WEBVTT - Some of America's Most Important Economic Data Is Decaying

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, I've said this a bunch of times, and we've

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of danced around this issue on the podcast before,

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 2>but I've said this a bunch of times. I'm sort

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>of fascinated by the degree to which we sort of

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 2>take numbers on the screen. For granted, Like you know,

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 2>we look at a price of a stock and it

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 2>exists on the screen, it's like, where did that come from?

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 4>How did that get there?

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Or like the first Friday of the month, the job's

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 2>data flashes on the screen and we just start talking

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>about what the data said, what the unemployment rate was,

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. But we don't really talk enough about like

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>what had to happen behind the scenes to get that

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>number to the screen, right.

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 3>I find this really interesting as well, because obviously there's

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 3>the data collection portion of this, Like, yeah, you have

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 3>to go out and talk to people for certain surveys,

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 3>certain data points, but also there are so many qualitative

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 3>and subjective adjustments that you can make to that data. So,

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 3>for instance, with CPI I didn't know that CPI waitings

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 3>are like different depending on what city you're in. So,

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 3>for instance, like food at home could matter a lot

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 3>more in I don't know, Minneapolis compared to Chicago. It's

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 3>really interesting. And there's also qualitative adjustments. Yeah, so if

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 3>your fridge gets Wi Fi connected, then that gets incorporated

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 3>into the price as well. So it's really interesting.

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 2>It's super interesting, and like I have a you know,

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 2>this is the issue. We don't talk about data collection,

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 2>but it's obviously some of the most interesting stuff there

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 2>is because of course, you know, things like food at

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>home and one city should be different than another city

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 2>if you really want to collect a basket, and so

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 2>means that you have is some of the most interesting

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>economics work being done anywhere in a realm that virtually

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 2>gets no attention. And when we talk about data collection,

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, you hear it a lot in politics, right,

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 2>surveys have gotten you know, no one answers the phone.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>It's you know, it's harder and harder to do high

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 2>quality surveys. I think you've written about this, like response

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 2>rates and just the actual cost of collection of all

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 2>this data is on the rise.

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I have a bunch of thoughts on this.

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll just say talking about the economic data might be

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 3>timely as well, because we know that Trump doesn't really

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 3>respect I guess a lot of official economic data. And

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 3>he's also trying to cut back on costs or funding

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 3>of a bunch of different government programs. So it's clear

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.279
<v Speaker 3>that you know, entities like the Bureau of Labor Statistics

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 3>could potentially be in the crosshairs here. But you're right,

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 3>response rates lower, response rates have been happening for a

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 3>long time, and it's really easy to look up like

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 3>just how bad things have gotten. If you look at

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 3>the BLS website, for instance, look at response rates on

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.399
<v Speaker 3>the housing portion of CPI that's gone from about seventy

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 3>percent back in twenty fifteen to just fifty seven percent. Now, wow,

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 3>response rates on jolts have gone from I think sixty

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:20.399
<v Speaker 3>seven percent to just thirty percent, So that's pretty amazing.

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 3>And the other interesting thing here is it's not just

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 3>a US problem, right, Like there's no US exceptionalism here.

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 3>You see the same pattern in other economies like the

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 3>UK and New Zealand, and actually in the UK just

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 3>last month, the Office of National Statistics said it wasn't

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 3>going to publish PPI because of a data quality issue.

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 3>And also trade data had a problem because of errors

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 3>in the data provided by HM Revenue and Customs. And

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 3>now there's a task force to look at all of

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 3>these mistakes and data problems at the ONS. So something

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 3>that goes beyond the US here.

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 2>This is a really big deal, especially when you just

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 2>consider how much economic activity is based on being able

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>to look at high quality data and make decisions from it,

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>obviously in the market, but also in just sort of

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>the quote real economy, et cetera. Anyway, without further ado,

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 2>we really do have the perfect guest, someone who knows

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot about how the sausage is made and why

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 2>making the sausage is getting more expensive. We are going

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>to be speaking to Bill Beach. He was most recently

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>the commissioner of the BLS, and he knows all about this.

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 2>He was the fifteenth commissioner at the BLS, does research

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 2>affiliated with the Economic Policy Innovation Center, and he's going

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 2>to talk to us about all of these issues.

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 4>Bill, thank you so much for coming on odd Lats.

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 5>Oh Man, it's just it's great to be with you

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.559
<v Speaker 5>and Tracy. Thank you very much. It's a great topic.

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 4>It's a great topic.

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know like when the process begins, but it's like,

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 2>I get this number. It says what the jobs report,

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 2>it says how many jobs were created that month? How

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 2>did that number get onto my screen or ontobls dot gov?

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 5>And it gets there every month, Yeah.

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Every month, every month. It's never missed except maybe once

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 2>send like a hurricane or so. Anyway, So to get.

