WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2019 NFL MegaPod Week 8 Preview

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Tom check It Down Man Down Man, Thursday Morning O,

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Beating the Book Podcast, the Megapod, Week eight, Wow, Week

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>Gate in the National Football League, Skill Alexander twenty nineteen

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Style with our staples of the show these days. On

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>my right, the conciliary to Derek Stevens over at the

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Circus Sports Conglomerates casino moguls that they are. He's also

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the vice president of Operations. By his formal title, It's

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palm. What's happening in Mike Good Morning, Mega Pod faithful? Uh, Mike,

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get a circuit update from you boitarily. And

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>on my left Todd wishing of from not only the

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Showtime docuseries Action, but Wednesday appearances on a numbers game.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Todd more beloved by the day. Thanks for doing this, Todd,

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. What's your what's your percentage? Now? In circle

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in the circuit contest? What do you? And one for

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a robot? Whereas Rufus would say completely random, I don't know,

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>let's find let's find out, what Rufus says. Making is

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a long away to return to the podcast after at

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>least a few years away. We are happy to have

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>him back. Ladies and Gentlemen's half of the Bet the

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Process podcast duo along with Jeff ma It's our old

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Fred Rufus. Paybody, what's happening to Rufus Guild? It's been

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a while. How are you doing, man? Where are you

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>right now? I'm doing great. I'm in Boston. How do

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you like living in Boston? I went to school there

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>for four years. It's you know, it's growing on me

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. There's a lot of a lot of

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Patriots fans, so's we'll get used to that. Have you

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>been through a winter yet? I have? It's not fun.

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 1>I hope you brought a jacket. My freshman and senior years,

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it was minus forty wind chill. Well, luckily we have

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>global warming now, so it's it's it's not quite as bad.

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe the correct phrases climate change. Allegedly, scientists are conflicted,

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know how they say it? All right? Let me stop?

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>All right? So, Rufus, how is your football season going?

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>How is your podcast season going? Are you and Jeff

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>having as much fun as you always did with it?

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>We we always have fun. We're like, you know, he's

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>like my older brother or something. It's it's It's funny.

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>It's funny that the feedback we get some people think

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, some people like more of that, some

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>people like less of that. But but we enjoy it.

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And and football season is has been very good for

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>college it's been um, you know, more like less good

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>for NFL right around break human. Yeah, I think that.

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I that's a common refrain that I that I hear

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>from people, at least anecdotally. The NFL has been I

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>mean weird is look and even teasers at least as

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we've shown on this show have not gone as well

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>as we haven't have had them go in the past seasons.

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out how we do today before we do

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>any of that. Mike Palm Circus Sports Update. Who's in

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the lead, how big is their lead? How far back

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is Todd? Well? Uh so? Overall for the contest, there's

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>one entry at twenty seven point skill out of a

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>possible Um, where are we at seven thirty five? Yeah? Um?

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And then one entry at twenty six point five, four

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>entries at twenty six, two at twenty five I believe,

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>nine at twenty four and a half, and another eleven

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>at twenty four. How many do you have Todd how

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>many points I have? Twenty one and a half. He's

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot, you're tat You're tied for a hundred and

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty third. In fact, your name appears amongst the fifty

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>seven people at twenty one point five when you scroll

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>through the results. Look at you, Toddy, how about that

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:33.679
<v Speaker 1>t Wish and nev one? There you are now as

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>far as the second quarter, which we wrap up this weekend, yes,

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we're another hundred and forty three thousand, seven fifty. We

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>have two entries at thirteen, we have seven entries at

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve and a half, and another sixteen at twelve. So

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>there's twenty five entries within one point of the lead

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>here as we come into the final week of quarter two.

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And again, for those who don't know, the circuit contest

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>features as one of their sort of staples quarterly contests

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>for or a hundred forty seven thousand dollars, is it

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>turned out you can try and get in November, you

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>can try and get in December. On this the record

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and quarter one that one was seventeen and three and

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that was a solo winner, right, yeah, seventeen and a half.

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe it was seventeen and three. But that's

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the surprising thing was that it was a solo winner. Yea,

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>so it's odd. You know, we had one push and

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>quarter one. Now we had another push last week and

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>quarter two. So it'll be interesting though. I I find

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the long shot as if we'd have another solo winner. Yeah,

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I would think that's the case. It's always interesting, you know,

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about this on the show the other day,

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>how everything in in sports betting is its own discipline

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>and pre flop. You know, a TS National Football League

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is its own thing with I guess its own. Some

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>might say, you know, it's not a skill, some might

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>say it's random. But you know, James Selinas, who I

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>always go back on. He won the Super Contest one year,

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>he finished third, the next year, finished twenty six the

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of years later. He's about the only guy in

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>modern history that I can sort of say that about

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>where he's been able to be consistent over time. But

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>even as we point out, that's still only what over

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and forty some picks over three seasons, so

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>even that could be subject to randomness. Even though he's

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>told us his method, and he watches a lot of

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.239
<v Speaker 1>game film and so who knows, but um, that's the story.

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Anybody can catch lightning in a bottle in a four

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>week period, that's for sure. Certainly hasn't happened to me. Todd,

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>we had a shot, but that we we craped out

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>week two of this particular month. So we'll keep that monitored.

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Before we get into our best bets of the week, gentlemen,

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.239
<v Speaker 1>let us do Thursday night football real quick, because people

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>want to hear about that first. If you don't have

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>an opinion, no biggie Minnesota Vikings sixteen and a half

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.239
<v Speaker 1>point favorites against the Washington Redskins rufus favorite team along

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>with mine. If we can't even say that anymore, rufus,

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>So you're still an Orioles fan, not a Nationals fan, right,

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>so you feel nothing about this Nationals run in the

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>World Series. Not much. You know, I actually wanted them

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to win that Wildcard game when they were losing, um,

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>just because I was like everybody, all these Nationals fans

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>have had a lot of heartbreak in the playoffs over

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the years, and so now that they're on the cusp

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of winning the World Series, I'm not sure how I

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>feel that, and I'm not sure how we feel about

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins at this point. Either the fandom has been

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>beaten out of us. I would imagine, honestly, I'm rooting

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>for defeat. Um, I'm rooting for embarrassment. I'm rooting for

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>anything that will result in systemic change in that organization.

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that wholeheartedly. Viking sixteen and a half

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>point favorites tonight. Some people will, by narrative, call it

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>the Kirk Cousins revenge game. It's equally the case Keenum

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>revenge game, I would imagine, and Adrian Peterson making it

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 1>returned in Minnesota. But the Redskins aren't very good at

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>football and the Vikings uh seem to be quite good

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>at it on both sides of the football. Kirk Cousins

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.119
<v Speaker 1>even doing his Redskins stats thing now in the box score.

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>But sixteen and a half is a lot of points, rufus,

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we start with you. Any thoughts tonight on the side

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>or the total. It is a lot of points. And

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately I happen to like the Redskins here. Um, I

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>think it. The lines actually up to seventeen in some places.

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 1>Now I make it thirteen. It's it feels it's not

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the kind of game I like taking. Um. I feel

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>like I've been on these big underdogs way too much

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and the NFL we we you know, there's a lot

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of parody, um, but there's also a few teams that

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>are really bad. But at the same time, I don't

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>think they're The Redskins are seventeen points worse. UM with

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>case team at quarterback who I do think is the

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>best quarterback to win right now on that Redskins roster.

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>What does worry me is that Kirk Cousins does seem

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to play well. Um. And this is just anecdotally. He

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>seems to play well against the bad teams like he

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Vikings blow out the teams that they're

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>supposed to beat. UM. That happened against the Raiders earlier.

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>They beat the Eagles at home, um pretty handily. And

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'm hoping, um, I'm hoping against the Redskins keep

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it close while somehow still being embarrassing. And you're not

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>required to watch the Redskins on your bet in this

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>football game. You just sort of look away and see

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>if it works out in the end. You did make

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a bet on this though, you did? Actually I did, Okay, Um,

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike any thoughts here tonight. It's actually my third best

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>bet this game is under forty two tonight. Biill Callahan,

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>who when he took over Nebraska thought it prudent to

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>take a program that had run the ball for sixty

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>years and as seventy at the time, now wants to

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>run the ball seventy percent at the time now that

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>he's taken over this Redskins, And I don't know if

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I necessarily blame him. Here's why I like this under.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>You have two quarterbacks that played for the other team.

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Who knows Keenam better than Zimmer. He had him for

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a year and went to the NFC title game with him.

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Didn't think they were good enough with Keenum. So I

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>think that Zimmer knows Keenum well. Hopefully the Redskins organization

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>knows Kirk Cousins well. Uh. In the same like, you

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>should be prepared for both these quarterbacks. I agree with Rufus.

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it's too high of a number. I'm gonna

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>play this game and live bets as a parlay with

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins and the under. But for what for my

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>best bet? Third best bet this week under forty two?

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we can already mark that down from my

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>third best bet under forty two Thursday Night Football. I

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>like the SMU game better, by the way, as a bet,

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll take SMU. I'll lay the fourteen. Todd, what do

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you think here? I don't want any part of the game,

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>but I would say that it's very possible that the

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Vikings get out to a huge lead, run the ball

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>incessantly in the second half, and then Washington down twenty three,

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>comes down and get the back door to lose by sixteen.

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want any part of it. In any way.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want any part of it either, but that

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point, you know, to Mike's under. The

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Vikings have had a couple of games this year, and

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>most notably, perhaps the first game of the season against

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons, Kirk Cousins dropped back a grand total of

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>eleven times through ten passes. I think there was a

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>subsequent game Todd and I were talking about this morning.

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>We think it was the Oakland game where they really

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 1>were like, we're running and that's all we're doing, so

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they're capable of really taking the air out of the

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>ball for sure, Rufus, I saw you leaning in on

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>my smu comment you had something to say there? Oh, yeah,

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you know I took uh, I took Houston there. I

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>know they have Deeric king is is is out but

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's worth a lot. But I mean,

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't resist when I got fourteen and a half. There,

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I understand Dana Holgersson is so bad though, such a

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>bad coach. Did you watch the Houston Yukon game last week?

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I didn't un should have won the football game out?

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's that's bad. But I mean, did you watch

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin Illinois? Do we think Ellinois is a better team

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>than Wisconsin? Yeah, so go yourself, Todd. All I'll say

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is I just I can't stand Houston. I just can't

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>stand him. But I hope you win. Oh great, thanks,

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that's very nice of you, Todd. Yeah that means you hope. Rufus.

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>If you followed Todd's work, you'll know he's a real

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>slave to recency. Also know you can you can get

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and a half with Actually, you know, I got

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a bookmaker. I got it at thirteen, so I'm only

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>land thirteen there. Yeah, but thank you, so Gil, like Gil,

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we have so we have we have a nice medal

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>between us. That's right, that's right. We have a nice

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>meddal fourteen points. We're all winners. That's what we're like, SMU.

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>First half, alright, s first half? Little college football? All right,

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's do the best bets, Mike. We already have uh,

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>your number three best bet, but rufus, let's start with

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 1>your best bet in the NFL week Gate either side

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>or total, sir um, unfortun only, I'm gonna have to

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>go with the Bengals plus thirteen and a half points.

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>This is I've been on the Bengals way too much,

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>just like I've been on the Broncos way too much.

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So far, They're They've been bad. Um. Their offensive line

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>play has just been absolutely horrendous. They grade is the

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>second worst pass blocking in the league. Um. And while

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I expect and to continue to be bad, I don't

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>expect them to be like to be quite as bad. Um.

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But who are the Bengals? I mean, going into this season,

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 1>we thought they were we knew them pretty well. The

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.319
<v Speaker 1>team with an average is quarterback in Andy Dalton, who

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't gonna win you games on his own, but with

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>an adequate supporting cast. Um good and the supporting cast

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really been there this year. I mean, obviously they

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't had an offensive line and they haven't had one

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in the last three seasons. But their skill position players,

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>um have not you know, been as good as in

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>previous years. And Andy Dalton has not played as well

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>as he had in the past. But the thing is

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 1>he has he's he's an NFL quarterback. I mean he's not. Um,

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 1>he's not. I'm trying to come up with an example

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of he's not Keith Null or any you know, not Hodges.

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>He's not. He's not. He's not. But so so I

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>just think, um, you know, obviously, the Dolphins are this

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of historically bad team that with with really really

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>very little talent um across the board, and I don't

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>think the Bengals are that team though. Um, if you

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the Rams, the Rams are are pretty you know,

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>they're okay it offensive tackle, but their offensive line, the

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>interior of their offensive line is just as bad. If um,

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it's actually worse than the Bengals and worse than any

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>other team with the exception of the Dolphins. So also,

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>if you look so far this season, the Bengals, they've

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>been outscored by eleven point eight points per game. But

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>based on my game grades, they've played to an expectation

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 1>of only UM of only minus seven and a half

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>points a game, so that that kind of that translates

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to UM over twenty points. That they've been kind of unlucky.

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And so honestly, this game is largely based on UM.

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>It is largely based on the prior, the fact that

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that Cincinnati is as bad as they've shown. UM.

