WEBVTT - #359 Packers Unscripted: Seahawks and sacks

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to Packers Unscripted from Packers dot Com.

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Spofford. He is West Hodkuits. We're coming

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to you here from our studios at lambeau Field and West.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>We're on a short week, a condensed week, so we're

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>going to uh condense a couple of shows into one here.

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna move on today to talk about the Seattle Seahawks,

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>but I also want to get to a story that

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>uh you posted on our website with regards to the

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>packers sack total defensively for this year. Some really interesting

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>numbers there. But starting with the Seattle Seahawks, they are

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>four and five after a loss to the Los Angeles

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Rams this last week, we know the Packers are four

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>four and one. These two teams both very very badly

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>need this victory. And when you start with the Seattle Seahawks,

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>for all the changes in personnel and everything that I've

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>gone on there over the last couple of years, it

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>still starts with Russell Wilson, it is. And and it's

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me, Mike, because with the way things have

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>gone for the Seahawks, you've seen, you know, some things

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that defense sort of a road here. Some guys got older,

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>some guys got a little bit more discontent. Whatever it is,

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it isn't the same unit that it

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>once was, but it's still a pretty darn good unit

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the way they play, and they still have two of

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the best linebackers in this league offensively though it was

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson, it is Russell Wilson, and it will continue

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to be Russell Wilson's team. In Russell Wilson's unit, Uh,

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>they've done a fairly decent job I think of trying

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to renovate his offensive line. There are a lot of

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>issues there for a number of seasons. It's still not

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the best old line in the league. But I think

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they're giving him a pocket that he can work with.

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>As far as the passing game. Tyler Lockett, they made

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a big investment to him in the off season and

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be paying off for them to this point.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>He's become their top playmaker and with a kind of

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a carousel of running backs to this point in the season,

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it's really Ben Wilson and Lockett show at this point. Yeah.

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>The thing I think that scares me the most, so

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to speak about Russell Wilson is that he's just one

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of these guys that you let him get outside the

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>pocket and start to scramble around. You can have everything

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>defended perfectly well, and he can still run for ten

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>or twelve or fifteen yards on you and just breaks

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you back. Yeah, I was gonna say nine two yards

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>rushing last week. Now, Rashad Penny was the new running

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>back who stepped in because Chris Carson was injured. He

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>suddenly goes for a buck eight on just twelve carries

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams, and then you add Russell Wilson's two yards.

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>That's suddenly two yards rushing from a backup running back

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and you're starting quarterback, and they just about knocked off

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the Rams out in l A. Yeah. I mean, if

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you know anything about Penny's story, they drafted him, and

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people all their expectation was

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that he'd be there starting running back. They've gone through

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a whirlwind here the past few years, in the aftermath

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of Marshawn Lynch. It's been a lot. And then Penny

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>had this really strange narrative throughout training camp in the

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>offseason about where where his weight was at, was he

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>in the shape he needed to be, and it ends

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>up being Chris Carson who takes a job with Mike Davis,

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the former San Francisco forty Niner being the backup. Well,

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Penny gets his opportunity. I think when you look at

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:31.239
<v Speaker 1>an athletics standpoint, it's not a surprise. It's just been

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>more about what it's taken to get him to this point.

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Now we have to see how this week is gonna

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>work out. If Carson is gonna be back in the plans.

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>If he's not, does it end up being Mike Davis again,

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is it Penny? Do they rotate all of them? A

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of guys to keep in mind, but the fact

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that they were able to put up a hundred yard

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>game after struggling as much as they have with the

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>run game and having that kind of work off of

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson. When you go back and think about those

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl teams and the teams that really gave the

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>NFC problems for a number of years, it was built

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>off that one two punch of Wilson and Marshawn Lynch.

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to find that. I don't wouldn't say that

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>they're there yet, but this was at least the promising

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>sign for them after last year being such a grind

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>going through Eddie Lacy and raw and Rawls and just

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>all the different guys that they were rotating at that

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to find something that would work for them. When

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you talk about what could be dangerous with a guy

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>like Penny stepping in like he is here we are

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of November. This is a guy with

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>some fresh legs. He can be you know, he can

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>be tough to handle. We've seen obviously the Packers have

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>not overused Aaron Jones, and as we've talked about all

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>season long, we're going to continue to see Aaron jones

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>workload get ramped up because the Packers were a little

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>leery of his injury history from his rookie season. Now

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we're getting into the stretch run here and and Jones

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously showed what he can do. But when you have

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>a brand new guy like this, like Penny, who jumps

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>in in the middle in the middle of the season

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and isn't as beat down as a normal starting running back,

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this can be a tough situation. And for defense, he

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>could be tough to handle. Yeah, absolutely, Mike. I was

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>just trying to bring up right now some of these

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>stats of how this is playing out for them this season.

