WEBVTT - Why Sunak May Quit Ahead of a July 4th Election

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news, John Mel do you

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>remember how excited you were last week when inflation went

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>down and it's you we need bit.

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I was thrilled you were.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, this week the footsy one hundred has gone up

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>and it'sy, we need bit and we have a new high.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So how excited are you today?

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Actually significantly more excited than I was last week.

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>You wait and you wait, and you wait, and finally

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the thing you've been wanting for happens. It kind of

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>happens all the time, and stop markets should regularly hit

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>new highs. Right, that was a normal stop market would

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>hit the new high all the time. But I do

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>want to say one thing before we go on to

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>talk about how wonderful it is that the footy one

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred it's finally going up. I do want to say

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>that this is not a and you high and inflation

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>adjusted terms, but that would have to get through about

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>well well over nine thousand, nine one hundred and sixty eight.

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I calculated it just now. But you know, don't don't

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>take my accuracy as say nine thy two hundred to

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>make it to a reason a random But so we're

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>not there yet. In real term, so of course we

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>had have dividends along the way, so we mustn't be

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>two respondent. But nonetheless a new higher nominal terms is nice.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Right do you feel, John, do you feel that there's

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>a turning point of any kind here?

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Actually I do a better, do you? I do a better? Yeah?

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean so like one of the things that I mean,

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.199
<v Speaker 2>from a purely technical point of view, when stuff makes

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 2>new highs, it just tends to go in to make

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 2>more new highs. You also get the sentiment issue of

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 2>people noticing the oh wait, man, the UK is doing

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 2>much better this year so far than the S and P,

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 2>for example, And I mean that really is a bit

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 2>more significant, you know. You get the Magnificent seven have

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 2>come off the boil a bit, and some people were panicking.

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Last week's the na's deck was down like one and

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 2>a half percent. I was like, oh, the nurse DC

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 2>never goes down. But you know, but going on nothing, Yes, no,

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't try being British for a while.

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>British. I'm telling you that is a job. This is

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>not the first time that the footsie's done or right, right,

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there is a general view in the market

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that the US has always had this wonderful acceptionism about it,

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and that US markets automatically do better and American stocks

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>automatically deserve a premium. But this isn't true. Is it

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>actually quite a recent phenomenon.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 2>It is recent, And I do think the other thing

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 2>you often hear with the Footy one hundred is almost

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the sense that it hasn't gone anywhere since basically the

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 2>dot com bust, because it was about seven thousand, nineteen

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine. And the thing is, if you can actually

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 2>look at the stats, because I looked at them this morning,

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 2>if you if you did the choice to buy either

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 2>UK stocks or US stocks after the dot com bubble

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 2>bottomed out, so don about November two thousand and two

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>or March two thousand and three, and then if you'd

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 2>held until the top of the banking kind of mortgage

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 2>bubble in mid two thousand and seven, the foot one

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 2>hundred absolutely thrashed the S and P. It's actually spending

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 2>the dates. It's kind of like you get anything up

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 2>to double the return, you know, so the foot say

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 2>basically trebled in value, whereas the S and P just

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 2>went up one hundred percent over that period. I mean

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 2>that's including evidence. So you know it's and it's in

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's in whatever currency you want to choose.

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 2>No pounds or US do all us. There's there's no

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 2>jiggery pokery here. The foot say UK stocks roundly beat

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 2>US stocks during that period, and yes, it's because you know,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 2>we had lots of banks and minors whereas they had

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 2>banks and kind of you know, shooting my staples and

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 2>things like that. But you know, you would have been

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 2>better off in the UK stock. So this is a

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 2>relatively recent phenomenon and is mostly a post financial crash phenomenon.

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>And to be fair, it's not just the UK. The

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>US is basically beaten everyone. I mean, that's not to

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 2>say the UK hasn't been one of the the wast laggards,

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>particularly in developing markets, but you really there is normal

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 2>market that has come close to the US, even when

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 2>the kind of obscure, kind of amusing market say yeah.

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting. So the key thing that we'd like to

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>think here is that this kind this kind of thing,

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the new high, even modern inflation and justice new high,

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>does draw attention to us and does mean that people

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>might look over and go look at that. And we

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>had Nick Train, a very well known UK fund manager,

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>out earlier this week talking again about how incredibly cheap

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>UK stocks are and saying we just need something to

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>draw attention to it, something to make people realize that

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>this is this is true, that there are fabulous opportunities here,

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that you have a once in a generational opportunity to

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>buy very high quality stocks at low prices. And his

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>thought was that as soon as there's a very big

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>takeover of a name on the on the UK market

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 1>that is internationally known that has taken over because it

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is so cheap, that will turn all international investorized towards

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the UK. They will notice what's going on here and

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>that once in a generational opportunity will be doubled up

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>fairly quickly.

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a really good point. I mean, you know,

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 2>like this week, another foot two fifty stock was bought

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 2>by a US rival. It's like our doors and window

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 2>frames maker, and we actually saw a bid battle erupt

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 2>for hypnosis trust of all, you know. I mean, that's

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 2>a troubled, troubled asset for a while there, and I

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of shared holders were probably relieved when

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 2>they got you know, the below I p o prize

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 2>bid from Concord I think it was, but then kind

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 2>of Blackstone came in and offered more, and suddenly, you know,

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 2>everyone's off to the races.

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So I'm pretty thrilled to get out of that.

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, cheapness well out eventually.

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Interesting. Now listen on the on the zebrage cheapness I

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about. I'll not talk about my column

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>this week.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think you should, because this one.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Caused a lot, a lot of trouble. I mean, it's

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>not like I go out of my way course problem.

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I go out of my way to course controversy on Twitter,

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>sorry X or anything like that. But this column. You know,

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a few weeks ago about how the problem

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>with the UK house building market is that we build

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>lots and lots of tiny, really rubbish houses, and our

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>house builders are culpable there and I just like them

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>intensely for building these horrible, horrible houses, although I accept

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the part of that is driven by regulation and planning

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff all give than that. So I wrote about how

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>awful tiny houses are, and then this week I thought

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd write another column about how absolutely brilliant tiny house

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>but in a slightly different context. So looking around the

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>coast of the UK and a particularly you know, some

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of the incredibly beautiful Scottish islands off the West coast,

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and some of the Welsh coast and the Cornish coast,

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 1>and one of the extraordinary things about the coast of

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the UK is how probably unpopulated it, how few houses

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>there are, how few of us have holiday houses. And

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the stats for the UK relative

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to Europe, a very small number of people in the

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>UK either own or have access to Are you not

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>renting better access to a holiday home? We don't have

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the same cabin or the hucked culture that lots of

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Scandinavia has, for example, or the second home culture that

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>France has, for example. And our politicians just hate anyone

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>having holiday homes or second homes, although obviously they all

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>have them themselves, that they hate anybody else having them.

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So you constantly get a sort of barrage of insult

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and new tax I think, are colleague Marcus Ashworths worried

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>about that a few weeks ago? And so I'd just

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>like to make the case, and please everyone, go and

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>read the column and tell me if you think I

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>made the case. Well, for us changing planning completely so

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that anyone, anyone build a nice little cabin and I

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>repeat the word nice, you know, scandy wooden kind of

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>thing anywhere across the UK where there's space for it

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>self built. Let's get self built cabins going. So not

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>fewer tiny houses, but more tiny houses. Are you in, John,

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Are you in?

