WEBVTT - #396 Wrongful Conviction: Junk Science - Footwear Comparison Evidence

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey folks, Kate Judson here, I'm a lawyer and the

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>executive director of the Center for Integrity and Forensic Sciences.

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:12.719
<v Speaker 1>We're back with another episode of Junk Science, a series

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we first released in twenty twenty. But these stories are

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>just as relevant as ever. In this week's episode, Josh

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>will dive into the story of Dale Johnson and the

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>use of footwear analysis to wrongfully convict an innocent man.

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>It's yet another example of a highly subjective analysis that

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is presented in court as objective fact. Just like other

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>types of pattern matching evidence, in court, testifying experts may

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>overstate the certainty of the evidence, overstate their conclusions, or

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>exaggerate their reliability. In fact, when looking at hair comparison

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>analyst testimony another type of flawed pattern matching, the FBI

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and others found that analysts overstated their conclusions more than

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety five percent of the time. There's no reason to

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>believe that other types of pattern analysis are any different.

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So sometimes analysts overstate or exaggerate, and of course sometimes

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they're just playing wrong. Dale Johnson's case is an extreme

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>example of this area of flawed analysis, but there are

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>plenty more cases where footwear comparisons are used in a

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>problematic way, and likely many more exonerations to come.

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 2>It's a clear fall day in America's heartland. You sit

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 2>in a chair outside your trailer, contently looking out over

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 2>your farm. It's cool and the sun is setting behind

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 2>the dense forest that surrounds your property. Everything seems just right.

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 2>That evening, your stepdaughter in Net stops by with her boyfriend.

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 2>You and your wife were pretty upset when Annette told

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>you she was moving away from the farm and moving

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 2>in with her boyfriend, Todd and his parents downtown. You

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 2>don't want a Net to be caught up with someone

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 2>from town. All those townies seem to care about his

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 2>church and gossip. You want nothing to do with them,

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 2>and they don't seem to want anything to do with you.

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 2>But in Nette's already eighteen, she's an adult. You can't

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 2>really control her. You try to act supportive, so you

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 2>nod to Todd and help a Nette pack the last

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 2>of her things into his trunk. You give her a

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 2>hug before she gets into the car with him, and

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 2>you watch as Todd pulls away to drive them back

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 2>into town, and you're feeling a little helpless. The next

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 2>day is pretty routine for you. You pick up loads

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 2>of hay to bring to your barn. It's strenuous work.

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 2>You work hard all day. You're exhausted, and you go

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>to bed early. The next morning, the phone rings. It's

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Todd's mother. She says, are net in Todd with you? No,

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 2>you say, I thought they were with you. Tod's mother

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 2>becomes frantic. She says, the kids went for a walk

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 2>around four pm yesterday and they never came home last night.

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 2>But there's something else going on there. There's a hint

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 2>of something, a tone of accusation in her voice, like

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 2>she's somehow blaming you. You hang up and call the

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 2>police immediately. You wait all day, hoping to hear something,

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 2>but there's nothing. You're just waiting and waiting, and the

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 2>police finally get back to you in the evening. They

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 2>can't find them. One sleepless night bleeds into another, and

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 2>then another and another. This is one terrible nightmare for

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 2>you and your wife. Ten days go on like this.

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 2>All you and your wife can do is it and worry.

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 2>You're not eating, you're not sleeping, you don't know what

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 2>to do with yourselves. It's raining outside when you finally

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 2>get a call from an officer and you can hear

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>it in the tone of their voice. This is not

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 2>going to be good. The news I have for you

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 2>is not going to be easy to hear. He says,

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 2>we found Todd in a net in the Hawking River.

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, you can't stand. Your body is trembling.