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>The thing that it really impresses me though, about Penny

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>coming out of San Diego State, Uh, it seemed like

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>he would be the type of back that would sort

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of fit that their style. I mean, he's listed at

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to twenty more of a power type back that has

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>some explosive tendencies to him. Uh. And I think it

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>was after a number of years of trying to use

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>late round picks and trying to find different pieces that

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>would fit, they tried to go out and not necessarily

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>get Marshawn Lynch, but find a guy that that fit

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>with that running style that they had so much success

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>with with with so many years. Uh. And and now

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at Doug Baldwin, what they have

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and Lockett. There's still weapons that you have to be

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>concerned with downfield, but with the moves they made, you know,

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 1>moving forward without Jimmy Graham basically more towards a blocking

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>type system with what they're looking for from their tight

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>ends and the inside of that. Luke Wilson the other

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>type he moved on as well. Yeah, it just seems

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 1>to me that they're trying to get back to their

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>base a little bit more. I you know, again, I'm

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>not following the Seattle Seahawks every day, but as far

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>as the perception, it just comes off like that because

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what Russell Wilson can do. You just talked

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>about it like he's versaal outside the pocket. He can

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>extend plays. Strangely, he is susceptible to sacks. Still he

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>can avoid them, but he still does. He still does

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>get sacked, well, he does. He does hold the ball

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and try to and try to make plays. But when

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>he does get the ball off, he's incredibly accurate. He

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't he doesn't have that whistle of a throw necessarily,

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>but his touch and and and his accuracy, his his

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>ability to put balls in in tricky spots, maybe dropping

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>it in from up above like those kinds. He makes

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>different types of throws than a lot of other quarterbacks,

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and he's very very accurate in doing so. And what

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm very interested to see is just how he plays

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and performs in this game the Packers. Yes, there's a

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>storied history there. You can go back to the fail Mary,

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you can go back to the NFC Championship game in

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, fourteen. But the Packers have won three straight

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>against Russell Wilson and five starts against them. He has

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a ser rating seven touchdowns ten interceptions for a guy,

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and I know one of those games he had like

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>five of them or whatever it was. But for a

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>guy that protects the ball as well as he does,

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the Packers did have success against him, and I'm gonna

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>be very interested to see that next chapter play out

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in this game if they can force the ball away

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>from him. Yeah, all right, Well, you had touched on

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks defense a moment ago, and I want to

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>get back to that in a second. But Packers fans

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>be sure to stop in at your local Quick Trip

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and pick up your Packers cup today, get eighty nine

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>cent refills on your Cafe Caruba coffee all season long.

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks Defense West, the Legion of Boom is no longer.

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Richard Sherman is gone, Cam Chancellor is gone. Earl Thomas

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Um no longer there as well. The crux of this defense,

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>from what I can tell, because it is still a

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>very good unit. You're not just gonna roll over these guys.

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>But those two linebackers, Bobby Wagner, kJ wright those guys are.

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Those guys really are kind of the heart and soul,

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>not only geographically because they line up in the middle

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the defense, but they really are the two guys

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of make this defense work. And it's funny

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>because now that I'm on this side of things, I'm

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>not really trying to work the phones as much anymore

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>than get like scout intel. But I remember my last

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>year at the Press because that I talked to one

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>scout for an NFL or an NFC team, and they

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>said to me, Bobby Weaker. The impressive thing about him

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>is he's the best linebacker in the league. And he's

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>been the best linebacker in the league, and it's very

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>difficult at that position. There's a there's a very select

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>few that can stay at the top of that position.

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>You see guys, and this is not to throw anybody

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>under the but you see the Navarro Bowman's of the world.

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>You see guys that really are They shine for a

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>season or two, but just can't keep up that level play.

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>What's impressive of Wagner's He's been doing this now for

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>seven eight years, and you're right, he is the face

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of that defense. He is the identity of that defense.