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 5>That first, yeah, the first Friday report, the Jobs Report,

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 5>which comes out at eight thirty Eastern time on the

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 5>first Friday. It consists of two surveys. So let me

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 5>talk about the first one, which is the one you

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 5>just mentioned that the number of jobs. That is a

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 5>survey of about four hundred thousand firms out of eleven

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 5>point three million firms in the United States, about four

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 5>hundred thousand of them have agreed voluntarily to send in

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 5>a pretty complex survey response. Every month, they send that

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 5>survey to electronic collection centers. There's one in Chicago, there's

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 5>one in Atlanta. And that survey has to contain the

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 5>twelfth day of the month, if it is a work day,

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 5>or the closest workday to that twelfth of November, or whatever,

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 5>and the reason for that is we want to get

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 5>at least one pay period in the report. Okay, So

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 5>they submit that. That data continues to be collected through

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 5>almost the end of the month, not quite, but almost

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 5>the end of the month. It goes from regional offices,

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 5>these regional collection centers to the national headquarters in Washington,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 5>where about forty people sometimes less, out of the two

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 5>thousand people that work there massage the data, which means

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 5>that they take the data which is in the survey.

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 5>It's a sample, it's just a fragment of the total population,

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 5>and they multiply the responses by what are called weights,

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 5>and that gives us the national number. So that number

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 5>is all done pretty much by Tuesday night, preceding the Friday,

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 5>and on Wednesday, the Commissioner gets to hear the data.

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 5>The Commissioner, by the way, plays no role whatsoever in

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 5>massaging the data or multiplying the survey results times the weights.

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 5>Then I would brief the White House. The White House

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 5>would then brief the Federal Reserve Ward chairman, the Secretary

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 5>of the Treasury on Thursday. That Thursday night, usually they're

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 5>sworn to secrecy, and then at eight o'clock in the morning.

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 5>I would walk over to the Department of Labor, because

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 5>blas's headquarters is about a twenty minute walk from the

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 5>Department of Labor. I would brief the Secretary of Labor

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 5>and for an hour from eight thirty to nine thirty,

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 5>the Secretary of Labor and his staff had to remain quiet,

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 5>and then at nine thirty they could answer questions of

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 5>the press. So that basically is the process for the

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 5>jobs report. There's another survey there. It interrupt me any time,

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 5>but that's where we get the unemployment raise, called the

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 5>Household Survey, and that's a survey of sixty thousand households

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 5>selected out of a sampling frame. We can talk about

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 5>that term to be representative of the entire United States

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 5>by demographic segments. You know how many people are in

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 5>the certain age group, male, female, the racial and ethnic compositions,

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 5>and geographic locations. So it's a complex sample. That sample

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 5>is done usually by Monday of the week prior to

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 5>the release on Friday, and then again I get to

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 5>see the results, so the commissioner gets to see the

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 5>results on Wednesday. So that's kind of the calendar. Both

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 5>the household Survey and the Employment survey cover the same

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 5>two week period in the month. Now there may be

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 5>a day or two switch there. Sometimes the household survey

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 5>has a few more days in it than the establishment survey,

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 5>but they all have that twelfth of the month because

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 5>we're trying to get the middle of the month. By

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 5>the way, that's really important because if you have a

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 5>natural disaster that happens prior to the twelfth or after

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 5>the surveys are closed, that does not affect the results,

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 5>even though you would think since it happened in the

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 5>month prior that you know, the hurricane might have affected

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 5>implument results.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 3>So one thing you mentioned is companies, you know, voluntarily

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 3>responding to these surveys. And one thing I always wondered

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 3>about is how how I guess onerous or resource intensive

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 3>is responding to these surveys. So do I have to

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 3>have like a person who's dedicated to doing this every month?

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.839
<v Speaker 3>Does it consume resources? How long is this going to

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 3>take me? And then also does the BLS ever try

0:09:56.320 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 3>to fact check some of these self reported data points?

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 5>Those are great questions. So the survey is not just

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 5>one or two questions. It takes about thirty minutes to

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 5>fill it out completely. We do get responses that are incomplete,

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 5>and we accept those incomplete responses. The survey is usually

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 5>filled out by someone who can access the company's data

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 5>on wages, on total employment, on employment by supervisory or

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 5>non supervisory job functions. In other words, it's a person

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 5>usually in the operations office of a company. Now we

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 5>ask companies that are very large, you know, like the

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 5>big box retailers, all the way down to really small

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 5>corporations or small firms, and it becomes more and more

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 5>of a difficulty for the smaller firms, and we're very

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 5>cognizant of that. So BLS has reduced the scope of

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 5>the survey to get it as small as possible and

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 5>as free of burdens and compliance as possible. It's also

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 5>an electronics survey so that they can fill it out

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 5>on their computer screens and hit a submit button, which

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 5>greatly greatly improved our response rate, by the way, so

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 5>that survey is not so hard now to fill out,

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 5>though I think it still takes about thirty minutes, maybe

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 5>more if you have to dig out the data if

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 5>you're not in possession of it. The household survey is

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 5>a totally different beast. It is a long survey. It

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 5>consists of over one hundred and twenty questions. It really

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 5>is hard to fill out if you kind of don't

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 5>know the terminology. Let me just give you one. We

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 5>asked the question on employment. Are you working or have

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 5>you looked for work in the past four weeks? That's

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 5>the key question. We've been asking that question for since

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 5>nineteen I think nineteen forty three. If they answer I'm working,

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 5>then they are considered employed. We'll have follow up questions

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.839
<v Speaker 5>about that, about their industry, about their tasks and so forth.

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 5>If they say no, I'm not working, then we say,

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 5>well did you look for work in the past four weeks?

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 5>And they'll say, well, you know, maybe I thought about it.