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>If you like, if you like the sort of narrative

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that under a new coach it takes time to adjust,

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>which UM, I feel like we've we've heard that with

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, right, and and the adjustment to a new

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>offensive system with about the floor. Uh, you know, we

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't really heard that with the Bengals. But if you

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>believe that narrative, you think that maybe the Bengals will

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>improve a little bit as the season progresses. Either that

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>or they'll just give up. So I'm on the Bengals

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>plus thirteen a half. I've been on the Bengals a

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of times on the road this year, and they

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>have gotten They've gotten the cover a couple of times. Uh,

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they'll try to do that again here as a road

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>dog catching thirteen at the Rams early game on Sunday.

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, there are you know, always tracking if

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the NFL gets this right, there are eight early games

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and there are excuse me, nine early games in three

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>afternoon games. So we're, yeah, we're subjected to that kind

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of schedule in the NFL at least, it's not the

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>ten to variety. By the way, Baltimore in Dallas, the

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>two teams on buys this week, Mike Palm best, but

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>number one. Well, I agree with Todd on this on

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>this premise, and we used them last week. We're going

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to use them again. I don't understand why the market

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is not recognizing the difference between Fitzpatrick and rosen Um.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>It's stunning that that the totals will move but the

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>sides won't move, when when we know Fitzpatrick is playing Um,

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>this still is the Steelers team without a great defense.

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It's still is the Steelers team that doesn't want to

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>let Mason Rudolph and I'm assuming he plays throw the

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>ball down field, They're gonna go with a lot of

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>short passes in the rounds. That type of a run

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>based offense. We saw the Dolphins against a very good

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Bills defense last week, be able to sustain drives and

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>run the ball and move the chains. I just think

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>fourteen is way wide here. I went to your point,

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>guilt when when you guess numbers on games. Yeah, I

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>thought this game was more like an eight or an

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. I couldn't believe it's two touchdowns.

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the Miami Dolphins on Monday night. It's fortune half.

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Give him the extra half fortune and a half. You

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>get the hook. I will say this, and for those

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>who didn't listen to Guessing Lines, because I think it's

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>probably a similar audience. But and thank you, by the

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>way to everybody who listens to it in podcast form

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>after we air it on Visa, because still great numbers

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>on Guessing Lines, people will find that show as great

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>as they've always done based on the numbers. So thank

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you to everybody. But that was not only my worst

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>guest of the week, and by worst, I mean furthest Off.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Let me not call it worst. It was not only

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>my furthest Off guest of the year. It is my

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>furthest Off guests in the history, the nine year history

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of Guessing Lines. I had seven and a half. Fourteen

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is where it's posted. I've never been that far off

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>on a number ever. Guessing now, listen, my number might

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>not be right either, but it certainly shouldn't be fourteen.

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>There's no justification for it. And Todd, you and I

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>were on the air last week again when Brian Flores said,

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going with Ryan Fitzpatrick, it's not gonna be Josh

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Rosen and that number against the Bills stayed put the

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>whole way through its seventeen. That doesn't make any sense

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to me. This number doesn't make any sense to me,

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that it's prime time and it's in

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh and any other narrative you want to associate with it.

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Give me the points. That's my first best bet as

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>well on the Dolphins. I'll take the fourteen in a hook. Happily.

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the Dolphins should have won the football game.

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>If they get it in there and to go up

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty one nine instead of throwing the pick, they're probably

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna win up twelve. It should also be noted that

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>we barely got the cover two because it could have

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>been a very unlucky push. Ryan Fitzpatrick fumbles at the

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>end right and the Dolphins happened to land on it

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>at their own five, so you know, it was Dolphins

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>doing Dolphins things at the end. There's always that to

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>worry about. That was after on Site's kick return for

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, which is the new thing, the new rage.

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden that that was great. I had

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the I had bills second half, so minus eight and

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a half. So that was that saved me a fourtuitous

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>turn of events for you. Wait, I didn't do my

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>first best bet. My best bet. It's gonna be just

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to just to make it a little more entertaining, I'm

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with over forty five and a half in

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Tennessee game. And here's why. I think. First

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of all, that Tampa Bay is a great over team

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this year. They really are are. You know, they can

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>be explosive on offense, but defensively they're an absolute dumpster fire.

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.959
<v Speaker 1>And now that Tanne Hills in the game instead of Mariota,

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Tennessee has a little bit more firepower

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>throwing the football, so I think they'll be able to

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>move the ball and score some points against Tampa Bay. Now,

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee's defense is pretty good, but Tampa Bay has the

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>ability to score pretty much on anybody as well, So

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to me, forty five and a half's a little too low.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go over forty five and a half for

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>my best bet. What's trippy about this podcast this week

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is that I have a visual on Rufus. So Rufus

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is tech savvy enough where I can actually see him

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>right so, not only by the ways he's wearing a

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>very nice shirt which is black and checkered, checkered, black

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and gray, but he's got a state of the art microphone.

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that a blue? What is that, Rufus? That's very

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>nice microphone. It is a blue, Yeah, very nice. I

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>got enough bad feedback on my sound quality over the

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>years with with some crappy microphone. I had that the

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>process podcast that I finally invested in a good one. Yeah,

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a nice one right there. But in

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>having the visual on Rufus, I can see his reactions

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.479
<v Speaker 1>to certain comments and making that he takes notes, so

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you obviously had a reaction to what Todd was saying there. Well,

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, my second best bet is gonna

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:36.959
<v Speaker 1>might be the other side there, So I'll get into

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that later. Okay, I think I think it's time for

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 1>your second best bet, because we've gone around the horn one.

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So what is your second best bet? So it is

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Tennessee under forty five and a half.

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And there you go, and why and why would you?

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:53.959
<v Speaker 1>What would you say? Why you I make I make

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the number forty two and a half. And and that's

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>They could change a little based on whether there is

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it's they're supposed to be old drizzle. Um, it's a

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>dreary day in Nashville, So if there is rain, um,

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll have that slightly lower as well. But but this

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a matchup of a slightly above average offense

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in in Tampa Bay versus a slightly above average UH

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>defense and UM in Tennessee. And then a bad offense

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>against a bad defense. So Tampa Bay is a pretty

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>past friendly offense. They passed eighth most or expect them

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>too relative to expectation. Tennessee is kind of the other

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>end of the spectrum UM in the twenties. But and

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>especially with UM, I mean with Tanna hill Um at quarterback. Now,

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>they I do think that you may see a little

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more UM more Derrick Henry. But Tampa has some

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>high scoring games basically because their offense can put up

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>garbage time points when they're down. And and Jamis Winston,

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 1>his you know, is known to give some gifts to

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the opposing teams. But Um Tampa's lab three defensive touchdowns.

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there's this narrative that Winston is, um

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to give a lot of points. You score

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points, but give up a lot of

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>points to himself. But three interceptions and pick six is

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>um so Tampa. So so yeah, they've allowed three defensive

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and they've turned the ball over more than twice

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a game. And yes, Winston is that guy. Um, he's

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>not really going to change who he is. I don't

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>think at this point. He's a guy that he holds

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball a long time, which results in big place

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>but it also results in a lot of sacks and

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>it results in Um interceptions. It's, you know, you have

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to take the bad with the good. But what what

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is interesting so far is that his average interception this

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>year has come from ball snapped his own thirty five

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>yard line, while Tampa's average offensive snap has been from

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the fifty yard line. So Um in the last three years,

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the average interception has been from a team zone forty

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>yard line, so there's not really so so in a way,

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>those interceptions that Winston has thrown has ended up costing UM,

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 1>have ended up being over helping interceptions rather than like

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a red zone interception, which is gonna be an under

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>helpy interception. So UM, isn't the sample size small? Rufus.

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the sample size is small for that UM,

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>or for for Winston's interceptions this year. I'm saying that

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.479
<v Speaker 1>so far this year they've helped be over and so

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it makes it makes Tampa they look like they're higher

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>scoring team. It makes their games look like they're higher

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>scoring UM than they fundamentally should be. The other thing

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is he's thrown you know, of his interceptions have been

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>pick six is this year. UM the league average is

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>eleven percent, and with Winston's historical rates ten point three percent,

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So you're not gonna see UM. I think the sort

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of narrative that that Winston is the Winston's style of

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>play leads to more points isn't doesn't necessarily bear out

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of UM, you know, predictively, so eat it. Okay, Well,

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not making the bet off of Winston. I just

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>think he's a bonus. But I'm just basing it on

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact I think, may I think um with with

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Um instead of Mariota um in there, I think they're

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to move it on Tampa Bay.

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think Tampa Bay's offensive decent. So we will

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>see who is correct on this one. So, so, do

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you think Tannehill is a better quarterback than Marietta? Unfortunately,

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think yes. So I have Tannehill graded

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>substantially worse than Mariotta. I think that's probably a big

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>part of it. In fact, Um, I think with Mariotta

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in there, I wouldn't this may not be a play

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for me. See that. That's when we were we were

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>debating that on air this morning, when we were talking

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>about this game, because Tannehill in his one game back

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>right one game, he was throwing the ball in tight quarters.

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>He was making these passes that were pretty incredible given

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>how his receivers were being covered. But I did say

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>on the air, I'm like, is this sustainable? You know?

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it was that just an aberrational thing? We're like, Wow,

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>tanneh Hill stuck that one into Oh my god, he

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>made that past two And I don't know the answer

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 1>to that, Like I don't have like supreme confidence in that.

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I just know that Mariota's one skill set was he

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't turn the ball over at all, which was just

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good skill set to have in the NFL.

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>That don't get you through a lot of years. Obviously,

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>his performance deteriorated recently that he that he's seen the bench.

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not so sure if I buy into Tannehill either.

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Mariota is he's a John Fox quarterback. He's

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy who's gonna give you, know, you know,

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>keep the turnovers down, but he's not explosive. I think

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill will probably give you more turnovers, but he's a

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>little more explosive. What I mean, I haven't looked at this,

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>but what was his sort of average depth of target

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>when he was with the with with the Dolphins, I

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of if I remember correctly, he didn't throw a

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>ton downfield? Did he? I think he did yea more

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>so more so then than we saw last week for sure.

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>He also he also rant like back with the with

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.959
<v Speaker 1>the fence, he he ran the ball decent amount, so

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if we see that post injury. All right,

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So you guys are apo on that one. Uh Todd

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is over and you are under rufus. That's what we

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 1>got down here. That's correct, all right. Mike palm Mike Palmieri,

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palmetto, what is your number two pick? I'm a

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>recent believer in this team, and I didn't know that

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>if Jacobe Rissette could take a team to the playoffs

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>um um. But as this sees and has worn on

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and they've played through injuries, I've become more and more

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>impressed with the Colts. I think this is a good

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>spot for them. Second consecutive home game. There's a big

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.959
<v Speaker 1>coaching mismatch here. I think Reich is just so good.

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I like their red zone defense. Uh Flacco um has

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>either he was never that good or he's deteriorated through age. Um.

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>He just doesn't sense any pressure in the pocket. He's

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>like a statue back there. I'm not impressed with this

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Broncos offense. I don't think they're gonna put up a

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 1>ton of points. I'll lay under a touchdown here. Five

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half. With the Colts at home in the

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>late game against Denver, I'm not sure Flacco is alive

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>part of the time. Listen. I I don't want to

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>mimic every one of your picks here, Mike, but people

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>have guessing lines to go to so that they know

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not making it up right now as we go.

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>But this was one of my best bets in terms

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>of just being more incredulous about the line. Now. Nothing

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>was like the Pittsburgh Miami line. And there's another one

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that I thought was further off too. But if you're

0:24:57.840 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>giving me less than a touchdown here on the Colts

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>at home with Jacoby Brissette, uh, the very ball conscious again,

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Brissette with a minimum and I think it was

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>like a two hundred or I can't remember what the

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>minimum passes is, but whatever that minimum is, he's historically

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>good in terms of protecting the football. Again, that sample

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>sizes smaller than it will be as we move forward.

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not impressed with the Broncos at all, and

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the Colts are a sneaky good football team.

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, I'm taking the Colts. I'm laying the

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>six and a half or whatever it is right now,

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>as long I think it's five and a half now,

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>uh five and a half in this game, it's going

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 1>down a little. So I'm doing that as well. Rufus,

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I know you've been on the Broncos. You said this

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>earlier on the show. That's kind of been your team,

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.959
<v Speaker 1>perhaps to your to your ultimate dissatisfaction. But you you

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>like the Broncos. Here do I'm I took the Broncos

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:47.719
<v Speaker 1>at plus six earlier in the week. I just I mean,

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they have I have the Broncos is basically

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.479
<v Speaker 1>an average team. Um, I think you know, obviously Flacco

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>looks really bad. I agree, Um, but they have their

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>defense is good. Um, they you know in the trenches there. Well,

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>their offensive line did not. I'll be honest. Their offensive

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>line lived pretty awful last week. But a lot of

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>that was was Flacco and the fact that, I mean,

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>sacks are mostly a quarterback stat. But now I'm trying

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to look at my my line numbers for the Broncos. Here.

