WEBVTT - The History of Podcasting

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Text technology with tech Stuff from works dot com. Hey there,

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm a senior writer with how stuff Works dot com

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and I've been doing this for a while, like like

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a long while. I've been podcasting for so long, and

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:32.279
<v Speaker 1>as I think back to all of those episodes, I've

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>done more than eight d fifty of them. At this point,

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>I realized that while I've talked about podcasting in an

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>episode or two, I've never done a full episode about

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.319
<v Speaker 1>the history of podcasting itself. And so that is what

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about today. We're going to look

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>at the history of podcasting, how it evolved, how it

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>got its name, the earliest examples of podcasts, and then

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>we gonna talk a little bit about the how Stuff

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Works history with podcasts, at least based upon what information

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I could glean from my taciturn coworkers. So sit back, relax,

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and let's learn about some history. Y'all. There's the stuff

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you missed in history of podcasting. I'm Jonathan Strickland. So

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>this particular story is a complicated one. It's filled with

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different people, a lot of different things

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>have happened over the course of the evolution of podcasting.

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>There are incidents and accidents, their hints and allegations. As

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Paul Simon would say, So let's dive in now. If

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at the story for like go Anywhere and

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 1>you look for the history of podcasting, you just type

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that into Google and you pull up some stuff you

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>including an article that we have on house to wars

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You will frequently see that podcasting dates back

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.559
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand four with Adam Curry, who I remember

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>from my childhood. He was a a VJ on MTV,

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>which used to show music videos, and that's where a

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of the histories start. They say two thousand four,

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Adam Curry made the first podcast, but uh, it's not

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>entirely accurate. Actually, the story dates back before two thousand four,

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and it's the first podcast was not from Adam Curry,

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>not really. So I thought we could probably dispel some

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>myths and learn about the truth here. Uh. And there

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>are also a few different threads to this story, as

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, and one of those threads I've already

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>covered in an episode of tech Stuff from about a

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>year ago. I thought it was more recent than that.

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>But as I was looking through the archives to pull

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>up my notes, I realized that I my notes dated

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>from two thousand and sixteen about the history of the

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>MP three standard. And this just shows how bad I

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>am at being able to keep track of time. I

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>was convinced that I had done the MP three episode

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe a month or two ago, and it is August

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>as I record this now. I'm not gonna go over

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>all of the history of the MP three standard again,

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's all there in that episode. But I'm gonna

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>give you the cliffs notes version. Our cliffs notes still thing.

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Someone tell me if cliffs notes still exist. I'm pretty

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>sure I've asked that in a previous episode, but i've

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I've clearly forgotten again. Anyway, I'm gonna give you a

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>summary of what I talked about in that previous episode.

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>A research institution in Germany formed a group that dedicated

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>itself to developing compression strategies for digital audio files. So

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a raw audio file, if you didn't compress it at all,

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it represents a pretty decent amount of digital information. So

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it obviously depends upon how long the audio track is. Right.

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>The more the more information is there, the longer the file,

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the larger the file size will be. So a three

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>minute song is gonna have more information packed into it

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>than say a minute of quiet room tone. So you've

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>got this fairly large amount of data. Especially for the

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>time that we're talking about, which was late nineteen seventies

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>early nineties, there was a need to find a way

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to compress that data down so it didn't take up

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>as much space, and that then you could transmit it

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>over various media like telephone lines. And that's what this

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>group in Germany was trying to do. They wanted to

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>be able to transmit digital audio over telephone lines, but

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in order to make it efficient, they needed to find

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a compression strategy or else the files were just gonna

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>be too large. Now these days, while the file sizes

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't really changed, I mean, the raw audio is still

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>what it is, we definitely have much faster throughput, Like

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we're able to send a lot more information in a

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>shorter amount of time than what we used to be

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>able to do. So it's not as big a deal

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>today unless you're talking about just trying to store a

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>ton of audio on a relatively small storage device. But

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>back in the nineteen seventies, and eighties. This was a

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough challenge. Now. Whether they were successful or not

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in creating a compression strategy that makes the file sizes

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>smaller without affecting the audio quality depends upon a couple

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of things. For one, it depends upon your sense of hearing,

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 1>because some people are more sensitive to it than others,

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and for one person it may sound perfectly fine, and

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>another person may say, no, I can hear all sorts

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of problems from the compression in that audio. For another,

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the settings of the compression itself. You

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>can compress it at different rates, and that will determine

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>how how much it affects the audio file itself. Broadly speaking,

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>their compression strategy was to create what was essentially a

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>virtual ear approach, in which a computer program would analyze

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>audio and attempt to remove straineous data. In other words,

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it was looking for any sounds that would lay outside

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 1>the typical range of human hearing and then chuck those

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>sounds out because people wouldn't be able to hear them anyway.

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>So any sound that was at a frequency above or

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 1>below what your typical human can hear, that would be

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>removed because you wouldn't be able to hear it anyway.

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it would be sounds that might be a soft

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.679
<v Speaker 1>sound that follows a very loud sound, because that loud

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>sound would mask the softer sound, and if we can't

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>hear the softer sound, then there's no reason to include it,

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>at least according to this compression strategy. And that was

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a way of getting rid of information so that you

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>can compress everything together and make smaller file sizes. So

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>really the goal was just to keep only the data

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that humans would really be able to perceive. And it

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>took some time for them to tweak this and make

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that they could come up with an algorithm that

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>worked and didn't result in a really choppy, unpleasant audio experience. So,

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>depending upon how you set your compression rates, you might

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>manage to reduce a file size and not notice a

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>huge difference in quality, or you might end up with

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>something that is truly unlistenable. If you remember, the people

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>working on the MP three standard back in the day

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>would use Tom's Diner as a way of measuring their success,

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and they said that the first few times they tried

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to make a compression formula, it turned Tom's Diner into

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>an unlistenable mess. Some of the uncharitable among us might

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>claim that the completely uncompressed version of Tom's Diner is

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>an unlistenable mess, but that's that's just being mean spirited.

