WEBVTT - Week 4: Taken Bye Surprise

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>advice League dot Com. Here's your host. Welcome to Fantasy

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. I am Paul Charchy and my co host

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>today are Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison. I think it

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>was you guys last week too. I'm getting sick of

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you two. Why are we gonna work some fish back

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>into the mix? Sounds like you're coming up on lent yea.

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>It does sound like I'm coming up online plenty to

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>get to. Over the course of the show, we will

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>give you premature speculation at the end of the show

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>when we reveal the three players you want to pick

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>up now that everybody else will be trying to pick

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>up next week. We'll answer three tough questions. We will

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me with nine players not normally

0:00:57.880 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in your starting line up, many of whom are available

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>on the waiver wire, which is extra important this week

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>because we have a surprise bye week surprise with the

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Steelers and the Titans um and this looks like this

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>will count as their one by week and you know

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>we knew going into the season they're gonna be situations

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>in which you just had to be a nimble, flexible

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>owner and league, and it's already upon us. It only

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>took four weeks, and now you get to we get

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to find out who's who's got a deep roster, who

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>can work the waiver wire, who can find free agents?

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>As a guy who just traded for Derrick Henry this

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>week to the guy I'm playing against. From the guy

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>playing against, he's laughing all the way at me. That's

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that's delicious. Right before the Titans obviously tested positive for covid, um,

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know your your league is not going to be

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>able to have rules in place for every possible scenario.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>But what we were looking at when we thought this

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be a Monday or Tuesday makeup, why is um,

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>what do I do? If you know? Do I leave

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry my starting lineup and just hope that the

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Monday game happens or the Tuesday game happens? And you

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't know for sure? And one of the better ideas

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that I saw get floated around Twitter, and I think

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 1>it was Ryan McDowell that I saw who did it

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>said it first. Was have a provisional player designated in

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 1>case that guy doesn't go. Um, and I think that

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>would have made sense here where you would have said,

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, i'm starting Derrick Henry, but if he does

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>not go, I'm rewinding it back to this guy who

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>hasn't played yet. Yeah, and I think that you should

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>stipulate it's if that game isn't played, it's not. It's

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>not if Derrick Henry all of a sudden comes up

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>lame and he's, oh, my hamstring hurts, I'm not playing today.

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 1>It's the whole game is called off right. I thought

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>that was a good way, a good way to handle it. Um,

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>there's myriad different scenarios here. We just encourage you to

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>be flexible, be fair, and don't be like I got

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>a I got a guy in my league who's just

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to turn everything to his advantage and trying to

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>wind his way into carrying a bunch extra play. Don't

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>do that. Let's let's jump into the man you want

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.119
<v Speaker 1>to name names chart, Yes, I do want to name

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>names calling out let's go, let's do it. I'm not

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>doing it. Uh. Let's begin breaking down the matchups one

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>game at a time. Beginning with a real barn burner

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville at Cincinnati, which actually kind of is a barn

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>burner in years passed. This was dreadful, but there's a

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of players from both sides you can go with here. Yeah,

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the battle of the Kitty Cats. Let's go James Robinson

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna start with for Jacksonville gets an A grade.

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:34.119
<v Speaker 1>I think so week one. I admittedly kind of called

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>him a warm body as the starting running back for Jacksonville,

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>but I've been way off. I apologize, James Robinson, you

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>get the A. The Bengals have allowed these second most

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>rushing yartists and running backs and have yielded the third

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>most touches to the position in gold. You got scenarios.

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Love James Robinson here with three ground scorers already twelve

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in rushing yards among running backs, third and receiving yards.

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Just an absolute jackpot so far for anyone who has

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>him on roster and who did the good times will

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>keep rolling this week against the Bengals. D J. Chark

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>likely to play this week, Yep, I'm gonna give him

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a CE here. He's been limited with the chest injury

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that held him out last week, but he should play.

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals are actually bottom seven and targets heeld to

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>what targets he yielded to wide receivers, meeting not a

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of targets he looked to wide receivers and have

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>only allowed two scores to the position. Secondary is pretty good,

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>William Jackson, particular corner or just the running defense is

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>so bad. They're finally to the past Noon Loan wide

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>out is it seventy five receiving yards seventy five receiving

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>yards against since the yet, but Chart could get there

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>if healthy. Gonna give him the C. For the other receivers,

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>Lavishka Chenult and Keelan Cole, I'll start with Keelan Cole,

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>who's turning to a sneaky safe PPR play from the slot.

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Fellow seemster Greg Ward had eight catches, seventy two yards

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown against the Bengals last week, So I'm

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>giving Cole a C. Got a bench. Chenult though, super

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>exciting player, but super dangerous to start and see them

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>with formats. If Chark somehow doesn't go all up, all upgrade,

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna go. Yeah, So I got Chennault on the bench.

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Now that brings us to Tyler Eiffert. In the revenge game,

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>opposing tight ends have blown up the box score against

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals. Chargers tight ends total ten targets for six

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>catches eighty three yards. Eagles tight ends thirteen catches for

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, thirteen targets for ten catches and ninety two yards.

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>That is Hunter, Henry and zach ERTs for the most part.

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Eiffert not those guys. But hey, since he let

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>him walk and this is a supposed shootout, so I'm

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>giving him a sea here and Gardner Minshew given him

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a b no chart killed him last week. His left

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>tackle was also ejected early. Did not bode well for Minshew.

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>But onward and upward with Gardner. Don't forget he has

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>wheels as well. Carson Rent Carson Wentz ran for sixty

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>five yards and a score against Since he last week,

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Minshew's a safe b uh in a high

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>scoring affair or what or what should be a high

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>scoring affair. Now over the Bengal side, Joe Mixing brutal

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>beginning to the season for him, but I'm gonna go

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to bat for him. The Cincinnati offensive line is thirty

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in adjusted line yards, and those remove the ability of

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the running back basically, and what the opportunity that the

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>line presents to the running back. Thirty in adjusted line yards,

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight and second level yards, and thirty first in

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>open field yards. He's doing it all on his own.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Still has touched to roles of and nineteen. Gotta keep

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 1>rolling with Joe, especially against jackson Ville, who are allowing

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred forty combo yards and a touchdown per game

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to end the running backs. Doesn't it feel like this

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>is the breakout game for the season for Mixing, It's

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna come. This happened last year. It's basically the same script,

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>very slow starting. Uh, he'll get it going and come on,

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>he's got He's got Joe Burrow behind him or in

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>front of him, I should say, but we'll talk about

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>him in a minute. To the receivers, Tyler Boyd, he

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>gets to be the Bengals, I'm sorry. The Jaguar is

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>only allowing a hundred thirteen yards pretty game to wide

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>receivers as a whole, but only one receiver has cracked

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>seven yards against him. That was Paris Campbell running from

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the slot and Adam Humprey has had a good game

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>from the slot as well, five catches for forty yards

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown. So Tyler Boardy gets a b uh

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>sees for Tee Higgins and a J. Green, and I

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 1>like te Higgins more than a J. Green at this point.

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>Higgins played the snaps last week, saw nine targets. He

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>ran the most pass routes of any wide receiver on

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Burrows dropbacks. He gets the c i'lso give a J.

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Green one as well. Just thirteen catches for a hundred

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen yards across three games. But all those targets

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you just figures sooner or later Burrow, if he's gonna

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>keep throwing that many passes to a J. Green sooner

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>or later, they're gonna connect. Yeah, and then then the

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>rust has to get knocked off at some point. Like

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you said, the target totals nine, thirteen and six. Those

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are healthy enough. Yeah, So a J. Green gets the start.

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Drew sample though everyone's favorite waiver wire wire Darling on

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a on the waiver wire last weekend from a tight

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>end perspective, one target last week oops, he ran thirty

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>four routes on fifty two of Burrows drop backs. Not

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>looking like c j Uzoma in terms of reliable fantasy producer,

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>he's on the bench, and then Joe Burrow lastly, but

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>not leastly, an A. This is a real stat. Jacksonville

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>owns an opponent completion percentage of as the next highest

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>teams like seventy one big games by every quarterback to

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>face Jacksonville. Ryan fits Pastrick, Ryan Fit's Patrick just through

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for two touchdowns and gash them on the ground. So

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow gets an A this week. Joe Burrow right

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>now in most fantasy leagues roughly quarterback ten in fantasy

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>points scoring. I mean, that's what do you guess? And

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>this is first three NFL games. He's the real deal.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Holy Field, what's what's the borough garbage time named? Brian?

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Are your workshopping that one yet? I'll go back to you,

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, Okay, Indianapolis takes on Chicago. I've got just

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of starters on the Indianapolis side, and it's

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>primarily Jonathan Taylor's. You could guess a heavy usage day

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>coming here. Probably Taylor faces a Bears defense that has

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>allowed running back to score against them in seven straight games. Taylor,

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of course getting heavy, heavy usage UM although in Chicago's

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>defense in home games, they've allowed one one hundred yard

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>rusher in their last twenties six Soldier field games. That's it,

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if the Taylor gets to one

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards here, but a score is likely. The only

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>other starting grade I've got is for emerging tight end

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>mo Ali Cox with a see it's in part because

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Paris Campbell and Michael Pittman have been ruled out of

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this game, and that means Ali Cox is gonna get

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that many more looks. And he's posted Fantasy relevant games

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and back to back weeks, and he outsnapped Jack Doyle

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>last week, and it looks like he's gonna be the

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>designated pass catching tight end a little bit like Eric

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Ebron was a few years ago. So he'll be back

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in the mix. Here bears the middle of the packet

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>defending tight ends. They're giving up five receptions for forty

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>two yards per game. The rest of the the rest

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Colts are on the bench. Even t Y Hilton,

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>aside from Calvin Ridley, receivers have been rendered useless against Chicago.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>They're the only secondary that has not given up a

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>single touchdown to wide receivers. And this despite the fact

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that he's had these easy, easy matchups every week rolling

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>into this game, he still hasn't scored. He's averaging forty

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>four yards per game, and he's had all these plus matchups.

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So now here's a bad matchup. So putting him on

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the bench more like t Y Wilton. I like it.

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I will, by the way, I'm going with Burbish times

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>so bad alright, last thing on hilt and he's gonna

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>face an elite cornerback and Kyle Fuller, who's yielding just

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>passer rating of forty two in his coverage, is playing

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>very well as he often does. Nahem, heines way to random.

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers is playing this sort of safe non fantasy

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>ball where he's completing a high percentage of his passes

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>without challenging downfield. Is our average yards per paths for

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers six point nine, the same as Teddy Bridgewater.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>That's it. As a result, he's thrown just one touchdown

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in every game and provides basically no upside. Let's go

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to the Chicago side, where we've got a handful of

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>starting grades, and that is it. David Montgomery clocks in

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>with the c Tariko and his out so he's gonna

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>get almost all the work, but the matchup is difficult.

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>The Colts have allowed the eighth fewest rushing yards and

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the fewest total touchdowns to opposing running backs. Just one

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 1>no posing back his top sixty three yards and that

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>includes Dalvin Cook, who is way better than David Montgomery.

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So just to see grade on Montgomery here. The only

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>receiver I like is Allen Robinson. I think the quarterback

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>upgrade to Nick Foles will certainly help get this. Only

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>forty seven percent of Allen Robinson's targets from from I

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>was about to say, what are we gonna do with this?

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>I need to do a trombone like. I gotta trombone Ski,

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I really do. I'm just find ways to work him

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>into the matchups going forward. Of Allen Robinson's targets from

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 1>sad Trombone Ski were deemed catchable by Pro Football Focus.

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>That's it can't even give you a coin flips chance

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>at a catchable pass. So the upgrade to Nick Foles

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>should certainly help here. Colts have allowed the third fewest

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>yards to receivers um and Robinson plays from all over

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the field, which usually helps, but the Colts have got

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>solid cornerbacks at every spot, including the resurgent Xavier Rhodes,

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>just the b on Allen Robinson. Nick Foles is on

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the bench. I know he was heroic last week, but

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>he's been very inconsistent over his career and this is

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a tough matchup against Pro Football focuses number one ranked

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>path defense. They've allowed the fewest passing yards by a mile,

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and I don't like any of his receiving matchups other

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>than Alan Robinson, Anthony Miller, Darnell Moody. That was our

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>spot starter guys against bad defense, as we are not

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Colts solid secondary here with them,

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and Jimmy Graham is also on the bench. The Colts

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>have allowed the fewest yards to tight ends. It was

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>just picturing Trubisky trying to flip a coin and edicine

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>envision struggle. I think he I think he'd managed to

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>have the coin not hit the ground. That's I think

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that would be the problem, no doubt. Up anti

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>gravity coins. An anti gravity coin. There you go. Me's

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a Fantasy football weekly coin. When we come back, we'll

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Chargers in a tough matchup against the

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers and the Bucks shorthanded in this game. What to

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>expect from those players? And nine players upon whom you

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>can take a chance. These are players not normally and

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:20.599
<v Speaker 1>you're starting lineup, many of whom are available on the

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire. We will tell you who they are. For

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>those with Steelers and Titans scrambling to find a starter,

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>stay tuned to Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>A segment week all take a chance on me, a

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>royalty free version for the so long that can't end

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>soon enough. We really make a chance on me. Pay

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>royalties to people for listening to that man. The advice

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is golden though. The advice is very very good. We

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>just put this out. They're red hot. If you come

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>up with an original take a chance on me song

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and send it our way has to be has to

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>be fully original. We may listen to it, and we

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>will listen to it, and we might play it. You

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>could be the background music behind this segment, or just

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>bart into a microphone and we might play it too.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>That it would be about where's the super sad troumbo?

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>There it is? This could be take a chance on

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>me and I would take it over the song we

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>just heard Somebody step on a duck take a poop

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>on Me by Odell Beckham. Let's begin at the quarterback position.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Who's you take a chance to me? Quarterback Brian Matt

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Stafford at home against the Saints who are now going

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to be without starting corners Genores Jenkins and Marshawn Lattimore.

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>You gotta love Stafford even more the healthy Kenny Golladay

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>back in the lineup, and unlike last season, you gotta

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>love the matchup against the Saints, who have surrendered passing

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>touchdown totals of two, three and three to start the season.

