Speaker 1: Hi, Thanks Scott chan An Hour two Sean Hannity Show,
Speaker 1: Toll free. Our number is eight hundred and ninety four
Speaker 1: one Sean if you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program one of Newsday. This has been as we
Speaker 1: have spent most of the program talking about Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: and what is now pending to be a contempt citation.
Speaker 1: Congressman James Comer, who will join us in a minute,
Speaker 1: said that today Hunter Biden defied lawful Sir Peter's that
Speaker 1: they will now initiate contempt of Congress proceedings, by the way,
Speaker 1: the same exact treatment that Steve Banning got, the same
Speaker 1: treatment that Peter Navarro got, and we will not provide
Speaker 1: special treatment because his last name is Biden. He put
Speaker 1: out a full statement on all of this now prior
Speaker 1: to him not going before the committee, Hunter Biden spoke
Speaker 1: to the press, and what was very clear and apparent
Speaker 1: to me is we've come a long way from Joe
Speaker 1: Biden saying I never once talked to my son, my brother,
Speaker 1: or anybody for that matter about their foreign business dealings.
Speaker 2: And now the bar has shifted yet again.
Speaker 1: And while we put those little montage together to remind
Speaker 1: you of all the things that have been said.
Speaker 3: Now, how many times have you ever spoken to your
Speaker 3: son about his overseas business dealing.
Speaker 4: I've never spoken my son about his overseas with his service.
Speaker 3: I have never.
Speaker 4: Discussed with my son, or my brother or anyone else
Speaker 4: being having to deal with their business period.
Speaker 3: One of your sons form our business associates is claiming
Speaker 3: that you were on speakerphone a lot with them talking business?
Speaker 3: Is that? What?
Speaker 2: Never talked business?
Speaker 5: Name? Then?
Speaker 2: And I know you have a lousy question. Why is
Speaker 2: that a lousy question? Because it's not true.
Speaker 3: The answer is not going to change. The answer remains
Speaker 3: the same. The President was never in business with his son.
Speaker 4: I can tell you that Hunter did not share his
Speaker 4: business with his dad. I can tell you that he
Speaker 4: did not share money from his businesses with his dad.
Speaker 3: Why you interacted with so many of your son and
Speaker 3: brothers foreign business associates.
Speaker 4: I'm not going to come and I did not, and
Speaker 4: especially a bunch of lies.
Speaker 3: And interacts with either earlier ross associates. I did not.
Speaker 3: There's a lie.
Speaker 4: My father was not financially involved in my business, not
Speaker 4: as a practicing lawyer, not as a board member of Barisma,
Speaker 4: not in my partnership with a Chinese private businessman, not
Speaker 4: in my investments at home nor abroad, and certainly not
Speaker 4: as an artist.
Speaker 2: Not as an artist. Gee, that was a hard one.
Speaker 1: Now earlier today, Hunter Biden speaking about James Comer, Jim Jordan,
Speaker 1: and Jason Smith, will get James Comer's reaction in a
Speaker 1: second and saying, all the Republicans have all distorted facts
Speaker 1: and all have lied. Meanwhile, the biggest liar in all
Speaker 1: of this is Joe Biden. But anyway, here's what he
Speaker 1: said talking about you know, they've taken the light of
Speaker 1: my dad's love for me and presented it as darkness.
Speaker 2: They have no shame.
Speaker 4: James Comer, Jim Jordan, Jason Smith and their colleagues have
Speaker 4: distorted the facts by cherry picking lines from a bank statement,
Speaker 4: manipulating texts I sent, editing the testimony of my friends
Speaker 4: and former business partners, and misstating personal information that was
Speaker 4: stolen from me. There is no fairness or decency in
Speaker 4: what these Republicans are doing. They have lied over and
Speaker 4: over about every aspect of my personal and professional life,
Speaker 4: so much so that their lives have become the false
Speaker 4: facts believed by too many people. No matter how many
Speaker 4: times it is debunked, they continue to insist that my
Speaker 4: father's support of Ukraine against Russia is the result of
Speaker 4: a non existent bribe. They displayed naked photos of me
Speaker 4: during and oversight hearing, and they have taken the light
Speaker 4: of my dad's love, the light of my dad's love
Speaker 4: for me, and presented it as darkness.