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 5>Well thinking about it. It's not enough you can look

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 5>for one day in the past four weeks and be

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 5>considered in the labor force but unemployed. So that sometimes

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 5>we have to have a verbal follow up rather than

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 5>they're just you know, just filling out a form. There

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 5>has to be a conversation. That's why we don't do

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:32.239
<v Speaker 5>more than sixty thousand households because it is it's burdensome

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 5>for the person who's the questioner.

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 2>This leads right into I think what I was about

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 2>to ask you, which is, you know we're having this

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 2>conversation April twenty twenty five. Your term of office at

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 2>the BLS ended March twenty twenty three, so you're actually

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 2>under both the two recent presidents, under the first Trump

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 2>administration then Biden. But let's say, okay, so let's say

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 2>it's March twenty twenty three. How much costlier is that

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 2>process of commune unicating with the households than it was,

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 2>say in twenty thirteen or two thousand and three.

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 5>It was more and more costly, certainly, and that's because

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 5>of inflation and how inflation affected the wage bill for

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 5>the survey. Okay, the survey is taken by the Census

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 5>Bureau under a contract by BLS, So we pay the

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Census Bureau to take this to go out in the

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 5>field and conduct the survey. Here's an idea of how

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 5>much more expensive it was. In twenty nineteen, which is

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 5>the first year of my term, I didn't have to

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 5>find any additional funding for the household survey. It might

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 5>have been just a small amount, but nothing significant. By

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty three, we were having to find almost four

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 5>million five million dollars. More so, the costs of the

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 5>survey is that ye per month, that would be for

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 5>the entire year. The cost of the survey went up significantly.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 5>Now your listeners will be thinking about the federal budget,

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.239
<v Speaker 5>which is in the trillions of dollars. You'd say, oh,

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 5>that's not very much money. But the Bureau's budget had

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 5>has not really changed for almost a decade, and our

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 5>costs have gone up, you know, progressively, especially during the

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.839
<v Speaker 5>period of significant inflation which we had starting in twenty

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 5>twenty one, so that you know, finding additional money is

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 5>really hard. During the pandemic, I found millions of dollars

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 5>of couch money, unused conference fees, unused travel fees, so

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 5>I could apply that couch money if it were, you know,

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 5>to p purposes like buoying up the CPS or building

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 5>a data We built a brand new data center out

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 5>in the suburb of Washington. But once we were back

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 5>in business and fully using our entire budget, it was

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 5>very difficult to find those dollars to fill the hole.

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 5>And I think you could safely say I've been arguing

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 5>this now for over two years. Our surveys, but especially

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 5>the current population survey, the one that gives us the

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 5>unemployment rate, the labor force data are dying, They're decaying.

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 5>They're in very serious trouble and we will have if

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 5>unless we modernize that survey, we will see a time

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 5>when we will be like the British right, unable to

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 5>publish portions of it that just don't have sufficient sample

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 5>for statistical release.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm going to ask the obvious question here, but

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 3>why have costs of conducting these surveys gathering this data

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 3>actually gone up? And I understand, you know, building data

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 3>centers is probably an expensive process. But on the other hand,

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, going electronic instead of mailing out thousands and

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 3>thousands of surveys in theory, I would imagine maybe that

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 3>saves you some money. So what exactly is causing the

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 3>increase in expenses here?

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 5>The problem is not with the electronic surveys. They will

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 5>eventually be very costly and they're there. We're suffering from

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 5>a different problem, which is just public support for the

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 5>electronic surveys. So the jobs report, that is that portion

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 5>of it that's electronically captured by these collection centers in

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 5>Chicago and Atlanta. I think those are going along all right,

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 5>for the time being, Our real problem is in the surveys,

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 5>the data of which is collected by people survey survey,

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 5>field survey people. They go out and they talk to

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 5>the households and they're The cost is the obvious one.

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 5>It is the wage bill. These people are highly skilled interviewers.

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 5>They are not high school graduates, and I have nothing

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 5>against high school graduates, but they are educated, very trained,

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 5>oftentimes economists, who will go out and speak to people

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 5>and to follow up interviews, oh my gosh, and they'll

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 5>spend hours and hours do it this. Well, okay, fine,

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 5>that's great, but it costs a lot to keep those

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 5>people employed. They have other opportunities, so we have to

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 5>have competitive wages. The wage bill is driving that. Collection

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 5>costs are a little bit higher, that is the processing costs,

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 5>but the big part of that is the wage build

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 5>and the wage bill is not going to go away.

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 5>That's just going to continue to go up. So we

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 5>need to do with the household survey what we have

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 5>done with the establishment survey, the firm survey, and that

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 5>is modernize it so it is more electronically collected. And

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 5>then we also need to integrate data which can be

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 5>obtained through the Internet on households. Households maybe go on

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 5>to a platform and with a tablet or something and

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.959
<v Speaker 5>supply Maybe we go to a million households and they

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 5>supply five or six questions and we combine that or

0:17:54.320 --> 0:18:00.360
<v Speaker 5>blended with a person to person collected data. That's that's

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 5>what we call modernization. I mean, I mean that sounds

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 5>so innovative to your listeners, but it is very innovative

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 5>for the statistical system. Unless we do that, the cost

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 5>will continue to rise. The response rates, by the way,

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 5>are continuing to decline. So that's public support and we

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 5>will be we just won't have these surveys in the future.