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>They are bottom nine and passer rating allowed, with a

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>one oh eight passer rating allowed to opposing quarterbacks. And really,

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>when you think about it, there haven't been many games

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>with a healthy Stafford, Golladay, Marvin Jones and t J. Hockenson.

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Hockinson was injured early last year, like in Week two,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh Stafford got hurt mid season. So not Stafford.

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I might give him an a grade in this matchup

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>might number ten ranked quarterback this week? Matt, who is

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>your take a chance of me? Quarterback? I mean in

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a week where you have a surprise bye week for

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Ben Roethlisberger and Ryan Tannehill. You might need to pick

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>up a guy like Teddy Bridgewater and start him. Uh.

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>The Cardinals is his opponent this week, and they faced

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>off against Garoppolo, Stafford, and Haskins, who all put up

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>eerily similar numbers all right around thirty three passing attempts,

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>two hundred fifty yards and two scores. Well, Bridgewater, he's

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>averaging two nine passing yards this year. Yes, it was

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw for that eight yards at a time. To

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty and two seems very doable for Teddy Bridgewater. I

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>think you can bank on that in this matchup. Might

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>take a chance to me. Quarterback is stew Beard. Yes,

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick, you may remember last week when I recommended

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that you start him, and because we got you, you

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta pick your spots with him right when you've got

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>these when you know he's gonna throw a lot. Love

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the yolo stylings of Ryan Fitzpatrick, and this is one

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of those spots. The Seattle defense ranks dead last in

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>completions allowed, dead last in passing yards allowed, dead last

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and pass rush by Pro Football Focus. Meanwhile, the run

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>defense ranks. Second, May's not gonna run the ball. They're

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>just gonna throw stew Beard's arm out of socket. And

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you want a part of that. Isaiah Ford, by the way,

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>sneaky deep play in this in this why wouldn't you

0:16:58.040 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>use them and take a chance to me later in

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this N one comment? Wow, but he is a sneaky

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.360
<v Speaker 1>deep play, all right, Brian, who's you take a chance

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of Mere? Running back? Yeah, we're not done picking on

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle secondary just yet in this segment. But not

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>yet running back Latavius Murray, I'm staying in Motown. On

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the other side, though, for the Saints going up against

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the Lions, the Lions once stout run defense has gone

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 1>from proud to cowardly. They're allowing six plus yards per

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>carry and am good. Yes, Alvin Kamara is in god

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.719
<v Speaker 1>mode right now. But Murray has at least twelve carries

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in two of three games and has caught a pass

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in back to back week so he will be serviceable

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in Detroit this weekend. Matt, who's your take a chance

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 1>of Mere? Running back? Well, there's death, there's taxes, and

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>there's running backs against Carolina. Three things. I'm not going there.

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>There are also death taxes. That's true. They will tax

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you into the grave. Uh, well, you can run away

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>from this because Chase Edmonds is the guy that you

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>want to start. Last year, the Panthers allowed almost two

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>running back touchdowns per game. This year, they've allowed seven

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>running back touchdowns in three weeks. So if we carried

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the nine, that's more than two. Oh my god, there

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>worse somehow. Kenyan Drake is still the bell cow, but

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.479
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been totally amazing yet, averaging only four point one

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. Edmonds is averaging about six touches per game.

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 1>But at five point four yards per carry that the

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Panthers are giving up, that's still thirty yards right there

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>to start, and we're gonna get more because there's no

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>reason to pass against the Panthers when you can run.

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think, I think, actually Kenyan Drake is just

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna get tired in this game, and Chase Edmonds is

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to hop in. Uh. You guys, remember Zack Moss,

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite sleepers from the preseason. No, this

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is your chance, this is your last chance to buy

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>him on the cheap. Right here. Last week we saw

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a rookie breakout performance is from Justin Jefferson, Brandon I U. P. Higgins.

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>These rookies that are now a month in that's this

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>is like their preseason has just happened. Now they're ready

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to hit the ground running. Zack Moss, as you may recall,

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Week one, scored a touchdown, Week two, got hurt, Week

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>three didn't play. Here we were into week four and

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>he faces Las Vegas, the team that has allowed the

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy points to running backs. They ranked thirty first

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in yards per carry at six yards per carry. Mosses

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in line to get goal line carries ahead of Devin Singletary,

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and the Raiders have allowed multiple rushing touchdowns to every

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>opponent Moss can catch, and the Raiders have allowed the

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>most receiving yards and the second most receptions to running backs.

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Both he and Devin Singletary sitting on nice games. Ryan,

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna take a chance of your receiver. Let's get

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to the aforementioned Seattle secondary. This is

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>not a drill. These are real statistics. That Seattle has

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>allowed two wide receivers so far this season seven the

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>six catches. The next highest total among teams who have

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 1>played three games is forty seven. Cheez. The Jets have

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>allowed the third most the next worst team with fifty

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and they played on Thursday night, So that's four games.

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Next yards allowed to wide receivers by the Seahawks one thousand,

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirty six in three games. Yes, Denver

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is the next highest, who played four games with seven

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred and nine four. I'm gonna pick on the secondary

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>way more when we get into the matchup. That's all

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you need to know about Preston Williams. Get him in

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>your lineup, and probably Isaiah Ford like you mentioned as well, Matt.

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Your take a chance of me receiver is Marquez Valdez scantling,

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>excellent pronunciation. Alan Lazard suddenly out indefinitely after undergoing core

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>muscle surgery on Thursday. Uh Davante Adams is still very

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>questionable at the hamstring injury. They're saying that he practiced

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>in a limited fashion. But it's a it's a Monday

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>nighter right before their bye week. Why wouldn't they save him?

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Which means m VS is the number one wide receiver

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in Green Bay and he's playing against Atlanta, that same

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta team that has allowed five different wide receivers. To

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>top ninety yards already this year. Yep, I will pick

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>him up and start him all right. I am going

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>with Randall Cobb. He plays the slot receiver position for

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Houston and they go up against Minnesota. Cobb coming off,

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>by the way, an impressive game against these Steelers, a

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 1>much better defense yards in a score. But we're not

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>just chasing that box score because he has a juicy

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>matchup against an injury battered Vikings secondary missing its slot

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>cornerback Mike Hughes. He has been ruled out. His replacement

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>last week was rookie Jeff Gladney, who allowed one hundred

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty yards from the slot, including a sixty one yard play.

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>He has allowed a passer rating of one twenty one

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage this year. Randall Cobb an excellent pickup

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and play opportuney dy for you. Uh. Let's go to

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>some matchups, beginning with the Chargers taking on the Bucks.

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Matt The Charges are all kinds of banged up, including

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>missing their two best offensive linemen. Yeah, Brian Bulaga and

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Trey Turner both ruled out for this game, so I

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't even know about that as I was making these

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>matchups up. So I downgraded all of my guys a

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>full letter grade. I took Keenan Allen from an A

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to a B. UH nineteen targets last week versus Carolina

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>ten ten targets the week before. That's double digs and

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>every Justin Herbert start right there. I still like him

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>as a B grade, but with Bulaga and Turner out,

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Herbert's can have less time to throw. Hunter Henry taking

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>him from a B to s C hasn't scored yet,

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>but eight eight and seven targets, five six and five catches,

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and he's topped fifty yards every week, so that's pretty solid.

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams has a hamstring injury. He looks more doubtful

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>than the questionable tag Uh and Jalen Guiton looks like

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the next man up, but you're not crazy enough to

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>start him. I took Justin Herbert from a SE grade

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>to bench. He has thrown for three hundred yards in

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>each of his first two starts, which is pretty impressive.

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It's very impressive now in Tampa allowed six of the

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>first nine quarterbacks they faced to top the three yard mark,

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.479
<v Speaker 1>but in the ten games since then, including this season,

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>they've only allowed two quarterbacks to top the three yard mark.

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>They've only faced Breeze Bridgewater and the Broncos quarterbacks this year.

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>But I just don't like it for Herbert in this one.

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Austin Ekeler, though. I'm gonna keep Austin

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Ekeler at an A grade. While Tampa has been really

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>good against the run since Todd Bowles arrived, they're very

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>weak against pass catching backs, ranking in the bottom four

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in the league in receptions and yards allowed through the

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>air to running backs. Eckler caught all eleven of his

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>targets last week. That's pretty good. And if he's if

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Herbert's rushed this week, he's gonna be ditching off to

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Ackler the whole game. I don't know. I still an

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>A grade. I want somebody to be able to run

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the I want my running back to be able to

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>run the ball. If he's got an A grade, he's

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna catch fifteen balls in this game out. I hope

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I got a solution to throw a minus in there,

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>not a not a solution, as you like to call it.

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm keeping Josh Kelly on the bench though, because ecler

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>was on the field for seventy of the plays last

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>week and out rushed Kelly twelve to eight. He's simply

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a change of pace back in the Herbert offense. Let's

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>go over to the Bucks side. Uh Leo and Roe Joe.

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I got him both on the bench. The good news

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>what yeah really? Yeah? Okay, four nets out and so yeah,

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>four nets out that he's he's his head coach said

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>he does not expect him to play. Okay, Well, then

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Rojoe is probably a star. Let's let's go with that.

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a tough it's not an easy matchup. Yeah, it's

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>not an easy matchup. But two of the Bolts front

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>four now on I r with Ingram and Sustin Jones,

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Chargers are allowing four point four yards per

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>carry over their last twenty games. Now, my my bench

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>grade was they're splitting time almost evenly. But if Leonard

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>four Nett is now out, Ronald Jones probably gets sixteen

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to twenty touches in. This is officially out of officially,

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but the better it looks for Rojoe, the worst it's

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be. I'm sure Keyshawn Vaughan is the guy

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>who comes into this game and gets sixteen. All right,

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady see start. Since the beginning of last year,

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers are one of the best in the league

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>against the past, allowing under only two sixteen passing yards

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and just over a score per game. And Brady will

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>be without Chris Godwin and this one who's feeling his

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 1>hamstring again and it's not feeling good. Mike Evans. I'm

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>giving a B two uh. Cornerbacks Michael Davis and Casey

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Hayward have done a spectacular job against the posing wide

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>receivers this season, holding everybody but Tyreek Hill to under

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:01.959
<v Speaker 1>sixty five yards, and Hill was the only one who

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>scored a touchdown. Evans did garner ten targets and top

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.439
<v Speaker 1>two hundred yards in the other game when Godwin didn't play,

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's always a threat near the stripe, as evidenced

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>by his two catches for two yards and two touchdowns

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>last week. One of the strangest lines ever receiver. Yes, yeah,

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Scottie Miller. He's on the bench, justin Watson to the

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.479
<v Speaker 1>bench to Miller has more targets on the season than Godwin,

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>but has only seen the field on of the snaps,

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>and when Godwin was out, Watson had the Miller's a

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>game time decision. So I don't think you're gonna want

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a monkey without against a good secondary. And O. J.

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Howard and Gronk, they're both on the bench. According to

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Evan Silva, among tight ends, Gronk is twenty eight in

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>the league and routes run and Howard is thirty five.

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you're only running about fifteen to twenty routes

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a game, that's not enough to get fifteen to twenty targets.

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not even enough to get five targets. So they're

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>they're both on the bench. All right, New Orleans, We're

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna try to fit in one more matchup New Orleans

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>takes on the Lions're we've already talked about some of

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>these players in a certain amount of detail. Here, this

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>is a there's an injury battered Saints. UH Saints team

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>offensively and defensively. Michael Thomas officially ruled out, as is

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook. So they're both on your bench. But let's

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>start with Alvin Kamara real quick, easy, a second in

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>receptions and fifth in receiving yards among everyone. Yeah, not

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Everyone. Opposing backs have only total eleven catches

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>against Detroit so far, but that's about to change. And

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Detroit has also allowed the third most rushing yards and

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>running backs uh, so smash spot for Alvin Kamara. Latavius

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Murrios might take a chance, I mean running back for

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that same reason. Detroit's run defense is just abysmal at

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 1>this point. As we just mentioned, Michael Thomas out, Jared

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Cook out, so I'm giving Emmanuel Sanders a B here.

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Desmond Truffont unlikely to make his season debut for the Lions.

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh Sanders was dreadful in Las Vegas in Week two,

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>but had touchdowns in the two other games, had a

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>season high and catches and yards last week, but only

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on five targets. Kind of troubling, but no no Cook

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>now and Thomas is still out. He gets it, he

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>gets a B and have to throw to him, right,

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Gonna have to throw to him and and to tra

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Kuan Smith. He's see more targets with Thomas sideline totals

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.679
<v Speaker 1>of seven and six and again it's a good matchup.

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>The lines are allowing five farts per game during five

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>yards and more than a touchdown per game allowed to

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers by the Lion so B for track Kuan Smith,

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Adam Troutman, if you're in super deep tight end lead

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to tight end, only lead me. He might be viable,

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but he's not. And Drew Brees I had to see.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna might throw a minus on that one charge.

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Sorry he could he could say he looked better last

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>week with Kamara, but I'm sorry, but Camar did all

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the heavy lifting. Uh that's not It's a decent matchup.

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>But he's very short on weapons on this one. So

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>just to see for Drew Brees over to the Lions side,

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Golladay gonna give him a safe be Alan Lazard

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>went nuclear last week and an injured um Mike Evans

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>score against New Orleans in Week one. Genor Jenkins is

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Marshawn Lattimore is not an A? What is? What is it?

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Why would he not be? Because they just got ruled out.

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I forgot to change my note, So he's in A.

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>He's actually an A plus now. Marvin Jones my number

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>one ranked wide receiver this week. Yeah, you did a plus. No,

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>he did an A and got a Marvin Jones. I

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>guess I'll bump up to a B now. I had

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a meta ce mild success for secondary receivers against the Saints.

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>But again everyone's hurt. So be for Marvin Jones. And

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>before the quarterback news, I t J. Hockenson with my

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>highest graded path catcher too. Oh yeah, well, Darren Waller

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>sat on a monster game against Detroit twelve catches, I'm

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>sorry against New Orleans twelve catches, a hundred and five

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>yards and a touchdown. Robert Tonyan had five for fifty

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown. Even O J. Howard scored a touchdown

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the aforementioned piece of garbage by Matt So Hockinson gets

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>an A and Matt Stafford might take a chance to

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback, He's take a chance on me. He's an

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>A grade now, he's a great He's not even taking

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like I took an easy lay up there.

