WEBVTT - AI's Impact on Hiring and Huawei Laptop Teardown

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>From Marhard where Innovation of money and power Collie in

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:11.720
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Heinde of Bluemug's world headquarters in New York

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 3>and I.

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Met Ludlow in San Francisco. This has been big technology

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 4>coming up.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 3>We have a mixed picture on US jobs and non

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 3>farm payrolls. Plus the ism will get the read on

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 3>the state of the labor market and how AI will

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 3>impact hiring in twenty twenty four.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 4>Plus a tear down of Huawei's newest laptop reveals its

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 4>chips empowered by TSMC, throwing cold water on chatter about

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 4>another technological breakthrough for the sanctioned company. Details ahead and.

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 5>An AI start up taking on Google.

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.959
<v Speaker 3>He gets fresh funding with backers including Jeff Bezos and

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Nvidia down with the CEO of Perplexity. AI is the

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 3>company which is a half a billion dollar valuation just

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 3>two years since its inception. And what is the read

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.119
<v Speaker 3>on the resilience of a consumer? What is the read

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 3>on the resilience of the labor market? Very muney picture today,

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 3>strong payrolls report, the nonfarm payrolls closing out twenty twenty three,

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.839
<v Speaker 3>just showing that the US adding two hundred and sixteen

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 3>thousand jobs in the month of December and the jobless

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 3>rate remaining unchanged. But then comes the US service sector

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 3>number and that shows sagnation and the end of twenty

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty three and the gauge of employment and indeed that

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 3>particular signal was its biggest contraction in more than three years.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Glad that we've got some nuanced to be put to

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 3>it with Corey Style an economist for the Indeed Hiring

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Lab and just wade through these waters right now, What

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 3>are you seeing at your hiring lab in terms of

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:50.559
<v Speaker 3>the resilience of the US labor market.

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean what we're seeing right now in our

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 6>postings data from Indeed is very much what we've seen

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 6>in the overall labor market picture from these government numbers,

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 6>which is we've seen, you know, kind of a decline

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 6>in job postings throughout the year, but still a much

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 6>stronger labor market than we had pre pandemic. You know,

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 6>So things have soppened over the last year, but we're

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 6>still above where we were in early twenty twenty.

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:20.279
<v Speaker 4>Corey zeroing in on the sort of technology sectors perspective,

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 4>it's actually interesting to look at where those gains were.

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 7>They were not in the technology sector. To me, it.

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 4>Seems like a lot of public sector jobs, right education,

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 4>health services, government, and to some extent, leisure in hospitality.

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:36.839
<v Speaker 7>Give us the tech story if there is one.

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:39.679
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So, I mean, I think the tech story is

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 6>a big part of the story in the labor market,

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 6>especially as we look back to kind of that pandemic baseline.

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 6>You know, what we saw was is the pandemic hit,

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 6>a lot of job postings fell together across all sectors.

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 6>Then we started seeing those sectors kind of all come

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 6>up together, and I think twenty twenty three really showed

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 6>us it was a year of divergence where we started

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 6>seeing more strength in these kind of in person type sectors.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 6>You know, healthcare has been kind of that perennial powerhouse

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 6>in terms of adding jobs, but we definitely saw some

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 6>kind of weakening demand in tech and some of these

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 6>other areas. And so I think ultimately the tech story

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 6>here is that, you know, tech has taken a little

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 6>more of a brunt in terms of a drop in

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 6>job postings over the last year, but really that's been

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 6>a part of this larger divergence. So we're adding jobs

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 6>over all at the top level once we roll it up,

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 6>But once you kind of look under the hood, you

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 6>can see kind of some of these differences that are

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 6>beginning to emerge between different sectors.

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is there's divergence within the tech space too.

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm pretty sure that anything with an AI name within

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 3>it has been hiring pretty well, and other areas a

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 3>little bit more bleak. Just start there, rather than how

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 3>AI is affecting the rest of the labor market, let's

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 3>just show how is it affecting tech jobs that aren't

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 3>off OKOI.

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, so ultimately, we have seen a pretty

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 6>dramatic increase in the number of job postings asking for

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, these types of generative AI type of skills,

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.559
<v Speaker 6>you know, really the new you know, the chat GPTs,

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 6>the generative AI skills. Obviously, AI kind of in a

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 6>broader sense of self driving cars and all those technologies

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 6>have been something we've discussed for the past couple of years.