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 5>There is too expensive.

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 2>I want to get to the modernization in a second,

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 2>but just talk to us about I mean, I think

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 2>you said these the surveys dying, which is pretty dramatic.

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Given the centrality of this between the response rates, the

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 2>increased wage bill, et cetera. How severe is this crisis?

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 2>How much time are we talking about because I imagine

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 2>it gets harder and harder to find that couch change

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 2>to keep it going.

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Actually, we're out of time. We have to cut

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 5>down on the sample and I'll give you I'll give

0:18:54.240 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 5>you the evidence, my successor, the current Commissioner of Labor Statistics,

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 5>at the end of last year that we would have

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 5>to reduce the sample in the CPS, that's the household

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 5>survey by five thousand households in order to just publish

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 5>the rest of the sample. Okay, by cutting back on

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 5>the sample, you cut back on publishing details in the

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 5>current report. You may not have enough to publish on

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 5>teenagers anymore. On certain demographic groups, you may not be

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 5>able to publish details on certain age intervals, like everyone

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 5>between the ages of fifty five and sixty or sixty

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 5>five and seventy five. Every time you reduce the sample

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 5>or your response rate falls and it kind of reduces

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 5>it for you. We can talk about that next. What

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 5>suffers are the details. Let's go to the CPI, which

0:19:55.640 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 5>BLS also does. The CPI is a very big survey,

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 5>important survey, but it is oftentimes the case that we

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 5>don't have details for certain parts of the basket of goods,

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 5>and so we will average across some months and published

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 5>for another month based on averages of prior months. But

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 5>then we run out of the integrity of that average

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 5>and we can't publish the bread price or something like that.

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:28.199
<v Speaker 5>That happens more and more because we're getting less and

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 5>less cooperation by retailers to allow our surveyors into their

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 5>stores and to go around grabbing the potato chip bag

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 5>and counting the number of potatoes in the back. So

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 5>we've had to innovate on the CPI, on the producer

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 5>price Index, on the import export price indexes. I hope

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 5>you haven't noticed the innovations because you're not supposed to,

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 5>but those innovations have saved, absolutely saved the import and

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 5>export price. We had response rates down in the twenty centiles,

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 5>completely unpublishable detail. During the time I was commissioner. We

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 5>went to using data from the Commerce Department that is

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 5>collected by the customs officials and it's working out just great,

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 5>so we completely left the surveys there. The PPI has

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 5>problems just like the British are having. Now not as bad,

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 5>and we're using more and more data from private companies

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 5>who will give us their data from the Internet, where

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 5>we collect that data and we combine that with the

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 5>survey data to keep the things alive on the CPI.

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 5>It's very interesting. We get all of our retail gas

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 5>prices now from a private company that aggregates gas prices

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 5>for the retail gasoline industry, and it's a very good source.

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 5>A lot of our housing prices now you mentioned housing,

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 5>We're going to more and more to aggregators, private aggregators.

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 5>So there are strategies for saving the survey by blending

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 5>in private data with the survey data. That is not

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 5>the case with the household survey of the labor force.

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 5>Nobody really collects that data except BLS. And that's why

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 5>these demographic surveys, Census has a bunch of them. Health

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 5>the health department, the Department of Health has a lot

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 5>very in very serious trouble.

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 3>So I take the point about innovations. But one of

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 3>the things that's been happening recently is we have been

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 3>seeing bigger and bigger revisions in a lot of the data.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Is that because of the response issues, So more late

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 3>responses mean that you know you're going to get revisions

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 3>later on as those responses are incorporated. And the reason

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 3>I ask is I remember speaking to someone at the BLS,

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 3>and here shout out to the people working at the BLS,

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 3>because you can actually just call them and ask questions.

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 3>They're really really responsive, amazingly, like the only government department

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 3>that I really know where they'll just pick up the

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 3>phone and talk to you about methodology. Anyway, I was

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 3>asking about revisions to PPI for mayonnaise, of all things,

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 3>and the data there had been revised from like five

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 3>percent to ten percent, which is a pretty big change

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 3>in the space of a couple months. And he was

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 3>talking about how the PPI is subject to revision up

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 3>to four months after it's published, and it gets updated

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 3>as new replies come in. So I imagine if response

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 3>rates are going lower, then maybe that's contributing to some

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 3>of the revision issue.

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 5>By and large, our issues have to do with response rate.

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 5>You're absolutely right, and I'm before I go further, I'm

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 5>very very happy you said that about BLS because BLS

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 5>prize itself and being responsive and transparent by the way,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 5>so that's a good thing. So I think there are

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 5>two sources of this problem. The first is really hidden

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 5>and no one talks about it. So let me just

0:23:56.320 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 5>mention when we refresh survey, and you have to do

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 5>this because people are asked to give their survey responses

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 5>only for a few months, right, and then they drop

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 5>out and you have to find new people. The regional offices,

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 5>there are six of them in the United States for

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 5>the BLS, they have people who go out and do

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 5>what's called initiate a new survey respondent. It's getting more

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 5>and more difficult now to initiate that respondent. Well, people

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 5>are saying, we just don't have time, you know, Oh

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 5>my gosh, there's so many important things to do. We

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 5>don't want to give you our data because if we

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 5>give you our data, then the IRS is going to

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 5>be after us, or we're going to have some kind

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 5>of osha of you know, we don't. BLS's data is

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 5>completely protected from the law enforcement aspects of the federal government,

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 5>absolutely only for statistical purposes. That does not prevent help

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 5>or people saying, oh, it's going to happen, you know.