Speaker 1: Joining us now, he is the chairman of the very
Speaker 1: powerful House Oversight Committee, Oversight and Accountability Committee. James Comer
Speaker 1: of Kentucky is with us today, Congress. Been great to
Speaker 1: have you back. It's been a very busy day. Let's
Speaker 1: start with your statement that you and Jim Jordan have
Speaker 1: put out on Hunter failing to appear for his deposition today,
Speaker 1: saying that he defied the lawful subpoena and that you
Speaker 1: will now initiate contempt of Congress proceedings and you will
Speaker 1: not provide special treatment because his last name is Biden.
Speaker 2: Let's talk about what happened today.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's exactly right. I mean, I've never seen such
Speaker 3: a display of arrogant and entitlement. At the same moment
Speaker 3: he was supposed to show up for a deposition, a
Speaker 3: deposition in which there were over a dozen members of
Speaker 3: Congress from both Oversight and Judiciary Committee in both parties,
Speaker 3: sitting in a room with boxes and boxes of bank statements,
Speaker 3: with hours and hours of preparation involved in preparing questions
Speaker 3: that pertain to honestly public corruption at the highest levels
Speaker 3: in our national security. And at the same time he
Speaker 3: rolls up in his big, fancy vehicle and has what
Speaker 3: he calls a press conference with the press issues his
Speaker 3: little publicity stunt, and then drives off, doesn't answer any questions,
Speaker 3: and just defies the congressional spoena. Hunter Biden thinks that
Speaker 3: the Oversight Committee's going to treat him like the irs,
Speaker 3: the DOJ, the FBI, the Treasury. If he thinks that,
Speaker 3: then he's badly mistaken. Sean and I hope that we
Speaker 3: can get everything together to be able to hold him
Speaker 3: in contempt as soon as possible.
Speaker 1: In your statement, you made a big point of pointing
Speaker 1: out that a deposition after a subpoena is a standard
Speaker 1: investigated procedure used by attorneys and congressional investigators. They tried
Speaker 1: to turn this into a narrative that, well, you wanted
Speaker 1: to only talk to Hunter behind closed doors and not publicly.
Speaker 1: You publicly stated on my shows both on radio and
Speaker 1: TV that in fact, Hunter would be very welcome to
Speaker 1: testify publicly after the deposition behind closed doors took place
Speaker 1: as required by law and as is normal procedure.
Speaker 2: Is that correct?
Speaker 3: That's one hundred secret percent correct, Joan Imy. Every major
Speaker 3: investigation in history, whether it be congressional investigation or a
Speaker 3: law enforcement investigation, you have a closed door deposition. And
Speaker 3: you don't always call it closed door, because that's a given.
Speaker 3: Every deposition's closed door. And the reason you do deposition
Speaker 3: is because it's a substantive investigation. A committee hearing, and
Speaker 3: I've said this before, we might get forty maybe forty
Speaker 3: five questions in when you go five minutes back and forth,
Speaker 3: one round of questions with twenty five Republicans. You do
Speaker 3: a closed door deposition where the Republicans have an hour,
Speaker 3: then the Democrats have an hours, then the Republicans have
Speaker 3: an hour, and say he goes eight hours, and that's
Speaker 3: how long the Trump families went when the Democrats were
Speaker 3: in controlled. But we could ask eight hundred questions. Hey,
Speaker 3: once we ask those questions, we can fact check those
Speaker 3: questions because we all know the Bidens have a history
Speaker 3: of not telling the truth, and then we'll have a
Speaker 3: public hearing, and you know, you have all your depositions,
Speaker 3: and then you go to the public hearing. That's the
Speaker 3: way congressional investigations are conducted. That's the way the Democrats
Speaker 3: always conducted it, and that's the way that we're going
Speaker 3: to conduct it.
