WEBVTT - Will Schumer REFUSE to Try Mayorkas, plus the Media Turns on Biden

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome.

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:04.359
<v Speaker 2>It is his verdict with Senator Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 2>with you and Senator we have got a lot to

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 2>talk about it, especially with the border. As you're hearing

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 2>from many Texans that are frustrated with what's going on.

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's exactly right. I'm in South Texas right now.

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 3>Next week, the Senate will receive articles of impeachment for

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Alejandro Majorcas and the Senate will have to act on it.

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 3>We're going to do a deep dive tonight on what

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 3>to expect in the impeachment trial of Alejandro Mayorcis, how

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 3>the Democrats are going to try to avoid this, cover

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 3>it up, hide it, how Chuck Schumer plans to ignore

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 3>the constitutional responsibility of the Senate, and everything to know

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 3>about what to expect next week. We're also going to

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 3>examine how the media is turning on Joe Biden. It's

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 3>truly quite remarkable. The New York Times, the Washington Post,

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 3>they've all suddenly discovered the guys old. Apparently he wasn't

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 3>old a few weeks ago, but it just struck him

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 3>out of nowhere. And it sure seems like rats are

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 3>are fleeing a sinking ship in a way that makes

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 3>you wonder what's next.

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, wait till you hear these headlines that they're actually printing.

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 2>They've never done this before. The bidens. Before we get

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 2>into the border issue in my orchis, let me tell

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 2>you about our friends at Patriot Mobile. If you have

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 2>a cell phone, listen up. It is time for you

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 2>to vote and switch with your dollars to a company

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 2>that stands for what you believe in. Get away from

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>woke Big Mobile. You may not realize this, but Big

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Mobile gives massive donations to Planned Parenthood, to democratic causes

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 2>and candidates. That's why Patriot Mobile has started more than

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 2>a decade ago. And when I say you're going to

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 2>get incredible service, trust me you are. I'm using Patriot

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Mobile right now because I get the same dependable, nationwide

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 2>coverage I was used to before.

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But the difference is this.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 2>When I pay my bill, a portion of that bill

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>every month goes back to support free speech, religious freedom organizations,

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 2>the same to the of life, the Second Amendment causes,

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 2>as well as supporting our military, our veterans, our first responders,

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 2>and wounded warriors. Yes, that's why Patriot Mobile is so special.

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 2>They've got one hundred percent US based customer service team

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 2>that makes switching easy. You keep your same number you

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 2>have now, keep your same phone in your hand, or

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 2>upgrade to a new one, and their team will help

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 2>you save money and get the best planned for you.

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Just go to Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict. Patriot Mobile

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash verdict are called nine to seven to

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 2>two Patriot. That's nine to seven to two Patriot get

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 2>free activation when you use the offer code Verdict as well.

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 2>Make that switch today and get rid of Big Mobile center.

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 2>You and several other senators signed a letter asking for

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 2>the Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to move forward quickly

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 2>with impeachment hearings for majorcis and there are a lot

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 2>of Republican establishment people that don't want this to move

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 2>forward to a trial. Explain why this letter was so

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 2>important and not a lot of Republicans sign this letter.

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>You guys are truly leading the way on this.

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Well. Next week the Senate will receive the articles of

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 3>impeachment and the Senate will return from recess on February

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty sixth, and under the Senate rules, when the Senate

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 3>receives articles of impeachment. The next thing that happens is

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 3>that senators are sworn in as jurors the next day,

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>and a trial is supposed to proceed. However, Chuck Schumer

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 3>has made clear he doesn't want to have a trial.

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't want anyone in America to know about the

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 3>absolute disaster that is unfolding on our southern border. And

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 3>so what Schumer is indicated he intends to do is

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 3>use a procedural mechanism called tabling the articles of impeachment.

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 3>What does it mean to table the articles of impeachment?

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 3>It means he wants the Senate to vote no, we're

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 3>not going to take these up. In other words, he

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 3>wants the Senate not to adjudicate the articles of impeachment

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 3>at all, not to conclude guilty or not guilty, simply

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>to table it on a party line vote and move on.

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 3>And the purpose of this, look, we've talked a lot

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 3>on this podcast about how the disaster on the southern border.

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 3>You cannot defend it on the merits, you cannot defend

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 3>it on the substance. The Democrats have one strategy, and

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 3>one strategy only, and that is hide it from the

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.119
<v Speaker 3>American people. In order to hide it from the American people.

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 3>They need to make sure that the average person doesn't

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 3>know the human suffering that the Democrats open borders are causing.

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 3>That's why Schumer wants to table the articles of impeachment

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 3>at the outset, never have a trial, never hear the evidence,

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>never consider anything, and never put any Senator on record

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 3>adjudicating the claims. And so, in response to that, Mike

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Lee and I together led a letter to Mitch McConnell,

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 3>and it's a letter that was signed by thirteen senators

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 3>and it calls on Mitch McConnell to stand up and

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 3>fight for the Senate to fulfill our constitutional obligation under

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 3>the terms of the Constitution, when the House impeaches, we

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 3>have an obligation to conduct a trial and to adjudicate

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 3>the guilt or innocence of the individual who's impeached. And

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Chuck Schumer is trying to, for the first time in

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.919
<v Speaker 3>our country's history in over two hundred years, refuse to

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 3>adjudicate an article of impeachment. Simply table it, make it

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 3>go away, say never mind, nothing to see here, and

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 3>give every Democrat senator a get out of jail free

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 3>pass by avoiding the need for them to give an

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 3>answer on guilt or innocence.