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Would this be one of your three best bets? Or

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this is just a random bet? You have? No? No,

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>this is this is like, honestly, I didn't see a

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of value on the card this week, but Bengals

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>and Broncos or two, UM, And I'll be honest, I

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>think that um right now, you know, the game of

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>football is changing a little bit, and I do think

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>my priors in a way are maybe overfit to a

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>different era. And and you know, you have the you

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>have two quarterbacks and like Flacco and Dalton who have

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of experience, they have a lot of starts,

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and in general, guys that have have a lot of starts,

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>UM get those starts because they're good quarterbacks, because they

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they played well in the past. And even

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, and so I think that you know, guys

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>like guys like Breeze, Roethlisberger, UM, Philip Rivers, Peyton Manning,

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady, guys that like have played a long time,

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>UM kind of have in a way shaped these prior

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>shaped the sort of experience factor in my priors, whereas

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, you don't. And so as a result, like

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Joe Flacco or someone like Andy Dalton

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>is in a way I think probably gonna be a

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit over inflated my numbers just because of um

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that sort of experience fixed effect UM in in my model.

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, no, I actually think that's a great discussion.

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>We kind of delve into that on a numbers game

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>on Visa and Series Sex and Channel two a four

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>weekday mornings Monday through Friday, seven and nine Pacific tend

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a noon easter. We do that quite often, not not often,

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>but every once in a while. I will make this

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>point about the difference in betting, say baseball antennis versus

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the National Football League Baseball in tennis, to me feel

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>very logical and very cerebral based on numbers Visa via

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the betting line in the NFL. And this is not

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you're saying, but it's sort of a cousin

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>of what you're saying akin to it, which is, you know,

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>also the coaching differences. For me, and I always say

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this with the NFL, that if you could only have one,

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>if one tool was at your disposal, just one in

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>picking NFL games, and it was just that you power

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>ranked coaches, if that was the only thing at your disposal,

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you might do better betting the NFL then running through

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>numbers anymore. Because the difference the chasm between the half

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and the have nots in the NFL and specifically with

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the coaches is so vast now that it almost diminishes

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the importance of your numbers. Sometimes I don't know if

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm making if I'm articulating that well, but just sort

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of throw that out there, rufus No, that makes a

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>ton of sense. And Frank Reich is an amazing coach,

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you see. I mean he'll go for it in the

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>first quarter at his own forty yard line on fourth

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and two, which is which is what he should do.

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I completely agree. And I think the hardest

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>thing to do in the NFL is to sort of

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>distinguish the value of the quarterback versus the the offense

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>surrounding him and versus the scheme he's in. UM and

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>so UM. And then when you add on you know,

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>what what coaches do in game, we can sort of

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>see the value of coach can add with good in

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>game decisions. That's kind of what you see when on Twitter, uh,

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, discussions of um, you know, mistakes by coaches.

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>It's generally bad in game decisions that we can quantify.

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>But um, what we what's a lot harder to gauge

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is the value of a coach schematically, because I think

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>for years, like Andy Reid is a guy that was

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>awful with clock management. But you know, he seemed to

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>his schemes are always good. He always you know, he

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>was I guess great in the locker room, motivating players

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and all that, and so his his teams would would

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>would do really well. So I mean, that's of course,

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's definitely I agree Gill. It's it's something that's

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that's hard to do and coaches do matter. By the way,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I just looked up Flacco's numbers this year on you know,

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus actually has graded him out as an

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>above slightly above average quarterback this year. So far, stop

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it stop appropriate. Yeah, that's the correnable, that's the corruptible

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers the factor when these models, you know I love models,

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not okay, well what however, they Pro football whatever

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.239
<v Speaker 1>you ranking you just called, they have some type of

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>uh way of figuring out who they called above average quarterback.

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And all I'm saying is whatever the numbers are that

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.719
<v Speaker 1>they're plugging in, it's numbers in, numbers out, and if

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they're shitty numbers in, your shitty numbers out, and if

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they're good numbers in, they're good numbers out. So I

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't agree with that ranking of of Flacco

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is slightly above average. I mean personally, I don't. I

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>don't see how I haven't watched every snap, but um,

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>which what what what their rankings are, That's what their

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>rankings are based on. They literally grade out each throw

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and each play and say like, it's a bunch of

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>humans doing this. Well, so my humans may be better

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>than you're. They're humans, so right, every I've watched every snap,

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>so I can't. I cannot call Joe flag I best.

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I can call him average. I cannot call him above average.

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean that, I mean that's what he is. What

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you're really asking Todd is have they seen his face

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in any of these games? Because not only does he

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>appear to not care while he's on the field, I'm

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>not sure he's alive. I really don't believe. Like some

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of the times, I'm like, dude, check if that dude

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>has a pulse, like he just where's the passion in this?

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Like it's like I'm not putting my money behind this guy,

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's when that's when you're you're human. Eye test

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is like, I can't do this anymore. It corrupts. Uh,

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know what for a football focus

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is doing to determine that. But I'm kind of with

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you on that, Todd. Maybe you're maybe your human brain

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is better than theirs in this case. I I don't

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>know whether I am or whether I'm not, but come

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>on now, um, I do want to agree with Rufe

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not making this one of my picks. But is

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that by the way, I've only given one pick because

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that Rufus is official third pick Denver plus five and

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a half. Yes, Rufus has three and Mike and I

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>already have two, so you're behind here. I'm gonna come

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>out looking like an idiot at the end of this week.

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be great. No, I'm I'm I'm gonna I'm

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not gonna take Denver as one of my picks. But

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I do want to say that I leaned to Rufus

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and against you and Mike Gil because I think that

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis is coming off a big win, uh and Denver

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is coming off an absolute ass whooping against the Chiefs,

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and I never want to have the team that just

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>looked great against the team that just looked horrendous, So

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to me, I would have to lean Denver. The other

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that sticks in my mind is the Raiders going

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>into Indian running it all over them, and I don't

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>see why Denver couldn't be able to run it and

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>then keep it close late. So I'll lean with Rufus

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on on Denver against you and Mike. But I'm not

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>going to use that as any of my picks. But

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>now do you want me to give you my second pick? Please? Okay,

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>my second pick. Oh and by the way, Rufus, I

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>loved what you said about Andy Reid schematically because I

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>was saying that today on a numbers game when when

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we were saying Kansas City getting three and a half.

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I love Mahomes. I think he's you know, it's a

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>little too soon to make him Jesus. He's not that great.

0:32:56.440 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>He's fantastic, but he's not Jesus. So Andy need schematically

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>with all those um with all those weapons. Is you know,

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's too many points with Green Bay. I'm

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>not gonna use that one either, but I still think

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay is is giving too many points to Kansas

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>City because Andy Reid is a great schemer. So I

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>totally agree with you on that. You know, you know what,

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you should go through the whole schedule and give us

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>all your leans except for your best bet, and then

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>finally get to your best bet. That was just two

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>points that I wanted to make that you guys were

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>just discussing, though, Todd, I think that's a great point

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>with Andy Reid. I mean, look what he did with

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Alex Smith exactly. But Gil Gil likes to get on

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>me and Mike likes to get on you know, both

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of them are they're they're just what hards is. What

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>can I tell you now? My second pick, I'm gonna

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>go with a team that we all know and love.

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>It's called the Miami Dolphins. Miami Dolphins, Miami Dolphins plus

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and a half. We've already discussed it ad nauseum.

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Mason Rudolph is gonna throw that little dinker ball. And

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>what does Pro Football Focus say about his point five

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>against Cincinnati when he didn't throw the ball more than

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>two yards down the goddamn field. So I don't want

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to hear about rankings and this bullshit that these people talk. Oh,

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Mason Rudolph was twenty five, He was fantastic. No, he wasn't.

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I could have thrown those little dinker ballsy, hold on,

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>hold on, you asked the question, brufus, do you have

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that in front of you? I can pull it up.

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm pulling it up right now. I'm curress. I just

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>think this is a good reference because I was I

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:27.800
<v Speaker 1>was curious with the flak of how bad he actually

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>had been and um no, actually that's the one game

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:39.919
<v Speaker 1>that Rudolph graded above average. Again, guess what anybody could

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.479
<v Speaker 1>have done that if you watched that game stats lie,

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>every single play was there was the wide receiver running

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in motion, snap it to Rudolph, He throws it one

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>and a half yards to the guy and he runs

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>around the end. And Cincinnati couldn't figure it out. So

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to hear about Mason Rudolph. Give me.

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Will Miami be able to figure that out? Though? Well?

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I just I just think that Miami's defense is is

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>not as bad as people think it is. It's it's

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>not good. I'm not saying it's good, but I'm not

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>saying it's as bad as people think it is. Remember,

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a team that went to Buffalo yesterday and

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean last week and should have been up to nine.

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>This team is not that horrendous. If fits can not

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>be bad fits, granted, if Fits his bad fits, and

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:27.399
<v Speaker 1>he throws eighteen interceptions like he's wont to do at times. Yeah,

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go down and smoke. But if Fits can

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 1>play an adequate game, manage the game played decently, we're

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>not getting beat by fourteen and a half by the

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh uh Tow Waivers. Okay, Miami plus fourteen and a

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 1>half Miami Dolphins. Okay, So Mike, me and you are

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 1>all on the Dolphins, Rufus is on the Bengals, and

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos say poo poo platter on this podcast. We

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>could all look terrible after this, but we shall see. Uh,

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palm, you haven't given a third pick? Right, yeah?

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Under forty two Minnesota ends. Since Rufus and I have

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>already given our third pick, it's time for Todd to

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>give two more leans in his third pick. All right, Todd,

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you go ahead, you give you a third Okay, I

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:12.280
<v Speaker 1>will give you my third best bet, and I'm going

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to go with the Caral line up Panthers, Riverboat ron

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I like this football team. I think they're flying a

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit under the radar. I think the San Francisco

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 1>forty niners well very good. Have had a bunch of

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>good games in a row before the slop game, and

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I like getting good teams with more. I mean San

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Francisco and Carolina. Here they're saying that San Francisco is

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 1>three points better on a neutral field, which is why

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 1>there's six point favorites in this game. And I do

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>not think there's three points difference between San Francisco and Carolina.

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Maybe one, maybe two. I don't think San Francisco's worth

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>three more on a neutral field. So I like the

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Panthers. I think Alan, as long as he doesn't

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:58.479
<v Speaker 1>make too many mistakes, he can throw a nice ball

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>out there. I like their offense with keek Lely, of course,

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I get the little running back who can run for

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, Miles and Miles. I think that Carolina will

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to at least control the Niner running game

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to some extent. Six points is a ton of points

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in the National Football League game. When two adequate teams

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>are going against each other. I'm gonna go with Riverboat

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Ron and the Carolina Panthers plus the six Thanks for

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the showmanship. Also, ton on that, are you worried that

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen's fumble luck is just off the charts. You know,

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you love to get on this Island guy for his fumbles.

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I remember seeing one of them was totally not his fault.

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>He got smashed in the back where he didn't All right,

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll take that off the shot. But the fact is

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that their fumble luck has been really good. So I

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>mean that just that just gives me a moment of pause,

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is all I'm saying. Okay, Well, I mean, look, fumble

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 1>luck can go both ways. What's the Niners fumble luck.

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know of fan, but it's not as as

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>fortunate as that of the of the Carolina Fathers. By

0:37:57.480 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the way, the slop at FedEx Field, can we just

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about that for saying, how is it that they

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>cannot get this right? Like even in great conditions at

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>FedEx Field. That's they always complain about how difficult that

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>field is to maintain. It's like, oh, the mid Atlantic

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>region of the country. What's so difficult about the mid Atlantic? Sod? Like,

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand that. And that was a slop field. Uh,

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And the Redskins end up being the second team in

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty five years to score no points and

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>cover the spread against the Niners. So you're on the

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Panthers um or any of these dogs. By the way,

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is anybody sprinkling anything on the money line on any

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of these dogs? And we're just doing this a t

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>s personally and I'm not I'm not putting anything on

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 1>money lines just because, um it's it's you know, I'm

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>trying to get full limits earlier in the week, so

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand maybe later in the week you don't piss

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>anybody off at this point. My third, by the way,

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>is the New Orleans Saints. I realized this is, uh, well,

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you how much it is right now.

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans is a ten point favorite. I get ten,

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.439
<v Speaker 1>ten point favorite, ten and a half most places skill

0:38:56.480 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>now no, yeah, it's it's ten consensus, I think, yeah,

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I see ten minus one away ten minus one oh five. Uh,

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's ten. H New Orleans given ten against Arizona. This

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>was my second most off guests of the year. Again,

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this is one of these weird years which has never

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>happened before with these guesses where I am authentically way

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:19.839
<v Speaker 1>off the numbers on some of these, and so this

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:21.919
<v Speaker 1>was I was four points off on this. I thought

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 1>this should be fourteen points. Arizona comes off a win

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>over the Giants. The Giants are dreadful. The week before

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Arizona got by Atlanta, Atlanta is not doing anything big.

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>And in that game against Atlanta, Arizona had not one,

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>not too but at least three instances in that game

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>where they got the benefits of calls that could have

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 1>just as easily gone against them and really determined the

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>outcome of that game. Obviously, Matt Bryant missing an extra

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>point at the end did as well, and and Kyler

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Murray uh sort of up and down, sort of a

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>choppy early regular season. I don't know if they found

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>something in Chase Edmonds or not. I'm not gonna read

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:57.399
<v Speaker 1>too much into it. But the New Orleans Saints, whether

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 1>it's Bridgewater or Breeze here, and I think it's should

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>be Bridgewater because I don't know why the Russian drew

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Brees back with a by coming up. I thought they

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>said it was playing. Breeze is playing? Now? Is that

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the word that I thought I thought they were saying

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:11.319
<v Speaker 1>the Breeze said he was gonna play, But I don't

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm wrong. I thought Jeff Parls said that this morning.