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say the MP three would later make podcasting practical,

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>but it was not a quick leap from MP three's

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>too podcasts. There was a good amount of time between

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the development of the MP three and the rise of

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the podcas cast. But the MP three development sort of

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>leads us into other things that will eventually allow podcast

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to become a reality. Now, let's skip ahead to the

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>early nine nineties. The development of the MP three largely

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>happened in the eighties, but didn't really start making a

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>debut until the nineties. Anyway, the mainstream world was scratching

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>its head over something called the Internet in those early nineties.

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Before then, the only people who really had access to

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the Internet were academics, government officials, and scientists who had

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>been using it for quite some time. But the rest

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of us really didn't have any exposure to it. It

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>was not something that your average person had any access to.

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Your average Joe hadn't really had any contact with it

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>at all. Computer hobbyists had been cutting their teeth on

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>bulletin board systems or bbs s. Now, these were message

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>boards and file repositories that typically sat on someone's spare computer.

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>So with your very basic bolletin board system, the way

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it would work is you would have a phone number

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and that phone number would go to the modem connected

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to this other computer, the computer that houses the BBS.

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>You would use your computer to dial into that number

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that would connect you to this other BBS, and you

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>would then be able to browse the files that have

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>been uploaded to that particular directory for the BBS, play games,

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>leave messages, that kind of thing, because you're dialing in.

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Typically a lot of those smaller BBS has had maybe

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>one phone line, sometimes up to three, where that's how

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>many people could connect at any one time. So there

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>are various ways to discourage people from spending too much

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>time on the BBS and thus keeping it busy for

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody else. For example, UH, some of them would charge

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>for a certain amount of time, like after a certain

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 1>number of minutes had passed, you would have to pay

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>two keep access to the BBS. UH. Some would just

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>have a time limit and after at the when you

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>hit your time limit, it would just kick you off

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and you would have to wait another day to be

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>able to log back into your BBS. Eventually you had

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 1>some bbs is on what was called Fido net. This

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>was a network that allowed bbs is to exchange information

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>with each other. So it's almost like post offices. Think

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>about going to a post office and you would drop

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a letter off, and that letter would then be sent

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to another post office, someone else's BBS and they could

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>receive it. That was kind of the world before the

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Internet had really taken off, and the Internet really is

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a different beast altogether. Instead of dialing into a single

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>machine and browsing what was on that machine, you could

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>suddenly connect to a network of networked machines. In something

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>very important happened in the United States, the Federal Communications

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Commission the c C made an important decision that encouraged

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>explosive growth on the Internet. That that decision was they're

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna lift some restrictions. Up until there was a restriction

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on commercial uses for the Internet. You you weren't allowed

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to use it for commercial purposes. It was meant for research,

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it was meant for government use, and that was it.

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>But in ninety one, the f C c said we're

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>lifting those restrictions, and it became the wild West for

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a while, where lots of companies said, I'm not sure

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>how we can use this to our advantage, but I'm

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>sure it's huge and we have to use it to

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>our advantage. So there are a lot of different parties

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>rushing into the space because now it was possible to

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>make a commercial use of it, but no one had

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.719
<v Speaker 1>really figured out how to actually do that yet. There

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of competition to try and figure out

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>how can we dominate this space, and no one really

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>had the answer yet. So how to this affect Internet use? Well,

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>before the FCC lifted restrictions, there were around one thousand

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Internet hosts connected to this network of networks. By there

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>were more than a million Internet hosts. But for our story,

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the important bit is that people and companies could launch

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>commercial interests in the Internet, including radio stations. Now, Carl

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Malamud gets the credit for being the first person to

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>launch an Internet radio site, and this was called Internet

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Talk Radio. Malamud launched this show in and he launched

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it with a program called Geek of the Week. You

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 1>can actually find recordings of some of those old episodes

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>online and they typically feature various important people in the

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>computer and text spheres, and Malamoud would just interview them

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>about whatever subject they wanted to talk about. And those

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>were the programs that went out live on the Internet.

0:12:55.520 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>On June, the band Severe Tire Damage became the first

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>musical act to perform a concert on Internet radio. Their

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 1>show went out over mbone. That's the letter M as

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in merry and bone, B O and E. That stands

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for Multicast backbone or it's actually a protocol that sat

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>on top of the multicast backbone, which made it feasible

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to send data to multiple viewers around the world simultaneously.

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So I thought it would be helpful to understand how

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>this works. Generally speaking, I p multicasting involves setting up

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a great big convoy, and more specifically, it has to

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>do with packets. So the Internet sends information in packets.

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Anytime there's data passing between computers on the Internet, you're

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>generally talking about packets that are going back and forth.

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And a packet is a unit of data and it

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>includes a few types of information within that packet. So

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the first type of that information is the data that's

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>necessary to deliver it to the right destination. So you've

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>got these sort of headers and footers inside of a packet,

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the very top and the very bottom

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of the packet. That helps tell the Internet system at

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>large where that packet needs to go. It's essentially like

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the address you would find on an envelope in the

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>post office. So the packets have that part of the information.

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>They also have the payload, the actual data that they're

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>carrying to the destination. Let's say it's a web page.

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>It would be a little part of that web page,

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>would be a small portion of the web page. And

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>then you have a third part, which is uh the

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>way that that packet fits in with other packets to

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>complete whatever that payload is. So again, in the case

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of a web page, let's say you're going to house

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:53.479
<v Speaker 1>stuffworks dot com, and just for the sake of this example,

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna use a nice round, simple number of

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>one hundred packets. It takes one d packets to to

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>load up the homepage of how stuff works dot com.

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Those headers and footers will tell the packets where they

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>need to go, which would be your browser, because you're

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the one who typed in www dot how stuff works

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and they also tell your browser how they

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>all fit together so that it can construct the website

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and you can see it on your side on the

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>client side of this exchange. UH packets tend to be

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>relatively small, so you typically need a lot of them

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to deliver any information of significant size. This brings us

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to that third type, that that bit of information that says, hey,

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm the puzzle piece that goes in the top right corner.