Speaker 1: I play a montage beginning with Joe Biden as a candidate,
Speaker 1: even as president, saying that he never one time spoke
Speaker 1: with or discussed with his son, his brother, or anybody
Speaker 1: they're foreign business dealings. That then evolved into that Joe
Speaker 1: never spoke about business. Then it broke into the president
Speaker 1: was never involved in business. He was not financially in business.
Speaker 1: This is an ever changing narrative. If you listen closely
Speaker 1: to the excuses that keep shifting and changing. What do
Speaker 1: you make of those shifting changes based on the evidence
Speaker 1: that has come out?
Speaker 2: They have to change their story.
Speaker 3: The media continues to move the goal post on what
Speaker 3: is actual evidence, and the Bidens continue to move and
Speaker 3: change their stories on what involvement Joe actually had. Remember,
Speaker 3: Joe said his family never took money from China. In
Speaker 3: Hunter's statement today, he talked about his Chinese associate who
Speaker 3: is missing. By the way, he the lies are untold.
Speaker 2: That they excuse me.
Speaker 1: But the Hunter himself said that in the Good Morning
Speaker 1: America interview that he'd never gotten any money from China.
Speaker 3: If I recall when I've disclosed the very first wire
Speaker 3: into the Robinson Walker shell company, that was a wire
Speaker 3: from China and the Washington Post fact take me intend
Speaker 3: he never got any money from China at the bank
Speaker 3: records here. When the Democrats sent up on the House
Speaker 3: floor and defend their man, Joe Biden and Hunter Biden,
Speaker 3: they say there's no evidence. I mean, Sean, we have
Speaker 3: piles of evidence, and we've been transparent with that evidence.
Speaker 3: We've shown it on our website, the House Republican Oversight
Speaker 3: Committee website. It goes down with bank statements. We've prepared
Speaker 3: for banking the randums. I mean, we had prepared for
Speaker 3: a very extensive, substantive deposition today. And Hunter Biden would
Speaker 3: have had an opportunity to clear his good name. He
Speaker 3: would have been able to say, no, you've misread all
Speaker 3: these bank statements. They really didn't come from China. This
Speaker 3: company really was a legitimate company. I had an energy company.
Speaker 3: You just haven't figured it out yet. It was here
Speaker 3: and this is what we did. This investment company. I
Speaker 3: know the bank said this investment company had no investments,
Speaker 3: but we really did. You just haven't found him yet.
Speaker 3: He had an opportunity to do that today and he
Speaker 3: waffled because it's all alive. This was an influenced peddling scheme.
Speaker 3: This was an organized criminal activity that Joe Biden was
Speaker 3: well aware of because he was the brand that they
Speaker 3: were selling.
Speaker 2: So let's go back.
Speaker 1: To the original lie that Joe Biden repeated often. I
Speaker 1: never once spoke to my son, my brother, or anybody
Speaker 1: for that matter about their foreign business deals.
Speaker 2: Let's focus on that.
Speaker 1: And I want to focus on two very specific issues
Speaker 1: because I think they're the most glaring examples of what
Speaker 1: I believe is the Joe Biden bribery and money laundering
Speaker 1: scandal allegations that are in play here. And Number one,
Speaker 1: correct me if any of my dates are wrong, is
Speaker 1: a true or false that in October of twenty fifteen,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, the Vice President, that within the Obama administration
Speaker 1: it became inner agency approval and policy of the administration
Speaker 1: to lend Ukraine give them a billion dollars in loan
Speaker 1: guarantees because of quote the progress they had made on
Speaker 1: the issue of Did that happen on October.
Speaker 2: Of twenty fifteen, sir?
Speaker 3: True?
Speaker 1: One d then I ask you, let's go to December
Speaker 1: of twenty fifteen. Joe Biden, five days or so away
Speaker 1: from going to Ukraine to deliver the one billion in
Speaker 1: loan guarantees, got a phone call from his son Hunter,
Speaker 1: who was with two Barisma executives and the three of
Speaker 1: them were in Dubai.
Speaker 2: Did that call happen, sir? Yes, on that phone.
Speaker 1: Call, we don't know what was discussed. I don't think
Speaker 1: I don't think there's a recording of it. However, was
Speaker 1: that not at the time where Barisma executives were emailing
Speaker 1: and texting that they were in desperate need of DC help?