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 5>So if your initiations are dropping and it's harder and harder,

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 5>no wonder the response rates are dropping because people are

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 5>less enthusiastic. Even if they say yeah, I'd love to

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 5>be a part of it, they're not as enthusiastic as

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 5>they were a generation ago. So the real problem starts

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 5>at the initiation level, and we're seeing that not only

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 5>in the household survey and in the price area, but

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 5>we're also seeing that in another survey we haven't talked about,

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 5>the National Compensation Survey, which is a wonderful survey on

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 5>how much people are getting in union houses, union households

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 5>and non union households, and Northeast and the Southwest is

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 5>terrific about that. The Joelts report the job opening is

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 5>in labor turnover survey that you mentioned at the opening.

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 5>Its response rate has fallen dramatically, and it's largely because

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 5>people are less enthusiastic generally about participating in government surveys.

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 5>It's going to be hard to stem that tide, and

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 5>I think the only way we can do it is

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 5>by going to these platformed surveys, that is, surveys that

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 5>use the Internet as the main platform, integrating a lot

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 5>of private data, and being highly original in the way

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 5>we think about preparing a statistic for public use. We're

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 5>just not going to be facing a different world overnight

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 5>of really happy people wanting to give all their data

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 5>to the government.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 2>It's really a fallen world. Sometimes I'll say that, you know,

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>we won't let you in the store to you know,

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 2>look at the price of bread anyway? What would it

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 2>take to get there? Can this be done unilaterally within

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>the BLS, this sort of big upgrade. Would it need

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 2>to be something involved with Congress? Would it need a

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 2>budget allocation that would come from Congress? What would need

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 2>to happen to get the sort of modernized statistical collection

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 2>system that you would like actually in place?

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 5>I think we have to approach this like we might

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 5>approach roads and bridges right. Once Congress becomes aware that

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 5>there's political liability and ignoring a problem, they generally focus

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 5>on it until it's fixed. And that was the case

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 5>with our national highway system still is a case with

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 5>our national highway system. We still have a lot of problems.

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 5>When I go to Congress and I talk about the

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 5>CPS and response rate, how we're going to lose the

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 5>unemployment rate, I get immediate response, and nobody, the Communists,

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 5>no one's ever said that to me, Oh, let's fix it.

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 5>So in the last Congressional Continuing Resolution, which is passed

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 5>a few weeks ago, BLS got six million more in

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 5>funding just to fill that hole that we've been talking

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 5>about on the wage bill. And that was an amazing

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 5>thing to get in a continuing resolution and increase in funding.

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 5>So I think Congress, presented with a plan, or the

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 5>administration of President Trump, is wide open to disruption and change.

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 5>I think if we develop an aggressive, bold, comprehensive plan

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 5>about how to rebuild the statistical system so that we're

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 5>using our resources much more efficiently, perhaps combining some agencies

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 5>together instead of having the twenty four separate statistical agencies,

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 5>maybe we ought to have just a handful, and then

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 5>going from there to a highly innovative different way of

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 5>collecting and disseminating data. Then our roads and bridges, statistically speaking,

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 5>won't be disintegrating or decaying. We will have new concrete,

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 5>will have new structures, and you can see a future

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 5>for the statistical system. I think right now, speaking as

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 5>a former director of an agency one of the most

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 5>important statistical agencies and not the most important statistical agency

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 5>in the world, that future looks grim to me, and

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 5>so change is required. It has to happen, and I

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 5>think that's what we have to do. Presented with the plan,

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 5>let Congress see what we're going to do and have

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 5>them fund modernization, not continuation of the current system.

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 3>This is a little out there, but could you if

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 3>the problem is the response rates and incentivizing people to

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 3>actually answer these surveys, could you potentially pay them to

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 3>do it.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 5>We've tried that. It's been tried a lot. Good suggestion. Yeah,

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, pay them dollars. Okay, tried that, didn't make

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 5>much of a difference. Then we thought, well, maybe they'd

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 5>like to have these cards you can take to retailers

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 5>and buy anything you want, right, gift cards. We tried, Yeah,

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 5>gift cards. So we tried that. Now that's not the issue.

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 5>I think you could pay people a lot of money,

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 5>say one thousand dollars a month, and they might participate

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 5>because that's a lot of money, But we can't afford that.

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 5>That's not out there for the statistical system. So inducements

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 5>may help with the margin, but they don't change the

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 5>trend line, which is going negative on the response rate.

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 5>I think we're going to live at that response rate

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 5>for a while. I do believe it's generational. I think

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 5>you can see in the really young kids now, not

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 5>the ones that are under five, but the ones that

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 5>are in their teams, kind of a return to doing

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 5>things together, having more social events. Maybe I would say

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 5>the bowling leagues are coming back, and maybe that's a

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 5>cultural change that leads to a more a greater sense

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 5>of participation and support of public institutions, one could hope.

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 3>I like the idea of all the kids coming together

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 3>to answer surveys from the BLS. That's great.