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 6>But what's interesting to note is that in the trend

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 6>of generative AI in particular, you know, last year there

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 6>were basically no jobs talking about these technologies, and what

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 6>we've seen is that in the last year, there's been

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 6>a dramatic increase. You know, if you look at the

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 6>graph for job postings with the genera of AI terms

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 6>being asked or skills being asked by employers, it's basically

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 6>a hockey stick. It was zero last year, and this

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 6>is the first time we're kind of sharing this data

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 6>publicly with the newest data from December, but at the

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 6>end of December, there was about point zero five or

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 6>point zero eighty five percent of jobs that were mentioning

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 6>gener of AI. So still overall a pretty small portion

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 6>of a labor market, but when you think about what

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 6>it means to go from zero to almost a tenth

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 6>of a percent in a year, that's starting to really

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 6>show some momentum for these types of jobs.

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 4>The other thing in the domain of technology that I've

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 4>been thinking about is participation in the economy and particularly

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 4>the age of workers. I think back to when we

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 4>talked about the union efforts with regards to the automakers

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 4>and ev and they'll concern down the line is that

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 4>there is a whole generation of workforce that will retire

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 4>in the coming years, and there are people sitting on

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 4>the sidelines what you would call prime age workers.

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and that's a great point.

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 6>I think that's one of the kind of key points

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 6>that we saw this morning in the jobs report is that, yes,

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 6>it was a jobs report where the number of jobs

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 6>we added really surpassed kind of a lot of expectations,

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 6>which was kind of a fit for you know, kind

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 6>of wrap up of what we saw in twenty twenty three.

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 6>But I think what was different from what we saw

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 6>in the rest of twenty twenty three is that in

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 6>the last couple months, we have seen the labor force

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 6>participation rate, especially among those primage workers, start to drop off,

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, and you talk about, you know, kind of

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 6>the demographic headwinds as we have fewer workers aging in

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 6>and many more workers aging out. You know, the US

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 6>is really facing kind of an uphill battle in terms

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 6>of making sure the labor supply is there, because adding

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 6>the jobs and having the job openings is one thing,

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 6>but finding the people to fill those jobs, you know,

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 6>is a vital part of actually making sure that the

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 6>economy and the labor market continues to be robust.

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 4>Corey style of indeed hiring lab just terrific data granular

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 4>data about the technology sector and jobs. Thank you, Let's

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 4>keep the conversation going. Is the labor market show some

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 4>signs of cooling? How is AI being implemented, particularly in

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 4>the financial services industry to help consumers and workers build

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 4>a safety net. Joining us now as Liz Davidson, founder

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 4>and CEO of financial Finess, which offers personalized financial coaching,

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 4>both live and AI powered to millions of employees, the

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 4>job state always gives us an opportunity to ask about

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 4>what is really happening right now in the way that

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 4>AI is impacting our daily task, but also, as our

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 4>last guest pointed out, hiring and I just asked you

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 4>in the first instance and kind of give us a

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 4>read of where you think that is.

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's very interesting those hiring numbers that were just articulated.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 2>What we're seeing is a whole lot of talk in

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 2>the financial services industry about AI and things that will

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 2>be happening in the future, but it's still very, very early,

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 2>and there's a lot of concerns about compliance and how

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 2>do you make this safe for consumers because we all

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>know open AI can really be problematic. We work in

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the financial coaching industry, providing financial coaching as an employee

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 2>benefit and have managed to leverage AI using vetted content,

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 2>only vetted content from on staff certified financial planners, so

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 2>that any questions that are asked in this virtual coaching

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 2>process where it asks you questions and you ask you questions,

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 2>any of that all points to our content and it's

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 2>completely safe and contained. And I think that's really you know,

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 2>one of the biggest hurdles that financial services companies need

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 2>to get through is how do you leverage this powerful

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 2>tool but make sure it's safe.

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 3>And also how do you ensure you're building yourself security

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 3>financial independence, particularly when you do start to see perhaps

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 3>the overall jobs market soften a little bit, but you've

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 3>actually managed to secure a bit of a wage increase

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 3>and you're wanting it ensure that you've got your you know,

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 3>underall overall safety net lined up list.

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 5>You use something called the.

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Artificial intelligence motivating employees everywhere any basically is how you

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 3>call it. Talk to us about how AI has really

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 3>managed to either reduce the amount of financial advisors one

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 3>needs to get the right information at the right time,

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 3>How are employees engaging with this more now than ever

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 3>because they feel a little bit less secure than perhaps

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 3>lost you.

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, And the great thing about AI is it allows

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 2>what we call mass personalization, so you can reach an

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 2>incredibly large number of people, but in an incredibly personalized way.

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 2>And we always say people's favorite financial topic is themselves.

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 2>It's not act allocation, and it's not stop actions, it's

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 2>themselves and their families and their financial security. So having

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the ability to have a virtual financial coach that can

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 2>walk you through these things, that you can ask questions

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 2>too and get vetted answers that you are fully confident

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 2>or in your best interests free you have any conflicts

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 2>of interest, is tremendous. Now, the interesting question is how

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 2>does this work with an advisor?

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 5>And I would.