Speaker 2: Is that true?
Speaker 3: That's true and we know that from the Devon Archer
Speaker 3: transcribed interview.
Speaker 1: And didn't Devin Archer contradict Joe's statements that he'd never
Speaker 1: spoke to Hunter's business partners or spoke about business, not
Speaker 1: one time, by confirming that over twenty occasions he was
Speaker 1: aware that Joe Biden was on phone calls with foreign
Speaker 1: business partners.
Speaker 3: Yes, I believe he said at least times so that
Speaker 3: at least when he could be a hundred, but yes,
Speaker 3: he did say that.
Speaker 1: And do we not have photographic evidence of some of
Speaker 1: Hunter's FIGM business partners, including the Russian oligarch former First
Speaker 1: Lady of Moscow Elena Battarina, and Joe Biden eating at
Speaker 1: the Cafe Milano and Joe Biden with other FIGM business
Speaker 1: partners eating at the Cafe Milana with Joe Biden?
Speaker 2: Is that true, sir?
Speaker 3: Yes, that's true, even though Joe Biden claimed during the
Speaker 3: presidential election he never met with any of these people.
Speaker 1: Next question, now, five days before when when Joe Biden
Speaker 1: got that call from Barisma executives that were with Hunter
Speaker 1: in Dubai? Five days later, is that when Joe Biden
Speaker 1: bragged at the Council on Farm Relations what he did
Speaker 1: that day, which was that he said, you're not getting
Speaker 1: the billion. You're not getting a billion unless you fire
Speaker 1: the prosecutor. The prosecutor's name is Victor Choken. Victor Chokin
Speaker 1: was investigating the oil and gas giant called Barisma, the
Speaker 1: same Bearisma that highired Hunter to be on the board
Speaker 1: and was paying him millions of dollars, even though he
Speaker 1: admitted that he had no experience and energy, oil, gas,
Speaker 1: coal or Ukraine. And that day that that guy and
Speaker 1: son of a bee? Didn't he get that guy fired
Speaker 1: by leveraging taxpayer dollars and going directly against Obama administration policy.
Speaker 3: He got the gut fired. We now know it was
Speaker 3: against Obama policy because we found in our investigation an
Speaker 3: email that showed that the John Kerry State Department had
Speaker 3: confidence in Victor Choken, the prosecutor, and they thought he
Speaker 3: was doing a great job investigating corruption. There. We know
Speaker 3: that Joe Biden leveraged the billion dollars because he admitted
Speaker 3: it in an interview. So yes, that's true.
Speaker 1: Then let me ask you the final question. As a
Speaker 1: result of Joe Biden's official actions leveraging a billion taxpayer
Speaker 1: dollars to get a prosecutor investigating his son and the
Speaker 1: company his son is associated with five getting that investigative fired,
Speaker 1: did that result in a huge financial benefit for Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden personally family member?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 1: And is that against the bribery statute? Is that an
Speaker 1: example that you believe might be bribery?
Speaker 3: Yes? I mean you you have bribed the media family member.
Speaker 3: That is bribery. Joe Biden was intricately involved in that
Speaker 3: because he admitted it on tape. He bragged about he
Speaker 3: bragged about firing the guy. We know that the owners
Speaker 3: of Barisma wanted Hunter Biden to call his dad to
Speaker 3: get the prosecutor fired, because that's what Devin Archer said
Speaker 3: under oath in a transcribe interview. And we know Hunter
Speaker 3: Biden got millions of millions of dollars from Barisma because
Speaker 3: he got indicted in California for for not paying taxes
Speaker 3: of it. So yes, oh that's true.
Speaker 2: Sean quick break, welcome back.
Speaker 1: He is the chairman of the very powerful houseover Sight
Speaker 1: and Accountability Committee. James Comer of Kentucky on the other side,
Speaker 1: eight hundred ninety four to one, Shawn, our number if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program as
Speaker 1: we continue twenty five to the top of the hour.
Speaker 1: Glad you're with us. Eight hundred nine four one Shawn.
Speaker 1: We'll get back to Congressman James Comer in just one minute.