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about what this try would look like and explain,

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 2>because this is not saying it's happened in my lifetime.

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 2>It's something it's very rare when it's a cabinet member

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 2>obviously throughout history. But let's talk about what a trial

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 2>would actually look like. Does it look very much like

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 2>what we've seen before when it comes to an impeachment

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 2>trial for a president.

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, it potentially does, but there are differences. So, for example,

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 3>the Constitution specifies that when the president of the United

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 3>States is impeached, the Chief Justice of the United States

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 3>will preside. By the way, interesting trivia, do you know

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 3>what the title of John Roberts is?

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>What is it?

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 3>John Roberts is the Chief Justice of the United States.

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 3>He is not the Chief Justice of the United States

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Supreme Court. Just like Joe Biden is the President of

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 3>the United States, John Roberts is the Chief Justice of

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 3>the United States. That that is the formal and technical title.

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 3>The Constitution provides the Chief Justice will preside over the

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 3>impeachment trial of a president. Because obviously may orcus is

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 3>not a president. The Chief Justice will not preside. Instead,

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 3>the trial is typically presided over over by the President

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>pro tem, which right now is Patty Murray, Democrat, senator

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 3>from Washington State. Now, when it comes to cabinet members,

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 3>impeaching cabinet members is exceptionally rare. In fact, this is

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 3>only the second time in history the House is impeached

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:24.559
<v Speaker 3>a cabinet member, and even that is overstating it because

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 3>the last Cabinet secretary to be impeached was Secretary of

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 3>War William Belknap, and that was in eighteen seventy six.

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.679
<v Speaker 3>Now what's interesting about Belknap is right before the House

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 3>voted to impeach him, Belknap resigned. So may Orcas is

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 3>actually the first sitting cabinet member ever to be impeached.

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 3>And in terms of how the trial will proceed, the

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Senate is not obligated to hold a full trial on

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 3>the floor of the Senate, as the Senate does for

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>them each man of a president. And so, for example,

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 3>in past impeachments, a number of judges have impeached, and

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 3>what the Senate has done in the past is appointed

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 3>an impeachment committee to conduct the trial, and typically that

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 3>committee consists of an equal number of Republicans and Democrats,

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 3>members of both parties, and so it can be a

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 3>smaller group of the Senate that conducts the trial. But

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 3>what has always happened is that the House managers get

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 3>to present their evidence, they get to prosecute the case,

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 3>they get to put on the trial.

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And what has.

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Also always happened is the Senators adjudicate. All one hundred

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 3>senators ultimately adjudicate guilt or innocence. So if the Senate

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 3>appoints an impeachment committee, that committee makes a recommendation to

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 3>the Senate, but then every Senator goes on record voting.

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 3>What Schumer is trying to do. He knows that if

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 3>there's a trial, even of a smaller committee than the

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 3>full Senate, that that will force press coverage of the

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 3>absolute disaster Mayorcus has been, the disaster Biden has been,

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the open border chaos they have produced. And Schumer doesn't

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 3>want anyone to know that. And so, as I said,

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 3>what he wants to do is instead just right at

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.599
<v Speaker 3>the outset before anything starts, say we're not going to

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 3>hear any evidence, We're not going to have a trial.

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 3>The House managers are not going to present the evidence

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 3>they don't get to prosecute the case. No senator is

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 3>going to vote guilty or not guilty. We're simply going

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 3>to vote to table and make it go away.

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Now, there's been a lot of media Republican establishment rhinotypes

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 2>had been out there saying this is a terrible decision

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 2>by conservatives to do this, that this is we already

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 2>know what the outcome of the vote's gonna be. This

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 2>is going to be an embarrassing moment slash failure, and

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 2>so why the hell are they doing this. If that

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 2>was the case, then Democrats wouldn't be fighting this. I

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 2>don't think this is a mistake, do you all? I mean,

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 2>this is about national security as well, and that's something

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 2>that the media and these Republican talking heads I think

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 2>they're forgetting that. This is about someone that is not

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 2>enforcing the laws of land, not protecting a country, having

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>an open border policy, deliberately not getting rid of people

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 2>that come in this country and break our.

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Laws who are here illegally.

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 2>And on top of all that, it's a national security

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 2>issue from the domestic from the terrorists on the terrorists

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 2>watch lists that are coming across the border at staggering numbers.

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I don't know who's been going on TV

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 3>saying that. So I can say this with complete free

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 3>conscience because I don't know who I'm talking about. But

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 3>anyone who says that is a blithering idiot with an

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 3>IQ below room temperature. To say it is a mistake

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 3>to impeach Alejandro Majorcas for aiding and embedding a criminal

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 3>invasion of the United States of America by global cartels

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 3>that have sent ten million people illegally into this country,

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 3>that are bringing murderers and rapists and gang members into

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 3>this country, that are abusing children, that are raping women,

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 3>that are potentially smuggling in Hamas and hezbel a terrorist.