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Say, you know, in our model, we have seen that

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 2>both leverage each other. Our financial coaches have trained the AI,

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 2>but the AI is also helping them become better financial coaches,

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 2>both in terms of understanding mass trends, aggregated trends, but

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>also individuals, you know, profiles. So we've become more efficient,

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 2>we've become able to help more people. AI has an

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 2>exponential power that is tremendous for contexts. Last year we

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 2>had one point six million interactions I'm sorry two thousand,

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two, one point six million interactions, twenty twenty three,

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 2>eight point three million interactions.

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 8>There is such an incredible.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Snowball effect when you use this technology right, especially in

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 2>tandem with human financial coaches or.

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Advisors, nesle, general Mills, NFL players, associations, some of those

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 3>that you served as Davidson Financial Finness founder.

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:58.839
<v Speaker 5>We thank you and CEO.

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.719
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, to turn our attention to another story that we

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 3>were following today, Tesla will deploy an over the air

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 3>software fixed to more than one point six million vehicles

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 3>in China, especially every car it's ever sold there.

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 5>That's of course a mid.

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Heightened risk potentially with its autopilot functions and the move mirrors.

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 3>That recall is sometimes they're called two million vehicles in

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the US last month.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 4>Then, sticking with Tesla in China, the other big story,

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 4>the electric vehicle maker has been overtaken by China's BYD

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 4>as the world's top selling electric car maker. Bloomberg's Weekly

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 4>doc takes a look at how that happened.

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 9>It likes to describe itself as.

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 10>The biggest car brand you've never heard of.

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 9>Now China's BYD has overtaken Tesla as the world's largest

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 9>seller of electric vehicles. Its success is a root of

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 9>long term strategic thinking on the part of BYD itself

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 9>and the Chinese government.

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 11>We've arguably never seen thing like this in terms of,

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:05.599
<v Speaker 11>you know, the amount of support that China has extended

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 11>to automakers, specifically pertaining to evs.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 9>Most of BYD's cars are simply a lot cheaper than

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 9>tesselas they.

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 12>Have very cheap models starting from ten thousand US dollars.

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 12>The most important factor is that BID is the only

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 12>auto maker that produces all of its batteries in house.

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 9>Making its own batteries and other components helps it reduce

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 9>a lot of costs. All of this is setting China

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.239
<v Speaker 9>up to be the dominant global player in the transportation

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 9>of the future electric vehicles, a business that could be

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 9>worth eight point eight trillion dollars by the end of

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 9>a decade.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 4>I highly recommend check out the full Dark eight minutes

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 4>packed with data and analysis are coming up here On

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Bluebeo technology, a tear down of Huawei's newest laptop shows

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 4>it's powered by a chip made in Taiwan, quashing talks

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 4>of another mainland Chinese technological breakthrough. We got those details. Next,

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 4>this is Bloomberg.

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Now as a new teardown video by tech Insights new

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 3>findings showing that Huawei's latest laptop it's actually run on

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 3>a chip made by Taiwan's Semiconductor to SMC.

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 5>It throws cold water on well that talk that.

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Was happening about another big Chinese advance and technology amid

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 3>this US China tech war. And we're going to break

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 3>it down with you for a moment because this was

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 3>commissioned by Bloomberg to do this tear down because suddenly

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 3>there was this talk that maybe an even more advanced

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 3>chip than have been thought it was inside this laptop.

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 5>But not the case.

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 4>So tech Insights is the same firm that Bloomberg News

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 4>partnered with on the teardown of the Huawei Mate sixty

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 4>or Mate sixty pro smartphone, and I would look at

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 4>it paradoxically. First, if they had found that that five

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 4>nanometer proessa in the laptop had indeed been made by SMICK,

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 4>China's mainland domestic chipfab, that would be huge news because

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 4>it would demonstrates and technological progress.

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 7>But it wasn't.

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 4>It was indeed made by TSMC a five and animeter

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 4>node used to make the processor.

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 7>But here's the thing.

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 4>It was made that generation back in twenty twenty, so

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 4>it's not even at the cutting edge, and it wasn't

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 4>made in China.

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 3>And also, what does it show about what Huawet's been

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 3>up to since twenty twenty. Twenty nineteen was when, of

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 3>course it was first ploll on the entities list. Twenty

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty is when TSMC was no longer allowed to basically

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 3>sell to it. But they would just stop piling were

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 3>they to be able to get this chip.

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there is evidence that they had been stockpiling chips

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 4>that at the time.

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 7>Were at the cutting edge and now are not.

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 4>The latest generation of node is three and animeter right,

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 4>that is used by TSMC and prevalent in many consumer electronics,

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 4>for example those made Apple. What we found in the

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 4>teardown of the Huawei laptop was a five nanometer produced

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 4>processor the care in nine hundred and six C. So

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 4>it's two generations removed from the latest but one generation

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 4>ahead of what we think China had access to, even

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 4>though it's still dated.