Speaker 1: Stay with us here. Look, ammo's expensive, it's in short supply.
Speaker 1: Many of you may not know. You can train without
Speaker 1: ammunition at your own home. Safely with the military grade
Speaker 1: technology that's called mantis X. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: all the best shooters in the world do the majority
Speaker 1: of their training doing what's called dry fire practice at home.
Speaker 1: Mantis X is a firearms training system. It's no ammo,
Speaker 1: it's all electronic. It's a way to practice and improve
Speaker 1: your shooting accuracy and safety. You attach it to your firearm,
Speaker 1: you connect it to your phone, and you're good to go.
Speaker 1: Mantis X will give you data driven, real time feedback
Speaker 1: on your technique. It'll guide you through drills and courses.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, ninety four percent of shooters
Speaker 1: improved within twenty minutes thanks to mantus X. That's why
Speaker 1: mantis X is used by the Marine Corps, the Army
Speaker 1: Special Forces. Military grade technology. The best part at an
Speaker 1: affordable price. You can get your ow mantis X. It's
Speaker 1: very simple. Check out their website. It's mantis x dot
Speaker 1: com m A n TI s X dot com. All right,
Speaker 1: we continue our discussion with Congressman James Comer. He is
Speaker 1: the chairman of the House Oversight Accountability Committee, and he
Speaker 1: and Jim Jordan putting out a statement earlier today that
Speaker 1: in fact, they hunter Biden defied a lawful subpoena, and
Speaker 1: they are now going to initiate contempt of Congress proceedings.
Speaker 1: We continue to discuss Hunter's comments that he made before
Speaker 1: the press at Washington.
Speaker 2: Let me let me ask you this.
Speaker 1: That was one example we went through now the whole
Speaker 1: Bearisma example, and it's clear that Joe Biden kind of
Speaker 1: went rogue, didn't he on the issue of what was
Speaker 1: official interagency recommendation and policies for the Obama administration by
Speaker 1: leveraging the billion in loan guarantees to get the investigator
Speaker 1: Victor chokenfired, who was investigating his son and Baris Beholdings
Speaker 1: that was paying his son with no experience millions of
Speaker 1: dollars in all that at a time he admits he
Speaker 1: was addicted to drugs.
Speaker 3: Correct, correct?
Speaker 1: All right, So my next question is what is when
Speaker 1: you juxtapose that whole story with everything that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: has been telling the American people, what do you conclude?
Speaker 3: Well, I conclude that Joe Biden hasn't been truthful with
Speaker 3: the American people, and if you look at what happened
Speaker 3: in Barisma, I believe that set the stage to where
Speaker 3: China realized they could have a tool in America to
Speaker 3: help them navigate the bureaucracy and remove barriers to entry
Speaker 3: to markets. Because China, you know, they have a significant
Speaker 3: spying operation. They watched all this. They know that Joe
Speaker 3: Biden was successful in a quid pro quo and got
Speaker 3: his son off the hook. And the Democrats in Washington
Speaker 3: impeached Donald Trump first time for asking the Lensky whether
Speaker 3: or not that was true. So so I'm sure the
Speaker 3: Chinese Companies Party was amazed at this. And then they
Speaker 3: saw what happened in Romania. The same thing happened in
Speaker 3: Romania that happened in Ukraine. Joe Biden went to Romania
Speaker 3: like he went to Ukraine, delivered a speech on public corruption,
Speaker 3: and then you know, days later, money from a corrupt
Speaker 3: Romanian oligarch starts flowing into the Biden show company. So
Speaker 3: he did it in Ukraine, he did it, and he
Speaker 3: did it in Romania. He did it in Russia before
Speaker 3: he did it in Ukraine, and China then said, there's
Speaker 3: our guy. And these are questions that shouldn't be hard
Speaker 3: to answer. The basic question of this whole investigation that
Speaker 3: I've led Sean on overside, was what did the bidens
Speaker 3: do to receive the tens of millions of dollars from
Speaker 3: our enemies around the world. That's a national security question,
Speaker 3: and that's the question that I think every hard working
Speaker 3: tax pan American has. So you know, there's a pattern here,
Speaker 3: and you see that ten twenty three form that alleged
Speaker 3: Joe Biden took a bribe. I mean, the way they
Speaker 3: set that bribe up in the allegation was they ran
Speaker 3: it through a bunch of different banks and a bunch
Speaker 3: of different show companies and investigators would have a hard
Speaker 3: time counted it. That's exactly what we saw in.