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you did too. To be honest, that wasn't

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>even that wasn't even difficult. That's the pot calling the

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>kettle black church. What are you talking about? What do

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you mean? I give you what's paws the Seahawks. That's

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a great matchup alecent of leagues. That is that is

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that is an absolutely lay up? Is Zack Moss. Let's

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>be real. People are dropping, people are dropping Zack Moss,

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>which is crazy talk crazy. When we come back, Houston

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>takes on Minnesota team with a lot of defensive problems. Actually,

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>both teams have got defensive problems. There's a lot of

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>points coming in this one. We'll tell you which Houston

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and Vikings players you will want to start, if not

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>all of them, when we return. Also, if you want

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to get all by player rankings, you can get them

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>for free at guillotine a leagues dot com. Every player,

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>every meaningful player rated. We've got explanations for them and

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it's all available for free guillotine a leagues dot com.

0:30:55.920 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly coming back in moments, Welcome Back, Fantasy

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Paul charchy in, Matt Harrison, Brian Johnson with you.

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>You can follow us respectively. I am at Paul Charge

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and you'll have to just figure out how to spell it.

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not that hard. It's it really spelled how it

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>sounds arg. Matt Harrison is at Explosive Output and Brian

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Johnson is at B T x J. That's easy to

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>spell and well, as long as you hear the T

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is a T and not a D. By the time

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you know I say it goes through my Mike through

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the processing on your speaker in your car with road noise,

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>pos are going to be like p d x Q,

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>what's that Brian toilet xylophone Johnson, that's what That's what

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it stands for. Knowing for all of those things. The

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Vikings and the Houston Texans will meet on Sunday. Dalvin

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Cook sitting on potentially a gigantic game here. Texans have

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.719
<v Speaker 1>allowed the most rushing yards, the second most yards per carry,

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and the third most rushing attempts to opposing backs. And

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>this is really what the Vikings are all about. It's

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just establishing the run and then finding spots for Kirk Cousins.

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the Vikings are all about. Well

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we know of Mike's Mike Zimmer wants his offense to

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>look and that is how he wants it to look.

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So Dalvin cooks an easy A grade. The passing game

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>clocks in with starting grades for Kirk Cousins, a positive

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>matchup for almost all of his receivers, including his tight ends.

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Um he won't have the volume for a massive day,

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>but one of two touchdowns as possible here, so he

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>gets a C grade. And now let's talk about some

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of those positive matchups, including Adam Feeling now over the

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks. Theland has been quiet um a couple

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago because he was getting double coverage in

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the last week because they basically just throw to Justin Jefferson.

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I expect a bounce back game of sorts here, but

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>he likely gets shadow covered from Bradley Roby, who follows

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>top receiver even into the slot where they can sometimes

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>hide theeling but don't confuse Bradley Roby with a shutdown corner,

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and he used to be a quasi shutdown guy, but

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>he's not anymore, and he's giving up a passer rating

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of one twelve in his coverage, So advantage Feeling b

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>grade next. Justin Jefferson with a breakout game last week,

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>including a career high fifty one snaps on offense, and

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that'll continue after he broke Randy Moss's single game rookie

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>receiving record. Jefferson should primarily face off against slack cornerback

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Eric Murray, who gave up a score last week did

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith Schuster and is giving up four inches and

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty pounds to Jefferson, who might just out muscle him

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>for contested catches. Justin Jefferson gets a B grade. Let's

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>go to the Houston side. They've played the toughest schedule

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in football by a mile, and by some measures, the

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>toughest opening three games in the history of the NFL.

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>They've actually been competitive, they have, which is kind of

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>been surprising. Yes, Deshaun Watson gets an A grade in

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>this on two of the three quarterbacks to face the

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Vikings of top three hundred yards against their rebuilt, inexperienced secondary.

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings pass rush has been mostly invisible and Daniel

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Hunter is not ready to play yet. Even though he's

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>eligible to come off i Arch, he will not. All

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>three of Watson's receivers have plus matchups against their cornerback counterparts,

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and let's dive into them right now. Will Fuller expected

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to play despite a mid week hamstring injury. You want

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to watch his status though hamstring injuries. They'll warm him

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>up before the game, they'll verify he can go. Hopefully

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>he will. Minnesota has yielded five scores to opposing wide receivers,

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>which is tied for second most. Fuller most frequently runs

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>from the left side of the field, which puts him

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:42.720
<v Speaker 1>up against disaster grade cornerback Holton Hill, who Pro Football

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>focuses ranks as cornerback one hundred four. I am guessing

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>most listeners would not have guessed that there are one

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 1>D and four cornerbacks in the NFL. He has a

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>significant fuller, has a significant speed advantage over any of

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings cornerbacks. Assuming he goes, you will give him start.

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>He is a B grade. He would be an A

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>grade were it not for the hamstring. Brandon Cooks gets

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:06.839
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. Uh he's I wish you'd get more

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 1>than the five targets per game. Um, but man, he's

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>got a terrific matchup on both outsides of the field.

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Vikings cornerback Cameron Danceler is likely to come back in

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>this game, but he's still very inexperienced, and Cooks has

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the massive speed advantage over Danceler. I think you can

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 1>give him a B grade. One other starter. And by

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the way, Randall Cobb again was might take a chance

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 1>on me wide receiver, love him in the slot this game.

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Aikins, you're in a pinch for a title, and

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you had my guy John U. Smith, or maybe you

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>had Eric Ebron. You need to pivot. Jordan's Aikins has

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 1>posted two relevant fantasy games in three weeks despite the

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>brutal Houston schedule. He now gets a Vikings defense that

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>has allowed big games to mo Ali Cox and the

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>afore mentioned John new Smith. Then, lastly, David Johnson hasn't

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>done much yet that could change here A grade for

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson. Minnesota's a lot of rushing touchdown to the

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>last five starting running backs they faced. Johnson was obviously

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>limited by Baltimore and Pittsburgh, and those are really good

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>run defenses. The Vikings run defense is graded thirty feet

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>by Pro Football Focus. This is a far better matchup

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and David Johnson goes back to being an A. Let's

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>go to our next matchup, which is Arizona taking on Carolina.

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Matt We're looking at a game time decision status on

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins. Yeah, I had him listed as an A grade.

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>It's now downgraded to a B because of the game

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>time situation. Um, it's a good matchup for him if

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 1>he does go a hundred and seventy six yards per

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>game to the wide receiver position allowed by the Panthers.

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>That's bottom five in the league. So Hopkins, he's he's

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 1>their best option. Christian Kirk still nursing a groin injury,

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and Andy Isabella and Larry Fitzgerald. You just can't trust

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>those guys enough in this situation. So I got all

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of those guys on the bench. I do have Dan

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Arnold on the bench as well. Sorry, Brian, uh. He's

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>only averaging three targets, actually less than three targets and

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>under two receptions per game. That's just not enough. But

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe everybody being injured on the wide receiver front gives

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Brian Dan Arnold moment to shine. This is it, This

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is it. He's still better than Gronk. This is the

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>one um check the tape in the sets. I'm still

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna give Kyler Murray and a grade. He's throwing for

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>about two sixty per game. The Panthers are giving a

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>giving up about two six per game, so that's a

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>solid floor in the passing game. Plus everything he does

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in the running game is just gravy here. And then

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I did mention that I like Chase Edmonds as might

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me runner, So I obviously like

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake to who also gets an A grade. Although

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it's worth noting that the Cardinals were the only team

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that the Panthers held to under fifty five rushing yards

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>last season, when they held David Johnson and Edmonds to

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty two rushing yards combined. Still, I don't believe it.

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 1>And if you can't give Kenyan drake An a grade now,

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>when can you? There's no other time? Well, this is it,

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.280
<v Speaker 1>this is this is it. On the other side, the Panthers,

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving Mike Davis a b Let it be known

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Panthers stick with one running back at all times.

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Davis had twenty one touches to Reggie Bonafon's too last week.

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh and since the beginning of the Cards are allowing

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>just under one yards per game to opposing backs. But

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>another forty seven yards through the air. That seems like

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>a bankable hundred totally yards for Mike Davis and this

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>one and probably a shot at a touchdown. I talked

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>about Teddy Bridgewater as might take a chance and met quarterback.

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I will add that Cardinal safety Buddha Baker is out

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 1>for this one too, which makes him a little bit

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>more interesting. And I do like his wide receivers. I'm

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>giving both d J Moore and Robby Anderson b grades

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>each are averaging just over eight targets per game. One

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is getting nine three yards, the other eighty. That's both good.

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 1>We've been a little disappointed from the scoring output so far,

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and the like I said, the Cards have allowed a

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:00.919
<v Speaker 1>ton to the wide receiver over the last nineteen games,

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>seventy five total yards. Speed receivers such as Terry McLaurin

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 1>and Kenny Golladay each had nice days against this secondary.

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:11.399
<v Speaker 1>So I like Robbie a little bit better than DJ.

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>But the more breakout is coming soon and it's going

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to be furious. This might be our last chance to

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 1>get DJ more at a discounted price. Finally, Ian Thomas,

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>really I got him on the bench we assume, so, yes,

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:27.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe three games isn't enough of a trend, but there's

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>two working against Thomas. First, he's averaging one point three targets,

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and second, the terrible Cardinals tight end defense is suddenly

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 1>not so terrible. They've only allowed one score on the

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>season and only fifty three yards per game to the position. Alright,

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Seattle takes on in Miami. We've already talked about a

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>bunch of players in this game. Because so many opportunities

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to score with these bad defenses. Let's start with Seattle.

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I know the air game is way more interesting, but

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we've got drama at the running back position. Chris Carson

0:39:56.760 --> 0:40:00.720
<v Speaker 1>looks like a game time decision. After the cow Boy Tristan,

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody tried to wrench his leg out of socket. Yeah,

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that was pretty bad. That's pretty bad. The crocodile roll,

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the crocodile, the old crocodile role. What do you think

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 1>about trying to start Chris Carson here? Yeah, I was

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 1>all set to give Carlos Hide solid be here. So yeah,

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 1>as you said, Carson a game time decision. Now, Pete

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Carroll says it's a good chance he suits up. So

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 1>if they let him play, I'm gonna give Carson the

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>B and if he sits, then then Hide gets the B.

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>It's that simple. If Carson plays, you cannot play Hide.

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a scenario out there, a worst case scenario

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:35.720
<v Speaker 1>where Carson's active. We all assume he's gonna get carries.

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But they decided to play it safe and use Hide

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.880
<v Speaker 1>as their starter and just keep Carson waiting in the wings.

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:47.359
<v Speaker 1>If that, but I think it's a chance you have

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to take with Carson. That is against Miami, who is

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>allowing a healthy four point six yards per carrying a

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:56.399
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdown per game to back, so they've also they've

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>also surrendered the seventh most receiving yards of the position,

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 1>nearly sixty yards per game. So whoever guess the majority

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of carries here? Touches here is in a line for

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a good bell cow day. But uh well, let's say

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:08.919
<v Speaker 1>a B for Carson again. If he doesn't go hide

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:12.880
<v Speaker 1>gets a B. Who doesn't get a B? Or Tyler

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Lockett and DJ Metcalf. Miami's allowing a hundred ninety

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>yards per game to wide receivers seventh most could be

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>without their best cornerback Byron Jones. Lock It has seven

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>catches in every game coming off the touchdown hat trick.

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>DK Metcalf has four catches in every game, for nine

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>yards in a touchdown, yards in a touchdown, and a

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred ten yards in a touchdown too. He got leon leaded.

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if he gets five catches in a game, what

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>could he do? We're probably gonna find out on Sunday.

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Greg Olsen, speaking of scrambling for tight ends, I'm on

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the fence here tended to give him a c in

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a likely shootout and a homecoming game for the former

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Miami Hurricane, but Miami Miami has allowed just eight catches

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred two yards to tight ends. That being said,

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>those tight ends are Ryan Izzoh, Reggie Gilliam, Dawson Knocks,

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>James O'Shaughnessy, and Tyler Eiffort. I only know Tyler Eifford

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:12.760
<v Speaker 1>is basically Dawson Knox. So Greg Olson, if you're super desperate,

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 1>give him a go. I'll give him a sea here

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and Russell Wilson. Come on, that's an easy a over

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Miami side. You're missing one receiver. David Moore

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is one of my sneaky favorite plays of this week.

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Why I mean, he's the starting outside receiver on the

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 1>best arguably the best passing offense in the NFL so

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 1>far this year. Byron Jones is out as the cornerback

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.240
<v Speaker 1>for Miami. That means Xavian Howard, who will follow Guys,

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to follow DK Metcalf on the outside. That

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 1>means David Moore is gonna get rookie cornerback Noah big

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Binogginy Bigog and he is allowing a passer hundred thirty

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>six in his coverage and two scores already, and he's

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:58.320
<v Speaker 1>not even a starter. He's already given up two scores.

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 1>He's profo. Bill focuses ninety drank running back David bar

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you're sneaky play. I like that. I think that's more

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of a DFS dart than a seasonal plug in play.

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>But there's potential there for sure. Um potential is there

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 1>for Miles Gaskin. Now, I'm even a B and PPR,

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 1>but a see if you're still playing standard leagues, because

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's Howard is always a vulture threat, as bad as

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:22.359
<v Speaker 1>he is, but Gaskins is a universal starter now twenty

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 1>seven touches against Jacksonville last week had five catches. He

0:43:25.520 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>totaled ten catches in his two games prior, when you're

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing less work. Seattle has allowed the sixth most catches

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:32.839
<v Speaker 1>to running back. So I'm liking gasking a lot here

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in this potential shootout. And you have to like the

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers for Miami against Seattle. We mentioned the massive

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>numbers are allowing in catches and yards. I want to

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.879
<v Speaker 1>extrapolate those really quick. So on a sixteen game pace.

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks are gonna allow four hud five catches. Last

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 1>year the most a lot it was two hundred and forty.

0:43:51.120 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>By the Bucks, they're on pace allows six hundred or

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:57.160
<v Speaker 1>six thousand, fifty nine yards. The most last year was

0:43:57.239 --> 0:44:00.800
<v Speaker 1>three thousand, one hundred and seventies six. Also buy the books.