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 2>You try to restate what the officer just said. You're

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 2>trying to wrap your head around what this means. You

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 2>found their bodies, their dead bodies. The officer says, they

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 2>didn't find their whole bodies, just their torsos. Their bodies

0:04:51.680 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 2>have been dismembered. You're completely sick. Officers spend two days

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 2>searching the cornfields between the railroad tracks and the river

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 2>where the torsos were found. They find Todd in the

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 2>net's limbs and heads buried in shallow graves. You and

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 2>your wife drive into town to the police station, and

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 2>you're taken aback by the attitudes of these cops. When

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 2>you're separated from your wife and pulled into an interrogation room,

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 2>officers tell you to take off your boots, your shirt,

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 2>your pants. You sit shivering in your underwear for eight

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 2>and a half hours and then a detective comes in.

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 2>He sits down right next to you, puts his finger

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>in your face and says, you did this. We know

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 2>you did this. We found your bootprint down by the riverbank.

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Once we match that boot to the print that was

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 2>left at that riverbank, it'll prove you were there. You

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 2>killed your stepdaughter, and then you sick bastard, you cut

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 2>off for arms, her legs, her head. You better confess,

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 2>because I'll tell you right now it's going to get

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 2>worse for you if you don't. You say, over and

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 2>over and over again, what in the world are you

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>talking about. I didn't murder a net I just came

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>here to help you find out who did What is

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 2>this all about. They don't have enough evidence to charge

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 2>you for the murder of a net and Todd, so

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 2>they have to let you go. They impound your car

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 2>so it can be searched for evidence. It's dark and

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 2>cold when they drive you home. They let you and

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 2>your wife out of the car and you're still naked

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 2>except for your underwear. You walk barefoot to your trailer.

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Your toes are totally dumb. By the time you get

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 2>to the door. Downtown, rumors start to spread. People are

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 2>saying this murder must have been some kind of cult ritual,

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 2>that it must have been you who did it. The quiet,

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 2>stern stepfather who never says much, never goes to church,

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 2>keeps his family hidden away. Who knows what goes on

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>at that farm. They didn't like you before, but now

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 2>they're straight a hostile. They cross the street to get

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>away from you when they see you coming. It takes

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 2>them a year to build the case against you. Are

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 2>they even looking at other suspects. The whispering of your

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 2>name around town grows to a fever pitch. You can

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 2>hear their accusations ring in your ears. Murderer, molester. You're

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 2>eventually arrested in charge with the butchering murder of your

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 2>stepdaughter and net and her boyfriend Todd. When you finally

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 2>go to court, you do something very out of the ordinary.

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 2>You waive the right to a jury trial. Finding twelve

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>impartial people in Logan, Ohio really not going to happen.

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 2>The newspapers, everyone around town, they all think you're guilty.

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Everyone just wants to feel safe again. They won't be

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 2>satisfied until someone is convicted and they are sure that

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 2>person is you instead of a jury. You put your

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 2>fate in the hands of a three judge panel. A

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 2>jury might not see it, but three judges they have to.

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 2>It's their job to apply the facts to the law

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>without any outside influence from the court of public opinion.

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Your lawyer calls to the stand and FBI analyst who

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 2>says the plaster mold of what the prosecution claims is

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 2>your bootprint at the riverbank is quote unquote unsuitable. The

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 2>analyst says it lacks sufficient detail for meaningful comparison, and

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 2>that it looks more like the footprint of someone who

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 2>is walking barefoot. There is no way to claim your

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 2>boots match that print, So you're optimistic. But then the

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 2>prosecution calls an anthropology professor or to the stand. She

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 2>says she studied footwear impressions of countless samples. Her delivery

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 2>is slow and deliberate and really credible. She says, quote

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 2>no person's footprints are the same as another. They're as

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 2>unique as a fingerprint. I've analyzed the wear patterns on

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 2>the inside of the defendant's boot, and I can say

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 2>with certainty, scientific certainty, that the footprint found by the

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 2>riverbank was made by the defendant. This sounds unbelievable, but

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 2>you see the judges are nodding along. There's no wather

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 2>buying this is there. After a very short deliberation, the

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 2>judges apparently believe the testimony of the prosecution's anthropologists who

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 2>put you right at the scene of the crime. They

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 2>convict you, and you are sentenced to death. The story

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 2>you just heard is based on the murders of Nette

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Cooper Johnston and Todd Schultz. Dale. Johnston was wrongfully convicted

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 2>and sentenced to death in nineteen eighty four. He was

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 2>exonerated in nineteen ninety, over twenty years after the murder.