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And he's done it as as long, if not longer

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>than even Patrick Willison San Francisco. He's at He's at

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that level in terms of in terms of the longevity

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>being at the top of the league. And what impress

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>says me too is word a day and age Mike,

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.239
<v Speaker 1>where everybody just wants to change and you know, transition

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>safeties hybrid players into linebackers, and they're in to some extent.

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess they did do this because they did get

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Shack Griffin in the draft and he's more of a

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>twinter player. But right in Wagner are just punch you

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in the mouth. Linebackers, gritty three down, can play coverage

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>when they need to lineback their throwback types, no doubt.

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 1>There's just a shortage of them right now in two

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>thousen with the way that this league structure. Yeah, upfront,

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 1>obviously Michael Bennett no longer they're on the defensive line.

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>The guy who's always intrigued me for them because he

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a guy who's capable of always having

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>that big standout game if you're not careful is Frank Clark.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Frank Clark is an interesting one because he is a

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit more of he could be. You could I

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 1>could see him as a three four outside linebacker. You

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>could see him as a hand in the dirt edge rusher.

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, eight sacks at this point in the season,

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>he's sort of Ben the new breed, if you will,

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>with that legion of boom and with with that defense,

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean ten secs two years ago. Over the last

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>three seasons, has become a starter in that scheme. And

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the right time. I mean, they

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>had Cliff Avril and you look at Michael Bennett and

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the things they did with their edge rush,

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>signing players elsewhere, bringing them in and you know, being

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>able to get strong performance out of them at out

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 1>of a modest rate. Yeah, they had Bruce Ivan and

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, and I always say this, I think

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I bring this up every time John Snyder got killed

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>for that draft pick back in two thousand and twelve,

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and I always like bruserv and I thought he fit

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they were trying to do it. And he's

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>just a consistent guy. That's gonna get you seven eight

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>sacks unless you're in Oakland and you just want to

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>ship them out. But yeah, it was considered a reach

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>at the time because there were a lot off the

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>field concerns with Burvon that everybody was like, boy, you're

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>taking a big chance taking him as high as they did. Well,

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, Schneider turned out to be to be right.

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>He did exactly what he needed to do there, and

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, you know, I was able to

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>keep his nose clean. But now you've got Frank Clark.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Now you've got a new uh breed. Like I was

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>saying of defensive pass rusher there, it's a different face

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in the trenches. But he's been a guy that's certainly

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>picked up that baton and and really really ran with it. Yeah. Well,

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>with with regards to this Seahawks defense, that one thing

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I forgot to check before we turn on the cameras

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>here West there their turnover situation, because I know it's

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a defense that over the years, when they were at

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>their best, they would take the ball away. Obviously the

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>legion of Boom, they would get interceptions, but they'd also

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>hit quarterbacks get the ball out, that kind of thing.

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Where is this defense in terms of turnover? Well, this

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is the tough part for them right now because Earl

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Thomas is still their leading uh intercepting defensive back. He

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>has three picks. They have ten as a team right now. Uh.

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Sequiel Griffin is I think a really solid player. Two

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:43.719
<v Speaker 1>picks for him on the year. I think he's the

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>guy that sort of jumps off the page. To me,

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd be lying to you if I told you I

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>knew much about their safety situation. Now, yeah, I'm not

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>too familiar with it, but it is they've made a

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>transition in the set in the back end as well. Uh,

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>and it is going to be interesting to see how

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>they do. But to this point, yeah, ten picks on

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the year and three of those blong Darryl Thomas. And

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 1>how are they using the two Griffin brothers you mentioned

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously they drafted uh, um the I guess you call

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>them the one armed Griffin. But yeah, Shack Griffin and

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>then and then his his older brother um Is is

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>on that defense as well. How are they using those? Well,

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Sequel is the starting boundary cornerback for them. I mean,

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>he he is a guy in the two years that

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>he's been there has been you know, the dude that

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>they're they're developing. Uh, Sack Griffin has been a little

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>bit different this year because there were some rumblings come

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>out of training camp that Okay, maybe this guy is

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna start. And he's mostly been on special teams to

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>this point. I think he's played in eight games. I

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>can look up. I can actually bring the stats up

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>in front of me. It was like eight or nine games,

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>has like eight tackles on the year, eight tackles started

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one contest for them, but for the most part has

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>been on special teams. Um, so yeah, they're both definitely

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>in the fold. It's gonna be interesting too. I don't

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>know how much it's gonna come up as a storyline,

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>but Marc Uisvelda Scantling has a history with the two brothers.

