WEBVTT - SYSK’s Summer Movie Playlist: How the MPAA Works

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, chuck here for another summer movie playlist feed drop.

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Today we're going to be covering how the MPAA works,

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and this is from June twenty fourteen, and it delves

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>into the ins and outs of the MPAA and how

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>they decide on rating movies because it's sort of a

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>dark art as far as we're concerned.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>So check it out. Welcome to Stuff you should know

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 2>from HowStuffWorks dot com.

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 3>Charles W Chuck, Bryant, Jerry.

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>But where's Waldough right over there?

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Apparently?

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Man, I wish people could hear the in between stuff.

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 3>I think Jerry was recording that last one.

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I think so. She used to give us

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 2>a neat little outtakes, but she doesn't do that anymore.

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Those days are long gone. They exist in the vault though.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>How you doing? Not good?

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't know what's wrong with me. I am

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 3>off today? Out of your game? Yeah, it's weird.

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think this is the perfect podcast to set

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:09.919
<v Speaker 2>you straight.

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:11.559
<v Speaker 3>Why, because it's.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 2>Something that we both have some passion about against.

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think anybody who's seen the documentary this film

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 3>is not yet rated. Yeah, that would be very difficult

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 3>to not be persuaded to feel strongly about the MPAA

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:32.839
<v Speaker 3>and its practices.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and at least how they do things.

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 3>But we're going to try to be objective.

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm going to go ahead and say up front,

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I have no problem with rating of film's content, so

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 2>parents can decide whether or not it's appropriate. I think

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>it's valuable, but I think there are ways to do

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 2>it that I don't think the MPa does. Yes, So

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted to float that early on.

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I think that was probably smart. Okay, Okay, I

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 3>don't have kids, so I don't really whatever, But I

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 3>mean I can understand the value of that kind of thing.

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it gives you an idea, Like I like

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 2>having an idea what I'm about to see too.

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I can tell just from watching a

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 3>trailer of previewsing a movie poster. I'm pretty I'm pretty

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 3>intuitive when it comes to the marketing techniques of movies.

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I think like being a film nerd, it's like,

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 2>is the New uh? Is the New Avengers movie going

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 2>to be rated? R? That really tells you something.

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Right, it won't be no it never would be because.

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 2>PG thirteen is the the that's the strike zone these.

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Days, it really is. Apparently PG thirteen movies pull in

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 3>more money than all other ratings combined. Yeah, and it's

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 3>a relatively new phenomenon. You want to talk about its origin, Yeah,

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 3>let's do it. So back in nineteen eighty four, a

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 3>man named Steven Spielberg had two movies out who Steven Spielberg? Right.

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 3>He directed one, Indiana Jones and the Templar Doom, and

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 3>he produced another, Gremlins. Yeah, and both of them he

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 3>caught a lot of heat from both of them.

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Sure, Indiana Jones for the heart removal scene specifically.

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but also the snake, the live snake at the

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 3>feast thing yeah yeah, all the snake babies, the eyeballs,

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 3>all that stuff.

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 3>And then with Gremlins, it was just downright terrifying in

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of different places, especially if you're a kid.

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 3>And the reason he caught heat was because both of

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 3>those movies were rated PG. Yeah. And so Spielberg went

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 3>to the NPAA, the Motion Picture Association of America, and said,

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 3>let's do something about this, because these clearly aren't our movies. Yeah,

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 3>but they apparently aren't PG movies either, so maybe we

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 3>should come up with something in between. And PG thirteen

0:03:58.240 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 3>was born.

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this was before he had all this way

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 2>in the world. He was influential, but it wasn't like

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Spielberg today, who could have just waved his wand and

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 2>made it happen.

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I think even at the time he was important.

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 3>He Yeah, there were very few directors at that time

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 3>who could have gotten something like that done too. So

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 3>that's where PG thirteen came from. And that, like you said,

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 3>that's the strike zone now. And the reason why is

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 3>because that is the kind of movie that caters to

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 3>young teenage boys, who apparently are the most successful at

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 3>getting girls to go to movies with them. So if

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 3>you can get a movie rated PG thirteen, you're going

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 3>to make a bunch of money.

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Plus it makes sense, it's right there in the middle. Yeah,

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 3>But the problem is is it's become a means of

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 3>almost advertising that rating rather than cautioning parents. It's a

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 3>way of attracting the audience. Yeah. True, it's like this

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 3>is in some kids PG movie. This is as close

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:07.679
<v Speaker 3>to an R movie as you can get.

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 2>In Yeah, and I think filmmakers try to achieve that

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 2>rating by either scaling back their R rated movie or

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 2>juicing up their PG movie.

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 3>Or adding more violence. Apparently PG thirteen movies are have

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 3>tripled in violence over the last few decades. Yeah, and

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 3>they now have, according to one study, more violence than

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 3>there are rated counterparts.

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and different kinds of violence that you didn't used

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 2>to see.