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 2>The true killer finally confessed, but even then the people

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 2>in the town of Logan still chose to believe that

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Dale was guilty in one way or another. On today's episode,

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 2>we're going to examine how a supposed footprint put an

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 2>innocent man on death row. I'm Josh Dubin, civil rights

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and criminal defense attorney and Innocent ambassador to the Innocence

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 2>Project in New York. Today, on Wrongful Conviction Junk Science,

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 2>we examined footwear comparison evidence, even when done correctly, impression

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 2>analysis of evidence like shoe prints and tire tracks as

0:10:55.800 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 2>purely subjective. Many experts recognize its limitations, but one so

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 2>called expert in particular push the limits of this forensic

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 2>discipline to produce horrific outcomes. It turns out that Dale

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Johnson wasn't the only innocent person to be convicted of

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 2>a crime based on faulty footwear comparison evidence.

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 3>The Pacers Foundation is a proud supporter of this episode

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 3>of wrongful conviction with Jason Flahm and of the Last

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Mile organization, which provides business and tech training to help

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 3>incarcerated individuals successfully and permanently re enter the workforce. The

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Pacers Foundation is committed to improving the lives of Hoosiers

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 3>across Indiana, supporting organizations dedicated primarily to helping young people

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 3>and students. For more information on the work of the

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Pacers Foundation or the Last Mile Program, visit Pacersfoundation dot

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 3>org or the Lastmile dot org.

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 2>In nineteen seventy six, archaeologists made one of the most

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 2>exciting discoveries of our time. They found footprints dating back

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 2>three point seven million years immortalized in the volcanic ash

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 2>in Tanzania, and they looked like human prints. Archaeologists were thrilled.

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 2>They thought these footprints could shed some light on when

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 2>human beings began walking upright on two feet. Luis Robbins

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 2>was an anthropology professor at the University of North Carolina

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 2>at Greensboro. She too was excited about these footprints and

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>wanted to know exactly who left them behind. Louise had

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 2>been conducting her own studies in footprint analysis. She started

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 2>collecting footprints from people who were still alive. Five hundred

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 2>people put ink onto their feet and then stood on

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 2>a piece of paper. Based on those prince Louise tried

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 2>to find characteristics and feet that were specific to age, sex, stature,

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 2>and weight, using her own system of measurement. She would

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 2>then compare those characteristics to the footprints found in the caves.

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Her conclusion, no two footprints are the same. In fact,

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 2>she thought she could tell a great deal about a

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 2>person just by looking at their footprint. Her methods were

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 2>never tested by her peers, nor were they confirmed by

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 2>other scientists, but Louise she thought she was onto something.

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 2>She claimed to do something no one else could identify

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 2>a person solely through their footprint, and so in nineteen

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 2>seventy eight, when a team of scientists went to excavate

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 2>the site in Tanzania where the prehistoric footprints were found.

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Louise went too. When she saw the prince, she claimed

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 2>that one of them was left by a woman that

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 2>was five and a half months pregnant. Now, other scientists

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 2>on the expedition scratched their heads. It was hard enough

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 2>to figure out if the prints that they were looking

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 2>at were even human at all. No one had ever

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 2>claimed to know the gender of the person that made

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 2>the print, let alone of that person was carrying a child.