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Ran on a relay with them in high school, so

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you have that storyline as well. And it would be

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of cool too if you see Sequil actually line

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>up against MBS as well, Shaquil Shakim. How does one

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>guy get the nickname Shack and not the other one? Well,

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>for me, it was because until basically the NFL scouting combine,

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know how to pronounce the chem. I didn't

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>know if it's sequam. I wasn't sure right, So yeah,

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it was shack and then everyone sort of called him that,

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So I was like, oh, this is cool. Maybe he

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>just won the coin flip. I'm not sure. I've just

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I've wondered about that. But a great story with those uh,

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>with those two brothers both playing together in Seattle, but West.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It is time to enter the Cousins Subs Best Seats

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in the House promotion. You and a guest could win

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a chance to kick back on the fifty yard line

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>in style. Two pairs of lucky Packers fans will be

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>chosen prior to each home game for this v I

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>P experience. Enter daily now through December sixteen by completing

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the entry form and submitting. For complete rules and eligibility,

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 1>go to Packers dot com slash Best Seats Cousin Subs.

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>We Believe in Better. Okay, I promised we were going

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the Packers defense and the sack numbers

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. Six sacks last Sunday against the Miami Dolphins

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>give the Packers thirty one on the season. That is

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>tied for the league lead. But maybe the most interesting

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>thing about the Packers being tied with a couple other

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>teams for the league lead in sacks right now is

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the Packers don't have any one individual with more than five.

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>This is really interesting how this is playing out with

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Mike Petton's defense in terms of the sacks being spread

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>out amongst so many players. And you looked up some

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of those numbers. Yeah, Now I don't have a SPA

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Stats and Info department like you do, so I was,

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing all these things crunching on myself. Uh.

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>The three things, there were three things that stood out

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>there were very interesting to me. One the fact that

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>they do have fifteen individual players who have had a

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>sack this season. Going back too when that became an

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>official statistic, the Packers have never had a defense have

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>more than fifteen players have at least a half sacked

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>in a non strike year. They actually did it eight seven,

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>but it was sixteen different guys and you had replacement

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>player that was the replacement players for a few games

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and all that kind of stuff. Yeah, so there's that

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>aspect of it. The fact that they also are tied

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>with I believe it's Kansas City, Minnesota, and I want

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to say is that Pitts Pittsburgh. Off the top of

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>my head, all three of those teams have have at

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>least one pass rusher that has I think seven or

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>eight sacks on the year. The Packers top right now

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is Kenny Clark and Kyler Facker with five. Lastly, and

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the most interesting is to a certain extent,

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you could expect this if you go back to how

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike Petton ran his defense during his time with the Jets.

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>He tit him across the board approach. You know, Mohammed

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Wilkerson didn't become a ten sack player until after Petton

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>had left. But also what's very interesting, they never had

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>more than forty sacks in a season with the Jets

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>ten top or four top ten defenses and four years,

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but the sacks always ranged from thirty one to forty.

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>The Packers around pace for fifty five. Now, if you

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>go to Petton season in Buffalo, they actually had fifty

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>seven that year. So it's not like he'd be setting

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a personal best or anything. You know, that was where

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Hughes really broke out and things of that nature.

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that the Packers are getting this kind

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of production, trust me. In The defensive players talked about this,

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike Petton has talked about it. They want to be

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>more consistent in their pressure, but they've been able to

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>get home. And I think when you look at they're

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>only six sacks right now off of last year. You know,

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>with seven games left to play, I think to some

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>extent you are seeing that Mike Petton effect in this defense. Yeah,

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're certainly seeing the not only the

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>depth in terms of the defense, but the creativity. Because

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>if you had said at the beginning of the season, Okay,

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>after nine games, the Packers are going to be tied

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>for the league lead in sacks and Clay Matthews and

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Nick Perry will have combined for four out of thirty

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>plus sex, I would have said, you know, you're crazy.