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>That's not exactly how it works, but it's a decent

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>enough analogy to kind of understand what's going on. Now,

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>why would you send data in packets. Why wouldn't you

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>just send the entire piece all at once. It's meant

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a way to ensure the delivery of information,

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and by divi riding it up into packets, you can

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>actually make a better case for that information, making it

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to where you wanted to go. If you're sending it

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>all out as one big file, one thing that can

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>happen is it can slow everything down because, depending on

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the size of the file, it might start to tax

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>certain parts of the system, and if it fails, you're

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got to send it all over again. It just

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>becomes a big nightmare. So the founders of the Internet,

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>who as we all know, put the Internet on top

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of Big ben because that's where it gets the best reception,

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>figured that by breaking information up into packets and sending

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>them along the network, you had a better chance of

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>actually receiving the information you wanted. And the reason for

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that is twofold. It's redundancy and packet switching. So redundancy

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>means that a server is sending out multiple copies of

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the same packet to make sure that one of them

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>gets to their destination. So this is kind of like

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>if you had critical message and you've got you make

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>three copies of it and you send a copy each

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>with a different messenger and they all rush out. Well,

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that means that you're more likely to get your message

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to where it needs to go, because even if one

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>of them fails along the way, you have three others going.

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Remember us at three copies, so you have one original

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>that's four total, so one of them is likely to

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>get there. So that way you can send those riders

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>off to gone door to let them know that Rowand

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>is coming out to help them or something. Packet switching

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>is the method of sending the packets themselves, and this

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 1>involves each packet taking its own path. Typically it's whichever

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>path is the most efficient for that packet at that

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>time for it to get to its destination. And packets

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>that all belong to the same document or file can

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>travel very different pathways. So if you go and you're

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to pull up house supports dot com, the packets

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that represent that web page could be taking very different

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>paths in order to get to your computer. Remember, the

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>network is this network of networks. It can be bouncing

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>from all sorts of different machines before it finally gets

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to you. The destination computer then assembles all those packets

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>back into the document or file or whatever it may be.

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>And this is really cool because it means that the

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Internet is really robust. If nodes on the Internet go

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>offline for whatever reason, if if certain computers between you

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and the computer you're trying to get information from go down,

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>well the packets can route around that. They don't come

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>up to like a sinkhole in the middle of the

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 1>road and say, well, we wanted to get there, but

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we can't. No, they can take a different pathway and

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 1>you just have to make sure that you are you know,

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>having that redundancy there, which, by the way, you don't

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>have to do. T c P I P does it

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>for you. But as long as that's in place, with

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>the redundancy, you don't even have to worry. If some

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>of those packets somehow lose their way for whatever reason,

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be, you'll likely end up getting the

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>information you asked for, may not be as fast as

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you wanted, depending upon the problems, but you'll get it.

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>So back to inbone, it's a little different from the

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>approach I just mentioned. The basic packet switching strategy works

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>great for static files and pages. So if I have

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a photograph and I want to send that information across

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>to some other computer, it works great for that. Photographs

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>don't change. It's gonna be the same photograph no matter what,

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's very easy to send that. And I'm not

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about photo editing software here, obviously, I'm just talking

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>about sending an image. But if you want to send

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>something like a video where you have stuff constantly changing

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>both the image and the audio, or even more so

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>live video which is persistently changing and you're not sure

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>when it's gonna end, another approach was pretty important so

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>broadcast represents this ongoing creation of information, and how do

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you disseminate that across the network? Inbone would keep all

0:19:55.800 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the packets together like packed together like a like a convoy,

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>as I said earlier, until the last possible moment before

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>they would split up and move through different routers and

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>go through the rest of its journey. So it's more

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>like a fire hose approach in the first half until

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you get to a point where you absolutely have to

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 1>split things up because they will not get to their

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>destination otherwise. This allows for a more efficient transmission of

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>live content, and it helped make sure that those packets

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>would arrive at their destinations at more or less the

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>same time. Because you want it to be like a broadcast,

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>You want the people who are watching it to all

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>have the same experience that are around the same time.

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise you could end up in a situation where one

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>person is watching the concert on a slight delay and

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>someone else might be more than a minute or two behind.

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And this does still happen. By the way, I can't

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>tell you how many times I've watched the w w

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>E network and have been in a Facebook chat about

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>what was going on with a pay per view only

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to have someone's boil something for me because I was

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>lagging a bit behind the rest of the live feed

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>for everybody else. But that's the price we pay for

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>this amazing technology. Xerox Park was the group that created

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the inbone extension and the Internet Engineering Task Force adopted

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it in nineteen nine two, so it was all well

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>in place for the Internet radio days of nineteen and

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Severe Tire Damage performed at Xerox Park. You remember, Xerox

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Park is also the research and development area where we

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>got things like the graphic user interface and the computer mouse,

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>as well as a ton of other stuff. A lot

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of interesting research and development came out of Xerox. So

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>their audience Severe Tire Damage for this initial concert in

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty much consisted of a dude in Australia, which is

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>really true. There was a researcher in Australia who was

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>helping along with this project and he was the intended

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>audience for the Severe Tire Damage concert of n In

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nine four, a slightly more famous band called The

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Rollings Stones performed their first live concert on the Internet,

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>and cheekily Severe Tire Damage performed a set just before

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the Rolling Stones were scheduled to go on and then

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>they put their set out over the Internet, this time

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>broadcast to the Internet at large, so severe tire Damage said,

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>we were happy to open for the Rolling Stones, even

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>though we're not in the same city as the Rolling Stones,

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>and that was kind of making a point saying you

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 1>could now have this sort of experience where people from

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the world could address an audience in

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>a sequence and they didn't have to be in the

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>same place at the same time. The Rolling Stones, for

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>their part, were pretty good natured about it. I think

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>at first they called him weird furry guys from from

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>uh Palo Alto, California, But they also said to The

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>New York Times that it was a good reminder of

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the democratic nature of the Internet. There was a college

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>radio station called w x y C still Is that

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>became the first terrestrial radio station to start broadcasting on

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. They began their simulcast in the fall of

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>now They first started off with their off air signals

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>using a Cornell University utility called see You See Me.

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>On November seven, the radio station became the first to

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>simulcast it's broadcast live over the air and on the Internet.