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Did he let me check on that? While we go

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>through this, but uh, I'm taking the I'm taking the Saints. Look,

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I know it's ten points. I know you're not gonna

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>make a huge profit long term doing this as a

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 1>rule in the NFL. But I think they're a vastly

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>better football team. Uh. They did what they did against

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bears supposedly vaunted defense last week without Alvin Kamara,

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 1>without Jared cook Um. Give me the Saints. I'm laying

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the points. And if I don't cover here, tip of

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the cap to the Cardinals. Some bet you have to

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be willing to lose. This would be one of them.

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>As Mike would say, he doesn't want to hear my leans,

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'm leaning with you. If Breese plays, I definitely

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like that. And I just googled it, and yeah, Breese

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>says he expects to play, apparently according to ESPN. And

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:56.359
<v Speaker 1>so that didn't move either, right on that news that's

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 1>sitting right where it is. So was the game even

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>whendn't like it wasn't even on the board at a

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of places for a while. Oh, it was up

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning, I thought from Monday anyway, So I'm

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing like Pinnacle didn't post anything till yesterday. Afternoon or evening.

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, we had a bunch of lines. I saw it.

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I saw it on the board at south Point all week. Yeah,

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I haven't my spreadshee just blank. Same with the Carton

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>or same with the Falcons game. The Falcons game is

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>still blank where I am. I don't see if I

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>don't see a number in that game anywhere between Seattle

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 1>and because we don't know if it's Matt Ryan or not.

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Half on bed online at six and a half. Yeah,

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 1>that's the only Yeah, it's the only place. Probably not,

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>probably not for very low limits. Support for today's beating

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the book podcast comes as always from our friends at

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Bookmaker dot eu. I have been saying it all season long.

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 1>I will continue to say it. The Bookmaker dot eu

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is an industry later for close to thirty years. You

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>should know that by now pro players consider them a

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>must because their first to post dots, They take the

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 1>highest limits, and most importantly, pride themselves on never having

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 1>kicked out a winning player. That is huge in this

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:01.919
<v Speaker 1>day at age. Bookmakers a high volume sports book best

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 1>suited for not only the sophisticated player who understand sports betting,

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>but also too large recreational players as well. And their

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 1>motto is where the lines originate, because chances are the

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>sports book at which you've been betting all along follows

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 1>their lines. And right now, if you visit bookmaker dot

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 1>eu slash gill that's Bookmaker dot U slash g I

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>l L, you can claim an exclusive welcome bonus of

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 1>up to three hundred dollars. Once again, that's Bookmaker dot

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 1>eu slash gill g I l L. To join and

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>claim you're welcome bonus of up to three hundred dollars

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, don't miss out Teaser of the week. Now,

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>let me just say this the you know, oh stand

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>for long. These aren't really working out this year. But

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>let's give a two team six point teaser of the week.

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 1>If you want to make it six and a half

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>or seven points, we'll let you do that as well. Um,

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 1>but rufus. If you were forced to make a two

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:53.919
<v Speaker 1>team tease play, which would it be for you this week?

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's really only one option. Um is Tampa

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Bay from two and a half to and half? And

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 1>I tease? Um? Where are they the Philadelphia Eagles from

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 1>two and a half to eight and a half. Yeah,

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that's probably the one I don't think that. I don't

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>think that needs an explanation, does it? No, none of

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 1>that does. But again, but but and I mean I

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>do so I make the Tampa Bay game like honestly,

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I I took Tampa, Um I got them at three,

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>so um, so I do lean them at two and

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a half. I wouldn't play them at two and a half.

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And with the Eagles, UM, I make that spread just one.

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>So uh, you know that that kind of helps it

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. Plus obviously you know, getting the three and

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the seven, which you know, the three and the seven

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't arguably aren't worth as much anymore now with with

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the longer extra points. But um, yeah, I think it

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously depends on what what what you're having to life.

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a two point two team six NA point teaser too, yeah,

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 1>no standard tease down through seven and three though on

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole favorite side, that is true. All right, So

0:43:56.520 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>rufus going with excuse me, Tampa Bay season it up

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:01.480
<v Speaker 1>through the three seven to well, let's call it eight

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Philadelphia, same deal, Um, just before we

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>move out for that Philadelphia, Buffalo. Philadelphia looked so bad

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 1>against the Dallas Cowboys. Do you worry about them in

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>a sense. I know, I understand you know, taking your

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>teaser side makes perfect sense. But just as a football

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:19.839
<v Speaker 1>team that a lot of people had high expectations for,

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:22.399
<v Speaker 1>do you look at them and think that they are

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in some ways fraudulent at all? You know, if if

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at any good team at the end of

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the season, they end up having bad games. Um. Even

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember I was a few weeks ago looking through

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and some of these historically good teams because I was interested.

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember back in the nineties when the forty

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Niners were huge favorites and Super Bowls against like the

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:45.879
<v Speaker 1>chart against the Chargers, um? And I was like, how

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 1>is you know, I feel like you have. I can't

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 1>imagine in this era you have like having a seventeen

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Poe favorite in the Super Bowl. And so I looked

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>through and then I saw the Niners like got blown

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 1>out in like a game like Week five or something

0:44:59.160 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>against the Elfie Eagles in and I was like, I

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>wonder what people were saying then creating what narratives they

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 1>created at the time. So I just think there is

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of randomness in football, and and just you know,

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not always going to have your a you know,

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a game every week. There's stuff you maybe not be

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 1>prepared for schematically. I don't want to honestly, Um, it

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>would surprise me if that was the case with the Cowboys,

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 1>just because, um, it's Jason Garrett and so you know,

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's any genius. Um, although Hellen Moore

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:31.319
<v Speaker 1>is look better. But you know, I think, you know,

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles do have a talented team. They've been banged

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 1>up in the secondary. Um, I think that, you know,

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:38.839
<v Speaker 1>my player level model likes them a lot more than

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 1>than the Massy Peabody team level model, So I think

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the talents there. By the way, and I'm not looking

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:46.959
<v Speaker 1>this up, but it was against the Philadelphia Eagles because

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I remember it very well. The Niners were a juggernaut

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:51.839
<v Speaker 1>and they had this weird game at home where they

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 1>got crushed by the Eagles. I'm gonna off the top

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:55.879
<v Speaker 1>of my head, and for some reason, I remember the score.

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it was forty eight something like that because

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it was this weird school were and when you asked

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 1>what was the narrative back then? The narrative back then

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:05.640
<v Speaker 1>was people just raise their hands and like, huh, that

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 1>was weird. I kept no explanation for that game, and

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 1>as the season went on and the Niners won, the

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:12.520
<v Speaker 1>super people like wow, what was that? That was basically

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the extent of the analysis back then, as I recall

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it as a as a child or as are as

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a young man. Anyway, Mike Palm teaser the week. Okay, girl,

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I was so excited. My biggest accomplishment of the week

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 1>last week wasn't that the Gnats past on the National

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>League pennant ticket, but that I hit a teaser to

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.719
<v Speaker 1>go two and five on the year. You've actually got

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 1>me betting teasers. I actually bet it live a teaser.

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I said, I cannot be this bad at teasers. It

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:39.040
<v Speaker 1>has to turn. So I actually bet the one last week.

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 1>This week, I'm gonna go with the Lions. I'm going

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to tease the Lions down from seven to one against

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. I think the Lions are better on both

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 1>sides of the ball and the jimming. This is such

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a tough division, the NFC North. I mean, I personally

0:46:56.680 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>think the Vikings are the best team, and the Packers

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 1>are right behind. The Lions are not that far behind

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 1>them them as well. Uh and the Bears are you know,

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>not awful, but probably overvalued. I'm gonna take the Lions

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 1>down to one at home against the Giants, who really

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 1>can't stop anybody. I think Stafford will put up put

0:47:16.800 --> 0:47:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a big numbers this week. I know Carrie and Johnson

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:22.720
<v Speaker 1>might be out, but I think the Lions are capable

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of hanging thirty one or thirty five on the Giants here.

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So we'll tease that down under seven and under three

0:47:28.640 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to one, and then I'm gonna go the other way

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>with a dog. I'm gonna take the Chargers up to

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 1>ten against the Bears. I actually bet the Chargers on

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the money line in this game. I just think Drabsky

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:43.319
<v Speaker 1>is that bad that. I mean, it's deceptive to think that.

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, they only lost that game by around ten

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:48.920
<v Speaker 1>points to the Saints. They were completely dominated. They cannot

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 1>move the ball. Drabinsky cannot throw down the field. I mean,

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:55.720
<v Speaker 1>what are the averaging three three or four yards per pass?

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean completed past, not attempt um. But you have

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the factor Anthony Lynn in here. He's probably worth in

0:48:02.320 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 1>a game that's decided by his score word minus three

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:06.839
<v Speaker 1>or Ford the Chargers and the way he handles ends

0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:08.799
<v Speaker 1>of games. So let's go all the way up to

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:12.960
<v Speaker 1>ten with the Chargers. That Chargers Tennessee finish last Sunday

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 1>one of the most incredible endings to any football game

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I had Tennessee. So it worked out for me. If

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:23.279
<v Speaker 1>you ever hear me complaining about any outcome of any

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 1>NFL game ever, remind me of that one. As two

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Chargers uh touchdowns at least on the field get reversed

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's followed by a subsequent fumble that was recovered

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 1>by the Tennessee Titans. Amazing sequence at the end of

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the game that after the referees seem to have botched

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Tannehill's or the or the Titans third down and

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 1>then Ryan Tannehill's sneak on fourth down on this on

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 1>the previous drive, there was a whole you know, just

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 1>consistent with the referetion anigans of this year in the NFL.

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And those who had the Titans get fortunate. Those who

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 1>had the Chargers see the most Chargers thing ever happened

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to them. With Anthony Lenna's head coach in that game. Um, alright,

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:04.799
<v Speaker 1>so mine is also rufus is is the same thing

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing. The typical Stanford Wong teaser Philadelphia Tampa Bay.

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 1>To me, that's probably the only teaser, at least that's

0:49:13.640 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the obvious teaser to make, and I'll go with that.

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think Buffalo is going to blow Philadelphia out,

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think Tennessee is gonna blow Tampa Bay out,

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and so I feel comfortable with that one. Todd. Yes,

0:49:22.960 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I would just like to say, unable to be challenged

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 1>or denied. Yes, that is the definition of the word

0:49:28.480 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>indisputable and disputable evidence. That's all I'm gonna say, folks.

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Indisputable evinces. What what Todd is saying is that he

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:41.360
<v Speaker 1>had the chargers and that although our laws of human

0:49:41.400 --> 0:49:45.280
<v Speaker 1>beings and gravity and physics suggests that those were probably

0:49:45.360 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 1>short of the goal line, there was no legitimate visual

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:52.720
<v Speaker 1>evidence to have overturned that. And Todd is very bitter. Correct,

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm slightly bitter. I think both balls were not touchdowns,

0:49:57.400 --> 0:50:01.760
<v Speaker 1>but clearly I've watched one billion games and they never

0:50:01.920 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>overturned unless it's unable to be challenged or denied the

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 1>definition of the word in disputable. Thank you, nfl Um.

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:14.799
<v Speaker 1>As far as my teaser goes Um and Gil, you

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:17.600
<v Speaker 1>said you liked my showmanship. In order to do my

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:19.759
<v Speaker 1>teaser this week, I will be doing the song that

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that that that that that that the uh that that

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 1>that that that the bom bom bomp. I'm just kidding anyways, UM,

0:50:27.360 --> 0:50:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I will I thought you might like that. So that's

0:50:29.640 --> 0:50:31.239
<v Speaker 1>that's a good one that always gets me fired up

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:36.320
<v Speaker 1>for football. Um. Anyways, I will go with the same

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:41.240
<v Speaker 1>teasers as both you and rufus Um Tampa Bay plus

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. Um, that's the only one I'd

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 1>be a little worried about. I think Philly is definitely

0:50:47.000 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna show up this week and play some offense in Buffalo,

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think Buffalo is the kind of team

0:50:51.920 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that usually wins by margin. So I will go Tampa

0:50:54.880 --> 0:50:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Bay with the plus eight and a half in Philly

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:58.000
<v Speaker 1>with the plus eight and a half. One other thing

0:50:58.000 --> 0:50:59.759
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, just so that people don't think

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying there's something. I think models are very important,

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think they have a lot to say. I

0:51:05.280 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 1>just think that a lot of times some people's models

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>have flaws in them, and the numbers can be corruptible,

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:15.080
<v Speaker 1>especially in a sport like football. So I'm not against models.

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm against ship and ship out models. And I

0:51:18.560 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of models out there that while

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:24.960
<v Speaker 1>they may be accurate of them, they may have of

0:51:24.960 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a blind spot so to speak. I don't I don't

0:51:27.080 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 1>have any problems. That's a really good point, Todd. Yeah,

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree. And I think especially in the game

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:34.480
<v Speaker 1>like football, where you do have such a small sample

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 1>sizing you do you know, in a season, and you

0:51:36.239 --> 0:51:38.799
<v Speaker 1>do have so many moving parts and things that are

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:41.759
<v Speaker 1>dependent on each other in context, I mean it's it's

0:51:41.880 --> 0:51:45.800
<v Speaker 1>very tough. Um, it's very tough to to model football.