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is a different type of system. It's a

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>different type of scheme. And not only is pett And

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>bringing guys from different angles. You know, you mug up

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>six or seven guys and then maybe only four of

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>them come, or maybe five of them come. That's sort

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of what his system has done. But also because the

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Packers have had to tap into their depth, We've seen

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Morrison have to step in for Blake Martinez and

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>then he gets the call as the guy who comes

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and he gets a sack in New England. For example,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw last week Raven Green has to step in

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>when kentro o'bryce leaves with an injury, and then on

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:15.479
<v Speaker 1>a big third down, he gets the call to go

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>after the quarterback and he gets a sack of Osweiler.

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's partly how this is getting so spread out

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>is because the Packers have had to call on so

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>many different guys because of injuries and shuffling personnel. But

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 1>yet when every guy is getting that call and getting

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity, he's doing his best to cash in on it.

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>What really stands out to me the most about pet

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>and scheme is You're right, there's guys stepping up, and

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's so diversified on where the sacks are

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.199
<v Speaker 1>coming from. But positionally it's also a part of that.

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yes, the linebackers are leading them once again,

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>but a part of that is the fact that if

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>you go back to his time with the Jets too,

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know you had David Harrison Bart Scott,

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>he would bless those guys, you know, he would send

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>them and he's showed a lot of those double a

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 1>gap pressure looks in this defense as well. It's what's

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>led to Martinez having four sacks. As you mentioned, Antonio

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Morrison stepping in there as well getting one. But you

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>have guys like uh, you know that these defensive backs

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>from the inside that are also being able to get

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>after the quarterback. They're getting pressure with their defensive lineman

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Dean Lawry getting on the board last week. Previous Adams

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 1>got his first career sacked last week, So that I

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>think is a really interesting, you know, aspect of this defense. Also,

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>what really stands out to me the most of anything

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that you had Kenny Clark dropping into

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>coverage at one point in that game. Last week, you

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>had an eight man rush with three defensive backs all

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>in cover zero having to stick with their guy hoping

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>that the rush is gonna get to Oswalder before Oswalder

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>can get the ball out. It's those type of things,

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>being able to show those varied amount of looks at

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the line of scrimmage in putting it on film that

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you're not afraid to do just send everybody. You gotta

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>have some get some grapefruits to pull that kind of

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 1>stuff off. And in Mike pett And I think has

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>showed a lot of confidence in a lot of young

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>defensive players who three or four weeks ago might not

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>even been playing in this defense. Yeah. Well, that being

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>said with regards to where the Packers are with their sacks.

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Quite honestly, West, I would be fine if they don't

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>sack Russell Wilson once on Thursday night, because to me,

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want Russell Wilson to be able to

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>run for eight hundred yards and and hurt them that way.

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I would rather and this is no disrespect to Tyler

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Lockett Doug Baldwin, I would rather have Russell Wilson in

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the pocket having to beat you with the throws than

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>to have to be worried about him running around. Because

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>if you you can beat your guy. And yes, Russell

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Wilson does take his share of sacks, but he can

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>also just get away and kill you. Yeah, and the

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Packers felt some of that. They've seen that in the

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>past with him. I think of that two thousand fourteen

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>opener against Seattle and when they tried to run that

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 1>quad defense against Wilson, and they were able to get

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff working, not just with the read option,

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>but being able to pass off the read option. The

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>difference I think now for this Packers defense is they're

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>much faster, particularly in the secondary. They have a lot

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of guys. It isn't just you know, Josh Jones running

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>a four four. They have just guys that can close

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the distance, and you need that type of approach. With

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Russell Wilson, you have to be disciplined,

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>but you have to be athletic too, because he's disciplined

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and athletic. I think it's gonna be a great chess

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>match and throwing in that that atmosphere with Century Link,

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be challenging. It's gonna challenge your communication on

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the ball and all three phases. But

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I still don't think with the

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>stat that you've pointed out to me this week, it's

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>as insurmountable to go in there and win, maybe like

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it was four or five years ago. Yeah, I don't

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>think it. I don't think it is either. I think

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>this is I think this is a Seahawks team that

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit vulnerable right now, but they're also

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>dangerous in the sense that they have their backs up

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>against the wall. So our next show, I want to

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>get to our keys to victory and all that. So

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we will continue that discussion, but for now we have

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to call it a wrap on this edition of Packers Unscripted,

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and be sure to follow all of our coverage of

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>the team on Packers dot com on Twitter. He's at

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>west Hot I'm at Mike Spofford at Packers for the

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>team account. Thanks for tuning in, everybody, See you next time.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>M