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a great idea. I think it would

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 2>really walk and also it be a good stepping stone

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>towards perhaps getting more self build fast houses as well

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 2>if it were too. It strikes me as a good experiment.

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 2>And you also, I mean, people pay like insane amounts

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 2>of money for these little beach huts on the shore

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 2>like a Dorset and all that, and they've got a

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 2>space to boil. Okay, well you can't even sleep in

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 2>them overnight. So I think you would.

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Think there is demage that's demanded. And you know when

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>people say, oh they couldn't, people don't want that. People

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>couldn't possibly, you know, not enough people want to travel

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to the to the Hebrides, to go to these islands

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and to a little house, et cetera. I'm like, yeah, okay,

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>well look at the price of a tiny little plot

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>on one of these islands has planning. You'll pay one

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred grand plots plus for a tiny blood that doesn't

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>even run right down to the beach. That tells me

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>those demand right.

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 2>No, absolutely, and I think I think.

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>There's information in those prices. Yeah.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 2>The one thing would say is just clarify so you

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 2>because I know that some readers will be sitting and

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 2>they're going, oh my gosh, she wants to build those

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, the entire course, the pamblic shut or whatever.

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 2>It's not. It's not that is this idea of sort

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 2>of market driven sympathetic development because you can only use

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 2>it for three months a year.

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Four months exactly. Allowed to reside in it permanently, that

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>would be wrong. So you're not allowed to use the

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure of the holiday area or the coach, you know,

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't get to use the schools or the hospital. Yeah,

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. So you just you know, so

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe you'd pay fifty percent council tax, probably allow the

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>local councils to build the schools and hospitals that everyone

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>else needs to use the people who live there permanently.

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And then you take the proper houses and you say,

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>do you know what this is going to come with

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the covenants they can only be sold onto locals, and

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that'd be very had for the people who paid five

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>million pounds for a big house and say you know

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>rock or something like that, but you know, too bad,

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and that would solve the problem of local people saying, well,

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>these holidaymakers are driving up the prices of our houses

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 1>and then they were for us to live and this

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>is destroying our community. So I think it's a bit

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of a win win. And interestingly, the as ever on

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>things like this, the response has been completely down the middle,

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>half of the people saying brilliant idea, let us do that,

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and half the people saying, why do you hate us?

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>You know? Onwards, John Onwards. I know I didn't ask

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>our guest about this this weekend. We talked about all

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>sorts of other things, but I know you suggested that

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>we get Helen Thomas from Blonde Money on because you've

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>led she was excellent and would be a great guest,

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think she she is. But why did you

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>suggest we had her on?

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, basically, ILL sent me oldly is the forodcast for

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 2>what's going to happen election ways in the UK, And

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 2>when I did, I thought God, that's pretty poinchy. Need

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 2>to get you to discuss that. And I can't remember

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 2>how much that you discussed in the actual podcast, but

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 2>that this if you want a quick summary, she's basically

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 2>saying she's going to step down before the election, call

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 2>it in July, and it will probably be pay any

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 2>moderant who takes over as the Prime minister during the

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 2>election period. And I thought July is a lot earlier

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 2>than personally I was expecting an election. I thought they

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 2>would string out for as long as possible, you know,

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 2>and they wouldn't even get an interest straight cut before then.

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, so I thought it was pretty punchy.

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Merren Drugs Money the podcast and which people

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>who know the markets explain the markets. I'm Merrin Sumset Web.

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>It's my conversation with Helen Thomas of market commentary firm

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Belonde Money. Helen has I have a fifteen years experience

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>working in a number of banks for funds. She's a

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>CFA charter holder and says on the board of CFI UK.

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>She also has political experience as an advisor the former

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Chaetom with the Exchequer George Osborne. And then thank you

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us today. It's really good to

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>have you on.

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much. I'm delighted to be here.

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Now let's start with what you've been writing about UK

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>politics recently, and your most recent note is about the

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>next election in the UK and one of the lines

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the note that particularly leapt out

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>at me was this suggestion that the whiskey and the

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>revolver are already in Rischie Sunek's office. He knows what

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>he has to do. What do you think it is

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that Rischie has to do?

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Rischie seem like he's entering the world of least worst options.

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 3>And this is because the Conservative Party is polling so

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 3>badly that we're talking about extinction level events. But by

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 3>the way, let me just stop one minute and say,

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 3>the reason I started my business was to look at

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 3>what actually is going to happen, to get away from

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 3>the all hyperbole that people reading the newspapers about politics,

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 3>which just total noise. That is a nightmare for people

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 3>in markets who just want to know what's going to happen.

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 3>So when I talk about this, it's because of the

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 3>very low level in the polls the Conservative Party are

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 3>at back down to those post trust lows and what

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 3>that will translate into in terms of seats tricky to calculate,

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 3>but it's clearly now a bad situation, as we're seeing

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 3>from so many of the polls. So basically we're in

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.479
<v Speaker 3>a situation where the Conservative Party itself could be decimated

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 3>and will it even survive as a political party.

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>More than decimated? Way more than decimating.

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's yeah, just obliterated maybe is a better Wayeah.

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 3>And so what that means, of course, when you're in politics,

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 3>is where is the blame going to lie? And also

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 3>what do the different political actors need from this situation,

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 3>because there are people who want the Conservative parties to survive.

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that's a surprise to some of the listeners, but

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 3>there are and therefore they now need there for Rishisunak

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 3>to be buried with the with this situation and in

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 3>order to resurrect the party whichever direction they want to

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 3>take it. And look, by the way, should also say

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't matter what I think, doesn't matter what you think.

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 3>We're just going to say that these are the calculations

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 3>that go on with politicians.

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, can we just go back a little bit and

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about why things are so bad for Rissius Sink.

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>He's put in place as a stability prime minister, the

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>guy who was going to make everything look okay, and

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>he is delivering a little bit on some of his pledgures.

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>You can argue about whether it's down to him in

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>any way whatsoever or his government that inflation has come down,

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but it has cause the price level has not come down,

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>but the rate of price growth has come down, and

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that still matters. Small boat crossings it down a bit.

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about GDP per ahead, which is awful,

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>but GDP growth as a whole isn't so awful, So

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>why is it quite this.

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Bad for so A couple of things on this one

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 3>is the economics, where if you look at a you

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 3>gov question of which party is best placed to deal

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 3>with the economy, and as you might expect, the Conservative

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Party is now below the Labor Party and has been

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 3>for a while. But that actually started to get worse

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 3>well before Richies, and that well before Liz Tross. It

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 3>actually happened in twenty twenty one twenty two as inflation

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 3>was rising. So the inflation shock has been extremely pernicious,

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 3>and not just here. President Biden's also facing this the US.

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Many other politicians are too. You said it there merin.

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 3>The rate of change of prices is coming down, but

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 3>prices are still higher. People still feel it. Perhaps it's

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 3>slightly part of Richestynac's academic approach to life that the

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 3>spreadsheet shows the numbers coming down and that looks good.

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 3>But to people who fill up their car with petrol

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 3>go to the shops, it still feels really quite bad.

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 3>They still remember it was nowhere near that much to

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 3>fill your car up with petrol a few years back.

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Time goes by and things should be beginning to feel

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better because wages arise in quite nicely,

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>But nonetheless Rissiu Scenac's approval ratings does keep falling. Nothing

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to make them any better.

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 3>This is where you have to come into the politics

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 3>of this and the man himself. By the way she

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 3>declare that we were at university together at the same

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 3>time as most people. I'm sorry, I'm another Oxford ppeist.