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>A few months later, w R. E. K reck Over

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>at Georgia Tech went live with its simulcast technology. And

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of interesting because they had actually hooked up

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>their Internet client on November seven, which was the same

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>day w x y C went live. But it would

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 1>take a few more months before Georgia Tech broadcast hit

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.959
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, and since then tons of different university and

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>then commercial radio stations as well as public radio have

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.959
<v Speaker 1>joined on and used the Internet for broadcast. Now we're

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break, but when we come back,

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about how this technology of streaming

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>radio gradually gave people the idea of creating sort of

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 1>an episodic content that would be digestible in a downloadable

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>format and thus eventually evolve into podcast But first, let's

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break to thank our sponsor. Okay, So

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>streaming radio was now available online and to listen to

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>any streaming radio station you needed to use an audio player.

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Real Audio and other companies were making software that would

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>allow you to listen to audio over the Internet. But

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>what about podcasts? Well, jumping back to that's when a

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Canadian science news program called Quirks and Quirks Hit the Internet.

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>The radio show had been airing on terrestrial radio since nineteen.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Each show lasts about an hour and consists of segments

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>about science, news and interesting facts. The Internet versions were

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>recorded episodes stored in MP three format of available for download,

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and this would become really important later on. Similarly, in

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>CNN launched its Internet newsroom, and the company began to

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>make shows available for download and included an updated compilation file.

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>This too would become really important later on. Meanwhile, a

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>guy named Jim Logan had founded a company called Personal Audio.

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>According to Alan Martin of a l phr dot com,

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna call it Alpha. Personal Audio's original goal

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>was to create a digital audio playing device, but that

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.679
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out. However, in the process of trying to

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.479
<v Speaker 1>make this happen, the company had filed for and been

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>awarded several patents dealing with digital audio distribution on the Internet.

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And this would be around the mid nineties six and later.

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>And this also becomes incredibly important. That's a lot of

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>foreshadowing right there. Some of you are way ahead of

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>me on this, I'm sure of it. But let's get

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>back to the nineties. Over the next few years, the

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.679
<v Speaker 1>MP three file format began to gain popularity, and in

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>nine Napster became perhaps the best known of the peer

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to peer networks that made sharing MP three's across computers

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>incredibly easy. And while I would never say that Napster

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>caused piracy, it definitely made it a lot easier to do.

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>You could rip tracks off of a disk with one

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of a dozen different programs. So you buy a CD

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>or you get a CD, you put it in your computer,

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you pull the music off of it, convert those files

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>into MP three format, store them on a drive on

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>your computer, download the Napster interface, and then you could

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>authorize Napster to use that particular drive to share all

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>those files, and the music industry got really scared. So

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in short, the way peer to peer works is that

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you have some software that allows your computer to direct

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>directly connect in to a network of other computers running

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that same software. And this network is constantly changing, with

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>some computers being connected and some computers going offline. It

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>all depends on who's using their computer for what. And

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you can search that network to see if there are

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>any copies of a particular type of file you want,

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and when you download you can actually download from multiple

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>sources at the same time. So if there's one source

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that is particularly slow because of whatever reason, maybe there's

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>some problems like there's congestion and the internet between you

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>and that particular server, then you can start getting packets

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>from other servers that also have that same file. And

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's all decentralized and it was a very quick way

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to spread files across and there's nothing illegal about that,

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>right you can you can spread any sort of file

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you like, and if you have the legal authorization to

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:56.719
<v Speaker 1>distribute that file, then peer to peer networks are completely valid.

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>The problem was a lot of people were using them

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to spread had MP three's that did not technically belong

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>to them. Maybe they had bought an album and then

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:11.239
<v Speaker 1>they uploaded or they rather made available all of the

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 1>tracks off that album and so people could get it

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>for free. Well that's not great. It's kind of violating

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:21.719
<v Speaker 1>copyright law, and it it helped precipitate an era in

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>which we saw crazy amounts of work in digital rights management,

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and it was not a bright and shining moment in

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Internet history. That being said, there are so many valid

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>reasons to use peer to peer. It's a real shame

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that Napster and other peer to peer platforms are forever

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>associated with this concept of piracy, just because that was

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big use for a lot of these networks

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and it got a lot of press. Around this same time,

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we also started seeing MP three players popping up. Now,

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the earliest players were pieces of software runing on your computer,

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>not exactly convenient for on the go listening. I did

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of episodes about the history of MP three players,

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>including the rise of the iPod. So again I'm not

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>going to go into it too much, but Apple's iPod

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>really helped push MP three's even further into the mainstream,

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and the iPod became the device most associated with this

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>relatively new form of consuming audio simultaneously. So much is

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>happening that's important to podcasting. We got the birth of

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the RSS feed. Now RSS stands for well, it depends

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>upon whom you ask. It could stand for rich site summary,

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it stands for really simple syndication. It just

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>depends upon the authority you're asking at the time. But

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever it stands for, what it does is pretty cool.

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>It is a format for delivering updated content to people.

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So in the old days, you go on the web,

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and web pages were pretty darn static. If you went

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to a web page one day and you looked at it,

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>chances are the next day it was gonna look exactly

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the same way. There were not that many dynamically changing

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>web pages. It just wasn't very easy to do and

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't much call for it. But over time we

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>started building in more functionality on the web. We started

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>creating more dynamic elements, and that created a new problem.

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.719
<v Speaker 1>How could you, as a user know if your favorite

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>websites have been updated. You could go and check them

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>every single day and look for differences, or you could

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>use rs S and RSS was this set of rules

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that people running these websites could use. They could incorporate

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it into their website. You could then subscribe to that

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>website and anytime there was a change, that change would

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>get reflected in your RSS aggregator. You would open up

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>your aggregator and would give you kind of like headlines

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of the latest changes that had happened in the pages

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that you are subscribed to. So once you were able

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to do that, it really transformed the browsing experience. You

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>no longer had to do all this legwork yourself and

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>just have your laundry list of websites that you visit

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>every single day. You could actually take a quick look

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>at your RSS aggregator and see if there's any reason

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to go to that website. Well, that RSS model would

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>later become helpful to podcasts. It could alert podcatching services

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and users to new episodes as they joined the list,

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>removing the need to visit the home page of the program.

