00:01:37,800 --> 00:01:39,880 Speaker 1: the races and those sorts of things. They want to 31 00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:43,560 Speaker 1: make sure inflation is definitely not just rolled over but 32 00:01:43,920 --> 00:01:48,080 Speaker 1: declined pretty meaningfully. But I expect to see that earlier 33 00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:54,800 Speaker 1: next year. Where do you place the risk of overtightening. Well, 34 00:01:55,520 --> 00:01:59,600 Speaker 1: so it is elevated because I say it's elevated because 35 00:01:59,680 --> 00:02:05,480 Speaker 1: it's the BED focuses on the employment market then there, 36 00:02:05,680 --> 00:02:08,560 Speaker 1: and that's there, you know, they're their primary focus and 37 00:02:09,040 --> 00:02:11,760 Speaker 1: rationale for tightening. Uh, then I think the odds of 38 00:02:11,840 --> 00:02:16,560 Speaker 1: going into a recession are elevated. You know, Historically, anything 39 00:02:16,600 --> 00:02:19,280 Speaker 1: around the labor market is a lagging indicator for the 40 00:02:19,320 --> 00:02:23,240 Speaker 1: overall economy. I feel as though this cycle it's going 41 00:02:23,320 --> 00:02:25,919 Speaker 1: to be an extra lagging indicator because we know the 42 00:02:26,040 --> 00:02:29,079 Speaker 1: companies struggle to find workers and they're gonna do everything 43 00:02:29,080 --> 00:02:32,400 Speaker 1: they can to not let workers go until they get 44 00:02:32,440 --> 00:02:36,440 Speaker 1: real clarity that things are slowing down. But away from that, 45 00:02:36,919 --> 00:02:42,239 Speaker 1: you know, we've seen signs of decline and inflation. But yeah, 46 00:02:42,360 --> 00:02:44,760 Speaker 1: that's the primary focus to FED. They're going to overcook 47 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:47,480 Speaker 1: it and we're gonna increase the odds of going to 48 00:02:47,520 --> 00:02:50,240 Speaker 1: a recession. Yeah, Wage inflation, I think is still an 49 00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:52,560 Speaker 1: issue that you mentioned. The labor market is very tight. 50 00:02:52,720 --> 00:02:55,120 Speaker 1: I'm wondering whether we're not in when I say we, 51 00:02:55,320 --> 00:02:59,440 Speaker 1: I'm thinking of markets more broadly, whether we've under estimated 52 00:02:59,440 --> 00:03:02,360 Speaker 1: the way in which the economy has been transformed, even 53 00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:05,359 Speaker 1: before COVID to step in and do as much as 54 00:03:05,360 --> 00:03:08,960 Speaker 1: the FED did, and then to realize that technology that 55 00:03:09,040 --> 00:03:13,400 Speaker 1: was available to American businesses away from services. I get travel, 56 00:03:13,440 --> 00:03:16,519 Speaker 1: I get airlines, hotels, right, but there were so many 57 00:03:16,600 --> 00:03:20,760 Speaker 1: other businesses that were embracing technology that didn't um or 58 00:03:20,800 --> 00:03:23,800 Speaker 1: that allowed them to continue to be productive. And I 59 00:03:23,880 --> 00:03:26,320 Speaker 1: understand that the housing market has suffered badly as a 60 00:03:26,360 --> 00:03:29,360 Speaker 1: result because it's very interest rate sensitive. But maybe the 61 00:03:29,400 --> 00:03:32,639 Speaker 1: economy is shifted and we are a little bit less 62 00:03:32,720 --> 00:03:37,080 Speaker 1: interest rate sensitive right now? Is that at all a possibility? Yeah, 63 00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:40,840 Speaker 1: surely it is a possibility, just as though you know, 64 00:03:40,920 --> 00:03:45,520 Speaker 1: we're less sensitive to the increase in oil prices as well. Um, 65 00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:49,240 