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what that qualifies before these days, but anyway.

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But this it qualifies you for this.

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I suppose that's fair. But it means that

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 3>the way that he became prime Minister was actually always

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be a problem for him because of course

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 3>he was a loser in an election campaign against Liz Trust.

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Now it's just within the Tory Party membership, but he

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 3>lost that campaign. This casts quite a long shadow. He

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 3>never went to a vote with his MPs when he

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 3>was up against Penny Mordant. People remember back to that period.

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 3>They went in a bit of a rush to get

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 3>the Prime Minister sorted. They never actually had a round

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 3>of voting. They just said Penny Morden said no, look,

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 3>I'll pull out at this stage. We'll just get on

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 3>with it. But what that means is you're never really

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 3>sure who your enemies are. And so the key problem

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 3>for issues here because he built a lot of enemies

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 3>within his own party, of various different kinds. So it's

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 3>not just got the opposition to worry about, and it's

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 3>not just one group in his own party, for example,

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 3>the Trust sites. He has got all these other different

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 3>elements who don't like the way he got there, don't

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 3>like his focus on certain policies. You should just look

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 3>at the vote that we've just had about banning the

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 3>sale of cigarettes to people born after the year of

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and nine. Now that went through, but it

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 3>went through on opposition votes. Half of Conservative MP's either

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:32.719
<v Speaker 3>abstained or voted against it. That's quite something. Didn't get

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 3>covered a lot because it feels like that maybe wasn't

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 3>that consequential a vote, but he had half of his

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 3>own party against that. And do the public care that

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 3>much if they can't get a doctor's appointment or they're

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 3>worried about getting on a train because there's a strike,

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 3>or they're worried about the votes. The key point is

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 3>he's not very good at the politics and the public

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 3>know it well.

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>He's not regular the politics. And also there's really nothing

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>he could do to improve matters in the time he's

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>got left. When it comes to the economy, cott really

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>doing anything about the NAT it's too late, anything about productivity,

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>can't really do anything about the number of people who

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't in the workforce, etcetera, etcetera. There's very few things

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that he can really do with this time to turn

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>things around, and that's been obvious for some time now.

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 3>The point is actually was that maybe not obvious when

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 3>he took over. The parliament has to end in January

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.719
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five. People might be delighted to hear and

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 3>so what was that that were two years? It's some

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 3>of that stuff, the productivity stuff you've been talking about

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 3>that a long time merin anyone following UK economy has.

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 3>It's been a problem for a decade, if not more.

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 3>But the other element to all of this is of

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 3>course the trust period guilt crisis, because that changed the

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 3>whole narrative of what could be done. Neither the next

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 3>labor government as looks likely, nor this one feels they

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 3>can do anything because they're so constrained by obr by

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 3>the markets. So we're in this you know, death spiral

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 3>hesitates use that phrase. But it's quite difficult that taking

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 3>over in the wake of all of that, As you say,

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:57.959
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these long term challenges would have been

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 3>very hard to address. It was pretty much an impossible task.

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 3>But the one thing you can do as a leader

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 3>is lead and inspire and give a vision, and it's

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 3>been extremely hard to know what that vision is from

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 3>this Prime minister.

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>I suppose one of the things that he has wanted

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is maybe not to be the vision guy, but there'd

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>be the stability guy, and that's been a mistake.

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, But then that's the point about being a

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of technocrat. Yeah, this is an ongoing question, isn't

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 3>it's oh sick of experts? Oh no, we want the experts. Ideally,

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 3>you want a bit of both. You need the person

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 3>at the LEC turn outside number ten Downing Street. It

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 3>should have a really simple message. I don't know Blair

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Tony Blair's education education, education. People knew what that was,

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 3>and then you need people around you to implement it,

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 3>and it just failed on both fronts.

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we know he's got to go. I think

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious to everybody that Rich is doing it. It's

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>not going to be a prime minister for much longer,

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>either either pre or post an election. Right, it is

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>nearly over. So why is it taking so longer? He

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>has all these enemies. It's perfectly clear that maybe he

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>isn't the best person to lead into the next election.

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>It's perfectly cleary certainly isn't going to be the prime

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>minister after the election. So if we know all these things,

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>why is it taking so long for him to go?

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Because the enemies need the method of dispatch to work

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 3>in their favor. So this is where the politics comes

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 3>into play, because there is clearly going to need to

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 3>be a resurrection of the Conservative Party. There is a

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 3>group that felt the trusts vision should come back. There

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 3>is a group that feel it needs to be much

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 3>more centrist and sort of address some of these migration

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 3>issues and end the Nasty Party as may once called it.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Battle for the soul of the Conservative Party. But nobody

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 3>wants to be the one to finally stab in the knife.

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 3>And where's what's quite interesting this has been Nigel Farage

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 3>because there's no doubt that Reform UK are doing well

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 3>in the polls. They've got quite an important thing in

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 3>any election campaign, which is momentum. That is absolutely crucial

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 3>in any election. Hermain is to have the momentum. And

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 3>what's happened is because you said, it's all petered out

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 3>a bit, which if you compare it to when the

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Brexit Party came into being, it was around four or

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 3>five percent and within three months it was polling at

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 3>twenty four percent on one of the poles, topping the poles.

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 3>It's certainly doable. But if you read interviews with Nigel Farage,

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 3>she talks about how he doesn't want to be the

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 3>man that actually vanquishes the Conservative party, because I think

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 3>the quote is people are quite tribal. They remember this stuff.

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 3>They may think he has some good vision of what

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 3>party should be, but actually being the one to stick

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 3>the knife in does not tend to go well with

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 3>a person who does it. So it's kind of a

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 3>sequencing going on at the moment. There's like a kind

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 3>of shadow boxing happening where everyone is waiting that now

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 3>for Rishie Sunak to fall on his own sword, because

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 3>if he falls on his own sword, then you know,

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 3>they rush in to be the savior. They're not the

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 3>ones who are actually brought him down, and so they're trying

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 3>to make it clear to him it's in your own

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 3>interest to step us. And that's why I talk about

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 3>the whisky and revolvers already in Downing Street and you're

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 3>starting to see this come through with reports or we're

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 3>thinking about maybe we could do an earlier election. We

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 3>could go in fourth of July has been floated as

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 3>a date rather than this thought it could be October November.

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So let's say he does fall on his sword,

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>who takes over? How does that work? I mean, obviously

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>we're all in the world of guessing here. I'm not

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>asking you to make clear, firm forecast, but now what

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 1>looks the most likely.

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 3>No, we do, Merin, Actually we do, because we will

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 3>always make a forecast. And if we're wrong, then that's

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 3>a good chance to say why are we wrong? Where

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 3>is the analysis wrong?

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Now?

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 3>The person taking over has to have some claim to

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 3>the position. So Penny Morden is in pole position by

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 3>virtue of having come second to as she's Sunac last

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 3>time round, also to the fact she has quite a

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of support amongst the local associations. Because here's the thing,

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 3>and I know there's been lots of Vernon bogdenor who's

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 3>professor of constitutional politics saying oh, it's a constitutional outrage

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 3>if we had yet another prime minister, but they'd purely

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 3>be prime minister for the election campaign. And that means

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 3>that actually some of the other names that have talked about,

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 3>like the Kemy Badernos of this world, in some respects

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 3>it's better for them to wait till after the election

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 3>because paying Audent, for example, has a much lower majority

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 3>than Kemy Baderock. There's a chance that actually Penny might

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:24.719
<v Speaker 3>not make it through that election commage on and keep

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 3>a seat. So Kenny Badanock could not be tainted with

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 3>the loss and then pick it up afterwards. This is

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 3>one of these nefarious calculations that politicians have to make.