Speaker 2: The ten twenty three form.
Speaker 1: Did that specifically refer to the Barisa example, yes?
Speaker 2: Or did that that did? Okay?
Speaker 1: So in other words, and that form did discuss that
Speaker 1: then Vice President Biden took official action that benefited his family,
Speaker 1: in this case, his son Hunter with no experience at
Speaker 1: a time he's addicted to drugs and alcohol.
Speaker 2: All right, So let me go back, let me go ahead.
Speaker 3: Something about that. So the reason that ten twenty three
Speaker 3: was out there and the Democrats in the media created
Speaker 3: a narrative that, oh, Barishma wasn't a real deal. Rudy
Speaker 3: Giuliani concocted that, and that was kind of the way.
Speaker 3: You know, Donald Trump was bad guy. He did the
Speaker 3: quid pro quote, so it kind of got left behind.
Speaker 3: But what resurrected the Barisma where when the FDI whistleblowers
Speaker 3: contacted Chuck Grassley about the existence of the ten twenty three.
Speaker 3: They contacted Grassley when they saw what we had uncovered
Speaker 3: in China and Romania about the Bidens getting millions of
Speaker 3: dollars through different shell companies from these oligarchs around the world,
Speaker 3: and that the FDI guy said, that is consistent with
Speaker 3: what that ten twenty three form alleged in Barisma. So
Speaker 3: that's how that came back on the scene, just like
Speaker 3: the IRS whistleblowers who said the IRS were closing in
Speaker 3: on Joe and that's when they were told to stand down.
Speaker 3: That ten twenty three was resurfaced when f some f
Speaker 3: the agents contacted Charles Grassley and said, look, this may
Speaker 3: be true because of what the oversight committees found in
Speaker 3: Romania and China.
Speaker 1: It's the Let me go back to the interview that
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden gave Good Morning America, which I think is
Speaker 1: going to play very pivotal in this case, and I
Speaker 1: want to play it for you and get your reaction
Speaker 1: to it in light of what you now know from
Speaker 1: your investigation.
Speaker 5: Listen, the President has repeatedly said that you received one
Speaker 5: point five billion dollars from trying to despite no experience
Speaker 5: and for no apparent reason. Obviously, fact checkers have said
Speaker 5: that that is not true.
Speaker 4: Look, this is literally has no basis in fact in
Speaker 4: any way.
Speaker 5: Have you received any money from my business dealing at all?
Speaker 5: Not one cent, not one cent, Definitely not one point
Speaker 5: five billion.
Speaker 4: It's crazy. They feel like they have the license to
Speaker 4: go out and say whatever they want. It feels to
Speaker 4: me like living in some kinds of Alice in wonderland,
Speaker 4: where you're up on the real world and then you
Speaker 4: fall down the rabbit hole, and you know, the president's
Speaker 4: a cheshire cat asking you questions about crazy things that
Speaker 4: don't have any resemblance to the reality of anything that
Speaker 4: has to do with me.
Speaker 2: And so.
Speaker 4: Here's the answer. No one ever paid me one point
Speaker 4: five billion dollars, and if they had, I would not
Speaker 4: be doing this interview right now.
Speaker 5: I want to get to the heart of it. Did
Speaker 5: you and your father ever discuss Ukraine?
Speaker 4: Now, as I said, The only time was after a
Speaker 4: news account. It wasn't a discussion in any way. There's
Speaker 4: no butt to this. No, we never did.
Speaker 5: What were your qualifications to be on the board of Barisma?
Speaker 4: Well, I was vice chairman of the board of Amtrak
Speaker 4: for five years. I was the chairman of the board
Speaker 4: of the UN World Food Program. I was a lawyer
Speaker 4: for Boys Schiller Flexner, one of the most prestigious law
Speaker 4: firms in the world.