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 3>To say that it is a mistake for Republicans to

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 3>fight for the House to impeach may orchis They should

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 3>have done this two years ago. You and I have

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 3>both been calling for this for two years. And in

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 3>the Senate, look is the Chuck Schumer Democrat Senate going

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 3>to vote to convict No, obviously not why Because the

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 3>Democrats are partisan hacks. They don't care about the facts,

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 3>they don't care about the truth. They are going to

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 3>vote with the Democrats because that's what Democrats do. When

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Schumer cracks the whip, every Democrat obeys that's what's going

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 3>to happen. But why is it that Biden has been

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 3>able to get away with this? So the biggest reason

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 3>is the media is utterly corrupt and they don't cover this.

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 3>If you watch Fox News, if you watch News Max

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 3>roy In, if you listen to Verdict, you know about

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 3>what's happen at the border. But if you watch CNN

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 3>or MSNBC or ABCNBCCBS, if you read the Washington Post

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 3>or the New York Times, there is no border crisis.

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Nothing is happening. The corrupt corporate media covers it up.

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 3>The reason this impeachment is important is to put the

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 3>evidence before the American people. And I got to say,

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 3>and it's why. You know, the amazing thing is the

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Democrats get this. Why do you think Schumer wants to

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 3>table this at the outset because he knows a trial

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 3>would be terrible? Why because the facts are terrible. What

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:39.359
<v Speaker 3>they are doing, the Democrats are doing is grossly inhumane.

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 3>It is cruel, It is evil. Schumer and Biden do

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.959
<v Speaker 3>not want the American people to know that, so they

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 3>want the issue to go away. But I got to say,

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 3>any Republican that, like a docile little sheep, rolls over

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 3>and starts buying the hell is wrong with them. And

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 3>there's a reason thirteen of us wrote a letter to

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.839
<v Speaker 3>our hip, because Republican leadership, when they see a fight,

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 3>typically turn around and charge the opposite direction. And so

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 3>we ought to stand united and say, listen, we have

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 3>a constitutional obligation. Listen, I'm going to read you the

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 3>letter we sent, because it's not a long letter. Dear

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Leader McConnell. Our Republican colleagues in the House have recently

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 3>passed two articles of impeachment against Department of Homeland Security

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Secretary Alejandro Majorcas for willful and systemic refusal to comply

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 3>with the law, as well as the breach of public trust.

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 3>These articles will soon be transmitted to the Senate. It

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 3>is imperative that the Senate Republican Conference prepared to fully

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 3>engage our constitutional duty and hold a trial. According to

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 3>multiple briefings by your staff, Majority Leader Schumer and Senate

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Democrats intend to dispose with the articles of impeachment simply

0:13:54.600 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 3>by tabling both individually. This is an action rarely contemplated

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 3>it and never taken by the US Senate in the

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 3>history of our republic. It remains to be seen if

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 3>the Senate rules will even allow us to brush aside

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 3>our duty in this manner. But one thing is sure.

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 3>If a similar strategy was contemplated by Senate Republicans when

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 3>we were in the majority with a Republican occupying the

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 3>White House, the opposition would be fierce and the volume

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 3>from Democrats would be deafening. We call on you to

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 3>join us in our efforts to jettison this approach by

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Democrats to shirk their constitutional duty, ensure that the Senate

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 3>conducts a proper trial, and that every Senator, Republican and Democrat,

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 3>adjudicates this matter. When the Senate returns and Mike Lee

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 3>and I let it signed by a total of thirteen Senators.

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you about strategy here of laying

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 2>this out to the American people, because that's going to

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 2>be obviously something we got to get right at the

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 2>very beginning. As you know, Republicans sometime are accused of

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 2>screwing up the basics. So I want to get your

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>perspective on what the strategies to be laying the south

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 2>of the American people that maybe haven't been listening to

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 2>this podcast or watching as you mentioned Fox or News

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Max or on. Let me first say about Freedom Gold

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 2>though real quick. If you have been looking at what's

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 2>been happening with our economy, with inflation, with the ups

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 2>and downs in the stock market, you may have seen

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 2>that your purchasing power has been disappearing. Well, that's happening

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 2>because of inflation. Maybe it's putting your savings, your retirement

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 2>accounts at risk.

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And then you have the other problem.

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 2>You have things going on like wars around the world,

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 2>national debt exceeding thirty four trillion and counting. That is

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 2>why so many are now actually protecting their hard earned

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 2>dollars by investing in gold and silver. That's why I

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 2>want you to know about Freedom Gold USA. They're a

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 2>company that I use and a company that you can

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 2>sit down with and talk to about protecting your hard

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 2>earned money. You have fifty thousand or more in retirement savings,

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 2>you may be at risk in times of economic uncertainty.

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Securing your family's financial future is essential. Call Freedom Gold

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 2>and they are here to help you navigate all of this.

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>One eight hundred sixty five y five eight eight four three.

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 2>That's one eight hundred sixty five five eight eight four three.

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 2>You can also visit them online at FREEDOMGOLDUSA dot com.

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 2>That's FREEDOMGOLDUSA dot com slash verting. Now here's the other

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 2>great thing. When you switch over investments or buy gold

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 2>and silver, you may qualify for up to ten thousand

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>dollars in free silver. Learn how to add gold and

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 2>silver to your IRA or have it shipped to your home.