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And there was a way of enclosing audio files that

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>would be developed a little bit later, and that really

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>sealed the deal. All of this was happening around to

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousand's. In December two thousands, a software

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>developer named Dave Winer found himself in an unlikely partnership

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>with Adam Curry that former MTV VJ I mentioned earlier,

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and they were trying to adapt the RSS feed so

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that it could include audio. So Weiner was the guy

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>who created that modification for RSS, and he demonstrated it

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in early by using it to enclose a song by

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>The Grateful Dead, and he put it in a blog

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>he was writing, so people who were following his blog

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>were subscribed to it could immediately get access to that song.

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And while This provided the skeletal structure upon which podcasts

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>would be built. Very few people were actually using it

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>back then. In September two thousand three, Winer adapted his

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>approach on behalf of a colleague named Christopher Leiden over

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>at the Harvard Brookman Center, and Leighton really wanted to

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>create an interview show with audio tracks saved in the

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>MP three format. He was thinking of as like an

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>audio blog, so he's regularly interviewing people and uploading those files,

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted there to be a way for people

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:45.719
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe to it. He was interviewing bloggers, futurists, and

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>political figures, and this would eventually become a show called

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Radio Open Source and is, by most accounts, the first

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>actual podcast, though at the time it wasn't called a podcast.

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>So if you hear the Adam Curry had the very

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>first podcast and it launched in two thousand four, just

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>know that two thousand three saw Christopher Lyden's show Radio

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Open Source, and by all measures, that really was a podcast,

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it just didn't have the name yet. Later in two

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand three, and influential jet named Kevin Marks whipped up

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>some interesting technological wizardry in connection with the two thousand

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>three Blogger Cohn event, he showed off a program that

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>could take the audio files housed in an RSS enclosure

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and transfer them automatically over to Apple's iTunes, and then

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you can use the iTunes management software to synchronize to

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>an iPod. Now, remember in these days, you had to

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>physically connect an iPod to a computer and use iTunes

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to transfer music across the cable to your iPod. There's

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>no wireless way of doing this yet. The iPod had

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>no access to the iTunes store directly. You had to

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>download things or rip things from your music collection directly

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to iTunes and then port those things from iTunes over

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>to your iPod or other m P three player. I

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>had a creative zen back then and I used it

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:21.240
<v Speaker 1>with iTunes and it was a headache, but it would

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of work. But this was huge, This approach to

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>having this automatic conversion and something that I don't think

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Apple necessarily anticipated when it built in the synchronization capability

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and iTunes. The purpose for the feature was convenience. So

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>let's say you've got a decent music collection and you

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:42.399
<v Speaker 1>put all your songs over on iTunes and you want

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 1>them to transfer those songs to your brain brand spanking

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>new iPod. That's not so difficult to do the first time,

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>though it can take a while. You just connect your

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:53.839
<v Speaker 1>iPod to iTunes and say, all right, I want all

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>these files to be moved over. But then later on,

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 1>let's say you add more music to your library. So

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 1>how do you add that to your iPod. You've already

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 1>got a music library on your iPod, You've got new

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>songs in your iTunes library on your computer. How do

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you get those two to match up again. Well, one

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>thing you could do is individually move those files over,

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's gonna take a while. You could try and

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>highlight them in a batch, but that's kind of irritating.

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So Apple built in this function where you could have

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>synchronization turned on and if you plugged your iPod into

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>your computer with your iTunes library, it would automatically pull

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>any new tracks, anything that had been added after the

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>last time your iPod had been synchronized and add them

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to your iPods library, so you didn't have to wait

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and do it all manually. That was the secret that

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 1>was able to you know, they were able to use

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to make this automatic updating for podcasts or what would

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 1>become podcasts. But again I don't think Apple was necessarily

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>thinking that when they included that feature. Kevin Marks was

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>able to take it and turn into something really useful

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 1>for people who wanted to create this episodic audio content. Now,

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Adam Curry would make a piece of code available that

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:17.760
<v Speaker 1>would automate this RSS and closed audio to iTunes process

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to his blog visitors, and it's called I Potter, I believe,

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is what the script was named. And he also began

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to contact other bloggers who are interested in using audio

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to reach an audience in this same sort of way.

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>On February eleven, two thousand four, The Guardian published an

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 1>article titled Audible Revolution. It was written by Ben Hammersley,

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and he was writing about the use of the Internet

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>as a means to distribute audio content. And in that

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:48.240
<v Speaker 1>piece Hammersley asks, quote but what to call it? Audio blogging? Podcasting?

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Guerrilla media end quote? And so this may very well

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>be the origin of the term podcasting. Now it's possible

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that the word podcasting had been mentioned by someone before,

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>but this is the earliest piece in writing that I

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>can find that mentions that term, and it happened at

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that point entered into the general conversation about audio distribution

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>through the Internet. On September two thousand four, Danny J.

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Gregoire used the term podcaster in a discussion about the

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>technical issues surrounding publishing and distributing podcasts and this section

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in which he said, this would go like this. Here's

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>a quote. I can see there being the desire of

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:36.359
<v Speaker 1>users in some instances to be able to easily subscribe

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and get older posts slash episode, slash shows. What are

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we calling these things? Anyway? How about pode or SEWED

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>for short that no longer appear on the RSS feed

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 1>right now? If, for example, someone wanted to listen to

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>all the daily source codes back to sewed number one,

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 1>they would have to manually go through the archives and

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 1>download any sleds not auto magically received, somewhat defeating the

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 1>purpose of an I potter. Not too much of a

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 1>problem now, But I guess one could argue that this

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 1>is simply an RSS slash server side issue, and that

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the podcaster, yes, I like making up new words, should

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.760
<v Speaker 1>be responsible enough to offer a page of separate feeds

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of old sods by month slash, year, slash, season, slash, etcetera.

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>End quote, so he also used the word podcaster. Two

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>days later, in the Evil Genius Chronicles podcast, Dave Slusher

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>had this to say, somebody has registered podcasting dot net

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and I saw a podcaster or podcaster dot net and

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw a podcaster hitting as a user against hitting

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 1>my RSS feed, and I went and looked at it.