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And and you know, honestly there's a lot of art

0:51:50.040 --> 0:51:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that goes into models too, and sort of intuition and

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to come up with, you know, um something logical.

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So I have zero problem with that statements. In fact,

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:03.799
<v Speaker 1>I would even suggest this. With legalization, we now see

0:52:03.800 --> 0:52:07.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously a proliferation of people who are you know, instant

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:11.040
<v Speaker 1>supposed experts on all things sports, betting, and part and

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:14.439
<v Speaker 1>parcel with that is when you see someone who has

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 1>who claims to have a model, there seems to be

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and you guys can tell me if I'm wrong or not,

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:22.280
<v Speaker 1>But I get the sense that by virtues by simple

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>virtue of the fact that person claims to have a model,

0:52:24.880 --> 0:52:28.240
<v Speaker 1>they are instantly i won't say deified, but they're instantly

0:52:28.320 --> 0:52:32.080
<v Speaker 1>canonized into oh, this person must be smart. They have

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a model, for God's sakes, And or they're all themselves sharp.

0:52:38.040 --> 0:52:41.040
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden they're deified as sharp. Oh great, well,

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll get a goddamn sharp certificate too. I think you

0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 1>can purchase purchase one of those down the street. They

0:52:50.640 --> 0:52:55.160
<v Speaker 1>could you buy a few? Yeah? Um? But that I

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:57.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm sensitive to that because I sort of

0:52:57.239 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 1>get that feeling where I'm like, oh, well, like, how

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:00.759
<v Speaker 1>do we know, Like, all of a sudden, this person

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to be super smart just because they have

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a model, Like, I don't know that. So anyway, it's

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:07.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I've been sensitive to. Alright,

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 1>final two questions, Yes, gil gil By the way, even

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:13.919
<v Speaker 1>guys who have good models, very good models, doesn't mean

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the modeling is some of these models may have slight

0:53:19.239 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 1>blind spots for sure. For sure. I mean, look or

0:53:26.760 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Rufus may know who I'm talking about when I refer

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to somebody who I know who has been doing models

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:35.880
<v Speaker 1>for decades, And let's just say, it's wonderful to talk about,

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's wonderful to analyze, and some of the stuff

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is really valuable, but there's also a lot of stuff

0:53:40.680 --> 0:53:43.839
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately is not that valuable and has and has

0:53:43.880 --> 0:53:47.319
<v Speaker 1>blind spots. So yeah, I mean nothing is infallible, right, Um,

0:53:47.360 --> 0:53:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I know who you're talking about, and I

0:53:48.880 --> 0:53:51.799
<v Speaker 1>think you might. Uh. Let's do the final two questions here,

0:53:51.840 --> 0:53:53.919
<v Speaker 1>boys and girls. Final two questions as we close every

0:53:53.920 --> 0:53:56.440
<v Speaker 1>megapod with UH. First of which is which is the

0:53:56.480 --> 0:53:59.040
<v Speaker 1>big favorites you believe is the most likely lose outright?

0:53:59.280 --> 0:54:01.959
<v Speaker 1>If you had to choose one of these, who would

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you think it is? Minnesota? SERI your candidates? Minnesota seventeen

0:54:05.000 --> 0:54:09.240
<v Speaker 1>point favorites tonight against the Skins, New Orleans ten point favorites,

0:54:09.320 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half. Ten, let's call it ten now

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:13.680
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half. I think you're right, Todd. I'm

0:54:13.680 --> 0:54:15.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing more ten and a half now, No, I see

0:54:15.120 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 1>more tense. Ten boy favorites at home against Arizona. Uh.

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Just to make this interesting, let me knock it down

0:54:21.560 --> 0:54:23.960
<v Speaker 1>just below the seven. So Jacksonville six and a half

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:26.719
<v Speaker 1>point favorites at home against the Jets Detroit seven point

0:54:26.760 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 1>favorites at home against the Giants, Niners six point favorites

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:32.920
<v Speaker 1>at home against Carolina, Houston seven point favorites at home

0:54:32.920 --> 0:54:35.319
<v Speaker 1>against ding Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding. All right, wait,

0:54:35.840 --> 0:54:40.120
<v Speaker 1>turn New England thirteen point favorites against Freddie Kitchens and

0:54:40.160 --> 0:54:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Browns, and then Monday night Pittsburgh fourteen point

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 1>favorites at home, maybe even fourteen and a half against

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Dolphins. Todd, does that mean you think Houston

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is the one. I think they're the most likely because

0:54:51.719 --> 0:54:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that, uh, you know, you have the Bill

0:54:54.160 --> 0:54:58.160
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien factor. In my model says that Bill O'Brien loves

0:54:58.239 --> 0:55:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to keep the other fucking team in the game. Pardon

0:55:00.719 --> 0:55:02.440
<v Speaker 1>me if I can't say the F word on the show,

0:55:02.719 --> 0:55:04.719
<v Speaker 1>but I will say that he loves to keep the

0:55:04.719 --> 0:55:07.280
<v Speaker 1>other team in the game. Oakland Raiders can run the football.

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Their defense is an abysmal bunch of garbage, but they

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:14.600
<v Speaker 1>actually can run the football. And I wouldn't be surprised

0:55:14.640 --> 0:55:17.839
<v Speaker 1>if Bill O'Brien gives us a little Anthony Lynn like

0:55:18.320 --> 0:55:21.319
<v Speaker 1>uh jokerism late in the game in Oakland pools some

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:25.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of stunner rufus same question. So we um was Denver,

0:55:25.280 --> 0:55:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Indy not eligible, uh, because it's kind of five and

0:55:28.320 --> 0:55:30.399
<v Speaker 1>a half, so I didn't put that in. Also, yeah,

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 1>let's not make that eligible because I've already discussed it. Um.

0:55:34.840 --> 0:55:38.359
<v Speaker 1>You know I'm gonna take Carolina, um, which Todd, You're

0:55:38.360 --> 0:55:42.359
<v Speaker 1>on that game overall? Right, Yeah, yeah, I think that um. Uh,

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:44.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't have much of an opinion. Um

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it's or not enough of an opinion to bet it.

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I make it um a four and a half point spread.

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:53.560
<v Speaker 1>But I do think you do have narratives working in

0:55:53.600 --> 0:55:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the right direction. Um with you know, as Todd said,

0:55:56.120 --> 0:56:01.240
<v Speaker 1>like san Fran coming off of a you know, really well. Actually,

0:56:01.280 --> 0:56:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say they came off a good

0:56:02.560 --> 0:56:04.839
<v Speaker 1>performance because I think you can kind of just throw

0:56:04.880 --> 0:56:08.040
<v Speaker 1>away that the mud bowl, right, I mean yeah, but

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what what that course and and the narrative.

0:56:12.480 --> 0:56:15.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're undefeated. Um. Although I am a little

0:56:15.800 --> 0:56:18.680
<v Speaker 1>concerned about Kyle Allen. I do think Kyle Allen is

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:22.600
<v Speaker 1>not a good quarterback. I you know, he's played, he's played, Okay, Um,

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:24.759
<v Speaker 1>he's five and o career as a starter. But there's

0:56:24.800 --> 0:56:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a reason he was an undrafted free agent and occasionally

0:56:28.239 --> 0:56:31.200
<v Speaker 1>there are quarterbacks that are you know, late round picks

0:56:31.280 --> 0:56:34.919
<v Speaker 1>like Tom Brady that end up being great quarterbacks. But uh,

0:56:35.000 --> 0:56:38.479
<v Speaker 1>the odds, you know, even even after five and start,

0:56:38.560 --> 0:56:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the odds of of Kyle Allen being someone with staying

0:56:41.920 --> 0:56:45.239
<v Speaker 1>power are quite low. But hopefully maybe he can. He

0:56:45.280 --> 0:56:48.480
<v Speaker 1>can continue to ride the hot hand or at least

0:56:48.480 --> 0:56:51.799
<v Speaker 1>the lukewarm hand, uh and and beat San Fran on

0:56:51.840 --> 0:56:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the road. So I think san Fran one thing they

0:56:54.760 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have surprisingly been recently is a little bit conservative with

0:56:59.600 --> 0:57:02.320
<v Speaker 1>their play calling an offense. And I've heard Kyle Shanahan

0:57:02.360 --> 0:57:04.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about how they're okay with winning with defense and

0:57:04.680 --> 0:57:07.560
<v Speaker 1>getting three yards per carry sometimes and which keeps the

0:57:07.560 --> 0:57:11.040
<v Speaker 1>opponent in the game. It does, and so, um, if

0:57:11.520 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 1>if the defense can't can't hold, then you know, we

0:57:14.640 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 1>could see we could see Carolina. Want to Kyle Shanahan, who,

0:57:17.200 --> 0:57:18.919
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in his career he says can

0:57:19.000 --> 0:57:21.440
<v Speaker 1>rely on a defense. He says, a very funny feeling

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 1>for him that he's never had this before. He's like, Wow,

0:57:23.280 --> 0:57:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I can actually rely on my defense. Um, Mikey, same question.

0:57:27.680 --> 0:57:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I look at the Texans and uh, I just you

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:34.960
<v Speaker 1>know this Raiders travel schedule. I know they've got to

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:38.840
<v Speaker 1>buy in between, but never being at home, Uh, it

0:57:38.960 --> 0:57:41.680
<v Speaker 1>seems to be very difficult spot for them to keep

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:44.640
<v Speaker 1>going on the road. I look at the forty nine ers,

0:57:44.760 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but how long can Kyle Allen's bumble luck continue. I

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:50.720
<v Speaker 1>think this will be a great game, but I still

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:54.120
<v Speaker 1>think this forty nine years defense is underrated. New Orleans

0:57:54.160 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota forty nine. I think these are the three best

0:57:57.520 --> 0:57:59.320
<v Speaker 1>teams with a chance to get to the super Bowl

0:57:59.360 --> 0:58:05.360
<v Speaker 1>because of their defense. I'm gonna go to the Jacksonville Jaguar.

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:09.040
<v Speaker 1>We are so we are so aligned, Mike, Yeah, that's

0:58:09.040 --> 0:58:12.120
<v Speaker 1>where I was going. I ever heard you talk about this,

0:58:12.200 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 1>gil Um? So I didn't know that, but no I haven't.

0:58:16.040 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I have never talked about it. But that's what I

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 1>was going to pay. I like the fact that uh

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Bean bell rallied around his quarterback and then playing that

0:58:26.360 --> 0:58:31.160
<v Speaker 1>idiotic decision to air the ghost comments Um. The Jets

0:58:31.160 --> 0:58:33.400
<v Speaker 1>are not as bad as they looked on Monday night.

0:58:34.080 --> 0:58:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm still not sold on the Jacksonville offense. I know

0:58:37.640 --> 0:58:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Minshew has been serviceable, but I think the Jets bounce

0:58:41.160 --> 0:58:43.960
<v Speaker 1>back here. I think if they can give Darnald time.

0:58:45.120 --> 0:58:47.959
<v Speaker 1>I just think that this game, this game is ripe

0:58:48.000 --> 0:58:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for an upset and a bounce back spot for the Jets. Yeah,

0:58:50.720 --> 0:58:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I think six too many. I'm not even gonna add

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:55.200
<v Speaker 1>anything to that. I immediately gravitated George this game. The

0:58:55.280 --> 0:58:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Jets aren't as bad as they looked Monday night. How

0:58:57.440 --> 0:58:59.920
<v Speaker 1>could you be? I mean, Sam the Sam Donald does

0:59:00.000 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>do this one thing where if he starts out poorly,

0:59:02.880 --> 0:59:06.040
<v Speaker 1>have you ever seen a quarterback whose spirals, as you know,

0:59:06.120 --> 0:59:08.680
<v Speaker 1>as rapidly as that guy does in game in a

0:59:08.840 --> 0:59:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in a situation like that, he just he's like, oh,

0:59:11.080 --> 0:59:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I threw two picks. Let me just go crazy and

0:59:13.640 --> 0:59:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and and make the worst decisions here down the stretch. Um.

0:59:16.760 --> 0:59:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I know that doesn't sound like that that's a vote

0:59:18.800 --> 0:59:20.320
<v Speaker 1>for the Jets, but I do think there are far

0:59:20.360 --> 0:59:23.120
<v Speaker 1>better football team than that. I think they're after they

0:59:23.160 --> 0:59:25.840
<v Speaker 1>beat the Cowboys the week before we called them. If

0:59:25.880 --> 0:59:28.880
<v Speaker 1>they have Sam Donald, maybe they're a perfectly average football team.

0:59:29.160 --> 0:59:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So I would say, if any of the big favorites

0:59:31.840 --> 0:59:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that we just mentioned were to lose, I would go

0:59:33.480 --> 0:59:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to this game because I'm not sold on Jacksonville either,

0:59:35.680 --> 0:59:39.160
<v Speaker 1>So Jacksonville would be my choice. Yes, before we go

0:59:39.240 --> 0:59:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to the final question, can I ask rufus a question? Please?