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Then Louise took a dangerous leap. She positioned herself as

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 2>a forensic expert, authoring a book on footprints. She didn't

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 2>write this book with her scientific peers in mind, but

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 2>she wrote it for law enforcement and crime labs. Only

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 2>five pages in this book were dedicated to the analysis

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 2>of actual shoe prints, and yet, based on these five pages,

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Louise claimed that she was an expert in this area

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 2>of forensic science. Lawyers began to hire her as an

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 2>expert witness. They told judges that her work was on

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 2>the cutting edge of forensic science. Critics of her work

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 2>called it Cinderella analysis. After all, she usually he made

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 2>sure that the shoe fit when she matched the suspects

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 2>foot to the shoe Prince found at a crime scene.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 2>In the more than twenty cases for which she testified,

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 2>twelve people, some of whom who have since been proven

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 2>to be innocent, were sent to prison, including Dale Johnston,

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 2>who was sentenced to death.

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 4>Dale Johnson and his wife Sarah at the time, came

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 4>down to Logan several days after the bodies had been discovered,

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 4>and they came to the Logan police department. They wanted

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 4>to be helpful to them, and Dale was immediately taken

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 4>up to an interrogation room. His boots, his pants, his

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 4>shirt were all confiscated. So he was sitting there in

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 4>the chair in his underwear and they were bombarding him.

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 4>You did it, didn't you? And we know you did it?

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 4>Over and over and over again. He kept saying, no,

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 4>I have nothing. I would just I came into town

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 4>to try to help.

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Here today is Bill Osinski, a journalist who covered the

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Dale Johnson case for years and wrote a book about

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 2>it called Guilty by Popular Demand. So Bill, tell us

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about yourself and how you started covering

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 2>this case.

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 4>For nearly forty years. I was a reporter. I worked

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 4>for eleven different newspapers around the country. I worked for

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 4>the Akron Beacon Journal at that time, which is nearly

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 4>two hundred miles away from Logan, Ohio, where the murders

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 4>took place. But in those days, the newspapers valued a

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 4>major story and would make that kind of an investment

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 4>in time and resources to cover a widely publicized case

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 4>like that.

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 2>So, Bill, you actually went to Logan, Ohio to cover

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Dale's trial? What was that like?

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 4>I drove into Logan, which is about thirty five miles

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 4>southeast of Columbus, Ohio. I've ever been there before, and

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 4>I drove in on a January morning, and it was

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 4>one of the coldest things I can remember. The temperatures

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 4>were well below zero. And I went to the center

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 4>of the little town and found the courthouse. And here,

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, eight o'clock on a weekday morning, there was

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.959
<v Speaker 4>a line outside the courthouse. People were standing in that

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 4>below zero cold waiting for a chance to get in

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 4>to hear all this salacious details of this horrific murder

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 4>of a teenage couple who were found dismembered, parts of

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 4>their bodies buried in a cornfield near the Hawking River

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 4>in Logan, Ohio.

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Wow, this is a really brutal crime. I mean, you

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 2>have body parts buried in fields. And the prosecutors claimed

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 2>that Dale Johnson committed these murders and putting aside what

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 2>his motive would have been. How did they claim he

0:17:58.359 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 2>committed the murders.

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 4>The prosecutor alleged in his scenario that Dale Johnston had

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 4>kidnapped these two kids in downtown Logan, made a stop

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 4>on his way home at a doctor's office and drove

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 4>him onto his trailer, where they got into an argument

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 4>about a little used car that the parents were supposed

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 4>to have given a net but hadn't yet, And out

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 4>of that argument, Dale went into a jealous fit and

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 4>pulled out a gun which they never found, and shot

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 4>his stepdaughter and a boyfriend, and then took them outside,

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 4>apparently and butchered them, and then brought them back to

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 4>downtown Logan where they had last been seen and put

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 4>some body parts, heads and limbs in the cornfield. I mean,

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 4>it just it made absolutely no sense. They had no

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 4>evidence that he was actually back in town at night

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 4>trying to bury these bodies, but that's what they elect.