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>And right now it's just a coming soon page. But

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to pay attention to that. I want to

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>see who's got that and what they're going, what they're

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>doing with that term. I think they've coined the term,

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>so iPod platform just doesn't spring from the tongue. But

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what I'm doing right here, and what Adams doing, meaning

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Adam Curry, and what Dave Winer is doing, and what

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I T Conversations are doing, that's podcasting. I think that

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is the term. I'm using that from here on out.

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, So I am a podcaster and they are podcasters,

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and I am podcasting right now, and you listen to

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>my podcast. The name stuck. That's an understatement and it's

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 1>something that we all know because you wouldn't be listening

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to this if it didn't. In November two thousand four,

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Libson launched l I b S. White and this was

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 1>the first podcast service provider and it still exists to

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:44.800
<v Speaker 1>this day. I've actually used it. It's pretty pretty useful,

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy to use. Not totally intuitive, but not difficult.

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>And these services make it easier for podcasters to get

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>their content up online. They handle all the RSS feeds

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and all the technical side of things. All you have

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to do is fill out if you feel and then

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you can start uploading your content to the service, where

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it will host your files and make them available for

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>various podcatching services. Later on, in February two thousand five,

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Public Radio International launched The World, which was the first

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:18.879
<v Speaker 1>daily public radio news podcast. The next month, March two

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand five, the Public Radio show on the Media would

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>become the first to also be distributed as a podcast

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in full. In April two thousand five, Leo Laporte, who

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>had worked in traditional media for years as a technology

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 1>news communicator, a reviewer, and an educator, formed This Week

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 1>in Tech, a network also known as twit. This would

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>become one of the first podcast networks in the world.

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:46.800
<v Speaker 1>In other words, it became the umbrella to multiple shows

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in podcast format. On June six, two thousand five, iTunes

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>four point nine launched with a podcast directory added to

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the iTunes music store, and this made it much easier

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>for iTunes users to find and download episodes, and it

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>became really important to podcasters that they get their shows

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>onto Apples directory because that was the place to be.

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>That's where most people were getting their podcasts from in

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 1>those days, so if you weren't showing up an Apple's directory,

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it felt like you were missing out on the people

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 1>who would otherwise be able to subscribe to your show.

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>This move also forced a different company to change its course,

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and that company was called Odeo O d e O.

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Odeo's purpose originally was to create a podcasting directory as

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 1>well as a suite of tools for creating podcasts. It

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>was poised to launch in the summer of two thousand five,

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>but then Apple got into the game with podcasting and

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the people at Odeo saw the writing on the wall.

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>There just was no way they were going to compete

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>against Apple in that space, So rather than abandoned ship entirely,

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:53.799
<v Speaker 1>they decided to change what their company was going to do,

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and they also ditched the name. Instead, Odeo would become

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a company that would allow people to send out little

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>messages to their friends using SMS messaging or a web client,

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's how Twitter was born. Yep, Twitter exists because

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of iTunes sort of. In August two thousand five, NPR

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>officially got into the podcast game, making show segments available

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>as podcast downloads. So while their rise in popularity a

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 1>few years later makes it seem like they were late

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:25.840
<v Speaker 1>comers to podcasting, the fact is they were around in

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>some of those earliest days. The New Oxford American Dictionary

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>would name podcast as their word of the year on

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>December third, two thousand five, and the following year, podcast

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:40.759
<v Speaker 1>would become a new word in the dictionary. We've got

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot more to talk about to wrap up, and

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:46.879
<v Speaker 1>actually to talk about some of the other influential podcasts

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that came out in those early years, But before we

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>do that, let's take another quick break to thank our sponsor.

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So in two thousand six, Edison Research held a survey

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to find out how many people were aware of podcasting

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in general. So two thousand six is still early days

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:13.759
<v Speaker 1>for podcasting, and the survey bears it out. According to

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 1>their report, twenty two of Americans who responded to this

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 1>survey said they had heard about podcasting, but only half

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 1>as many, only eleven percent had ever actually listened to

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a podcast. And this is why, in those early days

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of doing tech stuff just a couple of years later,

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I found it really challenging to explain to people what

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:38.359
<v Speaker 1>it was I was doing. I'd say things like, yeah,

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an audio show, kind of like a radio show. No, no,

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not. It's not on the radio. It's it's on

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the internet. No no, no, you don't. You don't stream it,

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you download it and then you then you listen to

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it on an iPod or like an MP three player.

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I've had that kind of conversation so many times. Well,

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in February two thousand and six, Wait Wait Don't Tell

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:07.839
<v Speaker 1>Me becomes nbr's first full program podcast, which means I've

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 1>been a subscriber for more than a decade. Wow. Before that,

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 1>NBR had been uploading segments of shows, but not entire episodes.

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 1>So wait, Wait don't tell Me. It was kind of

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>their experiment what would happen if they allowed an entire

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:27.319
<v Speaker 1>show that would go out on NPR to also be

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>downloaded as a podcast. As it turns out, people would

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 1>go bunkers for it. That really showed up when they

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:39.480
<v Speaker 1>started doing this American Life also that month, in February

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:41.839
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six, the Ricky Gervais Show entered the

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Guinness Book of World Records as the most downloaded podcast

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in history. Though come on, be fair, two thousand and

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 1>six is pretty early in the podcast game. I mean,

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't even started tech stuff yet, and it could

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:57.279
<v Speaker 1>have waited a bit, to be honest. That record would

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>be broken later on. In these spring of two thousand seven,

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Jack and Stench start a subscription based podcast at five

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:10.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars per month per subscription. The Jack and Stinch Show

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:14.360
<v Speaker 1>grew out of a radio program called Jamie Jack and Stinch.

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Their radio company had canceled their show, so they were

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>out of a job, and that's when the creators decided

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that they were gonna they were gonna try and make

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a listener supported series and see if they can make

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it work. And it turns out it did work. They're

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>still podcasting today and it's still five dollars per month

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:33.760
<v Speaker 1>or cents per show, as they say on their website.