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 5>I think you get some really interesting answers there. But yes,

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 5>short of that, we have to be innovative. We have

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 5>to change, We have to think outside the box. Otherwise

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 5>this infrastructure which we all need, you know, it runs

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 5>our country. There's no economy without the Bureau of Economic

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 5>Analysis and the GDP numbers. They don't grow on trees.

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 5>That's going to be either going to go away or

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 5>become less reliable.

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 2>You know something that strikes me while listening to you talk,

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 2>and like, oh, you found a way to allocate you know,

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 2>unused travel spending so that you could keep the surveys

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 2>going after the wage bilt went up, et cetera. I

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 2>keep rustling the couch change and I think about this

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 2>in you know, you mentioned Okay, well maybe the new

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 2>president is you know, theoretically open to shaking things up

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 2>and doing things a different way. Would you argue, pretty persuasively,

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 2>isn't necessary on the other hand, you have this sort

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 2>of dose kick which is sort of premised on this

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 2>idea that every agency in the government somehow is just

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 2>egregiously wasteful. That all of these agencies must be so

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 2>wasteful that you could cut aggressively and you almost certainly

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.959
<v Speaker 2>aren't actually going to hit any bone. Seems to be

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 2>a sort of premise of some of the cutting. It

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 2>doesn't sound like to me when you described to be

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 2>a less in twenty nineteen through twenty twenty three, that

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 2>this is an agency that was just you know, larded up,

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 2>but had plenty of plenty of fat that can be

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 2>trimmed off.

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 5>No fat, no pad at all. But you know, this

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.239
<v Speaker 5>is the age old conflict right between the entrepreneur and

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 5>the accountant. The entrepreneur always looking for innovation and changed

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 5>and higher return on investment, and the accountant is always

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 5>looking for waste and abuse. Are we using our pencils

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 5>until they are only three inches long? I think that's

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 5>a fruitful thing. I think you have to have both

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 5>of those forces working all the time and overtime. Right now.

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 5>I don't doubt for one second that a lot of

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 5>the federal government could use a thorough scrubbing on the

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 5>things that Doge is looking at. The statistical system has unfortunately,

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 5>in my opinion, but fortunately now been through that scrubbing

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 5>over the past fifteen years, no real budgets, and yet

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 5>an increase in responsibility. So efficiencies have been gained there

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 5>just from the brutality of living year after year after

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.719
<v Speaker 5>year with the same dollar amount while your costs are

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 5>going up while inflation is changing. Don't mind that because

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 5>efficiencies can occur, we can do more with fewer dollars.

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 5>That's okay. Innovation, on the other hand, has to be

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 5>kind of funded by your retained earnings, and we don't

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 5>have that in The statistical Congress has that, So we're

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 5>not getting the dollars necessary to innovate and secure the future.

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 5>That's the problem I want everybody kind of focus on.

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 3>So you mentioned earlier that you had used internet data

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 3>to try to make up for the lack of a

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 3>certain data point or a certain response from the surveys,

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 3>and I'm curious, there is the sense nowadays that everything

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 3>we do is tracked and recorded somewhere. Could you potentially

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 3>use some of that type of data instead of voluntarily

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 3>reported responses.

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 5>So to an extent you can use that. If you

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 5>have an unambiguous signal, and you can capture that unambiguous

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 5>signal month after month, why not capture it? Why not capture,

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 5>for example, certain pay bands or other things that are

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 5>happening in the labor force, or with wages, or with

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 5>working conditions. The restraint there is that not everything we

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 5>want to know about the world is unambiguously signaled every month.

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 5>And I go back to this seemingly easy question, are

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 5>you working or looking for work? You would be surprised

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 5>at the number of people who say I'm working, But

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 5>then we make that query, did you work for pay? No? No, okay,

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.479
<v Speaker 5>I did the dishes? Okay, fine, Well that doesn't see

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.800
<v Speaker 5>in the mind of the respondent, work is defined differently

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 5>than it needs to be defined in the statistics. Are

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 5>you looking for work, Well, yeah, I'm looking for work.

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.919
<v Speaker 5>When did you look for work last year? Okay? See,

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 5>that doesn't count as the key determinant of whether or

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:04.760
<v Speaker 5>not you're in the labor force. You're in the labor

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 5>force if you're working or looking for work in the

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 5>past four weeks. So that seemingly simple question is not

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 5>going to be unambiguously signaled by somebody answering an Internet question.

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 5>Because of the many different ways we think about our

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 5>lives and about what work is. We find this particularly

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.879
<v Speaker 5>true as our country becomes I think it's a good thing.

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 5>More and more culturally diverse. People come in with very

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 5>different views of what is work of, what is pay of,

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 5>what is a family of, what is a household? And

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:42.720
<v Speaker 5>we have to work harder and harder and harder to

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 5>make sure that their responses fit this continuous since nineteen

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 5>forty three, continuous stream of data that allows us to

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 5>do these wonderful time series analyzes. That's the issue tracy

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 5>with using Internet data. Some of it can be used

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.280
<v Speaker 5>and blended in, some of it from the private sector

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 5>can be used and blended in, but some cannot. You

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 5>still have to have that survey instrument out there, asking

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 5>the hard questions, doing the follow ups.