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Safeguard your wealth of physical gold and silver, and take

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 2>control of your financial future today one eight hundred sixty

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 2>five five eight eight four three or Freedom Goold USA

0:16:54.080 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash vertic center laying all this out and

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the threat from MAJORCIS and not doing his job, which

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 2>is what this is basically about. How do the Republicans

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 2>do this the right way? Do you break it up into, Hey,

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the fetanyl coming across the southern border because it's open

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 2>is the number one killer of people under the age

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 2>of forty nine, And you go through that. Do you

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 2>then go through the sex trafficking and the human smuggling.

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Do you then go to the domestic the terrorists on

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 2>the terrorists watch list? Do you then go to the

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 2>financial aspects? I mean, is that how we need to

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 2>break this down to the American people understand just how

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 2>catastrophic this is.

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, listen, what you say makes a lot of sense.

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 3>And what you're doing there is telling a story. And

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.719
<v Speaker 3>I will say that's one thing Republicans are typically horrible

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 3>at doing, is telling a story. And that's what we

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 3>desperately need to do. At the end of the day,

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 3>the choice of how to present the evidence is not

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 3>going to be one for the Senate to make. The

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 3>way an impeachment trial works, the House managers or the prosecutors,

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 3>so they will present their case and will be ultimately

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the managers selected by the Speaker of the House, who

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 3>will present the evidence and lay it out, and they

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 3>could very well follow the pattern you laid out. It

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 3>should be a systematic presentation of the evidence. I think

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 3>it should focus on the harms. It should focus on

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 3>who has heard. It should focus on the dead bodies,

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 3>the biden body bags that have piled up, one after

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 3>the other after the other. It should focus on the

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 3>children who've been physically and sexually abused over and over

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 3>and over again. It should focus on the women who've

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 3>been violently raped. It should focus on the disease that

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 3>has come in over an open border. It should focus

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 3>on the more than one hundred thousand drug overdoses last year,

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 3>the highest and recorded history, seventy percent of which came

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 3>from Chinese fentanyl coming across our southern border. It should

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 3>focus on the terror threat hamas Hezbela, the open borders

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 3>we have, and the exposure we have to a major

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 3>terrorist attack higher, I believe right now than any time

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 3>since September eleventh. All of that they should do. But

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 3>what Chuck Schumer's trying to do is prevent all of that.

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 3>He wants to table the articles before any evidence is presented,

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 3>before the Senate considers anything, and he wants to spare

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Democrat senators. Understand, there are a bunch of Democrat senators

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 3>running in red and purple states that Schumer doesn't want

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 3>to have them vote not guilty because may Orkis is

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 3>obviously guilty, and so he doesn't want to get them

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 3>on record and tabling it is a much simpler and

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 3>less painful way to do it. Now. I can tell

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 3>you a week ago, Mike Lee and I together went

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 3>to the Senate Parliamentarian's office and we presented an argument,

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 3>the two of us. It's quite rare for Senators to

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:47.239
<v Speaker 3>go directly to the parliamentarian. Typically, staff lawyers on our

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 3>staff make those arguments. Mike and I made these arguments ourselves,

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 3>and he and I have both done this a couple

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 3>of different times over the last decade. But the argument

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 3>we presented is we wanted to walk through the parliamentarian

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 3>the history and the precedent in this case, and in

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 3>particular because Schumer wants to table the articles, we wanted

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 3>to underscore that in over two centuries, the Senate has

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 3>never once tabled articles of impeachment. There was a previous

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 3>impeachment in which the Senate tabled the procedural rules, but

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 3>that's different than tabling the actual articles of impeachment refusing

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 3>to adjudicate. And the point we made, which the Parliamentarian

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 3>agreed with, is every single time when an impeachment came over,

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 3>the Senate adjudicated the merits, it reached the merits. The

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 3>one exception was a case where the individual resigned and

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 3>in that case the House basically withdrew the articles of impeachment.

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 3>So every time there was an impeachment and the House

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 3>was pressing the impeachment, the end of it was every

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.719
<v Speaker 3>senator saying guilty or not guilty. And what Chuck Schumer

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 3>is trying to do is throw away two hundred years

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 3>of our nation's history, all in an effort to give

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 3>political protection to vulnerable Democrats and to avoid any media

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 3>coverage of the disaster at our southern border.

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 2>One other question on this, and that is who is

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 2>going to run this? I mean, will this be you

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 2>and Sinerle and others heavily involved, or is this going

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 2>to be lawyers representing the Republicans that would be asking

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the questions. How does that play out?

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, actually, when it comes to questions, unfortunately, the Senate

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 3>doesn't get to ask questions. And so if you remember back,

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 3>look when Verdict launched, the very first episode of this

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 3>podcast was the first night of the first Trump impeachment.

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 3>And if you remember what happened in impeachment number one

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 3>and impeachment number two, when we sat there as jurors,

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 3>we couldn't speak. Yeah, I'll admit that was frustrating. You know,

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 3>among things I like to do, I do kind of

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 3>enjoy talking.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I do it a lot.