Speaker 5: You didn't have any extensive knowledge about natural gas or
Speaker 5: Ukraine itself.
Speaker 4: Though, No, But I think that I had as much
Speaker 4: knowledge as anybody else that was on the board, if
Speaker 4: not more.
Speaker 5: In the list you gave me of the reasons why
Speaker 5: you're on that board, you did not list the fact
Speaker 5: that you were the son of the of course.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 4: No, what rule do you think that played. I think
Speaker 4: that it is impossible for me to be on any
Speaker 4: of the boards that I just mentioned without saying that
Speaker 4: I'm the son of the vice president of the United States.
Speaker 5: If your last name wasn't Biden, do you think he
Speaker 5: would have been asked to be on the board of Barisma.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 4: I don't know, probably not. I don't think that there's
Speaker 4: a lot of things that would have happened in my
Speaker 4: life that if my last name wasn't Biden.
Speaker 5: Did you say you and your dad talk every night
Speaker 5: every night?
Speaker 4: Yeah? Yeah, well we talk at least every night. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Sometimes.
Speaker 4: By the way, not only does he talk to me
Speaker 4: every night, he calls every one of my daughters. He
Speaker 4: talks to each one of them every day, and he
Speaker 4: talks to me. And I know that he's president of
Speaker 4: the United States. Yeah, but by the way, he's always
Speaker 4: done that.
Speaker 1: I want to ask you a number of questions about
Speaker 1: that exchange here. Now, do you have irrefutable evidence that
Speaker 1: that phone call from Dubai took place with Hunter and
Speaker 1: Barisma executives to Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: Do you have evidence of that?
Speaker 3: We have evidence through the transcribe interview, and we are
Speaker 3: trying to get cell phone evidence as we speak. This
Speaker 3: part of the stuff that we're having trouble getting.
Speaker 1: But yes, in other words, it was it Devin Archer
Speaker 1: who told you that that phone call took place. Yes,
Speaker 1: let me ask you this. Hunter says he never got
Speaker 1: a penny. Joe Biden said he never got a penny
Speaker 1: from China? Did a one was it originally a one
Speaker 1: billion dollar becoming a one point five billion dollar deal
Speaker 1: with the Bank of China. Did that take place with
Speaker 1: Hunter's company.
Speaker 3: I don't know if that ever happened or not, but
Speaker 3: we know that five hundred thousand was wired over, which
Speaker 3: would have probably been the fee that he would have
Speaker 3: gotten for a big one point five billion dollars investment.
Speaker 3: But remember he sent to WhatsApp message to shake him
Speaker 3: down for the five hundred thousand, and when he got
Speaker 3: that the.
Speaker 1: That's the message that says, I'm sitting here with my father,
Speaker 1: why haven't you fulfilled the commitment? And between everybody he
Speaker 1: knows and my ability to hold the grudge, You're you're
Speaker 1: going to regret it, and me and my father are
Speaker 1: waiting for you to call us now. And then how
Speaker 1: many days later did five million dollars show up in
Speaker 1: one of his accounts from China's energy company, their energy
Speaker 1: Giant CEFC. Five days later, five million dollars showed up
Speaker 1: in their account another energy deal where he has no experience.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you this. You have evidence that a
Speaker 1: five million dollar give them?
Speaker 3: Yeah, go ahead, Oh, I mean it was for energy,
Speaker 3: is what the narrative was. But no, there was never
Speaker 3: an energy company. I mean, he never We've never found
Speaker 3: an energy company. There's not a legitimate business in the
Speaker 3: Biden portfolio that we have found. Now. A Hunter could
Speaker 3: have come in today and said, no, you're run. We
Speaker 3: had an energy company. It was over here. You didn't
Speaker 3: find it. But all that we found was the five
Speaker 3: million dollars coming and then the Biden's basically took it all,
Speaker 3: you know, when they split it up between those show companies,
Speaker 3: and then Joe Biden ends up with forty thousand of
Speaker 3: the four hundred thousand that went to the a Wastco
Speaker 3: company that he was supposed to be ten percent owner in.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's it's well well.