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 4>Dale was not a warm guy. I mean, you know,

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 4>he was the outsider. He didn't have a high opinion

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 4>of the locals. They didn't like him. You know, he

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 4>was convenient guy for them to hang in on.

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 2>So, Bill, did anyone think that Dale was innocent? I mean,

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 2>what was your sense of the atmosphere surrounding the case.

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 4>There was such an atmosphere of the case having been

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 4>already tried in the court of public opinion before the

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 4>trial even started. More than a year passed between the

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 4>murderers and the trial, and obviously the only story coming

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 4>out of the investigation was that Dale Johnson did it.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 4>So that, in fact, was why the defense waived a

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 4>jury trial and asked for a three judge panel, because

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 4>they knew that people in Hocking County were so predisposed

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 4>to believe that Dale Johnson was the killer.

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Now, very little evidence was found at the scenes where

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 2>these body parts were found, but we know investigators found

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 2>some sort of print in the mud by the riverbank.

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 2>And Dale goes down to the police station with his

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 2>wife Sarah, and he thinks he's going there to help

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.719
<v Speaker 2>them find the killers, but they confiscate his boots, and

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 2>of course those boots would be compared to the impression

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 2>found at the scene. So tell us a little bit

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 2>more about what happened.

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 4>There were so many cops out there that, according to

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 4>the testimony of a Ohio Bureau of Investigation agent, they

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 4>totally ruined the crime scene as far as being able

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 4>to collect any valid evidence. They were cops stomping all over. Well,

0:20:55.480 --> 0:21:00.400
<v Speaker 4>what happened was the share of Hockeing County had an

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.719
<v Speaker 4>impression made of a depression in the riverbank, and they

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 4>made it casting, and they sent it off to the FBI,

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 4>and it was examined by a nationally known footprint expert

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 4>at the FBI, and he was brought in to testify

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 4>to his findings, and he testified that, well, all he

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 4>could say that this casting was more likely a footprint

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 4>than any kind of a shoeprint or bootprint. And however,

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 4>he forwarded this plaster cast at his own volition to

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 4>a woman anthropologist, Luis Robbins, for her examination. And she

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 4>had a theory of how he could identify footprints from

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 4>the ware patterns on the inside of someone's footwear. She

0:21:55.280 --> 0:22:00.719
<v Speaker 4>had this Kakamami theory that by examining the interior of

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 4>a footwear she could get wear impressions and use that

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 4>to analyze a casting of a print from a shoe

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 4>or a boot. And so she testified and triwed it. Well,

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 4>you can't really say that Dale Johnson's boot fits this,

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 4>but from the wear patterns that she observed from the

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 4>interior of the boot, when you looked at it that way,

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 4>then yes, this was made by Dale Johnson's boot. And

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, I had never heard of that before. It

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 4>didn't make any sense to me. It was only later,

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 4>after the damage was done, that it came out how

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 4>irresponsible and unreliable and untrue. Her testimony was.

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 2>So let me hit this straight. This is like, you know,

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 2>kind of mind blowing here. Louise Robbins said that she

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 2>could match the depression found by the riverbank to Dale

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 2>based on war patterns made by his foot inside his boot.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it just sounds ridiculous. I've never even heard

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 2>of that before. This seems to go so far outside

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 2>the bounds of any verifiable science. And you know, it's

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 2>important for our listeners to keep in mind that with

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 2>impression pattern matching methods, that's the type of science we're

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 2>talking about, or alleged science that we're talking about with

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>shoe prints and tires. There's a database that experts have

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 2>and they refer to this database when they're matching a

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 2>shoe or a tire to an impression at a scene.