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, there are some people who simply do not

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:18.399
<v Speaker 2>believe these statistical agencies are honest, or they believe they

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, they do not trust when academic economists explain

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:26.359
<v Speaker 2>why data gets revised a year later or something like that,

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and they assume that there is political influence of some sort,

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 2>or they believe it and you know, it goes back

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 2>years and I remember two thousand and twelve years ago,

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Jack Welch, the Chicago guys will do anything, can't believe

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 2>these jobs numbers, et cetera. You were appointed in twenty

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 2>nineteen by President Trump and you crossed over to Biden.

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 2>What do you say to people who do not believe

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:50.800
<v Speaker 2>that they can trust these numbers?

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, I can't dislaunch their suspicions without going to some

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 5>factual basis. So I take them through the simplest revision process,

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 5>which is the jobs revision that you know. We had

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 5>an eight hundred and eighteen thousand preliminary estimate of a

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:11.240
<v Speaker 5>decrease in employment that was announced last August, and everybody

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 5>President Trump was running for at the time, and he

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 5>just said, look at this, it is totally dishonest. Bls okay.

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 5>So this happens every year. We compare our numbers to

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 5>a sampling frame with all the people who work in

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 5>the entire country, and we say, is our estimate of

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 5>total employment based on a much smaller sample than all

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 5>the firms. Is it accurate? And when we go up

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 5>there and we compare it every March to this total universe,

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:43.359
<v Speaker 5>we sometimes find we're spot on, you know, less than

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:46.359
<v Speaker 5>one tenth of a percent off, and sometimes we find

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 5>we're as much as two percent or three percent off.

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 5>That we're off more often when the economy is either

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 5>diving into recession or growing rapidly out of a recession,

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 5>or has a period of really bad time happening. So

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 5>when I take them through the revision process, they usually

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 5>come out and say, you know, I never knew that,

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 5>And so the next time they think about, oh, the

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 5>BLS is lying, they'll have that in their mind that really,

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:15.240
<v Speaker 5>we did this every year it is the same way,

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:17.320
<v Speaker 5>and we're pretty good with those numbers.

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 3>So I want to ask you about qualitative adjustments because

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:24.320
<v Speaker 3>I find these so interesting. And the example I used

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 3>was fridges that now have I don't know, new and

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 3>interesting features. And my understanding is that if a company

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 3>is selling a basic refrigerator for like one thousand dollars,

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 3>and then the next year it sells this new advanced

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 3>refrigerator for one thousand, one hundred and fifty, and then

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 3>it's also spending additional money, so like an extra hundred

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 3>or whatever to make the more advanced fridge. In cases

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 3>like that, the BLS would use a qualitative adjustment and

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 3>then the year on year PPI would be something like,

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, it would be five percent instead of

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 3>the fifteen percent change in the actual price. How do

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 3>you actually go about making those qualitative adjustments? And I

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 3>imagine they must have been getting harder as things become

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:13.240
<v Speaker 3>more technologically complex.

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 5>Well, you're absolutely right, it is very difficult to do that,

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 5>but we do a lot of training. A lot of

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 5>people don't know that. At the National Headquarters there is

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.800
<v Speaker 5>a training suite. I think it's on the second second floor,

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 5>at least be before we moved out of that building.

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 5>And so people from the regions who are the CPI

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 5>and PPI field teams that go out and do the surveying,

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 5>they come to the bl AS for training. And in

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 5>these training rooms our kitchens, there are grocery store aisles.

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 5>We've recreated kind of the inventory you might find in

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 5>a grocery store or a warehouse, and we will train

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 5>people from time to time on the changes in the

0:39:56.680 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 5>items in the CPI, the two hundred plus items the

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 5>CPI or the items that we're surveying at the producer

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 5>price level. So if there is a change all the

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 5>way from the number of potato chips in a bag,

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 5>which is a very important thing. And when we do

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:17.280
<v Speaker 5>the we will look at fast foods and potato chips

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 5>and so forth, all the way to the technology involved

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 5>in diamond cutting. We will be training people to observe

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 5>the change and work that into their evaluation of the

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 5>product when they're in the store, when they're in the warehouse.

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 5>So the field person will literally pick up a jar

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 5>of if I could say pringles, right, and they'll say, well,

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 5>last month I had thirty six springles in here, and

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.720
<v Speaker 5>it's this month it's the same price, but we only

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 5>have thirty two pringles here.

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Wow. True regularity.

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so that that fits into.

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Now price perles keep going exactly.

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 5>But it has to be that way because what happened

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 5>is the retailer will keep the or the producer will

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 5>keep the price at the same level, but decrease the

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 5>item count in the in the product bag, and that

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 5>means that the product has actually gone up in price,

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 5>not have the same price. Let me just say one

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 5>more thing, great question for Tracy. We have. That's the

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 5>reason why we can't go to the internet and get

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 5>all of our prices because when you go to the internet,

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 5>you can't sometimes see the quality adjustments that are there.

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 5>You can't see that the fact that the hot dogs

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 5>are just a little shorter than they used to be,

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 5>or the apples a little smaller than they used to be.