Speaker 1: but you know, eventually they will have an impact because 66 00:03:49,720 --> 00:03:52,080 Speaker 1: and Powell and I think the Fed and General has 67 00:03:52,120 --> 00:03:55,120 Speaker 1: been very good about the roadmap knowing that, hey, things 68 00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:58,560 Speaker 1: around goods are going to see deflation. Eventually, we're gonna 69 00:03:58,600 --> 00:04:03,280 Speaker 1: see housing service inflation decline, and then the core service 70 00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:05,520 Speaker 1: is going to be the last thing that will will 71 00:04:05,520 --> 00:04:09,400 Speaker 1: see decline. But if we see weakness in those other sectors, 72 00:04:09,720 --> 00:04:12,800 Speaker 1: then I think that will funnel through into service sectors 73 00:04:12,840 --> 00:04:16,000 Speaker 1: as well. Again, this is very big picture long term, 74 00:04:16,120 --> 00:04:20,360 Speaker 1: but you will see more investment in automation robotics, excepting 75 00:04:20,400 --> 00:04:23,320 Speaker 1: those little things as well as because of this, because 76 00:04:23,320 --> 00:04:26,719 Speaker 1: of the dishortage in labor Nearer to him in the 77 00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:28,760 Speaker 1: next couple of quarters. What sort of pressure do you 78 00:04:28,839 --> 00:04:32,359 Speaker 1: expect the sustained high rights to be having on balance sheets, 79 00:04:32,360 --> 00:04:37,040 Speaker 1: stings and consumer confidence as well? Yeah, I think, uh, 80 00:04:37,080 --> 00:04:41,120 Speaker 1: all of those factors as well. It's you know, we've 81 00:04:41,120 --> 00:04:45,839 Speaker 1: been positioning our portfolio, adding treasury duration in the portfolio 82 00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:48,720 Speaker 1: as an offset of that, because I think that the 83 00:04:49,240 --> 00:04:52,560 Speaker 1: tightening of financial conditions that we've been talking about increase 84 00:04:52,640 --> 00:04:56,599 Speaker 1: the odds of the economy slowing down. And you know, again, 85 00:04:56,640 --> 00:04:59,560 Speaker 1: the FEED is very committed to making sure that they 86 00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:02,400 Speaker 1: break the lack of inflation. It's just seemingly when you 87 00:05:02,440 --> 00:05:05,040 Speaker 1: put everything together, it's hard to come out of this 88 00:05:05,080 --> 00:05:07,520 Speaker 1: with a soft landing uh in here, and I think 89 00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:10,200 Speaker 1: that certainly is going to impact um. You know what 90 00:05:10,240 --> 00:05:12,360 Speaker 1: we see on the corporate sector as well well. The 91 00:05:12,400 --> 00:05:14,400 Speaker 1: FED doesn't seem to be there yet. I mean the 92 00:05:14,440 --> 00:05:18,760 Speaker 1: summary of economic projections they're looking at positivity in three. 93 00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:22,039 Speaker 1: If you have to go offshore right now, though, Jack, 94 00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:24,760 Speaker 1: if you have to look to maybe areas in Asia 95 00:05:24,839 --> 00:05:27,960 Speaker 1: to put money to work, are you less inclined to 96 00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:30,680 Speaker 1: be exposed to the US given everything you described. I mean, 97 00:05:30,720 --> 00:05:33,280 Speaker 1: I understand your being a little conservative here looking at 98 00:05:33,279 --> 00:05:35,599 Speaker 1: the bond market, but if if you need to capture 99 00:05:35,920 --> 00:05:39,480 Speaker 1: a better yield, do you go offshore and chase equities there? 