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 5>I love these teardowns are so useful.

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, the thing about it as well, is that you

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 4>lift the lid, you get the analysis from the experts,

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 4>you answer a lot of questions about where we're at

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 4>in this tech war and supply chain.

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 3>And actually what sunk the share prices of some of

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 3>those that were traded over in China. The anticipation had

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 3>perhaps run up on smoke, and actually it pulled back

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 3>a little bit.

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 5>Time now for talking tech.

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 3>First up, Fox con warned of its fourth consecutive decline

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 3>and quarterly sales. Now the Apple partner reported a steep

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven percent drop in December sales. Now, is these

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 3>sales falling in the current period as well? So I

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 3>think to concerns about all that slowing demand we're talking

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 3>on for the latest iPhone. And as Twitch tries to

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.359
<v Speaker 3>take on the likes of TikTok is a new discovery

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 3>feed for short videos, well, it's raising.

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 5>Concerns for kids safety.

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Now, an analysis by Bloomberg News of nearly eleven hundred clips

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 3>on Twitch found that at least eighty three of the

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 3>short videos contain sexualized content involving children. Once Bloomberg alar

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 3>to the company, Twitch removed that prohibited content. Plus American Tower, well,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 3>it's agreed to sell its operations in India to an

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 3>affiliate of Brookfield Asset Management. Is then a deal worth

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 3>about two and a half billion dollars in the US

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 3>networking company now. The deal is expected to close in

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 3>the second half of this year.

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 5>That's according to the company.

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 12>Ed.

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, another news story we're tracking in the world of

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 4>vc CO two closing its European office in London two

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 4>years after they opened it. The move is part of

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 4>a wider strategy overhaul to adjust to a downturn in

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 4>the technology market. Let's bring in Bloombergs mark Bergen out

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 4>there in London. I mean, the stated reason is streamlining

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 4>the investment approach in Europe. But what else do we

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 4>know about what was a short lived stay in London.

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:05.959
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think there's a couple off in factors.

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 13>One say is unique to the fund SOKO two has

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 13>been going through this big adjustment and they've lost a

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 13>managing partner in last months. They had a write down

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 13>of about thirty percent that we reported in November.

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 10>On their portfolio.

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 13>Some of that because they mark down some of their

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 13>startup holdings as much as ninety percent. I think this

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 13>is something a lot of firms are doing they've raised

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 13>a new fund with this discount, this kind of rare,

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 13>unusual move where they're letting the investors in their fund

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 13>get into startups at a discounted rate in exchange for

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 13>cutting some of the fees. And so they're making some

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 13>different strategic changes. I think there's also a bigger trend,

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 13>which is, you know, they're not the first VC fund

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 13>in the past six months to pull out Omer's ventures.

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 13>The Canadian Pension Fund left Europe. We reported that this

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 13>summer there's not a lot of deal activity in.

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 7>Anything but the early stage.

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 13>So these later stage startups growth, it's been pretty quiet

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 13>here and so maybe they're the tea leaves on that

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 13>going forward.

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 3>But why then, has iv P has Andrewson Horowitz just

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 3>set up shop in London? What are they saying that

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 3>perhaps while CO two.

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 13>Isn't It's a really good question, I think, I mean,

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 13>and Dresen came here at least they announced it as

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 13>focused on crypto. As far as they know, they haven't

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 13>made other investments, but they have, you know, they just

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 13>we reported earlier they came in this big round from Mistral,

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 13>the French company that was out of their California team.

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 10>But you know they will CO two says the same thing.

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 13>They're going to continue to invest in Europe out of California,

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 13>out of New York. I think different funds have a

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 13>different approach about whether or not it's worthwhile to have

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 13>people on the ground where they can go and meet

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 13>the startups in Paris, in Scandinavia, in Eastern Europe, where

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 13>you know the UiPath which was a co to investment.

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 13>That people here talk a lot about the value of

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 13>being on the ground. And that being said, this is

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 13>obviously some some ferns and maybe their LPs think it's worthwhile.

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Not to be there were early backer in Spotify and

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 3>new iPath. We'll see how much they can continue to

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 3>get in on some of these European startups, even though

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 3>perhaps it's been a tougher time for these crossover funds.

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 3>In particular Mattberg and brilliant and really well read story,

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 3>we thank you so much for all the lives, comings

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 3>and goings in BC in Europe. Meanwhile, let's go into

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 3>this conversation with Catherine Dowling, general counsel and chief compliance

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Officer at bit Wise Asset Management, and you are gazing

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 3>into those sec stars as well, and ultimately it is

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 3>important as to whether or not we get the yay

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 3>or nay by January the tenth. Are you more on

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 3>the probabilities really stacked towards a yes.