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, all right, I guess we should go back

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 2>in time a little bit. Let's is it way back machine?

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Sure, let's go way back in time in Hollywood. All right,

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 3>it's nineteen twenty two.

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Hollywood and Vine is a viable intersection in Hollywood at

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the time. I'm unlike now, although people are going to say, no,

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 2>they built that area back up. Yeah, and that is

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 2>when the NPA was born in the early nineteen twenties.

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 2>And at the time, it was up to local authorities

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 2>or your state or your municipality to either stamp something

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 2>as moral or immoral. There were no ratings on movies.

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 2>And thanks to a guy named Will Hayes, who was

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 2>the first president of the MPa, he installed the Hayes

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Code and said, you're either going to pass or fail.

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 2>It's either going to be stamped in moral or moral right.

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 3>And the reason Will Hayes, who is the MPAA president,

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 3>came up with the Hayes Code, which was really extensive. Yeah,

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 3>it was like, if you talk about the government, it

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 3>always has to be good, sexuality has to be like

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 3>repressed and just basically an hetero. How you think about

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 3>all movies from like the thirties and forties, Yeah, squeaky clean,

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>basically like the division between good and evil is very

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 3>clearly defined and the good guy always wins. And if

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 3>you didn't fall into that Hayes code, like you said,

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 3>your movie would be stamped immoral. But the whole reason

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 3>he came up with this code was because local municipalities

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 3>could pass their own obscenity laws and that could be

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 3>bad for business.

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>So is it not even get your film exhibited?

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Right? So remember in the A c l U episode

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 3>where we're talking about that one, that one movie that

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 3>New York, just the Catholic said no, you can't show

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 3>that here, and the a cl went to work getting

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 3>getting the Catholics beaten in court.

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Right, even though it was just a bad movie, had

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 2>something to do with well, I mean it did, but

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 2>it shouldn't have been shown because it was so terrible.

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Was it bad? I don't remember.

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it was supposed to be not very good.

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but it happened like that kind of thing happened

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot like local local town said we're not going

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 3>to show that movie. So Hayes figured out if if

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Hollyoo policed itself, then they could control what, you know,

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 3>what movies came out, and therefore everybody could make a

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 3>bunch of money. That's right, And that's the point of

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 3>the NPAA. They're the lobbying arm of six major Hollywood studios.

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they work for them. Yeah, well, yeah, that's one

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 2>way to say it. But they and it's just those

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>six too, isn't it. Uh well, yeah, I mean you

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 2>there's definitely an argument these days that independent filmmakers have

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 2>a much rougher time with the MPAA. Yeah, but most

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 2>of the indies too, are eventually distributed by the majors.

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, I got you. You know what I'm saying.

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So flash forward a bit in our wayback machine

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 2>to the nineteen fifties. Things changed a little bit after

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 2>World War Two, and people, I guess the easiest way

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 2>to say it is people loosened up a little bit

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and didn't mind certain elements in their entertainment any longer. Yes,

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 2>A big example this article uses Frank Sinatra got an

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 2>oscar nomen for playing a heroin Addict and the Man

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>with a Golden Arm. And that couldn't have happened in

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen forties.

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 3>No, millions of people hadn't died in World War Two yet,

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 3>that's right. I imagine that kind of loosens you up

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 3>as far as the seeing Chris words and stuff in

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 3>movies goes.

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like that's not a big deal, Like World War

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 2>two is a big deal, right, get your haunches down exactly.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was the big one, the big first crack

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 3>to the Hayes code. Yeah, and then there were I

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 3>think that you said he won an oscar, right. Yeah.

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 3>It was a really good movie that kind of opened

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 3>the floodgate so that by the end of the fifties

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 3>you got some like it. Hot Tony Curtis and Jack

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 3>lemon are dressed like women hitting on Marilyn Monroe. Yeah,

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 3>and at that point it was pretty obvious the Hayes

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 3>code was dead. Yeah.

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they weren't passing the code, but they were

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 2>still getting released. So once something is subverted like that,

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 2>it's it's dead in.

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 3>The water, right, So there was a that was fine

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 3>for a little while. I think the Hayes coach just

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 3>kind of fell to the wayside, and people were releasing

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 3>movies without any kind of moral or immoral stamp. But

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 3>the rating system as we understand it today hadn't come

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 3>about yet, so it's kind of a limbo period until

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 3>nineteen sixty eight and a store owner in New York

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 3>with the last name of Ginsburg got busted for selling

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 3>nudimags to sixteen year old boys, and he took it

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 3>all the way to the Supreme Court, saying, you can't

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 3>say anything about this. There's federal laws about upsnity, not

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 3>local laws. And the Supreme Court said, you know what,

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 3>we really think it's up to local municipalities to decide

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 3>what they want their miners exposed to or not. That

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 3>got Hollywood's attention because all of a sudden, local municipalities

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 3>could decide whether or not they wanted to show movies

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 3>to miners or not. So what was old became new again.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 3>And Jack Valenti, who was in charge of the MPAA, said,

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 3>we need another system of self knowther self policing system,

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 3>and he came up with the rating system that we

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 3>have today.