0:59:42.640 --> 0:59:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Rufus um? So I think I can say with confidence

0:59:47.080 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 1>for the other three of them, Gil Todd and myself

0:59:50.080 --> 0:59:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that in terms of volume we do more in game

0:59:53.280 --> 0:59:57.640
<v Speaker 1>wagering and pre flop wagering. How do you approach in

0:59:57.760 --> 1:00:00.880
<v Speaker 1>game wagering and how much of let's say percentage of

1:00:00.920 --> 1:00:04.439
<v Speaker 1>your volume of wagering is it? So I don't do

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>any live live wagering. I bet second halves, um, but

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't bet nearly as much on second halfs as

1:00:11.400 --> 1:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I used to it, at least for football. I mean

1:00:13.400 --> 1:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for uh, it used to be maybe four or five

1:00:16.880 --> 1:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>years ago. UM. Maybe my football volume was second halfs.

1:00:21.960 --> 1:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I had a model that that did quite well. But

1:00:24.440 --> 1:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the market has caught up a little bit

1:00:26.400 --> 1:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>there and so there's not you know, as many opportunities.

1:00:28.760 --> 1:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>But the issue, I mean, live betting is very um

1:00:32.040 --> 1:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>labor intensive and time intensive and um. And the other

1:00:36.920 --> 1:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>thing is there are issues with um with being well

1:00:41.320 --> 1:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>with limits and as well as particular books, I think

1:00:45.280 --> 1:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>mostly New Jersey, you know, waiting for approval and kind

1:00:48.640 --> 1:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of free rolling themselves. And that's why you only go

1:00:51.360 --> 1:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a commercials groupe. Right, Yeah, do you find yourself doing

1:00:54.640 --> 1:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>more of your betting in New Jersey in terms of

1:00:56.640 --> 1:00:59.439
<v Speaker 1>legal sports books? Um, well more than when there weren't

1:00:59.480 --> 1:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>legal sports looks in New Jersey. Well, no, I meant,

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I meant Visa v versus Nevada. Um, I think it's no.

1:01:05.480 --> 1:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I think still more in Nevada. But New Jersey does

1:01:08.880 --> 1:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>offer have better offerings for certain things like like golf, Um,

1:01:12.920 --> 1:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you know the fan duel for example, as like top

1:01:15.520 --> 1:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>ten forty for tournaments like yes or Nos, and and

1:01:21.560 --> 1:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>more of the European offerings. But the problem is the

1:01:24.440 --> 1:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>books in New Jersey or more of the European style

1:01:27.280 --> 1:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>books generally and more likely to limit winning betters. I

1:01:31.240 --> 1:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>have sat with rufus of the past on college football

1:01:34.160 --> 1:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Saturday at a Pro Football Sunday and watched you do

1:01:37.480 --> 1:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>your halftime wagering. This is like you said four years

1:01:40.680 --> 1:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>ago or something like that. Uh, and you were massive

1:01:44.280 --> 1:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>volume for that type of wager. So it's interesting to

1:01:46.520 --> 1:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>hear that you know things change, right, for sure? They

1:01:48.840 --> 1:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>do in sports betting. Yeah, honestly, I was returned. I was, yeah,

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>returning a lot on NFL and college football halftimes. In

1:01:56.800 --> 1:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the last three years, it's basically been break even. So

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it kind of just abruptly, you know, the winds of

1:02:03.000 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>change arrived, the winds of change songs? Are you? Oh,

1:02:08.040 --> 1:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that one, Rufus. Are you? Are you

1:02:10.320 --> 1:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>aware though, of the incredible disparity between books on in

1:02:14.720 --> 1:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>game lines, Yes, I am. I know that it's just

1:02:18.240 --> 1:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>more of a limits issue. And ay and ay, I

1:02:22.040 --> 1:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>mean that that sounds to be the labor intensiveness and

1:02:24.720 --> 1:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the limits are the reason you don't really want to

1:02:26.480 --> 1:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>do it. And I don't even have a live model myself. Um,

1:02:29.080 --> 1:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I've I guess I tried to build one maybe a

1:02:31.880 --> 1:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>decade ago, when I was like, this is gonna be

1:02:33.480 --> 1:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the future. But you're having to monitor a bunch of

1:02:36.280 --> 1:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>games at the same time, and it's hard to it's

1:02:38.600 --> 1:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>hard to really scale it. That's the biggest thing. And

1:02:40.680 --> 1:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a life now, rufus. You have a life. Now,

1:02:42.640 --> 1:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a life, if not a wife, rufus, rufus.

1:02:46.040 --> 1:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>If I can give you one tip, a life is negative, evy,

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that's why I waited ten years to have a life.

1:02:54.640 --> 1:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Can I follow up and ask since you guys are

1:02:57.240 --> 1:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>betting live What type of live betting are you doing?

1:02:59.080 --> 1:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you are you my nitoring all? Do you monitor

1:03:02.240 --> 1:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>all these games going on at the same time and

1:03:04.320 --> 1:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>look for opportunities? Are you just near zeroing in on

1:03:06.760 --> 1:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a few games? I do the first the former Mikey

1:03:11.720 --> 1:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I would I would say I will focus on an

1:03:14.240 --> 1:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>NFL on a ten am slate with eight to nine games,

1:03:17.600 --> 1:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>on two or three games that I'm looking at to

1:03:20.200 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>find value. Uh. I do a lot of Baseball and

1:03:25.240 --> 1:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>hockey end game, and it's typically on games I've already

1:03:29.280 --> 1:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>pre flop bet and I have a lean to already

1:03:32.400 --> 1:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>or theory on the game or or somewhere where I

1:03:35.320 --> 1:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>disagree with the pre flop market, I'll focus on those

1:03:38.560 --> 1:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>games more. Obviously it's easier now when you get to

1:03:41.200 --> 1:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs because there's fewer games you can focus on

1:03:43.560 --> 1:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in baseball. Um, but yeah, typically, But for me, for

1:03:47.800 --> 1:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>limits aren't a problem because both pre flop and end

1:03:50.440 --> 1:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>game I'm a five d to three thousand dollar better,

1:03:52.720 --> 1:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>so I don't really have to come up against those limits. Well,

1:03:55.880 --> 1:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would think one thing with in game

1:03:58.000 --> 1:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>betting is you can craft yourself quite a large position

1:04:00.480 --> 1:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>if you if you like you know, let's say you

1:04:02.760 --> 1:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>like one team at one commercial break, and then you're

1:04:04.440 --> 1:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna like them. You might continue to like them.

1:04:07.480 --> 1:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>But do you do you, I mean, do you have

1:04:09.880 --> 1:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>an idea of what you're looking for before the game?

1:04:13.160 --> 1:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you give me an example? Rufus all give you

1:04:15.440 --> 1:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>an example of what I'm looking for? Often, very often

1:04:18.200 --> 1:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>late in the second quarter. We've talked about this on

1:04:20.600 --> 1:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game with Guilt Show. Many times late in

1:04:23.680 --> 1:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter there are massive mistakes, very often by

1:04:27.240 --> 1:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the books. One game that comes to mind was the

1:04:30.120 --> 1:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Seattle l A Ram Thursday Night game a couple of

1:04:32.960 --> 1:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, where it was fourteen six with a minute

1:04:36.080 --> 1:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>forty to go. Seattle had the ball at the Ram

1:04:38.440 --> 1:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty and it was fourth and one. They were deciding

1:04:41.200 --> 1:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>whether to kick the field goal or not. If you

1:04:43.480 --> 1:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>if they kicked the field goal, you're at twenty three

1:04:46.400 --> 1:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and you have to assume the Rams are going to

1:04:48.200 --> 1:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>get three more on the other side, or at least

1:04:50.360 --> 1:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>two and a half you know from an expected return.

1:04:53.320 --> 1:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh and they and the they put it up at

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>forty nine and a half, which was obviously slightly short

1:04:58.840 --> 1:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>because the second half line had to have been twenty

1:05:01.640 --> 1:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>four and a half because the original line was forty nine,

1:05:04.560 --> 1:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>so they really doing you know, And of course Seattle

1:05:07.600 --> 1:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>could have gotten a touchdown and or the Rams could

1:05:09.720 --> 1:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>have gotten a touchdown, which is exactly what happened. So

1:05:11.800 --> 1:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you ended up getting on the good side of twenty

1:05:14.000 --> 1:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>four when when twenty four and a half is going

1:05:16.920 --> 1:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to be the second half line. So if you like

1:05:18.400 --> 1:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>it over anyways and you're getting the extra point there,

1:05:22.120 --> 1:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's a delicious spot. That's just one example.

1:05:25.280 --> 1:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a lot of examples, obviously. Do you

1:05:27.520 --> 1:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>find I know that the end of game scenarios are

1:05:29.920 --> 1:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the hardest for the books to model, like, you know,

1:05:33.560 --> 1:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it is really hard to model live football without like

1:05:36.640 --> 1:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>simulation based stuff, and so I do, like I feel

1:05:39.640 --> 1:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>like just I think betters have there are definitely more

1:05:43.000 --> 1:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunities there. Do you have you found that I would

1:05:45.880 --> 1:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>agree with that wholeheartedly, both in football and in baseball.

1:05:48.440 --> 1:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I think that they have real trouble

1:05:50.920 --> 1:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>late in baseball games, and I think they have real

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>trouble lated in football games. In fact, in football games,

1:05:55.440 --> 1:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>like you can almost take it to the extreme. If

1:05:57.880 --> 1:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you're watching a game you can see on the screen

1:06:02.480 --> 1:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>based on who you know, the personnel that they bring

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>into a game, and based on the in game number

1:06:07.360 --> 1:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>they're throwing out there that it's almost a free before

1:06:09.720 --> 1:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you at the end, like if it's twenty four point

1:06:11.440 --> 1:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>s brand then it's minus twenty four whatever. You can

1:06:13.600 --> 1:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>see the intentions of that team at that point. Baseball

1:06:16.240 --> 1:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is a little more mechanical, but I think they have

1:06:18.320 --> 1:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>more difficulty, more difficulty for sure the later in games.

1:06:21.360 --> 1:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>For me, it's much other. Last night, Gil Gil last

1:06:23.920 --> 1:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>night was a perfect example with the with the Fernando

1:06:27.000 --> 1:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Rodney twelve because even even though Rodney wasn't the mistake,

1:06:30.960 --> 1:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you were still getting two and a half innings of

1:06:32.920 --> 1:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>great hitting teams and you were only costing you two runs.

1:06:36.800 --> 1:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And you knew Houston would have all their ship ballers

1:06:39.160 --> 1:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in because there were down eight runs and Washington was

1:06:41.720 --> 1:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna they were gonna give they were gonna give you Rodney.

1:06:45.080 --> 1:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And that number is just not a correct number because

1:06:48.080 --> 1:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>two and a half innings, two runs, that's based off

1:06:50.720 --> 1:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the original line. That's just not right. And and no model,

1:06:53.880 --> 1:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and no model necessarily is going to know the personnel

1:06:56.520 --> 1:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>like the anticipated personnel coming in or or build the

1:06:59.520 --> 1:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>bill bell check is hunting from you know, his opponents

1:07:02.320 --> 1:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, which basically signals that he's done trying, done

1:07:05.320 --> 1:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>scoring points for the game. To this roofus to your

1:07:08.560 --> 1:07:12.439
<v Speaker 1>endo game question. You know there's instances in football where

1:07:12.480 --> 1:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they'll post the number. Let's say a team is ahead

1:07:14.920 --> 1:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>by six and the other team has the ball in

1:07:18.200 --> 1:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a disadvantaged situation, either deep in their own territory or

1:07:21.520 --> 1:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>they take a sack and its second and eighteen, and

1:07:24.320 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll post the team that's ahead minus say six and

1:07:27.240 --> 1:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a half minus three hundred, there's four minutes to go

1:07:30.200 --> 1:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in the game. Well, the only way you're gonna that

1:07:32.800 --> 1:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna cover that um is if you get a

1:07:36.560 --> 1:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>pick six or a scoop six, because if they stop

1:07:39.440 --> 1:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>them on downs one, first downald run out and it

1:07:41.760 --> 1:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't model that, and you know you can lay three

1:07:44.400 --> 1:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and four hundred and some of those spots because it's

1:07:46.480 --> 1:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>really seven or eight to one that that's gonna happen.

1:07:49.560 --> 1:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I like to do with baseball is,

1:07:52.360 --> 1:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you know William Hill offers end game first five, right, son,

1:07:56.760 --> 1:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm a first five better because I can't bet full

1:07:59.120 --> 1:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>games because of all friends I've taken. I want to

1:08:01.440 --> 1:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>take every boltpen out of play because of the un predictability. Right,

1:08:05.320 --> 1:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So like last night, you get four runs in the

1:08:07.600 --> 1:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>first and then going to the third, the five inning

1:08:11.960 --> 1:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>line is still six and a half. Well, it opened

1:08:14.880 --> 1:08:17.439
<v Speaker 1>in the first five innings the number is three and

1:08:17.479 --> 1:08:20.599
<v Speaker 1>a half. Now it's two and a half for three innings.