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 8>I am on record with your colleagues saying that my

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 8>prediction was mid January, and I have not changed my

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.719
<v Speaker 8>opinion on that. I can't speak to our specific conversations

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 8>with the SEC. But if you look at what's happening

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 8>out in the public, yes, there's a lot of fake

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 8>news and some fake bumps, but if you can do

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 8>the actual documents being fun, you're seeing that there are

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 8>fewer and fewer blanks in those documents, and you can

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 8>look at those documents and see what the basics of

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 8>the conversations are looking like with the SEC. The SEC

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 8>is doing their job. They're working hard. They are working

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 8>behind the scenes and did over the holidays to make

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 8>sure that what's known as the s one side of

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 8>the House, the disclosure document, has all the investor protections

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 8>in it, all the disclosures. They've been pushing on the

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 8>issuers as they should to make sure that all of

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 8>the information is set forth in that document, that it's

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 8>very clear. And on the other side of the house,

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 8>we have the nineteen before document the exchange document, and

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 8>you'll see that there's information that is being matched up

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 8>between those two documents, so you can see that progression

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 8>in the public record as issuers work to work on

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:52.479
<v Speaker 8>both sides of those documents, and the SEC also works

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 8>to communicate with the various issuers behind the scenes, and

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 8>all of this is going to be a huge win

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 8>for investors when it does come out of the gates.

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 3>As one of the applicants for spot bitcoin ETFE, what

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 3>is the upside here? What sort of fun flows you anticipating.

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 3>We got a general anticipation a one to two billion,

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 3>for example, on the first week that it actually is.

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 5>Able to be traded.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Do you abide by that sort of level of increase

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 3>and interest coming from institutions and retail on that first week.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 8>Yes, Caroline, we expect a big uptick out of the gates,

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 8>and part of that we look at the history of

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 8>gold ETFs, we look at the Bitcoin futures ETF so

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 8>we do have historic issues to look at to see

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 8>what we can expect, and also with this issuance, the

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 8>expectation if all goes as we believe it should be going,

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 8>we'll have a number of issuers come out of the

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 8>gates at the same time, so you will have a

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 8>number of options for investors. And from a demand standpoint,

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 8>bitwise has just put out our or research survey with

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 8>financial advisors, and a number of financial advisors have been

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 8>waiting for this moment to get into bitcoin for their

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 8>clients because it's just a much easier and we're transparent

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 8>way for them to provide Bitcoin exposure to their clients, Catherine.

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 4>As Caroline pointed out, bitwise asset management is an applicant.

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 4>You've applied for an ETF, but I'm really interested in

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 4>your role as general counsel and chief compliance officer and

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 4>what you're doing every day. You know, you said you're

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 4>stuck by your mid January call, But there's only one

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 4>party in all of this that actually knows, and that's

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 4>the SEC.

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 8>Yes, the SEC is definitely the zeus in this operation.

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 8>But what we can also see is looking in history,

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 8>the SEC doesn't want they don't want hunger games here.

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 8>They want what's best for the investor, which is a

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 8>number of issuers coming out. So as you see from

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 8>the public record, they're speaking with all of us and

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 8>to your question of what you know we do or

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 8>what I do in my role where speaking to them,

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 8>we're answering their questions, we're working with them, And what

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 8>I can tell you is that they have been very

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 8>dedicated to making sure that one if you kind of

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 8>go back a little bit in time, first it started

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 8>as this kind of academic conversation Ivory Tower, you know,

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 8>what is this product? How does it work? And then

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 8>we moved into a higher energy, a little more intensity

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 8>about Okay, let's look at the nuts and bolts, how

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 8>does this really work. Who's holding the bitcoin, where's the risk,

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 8>where's the cash coming in? Who are the different players?

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 8>And you know that's why you're seeing in the public

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 8>record a concern with the SEC of let's list the aps,

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 8>Let's get the people out here, the entities, the parties

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 8>who are going to be engaging in this process, so

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 8>that there is an understanding and so we can have

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 8>a fulsome disclosure about how this product works. So you

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 8>saw that progression with the SEC engaging on understanding how

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 8>this product works.

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 14>And I think they've been.

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 8>Pretty dedicated to making sure they understand that because they

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 8>have to first understand it to make sure that the

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 8>correct disclosures are in the prospectus, So that's what's going

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 8>on behind the scenes. But you can see that reflected

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 8>in the amended s ones that you're seeing that everybody's following.

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 8>You can see the fewer blanks happening, and you can

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 8>actually back and see the additional disclosures that are being

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 8>added as this process goes forward and progresses.

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 4>A very simple question in the thirty seconds you've got,

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 4>is the SEC and the United States a good regulator,

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 4>a competent regulator for this field?