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he, I mean Jack Valenti was the head

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 2>of the NBA for close to forty years, and he

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 2>initially the intention was to stop censorship because he feared

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 2>that the movies were going to start being censored locally.

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 2>And so I think the origins of the MPA's rating

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.479
<v Speaker 2>system were.

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Art centered, art center, but also money centered, because again,

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 3>if you have if you have town A showing the movie,

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 3>but Town's B through L deciding that the movie is

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 3>obscene and not showing it, then you're losing that money

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 3>and B through L. So what Valenti came up with

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 3>was this idea that let us tell you what is

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 3>appropriate for minors or not, what movie is, and we'll

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 3>just make a simple rating system. Yeah, gpg R or

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 3>X the old X yeah.

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 2>And triple X. It wasn't even formally a rating, it

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 2>was just.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 3>A marketing tool.

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, because three x'es that's like WHOA.

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if anybody ever came out with one with

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 3>four X.

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah or double X even yeah, like we cut out

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 2>that one part so ta X uh. Yeah. Christian our

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>colleague here wrote a great blog post about the former

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 2>X rated movie.

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 3>Is that right? Yeah, we'll have to check that out.

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 3>It's good for brain stuff for stuff of genius.

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 2>On the brain Stuff blog earlier this year, and you

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 2>actually recommended it on your blog the X rating, yeah

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 2>the best I remember it this week.

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I remember recommending one of his things. I just

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 3>don't remember that one. It's good.

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 2>I thought about asking him in here, but then I thought, yeah,

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 2>we got it N So yeah, back then it was

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 2>G through X and well we'll talk about you know

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 2>how that changed maybe after this message break. All right,

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.719
<v Speaker 2>so no longer do we have X rated movies? Now

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 2>we have something. I guess we should just go through

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 2>what these ratings mean today in twenty fourteen. Okay, so

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 2>you've got your G.

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 3>G's always been G general audience.

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Anyone can see it, Yes, and that's your your family

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 2>cartoon that kids love and parents are forced to go to.

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Then you've got PG that means no drug use, maybe

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 2>a little violence, because as we'll learn, the MPa has

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 2>less problems with violence and more problems with language and sex.

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 3>Huge criticism, huge criticism.

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 2>PG thirteen, which we've you know, kind of been through.

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Then you've got your R and that is no one

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 2>under seven. This is a suggestion that no one over

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 2>seventeen be admitted without a parent. And these aren't laws though,

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 2>that's one thing that's important to point out. Those are suggestions.

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 2>And then theaters have policies.

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's let's kind of dig into that. So none

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 3>of this is legally binding. Now, none of them are

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 3>anything more than recommendation. And they're basically saying that this

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 3>movie has X amount of profanity or x amount of nudity,

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 3>or lacks any drug use or something like that. And

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 3>so for what the MPAA thinks the average moral compass

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 3>of the average American thinks about these different things like sex, drugs, nudity,

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 3>all that stuff, this movie falls into this rating. And

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 3>again it's not enforceable. You don't even need to have

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 3>a rating to release a movie. But if you want

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 3>to get your movie in theaters, there's basically no theater

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 3>chain out there right now, no major theater chain out

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 3>there right now that will show an unrated movie.

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a completely voluntary system to submit your film

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 2>to the MPa ratings board.

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.239
<v Speaker 3>But it's de facto.

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 2>But you have to do it. Yeah, that's the rub

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 2>is that they say it's voluntary, but you actually have

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 2>to pay a fee to submit your movie if you

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 2>ever want to have it shown in theaters.

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Right, is anywhere from like twenty five thousand dollars for

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 3>a big budget movie to seven hundred and fifty dollars

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 3>for a short. Yeah, and so you submit your movie. Well,

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 3>we'll get into it in a second. Let's talk some

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 3>more about the rest of the ratings.

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well there's only one more, and that's NC seventeen,

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 2>which replaced X. And that means this is in nineteen

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 2>ninety and that basically means that it's for adults only

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 2>and you should not come in if you're under eighteen.

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Right, and also means these days it's foreign or about

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 3>lesbian or gays. Basically, yeah, not fully, but sure, it's

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 3>pretty close. Yeah, and NC seventeen. The first movie to

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 3>come out with that was Henry in June. Yeah, not

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 3>to be confused with Benny and June. And it basically

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 3>sunk that movie because everybody was like, oh, this is

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 3>X now, right, NC seventeen. If you jumble it all together,

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 3>it looks like X. And the whole reason they came

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 3>out with NC seventyeen was to replace X because X

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 3>was associated exclusively with pornography in the minds of moviegoers.

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah exactly, Yeah, all right, so let's get into this.