100 00:05:40,880 --> 00:05:42,640 Speaker 1: I would do that, and we are doing that in 101 00:05:42,720 --> 00:05:45,440 Speaker 1: terms of our bond allocation as well, because I actually 102 00:05:45,480 --> 00:05:48,880 Speaker 1: think what we're seeing is as the U S slows 103 00:05:48,920 --> 00:05:50,839 Speaker 1: down and the end what we've talked about the odds 104 00:05:50,839 --> 00:05:53,360 Speaker 1: of recession increased, but look at what China is doing. 105 00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:56,400 Speaker 1: China is actually doing the exact option. And I get it. 106 00:05:56,440 --> 00:06:00,000 Speaker 1: This is going to be a bumpy transition as they 107 00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:02,840 Speaker 1: move away from COVID. It's going to be some version 108 00:06:02,880 --> 00:06:05,520 Speaker 1: of two steps forward, one step back. But if you 109 00:06:05,600 --> 00:06:08,640 Speaker 1: extend your time rising and it's very similar to what 110 00:06:08,640 --> 00:06:11,000 Speaker 1: we did in the spring of because of the uncertainty 111 00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:14,320 Speaker 1: around COVID, then but they're ejecting more stimulus and we 112 00:06:14,360 --> 00:06:17,279 Speaker 1: have a more favorable view of China. So the point 113 00:06:17,640 --> 00:06:19,560 Speaker 1: being is that I think you're going to see a 114 00:06:19,720 --> 00:06:23,880 Speaker 1: shift in relative growth North America led by a slowdown 115 00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:26,520 Speaker 1: in the US, but then Asia actually starts to get 116 00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:29,279 Speaker 1: a little bit more traction, led by China coming out 117 00:06:29,279 --> 00:06:31,800 Speaker 1: of that. I think it's got personally, it's got a 118 00:06:31,880 --> 00:06:35,120 Speaker 1: huge US dollar implications. It's going to drive the dollar lower, 119 00:06:35,320 --> 00:06:40,040 Speaker 1: it's gonna push capital more into Asia. UH, and also 120 00:06:40,080 --> 00:06:42,800 Speaker 1: I think in UH Latin America some of the higher 121 00:06:42,880 --> 00:06:47,359 Speaker 1: yielding markets as well, and then eventually even Europe. Do 122 00:06:47,400 --> 00:06:50,680 Speaker 1: you have a sick to specific approach to China, considering 123 00:06:50,839 --> 00:06:55,320 Speaker 1: how enthusiastic regulators often tamed to be there, so you 124 00:06:55,360 --> 00:06:58,799 Speaker 1: know interesting. You know, I'm talking very constructively on China, 125 00:06:58,839 --> 00:07:02,240 Speaker 1: but we don't have a direct all cation into China 126 00:07:03,200 --> 00:07:06,360 Speaker 1: because again, I don't want to own their bonds. If 127 00:07:06,400 --> 00:07:10,120 Speaker 1: they are opening their economy. The currency is interesting, but 128 00:07:10,160 --> 00:07:13,360 Speaker 1: I think there's other ways to be positioned to benefit 129 00:07:13,440 --> 00:07:17,920 Speaker 1: from China's UH sort of potential uptick as they move 130 00:07:18,000 --> 00:07:20,920 Speaker 1: away from covid UH. And that's just more in Asia 131 00:07:21,560 --> 00:07:25,640 Speaker 1: currencies and Asia equities in general. In our world, Asian 132 00:07:25,760 --> 00:07:28,320 Speaker 1: to hire some of the higher yielding bomb markets in 133 00:07:28,360 --> 00:07:31,280 Speaker 1: Asia as well. Jack, always a pleasure. Thank you for 134 00:07:31,400 --> 00:07:34,840 Speaker 1: spending time with us and sharing your perspective on price 135 00:07:34,880 --> 00:07:37,440 Speaker 1: action and markets not just here in the States, but 136 00:07:37,760 --> 00:07:41,120 Speaker 1: in the pack Rim as well. Jack McIntyre's global portfolio 137 00:07:41,160 --> 00:07:42,320 Speaker 1: manager at Brandywine