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 3>And we were not allowed to say a word. We

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 3>were to sit there and listen, and we listen to

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 3>the presentation of the House impeachment managers. We listened to

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 3>the presentation of the President's defense team. Now, as I

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 3>discussed at great length in those Opening Verdict episodes, I

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 3>spoke frequently with President Trump's defense team. And by the way,

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 3>some observers said at the time, Oh, that's terrible. You're

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be jurors. You're supposed to be impartial, And

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 3>that's not actually right. It is true that we are

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 3>jurors in one sense, and that we adjudicate guilt or innocence,

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 3>but senators are not designed to be impartial. Frequently in

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 3>impeachment you have senators who are very close to the

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 3>individual being impeached or very antagonistic to the individual being impeached.

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 3>The impeachments occur in a partisan context, and senators are

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 3>elected in partisan elections. The framers knew that that was

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 3>the world in which impeachments would occur, and they placed

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 3>it in a political body to have an exercise of judgment.

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 3>Uh And and importantly, actually, during the Bill Clinton impeachment,

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Tom Harkin, the Senator from Iowa at the time, stood

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 3>up and raised a point of order and asked for

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 3>clarification from the presiding Chief Justice that was William Rehnquist,

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 3>my former boss, the previous Chief Justice uh and And

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 3>Harkin raised a point of order and said, to clarify,

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 3>we are not jurors in the sense of a jury

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 3>in a in a criminal case, where we simply have

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 3>to review the evidence and making determination. And the Chief

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Justice rule that is correct. The Constitution empowers you to

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 3>adjudicate this matter, uh and and and to consider issues

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 3>of fact and law and policy and politics and everything else.

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 3>But during that trial, I spoke frequently with President Trump's lawyers.

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 3>More than once I told them I thought a strategy

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 3>they were pursuing was boneheaded. A number of times I

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 3>told them there were strategies they were pursuing that were

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 3>quite good and they should do more of it. And

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 3>I was trying to give my judgment in terms I

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 3>thought both Trump impeachments were completely bogus. They were not

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 3>supported by either the facts or the law, and I

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.479
<v Speaker 3>wanted that to be the outcome, and so I was

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 3>actively involved in giving my thoughts and counsel to the

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 3>Trump impeachment defense. Now you'll recall the questions we asked

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 3>in the full trial were asked. We wrote them on

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 3>note cards and then submitted them to the bench, and

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 3>actually the Chief Justice read the questions, and so that's

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 3>how it proceeded on the floor of the Senate in

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 3>this instance, if we have a trial, if the Senate

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 3>follows the procedure, I think it is more likely than

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 3>not that a trial would be conducted by a smaller committee,

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 3>not the full Senate. Don't think we're likely to spend

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 3>weeks on the Senate floor. If we had a Republican majority,

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 3>I would be arguing vociferously for us to spend weeks

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 3>on the Senate floor trying this, But with Schumer as

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 3>majority leader, that argument is going to fail. So I

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 3>think it is likely instead to go to a smaller

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 3>committee appointed to hear the trial. But then the trial

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 3>will be driven by the presentation of evidence by the

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 3>House managers. If the Senate actually does its job and

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Republicans don't roll over quietly while Schumer tables the whole

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 3>matter to make.

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>It go away.

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 2>One last question, because this is incredibly complicated but also

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 2>unbelievably interesting, there are going to be a ton of

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 2>people that say this is a frivolous waste of taxpayers

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 2>money in time, because you can count the votes, and

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 2>you know the Democrats are going to be able to

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 2>defeat this. Therefore, Republicans shouldn't do this. What is your

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 2>counter to that.

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 3>That it's obviously false, and by the way, that was

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 3>true of the Trump impeachment, the Trump impeachment, the Clinton

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 3>impeachment before that. That's been true of a lot of impeachments.

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 3>But there is a value, you know. Look, Schumer gets

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 3>the value of it. It's why he's scared of this.

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 3>The problem is Republican leadership doesn't get the value of it.

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Our leadership is from a prior generation where they do

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 3>not understand that what we do in the Senate actually

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 3>influences public opinion. A lot of our leadership comes from

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 3>an era where they say, look, we make decisions in

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 3>smoke filled rooms in Washington, and then we go back

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 3>to our home states and we tell the silly constituents

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 3>there whatever it is they want to hear. And there's

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 3>no connection between the two. That they think public opinion

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 3>is exogenous. Is it is separate and not impacted by

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 3>what we're doing. I think that is a fundamental mistake.

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 3>That a major part of our job is to present

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 3>facts and argument in a way that move public opinion.

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Our leadership fundamentally doesn't think that way. Ironically, the Democrats

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 3>do everything they do is designed to move public opinion.

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Virtually nothing Republican leadership does is designed to move public

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 3>opinion because they don't view that as our job. I

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 3>think it is critical to our job. And all right,

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 3>let's just go through some facts. So, since seventeen eighty nine,

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 3>the Senate has completed seventeen impeachment trials. Of those seventeen

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 3>trials completed the Senate, seven of them were conducted in

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 3>the last eighty years, and four of them were federal judges.

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 3>In those four cases, the Senate appointed a trial committee

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 3>composed of an equal number of senators from each party

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 3>here and consider evidence and report to the Senate. The

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 3>trial committees were not used for presidential impeachments, and the

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 3>three trials since eighteen thirty six conducted without a committee,

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 3>where Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Donald Trump. Every single

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 3>instance in over two hundred years of our nation's history,

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 3>the Senate has never, once, not even a single time,

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 3>tabled articles of impeachment. Every single time the Senate has

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 3>voted on either guilt or innocence or the House has

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 3>withdrawn the impeachment, and so this is an opportunity for

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Senate Republican leadership just to stand and fight, and I

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 3>hope that they do. I don't know if they will,

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 3>but I hope that they do.