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 3>I always say, by the way, because I've worked in

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 3>both politics and finance, that business people get very frustrated

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 3>by this because business is about what works, but politics

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 3>is about what sells, and you've got to remember who

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 3>you're selling to, and that changing the team into an

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 3>election campaign. Of course, the electorate the public at largely

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 3>like what is going on. But because it's an extinction

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 3>level event, the Tories are talking to their own activists

0:23:58.000 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 3>in the midst of it going so badly, the last

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 3>thing you want is you're not gonna have people knocking

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 3>on doors delivering leaflets, not feeling motivated to bother the

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 3>god to ge those people up. So someone like Penny Morden,

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 3>who herself wrote to the Telegraph and said she'd visited

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 3>seventy local associations in the last year, is that kind

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 3>of geeing up the base.

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Keep an eye on Penny basically, yeah, And keep an

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>eye on the possibility of Rishie's standing down in the

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>next few weeks, Penny possibly replacing him and going into

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a general election in the beginning of July exactly.

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 3>That's our core scenario.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, okay, all right, let's get forward then, because I

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>think we can then guess what happens, whoever might replaate

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Rissy's sunk or whether he decides to go for it himself.

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>However that happens, we are most likely to end up

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>with a labor government after that and kiss Damer's Prime minister.

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>And very few people are negative about that scenario. Most

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>people are fairly positive about that scenario. See it as

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>a Hobstly we need change. How do you see it?

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Just picking up on your point there about change, because

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 3>I've been thinking thinking about this because change normally means

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 3>massive enthusiasm and optimism of yeah, let's go for this person, right,

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 3>this is the change. I think what people want is competence. Ironically,

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.239
<v Speaker 3>of course, as we've discussed, which you seem like we're

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 3>supposed to liiver that, But they just want someone to

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 3>get a grip of it, get your party in line,

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:22.719
<v Speaker 3>get things organized, and make things work. That's a minimum.

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Before we've talked about trying to get growth and trying to.

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but that is change right now at the moment,

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing seems to work. It nothing seems to work. So

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone who can make something work that seems like very

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>positive change, and the idea that stuff might work is

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>about as optimistic as I'm prepared to be at the moment.

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 3>It is a bit like from a purely I don't know,

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 3>political academic perspective, when you think about change, you tend

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 3>to think about changes as a vote for something, whereas

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 3>some of this support for labor is a vote against

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 3>what we currently have. So that's interesting because it means

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 3>that have people really thought about what a labor government

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 3>will do, and they've done an extremely good job. I

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 3>must say it's a very well disciplined campaign the Labor

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Party of pursuing. They're keeping on the same song sheet.

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:09.360
<v Speaker 3>They're not scaring the horses with anything, particularly the markets

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 3>on the economic and fine out side. But I would

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 3>draw attention to Rachel Reeves's May's lecture, which might sound

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 3>extremely dull, but is absolutely worth reading for giving a

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 3>revelation to what Rachel Reeves really thinks about the economy.

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what does Rachel Reeves really think? So more radical

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>things than most people think. She thinks that it suspects.

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Exactly what was quite amazing about the way that was

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 3>brief to the newspapers is lots of people. Oh it's

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 3>exactly the same as well. She see like, Oh, you're

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 3>saying the same things. What's the difference. I'm actually going

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 3>to just quote a bit of it if I might

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 3>for one second. It's just a couple of lines Merin right.

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 3>So this is from Rachel Reeves's May's lecture. A model

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 3>based on the pursuit of narrow based, narrowly shared growth

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 3>with ever diminishing returns cannot produce adequate returns in growth

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 3>and living standards, nor can it command democratic consent. Now,

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 3>what she's saying there is capitalism is too narrow. We

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 3>need to be broader about how we share the proceeds

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 3>of growth. But the key part is right at the end,

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 3>nor can it command democratic consent. She's suggesting there, capitalism

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 3>itself erodes democracy, it will blow up the system, and

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 3>therefore socialism is the only way for the world to proceed. Now,

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 3>some people may agree with that, some people may not.

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't matter, But that's what she's set out in this

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Maize lecture of what she thinks, and it has some

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 3>fairly radical implications because it means that, And she goes

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 3>and talks a lot in the speech about we want

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 3>to pay more money to people with high skills, but

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 3>then she also says, we really want to give more

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 3>money to people with lower skills, and in fact, we

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 3>don't really care about money. We just want people to

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 3>be happy, and we want workers and secure.

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>We want people to be secure.

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Secure, yeah, which nothing bad can happen because if bad

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:04.360
<v Speaker 3>things happen, people won't take risks. And that's that's pretty radical.

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 3>Now you're starting to say, oh, hang on a minute,

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 3>So if I just go for a start a business,

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 3>does that mean I'm bailed out whatever happens, which is

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 3>pretty much the opposite of a capitalist approach, And so

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 3>that's fairly Yeah, it's a pretty it's a pretty radical

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 3>left wing approach. She quotes a lot of economists in there,

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 3>if you can bear to read all of it. I

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 3>know it's difficult people to get through some of this stuff,

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 3>but it's worth it because it's the first time we've

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.880
<v Speaker 3>really heard what she thinks, and she mentions a lot

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 3>of fairly left wing economists in that piece.

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Basically, we've been on a path to big and bigger

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>government for quite a long time. And everything that she

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>said suggests that we're on a path to even bigger government,

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and that there's many new organizations that are going to

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>be set up. Aparently there's the Wealth Fund, there's a

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>British Energy Group, and Skills England excely except that there's

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>an endless list of new groups, new institutions set up.

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, new government group.

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Going to extend the reach of government into into pretty

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>much everything. It's it's hard to see any way in

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>which government as a whole can't get bigger and bigger

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>under this resume.

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, and as I say, it's been a good job

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 3>of trying to brief it out that it's not too frightening.

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 3>And she makes throw away points about the fiscal rules.

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 3>I will sie to the government's fiscal rules, except we

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 3>will allow borrowing for investment purposes. Actually, that's quite Gordon Brown,

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 3>and it's good bread. Initially doesn't sound maybe that scary,

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 3>but as we know with governments. Okay, so it suddenly

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 3>becomes the case that you can classify something is oh no,

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 3>that is borrowing from investment because it's going to do this,

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 3>or we've teamed up with this organization to do that

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 3>it's a bit like in Germany where they have all

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 3>the debt rules and they try to keep a balanced budget.

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 3>But then oh, hang on a minute, We've got this

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 3>fund over here and it's not on the balance sheet exactly,

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 3>and it does borrow and it does do things, and

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 3>it's one of those things where once the door is

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 3>slightly open, you can just push it and ram in.

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 3>More So, I think tax and spend is quite easy

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 3>to see happen underneath that framework that we see in

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 3>that Maize lecture.

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But where do taxes go? How high can taxes in

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the UK go without getting to the point where it

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>becomes a little self destructive. It feels to me like

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>we're already knocking on that door with then I live

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in Scotland.