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Other subscription based shows would soon follow, and so you

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 1>began to see a few different ways to monetize podcasts.

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>There were these listeners supported shows through subscriptions or later

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>on through platforms like Patreon. Then there are sponsors supported

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 1>shows such as tech Stuff, where we monetized by having

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 1>ads in our shows. There's also fully sponsored content, in

0:45:57.560 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 1>which a company will pay for a full episode of

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:02.239
<v Speaker 1>a pro graham. So there are a few different ways

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to make money from podcasting, though I'd say the vast

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 1>majority of podcasters out there aren't really making a big

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 1>profit from it. On April two thousand eight, Josh Clark

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:17.799
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Palette became Internet superstars forever and ever when

0:46:17.840 --> 0:46:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the very first episode of Stuff You Should Know published.

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 1>That is our most popular podcast here at how Stuff

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com and Stuff you Should Know. The very

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>first episode April two thousand eight, Chuck was not a

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 1>co host yet, it was my former editor Chris Palette.

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>The topic they covered was how grass aline works, and

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the show was just nine minutes long. Those early episodes

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>saw Josh work with a couple of different potential co hosts,

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So there was Chris Palette and there was also Candice,

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:50.520
<v Speaker 1>who would later go on to be one of the

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:54.360
<v Speaker 1>original hosts of Stuff You Missed in History Class, which

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:58.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, was originally called Factor fiction. Chuck Bryant

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:01.719
<v Speaker 1>would join Josh for the episod owed why does Toothpaste

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:06.239
<v Speaker 1>make Orange Juice Taste Bad? Which published on May two

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight, and the charisma between the two hosts was undeniable.

0:47:10.360 --> 0:47:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Josh and Chuck would become the definitive voices of stuff

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you should Know, and they still are today, and they

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>sit on either side of me. Chuck's on my right,

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Josh is on my left. Other house stuff works shows

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:28.439
<v Speaker 1>that launched around that same time, where Brain Stuff, which

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:32.279
<v Speaker 1>originally featured our founder Marshall Brain giving short explanations of

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:35.839
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff, and then Stuff you Missed in History Class, which,

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:39.919
<v Speaker 1>as I said before, started life as Factor fiction. And

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 1>there there was a little show called tech Stuff, tiny

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>little show that you're listening to right now. The first

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 1>official episode of tech Stuff because we recorded a few

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that never published, a bunch of test episodes so that

0:47:53.120 --> 0:47:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we could get used to being on the microphone, and

0:47:56.480 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 1>they were bad and we should feel bad. I don't

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 1>think they exist anymore. I'm pretty sure there's no existing

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>recording of those early episodes, or I would release them.

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Why not? I would be I would group them together

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and say you want to listen to what the show

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:14.279
<v Speaker 1>sounded like back in two thousand and eight, because this

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is it. So the first official episode went live on

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:21.840
<v Speaker 1>June tenth, two thousand eight, and that episode was called

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 1>How the Google Apple Cloud Computer Will Work. The less

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 1>said about that, the better podcasts continued to grow in popularity,

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:36.839
<v Speaker 1>and podcast networks also began to grow. And then we

0:48:36.880 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 1>flashed back to that story I mentioned about Personal Audio

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Back in the nineteen nineties, the company Personal Audio LLC.

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Was what some people called a patent holding company, being

0:48:47.640 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the company was in the business of making money from

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the patents it held. It didn't make anything else. It

0:48:53.600 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't offer any services, it didn't offer any products. It

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>had these patents. Now, there are a couple of different

0:48:59.000 --> 0:49:00.839
<v Speaker 1>ways you can make money with patents, and they are

0:49:00.880 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 1>completely viable. One of this is to license your patent

0:49:06.200 --> 0:49:09.839
<v Speaker 1>and design two interested parties, and again there's nothing wrong

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 1>with that. So let's say I come up with a

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>really cool idea on how to do something, and I

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 1>patent that idea and then let companies know, Hey, if

0:49:19.239 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to do this thing in this cool way

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that I thought of, just come on over to me

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and we'll make a deal. Will you'll pay a licensing fee,

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll allow you to use my method. Everything will be

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:31.840
<v Speaker 1>cool until the patent expires, in which case it becomes

0:49:31.840 --> 0:49:36.920
<v Speaker 1>public property. Or you could go another route, which involves

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 1>just sitting on your patents and looking around and then

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:42.840
<v Speaker 1>suing people who appear to be using your patented ideas.

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Then you can either win money through a lawsuit or,

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>as is more common, reach a settlement agreement where a

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 1>company will pay you for using that patented idea. Lawsuits

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:56.640
<v Speaker 1>are really expensive, and often you'll find parties willing to

0:49:56.640 --> 0:49:59.919
<v Speaker 1>settle out of court just to avoid risking a full,

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 1>full blown court battle where even if you win it's expensive,

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but if you don't win, it's even more expensive. Well,

0:50:06.960 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Personal Audio had sued Apple a couple of times in

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 1>an East Texas court over patents involving playlists Why East Texas.

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Personal Audio claimed it had an office nast Texas, but

0:50:18.120 --> 0:50:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different technology journalists said that that office

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was essentially empty and really was just connected to their

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 1>patent lawyer's office. I don't know if that's true or not,

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but that's how it was reported, and that to East

0:50:32.280 --> 0:50:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Texas was known as being a very favorable court when

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it came to patent litigation, it was very favorable towards

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:46.600
<v Speaker 1>patent holders. So in Personal Audio sued several parties, including

0:50:46.640 --> 0:50:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Adam Carolla and How Stuff Works, among others, Although technically

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 1>they were going after Discovery because How Stuff Works was

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:56.360
<v Speaker 1>owned by Discovery at that time. The claim was that

0:50:56.440 --> 0:50:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Personal Audio held the patent approach that these other podcasts

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:02.400
<v Speaker 1>were using to distribute audio over the web, and then

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a long legal battle followed. Now I was in the

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:09.000
<v Speaker 1>dark throughout the entire process, for which I am thankful.