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Senator you said something there was very interesting.

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 2>You got to really pay attention to the words, and

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 2>you said there was seventeen completed impeachment. So the question

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I have to ask is, well, then, how many others

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 2>weren't completed?

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>And what it's the difference between the two.

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Is it meaning that the Senate decides guilt or innocence

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 2>and that is completed.

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 3>That's a very good question. In total, there been twenty

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 3>one impeachments sent to the Senate, and look, we're well

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 3>over two hundred years old, so it averages a little

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 3>less frequently than once every ten years. Of the twenty

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 3>one impeachments, twenty one individuals who were impeached by the

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 3>House of Representatives and transmitted to the Senate. Seventeen of

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 3>them were completed, had a trial, and they ended in

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 3>an adjudication of guilty or not guilty. One of the

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty one never got started and the Senate didn't take

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 3>action because the person resigned, and so it became mooted,

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 3>and then three of them were dismissed. One of them

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 3>was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds, and two of them were

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 3>dismissed because the people resigned, and the House asked for

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 3>the proceedings to be halted. The one that was dismissed

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 3>on jurisdictional grounds was the first ever impeachment, and it

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 3>was the impeachment of a senator, and the Senate concluded

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 3>they had no jurisdiction over the impeachment of a sen

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 3>that that impeachment applies to executive officers or judicial officers,

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 3>but not to members the legislature, and so it was

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 3>dismissed on the.

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Basis of jurisdiction.

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 3>The other two that were dismissed were judges who resigned,

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 3>and so the House asked the Senate to end the proceedings.

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 3>And the ones that were dismissed, the most recent one

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 3>was Samuel Kent, who was a district judge in Texas

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 3>who who was impeached and then he resigned right and

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 3>so the House asked the Senate to dismiss the matter.

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Before that was George W. English, who was a district

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 3>judge from Illinois who was impeached by the House in

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 3>nineteen twenty six, and likewise, the judge resigned, and so

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 3>the House asked the Senate not to proceed. And then

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 3>the very first one that I mentioned was Senator William Blount,

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.479
<v Speaker 3>and and Blount was a Senator from Tennessee, and he

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 3>was charged with conspiring with British forces and Indian tribes

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 3>to seize Spanish held lands in the Lower Mississippi Valley

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 3>in order to open the area to more settlers than

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 3>to increase his personal landholdings. So I mean, you want

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 3>to talk about salacious charges, it was literally treason with

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 3>our enemies to enrich themselves. And what happened there was

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 3>that the House impeached him and the Senate and this

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 3>was in seventeen ninety seven, so it was very early

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 3>in our country's history. And over the next several months

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 3>the Senate spent a lot of time preparing for the trial.

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 3>And the Senate trial began on December seventeenth, seventeen ninety eight,

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 3>and the House managers and Blounts defense council presented arguments,

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 3>but ultimately the question came down to whether Congress could

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 3>impeach a former member, and on January fourteenth, seventeen ninety nine,

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 3>the Senate dismissed the case, doing so unjust dictional grounds,

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 3>holding that that impeachment did not lie again against a

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 3>member of the legislature. What that means is unless there's

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 3>a jurisdictional claim, and there's not uh, and unless Majorcus

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:21.239
<v Speaker 3>resigns and he hasn't that In every single instance for

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 3>more than two hundred years, when the House has impeached someone,

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the Senate has adjudicated the matter and has come to

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 3>a conclusion guilty or not guilty. That's the argument I

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 3>presented to Mike Lee, presented to the parliamentarian. I think

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 3>that's consistent with the Constitution, in our rules, and I

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 3>very much hope that we see Republicans united in holding

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Democrats to follow the Constitution and follow the rules of

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 3>the Senate.

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Last question for you, and that is there are people

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 2>that are going to be listening and they're going to

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 2>be saying to themselves, how do I get involved to

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 2>make sure Republican leadership does the right thing? Is this

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 2>that that moment of call to arms or you say, hey,

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 2>call your senator, regardless of their Republican or Democrat call

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 2>the Senate Minority leader's office as well.

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>What should people do now.

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, that is always effective, picking up the phone and

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 3>calling your senator and saying, follow the law, convict majorcas

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 3>remove him from office. The invasion at our southern border

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 3>is threatening the safety and security of my family. It

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 3>is threatening this country. It is inhumane, it is cruel,

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 3>it is it is a grotesque violation of the obligations

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 3>of a cabinet member. And look, every senator, it makes

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 3>a difference when their constituent calls that that that can

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 3>be very effective, and speak out and make the case

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 3>to your friends and family and on social media and

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 3>to anyone else who will listen. That the right thing

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 3>to do here was to impeach him, and now it's

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 3>to convict him.

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 2>I want to tell you about saying that it is

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 2>really cool. Many of you may know this. I was

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 2>an under of a gun store for four years and

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 2>during COVID there was a massive shortage that happened with AMO.