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes exactly, this is a very good question. And till

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 3>the pips squeak. As has been said in the past,

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 3>one of the things we do know about this new

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 3>labor government will be the vat on private school fees,

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 3>which they I think are claiming will raise two billion pounds,

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 3>which by the way, is a massive just drop in

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 3>the ocean compared to the hundreds of billions that will

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 3>borrowed or in COVID and the size of the deficit.

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And possibly compared to how much it's going to cost

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to take all the children who leave private schools into

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the state sector.

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 3>This is it. You started to see already surveys of

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 3>parents and analysis that suggests that far from raising anything best,

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 3>it could be neutral or might even cost money. And

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 3>that is that's obviously the point about these tax risers.

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 3>So therefore, when I look at that policy as that

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 3>being one of the few that we know about, it

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 3>suggests to me when you say, where else could these

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 3>taxes come from? It could be some sort of a

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 3>wealth tax, or of course it may not be branded

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 3>as that, could be branded as a second home tax

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 3>above a certain level. Or it's quite possible that you

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 3>could start to see extra taxes coming in called something else.

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's not shy away from this. Of course, the Conservative

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 3>government introduced to health and social care levy, so you

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 3>know what they're realizing, what they've spotted is the Overton

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 3>window has shifted, and as you said, there is a

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 3>bigger state.

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It is bigger, and there are lots of spaces for

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>wealth taxes. I mean everything from you know, whether you

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>approve them or not, as by the pie. There's lots

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of places you can put in place in new wealth taxes.

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a CGT on private homes above a certain level,

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>for example. Yeah, and we're already thinking things like double

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>council tax on second terms, I mean that you can

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>call it what you like, but it's a wealth tax,

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that's right exactly. We're seeing those throughout the structure of

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the tax system. And then of course the capital gains tax,

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>which is an unindexed to inflations and so is therefore

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>automatic wealth tax. And what really have to do is

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>put that up and you've got really a relatively high

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>wealth tax.

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 3>They're all over the place exactly. So I just think,

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, we could expect to see more of the same,

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 3>so that for markets it's going to be quite interesting

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 3>actually in terms of global capital because of course these

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 3>challenges facing the UK are not just restricted to the

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 3>UK of Western Europe, somewhat in the US. But of

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 3>course the US has been interesting in terms of actually

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 3>having some growth, and where that seems to be coming from.

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 3>The difference that I see is they've had a huge

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 3>amount of visa issuances in the US over the last

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 3>two years. They've had a lot of immigration. Whatever you

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 3>might think about, it does seem to be contributing to

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 3>more growth and also slightly bearing down on inflation as

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 3>that growth has come, which is why we've had a

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 3>bit of a goldilocks period for the US economy in

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 3>last year. Whether it will last, we'll now see. But

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 3>I can understand people getting very energized about the question

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 3>of immigration because there is the concept, okay with pie

0:32:57.440 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 3>might grow as immigrants become assimilated and w but then

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 3>it might shrink if they are taking from the state

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 3>more than they are giving. And I think this is

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 3>a huge topic in the UK. We've seen, of course,

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 3>this Rwanda policy going on, and of it's quite clear

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 3>that Rishie now thinks that another argument, by the way,

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 3>for a summer election could be that election happens as

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 3>the first flight leaves for a Wanda. But it's a

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 3>hot button topic everywhere.

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have the question, as we mentioned briefly earlier,

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it's all about GDP per head as opposed to just

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>with GDP. It's all very well seeing GDP go up

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>by a half percent here, a half percent there, one

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>percent here, whatever. But if GDP per head is constant

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>or falling and if while everything works on an income basis,

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but nonetheless we have a massive short of infrastructure as

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>our population grows. This is where the problems come in. Yeah,

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>this is the essential population and you may have a

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>short term boosted GDP, but that doesn't help you out,

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>yeah in any way, with the hospitals, the roads, the schools.

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 3>This is where when talk about the Labor Party coming in,

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 3>they are going to face an awful lot of challenges.

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 3>And remember they've been out of government for a long time.

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 3>Although they're getting advice from the Blair Brown period and

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 3>there are plenty of advisors who are involved, actually getting

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 3>into government is very different as the Conservatives are seen.

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 3>And remember the Conservatives have just had they did have

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 3>a majority of eighty and they still struggled. So I

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 3>know there will of course be the excitement that all

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Labor are in and they win a big majority. But

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 3>just as the Conservative Party have struggled with the right wing,

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 3>there will also be a left wing element to the

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Labor Party that says, wow, we've got this, we've got

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 3>the mandate, let's do this stuff. And that could well

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 3>cause tension for Keir Starmer as well. So it's going

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 3>to be extremely difficult period for whoever I.

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Always think it must be. Actually becoming prime minister must

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>be one of the most disappointing things in the world.

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>You spend so long working towards it. You have all

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>these ideas, you spend the years criticizing other people and

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>criticizing the economies are run, societies are run, politics a run,

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and etc. I could do it better. I could do

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it better. You get into number ten and you find,

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>my god, it's so hard and you can't just say,

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.359
<v Speaker 1>let this happen, and it happened, because it's not like that.

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>You have much more limited power than you believe you

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.439
<v Speaker 1>have on the way in. It's only when you get

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>there that you find out just how little power you

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>really have over an economy, over a society, of rejustice system,

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 1>et cetera.

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the leavers are really hard to find, and there

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 3>isn't one that's marked click here, you'll get everything done.

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely No, it's a constant, that constant selling that I'm

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 3>talking that I was talking about. They due to the electorate,

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 3>they're doing it internally, they're doing it to the civil service.

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.879
<v Speaker 3>They're trying to get the project going. I should say

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 3>by the way. That also applies in the US, and

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 3>there's always and in fact even more so in the

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 3>US because of the separation of powers. In the UK,

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 3>you've got the executive sits in the legislature. In the US,

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 3>it's separate in terms of what the US president can

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 3>actually do. They are severely constrained, even with the majority

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 3>for their party in the other elements of Congress. One

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 3>of the things I was found when you critical of

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump was that he often seemed to be casting

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 3>around for the leavers and failing abysmally to find them,

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 3>and then missing the ones he did have. He didn't

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 3>seem to grab the power is even as best as

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 3>he could. I want to make a really broad and

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 3>important point about all of the world and the politics

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 3>and what's going on right now, because sometimes people can

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 3>feel terribly upset, and I get it. But if we

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 3>look at what we've gone through for these last four years,

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 3>locked up at home, war on Europe, well, war in

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East, inflation for the first time in many

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 3>people's lifetimes, if we weren't angry, what on earth is

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 3>going on? Of course people are going to be furious,

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:49.760
<v Speaker 3>and then that means we should see radically different political parties,

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 3>emerging different kinds of leaders and huge political volatility. So actually,

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:56.879
<v Speaker 3>this current phase that we're going to go through now

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 3>another spasm for the Tory Party. Then the Laby prjer

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 3>come in and then it'll be difficult because they also

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 3>need to grasp these big challenges. We're talking about at

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 3>least a decade more of really dramatic political change across

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 3>the world, but particularly across anywhere with the democracy. And

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm mean kind of part of me is wildly excited

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 3>and frightened at the same time, but it's what people

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.879
<v Speaker 3>in markets need to pay attention to. I'm afraid you're

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 3>not going to be able to stop thinking about politics

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:24.439
<v Speaker 3>for a while.

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Well that brings us to the next thing I was

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 1>going to ask you, which is what does this mean

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>for markets, and particularly for markets in the UK. I

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>have conversation after conversation on this podcast about the awfulness

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of UK capital markets and what can possibly happen to

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>get some flows starting to come back into the UK.

