WEBVTT - Bloomberg Law Brief: Democrats vs. Trump Administration (Audio)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Now it's time for our daily Bloomberg Law Brief, exploring

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>legal issues in the news. And Today, Bloomberg Law Hosttum

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Grosso and Greg Sture speak with James Tierney, former main

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>attorney general and lecturer at Harvard Law School, and Paul Nolett,

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 1>a professor at Marquette University Law School, about how Democrats

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>planned to battle the Trump administration in court. Paul, as

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.159
<v Speaker 1>you look over the legal landscape, and of course we

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly what the Trump administration is going to do,

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>But where do you think Democratic attorneys general are likely

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to have the biggest impact? Is that filling in the

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>regulatory gaps? Is it challenging, say, environmental regulations. Where do

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>you see them making a mark? Well, I think just

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>in terms of pure quantity of litigation, I think the

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the big focal points will be definitely an

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>environmental policy. Um and so at the beginning of the

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration, I think it will be some continuing skirmishes

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>over some of Obama's regulatory efforts like the Clean Power Plane,

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the waters of the US rule, and other things like that.

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think throughout the Trump administer reason I would

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>expect to see quite a lot of wrangling over UM

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>de regulatory efforts coming out of the e p A,

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and UH potentially a variety of other new environmental issues

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the next few years as well. I

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think part of it will be going after the FEDS directly,

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>so suing the e p A, trying to delay or

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>stop deregulatory efforts, But some of it will also potentially

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>be going after say utilities or industry in general, kind

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of similar to what some AGS have done UM investigating

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Exxon over the past year and their connection to UM

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>climate research and potentially sweeping some of that research under

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the RUG. So I see those areas being particularly prominent

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>areas for AGES in the coming years, Jim, any other

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>hot button areas were democratic ages have the best chance

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of winning. You know, my friend Paul makes some good points,

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but he, I'm sure would say that a lot of

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that sort of speculations this point were we really don't know. UM.

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I think a g s are going to be very

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>focused on criminal justice reform, and we don't know what

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration's position will be. All ages are against hate,

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>crunt and will you know, we'll roll up to sleeves

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>on that. I think dealing with an increasingly diverse population

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>that we have in this country. If you're in a

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>g is pretty important. What kids are in school, what

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>about witnesses in court? What about victims of crime? Um,

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these things, don't you know, don't pay

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>attention to some of these legal status in the country.

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>So I see a lot of diversity related issues. I

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>thought former CIA Director Robert Gates made a good point

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>when he said, you know, people say one things in campaigns,

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they act a lot differently once they're in office. And

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that all ages, and democratic ages in particular,

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>are certainly willing to give the Trump administration the chance

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to see what they're really going to do. Um. He

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>does come in personally with a bad rep from his

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump University days. Every Attorney General look at that case

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and was pretty disturbed by the behavior of Trump University.

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 1>That was none of the partisan issue. So, uh, he's

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>on everybody's watched list. Uh and maybe the Attorney's General

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>looking particularly closely, but we'll have to wait and see

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>what happens. And that's James Tierney, former main Attorney General

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and lecturer at Harvard Law School, and Paul Nolett, a

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>professor at Marquette University Law School, speaking with Bloomberg Law

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 1>host Jum Grasso and Greg's story. You can listen to

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law weekdays at one pm Wall Street Time here

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio, and that's This morning is Bloomberg Law Brief.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>You can find more legal news at Bloomberg Law dot

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>com and Bloomberg Benna dot com. Attorneys will find exceptional

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>legal research and business development tools there as well. Visit

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law dot com and Bloomberg Bna dot com for

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>more information