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 5>They are absolutely, I think.

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 8>I know we've had a lot of dialogue about Obviously,

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 8>other countries have gotten this product out in advance, but

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 8>in our country, we have a number of regulators and

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 8>they're looking at what they should be looking at. Has

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 8>this progressed more slowly than many of us would have liked. Yes,

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 8>But at the end of the day, we're going to

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.239
<v Speaker 8>get a product that is better for investors. It's going

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 8>to have the disclosures, it's going to have the information.

0:24:57.680 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 8>They're going to have a more fulsome understanding of how

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 8>this product works, and that's going to make everybody able

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 8>to make a better decision if they want to include

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 8>this as one of their investment.

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Choices, Catherine Dowling, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer over a

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 4>bit wise asset management.

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 7>Thank you okay.

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 4>As open Ai is due to complete its tender offer,

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 4>the company is also talking to dozens of publishers about

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 4>striking deals to license their articles. This is the startup

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 4>looks for content to train its artificial intelligence models. Let's

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 4>bring in Bloomberg's Sharen Gafari for more. I've been reading

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot about this in the press over weeks and months,

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 4>the value of data, who they're talking to and who

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 4>they're not.

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:44.239
<v Speaker 7>What do we know?

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 14>So we know that they are speaking to dozens of

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 14>publishers about significant deals, and this would be both to

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 14>pay for these publishers to give data that will help

0:25:56.680 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 14>Opening Eye train its models, as well as to more

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 14>prominently display these articles themselves and the output of what

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 14>chat GPT tells you.

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 3>So while they're trying to navigate potential well future cases

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 3>of course, whether being sued by The New York Times,

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 3>are trying to ensure that other publishers getting on board

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 3>all of this tovindicate their business model. Ultimately, there's at

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 3>a time where we know the company is a perhaps

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 3>looking for new funding, but also completing on a tender

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 3>offer where they're giving some liquidity to the actual employee

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 3>base at the moment, how is that tender offer looking.

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 14>That's correct, So as far as we know, the tender

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 14>offer is still on. It's set actually to close today.

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 14>Remember that was basically an offer that allows employees to

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 14>sell their shares in the company to investors. So it's

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 14>offering employees a chance to liquidate the assets that they

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 14>have in open Ai. And it was set for eighty

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 14>six billion, and it was extended a little bit in

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 14>the chaos that ensued during the board ouster. So this

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 14>is an extended deadline.

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 4>So what I heard is that you know, the money's

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 4>been wired. What needs to happen now, Caro is open

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 4>AI does a transfer of ownership for the shares and

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 4>then issues new share certificates.

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 7>So it seems like it's buttoned up. But as Shearon

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 7>and I reported before the holidays, they're.

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 4>Going to do a primary straight away more than one

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 4>hundred billion dollar valuation. Can those guys just come on,

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, we all need a break at some point, Carrot.

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, interesting as to whether or not you've been selling

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 3>out at a moment of a slightly lower evaluation that

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.360
<v Speaker 3>you're about to see of current shareholding the numbered at

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 3>It's fascinating ongoing and continuing conversation that you and Sharon

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 3>have been leading me. Thank you so much, Sharon Gaffride

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 3>to just take us through what's happening in the midst

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 3>of a tender offer and new primary raise. Meanwhile, let's

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 3>continue the conversation on like the secondary market activity a bit.

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Greg Martin's with us co founder and managing director at

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 3>rain Maker Securities mid market investment bank broke a deeda

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 3>specializing in pre IPO investing, and I mean ed just

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 3>told us about the state of play where we are

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 3>in terms of this tender offer. But the fact that

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 3>also open Ai might raise new funds just tell us

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 3>about the extent of demand to get into this company

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:07.360
<v Speaker 3>despite some of the internal turmoil.

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, great to see you again and thank you for having me.

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, open Ai has been one of the hottest

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you know companies, certainly in the last year. I mean

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it's its previous tender was was you know, at twenty

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>eight billion, and now it's three x that, and as

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you've mentioned that it may be going up even more

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in a primary round. We have seen you know, almost

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 1>unlimited demand for open Ai this year, and of course

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty new phenomenon. I mean, the company just

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>released chat GQBT in November of twenty twenty two, so

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's revenues have gone from zero to a

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>billion six run rate reported you know, in the end

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of twenty three, and I'm hearing they might finish twenty

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, you know, closer to five billions. So the

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>growth in the company is immense, and the demand for

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>stock and open Ai is also immense. And we're seeing

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a ton of trading and interest on our platform today

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's why you're seeing, you know, the

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>valuation continue to go up even a month after a

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>tender is about to close.

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 4>It's that trading, active tense that I'm really interested in.

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, the tender is a transaction, right, and my

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 4>understanding is is very hard to get in on that tender.