1:08:20.680 --> 1:08:22.599
<v Speaker 1>The math is on your side, it's gonna be under

1:08:22.640 --> 1:08:25.479
<v Speaker 1>You're getting a better value on terms of at bats

1:08:25.520 --> 1:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to number of runs scored. So I just think you're

1:08:27.880 --> 1:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>looking for those opportunities. I think that's exactly even even

1:08:30.840 --> 1:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>if it's even if it's second or third time through

1:08:32.920 --> 1:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the order, whatever it is, Right, there's some things on

1:08:34.640 --> 1:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>their side too, But I agree with you, Mike, like

1:08:36.800 --> 1:08:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the just the math is in your favor at that point,

1:08:40.080 --> 1:08:42.719
<v Speaker 1>and there's so many of those opportunities in both baseball

1:08:42.800 --> 1:08:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and football, you just have to really dive into it.

1:08:45.520 --> 1:08:49.439
<v Speaker 1>By the way, in football betting, this takes away game sequence,

1:08:49.520 --> 1:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, game actually trajectory out of it entirely. But

1:08:52.920 --> 1:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>like there are markets also that are being offered, like

1:08:55.080 --> 1:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>at h Forstan a bookmaker, which is a sponsor to

1:08:57.439 --> 1:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, where I'm betting on replay, whether to stand

1:09:01.120 --> 1:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>or not to stand. Right, it's obviously a quirky little market,

1:09:03.400 --> 1:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>but they're making a market for stuff like that, and

1:09:05.880 --> 1:09:07.599
<v Speaker 1>some of those are they limited, Right, it's only three

1:09:08.040 --> 1:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>pop and you have to keep doing it, but some

1:09:09.800 --> 1:09:12.719
<v Speaker 1>of those are you know, Look, it's getting harder and harder.

1:09:12.760 --> 1:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Let me just say it was easier a couple of

1:09:13.960 --> 1:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Is now you really don't know sometimes what's

1:09:16.040 --> 1:09:17.599
<v Speaker 1>a catch, what's not a catch, what any of these

1:09:17.680 --> 1:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>rules mean. But there are so many better opportunities. Even

1:09:22.479 --> 1:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>something like that is a more sure thing than the

1:09:27.400 --> 1:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>standard preflop bets that we all have to fill content

1:09:30.400 --> 1:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about with at nauseum. Right, So I mean that

1:09:33.760 --> 1:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>should tell you right there. I mean NFL NFL sides

1:09:36.920 --> 1:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>are are about as especially in game day, are about

1:09:40.240 --> 1:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>as efficient market as there is right in the sports

1:09:42.720 --> 1:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>betting world. Right. But one other point to make is

1:09:46.120 --> 1:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>the proof is in the pudding. If one book is

1:09:48.479 --> 1:09:50.639
<v Speaker 1>at thirty six and a half and the other book

1:09:50.680 --> 1:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is at thirty eight and a half, somebody's wrong. Somebody's wrong.

1:09:54.080 --> 1:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>That's right. All the time. Me and Mike are sitting

1:09:57.680 --> 1:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>at the south point and we're looking at our phones

1:09:59.720 --> 1:10:03.479
<v Speaker 1>were like, these lines are so incredibly some d is wrong.

1:10:04.439 --> 1:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>The problem with that, though, is that if you're betting

1:10:06.360 --> 1:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>live stuff. From what I've heard, um, betting live stuff

1:10:10.160 --> 1:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is I guess, aside from props, the quickest way to

1:10:13.120 --> 1:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>get UM to get limited, especially in these New Jersey books.

1:10:17.080 --> 1:10:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's a different story. But betting live stuff

1:10:19.520 --> 1:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and doing it in an educated way, and it were

1:10:22.400 --> 1:10:25.479
<v Speaker 1>especially if if they see you're betting something, that's where

1:10:25.520 --> 1:10:27.519
<v Speaker 1>they're where they're different from the market. Yeah, I haven't

1:10:27.520 --> 1:10:30.519
<v Speaker 1>had that. That's a whole another that's a whole another

1:10:30.560 --> 1:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>topic you're talking about, you know, how to count cards

1:10:33.240 --> 1:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>without looking smart as opposed to um, you know what.

1:10:37.000 --> 1:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a great point obviously, but Gil, you know what

1:10:40.479 --> 1:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Gil would say, Gil, what would you say to that? About?

1:10:43.400 --> 1:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>What about what Ruf's getting banned? Like, oh, I know

1:10:46.040 --> 1:10:48.479
<v Speaker 1>what you're getting at. No, what Rufus is doing is

1:10:48.520 --> 1:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>in game, Betty, that's a different thing. What I was

1:10:50.640 --> 1:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>referring to, which I think is what you're referring to,

1:10:52.400 --> 1:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is people were getting banned at William Hill as a

1:10:54.840 --> 1:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>badge of honor. Some people like Rufus have earned that

1:10:57.840 --> 1:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that badge of honor. Other people liked to go around say,

1:11:00.880 --> 1:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>oh I got banded at William Hill, they don't take

1:11:02.720 --> 1:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>my bets. If you're getting bets at william Hill, you

1:11:05.080 --> 1:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>can't be that smart. Um. I don't want to get

1:11:08.160 --> 1:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>band at william Hill, right, so I will I will

1:11:11.200 --> 1:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>purposely not be an asshole so that I can still

1:11:15.560 --> 1:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>all the calendar year get these unbelievable betting opportunities from them.

1:11:20.400 --> 1:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not like making a killing becoming rich off them,

1:11:22.960 --> 1:11:25.519
<v Speaker 1>but I'm getting thousands at a time betting the NL

1:11:25.560 --> 1:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>wild Who's gonna win the NL wild Card game? Right?

1:11:27.600 --> 1:11:29.599
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't lose. I had the Gnats and the Brewers.

1:11:29.920 --> 1:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I set myself up with that, the Browns, I have

1:11:32.360 --> 1:11:34.439
<v Speaker 1>the you know, not make the playoffs and plus money

1:11:34.439 --> 1:11:36.479
<v Speaker 1>plus one fifty five over eight and a half. Like

1:11:36.479 --> 1:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>William Hill shouldn't be putting up those two props together. Someone,

1:11:40.240 --> 1:11:42.639
<v Speaker 1>someone who put those up together is stupid for having

1:11:42.640 --> 1:11:44.479
<v Speaker 1>put them up, And it's my job is a better

1:11:44.520 --> 1:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to exploit that. But I'm not gonna go in and

1:11:46.960 --> 1:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>pound the crap out of it and then talk about

1:11:48.880 --> 1:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>how dumb they are on my show so I can

1:11:50.680 --> 1:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>get banned. Why would I want to do that. And

1:11:52.600 --> 1:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>so if people, by the way Ed Miller feels the

1:11:54.439 --> 1:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>same way I do, Ed Miller, who plays poker but

1:11:56.040 --> 1:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>who wrote a book on the logic of sports betting,

1:11:58.720 --> 1:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not our intention. And like, if you think we're

1:12:01.320 --> 1:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>lesser for not having been banned, you don't really get

1:12:03.960 --> 1:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>what the motivation is. So that I think that's what

1:12:05.960 --> 1:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>you referring to write UH sort of down that road.

1:12:08.479 --> 1:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, really the bottom line, me and Mike,

1:12:10.800 --> 1:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we're just trying to make the point that

1:12:12.360 --> 1:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>there are advantages and and probably Ruffin's is right that

1:12:15.200 --> 1:12:17.479
<v Speaker 1>you know if you do it too smart. Thankfully I

1:12:17.560 --> 1:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>mixing enough dumbness that they don't ban me just yet. Well,

1:12:22.439 --> 1:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I think what gil Gil all you were saying was

1:12:24.160 --> 1:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the short game versus the long game, right, I mean,

1:12:26.520 --> 1:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you want there's more e V and having a William

1:12:29.120 --> 1:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Hill account, um, then there is and maybe making a

1:12:32.840 --> 1:12:34.599
<v Speaker 1>bunch of money off of something in the short term,

1:12:34.640 --> 1:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>which you could, but then losing that And and believe me,

1:12:38.160 --> 1:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I know how valuable William Hill is. I went to UH,

1:12:41.040 --> 1:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I was in New Jersey last May and was betting

1:12:44.000 --> 1:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that I wanted to see if I could bet there,

1:12:45.920 --> 1:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I couldn't bet it William Hill in

1:12:47.520 --> 1:12:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Nevada they were taking five thousand dollars on golf round

1:12:50.560 --> 1:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>matchups for me on the app and then for and

1:12:53.760 --> 1:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>then eight hours later my account was shut down. But yeah,

1:12:57.840 --> 1:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>well or limited to ten dollars. Sorry. You come in

1:13:00.400 --> 1:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>there with blinking neon lights though, rufus I would imagine

1:13:02.920 --> 1:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>for them at this point. I don't. I don't. I

1:13:04.600 --> 1:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think people were like, I don't think people really

1:13:06.720 --> 1:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>recognize me. Well, I'm just saying figuratively speaking, I'm sure

1:13:09.880 --> 1:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they're aware of you. I mean occasionally when I do

1:13:13.120 --> 1:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>wear the neon lights, they do. Yes, Okay, I know

1:13:16.280 --> 1:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes maybe you should not coming from Burning Man? Are

1:13:19.000 --> 1:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you still going to Burning Man? I went for the

1:13:20.960 --> 1:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>first time this year. It was incredible. Really, you love

1:13:23.760 --> 1:13:25.519
<v Speaker 1>you seem like the kind of guy that would love that.

1:13:25.760 --> 1:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>What is by the way, I've always wanted to go

1:13:27.479 --> 1:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to Burning Man. I've always wanted to go. I'll put

1:13:30.320 --> 1:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>it this way. There's something for everybody there. I said.

1:13:32.840 --> 1:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>My parents would have had a great time too. You know,

1:13:35.200 --> 1:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>if you can be like a druggy party person, you

1:13:38.280 --> 1:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>can be a completely sober person you can have appreciate art,

1:13:41.320 --> 1:13:46.439
<v Speaker 1>appreciate music, just the spirit of of whimsical playfulness that

1:13:46.439 --> 1:13:52.519
<v Speaker 1>that sort of embodies. There's no commerce, burning man, it's

1:13:52.520 --> 1:13:55.519
<v Speaker 1>a gift economy. It's it's fantastic, Todd. There's no sports,

1:13:55.560 --> 1:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no sports book there, Todd, you wouldn't have a

1:13:57.439 --> 1:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>good time. I know. And it's always the it's always

1:13:59.880 --> 1:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the first week of college football. But don't worry. I've before.

1:14:04.439 --> 1:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Can I just ask you one other question, please? Okay,

1:14:07.000 --> 1:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the other day I wore a shirt exactly like what

1:14:10.120 --> 1:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Rufus is wearing today, and you ridiculed me mercilessly that

1:14:14.080 --> 1:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I was wearing a tablecloth from a restaurant. How Come

1:14:16.960 --> 1:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you didn't do that to Rufus? Okay, So I'm gonna

1:14:19.120 --> 1:14:22.599
<v Speaker 1>answer that honestly, since we're doing an authentic show here. Okay.

1:14:22.880 --> 1:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So now let me get this from from the great

1:14:24.960 --> 1:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Deborah Song, who is a fashion stylist. Okay, she talks

1:14:27.840 --> 1:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>as amazing fashion. That's right. Rufus was completely dressed by

1:14:32.160 --> 1:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>her on ESPN. Right, So what Deborah would say is this,

1:14:35.760 --> 1:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and this applies to me. I'm not picking on you

1:14:38.880 --> 1:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to Todd. What she used to say to me is

1:14:40.840 --> 1:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>because I used to be slim like Rufus. Rufus is

1:14:43.400 --> 1:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a very slender young man. As we have gotten older.

1:14:47.320 --> 1:14:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Let me just say about me, as I have gotten older,

1:14:49.479 --> 1:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not as slim as I used to be, right,

1:14:51.160 --> 1:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I used to be pretty young and pretty. But as

1:14:53.920 --> 1:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you get bigger, you are not able to wear the

1:14:58.479 --> 1:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>same things. Everything looks on a slim person, right, So

1:15:01.360 --> 1:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Rufus could put on anything and it would look great

1:15:03.400 --> 1:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>on him. That's why not clothes. Clothes and a slim person, right,

1:15:09.600 --> 1:15:12.479
<v Speaker 1>not good. But there's a reason why mannekins and stores

1:15:12.520 --> 1:15:15.519
<v Speaker 1>are all slim. Right. So basically what I was told

1:15:15.640 --> 1:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>from Debra is that look, she goes, if you were slim,

1:15:18.400 --> 1:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it would look good on you, but because you're not,

1:15:21.439 --> 1:15:25.439
<v Speaker 1>it kind of looks slumpy. And so that's my answer.

1:15:26.439 --> 1:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So the proof is, Mike, I need you to get

1:15:28.760 --> 1:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that shirt and walk around Gil and we'll see what

1:15:31.080 --> 1:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>he says. Okay, that'll be the determinant if I like

1:15:36.240 --> 1:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>this experiment. Yeah, Mike is not exact rufus in. You know,

1:15:42.880 --> 1:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Mike is definitely not what I would call a slender

1:15:45.240 --> 1:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>young man. I would call him more on the portly

1:15:48.520 --> 1:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>side Porky. Wow, okay, why are you so angry this morning? Yeah? Yeah,

1:15:55.920 --> 1:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>so angry? You locked into an extra hour of pay

1:15:59.240 --> 1:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>from Visa the world. Oh I think I hit I

1:16:06.080 --> 1:16:09.479
<v Speaker 1>hit a nerve with Mikey. Shot fired against me. Mikey,

1:16:09.560 --> 1:16:11.519
<v Speaker 1>you know I love you. Come on, Mikey, you know

1:16:11.600 --> 1:16:17.639
<v Speaker 1>I love you. Love everybody you beat regularly at tennis. That's,

1:16:17.640 --> 1:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that noted Todd wishnev tennis ringer. Unbelievable

1:16:21.880 --> 1:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>tennis prowess for a man of his size. Al Right,

1:16:25.040 --> 1:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to play tennis sometime, Rufus, Come on down.