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And I suppose one hope might be all the change

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of government might make global investors say the UK looks

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 1>like a place that might begin to reintegrate a little

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>with Europe and this kind of thing. So maybe the

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Brexit discount might begin to disappear and that just may

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>start to come back to the UK. This could be

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:58.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the catalysts that we've been waiting for. Or

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 1>is that too optimistic? Have a guest done last week

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>who insisted that the Labor Party absolutely get it and

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>will be very careful of like capital markets.

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 3>I think it's going to be a game of two halves.

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 3>I think when they Labor Party get in by virtue

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 3>of having one and having a majority and everyone being

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:17.840
<v Speaker 3>on board with that within the party at least to

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 3>start with, it's going to look good. It's going to

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 3>look coherent and we are it looks quite clear that

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 3>they will try and seek a more conciliatory link with

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 3>Europe at least, so I would imagine, yes, some of

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 3>that kind of optimism is quite well founded in the

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 3>first sort of year or two of the Labor government

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 3>and just some of the sort of uncertainty premium of

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 3>the last few years of it just all looking like

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 3>a total shambles and a mess. Because the Labor Party

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 3>will end up probably they'll do a fair few things

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 3>to start with, but it'll be It's not the sort

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 3>of thing that would frighten investors. I don't think the

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 3>trouble will come when we talk about how they're not

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 3>going to have any money to do anything. They face

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 3>all the same challenges. Where's the growth going to come from?

0:38:57.000 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 3>Where the productivity? And the temptation then to start on

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:04.479
<v Speaker 3>some of those wealth taxes. I would imagine that might

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 3>be quite perturbing for international investors.

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 1>But it's a couple of years at okay and interest rationing,

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 1>inflation in the UK, where do you see them GOLEA,

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:16.359
<v Speaker 1>And now we're getting out of the tricky questions. We've

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:17.320
<v Speaker 1>done all the stuff.

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's funny, isn't it? Because I always feel like

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 3>we's seen Act a bit of a hedge fund punter

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 3>on interest rates. I think that he's as much a

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 3>guilt trader as anybody else, because I think he thought,

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 3>oh great, we're going to get inflation down. We're going

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 3>to get three rate cuts before I am an election brilliant,

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 3>and that's not going to happen. I mean, the big

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 3>theme that we all have to come to terms with

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 3>is inflation is going to be higher than it was

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 3>in the fifteen to twenty years prior to the pandemic.

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 3>It just is because the world is being redrawn. There's

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 3>more inefficiencies as we go to a new equilibrium, and

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 3>that just means that we hire inflation. So therefore all

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 3>else e Court interest rates should be higher. But I

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:57.399
<v Speaker 3>think it's clear that we're going to get a cut

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:59.879
<v Speaker 3>or two from the UK this year, a bit more

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 3>the EU because they've got a bit more a bit

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 3>lower growth, and a bit more consistency consensus, I should say,

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 3>on the ECB. But of course the US. I looked

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 3>at this alleged pivot that the FED made in December

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 3>and I thought, what are they doing it now? This

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:18.319
<v Speaker 3>is odd. The data doesn't really seem to suggest that

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 3>they need to do this. The market's been expecting cuts

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 3>all year, they never delivered them. Growth good, inflation is good.

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 3>What's it what they are about? And I thought, the

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 3>only thing can be this US election. In a way,

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 3>I know they are politically independent, but they are appointed

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 3>by a politicians and it would help Biden to have

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 3>a couple of rate cuts before November. And now that

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Fed's in quite a sticky wicket because it's not going

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 3>to be anything this month. It's got June, where yeah, okay,

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 3>maybe they'll have to do one or signal it. Then

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:51.320
<v Speaker 3>they've not got They've got two more meetings before the

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 3>US election. And then once you get two plays, you

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 3>start to look a bit too political. It's tricky for them.

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, central Bank, the federal banking it's tricky.

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, okay, a better answer, sorry, better and more

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 3>coherent answer. The rate cuts that will come will make

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 3>very little difference to actual economic conditions. There you go.

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is the interesting. This is the interesting that

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>John and I talk about a lot that you may

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:19.359
<v Speaker 1>get from these levels. You may get a cut here

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>and a cut there, but absolutely the incorrect response to

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that would be to expect rate to keep falling back

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:28.320
<v Speaker 1>down to the low levels we've seen in the past.

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Any cut from here could be reversed, could stay there

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>for ages. We have to assume that something around four

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:37.320
<v Speaker 1>five percent is the norm, and you just see cuts around

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that cuts or rises around that level.

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 3>And I think in the sort of mid nineties period,

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, we have to all come to terms with

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 3>the fact that was the aberration zero interest rates. Why

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 3>is there this obsession that once you get up to

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 3>the long term normal average would you go back down

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:53.240
<v Speaker 3>to zero.

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Just yeah, all these efforts spent getting up, you want

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to stay up? Now. It's a last question, absolute last question.

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I promise this is the one we have to ask

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody at the end. If you're only allowed to invest

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 1>in one asset class over the next ten years, and

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that asset class could only be bitcoin or gold, I

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>might be digging bitcoin up a little by calling it

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 1>an asset class. Hate mailed the usuler address. Wait do

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you one of those? Would you choose? Wow?

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:23.239
<v Speaker 3>Just bitcoin or gold? Goodness means that's all all of

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 3>the safe havens. Perhaps they might call it bitcoin.

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh, tell us more.

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 3>And I say that as someone who does not understand

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:35.839
<v Speaker 3>it enough it wants to owns a little bit, has

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 3>been learning a lot about it, has been learning about

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:41.919
<v Speaker 3>cold storage and all this stuff. I think that there

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 3>is a safe haven argument for bitcoin over gold in

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 3>the technological era by saying that it exists virtually and

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 3>not physically, because I think our future is virtual, not physical,

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 3>So therefore something that's in the cloud is going to

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 3>do better that can be moved around in the palm

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:05.359
<v Speaker 3>of your literally in a device the part of your

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 3>hand will have more long term value than gold. But

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I want either of them. Marrion, Sorry,

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:12.960
<v Speaker 3>oh okay, what do you want you to say?

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Then? I'm opening the world to you. Oh okay, oh

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 1>just you Normally I don't do this as you definitely

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want to either of them. What would you take?

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 1>And said, I'm just I'm still only giving you one

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>asset class for teny it.

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Can I do US tech Stocks? You can? Too broad?

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Now? Yeah, that's not too broad.

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 3>I was going to picture just one of them, and

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 3>then I feel a bit like that's tricky because you know,

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, in video is doing very well at the moment,

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 3>But is it's technology always going to be ahead of

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:37.439
<v Speaker 3>the curve?

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:39.840
<v Speaker 3>I think we are. I think we're again taking a

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 3>massive long term historical view of everything that's going on.

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 3>We're in a technological revolution, just like the industrial revolution,

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 3>and we've got to embrace it. It is. It is

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 3>the future, and therefore you want to be on it.

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:54.840
<v Speaker 3>And where is all the where is all the advance happening?

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 3>And it is the US?

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:59.320
<v Speaker 1>So there you go, Okay, US tech Stocks is it?