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>That's why President Williams was like, take a chance for

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>me a wide receiver. Ryan It's Patrick was would take

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 1>a chance in the quarterback and Mike Kasicki was gonna

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:09.279
<v Speaker 1>give him a seat. But he gets a b now

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 1>that Jamal Adams has been ruled out for Seattle, so

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>safety for Gassicky it's gonna be a point orgy and

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff beach baby. By the way, Gassicki runs more slot

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>routes than a tight end in the league. He's sitting on.

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he's in a grade. When we come back,

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>three tough questions. Play along see if you can go

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>three and oh with our panel of experts. It's Fantasy

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly on Paul Archie

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and Guillotine leagues dot com. Brian Hart, Brian Harrison, Brian Johnson,

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine Lease dot Com, Matt Harrison Shocked Fantasy. Yeah, you

0:44:57.360 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 1>want to get in your Shock Fantasy promo code Peacock

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>dec promo code Precock four dollars for a full year

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of shock Fantasy goodness. That is a lot of shocking

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 1>at Shock Fantasy, a shocking deal, a shock for the peacock.

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Al Right, absolutely, this is again we call three tough questions.

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 1>We encourage you to play along. See if you can't

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 1>go three and o as I Pepper my co host

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 1>with three tough questions, beginning with tough question number one,

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:27.320
<v Speaker 1>what is the appropriate level of panic for Lamar Jackson owners? None?

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Some or a bowl loosening level of existential dread? Brian alright, so,

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 1>l Jacks. Last year he finished as QB six or

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 1>better in seventy three percent of his games. That's super impressive.

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:49.760
<v Speaker 1>He finished outside the top eighteen quarterbacks in zero percent,

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 1>so insane ceiling, super safe floor. Your loving life with

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson last year, especially based on his ADP, I'm

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure this question is oriented for this year right now.

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:03.880
<v Speaker 1>This year, he was QB five in week one, okay,

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 1>so far, so good, but then QB eighteen in week two,

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and then QB twenty two last week, so you're not

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling too good about l Jack's right now. He still

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is averaging eleven plus rush attempts per game. That is good,

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:18.319
<v Speaker 1>although zero carries inside the five yard lines so far

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:21.879
<v Speaker 1>not good. So I'm just gonna say some because he's

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:23.960
<v Speaker 1>clearly not on the same trajectories last year with the

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>bloated ADP, but he will have big weeks. So just

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:29.840
<v Speaker 1>some level of concern. Okay, Matt, what is the appropriate

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:33.160
<v Speaker 1>level of panic for Lamar Jackson owners? His bad games

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 1>tend to come against the Kansas City Chiefs for one

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 1>reason or another, specifically specifically, So I'm not going to

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>freak out about a quarterback who's averaging eighty rushing yards

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:47.319
<v Speaker 1>per game over his last nineteen games. I'm not going

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to freak out about a guy who has forty two

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:55.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes to only eight interceptions since that span. I'm

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:58.400
<v Speaker 1>not freaked out at all. Come on, let's get over this, guys.

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:02.320
<v Speaker 1>This is okay. There's no panic here. The correct answer

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is some the defenses are taking away Mark Andrews, and

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:08.959
<v Speaker 1>that means they're they're making Jackson go to his second

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:12.239
<v Speaker 1>year receivers Brown and Boykin, and the hope was that

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Brown and boy Can in their second year would improve

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and progress, and they frankly, they haven't and or Jackson

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>just isn't being is not able to find them consistently,

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and because of that, his passing numbers remain bad. Now

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the running remains mostly intact. I think, with the exception

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:31.279
<v Speaker 1>of what Brian mentioned, we're not getting these we're not

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 1>getting these the touchdowns that we were hoping to get,

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but he's still getting carries. And because those rushing numbers,

0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the fifty yards, the sixty yards, the seventy yards, the

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:43.760
<v Speaker 1>eight yards on the ground, you've got basically a statistical

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 1>safety net for Lamar Jackson that means you never have

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to be in a bowl. Loosening level of existential dread.

0:47:54.040 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Tough question number two, sticking with Baltimore, they're running back.

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Such a wation has been a disaster for everybody involved

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:05.719
<v Speaker 1>in particularly mark Ingram for the rest of the year.

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Is Ingram and RB two a flex or a bench

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:13.319
<v Speaker 1>level player? Matt, we begin with you for this one.

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It's weird that Gus Edwards has kind of looked like

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they're best running back so far this year, and as

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and and that's not a good sign. I do like

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:22.880
<v Speaker 1>j K. Dobbins quite a bit, and I think that

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:25.840
<v Speaker 1>eventually his role expands more. He's definitely involved in the

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>passing game, so mark Ingram's in a three way time

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 1>share now and in the next couple of weeks here

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:35.439
<v Speaker 1>he's got since Philly and then a bye so those

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 1>two games are good. Then then you get the bye week.

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:44.280
<v Speaker 1>But out of the by it gets absolutely nasty. Pittsburgh twice, Indie, Dallas,

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and Cleveland, who are all top ten running back defenses

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>this year, are five of his next seven games. Out

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of the by. He's gonna be on the bench in

0:48:54.320 --> 0:48:56.879
<v Speaker 1>five of those seven games, so he's gonna get more

0:48:56.880 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 1>bench grades than flex grade. So he's on the bench. Yeah.

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:04.479
<v Speaker 1>I we thought, or I thought at least that Ingram

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be a safe RB two for the first

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:07.840
<v Speaker 1>quarter of the season at the least, But his carries

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:09.799
<v Speaker 1>have gone down starry in Week one from ten to

0:49:09.960 --> 0:49:12.879
<v Speaker 1>nine to seven. Like L Jacks, he too has zero

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 1>carries inside the five yard line. J K. Dobbins has

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>two and Gus Edwards has one, and like Matt said,

0:49:18.120 --> 0:49:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards looks like the best running back on the

0:49:20.400 --> 0:49:22.880
<v Speaker 1>team right now j K. Dobbins just has to improve

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 1>as the season goes on, one would think, and as

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Matt also alluded to, Baltimore is the tenth partiest remaining

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:30.840
<v Speaker 1>strength of schedule for running backs per fantacy pro So

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Ingram on the bench, Ingram on the bench. Ingram has

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 1>fewer snaps than Dobbins, which you mentioned, you guys took

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:40.240
<v Speaker 1>most of my talking points. Um, just the ten touches

0:49:40.280 --> 0:49:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a game. That's just not enough for reliable production and

0:49:42.960 --> 0:49:45.839
<v Speaker 1>ten why would he get more than the ten when

0:49:46.120 --> 0:49:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Dobbins figures to get better and Gus Edwards has been

0:49:48.680 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 1>playing better. I think, Um, you're saving graces that Ingram

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>has gotten double the red zone looks than Dobbins and

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Edwards combined. But I don't. I don't know that even

0:49:57.680 --> 0:50:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that continues here, So it pay means to me to

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:03.400
<v Speaker 1>say it. But mark Ingram, you guys are correct. Bench

0:50:03.800 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>he will be a bench level grade most of the time. Now, Matt,

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:08.439
<v Speaker 1>follow up on your point in the schedule. I think

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you can wait two weeks on Ingram. Hope he gets

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>value in these next him. He rolls into that by

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:15.839
<v Speaker 1>and into that brutal part of his schedule and then

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:18.759
<v Speaker 1>we move him hope for an uptick from Ingram Right.

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't sell now because his value is very low now,

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:23.399
<v Speaker 1>but these next two weeks are promising. Do it after

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the Washington game this week and then before the bye

0:50:25.760 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 1>when there's more value. Not leaving since and Philly the

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 1>next two weeks are both good matchups to tough question

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:35.920
<v Speaker 1>number three? Should fantasy owners drop Carson Rentz Wentz out right,

0:50:36.000 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna pivot this into two parts. One would

0:50:38.600 --> 0:50:41.360
<v Speaker 1>be in quarterback one leagues where you're just starting the

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:44.160
<v Speaker 1>one quarterback, and then secondarily, what if you're in a

0:50:44.200 --> 0:50:47.000
<v Speaker 1>super flex and you can start too, So there's two.

0:50:47.080 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a two part answer to this. Can we get

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:53.279
<v Speaker 1>four out of three? Then yes, yes you can get four.

0:50:53.320 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I can, Okay, alright, well yeah you

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe not. Alright in super flex you can't drop and

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you basically can't stop drop a starting quarterback in super flex,

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 1>but make sure you have Jalen Hurts on roster if

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:05.239
<v Speaker 1>you have wins on your team in super flex, But

0:51:05.280 --> 0:51:08.799
<v Speaker 1>for one quarterback leagues, the answers absolutely yes right now.

0:51:08.960 --> 0:51:10.479
<v Speaker 1>But you can drop him right now with the next

0:51:10.520 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 1>three games being san Francisco, Pittsburgh, and Baltimore. That is

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:17.560
<v Speaker 1>absolutely brutal for Wins, who virtually has no weapons left

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>outside of zach Ertz. But pick him back up, preferably

0:51:21.680 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>before the Baltimore game in week six, because after that

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it goes Giants, Dallas, Giants, Cleveland, Seattle Man. Any warm

0:51:31.080 --> 0:51:33.759
<v Speaker 1>body quarterback is going to get a starting grade of

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:37.840
<v Speaker 1>probably at least a B against those teams moving forward.

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So drop him now, let pick him back up, alright?

0:51:40.360 --> 0:51:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Is that is that? Is that a valid you get

0:51:43.920 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>You gave it, You gave a You gave an answer,

0:51:45.640 --> 0:51:48.600
<v Speaker 1>which is yes, dropping one quarterback, Leagues, no, drop, don't

0:51:48.640 --> 0:51:51.800
<v Speaker 1>drop in in super flex, Matt, Yeah, Brian hit the

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 1>nail on the head. Can't drop him in super flex.

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:56.719
<v Speaker 1>But you could drop him right now. San fran and

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh in the next couple of weeks. But then the

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:01.640
<v Speaker 1>schedule does lie and up considerably. They have the fourth

0:52:01.719 --> 0:52:06.000
<v Speaker 1>easiest remaining schedule against the pass, and you should get

0:52:06.040 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 1>some of these receivers back with Alshon, Jeffrey, Jalen Reagor,

0:52:09.320 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Goddard and uh DeShawn Jackson, that should all be

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>back on the field in the near future, we hope,

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 1>although the Eagles can't keep anybody healthy, so I don't

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:22.320
<v Speaker 1>know why. Uh there there there's good times ahead for Wentz.

0:52:22.440 --> 0:52:24.759
<v Speaker 1>It's not all bad, but we need some receivers back

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:27.080
<v Speaker 1>on the field for him. You guys hit all my

0:52:27.160 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 1>talking points here. I'll mention this. I did some Philadelphia

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>radio this week and Matt let me tell you they

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 1>they have had it. He'd see Carson that's is under

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:38.840
<v Speaker 1>siege and the fact that Nick Foles did what he

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 1>just did. The Eagles fans are I rate that the

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:46.080
<v Speaker 1>team has decided to go with Carson Wentz. Not always

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:51.040
<v Speaker 1>sunny in Philadelphia Cloud Carson Wentz. But it here's the thing, though,

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 1>he's never he never gets like a full team with him.

0:52:55.480 --> 0:52:59.560
<v Speaker 1>It's always disaster level receivers, the injuries. The offensive line

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 1>is hurt right now. They have one wide receiver who

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:06.839
<v Speaker 1>is healthy one that's it and he was in the

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>right and Dallas Goddard's on I R. I mean, it's

0:53:11.280 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just nobody could do much with what they've got

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to work with their all right, Let's get back to

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:21.759
<v Speaker 1>a couple of matchups here, beginning with Baltimore taking on Washington. Hey,

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that's me. We just talked about Lamar Jackson. He is

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:30.759
<v Speaker 1>a I agonized I agonized over this grade for a

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:34.799
<v Speaker 1>long time for the last two weeks. Of course he

0:53:34.960 --> 0:53:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is he there have been a lot of struggles. He

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:40.400
<v Speaker 1>faces a much improved Washington defense this week, featuring a

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 1>ferocious front four, but they'll be without Chase Young, who

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:47.200
<v Speaker 1>has been awesome through three weeks. Job, maybe they end

0:53:47.280 --> 0:53:50.279
<v Speaker 1>up generating a lot of pressure on Jackson and then

0:53:50.520 --> 0:53:52.440
<v Speaker 1>he has to run from the pressure, and then he

0:53:52.520 --> 0:53:54.240
<v Speaker 1>runs out of the pocket, and then he runs downfield

0:53:54.280 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and he helps you with a bunch of rushing yards,

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:58.799
<v Speaker 1>which is really what we want anyway from Lamar Jackson. Now,

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:02.000
<v Speaker 1>he could help with his arms. Washington second areas they're

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:04.800
<v Speaker 1>just okay, and he could get on track with the

0:54:04.920 --> 0:54:07.040
<v Speaker 1>receivers here. But I still think his best opportunities on

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the ground. But I can't give him an a grade

0:54:09.280 --> 0:54:11.239
<v Speaker 1>based on the version of Lamar Jackson I've seen the

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks. I'm only giving him the b let's

0:54:14.120 --> 0:54:16.760
<v Speaker 1>stick with the passing game, Marcus Brown gets a C grade.

0:54:16.800 --> 0:54:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Washington secondary is surrendered the fifth fewest points to Fantasy

0:54:20.480 --> 0:54:23.520
<v Speaker 1>points to opposing receivers so I just you know, Brown

0:54:23.600 --> 0:54:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is always the hit and miss Jackpot guy. I think

0:54:26.200 --> 0:54:28.279
<v Speaker 1>he's more likely to be a miss here, especially if

0:54:28.280 --> 0:54:29.840
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of pressure on Jackson and they

0:54:29.880 --> 0:54:33.280
<v Speaker 1>can't set up the long past to Marcus Brown. Also,

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 1>he may get covered by Ronald Darby, who has one

0:54:35.680 --> 0:54:37.759
<v Speaker 1>skill trade, which is to run fast, and that's what

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Markus Brown does. Then uh that's se Then, oh, Mark Andrews.

0:54:43.640 --> 0:54:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I would stay with the passing game. Back to back

0:54:45.719 --> 0:54:49.959
<v Speaker 1>lousy games for Andrews, including a dreadful sniping by Nick

0:54:50.120 --> 0:54:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Boyle last week that was frustrating. Fortunately, Washington has struggled

0:54:54.160 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>against tight ends with three touchdowns in three games. They

0:54:56.560 --> 0:54:59.480
<v Speaker 1>gave up a monster game to the similarly athletic Dallas

0:54:59.520 --> 0:55:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Goddard and week one. So I've got a B grade

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:04.640
<v Speaker 1>on Mark Andrews. Now, we talk about the running backs,

0:55:04.640 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and I know we just talked about a lot of

0:55:06.120 --> 0:55:10.200
<v Speaker 1>these guys. I don't think you really want to start

0:55:10.280 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 1>any of them. But Washington did give Nick Chubb and

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Honda hundred fifty four rushing yards last week. So

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:21.359
<v Speaker 1>if you gotta pick one, it's Mark Ingram I'll give

0:55:21.440 --> 0:55:24.359
<v Speaker 1>him the sea here. I'm tempted to throw a dart

0:55:24.400 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 1>at Gus Edwards just because he's been the best of

0:55:26.239 --> 0:55:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the bunch, but he just doesn't touch the ball enough.

0:55:28.239 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And J. K. Dobbins is out of consideration. Baltimore is

0:55:31.520 --> 0:55:33.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a get right game this week. It's just

0:55:33.880 --> 0:55:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's just coming. I wouldn't be surprised

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 1>if they put up forty points. Yeah, it's it's just coming.

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And and everybody's gonna be sleeping on it because they

0:55:42.520 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 1>all saw what happened on Monday night, well in the

0:55:44.520 --> 0:55:46.759
<v Speaker 1>week before. Though, this is not just one bad game.

0:55:47.040 --> 0:55:49.000
<v Speaker 1>That whole offense just looks so out of sink. Where's

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the game again? Is it in Baltimore at Washington? It's

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:54.719
<v Speaker 1>not that far off a bus. There's gonna be more

0:55:54.920 --> 0:56:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Ravens fans at that game. There's not gonna be Ye. Well,

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:03.880
<v Speaker 1>let's let's go to the Washington side of this game,

0:56:04.000 --> 0:56:06.120
<v Speaker 1>where I've got three starters for you, beginning in the

0:56:06.200 --> 0:56:08.360
<v Speaker 1>running game with Antonio Gibson, who was scored back to

0:56:08.400 --> 0:56:11.800
<v Speaker 1>back games and increased his yards per carry and yardage

0:56:11.800 --> 0:56:15.520
<v Speaker 1>total outputs in every game, but he faces a very

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:20.280
<v Speaker 1>good Baltimore run defense. Nick Chubb, David Johnson and Clyde

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Edwards A Laire all struggled against Baltimore, managing a scoreless

0:56:24.480 --> 0:56:28.160
<v Speaker 1>fifties seven rushing yards per game on average. That's it.

0:56:29.160 --> 0:56:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Gibson gets got the goal line carry last week, so

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that was good news. Wasn't not Peton Barber, it was

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Gibson, So you still got a shot here and

0:56:36.160 --> 0:56:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll give him a C grade. Also getting a C

0:56:38.440 --> 0:56:43.160
<v Speaker 1>grade Terry McLaurin mcon It's a brutal matchup. The Ravens

0:56:43.200 --> 0:56:46.120
<v Speaker 1>have allowed wide receivers to score just five times in

0:56:46.120 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 1>their last eleven games, the last one yard receiver against

0:56:50.000 --> 0:56:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore a year ago, Week four of last year. McLaren

0:56:55.160 --> 0:56:57.239
<v Speaker 1>runs from all over the field, but he's got tough

0:56:57.280 --> 0:57:01.880
<v Speaker 1>matchups at every stop. It's Jimmy Smith, Marcus Peters, Marlon Humphrey.

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:04.640
<v Speaker 1>McLaren did pop up on the injury report later in

0:57:04.680 --> 0:57:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the week with a thigh injury as well. It doesn't

0:57:06.880 --> 0:57:10.200
<v Speaker 1>help matters and that helps cement the C grade um

0:57:10.239 --> 0:57:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and then lastly, a sneaky play at tight end if

0:57:12.760 --> 0:57:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you've get if you had Johnny Smith or Eric Ebron,

0:57:15.680 --> 0:57:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Logan Thomas only one fewer target on the season than

0:57:19.080 --> 0:57:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Terry McLaurin, and he's averaging playing time. The Ravens have

0:57:23.160 --> 0:57:25.360
<v Speaker 1>been more yielding to the tight end position than any

0:57:25.360 --> 0:57:28.040
<v Speaker 1>other spot. Tight ends of top fifty yards in every

0:57:28.040 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 1>game against Baltimore, and that includes David and Joko and

0:57:31.680 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's Aikens. They're not exactly the second coming of Tony Gonzalez.

0:57:35.880 --> 0:57:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So Logan Thomas in play, I'm happy to say low too,

0:57:39.560 --> 0:57:44.400
<v Speaker 1>low too to his friends. Low to um Matt Buffalo

0:57:44.800 --> 0:57:47.560
<v Speaker 1>taking on Oakland. Let's see if we can squeeze this

0:57:47.600 --> 0:57:50.760
<v Speaker 1>into about three minutes. Yeah we can. Zack Moss was

0:57:50.800 --> 0:57:52.520
<v Speaker 1>here to take a chance on me runner. But I

0:57:52.560 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 1>actually like Devin Singletary better this week. I'm giving him

0:57:56.120 --> 0:57:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. Uh. First, he's garnering five targets per

0:57:59.600 --> 0:58:02.840
<v Speaker 1>game versus four targets on the season two Moss. Second,

0:58:03.240 --> 0:58:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he's led or tied Moss and rushing attempts every game

0:58:06.080 --> 0:58:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that they've both played this year. Third, the matchup skews

0:58:09.600 --> 0:58:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in his favor. The Raiders have allowed at least two

0:58:11.920 --> 0:58:15.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to a single running back in every game this season.

0:58:15.680 --> 0:58:19.240
<v Speaker 1>It was Christian McCaffrey, Alvin Kamara, and Rex Birkehead. What

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:22.080
<v Speaker 1>do they have in common? They all lead their respective

0:58:22.200 --> 0:58:25.240
<v Speaker 1>running back rooms in targets on that day, and I

0:58:25.280 --> 0:58:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think Singletary will do that, especially with Zach Moss still

0:58:28.200 --> 0:58:30.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of nursing that toe injury. The back with the

0:58:30.840 --> 0:58:34.560
<v Speaker 1>pass catching ability wins the day against the Raiders. Josh Allen,

0:58:34.600 --> 0:58:37.720
<v Speaker 1>he gets an A savaging thy six passing yards and

0:58:37.760 --> 0:58:40.440
<v Speaker 1>over three touchdowns per game. He's just an auto stark.

0:58:40.520 --> 0:58:43.600
<v Speaker 1>He is uh. Stephan Diggs, he gets an A too.

0:58:43.680 --> 0:58:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Since the start of last year, the Raiders are allowing

0:58:45.920 --> 0:58:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy yards to the wide receiver position,

0:58:48.760 --> 0:58:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and Digs is top to eighty five yards or scored

0:58:51.040 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in every game in his Bill's career. John Brown, who's

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:57.440
<v Speaker 1>dinged up. If he goes, I'm gonna give him a see.

0:58:57.440 --> 0:59:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Cole Beasley, He's a He's a good see start as well,

0:59:01.000 --> 0:59:03.919
<v Speaker 1>both averaging six targets per game. Brian nailed the Cole

0:59:03.960 --> 0:59:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Beasley one yard game last week. Give m a becoc

0:59:06.720 --> 0:59:11.480
<v Speaker 1>charge where you. Brown was blank last week after a

0:59:11.560 --> 0:59:15.000
<v Speaker 1>calf injury, but enjoyed seventy yards and a score in

0:59:15.000 --> 0:59:16.960
<v Speaker 1>each of the first two If healthy, it's a it's

0:59:16.960 --> 0:59:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a good game for him, and the Raiders just lost

0:59:19.320 --> 0:59:23.640
<v Speaker 1>first round cornerback Damon Arnett and their secondary sucks. Beyond that,

0:59:24.320 --> 0:59:26.680
<v Speaker 1>we're not chasing the tight end scores from last week

0:59:26.720 --> 0:59:29.280
<v Speaker 1>at all, So let's move over to the Raiders. Josh

0:59:29.360 --> 0:59:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs is a B grade. He got Caroline in Week one,

0:59:32.360 --> 0:59:35.400
<v Speaker 1>wonderful explosive output there. Then he got New Orleans and

0:59:35.440 --> 0:59:37.840
<v Speaker 1>New England among the best run defenses in the league.

0:59:38.000 --> 0:59:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Follow that up with Buffalo, who's only allowing eighty eight

0:59:40.760 --> 0:59:43.000
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game since the beginning of last year

0:59:43.160 --> 0:59:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and around half a touchdown. It's just a B for

0:59:45.800 --> 0:59:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs this week. Cars on the bench. The Raiders are

0:59:49.040 --> 0:59:52.720
<v Speaker 1>missing Henry Rugs, Brian Edwards, Ritchie Incognito, and Trent Brown

0:59:52.800 --> 0:59:55.880
<v Speaker 1>from their old line. The Bills have allowed over three

0:59:56.320 --> 0:59:58.600
<v Speaker 1>yards and two passing touchdowns to each of the last

0:59:58.600 --> 1:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>two quarterbacks they faced, but they've been very good over

1:00:02.200 --> 1:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the last year, only two twenty one per game. So

1:00:05.040 --> 1:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just leaving car on the bench. I am giving

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>starting grades to a couple of his receivers. Though Darren

1:00:09.720 --> 1:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Waller gets a B. He's going to get double digit

1:00:12.440 --> 1:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>targets in this game. He's averaging nine point three. Since

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>tight ends who have had double digit targets against the

1:00:19.400 --> 1:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Bills have averaged eight catches a hundred and thirty yards

1:00:22.480 --> 1:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in a score per game, So I'll downgrade this possible

1:00:26.800 --> 1:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>A grade to a B because Matt Milano and Tremaine

1:00:29.720 --> 1:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Edmonds are elite at covering the tight end for the Bills.

1:00:32.720 --> 1:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>They held Higbee, Herndon, and Everett to forty yards or less.

1:00:36.080 --> 1:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Renfro is the only wide receiver that gets a

1:00:38.240 --> 1:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>starting grade. He gets a sea really is he's running

1:00:42.080 --> 1:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>about six of his routes from the slot. Jamison Crowder

1:00:45.080 --> 1:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and Cooper Cup each scored and topped a hundred yards

1:00:48.160 --> 1:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>from the slot this year already, and the Dolphins slot

1:00:50.800 --> 1:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver Isaiah Ford had seven catches for seventy six yards.

1:00:54.720 --> 1:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>The only issue maybe do they throw a waller in

1:00:57.240 --> 1:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the slot and put Hunter Renfro on the out side

1:01:00.840 --> 1:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>just because he's healthy and he's upright? Yeah? Yeah, Nelson

1:01:05.240 --> 1:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Agilar is not meant to play outside either, is not

1:01:09.040 --> 1:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>meant to play. You could have just offended with that.

1:01:11.800 --> 1:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to be a day Z day. It

1:01:14.600 --> 1:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>could be another guy who's meant to run out and

1:01:17.880 --> 1:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>another guy in a revenge game? Does Joe every Buffalo

1:01:23.640 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>games a revenge game because like jettison so many guys

1:01:26.320 --> 1:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and turned through so many guys that have stayed in

1:01:28.080 --> 1:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the league. When we come back, Cleveland takes on Dallas.

1:01:31.240 --> 1:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Is this a monster game coming for Nick Chubb? If

1:01:34.320 --> 1:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we have an in a slightly slightly injured Kareem Hunt

1:01:38.120 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and or what about this passing gave Baker Mayfield good

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in two straight games? Does it continue? Stay tuned. Fantasy

1:01:44.280 --> 1:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly returns in moments. The precious new format fantasy

1:02:09.400 --> 1:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sports is Guillote Leagues fresh? It is? It is fresh,

1:02:14.760 --> 1:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>no had to had. Every week the low scoring team

1:02:17.400 --> 1:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>gets cut and all of their players go to the

1:02:20.560 --> 1:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire, where pandemonium ensues as you battle to bid

1:02:25.120 --> 1:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>on all of these great players. Certified fresh at is

1:02:31.360 --> 1:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>uh Guillotine League still forming every almost every day at

1:02:34.720 --> 1:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot com, we encourage you to check that out. Brian.

1:02:39.360 --> 1:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>By my eyes, Baker Mayfields played pretty well the last

1:02:42.240 --> 1:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. Odell Beckham sparking to a level of

1:02:44.960 --> 1:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>competence that we haven't seen in a while, And here

1:02:47.440 --> 1:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>comes Dallas minus some starting cornerbacks. What do you think

1:02:50.560 --> 1:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of this Cleveland offense? Yeah, San Baker Mayfield the easy

1:02:54.360 --> 1:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>be uh maybe even in A. The Cowboys have allowed

1:02:57.120 --> 1:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>nine passing touchdowns over the last two weeks. That's all

1:02:59.520 --> 1:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you really need to know for Mayfield. And the injury

1:03:01.680 --> 1:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is like you just mentioned, so he's in a great

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>spot as r as wide receivers at L. Beckham gonna

1:03:06.000 --> 1:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>get an A was limited by a back injury for

1:03:08.680 --> 1:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>most of the week, but practice and full on Friday.

1:03:11.120 --> 1:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys have surrendered the most wide receiver touchdowns was seven, somehow,

1:03:14.760 --> 1:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>beating the Seahawks in a category. Seahawks only quote unquote

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>only have allowed five wide receiver touchdowns. So in A

1:03:21.360 --> 1:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for Beckham uh and B for Jarvis Landry only thirteen

1:03:24.640 --> 1:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>targets for Landry to Beckham's twenty two so far. But

1:03:27.320 --> 1:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>he's been a little dinged up. Just mentioned the seven

1:03:29.720 --> 1:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns surrendered to wide receivers by Dallas. Four of those

1:03:33.200 --> 1:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>went to fellow slot with wide receivers at Russell Gage

1:03:35.680 --> 1:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and Tyler Lockett. So B for Jarvis Landry. And I'm

1:03:39.080 --> 1:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna give Austin Hooper as C as in C later

1:03:42.240 --> 1:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>if you don't produce in this game, already dropped him

1:03:45.440 --> 1:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in all my leave. Hayden Hurst came through against the

1:03:48.120 --> 1:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys four catches for seventy two yards and a touchdown.

1:03:50.600 --> 1:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Even Greg Olsen was serviceable five catches for sixty one yards.

1:03:54.080 --> 1:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>That should be Hooper's floor here. You should be able

1:03:57.000 --> 1:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to replicate the Olsen numbers. But if he doesn't, there's

1:03:59.760 --> 1:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>another tight end in Cleveland I've got my eye on.

1:04:02.040 --> 1:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about a little later in the show. And

1:04:04.520 --> 1:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of course we have to mention Nick Chubb and Kareem Hunt.

1:04:06.640 --> 1:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt a little if he with a groin injury.

1:04:09.080 --> 1:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Groin injuries on running backs, no boy, no. So we'll

1:04:11.920 --> 1:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>get to Hunt in a minute. If Nick Chubb easy

1:04:15.040 --> 1:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a Hunt sits pretty much an A A Hunt goes

1:04:18.320 --> 1:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>but a strong B. But he's he's an A either way,

1:04:20.640 --> 1:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>You're not starting in one over Kareem Hunt. He's been

1:04:22.680 --> 1:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>great even with Cream Hunt lurking all year. Uh Chub

1:04:25.760 --> 1:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>averaging five point seven yards per carry on seventeen yards

1:04:28.360 --> 1:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a game. It is a tough matchup on paper, as

1:04:30.200 --> 1:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>no loan back has topped eighty five rushing yards against

1:04:33.200 --> 1:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys for better or for worse, Dallas is funneling

1:04:36.160 --> 1:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the opposition to the past, so and so kareem hunt

1:04:39.800 --> 1:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>back to him. I'll give him a see if he plays.

1:04:42.320 --> 1:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>He has had double digit carries in every game, which

1:04:44.880 --> 1:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a choker to me, but only and

1:04:46.680 --> 1:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to receiving scores so far. But hasn't hit twenty receiving

1:04:49.920 --> 1:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>yards yet in a game. But he's stuffed to sit

1:04:52.120 --> 1:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in PPR. I'll still give him a c over to

1:04:55.000 --> 1:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas side. Just gonna give Zeke a b here.

1:04:57.520 --> 1:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>He might get the return of Tyron Smith his last town.

1:05:00.360 --> 1:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>That would help big time. So the Cowboys are the

1:05:03.800 --> 1:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>only team in the NFL without a rush of fifteen

1:05:06.560 --> 1:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>plus yards. It was the Jets against Sam Donald to

1:05:10.360 --> 1:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>care that on Thursday night. And the Browns run defense

1:05:13.680 --> 1:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>has been very good, having well the fourth viewist rushing

1:05:16.080 --> 1:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>attempts in fourth viewist rushing yards to running backs at

1:05:18.760 --> 1:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>three point three yards per carry. Zeke does have twenty

1:05:21.840 --> 1:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>six touches in every game, is the second most target

1:05:23.960 --> 1:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>running back in the league. So a safety with with

1:05:26.000 --> 1:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a a potential for sure Mark Cooper gets an a

1:05:29.480 --> 1:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>at least nine targets and eight yards in every game.

1:05:32.240 --> 1:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>He's not a coin flip like Michael Gallop or Ceedee Lamb.

1:05:35.200 --> 1:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland secondary has already given up five touchdowns to opposing

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers and and an opposing receiver has topped at

1:05:41.680 --> 1:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>least seventy yards in every game. And Cleveland's top corner,

1:05:44.400 --> 1:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Denzel Award is just having an off here, looking like

1:05:46.600 --> 1:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a shadow of his warm herself. So in a for Cooper,

1:05:48.920 --> 1:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just sitting get Michael Gallop and Ceedee Lamb. Is ce.

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned the plus numbers for opposing wide receivers against

1:05:54.120 --> 1:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the Browns, who are also yielding the fifth most targets

1:05:56.720 --> 1:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers and the most targets to wide receivers

1:05:59.840 --> 1:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in red zone. But both of these guys are just

1:06:02.400 --> 1:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in danger of getting left out in the cold. But

1:06:04.240 --> 1:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to start them both in a suspected shootout.

1:06:07.000 --> 1:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I got some Eric Decker theory on Ceedee Lamb this week.

1:06:10.480 --> 1:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>That theory we don't have enough time to get all right, um,

1:06:15.520 --> 1:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and who else is stortable? Dalton Schultz gonna give him

1:06:18.000 --> 1:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a sea has seen sevent snapshare since Blake Jarwin went down.

1:06:22.360 --> 1:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland has been getting lit up by tight ends, allowing

1:06:25.480 --> 1:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>seven catches, sixty yards and a touchdown per game, So

1:06:28.360 --> 1:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a safe c for Adulton Schultz. And last, but not

1:06:32.000 --> 1:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>least unless you're Jerry Jones, of course, is Dak Prescott. Yeah. Hey,

1:06:37.680 --> 1:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the Browns have surrendered multiple passing touchdowns in every game

1:06:40.000 --> 1:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and st Based on everything else you said, there was

1:06:42.040 --> 1:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>no doubt that Dak Prescott was going to be an

1:06:44.400 --> 1:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a Why does Jerry Jones hate him so much that

1:06:46.320 --> 1:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand? Well, he's senile and I can go

1:06:49.440 --> 1:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>on by that. Well, well, I think it might just

1:06:51.840 --> 1:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>come down to money. That might be part of it.

1:06:53.800 --> 1:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>New England takes on Kansas City. There's not many starters

1:06:56.520 --> 1:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>on the New England side here. Let's start with Cam Newton.

1:06:58.840 --> 1:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>For three years, Newton is per even to be an

1:07:00.560 --> 1:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent passer at best, and even now under Bill Belichick,

1:07:05.120 --> 1:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>he's thrown just two touchdowns in the three games. And

1:07:08.360 --> 1:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>this is toughest matchup by a mile so far this year.

1:07:10.800 --> 1:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City just finished destroying Lamar Jackson, holding him to

1:07:14.560 --> 1:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>nineties seven passing yards and one score. Chiefs have given

1:07:18.640 --> 1:07:21.959
<v Speaker 1>up solid rushing performances to every quarterback they've faced, though,

1:07:22.000 --> 1:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not ruling out a decent rushing game from

1:07:24.720 --> 1:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton, but I don't think you're getting anything from

1:07:26.560 --> 1:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>his arm, and rushing is very scattered shot, so I'm

1:07:29.000 --> 1:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>just giving Cam a C grade. His receiver. The only

1:07:32.360 --> 1:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>receiver I'm starting is Julian Edelman. Even with teams playing

1:07:35.320 --> 1:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>catchup against Kansas City, they've still allowed the fewest Fantasy

1:07:38.480 --> 1:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>points to opposing receivers, so I think it's hard to

1:07:41.240 --> 1:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>rely on Edelman in this matchup. He'll see a lot

1:07:43.680 --> 1:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of Tyrone Matthew and he's held opponents scoreless while not

1:07:46.880 --> 1:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>allowing any receiver more than forty one yards in any game.

1:07:49.800 --> 1:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Those are brutal matchup for Julian Edelman and just the

1:07:53.640 --> 1:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>C grade. Probably I could put him on the bench,

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's tempting, but I've I've settled on a C

1:07:58.200 --> 1:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>grade for Julian Edelman. Nikkil Harry needs primo matchups to

1:08:01.880 --> 1:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>be startable, and this is not even close to one

1:08:03.600 --> 1:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of them, so he's on the bench. Let's go to

1:08:05.080 --> 1:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the running game. James White's the only running back I'm

1:08:07.880 --> 1:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>recommending that you play, and he only gets a C grade.

1:08:10.560 --> 1:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Runners have fared well against the Chiefs through the air,

1:08:13.840 --> 1:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that's White's game. Not have scored, but they're giving up

1:08:17.200 --> 1:08:20.479
<v Speaker 1>sixty running back receiving yards per game. The Chiefs arey,

1:08:20.520 --> 1:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll take sixty six for sixty for James White. That's

1:08:23.800 --> 1:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. Worried that he splits it with Rex

1:08:26.200 --> 1:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Burkhead a little, Well, he wasn't before, so he got

1:08:29.200 --> 1:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a whole week of practice in so I'm hoping not.

1:08:31.240 --> 1:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned Rex Burkhead, Sony Michelle, but off I R.

1:08:36.040 --> 1:08:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Here's Damian Williams, and back comes James Harris. Damian Harris,

1:08:39.640 --> 1:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you, And here comes James White. And so now

1:08:42.200 --> 1:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that whole backfields way, way, way too muddy, except I

1:08:44.800 --> 1:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>think James James White, who just goes back to being

1:08:47.400 --> 1:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>when it seems to be the only one with a

1:08:48.920 --> 1:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>defined role. Agreed, Let's go to the Kansas City side,

1:08:52.040 --> 1:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>where every week I kind of say the same thing.

1:08:54.360 --> 1:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes, Travis Kelsey, Tyreek Hill, all a grades. Two

1:08:58.479 --> 1:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, the similarly skilled Russell Wilson through five touchdowns

1:09:01.880 --> 1:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>against the Patriots. You know, for Kelsey it's a tough

1:09:04.320 --> 1:09:06.639
<v Speaker 1>matchup and no opposing tight end is top thirty yards

1:09:06.640 --> 1:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>against the Patriots. But you start him anyway, because he's

1:09:09.400 --> 1:09:13.479
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey. As for Hill, New England's secondary has been

1:09:14.040 --> 1:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>oddly beatable this year. They're allowing the seventh most fantasy

1:09:17.479 --> 1:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>points to opposing receivers, including five scores to wide receivers. Already,

1:09:22.040 --> 1:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Hill should see a healthy dose of Stephan Gilmore and

1:09:25.560 --> 1:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Jones and coverage, and both have uncharacteristically given up

1:09:29.080 --> 1:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>scores in their coverage. So we're gonna keep the A

1:09:30.920 --> 1:09:33.759
<v Speaker 1>grade on Tyreek Hill. The only other guy I'm starting

1:09:33.880 --> 1:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is Clyde Edwards, a layer with a B grade. Patriots

1:09:37.280 --> 1:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>rebuilt front seven are allowing a healthy four and a

1:09:39.400 --> 1:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>half yards per carry, far easier to run than pass

1:09:42.960 --> 1:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>on New England, So I think you're getting a lot

1:09:44.600 --> 1:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of volume from Clyde Edwards, a layer the catches. He's

1:09:48.400 --> 1:09:50.559
<v Speaker 1>just not doing anything near the stripe, and I'm I'm

1:09:50.600 --> 1:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>really worried that at the end of the year we're

1:09:53.240 --> 1:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna look back at Clyde Edwards, a layer and say, well,

1:09:55.880 --> 1:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that was an interesting four touchdown season could be. I mean,

1:10:00.600 --> 1:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he's doing nothing inside inside the ten, inside the five,

1:10:04.200 --> 1:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and his offensive line has given him nothing to work

1:10:06.360 --> 1:10:09.759
<v Speaker 1>with either. He's not going to be the new Ryan Matthews. Izzy, Well,

1:10:09.800 --> 1:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>he's already better than Ryan Matthews, I think. But he's

1:10:13.280 --> 1:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a good receiver and the Patriots, although the Patriots have

1:10:16.040 --> 1:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>been good at stopping backs through the air, but he'll

1:10:18.680 --> 1:10:20.639
<v Speaker 1>still pick up a few yards that way. Let's talk

1:10:20.680 --> 1:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>about Sammy Watkins for a minute. He's protecting an injury

1:10:23.720 --> 1:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, he's basically catching the ball and

1:10:25.800 --> 1:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>falling down. I can't start him based on that. I

1:10:28.720 --> 1:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>know he had a decent game last week and had

1:10:30.720 --> 1:10:33.519
<v Speaker 1>a good week one. Sammy s Watkins, Yeah, I like it,

1:10:33.600 --> 1:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Squatkins. We're not starting him. Final matchup of this

1:10:36.800 --> 1:10:39.479
<v Speaker 1>segment is Atlanta taking on Green Bay on the Monday nighter,

1:10:39.600 --> 1:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and this looks like a massive shootout, but we've got

1:10:43.000 --> 1:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>big question marks at both wide receiver positions for the

1:10:45.640 --> 1:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>star player. It is super thorny from a wide receiver perspective,

1:10:49.600 --> 1:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and good matchups for any wide receivers who decide that

1:10:52.720 --> 1:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they are going to play in this game. UM let's

1:10:55.360 --> 1:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>start with Calvin Ridley, who did pop up on the

1:10:58.439 --> 1:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>injury report on Friday, limited in practice with an ankle injury.

1:11:02.160 --> 1:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>But I don't believe that one. I think that that

1:11:04.960 --> 1:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>one is most likely to go, still giving him an

1:11:07.360 --> 1:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>A grade. He's wide receiver one in Atlanta now, averaging

1:11:10.760 --> 1:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>twelve targets hundred and sixteen yards per game. He scored

1:11:14.479 --> 1:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>four times this year already. He's an A grade now.

1:11:17.640 --> 1:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones and Russell Gauge, I'm gonna leave them on

1:11:21.360 --> 1:11:26.479
<v Speaker 1>the bench. But if they do play, there a C grade. Um,

1:11:26.520 --> 1:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I just can't trust if either, We'll plan it's Monday night.

1:11:28.920 --> 1:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Jones is still dealing with a hamstring, which caused him

1:11:31.040 --> 1:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to sit last week. Gauges in the concussion protocol. If

1:11:34.920 --> 1:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>he clears it, though he's you know, it's not like

1:11:37.240 --> 1:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>he's got Probably he's probably a little bit more likely

1:11:41.360 --> 1:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to play than Jones. Uh. Neither participated Thursday. Uh. Since

1:11:45.920 --> 1:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a Monday night game. If they're in your lineup,

1:11:48.040 --> 1:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you need to have a backup ready and I I

1:11:50.479 --> 1:11:53.719
<v Speaker 1>recommended Marquez Veldez Scantling, you can pick him up. If

1:11:53.800 --> 1:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>not Brandon Powell or oh lim Oh my god, I

1:11:59.439 --> 1:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>can't even say his name, old m me day Zackius. Yeah,

1:12:05.080 --> 1:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>he had four receptions for the Falcons last week. We're

1:12:09.960 --> 1:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna call him o z uh and Brandon. Is he

1:12:13.240 --> 1:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the Wizard of Oz? Yeah, he might be. Brandon Powell

1:12:16.280 --> 1:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>had three receptions last week, so if either Jones or

1:12:19.320 --> 1:12:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Gauge play, they're in. But those are options, I guess

1:12:22.760 --> 1:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>if they don't, I'm giving Hayden Hurst a be lack

1:12:26.439 --> 1:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of wide receiver depth probably means an increase in targets

1:12:29.240 --> 1:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>for Hurst, although it didn't work out last week when

1:12:31.400 --> 1:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Hurst only had three targets and had the half of

1:12:34.120 --> 1:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans game one catch, one yard, and one touchdown.

1:12:38.520 --> 1:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather start Hurst and a flex over Powell or

1:12:41.320 --> 1:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Zackius if you need an Adams, Jones or Gauge replacement.

1:12:45.000 --> 1:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a soft be though. It's like a like a

1:12:47.200 --> 1:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>bay Uh. Let's talk about Matt Ryan A grade averaging

1:12:51.560 --> 1:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>over three yards per game, and the Packers have yet

1:12:54.040 --> 1:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to allow a three d yard pastor this season. But

1:12:56.240 --> 1:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I've given up multiple scores to each quarterback they've faced,

1:12:59.280 --> 1:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and the running game him, Todd Gurley and Brian Hill.

1:13:02.120 --> 1:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving both a C grade too. Yeah. I'm glad

1:13:05.600 --> 1:13:08.479
<v Speaker 1>you're mentioning Brian Hill because I I be at least

1:13:08.520 --> 1:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>in at least last week, I thought he looked like

1:13:10.840 --> 1:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the better back. Well, let's talk about last week fifteen

1:13:13.280 --> 1:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>touches for Girley eighty two yards in a score. Hill

1:13:16.760 --> 1:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>ten touches last week eighty yards in a score. Uh,

1:13:20.320 --> 1:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that's better yards per touch for Hill there, But it

1:13:23.960 --> 1:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like a timeshare now. And the Packers have given

1:13:26.080 --> 1:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>up big numbers to Dalvin Cook and Alvin Camaro, Wall,

1:13:29.280 --> 1:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Latavius Murray and carry On Johnson kind of back up

1:13:32.040 --> 1:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>halftime backs. Each had respectable days and change of pace

1:13:35.520 --> 1:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>rolls over on the Packers side. Uh. Aaron Jones is

1:13:40.000 --> 1:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>an easy a per game averages with Davante Adams fifteen carries,

1:13:45.600 --> 1:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>three point six targets one touchdown per game averages without

1:13:49.400 --> 1:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Davontae Adams fourteen point eight carries, six and a half

1:13:52.920 --> 1:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>targets one point eight touchdowns. He's actually better without Davante Adams.

1:13:58.120 --> 1:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So maybe if you're an Aaron Jones owner, you're hoping

1:14:00.360 --> 1:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Davanta Adams. Maybe. Um, that's a that's stat's courtesy of

1:14:04.800 --> 1:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Mr Scott Fish. By the way, Aaron Rodgers, I'm giving

1:14:08.240 --> 1:14:10.479
<v Speaker 1>an A grade two and Brian says, I can't give

1:14:10.479 --> 1:14:13.919
<v Speaker 1>fantasy Fonzis anymore, So I'm going to make Aaron Rodgers,

1:14:15.000 --> 1:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>who has two a's in his name, the Fantasy Art

1:14:17.320 --> 1:14:21.479
<v Speaker 1>Vark because there's it's a double A grade brand to

1:14:21.479 --> 1:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>find out what sound is like, so we can can

1:14:24.880 --> 1:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>add that in. We've got the we have, we got

1:14:28.320 --> 1:14:33.519
<v Speaker 1>the dock, we've got the vulture, we've got the peacock. Well,

1:14:33.520 --> 1:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>we got a Fantasy art Vark. Now we have probably

1:14:36.600 --> 1:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>bell Um. That's the single bell although the Falcons have

1:14:40.360 --> 1:14:43.599
<v Speaker 1>allowed three passing yards in every game this year, so

1:14:44.000 --> 1:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Rogers is going to be great. Davante Adams, he's still

1:14:47.160 --> 1:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>got the hamstring injury. They're talking positively about him, but

1:14:51.000 --> 1:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>why would they bring him back on a Monday night,

1:14:54.000 --> 1:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>right before a bye week against Atlanta who they should

1:14:57.080 --> 1:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>beat at home. It doesn't make any sense to bring

1:14:59.360 --> 1:15:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Davanta adam Is back unless he's I think you're kind

1:15:02.439 --> 1:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of right, and he said he he only wants to

1:15:04.360 --> 1:15:06.439
<v Speaker 1>come back in a percent. But we've seen guys do

1:15:06.520 --> 1:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this before. Yeah, to come back before the bye week

1:15:09.400 --> 1:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and surprise us is strange. I can't put him in

1:15:12.120 --> 1:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a lineup, but if he does go, he's an A grade.

1:15:14.680 --> 1:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course. I mentioned Allan Lazard core surgery out in

1:15:17.720 --> 1:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely MVS was might take a chance on me wide

1:15:21.160 --> 1:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver with a B grade worth noting that Malik Taylor

1:15:24.520 --> 1:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and Darius Shepherd are the two other wide receivers on

1:15:28.000 --> 1:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the depth chart. Shepherd had one target last week, so

1:15:31.000 --> 1:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>he's probably the next man up, and then Jay Sternberger,

1:15:34.840 --> 1:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Robert Tanyan, Mercedes Lewis. Roll the dice if you want to.

1:15:38.080 --> 1:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>If there's a lot of injuries here, because they might. Yeah,

1:15:41.160 --> 1:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to. Robert Tonyan with has been more

1:15:44.360 --> 1:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of a scoring threat of if it was one guy,

1:15:48.520 --> 1:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's an A grade yeah, right. If you could roll

1:15:50.280 --> 1:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>them into one guy and one other than that, it's

1:15:52.320 --> 1:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a super tight end s great for any of them,

1:15:54.840 --> 1:15:56.479
<v Speaker 1>if you want to, roll the dice, if you want to.

1:15:56.560 --> 1:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>When we come back premature speculation, this is the bit

1:16:00.000 --> 1:16:02.639
<v Speaker 1>are we give you three players to pick up this

1:16:02.680 --> 1:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>week that we we will be hot waiver wire pickups

1:16:05.439 --> 1:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>next week and will already be on your team Because

1:16:08.400 --> 1:16:34.799
<v Speaker 1>you listened to Fantasy Football Weekly. Final segment of Fantasy

1:16:34.920 --> 1:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly, Thank you for listening. If you're listening over

1:16:39.400 --> 1:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the air and you missed part of the show, it's

1:16:43.080 --> 1:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>all podcast able Fantasy Football Weekly on whatever podcasting platform

1:16:47.080 --> 1:16:49.839
<v Speaker 1>is your favorite, but rate and review it on whichever

1:16:49.880 --> 1:16:52.519
<v Speaker 1>one you listen to subscribe, rate and review please we

1:16:52.560 --> 1:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that very much. This is a segment we call

1:16:55.720 --> 1:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>premature speculation. We offer a player each of us that

1:16:59.520 --> 1:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>we think will be a potential waiver wire pick up

1:17:02.760 --> 1:17:06.439
<v Speaker 1>next week that you're going to already have on roster. Brian,

1:17:06.640 --> 1:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>who do you got Harrison Bryant. Cleveland's tight end. Austin

1:17:10.920 --> 1:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Hooper has been a pooper of the bed so far

1:17:13.880 --> 1:17:16.360
<v Speaker 1>this season. He's clearly a product of the Atlanta offense.

1:17:16.360 --> 1:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>He did not make that offense go. That offense made

1:17:19.800 --> 1:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>him go, and now he's in Cleveland sucking it up.

1:17:22.040 --> 1:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hooper, that is you know who doesn't suck. Harrison Bryant,

1:17:25.240 --> 1:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>six five pounds, fourth round pick by the Browns out

1:17:28.960 --> 1:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of Florida Atlantic this year unanimous All American Phil Mackie

1:17:33.160 --> 1:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Award winner that goes to the most outstanding tight end

1:17:36.080 --> 1:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in college has had a ton of opportunity yet Harrison Bryant.

1:17:39.920 --> 1:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But he did score a touchdown last week and if

1:17:42.120 --> 1:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>he soaks up some more targets from Auston Hooper, and

1:17:44.479 --> 1:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>he will because he's a better football player. He's gonna

1:17:47.200 --> 1:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>have do pretty well for the man of the season

1:17:48.720 --> 1:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>because Cleveland has the ninth easiest remaining strength of schedule

1:17:52.160 --> 1:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>for tight ends and the landscape is getting kinda kind

1:17:55.840 --> 1:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of ready. So keep your Ryan Harrison. Bryan Austin Hooper

1:17:58.400 --> 1:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>signed a forty four million dollar deal with twenty three

1:18:02.240 --> 1:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>million guaranteed. It's gonna be it's gonna be hard to

1:18:05.400 --> 1:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>get him out of the starting line up in four weeks.

1:18:07.439 --> 1:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got a great name. By the way,

1:18:10.360 --> 1:18:12.559
<v Speaker 1>if you drop the tee off of it, Yeah, Brian,

1:18:13.080 --> 1:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>he's Brian Harrison. Is he one of the Harrison Brian,

1:18:17.439 --> 1:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned Brian Harrison. You're premature speculation player. Matt Christian

1:18:22.080 --> 1:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Kirk is suddenly down to forty eight percent owned in

1:18:25.200 --> 1:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>ESPN leagues. He is still limited and practice of that

1:18:27.760 --> 1:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>groin injury, and I kind of hope he sits this

1:18:30.240 --> 1:18:33.599
<v Speaker 1>week because he can't hurt it anymore if he's sitting,

1:18:34.040 --> 1:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and why because he gets the Jets terrible defense next week,

1:18:37.800 --> 1:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Dallas in week six, Seattle in weeks seven, that's delicious

1:18:43.080 --> 1:18:45.519
<v Speaker 1>buy in week eight, and then Miami in week nine.

1:18:46.240 --> 1:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>He's got some really nice matchups coming up. That's four

1:18:49.400 --> 1:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>starting grades in the next five weeks for Christian Kirk

1:18:52.560 --> 1:18:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and if he is owned, if you're in one of

1:18:54.120 --> 1:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the forty eight percent where he is owned, and this

1:18:56.400 --> 1:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is your bylow opportunity on a gimpy Christian Kirk with

1:19:00.160 --> 1:19:05.519
<v Speaker 1>schedule coming the Kirk store called, They're there, Kirk's for sale,

1:19:06.439 --> 1:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Come on about All right, let's go to my premature speculation.

1:19:14.960 --> 1:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Guy is Pittsburgh running back Anthony McFarland. He's the fourth

1:19:19.880 --> 1:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>round rookie from Maryland. He's um. He's medium built, but

1:19:23.360 --> 1:19:25.759
<v Speaker 1>he's a willing inside runner and he's got some bursts

1:19:25.760 --> 1:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and big play potential to him. I don't know why,

1:19:28.280 --> 1:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>but Benny smells in the doghouse, and we all saw

1:19:30.120 --> 1:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>him look great in week one. But for whatever reason,

1:19:32.880 --> 1:19:35.519
<v Speaker 1>Benny smith Snell is apparently not going to be a

1:19:35.520 --> 1:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>factor in this in this offense. Maybe it's the Benny smell.

1:19:38.360 --> 1:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>I think you pumped him up too much. I don't

1:19:40.479 --> 1:19:45.519
<v Speaker 1>know why. McFarland um, after getting zero snaps in week one,

1:19:46.080 --> 1:19:49.479
<v Speaker 1>zero snaps in week two, got seven touches last week

1:19:49.800 --> 1:19:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and turned seven touches into fifty yards and that was

1:19:53.439 --> 1:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>more than Benny Snell got as well, might add both

1:19:56.280 --> 1:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in touches and yards. James Conner is the league's biggest

1:19:59.320 --> 1:20:02.759
<v Speaker 1>injury risk at any position, and the Steelers are handling

1:20:02.800 --> 1:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>him exactly the wrong way. He can't be a workhorse,

1:20:06.680 --> 1:20:09.599
<v Speaker 1>and here they are using him like a workhorse. There

1:20:09.680 --> 1:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is no bigger ticking time bomb than James Connor. So

1:20:14.280 --> 1:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>let's pivot to his backup. And it may not be

1:20:16.840 --> 1:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Benny Snell. It could be Anthony McFarland, could be, could be,

1:20:22.479 --> 1:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know yet. But last week it was

1:20:25.880 --> 1:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>insert Jaylen Samuel's. We have two matchups left, beginning with

1:20:30.000 --> 1:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia taking on San Francisco. It's last man standing for

1:20:33.160 --> 1:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. There's just there's nobody left other than with

1:20:38.280 --> 1:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders, one of the two reliable players left on Philly.

1:20:41.360 --> 1:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Sanders gets it be um. Despite key injuries all over

1:20:44.680 --> 1:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the defensive side for San Francisco, there's They're still top

1:20:47.479 --> 1:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>five in terms of fewest rushing attempts, rushing yards, receptions,

1:20:51.200 --> 1:20:54.719
<v Speaker 1>and receiving yards allowed to opposing running backs to be fair.

1:20:54.960 --> 1:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, they've also faced Levy on not a

1:20:58.320 --> 1:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Bell Cow and the Giants and see Quon, so not

1:21:01.240 --> 1:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>much competition for San Francisco. Sanders will be the best

1:21:04.080 --> 1:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>back they faced. He's averaging twenty seven touches per game

1:21:06.960 --> 1:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in a meaty eight targets per game, so he's an

1:21:09.320 --> 1:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>easy volume based b in this one. Zach ERT's gonna

1:21:12.240 --> 1:21:14.439
<v Speaker 1>give him an A even though it's not a great matchup.

1:21:14.479 --> 1:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Saw ten targets last week and that's probably a safe

1:21:17.320 --> 1:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>floor moving forward. With all the injuries for Philly on offense,

1:21:20.400 --> 1:21:22.559
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners are banged up on defense, but they

1:21:22.560 --> 1:21:24.519
<v Speaker 1>have been stout against tight ends as well, having only

1:21:24.520 --> 1:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>surrendered seven total catches to the position. So uh. But

1:21:28.080 --> 1:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in the tight end landscape this week, especially with no

1:21:30.320 --> 1:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>John new Smith right, you have to just bump up

1:21:32.400 --> 1:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>earths into uh to the wide receivers. No a's going

1:21:36.920 --> 1:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>out to these guys. To Sean Jackson ruled out, so

1:21:40.040 --> 1:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>get him out of your lineup. The song remains the

1:21:42.000 --> 1:21:44.599
<v Speaker 1>same with him with a hamstring injury. Um. The forty

1:21:44.680 --> 1:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Niners have actually allowed the fourth most catches to wide receivers,

1:21:48.080 --> 1:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's behind the Broncos and Jets in two and

1:21:50.240 --> 1:21:53.519
<v Speaker 1>three who played four games. And of course Seattle's number

1:21:53.560 --> 1:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>one with like a million, but anyway, a good matchup

1:21:56.040 --> 1:21:59.360
<v Speaker 1>for wide receivers and Richard Sherman an Emmanuel Moseley. Starting

1:21:59.439 --> 1:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks are not going to play in this game, so

1:22:01.880 --> 1:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg Ward gets a c I just worry they're gonna

1:22:04.320 --> 1:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>play to take greg Ward away, because who else do

1:22:07.360 --> 1:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you throw? I cannot name another Philadelphia wide receiver right now.

1:22:11.920 --> 1:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who they are, so I'm just saying

1:22:14.200 --> 1:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>greg Ward it's not and he runs from the slot,

1:22:17.520 --> 1:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and fellow slot receivers Braxton Barrios and Golden Tad had

1:22:20.320 --> 1:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>good games against the forty niners when they're a little

1:22:22.200 --> 1:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>bit healthier. So I'm giving Greg Ward the sea here,

1:22:24.920 --> 1:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'll give Carson Wentz to see. It's really only

1:22:27.800 --> 1:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in super flex, but even in one quarterback leagues. It's

1:22:30.120 --> 1:22:33.120
<v Speaker 1>only because the two corners I mentioned are out. Nick

1:22:33.200 --> 1:22:36.599
<v Speaker 1>Bosa is out, d Ford fellow defensive end is out,

1:22:37.400 --> 1:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>uh Solomon Thomas is out. Strong side linebacker Dre green

1:22:42.000 --> 1:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Law is out. Everyone is out for San Fran and

1:22:45.000 --> 1:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Wentz can still run. He had sixty plus yards in

1:22:47.160 --> 1:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a rushing touchdown last week. Daniel Jones had forty nine

1:22:50.160 --> 1:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards against San Fran last week, so Wentz sort

1:22:53.040 --> 1:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of has a safe floor, but not really. That's a

1:22:55.280 --> 1:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>nice contrarian angle on Wentz right there. Okay, I like that.

1:22:58.600 --> 1:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Sadly can't play this game in the main slate on

1:23:00.960 --> 1:23:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the other side because it's the late game is a

1:23:02.400 --> 1:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night game. But anyway, over the San France side,

1:23:05.040 --> 1:23:06.759
<v Speaker 1>they love. They hate when you call it san Franz

1:23:06.760 --> 1:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and san France, so I love saying san France. George

1:23:09.040 --> 1:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Kittle gets in a he's ready to quote unquote let

1:23:11.760 --> 1:23:14.479
<v Speaker 1>it loose against the Eagles after practicing in full on

1:23:14.520 --> 1:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday and Thursday. The Eagles conceded a good game to

1:23:17.760 --> 1:23:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Logan Thomas, who had four catches or thirty seven yards

1:23:20.360 --> 1:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown, and then a monster game to Tyler Higibe.

1:23:23.200 --> 1:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>You at five catches, fifty four yards and the touchdown

1:23:26.040 --> 1:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>hat trick. So we haven't given out a FUNSI yet.

1:23:28.800 --> 1:23:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving it to Kittle on his return. A grade

1:23:31.800 --> 1:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>for George Kittle. Devo Samuel was not supposed to play,

1:23:35.080 --> 1:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>but he will play in this game, but will be

1:23:37.160 --> 1:23:39.880
<v Speaker 1>eased back into action. Keep him on your bench, but

1:23:39.960 --> 1:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>check your waiver wire for Debo if he's available. Scoop

1:23:42.920 --> 1:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>him up right now. I'm gonna leave my receiver grades

1:23:45.720 --> 1:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>as they were before the debo news. That's a B

1:23:48.160 --> 1:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>for Brandon Aiyuk and a C for Kendrick Borne. The

1:23:51.160 --> 1:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Eagles secondary is allowing over one eighty yards per game

1:23:54.120 --> 1:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to opposing wide receivers. That includes two hundred and thirty

1:23:57.240 --> 1:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>yards the Bengals whiteouts last week, so Ayuk and Born

1:24:00.360 --> 1:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>are both startable, as is Nick Mullins. He gets to

1:24:03.120 --> 1:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>see this is really only because George Kittle is coming back.

1:24:06.120 --> 1:24:08.719
<v Speaker 1>But the Eagles are allowing the seventh highest opponent passer

1:24:08.760 --> 1:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>rating and have surrendered five touchdown tosses over the last

1:24:12.400 --> 1:24:15.519
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. So uh C grade for Mullins. And lastly

1:24:15.560 --> 1:24:18.439
<v Speaker 1>to the running backs, Jerick McKinnon will play with the

1:24:18.520 --> 1:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>rib injury, he should serve as a lead back and

1:24:20.760 --> 1:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>give him a B here. Philly shut down Washington backs

1:24:24.320 --> 1:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>understandably so and limited Joe Mixon last week, but the

1:24:27.680 --> 1:24:31.599
<v Speaker 1>Rams backs gashed Philly in Week two, primarily Darryl Henderson

1:24:31.720 --> 1:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>had a hundred twenty one combo yards and a score.

1:24:33.960 --> 1:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Jet can get to that, and do not forget about

1:24:36.479 --> 1:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Wilson, who also gets to see he will be

1:24:39.200 --> 1:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the goal lineback in this one, and the Eagles have

1:24:41.280 --> 1:24:44.559
<v Speaker 1>yielded the second most touches to running backs in goal

1:24:44.840 --> 1:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to go snari Oh, all right, I'm done for the week.

1:24:49.000 --> 1:24:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Our final matchup is the Giants taking on the Rams.

1:24:53.000 --> 1:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>There's only one starter for the Giants and it's tight

1:24:55.280 --> 1:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>end Evan Ingram. I don't even love it. He's been quiet,

1:24:58.000 --> 1:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but maybe a good game here. Opposing height ends against

1:25:01.040 --> 1:25:03.479
<v Speaker 1>the Rams have been targeted eight times. I was scoring

1:25:03.520 --> 1:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown per game, so maybe you can get at

1:25:05.479 --> 1:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>something done. You're really in a pinch. You could try

1:25:07.960 --> 1:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Golden Tate, who runs from the slot, so he gets

1:25:10.120 --> 1:25:12.799
<v Speaker 1>to avoid Jalen Ramsey and draw a much easier matchup

1:25:12.800 --> 1:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>with Troy Hill. Hill is allowed twenty one of twenty

1:25:16.000 --> 1:25:18.439
<v Speaker 1>two passes in his coverage to to be completed, So

1:25:18.479 --> 1:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in fact I'm gonna give Golden Tate the C grade here.

1:25:21.280 --> 1:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Everybody else is on the bench. Daniel Jones has zero

1:25:24.400 --> 1:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes the past two weeks and another's a tough

1:25:27.240 --> 1:25:29.360
<v Speaker 1>match up. Darius Slayton's on the bench because he draws

1:25:29.439 --> 1:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Ramsey who will shadow him. Um and with Sterling

1:25:33.080 --> 1:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Shepherd out I think that makes it a lock that

1:25:35.000 --> 1:25:37.599
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Ramsey shadows Darius Slayton. So he's out and all

1:25:37.640 --> 1:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the runners are out. Dan Lewis, Devanta Freeman, Wayne Gollman.

1:25:41.360 --> 1:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Lots of reasons not to play any of them. They

1:25:43.760 --> 1:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>split snaps evenly last week. The Giants run the ball

1:25:47.360 --> 1:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>less than any team in the NFL. The Giants runners

1:25:50.400 --> 1:25:53.519
<v Speaker 1>as a group are averaging one point eight yards per carry.

1:25:53.560 --> 1:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Here we just say, don't start Giants until further notice,

1:25:56.439 --> 1:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and well we'll like, you know, yeah, well we'll we'll

1:25:59.040 --> 1:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>put to mention Giants runners anymore. Could you get one

1:26:02.280 --> 1:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>point eight yards if you fell forward? It's taller than that,

1:26:05.960 --> 1:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>so yes, yes you could. All right, we can't they're

1:26:08.479 --> 1:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>not the Giants runners. No, they can't. They're short. Let's

1:26:10.720 --> 1:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>go to the l A side. Lots of starters here,

1:26:12.800 --> 1:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a whole different story, beginning in the passing game with

1:26:15.000 --> 1:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a B grade on Jared Goff coming off one of

1:26:17.000 --> 1:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>his best games ever, and he has my highest grade

1:26:19.880 --> 1:26:22.599
<v Speaker 1>for him this year. UH. A couple of backups, Nick

1:26:22.640 --> 1:26:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Mullins and Sad trombone Sky both posted solid fantasy games

1:26:26.520 --> 1:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants and his receivers and Tyler Higbee have

1:26:29.800 --> 1:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>all got plus matchups. I worry most honestly, just that

1:26:32.640 --> 1:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the Rams running backs are gonna be so good that

1:26:34.680 --> 1:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff doesn't end up in a big game. So

1:26:36.560 --> 1:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>just the B grade on him. Robert Woods and Cooper

1:26:39.080 --> 1:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Cup each get a's. For Woods, he's tallied one hundred

1:26:42.400 --> 1:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>total yards a touchdowner both in all three games. He's

1:26:45.000 --> 1:26:47.719
<v Speaker 1>going to go up against James Bradbury, who has already

1:26:47.720 --> 1:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>been victimized for two scores in three games. Cooper Cup

1:26:50.680 --> 1:26:53.400
<v Speaker 1>works from the slot. He now leads the team in targets,

1:26:53.439 --> 1:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>receptions and red zone targets. He's going to see the

1:26:57.200 --> 1:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>horrible slot cornerback Darnay Holmes, who ranks is Pro Football

1:27:01.080 --> 1:27:06.559
<v Speaker 1>Focus is cornerback one hundred five out of like seven

1:27:07.840 --> 1:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>correct um and then Tyler Higgbye inexplicably silent last week,

1:27:13.320 --> 1:27:15.599
<v Speaker 1>but a bounce back could becoming. The Giants are allowing

1:27:15.640 --> 1:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>twelve yards per catch two tight ends, although not a

1:27:18.800 --> 1:27:20.599
<v Speaker 1>ton of volume. They don't have to throw the tight

1:27:20.720 --> 1:27:22.479
<v Speaker 1>ends that much. I don't think there's a very good

1:27:22.479 --> 1:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>tight end defense, although they haven't shown it to this point.

1:27:25.080 --> 1:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I worry there's just not enough meat left

1:27:27.120 --> 1:27:29.120
<v Speaker 1>on the bone for Higby here with all these other

1:27:29.160 --> 1:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>mouths defeat um. And then let's go to the running game.

1:27:31.960 --> 1:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Darryl Henderson sitting on potentially a great game, and he

1:27:34.360 --> 1:27:36.479
<v Speaker 1>is an A grade. He just shredded too far better

1:27:36.560 --> 1:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>run defenses Buffalo and Philly. The predictably bad Giants run

1:27:40.240 --> 1:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>defense shredded in all three games as well, giving big

1:27:43.120 --> 1:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>performances to Benny Snell, David Montgomery, and both of the

1:27:46.320 --> 1:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Niners running backs last week. And so Darryl Henderson, who

1:27:49.720 --> 1:27:52.599
<v Speaker 1>has been great, should continue to be very good here

1:27:52.600 --> 1:27:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get the bulk of the work. But that

1:27:54.160 --> 1:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you can't start Malcolm Brown. Don't say cam

1:27:58.720 --> 1:28:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Akers because he's been ruled out. Not cam Akers, Malcolm Brown,

1:28:01.600 --> 1:28:03.719
<v Speaker 1>and all the more reason to like Malcolm Brown. Plenty

1:28:03.800 --> 1:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to go around here against the Giant's team allowing one

1:28:05.960 --> 1:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty three total yards and one and a half

1:28:08.920 --> 1:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game to opposing running backs. The dual headed

1:28:12.160 --> 1:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>approach worked last week against the Giants when Jerick McKinnon

1:28:15.080 --> 1:28:17.679
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff Wilson combined for under fifty yards and three scores.

1:28:17.720 --> 1:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll try two running backs here too, Malcolm Brown. If

1:28:20.320 --> 1:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>you're in a pinch, available on waiver wires in many leagues,

1:28:22.640 --> 1:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you could pick him up and start him. Final reminder

1:28:26.160 --> 1:28:28.839
<v Speaker 1>that you can get all of my player ratings and

1:28:29.120 --> 1:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>rankings available at Guillotine leagues dot com. And we're still

1:28:32.160 --> 1:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>forming brand new Guillotine leagues at Guillotine leagues dot com.

1:28:34.760 --> 1:28:36.559
<v Speaker 1>If you want to try the freshest new format in

1:28:36.600 --> 1:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports, Guillotine Leagues dot com. Brian Matt, thanks great

1:28:41.120 --> 1:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to Thank you's a part of the show. We encourage

1:28:43.280 --> 1:28:45.599
<v Speaker 1>you to check out the podcast available on your favorite

1:28:45.640 --> 1:28:49.479
<v Speaker 1>podcasting platform. Again, it's Fantasy Football Weekly and we'll talk

1:28:49.520 --> 1:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to you in one week's time. Fantasy Football Weekly is

1:29:02.400 --> 1:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts from

1:29:05.080 --> 1:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:29:08.479 --> 1:29:10.479
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.