1:16:27.960 --> 1:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>We make lines and everything we do in game, everything fantastic.

1:16:32.640 --> 1:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>That sounds amazing. Oh well, keeping each other alive, that's

1:16:35.439 --> 1:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the main point, um. All right. Then the final question

1:16:38.040 --> 1:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>would be, and it seems kind of trivial at this point,

1:16:40.439 --> 1:16:42.439
<v Speaker 1>but if you had to bet every single one of

1:16:42.479 --> 1:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>these uh in the bizarro world, but you are allowed

1:16:44.920 --> 1:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>one past one game that you want no part of

1:16:46.680 --> 1:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever on the side, Rufus, what game would that be?

1:16:49.560 --> 1:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Scottle Atlanta, which is actually a line up their right.

1:16:55.680 --> 1:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Atlanta is a team that is has stumped me.

1:16:59.120 --> 1:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>They are Um, there they look awful in terms of

1:17:02.640 --> 1:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the metrics. They look awful according to the I S.

1:17:04.720 --> 1:17:07.479
<v Speaker 1>But they have they should be better based on the

1:17:07.479 --> 1:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>talent they have on that on that team. They have

1:17:10.120 --> 1:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>not been particularly unlucky with injuries either. Um, they were

1:17:13.920 --> 1:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in wind now mode through up against the salary cap.

1:17:16.080 --> 1:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>They you know, you have guys with track records and

1:17:18.240 --> 1:17:22.679
<v Speaker 1>and and Matt Ryan is you know, according to the numbers,

1:17:22.920 --> 1:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and according to many people's eye tests, still playing quite well.

1:17:27.479 --> 1:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And yet they here they are and you know, a

1:17:30.960 --> 1:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>train wreck. It completes that. But it's the defense, though, rufus.

1:17:33.960 --> 1:17:37.640
<v Speaker 1>The defense is not interested in tackling another team. No,

1:17:37.840 --> 1:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it's I think, honestly that coaching staff needs to go.

1:17:40.760 --> 1:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm guessing they're gonna go. I mean, what next

1:17:43.160 --> 1:17:45.559
<v Speaker 1>week they have the by after this week, I'm betting

1:17:45.640 --> 1:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>dan Quinn is fired on Monday or Sunday night. And

1:17:48.479 --> 1:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I would I would lay a big price on that. Actually,

1:17:50.600 --> 1:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I wish there was a market for that, I really do. Yeah,

1:17:53.439 --> 1:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I know a Falcons fan who who who actually heard

1:17:56.880 --> 1:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that as well? So and that dan Quinn has heard

1:17:59.040 --> 1:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that too. That's that's with these things work. Yes, the Falcons, Like, yeah,

1:18:03.120 --> 1:18:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it. Dan Quinn his he's the defensive

1:18:06.439 --> 1:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>coordinator now he took over play calling duties and and

1:18:08.760 --> 1:18:10.559
<v Speaker 1>look how bad they've been. I mean, I think the

1:18:10.640 --> 1:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>reason I think it's becoming apparent that the reason they

1:18:13.439 --> 1:18:16.519
<v Speaker 1>were like they made the Super Bowl was was they

1:18:16.520 --> 1:18:20.400
<v Speaker 1>had Kyle Shanahan directing that offense. And um, I don't

1:18:20.439 --> 1:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>know who was the defensive coordinator then. I mean they

1:18:23.320 --> 1:18:25.759
<v Speaker 1>did not have a great defense. But dan Quinn seems

1:18:25.800 --> 1:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to lose. I mean, just like Anthony Lynn. Do you

1:18:28.000 --> 1:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>remember that year, Um, I think it was the year

1:18:29.720 --> 1:18:31.519
<v Speaker 1>before they won the Super Bowl where they just seemed

1:18:31.560 --> 1:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to lose every uh every game, every close game, Like

1:18:36.080 --> 1:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>they could score with twenty seven seconds left to take

1:18:38.360 --> 1:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a two point lead and the other team always comes

1:18:40.320 --> 1:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>down field goal every single time. The The the Chargers

1:18:44.320 --> 1:18:46.559
<v Speaker 1>game against Denver last year is still the seminal moment

1:18:46.560 --> 1:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in Anthony Lynn's career to me, where they had the

1:18:49.080 --> 1:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>third and short and ne plus territory Rivers of course

1:18:52.439 --> 1:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>throws it into the ground. They managed to uh let

1:18:55.720 --> 1:18:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Denver matriculate down the field. Um is it then effect

1:18:59.800 --> 1:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>or is at the Rivers? In fact, I feel like

1:19:01.280 --> 1:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Rivers has always has never come through in big games. Well,

1:19:04.360 --> 1:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>so you know that that ending against Tennessee this past week,

1:19:07.320 --> 1:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Rufus is funny you bring this up because this has

1:19:08.880 --> 1:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>been my thing with Rivers for years now. Find me

1:19:12.240 --> 1:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>footage and apparently weren't. Weren't sharp play found one play.

1:19:16.040 --> 1:19:18.679
<v Speaker 1>But I used to say, find me footage of Philip

1:19:18.760 --> 1:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Rivers ever sneaking the football. It's as if he hates

1:19:23.920 --> 1:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>It's as if it's a right. So like that last

1:19:27.160 --> 1:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>sequence against the Titans, the Titans didn't have to think

1:19:30.000 --> 1:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>about that as a as an option for the charges.

1:19:32.280 --> 1:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>They're like, nope, they're gonna give it to Melvin Gordon.

1:19:34.360 --> 1:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>We know that, like they never had to worry about

1:19:36.760 --> 1:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Rivers sneaking, and like that's a competitive disadvantage for sure.

1:19:41.200 --> 1:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Todd, why don't you tell Rufus what

1:19:42.840 --> 1:19:44.519
<v Speaker 1>since he brought up the Atlanta Falcons game. What's my

1:19:44.560 --> 1:19:47.160
<v Speaker 1>nickname on the tennis court that you've given me? Well, Rufus,

1:19:47.160 --> 1:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we call my good friend Gil who makes unforced air

1:19:50.120 --> 1:19:55.799
<v Speaker 1>after unforced air, we call him Gilly Ice, which means

1:19:55.960 --> 1:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>what exactly it means. Maddie Ice is very talent it.

1:20:00.200 --> 1:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>You can throw the ball all over the place, but

1:20:01.880 --> 1:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna make a big mistake in a big ball

1:20:03.960 --> 1:20:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in a big time. He's gonna make an unforced their

1:20:06.400 --> 1:20:08.559
<v Speaker 1>at a big time. And that's why we love gilly Ice.

1:20:08.600 --> 1:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And we love giving him minus two in the in

1:20:10.680 --> 1:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a three game set and he loses three. Oh, even

1:20:12.880 --> 1:20:16.599
<v Speaker 1>though he's head so so he's got he's got the strokes.

1:20:16.640 --> 1:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>He looks like he should be good. And then and then,

1:20:19.720 --> 1:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and if you go the eye test, the guy looks

1:20:22.360 --> 1:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>like Ohio State. I mean, you can't. You got to

1:20:26.320 --> 1:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>see him in the practice. He's smashing the ball, he's

1:20:29.080 --> 1:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>got a giant serve. He's fantastic. But all the money

1:20:32.400 --> 1:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>is on the table and it's Mr gilly Ice right

1:20:36.080 --> 1:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>there was I know exactly what you're talking about. There

1:20:38.840 --> 1:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>was a guy in my high school tennis team. He

1:20:40.600 --> 1:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>looked like he was going to be a professional. In practice,

1:20:42.680 --> 1:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>literally he was so good and then and then I

1:20:44.840 --> 1:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>would beat him six out just because he just when

1:20:47.479 --> 1:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>it counted, he did not. He was not mentally strong,

1:20:50.439 --> 1:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I'm the opposite. I'm the opposite. I

1:20:52.800 --> 1:20:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I look like the fattest guy you've ever seen in

1:20:55.400 --> 1:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>your life, who couldn't even last two minutes on the

1:20:57.880 --> 1:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>on the court, but got the mental fortitude of a

1:21:00.960 --> 1:21:06.839
<v Speaker 1>young Mike Palm. I'm thrilled, I asked, thrilled. I asked Mikey,

1:21:06.920 --> 1:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>same question. What do you want no part of? I

1:21:09.160 --> 1:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>choose this game because I have no read on the

1:21:11.200 --> 1:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland team Brown's Patriots. I I don't get this team.

1:21:15.280 --> 1:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I their talent level, they haven't performed to it. They're

1:21:19.680 --> 1:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>so inconsistent. I could see them going into New England

1:21:23.280 --> 1:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and giving them a good game. I could see them

1:21:24.960 --> 1:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>getting beat by thirty five. So I I just I

1:21:28.439 --> 1:21:30.519
<v Speaker 1>don't have a read. I know New England's defense is

1:21:30.640 --> 1:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>very good. Fox bro is tough to play, but the

1:21:32.880 --> 1:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Browns should be a lot better than they are. So

1:21:34.680 --> 1:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a pass for me. Tough number Todd without

1:21:38.160 --> 1:21:40.599
<v Speaker 1>reading the talm Wood, what is your pick? I don't

1:21:40.600 --> 1:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>even get that line. What does that mean? Because it

1:21:42.240 --> 1:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>would take a long time. Whatever. So I've overtalked, so

1:21:45.160 --> 1:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>one show, I undertalk and I get get in trouble.

1:21:48.280 --> 1:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Now I overtalk and get in trouble. Okay, that's great, Um,

1:21:51.280 --> 1:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I will I will take my game that I do

1:21:55.880 --> 1:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>not want a part of as I'm gonna go with

1:21:59.720 --> 1:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Ellie Chargers Chicago Bears. When you've got Troubinsky involved, and

1:22:03.760 --> 1:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got Anthony Lynn, and you've got the religious Philip Rivers.

1:22:07.360 --> 1:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, Uh, Philip Jesus did say you could sneak

1:22:10.240 --> 1:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the ball into the end zone. You know that. I

1:22:12.280 --> 1:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>know you're not allowed to swear, and you have to

1:22:13.960 --> 1:22:16.479
<v Speaker 1>have eight hundred kids, but you could sneak the ball in.

1:22:16.600 --> 1:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Every once in a while, I will say I don't

1:22:19.240 --> 1:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>want any part of that game. I'm gonna use the

1:22:21.360 --> 1:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>same answer that I used for the team most likely

1:22:23.960 --> 1:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to lose out right Jets Jacksonville, because to me, that's

1:22:26.760 --> 1:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the most volatible score for me. So I can just

1:22:29.320 --> 1:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>as easily see Jacksonville win as I can see the

1:22:32.040 --> 1:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>excuse the Jets win, as I can see Jacksonville blowing

1:22:34.840 --> 1:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>them out. So for me, that's the complete stay away

1:22:37.080 --> 1:22:39.519
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville and the Jets, gentlemen. And we've enjoyed it, or

1:22:39.520 --> 1:22:42.759
<v Speaker 1>at least I've enjoyed it. Uh. Todd in Uh, Mike

1:22:43.160 --> 1:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palm from Circus Sports, Todd from Action and Visa.

1:22:47.400 --> 1:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike is all over Visa as well. Mike it was

1:22:49.160 --> 1:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>nice to meet your wife and your child. Yesterday by

1:22:51.000 --> 1:22:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the way, you know, uh, we were there at the

1:22:53.479 --> 1:22:57.599
<v Speaker 1>Italy with my wife's co worker friends and the female

1:22:57.720 --> 1:23:01.719
<v Speaker 1>is uh is single. And when you left, Gil, they said, oh,

1:23:01.760 --> 1:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>what about your friend? What about your friend? Is he gay?

1:23:04.960 --> 1:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And I? Who God? I said, nobody's Jewish and gay,

1:23:14.320 --> 1:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>nobody's Jewish. That's awesome. We're so politically correct here. We're

1:23:19.920 --> 1:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>so politically correct. And Rufus b body is my old

1:23:23.360 --> 1:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>friend Rufus back on the show. Thrilled to have him on. Rufus.

1:23:26.120 --> 1:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for doing it, man, I appreciate it.

1:23:28.920 --> 1:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>This was so much fun. Guys, we really enjoyed it,

1:23:31.439 --> 1:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed having you. Hopefully we could do it again sometime soon.

1:23:34.439 --> 1:23:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Say hello to your buddy, Jeff I Bet the process,

1:23:37.240 --> 1:23:42.400
<v Speaker 1>for Rufus, for Mike, for what's your name again? Todd Wishnev, Gil, Alexander,

1:23:42.400 --> 1:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for listening. Good luck with all

1:23:43.960 --> 1:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>your bets this weekend in the NFL