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much this week to do for my

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Helen I've got John Stuffic and also Bloomberg

0:44:11.200 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 1>opinion columnist Adrian Wildbridge. And just before we get into

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>our discussion about this week's interview, I want to let

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 1>our listeners know that you are co hosting your own podcast,

0:44:20.640 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a new one, a series that just today called voter Nomics. You,

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie Flanders know we're Stratton. You'll be coming together weekly

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>having conversations about the elections taking place this year that

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is shaping the geoeconomic landscape. And this week's episode is

0:44:32.680 --> 0:44:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with Neil Ferguson, absolutely something to look forward to.

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll all be listening to that right onwards. John, I'm

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>going to ask you first, because I always do, what

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 1>did you think about this conversation with Helen which you

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:45.840
<v Speaker 1>suggested by the way, we had Helen on because you

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>suggested we did, and I thought that was an all

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>right suggestion.

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm glad to hear that. I know though, it

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 2>was very interesting, and I thought, actually the idea that

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Vshi is going to step down of his own accord

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 2>and then call someone election, it's quite a punchy call.

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 2>And she did seem pretty comfortable to you know, put

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:10.959
<v Speaker 2>that out there. So I thought it was gonna work

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of talking about it, because if that happens, I mean,

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 2>that's I I would. I mean that that that surprised

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 2>me as an idea.

0:45:21.560 --> 0:45:24.839
<v Speaker 1>John. After we recorded that conversation, I had a couple

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of conversations with other people who think they're in the

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>there well maybe are in the know, and they pretty

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>much all said the same thing. Okay, so independent backup

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of that opinion, it's definitely floating around as a distinct possibility.

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so, I mean, at the end of the day,

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not plugged into Westminster, and there's, you know, a

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 2>part of me that things the whole gossip side it

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of borden, but it is important, and I do

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 2>think that. I mean, if anything, I actually think your

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:59.360
<v Speaker 2>discussion about what will happen afterwards was it more interesting,

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 2>because that's the idea that you know, labor getting and

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 2>at the moment everyone seems to be kain comfortable with

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 2>that and happy enough about it and assuming there's going

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:10.240
<v Speaker 2>to be something along the lanes of business as usual,

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 2>but clearly when you look at the state of the

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:16.760
<v Speaker 2>public finances, that's just not possible. There's got to be

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 2>a change and the big Devin Steen label on the

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Tories is that the Tories at least have to pretend

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 2>to be a law tax party, but as there's no

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:27.839
<v Speaker 2>such you know, kind of restriction when labor once they

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 2>get in, I don't know why.

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 1>They bother with the pretense Adrian, let me bring in

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you and de fancy the idea of Penny more than

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 1>just prime minister has that working fear.

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a very interesting sort of question. I

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:43.760
<v Speaker 4>think a lot depends on what happens to the mayors

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 4>in the in the local elections. I think if a

0:46:46.200 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 4>bunch of counselors losing the local elections, people, you know,

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 4>even if the number is very large, people think out, well,

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.360
<v Speaker 4>who cares about these local cancers. If you lose a

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 4>big city, let's say Birmingham, then the party really does

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 4>begin to panic. And I think that Rechi steps down

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 4>rather than having another act of regicide quite interesting. And

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:08.319
<v Speaker 4>I think if anybody were to replace him, I think

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 4>Penny Morden would be a very very good choice in

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:14.359
<v Speaker 4>all sorts of ways. One is that she's you know,

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:18.880
<v Speaker 4>an attractive and articulate figure. She carried the sword extremely

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:22.320
<v Speaker 4>well during the during the coronation, which is no mean feat,

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, So it's a pretty important qualification for running

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 4>the country these days.

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Also, she.

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 4>Has a good feeling for the upper working class vote,

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:37.360
<v Speaker 4>the white working class vote. Her constituency, which is Portsmouth North,

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 4>was a labor constituency before she took it over. She's

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:44.400
<v Speaker 4>converted it into a pretty solid majority at the moment,

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 4>and nothing will be solid whenever the election comes, but

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:49.319
<v Speaker 4>up to now it's been pretty solid. She knows how

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:52.919
<v Speaker 4>to deal with that sort of version of the red

0:47:52.960 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 4>Wall down in the South. And she's a better retail

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 4>politician and more attractive retail politician than Richie who is

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 4>a very clumsy retail policy and a technocrat. So if

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:04.839
<v Speaker 4>I were a Tory wanting to save my seat, I'd

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 4>rather have her than him. And also thinking from the

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 4>national interest, the interests of the country, I think we

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 4>are perhaps if things continue to go as they are

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:19.440
<v Speaker 4>with Rishi, looking at an absolute catastrophe for the Tory parties,

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 4>for the Tory Party and a very big labor majority.

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 4>And I think a very big labor majority might be

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 4>a very worrying thing. It would be a very worrying

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 4>thing for the city. It might be a very worrying

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 4>thing for Kirs Starmer, who might not want to have

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:34.560
<v Speaker 4>this huge pressure not only of expectations, but of MPs

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:36.719
<v Speaker 4>who will find it more and more difficult control than

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 4>more of them there are.

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>But do you think that changing Prime Minister at this point,

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:44.239
<v Speaker 1>swapping Richie for Penny, it would make any difference to

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the result of the election. It kind of feels like

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't.

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 4>I think that you can change the narrative a bit.

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 4>I think at the moment, as long as it's Ritchi,

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:56.839
<v Speaker 4>its failure, it's the sort of sex frindses of these

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:59.800
<v Speaker 4>various MP's, it's whatever the latest story is. If you

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 4>put a new person in the front, it's like it's

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:05.759
<v Speaker 4>like reviving a soap opera and you at least have

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:11.319
<v Speaker 4>a chance to change the story. And I think she's

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:14.240
<v Speaker 4>a better face for the party. Now you really forced

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 4>bit of you know, to put money on the line,

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:19.359
<v Speaker 4>I'd say no, the Tory Party's finished, you know, it's

0:49:19.600 --> 0:49:21.760
<v Speaker 4>for the moment it is. People have made up their minds.

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:25.319
<v Speaker 4>But I think as a sort of hospital pass, i'd

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:25.799
<v Speaker 4>go for it.

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:30.239
<v Speaker 1>With reform out there, with the Workers Party out there,

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is there any chance for hung Parliament. We naturally assume

0:49:33.320 --> 0:49:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that there's going to be a massive labor majority simply

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:38.600
<v Speaker 1>because the toy is horrible, horrible state. But there are

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:39.240
<v Speaker 1>other parties.

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:43.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but it cannibalizes the Reform Party, cannibalizes the Tory votes,

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:46.759
<v Speaker 4>and the Tory vote is still going down and the

0:49:46.800 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Reform Party is still going up at the moment. So

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:52.319
<v Speaker 4>I think it is splitting the right. And again that's

0:49:52.360 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 4>another reason why I think there is a there is

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:55.799
<v Speaker 4>a danger, if you want to look at it from

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 4>that point of view, at least a possibility of a

0:49:57.840 --> 0:50:00.840
<v Speaker 4>very substantial labor major. And what you might have is

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:03.880
<v Speaker 4>a very weird world in which you have a substantial

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 4>labor majority, just like in ninety seven. But in ninety

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 4>seven you had a lot of enthusiasm, new labor, new beginning.

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 4>You know, Tony Blair very good at his job. You'll

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 4>have a substantial labor majority with no really having many

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:19.280
<v Speaker 4>expectations for them, boring Prime minister, expectations of things actually

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:22.480
<v Speaker 4>going pretty dismally, no money to spend, and so more

0:50:22.520 --> 0:50:24.840
<v Speaker 4>of the same mood of despair, but with a different

0:50:24.880 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 4>bunch of people to kick and complain about.