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 2>And tires and shoes are mass produced, so the same

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 2>rubber mold is used to make them. But that just

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 2>tells an expert what class that piece of evidence came from. So,

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 2>for instance, they can say that this footwear impression was

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 2>made by a size ten Nike Air Jordan. But the

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 2>problem is a lot of people own a size ten

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Nike Air Jordan, so it's not enough to put somebody

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 2>at the scene. So impression analysis really comes down to

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:10.239
<v Speaker 2>the individual characteristics in the specific shoe or shoes that

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 2>belong to the accused, and we're talking about things like

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 2>cracks in the sole of the shoe, comes stuck to

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the bottom of the heel, you know, characteristics that are

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 2>often caused by routine wear and tear. But the problem

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 2>is there is no standard regarding the number of unique

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 2>characteristics that are needed to make a positive identification. And

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 2>it sounds like from the mold they were working with

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 2>in this case that the FBI analysts couldn't even tell

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 2>if the impression was made by a bare foot or

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 2>a shoe, let alone, what kind of a shoe? So

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 2>that should tell you something about the quality of the

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.919
<v Speaker 2>impression they were working with. But Ms Robbins makes this

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 2>huge leap, and it's really really hard to imagine that

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 2>this could have been allowed in a courtroom when someone's

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 2>freedom was on the line. And yet he or she

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 2>is one of the prosecution's key witnesses when it came

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 2>to analyzing the physical evidence of the scene. So how

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 2>prominently did Miss Robbin's testimony play in the prosecution's closing arguments?

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 4>Bill, Well, it was very prominent because it was the

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 4>only piece of evidence that linked Dale Johnson to the

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 4>murder scene. I thought it was a very weak link

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 4>to begin with, but apparently it was strong enough for

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 4>three judges. His closing line was, murder is the ultimate

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 4>form of molestation, so you must be guilty of the

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 4>murder too. He had, of course, been alleging without evidence,

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 4>that Dale Johnson had inappropriate relationship with Annette.

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 2>So after he's convicted and sentence, what happens next?

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Bill? He was sent immediately to death row. But you know,

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 4>it was such a weird, hostile atmosphere in that town.

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I will never forget when it came time

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 4>for the verdict, all the spectators had gathered on the

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 4>lower level of the courthouse but listened to the verdict

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 4>by radio, and I will never forget that when the

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 4>guilty verdict was announced, there was this eerie cheering that

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 4>came from below, you know, that filled up the courtroom.

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 4>And these people wanted somebody to pay, and Dale Johnston

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 4>happened to be the guy who they were able to

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 4>hang it on.

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it seems Bill that they didn't even have

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 2>anything other than a hunch that Dal Johnston did this.

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I it's hard to make sense of this.

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, do you think that they did this on purpose?

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that they've set out to frame Dale Johnson?

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, I don't think anyone wants to accept that the

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 4>prosecutors and police would knowingly fabricate an entire case against

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 4>a murder defendant. And I know I came down to

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Logan with no preconceptions. I do remember, you know, having

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 4>the belief that you know, the state wouldn't bring these

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 4>charges unless they had something against this guy. And by

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 4>the end, I said, where is the case I was

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 4>shocked at the prosecutor's summary. I mean it, it was

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 4>total high opera and total fantasy. Everything that was presented

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 4>in that trial was a lie. I believe somewhere before

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 4>I die, I'm going to learn the truth in this case,

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 4>and it just so happens that I did.

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's interesting that oftentimes, when one of these

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 2>disciplines of junk science is used in a case and

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 2>the person is convicted, it's not the exposure of that

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 2>junk science as being total bullshit that leads to the exoneration.

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 2>It's often that DNA testing is used to prove that

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 2>they have the wrong person. What's really interesting about this

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 2>case is that Dale is eventually released from prison because

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 2>his lawyers were able to prove that some of the

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 2>evidence that was used the convictim was not admissible. And

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 2>oddly enough, it wasn't the shoe evidence that was thrown out,

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 2>but another witness's testimony. It turns out that a witness

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:51.959
<v Speaker 2>had been hypnotized by a detective and was persuaded to

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 2>give this awful testimony against Dale at the trial, and

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 2>testimony that he like forcefully put a net in and

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Todd into a car and that testimony was never supposed

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 2>to be admitted in court, and that was what was

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 2>deemed inadmissible, and Dale was let out because of that.