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 4>But what struck me in the days prior to Sam

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 4>Altman initially being dismissed by the board was how liquid

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 4>the market was the secondary's market for an open Ai shares,

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 4>And I just wondered if you could explain to us

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 4>how that works.

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I mean, just to be clear, the week

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that Sam Altman, you know, decided to leave and then

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>come back again, was definitely a near term wet blank

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 7>Know that he decided to leave ground. I think he

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 7>was fired, but things keep going.

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>That may be, but it was a wet blanker for

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a moment in time. There was a lot of you know,

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>worried investors, you know, and of course I think a

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of that has been solidified. I think there's a

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling of stability now the team is back in place.

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, trading is interesting because, as I said,

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>there's actually consummating a trade is challenging. I mean, there's

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of bits. There's people who want

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to be owners of open ai. Obviously it's forty nine

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>percent owned by Microsoft. It has a funky corporate structure,

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the combination of a non for profit,

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and so I think people are setting up entities, you know,

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>special purpose vehicles, et cetera, by which they hold the

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:22.479
<v Speaker 1>shares and they're actually sometimes selling units in those special

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>purpose vehicles versus actually trading the shares. In some cases,

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>clearly the tender offer is actually a direct trade of shares,

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>but people are trying to find all kinds of innovative

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>ways to actually trade the shares, and we're facilitating a

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of that at Rainmaker.

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Is there any other company that can compare? I mean

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 3>there are some other very heady valuations in the private

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 3>market still, but they've been fewer and further between. They're

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 3>just some obvious culprits that everyone wants in and everyone

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh the others are just second here.

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, the big I mean the biggest in

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years is SpaceX. SpaceX is literally

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and figuratively defied gravity. You know, in twenty twenty two,

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>when when most stocks were down, SpaceX was continuing to rise,

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and we see a tender being announced in SpaceX to

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the tune of about another seven hundred and fifty million

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>at an eight and eighty billion valuation. So SpaceX has

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>has been our hottest stock on our platform for several

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>years now and continues to be even though the valuation

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>has reached a very high level. I think it's something

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>like twenty times you know, projected twenty twenty three revenues.

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, SpaceX has been very hot. Anything AI frankly,

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know since chat GPT launched, you know, whether it's anthropic.

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>We just saw propic announcement valuation around and at the

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>end of December we we see, you know, Elon Musk

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>himself has Xai, which you know I'm hearing is coming

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>out at a thirty billion valuation. So AI companies are

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>are definitely hot across the board, you know, clearly led

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>by open Ai. But I think that's where we saw

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the rise of Nvidia and the public markets and we

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>see the numbers that are putting up. There's clearly a

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of demand, uh, you know for AI capabilities, and

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>so companies that have real AI businesses, real technology are

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:05.959
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of demand.

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 4>The volume of demands there that specifically, where is it

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 4>coming from? Institutionals, high net worth individuals, who's buying?

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:17.239
<v Speaker 1>It's all of you above, I mean, clearly led by

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the institutions who have you know, the larger pockets of capital.

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So definitely a strong, strong demand from institutional capital, but

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it goes to family offices, it goes to high networth individuals.

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a fear of missing out right now,

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's also frankly, there's a vanity play.

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I think people like to say they own an AI company,

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think there's there's still a little

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>bit to be desired in terms of properly valuing these

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>businesses because the revenues are still very light, and so

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it's based on the prospects and hopes

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>for the future. And you know, we'll see what happens

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>if pro starts to normalize in some of these companies,

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>But right now, the demand is very insatiable across the

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>board for.

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 7>What it's worth.

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 4>Greg, that's SpaceX tender at one hundred and eighty billion.

0:32:57.880 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they announced it. I think Katie roof

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 4>and reported it on December twelfth, But I appreciate the

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Greg Martin co found it.

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Give you proper credit for that. That was right now?

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 7>All good?

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 5>Oh he'll don't you worry.

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 7>We appreciate the analysis.

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 4>Greg Martin, founder and managing director of Rainmaker Securities.

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 7>Thank you.

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 4>Now coming up here on Bloomberg Technology, one AI powered

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 4>search engine is aiming to take on the likes of

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Google and Chat GPT. We're going to talk to the

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 4>CEO Perplexity. That's next.

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 7>This is Bloomberg.

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 4>Perplexity says it's AI powered conversational search engine has the

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 4>chops to take on the likes of Google and chat GPT,

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 4>and backers like Jeff Bezos and Nvidia agree. The startups

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 4>just raised seventy three zero point six million dollars in

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 4>a series B round. Here to tell us more is

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 4>Aravin Trinavass, CEO of Perplexity, Interesting backers, interesting competition.

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 7>Let's just start with the technology.

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 4>What is it that's unique about either your model or

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 4>just the tool, the generative AI tool?