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 2>The actual ratings board. There's the MPAA, and then working

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 2>for the MPa is the classification and ratings administration Kara,

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 2>and Kara doesn't say whether your movie stinks or not.

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Kara is eight to thirteen people, and they are called raiders,

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 2>and they are overseen by senior Raider, and they sit

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 2>down and watch these movies and take copious notes on

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 2>what they think based on their standards. Is I don't

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 2>want to say offensive, but just noteworthy, right, Like maybe

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>they're not offended, but they think the average mom and

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 2>sheboygan might be offended.

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Right supposedly, which is a kind of a thing, because

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 3>the whole rating system, as you just kind of pointed out,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 3>is a subjective.

0:16:56.080 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Totally subjective. They supposedly. Here's the other rub is it's

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 2>all secret.

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 2>You can find out a federal judge's name and address,

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 2>but you can't find out who a raider is for

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 2>your films. It's all conducted in private. None of the

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 2>stuff is released and That's one of the big rubs

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 2>in that documentary and with filmmakers in general, is it's all,

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, done behind closed doors. There's never any explanations provided.

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 2>These people are supposed to have kids between ages of

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 2>five and seventeen, but many of them do not, right,

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 2>either have kids at all or have kids that are

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 2>older than eighteen.

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 2>It basically frees them up from any accountability. Yeah, to

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 2>do this all in private and in secrecy.

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 3>And until that movie by Kirby what is Kirby's last name?

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Henry and June No no, the documentary.

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh yeah, this film is not yet rated.

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, until Kirby Dick's this film is not yet rated

0:17:56.080 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 3>came out, Like all of this stuff was just conjection

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 3>and conjecture in Hollywood legend. He was the first one

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 3>to really basically he tailed these people, tailed them to

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 3>lunch to find out who they were and eavesdrop on

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 3>them and like did some digging and found like these

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 3>anonymous people did not fall into the requirements that the

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.719
<v Speaker 3>NPAA said they did. And so not only was it

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 3>in secret, it was it was fraudulent. Basically, this rating system.

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 3>So according to the standards, you submit your film. This

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.719
<v Speaker 3>group of people, this anonymous group of people, watch it,

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 3>they rate it, then they come together and vote on

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 3>a rating, and then they passed their their vote along

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 3>to a senior raider. Yeah, who talks to the movie's

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 3>distributor or director or producer says, here's the rating, here's

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 3>why we rated it like this, and then your face

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 3>with a choice. You can accept the rating. You can

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 3>edit your film as per the CI's recommendations.

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Take out these bad words, cut the sex scene a

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 2>little early, leave all the violence.

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Or you can reject the rating and just release

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 3>your movie is unrated.

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which, well, you can try to release it, but

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 2>since no one will show it, it's really sort of

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 2>a misnomer.

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Right, but it's becoming increasingly a thing again. You need

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 3>the rating to get your movie shown in movie theaters. Yeah,

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 3>But what happens if you don't care if your movie

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 3>comes out in theaters, video on demand, yeah, or just

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 3>releasing it to the internet.

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, I'm curious about that. How that's going to change

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>the landscape.

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, right now, it's a huge threat to the NPAA

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 3>because all of the power they wield is found in

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 3>this rating system.

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 2>And if for theaters yes, If no one's going to theaters.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Then the MPAA loses all of that power, which is

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 3>a big deal, especially now because the NPAA is needed

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 3>more than ever as a lobbying group because of online piracy,

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 3>which we'll talk about some more. So it's a very

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 3>precarious time for the MPAA right now, and it's a

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 3>terrible time for them to be under as much scrutiny

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 3>and public attack and critique as they are. So it's

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they got spears sticking out every which way,

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and their trunk is flailing and they're honking. That is true.

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 2>One thing I should point out is I said, is

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 2>that there's no accountability.

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 3>That's what the NPA says.

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 2>It's the good thing about the secrecy is that it

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 2>frees them up. That anonymity does. It frees them up

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 2>from accountability.

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 3>I just don't agree, right, Okay, So the if you

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 3>want to appeal, there was apparently a change made in

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 3>response to Kirby Dick's movie the documentary before if you

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 3>were appealing your rating, which is very difficult, almost never

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 3>was done.

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Well you never want that's for sure.

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Right, And when you were appear you couldn't reference any

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 3>other film. It was totally done in a vacuum, which

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 3>is pretty preposterous.

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like that's the only way to be able to

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 2>tell us, like, wait a minute, if you said this

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 2>about this, then why not this for my movie?

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Right, Which meant that there was no real standard, yeah,

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 3>that you could point to, or there were standards you

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 3>could point to, they just wouldn't be considered.

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or at the very least, if they do have

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 2>written standards, they don't release them, so you don't even

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 2>know what they are.

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Right. So the MPAA is, they've got their rating system,

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 3>they've got the appeals process.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Which was also in secret, unless that's changed, right, I think.

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the appeals board not only was the appeals

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 2>board and secret, but they weren't even just raiders. They

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 2>were people from the industry.

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Right, and the Theater Owners Association exactly, whereas the people

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 3>who were raiders are supposedly unaffiliated with the movie indust

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 3>and are just like average ordinary.

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Parents representing EU Middle America. We'll just call it, even

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 2>though I think that's insulting.

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 3>The thing is, though, is a lot of people criticize

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 3>the NPA and say these raiders are really representing the

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 3>six major studios who rake in ninety five percent of

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 3>the ten point nine billion dollars made in the United States. Yeah,

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 3>in theaters alone, just ticket sales, not DVD or anything

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 3>like that. Yeah, And that's what the NPAA does. In

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 3>addition to rating, they are, like we said, the lobby

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 3>are for these six studios.

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 2>That's right, and they I guess we should talk about

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 2>piracy now, Huh. That's one of their other big besides

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 2>from rating movies, they are heavy in the lobby against well,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 2>especially now with online piracy, because the digital distribution network

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 2>is it seems like the way forward as far as

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 2>distribution goes, right, Like it's the futre. It's not the future,

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 2>it's the present and the future.

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 3>And the NPAA has a they're accused of basically trying

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 3>to quell new technology by just saying like, well, let's

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 3>just keep people from peer to peer file sharing in

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 3>total so that they can't steal movies. In part, and

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 3>if you go back to the early eighties, Jack Valente

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 3>was known to have railed and lobbied against the legality

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 3>of VCRs.

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 2>People are just gonna be recording things and handing them

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 2>out to their friends exactly.

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 3>So there was a the NPA is a long history

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 3>of basically like just doing anything at can to stifle

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 3>innovation in order to protect the profits of these big

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 3>movie studios. The other problem with them lobbying in favor

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 3>of these six movie studios is that they inherently have

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 3>a conflict of interest against the studios that are not

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 3>part of these six that they represent, but whose movies

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 3>they still rate. Right, so they've been accused of more

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 3>scrupulously or scrutinously rating the movies of rival studios or

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 3>foreign studios when assigning a rating.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, and that's why filmmakers call consistently for transparency. I

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.479
<v Speaker 2>don't think there are many filmmakers out there saying there

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 2>should be no rating, we should just maybe some like

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 2>a large fontrier, you know, or Werner Herzog. They're probably

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 2>like nota eight things at all. But I think they

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 2>just want transparency, like open it up and let everyone

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 2>know how this is all done, who these people are,

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 2>and give us an idea on what in the world

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 2>we're submitting to voluntarily quote unquote. Pretty interesting.

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 3>So you were talking about online piracy, and with digital

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 3>distribution being a big deal now, the NPAs needed more

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 3>than ever because they have to lobby Congress to fight

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 3>online piracy at a time when more and more people

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 3>are distributing online and going around the MPAA. So it's

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 3>losing its power, right, but it needs its power more

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 3>than ever. So, like we said, it's a precarious time

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 3>for the MPAA. Yeah, and they tried a few things.

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 3>They were successful with the what was the first one

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 3>in two thousand, the Digital Sofa No, the Digital Millennium

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Copyright Act, oh right, which basically that up until then

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't a federal crime to share movies on peer

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 3>to peer networks, right, that one did it, and they

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 3>got that passed. The MPAA lobbied and got that passed.

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they've cracked down on camcorder recording yeap. Like when

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 2>you're in New York City and someone has that brand

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 2>new copy of Godzilla on video cassette for you, Yeah,

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 2>that's because if you've seen Seinfeld, someone went and sat

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 2>in that theater with a camera recorder and just made

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 2>a stupid, awful quality pirated version.

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And it says that those are the most common.

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess I kind of believe that they're also the

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 3>worst quality. Like sometimes people will like get up and

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 3>move in front of the camera, like they go to

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 3>the bathroom or something.

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, it's uh, I've never seen one, but I

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 2>think they're terrible.

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah much, I don't want to say more common, but

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 3>probably more common these days are like copies of screeners. Yeah,

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 3>like they send out DVDs to everybody who's members of

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 3>the Academy to vote on movies, and so around Oscar

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 3>timer before Oscar time, it seems like the Internet gets

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 3>flooded with way more high quality copies of these major

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 3>movies that are up for awards. Yeah.

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 2>I think now they have, thanks to the NPA, have

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 2>something coded to your name now on your copy.

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 3>So like they'll know who leaked it or whatever. I think. So, yeah,

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not surprised by that. Apparently, if you want to

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 3>show Frozen at your church, yeah, you better have a

0:26:55.359 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 3>public performance license because it is illegal to show a

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 3>movie outside of your home. Yeah, that surprised me.

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 2>But there are a lot of especially in the summertime,

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of community screenings, like every city now has uh,

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, Atlanta shows them and uh, I think at

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Oakland Cemetery some other places in New York. They have

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 2>them all over the place. And technically, yeah, they're supposed

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 2>to have a license to do, so, I'm sure they

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 2>do the big ones.

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the big ones, I'm sure do.

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 2>But like at your community pool and you want to

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 2>show et and.

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 3>The FED could kick the gate down around the pool.

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 3>I bet everybody.

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 2>I bet they don't love HBO these days because you know,

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 2>HBO go people steal that. They're just like, hey, dude,

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 2>what's your log in? Oh right, yeah, and HBO came

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 2>out and they're like, who cares?

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, people are watching it, yeah, like go watch True Detective.

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you'll sign up for HBO, yeah because you liked it,

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 2>or maybe you'll just support the show period on social media,

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 2>even though you're getting it for free. Like we're making

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 2>enough money basically.

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And that's some thing that a lot of people say,

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, film industry, we don't really feel that bad

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 3>for you, Yeah, Sean Austin, sit down, because you guys

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 3>made ten point nine billion dollars in America in ticket

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 3>sales alone in twenty thirteen. We don't feel that bad

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 3>about this whole conundrum that the MPAA is facing.

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 2>What's Shawn aston Steel he was voices or yeah, yeah,

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 2>oh okay, Yeah, I don't think I knew that.

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah he was. I can't remember the there was like

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 3>a whole kind of push, an anti piracy pushed a

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 3>few years back, and he was the face of it,

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 3>part of it. Yeah, yeah, and he looked really mad

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 3>about things too. Du But speaking of piracy, I remember

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 3>there was a story that came out recently. It was

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 3>if you think about it at first, it's like wah whah,

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 3>But then if if you really kind of lended some thought,

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 3>it's really disturbing. Yeah, there were there was a report

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 3>of prisoners at a prison being shown pirated movies and

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 3>some of the prisoners were there for pirting movies. Oh wow,

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 3>and like really think about the injustice behind that. Yeah,

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 3>like that's just crazy town. Imagine if you've been like

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 3>selling counterfeit first, and you go to prison and all

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 3>of the all the guards are wearing counterfeit for coats.

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 2>It'd be pretty swing in prison.

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 3>It'd be weird, but it would also be unjust.

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, true. But in relation to this, it's just more

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 3>and more widespread every day. It feels like it's it's

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 3>a losing battle. I think that the NPAA is fighting

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think I read somewhere today that they I

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 2>think they might release a few of the Raiders' names

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 2>per film, not all like thirteen, right, but I need

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 2>to look up that. Look that up again, because that

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't see the why releasing a

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 2>three out of thirteen names? Does anybody any good?

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 3>It does zero good? Yeah, And speaking of doing zero good,

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 3>there's kind of a new attachment to the rating system

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 3>that they have now. It's called check the box, and

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 3>it's basically a brief description of why a movie is,

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 3>like PG. Thirteen, So it'll say like intense sci fi

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 3>action or something like that, or some drug use, yeah,

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 3>that kind of thing. And some critics of the NPAA

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 3>say it's just basically like shooting a laser beam into

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 3>like a fifteen year old boy's brain, like brief nudity.

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Come see it PG thirteen, Check it out, kid. And

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of people are looking at it

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 3>like it's it's just kind of a disingenuous advertisement, cynical advertisement,

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 3>because the MPAA is accused of not regulating or even

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 3>potentially directly marketing to kids under the age of the

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 3>movie that are being advertised. Yeah, so like you're seeing

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 3>a lot of ads for like r rated movies on

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 3>websites that are like very popular among like the seventeen

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 3>and undercrowd. There's a lot of tie ins for PG

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 3>thirteen movies with like kids toys for kids who are

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 3>under who are under thirteen, And so there's like this

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 3>idea that there's the MPAA is supposedly serving America's moral compasses. Yeah,

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 3>but really, at the same time, they're undermining that morality

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 3>that they're supposedly defending. Yeah, by marketing and exploiting kids.

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that'd be like a cigarette company having a cartoon

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 2>animal as their mascot.

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Can you imagine?

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Be weird? Well, one thing about the the subjectivity of

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 2>it and the fact that it is a closed book

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 2>and they filmmakers don't even know, you know what, how

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 2>to tailor their movie to achieve a certain rating, I

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 2>mean to within a certain degree, but they've learned how

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 2>to manipulate it because there is no set standard by

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 2>if you watch that film is not yet rated. And

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 2>you've heard plenty of stories over the years about filmmakers

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 2>intentionally putting in things that they never intend to be

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 2>in the final movie. Oh yeah, just to sort of

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 2>distract from some of the other things. So they'll shoot

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 2>something kind of really outrageous to get the MPA's raiders

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 2>haunches up and what they were never going to keep

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 2>that part anyway, right, So they're subverting the system because

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 2>there is no set standard.

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and they're just the stuff they want to keep

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 3>in is comparatively exactly more palatable.

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 2>And if you don't have the set standard where you

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 2>can go and I wonder what those sheets look like

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 2>on the interior, you know, I mean that's the great mystery. Yeah,

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 2>surely they have their own interior standards. They're not just

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 2>like watch it and see what you think. Well, they

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 2>have group discussions too, man, I'd love to sit in

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 2>on those.

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 3>So the I read Another criticism of NPAA is that

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 3>the difference between PG thirteen movies and our movies these

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 3>days is the profanity and the sexuality. That they're similar

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 3>in violence, if not more violent in PG thirteen movies,

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 3>and that this is kind of messed up, that the

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 3>NPAA has very little problem with violence. Yeah, but when

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 3>it comes to bad words or sexuality of almost any

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 3>nature except for women being objectified and men being gratified,

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 3>then the NPAA suddenly puckers up.

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, in any a woman achieving receiving sexual gratification,

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 2>or a homosexual couple NC seventeen.

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, virtually like guaranteed or depending on how they do it,

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 3>are if it's coming out of like one of the

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 3>major studios.

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 2>So in other words, a man can receive pleasure from

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 2>a woman, and of course it's scrutinized somewhat, because any

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of sex is more heavily scrutinized than violence. But

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:06.959
<v Speaker 2>if a woman does like you said, or if it's

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 2>a gay couple, it's all over so homophobic, misogynistic.

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 3>You decide right, and fetishistic of violence, you know.

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like here's one example. There's a great article called

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Don't Expect any major changes to the NPA rating system

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 2>in twenty fourteen, and it's basically Chris Dodd, who's the

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 2>new head and the gang, digging in and saying, you

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 2>know what, we talk to your average parents and we

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:40.879
<v Speaker 2>pull them and this is what they want. But they

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 2>release No, none of those studies are released. Yeah, none

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 2>of those conversations are released. A movie like Filamina, which

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 2>you saw, was rated at R.

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. It was about a lady looking for a long

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 3>lost sun. It was so far from an R movie.

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 3>It was ridiculous.

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it had a couple of F bombs in it,

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 2>so they cut those out and they bring it to

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 2>a PG thirteen. You might think, who cares cut up

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 2>the F bombs make it PG thirteen. But there's something

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 2>bigger going on here, you know.

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's a great AV Club article about how just

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 3>totally out of step a lot of the ratings are.

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 3>And they have fifteen movies listed and basically talk about

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 3>their ratings. Like the first one they talk about once. Yeah,

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 3>that romantic. It wasn't like a romantic comedy, wasn't. No.

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I would say it was a bittersweet, just a modern

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 2>day romance told through music.

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't a musical, but there are a lot of

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 2>musical numbers.

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Highly inoffensive love story. Yeah, very sweet movie. It had

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 3>the same rating as a hostile too, which is basically

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 3>torture porn. They both got the same rating.

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we should read this first line from the AV Club.

0:35:56.880 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 2>In early summer of two thousand and seven, two films

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 2>were released with our ratings. One feature to scene where

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 2>a naked woman is suspended from a ceiling while another

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 2>naked woman slashes her with a scyth and baths in

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Her Blood. The other featured two Dublin musicians singing songs together,

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 2>falling in love and opting not to act on it.

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Like there was never any sex scene. They didn't even

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 2>get together. Really.

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Nope.

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 2>They're both rated R.

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Both rated are because of profanity.

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Rushmore rated R for the uh scene at the end

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 2>whether Max is putting on the play, the Vietnam play,

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.479
<v Speaker 2>and there is a shot of a couple of little

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 2>kids looking at on the set. There's some Playboy centerfolds

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 2>up in the locker, yep, like on the Vietnam set,

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 2>and these it shows these little kids like looking at

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 2>those like a twelve year.

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 3>Old would probably do. And it got an R for that,

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 3>got an R for that. Happiness Todd Sollins one of

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 3>my favorite movies of all time. Yeah, they tried to

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 3>give it an NC seventeen rating, and he said, you

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 3>know what, I'm not cutting anything. You who can just

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 3>go take a long walk off a short peer is

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 3>what I think he famously said to them. Yeah, and

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 3>he released his movie as unrated. Oh really, yep, I

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 3>don't think I knew that way to go.

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 2>Todd Solins, or if you're looking at some serious homophobia.

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:22.240
<v Speaker 2>The Great nineteen eighty nine movie and longtime Companion features

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 2>no real sex acts at all, nothing explicit. In fact,

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the AB Club says it could show on network TV

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 2>today with just a few alterations. But it was about

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 2>a gay couple, and uh so I got an NC seventeen.

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. There's something called Afternoon Delight, which was a movie

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 3>about a woman who hires a jigalow. Yeah, and it

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:56.919
<v Speaker 3>apparently is heavy on the the woman receiving sexual gratification.

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 3>It got an R rating. Yeah, bite, and it got

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 3>in our rating after apparently the director cut a lot

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 3>of stuff out and the director said, what the hey,

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 3>after Wolf of Wall Street came out, Like, have you

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.720
<v Speaker 3>seen this movie with like some very graphic apparent sex

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 3>scenes between a man and a woman. Yeah, but Leonardo

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 3>DiCaprio is the one enjoying it the most, So it's fine.

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 3>It's an R right. Blue is the warmest color. Yeah.

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Last year that a teenage lesbian love story n S seventeen.

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeap got a lot of attention, and there were some

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 2>theaters that allowed high school age kids to go see

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 2>that anyway.

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 3>Because again, this is in law, it's not binding it's

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:41.760
<v Speaker 3>up to the theaters.

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just so strange that such a small group

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 2>of people have such influence on such a large industry.

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, the secret the more you dig into it,

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 3>the more conflicts of interest arise, and the more arbitrary

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 3>the standards become, the more blood boiling it is. I

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 3>highly recommend you go read some stuff like Rated Are

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 3>for Ridiculous by Kirby Dick his little uh yeah, his

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:09.839
<v Speaker 3>little op ed about the MPAA that one US News

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 3>and World Report article you wrote or suggested it was good.

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 2>I wish I wrote it.

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Had you been there, would have been used correctly.

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh did they misuse it? What?

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I know, and that's terrible. Uh So the NPA will

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 2>defend themselves and they say that there's no such bias

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 2>and that we all these objectionable scenes are rated on

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 2>the graphic quality and how graphic it is. But if

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 2>you just look at the you'd have to be a

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:41.879
<v Speaker 2>dummy not to see these correlations, right, And the fact

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 2>that they don't seem to care that much about violence

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 2>in this age where I don't know, does it influence

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 2>people to go shoot up a school? Who knows?

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Did you see that John Oliver quote that's going around, Yes,

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 3>but what was it? It's like somebody on successfully tries

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 3>to carry a bomb onto a plane in their shoe.

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 3>We all take our shoes off. Oh right, there's like

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 3>thirty somethings school shootings after Columbine and absolutely nothing's changed.

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or the onion article that's going around too, now,

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 2>is this is something that can't be prevented, says the

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 2>only country where this kind of thing happens all the

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 2>time something like that. Huh I'm paraphrasing.

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, that's the onion.

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, good stuff, MPa, keep doing the fighting, the good fight.

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:33.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, go check out, like, just go start reading up

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 3>on it. It's funny how much we just take this

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 3>stuff for granted, but when just start digging just slightly

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:41.959
<v Speaker 3>beneath the surface at the very least. See this film

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 3>is not yet rated. It's really good, Yeah, really engrossing.

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 3>And you know, for every one hundred documentaries that come out,

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 3>what five of them are like really great? Sure, most

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 3>of them are pretty good, some are terrible. So any

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 3>really good one is worth seeing just in and of itself.

0:40:58.440 --> 0:40:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Agreed.

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 3>You want to learn more about the MPAA. Type those

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:04.839
<v Speaker 3>letters into the search housetifforks dot com and I said,

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 3>search pars. It's time for listener mail.

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna call this wild Parrots. Josh mentioned in the

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:16.439
<v Speaker 2>Tattoo podcast that he had heard parrots like to hang

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 2>together when free, and I wanted to burst in the

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 2>podcast booth and tell you about the wild parrots of

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco. I'm not going to get into it except

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 2>to say that, over the course of my life, the

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 2>parrots in San Francisco are a sort of living legend

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 2>that one would occaionally get the privilege of spotting now

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 2>and then. However, about three years ago, I moved in

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:38.320
<v Speaker 2>with my aunt in the little San Francisco suburb of Brisbane,

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:41.439
<v Speaker 2>and apparently the famous flocks of parrots were also making

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 2>their home there. Since it was warmer unless windy, these

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:47.399
<v Speaker 2>parrots were often hanging right outside my bedroom window, which

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 2>is pretty amazing or no, she says, amusing. I say

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 2>it's amazing, but also somewhat annoying, especially since my first

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 2>son was just a little guy then and a very

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 2>light sleeper, and these suckers are allowed, That's true. They

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.919
<v Speaker 2>are very loud. Also, guys, I'm sending you the link

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:04.879
<v Speaker 2>to watch the preview of the two thousand and three

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 2>documentary The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill. So I didn't

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 2>know that was a documentary.

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 3>I've heard that, Yeah, I've heard of that before. I

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:13.320
<v Speaker 3>never knew what it was about. Amy.

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 2>I will check that out.

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, thank you for writing it. Yeah, thanks a lot, Amy.

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 3>If you have a documentary recommendation, we are always interested

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 3>in those. Heck yeah, you can tweet them to us

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:28.759
<v Speaker 3>at SYSK podcast. You can post them on Facebook dot com,

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 3>slash stuff you Should Know, and you can send us

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 3>an email to Stuff Podcast at HowStuffWorks dot com and

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 3>as always, joined us at our home on the web,

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:45.280
<v Speaker 3>the Beautiful stuff youshould Know dot com.

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:47.959
<v Speaker 2>For more on this and thousands of other topics, visit

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 2>HowStuffWorks dot com.