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 2>We saw AMMO prices skyrocket and people coming in that

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 2>just want to make sure they can protect and defend

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:18.280
<v Speaker 2>themselves in their family and they couldn't find what they needed.

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 2>I back then thought, man, I wish there was a

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 2>way that you could just get Ammo and store it. Well,

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 2>there is a way now, and it's called Ammo Squared.

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:31.720
<v Speaker 2>It's helping people just like you and I stay stocked

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 2>up on Ammunition automatically. Ammo is delivered on demand or

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 2>automatically when you need it, and stored for free when

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.439
<v Speaker 2>you don't. It's customizable to your budget. You can buy

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 2>as little as a few dollars a month and let

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 2>it grow over time, or buy a bunch all at once,

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 2>and you have it when you need it. It's truly automatic,

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Set it and forget it. Ammo purchasing, you pick your calibers,

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 2>you set your budget, you select a shipping trigger, and

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 2>that's it builds up over time, and it delivered automatically

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 2>when you want it, no matter what's going on in

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 2>the market, because you already own it. In twenty twenty,

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:11.720
<v Speaker 2>when the store shows were empty and everyone had trouble

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 2>finding Ammo locally or online, Ammo squared customers just need

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 2>to ship their Amo stored at AMO squared and get

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 2>it all immediately delivered with just the click of a

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 2>single button. So forget about dealing with a moving, heavy

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 2>case of ammunition in your garage, are having to figure

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 2>out how to store it, or worried about prices skyrocketing

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 2>when you need it the most. Check out amosquared dot

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 2>com slash ben that's amosquared dot com slash bend to

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 2>sign up and get free AMO in your account. It's

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 2>effortless ammunition management. Amosquared dot com slash bend to sign

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:51.280
<v Speaker 2>up and get free AMMO in your account today, Senator,

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I want to move lastly to this other issue, and

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 2>that is it is weird. The media seems to be

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 2>turning on Joe Biden. Headlines now coming from major news organizations.

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:07.720
<v Speaker 2>The Washington Post, for example, had this headline, what happens

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 2>if Trump or Biden can no longer run for president?

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 2>Obviously they're trying to act like Donald Trump is in

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 2>cognitive decline. It's not happening, and we know it's different

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 2>with Joe Biden. The New York Times even said this,

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 2>how old is too old to be president? An uncomfortable

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 2>question arises again, and now the New York Times taking

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.720
<v Speaker 2>heat for that headline. I want to get your reaction

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to this moment on Fox News Channel as They describe

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 2>this turning on the president on the story.

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:42.280
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for being here this afternoon with us, everybody. Interesting

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 4>when you take a look at a them that seems

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 4>to be emerging in the coverage of this campaign, this

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 4>presidential race. Right, check out some of these recent headlines,

0:36:54.840 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 4>quote what we know about cognitive decline? Quote what happens

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 4>if Trump or Biden can no longer run for president?

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 4>How old is too old to be president? These are

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 4>not your typical electioneer headlines. But this is clearly not

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 4>a typical election year matchup if it turns out to

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 4>be these two presumed nominees. So the publisher of The

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 4>New York Times is standing by his papers reporting on

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 4>the president's quote on popularity and his age, but says

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 4>that the White House is not happy. In fact, he

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 4>says they're extremely upset about the coverage that they're getting

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 4>at the New York Times. And take a listen to

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 4>this exchange just a short time ago, as President Biden

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:46.879
<v Speaker 4>left for a fundraising trip to California, watching.

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Biden, are you ready, yes, Blod, look at Blod'm looking

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>at you.

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 4>We're looking to you, Okay that we bring in our paper.

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he didn't even know what they were talking about,

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Senator and you can see the media flipping on him.

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Is this the beginning of the end of his presidency

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 2>with the Democratic Party figuring out how to offload him?

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 3>Look, that was weird that exchange at the end, being asked,

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 3>are you're going to California for a plan B to

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 3>talk to Gavin Newsom? Look, that was a nasty little question,

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 3>but his answer was bizarre. It was a non sequit

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:22.919
<v Speaker 3>or it made no sense. And you know those three

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 3>headlines that the Fox story just read. The first one

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 3>was from the Wall Street Journal, the second one was

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 3>from the Washington Post, the third one was from the

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:34.720
<v Speaker 3>New York Times. And I do think we are seeing

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 3>the corporate media starting to turn on Joe Biden. And

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 3>we've talked at length. Listen, it was this podcast that

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 3>drove news and drove news across the country when we

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 3>said months ago that I believe there was a very

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 3>significant chance the Democrat Party would pull the court on

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden, yank him out and replace him with Michelle Obama.

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 3>And I think if they do that, they're likely to

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 3>do it either at the Democrat convention this summer or

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 3>shortly thereafter, and we're seeing the corporate media, which is

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 3>one and the same with the Democrat Party, but in

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 3>many ways they're the left wing of the Democrat Party.

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:16.760
<v Speaker 3>They're starting to get nervous. They're starting to realize, crap,

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 3>if it's Biden against Trump, we think Trump's gonna win,

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 3>and so they're they're they're hitting the panic button. And

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.280
<v Speaker 3>I think we're going to see more of these stories

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 3>as the media turns on him. I do think you're

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 3>seeing both Democrats in the media getting very, very worried

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 3>about Joe Biden's ability to win in November.