Speaker 1: Hunter today said that his father did not financially benefit
Speaker 1: in any way, but yet on his own laptop, which
Speaker 1: I guess he's now claiming was stolen, But didn't Hunter's laptop.
Speaker 1: Didn't he implicate his own father by saying half his
Speaker 1: income goes to Pops. Didn't he implicate himself by saying
Speaker 1: he pays for Pop's home repairs. Didn't Tony Bobolinsky implicate
Speaker 1: Joe Biden by saying ten percent for the big guy,
Speaker 1: and that the big guy everybody knew was Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Didn't Jason Smith's committee finding these pseudonym emails from Joe
Speaker 1: Biden to Eric Sherwin, the financial guy, did they not
Speaker 1: implicate that Joe benefited from financially from Hunter's forearm business deals.
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 1: Right, So the last question I have on China, was
Speaker 1: there a five million dollar no interest forgivable loan given
Speaker 1: that you know of.
Speaker 3: We know they sent him five million dollars. We don't
Speaker 3: know what it was for. We know that he told
Speaker 3: a bank examiner it was a loan, but I can
Speaker 3: assure you they never made the first payment on that
Speaker 3: back to back to China. There was nothing. We know.
Speaker 3: We got another two hundred and fifty thousand dollars wire
Speaker 3: from China that was sent at Joe Biden's house that
Speaker 3: he claimed was alone, but he never made any payments
Speaker 3: on that either. So that's that's five. You know, over
Speaker 3: five million dollars, five and a quarter million dollars that
Speaker 3: he's gotten directly from the Chinese Commings Party, and we
Speaker 3: have no idea what it was for. That's that's going
Speaker 3: to be the first question we would ask a deposition.
Speaker 1: Let me ask this, You have identified how many show corporations,
Speaker 1: and how many Biden family members that have received money
Speaker 1: and in any case of you identified any services rendered
Speaker 1: with either China, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, Kazakhstein that they the
Speaker 1: Biden family engaged him for these for this massive amount
Speaker 1: of money, tens of millions of dollars.
Speaker 3: We've identified at least twenty shell companies. The book still
Speaker 3: out on three or four more. We were going to
Speaker 3: ask them about that, but at least twenty shell companies.
Speaker 3: What's your fake companies? We've identified ten Biden family members
Speaker 3: that receive payments that were laundered through these shell companies
Speaker 3: that came from foreign sources. And we don't know of
Speaker 3: one single thing that any of those ten Bidens did
Speaker 3: to receive that money, not a single thing.
Speaker 1: Do you believe that at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: you know, as you look at the evidence, you've accumulated
Speaker 1: that Hunter Biden and Joe Biden have led at the
Speaker 1: highest level, and that they cashed in on Joe Biden's position,
Speaker 1: and that they were involved in influence pedaling and that
Speaker 1: and do you believe that this rises to the level
Speaker 1: of bribery based on the law.
Speaker 3: There's no question that this was a very organized, extensive
Speaker 3: influence peddling scheme that Hunter Biden and Jim Biden, the
Speaker 3: President's brother, were at the top of this scheme. Joe
Speaker 3: Biden used plausible deniability. They went to great links to
Speaker 3: give him code names. We've already found where he used
Speaker 3: pseudonym emails when he was communicating back and forth with them.
Speaker 3: So Joe Biden did everything in his ability in this
Speaker 3: organized crime ring to be able to say to claim
Speaker 3: plausible deniability. But there's no question, as Devin Archer testified
Speaker 3: under oath that they were selling the brand and Joe
Speaker 3: Biden with the brand. Joe Biden has not been honest
Speaker 3: about who all he met with about the communication, and
Speaker 3: we saw today the Bidens continue to change the story.
Speaker 3: The more evidence we find, the more they change their story.
Speaker 1: We really appreciate your time. We'll watch very closely these
Speaker 1: contempt proceedings that you will be pursuing. Thank you, sir
Speaker 1: for being with us, and we appreciate it.
Speaker 3: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Sean eight hundred ninety four one. Shawn is our number.
Speaker 1: If you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 2: We'll continue