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 2>And of course Louise Robbin's testimony about his you know,

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 2>the inside wear patterns on his boots, you know, being

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 2>definitive proof that the impression left on the riverbank was

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 2>his that was left undisturbed. And everyone still believed he

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 2>was guilty. But then someone else confessed to murdering and

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 2>it and Todd so Bill tell us about that. Who

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 2>actually committed this crime, A.

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Sorry little fellow named Chester mcnight was nicknamed Chester the

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 4>Molester just because apparently because he was weird and was

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 4>an habitual criminal, habitual drunk, even though he had a

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 4>history of assaults against women. And Chester actually got married

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 4>and it lasted a couple of weeks before she kicked

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 4>him out and left. And it was in that atmosphere

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 4>where Chester just went over the deep end and was

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 4>drinking day in and day out. He was obviously depressed,

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 4>the wife had left him, and he was just drinking incessantly.

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 4>He came on that afternoon, early evening of October fourth,

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 4>to Kenny Lynn Scott's house, a local drug dealer, you know,

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 4>they were drinking buddies. Anyway, there was a kind of

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 4>a makeshift party in Kenny's yard and Chester joined in,

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 4>and here comes Todd and Annette. So they joined the

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 4>party for a little while. I think they may have

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 4>had a beer and Chester decided to hey, let's keep

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 4>the party going. I've got some I've got some stuff.

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 4>And so they start walking down the railroad tracks and

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 4>according to Chester's account, he wanted to have a group

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 4>sex with Annette, and she of course know and Todd

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 4>tried to get her out of the situation, and that's

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 4>when Chester pulled a gun and shot him, and that

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 4>started screaming. She shot her. At that point, Chester and

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 4>Kenny dragged the bodies down to the riverfront at the

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 4>edge of the cornfield and dismembered them. And Kenny, maybe

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 4>with help maybe not, got the bodies back into the

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 4>cornfield and dug shallow holes and put the limbs and

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 4>the heads into a kind of a bare spot in

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 4>the middle of the cornfield that he knew about. And

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 4>Kenny the next few nights he would go out to

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 4>that railroad bridge and cry and moan and friends saying,

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 4>what's wrong Kenny and he told them, Yo, you wouldn't understand.

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 4>His neighbors knew what he was doing. His neighbors saw

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 4>his behavior. His neighbors told the police that they should

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 4>be investigating him, but they never did, and they did

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 4>have a record then of this strange call made the

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 4>night before the body parts were found. Kenny Linscott made

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 4>the call and said, have you found the bodies yet?

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 4>And nobody at that point knew that the kids were

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 4>even dead or that there were bodies to be found,

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 4>And that call was logged and it became the thing

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 4>that led to Kenny and ultimately to Chester. And so

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:26.239
<v Speaker 4>I have a law enforcement source that helped me with this,

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 4>and he told me that, you know, everybody knew Kenny

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 4>was acting weird after the killings. And he said, well,

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 4>let's go talk to Kenny. And the sheriff says, oh, no,

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 4>we confined him, when then we need him. So at

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 4>the very beginning, Lin Scott's name came up, but yet

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 4>the police just dismissed him right out of hand.

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 2>In reflecting on all this, I just want to go

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 2>back to Luiz Robin's testimony about the shoeprint for a moment.

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I understand why jurors would be persuaded by her. She's

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 2>got this anthropology degree, she's a professor. She comes across

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 2>short convincingly. She went and studied these ancient footprints in Tanzania.

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 2>That all makes sense. But the three judges hearing this,

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, the inside wear patterns on the boot and

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 2>that being definitive proof that it was Dale Johnson's bootprint.