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 2>When you are running for president, you've done this before

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 2>and you see something this significant of a change in

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 2>the news cycle. Joe Biden has had three years of

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.879
<v Speaker 2>basically a media that's been covering for him. I think

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.919
<v Speaker 2>that's why he was so shocked when he had that

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the report that came out about his cognitive decline and

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 2>couldn't answer basic questions, and then he came out with

0:39:56.600 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 2>that very angry, uh really dysfunction press conference at night,

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:03.919
<v Speaker 2>and the media didn't get back in line since then.

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 2>So when you see this, who is moving the needle?

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Is it donors who are saying we're not going to

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 2>give money anymore. Or is it the leadership of the

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Party saying we got to figure something out, we

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 2>got to figure it out fast, or could it even

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 2>be both?

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 3>So I don't think it's donors and I don't think

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 3>it's anyone cutting off money. And understand, the Democrats and

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 3>the media would be perfectly happy if they could wave

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 3>a wand and put Joe Biden there four years more.

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 3>They're not worried that he's incompetent to be president. They're

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 3>not worried that the Department of Justice says he's not

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 3>competent to stand trial. They're not worried that he's such

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:41.800
<v Speaker 3>a weak commander in chief that our enemies are attacking

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 3>our allies and threatening America. They're not worried that he

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 3>lacks the competence to do the job. That there's only

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 3>one thing they're worried about that he would lose. If

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 3>they believed he would win, they'd be perfectly fine to

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 3>weekend it bernies him, to stand him up as a

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 3>corpse and say Joe Biden's there, and let's keep pulling

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 3>the puppet strings. Their concern is they're worried he's going

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 3>to lose, and that is a very real and an

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 3>acute concern on their part. It's also worth noting you

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 3>were talking about the press turning on him. You know,

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 3>there's a real difference between Republicans and Democrats. Look, on

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:25.719
<v Speaker 3>my end, the press has always turned on me. They're

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:28.759
<v Speaker 3>always hostile. Every question they're asking there, they're looking to

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 3>screw me nine ways to Sunday. That's just when you're

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 3>and by the way, and you've been in the Capitol

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 3>with me, Ben, as you know, when I walk from

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.879
<v Speaker 3>my office to the Senate floor, and I do so repeatedly,

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 3>whether it is to vote, or to go to meetings

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 3>or to go to committee hearings, I'm walking back and

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:47.280
<v Speaker 3>forth through the Capitol and there's a cluster of reporters

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 3>that surround you, and they ask you a hostile question

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 3>after hostile question on every topic under the sun. And

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 3>if you're a Republican, especially a conservative Republican, you're used

0:41:56.680 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 3>to just getting constant barrages of attacks. The Democrats don't

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 3>get that. They get the kind of questions. Remember Joe

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Biden in his first year in the White House, the

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 3>reporters would ask him things like, mister President what's your

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 3>favorite flavor of ice cream? I mean, that was right.

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's embarrassing.

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 3>It's it's there like groupies chasing the Beatles, throwing their

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 3>panties at him. And that's just the guys. I mean,

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean it is it's pitiful and and and so

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 3>he is really startled because he's not used to any scrutiny.

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 3>He's not used to journalists actually being journalists. By the way,

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 3>there is this phenomenon for Republicans as well. If you

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 3>remember John McCain. John McCain used to get lots of

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 3>adoring press coverage because when he was a Republican senator

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 3>he would often attack other Republicans and the press, and

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 3>he would attack him from the left. And the press

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 3>loves it when a Republican attacks other Republicans from the left.

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 3>It's the best way to get good press. You get

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 3>called at bipartisans statesman when you agree with the Democrats

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 3>and attack your fellow Republicans. Well, when John McCain got

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 3>the Republican nomination, and you and I both supported John

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:13.360
<v Speaker 3>McCain once it is our nominee, Yeah, but the press

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 3>turned on him and turned viciously on him. If you remember,

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 3>McCain made a comment something like, I don't understand I

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 3>thought you guys were my base, and he was completely startled.

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Because it's the same sentiment Biden's having. When you're used

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 3>to just getting your your hindquarters kissed by the media,

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 3>when they start biting, you don't know how to handle it.

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 2>And one of two things is gonna happen when it

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:42.399
<v Speaker 2>comes to this center. They're either going to get back

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 2>in line after trying to, you know, step out and see,

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 2>well others follow us right and test the waters, or

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 2>they're going to keep going what's your prediction.

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, if he stays the nominee, they'll get back in

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 3>line and they'll immediately begin saying it's agist and racist

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 3>and horrible to even ask these questions, and they have

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 3>no shame. So this is the moment where they're trying

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 3>to see if they can push him out and replace

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 3>him with Michelle Obama. If they can't, if he doesn't go,

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 3>if we get to September and Biden's the nominee, the

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 3>media will suddenly be completely silent on this front and

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:22.320
<v Speaker 3>will attack anyone who dares raise the same questions they're raising,

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 3>right now don't forget.

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 2>We do the show Monday, Wednesday and Friday. We have

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 2>a week in review on Saturdays. Make sure you grab

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 2>that wherever you get your podcasts, hit that subscribe, auto

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:38.360
<v Speaker 2>download or follow button as well, and The Sinner and

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I will be back with you on Friday morning.