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:11.799
<v Speaker 1>I only learned about developments after they had hit the

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 1>news cycle. The Electronic Frontier Foundation got involved. The e

0:51:16.239 --> 0:51:20.240
<v Speaker 1>f F, and they're very much a a consumer based

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 1>organization that tries to look out for protections against corporations

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 1>encroaching upon the Internet. They view the Internet as a

0:51:31.560 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 1>public utility that should be UH, should be accessible by all,

0:51:37.480 --> 0:51:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and that no company should have this kind of of

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:45.080
<v Speaker 1>leverage over it. So the tech news sites did some

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 1>digging and made some allegations about Personal Audio about UH,

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the company had not ever produced a podcast,

0:51:52.719 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>nor ever planned to do so, and so a lot

0:51:55.520 --> 0:51:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of people were throwing around the words patent troll about

0:51:58.440 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Personal Audio that it's not my place to say, but

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the courts did ultimately find in favor of the podcasters.

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:08.359
<v Speaker 1>This was after Personal Audio had already started to back

0:52:08.440 --> 0:52:12.200
<v Speaker 1>off from the lawsuits, not because the company was saying

0:52:12.239 --> 0:52:14.879
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have a case. They said, no, we've got

0:52:14.920 --> 0:52:17.759
<v Speaker 1>a case. There's just no money in podcasting, so no

0:52:17.760 --> 0:52:21.080
<v Speaker 1>one could pay us, which was kind of like a

0:52:21.160 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 1>back end its slap against podcasters. I mean, I can't

0:52:24.120 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 1>necessarily disagree with him. There's not a whole lot of

0:52:26.640 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 1>money in podcasting for for the vast majority of podcasters

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:31.839
<v Speaker 1>out there. You gotta do it because you love it,

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:35.359
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you wind up finding a profitable approach to it.

0:52:35.360 --> 0:52:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It does happen, but it's hard to do. Now. It

0:52:40.560 --> 0:52:44.239
<v Speaker 1>turns out that all of that was moot because there

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:48.520
<v Speaker 1>have been further UH lawsuits. The e f F pursued

0:52:48.520 --> 0:52:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a claim that the patents that Personal Audio was depending

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:56.399
<v Speaker 1>upon are invalid, and that has gone to court and

0:52:57.120 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that ended up being decided in the favor of e

0:53:00.880 --> 0:53:05.560
<v Speaker 1>f F and against Personal Audio. So there's you know,

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:08.719
<v Speaker 1>some of those examples I was talking about earlier, like

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 1>quirks and quirks and Malamud's Internet talk radio platform. We're

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>exhibiting features that were described in the Personal Audio patent. Now,

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that patent that they were really relying upon in this

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:23.440
<v Speaker 1>particular case was filed in two thousand nine, but it

0:53:23.520 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 1>was given a priority date of nine. And this does

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:30.240
<v Speaker 1>happen in patent law. If you have filed for certain

0:53:30.320 --> 0:53:34.480
<v Speaker 1>patents and you have a later patent that you feel

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is derivative of a previous one, and you want that

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 1>effective date to be early earlier than what you're filing

0:53:44.680 --> 0:53:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it for, you can appeal for a priority date, and

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:50.239
<v Speaker 1>they did and they got it. It was in but

0:53:51.040 --> 0:53:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the examples of Quirks and Quirks and Internet Talk Radio

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:58.160
<v Speaker 1>pre dated nine, and that led the court to rule

0:53:58.239 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that the patent was invalid as it was describing something

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that had already existed. So the case went to the

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Court of Appeals and the Court of Appeals upheld that ruling.

0:54:08.120 --> 0:54:10.319
<v Speaker 1>So as of the recording of this podcast, there's been

0:54:10.320 --> 0:54:12.799
<v Speaker 1>no word if Personal Audio will pursue this to the

0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court, because they could it could go that next step,

0:54:17.040 --> 0:54:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But two courts so far have said, you know, there's

0:54:21.320 --> 0:54:25.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence here that this stuff existed before you described it

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in your patent, and you can't patent an idea that

0:54:28.480 --> 0:54:34.080
<v Speaker 1>already exists. Today, you can find podcasts about practically every

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:37.480
<v Speaker 1>topic you can imagine, from news to commentary to fiction

0:54:37.560 --> 0:54:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and all things in between. I've listened to lots of

0:54:40.520 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 1>different podcasts, and I contribute to a few of my

0:54:43.239 --> 0:54:45.719
<v Speaker 1>own outside of How Stuff Works. But I'm curious to

0:54:45.719 --> 0:54:48.960
<v Speaker 1>hear from you guys. What are some of your favorite podcasts?

0:54:48.960 --> 0:54:52.360
<v Speaker 1>What's worth checking out. I'm always looking for something that's

0:54:52.400 --> 0:54:55.319
<v Speaker 1>interesting or fascinating or just playing funny to add to

0:54:55.400 --> 0:54:58.239
<v Speaker 1>my walks to and from the office. So let me know.

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Send me a message. Our email addresses tech Stuff at

0:55:02.280 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 1>how stuff Works dot com, or you can drop me

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:06.879
<v Speaker 1>a line on Facebook or Twitter. Just let me know, Hey,

0:55:06.920 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>here's a great podcast you should check out. My handle

0:55:10.040 --> 0:55:13.320
<v Speaker 1>at both of those is tech Stuff hs W. Remember

0:55:13.600 --> 0:55:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you can come to twitch dot tv slash tech Stuff

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:19.920
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesdays and Fridays and watch me live as I

0:55:19.960 --> 0:55:23.160
<v Speaker 1>record these episodes. Just like a bunch of really smart

0:55:23.200 --> 0:55:25.799
<v Speaker 1>people are doing right now, and they're talking about all

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:28.000
<v Speaker 1>sorts of tech related things that are pretty cool, and

0:55:28.040 --> 0:55:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to get back to chatting with them,

0:55:30.360 --> 0:55:31.880
<v Speaker 1>so you know what, I think. I'm gonna do that

0:55:32.000 --> 0:55:35.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, and I'll talk to you guys again really

0:55:35.320 --> 0:55:43.160
<v Speaker 1>soon for more on this and thousands of other topics,

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:54.440
<v Speaker 1>because a house top works dot com