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:29.799
<v Speaker 1>You say that it would all feel pretty dismal. But

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:31.799
<v Speaker 1>John and I were talking about this the other day.

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking that possibly a large labor majority would make

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:39.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone feel mildly optimistic, largely because they don't quite understand

0:50:39.239 --> 0:50:42.359
<v Speaker 1>what a very large laborjority would mean over the medium term,

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but just because there'd be the sense of something vaguely

0:50:45.520 --> 0:50:47.319
<v Speaker 1>new and of stability. Yeah.

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 4>But if the person who's the front line of the

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:52.680
<v Speaker 4>act is Kars Starmer, it's hard just to get excited.

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:55.440
<v Speaker 4>Or can you get excited about Rachel Reeves or men

0:50:55.520 --> 0:50:56.919
<v Speaker 4>of the rest of it. I don't think you can.

0:50:57.360 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 4>And I think the Labor Party is going to go

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:02.960
<v Speaker 4>interpower with no money to spend a lot of expectations

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 4>for fixing potholes and picked fixing hospital which they can't fulfill.

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:14.480
<v Speaker 4>And if I were a sort of hyperactive left wing columnist,

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:17.840
<v Speaker 4>I'd be looking forward to a great future denouncing the

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:20.000
<v Speaker 4>Lay Party and saying they betrayed everything and that we

0:51:20.000 --> 0:51:22.440
<v Speaker 4>should go back to a more Corbynite policy.

0:51:22.440 --> 0:51:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm afraid I mean that that is part of the problem.

0:51:26.520 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Connect very irresponsible. It's like, how do you keep the

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:34.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of file left on the under wraps once the

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:36.839
<v Speaker 2>then pos of course to keeping them shot up.

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 4>And you've got a restricted majority, you can give a

0:51:39.520 --> 0:51:43.719
<v Speaker 4>lot of people jobs, which means money, which means you

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:45.799
<v Speaker 4>can basically afford to live in London. If you haven't

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 4>got that, if you've got all these hungry people outside, well,

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 4>the temptation to to to you know, go down the

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Owen Jones line is greater.

0:51:55.040 --> 0:51:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So what what do you think when you say

0:51:57.200 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this is dangerous and this is frightening. What is it

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that you are expecting policy wise in the early days

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that might scare horses.

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think what's going to happen is that they

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:17.080
<v Speaker 4>will have pretty conservative macroeconomic policy that they will continue

0:52:17.080 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 4>with a lot of the Tory policies that will create

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:22.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of frustration. They'll have a bit of promises

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:25.279
<v Speaker 4>on fixing the National Health Service, fixing potholes and all

0:52:25.280 --> 0:52:27.760
<v Speaker 4>the rest of that, which they won't have any money

0:52:27.840 --> 0:52:30.960
<v Speaker 4>to do. They'll increasingly be tempted to engage in gesture

0:52:31.040 --> 0:52:37.120
<v Speaker 4>or performative politics, which will I think solve no problems

0:52:37.160 --> 0:52:42.279
<v Speaker 4>and actually increase the potential for polarization and discontent. And

0:52:42.320 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 4>I can see after not very long of a sort

0:52:45.560 --> 0:52:49.720
<v Speaker 4>of basically inert Starmerish labor government, a surge in support

0:52:49.760 --> 0:52:55.799
<v Speaker 4>for Corbynism and a surge in support for you know,

0:52:56.320 --> 0:52:58.600
<v Speaker 4>anti work policies or whatever you want to call them.

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 4>For our style is on the right, so you know,

0:53:03.440 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 4>a dismal but more polarized Britain and I we're all going.

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:08.960
<v Speaker 1>To be desperate to have Rishi back in six months.

0:53:09.320 --> 0:53:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Oh, we will say technocrat, a sensible guy. Can't we

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 4>have something to learn that.

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 1>We were talking earlier in our introduction about the at

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the market you hires for the fifty one hundred, etcetera.

0:53:19.960 --> 0:53:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Is any optimism from either review that the assumed stability

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of a labor majority and perhaps a little more friendliness

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:31.280
<v Speaker 1>with the EU as I discussed with Helen might actually

0:53:31.320 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 1>be good for the market, possibly bring some international investors

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:36.240
<v Speaker 1>back in or at least of the outflow from the UK,

0:53:36.960 --> 0:53:39.920
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps another way, perhaps there'll be regulations that will

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:41.400
<v Speaker 1>prevent the outflows from the UK.

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 4>I just think that if you're looking around the world

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 4>at the moment, the US is so dynamic and so

0:53:48.120 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 4>tempting that I didn't see whether the UK would be

0:53:51.200 --> 0:53:53.080
<v Speaker 4>attracting you when you could when you could go to

0:53:53.120 --> 0:53:53.960
<v Speaker 4>the US instead.

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I suppose that depends on whether the Trump baken in the.

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:01.719
<v Speaker 4>V But I think Trump will be could be a

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:05.439
<v Speaker 4>huge boost in film States. I mean cutting capital, court

0:54:05.480 --> 0:54:09.440
<v Speaker 4>corporation tax, cutting taxes, I think, deregulating quite a bit,

0:54:09.760 --> 0:54:11.560
<v Speaker 4>rolling back a lot of green stuff. I think it

0:54:11.600 --> 0:54:16.360
<v Speaker 4>will suck huge amounts of money and indeed talent from Europe,

0:54:16.360 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 4>from Britain into the United States and make the boom

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 4>even bigger than it's already been. And you must remember

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:25.120
<v Speaker 4>the first two or three years of the last Trump administration,

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:27.720
<v Speaker 4>before COVID came and he started telling people to inject

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:31.239
<v Speaker 4>themselves with bleach. I mean, the economy was booming, you know,

0:54:31.360 --> 0:54:33.440
<v Speaker 4>and business was saying, you know, he may be a nutter,

0:54:33.480 --> 0:54:36.439
<v Speaker 4>but he's our nutter. And I can see that coming back.

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:41.920
<v Speaker 2>More US exceptionalism then, basically.

0:54:41.840 --> 0:54:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a slightly different kind and more acceptable acceptionalism from

0:54:45.480 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 1>US to a bad kind. Agre John, thank you so

0:54:48.719 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us today. Thank you thanks for listening

0:54:53.560 --> 0:54:55.839
<v Speaker 1>this week's Marin Talks Money. We will be back next

0:54:55.880 --> 0:54:57.879
<v Speaker 1>week in the meantime. If you like us, sh rate,

0:54:57.960 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 1>review and subscribe whereever you listen to your podcasts. And

0:55:00.960 --> 0:55:03.240
<v Speaker 1>finally we have our show email, so I send along ideas,

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 1>questions or comments to Merrin Money at Bloomberg dot net.

0:55:06.120 --> 0:55:08.279
<v Speaker 1>And if you have ideas on when Roshu's going to

0:55:08.280 --> 0:55:10.200
<v Speaker 1>go and who the next Prime Minister will be, please

0:55:10.280 --> 0:55:13.040
<v Speaker 1>do let us know. This episode was hosted by me

0:55:13.160 --> 0:55:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Maren sumset Web. It was produced by some Asidi, additional

0:55:16.120 --> 0:55:18.920
<v Speaker 1>editing by Blake Maple's Special thanks to Helen Thomas and

0:55:19.080 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of course to John Steppek and Abrian Wildridge