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what did they make of her testimony?

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 4>I can tell you how strongly her testimony was accepted.

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Twenty five years later, you know, when the real truth

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 4>came out. I interviewed two of the three judges on

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 4>the case and they both said, well, we had doctor

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Robin's testimony before us, and that was very convincing. This

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 4>was even after they learned the truth, after they learned

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 4>that everything this woman said was a lie, they still

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 4>wanted to believe in her. I have summed up this

0:33:55.960 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 4>case as a total collapse of a local justice system,

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 4>and I still believe that it left me with such

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 4>a sense of outrage that this kind of thing can

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 4>be done in our system of justice toom and I mean,

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 4>you know it was it was not even close. But

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 4>the lies that were told in that courtroom were enough

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 4>to send an into some man to death row sitting

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 4>there through the entire trial. Is they never they never

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 4>presented a rational case, and the evidence that they did

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:39.240
<v Speaker 4>present was you know, challenged very successfully by the defense.

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what I learned is that someone with an

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 4>academic position and the claim of scientific expertise is automatically

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 4>granted some level of believability, even by judges and prosecutors

0:34:56.120 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 4>and investigators. And they really accepted Louise robins testimony and

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 4>as fact I called it in my book fantasy Forensics,

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 4>and as events have proven, it was totally fabricated. I

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 4>can only attribute it to the desire to get a conviction,

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 4>any conviction. That people in that town were petrified. The

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 4>judges knew it, They knew what would happen if they

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 4>didn't get a conviction, and they knew that they wouldn't

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 4>have another crack at Dale Johnson if they acquitted him.

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:34.959
<v Speaker 4>So they convicted him and just went back home.

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 2>The use of doctor Robins as a forensic expert is

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 2>an example of what can go horribly wrong when courts

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:50.760
<v Speaker 2>allow unverified signs into our courtrooms. She testified in twenty

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 2>cases truly a hired gun by attorneys looking for a

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 2>particular outcome. Her work was reviewed by a panel of

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and thirty five anthropologists, forensic scientists, lawyers, and

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 2>legal scholars sponsored by the American Academy of Forensic Sciences,

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 2>and they concluded that her methodology for identification had no

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 2>basis in science, but the damage had already been done.

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Dale Johnson spent four years on death row for a

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 2>double homicide that he didn't commit. But he was fortunate

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 2>and that even though his trial left him impoverished, his

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 2>attorneys stayed on his case pro bono and took on

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 2>the appeals. The psychological trauma inflicted on those who were

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:41.399
<v Speaker 2>wrongfully convicted, especially for people who are innocent and sit

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 2>on death row, is well documented. It isn't just the

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 2>conviction that stays with the wrongfully convicted, it's the aftermath.

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Dale lost it all. He lost his stepdaughter, his property,

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 2>his wife divorced him. It wasn't until well into his

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 2>eighties earlier this year that Dale finally received some compensation

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:08.240
<v Speaker 2>for his time spent in prison. The Innocence Project provides

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 2>support for therapy and social services for its clients who

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 2>are forced to cope with the harms associated with their

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 2>wrongful conviction. You can donate to the Innocence Project by

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 2>visiting www. Dot Innocenceproject dot org, slash give. Next week,

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 2>we'll explore the junk science of fingerprint evidence. Wrongful Conviction

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Junk Science is a production of Lava for Good Podcasts

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 2>in association with Signal Company Number One. Thanks to our

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 2>executive producer Jason Flam and the team at Signal Company

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:51.959
<v Speaker 2>Number One executive producer Kevin Wardis and senior producers Karen

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Kornhaber and Britz Spangler. Our music was composed by Jay Ralph.

0:37:56.920 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 2>You can follow me on Instagram at dubin Josh. Follow

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 2>the Wrongful Conviction podcast on Facebook and on Instagram at

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 2>wrongful Conviction and on Twitter at wrong Conviction