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so thank you for having me here.

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 15>So Perplexity is an AI power conversational answer engine.

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 10>It's not a search engine.

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 15>So you ask a query, you ask a question, it

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 15>just directly gives you the answer.

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 10>The main difference from other.

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 15>Chatbots like Chadgipt is that you always get the sources,

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 15>so it only says what exists on the web already,

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 15>and it clearly deals to user where every part of

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 15>the answer, Where is it coming from on the web.

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 4>One of the backers or investors is in Nvidia, but

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 4>are they also supporting you in compute? Did you get

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 4>access to an H one hundred cluster?

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 7>For example?

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 15>So in video is an investor in US strategically where

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 15>we partner with them to work on frameworks for training

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 15>and inference. But we have all our compute cluster on

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.919
<v Speaker 15>other hyperscalers like AWS.

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 7>Competition.

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 4>I get that the uniqueness is that the source is

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 4>clearly labeled, but you're directly taking on chat GPT barred.

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Is the sourcing enough to sort of differentiate in that market?

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:20.399
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, So our perspective is that AI chad bots are

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:20.959
<v Speaker 15>going to be.

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 10>Of wide variety. There.

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 15>It's going to be a chadbot for you to go

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 15>and brainstorm new ideas and interact with it to like

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 15>ask for ideas for birthday pressens, or generate essays or

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 15>write poems. There's going to be character AI like chadbots,

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 15>very chatting with personalities.

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 10>But there has to be.

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 15>One single chat bot which you rely on for accurate, live,

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 15>correct information on the web. And that market is there

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 15>for the taking, and we want to.

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Go for that and ten million people on a monthly basis.

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 3>Do I'm interested in your desire to go out and

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 3>build this van because you were at open AI as

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 3>a researcher, you've been working with deep Mind. Why did

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 3>you feel that something new was necessary to be created?

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 15>I always wanted to try an entrepreneurial journey, so it

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 15>was not meant to go and create a company for search.

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:12.959
<v Speaker 15>We initially started off as just to brainstorm and create

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 15>products using the large language models as an upcoming technology.

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 10>Much before it was even called generative AI.

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 15>It was just that we stumbled on this amazing idea

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 15>of combining large language models and web search together in

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 15>the form of a new product called Perplexity.

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 3>So you raise this money, is that to be put

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 3>towards R and D compute power is a little bit

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 3>of marketing because I'm kind of interested as how you

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 3>got into the hands of ten million people.

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so we've really been fortunate to have completely organic growth.

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 10>We haven't paid for any of these users.

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 15>We obviously announce all our product features on Twitter and like,

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 15>people follow us there and get to know about us,

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 15>and there's a lot of word of mouth growth for us.

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 10>But our space is largely.

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:03.839
<v Speaker 15>Going to be on scaling adoption and usage, and that's

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 15>going to be spent more on computer resources.

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:08.320
<v Speaker 4>As you want out, Caroline and I have experienced some

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 4>of that word of mouth about Perplexity.

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 7>Here's the thing.

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 4>The story with open ai was about the push to commercialize.

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 4>Do you feel as a founder and leader of that

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 4>company that pressure.

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:23.760
<v Speaker 15>Well, honestly, I think people just want progress, and progress

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 15>can be reflected in terms of clear user growth and

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.919
<v Speaker 15>adoption and not just through revenue. So as you get

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.320
<v Speaker 15>more and more users, there's always going to be plenty

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 15>of opportunities for you to monetize, either through subscriptions or

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 15>of other forms of monetization. And therefore, right now all

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 15>our investors are pretty aligned with us that we actually

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 15>want to scale more in.

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 10>Terms of getting growing a larger user base.

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Ara of intronovsc of Perplexity, greats have you here in

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.959
<v Speaker 4>the studio San Francisco. Thank you for your time, Carrot.

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and we finish up on a topic that we

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 3>love to lace throughout the show, whether it's twenty twenty

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 3>three or twenty twenty four, All things AI, all things

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 3>about the desire to get into the secondary market, the

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 3>primary market of these companies and the valuations that just

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 3>goes onto this ongoing narrative. And for now it feels

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 3>like that does it for this addition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, much of the same themes of last year continuing

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 4>into twenty twenty four, but that's not a bad thing.

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Recap the show on our podcast. Thanks to everyone that

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 4>has tuned in. Whereve yougate your podcast? We're on Apple,

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 4>We're on Spotify, we're on iHeart, and of course we're

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 4>uploading everything to the Bloomberg platforms. Next week is a

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 4>big one. I'm off to Vegas. Vegas, BABYCS Will I survive?

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 4>Tune in to find out. Caroline from San Francisco and.

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 3>A small thing called the spot Bitcoin.

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 7>E t is based on prior experiences.

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg technology.