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:43.280
<v Speaker 5>I don't know about the apple thing, but the shorter

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 5>hot dogs is definite the case. So you have to

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 5>we train these people. They're highly trained. That's they're also

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 5>very expensive because they're highly trained people and they can

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 5>see and know when to look and when to check

0:41:56.400 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 5>for quality improvements. Electronics definitely, you know, but a lot

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 5>of times the producers of the electronics will heavily advertise

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 5>the changes, make it known to everybody, because that's what

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 5>you're selling new and improved. It's all of these other

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:14.240
<v Speaker 5>items that it's more subtle. And you know, housing, Housing

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 5>is a big deal because the house is more valuable

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:20.399
<v Speaker 5>if it has improvements in it, and some of those

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 5>improvements are completely invisible. So we're we're very conscious of

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 5>the fact that quality governs the price structure.

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Bill Beach, that was a fascinating conversation. I feel like

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 2>some of these areas like even just like I'm talking

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:39.319
<v Speaker 2>about the art of actually conducting an interview you see

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 2>if someone's in the labor force, really fascinating stuff.

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:44.879
<v Speaker 4>Really appreciate you coming on. There's something we want.

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:47.399
<v Speaker 2>We wanted to talk to you, to talk to someone

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.880
<v Speaker 2>long time as so appreciate you joining outlines.

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:52.839
<v Speaker 5>It's been it's been a pleasure. Thank you very much.

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:53.879
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much.

0:42:53.920 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 4>That was great, Tracy. I thought that was great.

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm so glad we finally did that one. Yeah, a

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 3>couple points. So, first of all, I did not know

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 3>that hot dogs have been getting shorter.

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 4>Me neither.

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 3>And it's being incorporated into the inflation data, So all

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 3>the people complaining about shrink flation, I guess you know

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 3>it is mitigated. Yeah, exactly. And then the other thing

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 3>I would say is I thought the point Bill was

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:34.319
<v Speaker 3>making about the loss of granularity in the data was

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 3>really important. So the idea of getting to like the

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:41.320
<v Speaker 3>tails of the distribution or certain minorities. And the reason

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:43.919
<v Speaker 3>I say that is because we've been seeing a lot

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 3>of regional and social variation in a lot of these

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 3>consumer surveys. Right, So obviously people who are poorer have

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 3>been feeling terrible during the days of high inflation, and

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 3>people who are rich feel, you know, pretty good, good

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 3>but also inflation in Florida has been higher than elsewhere

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 3>in the country. So I think it does become more

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:10.359
<v Speaker 3>important to get really really specific with some of these

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 3>statistics as we see those differences increase.

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting to me to think about government high

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:22.239
<v Speaker 2>quality government data as like this public good and try

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 2>to imagine infrastructure, right infrastructure, and try to imagine the

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 2>amount of economic activity that exists because this thing is

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 2>offered for free that we don't that people don't have

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 2>to pay for. And obviously in the investing world there's

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 2>a tremendous amount of interest in all this, but it's

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 2>obviously not just you know, the investing world, and so

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 2>all of these questions, whether you're starting a business or

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:47.799
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is, you know, on some level you can

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 2>do because there is consistent, trustworthy data. And the thought

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:56.359
<v Speaker 2>of like that going away, and what I imagine what happened is, yeah,

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:59.840
<v Speaker 2>sure you'd have like private versions of varying quality that

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 2>try to replace it, and that exists today. You know,

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 2>there's private measures of inflation, et cetera. But like that

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:08.399
<v Speaker 2>would like start to deteriorate the idea of like there

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:11.279
<v Speaker 2>being a gold standard, and so then you hear it's like, oh,

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 2>here's like a oh, we needed to find a few

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 2>more million dollars to pay the budgets of the survey collectors.

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Like how many billions are riding on that few extra millions?

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, right, like how many hundreds of billions in activity?

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 2>So it's just really interesting. And then his thing explanation

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 2>at the end, why like survey collection for something like

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:34.839
<v Speaker 2>this is it makes sense to do as a trained job, right,

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:37.480
<v Speaker 2>and even like the subjectivity of like are you working

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 2>and what does that mean and et cetera. It's really

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 2>interesting to think about why it's not trivial to just

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 2>send out a survey or send out a high school

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:47.279
<v Speaker 2>or send out a volunteer or something like that.

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely. Also, I just love the idea of someone at

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 3>the BLS counting how many potato chips are in a bag?

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 2>I know, you know what I'm imagining, like I don't know,

0:45:57.040 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 2>like someone with like a monocle, yeah, or something like.

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 3>The magnifying class examining shifts seeing how big they are.

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 2>We have we're having the same image in our minds,

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:07.839
<v Speaker 2>that's sure right now?

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, shall we leave it there?

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:10.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's leave it there.

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the Authoughts podcast. I'm

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:15.879
<v Speaker 3>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy.

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Alloway and I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:22.279
<v Speaker 2>the Stalwart. Follow our producers Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman armand

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Dashill Bennett at Dashbot and kil Brooks at Kale Brooks.

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 2>For more odd Laws content, go to Bloomberg dot com

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 2>slash odd Lots, where we have all of our episodes

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:33.239
<v Speaker 2>in the daily newsletter and you can chat about all

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 2>of these topics twenty four to seven in our discord

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Discord dot gg slash od.

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Lots And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 3>it when we talk about how these statistics sausage actually

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:46.400
<v Speaker 3>gets made, then please leave us a positive review on

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:49.839
<v Speaker 3>your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you are a

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:53.239
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of our episodes

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:55.839
<v Speaker 3>absolutely ad free. All you need to do is find

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there.

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening.