WEBVTT - Previewing the Denver Broncos!

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I do not understand how the over underwin total for

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Broncos this year is at eight and a

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.799
<v Speaker 1>half wins. I do not think this is a nine

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and seven team. If anything, I think this team actually

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>occupies the basement of the a f C West, and

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the reason why is because they have the worst quarterback

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>play in the a f C West. I am not

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>sold on the seventh round pick out of Northwestern Trevor Simeon.

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Neither are the Denver Broncos. I am not sold on

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the first round pick of last year Paxton Lynch. I

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Broncos are either. Remember I have my

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>theory about quarterback play and what that means for teams

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. If you listen to the fantasy freestyle,

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you know about this. I would rather be a team

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that knows that I don't have my quarterback or that

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>just tried to get my new young quarterback this year,

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>then a team that is kind of saddled with having

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>invested something in their quarterback position already and is sort

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of on the precipice of knowing that they don't have something.

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>For example, I'd rather have the Cleveland Browns, the Houston Texans,

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Bears quarterback situation. They just got guys in

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Kaiser and Deshaun Watson and even Mitchell don't call me,

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Trabinsky, who they think could be the guy. So

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the optimism is still there at that part of the cycle.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>When you have these ascending young quarterbacks, you're great. When

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you have the sunsetting quarterback, at least you know you

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>need to start to make plans for it. I actually

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>think that the Denver Broncos have ready for this, the

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>worst quarterback situation in the entire NFL. Them and the

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Rams, who are still figuring out that Jared

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Goff is not the answer. Give me any other team,

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>even the New York Jets. I'd rather be the New

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>York Jets, because I know I'm getting my quarterback next year,

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in free agency with a guy like Stafford

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>or Cousins that I've mentioned, or they're gonna spend the

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>top five pick on the quarterback position. M'd rather be

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco forty Niners that thinks they're gonna get

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback next year. I am maybe Kirk Cousins or

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>will also be drafted in the top five and get

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the studs that come out next year. If

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you're the Denver Broncos, you can't do that. You just

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>spent a first round pick on Paxton Lynch. I think

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that is crucial and because of that, I think Denver

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is doomed for the next few years. And when you

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>have guys like Derek Carr ascending in that division, when

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you have a stable team like the Kansas City Chiefs,

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be in the mix. And when you have

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a team that I think is ascending in the Los

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Chargers, that means I think the Broncos will be

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in the basement of the a f C West. You

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>clearly fade this quarterback position. Also, they just lost Russell

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.839
<v Speaker 1>o'coon in free agency. That's their left tackle. That does

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>not bode well for their offensive line either. I'm also,

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy purposes, fading their running back position this year.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Listen at running back going for the Denver Broncos. This year.

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You got incumbent C. J. Anderson. These guys got Jamal

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Charles in the off season. Okay, but Jamal Charles is

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>coming off knee injuries for the last couple of years.

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>He is turning or is already. This is his age

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty season. He is not what he used to be.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Remember there's also the young second year player Davante Booker.

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I think these guys maybe okay for their NFL backfield,

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>but this is going to be a straight committee. You

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>need to keep your eye on the Denver Broncos running

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>back situation. I would not be surprised if you see C. J.

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Anderson wind up like seven hundred yards, if you see

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Charles wind up with like seven hundred yards, if

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you see Davontae Booker wind up like three hundred yards.

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>But guess what that means. None of them will become

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a week to week guy that you could roll out

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>there with confidence in your fantasy football team. I think

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the share of the running back room is a problem

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to fantasy goodness for the Denver Broncos